hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
November 2018
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
06/17/14
DREAMS OF HIS ‘FATHER’?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AL QAEDA, #BLACKS, SYRIA, #BLAME, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:28 am

The truth is that President Barack Hussein Obama these years self tagged as to a “New Foundation” is he most physically in a political responsibility he most culpable for how he has destroyed the better foundations that better structured a ‘global’ America.

We can not and should not forget what it can be said he too inherited from the years 1993-2001 of the Administrations of the Clintons.  President Obama is he whom started afoot in the foreign and domestic of professing he desired so to have a personality based presidency.  President Obama firstly should be now, as to “personality”, at blaming himself.

In the news and off the grid, so of the grapevines of blogs, there are discussions to religiosity more Constitutionally restored and vitally in a refreshed People’d peoples civic engagements.  It may help President Obama now more than Mrs. Clinton, however, that too by Susan B. Anthony List standing at The Supreme Court of The United States of America there is now with such originality refreshed of the logic and faith of the Founding Fathers that the Bill of Rights is an accompaniment to the New Testament at least and so that lying is cover-ed by the Ten Commandments, however, written by a man.  Something about ‘bearing false witness’ seems akin to the ‘legacy’ of the House of Clintons.

There may be much President Obama can blame on Secretary Clinton and as well on the years of the terms of the Administration of the Clintons.  Yet though, for now President Obama has himself most to blame.  Yet though, for now President Obama is a he more responsible than she, yes too as a she, as Secretary Clinton and Mrs. Clinton, however.  President Obama, however he proffered an “I inherited this…” has it that regardless of which history he said he “inherited” he chose between available options and much it seems without considering many of his options.

This is not about Mr. Obama - Father Obama - Dad biological to the President.  It however cannot escape the prima facia dramatic that Mrs. Clinton to President Clinton offered a resolution for an Oedipal as if a surrogate white mother figure.  President Clinton is more a ‘father’ for the sake of necessary and timely governance purview discourse - and too still the earlier ‘fathers’ back to the founding fathers - the ‘Founding Fathers.”

The foundations to the problems President Obama is facing about obvious failures at his “New Foundation” have his roots of he a sprouting Harvard Law Student near about the time Al Qaeda was so born - born to become ISIS as is an is like of Osama Bin Laden, however a ‘father’ to it, as an is an is like of a JIHAD against American Infidels too much of “is”s not as “is”s.  The 9/11 Commission Report is hopefully not relied upon by President Obama;  President Obama may be better served to ignore it an yet consider the tome of TERROR AND CONSENT by Philip Bobbitt as a Clinton NSC adviser whom tagged it dangerous as to a begetting terrorism of an if and when the The White House is of an administration working too closely with Hollywood.  Al Qaeda wasn’t covered enough or far enough back by the 9/11 Commission to now have enough in a know as to how the ISIS of today is like of proud sons of OBL living out the purpose that Al Qaeda was formed and originally of asking Saudi Arabian leaders for their blessings to become - to grow into.

To the religiosity yet of the unexpected ‘domestic’ elements of the quandary and conundrums particular to the insufficeincies in his “New Foundation” politics of his sought “personality based presidency” we can consider that it is helpful that the People’d people of the The United States of America are refreshed to how the Bill of Rights is a ten like the Ten Commandments and how the First Amendment affirms that the separation of church and state is so of them as presumed of an equal or greater right at interpretation of God’s will and establishments than the Congress.  The First Amendment affirms that the body of the Constitution by the preamble is the Peoples’ “Order” [with order here as a noun] “done” as a “more perfect Union” than the United Kingdom’s, at least, and so as “subscribed” unanimously while “agreed” or “so agreed” could have otherwise sustained the liberal wants of it set secular.

It should help the People’d people that it has become refreshed that the founding ‘fathers’ secured the ordained and established more perfect “Order” under God by their specified subscribing so in that year of the Christian calendar so of the New Testament as “done” “in the Year of our Lord…”!  So established the separation of church and state and free speech protections of the Bill of Rights by its First has it that “lying” is not to be “legal” (maybe at least in politics of campaigns - campaign advertising) as the Constitution is of the accompaniment writ so to the New Testament, at least.

It should help President Obama and yet not likely his ‘mother’ Clinton nor his ‘father’ Clinton as so refreshed of the original American Dream so conceived and long consecrated the The United States of America is not writ large to an infidelity to Holy words and guidance;  It should help President Obama for such “America” has standing in the Middle East with any “justice” core common of ISIS so that we can stand comparatively to be at the borders edges to Syria and Iraq of an alternative and example that their ‘foundations’ and any success at ‘governance’ can be then related and digressed over, firstly - firstly before there yet could be a more ‘global’ campaign as rationally reasoned in a ‘justice’ against the idea that is “The United States of America.”

President Clinton has been a bad ‘father’ to President Obama.  It seems President Obama has been falling and failing where he may have like accepted advice or “dreams” from President William Jefferson Clinton - he born as conflicted as William Jefferson (Davis) Blythe III — so it seems.

The milk and any cream of the days of Secretary Clinton as of “hard choices” have spoiled on poor President Barack Hussein Obama, however she a ‘mother’ and even too much to an Oedipal as he of any sought of seeking a surrogate elderly white mother figure.  She and he the ‘father’ to her a ‘mother’ of the House of Clintons is embroiled forever forward and backwards of a compromised legacy and of basic wants that will not be favored judiciously or by many People’d peoples while she and he are of the BIG establishments as both known to be revealed and tagged as “Big Liars.”

President Thomas Jefferson did lead a politics for 40 years after 1800 as if its ‘father’ - is it as a ‘father’ of Jeffersonian Republicans?  But while the “Founding Fathers” were dedicated and joined to their historic establishment and ordaining of a People’d Order [again with “Order” as a noun] Thomas Jefferson was over seas and out of their hair/wigs.  The “Founding Fathers” found Thomas Jefferson on his return and Constitutional perusals has issues with their writ;  The writing as the first moderation of the body as the People’s Order of the First Amendment is cleverly penned in unusual first language so to seem to appease the “issues” of Jefferson’s complaints - and yet not to at all.

By Jefferson’s practice and the devotions like apostolic by Jeffersonian Republicans of 1800-1840 quite we have an elephant in the room about how to interpret maybe otherwise than the original intent the specific words of the body and the first amending.  We have that though the Constitution reads as set under God as to an meant accompaniment with the New Testament and as the context of the times affirm such is a natural development of the idea of the colonies independent it is still that how Jefferson governed and his ’sons’ like later may have been only of success for being of a parsed and nuanced otherness.

Comments Off
05/17/14
OBAMA’S HAPPY MIRAGE?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, #BLACKS, TWO HISTORIES, WAR ON WOMEN, #BLAME, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:30 am

President George W. Bush and his henchmen are poor messengers of how the Afghanistan War has been an unnecessary, improper, and poorly run “war” however run these years on a credit card.

President Bush and his henchmen are not the guiltiest party;  The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is now open;  People’d of the world cannot long ignore a real history of the Clintons and their Clinton 8.

Though Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton’s - Hillary R. Clinton’s - “Jack” moment of herself like ‘not able to handle the truth’ while before Congress, as if of a “A Few Good Men” prosecution, still sits heavy as a telling outburst about war and wars by political leadership.

President Barack H. Obama’s first Secretary of State did run out the clock so as per learning of how poorly she operated regarding Benghazi & Libya and too Obama’s war of choice theirs differently from Bush’s as that changed in Afghanistan to a war against the Taliban.  She only got to a Congressional “review” when she could tick-tock a clocketh runneth outeth defense.

There is hardly a way to put a happy face on how its seems confirmed that Democrats do not know how to operate a war nor win a war, still.  There is comfort for Democrats now only if still it can be said that President Bush and his henchmen operated worsely.

The Clinton “two-fer” presence at the opening & dedication of The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is characteristic of them of willing to do (and say?) anything that will help them to appear later better as they should appear for that actually of their ‘before.”  The museum has a duty now to open each day to curate the querious of truth seekers, and, the museum cannot ignore the still too missing years 1993-2001.

It is a fair question causal about the attacks of 9/11/01 if it isn’t that had President William Jefferson Clinton not been at dalliances of the blue dress of Monica Lewinsky would he yet have put in the time to have prevented such diabolical expounding upon the United States of America homeland?  That there are near a trillion unit points per dollar to otherwise asses for a liability or gross negligence, at least as when accounting for the rash cuts to defense and intelligence, pairs with his dalliances.  Too, President Clinton, besides his unnecessary surpluses, if of his “walls of separation” affected at the F.B.I. between Enforcement & Intelligence, to abide a tagging that runneth to ‘accomplice.”

The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is now open!  President Barack Hussein Obama with his Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton did expand/broaden the theater of war of the Bush’s operated GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM in Afghanistan from the original trespass to find and kill or capture about 50 thought “campers” of Al Qaeda.  President Obama with Secretary Clinton did alter operations in Afghanistan for a Democrats war of choice, too on a credit card, as a war without due process too much like as a genocide upon the Taliban women hating illiterate natives.

The ugly face of Obama’s war of choice against the Taliban is that he was operated too much devoid of civil procedure and too much as if of a “feminist envy” effected like exterminators of bugs.  The pretty face is supposedly that because it was a picturesque region for still shots of “war” unlike the slog of Iraq and its urban jungles the Democrats of Obama & Clinton(s) could sell they could run a like ‘cleaner’ war.

Still President Bush and his henchmen are not the best messengers for how bad and how long so bad the Democrats have been so ugly and base in their bad even as just as per the ‘theater’ of ‘war’ of Afghanistan.  The Republicans are poor messengers for the good and better they were at much for they themselves hardly found the words to explain how they were better or best - just more of a ‘good.’  That the Republicans were or are better is hard to believe for they have so far much failed to even sell that they were right while the flip flip of calendars has clocked them as more right.

The Obama AFGHANISTAN WAR has been from day one of the Democrats’ political management as a war of choice of the mission creep from Bush and his henchmen at the GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR so within the sovereign lands of Afghanistan.  The Obama administration moved from trading the building of roads and schools for trespass rights to find the expected near about 50 of Al Qaeda, as foreigners literate among the mostly illiterate natives, to a SURGE for an a war not justified by the 911 attacks as a war generally against the Taliban.

President Obama and Secretary Clinton put a happy face on their plans to much be at exterminating the too misogynistic & too illiterate Taliban by selling that theirs was a ‘right’ war and Bush’s late policing of Saddam Hussein and Iraq was a ‘wrong’ war.

As the The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is now open the Clintons, mostly, and primarily, now have no place to hide;  The “911 Museum” is a permanent “wrench in their gears” of political operations - forward;  The “911 Museum” has the blue dress controversy among its hauntings and curatory duty and all the while the trillion unit points ghost the years whence from trouble brewed and stirred much because President William Jefferson Clinton decided, it seems (still) that he would not prosecute Saddam Hussein because he didn’t want to, and, he wouldn’t prosecute Saddam Hussein because he already had Bosnia and Herzegovina undesirably on his desk.

President William J. Clinton may be most to blame for their being now the The National September 11 Memorial & Museum.  President George W. Bush may be most to blame for not being able to ’sell’ in real time and still how it was right that he was as he said of doing right.  President Barack H. Obama may be most to blame for having a war of choice so in Afghanistan now as a “Longest War” as it though seems maybe inherited from FLOTUS Clinton crusading as a meant AFGHANISTAN WAR to target and subdue the too misogynistic and illiterate Taliban.

It figures when one looks more seriously at the history of Al Qaeda, than the 9/11 Commission so did in choosing to look only ten years back, that the 9/11 attacks may have been planned since 1993 and the very day President Clinton likely decided his didn’t want to do the messy work of prosecuting Saddam Hussein so he wouldn’t - wouldn’t for however long he was in office.

A queriousness due of every visit to the The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is prudent upon the “good” of President Clinton still too much as a “mirage” of the cover-up of the Clintons President Obama was wrongly more at than President Bush had been yet at too long.  It is now improper to hide the Clintons’ vast culpabilities and as it is historic that there are a 9/11 I & 9/11 II with Clinton paw prints all over ‘em.  We are now beyond “if” to a but “how” expected - expected daily.

It figures most clearly, however revealing in real time whence could have compromised “mission”, that Iraq as by OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM was not a “war of choice” for Al Qaeda seemed bent to prosecuting the United States of America on its homeland ever since the day President Clinton shrugged from doing right with his decision to do next to nothing towards prosecuting Saddam Hussein.  It seems in comparison President Obama & Secretary Clinton of their warring on the Taliban are those of a “war of choice” run unnecessarily and improperly and poorly run while diabolically run on a credit card.

The THE NATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL & MUSEUM is duty bound to curate for truth and honest forward.  Its doors however open or closed represent a thresholds of history and while it only a dangerous mirage that there are yet these two histories coexistent and with the Democrats affectings not yet known as mostly all a too political and partisan mirage.

The THE NATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL & MUSEUM is now ground zero to GROUND ZERO of it that each day by each visitor a queriousness should arise of:  HERE FOR HOW MUCH THE CLINTONS GOT WRONG IN THE 1990S?

There has too long been miscarriages of American “justice” by the politics so slanted and distorted by the Clintons, and now the Presidency of Obama.  If Al Qaeda so decided the American homeland deserved attacking so on that day that President William J. Clinton in 1993 decided he would evade and ignore the issues of rendering justice upon Saddam Hussein it becomes clearer finally that OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM was a necessary war and the Democrats warring on the too misogynistic and illiterate Taliban was just a political convenient coy war distraction as a unpaid for war of choice.

There has too long been miscarriages of American “justice” by the politics so slanted and polarized by Democrats’ defensive partisan machinations in spin;  As the history of Al Qaeda supersedes the “report” of the 9/11 Commission since its “investigation” looked back only 10 years it becomes excusable that President George W. Bush couldn’t explain how right he was while the President more rightly at war. If we still ignore the history of the organizing of Al Qaeda of Osama Bin Laden’s hopes to change the Middle East by an allowance for himself to general the prosecution of Saddam Hussein as a justice of and by Muslims we will become in greater peril from a continuance in these mirages beset in ignorance.

The now “THE LONGEST WAR - THE AFGHANISTAN WAR” is outed as President Barack H. Obama’s war of choice.  It is now, as the “911 Museum” thresholds, that OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM was a necessary war, even as contrary to the 9/11 Commission, for the pathology forensic of the causal rests forever in a simple consideration that the USA got “policed” on 9/11 because President William Jefferson Clinton had decided in 1993 that he wouldn’t “police” Iraq and Saddam Hussein, and as such decision then necessarily was to be for the remainder of his terms. 

The mirage is sad as the Democrats now can hardly justify the lack of jurisprudence and due process party to their party warring for politics in Afghanistan.  The Clintons have already shown themselves to fit in an episode of a THE SOPRANOS and yet where is the talk of “Politics” or “Diplomacy” of it that Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was responsible for the “diplomacy” of having such control over 80% of the world opium production during her “service” to President Barack Hussein Obama?  Secretary Clinton served President Obama more as if of BREAKING BAD in a drug trade to diabolically while she more as if a SECRETARY OF WAR than of “diplomacy.”

Comments Off
01/17/14
WHAT IS BEAUTY?
Filed under: GENERAL, IRAQ, TREASON, #CGI, #BLACKS, WAR ON WOMEN, #FEMINISM, #PUTIN ESSAYS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:17 am

*As I start today’s satire/punditry on heavy issues about a/the real Hillary Clinton, and so live, here is a link to SUMMER FARE oldie as of SAMPLER of JPHogan.org @ http://jphogan.org/113201.html.

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY OF YOUR 29TH BIRTHDAY FIRST LADY MICHELLE OBAMA

                                        *      *      *
There are times for comparative political literature and then there are TIMES for critical political literature.  If and/or how what now may transpire can be said (at all) to be literature is for you and others - not me - to wax upon, figuratively.

We all have our temptations.  Fewer of us of a global we though have equal freedoms.  Discretion and prudence may be a better part of democratic politics than Democrats like Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton may care to admit.

Well WORLD today is First Lady Michelle Obama’s 50th Birthday, and today is the first day I have considered the it isn’t too timely a stretch to assuage a shared historical as now:  Michelle Obama and I spent near a year in Cambridge together. For now this is here as a memory trick — I had been lax in thinking President Obama had a thing for an earlier graduate of Harvard Law School as a thing for an older woman - I have now realized that like myself she was in the Boston and Cambridge area before her husband, as was I.  It may be that we were actually together even in Grendel’s Den a time or two and maybe even socially flirtive.

But more seriously, today we should be vigilant to the lingering and haunting husbandry of Secretary Hillary Clinton, firstly.

It is more biographical if I can be objective or accurate in an auto’d bio’d to offer that the me/I of 1987-1988 year of Suffolk University Law School was like most of my years of a white guy just under 5′ 9″ whom though athletic still was generally not of a fear of black women (any more than women of other colors) while to a trepidation though (maybe of insecurity) albeit about tall/taller women.  Though First Lady Mrs. Obama and I can nearly be said to have spent a year in Cambridge together I cannot profess to know her politics, and nor will I presume to.  I did leave law school the spring before her husband started at Harvard and so the same spring she did graduate.  I did leave law school after confirming with one year that I was correct that I wanted to stay more creative and not barred at lawyering.  I did leave law school to creatively and originally be to setting myself up with experiences to be the best caboose to the Reagan Revolution that I could manage.

My story that supports my critical writing about even just Hillary Clinton is especially of such year and my reasons for leaving law school to be a marketing and politics caboose to Reagan’s Revolution freedom train.  I have know NYPD Commissioner/Chief William Bratton since such year in the Boston area.  Again, I have known of Barack Obama since the late 70s, Sarah Palin since about 1982, and the Clintons since the early 70s.  I have not been able to support the politics of President Obama because of his choice of Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton for any spot in his cabinet, and especially for her selection to be his top diplomat.

                                        *      *      *

So more seriously:  Today we should be vigilant to the lingering and haunting husbandry of Secretary Hillary Clinton, firstly.

I welcome and applaud the Senate’s recent rebuke of the Clinton State Department per Secretary Hillary Clinton, her admitted culpability, and a general diligence due for the tragedy of Benghazi.  I welcome the new politics from such by the Senate that now should work as a better political check on President Obama as a Senate willing to rebuke the Clinton State Department is a Senate not to be presumed still as if unwilling to consider a possibility that an impeachment might be prudent.

For now while all of so much tragic is yet so fresh anew it behoove us to consider that at least First Lady Michelle Obama knows that her husband’s first Secretary of State can be blamed for most of his global failings.  You can say there is beauty - political beauty in this concept.  A historical Hillary Clinton is a dangerous political Clinton.  She doesn’t really come in many colors - her legacy is black with tragedies, and darkness.

All Americans of the northern continent Constituted in united states of a measured federalism prudence as a confederate republic have still (if Democrats) the Clintons firstly and mostly to blame for Vice President Al Gore 2000 loss.  A lesson for today is that the Clintons cannot likewise be trusted to not turn on the Obamas at least towards 2016.

                                        *      *      *

First Lady Michelle, it seems I still recall a flirtatious glance to a pretty black coed whence thence of a rendezvous at Grendel’s with other law school singles and yet until today had consider it as impossible that it could have been timely as of with you.  In any smile from me then at or near Harvard would have been that I was of inner city public schooling of New Haven, CT; that William Stringfellow whom recently likely had passed had been a client of mine; that when I was about five I shook hands with one whom still is likely both the tallest person I have shaken hands with and as well the tallest black person —and as Augustus A. White M.D. is most certainly the tallest doctor, however then when met quite still the renowned physician of the Black Panthers; and that I was thinking to be a great caboose to all and a outside facilitator for improvements in civility for law enforcement.  As it is I have known Dr. White since about age five and as socially introduced on the New Haven green in a happenstance reunion of he and my dad as “friends.”  Of my year so nearly spent about Cambridge with Michelle Obama of 1987-1988 it has been that I have recalled a casual flirtatious smile at Grendel’s thence whence with a black coed however of a different law school maybe that was abridged when such rose from seated to standing, and yet have until today never really considered that such could or might have been she.

                                        *      *      *

Dear readers this is becoming bulleted about Hillary Clinton even though originally meant to be more bulleted about Hillary Clinton critically — this is not supposed to be a beating about a bush of Mrs. Clinton but a beating at a/the real Mrs. Clinton.

Again:  I will not even now after five years of the administration of President Barack Hussein Obama yet presume to know the politics of First Lady Michelle Obama.

I will not underestimate Mrs. Obama as per a rivaling First Lady Mrs. Clinton nor soon forget how the Clintons in politics even turned on the quite familial postured real friendship bosomed by the Bush clan and with dark back stabbing when politically convenient for the First Couple’d Clintons.  I don’t see how any Democrat can expect anything if a support of the Clintons towards 2016 as anything but severely guarded and restrained if by the First Couple’d Obamas.

To Mrs. Clinton, despite her spun propaganda for feminism, President Clinton is still too much her “Russian Bear” too over-coddled as if too meant to be like an American Putin of a return to the Power of the Presidency even as a Constitution seemed dead set writ against such.  It just seems a/the real Hillary Rodham Clinton is still of her personal and professional story of like always of having been to a predilection at wanting her “Bill” on top.

It is dark politics to delve into a depth of a/the real Hillary Clinton as one whom it seems has worked to undermine a Presidency for Al Gore and as well did work to undermine the Presidency of George Bush.  It seems simply clear that Secretary Hillary is supposed to reign as being a rival to the Presidency of Barack Obama and as yet still one whom politically can try to claim that those successes he did have were really of a pathology of her skill and not any really of his.

I will not underestimate Mrs. Obama or her ability to check an expected smack from Mrs. Clinton if she enters 2016 officially.

Giving such a confidence in a political and legal acumen for First Lady Michelle Obama I will now try to wrap this up albeit with less brevity than the brevity I did firstly intend.

Looking back to 1993 it is arguable that there hasn’t been a disaster or a tragedy that doesn’t have Hillary Clinton some at the heart of it.  There are too many political and historical layers caked upon Mrs. Clinton, however, for her to be to 2016 as a natural beauty.  A/the real Hillary Rodham Clinton is to be discerned best maybe by understanding Vice President Al Gore’s failed 2000 campaign as principally due to the betrayal by the Clintons towards a selfish husbandry to protecting themselves over their own Party towards a securing of more terms as Hillary’s terms.  It is that only if you like tragedy can you possible see a visible historical darkness of a/the real Hillary Rodham Clinton anyhow as beautious.

There is a beauty in the rivalry between the Clintons and the Obamas - but then you know by now today is First Lady Michelle Obama’s anniversary of her 29th birthday.  She shines bright today and as a darkness and doom lingers over Mrs. Clinton, however.  I do welcome and applaud the Senate’s recent rebuke of the Clinton State Department, REALLY!  It helps it be crystal clear that Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State was no gem.  It seems she didn’t even master being a master of part of the house of Obama.  There seems an unflattering dirt and blood of many beneath the political nails of Obama’s first Secretary of State, and, yes, it seems some of it of stains she hasn’t been able to wash away from the first term hers of 1993-1997.

It seems Congress can do itself one better by First Lady Michelle Obama and now be of its Constitutional right and duty at checking more than just 2016 political smack by the Clintons - it seems Congress now by two houses bicameral can be to a very public investigating intrusion into the Clintons and their political machinations by ways of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives CGI, both by foreign and domestic jurisdiction.  The Clintons are in jeopardy by the Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 8 of the Constitution or by the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Courts — they are either now of the jurisdiction of one or both, and especially for a consideration of what could or can not be “legal” as per the months between their departure from the Executive plantation and that of September of 2001 of 9/11 I.  It is that the Clintons are likely still “legally” in reach of Congress, however bicameral, as by the Constitution bar of titling and checks on all whom can be said to be “agents” of The United States of America.

But to be brief it is a beauty how simply the Clintons can and should be now publicly dissected LIVE.

You do not need to be a lawyer to fathom that by the 22nd Amendment all People have a right and a duty to assert that the Clintons if to a Presidential campaign are in violation of the yet undecided Law of the term limits amendment and so taggable as criminal/un-Constitutional/treasonous.  As long as the 22nd Amendment is still undecided Law it is open to an original interpretation that its language of heralding in holding of office as if inseparable from a holding of a spouse is meant to be of an accounting prudence akin to petty cash safeties as also barred from an electing to the Presidency.  As a spouse has a right in marriage to hold their spouse the 22nd Amendment by the 80th Congress set with Richard Nixon an election of a spouse after a term limiting would simply in a logical be of a barred returning by election of the other to the barred holding.

                                        *      *      *

Happy Birthday First Lady Michelle Obama.  It seems a simple truth quite beautiful that you have it in your power to easily check the threat of the Clintons to all the People and to defend your legacy - you and your husband’s yet still possibly net positive Presidential legacy.

People it is that the President and First Lady can still blame Iraq and Afghanistan failures most recently on a failure to measure up by First Lady Senator Secretary Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.  It seems as per our longest war that President Obama just had a top diplomat not capable of a diplomatic solution alternative to war, and likewise it is that it seems the President Obama’s early departure as a retreat from Iraq is likely historical as of a Secretary of State of having over estimated and under delivered on any promise that she with her “personality” could handle it all.

And simply there seems hope again as the Senate has proudly stood up dutifully and rendered a rebuke on the Clinton State Department - I mean at least for now the Clinton State Department of the Obama administration.

Comments Off
01/14/14
MASTER OF DISASTER
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AL QAEDA, WAR ON WOMEN, CRUSADES, #FEMINISM, #MORALS, #ISLAM SQUIBS, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:04 am

A FEMIFEST DESTINY to excuse even the past twenty plus years of Democrat Party national politics is far more inexcusable than a charge up San Juan Hill as if a Roosevelt’s convenient wag the dog war of choice.

Is Hillary Rodham Clinton forgivable as a MASTER OF DISASTER if it is to be politically excusable as figured and affected as if a THE FEMIFEST DESTINY?  I think not!

How in a Constitutional jeopardy are the People of The United States of America now free and proper to asserting if to asserting such just about Hillary Rodham Clinton?  There must be considerable jeopardy hemming in the Clintons and remarkably for times they were not actually of the Executive in the months between their departure from The White House and the very moments of the first 9/11 attacks.  These times are maybe as critical to understanding the real Clintons as the those unread missing Faulkner chapters may be to understanding him.  There is a jeopardy for the Clintons much just in the public record theirs since 9/11 and especially about those remarks they shouldn’t have made at all unless they needed to cover-up a reality wrought of their own knowing and willful politics.  The most serious jeopardy possible for the “two-fer” Clintons likely has to be for these months between their exit and the commencement of the long planned Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11 I. 

It may be that a MASTER OF DISASTER may have been a best hope for a global war on women politics, and, yet it may be that it is that at least Hillary Rodham Clinton failed to master a mastery if so of any ends justifying the means disaster ‘politics.”  I believe there are enough public statements made by either President or Mrs. Clinton now that compromise a possible forgiveness for even inciting discord abroad theirs — it seems that the Clintons have already said too much and so enough that the months here broached of their firstly without Executive privileged are smoking gun days to a negligence for them and at least for their surpluses as per 9/11 attacks.  It seems the Clintons did not let go of executive power as expected and have since compromised a presumption of innocence defense for themselves for the months before 9/11.  If a MASTER OF DISASTER either or both of the Clinton “two-fer” would not have to still rate as if the smartest person in the room about such — this ship of superiority has sailed long ago without them.

The 9/11 Commission Report was seriously flawed and somehow maybe by a political defensiveness coy enough by the Clintons as by only looking back 10 years at Al Qaeda that was then at least 2-3 years older than 10 it became possible to look away from the Clintons when looking for negligence and/or gross negligence of/by any Presidency.  I still have no idea how Congress did abide or sanction a 9/11 Commission Report that would not at least look back far enough to be looking at it as it was born/conceived firstly.  If one looks back to the birth of Al Qaeda as so to be an Islamic response to Saddam Hussein and his invasion of Kuwait and so to at least more years than the Commission did then one likely has to then grapple with a conundrum about a negligence for the Clintons more specifically as of an idea that The United States of America did get attacked on 9/11 because the Clintons’ Administration had failed to sufficiently bring justice upon Saddam Hussein by a thinking of justice by Al Qaeda ideology.

Wars on women rights and for literacy if of a core scheme since the Clintons’ first days at the helm can only maybe offer a political forgiveness - can only go so far politically.  It seems that if their is a core like of a FEMIFEST DESTINY as like a Presidency set-up as Teddy Roosevelt Rough Riding coincidences there is now a problem that the Clintons seemed to have failed to be smart enough to pull off what might yet be also now of a means justifying the ends forgivable politics.  There are really a trillion reasons why the Clintons can be said to have come up short from being smart enough - say from being as smart as they needed to be and as smart as they may have thought that they were.  We can hardly now justify Afghanistan as a just war of choice in keeping with the too imperialist feminist crusading by First Lady Clinton whence — As convenient as such seemed for her if due a Presidency we all have to query how it can be right to have been at such and yet not right to have been as well firstly in Iraq for the majority of its women so of its majority Shia populace.

To really be condemnable as a MASTER OF DESTRUCTION we must look at Hillary Rodham Clinton as possibly or likely causal to 9/11 attacks by an incited Al Qaeda.  We have a trillion reasons to justly tag the administration by the Clintons as negligent due to their surplus at near a trillion cut that can be said to have been necessary spending cut that time has established  a Posterity about as best if yet it had not been cut.  Yet as per 9/11 attacks we have to consider that the Clintons were smart enough, albeit, to know they international crusading on women’s rights was also incendiary and inciting and especially for those times that First Lady Clinton when into the turf of the quite radicalized and dictated that they needed to learn to behave and treat women the way she said so.

It seems in light of public comments made by the Clintons and their old team that such were only justifiable or rational comments as per past disasters if they were that the Clintons knew they had at least a negligence about such.  The Clintons and their people have a trail of remarks that shouldn’t have been made unless they had to be defensive in/of a known guilt.  As for the months between the Presidency of the Clintons and 9/11 it seems due to later made comments that these are days they may have been enough in a know about threats and yet immoral in an acquiescence at least of a negligence for a silence — the Clintons seem to have done enough knowingly to have knowingly been about a premeditation at taunting radicals in the Middle East towards action by way of First Lady Clinton and her crusading for her idea of women’s rights.

If she is of a grand plan like a THE FEMIFEST DESTINY suggested, as coined by me, we have that though she maybe forgivable for noble ends her means can hardly now be forgiven.  She has been far from uniform or universal in a general Welfare application, however.  She is now of a history of remarks her own that can condemn her and seriously self incriminate however lately yet.  She it seems hasn’t been as smart as she thought herself to be nor smart enough for what at least became duties of her political charges.  Whether she had a master plan to expedite her universal feminist crusade we have to be doubters as now it seems however if so there yet never has been enough uniformity globally.

There is a problem now just because the Clintons have a record of saying things that no politician should have said rationally unless they had something very serious to hide.  We have that for all these years that President Barack Obama compromised his own Presidency with a cover-up like “all Bush’s fault” presumption of immunity and innocence for the Clintons there yet now is a public trail of remarks by the Clintons that stand as contrary and self incriminating.

I do not believe Hillary Rodham Clinton has it in her to sufficiently explain her political life of at least the past 20 plus years as if of an ends justifying the means and as if a FEMIFEST DESTINY dogmatic where intervention anywhere is to be justified for her if she asserts a political purposefulness as about a liberation in feminism.

To Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as taggable as a MASTER OF DISASTER we have 2014 & 2016 politics to work a discover about.  It seems that for her to be actually electable she herself has to present and sell herself as if a MASTER OF DISASTER for otherwise it seems she has failed her way to the top so far and otherwise of a tragedy of errors culpability that must be said to have bordered on incompetence.  And, since her she wrapped up her first Benghazi attacks remarks from outside the office of the Secretary of State with near “I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT THIS COULD HAPPEN IN A COUNTRY THAT I LIBERATED” it may be that she has herself admitted to not have been a master of the many disasters or even the two 9/11s, and that she has basically since 9/11 II admitted an ignorance and incompetence as per the Middle East politics and especially all things relating to Al Qaeda.

But yet it behoove us all not to yet fully consider that the Clintons do have a incriminating past as per a negligence to gross negligence prior to the first 9/11 attacks.  As per any candidate Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton now it must be that we be thorough and diligent and to seriously considering how the administration of the Clintons does better explain how and why so much went wrong - does still better explain causals that the here to fore tagging of just the President Bush decidings.

It is hard to say the Clinton Presidency wasn’t knowingly to inciting Al Qaeda as if by cornering in trapping.  It may be that 9/11 did happen because of a crusading too imperialistic First Lady Clinton, and so that we should think that she must have been intelligent enough to know that at least while she was so crusading it was then negligent to grossly negligent for she to be back in the US then knowingly supporting President Clintons defunding of so many budget items that secure the USA from threats foreign and domestic.  It seems that a MASTER OF DISASTER wouldn’t have knowingly incited and as well partaken in such as it was the great defunding of intelligence and defense programs coincidentally, the coupled and compromised further with the real work of the Clintons to establish walls of separation at the FBI between intelligence and enforcement.

If she has felt justified as if of a FEMIFEST DESTINY to be as a steward of disasters it at least now for political purposes seems as if looking forward we can all say that looking back she has failed to be a master of many past disasters.  For forward or backwards if she/they didn’t understand that First Lady Clinton’s global feminist crusades were inciting and incendiary these disasters are likely it seems more to a gross incompetence and not mere at a gross negligence.

Comments Off
09/10/13
SLICK WILLY II
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, SYRIA, #FEMINISM, #BLAME, #SLICKWILLY, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 6:17 am

Because of Bill Clinton - President William Jefferson Clinton - it is most improbable now that any national Democrat can offer a bi-partisan road forward.  Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton oddly, for her purported “feminism”, is secured it seems as FLOTUS Hillary of the Clinton Foundation - as First Lady of the Clintons’ global initiatives.

Because of the partisan political first steps of the Clinton administration per the Middle East as it dates to the Year of the Founders’ Lord one thousand nine hundred and Ninety three the politics of the People of the United States of America are undermined.  President Clinton is remembered for a lawyer trickery like a used car salesman of the lower ranks of strategery for pushing lemons as sound vehicles. 

The threat reports of the United States as per the Middle East and our long history of Cold War involvements are yet corrected or properly of sufficient factoring for the variables related to the first move of the Clinton administration with a group of Middle East leaders so of he requesting that they contractually agree to just blame all ‘anti-American’ sentiment and justifications on Republicans.  It was a cheap trick to akin to the low ranks of thought stereotypes for used car salesmen.  It is a wrench still in the gears of the foreign affairs of the United States and as well all “intelligence” derived within.  It is that President Clinton is remembered for locking in a group of Middle East leaders to not blame him or Democrats for any or all of the Cold War years, at least, and to give him a clean slate - and that such to him was for a way to then avoid the action and commitment for the US relationships that better would have been with him to working to resolve in lieu of just blaming.

A slippery slope or an impossible oil slick for even a pedestrian navigation of current US relations across the Middle East is much the crash lawyering trickery of President Clinton akin to his reputation as “Slick Willy” for it seems having a slippery fork tongued (disbarred) esquired willingness to stand and present himself of an innocence while more of a guilt.

The people of the Middle East are of an honor and pride themselves in being honorable for their sense of honor.  The leaders of the Middle East seem foremost among those that pride themselves on being honorable for their sense of honor. 

President Clinton’s crass cheap tricks in politics to bias history of his first year and first steps developed to be much lacking in honor.  President Clinton’s “diplomacy” haunts now our foreign relations and ability to properly interpret intelligence — He as remembered so was to trapping a people of their sense of honor in a contract he then enforced to his selfish purposes and in ways that then held other “leaders” to a performance to keep up their end of his “bargain” to just blame Republicans. 

This is remembered while remembering also that such fits with my first bad first impression of Bill and Hillary from the early 1970s in the year or two before Watergate.  I have known Bill and Hillary since their law school days for it was that they polled my as a young youth to whether they could both become President of the United States of America some day.  It is remembered that from my first meeting of Bill Clinton I found him willing to lie and as well to ask a near first grader to lie to and in support of his lying as to what such’s God’s honest answer was to his querying.

There is a much longer story in the how and why of their rise in the 1992 election cycle for me to tell in coming years as of how for all the leading help they got from me after my initial guidance to Democrats as to how they could win in 1992 it was that much that came from me that has long benefited the Clintons after getting on such a wagon of mine was long firstly figured otherwise to be to protecting people from them specifically.  For now let me just say that though I did tell them that if they entered and learned how to sound like me they could win, and, that I wasn’t intending my help and guidance for Democrats to be enough to get them elected.  I was meaning to make sure President Bush had an actual credible opponent in the 1992 race and hadn’t figured the entrance of Ross Perot.  I was of my original opinion of the Clintons then and yet helping them to seem more electable than even I thought they were as a matter in my mind about national security.  I was of such opinions and a hope to flush these two out for a single use as disposable politicians.

On the honor of the code of honor honorable among the people and leaders whence and now of the Middle East it is that our systems are still corrupted by the first steps and the performance President Clinton insisted upon as per the improper “contract” he worked so of a promise that only Republicans would be blamed for the past problems and that too he would have it interpreted that such promise was to avoid blaming him as long as he was still in office.

There is very little honor in this as how President Clinton (the Clintons) can be remembered.

As for our story and how it was of years and decades of Bill and Hillary checking in while of their political plotting at times of wondering if ‘that charming boy from the school yard’ was of thinking they then were trying to go too far - we have a special relationship - and especially special relationship since so much good I worked was actually firstly figured in parts to be bulwarks against them and their shared plotting.  It is ridiculous how they are still too well considered for “successes” that only came to be from work long as prophylactics against them.  It is ridiculous but how when I stopped protecting us and them from themselves they weren’t even then able to defeat the near unknown junior peer of Senator Hillary Clinton in the 2008 race.  I have comfort in my knowledge of the decades about such conflicted politics of how I did help and then not help in order to asses and know how when I helped them they looked good or great and when I withheld pro-active voluntary efforts they mostly stumbled and bumbled.

There is an honor I hope in my years of work after my efforts at knowingly helping the Clintons seem better and more electable than even I thought they were for it of voluntary and proactive work to many years and trying times at then a business too “proactive” and “voluntary” to mediate and reduce the risks of and from the Clintons if and when left to be themselves politically.  There is that after they were unexpectedly elected (for the lack of a factoring of Ross Perot) I thought I had a responsibility to keep trying to save Democrats from themselves to then save what could be saved of the People more generally.

Essentially it may be the worst of Bill Clinton as “Slick Willy” that he proceeded as President in foreign policy that not only asked the Middle East to bias history with sole blaming of Republicans for all that was wrong but to then put them on their honor to continue just blaming the Republicans for all those years that the Clinton Administration’s avoidance and inaction was diabolical “politics” actually of his hands not Republicans. 

It is so also remembered and due finally a dealing with that while holding such some remembered Middle East leaders to he secured promise to not blame him or Democrats he was then firstly of his work to have such be a contract also of a promise that with such would be a promise to not attack America - The homeland of the United States of America - about such as they were to just blame Republicans about - as long as he was still in office.

Syria now presents and opportunity for the known world and all of the United States of America to get the history and politics of their times all wrong anew.  These days are the days we need to open a dialogue about what did and has gone wrong because President Clinton thought his “lawyering” trickery of his reputation of short of honor as “Slick Willy” could provide a foundations for lasting understanding and lasting growth.

It is that I just hope that how the 911 Commission work has been flawed from their start and so about a “prudence” proffered, however, as if looking back just ten years to understand Al Qaeda would be intelligent or telling isn’t of a politics of the Clintons at a lobbying about such to keep the Government of the United States of America from looking far enough back - to looking just back 12 -14 years - to looking just back to the conception/birth of Al Qaeda - to looking far enough back to clearly unearth a (legally) buried “contracted” culpability or just gross negligence.

It is that it seems while near another anniversary of the attacks of 9/11 by Al Qaeda it figures most simply that we got attacked because President Clinton had failed to sufficiently prosecute Saddam Hussein even just for his invasion of Kuwait.  It is slippery more though and still how our paths for an understanding as it now is needed most with Syria conflicts stirring are of risks for a lack of understanding that President Clinton actually spent his eight years trapping Middle East leaders, as remembered, on their honor of his worked promise to just blame Republicans and to not be to any attacks on the homeland of the US while he was still President.

It is simply now also important to consider and debate how it seems the attacks of 9/11/2001 were planned and prepared for for years before those first months of the Administration of  George W. Bush and as it was that globally those times were of an expectation that the next President of the United States was most likely to be Al Gore.

Comments Off
02/18/13
MASHABLE POWER(S)
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, OBAMACARE, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, CLIMATE CHANGE, AL QAEDA, IRAN, TWO HISTORIES, #MORALS, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:53 am

It is inescapable that Bill Clinton is at heart the very politician that gave the filibuster like Democratic Party Convention Speech for the nomination of Governor Michael Dukakis.  1988 was a different time for Americans of the United States of America still in the longest of warring such as our Cold War.  Governor Clinton of Arkansas in 1988 in Atlanta, Georgia, droned on and on, and on, by many reports.

By 1991 we were in a new global state of affairs heralded as a NEW WORLD ORDER.  Many may have been dreading seeing Governor Clinton return to any national dais for another oration.  There is a long story to tell that now fits with a Democrat Party in need of branding help.  Today’s order as per intra-party Democrat worlds has a is segmented to a split about three identities;  Today there are different biases about the brand as of a trichotomy between Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - Barack Hussein Obama Dems.

Some are grateful much more than others that Vice President George H. W. Bush was elected in 1988 and that Governor Michael Dukakis was not.  As many may be grateful some about a retrospective that Governor Clinton may have cost Governor Dukakis the election with his convention speech still reported as of an air of a “Will it ever end?”

Students of the politics of the United States of America can hardly be to erudite posits and papers today in these times without having an understanding of the years 1988-1993.  To some it was just the years that the U.S.A. became the sole superpower in the world, and, to others it was the years of a concern that a third world war would break out and be the foretold end - the end of the world as by fire.

Of at least an intra-party Democrat world set about with a dichotomy just between Bill Clinton Dems & Hillary Clinton Dems we have that the First Couple Clintons did leave after their eight years without having left, so it seems, any alternative plan for “bite” as per Saddam Hussein.  We still have a vacuum about our political logic quite dangerously of roll outs of new policies and defense spending concerns endemic to the Administration of the Clintons and how they left President George W. Bush no entrance and/or exit strategy for Iraq and the considerable dust ups about a prosecution due for Saddam Hussein.

There is much hubris about so much over too many of these many years since Governor Clinton showed his true self with the nominating speech for Governor Dukakis that is of reports of some fearing it might never end, like.  From this we have that students of American history of the politics of the United States of America have a dichotomy to consider and scrutinize too much just within that which is just singularly of the known history of Bill Clinton.

Iraq and Iran, logically speaking, now would likely be engaged in a mini cold war of their own with non U.S. global support of quite a different “new world order” than President George H. W. Bush managed us towards.  Without the PERSIAN GULF WAR of President George H. W. Bush and OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM of President George W. Bush it is logical and supportable by known global sympathies that Saddam if still in power would now be in a cold war nuclear power and nuclear weapon race with Iran.  It helps to understand the years between 1988 & 1993 and how so then about a major adjustment for the world to a NEW WORLD ORDER with the U.S.A. emerged from such long dust up with the U.S.S.R. as a sole global super power.

About so much of this is still that Hillary Clinton Dems of the above concerning trichotomy and or dichotomy is that which did the most flip flopping.  She is also the Clinton, and Democrat, most culpable and mashable around a hashable #Iraq for she voted for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, logically, as one that as Mrs. Clinton the former FLOTUS of the most recent prior administration was of intimate enough “intelligence” to have known if “WMD” was or was not a lie.  She is remembered for being of reports that she was so confident with “WMD” intelligence as former FLOTUS, it seems, that she didn’t even take it upon herself to read the provided “NEW” intelligence estimates.

In light of the recent vast democratic reset that happened when the U.S.A became the victor of the longest of wars - of the COLD WAR - and became in the years 1988 -1993 effectively the only super power it is quite relevant and concerning that logic can help us be to better understandings of our here and now if we dig into the old dust ups of a couple decades ago.  Afghanistan can be said to have been the GETTYSBURG of the COLD WAR - the “turning point.”

In the mashable of our current problema challenging any now “Democrat” as of an “Intelligentsia” we have that we should consider that “WMD” may have been a genius stroke however a “LIE” for still we have that any entrance or exit about Iraq for a prosecution of Saddam Hussein and/or “bite” for United Nations’ sanctions was best to be booted as somehow definitively not of the U.S.A. or Coalition as to a HOLY WAR footing.

Hillary Clinton Dems are now quite past a reasonable deadline for proffering posits positively purposeful politically per prudent possible and probable prosecution of her past sworn officialdoms.  It is logical that Hillary Clinton has been making the same mistakes over and over since she first flip flopped about OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM.  When one accepts “Bush lied” it logically becomes both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton whom appear to look worse - worser even that President George W. Bush.

There is a dichotomy taggable as of a Bill Clinton’s Dems and Hillary Clinton’s Dems even from their Administration as the first stirrings of a dust up in Afghanistan had one more a dove and the other more hawkish.  Together they abandoned Afghanistan for their eight years and such that once was manageable as of a too early exit by the United States of American became years of insult added to injury, like, such that now we may be there and for so long because they wanted to sell PEACE before its time and be coyly of an inaction and avoidance in Afghanistan and Iraq so that they could justify, somehow, PEACE DIVIDENDS during known unsettled times.

Yes there is a dichotomy at least just in Bill Clinton that is now still very relevant for it is not logical that he was himself truly while of his 1988 Democrat Party Convention speechifying and that he had been naturally as himself while of much of the exposure since their late entry into the 1992 Presidential race.

OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM would better to have been of ACTION by the Clintons in the first term of the Administration of the Clintons’ “two-fer” and then as well somehow clearly and definitively as of a “war” like posture not footed or booted as confusable as a HOLY WAR. 

Saddam Hussein was like a father or godfather figure about Al Qaeda.  How much this was strategic and purposefully politicked by Saddam Hussein to a consideration that he would be able to keep Kuwait despite the U.S.A. of treaties because Americans wouldn’t risk stirring up radicals known to be of geopolitical sensitivity and pride - like Al Qaeda.  We have that we are still deciding politics with still too little consideration about how our 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT is flawed for having looked back only ten years at Al Qaeda all the while it was nearer 12 years old and formed specifically to be a response/reaction to politics and warring by Saddam Hussein.  Saddam Hussein may have well like rocked the cradles of Al Qaeda against the United States of America towards gains like of his efforts in seizing Kuwait.

And today there is at least about Iraq and OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM an intra-party trichotomy among Democrats as of either Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - President Barack Hussein Obama Dems.  These three still have different histories related to so much of what is now too effecting to our politics and these years of gridlock.

Logically there wouldn’t have been a 9/11 I or 9/11 II if Saddam Hussein hadn’t invaded Kuwait.  Logically it seems 9/11 may have been kept like as a HOLY DAY for Jihadists of Al Qaeda 2001 sense of justice and so if as well an attack by them to being only then interpretable of an “intelligence” of a motive nearly identical to 9/11 I.  There is more in just the broached “dichotomy” concern about Bill Clinton that relates to some of his earliest moral short comings of his first steps in the Middle East of his first year of his first term;  it is actually mashable and logical that Al Qaeda attacked us on both 9/11 days as acts of war in a HOLY WAR or Jihad for a sense of justice related still to Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait.

And today there is still a concern about “LIES” of “WMD” and yet hardly enough discussion as to the religious and geopolitics variables that were better worked around to assure that any due prosecution of Saddam Hussein wouldn’t and couldn’t be seen as of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA of a wagging of HOLY WAR.

Again, there is a dichotomy just about Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton for their years of the Administration of the Clintons as per Afghanistan and Iraq.  Again, most reports still are of us as having had power shift from the Clintons to President George W. Bush without there having been a plan of the Clintons’ eight years left for entering and exiting Iraq. 

It seems that “BITE” for United Nations’ sanctions on Saddam Hussein, as an issue, as our history, does divide the house of Clintons still.

And, still we had the clock running.   We were some to a new way of “liberation” for the United States of America, as of a new world order, and expectation to “police’” as a sole super power, as it became an expected way for Americans that had risks of the U.S.A. becoming punk’d by other nations to such while to such.  We the People of the United States of America were uniquely fortified to a new way to “liberation” of other peoples where we had been compromised/engaged before much some just because we had (still had) an all volunteer force.

And now though with two acts of war by Al Qaeda on 9/11s are we to measure and consider the current intra-party trichotomy existant about a logical and historical divide between the politics of Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - President Barack Hussein Obama Dems?

And, again:  It is remarkable that as the discussion goes from “Bush lied” to an acceptance that “Bush lied” it is the Clintons however similar and intimate and different are two that each are to politically looking worse that President George W. Bush!

So:  Did we get attacked on both 9/11 because Bill Clinton failed to sufficiently prosecute Saddam Hussein per the sense of justice reasoning of Al Qaeda?  Was the second act of war on such that may have been kept as a terrorist HOLY DAY then for Bill Clinton returned and not penitent so when again in a Democrat Party Convention - when at Charlotte as the charlatan yet of a history of having been of an Administration of the Clintons now proven to have been too much of an avoidance and inaction as per Afghanistan and Iraq? 

We can accept that it is logical that Saddam Hussein fathered Al Qaeda by his violation of Kuwait - Right?

Comments Off
02/01/13
THE BOOBS
Filed under: POLITICS, AL QAEDA, TWO HISTORIES, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:42 am

Perhaps you have heard of the long day ride of the nominee of President Obama Chuck Hagel!  Two lanterns may be needed, or just one, for that guardian charge many are being asked to allow as a trusted duty his.

How many candles can he light - need he of Nebraska light at least metaphorically - how wicked or enlightened be he in old lights for Posterity as a candle otherwise maybe lit as our beacon of defense?  William Golding of Brasenose College - a perhaps idyllic or iconic in life and death for Chuck Hagel and his comraderies?

We were nearly all the boobs of the threat considerations of the 2006 SURGE dates — Senator Chuck Hagel, whence pressed, and probed, those moments lingering on, still as “complicated” relationships hung over much, with fogs of ignorance and naivete horned yet not seen, was figuratively a Paul Revere of Nebraska biased to measures scaled to relations foremost considerate of natural law erudity flames or sparks.

“Among the vicissitudes incident to life”* start stands as a prophylactic of earlier days governance commencements quite so whence Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska was charged of considerations of personal emoluments of official duties and which ever pecuniary costs for skins or pounds of flesh, however Solomesque, the peace of the dates or the spark of threats had embedded particularly.

It is considerate to not relate or report yesterday’s pounding of President Barack H. Obama’s first choice to succeed Sec Def Panetta as Republican on Republican hate.  He may have been a silversmith to only a second place though for himself, now.

When Senator, he, Chuck Hagel,  may have wanted to see a Clinton PEACE as not a “PEACE!” before its time and been too much to a bosomed embrace of our Houses as united while still divided by actual wars and their political costs and histories.

There were ways to buffet such dates of so much warring thought not to have been to becoming our fate or destiny but not to run from the light of the actual candles/beacons of truths of the ages in which all was bedded.

The pounding and pressing of President Barack H. Obama’s first choice even if it leaves nominee Hagel now of a silver of his own wraught - is good for the President and for us since it was an airing of shared SURGE naivete still long over-coddled by the Administration of Obama.  What was lit yesterday for all to be forewarned from is that his shared pinings and sympatheties on review as also those long fronted by our current President are now no longer “historical” or defensible - that they are not now “reasoned” nor “reasonable” as most now shed their innocence and naivete of the “it’s complicated” old dated relationships as per threats not as simple as such that a warm embrace could fix or settle.

Among the vicissitudes incident to the SURGE Senator John McCain and myself and maybe all that I wrote publicly in 2006 as “uc” has been much confirmed and affirmed as our actual histories for and about the SURGE for Posterity now as a candle/beacon of and for fact based governance (and defense budgeting).

Strategically speaking so much of such past dates were really always political then of “it’s complicated” near to a maximus, and, still of a more reasoned understanding for motivations as justifications by the seats of Al Qaeda to 9/11 I quite that more should be considerate that our Senators at least had their judgement compromised by our 9/11 Commission Report as it was/is a flawed bedded and binded mess for having only looked back ten years all the while Al Qaeda was known to have been born nearer twelve years thence earlier.

Of nominee for Secretary of Defense beaconship we can be considerate that Senator Chuck Hagel when given the right histories or facts is likely of a capacity and accomplishment in governance to make a good or right decision.  It is arguable that his hot seat flaming is lit by embers of ignorance and naivete official bound by our 9/11 Commission findings.

The incident vicissitudes particular to the erring by nominee Hagel now so historical as lacking in “historical” correctness are of days and threats against America that had long passed Nebraska thresholds as of a bosom and soothing or settling by coddling, it seems.

We have too long been blinded by the worked ignorance upon the minds of just Americans by politicking with our histories such as two Clintons have too long done.  It is considerate not to report yesterday’s ups and downs so incident as Republican on Republican HATE.  The bound bedding now long pertinent to the bad dates so rehashed with discussions of earlier Republican possible partisan betrayal is buttress’d covertly too much in a false narrative not a rap enough of the false yet convenient rap of two of the Clintons. 

As per such as the important and incident actual histories of the relative past twenty plus years of ups and downs foreign and domestic it behoove all to remember the Clintons’ are by their “friends” still fresh of taggings as “BIG LIARS”! 

By the lies of the Clintons - the known and the unknown lies of the Clintons many leaders have fallen or slipped as BOOBS!

William Golding was of erudition by way of Brasenose College and Senator Chuck Hagel to politics of vicissitudes of incidents domestic and foreign by way of Nebraska. 

His hesitancy whence to be of Republican Party loyalty as to the proven sound reasoning of and for a SURGE is not quite as bad a faux pas as that which have made Clinton loyalists and the Clintons themselves now nearer to a record as of a actual historical global naivete - of an embrace to much of “PEACE” before its time.

But of his Congressional Senatorial review - it is good news that the President’s seemingly intimately shared naivete about histories now better understood than whence thence to political hesitancy and dangerous inaction and avoidance posturing have been aired by his first choice for Secretary of Defense charge.  We now may all be able to GET SMART and start moving forward with intellectual honesty and a reset to US Governance along fact based actual histories.

We may all be at risk if we don’t check nominee Chuck Hagel’s rendition of SURGE political bedding/binding.  Whether by across the seas or by lands American of the United States all are now still too at risk of also becoming BOOBS of the Clintons at least if failing to consider that Saddam Hussein gave birth incidentally to Al Qaeda by his invasion of our Ally Kuwait, and, that Al Qaeda likely attacked us on both 9/11 as a political or thought just act of “Jihad” against first the failures of President Clinton to sufficiently have prosecuted Saddam Hussein, by their radically so sense of justice, and, then with the second 9/11 maybe so for the same reasoning then of an abhorance visceral to their ideological theocratic group think as President Clinton of Charlotte charlatan posturing like a pouring of salts into their wounds, the wounds by their conception kept open and sore and misunderstood at least by those that trust our 9/11 Commission findings.

It may be that Nebraskan nominee Chuck Hagel came across as a BOOB of Obama’s preference from a trust in the history as bound by his old Congress’ consdiration of Al Qaeda by way of their 9/11 Commission and its ______________ for having only looked back ten years when the group know to have actually attacked of their own wills and sense of justice was yet then nearer twelve years old.

A better embrace of history is now available for many - for many more than whence thence now of old wounds reopened:

Al Qaeda was formed to be a Muslim answer to Saddam Hussein’s invasion of neighbor Nation State of Kuwait and was so chided and long abraded by the USA and coalition states having been otherwise chosen to be the just warriors.  It can be said that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11 but likely only by way of having incidentally having been the father of Al Qaeda by way of his inappropriate violation of Kuwait. 

There is real and historical “cause and effect” now more publicly consumable such that fewer need be BOOBS still about our own trying times that followed on so much of the Clintons’ “PEACE DIVIDENDS” of ups and downs like of lies of a “PEACE” “officially” before its times.

Nominee Chuck Hagel might be a candle of naivete too much - I hope our Senators figure out such in time.  As more than a time of natural law biased “PEACE” where coddling too long thought a way to bedding for Posterity Nominee Hagel is still at risk of not being embraced if he rests with President Obama like of a innocence from ignorance and naivete disrespective of incidental histories that relate to Saddam Hussein legacy and motivations seemingly of a confidence that he thought he had a way to defeat the United States of America - globally, and, specifically with traps set about an assault figurable against Americans of the United States by way of cyber or global public relations warring spin.

These hearings now are for Posterity with us now to trust that our charged Congress will be to greater good discourse to be a prophylactic for endemic naivete imprudence.

* {SEE: FIRST INAUGURAL SPEECH OF THE FIRST PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES}

Comments Off
12/30/12
THE BIG TENT
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, SYRIA, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:54 am

Barack Hussein Obama has been an “Our Pot Has Held A Melting” person for his first term.  We are now of a time he inherited more than made but to now the circus of his elementary politics all so gone carney.  These times are ours as the new year two thousand ten and three fast approaches.

Many people of color before him have done more for America and fellow Americans that he has (yet) and with less.  That he is our first black President of record has us now of such as a “fact” for comparing and contrasting more than now celebrating.  Earlier times had yeomen of Republican Party being nearly the most critical of legislators for early passage of civil rights laws.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he can hardly claim to have built it himself.

As a RING MASTER he has been big on ceremony and big promises of miraculous what evers and as if he had more rings in his circus “tent” than were actually there.  He has built a carney atmosphere about our once more prudent Republic and its governance from Washington.  He has even spirited hoopla about his rings of influence as if we could read our Second Amendment with import as if our First Amendment didn’t come first.

As Condoleezza Rice, a trailblazer in/of merit based race equality, has often pined, we have that America is now already a country where your zip code is too much predetermining your individual possibilities to advance with hard work and education.  Republicans have a different perspective to solutions while long of sharing a common humanity concerning equality problems.

Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Cheney in far earlier years and more specifically of charges each of and about our Congress did marshall the necessary yeomen legislative muscle to stir our governance of our 60s - to whip their Congressional peers - to the passage of some of our most basic and fundamental civil rights laws.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he has been more a divider than a uniter himself.

We have that President Barack Hussein Obama has created a circus of governance these past four years with it he that took us all to such so “gone carney.”  Donald Rumsfeld nor Richard Cheney are half breed black Americans yet they together did much and for a long time less “carney” and quite effecting to a “bigger” “tent” for Americans and even others around the world.

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

President Obama has been of such a circus of governance these past four years that often two things in one of his sentences do not and cannot work together yet orated as if they can.  Condoleezza Rice was a pioneer for THE FREEDOM AGENDA and a trend setter for even Barack Hussein Obama but for a prudence and practicality in foreign affairs.

Little, as the year 2012 wraps up, can or should be said well of Hillary Clinton as Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.  It doesn’t matter as per Libya if Congress had the purse strings for “security” as this was one of her “babies” of “accomplishment” and “boldness” that should have had Ambassador Chris Stevens and all about his charge SECURED by 9/10 with at least a bed check by herself.  Libya has led to us seeing “Hillary” as willing to sacrifice Ambassador Susan Rice in a playing of politics CYA for her own hams;  “Hillary” was the lead as per ODYSSEY DAWN but how the French needed to provide the leadership she lacked;  Libya consulate security should have been at least in her top 5 checked every day and not at the mercy of “Congressional purse strings.”

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

Much of President Obama’s problem of our governance turned into a circus act by his deciding does rest historically upon the Clintons and thought “GOOD” decisions made by them during the 90s that were actually the “BAD” decision(s).

Our Fiscal Cliff is only here now because we haven’t dealt with how the CLINTONS’ SURPLUSES were the greatest economic blunder of the past century.  We had no need for surpluses those years and we had already arguably cut too much too quickly when the Republicans found a way to offer a thought impossible balanced budget.  We have been of war costs and social costs especially school and infrastructure items because of that extra trillion cut by the Clintons for convenient political popularity;  we have been of greater costs and economic struggles because we have needed after the surpluses to be at far greater costs to a putting back so much of what they cut, and as necessary spending.

To appreciate the comments of racial trailblazer Condoleezza Rice as per deep problems in America’s education paradigm and how we are at a point where one’s zip code is too determinative it may help to refresh some management  methodologies even if they stir a like “federalism” debate about such.  When you have problems like such is the worst place to attempt a fix a distant centralized see of sorts?  Is this a problem that needs to see an uncentralized “one size does not fit all” approach were distant cells more local and of “community” are stirred in freedoms to compete in lieu of a national assimilation?

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

We may be clearly of a showing that the “rings” of the “tent” of President Barack Hussein Obama’s “governance” show that Democrats do not have the management sense or skill needed to even just be as successful as Republicans had years before when of a practical broadening of our BIG TENT. 

Obama’s engagement in Afghanistan has been “war of choice” of Democrat specificities.  Afghanistan mission still troubled for it in a country that has its primary national industry that of supplying near 80% of the world’s opium.  Afghanistan may be a convenient place to play war and with a “war of choice” from a earlier measured enterprise to trespass to find Al Qaeda 50 or so “campers” - but the nation has nearly 75% of its populace as illiterate in any language even a “local tribal dialect”.

As we look to judge President Obama by his Secretary of State we still have it a circus of contrariness where two things just never seem to belong together in a single promise or proffering.

President George W. Bush, with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Richard Cheney, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, was in Afghanistan not in a “war of choice” but as of a “WAR ON TERROR” and specific deals and permissions to be trespassers on such nation’s sovereignty per a policing search for wanted and known members of Al Qaeda.  President Bush’s administration was trading road and school construction as part of a limited engagement about Afghanistan of a necessary WAR AGAINST TERROR.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he can hardly claim to have built it himself.

A suggestion by President Obama or even just his mere political appointee Madam Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton that Afghanistan can be won is best balanced and checked with a simple comparison to our Southwest border — I should be logically at least fifty percent easier to solve the problems of our Southwest border and it as well of a drug trade of huge scale than it should be to be able to “win” in Afghanistan while interrupting whole foreign cultures about opiates.

The explanation for Al Qaeda’s attacks of 9/11 that make now still the most simple and logical understanding possible is much of the hypothesis that we were attacked after the Administration of the Clintons because America during the such years had failed to bring sufficient justice to/upon Saddam Hussein.  Our 9/11 Commission Report still rings as flawed with echoes still fresh of its charged American leaders’ personal statements that they had decided to “only look back ten years”!  We have that with such our chosen “detectives” for such purposes as they were charged as a “commission” was of a naivete like that more recently by Madam Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton with regards to Benghazi — at the time they “chose” to only look back ten years Al Qaeda was maybe already past its 12th anniversary of its conception/consecration as a group organized to bring needed justice to/upon Saddam Hussein.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he has been more a divider than a uniter himself.

Personally, my public commentary about Afghanistan near as soon as the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama started was early and regularly of:  “BRING OUR TROOPS HOME - BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW!!!” postings as of my best advice per such “conflict.”

It is more logical to believe that we could fix our immigration and our Southwest border with the level of commitment and engaged troop levels for Afghanistan than that such could be close to reasonable for whichever limited “goals”/”mission” that could be writ as if then a reachable goal to a “win.”

As per education - much has been made to be such a governance circus with this administration leading the rings to too much all carney.  We have that “federalism” discourse must continue as such is where the answers lie for workable management methodologies for solutions that stay of our keep with freedoms first and protections second so Constituted.

As per the ARAB SPRING - you should be better of lessons that there wouldn’t and couldn’t be an up side if Operation Iraqi Freedom hadn’t affected the then oh so late prosecution of Saddam Hussein.

As per the COLD WAR - Afghanistan, until the eight years of avoidance and inaction that cooked a great “abandonment” attitude as those eight were of the “leadership” of the Administration of the Clintons, was an Afghanistan to the Cold War as Gettysburg was to our Civil War.

As per THE BENGHAZI FOUR - you still should be considering it is late for any “Diplomat” to be speaking of “terrorists” without specifities as to how such was not of STATE ACTING - A RELIGIOUS ACTING - A CRIMINAL ACTING.  We have that we are still of a underwhelming “explanation” by this Administration of Obama that allows a tagging as “demostration” or “terror” while it may make more sense that it is an expansion of the “theater” of conflict in our now LONGEST WAR in Afghanistan so however commenced to a forced marriage between the TALIBAN & AL QAEDA.  We have not begun to hear sufficient explanations for “Hillary’s” serious failures in Libya.

As per THE TALIBAN - their leadership has been on TV with interviews and speaking of how in Afghanistan now of the Obama years and policies, at least, the Taliban & Al Qaeda are now basically one.  It is still possible that BENGHAZI ambush of “Hillary’s” people was of an ACT OF WAR in an ongoing war with the Taliban and as an act thought justly of and to a broader theater of conflict.

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

It was straight up a clear demonstration of “Hillary’s” persistent naivete as per the conflicts of the Middle East post the Saddam invasion of Kuwait when she with near first comments about her failures as per the lost BENGHAZI FOUR, at least, spoke with:  “I do not know how this could have happened in a country we liberated.”

As of the ARAB SPRING, again, there likely would be no upside for the United States of America now if such were happening before we had “prosecuted” Saddam Hussein.  I am still of the opinion that the best time and place for the full enforcement of the United Nations sanctions against Saddam Hussein was during the first term of the Administration of the Clintons.  It is little considered, and dangerously, still, that those were the best years to have proceeded judiciously in keeping with our standards and examples with Germany and Japan after earlier world warring.  We have now an ARAB SPRING contrary to the governance posits and proffering of this administration and even more so to that of the Administration of the Clintons — these days the “SPRING” is some a competition with justly freed Iraqi people and to attempts to better them in their workings at bettering for themselves a better Constitution that that which is America’s.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he can hardly claim to have built it himself.

And we cannot now avoid the 16 trillion made by the Administration of Obama with the careful hands of those seemingly in line to have been the chosen Clinton experts if “Hillary” had managed to have been actually “inevitably” aligned by political machinations concerning enough without foreign concerns.

And we must consider how simple a truth it is for “budgets” now that it will be irresponsible for the Administration of Obama with whomever left-overs of the Administration of the Clintons to be suggesting job and economic growth promises without first seriously offering a solid fix to immigration.  It is ridiculous that with immigration and illegals so long such a problem and a problem also much ignored by the Administration of the Clintons (while of a trillion not needed to go to surpluse to spend) that Healthcare Reform was put ahead of Jobs Plans and that both were put ahead of Immigration Reform like of “carrots” towards temptations to over-ride any possible planned new workings for Immigration Reform.

And, so we have that President Obama is of a BIG TENT America hardly of his own “building” - and with us to a new year two thousand ten and three with it seeming he has now “accountability” for so so so many proposals and plans that are of the circus of governance now set in our DC.  He built this mess upon good deeds built by others, not nearly as guilty as he - as he is making others out to be while covering up for clearer fault and guilt of both Mr. and Mrs. Clinton.

And again, as per Iraq and the Administration of George W. Bush - Today’s ARAB SPRING though under the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama would not have an up side for the United States of America if we hadn’t already worked that very late and very costly due prosecution of Saddam Hussein. 

As the Clintons had been leaving it - if so still as they had been leaving it - today we could hardly globally appear to be much better than Syria’s Assad - Don’t you think?

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

Comments Off
09/07/12
CLOSER TO HOME
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, AL QAEDA, #BLAME, #NEW_YORK
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:37 am

ORIGINAL TO 12/07/11
CLOSER TO HOME
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 10:42 pm

Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day.  What will long live in infamy now may be a commission report that …

A first strike if to a new world war likely would be with multiple and seeming unrelated EMP incidents and…

If a small yield nuclear device hidden on drones detonates if/when opened the wrong way are we to blame if…

And, how was it that our 9/11 Commission decided it was responsible - responsible with a decision to look back only ten years?

It does seem that President Clinton preceded this - this new unexpected tack by President Obama - “Teddy” Obama - when recently with his envy on parade and with his book his tool and trade while “political” again, much, with near:  “I should be allowed to have a third term.”  I don’t know what or whom was served with our 9/11 Commission self limiting history to a ten year window of relevance.

What do you say when a President wants a third term?

What do you say when a President wants a third term if not even likely to get a second term?

What do you say when PBC seemed to be channeling TR a week or more before PBO?

It does seem odd that President Clinton didn’t insist that the 9/11 Commission at least look far enough back to include Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi invasion of neighbor Kuwait - of neighbor Kuwait with many “friend” by treaties of declared united ends.  It does seem odd that even Senator Clinton of “Ground Zero Senator” instant extreme personal and political makeover didn’t as well insist on behalf of New York that Congress and 9/11 Commission at least look back farther than 10 year self imposed historical window limit and back far enough to consider at least the early days that were of the conception and original unifying for Al Qaeda.

I guess we have to assume that another world war is possible.

I guess we have to allow that we should have back ups for most of our “connectedness” and new media.

I guess we have to articulate that we could be surprised with lasers in the sky and EMP suitcase stored.

It does still seem odd that both Clintons didn’t raise cain early and often after 9/11.  Where were their calls to probe publicly and transparently questions at least about why Saddam Hussein must have thought he would be able to keep Kuwait?  Where are now their explanations that there could be no “real bite” in any international sanctions if we only had their eight years of “enforcement” about them?  I mean it has been a while since I remembered being in seventh grade and being entered in schools oratory contest to present President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s DAY OF INFAMY speech - I mean it has been a while since I could remember with certainty that Al Qaeda original formation did date back longer than ten years from surprise attacks of 9/11/2001.

Sometimes you learn about warring surprises festering in time.

Sometimes you learn from a book not until 70 years after the fact.

Sometimes you can not learn for thirty years or some plus a new thirty of protection as if anew to President Clinton.

You don’t always have to read an entire book - sometimes a “cover to cover” of just book jacket enough to be surprise.  Take inside front cover of Edmund Morris’ COLONEL ROOSEVELT and its first paragraph as:

“Of all our great Presidents, Theodore Roosevelt is the only one whose greatness increased out of office. When he toured Europe in 1910 as plain ‘Colonel Roosevelt’ he was hailed as the most famous man in the world.  Crowned heads vied to put him up in their palaces.  ‘If I see another king,’ he joked, ‘I think I shall bit him.’”

And then:

“Had TR won his historic “Bull Moose” campaign in 1912 (when he outpolled the sitting president, William Howard Taft), he might have averted World War I, so great was his international influence.”

Due to unforeseen erudition around Colonel Roosevelt I may not get past the second chapter that seems to have already warned “Teddy” or plainly as “Colonel Roosevelt” already past two terms in office and his huge British East Africa predatory mass killings while on largest safari ever set about by man, and from minds about Europe that America of 1910 era was likely on a path to war with Japan.  Or was it Japan was seemingly already then on a path towards eventual war against the United States of America.

And, again, I don’t know how our 9/11 Commission set out historically with a ten year window presumption agreed.  And, I really don’t know how either former President Clinton or Senator Clinton let such slide, and still.

Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day - that day is not alone in infamy, now.

Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day - I did take second place with “INFAMY” in the seventies - I didn’t want 1st for “WAR!”.

Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day - and I don’t recall classmate next to me who wondered if a Hawaiian could compete, so.

But now we have President Barack “Teddy” Obama who better could have taken such Rooseveltianism to the HQ of the National Rifle Association as such commemorates “plain ‘Colonel Roosevelt’” it seems, so far, for being predatory most of 1909, and so to a “Bull Moose” “New Nationalism” a spin around America for hunters and gun totters to celebrate his hunts and haunts locally in chase - in chase of American moose.  Was it accidental or did he get punked by President Clinton?  How did a sitting Democrat President come out so exactingly for furs and hunting?  How can “Bull Moose” not been a progressive argument for gun ownership and hunting of moose, of American moose, of local moose, of hopefully that US trophy bull moose?

A first strike if too a new world war likely would be with multiple and seeming unrelated EMP incidents and…

Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day - I think a Hawaiian did think they could compete.

If a small yield nuclear device hidden on a drone detonates if/when opened the wrong way are we to blame if…

PEACE is possible if…

Comments Off
07/07/12
LOOK AT HILLARY (AGAIN)
Filed under: POLITICS, CRUSADES, #NEW_YORK, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 12:39 pm
01/02/12
LOOK AT HILLARY
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 9:15 am

It goes to motivation. 

With all working to let Hillary get away with so much why should any or many want to play fair - want to be informed?

Your inheritance may be safe as a “jobless recovery” likely not too relevant to such.

It was completely unfair and inappropriate that any Clinton got a rise with Obama & his Bush’s inheritance faulting.

Rightie Oh!  That is a recollection of what was left President Obama as an “inheritance” from Bush.

Rightie Oh!  That was not a commentary on any of the “inheritance” left President Bush by Clintons’ “two-fer”.

Hillary Clinton does not deserve her current job - she may have been the most dangerous possible appointee.

If she hadn’t been a Senator - hadn’t been a Senator from New York - on 9/11 things would have been different.

She doesn’t deserve her current job - and without Senate seat - may have faded away in Senate mess since 9/11.

9/11 was an “inheritance” left the Bush administration by both Clintons and the Clintons administration “two-fering”.

Most of the media went along for the ride with the Clintons - most don’t want to have to discuss this.

Most of the media went along for the ride with the Clintons - most don’t want to implicate themselves as per Hillary.

If Hillary hadn’t been a Senator from New York and so the “GROUND ZERO SENATOR” she would have faded away.

Don’t know why the general media doesn’t want to cover Hillary well - but for that professional incrimination embedded.

It goes to motivation - as long as Hillary gets away with it they get away with it,

And our Congress suffers - and our Congress reaches lowest level of public respect.

And yet if now tagged of “Clintons’ inheritance” left President Bush our media could help our Congress & country.

If you have been involved as long as I have been then you too could maybe say:

If you have been involved as long you too might be able to say you thought if they went that way we would get attacked.

Hillary does not deserve her current job and did not deserve the Presidency.

Hillary claims her Clintons’ 8 qualified her for such - yet that it a Clintons’ inheritance incriminating not admitted.

The general media went along for the ride with the Clintons - and still - and still way too much.

If you like me involved so long you too might have said early:  If the Clintons go that way America will get attacked.

If you like me involved so long you too might have said finally on 9/10/2001:  It time to admit you must have been wrong.

If you like me involved so long you might on 9/10 have decided to finally move on accepting you must have been wrong.

Hillary is about the most ridiculous occurrence political in American history - all of our short history.  RIDICULOUS!

Hillary is about the most insane survival story and inappropriate appointee ever - it was a Clintons’ inheritance.

It was a Clintons’ “inheritance” and Hillary claims those years as “qualifying” and yet inadmissible for incriminating.

Hillary was no ordinary First Lady - she besides being a globally inciting crusader was of a Clintons’ “two-fer”.

Hillary was no ordinary First Lady - she insisted as being officially involved and publicly credited - BUT!

It
is politically insane that Hillary is in another administration -
especially insane to be of one of “Bush’s inheritance” lies.


It is illogical that so much of “Bush’s inheritance” of just a Bush’s inheritance - and not as much a Clintons’ inheritance.

It is insane that Hillary is a Secretary of State and that the “Clintons’ inheritance” coddled away by general media, still.

We have that the media cannot quite incriminate “Hillary” without also incriminating themselves.

We have that Congress now looks ridiculous as so un-popular and yet it may be “institutional” for Hillary - for Clintons.

It goes to motivation - I did say early in Clintons’ “two-fer” days that if they went that way America would get attacked.

It goes to motivation - I did admit, necessarily on 9/10/2001 that I must have been wrong and wrong for a long time.

It goes to motivation - The Clintons’ “two-fer” went a different way early - and so that I thought we would get attacked.

It goes to motivation - The Clintons’ (since Hillary claims experience qualifies her) have 9/11 their “inheritance.”

A nation that embraces a return for one or both of such a legacy and “inheritance” deserve a diminished motivation.

A nation that embraces a return for Hillary is also insane, some — 9/11 was her “inheritance.”

A nation that embraces a  return for Hillary while media trying to avoid incriminating its self - is a lesser nation.

Hillary and Bill did go a different way early and so that such as it was a diversion from my assistance - set me free.

Hillary and Bill did go a different way early - they did so and left me to conclusions that they were going to get us attacked.

Hillary and Bill don’t deserve a “return” - on 9/11 I was proved wrong for thought of 9/10 but not about Clintons’ “two-fer.”

It is ridiculous and dangerous that Hillary survived just because she was conveniently a New York Senator.

It is ridiculous and dangerous that Hillary didn’t become buried in our Senate and its seniority ways, of committees.

It is ridiculous and dangerous and quite insane that one of such a history and “experience” now back at Exec. tables.

Look at Hillary - besides that the general media concerned with incriminating themselves - look at Hillary.

I so thought on 9/10 that I must have been wrong and imagining too much for so long I drove by White House on 9/11.

I so decided I must have been wrong that if first plane on 9/11 hit White House and at that time it might have hit me.

I had thoughts of Condoleezza Rice that morning and minutes before attacks about closet doors I had installed for her.

Look at Hillary - on 9/11 I was proved right - right so that it now is better all as “Clintons’ inheritance.”

Look at Hillary - on 9/11 I was on 17th Street by White House on way to install new doors for another.

Look at Hillary - on 9/11 just moments before first plane struck NSA Rice was in my thoughts while on 17th Street NW.

It
is insane that Hillary is in another administration.  It is still quite
insane that 9/11 Commission only looked back 10 years.


I’ld wish you a simple “Happy New Year” now that it is 2012 - but our government has gone to “insane” much.

[PLEASE KEEP “CITIZEN” AND “CITIZENROSEBUD.ORG” IN YOUR THOUGHTS - YEE SUBJECTS OTHERWISE NOW.]

Comments Off
05/16/12
HARD TIMES AT CLINTONS’ HIGH?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, #QUEEN, #AUSTERITY
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:29 am

In the legend of Johnny Cash there really is a prison - a Folsom Prison.  And yet when you hear how poorly she wares MEMBERS ONLY? comes to mind - is the thought that should be landing in measured time.

It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.

First Lady Michelle Obama had a call Herculean and daunting just for the trillions the Clintons’ dietariness was costing.

First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton has been more to dressing to Marie Antoinette than to the black of Johnny Cash.

Oh, have you yet considered our times of old - say September 12 , 2001 - and how a then President Barack Hussein Obama would have stepped out?

Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes?  The all black of Johnny Cash, NOT - but maybe the hats of M. Antoinette?

First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton did more to encourage a two Big Macs a day habit than the austerity of First Lady Michelle Obama.  First Lady Hillary did seem to favor KING OF QUEENS mad dashing to a marketed acceptability of her bubba’s pre-existing condition.  First Lady Michelle as otherwise embrace labor and austerity and “twigs” for her hubbie.

Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes?  Can you imagine both in stripes?

It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.

Prison fare may suit them and even set a better example for all - even better than “twigs” for Lady Obama’s hubbie.

Word is it is costing us a trillion more than it would have - word is the Clintons dietary “leadership” raised weights and related healthcare costs for the past two decades such that a reverse of their guidance could save us a trillion dollars in healthcare costs.

But diabolical more is still the alternate realm and possibility of this President Obama as President Obama circa 9-12-01.

We have that he is a man merely of “twigs” and “arugula” but when his burger is with cheddar, arugula and Dijon mustard.  We have that he, President Obama, another of a Hyde Park with wants to New Deal Austerity for all has stayed in character theirs so.

It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.

As you wake up to this thought as if waking now on September 12, 2001 with President Obama in charge of which ever nationalism or new nationalism he might already have worked out with labors, his - would it be stripes for the Clintons, and not the flattering types? 

As you wake up to this thought asked in keeping with Obamas now decades still in character consistency so - would it be a call to austerity and apologies and as well a chiding of a suggestion to “please go shopping”?

Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes?  The all black of Johnny Cash, NOT - but maybe the hats of M. Antoinette?

Seems we can suggest that the Obamas do only know austerity for others and not in a Johnny Cash black suitedness kindly way.

But as you wake to these thoughts - and stir anew in as much curiosity to intellectual honesty as your habit or hope — President Barack Hussein Obama on a morning of September 12, 2001, left as it was actually whence, but unable to be himself and declare like or exactly:  “I INHERITED THIS MESS!!!”

NO!  You own this mess???

NO!  “I INHERITED THIS MESS!!!”

OK!  - SO LET US LOOK BACK AT LEAST THROUGHOUT THE PAST TEN YEARS - BUT LET US BE SMARTER THAN THE 9/11 COMMISSION AND NOT ONLY LOOK BACK TEN YEARS - LET US AT LEAST FINALLY LITIGATE THIS FOR YOU AND LOOK BACK AT LEAST TWELVE YEARS OR BETTER YET TWO DECADES.  IT SEEMS YOU DID INHERIT A MESS FROM THE CLINTONS’ 8 OF DANGEROUS ABANDONMENT OF AFGHANS AND IRAQI PEOPLE, IN PRACTICE,  AND SUCH AS IT IS OF DANGERS YOU SPOKE TO WITH YOUR NOBEL PRIZE ACCEPTANCE SPEECH WHEN YOU CHIDED YOUR PREDECESSORS SO ABOUT DANGERS OF INACTION AND AVOIDANCE IN FOREIGN POLICIES.  YES IT SEEMS A MESS WAS INHERITED FROM THE CLINTONS BUT REALLY IF WE LOOK BACK MORE THAN THE TEN YEARS THAT OUR 9/11 COMMISSION LIMITED ITSELF TO WE CAN BEGIN TO SEE IT ALL MIGHT NOT HAVE HAPPENED BUT FOR SCHEMING OF SADDAM HUSSEIN AND ESPECIALLY THAT RELATED TO HIS INVASION AND HOPES TO KEEP AN ALLY - KUWAIT.

A OK!

“A OK!”???

Comments Off
04/26/12
THE PERFECT OTTOMAN?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, IRAN, TWO HISTORIES, CRUSADES, #ISLAM SQUIBS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:29 am

Perhaps I should try to work on my humor.

I am fresh off catching my old Facebook friend Don Wildman’s CITIES OF THE UNDERWORLD episode on Vlad the Impaler; - Don, if you see this please pass on greetings to your wife, - an even older friend. 

As the annual White House Correspondents Dinner approaches we are at a conundrum of collusion or coup.

It seems we have an open political season now authorized upon President Clinton by President Clinton.

Why should France no longer of President Mitterrand nor Chirac allow Americans to suppose they accept Bill Clinton as the undisputed President Of The World and so of France at least to the America now of the world as we know it now?  It seems it should be unnecessary and disloyal for France now to be having a provincial election with America so still led to believe that the world and Europe accepts that Bill Clinton is the undisputed leader of the world as Americans have been told to know it.

2012 is quite different from 2008 - the years 1993-2001 actually exist in 2012 campaign and political discussions.  And so with that said I am at a loss trying to remember whom it was as the chosen leader of France - whether Mitterrand or Chirac, or both - that was Saddam’s ticket to freedom from the United States and quite nearly due to inaction and avoidance by Clintons nearly to hooking him up as if a supplier anew for a nuclear race between Iran and Iraq.

We and Afghanistan are fortunate that the global and domestic threats known and unknown still of the over reaching by just the Clintons, yet more as well by President Obama by crediting standards, are of the necessary build up to Socialism that first when working from such a condition it is better to first tease peoples with supposed freedoms in a federalism and individuality before as well working them over to a governance by an elite few in a new global socialism.

We don’t seem to be out of time.

What was meant with the suggestions in “three legs” of “stool” as of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton a chosen and confirmed vessel to a furtherance of all legs of President Clinton’s global initiatives?  How was it that President Obama seemed to be to saying we all needed the “three legs” of President Clinton, and yet be to ignoring the years 1993-2001 as if they didn’t really exist?

We don’t seem to be out of time?

Are we all back to a due consideration of “THE CLINTONS” as political blood suckers and so that the very mention of more years for either does put in question a “sovereignty” even for French people no longer governed by one or another once more willing to seemingly give Saddam Hussein absolution and safe harbor and as if to a strategy to side line the USA whence it was new to being the world’s sole superpower and to an aim to work with Saddam Hussein to a hope and change to a new Euro-centric new world order?

Much of this seems to be of years President Obama has documented with early autobiography as those years he was a young idealist with his head stuck in the works of Marx.   I don’t know even how to jest this week with President Obama being a Harvard Law grad and yet so regularly to “generalizations” when I thought lawyers are taught early and often to not generalize - it must have all started after he graduated from Harvard Law and as if a regressing or devolving, right?

There are reasons we may not like or trust the French - but none it seems actually elected since of terms coincident with the missing chapters of 1993 - 2001 of the Clintons’ intimate and inciting global “two-fer” power sharing and collusion.

If  you are a foreigner have you actually yet measured quite how much the Clintons are being presented to Americans in the world as they are told to know it as if you are all fully in support of at least President Clinton as an undisputed and unelected President Of The World and over your sovereignty too?  And, to their establishments that they are the chosen who know better how to make decisions for you?  And, to their implications that we need them because you can’t do without them?

I know where are the racists - where are the feminists?  President Clinton has declared political open season on himself and so compromised the very chartered “goodness” of a fronted “non-partisan” and “non-political” for his political and global initiative to maintaining and increasing personal power.  President Clinton has opened season on himself politically speaking as a political public figure - where at least are the racist analysts or feminists as his efforts on their face suggest he sees himself near 2/5th more a person (man) than President Obama and Madam Secretary Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?

Bill Clinton is in the room - is it a coup?  It is a conundrum that his feathers so fanned suggest that both President Obama and his wife needed him to step in and save them and as if they have proven themselves to be worth no more than as if they were each only 3/5th the person he is and was.

We have that President Obama did only maybe mention the years 1993 - 2001 critically when of accepting his Nobel Peace Prize and with his acceptance speech for “peace” — We have that at least in such speech he spoke of dangers of “inaction” and “avoidance” but not in the context of the Clintons’ 8 nor as of a pressing danger for Arizona re: immigration.  We have that at least in such speech he spoke of dangers of “inaction” and “avoidance” specifically as a warning or condemnation of the Clintons’ 8 and how their left “inheritance” to successor administration was fraught with sit reps of too few options left especially for Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan.

If the Clintons had been Vlad The Impaler and not just the political blood suckers they were/are it figures they at least would have left either President Gore or President Bush and variety of plans fully psyched through as of entrance and exit plans for dealing with Saddam Hussein so that at least future sanctions could be said or thought to actually have “BITE!”

Is it now just silly that Mrs. Clinton still waxes submissive and while fronting President Obama as needing the “three legs” of President Clinton and not just as the ottoman for her favorite Ottoman?

This is no time to relitigate the past - we can get to that later, first we must just try to remember it - we must try, try, try and try even if feet up and rings on.  This is a time to wonder as well about the Clintons and as of a conundrum as well of a complicity or naivete once of days of greater risks in French peoples choices of French leaders.  We still have that our 9/11 Commission erred simply from an avoidance to an inaction dangerous for having worked a judging of complicated histories and geo-politics for a region that plans by decades as if a selective amnesia worked (accidentally) so with a committee think to “fullness” as possible with them to metrics and data reduced to small window of “just ten years” like.

Mr. President, I may have to work on my humor — however, do you happen to have an explanation for our 9/11 Commission as of a Muslim past for it thinking that it was at all proper or wise to have just looked back ten years?

I know, it retrospect it doesn’t seem funny.

Mr. President, it does seem you, not Governor Cuomo, is the one actually in a political and partisan contest with the Clintons and as if just against Hillary Clinton aka Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.  It does seem that while it seems a boon that President Clinton has set himself up as a “public figure” anew for 2012 and so to a new political “open season” upon himself it is almost sad. 

Mr. President by appearing with President Clinton so that he could look like a caped crusader (superhero) you have let it look like you and your Secretary of State are feet up and rings on to President Clinton as if 2/5th more a person and still of the “three legs” of your vessel(s) of State.  Was it a coup or did you freely and fully admit and accept you needed President Clinton to fill in for your inadequacy as if you were and are only 3/5th of what is needed?

Mr. President now that 2012 is set to be unlike 2008 as for it seems impossible that the years 1993 - 2001 can just disappear from our consideration again — Do you yet realize or have you yet remembered that First Lady Hillary Clinton did travel the turfs of Islamic radical and crusade with inciting rhetoric and imperialistic directives, and, did then return home and collude with her husband to the most irresponsible and illogical governance of undercutting and unfunding our intelligence and defense budgets and with most political and dangerous new walls of separation between enforcement and intelligence efforts at least as per our Federal Bureau of Investigations?

Mr. President can you make a joke of the Clintons’ 8 of the years from 1993 - 2001?   I can not.  Can you responsibly put your feet up on Hillary’s “stool” any longer with any confidence or sense of sovereignty?  Can you even joke how a leader could go around the world inciting radicalism against America and then be simply to returning home to lobbying intimately for a reduction in our preparedness, safety, and securedness?

When I hear of Dracula these days I do still think of both the Clintons.  That is an old story shared first of a realization that both Clintons were when contesting your un-inevitableness, mine, from when I still a resident of our District of Columbia, and to an opened minded reading of tales of Transylvania by Bram Stoker.  It was then I read such of DRACULA and from an open minded consideration to a realization of a parallel to “Vlad” (?) as the Clintons were presenting as political blood (money) suckers - Vampires upon our naive body politic - upon our dumbed down nation of People not meant to be just “subjects.”

Yes I went to an inner city public school system kindergarten through twelfth grade - Yes, my American story is at times of an education as a white man near a minority among his classmates.  Go Governors!  Wilbur Cross Governors ROCK still.

Mr. President, yeh, what about our Governors - seems you are running against them defending their peoples powers and rights from their Creator more than you are running against a “lesser evil” megolomaniac Republican singularity.

Comments Off
04/18/12
FEED THE BEAST!
Filed under: POLITICS, AFGHANISTAN, #BLAME, #NEW_YORK
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:14 am

Bad news sells - right?

A new dark ages is upon us - no Paul Revere with a quaint and sporting alerting ride today can timely forewarn.

We have the Democrats war of choice on and in Afghanistan now breaking most of our past war records to enduring “war” run by politics and politicians.  We have that like President’s degradation of our jurisprudence we have as well that Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is also an unelected official.

It is hard to say that Secretary Mrs. Clinton is guiding in an “intellectual” or with “honesty.”  It is easy to say that both Clintons have quite a “rap sheet” of public transpondences as “liars” and “BIG LIARS” and cheapening lying a daily way.

How is a pundit today to stay true to his/her art? 

We have the Democrats were nearly of a much earlier war of choice on Afghanistan with a former Vietnam era war photo journalist as President offering a daily dishing of the photographs and the wars.

You remember Al Gore - right?

But what about President Obama and his unelected “top diplomat” so beastly it seems better she be heralded as a Secretary of War?

Bad news sells - right?

You remember Al Gore - right?

So how was the invitations to Senator Patrick Moynihan by President Clinton to the Clintons’ White House to discuss how his seat could be arranged for Mrs. Clinton not still served daily as a corrupt and dangerous political nepotism of the worst order?

I mean that is how it all seems to have gone down quietly on a Presidential down low coyness - isn’t it? 

Bad news sells - right?

We have that it is hard to speak of “intellectual honesty” and “Hillary” in the same due consideration.  Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton seems “old school” Tweadie or “Chicago” as if “brown bag” politiking globally was “diplomacy” - it seems Republicans have evolved more.

Bad news sells - right?

A new dark ages does seem already upon us.  Our Clintons are now what they are made to appear as - neither now with such vast powers is actually an “elected official.”  President Obama?  Mr. President Obama?  Are they more dangerous than our “unelected” members of our highest court?

You do remember Al Gore - don’t you?  You do remember he was a Vietnam era war photo journalist that then years later look to the world by mid 2000 to be most certainly America’s next President say on September 11, 2001? 

Bad news sells - right?

A new dark ages does seem already upon us.  Oh me oh my - how was President Al Gore not necessarily to such just as unjust war of choice on and in Afghanistan as but for our honorable un-elected highest of judges?

How is an artist supposed to stay true to his/her art?

Bad news sells - right?

It is racist and even sexist that President Obama’s unelected Secretary Clinton fronts herself now as if responsible for the successes of Secretary Powell and Secretary Rice and yet not her own failures that they and we greatly “inherited”.  She was a crusading First Lady meddling in foreign and domestic official threads and realms - she has kept her fiefdom much - but maybe only for the arranged political nepotism of past President Clinton with “politiking” on New Yorkers for his wife - and well the inappropriate existence of the Clintons’ Global Initiative. 

We have that if you look hard enough and long enough and further back than the ridiculous “back just ten years” of the 9/11 Commission at the Clintons you should be able to see the wanna bee “power couple” on a path to manipulate others and their times towards ditching Constitutionals with a shared intimate personal ambition to an over-reaching to a global AUTOCRACY OF THE CLINTONS.

Bad news sells - right?

We may be in this mess so near a new dark ages just because the Clintons have been exercising near “executive” power still while not elected officials.

Bad news sells - right?

And yes it did look like Al Gore as thought inevitable next President was to “inheriting” the 9/11 mess that President Bush and his team of duly Constitutional Constitutionally appointed associations did otherwise get seemingly surprised by.

And yes it does still seem wrong that “Senator” Clinton did seem pre-arranged of an untowards political nepotism obvious in its carpetbagging with BONUS ‘baggage’ of getting “Bill” (Bill in NYC) as a BOGO.

And yes it does still seem wrong that “Senator” Clinton just had to be paraded around the state of New York a few times by Clinton Secret Service with maxed pomp and circumstance to seal the nepotismic malfeasance, theirs.

It is hard not to see the Clintons now of a responsibility for us near upon a new dark ages as it seems it their intimate and selfish political ambitions to over-reach and max a disregard for our Constitution to them as near a Global Initiative to Autocracy of Clintons but for how President Obama has acquiesced his “un-elected” compatriots (colluders major?) (accomplices major?).

Bad news sells - right?

You do remember Al Gore?  You have considered he would have jumped the guns all over Afghanistan and been in a wider war of choice their providing the pictures and the wars - haven’t you - haven’t you already?

Is there anything “Hillary” shouldn’t be able to get away with?

How bad is it that she is taking credit for the successes of Secretary Powell and Secretary Rice and regularly tagging them with blame and fault for her own failures and as well all the failures of her shared White House but for those parts of such too “intimate” to be projected or transferred upon Republicans?

Bad news sells - right?

How is an artist supposed to stay true to his/her art now?

Comments Off