What is campaigning but warring by another more peaceful means? What is warring when the battles are clever e-battles of words and word play and more of cyber fronts and lines than armed entrenchments?
It seems global apology tours can be tagged as if radioactive in an aiding and abetting of states of ideals writ large otherwise than those of the standards of the consecrated and Constituted Law of the United States of America. It is battle logic whether of armed warring or clever more e and cyber strategery that more civil campaigning can be warring and effective to aiding and comforting known socialist foreign sovereigns.
But can Obamacare stand now or long as if a permanent Constitutional right? Seems it cannot! Seems the First Amendment protections if the ordained and established Law of the Constitution can be called upon to trump a temporary power to tax as if as a war power for a national campaign on health. Seems the Supreme Court of the United States but for “It’s a Tax” was left to nearly or effectively ruling that a few or the entire mass of Democrats had waged war on the United States Constitution and in ways to offer comfort and aid to even more socialist foreign sovereigns. Seems Chief Justice John Roberts did pass the Affordable Care Act but as if of a time when it looked like the Congress and Constitution would hold and that Constitutionalist were capable of the then an 8 fewer votes needed to quickly defeat “Obamacare.”
These are times to hunker down and consider how long we have been of a new Civil Warring in a borderless way but by the intellectual lines prescribed and subscribed by the Founding Fathers and later amending People. The battle flag standard of the Democrats and especially the Clintons seem fit to be in few characters labeled as THE CONSTITUTION MUST FALL.
The recent decisions on Voter Rights and the improperly conceived defense of marriage law have a Walt Whitmanesque concern to them and particularly the same sex marriage energy and electricity so recently telegraphed. The telegraph may have nearly been the only real electricity about the time of the Civil War and Walt Whitman choruses of odes to us of body electrics.
The Constitution is holding for now - and surprisingly for how long and seriously clever it has been warred against by the Clintons and fellow Democrats. The First Amendment is a wonder of affirmation that the Founding Fathers did unanimously subscribe the country under God by the specific Lord of the Christian calender when signing off on the articles as keyed in a legend to be measured forever as ordained and established of the Lord of the New Testament.
For now as we are at the 150th Anniversary water mark of the Civil War days of Vicksburg and Gettysburg we might miss how warring can be civil otherwise and yet as great a war threat to our union by Constitution and Amending.
There are many, I presume, who could drop Obama dimes on the Clintons to show a more historical battle history to that now briefer of an assessable strategizing of President Barack Hussein Obama. There are more than a few past comments still notable of the Clintons that as when spoken kinda needed the Constitution to fall as hoped for them not to be later also assessable for attempts to undermine with wilful purpose and intent the original and necessary import of the Law of the USA.
We all have now heard of cyber warring - yet may have to a too many been so far naively to an open flank as per a necessary consideration that such could be a new method of civil warring.
But as per Obamacare as likely impossibly unstable for Posterity unless our Constitution is amended or rewritten by a all out Constitutional Convention convening: The Federal Government has standards for polarity and with allowances that different labeling is necessary and critical at least for UL listing as we all are of a body politic of Walt Whitman’s odes of a body electric.
As the Constitution is amazingly still standing so far into the advances of socialistic sympathetic home rule in the United States of America we are wise to ask at least ourselves: How can it be that polarity can be different for electricity as per our Constitution and so as that as illuminating to how the love electricity of the body electrics don’t as well need clear and specific different labeling?
I personally am of the opinion that the Affordable Care Act is due a date back at the bench of the Supreme Court of the United States for a ruling that it is Un-Constitutional as per the First Amendment - at least. Whether you know some already too long sympathetic to the aiding and comforting of at least foreign socialist sovereigns or just have a gut feeling that the Clintons are inescapable from an innocence from a charge that they have admittedly been of attempts to undermine the Constitution it is that such is quite due a rap as if it has from its start been a e and cyber new Civil War.
The First Amendment does bar Congress from making any law like the Defense Of Marriage Act by it barring Congress from undermining the ordained establishment in the Lord of the Founders as set with marriage as just one of many “establishments” of “religion” that the Founders protected the People from as a predictable National possible perversion of what are tenets of the foundational faith of the United States of America. It seems that the Supreme Court at the time of the first challenge to the Affordable Care Act was right to not legislate from the bench and to defend piecemeal with their branch of “It’s a Tax” broadside of an allowance that the Federal Government at least temporarily must have the power to raise revenue for at least epidemic health concerns.
This Forth of July the People, like myself, as citizens of the United States of America are of experiences now suppressive to our economic much related to the sociology of a new world order too favoring to foreign more socialist sovereigns that have us effectively for now by Law as if more subjects than citizen People than yet ever before in the short history of the USA.
You can say that since the Congress is not allowed to make a Law like DOMA it has been held up that the Constitution is still standing (to the jeopardy of the Clintons) as with religion and marriages broadly lined up sufficiently still as the forest and trees of the First Amendment bar to Congress from making of any law with an interpretation of the establishments of the New Testament and its Lord of the Founders subscribing. Again we are at Walt Whitman as of his odes of bodies “electric” still to telegraph as of a Civil War. If you know your plugging and electricity you then know some at least how some apparatus allow prongs of equal size without a concern for polarity pairing, and, that for other parts of our “electricity” a specific polarity has to be wired and established and secured for those protected with different and not equal prongs so that the hot wire doesn’t go into the ground or neutral female fixture ports.
The Federal Government of the Constituting by the Founding Fathers of the just ordained and established original articles as keyed by the preamble as a legend for its metrics and reasoning was subscribed unanimously to prevent even an act or law by Congress at all to the effect that God needed to be replaced or fired or otherwise denied. Congress by the affirmation of the Constitution by the Bill of Rights is barred even from making a law saying effectively: THERE IS NO GOD.
Obamacare is killing the economy but not as a sole battle to undermine our Constitution to ease or aid and comfort more socialist sovereign foreigners. There is that now American prudence and thrift has a new National sense to it that hurts the old economy as by an right to account and assume that if it is costing now that/this much for the Government to be planning a socialist and centralized new nationalistic “caring” then even as per their neighbors one is logically to posture firstly that the federal government must already be helping our neighbors with such vast sums so that any effort really now is best spent otherwise more selfishly in a the new decreed thrift.
The recent rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States of America has re-established that the Constitution is still (to the jeopardy of the Clintons - at least) still standing and while baring stepping out to more definitively establish how even the Affordable Care Act can not be permanent and of a new bureaucracy unless the Constitution is amended or replace. The first battle of ACA at the Supreme Court did preserve the domain as that of the People and Congress to amend or overthrow such bill while it had that defined Power to be at least a Tax as if a war power necessarily though as if more a temporary power.
It has been of debate if this has been so far such a challenge to our Constitution to have been a warring and a treason with premeditation towards undermining our constitution and as of a purpose to aid and comfort foreign sovereigns long much more socialist and tyrannical.
But we have that the First Amendment can turn back the Affordable Care Act at least in so much as the electricity of federalism consistently in just the more recent rulings from the bench of the Nine of the highest Court is wired and grounded to the established polarities of the tenets as establishments of the New Testament. The recent rulings by SCOTUS do undermine the lasting footing for ACA aka Obamacare — once they ruled per Prop 8 so they re-affirmed the federalism in faith that allows only states to interpret scripture for citizens of the US.
These recent ruling have set the clock ticking against national healthcare by the adhering to the Constitution and its federalism soul as it has been considerable that the highest Court established basically that a relationship between “Holy” and “Healthy” remains of the states of the only jurisdiction to govern about the power of the seven deadly sins spirit.
It seems civil though we have been respectively long already engaged in an e-warring more cyber and borderless as if of a new Civil War to undo the Constitution when we consider that some can be called to account for strategery quite diabolical, and that Democrats now may be best to a prudence to rat and dime out other Democrats in keeping with President Obama’s bureaucratic standards for ratting out and dimming out any more loyal to others than he within any of his ranks.
Humans of Whitman’s original American odic “electricity” can hardly still telegraph such a civil war - we are of bodies electric and with blood types some more “universal receivers” and “universal donors” like of a polarity in blood like that established, governed and protected differently in electricity.
And, there are Democrats for other Democrats to loyally dime out and rat on to protect President Obama until Obamacare has to be surrendered as not Constitutionally fit for permanency for it while of a right to tax and raise revenue as if for a war as of a health epidemic is too boldly an affront to the First Amendment and its barring to Congress from any law like DOMA that attempts to violate the states’ rights in federalism as the parishes for interpretation of “Holy” and “Healthy.”
It has recently been re-established that the states own the domain for the seven deadly sins jurisprudence by the decisions recently and especially the standing determined about the Proposition 8 case — The federal government cannot until the Constitution is actually at least amended be permanently of a power to heal those the states have a duty and charge to govern in their particular faith metrics and establishments.
If it can be said to have been a willful warring at the Constitution towards a rabble rousing to undermine the establishments long secured whom is it that firstly and mostly needs to be dime’d out in the new rat em out order of the Democrat Party ranks of the Executive reach of President Barack Hussein Obama?
As long as we are so protected by the Federal establishments so ordained that keep Congress from a superior right to interpret religion and faith and as of the odic long civilly of “the body electric” he engorged us poetically and Constitutionally in ways that today keep established that different labels are necessary and proper for different polarity - for different electrical attraction energies.
Is it that former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is due a ratting from inside as much as Obama may wished loyalists to first dime out the Clintons? Is it that she with a recent suggestion that “in just five years…” the recent rulings of the Supreme Court can be undermine for Posterity has been just wrong unless she sees a way to amend the now re-established as Constitutional limits per these specific charged issues?
It seems worth sharing that after the string of recent Bench of 9 decisions that it has been secured that to change the laws of the odes for the electricity of the bodies the politics will require at least an amending to the Constitution and really nothing less.