So you are back at school, or soon back in school, and get the reference!
If the The United States of America can yet restore itself to a moral economics of growth what must you now be reared in for a reset to moral capitalism? What should they, I, or you now be asking “teachers” to be instructive of for the new year 2014-2015? Whom now but Mrs. Clinton needs to be dissected in a forensics as if of a cold case of old bones yet pathological from a so late autopsy on the economics (of so many crushed by Mrs. Clinton)?
Is it that we witnessed not a squeak - but a ROAR - by those campy of the OCCUPY civil disobedience?
We are of a new media eco-systematic where the lead much went to the HUFF-PO and Arianna Huffington for a mediacratic dissemination of a pressing of evils of banks and banking. Well, where I for sake of time management, however of flex time flexibility, left it organizationally more to AH to carry on in capitalizing on improper capitalism by BIG BANKS. The TARP of the BANKS gave moral rise to camps of the tarps of OCCUPY - can any “work” now be done in a reset for “business ethics” and per how the Obama TARP was an unjust and unfair bailout of the BIG BANKS that suffered many a commoner indiscriminately?
In a modern linguistic, a lingua franca of hip hop, the rap of such, much come of the sixties, is not yet so good as has been twained and rapped about. There are people in power now whom can be peeled back like say an onion and shown to be of the seeds of the sixties and corrupted at least in altered think or illogic since fertilized of such epochal. The “grip” of Mrs. Clinton may yet be less deadly than her hands at “diplomacy.” The tail of Mrs. Clinton is too the WAG THE DOG tales of a corruption akin to “Bill” Clinton. What President Obama was able to do with the Clintons’ economic experts as his, however, since becoming effectual while still only “President-elect” is true to a forensics where logic can dictate that since Mrs. Clinton so of priors in such primarily contested was of such same extensive promises she today would have necessarily been of all or most of the same perils in economics as we have suffered since 2008.
That decidedly exposed, per the economic culpability, of Mrs. Clinton, however, still leaves us to it, even if rapped, that Mrs. Clinton, if of a VMAs, would be of a sound track for “HARD CHOICES” of a cacophony of discordance loud as war however yet measured in beatings in a bombastic percussionary irregularity most ironic if in sotto voce. Any soundtrack for “diplomacy” of Mrs. Clinton, however since Secretary Clinton, is let of discord in war of stories to be told of her fallen below a capacity for “diplomatic solutions” - at least for a new “longest war.”
An allegorical is somehow at least that Mrs. Clinton does not have a soft touch. It is said, and arguably logically, that she is (at least) postured as a “WAR HAWK”!
As Mrs. Clinton, however unlikely ever to have become President Clinton also in a Clinton proper name while of a marriage union of its whole of the 22nd Amendment term limits post Roosevelt National prudence, was yet set up to be postured economically as President Barack Hussein Obama was with the hold-over “Clintons’ EXPERTS” it seems fair to assuage a GUILTY as much upon HRC now as ever on PBO for the trials and tribulations long suffered as of “Obamanomics”!
A little known - too little known - truth of the economic recovery of the said Clintons’ 1990s is that such wasn’t a “Clintons’” worked recovery but a wave of economic resets they inherited as otherwise already secured and tracking to be for a second term of President George H.W. Bush. I know of what I press out here in new media of this modern e-eco-system.
There is a vast, and yet central - centrist - problema to any posturing that Mrs. Clinton could yet fix what President Barack Hussein Obama has failed to fix - to even “reset.” There is that essential to the recovery of the early 1990s is that it wasn’t the Clintons responsible - that they were wrong to treat being blessed with such inherited as if such was deeded to them as theirs forever as only their success for perpetuity in any political Posterity.
A problem of the tales of the Clintons yet is how tall they are at times of false constructs to be to burying a truth of how much came from one not of any PhD and yet successful to such, in its originality, and while yet so of his early twenties and boxed as of Generation X. It is a complicated tale of economic and marketing truths of old worked synchronistically in integrated marketing where he that was most creative in originality to its engineered workable constructs in a choreographed economic growth potential didn’t need to be credited with it while it was happening - but yet — but yet, however, was carefully balanced in a Poseterity of nuancing so that if any not its say “godfather” or “father” were to claim it as of a false paternity the very “music” of such would be corrupted and effective to it to falling apart due to unethical burdens upon as too much weigh to yet stand.
The grip of Mrs. Clinton is for the record of deadly consequences. It is now too for this new year 2014-2015 that future leaders of the known world are to asking at least themselves if and how it is that Mrs. Clinton isn’t yet aware or enough conscious of the dangers of her hands at our business.
For starters for all this new year 2014-2015 we are at it that the banks haven’t seen to or lead the remedying of the injustices and unfairness of the effected Obama TARP favorings. Yet too it is that such is likely as for of the tale that they as Senator Clinton & Senator Obama did make all to nearly all the same very promises to be so engaged politically we must consider that Mrs. Clinton is no more than a female white “Obama.” Yet too it seems prudent and necessary to right how wrong it has been to however have been carrying on to letting the Clintons take credit by like burying the truths much of a recovery from before they even entered the 1992 race as it that they inherited much that was secured and tracking to be otherwise for President George H.W. Bush in a second term.
Again, I know of what I press here in speaking to a reset for business ethics as it is that I know quite personally that when in my early twenties I didn’t need to be given credit for that orchestrated to recovery originally from me, and of already at least a decade while yet so young in consideration, and so yet that though I didn’t need to be given credit whence it was so complicated that any false paternity or false claims to authority would necessarily undermine the strength of such and any further potential for it.
Mrs. Clinton if of a sound track to “HARD CHOICES” is but of noise - loud noise - VERY LOUD NOISES OF WAR! Her hands at our Diplomacy have been too deadly for too many.
His hands at economics yet prove as if real as arguably as her hands if also at the general economics too as if like a strangle hold upon any mice of such a woman. Whomever, however, we yet today are forward towards a commenced new year 2014-2015 of it unsettled and still a torch for justice how the TARP of President Barack Hussein Obama was not equitable to the People’d people generally.
I know of what I share/press here in new e-eco-mediatic-systematics of it that though I didn’t need to get the credit for that of my architecture of recovery that pre-dates the 1992 relevance of the Clintons it is that they cannot be stewards forward to any new recovery much for their reigned ruinous on the earlier recovery by taking onto themselves as if theirs what wasn’t theirs ever properly or pathologically. Any autopsy of the economic collapses should find clearly that at least Mrs. Clinton’s hands were culpable to such as if a knowing or unknowing improper gripping.
The Clintons are those most culpable, especially if to scholastic causals, for they by their selfish politics falsely hoisted themselves of a flag for recovery not originally theirs, and yet as if theirs, and, and as it is that their selfish and too spousal politics worked it so that the designed and once secured greater and broader range of the early 1990s recovery was yet politicized so that it did work for fewer people and more selfishly just for them.
Arianna Huffington, of the Huffington Post, do you concur that this new year besides anewly set up of #ClimateChange #GlobalWarming #ALARMISM is yet still morally begot to be necessarily to a review of parity and fairness of the Obama TARP as yet begotten in inequitable politics?
Arianna Huffington, of the Huffington Post, do you yet, perchance, share the ethics and generally esposed morality in those of the collective by ‘MILEAGE’ at http://bit.ly/MILEAGE - Too: That crime shouldn’t pay, and, too that Mrs. Clinton to have trouble at least with any state’s “clean hands” jurisdictions?
Is Ferguson, Missouri a God forsaken oasis in middle America where too many live as if on a reservation limited also in a fear of the Law for having to too many a body been to abstention from lawful behavior?
The national politics of such isn’t for a comparison of an unknown Mrs. Clinton and a known President Obama on race - the only comparison justified to if a Democrat has the backs of the blacks of Ferguson is yet of the rivalry of the knowable of white President Clinton and a knowable of black President Obama.
President Vladimir Putin may be spoken of instructionally if not without actual praise though too comparatively at least on marches in nationalism. It seems that President Putin can be discussed as capable of eclipsing President Clinton and President Obama. There is that President Putin has Socialism to recover from and the perils from such as per Ukraine at least of a reported 60% + of irreligious where in the western there is yet Greek Orthodoxy and the eastern there is Moscow Russian Orthodoxy.
Though I write as a white male of Connecticut of New England of the New York City general Metropolitanism of the The United States of America I write as one who share “sugar” if not “honey” in friendship knowing of Michelle Obama, First Lady, since she was in her third year at Harvard Law School. But for the hopes and dreams shared it was only in my dreams that I went back - that we went back - after she learned I didn’t discriminate because she was black.
Though I write now to suggest we must ask per Ferguson misery and tragedy if it that President Obama has his subjects backs there or otherwise if President Clinton can be said to now or ever have had such peoples backs. I know near nothing of the said new Black Panthers but when Michelle and I smiled at each other in Grendel’s of Harvard Square I was of standing in knowing Augustus A. White M.D. since I was about five years old and he of “Dr. White at your service” in a public social setting as a friend of my father’s while yet the tallest person and tallest black person I had yet or ever made such a connection.
Right! Though I know nothing of the said new Black Panthers I am one who since about age five had a friendship with he whom was of record as the original Black Panther’s physician. What I found scary about Dr. White wasn’t that he was so tall or black but that he was both a doctor and a Dr. White though black. The only other Dr. White I have known was a neighbor who cared for Veterans who let me use his Parks Bike Truing Stand, and as later learned had been a pal of George W. Bush while a Yale classmate.
For the blacks of Ferguson the politics are now that it is either President Clintons has and had their backs or that President Obama has their backs - it cannot be that they both have their backs as these two are known of a rivalry since day one that to others is so serious it is a “BLOOD FEUD.” If the incident had been of a say near 100 Lbs black female officer also called to enforce in the spirit of to serve and to protect fidelity - a near 100 Lbs black female of smaller stature of such weight so without her belt and tools of the enforcement duty - we may have cause to compare Mrs. Clinton to President Obama and President Clinton - to also compare her.
Whom among us can in a scholarly expose a proffering to it that Ferguson is like Ukraine and of problems from years of too much socialism to too much irreligiousness among its subjects? Is it that a Putinesque intervention is what Ferguson now needs? How is it that President Clinton’s trillion in cuts for surpluses maybe better explain an economic plight of Missouri blacks for of years of a leader too much in cold blooded imperial totalitarian wanton governance? How is it that President Obama can blame President Clinton for economic gross negligence and yet isn’t yet, and, now as it may be per Ferguson that such is such an economic outlier that for all the economic ruinous the Clintons’ surpluses wrought such of Missouri eitherwise yet would be just as stricken and down?
Is Ferguson a too irreligious hell hole like the now also economically depressed Ukraine, and also due to the economics of President Clinton too much at cold totalitarian selfish political decidings? Is Ferguson at all an irreligious hell hole to its own People’d peoples or has it been too long just left out and necessarily so much because the national leadership from a “top” was of the Clintons at their cutting of an extra trillion from budgeted and affordable programs to generally fating Ferguson to a new greater depressing “economics”? As I like only so far pressed concerning the tragedy of fallen Michael Brown: I queried: Was this a case of a college bound teen Michael Brown of copping an attitude for his last days in the say “‘hood” of a getting out before having gotten out and of a general like F&^@ YOU at least to those of local governance and enforcement?
President Obama in recent speaking to the issues of race and unrest seems to be borrowing the very words and import of such in “shared humanity” as I have been myself publicly of usage generally for a while. I am not offering that I have any answers and suggest President Obama if just borrowing such from me so also isn’t with answers but now maybe closer for being near possibly to better language that may bring us closer to better - or the right - questions.
The Clintons have since day one positioned themselves to be “political rivals” and only in Obama’s house as rivals of he thinking he needed them and needed a TEAM OF RIVALS. The race and economic issues of Ferguson are now essentially peculiar to either a story of rivalry of it either that President Clinton or President Obama has such subjects backs.
For both the Clinton and Obama administrations it is arguable that any of Ferguson were considered more “subjects” than “citizens.” It is unreasonable to proffer that both President Clinton and President Obama have had or do have the backs of the People’d people of Ferguson - they have firstly and continuously been of standing as “RIVALS” so any discussion must flush out the known and unknown of all knowable yet that is historical to how they have been different - to also how while different they have been more to betrayal and abandonment of such Americans even if not of a perils like Ukraine of too many too long of socialism and a nationalism to assimilation in obedience of irreligiosity in lieu of faith and community.
As President Clinton now due to be in the Ferguson HOT SEAT we have that Mrs. Clinton is an unknown as per racial oppression in Missouri while yet also of HOT SPOTS of a comparable culpability as per Russia and Ukraine, at least. It would be wrong to discuss Mrs. Clinton now as per domestic issues where President Mr. Clinton has knowns and posited in rivalry that should dominate any discussion of culpability or innocence yet for black President Obama. President Obama should too, as per Mrs. Clinton, be allowed an innocent until proven more guilty than a Clinton in regards to Ukraine, at least.
I don’t know why black President-Elect Senator Barack Hussein Obama was to coddling the Clintons or allowing an dominatrix of offer coddling by Mrs. Clinton — I don’t know why PBO both proceeded forward from the start with the economic team of Clintons’ economic experts as his “team” and while of “politics” and “office politics” of standing for the Clintons as rivals and he dependent on them so much that he so seemingly necessarily to an attempt at a legacy in administering a “THE OBAMA” yet while very publicly yet of floating the “THE CLINTON” as at least equal, or superior, and extant in a TEAM OF RIVALS.
The Clintons’ surpluses as from an extra trillion found and cut from the budgeted and then affordable may be that which best explains how Ferguson and Ukraine are now suffering so much and so vulnerable. President Obama yet embraced those of the evils of the surpluses at least as necessary evils in his TEAM OF RIVALS so that he maybe firstly should attempt to explain himself as more innocent yet and less culpable to any Executive gross negligence than at least President Clinton.
Again: The politics of race now for the nation too much to a private rivalry in totalitarian Power Clintons’ are yet beset by the possible perils of a people too yet too far in socialism to be also of a perils from irreligiosity at seemingly at least the eastern third of Ukraine.
Again: The politics of race now for the nation too much to a private rivalry have it only reasonable, for starters, that it is either that President did and does have Ferguson’s six or that President Obama did ever or does now finally.
Again: The politics are that it is not possible that both President Clinton and President Obama have the backs of the People’d people of Ferguson in Missouri of the The United States of America.
Again: The DOMINANT politics is that the “THE CLINTON” and the “THE OBAMA” are as “RIVALS” of a “DEMOCRAT” HOUSE divided.
You’ve been monetized!
On McDonnell’s farm there is a greater beast - greater beasts: “THE CLINTON” / the Clintons. Let us differentiate the monetary! Let us now, all together, litigate what should never be decided at the ballot boxes! Let us look fairly and clear eyed at the raised issues of QUID PRO QUO but as also in a historical peculiar to the bones of the Clintons. Peculiar to the Clintons is much that the issue of “THE CLINTON” isn’t yet perceived as greater of the predicament of the “THE McDONNELL”!
William Jefferson Clinton may have taken further than any President yet a wanton wayward beset firmly in a wanting more to be “KING”! On McDonnell’s farm the McDonnells are small potatoes to the strategery and practiced of the Clintons to powers to rival globally affixed as structurally quite autocratic. The “corporate” of the Clintons is quite a brand of a totalitarianism.
For Posterity we still should be asking for President Barack Obama’s college and Harvard Law School papers, and we should really be to probing the Clinton Rhodes scholarship as time spent in England towards learning how, though American, to work the think towards the possibility that an American white of the South could yet bring back a more monarchical “governance” to the otherwise yet united republic.
William Jefferson Clinton is more than and “Hillary Clinton” - William Jefferson Clinton, born William Blythe III, seems to have studied and studied towards effecting a post-Constitutional dismembering of the prudence of original Federalism of the confederated republic The United States of America. WJC seems to have a pedigree, and of his Rhodes scholarship, that was forward for establishments of anti-Constitutional new anti-Federalist root programming so that he could seem more like Thomas Jefferson but effect as if Governor George Clinton of New York, of the founding days, yet got his way.
I am not sure it matters for any “scholarship” of these issues if “Bill” is more “Larry” “Hillary” more “Mo’” and if so such then than President Barack Obama is best then “Curly.” For these purposes either quite can be any or any either other of a threesome in Curly, Larry, & Mo’. Right — we’ve all become monetized! We’ve all become at least monetized by the “THE CLINTON”!
With such a monarchical want scholarship in the pedigree of the “THE CLINTON” it may be dangerous to over-simplify any running con by a presumption that such now entertain as if slap-stick appropriate can be other than set up root to character shifting politics. It may not be what WJC was taught at Oxford but much what he learned - learned from studying under the legacy of monarchical governance for empire building.
It may be wisest to let is be “open” as if any WJC, HRC, PBO is either a Curly, Larry, Mo’ or a Larry, Curly, Mo’ or a Mo’, Larry, Curly or a Larry, Mo’, Curly. PBO though is a complication unplanned or fig’d, it seems, in the plotting and practices to Americans in totalitarianisms newly beset globally in an autocracy affected “CLINTON”!
It still seems inconvenient to the Clintons that any plan theirs however as original to scholarship by initiative of Rhodes was yet never calculated enough to plan for or prepare for a possibility that any black like PBO could become elected in between the workings for a Presidency in proper name of Mrs. Clinton through a planned succession in an ASAP from the Presidency as named proper in Mr. Clinton.
To keep this simple and yet guarded enough from the post-Constitutionals however yet covered by political slap-stick entertainment we should return to the McDonnell’s “farm” basis of the “THE CLINTON” the greater beast!
Again, the issues around being monetized are of QUID PRO QUO but more greatly of the bumbling of the Clintons!
Again, these issues are pressing and fresh at least for now balance for scales of Justice seems possible if we aren’t to litigate the Clintons and towards the prudence that such of their searchable forensic pathology is some to much quantifiable as totalitarian, at least in wants, and seemingly of a QUID PRO QUO so grand it is hard to see for its breadth and scope!
For starters there is comparison necessary and prudent with the prosecution of Governor McDonnell in Virginia as it seems reported and spoken of by Mrs.Clinton that the current Governor of Virginia, a Democrat, did so help them financially (and Politically) when said “Dead Broke” that it is hard not to tag Governor McAuliffe and the Clintons for its seems too much that he now a Democrat Governor, somehow, in comparison was like to buying the Clintons a house or two.
Right! Where does President Barack Hussein Obama fit in here as to a “Curly, Larry, & Mo’” too Political while yet seeming so specifically and peculiar more just to the Clintons? Simply PBO is aiding and maybe abetting the seeming wanton of the Clintons by offering distractions when he and his Justice Department should be practicing enforcement upon the “THE CLINTON”!
It is too late to now leave Governor Rich Perry out of this. I agree that some matters are to be left to the ballot boxes and eschewed from litigation. But, this however is quite peculiar in it of a Clintons peculiarity such that a litigation (and Congressional probe?) is necessary and proper as fitting issues apparently disqualifying for ballot box decidings.
The vast emoluments so pecuniary in a pre-specified monetary in valuation for Clintons speaking are numerous in stand alone examples of the “THE CLINTON” of practicing a “Politics” of everyone now being monetized to them!
Not in a defense of Governor McDonnell, so offered, these are yet points of order for balance in Justice here so checked and pressed. It seems that a “speaking” by an of the “THE CLINTON” now is priced to be of them of greater importance and Powers now than when the “First Couple” of a People’d peoples allowance per year as less than now what they demand for nearly a single hour.
President Barack Hussein Obama has too much and for too long participated in this so entertained yet as a charade not an actual improper “cover-up” so that now and forward he must be either Curly, Larry, or Mo’ to “Bill” and “Hillary” however!
More history to the imbalance now beset in the defense of Governor McDonnell is at least the story to how it seemed arranged in the Clinton White House that a New York Senate seat would be bought for Mrs. Clinton.
Too: It is a matter of record, for these improprieties posited, that President Clinton, while not content with a post-office taxpayer payed rental allowance, when yet he asked for more per year that that as a total for all past Presidents’ annuals combined, was yet to compromising the “Senator” for Mrs. Clinton, by asking his BIG BANK associated for gratuities in thanks for his having made them so much money in the story of his having pushed them into derivatives “gambling” as towards quantifiable emoluments towards a reported near one million per year “rent” necessary if he was to get the near regal spacious quite like penthouse leasehold in the Carnegie Hall Tower high above the RUSSIAN TEA ROOM.
Too: It is much searchable for a forensic pathology of the Clintons as too clever, still, it seems with “HUG IT OUT” and other slap-stick distractive politics that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES offer a $1-2 Trillion spectrum of “corruption” that at least offers 1 Trillion unit points per dollar to counter any “claim” of “charitable” now or ever of the “THE CLINTON”!
Right! How can the Clintons speaking funds if funnelled through the Clintons’ Global Initiatives as for “charity” be for “charity” if their personality and past record, however publicly yet clear, speaks loudly in a contrary? It may be a stretched to posit that the record speaks loudly to it that the Clintons have always seen people as to be monetized and that any money “politically” through them is always firstly as “patronage” and lastly at all “charity”!
Right! It so may not be a stretch at all. After all a learned perspective on the 1 Trillion in unit points per dollar of the Clintons’ SURPLUSES barks out - even roars - of impropriety towards QUID PRO QUO recklessness!
Right! It so may not be a stretch at all. After all a learned perspective on the 1 Trillion in unit points per dollar rest as of the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of a time when the politics generally and the economics globally and locally had no peculiar need for surpluses by cutting an extra trillion but that peculiarly of the selfish spousal politics of the “THE CLINTON” of needing to prove they could find as much as the Republicans had yet found to balance the budget.
Right! It is hardly a stretch which so much now far more public and out about a “real” Clintons! It seems that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES were only needed by the “politics” spousal and selfish of the Clintons, and even despite their “totalitarian” wants to global autocratic Powers in a worked “Post-Constitutional” “working” “philosophy” of “governance”! Without finding an extra trillion to cut after the Republicans has worked responsibly to find a first trillion to cut to balance the budget it is essentially an inconvenient fact for the Clintons that their seeming “need” for the vast irresponsible cuts of an extra trillion was to protect the “THE CLINTON” to protect any planning and plotting in said “his” Presidency to protect yet a set up for “her” Presidency.
Too: Simply: Essentially: THERE WAS NO “CHARITY” IN THE CLINTONS CUTTING OF AN EXTRA TRILLION DOLLARS FROM THE BUDGETED AND AFFORDABLE! THERE WAS COLD BLOODED AND SELFISH CRUEL ECONOMIC DESTRUCTIVENESS THAT BRIDGES, NECESSARILY NOW TO THAT WHICH SHOULD BE LITIGATED EVEN AS SO CONFUSED AS LIKE “QUID PRO QUO” BETWEEN SPOUSES WHILE ALSO TOO MUCH AS IF NEPOTISM - AS IF NEPOTIC! THERE IS SUCH AN ABSENCE OF “CHARITABLE” IN THEIR SURPLUS EFFECTING THAT ANY SPEAKING FEE NOW SO HOWEVER IN A PER HOUR IN EXCESS OF THEIR OLD PER YEAR COMPENSATION AS “FIRST COUPLE” THAT JUST THEIR “SPEAKING FEES” PRESENT AS EMOLUMENTS PECUNIARY OF A SEARCHABLE FORENSICS OF THEM AT A TOTALITARIAN MONETIZING OF EACH PERSON AND THEIR OWN “VALUE” AS BILLED “SUPERIOR”!
Too: Right! This is yet too much accepted as unequal or yet greater assaults on proper governance. Right! PBO is under the arm of contempt for the Peoples House by litigation by suits and such is only the tip of the bulge of the breached Constitutionals of the “THE CLINTON” of which an inappropriate “COVER-UP” has been uncovered and moved “officially” towards prosecution from that yet kept too much as acceptable politics in slap-stick.
Right! To keep it simple for starters as balance becomes the issue of a prosecution of any McDonnell’s “farm” the Clintons expected, it seems, to be safely now in a “post-Constitutional” United States of America that was to have been entertained and laughed away from considering them of impropriety and willful undermining of prudent Constitutional “politics”!
Right! To keep it simple: Yes look at what William Jefferson Clinton tried to learn at Oxford as a Rhode Scholar and specifically if different and more towards a totalitarian practicable than what was curricular as of a lesson plan. Yes look now beyond these three bold examples of the “THE CLINTON” as at a think that every person must be monetized by their self valuation for political influence and global patronage.
Right! Beyond all the seeming ready examples of the Clintons at “money” in improprieties far worse than any Republican Governor Bob McDonnell yet seems accused we still should be first most worried as to them globally of patronage, however naively forgetting “no such thing as permanent friends or enemies - just permanent interests” (like) when Mrs. Clinton, however now, presents herself as if prime for Presidential politics because of the number of foreign leaders she, at least, is already now in bed with. See it is still to be mostly or generally reported how any so name dropped by Mrs. Clinton is yet a friend much just because of emoluments flowing as “patronage” covered however at times as “charity” to the people or the causes of the people whose names she is dropping for benefit at home for of foreign influence Power.
Right! It is that a cover-up has been found to have occurred and such is now near ready for a prosecution more litigation such as is proper to prevent inappropriate candidates from corrupt advantage in the ballot boxes. For now it is too much a “CURLY, LARRY, & MO’” where WJC is called up as HRC’s character reference and while HRC yet is slamming into PBO and then as if comedic to a “HUG IT OUT” acceptable or believable comity.
Right! FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!
Right! FOLLOW THE MONEY - ESPECIALLY THE MONEY THAT FLOWS AS IF “BILL’S” WHILE YET ALSO TOO MUCH AS IF “HILLARY’S” AND/OR PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S CONTROLLED!!!
Right! FOLLOW THE MONEY BUT DON’T EVER FORGET TO LOOK AT THE SIMPLE AND A LOGICAL IN A PATTERN OF THE CLINTONS, AT LEAST, OF A “PHILOSOPHY” AND “MOTIVE” IN THEIR MEANS AND OPPORTUNITIES. DON’T FORGET TO LOOK BEYOND A SEEMING INNOCENT COMEDIC FOR SERIOUS THREATS TO THE CONSTITUTION THAT EXPLAIN A WHY THE CLINTONS SO LONG WORKED TO HAVE A YET MORE CONVENIENT TO THEIR PURPOSES NEW AMERICA OF A NEW “GOVERNANCE” IN A YET REVOLUTIONARY NEW “POST-CONSTITUTIONAL” ATTITUDE!
Right! As per “balance” to the charges at least against Governor Bob McDonnell (R) mustn’t we consider how implausible that $250,000.00 for an hour of speaking can be for “charity” and not more “patronage” just because the 1 Trillion unit points per dollar in the Clintons’ cutting unnecessarily of an extra trillion for surpluses was not at all “charitable”?
And, again isn’t it that WJC essentially arranged from the The White House while President “Bill” Clinton the buying of a New York Senate seat as a improper “gift” to Mrs. Clinton? And again as PBO plays along too much in a comedy too slap-stick how do any fairly explain any “proper” in President Clintons’ asking the BIG BANK “FOB” for rent gratuities as emoluments freely towards an annual near penthouse rent as not also improper at least for “MONEY” in a marriage as for seeming “influence” at least of/for a New York Senator?
Right! It seems now that President Barack Hussein Obama is trapped in an inconvenient trio of a politics befitting prosecution for such if of concerns that experts are supposed to investigate before lay can rightly trust a candidate or ballot boxes!