May Day has passed.
As we stare down remnants of our recent Memorial Day here in America “Americana” is or is not a left-over.
A long view towards a fresh self-helping all about our confederated republic is now a view towards November.
It may be more telling to a new HOPE - a NEW HOPEFUL - that Ann Romney has two Cadillacs than that First Lady Michelle Obama is farming out austerity - tilling a new agri-state for all with shovel fulls from our White House.
We should have expected trouble - troubling leadership from an American born William Blythe III - especially after learning of such having sought English lessons. We should have been forewarned by one taken to the last name Clinton as well for history we could have learned from of the time of Governor Clinton of New York State that necessitated Hamilton Madison and Jay to works as Publius.
Independence Day is coming. Long live Independence Day! Was Oxford the best place for a new Clinton to learn to be more directed to Autocracy or totalitarianism? For a Clinton born a Blythe there must have been a predominant penchant for our revolutionary days yet so for one then less of a special relationship but a relationship non the less. If he wanted to keep control of the BOUNTY shall we say he had better been wise to ways early American of such as other Governor Clinton above mentioned - he had better learn to appear different and differentiated from his command wants - so it seems.
It is clear as day that our summer is started with our fresh faces of our Executive much ado about austerity and home grown.
Pie may spoil President Obama’s diet - but weren’t we led to believe in Clinton as a two Big Mac & two packaged McDonald’s apple pie a day Executive? We can warm to Michelle Obama, First Lady of our United States of America, actually of a maternal rule with kitchen and baking time as still we can’t really for Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.
We have not heard though of a REZCO PLANTATION or a REZCO VICTORY GARDEN in Hyde Park or that the four car garage of the Obama Chicago Estate largely dedicated to field and garden passions or dedicated self-help American self reliant particular tilling. We do have that Ann Romney by having two Cadillacs stands in Americana as an American Women who wouldn’t have let her husband, if means were present, to let her standards fall to disgrace of an industrial and conceptual failing.
May Day has passed and only some of our Memorial Day echoes now to a long view forward with left-overs.
May Day has passed and we have that “homegrown” for our Obama’s seems maybe a very new thing.
May Day has passed and you too can consider a women with two Cadillacs knows a private save of General Motors might have been a new chivalrous for her husband and/or his ilk and not of a new necessary hailing towards totalitarianism or a “Big Government” take-over. It does seem clear we are of a 2012 long view now with two very distinctly different economic theory views and so too a public - private governance workings. We do seem to be much of an age essentially called to a buffet Americana or less so much newly to a serving or service to a new federalism.
I do not know if you know your state’s Governor’s name - the name of your neighboring state’s Governor or your neighboring town or cities mayor. You may be in too limited a minority if you actually do.
I am not a one to mess with that 2012 is also the year of the women - both types of women.
We can say that we wouldn’t have had THE FEDERALIST PAPERS without Governor Clinton, and, we can say that we would be now to this essential NEW FEDERALISM but for Governor Clinton (President Clinton - of a Presidential wants too much as Gov. Clinton earlier kept to New York empire wants).
President William Jefferson Clinton was born William Blythe III & and earlier Governor Clinton of New York that gave rise to a mediated need for such as was of Publius moniker for Hamilton Madison and Jay was of the era too post our Revolution as was Fletcher Christian of THE BOUNTY and the questionable leadership and commanding nature of Captain William Blygh.
I am not a one to mess with that 2012 is also the year of the women - both types of women. Clearly there are many actual now expert in the liberal feminism model and as well in the conservative feminism model. I am likely (hopefully) still a man of the middle - but you too may now be puzzling as to this for 2012:
THE MIDDLE OF WHAT?
Two Cadillacs suggests a women that wouldn’t have let her car company of shared standards actually fail - and how.
A gardening by First Lady Michelle Obama does till austerity and how - but did she ever have a garden before?
THE MIDDLE OF WHAT? - RIGHT!
We do still much have the leadership of President Clinton to worry ourselves about - even more so than Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William J. Clinton - why have they created as much a need for THE FEDERALIST PAPERS now as an earlier Governor - Governor Clinton once of New York State did himself?
Is it just the misses Clinton of serving up such a need for a NEW FEDERALISM - reactively against her philosophy and practices in governance? And, how have we gotten here, so far dangerously along to here now, for one once so of a Rose Law Firm while her husband was Governor that even that job for her seemed of political nepotism and affirmative action?
As we stare down remnants of our recent Memorial Day here in America “Americana” is or is not a left-over.
Mr. President we are becoming concerned that you have partaken of Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton’s laudenum.
Enough about New Jersey! Have you heard the one about how President Bush’s spending saved us from a new Great Depression?
Enough about New Jersey! Mr. President you haven’t been having too many of those poppy seed bagels with extra poppy seeds, again, have you?
This is one of the first weekends - at least it seems a first full weekend - since New York City has been generally and civilly a new kind of Eden. Yes, dare I say it is still a place where snakes do play.
You may not be able to park in a park or smoke in a garden - it may even be illegal for excessive PDA in any parked vehicle anywhere public within this new Eden’s city limits. If you have got salt may it be literately as a metaphor for sea-worthiness and grit.
If your apples are in a barrel still beware of bad apples and Bernoulli. It is better to avoid flight - lift offs with bad apples, anywhere. Note to self: Hmmm? Again, how was it you once heard Bernoulli Principle as also about economics and determinings for bad apples? Hmmm? How was that again?
We have it self evident that Memorial Day was created equal to Independence Day as a day goes except that it more often can partake to a three day weekend pressing. How are the Cider Rules - how goes our Declaration of Independence still?
We have it a concern though that President Barack Hussein Obama on his special inaugural day did commence from our historical Philadelphia full of brotherly love but for our Declaration of Independence. It was clear on that day that he might as well not like Memorial Day as too much like Independence Day and also of a celebration of our Declaration which he declared we could do without now when of his own declaring that we needed a new “Declaration.”
Enough about New Jersey! I don’t know how New York City has beaten it to being a new Eden - a new more civil “apple.”
Enough about New Jersey! Can’t yet figure why President Obama passed on credit for spending that saved the world from a new Great Depression on to President Bush, and especially to so publicly preface our Memorial Day Weekend 2012.
Mr. President we are becoming concerned that you have partaken of Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton’s laudenum.
New York City may clearly now be being less about what you do as per PDA than where you do it - where you cannot do it.
Enough about New Jersey! Have you heard the one about how President Bush’s spending saved us from a new Great Depression?
Enough about New Jersey! Mr. President you haven’t been having too many of those poppy seed bagels with extra poppy seeds, again, have you?
Well Afghanistan - there’s another story! Yikes! Afghanistan - there’s another story!
You have figured that since inaugural day Obama declaration that we needed a new Declaration he is figurable to dislike Memorial Day more than Independence Day - as for it so long a monumental holiday to struggles to defend and protect what our Independence Day more just about a conception for - for all more equally.
The New York City Council has counciled all to new ways of counseling. The where of such new abouts may be more a concern, civilly, than the habits natural otherwise on display or in the air publicly as of displays of affection.
I don’t know what this says about Chicago or NATO of Chicago and President Obama about Afghanistan.
Happy Memorial Day Weekend - Long live our Declaration of Independence! It does figure President Obama must dislike Memorial Day more than Independence Day. I don’t know why his Cairo speech as SPEECH TO THE MUSLIM WORLD had him a Civil War denier of our American Civil War except as maybe an import to progressive movement liberal theology speechifying to avoid speaking of great losses of mostly white men in struggles for freedoms for others.
In President Barack Hussein Obama’s SPEECH TO THE MUSLIM WORLD from Cairo as approved with all desired edits of Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton’s political capability we still have that he told the world that American slaves got out of their bondage “peacefully and without violence.”
This Memorial Day Weekend as per our new globally reset economy of such New Deal Austerity we have that President Obama with his recent “spending” thrift claims has missed the boat of Laffer’s titillating curve civility all the while seeming to pass credit for the actual spending for “save” from new Great Depression to President Bush and his too generous and unprecedented cooperation during transition months of 2008.
Off the gang plank he went - off the short plank he took too long steps - however he seems all wet now on his own “economics” - his own governing without a budget his.
Emboldened and secured in our Declaration of Independence whether liked or not is the pride and story of our first capitalists of Plymouth Plantation. We have that they learned some basic taxation civility and all the while then too of too much expected to be earned and just passed along to others thousands of miles away and distant.
Mr. President we are becoming concerned that you have partaken of Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton’s laudenum.
Enough about New Jersey! Have you heard the one about how President Bush’s spending saved us from a new Great Depression?
Enough about New Jersey! Mr. President you haven’t been having too many of those poppy seed bagels with extra poppy seeds, again, have you?
Well Afghanistan - there’s another story! Yikes! Afghanistan - there’s another story!
This Memorial Day Weekend we all would do better to discuss the current global warming climate change crisis and the vast deposits of rare earth minerals discovered in Afghanistan just as a global need for such to maintain or save our green tech businesses rolls in the hay of our politics and economies.
President Barack Hussein Obama - who is maybe our first President to have publicly denied the efforts not peaceful or non-violent that is our shared history of at least our Buffalo Soldiers and the entirety of our Civil War is now more critically a spokesperson with thought economic impact who has left the recent staged battlegrounds of a G8 Summit and NATO Chicago gathering without a declaration of the current progress mostly his in saving the entire planet from the professed end of the world as we know it for the world as he proffered it as our actual world and the DOOM about our climate due to warming.
Enough about New Jersey! Have you heard the one about how President Bush’s spending saved us from a new Great Depression?
I mean if you get the Laffer titillating curves as per maximizing public benefit and performance than you may be more economically agile and adept than President Barack Hussein Obama.
As he shifts his pride from having saved the world from a new Great Depression onto President Bush for actually having figured and done most of such spending during those months of unprecedented and civil cooperation during a transition we have that he has missed how taxing he has been and how discouraging his otherwise preening public has been.
Enough about New Jersey! How about this new Eden that is New York City this Memorial Day Weekend?
How about it New York? Have you figured out JOBIAN ECONOMICS so I can start to explain it better to others?
As President Obama traipses too State’s rights to over-lord we have that you all can celebrate Laffer and his more civil and titillating curves still adrift to sail with free markets in the spirit of Adam Smith and selfish pursuits best. I don’t know if a apple of creationism is depressing for some and now as the apple of New York City more civil otherwise for all.
As per some simple truths evident expectant or pregnant in all economics each may see JOBIAN ECONOMICS more selfishly or specifically robust of a more individualistic supply and demand public display.
This is a brave new day in a new world order for those of the apple that is manicured and fertilized as an Eden of NYC.
Not all apples maybe be as bitter as a granny - your granny smith - and some may not at all be depressing.
Enough about New Jersey! What about Afghanistan - what about our success rate to saving our planet?
We the People of the United States of America did just participate in two summits and yet now without an economic plan less taxing to a new economic modeling for Afghanistan as a new great frontier with new world orders for rare earth minerals needed to sustain and celebrate energy independence.
We the People of the United States of America did just participate in two summits and yet now without an economic plan less taxing to a new economic modeling for any of G8 specific to a current DEFCON concern status for the fate of the world as per the long proffered DOOM to the professed end of the world as we know it declarations so taxing to our economies.
Mr. President we are becoming concerned that you have partaken of Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton’s laudenum.
New York City may clearly now be being less about what you do as per PDA than where you do it - where you cannot do it.
Enough about New Jersey! Have you heard the one about how President Bush’s spending saved us from a new Great Depression?
In THE WORLD OF O? I mean we have a President that on a global stage acted as if a Civil War denier and before that of his proffered professing as a former Constitutional Law Professor that we needed a new declaration. I mean we have that this law studies hare of a racer isn’t looking to finish well and as we have he as “most taxing” so contrary to Laffer and his public displays.
We still have Adam Smith - at least in our text books - but what are our minimum standards for a President at least as per “economics” or “budgets”? How will Texas text book boards be allowed to tell the tale of President Barack Hussein Obama?
In THE WORLD OF O? I mean if he had succeeded as he had commenced both as a “messiah” shouldering a call to a different Declaration and such and with his Big Brother seeming secular daily interruptions of regular scheduled broadcasting to near an hour of evangelizing sermonizing spewed out globally to not being of violating our 1st Amendment for his tense timing was to new laws to religiousness and establishments as per religion but in a future tense not seemingly literally forbidden.
In THE WORLD OF O? I mean if he had succeeded as he had commenced what would he have called it - how would we now be addressing him? It is clever in a Constitutional Law kindly way that our 1st Amendment seems to allow a messiah to rise to a new religion and a new evangelizing governance with laws then allowed to respect such as an establishment for until or unless such revolution seeming secular otherwise were to succeed it couldn’t be a “religion” nor of existing “establishment” as per “religion” - quite.
Happy Memorial Day Weekend - Especially if this finds you in New Jersey - in its politics of this week - Happy Memorial Day Weekend where ever you are and this column may have found you still celebrant but monumental in memorials to our fallen and our long struggles for freedom for us and for others.
Enough about New Jersey! What about Afghanistan - what about our success rate to saving our planet?
Enough about New Jersey! How about this new Eden that is New York City this Memorial Day Weekend?
How about it New York? Have you figured out JOBIAN ECONOMICS so I can start to explain it better to others?
Sure Cory Booker has potential to a INTERNATIONAL PLAY BOY - even a LAST INTERNATIONAL PLAY BOY.
He may be being too modest. He may be the world of economist dream boy at least - a real GO TO GUY - man’s man.
By now you all should be versed in JOBIAN ECONOMICS some how - some way. You should have already had the inkling that Mayor Booker a leading man - leading political figure in our new economics. He may be both the anti-Clinton and an anti-Obama.
Mayor Cory Booker may know his city well enough to be successful but not know yours well enough to be a cookie cutter one size fits all obamanation for you and yours of your community.
In contrast to President Bill Clinton who worked to be an international play boy we still have Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary President wanna be, almost like clockwork to be playing a bad cop to his old jolly good cop in otherwise bad times.
Yes we have President Clinton in contrast to Secretary Clinton — both are in contrast to Democrat Mayor Booker in many ways and maybe more than now Governor of New York State Andrew Cuomo.
Like in the realm of international play boys we have many contrary ideals seemingly able to exist as only drugs allowed so much of pop America 60s ideologies to.
Unlike Governor Cuomo Mayor Cory Booker to a miracle doesn’t personally have to unlearn so much from days of the Clintons 8 and now learn new ways that can actually work long term for New York. Mayor Booker was schooled and of an era of LIVEABLE CITIES and moves to decentralize policing to COMMUNITY POLICING but I should leave to he now how it is that Governor Cuomo to a New York Cuomo miracle has to find ways contrary to ways of Clintons and their 8.
(I have not met Mayor Booker but one of his past Deputy Mayors (title?) and I did meet back in 90s when he was working in New Haven about Community Policing and Liveable Cities Initiatives and to hosting a road trip to Richmond, Virginia for volunteers like myself interested in putting in some time helping rebuild a black neighborhoods church that had been a victim of arson. I do believe they were law classmates. I, again, have been thinking some of Community Policing since late 80s when I learned of William Bratton and became wired with him to positive change shared ambitions, and then my days back actually living and working in New Haven as such was new policies to new practices. Yes, last I checked his former Deputy is still a Facebook friend.)
President Obama is more a dud than a dude as a believable International player - he today ran into problems that even fifth graders wouldn’t likely - even some Sesame Streeters skilled at seeing which thing doesn’t belong with the others. President Obama now has historical troubles as per Afghanistan as of today with his NATO grandstanding. He has presented our involvement and his strategizing as if it couldn’t have been any or much at all Bush’s fault but that which he just inherited from the Clintons’ 8. As per “Sesame Street” it does seem inappropriate with these truths now slipping from Democrat Party cover-up that Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary, has any logical or appropriate “calling” to any involvement now regarding at least Afghanistan.
With Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton involved at all we are so “tilted” and so irregular that our Central Intelligence Agency is better to be retitled at most our CENTRAL INFORMATION AGENCY. We with Clintons so preposterously proffered still as reasonably innocent are not of an “intelligence” as per our discussions at least about Afghanistan.
We need a Cory Booker in every city for JOBIAN ECONOMICS to be to the long awaited return to growing economy.
We don’t need Cory Booker in every city and town - we need a Cory Booker also of actual community sensitivities and global awareness for each. Each and all need someone who can also hear or see those of struggles too great that their faith shouldn’t be that tested alone and work magically at least to help one neighbor find another neighbor and maybe a way to earn and even profit, each, with one or more then to seeing a struggle that if helped with could be to economic gains for all.
I have said before that we may want to get back to Adam Smith economics of “Invisible Hand Theoreticals” and that we are now of a time and economic condition where we cannot use Adam Smith to get back to Adam Smith. We seem to be of a new time now and because grandstanding national Democrat leaders did work too hard to be international global play boys.
If you have ever heard of or spoken the creed of the Jaycees - Junior Chamber of Commerce - you may be near a creed that Mayor Cory Booker has specifically developed and worked out in practice - past the theoretical. I don’t know if Mayor Cory Booker has ever been a Jaycee himself. I did in late 80s and early 90s consider that the Jaycee creed did seem similar to Adam Smith economics. But now we may need to call it all something new to balance how for too long some that raced to the top like hares of O’Hare have been beaten by themselves so that tortoises are out pacing them. We could all be to calling it a JOBIAN ECONOMICS and in part for it also seems to raise Steven Jobs and our new Jobian tablets and some of the many ways some could and should suggest this Obama administration has been of obamanations with their picked economics and politics as so wrong for a new economy with so many with so many tablets.
Our President is not being intelligent suggesting with NATO at all to an “it is all Bush’s fault” and with the history of the matter that he so has positioned himself to focusing on the very problems that the Clintons left as an inheritance to President Bush.
It seems if we are to find a way back to a growth economy we are better to be listening to Mayor Cory Booker than Governor Andrew Cuomo or either of the Clintons or President Obama. We are of a time of complaints about “austerity” but that again is a problem theirs as per “intelligence” and from their use of central information dissemination e-works to have been of hopes to a Big Brother evangelizing to Obama Zombies with their pad connections. We are of a time of complaints about “austerity” when the intelligent know to remember this started to a new conservationism to help save the planet from an end of the world as we know it due to global warming or climate change.
We are, as many fifth graders now eighth or ninth graders can recall, of days remembered, where they were all patriots, even more than Democrats hearts could imagine, with the evangelized e-messaging by hopeful President Obama so their new godly calling, and the school worked new conservationism revolutionizing to an actual effective austerity otherwise a globally patriotic new conservationism that obviously was more important a priority of our President and his visible hands of governance than a policy actually not to austerity - a policy actually towards the future and growth with confidence that our colleges at least were already well along on working on necessary engineering solutions.
It is more just an odd centralized information servicing this admin has been to and as concerning today as on any day due to NATO gathering to decide the fates of so many others. It is necessarily just a centralized informing contrary to a historical intelligence that we have all been now at least three years victims to.
A remembered part of the Jaycees Creed is “service to humanity is the best work of life.” I cannot myself separate such from a consideration of Mayor Cory Booker nor from my suggestion that “JOBIAN ECONOMICS” is what we are now unfortunately of struggles with. I can with some confidence suggest that we have been of Democrat Party nationalistic centralizations more of misinformation than intelligence and that they have worked us to a separation from Adam Smith’s economics and as well from much long of our junior chamber of commerce such as the Jaycees still carry torches for humanity with.
It does seem there can be no Cuomo miracle for New York State that doesn’t necessarily repudiate the Clintons and separate Cuomo politics from Clinton politics.
It does seem that every city, town or hamlet now needs their own Cory Booker in ways that only Newark can be an incubator for Mayor Cory Booker success otherwise. They need their own Cory Booker for a clone won’t relocate well - they need one willing to do “the best work of life” and be of “service to humanity” in what could be a JOBIAN ECONOMICS at least as a descriptive theoretical for these times of struggles.
It is not “intelligent” that we are letting this un-elected political appointee Clinton have so much power and sway as her “two-fer” also may be effecting quietly over our young and inexperienced President. We are not being “intelligent” for letting this obamanation of a “diplomacy” ours so about NATO and Afghanistan be so of either Clinton involved since it was the inheritance they left President Bush with their eight years of abandonment with avoidance and inaction that was of the heart and sole of the mission President Obama was grandstanding to today, just today with NATO and globe watching.
Yes it seems they have been misinforming us - it seems the INTELLIGENT understanding is that we need to be doing this now because the Clintons played too much back whence - that we need to be doing this now because the Clintons didn’t do it earlier - we need to be doing this now because the Clintons let it get so bad that it is quite horrible still what the “inheritance” they left us and President Bush actually was.
President Barack Hussein Obama with his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech did at least play at chiding the Clintons and their eight years while speaking of “dangers” of “avoidance” and “inaction” but now again he seems to be back to playing with cover-ups for the Clintons and misinformation than intelligence.
Can you find your own Cory Booker? Do you have one sensitive and intelligent enough to help those with great struggles find others about them able to help them and work with them without compromising their story and seeking and to a benefit commercial for each together?
We can not expect to use Adam Smith economic theory to get back to a workable Adam Smith economics, can we?
Some times love just doesn’t arrive in time.
Other times there may have been an attempt to politicize and delay for politics.
We have that we are still of a time of Clinton - yet these are not now “just Bill being Bill times” innocent.
Feckless may be less appropriate than another suggestion to Un-Constitutional “over-reaching.”
But we have words for such.
But we have words for such.
Word?
We may want to avoid “chauvinist” for starters - this is maybe too personal a saga to lead with.
We may want to start with “leach” for to avoid avoiding the implicit attempt to Carnegie Hall Tower regality.
You too may not be able to avoid “megalomaniac”!
But in the name of the Clinton are we to use of “racist” politically speaking for “First Black President” of Harlem Clinton?
Are we of a dangerous hanger-on not of (innocence) once of “just Bill being Bill” with Bill still stepping on Hillary’s toes too.
We have that in the name of the Clinton - globally are initiatives to be to people more to an “in the name of the Clinton” than laws.
Are you of the Party of Clinton? or are you of the Party of Obama?
Do you mind the apparent racism and chauvinism of Bill?
Do you mind the apparent racism and chauvinism of Bill to grandstanding and revivals for all to be still to an “in the name of the Clinton”?
This is not a happy place for most Americans and Greeks these days - even Italians now too.
This is a time of the two trillion cut by Clinton with one of such too much to the “in the name of the Clinton” such that it has been of spending cuts found to have been for necessary not disposable budget items.
This is a time of the one trillion cut by Clinton politically for SURPLUS popularity that is proving to be costing us near three to four trillion or such to get back in to our budgets as missed missing necessary spending.
Who in the BBD needs more now in the name of the Clinton?
[Note: this column is now first draft and near half way thought to and composed with me now having a schedule to keep — look back later for return to the words to discuss the words more appropriate to such still too much in the name of the Clinton. I’ll be back to this as soon as I can - but won’t be near computer again until at least late afternoon.]
{When Clinton had to leave office - our office of the President - for what ever reasons - his pals all were wrong to work together in such spirit to help him find ways to stay relevant so specifically as if a shame that he was too young to stop getting to be President still - The Clintons’ foundations and specifically the CGI were conceived of in an extra-Constitutional over-reaching especially for its day. We haven’t had a normal president since such former President was set up to stay powerful and global of such international and domestic entanglements beyond our fair terms writ terminology. We haven’t had a normal President since former President Clinton set up so even less than he had worked to and hoped to be able to be globally daily to a extra-Constitutional over-reaching very much to a regular “in the name of the Clinton” structuring of actual and real power.}
On today Friday this May in the Year of our Lord two thousand ten and two we have that our personal lives have become too commercialized. We could now see a counter cultural demonstrative with new bumper stickers like with “WHO THE BBD NEEDS FACEBOOK?” (with “BBD” short for Biden’s “… Big Deal”).
More concerning is the “LEAN FORWARD” - “LEAD FROM BEHIND” - Anti-Christ factor.
Once upon a time in America - yes, in America - morals were taught as well as discretion.
Once upon a time in America - yes, in America - people didn’t need to be so taxed to create jobs - they did just buy more magazines - glossy pictures and all with post men and women and subscriptions with people paid for their goodness or whatever they had subscribers to that was their worthiness so.
How have we come to this year 2012 as yet another since our original ordaining and subscriptions to our Constitution whence so in that early “Year of our Lord” not too far back now, maybe, from this Year of same Lord two thousand ten and two?
We have with the Facebook IPO today a commercialization and valuation of our personal lives - we have that with a valuation for them of such machine domination we should now be expected to have a “value” key and duty for each of our “friends” - we should have our own “FRIENDS TICKER” with a dollar sign or symbol of appropriate currency to show a monetary value for each friend listed and with ranking options - highest first - lowest first - most depreciated - most appreciated in past week - friend of the day - friend of the week - friend of the month - friend of the year - like…
BUY A MAGAZINE - CREATE A JOB? YOU TOO DO MEAN A GLOSSY PAGED SUBSCRIBABLE, RIGHT?
Are we at all Democrats essentially running as Anti-Christ commercialists still asking for an over reached loyalty for Clintons too near to a global Autocracy secular for them - their “friend” confused “two-fer”?
Oh, what to do with the free loading friends, now?
Oh, what to do with the free loading family, now?
Oh MY! Oh MINE?
Once upon a time - yes in earlier days of America - people were raised and trained in a morality so that they could judge right and wrong to “good” or “evil” and “iffy” as equally intrusive interactive socialness did stream through their Christian existential.
LEAN FORWARD?
BE LEAD FROM BEHIND?
Now in a time and year where glitz and glitter to requests to follow and like or friend out of a pop less circumstanced with a due moral consideration - now to a time too near an Anti-Christ sloth and crass immediacy?
BUY A REAL MAGAZINE - CREATE A JOB?
With the commercialization of Facebook and to a daily ticker of valuation of all ours and our personal sociated media aren’t we now better to join the band and hope aboard with a time line ticker for all our friends as well with a monetized valuation?
On today Friday this May in the Year of our Lord two thousand ten and two we have that our personal lives have become too commercialized. We could now see a counter cultural demonstrative with new bumper stickers like with “WHO THE BBD NEEDS FACEBOOK?” (with “BBD” short for Biden’s ”… Big Deal”).
Once upon a time in America - yes, in America - morals were taught as well as discretion.
Are you sure you are not now being lead from behind to a pop leaning forward inconsiderate of essential social morality?
Better to be a Facebook wise user and not a schmuck giving free content at least more than getting free useful content? I mean it has now been commercialized - shouldn’t all be able to see at least a paper valuation for each click or share?
How many are just free loading? Are you giving away too much free content? Are you too well informing your competitors, and for free? Are the Clintons the leaders to this soft morality now far nearer a Dem Party about Anti-Christ factor celebration?
Say it isn’t so?
Once upon a time in America - yes, in America - people didn’t need to be so taxed to create jobs - they did just buy more magazines - glossy pictures and all with post men and women and subscriptions with people paid for their goodness or whatever they had subscribers to that was their worthiness so. I mean has it taken a day like today to realize how many fewer have jobs now because you are buying and reading fewer magazines - how many just once more in sustainable forestry and paper and pulp fabrication that if done now at night could be using lower energy rates for energy that is just being made and wasted for “capacity”?
I don’t know about you - I don’t what nice there is to say about the Clintons - I don’t get “LEADING FROM BEHIND” but as well if too much to such as an Anti-Christ factor. Would the absence of a mind already bent to leaning forward have once had more morality infused with purpose and community be yours if not for all this now valued and commercialized social media - all this mechanization of what was of a religious acceptance and community spirit maintained by careful leadership to a moral consciousness existential?
It is more evident now,yet hardly enough via social media - even just Facebook - that the Clintons seem to definitely have been to schemes and decades of plotting to political over-reaching like socialism but more towards a secular autocracy for them in their odd “two-fer”. This may be enough to tolerate such commercialization and valuation of so many Peoples’ personal lives, for now. You do get that Bill Clinton keeps moving back into the political picture to take credit - and much he doesn’t deserve but thought he could wrangle control of as if his for fewer we likely to be immune from being fooled all of the time.
I am not a student of Islam nor Judaism - I am not trying to leave Hammurabi out or suggest Muslims are more forgiving. It is more that it seems the personal story of President Obama and as well the Clintons would be only to this as a Anti-Christ factor rendering/rendition.
Have you figured out how to value and monetize your wall - your friends list?
Is it time to present quanlity over quantity again for your conscious existentiality?
Are you now if not to monetizing your social media to soon “unfriending” freeloading friends, family and competitors?
BUY A MAGAZINE - CREATE A JOB? YOU TOO DO MEAN A GLOSSY PAGED SUBSCRIBABLE, RIGHT?
It is elementary dear Budget San. You may be away from your wheel house for a while, actually quite a while.
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
There may be something equally historical to the lost decade for Japanese economy and the T BIRDS.
As an avian Bill flew yet as an avian Hill seems to have her wings clipped.
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
Her T BIRD is fried - it hits the pan and burns. Avian fluish less her condition than Evian spelled backwards.
We could all start with: THERE IS NO MONEY FOR BOATS.
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
MacAurthur, General, had boats but the Navy had ships and vessels - you could say.
Anjin San had a ship, had another, even had another, I think.
In the early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate Americana to JAPANESE MANAGEMENT CULTURE.
IBM may have been ready - yet a story as trying as Anjin Sans there may be to floating IBM from such whence.
Her T BIRD is fried - it hits the pan and burns. Avian fluish less her condition than Evian spelled backwards.
It is elementary dear Budget San. You may be away from your wheel house for a while, actually quite a while.
There may be something equally historical to the lost decade for Japanese economy and the T BIRDS.
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet? Have you even heard of the bird flu so avian and Asian whence?
IBM may have been ready - yet a story as trying as Anjin Sans there may be to floating IBM from such whence.
America didn’t have to follow its leaders it didn’t also be to such “almost” JAPANESE MANAGEMENT assimilation.
GE may have been on board at first and as well rallied to sail and tack back to more American waters.
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
For the Japanese of early 90s nothing suddenly surprising wasn’t quite a gung - ho as they had planned.
For the United States of America today we should deal with an elementary of a Budget San as well as naivete of a Hill.
There may be something equally historical to the lost decade for Japanese economy and the T BIRDS.
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
Dear Budget San, how elementary is it that CLINTONS’ SURPLUS & OBAMA’S IN RED STATE are irreconcilable?
These truths we hold self evident — we should.
It is elementary that OBAMA’S RED STATE SPENDING upside down to CLINTONS’ TOO BLACK SURPLUS.
We could all start with: THERE IS NO MONEY FOR BOATS.
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
In the Year of our Lord two thousand ten and two years either Clintons are right or Obama is right.
It should be elementary and self evident that these two can not both be right.
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
For the Japanese of early 90s nothing suddenly surprising wasn’t quite a gung - ho as they had planned.
Are we all clearly now of a tale of SHOBUDGE with trials of a Budget San?
Oh, Captain our Captains - Clintons can not also be right if Obama right about spending. One dishonorable?
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
Call me SHOBUDGE?
Call me Budget San?
Call me ghost of 90s past when once more to a T BIRD stand for domestic over expected foreign flop?
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
MacAurthur, General, had boats but the Navy had ships and vessels - you could say.
Were we just court marshalling MacArthur - a past Robert Moses of Japan - of Japanese?
Was the JAPANESE MANAGEMENT CULTURE we suddenly turned from assimilating to too MacArthur so?
As an avian Bill flew yet as an avian Hill seems to have her wings clipped.
This time a budget - a Budget San wheel house or not our USA still sworn to Constitutionals?
This time a budget - a Budget San with less float needed?
We could all start for CLINTONS’ SURPLUS “bad” if RED STATE SPENDING “good”?
We could all start for RED STATE SPENDING “bad” if CLINTONS’ SURPLUS “good”?
Yet it seems elementary, finally, and consecrated enough that C’s SURPLUS has cost too much to rebuild.
We have that Hill of Bill doth cut near two trillion with cutting “good” and spending to the red “bad”!
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
Her T BIRD is fried - it hits the pan and burns. Avian fluish less her condition than Evian spelled backwards.
Anjin San had a ship, had another, even had another, I think.
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
MacAurthur, General, had boats but the Navy had ships and vessels - you could say.
You could ask Akers or Welch, maybe even Punch or Pinch.
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
Call me SHOBUDGE?
Call me Budget San?
Call me ghost of 90s past when once more to a T BIRD stand for domestic over expected foreign flop?
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
We have that Hill of Bill doth cut near two trillion with cutting “good” and spending to the red “bad”!
Her T BIRD is fried - it hits the pan and burns. Avian fluish less her condition than Evian spelled backwards.
We could all start with: THERE IS NO MONEY FOR BOATS.
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
MacAurthur, General, had boats but the Navy had ships and vessels - you could say.
Anjin San had a ship, had another, even had another, I think.
In the early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate Americana to JAPANESE MANAGEMENT CULTURE.
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?
It seems self evident there still is a shipped naivete that C’s SURPLUS can be a “good”.
We have little figured yet just how much more it has cost USA to put back so much spending cut by Clintons.
As an avian Bill flew yet as an avian Hill seems to have her wings clipped.
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
For the Japanese of early 90s nothing suddenly surprising wasn’t quite a gung - ho as they had planned.
For the people of the world - Republicans and patriots all - things aren’t going as Clintons planned or budgeted.
{note: Yes this is partly autobiographical and as well of those years mine still in my early twenties so to standing against businesses of Business Roundtable and IBM at least when the dared seem to take first step to issuances of a guidance suggestive of an American need to assimilate all to JAPANESE MANAGEMENT CULTURE.}
In the legend of Johnny Cash there really is a prison - a Folsom Prison. And yet when you hear how poorly she wares MEMBERS ONLY? comes to mind - is the thought that should be landing in measured time.
It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.
First Lady Michelle Obama had a call Herculean and daunting just for the trillions the Clintons’ dietariness was costing.
First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton has been more to dressing to Marie Antoinette than to the black of Johnny Cash.
Oh, have you yet considered our times of old - say September 12 , 2001 - and how a then President Barack Hussein Obama would have stepped out?
Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes? The all black of Johnny Cash, NOT - but maybe the hats of M. Antoinette?
First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton did more to encourage a two Big Macs a day habit than the austerity of First Lady Michelle Obama. First Lady Hillary did seem to favor KING OF QUEENS mad dashing to a marketed acceptability of her bubba’s pre-existing condition. First Lady Michelle as otherwise embrace labor and austerity and “twigs” for her hubbie.
Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes? Can you imagine both in stripes?
It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.
Prison fare may suit them and even set a better example for all - even better than “twigs” for Lady Obama’s hubbie.
Word is it is costing us a trillion more than it would have - word is the Clintons dietary “leadership” raised weights and related healthcare costs for the past two decades such that a reverse of their guidance could save us a trillion dollars in healthcare costs.
But diabolical more is still the alternate realm and possibility of this President Obama as President Obama circa 9-12-01.
We have that he is a man merely of “twigs” and “arugula” but when his burger is with cheddar, arugula and Dijon mustard. We have that he, President Obama, another of a Hyde Park with wants to New Deal Austerity for all has stayed in character theirs so.
It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.
As you wake up to this thought as if waking now on September 12, 2001 with President Obama in charge of which ever nationalism or new nationalism he might already have worked out with labors, his - would it be stripes for the Clintons, and not the flattering types?
As you wake up to this thought asked in keeping with Obamas now decades still in character consistency so - would it be a call to austerity and apologies and as well a chiding of a suggestion to “please go shopping”?
Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes? The all black of Johnny Cash, NOT - but maybe the hats of M. Antoinette?
Seems we can suggest that the Obamas do only know austerity for others and not in a Johnny Cash black suitedness kindly way.
But as you wake to these thoughts - and stir anew in as much curiosity to intellectual honesty as your habit or hope — President Barack Hussein Obama on a morning of September 12, 2001, left as it was actually whence, but unable to be himself and declare like or exactly: “I INHERITED THIS MESS!!!”
NO! You own this mess???
NO! “I INHERITED THIS MESS!!!”
OK! - SO LET US LOOK BACK AT LEAST THROUGHOUT THE PAST TEN YEARS - BUT LET US BE SMARTER THAN THE 9/11 COMMISSION AND NOT ONLY LOOK BACK TEN YEARS - LET US AT LEAST FINALLY LITIGATE THIS FOR YOU AND LOOK BACK AT LEAST TWELVE YEARS OR BETTER YET TWO DECADES. IT SEEMS YOU DID INHERIT A MESS FROM THE CLINTONS’ 8 OF DANGEROUS ABANDONMENT OF AFGHANS AND IRAQI PEOPLE, IN PRACTICE, AND SUCH AS IT IS OF DANGERS YOU SPOKE TO WITH YOUR NOBEL PRIZE ACCEPTANCE SPEECH WHEN YOU CHIDED YOUR PREDECESSORS SO ABOUT DANGERS OF INACTION AND AVOIDANCE IN FOREIGN POLICIES. YES IT SEEMS A MESS WAS INHERITED FROM THE CLINTONS BUT REALLY IF WE LOOK BACK MORE THAN THE TEN YEARS THAT OUR 9/11 COMMISSION LIMITED ITSELF TO WE CAN BEGIN TO SEE IT ALL MIGHT NOT HAVE HAPPENED BUT FOR SCHEMING OF SADDAM HUSSEIN AND ESPECIALLY THAT RELATED TO HIS INVASION AND HOPES TO KEEP AN ALLY - KUWAIT.
A OK!
“A OK!”???
She was big in polyester. Reports have not been substantiated that she chose homespun or sack cloth for her sheik.
e. e. cummings may have spun to worries so for this chic and her twined sheik.
Clemens may have been want to twain more than false outrage at her treatments in sheik to all that might be marked Sheiks.
e. e. cummings lived at least near to the polyester rage and her rise to so much modern riling with threads.
She was big in polyester - she must have been — where otherwise are the reports of sack cloth or homespun for her sheik?
She has dressed down our preamble - it so ordained then in within the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven to only general Welfare.
And yet too Posterity.
And yet too domestic Tranquility.
And yet too a more perfect Union.
Doth they crow ravenous - or?
How would he hath then or now whence to marking our twaining on her threads and her pre-9/11 sheik (Sheik?) - he that e. e. or that Samuel?
She was big in polyester - she must have been. Oh, the THE DOORS - where was her top hat then?
You can petition the Lord with Prayer… You can Petition the Lord with Prayer - like.
Oh how she has dressed down at least our legend and its keying - our Constitution - its preamble.
The scary ware that is her’s of that whence her fashioning is twained and marked as per 9/11.
It wasn’t homespun.
It wasn’t sack cloth.
Members Only? She was big in polyester - was it all about oil? - she had to have been big in polyester.
Where beckon with Edith?
How bombed with Wharton?
Was she a Maud and a gunner?
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?
It really did take an Afghan village?
It really just take and Afghan village?
Let’s say Taliban - why worry about Al Qaeda!
Members Only? She was big in polyester - was it all about oil? - she had to have been big in polyester.
e. e. cummings may have spun to worries so for this chic and her twined sheik.
Clemens may have been want to twain more than false outrage at her treatments in sheik to all that might be marked Sheiks.
e. e. cummings lived at least near to the polyester rage and her rise to so much modern riling with threads.
She was big in polyester - she must have been — where otherwise are the reports of sack cloth or homespun for her sheik?
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?
It really did take an Afghan village?
It really just take and Afghan village?
Let’s say Taliban - why worry about Al Qaeda!
in simple cummings or well marked twaining by clemens her sheik fashioning either a rage or THE BOMB.
Back whence when she nearer agent orange than most - how did she sing - how with preamble did she dress down or dress up?
She has dressed down our preamble - it so ordained then in within the
Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven to only
general Welfare.
And yet too Posterity.
And yet too domestic Tranquility.
And yet too a more perfect Union.
Doth they crow ravenous - or?
How doth she mark and wear the sands of time - how stowed? - how on the beach? Was it all about oil - her polyester?
She was big in polyester. Reports have not been substantiated that she chose homespun or sack cloth for her sheik.
And some crow her times they were not ravenous - 9/11 marked - twained - either Clintons’ great success or their…?
If you are drinking a beer with Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary, or especially if to toasting her your beer likely should be tasting like suds - like soap.
We can not help but think to look for manufactured crisis.
We are lucky and can count ourselves as quite fortunate that President Obama saved us from President Clinton.
That said Governor Mitt Romney may be more right on General Motors than President Obama.
We have first to allow ourselves that there was another option to thought inevitable next President as a Clinton.
We have second, or as an alternate first, to appreciate that climate change didn’t have to rise to the ALAMISM of Gore’s GLOBAL WARMING END OF THE WORLD CRISIS crusades.
As well maybe first we could look at the corporate speak like that was the institutional shorting of endowment funds as political speech towards a down economy for political benefit of Democrat candidate, whomever.
As per Mitt Romney and past ideas for saving General Motors - we have that if Democrats hadn’t won in 2008 GM would have needed a whole lot less effort if any about a saving of GM.
I still have a hard time seeing Mrs. Clinton as other than having failed to the top - I am not sure you should be toasting her or thinking of drinking with her.
An election of the Republican alternative to either the “inevitable Hillary” or her most junior also most junior Senate peer Barack was of platforms and positions arguing to the very direction now there seems to be a general consensus towards as where we should now go and would best have been to have gone earlier.
We can easily suggest that without the threats to seize all oil company profits by Senator Clinton her current position still might only look progressive and a success in promotion - promotion of socialism, only.
General Motors might not have needed any saving if only Al Gore had moderate views or moderated his alarmism from the super subjective “end of the world as we know it” DOOM and GUILT and taught about climate change without attacking the industry of General Motors and people for owning and using their evil products.
I guess it is that we are supposed to just accept how Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is bottled.
I am still confident that if McCain and Palin had been elected the move to retraining and encouraging for our states as a higher priority than a political soft RESET with Russia would have sufficiently rebooted our economy and warded off the simplicities complicating our economy of the Democrat propaganda enough that saving General Motors wouldn’t have needed an young unproven czar or even a political hack to drive a new unnecessary nationalism.
More than once in the past couple decades I have heard after a column or comment or opinionated stance voices from Detroit industries saying I did save them. I remember most the early days of Clintons’ 8 and how frustrated Detroit was with what seemed capitalist ignorance by the new Democrat admin as there efforts in asking for a sense of direction and theme to work to even if to green energy or fuel efficiency was missing - missing until I offered a direction independently and privately to usher in interesting smaller cars maybe to look like smaller 50s & 60s American made headliners.
No, I don’t see how you can be wanting to celebrate or toast Hillary R. Clinton, Secretary, unless you think her rise and progressing with socialism a success and not as I do a failing to the top.
There are many ways I can go back an confidently reconsider that an election of McCain might have been all the save Mitt Romney might have needed too for General Motors but for the marketing of a superiority and elitism still over lobbied to benefit foreign brands, by some of our politicians.
Yes there have been more than a few times where Detroit either said from afar that I had saved them or was to saying they wanted to hire me. If you do like the break out of small fun cars during the Clintons’ years don’t look to them for a toast worthiness but look to me - It was I not them, and as implied seeming with them ignorant of an important domestic essence of marketing for free markets and non-socialistic capitalism based job saving and/or creating.
We can not help but think to look for manufactured crisis. And especially with Democrats and manufacturing and jobs crisis pomp and toasted circumstancings.
This said, again, Governor Mitt Romney may be more right on General Motors than President Obama — but a President McCain likely would have incidentally reset our economy with his spoken to preference to govern to a restoration of states and a restrengthening of state economic sovereignty and so made a save of General Motors at most a remarketing challenge for Mad Men/Women.
We have that there was not a vacuum in progress and inventiveness during the Bush years - we have seen that new products were very nearly ready for marketing and some that Democrats just rushed to a CRISIS so to be able to grandstand with a partisan credit taking.
We didn’t need this economic downturn - or at least quite so. We didn’t need to see then or now that Hillary all sudsy with a progressing rise as a success if only “socialism” was her goal. It still seems to generally be about things more our traditionals that she has failed to the top.
A bottling plant for Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton since now we seem to be seeing other than how she has been being bottled herself?
Like a “BOTTOMS UP RODHAM” we should have seen you so earlier more even when to First Lady Clinton?
I don’t know what you have been up to this Mother’s Day Weekend. Me, myself, and I have gotten to thinking of Mitt Romney and Ireland.
Oh, yeh, this cannot be good for either Clinton.
Next President Mitt Romney, dare I say, there are some things you should think about as you move to possible charge to officially and truthfully consider Ireland.
Enough said of writing as excessive and public as mine has been that with such no political future is possible. Such doth leave me to now thinking about Ireland and the Clintons 90s - and well Al Franken, Senator, a likely unnecessary exception.
Maybe the first thing that annoyed me about the Clintons was so early it was “I didn’t inhale” and that so early it seemed too much like the only answer I had to: “Have you ever tried pot?”.
Yet as I think now of Ireland I have to wonder about Hillary Clinton and the wonder that she is for seemingly having failed to the top.
I don’t know if Governor Clinton had actually ever tried pot and not inhaled - I do know that was my true story and history being shared then before hearing an unlikely tale from one of his generation so “networked” about himself. I don’t know if it was just hinky for it only answered to smoked pot and not to whether Hillary Rodham had been a culinary wonder with pot brownies.
I see that she as so “failed upwards” that even today I was again to wondering what she must have been smoking to think that she should be promoted or maintained at any level near cabinet level.
Maybe I am too this (to this?) because I have shared via social media pictures and tales related to my being about making a diplomatic three legged stool of my own - a heart shaped guitar legged bench height 3 legged stool.
I did try pot only once - when I accepted such from another I moved to take a smoke (a hit?) from it but decided with a few steps of consideration not to inhale and to pass it back (along?).
Hillary must be smart enough to wake each morning wondering how she has managed to have failed to the top so and be still relevant considering how much of her past hands on fully documented years are not mostly much at fault and quite causal to our current depressed states of malaise, economic.
In Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton’s defense it does seem from her being so off on traditional American recipes that it seems unlikely she as Hillary Rodham might have managed edible pot brownies. As it is I only know of one possible occasion where I may have inadvertently partaken of a pot brownie and such being the first day of my life when I learned there was even such a thing.
But far more serious with my history with the Clintons is how Ireland has a relation to Time Square and Las Vegas - of one about IBM & Me & The 90s.
It is not fun to remember the Clintons or consider that now still it is concerning and even for Ireland that Hillary has failed to the top so.
I do personally still find it hard to believe that Bill Clinton, born William Blythe III, didn’t himself inhale, and inhale often. I am not sure why this part of his story similar to my history is hard to believe from him.
By now you all have heard some or much of my telling about my collection THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM.
Yes, that was near all a work proffered from blue and white collar actual living with real challenges mine all considered strategically and written drug free.
Some complications did arise when IBM CFO Metz was discovered to have been developing changes for IBM after our meeting back whence near 89-90 when the Economist Magazine was running articles beating up IBM and for having been being “out innovated by blue jeaned entreprenuers.” Some complications arose so when I learned after getting his daughter to break up with me via that method when I learned he had started using my advise given personally in his home privately actually within IBM. The complication was more how to then figure the right developmental pace for IBM as now I had to make sure all my other strategizing to positive change would stay as choriographed and psyched through as my other considerations about an integrated marketing and such also thought to scientific as well for those in network concerned with traumatized friends or patients.
There were times where there became such a gap in benefit that IBM was getting freely from such tie in and it for which roots it had related to me and my primary ambition to become a Mad Man like my maternal grandfather Arthur Monroe Menadier had been when last to duties from Y&R mostly with James E. Burke.
My biggest complaint about the Clintons is related to their failing upwards in it being related to my knowing that fewer were able to be helped or those being helped with an era of shared cause and efforts to a new political correctness and to as much positive change as possible in a rare time of a grand nation in a new world order as a country forced to adapt to sole superpower status, locally and globally.
Maybe my problem with Bill’s pot line as “I didn’t inhale” was that it always seemed to close as and imitation not actually flattering to me due to his being the source so similar. Really this is supposed to be about Hillary as having failed upwards and how she so was cooperative and an accomplice so for the detrimental effects had upon Ireland because she and her “two-fer” were at least cutting corners.
I may not have written too much to discredit myself from some public service - I may not have written to much or shared to much creatively written on social media - I may at least have not written too much literally near literature to be unconsiderable say for a short list as possible next Ambassador to Ireland - and maybe at least one other country so I hope.
After all Al Franken has made it to Senator Franken and well Mrs. Clinton has failed upwards.
I am not suggesting that the Clintons have so lowered our standards that now I too might be qualified - I am starting here to tell of how when imbalances grew between myself and IBM about benefits they were seeing from use of my guidance I was so dedicated to massive and vast non[partisan efforts to positive change that I was to saying they should like spend a comparable some to help rebuild Time Square - to help turn around Las Vegas - And, yes to consider investing in Ireland would be another welcomed celebration of the good they were benefiting from that was originating from me.
I did try pot once - I actually did not inhale - I did find much very complicating as per IBM with above just partly for having used the “get her to break up with you” strategy when it seemed our old friendship of four years due to her a distant friend of my sisters proved after a couple months not to be right for me. James E. Burke is the one the lead the search committee that replaced Akers and Metz from IBM executive spots and brought in Louis Gerstner. Such change did maybe unnecessarily only complicate everything I was strategically much about and especially that which had become my efforts to help Democrats become encouraged to find someone to not run away from running as Senator Gore had and to such with me offering direction and guidance with confidence that if they learned it they would become electable.
Ireland you really may have the Clintons both to blame for much of the globally depressed economy. To me Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton in her own rights as Hillary Rodham Clinton has failed upwards and taken you all down with so many others.
Somewhere here I think I at least started to mention how the Clintons’ politics did make all my work to help see a scientific or medical improvement for trauma patients as a general category of concern end up working less well and for fewer because either they were ignorant or careless. I was of doing so much and integrating so much back whence that it is still a wonder that now one benefiting asked me how such was supposed to work in an entirety nor ask if more was actually in the works more than they were just to waking each day of hopes they could steal a use (a hit? a fix?) for one more day.
I was of doing so much it seems now that I may be the only expert in my field, still. Yes, I have known Anne McInerney now since before she became a mother, and yes I can remember thought of her proud near her first trimester, and, how this was about the time I was heading off for my high school pre-prom party and prom. Yes, a night that could have changed my life was the night I found there was another interesting Shaw in the world after having walked as a registered citizen canvasser up his driveway near Christmas I think of 1991 - Yes that night I nearly stopped canvassing as it seemed this Shaw I met in his driveway that used to be a San Francisco cop had gotten talking and enough that I was nearly to mentioning I had been “more a citizen Rosebud than a Citizen Kane” since 1983 and he as we got talking about Hearst Corporation is remembered for having been to inviting me in for his family dinner and so to a night I likely would have decided a different path and one that would have had me stop canvassing and such political writing of those days but not maybe the strategizing to positive change and a new less sexist and racist or traumatic new political correctness.
Yes, I have had maybe as many opportunities to walk a different was as George Clooney has had - yes I did decide to decline dinner or a beer that winter night amidst my citizen canvassing door to door to door to another door for cleaner air and healthcare coverage reforms, and, return to my evening of canvassing his neighbors as it was that night.
Yes, it is complicated, really - and not just because from where I view it Hillary Rodham still seems to have failed upwards - and so such that others than I should be already be as seems to asking “what was she smoking?”
In this story mentioning a former San Francisco cop Shaw is that William Bratton and his policing ambitions were integrated as well into these efforts about so much as well and so for a wiring drug free as well with him kept since we first crossed wires near 1987 in Boston when he was new to the green fleet of municipal police fleet and reports that he had been moved offer to the worst force in Massachusetts and to a fleet of green colored cop cars mostly without working radios, and, me in that year of law studies at Suffolk Law I thought I should at least get towards training about my goal of becoming a ‘Mad Man’ as well due the full respect of James E. Burke as my grandfather Menadier, at least.
I still don’t know why so many never took to asking me about there maybe being more to what I was obviously at least partly up to and so that such was proving to be very helpful to them in so many ways. I don’t know how so many could have let time pass without at least asking if there might be more and some timed strategically to work together when they might if they did actually come together seemingly unexpectedly and to then working together, yet while looking like happenstance.
I do wonder if I am the only expert in my own field and such that THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM still holds together as a quite complete outline though poetic mostly, and now since the early 90s and even those days of its figuring that predate the Clintons actually braving an entry into 1992 race and how so it was brave to start sounding like me and learn more and more how to sound more like me of my blue and white collar disciplines and personal work and efforts a part of ambitions actually to be at least as good at global marketing as James E. Burke and Bob Johnson once near or actually did consider the rate of my maternal grandfather who when he retired in 1971 did retire from near 25 years of running most or all of J&J marketing and ad business, and so from Young and Rubicam organization those years so associated.
Yes I have known Anne H. McInerney since before she became a mother. Many times I could have taken different and easier paths. Many times I could have chosen to stop my work so of my efforts to be and stay to journalism and media standards more to being a Citizen Rosebud than a Citizen Kane.
I may need to set up my own think tank or foundation and find sufficient endowments just to piece this all together accurately - I know a whole lot of checking and checking and reviewing and of time and place, and other times and places is about now due and maybe necessary. It seems with “Hillary” being so visibly to a failing as much at the top as President Obama time now may be of the essence and my public mass of public commentary may not be a bar to much, to too much, at least.
Please don’t smoke, please don’t think you need to smoke to understand my works maybe literature and even poetic.
George, maybe we can talk - I have an idea for another less political fundraiser.
Again, I have know Bill and Hillary since they were law students and not yet engaged - I have so known them since I was still just near or in first grade at Hooker School - Are we all now like “up in smoke” because they actually were like “up in smoke”?
The person of my past the did warn me in high school of brownies maybe pot brownies or at least brownies he didn’t want to share and was strategically to telling me something to dissuade me from chocolate consumption so did end up working for President Clinton in a communications role as editor if I recall correctly so as within our office of Letters to the President.
It is possible that the Clintons didn’t inhale, actually, but that right now would be a preferred excuse for their failures, really.
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet? Really, have you found them - this isn’t a joke!!!
Next President Willard Mitt Romney, when looking for an Ambassador to Ireland might you look at me?
Is there a singular moment in your life, as you know it already, where but for a stance you took, believing such was right, that it, that which you stood for turned out to be wrong? These are days that are trying the President very publicly - he isn’t on trial for one Constitutional issue, or is he?
What is there in a dog or puppies life story that may be instructive - if such dog(s) were raised free and loved?
To sell veal you do need to make sure that such creature to such meals has no tough life.
To sell puppies you are not supposed to be selling meals - but approved food for them not of them.
How is the selling of President Obama and his gay stances now to be farmed out in 2012 politics as a right, not a wrong?
To sell puppies you should have a license and a business location or be near enough of family litter that it is like you are selling off one of your own loved children.
It is confusing now how President Obama may be on trial for one Constitutional issue and yet have it seem like many. If a local community is organized to allow the sale of veal - there is an expectation that it has been raised so that a tough life was avoided for such young source of nutrients for human consumption.
If a local community is organized to allow domestic pets - there is an expectation that a “jolly pet” purchase isn’t actually a animal rescue and saving, from an animal hell being presented as other than a black hole of a natural uncertainty.
If you were to steal from chicken stock where is the chicken stock now for such thievery? It is possible to say that President Obama is on trial in more than one trial for one Constitutional issue.
It is a prettier picture to imagine a great and sufficient puppy ranch than to imagine or remember a veal facility — room to play and run, nudge and cuddle, and not be like a pack of hens, old hens still stuck together with an obvious pecking order.
If you sell a puppy you are selling a dream, even if selling a pit bull.
If you sell a puppy you are celebrating adventure and Americana long work literally and creatively even if Tom Sawyer didn’t have a dog of his own. It is hard to think of Mark Twain without thinking of happy puppies - even if they weren’t seen or heard.
If President Obama is on trial, though now in many trials, for one Constitutional issue how now about his gay stances?
We have the fear this morning that George Clooney hosted a meeting of modern communists last night in Hollywood.
We have the fear that this happened even though “modern communists” as tag for Americans now like “Army Intelligence” old gag line - see globally speaking “modern communists” have been becoming more of capitalism so President Obama could just be left to being a “Soviet sympathizer” or just a “communist sympathizer” pining for days of his youth while over coddled by his young parents studying in Soviet studies together.
I am not suggesting President Obama’s parents would have sold him off for their cause(s) - it does seem undeniable that he has long had a penchant for other countries ways at least as much as those of America he managed to learn about.
And so now we can have a hard time seeing puppies as free and happy and not also of a mill like ranch for raising dog meat like veal at least so that President Obama won’t betray another father of his he has celebrated for lessons to it being us in a “boy eat dogs” world.
In American communities if you are licensed to sell puppies it is not for butchery but for dreams of freedom and happiness with a jolly pet, right? Back in an earlier day our Supreme Court ruled that chicken stocks and their butchering was “local” business not of the reach of Federal Government as national commerce. Amity Shlaes in her THE FORGOTTEN MAN did cover this issue specifically from the era of the earlier than Obama New Dealer Roosevelt as per our Commerce Clause reach or over reaching checks.
It may now be harder to see healthcare as also just a local good as the raising and butchering of chickens was whence in our real Depression era but really it is still neighbors building a skill and working it locally in a community to mostly and quite substantially be to “local good” commerce as well of a neighbor getting or providing for another neighbor.
We have that President Obama may have the same problems President Roosevelt was to - we have that he may want “local goods” issues to be his issue for his edicts, judging and executing — we have that President Obama may be over selling healthcare at least as far more a national good in a national commerce than it is or is best to be generally considered.
If you steal a chicken from another’s chicken stock or their chicken yards you are at least due some time publicly reviewable as if stuck somehow still into a stocks for chicken thievery.
What we can see now from President Obama’s gay stances is that he has a problem with our Constitution.
Whether he was raised a sell out to Soviet sympathies before he was reared into a “boy eats dogs world” we have that after getting a Harvard Law degree he is showing very publicly a problem with our Constitution - at least one problem so though of more than one contesting of one issue.
I imagine George Clooney only was serving up political “Kool Aid” last night and wasn’t working to a new cook book for commies - even a CHICKEN STOCK FOR COMMIES headlining.
However George served up “modern” last night our President, his guest, now has a problem with healthcare and immigration power over-reaching as well due to his recent gay stances — How can our national government have a Commerce Power over healthcare, just, as a national good, and yet have us thinking with him so expressive so publicly that gay rights are a matter of local or state Power?
Again: How can our national government have a Commerce Power over healthcare, just, as a national good, and yet have us thinking with him so expressive so publicly that gay rights are a matter of local or state Power?
What are you selling? How are you selling it? Is it actually what you are selling that you are selling?
How can the body of a gay or lesbian be of a national good for healthcare by President’s proffering and yet be a “local good” as well body specific as per freedoms and rights locally?
President Obama does seem to have a problem with our Constitution - it is starting to make less sense and seem more willful and intentional to a premeditated work to an at least Soviet sympathizing less logical interpretation of our Constitution and our Declaration of Independence.
Again: How can our national government have a Commerce Power over healthcare, just, as a national good, and yet have us thinking with him so expressive so publicly that gay rights are a matter of local or state Power?
Where is our America and American of Finn, today — where should it be for all our tomorrows?
Really how isn’t our healthcare not better kept to be considered mostly a “local good” of neighbors in a community helping other neighbors and being helped judiciously by other neighbors and to protections such that what you seem to be buying is what is actually seemingly for sale?
What did George Clooney cook up last night, anyways? Was it “modern” and “legal” - just “modern” but not “legal”?
There comes a time in a political afterlife, after too long proffered and maintained dishonestly that the public and even Hollywood will usually and finally get around to covering such in spirit of show business.
We have that the final season of “24″ did seem to suggest that a President Hillary Clinton was on track already to a likely future, if ever actually elected so. too “in bed” and “criminally” as per our Constitution’s “criminality” and “limiting principles” with Russians. I don’t know how there were not more shows to such important import, already as well by then.
Have you heard the one about the Clintons having been term limited effectively by our 22 Amendment?
This morning dawning past the eve of the George Clooney Hollywood Goes Obama downer scheduled for tonight is breaking with a new honesty in the air maybe not as politically relevant as say when I and others seemed to be asking from afar, at least, if David Geffen needed help with a legal defense fund after telling the whole world “The Clintons Are Big Liars.”
Don’t worry! There is very little likelihood that this “EVENT” tonight can be confused as a meeting of modern communists.
Yes, George, it is true that I was in AMISTAD - that I was in a room with Steven Spielberg for two days and even made it into Entertainment Weekly as the extra that I was in background of courtroom scene with Matthew McC and Cecil B. DeMille “real gun” later celebrant (celebratee?) Morgan F. in foreground. Yes, your original role in ER was most of all of such characters the one written most to be the fictional alter me after Jamie Tarses for NBC was back in my head asking near: “can we have one more show idea and for Thursdays at ten?”
Years later when I was in DC and would happen to find Hollywood in town filming I did get to meeting Leonardo D C and Russell Crowe and such some years after finding ARLINGTON ROAD with Jeff Bridges and he to wondering why I wasn’t asking for an autograph and his producer almost to acting on our thoughts that I could help if hired with editing. I did appreciate meeting Livingston and McPherson when they were filming pilot episode for SEVEN DAYS and that they let me hang around their sets I first found after wondering why Don Franklin was sitting against a wall on a DC side walk in fatigues (away from anything yet noticed as a set and of a Hollywood production.). I did later meet Sir Ridley S. and quite almost unavoidably since he set up his directors tent with that other world famous producer/director working on BODY OF LIES directly across the street from my then DC apartment on Capitol Hill. Oh, yeh, that spot was part of MERCURY RISING, if I recall from film correctly, and for the scene to finding an actual old typewriter that could type in triplicate with carbon film. I don’t know how I missed catching any of filming of MERCURY RISING since some of it too was so actually produced across the street from my apartment.
But this George is meant to be about you talking to donkeys, and how it may be a due time to explain how the Democrats, but for President Obama specifically, did set up and cause much if not all of this economic down turn. We have it as an unavoidable truth that President Obama a man also of a Hyde Park was of wants to be to a new era of New Deal Austerity and a grand economy crushing rush to GREEN politics - but you have him as a guest tonight so let us first focus just on Hillary for President that starred Bill and Hillary and as well on GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM with Al Gore attempting to play a new Mr. Science.
Have you heard the one about the Clintons having been term limited effectively by our 22 Amendment?
I know, like really, that is dangerously too close to old joke line “Army Intelligence” much like my suggested use of “modern communists” today respective of your arrangements and planned gathering tonight. Seems, yes, that “modern communists” would apply more to Chinese having been more to capitalism than your Obama in these long past few years - seems that you might be of a crowd tonight sympathetic to “communism” but not “modern” with such, right - reads well this way?
For starters it still makes no political or economic sense that George Bush and Republicans of 2008 challenges would have created the economic down turn if they could have created such an economic down turn.
Oh, you get it now? You get that the Clintons were meant to be effectively term limited but have proven still to be too slippery yet?
I know, like really, when we retire a President after eight years because of our term limit Amendment the money we give him though never to such excess and ridiculousness as effected for President Clinton ever before is for what ever the amount arranged to help “retire” or “sever” such from the powers of the office of our President. Can you believe the gall of President Clinton for asking just for a NYC rent a sum greater then for a year that that of a sum for all our past presidents annual post office “rents” combined, and, that he was busy then and now still to using our taxpayer benefits otherwise than expected or budgeted to actually work to hold and gain power, and as much or more of “executive” power as he and his spouse can yet work?
It does seem just bad scripting and too dramatic a writing that our 22 Amendment hasn’t been more effective in keeping Clintons as limited as thought wise. It really has gotten past how much they did to set up and later cause this economic down turn to also us to asking Hollywood to dramatize their corruptions and crass gross ambition in all its colors. It seems dangerous that “retirement” funds could be used politically so domestically and globally however now so mixed by Clintons and the Clintons’ Global Initiative to effect campaigns and our 2012 elections. It seems dangerous that “retirement” funds not even of the excess sought and gotten by President Clinton could ever have been approved and so now for such inseparable near irreconcilable very political power grabbing and efforts to influence, partisan.
It does seem an unacceptable story line that President Bush or Republicans could have intentionally caused this economic down turn.
I can and have explained how it was the Clintons’ administering of PEACE DIVIDENDS before their time and an unnecessary and so unjustifiable SURPLUS of cutting a second trillion out of spending for jobs and economic growth when we actually had the funds available and set aside that are hallmarks of CLINTONOMICS. We have long before Hillary For President attempted a repackaged sloppy BOGO “two-fer” and launched such like a spoiled “inevitable” Hun with a declaration to “socialistic” plans to “seize all oil company profits” that the Clintons of the now mostly missing years of 1993- 2001 were to cutting the very spending of funds actually available that had been left alone by Republicans as too much to cut and seemingly rightly of fears that such might to greatly reduce our budgets and its spending for jobs and growth for years following such out 2- even 8 years after Clintons were to be expected gone and in retirement.
President Obama may be guilty for of the “be careful what you wish for…” & now us to why did you wish for a CRISIS to justify a new New Deal Austerity!
Yes President Obama may be guilty for having wanted to be a new FDR of a similar social programming that pushed Constitutional limits to or past our limits - but it is the Clintons that look and smell dirty and guilty for the general and great economic collapse.
Simply it is still ridiculous to think that the Republicans could have or would have intentionally caused such - and still wise to consider that President Bush “fault” may be limited to a failure political to reverse the Clintons’ SURPLUS enough in time.
See, to be clear - let me be clear - let me be real clear: In 2008 it look like a near certainty that Republicans would lose just because no one yet understood that actual complexity of the struggles in the Middle East as so many now seem to fathom - in 2008 it looked most likely that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton had enough reason to think she might be an “inevitable” next President by election though as a repackaged and spoiled dangerous democratic produce BOGO - in 2008 it looked like Republicans only chance for wins that November would be to have gas prices go down, not up, up, and up.
See, to be really clear: It looked as if we were supposed to think that the suddenly rising gas prices were supposed to be good for the Republicans as of the “its all about oil party politics” and yet that just doesn’t make sense since it was of those days that Hillary looked quite “inevitable” and with a proffered declaration of plans to seize all oil company profits. See??? See that under such conditions the last thing we should conclude is that Republicans would have wanted gas prices to go up for that would be to more profits for Hillary to seize so, as she was promising.
And now as it looks like George will be hosting and talking to Donkeys so tonight we have that there is little likelihood that such will be a gathering of modern communists. And that it is still odd that Clintons can be collecting and spending benefits, excessive newly vast amounts of “retirement” benefits, towards actual and current meddling in partisan politics and power grabbing schemes. But really it is that Hillary For President even though a spoiled repackaging we should have united to a “pulling from our shelves” wisdom that had a directly observable benefit in seeing oil prices spike, however, for not only then would it look bad for all Republicans as bad for economy it would also look like her promise of seizing all oil company profits was going to be a huge vast bottomless amount suddenly available for excesses of a left still controlled by Clintons’ political machinery.
But really this is about Hollywood and George’s party plans - let us try to keep this to civil and polite small talk.
So it was the Clintons that had the clearest means, motive and opportunity and a crass hunger to get back real POWER for themselves, however, right? And now so with such we should see President Bush and his Republican Presidents’ Women/Men now as sympathetic figures long of a fight thought prevented by our 80th Congress and their work to keep others ever from so much extra-Constitutional over reaching as the real New Deal and otherwise austere Franklin Delano Roosevelt was while staring in his POWER show all the while with Eleanor and his quite involved daughter, right?
I mean our 22 Amendment has to be there for a purpose - but what could that be? How is it the Clintons have made it look impotent and irrelevant and so all the work by our 80th Congress and our nation back whence to the actual proper process for big government concerns of protecting rights that is our Amending processes? It does now even more clearly seem that our term limit laws were written to protect us from another First Couple like Franklin and Eleanor and their spoiled past attempts to stay in power past their own freshness and Hollywood marketability.
Oh, yeh, the Clintons, at least Bill, did ask banker friends to find a way to gamble away the expected risks of the housing bubble economics he wanted to play with like a candle burning from two ends at once. Yes he with their SURPLUS did cut out a trillion that the Republicans had otherwise decided not to touch and did chose those budgeted items for a political save for his First Couple since after Republicans did the thought impossible and found a trillion to cut to BALANCED he had little choice but to resign himself to their greatness or double down irresponsibly and grandstand about he too being able to find a thought impossible trillion to cut. But really it is debatable though Hillary Clinton for her First Couple BOGO “two-fer” with all the clear means, motive and opportunity, could be more responsible for the spike in gas prices than Al Gore subjective economic alarmism about his playing a MR. SCIENCE with our lives with his GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM.
It is difficult to say whether it was the scare of Hillary a Hun in a new socialism could have been more responsible for gas price spike than Al Gore. It still is quite ridiculous to think that Bush or the Republicans could have or would have intentionally caused this economic down turn that got going when the price of gas became too much for all those pimped by Bill Clinton into his housing bubble economics and its hyper consumerism.
Once upon a time in the landings of Clintons…
Once upon a time in the time before President Do Over Barack Hussein Obama…
Possibly there is only now a President NOT Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton because the Clinton BOGO “two-fer” didn’t know how spoiled it was themselves - didn’t know they were so spoiled they were missing how greatly they were underestimating a foe that looked an impossible oddly named well colored contestee.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Once upon a time in the land of — WAIT!!! - HAVE YOU FOUND THE MISSING YEARS 1993 - 2001 YET?
Once upon a time in the landing of President Clinton with his TOUR D’ PENITENCE about Africa speaking in a penitent to so many about dangers of adultery and multiple partner politics.
Possibly but for President William Jefferson Clinton scandalous second term we might have looked in time at how his politics were wrong and dangerous, all by themselves.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Operation TOUR D’ PENITENCE did commence post Clinton - Lewinsky follies — to COME BACK?
Operation TOUR D’ PENITENCE was of President Clinton in a penitent, so it appeared, selling/pushing safe sex.
Possibly never before had a President owed so much to his wife - to the other in a “two-fer” BOGO.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and repackaging.
On this day that has France returning to a Socialist leader for first time since Clintons’ years…
On this day that has France returning to those ways they can do things not protected by our Constitution…
Possibly the France can run a socialism system just because of their size - or because they tax differently.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Once upon a time in the landings of Clintons…
Once upon a time in the time before President Do Over Barack Hussein Obama…
Possibly there is only now a President NOT Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton
because the Clinton BOGO “two-fer” didn’t know how spoiled it was
themselves - didn’t know they were so spoiled they were missing how
greatly they were underestimating a foe that looked an impossible oddly
named well colored contestee.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Our Constitution and our federal revenue basis off income and profits doth limit so much “Obama”.
Our Constitution and our representative system seems to have President Obama trying to avoid work of politics.
Possibly he, President Obama, is only President because Clinton BOGO “two-fer” was too spoiled and rotten so.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Once upon a time in the land of — WAIT!!! - HAVE YOU FOUND THE MISSING YEARS 1993 - 2001 YET?
Once upon a time in the landing of President Clinton with his TOUR D’
PENITENCE about Africa speaking in a penitent to so many about dangers
of adultery and multiple partner politics.
Presently we have President Clinton again of the years 1993 - 2001 — without a chance of a comeback.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Over the weekend and over the world we had suggestion that “OFFICIAL LAUNCH” was new.
Over the weekend and over the world - WHAT? Is Pres O accounting like GSA for partying? A new fiscal year - a what?
Presently we have a confusion with “OFFICIALLY LAUNCHES” as if a DO OVER - not accountable as NEW PARTY time.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Our ways Constitutional may not be France’s more flexible - Socialism here better only at state level and on wealth taxing?
Our ways Constitutional may not be France’s more flexible - Socialism here better only at state level and on wealth taxing?
Possibly our economy is down for these Jobian days of Obama’s un-magical hands on economic based on income, on profits.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Oops!
Oops!
President O - Oops?
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Obama’s austerity only as complicit as Clintons’ BOGO “two-fer” being repackaged and sold again past a freshness?
Obama’s austerity only as complicit as Clintons’ BOGO “two-fer” being repackaged and sold again past a freshness?
Presently past TOUR D’ PENITENCE come back effecting CGI should be in jeopardy for new politics!!!
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Once upon a time in the landings of Clintons…
Once upon a time in the time before President Do Over Barack Hussein Obama…
Possibly there is only now a President NOT Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton
because the Clinton BOGO “two-fer” didn’t know how spoiled it was
themselves - didn’t know they were so spoiled they were missing how
greatly they were underestimating a foe that looked an impossible oddly
named well colored contestee.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Over the weekend we were asked to accept “OFFICIALLY LAUNCHES” — How GSA in party accouting!
Over the weekend with “OFFICIALLY LAUNCHES” a “Do Over” sold as well beyond it accountable freshness!
Possibly now it is as much the fault of a spoiled Obama as it is the past freshness repackaged BOGO “two-fer” Clintons.
Seriously - let me be clear — they sold the BOGO “two-fer” first in 1992 - Now it anew is seconds spoiled and sloppy.
Once upon a time in the landings of Clintons…
Once upon a time in the time before President Do Over Barack Hussein Obama…
Possibly there is only now a President NOT Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton
because the Clinton BOGO “two-fer” didn’t know how spoiled it was
themselves - didn’t know they were so spoiled they were missing how
greatly they were underestimating a foe that looked an impossible oddly
named well colored contestee.
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and packaging.
Oops!
Oops!
President O - Oops?
Seriously - let me be clear — We have to talk about the BOGO “two-fer” freshness and repackaging.
Exclamation — HAVE YOU FOUND THE MISSING YEARS 1993 - 2001 YET? — Exclamation.
Paul Krugman continued pack mentality suggests he too may have too long eaten of the dog.
You have heard of THE BUSH TAX CUTS and yet maybe not wondered why feminists haven’t rallied around such just for its name and suggestion of a life less taxing, men too.
You have heard of Keynian Economics — oh, ha, ha, ha - that’s a funny one.
You have heard of Reagonomics and Trickle Down Economics.
Clintonomics may have had little to do with “economics” if “science” has to be in “science” of “economics”!
President Barack Hussein Obama is still trying to deny ownership and culpability for “economics” of his charge — with his disowning of his own visible hands afoot we seem to still need a “title”/”headliner” for this era of deconstruction to his “new foundation” and “new nationalism” and “new deal austerity” and near: You are too fat, using too much gas, not saving enough, and beyond that actually spending too much and generally wasteful and slothful Americans.
Should we be looking for an Obama “Cultural Revolution” and a strategy and science or are we better to now label and tag his “economics” a new economics and now JOBIAN ECONOMICS?
I can speak from a couple decades of involvement to stimulating demand various ways and even so as to defend freedom — I even can remark that President Bush seemed to like most my old: He came into office neck deep in the wrenches in the gears of government the Clintons jammed about and looks to be leaving office after only enough time to get to being only knee deep.
I shouldn’t be laughing, this isn’t very funny — but if you are me and of the Clintons starting off back whence treating what was mine and “economic” as if theirs and their State gravy you might as well see the sad humor now if also of a BA at least in economics for now it seems that no known past economic school or science can be right for our times.
JOBIAN ECONOMICS seems maybe of the most transparent poetic suggestive tagging possible for these works from the charge to “economics” by the hands of President Barack Hussein Obama that for his pattern of coy and crass denials are best not more greatly confused with a suggestion that “Obamanomics” might have to their being “strategy” or “science” in such unless maybe his purpose was austerity and to mass unemployment for an American Cultural Revolution.
We can’t go back to CLINTONOMICS for the world they were proffered for never really existed - and the Clintons corrupted its the working invisibility of hands about growth economics and machinations fluid and smooth yet without too many wrenches jammed, selfishly in a political partisan, crassly. The Clintons may not have started then admin off on wrong path as early as President Barack Hussein Obama did with partisan lying in his inaugural speech - but then it may have been within their first few days that they went astray and started our economics and national security off to the dogs, shall we say.
JOBIAN ECONOMICS would need to be scientific with a recording and consideration that THE BUSH TAX CUTS were right for their time and justified as CLINTONOMICS could only justify. THE BUSH TAX CUTS were justified by the CLINTONS’ SURPLUSES of near a trillion extra found to be cut so that spending that could have been done if their was not THE BUSH TAX CUTS was already moved and decided as wrong and unnecessary and strongly defended by Democrats. Since the spending side of the two trillion the Clintons cut, while the world was dangerously warming, and our schools, and bridges were falling apart, and duly noted as nearly ready to fall apart or down so already, was the pride of the Dems for it was it is questionable that CLINTONOMICS should or can be tagged of “economic science”.
This is where as we discuss that we need now to discuss an economic solution around JOBIAN ECONOMICS in order to spirit enough of a shared perspective to facilitate a common cause new middle ground I have to remind you that I am not writing to be PARTISAN though I do often seem partisan - that I am writing to defend my own intellectual property and past economics workings that date back to before days of the Clintons deciding to brave and entry onto such field as the 1992 national race. Again, I am writing not to specifically be Partisan - am writing to share that the Clintons were wrong to misappropriate my work of original thinking/strategizing, and wrong in ways I may be uniquely be able to explain, and for so much for how they misused what they were misappropriating.
I should get going on a bumper sticker for 2012 >>> HAVE YOU FOUND THE MISSING YEARS 1993 - 2001 YET?
If I otherwise was “in politics” or intentionally “partisan” I would likely be a candidate somewhere against all my ambitions and media plans and be maybe now: HOGAN - ENOUGH OF STUPID!
Keynesian Economics is out — A CULTURAL REVOLUTION may be in — Adam Smith is out - since crass “new foundation” and “new nationalism” worked with austerity of other man from a Hyde Park President Barack Hussein Obama of wants to a new New Deal Austerity has deconstructed most of the magic structure so that “invisible hand” economics may be where we should get back to but not a workable how towards such.
As per JOBIAN ECONOMICS we have that so many are now in struggles too like Job and while another Jobs responsible much of new tablets and a mass effect on volumes and volumes of economic considerations that those of the administering of our economy about an Obama team and a general denial of ownership of fault have just been getting wrong, wrong, wrong.
As I still ponder that old puzzlement that women, especially feminists, hadn’t jumped all over tagging “BUSH TAX CUTS” lovingly with dedication of the hopefulness in its poetic I am certainly left remembering that the Clintons’ unnecessary and crassly irresponsible cutting of an extra trillion when revenues were available to their too popular SURPLUS just for the pride in its worked spending side did and still intellectually does justify THE BUSH TAX CUTS.
If it can be as simple that our economy isn’t improving because we don’t have the words for it - I now freely offer we are now of a new science era for economics and so that “JOBIAN ECONOMICS” has an air of hope that we can get to and past the corruptions by the Clintons and these years of naive denials by President Barack Hussein Obama necessarily so unless of course his purpose was this and strategized invisibly to be to so many now so like Job in their struggles and he to be praised for his leadership specifically designed and worked to bring the USA as near a CULTURAL REVOLUTION as he could and as only a new “nearest a Great Depression” could effect.
I don’t know what President Obama can or should take credit for - I do personally have a story to tell of how the Clintons from their very first days did set up much of this mess and not just for misappropriations or misuse of works not theirs or our State’s - I do still in a non-partisan economic expression stand on a simple truth that as bad as THE BUSH TAX CUTS are made out to be the CLINTONS’ SURPLUSES were worse and factually to politically and naively justifying a reduction in taxes about those days - those days when the inheritance from such by the Clintons was still uncertain yet gutterly felt enough to be expected.
There may be something to working with a CULTURAL REVOLUTION as a best way forward to a new “invisible hand” working economic again of Adam Smith - we have that it might be better to call it JOBIAN ECONOMICS for now what may seem socialism may actually be a restoration of capitalism and a return to grass roots community based economics and banking much so that Obamacare would naturally become ridiculous intellectually speaking and so would foreign policies that pushed expansive socialism over community spirit raising and community organizing.
We have again that it better to think of me as acting as an individual trying to protect my intellectual property and pursue the bad actors common now to later bad acts more generally of the People of at least our nation. We have that it may seem I am acting and writing in a Partisan while I am more acting knowing whom I should be disappointed in more factually and personally. We have that it wasn’t Partisan that I advised Republicans and conservatives early to be to what got tagged “the party of no” and from a independent perspective and analysis shared that the fastest way to defeat these Democrats would be to letting them have all the room “no” in a “partisan” would allow so that them defeating themselves would be transparently clear.
If you did read or view Paul Krugman yesterday - I do hope this may help restore your sanity and work as an antidote to his ridiculous “economic” commentary. Yes, I did suggest after Dems won in 2008 that they would be defeating themselves and that Republicans would be wasting energy if they tried to expedite the failure of the Dems political strategies - for it seemed that the fastest way for Republicans to win would be to let the Democrats defeat themselves all by their lonesome.
Unless we with these modern struggles are to hearing Dems fully explain how we are all now right where they meant to bring us and to such austere times of real struggles for so many all around the world - then we actually are at a time of a clear and certain failure in Dem Liberal “economic” “science”!
Please don’t be so vain to think this blog is about you - only about you.
Well - about you, unless you maybe were just voting “Present” while others were actually present and less so to just racing to the top.
American Republicans could learn a lot from the French these days, they may have heard of the French, seen of the French, even drank of the French, and yet now they may not be seeing enough of the “French” from which ever era now out of place as if modern and appropriate.
To better discuss the French today seems a day to top off with a comparison between the American Journey of Colin Powell and the unsettling racing to the top of far less critical presence of present President Barack Hussein Obama. One was actually in our history and ready and actually present, yes - true, and, another one did just vote “present” from a safe distance or maybe actually have read about it whence - “it” as actually history in real time and really during “CRISIS” moments.
Recently we have forgotten that General Colin Powell seemed to face real opposition from even or mostly the Clintons’ vast political machine while thinking that he could contest them to be the first black president and so before Mrs. Clinton first got a chance to be a first female (white female) president. Recently we have been forgetting still that Secretary of State (black) Colin Powell did inherit quite a mess from the Clintons’ 8 years of “two-fer” governance.
Bill and Hillary have much been party to a new extravagance and to suggestions themselves that our United States of America needs to become more like France - more socialist and so susceptible to a few elite locking up near autocratic power for themselves irrespective of thought effective term limits. Bill and Hillary may have punked President Barack O. into some of his parading about embracing a selective French story for thought shared political purposes.
President Barack Hussein Obama may have been onto a truth with his blurb, nervous self consciousness, during the recent White House Correspondents Dinner when suggesting he was starting to actually look like Morgan Freeman — yes it is seeming that the Clintons have been succeeding to putting him in the drivers seat for them anew as a Mr. & Mrs Daisy.
For former General Colin Powell, long of being present, and actually effective, while duty bound, in a still representative system, was to being former first black Secretary of State Colin Powell, and, of a spoken concern for his and his family’s safety if he were to seek high offices the Clintons had their designs upon, to have been so must it strategically have had a basis in fear that must track back to the vast Clinton political machine? We in 2012 are really to finally being asked to consider that the Clintons really left a horrible inheritance for our first black Secretary of State.
We have been distracted - we have been easily distracted. We have been asked to let Democrats say we should be more like the French but without them fitting their personal ambitions to a perfect match with a specific time and place in French History - not even where most appropriate to a Napoleonic era.
Before we rush to becoming more French in the “socialism” an elite Democrat Party few see best towards keeping them to power and in power as easily as practicable, maybe, shouldn’t we first work on a quantitative perspective say by suggestion to be more like France we need only let New York State become run by the Governor of Vermont, right?
What a nightmare it would have been if our first black Secretary of State with his long history of actual presence and effectiveness it would have been for the Clintons if he had run and so run with the story of the Clintons’ inheritance left their successor in 2001. Really!!!
We do have at least one speech by President Obama to praise - yes, it is odd that it is a Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech of record. In that speech more than any other he respected the story of our first black Secretary of State and chided the Clintons with his warning of “dangers” from “inaction” and “avoidance” as it seemed to be related to even he then being stuck with too few global options after the eight years of the Clintons’ “two-fer” governance specifically related to Afghanistan and Iraq of Saddam Hussein.
How could Gen Sec Powell have been so concerned about his and his family’s safety with a record of effective presence for his country bravely and patriotically? Who was he considering challenging for power - how far were they willing to go to keep the power to themselves?
In the past weeks some developments have come to light about President Obama as if actually moved to the driver’s seat as if Morgan Freeman to a Mr. and Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton Daisy.
Let me be clear: Presidents Clinton of the intimate power sharing BOGO “two-fer” with its international crusading and inciting of radicals were to excess and extravagances. Presidents Clinton did act after being forced out of the grand palace theirs in public housing that is our White House did work a “benefits package” for Bill Clinton so that it seemed he was being compensated as if being promoted out of an above our more minor office of the Presidency. He did attempt to get clearly more in first year rent in NYC and so as to rent for life an amount then more than all past Presidents’ post office first year rents combined. And, with his Harlem suites he still ended up with near the same amount, and amount still too grand and regal and to also seeming a violation of our Constitution and its bar for America from “titling” Americans as if to a nobility.
President Barack Hussein Obama has many faults just his own for an extravagance and detachment and so that it would be more obvious if he hadn’t been stopped after two or three Wednesday Court Dinners at the White House by a free and active new media based pressing so to help DC economy by fighting a start too Marie Antoinettish to courtly over rational or common that looked on path to be bankrupting numerous high end privately operated public fine dining establishments.
Strategically as if a war for socialism it might make sense to let the Governor of Vermont first prove he can also run New York state as if his to a Frenchness spoken to as right for all of us in our USA.
All that may have been missing for these Dem “boobs” may be the hats of Marie Antoinette as dramatized for having preceded her fall. It seems to have recently been real “boobs” calling others more innocent and experienced “boobs.”
But what about Gen Sec Colin Powell our first black Secretary of State?
When it comes to “inheritance” his then presently was far worse and yet related to “inheritance” still naively spoken about by President who once gave a speech after years of having just voted “Present” just a few years after some community organizing he wrote of such a distaste for that he published a line in his DREAMS OF HIS FATHER near “I have to get out of this place, I have to get out of this place…”
President Obama may have a “mother complex” he may even have an Oedipal Complex - such could explain his keeping Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton so close. How this works with his efforts to bring us more into the bosoms of a Frenchness such as a over-coddling by a few elite Dems has been sold as if a good remains a puzzle - remains puzzling, seems our economy hasn’t even figured it out.
But about Gen Sec Colin Powell and his actual American Journey and how it should be updated — Wow, what an inheritance!!! Like? Can you even remember the years 1993 - 2001 as they actually were of so much dangerous inaction and avoidance by the Clintons’ BOGO “two-fer” such that no Secretary of State ever before and especially no black Secretary of State nor his boss our President was ever quite to having been left so few options for so many troubling areas, to actually nearly no alternatives but one?
Really, what? Really, whom? Really, how could a man so present and effective in a braveness so long have been scared for his own safety and his family’s just with thoughts of being up against the vast Clinton political machine?
We had been in Afghanistan before the Clintons and during the Clintons’ BOGO “two-fer” 8 years they knew our absence was letting the state of Afghanistan dangerously deteriorate - they were not without a moral argument to return our United States presence to an “in country” status with Afghanistan - yet avoided such.
We had been in Iraq and accused already of an abandonment as well of Iraqi people as of Afghani people already by Clintons’ first year and especially as related to known issues of violence against women and people supporting freedom and equality as they liked to speak about but for them so that they could proceed with more of a domestic extravagance anchored in an actual lack of presence much of chided dangers of mentioned erudite oration once of President Barack Hussein Obama with Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance speech and accentuation on a past with too much avoidance and inaction.
The Clintons even though of eight years supposedly dealing just with Saddam Hussein was it still seems as settled history to leaving their successor no entrance or exit plans worked through in order to back up any fronting by them to a “bite” in sanctions, in sanctions just upon Saddam Hussein. We seem to have had the inheritance left our first black Secretary of State a general condition quite dangerous of a lack of preparedness. We seem to have actually had the Clintons not have a plan to actually have “bite” in sanctions by the United Nations upon Saddam Hussein.
Secretary Colin Powell clearly may have a story to tell that should rock the world of an innocence kept for the Clintons and their fronting as a still innocent “two-fer” - Really!
Sec Gen Powell, unlike President Obama, is of a history for many of these years still of concern and relevance not of him just having stood and voted “Present” but actually of being a stalwart bravely present and actually effective.
Please don’t be so vain and think this blog is all about you - just you - unless maybe you were a Clinton or one of their henchmen or female gutter snipes that was party to leaving their successor in 2001 so few options that nearly only one option was left and that truly without there even having been a plan for “bite” for sanctions with an entrance or exit strategy fully developed and psyched through for Iraq.
Man in robe walks out of desert - Bill and maybe Hillary seen dancing and what around a gilded pig. Moses had it easy.
It is not every day communistic lawyers find a really Communist lawyer to make a sympathetic global figure and role model even for American mothers to use to indoctrinate a new American ideal. Moses had it easy, MAYBE - but Obama may be having it too easy.
It seems we are of a time where our President has issues with the Holy Trinity. He isn’t alone it seems - it is still not clear whose robes he is wearing. Shepard Rick Warren may be of a coven less of his hoven.
It starts like a tag line for a comedian how sickly a man may be looking -so thin he may be on a diet of Joseph’s sticks - but then it could be kosher fare or even a want for cous cous some more. To look so poor or tired and yet with a garden his own - Hmmm? - A garden his own that is actually a garden of the State? Hmmm? Does he just not get to keep enough of his own endeavorings?
When it comes to the Holy Trinity and politics - American politics - you have to ask yourself and with great vast wonderment: How is it Bill Clinton now seems to be the “expert” on what “is” or “is not” “in politics” or “is politics”! Gosh he couldn’t even get level with a God’s honest truth for Government testimony on when “is” is “is” as per simpler but maybe as tempting pleasure seeking - simpler and as tempting at least as his want for political power - real and global as near Autocratic as possible political power, like.
Moses had it easy? When man in robe that looks as said as if on a diet of sticks walks out of desert to find Bill Clinton of all people about dancing around a gilded pig with Weiner roasting recent - it really will matter as much what should be Ramses (Ramsey’s?) and what should be free. But did Moses on a Mayday have a blind communist lawyer to make a cause celeb and a secular idol for American mothers to begin an indoctrination of their young with?
As it has been told Moses was able to bring law and order and happiness or guilt to a people otherwise happy with gilded pork. Poor President Obama, an emaciated as barked, he still has the lawlessness of at least Bill keeping his edicts and dictates from a dividing now of his party too. It does seem his Secretary for Communist Affairs will get the blind communist lawyer to herself and her shared Autocratic aspirations kept long intimately and cosilly with her first man Clinton — President Obama may be able to leverage and share the secular idol worshipping craze - hard to say now — again, how is it Bill Clinton has become the “expert” on what “is” or “is not” in the “is” in “is in politics” or not?
How will man in robe, shall we say, be now, while we still wonder on whose robes or cloth he wears, to handle law and order with all this new partying with Bill Clinton and so much pork? How will Obama command - again, evermore?
There is “has problems with the Holy Trinity” and then there is “has problems with the Holy Trinity” - Shepard Warren? Most Reverend Wright? Can we first find a lawful and unpartisan and unbiased cross to bear fairly on what “is in politics” now?
I don’t mean to skin a moose here of dress a dog - but with a pal in our politics like Bill Clinton can Obama find a worse Judas?