In this year two thousand twenty and three we have reached the 75th anniversary of “THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS”.
What, today, is the state of religious freedom, here, and abroad?
How is it compatible with originalism upon our constitution?
The other day I was a visitor seated in the House of Representative Gallery as a resolution was discussed and passed towards restricting Representative Omar from the Foreign Affairs Committee, and as well for the passage of resolution H.R. Res. 9 offering the full House an opportunity to condemn the past horrors of socialism/socialists.
The days before I attended the “International Religious Freedom Summit”- #IRFSummit2023.
Representative Ilhan Omar history may too be in conflict on human dignity core of “The International Declaration of Human Rights”.
To reach a consensus on the complexity of these discussions we are wise to consider what history relates and if there amidst such isn’t a biased incorrect partisan spin that also compromises committee assignments.
Representative Omar is not firstly a woman of color, nor a Muslim. This Minneapolis politician is principally a Democrat. As a Democrat party operative her history can objectively be reconsidered upon where there are contradictions in her known biases, and even where such essentially admits into discussion/evidence past cover-ups for leaders of her party.
Protecting human dignity, and also religious freedom of each individual, how issues relate, is a global goal. These times have nationalisms and imperialisms rising as at least existential threats to what was written and agreed upon of the United Nations General Assembly 75 years ago.
Let us not forget how clever the founding fathers were, especially James Madison, in the establishment of the Peoples’ “Order” ordained a constitution for uniting states. Human dignity is in originalism much by that there is no right in this ordered liberty established “Order” for any to violate the 10 COMMANDMENTS. Though Thomas Jefferson opined the nation was not constituted as a Christian nation he yet did not write it – it of it was subscribed “done” in the “Year of our Lord”.
James Madison protected human dignity cleverly as well, shall we consider, to it of the First Amendment, the Bill of Rights generally, is redundant to the body of the Peoples’ “Order” established ordained a constitution. To any understanding “THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE” the originalism of the constituted is that each is firstly of their rights from their Creator.
The religious freedom constituted is not of the Nation is ordered as Christian, but yet is of the nation is a republic that secures each their rights to self-govern in the Lord’s Laws, and as vitally secured to be firstly particularly for neighbor amongst neighbor common neighborly considerations/jurisdictions.
The constitution respects that each is under God before under government, and secures protections from tyranny for the people for which it orders liberty. The real separation of church and states is not a “wall of separation” as Thomas Jefferson emphasized but the vertical separation written in by James Madison to the Government is also under God – not to be theocratic – not to play God – not even to say there is no God.
In 1941 we can argue the interpretation of “wall of separation” was tweaked to legally attempt to legalize SOCIALISM – towards there could be a secular equal standing for Franklin D. Roosevelt to stand up a “NEW DEAL” phat with social programs. Human dignity is firstly protected by originalism to such would be contrary to the constituted “Order” by to an otherwise stood up to as if citizens are more firstly just subjects and more to be presumed guilty – needing a NANNY STATE – and not innocent under God existentially.
With originalism read of a vertical separation the redundant in the Bill of Rights rightly reads of a snarky grammar. Any of an understanding that the American Revolution was fought for individual rights in the vein of each of rights from their Creator – of “a free state” as a human condition of LIBERTY in religious freedom – each by how united PLURIBUS is an individual an UNUM of rights to defend themselves from any violate of the 10 COMMANDMENT against them, and of too such is of First and Second Amendments distinctively of rights versus their own government.
You too can play this game!
This is not the old game of “how about a game of TIC-TAC-TOE?”.
The proliferation of Kim Jong Un, nuclear, is a complicated American morality mashable. It seems Iran and North Korea weaponization of rockets manned to based to be post “GLOBAL THERMONUCLEAR WAR” madness evolved from to armaments to for waging IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE.
As America is an IDEA each citizen should now step up a joined to a letter writing campaign. Each of us is needed to pen letters to North Korea to be bulk carried by President Donald J. Trump to his summit for “ONE KOREA” ice breaking. As POTUS is “Trumpet Boy” the SWAMP of these united states of the Americas must be heard over.
The new IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE paradigm being brought to a head for “ONE KOREA” summit variant is now after the FIRST STRIKE, & SECOND STRIKE, and to if an EVIL TWIN BROTHER “KIM JONG OH YEH” to seek to target university towns across America over military or government establishments.
Kim Jong Un’s evil twin brother “Kim Jong Oh Yeh” is as much the relevant core issue as in Middle East and particularly accelerated basic concurrent of Iran.
Great Americans now is the time for at least a major lettering writing campaign due Donald J. Trump mission is that Americans are generally good people and it is the humble greatness of Americans that is our individual best defense to Kim Jong Un too as if “Kim Jong Oh Yeh!”.
Consider the SWAMP of fogs of partisan sniping bogging down a global and local means to rationalize our ecosystems from slipped to divisive paradigm dominant.
Donald J. Trump, negotiator, has before him the ignorance of the “SWAMP” collating HOPE to two distinct boxes.
Donald J. Trump, manager, can use expressive masses of individual voices to pen letters to explain why they do not deserve to be targeted even if of a university town.
Donald J. Trump, Republican, has much progress arrested and his hands strapped from breaking partisan divide due Democrats won’t yet even step up to basic simple first step to outta the box potential from teeing up fair play by offering in an also humble set a list of at least 10 things 5 top Democrats leaders have each made since January 1993.
Republicans are not hiding from progress to a restoration of BIPARTISAN colluding for the People by shying away from listing and discussing what mistakes Republicans may have made, while - yes - essentially Democrats still won’t list or open discussion even on just what mistakes William J. Clinton may have made in 1993.
Imagine you are to be standing waist deep in “ONE KOREA” summit without loads and loads o mailbags filled with letters asking Kim Jong Un, Supreme Leader, not to target them individually, - even if of in a university town of too much diversity of now a legacy of failed to martial DPRK type SOCIALISM to Washington, DC broadly.
Imagine North Korea Supreme Leader is true to his words to that he is not a one to want to bomb free people back to the stone ages.
The Supreme Leader of the DPRK now has us imagining a “ONE KOREA” breakthrough but by how “Un” knows “Un” so may yet be from that so far “Un” of experience learned from a proving North Korea could be nuclear aggressor and not as yet from R&D safe spaces to trigger state that could surface an EVIL twin brother dynamic of “Kim Jong Oh Yeh” buttons pounder.
Now is the time to table BIPARTISANSHIP as it is elementarily common to parry commencement post seating arrangement and the shape of the table of to a common proffered honor in humility of now the Democrats to first offer and opening list to discuss to heal partisan divide by offering now second step as to be open to dissecting what mistakes William J. Clinton did and may have tragically made at least of 1993 to 2001.
We must gradually open minds for BIPARTISANSHIP back for an America GREAT AGAIN by once again likewise as a “ONE AMERICA!”.
We must not rush from gradually opening mind to resolved from blind partisans - of a modern dark ages - to too soon breaking down that DPRK to “ONE KOREA” could have happened near 9 years ago but couldn’t because Barack H. Obama, President, wouldn’t heed foreign leaders of Socialist countries entreaties to be less SOCIALIST and to from rubbing their progress to FREE MARKETS more akin CAPITALISM raw.
If Democrats won’t cease & desist from being faux AVENGERS and shift from first order OBSTRUCTIONISM all progress for also “ONE KOREA” may be DOOMED!
If Democrats do not offer a fundamental shift to open to parity to fair polity comity can not be seeded even to meditations for BIPARTISANSHIP!
If Democrats now resist a shift from first order OBSTRUCTIONISM and refuse to offer service to our tables for DIPLOMACY - domestic DIPLOMACY and foreign too - our resistance alone to also displaced!
The shift from “GLOBAL THERMONUCLEAR WAR” to “TIC-TAC-TOE” to now attitudes for NUCLEAR exercised as of IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE justified is firstly concerning due such shirts FIRST STIKE, SECOND STRIKE, THIRD STRIKE, equations to algorithms of university towns more natural targets than military or government establishments forward?
Letter writing campaign may now be our best defense.
Meditations for BIPARTISANSHIP persist thwarted from suffice by too of a “MEXICAN STAND-OFF” between the 100% INNOCENT William J. Clinton and the Democrats’ REAL William J. Clinton.
We seem able to take North Korea Supreme Leader at his word that he has learned from developing his NUCLEAR potential, so far, that his “HE” is of not to be EVIL like twin brother a “Kim Jong Oh Yeh!”.
President Donald J. Trump, of the humble great People of these united states of the Americas, while partisan divide to healing remains thwarted, now may need at least the spirit amassed and bundled voices of “GREAT AMERICANS” of individuals to proofing his belief in normal Peoples by free and open exercised rights to ask the honorable Kim Jong Un to not target them and with explanations to why targeting normal Americans so would not be just?
This THIRD STRIKE conundrum is not only of what could have yet also happened/progressed since 2009 if otherwise tabulated!
Do, PLEASE, help NUCLEAR Kim Jong Un understand why each of you should NOT deserve being of his “THIRD STRIKE” algorithms - even if of a university town too diverse to muddled blandness and if such of institutions failed to martial SOCIALISM arts endured.
Otherwise: The strikes against Hillary Rodham Clinton are justified - are just to discuss & dissect!!!
Had Hillary R. Clinton won we would have no where to press off to due to guilty by association and called to DEFEND HER HONOR even as leaks and truths discovered of lacked/lacks HONOR!!! [There is something to the size of a cover-up suggest he size of crimes, and likewise Democrats can’t yet even admit were 1% errant/bad!!!]
A parity for polity - fair play - got game - forward depends on comity by effecting a playing out of teeing up now also all the strikes against Democrats and to assisting negotiations for unity by actually offering service to statistics to summed up now on what were at least 10 mistakes by William J. Clinton, Albert A.Gore, Speaker Nancy P. D’A. Pelosi, First Lady/Senator/Secretary of State/First Mate of Clinton Foundation Hillary R. Clinton each!!!
* * * BABY STEPS? * * *
Ok, - Jon Stewart has left a void, Stephen Colbert is not ready for Late Show, and Schumer now is big in real news.
As it is August in New York we must be girded forthrightly that this is wrong if biased a vagina monologue, or of a Trump “menstral” “bloody”, — though of a train wreck yet more prostrate to a Schumer of just saying NO! Has President Obama foresaken a metrosexual in a rush to a trans-national pop grand parading grandstanding sandbox politik?
Schumer is august in just saying NO! Obama has been reckless to nuclear without sufficient courtship; to his YES YES ~ blush’n. Obama needs to labor days forward more as if in the real politics of the deserts than gleefully in sandbox politik.
How is the box blocked, to an irascible, while Schumer is present crossing guard for a mediated copacetic? How is there too much trafficking for a YES YES ~ assimilation now congesting the prudence for even just a measure more than once, and look before you sign to leaping off? Is Schumer now a necessary voice of reason, — a moderated for a rushed nuclear to devoid of courtship and standards for comity?
Before you get all blood drawn or to bleeding of Trump let us be good citizens and to a querious, before too honest, to if Governors standing up to The Donald grandiosity don’t themselves have more golf courses and hotels, and especially housing units, under their licenses than he, however trans-state & trans-national? Before we compare his sour grapes to the protestant of the others opines aren’t we all behooved to see it comical that what his “show” is now is of plane, suits, & helicopters branded as state peoples long scoff at to extravagance for any yet of the public contracted duties? Can we get past disliking lesser showmen of equal or greater licenses and budgets now wisely in a knowing that they have only been so for kept by us from being too like The Donald while on taxables?
Who is this Schumer now so pressing a heroic in real news? Why does this Schumer relate comity by “NO!”?
In this void we have it just wafting in the air the scent of the The Donald post the prostrations of the GOP Debate as if he more than Foxy Megyn Kelly were the present too as if with blooded eyes, and as if at least menstruating least by steam or smoke from (his) ears?
To be more august to the real news, and of Schumer the hot smack stand up guy, we can get comparative to problematics too of the Republican (establishment) in field of GOP Debate Top Ten: We can wax on and wax off of Bush “The Jeb!” to see if he a parable for Party luster, beyond if repairable to Florida, or Texas. It wasn’t as if and anti-Nixon perspiration ph balancing was super-evident in an extant of a beading up of his porous to a blocking but there was much blushing of the Bush a Jeb of the heat!
Flat was the stand up of the “Republican Establishment” Bush alternative, even as if trumped, merely by a whimpish bluster too also of legs of a walk not too sandbox politik played. Flat is the ride, and bugs ended the Jeb grill, - and the bonnet, and windscreen of the Bush mobile. “Illustrious” is foreign to the foreign policy diatribe of Governor Jeb Bush.
Did you hear the one about Hillary Clinton by Governor Jeb Bush? Did you hear the one about Bill Clinton by Governor Jeb Bush? Did you only, too, hear the one against President George Bush by Governor Jeb Bush, — and even as 1993-2001 rest of mine fields still explosive of Clintons’ culpabilities, and even more so than opined as only against his real brother?
Who is this Schumer now so pressing a heroic in real news? Why does this Schumer relate comity by “NO!”?
How remarkable is it now today there is a Democratic Party future leader necessarily now standing up against the real Clintons, and to the nuclear stocks, more than a Republican Bush, as too while stand up for New York of a “NO!” to President Barack Obama?
Senator Chuck Schumer is like circumcising the Bush brethren while pulling a sold as “magic carpet” out from under a rushed OBAMA & THE PERSIANS parading. Do we have to atone to a resonance too that Schumer seems to be trumping The Donald?
Too, now, concurrent to the Republicans as flat on Iraq and so to of an unknow of their unknown of deserts & Persian knowns, — NEW YORK VOTES NO! Go Chuck go? #StandWithSchumer?
Senator Chuck Schumer has legs to stand up CHECKS AND BALANCES are alive! Schumer can stand up with the best of them, even all of them (as his Party’s next leader) that Congress should, before to YES YES ~ blush’n (appeasing), too as if of ‘a weak deal as if better than a good deal’ prostration, be to availing the discourse of the phat of “American” as a confederated republic, morphed to more representative of all people, to the rich experiential potential in thorough debate, — in thorough civil procedures to delve, delve, delve, and trust if can verify.
Oy! Schumer! Mustn’t Congress call both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton before the Iran Nuclear Agreement review boards as “experts” - “expert witnesses” - to be for the heat of these trans-national momentous to espoused experience on the history of sanctions success at least as against Iraq during 1993-2001?
Oy! Governor Jeb Bush! It was not tremendous but HUGE you like only blamed your brethren while a greater culpability lies in the preceding years of the intimate administering of issues per Iraq and Iran so those as the THE CLINTONS’ YEARS.
Who is this Schumer now so pressing a heroic in real news? Why does this Schumer relate comity by “NO!”?
#OMG #SCHUMER #4REAL #STANDUPGUY #FORWARD @ #IRANDEAL #JUSTSAYNO!
There is at least a union of these united American states of the confederate republic now more representative of all people forwith that should stand with Schumer and this NEW YORK VOTES NO! punctuation of his August exclamations, for really at least before a force assimilation driven executive order style freshly there is at least that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton of #Hillary2016, #Benghazi, #HillaryEmail, #GruberGate, #BIGLIAR, #Impeachment!
And so now there is #MrsC, whom is a self claiming “expert” whom the People’s Congress shouldn’t waste — shouldn’t waste an opportunity to pick and pick at — as too so “expert” — so available at least to how these worse or better days are, as from her experience, and of hindsight of/for Secretary of State, so if rooted in mistakes made by President William Jefferson Clinton in too much avoidance and inaction, and quite a general abandonment of assurance that United Nations #SANCTIONS were to be demonstrable of teeth to Saddam Hussein, and Iraq, and too Iran.
The Iran Nuclear Agreement smacks as if rushed for partisan or intra-partisan political gain; Thank you Senator Chuck Schumer of New York for standing up (for a restoration of Congress) your blocking of President Barack Obama YES YES ~ BLUSH’D as if it could only be GOOD and while politics beckon it is prudent to also call at least Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton as a supposed “expert” for all the years at least since Iraq invaded Kuwait!
Yes, Schumer there is a lot to stand up about the “woman” and “female” so much about Obama’s nuclear prima facia.
Yes, Schumer there is a lot to stand up about the “nuclear” of the THE CLINTON, and too of the THE BUSH(ES)!
Yes, Schumer there is a lot to stand up about a good for New York in just saying “NO” until #Hillary2016 asked re:!
* * *
[COMING AUGUST 9, 2015 - SOON: A DISQ ON IRAN DEAL THAT SHOULD HAVE YOU SIDING WITH SENATOR CHUCK SCHUMER, AND MAYBE WONDERING NO LONGER AT THE NEW BUSH, FORWARD, FOR HIS IRAQ RELATED OPINES]
President Barack Hussein Obama may not (yet) be to a post Presidency as dramatized with Gene Hackman in WELCOME TO MOOSEPORT - there yet is to be much considered a HOW BIG? - how big a library he may deserve/afford. PBHO may be all VIP to UK PM, as if of a singularity in importance, and not of “juice” @ #NoJuiceObama beyond questioned, but he is now checked by a Republican Congress and for checkered inconvenient truths.
Governor Mitt Romney shouldn’t look to be thought able to defeat the Clinton after not having been able to defeat PBHO; GMR should be embarrassed as a businessman for the last month of his 2012 campaign of PBHO of defining him unchecked. It is seeming an embarrassment that GMR defeated himself especially in his last month when most obviously of like rookie PR mistakes or hubris; GMR let PBHO be seeming erudite of proffers that Obamacare was Romneycare while GMR let himself seem played while declaring he would replace Obamacare with Romneycare.
Right! GMR for especially the last month let it seem ridiculous to elect him for if Obamacare was Romneycare and he was just going to like replace Obamacare with Romneycare than the only seeming issue was was it wrong for a black President to have brought the country Romneycare before white Governor brought the nation anything like such an “Affordable Care Act”?
Right! Piddly to the problems another white Governor seems beset of as a Bush; Right it seems Governor Jeb Bush is more in a pickle as in the pickle barrel banded about President William Jefferson Clinton and his Mrs., however, and President George Walker Bush. It seems rookie PR errs are to be trumped by a Governor a brother as like also a step brother while all the lot are to be like the work of the new Republican Congress (just for National Security needs) of accepting that there has been a cover-up at least of that of PWJC when Mrs. FLOTUS and that PBHO did at least inherit a (dangerous) cover-up from, quite the bulk of the Bush clan.
Right! GJB seems compromised by his brother and his father, at least as Presidents of record goes, for it seems a truth an inconvenient that there was a cover-up that needed a new cover-up after the United States of America was attacked on Benghazi properties for the lies for the PWJC sustaining were falling apart as lies no longer of sufficient constitution, at least.
Right! PBHO however of inheriting said cover-up so of such absolutes it is impossible to disprove or deny, is yet to be considered for a modest Presidential Library for too it seems to easy to prove he worked from hour one to improve the cover-up of the Clintons and to then like stab the Bush clan in the back towards trying to repair the Clintons to at least be able to bully their way forward evermore at least over any Republicans as under them as the Bush beset under them like so.
But today is of PM of UK of a pop across the pond to at least find intelligent allegiances upon Jenkins Hill as seated in the 114th Congress. PM of UK may need friends now as the 2016 campaign allowances are expected to be forward well defined and compartmentalized between “governing” and “political partisan campaigning.”
So where is the beef as for now we can leave the pork to less pressing but due deep probatives and debating?
So where is the beef in UK PM cross’d the pond per immediate security and policy concerns?
#IRAN - How not start here for there is actually “moral hazard” in it if allowed to be a brokered “improvement” if made or credited by Secretary of State John Kerry? Really there is “moral hazard” in there being a deal with Iran now, however reasonable, for SoSJK is of a past that is contrary to compromised for a Posterity for any deal to endure of a constitutional establismentary. Really there is a risk in SoSJK being a one or the one upon which such could be possible if to endure; His opposition to Operation Iraqi Freedom is contrary and too his years as of the PWJC years of the avoidance and inaction in years 1993-2001.
For a brevity as newly seated “leaders” are charged to sworn to these duties as of the majority of a bicameral People’d Congress I will try to wrap it for future nibbles upon the hard tack and how SoSJK isn’t quite the right bride for such a FP marriage - for FP progress by “agreement”! Here:
Iran should favor new deals with the The United States of America because of Operation Iraqi Freedom as right and just and at least as for a late by 8-10 years of offering something less than abandonment to the Iraqi Shia.
Iran if to a willingness to make a deal with the USA is yet of “moral hazard” to any such deal if not to stipulations of SoSJK an inconvenient “messenger” whose opposition to OIF should be apologized for writ large and concurrently.
As since for such to be with the new younger Iran so populated and currently constituted it behoove the poets of Irani nationalism, and hopes, be expressive to at least attempt to rap the bad in the past of Mrs. PWJC, however, however all the way back to 1993 when firstly FLOTUS Mrs. PWJC.
Operation Iraqi Freedom was necessary to any possible progress now with Iran - if rumors of such at a new threshold of a global copacetic are to be believed. The Democrats of these days are too much the Democrats of the days of abandonment from 1993-2001 of expectant of Iraq and Afghanistan; The Democrats have the history of PWJC of “official speak” as if fixed in his FP as per the ME such that to Iraqi concerns he was bigoted in Islam as biased to favors favoring the Sunni; The Democrats have that PWJC was officially of posturing that bigotry against Shia - against specifically all Shia of Iraq - against Shia so much he did declare like: THE (IRAQI) SHIA ARE NOT (PEOPLE) CAPABLE OF GOVERNING THEMSELVES.
For this to be of said brevity let me just tease a problem too relating to Syria and Ukraine:
At least: It for their history as part of the U.S.S.R. has baggage to check before allowance for being “separatists” morally. Ukraine is of the history of the Soviets as per the Cold War of Iran and Iraq played like pawns for the security of oil supplies was needed for a victory by one or the other - historically.
So for brevity:
What can be allowed however SoSJK of a “moral hazard” pertinent to UK PM DC visit to DC and USC & the WH both while a Posterity needs a strength of truth - of cause and effect development logic.
How can an deal be brokered by any Obama Democrat and especially his SoSJK, irregardless of it less of a “moral hazard” than if so hazard actually by Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton while SoSWJC aka “SoSHRC”?
Otherwise however, isn’t a first step to fixin’ Syria and Ukraine at least to settle the history most contested by Iran?
Mischief to be to undermining all of the above: If Iran isn’t to being convinced by Ukraine that the Holocaust was real then…?
PRESIDENT OBAMA? UK PM DC? USC? WH? NSA? PEOPLE’D PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?
It is seemingly - seemingly rapidly becoming - seemingly rapidly becoming known - seemingly rapidly becoming known and self evident that Hillary Clinton is here to for becoming an out-cast untouchable. The “The Clinton” is now more a rock in the path of blockage, as if by political avalanche, than a common vine to any fruit from diplomacy now otherwise by the essence of Secretary John Kerry.
Any vitality of any diplomatic essence of Mrs. Clinton, from FLOTUS to First Mate of CGI, is now worlds apart from that being witness of her successor from Boston’s top echelon/caste. There may now be now clear and easy way towards understanding the taller standing of Secretary Kerry from Secretary Clinton due to the elephant of religion in their pathologies diplomatic; Secretary John Kerry isn’t a Methodist, isn’t from Chicago; Secretary Kerry is Catholic and from Boston. It is in more than one or simple ways that Secretary Kerry is now standing so much taller than Mrs. Clinton ever managed.
A cover ‘o cover reading for “HARD CHOICES” can be from it suggestive that she is only allowed publication much at talking and talking of process; HRC is quite arrested from truth being an option that being heavy on process is her only safe harbor. To a cover, of “HARD CHOICES”, each is initially, civilly, beset to ponder: IF “HARD” WHY “HARD”? HRC is not a Catholic; HRC is a Methodist. HRC iss the longest serving top Diplomat charged for diplomatic solutions by President Obama during the “longest war.” The “The Longest War” now is HRC’s “war” for it she who most failed to find a diplomatic solution the longest.
HRC is now so becoming an out-cast untouchable it is critical that we separate her as not of any American caste or nobility. Secretary Kerry, for being Catholic of Boston, may yet not be justifiably, however of Boston 1%, “Boston Brahmin.” Secretary Kerry has inherited from HRC’s predecessors much in opportunities for greater “Tranquility” that is not of or from the “diplomacy” or “skirting” of his predecessor. Secretary Kerry now with HOPE for CHANGE with IRAN, now so young a nation again, of standing more on the settled well foundations from the Bush Administration FREEDOM AGENDA ways than any “new foundation” of President Obama or his first top diplomat. We all may be behooved to look at the paths forward available and to work away from any beaten of the Clintons - HRC & the CGI corporate and to each person. The Clintons eitherwise of one or two paths distinguishable are yet present as obstructionists as if fallen to inconvenient barriers to any apropos “forward.”
Who is Secretary John Kerry now to us - to the President - to the U.S. - to Iran - to the world? Can he be now so much taller than his predecessor HRC just because he is Catholic and/or of Boston, however 1% or Brahmin caste? Do new words from his boss the President now, too much yet still of a daily emoting, yet work to undermine any path or way but for any stable now as yet built upon a well settled foundation much of, or from, the Bush Administration day about a FREEDOM AGENDA? As a Catholic working for the “Messiah” what is religion and what is politics? As a Catholic what is post-Clinton post-imperial socialism bias and returned to a basis in property rights and federalism parlance and nuance? As a Catholic, like Vice President Joseph Biden, yes of Delaware - The First State - how is Secretary Kerry maybe evangelizing “Messiah” President Obama globally?
Iran isn’t as complicated as HRC seems to have long implied. But as she never seemed to fathom the grand potential and opportunities so globally progressing that explains the Clintons most unexpected and late rise of the 1992 Presidential contest perhaps we should show mercy for her too much of an ignorance. To this there is flow as if a vine not from merely the Bush Administration while of a FREEDOM AGENDA but to President Reagan and how the expansionist socialism was stopped in its tracks in Afghanistan and then beyond, and how the expansionist socialism fell to a new world order rising to a reboot I’ve long tagged as a “CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM.” Coincidentally what best explains the Clinton unlikely old story yet of their 1992 rising is what HRC and WJC have long not proffered or posited as best for the way forward and yet it is that which is now of the foundations that Secretary Kerry now can best build upon.
Iran isn’t as complicated as HRC seems to have long implied - Iran is far simpler to understand if one learns to fathom how the Clintons and President Obama have been so wrong about Iraq and for so long that they can yet, if ever, be, for the records and Posterity, as “correct” about much at least across the Middle East, and, at least especially regarding or respecting Iran.
From where I sit informed to “expert” at least of my own perspective regarding such, as of a cover for retrospectives, for others, I must parse, for a greater parity, if not Tranquility too, how we must yet separate the “Bush” from the “Hogan” - the decidings rendered by the necessarily at “politics” of the Bush Administration from that as lay and unsolicited, however respecting “politics”, for that which I share is much of my opined and faxed to the Bush Administration via their NSC # as of my perspectives, private, and volunteered, yet more of the business or marketing perspective in a pre-politics rendition that then the office of the President would have to, if needed, modify for the charge “political” of his duty of the Presidency. I so put forth such qualifier for this of which I write now dates to it as common to the very advise to Middle East and Iran postures whence the hard choices had to be made by President Bush. Again, “HARD CHOICES” of HRC to each cover is yet tragically of her “politics” to easier choices less possible for decidings more of truths were not an option to Mrs. Clinton.
Secretary John Kerry is more than just now obviously to a self evident truth of standing far taller than his predecessor on the global and Middle East soap boxes of the duty a charge for diplomacy, President Barack H. Obama’s Secretary of State secondly is standing tall on merits that do yet run contrary still to the process and speak of the “The Obama” doctrinally yet. For more to how HRC didn’t affect a “new foundation” & nor so President Obama, himself, at least until newly to also building on the Reagan legacy yet as the Bush Administrations did, it may behoove a visit to http://JPHogan.org for the essay regarding Iraq set as “OBAMA’S RETREAT” as specifically at http://bit.ly/ObamasRetreat!
We hardly yet know if HRC failed the nation both as per the compensations for liberations as per OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM and too her “baby” ODYSSEY DAWN. It seems HRC is most culpable at least in association with the partisan leadership by Nancy Pelosi to how how both the liberation of Iraq (and Libya) were prudently commenced with plans that a country’s vast oil profits could be readily credited out in compensation to any of the liberating coalesced nations.
I have problems with the seeming progress of Secretary of State John Kerry as per Iran and the nuclear path(s) of the young again sovereign country. For the years of the COLD WAR they like Iraq were as if pawns (too much) in a geopolitics of the United States of America, with oil economics interests, to thwarting globally the expansionist socialism of the U.S.S.R.! Iran now is among the youngest of sovereign nations in the known world.
I do not know the sociological or demographic specifics to the root of the how or why such nation regirthed itself with its own baby boom. Iran so situated near the U.S.S.R. and yet while however once more aligned with Moscow seems now positioned and structured to see Russia as an enemy long before assuaging the The United States of America as a greater enemy. The USA is of the “lucky” for Secretary Kerry, however “Boston Brahmin” as per the Middle East and especially Iran in how Iran now is of less moral need for nuclear weapons because the Bush Administration (of #43) did remove the neighboring nuclear threat persisting of Saddam Hussein - of that which persisted and nearly became reborn while of the years mostly of avoidance and inaction of the Administration of the Clintons.
There is more differentiating HRC from her successor than how he morally, even, is of a most obvious standing taller than at least as per the Middle East and Iran. HRC was an inappropriate messenger for any diplomacy for her close and intimate association with the abandonment of Afghanistan and Iraq by the The United States of America as of the Administration of the Clintons as so of, and from, the avoidance and inaction root in the Clinton “political.” President Obama’s worst decision of his legacy maybe forever will be that of having rival HRC of the “House of Clinton” as ever a Secretary of State, and/or at all of his administration.
Secretary Clinton was compromised from the start. She was a compromised officer to any Tranquility abroad where history and truth could yet conquer. She was a compromised officer to any Tranquility much at least for how she didn’t confess while trying to bring bite to nuclear sanctions, and sanction at least specifically on Iran, of how there is the “BUT FOR OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM…” with no thanks to the “ABANDONMENT, AVOIDANCE, INACTION OF THE CLINTONS…” prescient to any progress in enforcement for she herself represented an expectation that escape from Justice was possible - too possible. It stands tall with the progress of HRC’s successor and any of his background reasoning that he is now more standing “lucky” on the foundation more of the Bush FREEDOM AGENDA than any “new foundation” of President Barack H. Obama and his first Top Diplomat of the “House of Clinton.”
To be brief while any “lucky” of Irish Catholic, of Boston, however of a “Boston Brahmin” 1% or caste, we yet must affect intellectual bulwarks to a slide to the old abandonment classically now “CLINTONESQUE” in a tragic historical/historicals; to be brief, while Secretary Kerry now stands more than just morally taller than his predecessor HRC, here we are yet of it more complicated that Mrs. Clinton is allowed to, or capable to, explain at least for every decision was always harder than it otherwise would have been for any other for she had it much that truth(s) not an option for long about she and her spouse have been liberal at politics at lies in cover-ups of their own culpability at least to negligence prior to the Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11 I. HRC’s decisions all had to be harder for she as a spouse of a former President is expected to be lawful firstly to the standard of marriage contracts and traditions of a spouse not allowed to or supposed to be to incriminating the other spouse.
Secretary of State John Kerry stands taller than any of the “House of Clintons” and still however as they persist in defensive global initiatives at global partisan and political meddling by ways corporal of CGI - of CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVES! Secretary Kerry though is yet to be understood of his progress so superior to his predecessor Clinton at least for it matters if and how his “taller” taller for he different as Catholic and/or of a global 1%. It isn’t yet convenient for HRC’s successor that he should be more honest and “taller” by confessing he is so more standing on Reagan’s “foundations” than any however yet of the Presidency of Barack H. Obama. Secretary Kerry is yet differentiable for intelligence and balance from of Maine, of New England and an elder, Senator George J. Mitchell now yet if Northern Ireland struggles have parallels currently to a “spring” or maybe “renaissance” in the Middle East.
The internet and social media was also arriving to the peoples of the Middle East however free or differently free and organized while it was arriving across the Americas.
It is foolish to not consider, at least that due to the necessary new world ordering to recover from the COLD WAR geopolitics and to the rise of interactive global machinery that OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM was necessary and remains as rightfully commenced. It will be for a long time that OIF is seriously debatable more for how it wasn’t operated well even as now we should be nearer to a consensus that it due to the rise of interactive global machinery it was absolutely of a necessary so that the The United States of America didn’t get caught on the wrong side of “progress” in the eyes of at least the young in the Middle East. I will not go into such here but will offer that it as a subject is at least more broached in the collection in the category of “IRAQ” as at http://CitRB.com here linked specifically more conveniently with http://bit.ly/IRAQbyJPHogan.
As the above established sharer of diplomatic perspectives as always just a private citizen of no “official” solicitation for help from the Bush Administration I persist still of the core of such as foundationally still standing true and level of my thinking and writing of the pre-Clinton days as organized of my privately shared THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM. I cannot, nor do I plan to attempt to, explain that which was either all “political” or any “partisan” of the relative decidings during the Bush Administration years of decidings. What I offered, and especially so of when I offered how not to go too far with Iran on nuclear power and weapons standing, necessarily left the “American” “political” to the filtering and prudence of President George W. Bush. I did though strongly suggest, at least via a material fax, when or how to stop as per Iran for the progress of the FREEDOM AGENDA in Iraq was setting up better possibilities for a greater moral parity nuclear within Iran so that one effort could undermine the other if too strongly individually pushed otherwise.
The Ukraine vs. Russian problems are different quite than any of the nuclear standing of Iran. It is considerable though that Russian with such as if new Soviet expansionism is yet now more “Christian” and “missionary” than “communistic” and to it that Iran now is being given an (unnecessary) justification for nuclear weapons (if not more allied with the USA) by Russia as a new threat. As to any “HOMELAND” associations there is yet that there may be an inherent path forward to better relations with the now newly young Iran, actually. Any opportunities for improved parity of morality with Iran now is yet of a path not obstructed like that of all paths walked historically of the “politics” of the Clintons. President Obama can still be said to have been so wrong (also) as per Iraq that he has hardly since been able to be right about anything in the Middle East, and too that the unrest between Ukraine & Russia is some to much of global instabilities risen from his failing economics, and the associated “politics” of the Clintons.
There was a Holocaust. Iran is of the Persian Gulf of Persians and so too as Aryans. I do not know the sociological or demographics, however related historically, to any necessary consideration of concern for the Irani people for they are blooded as Aryans as Germans of Hitler’s rise were blooded proudly as Aryans. There is the “moral” yet a conundrum of the Iran nuclear parity diplomatic concerns where though of years under the COLD WAR stuck as if too much pawns among a global human contesting they yet now are humans too to be considered as born equal. There is a morality as I expressed in an old material fax to the NSC # during the Bush Administration that I posited in my lay, however learned, to it that as a sovereign nation Iran of its people could be to a moral right to also have the technology and know how to nuclear power and a pride of knowing themselves also capable of the highest sciences of shared humanity, and yet while it though likely wouldn’t be “moral” to presume there was a prudence in also or ever also having nuclear weapons.
I only saw some of the last episodes of the last season of HOMELAND. I may now be looking forward to catching a new season that builds on there being actual possibilities for improved relations with such a newly young nation. I yet have always been only a lay private citizen despite my years of sharing timely and at times quite pro-active proven useful opines. I yet have always been so engaged with it all of a common core a consistent vine rooted to my pre-Clinton THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM thinking and writing.
As per HOMELAND and me I did though also fax the Administration of George W. Bush after seeing a WELCOME TO PENNSYLVANIA sign while state of the Governor Thomas Ridge a quick note whence then in the days when the idea of a Department of Homeland Defense was so initialized it wasn’t yet to a list (public to me) for any to be its first Director. I did fax a suggestion that Governor Thomas Ridge was at least well named to be a first ever top first director - the first head of such developing Department of Homeland Security.
It seems we are now here gathered of it as per Iran that what may be unlucky for us and Secretary of State John Kerry, however of he Catholic and/or of Boston as of a “Boston Brahmin” or 1%, is that he may be too inconveniently a compromised messenger for such possibilities if he cannot yet find a more historical and truthful “foundation” for his, at least public, sharing. It is for the historians, necessarily to differentiate any new Tranquility from the diplomacy of Secretary of State John Kerry and to how much he yet stood taller than Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, at least, rightly and morally, and, to how he could stand taller however while Catholic just because unlike HRC truth was not an option not an option in his choices.
However now we can together stand of new HOPE and CHANGE we cannot abide at least an attempt at greater intellectual standing ourselves by a clear eyed civility commenced with an appreciation that at least as per Ukraine such unrest is from the unsettled global economics that can be tagged as from the Administration of President Obama failed economics. It though is such to Democrats yet is sadly of them claiming successes in what seems failure, to others, for it seems incontrovertible that their pride was so of a GREEN AGENDA that much of this is to a person Democrat as if acceptable in an economic collateral damage rationalization - #FORWARD.
What gave rise to the Clintons in 1991 does and will best explain their now so public arresting falls. Iraq of today is far removed from the Iraq the Administration of the Clintons inherited - and then it is not. We can learn from Vice President Cheney’s recent air time, historical and personal, about those years of “exiting” the Persian Gulf War.
The reputation of William Jefferson Clinton may weigh heavy now on all “Americans” however a spotlight may now locally or globally be lit to highlight their personal honor and acuity and agility. Where Republicans and Richard Cheney may have “gone wrong” it now is very late breaking news that WJC yet didn’t “go right.” 1993 may be the most important or just easiest year to focus on to have it be copacetic and sporting - and intelligent and honest - while of retrospectives of “war(s)” talk.
It is now more publicly known as of a reputation of Republicans or just Richard Cheney that Saddam Hussein was underestimated as a “spin-doctor” as we have the Cheney versus Clinton histories fielded. [I have long (for sanity) tried to downplay myself, to myself, how it seems I of regular experiences of my reputation preceding me in an air of tongues at “He took down Saddam Hussein.” Today it seems a more sane “reputation” even for me to accept.]
Most people do not know a real history of such times and are too much of many mornings and dusks of fresh fogs of war.
For a sake of brevity with so much kicked off now as if possibly sport (in politics) (and philosophy) let us entertain that for Posterity it should be that WJC was worse at leading - leading by example specifically too - than RBC (Richard Bruce Cheney). And that there is an honor legend too of such spotlighting where a father and son tale can echo for all times in how President Bush was able to pick up his father’s “sword” of him too President Bush as if from a stone that WJC hadn’t even thought to look for and look as if too for a higher caliber of Camelot. It may be much either all Germany’s fault or of it also much Germany’s fault that President Bush could be later honored by his son as if to his “x” caliber years after the USA started suddenly to learn how to be a sole superpower in the known world.
The United States of America is the sole superpower of the known world! Right!!! These are the days the USA began to have such a target upon it where ever the idea and presence of “American” colors heralded. We shouldn’t completely forget the Japan of such days, as there is still a haunting of Japanese like Germans (maybe as “leading” “private” citizens in pride) to how especially in these past days a new Axis was stirring as if to yet win WWII and by other means. As the Persian Gulf War was oft reckoned as if a World War III we too are behooved to reconsider it was at times still World War II all over again. But we shouldn’t forget to at least consider that Saddam Hussein post the wrap of the Persian Gulf War may have had a new Franco-French siding towards assistance with Iraq towards them of their own nuclear program - forward.
The good news, but for how little this is all copacetic in a public governance, and for too few yet have even pondered how much was of fields of battles and regular fresh fogs whence, is that we are now in the stadiums of history with it that such of such times (however of a pride of private French, German and/or Japanese citizens’ hopes) are now too also “old” thems - these days are times of at least France, Germany and Japan of having moved past such days haunting in a deja vu to renaissances, like, of their “nationalisms” to teams of better Posterity. RBC did, with Charlie Rose, admit to having been surprised at how Saddam Hussein had been able to turn a “BFD DEFEAT” into a win after the “exiting” from the Persian Gulf War.
As I have fielded for a pro USA Tranquility of old and new challengers: Check your goalie gloves of civil sport and too your 100% ID check systemology. However whence there may have been global initiatives of a resurgent “GERMAN” and “JAPANESE” by strategery of private citizens and their personal ideas of national pride we have that as RBC refreshed Saddam Hussein and Iraq have had years when they were very near to having a nuclear arsenal ready. Whom were those willing to be of a nuclear axis with IRAQ’s Saddam Hussein then in those days when the USA was concurrently like a too big and newly so sole superpower of the world - a target?
We should not forget whom the French were as French whence and how they were (stereotypically) ready for a new Franco even if a Euro-centric new Franco-German within an axis global with Iraq as nuclear and secured in oil Power. RBC has, with his recent challenging of the too long accepted WJC talking points, torn the “American” colors honor off of WJC and the Administration of the Clintons. That RBC is now talking so calmly in a historical begets that WJC has been too long just full of hot air and more just careening in “fogs of warrings” dated to whence and then forward to concurrently. The French are remembered now for having had a leader who seemed at least willing to work with Saddam Hussein and with he to a nuclear program in a shared “war” motive to reset the global balance of power from of the USA as the sole superpower to a new Euro-centric axis possible if at least a few European “leaders” could shift the economic Power of oil supplies and demand valuations upon their colors.
That RBC had expressed sincere past surprise to how Saddam Hussein turned a thought “BFD DEFEAT” by a world wide coalition as if in a World War III into his “VICTORY” is “NEWS”! I was after Saddam Hussein first invaded Kuwait to a personal intelligence exercising of philosophizing cause and effect scenarios as if to wondering on SH’s “chesss” and specifically to asking and attempting to answer “WHY DID SADDAM HUSSEIN THINK HE COULD KEEP KUWAIT?”
RBC is showing the WJC “Clinton” colors to be soiled and near already of a tag of “FOOLS”. But now we have it we need to consider there were whence possible new axis muscle ready for at least a new balance of powers in a SADDAM-GERMAN. But now we too have to consider that RBC has been admitting he and the Bush Administration so charged more specifically had been to underestimating SH. RBC has reminded many now already that Saddam Hussein was nearly whence to becoming (too powerfully) of a new axis of Power with help to being a nuclear power.
What RBC seems to be admitting now is news and yet of that which I had myself considered whence. RBC has now exposed the Administration of the Bushes as likely both of having not figured fully enough that SH’s surprising reversal of “BFD DEFEAT” shouldn’t have been a surprise for it likely was of his strategy and plans as I considered as to the hows and whys he invaded Kuwait and seemingly thinking that he would be able to keep Kuwait. We have hardly talked of all the airs and fogs of war that now are yet explanatory to how HRC (Hillary Rodham Clinton) could have been so regularly “careening” due to a general and pervasive ignorance.
For now the resurgent national prides so fielded as of the era of when the “AMERICAN” was maybe to an intolerable globally of many willing to be newly “friends” as from feeling sympatico as if common in “enemy” as also “enemies of their enimies” seems bettered and bested and quieted to gone for good. OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM though too was necessary for without it Saddam Hussein, as excused by WJC (& HRC) “policies” of the administration of the Clintons, was ready to start anew, it still seems, and with some global “axis” alliances, to being to a nuclear power and arms race with IRAN.
In RBC defense: The Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11 I & II do justify a OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM WAS NECESSARY. That it was right and just to be to such a late prosecution of Saddam Hussein though is complicated as 9/11 I made the public selling that SH needed prosecution and an intervention so much more complicated. It is telling that such attacks have shown WJC and HRC to have benefited politically specifically from such and far more than any Republican especially as the attacks made doing the right thing, however so “lately”, so much more difficult to do and sell. The only other way to “sell” OIF was likely to directly explain how there is and was a gross negligence in foreign policy at least of the Administration of the Clintons while looking to bipartisan support in Congress to do a right thing by standing the “AMERICAN” up with a sole superpower status so with it as the USA wouldn’t compromise EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL still abroad so.
[Right! I have decades now of sharing my thoughts with administrations and especially with the Bush Administration of Vice President Richard Bruce Cheney from like moments immediately after 9/11 I’s THE DAY AFTER. As recalled: After faxing the White House number for the NSC offices my circa such old times THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM with note like “It worked for such issues global nuancing then much and is now ready to work again.” my visceral awareness was alighted with a seeming smarting Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to whomever then in that company across town of he with a “Is he trying to pull rank on me?” and me to in unison from afar so near with “NO!”]
For now any USA versus GERMANY seems safely sporting in a post adjustment era of times when the “AMERICAN” may have actually deserved new axis mainlining to check as if by a bold “intervention” a too proud sole superpower “AMERICA.”
But if we do not know history and learn from history and especially are to burying inconvenient historical resurgent colors and fogs then we may still have new problems too much as if the old problems. By the wrap of the PERSIAN GULF WAR it was wrong for the USA and Coalition nations to not have more fully considered that the surprising “spin doctoring” by SH acumen was part of his plan and strategy from the start when he tipped the scales of civility and justice with his invasion of Kuwait.
[Of my strategy so private and individualistic at endeavoring to understand SH’s chess I was to thinking that the USA was maybe to a bait and switch fitting such concerns and to a electoral upset of President George H.W. Bush, as a new Lincoln of having yet though held the world together, with the propositions that WJC could be right as the USA may then be best to a weak President and a do nothing Presidency.]
[Right! As I am of my Menadier genes - I am maybe while however of “Irish” character and pride of dominant traits in Franco-German blooded lines. It may be my worked at “Irish” comity that had me like Reagan of his times in his times of an “IT TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE” at least as per “spin doctors” as “Mad Men” as my maternal grandfather had been a top Madison Avenue Ad man until his retirement from having run a consolidated Johnson & Johnson account for his last 25 years so wrapped as of Young & Rubicam (Y&R).]
[Right! To the raising of my blind ear to a reputation mine preceding me at times and at times very regularly: I have the memories still of my surprise one night years after I started a private sector spinning to close breaches in our “AMERICAN” artfully and voluntarily and quietly, however some of my pushing to pull likes of the Clintons into the 1992 race, as for an option to a needed weak Presidency, and one of time for a DO NOTHING PRESIDENT, now less haunting of how I was surprised by a bedtime presence of no other than Saddam Hussein smarting with a “YOU DEFEATED ME” - “WHAT IS NOW TO HAPPEN?” and my at least while tired and near sleep among things about so to “responding” “WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO COME FOR YOU.”]
Go USA - you have survived the convenient years of WJC being perfectly and naturally a weak President much of a do nothing Presidency, and yet hardly know it historically for what it was, and how WJC & HRC were tools not leaders, and yet chosen by the public freely - however ignorant of “wars” and “fogs of war” causal to political careening. Go USA!!!
However SH had at least French, German or Japanese governments or private citizens of global initiatives ambition at the ready to help him whence reset the balance of powers and too as it still haunts to a new Euro-centric it is that RBC is right that OIF was right and that the PERSIAN GULF WAR was right to wrap (temporarily) short of Baghdad. It is too true and historical that SH if allowed to escape JUSTICE as bedded forward as possible and likely by WJC & HRC we instead now would have it that the world was generally behind SH and IRAQ having a right to be a nuclear state to balance, however a new COLD WAR, that IRAN asserts (in historic victimhood at least) that it has a right to be NUCLEAR.
GO USA!!! PLEASE, SOCCER FANS AND PLAYERS AND OFFICIALS, LET US KEEP IT SPORTING!!!
Grab a seat - sit down - get comfortable; This may take a while!
As you settle in and down let us preface this of a consideration that Mr. William J. Clinton and Mrs. William J. Clinton, by the time we are done here, should seem not as if they do belong in prison but more so to that they have already long deserved to be “checked” & “balanced” and “policed” to such of justifying incarceration.
Any Atticus Finch now is beyond any “free at last” for the feminine lawyer Clinton “Hillary” even if she however of being off/other handed than her culpability defense yet has allowed, as affirming for something other than any “innocence.” It may be she is most “guilty” for beating our economies to these pulps but that such isn’t what is most egregious of her “guilts” - even her “guilty pleasures.”
She has no place in Ayn Rand’s literary accomplishment but as a worse & worst female antagonist as a feminine Peter Keating & yet as of a more trying and compromising older profession - older it seems than considerate “architecture.”
I do not know in any learnedness if she can be cast in any better light by Russian or Soviet literature - even if at all by WAR & PEACE or FATHERS & SONS. Her “RUSSIAN RESET” has us nearest her greatest infidelity and compromising of American traditions as yet still fashionable as Constitutional; She may now be dammed and ruined yet still we may not as a People generally know enough about her “hows” and “whys” to so much now publicly marketable as too if too as if like at least a “treasonous.” It may be that her “RUSSIAN RESET” may best explain the fall of the houses of Clinton and Obama, and yet today we need consider with open minds if and how her other ‘machinations’ might yet be more diabolical and appropriately more her “hanging offense.”
So you’ve heard the one about the Cold War having ended without a like loss of life on any battlefield? So you’ve yet to fathom how ridiculous such a posit is even if so proffered to you whence and however ‘learnedly’? For the purposes of celebrating the USA victory over the old Soviet styled Russia as the victory of capitalism over expansionist socialism let us now tip our spirits, however, to swirling the body of HRC as best left for spittle. There is so much in her even just admitted “culpability” as per Benghazi’s tragic and unnecessary loss of people staffers of her “house” of State that has a relativity to undo her past any hypothetical to inconvenient theoreticals as it seems historical that she has made what seems the same intelligence mistakes her spouse did years earlier. Mrs. William J. Clinton as for just her years as President Obama’s Secretary of State has it damnable that her Benghazi culpability fits with the ignorant American pushed perspective that the Cold War ended without a shot fired, and yet it is that the Iran & Iraq years of war with the million plus lives lost is essential “Cold War” in all related “geopoliticals.”
Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is so “culpable” in other times such likely would have been such a “hanging offense” that heads would already have rolled and rolled with and among her own head.
The essential “Hillary” however now newly posited as firstly Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton conveniently of close and intimate global initiatives inclusive of domestic partisan political operations is of a incomparable “guilt” fitting her like better than any ball slipper ever otherwise yet opined a hopeful for a more real Cinderella. The ashes of the Mrs. C are see-able and seen as of tragic and, yes, unnecessary losses of lives of those truly America’s brave and courageous.
It is truly sad how much can now be properly eschewed upon the capacity of the Clintons’ shoulders and as such is truly inhumane in their heft to be so long so well past any risk of “a last straw”! I can only be, so seemingly, that any “rhetoric” of a the “Hillary Clinton” now is fore set as drivel too fit as spittle for a spittoon. She may yaw and knaw on a hopeful but she is of her years as FLOTUS Clinton too much of the “danger” President Barack Hussein Obama spoke to so Nobelly with his Nobel acceptance speech with it so of suggestive as extant and of “evident” from “inaction” and “avoidance” such as so much of the “politics” of the Administration of the Clintons.
Her (beloved) Saddam Hussein - as suggested from the Administration of the Clintons too embeddedness and seeming “forgiveness” - is a greater hand specific culpability a stain upon her hands yet now than Benghazi. It seems we are behooved to fathom her of dark depths that have it that she became like “lips locked” and “tongue tied” after the first moments of the dire set upon her “house” at the Libyan consulate there abouts in Benghazi, and so as for a concern that she couldn’t speak any truth without implicating her days as FLOTUS and worse so that she couldn’t without then being a spouse betraying the other spouse as with comments that would have too simply implicated and incriminated her spouse - at least.
We have that there was a Cold War and that it is dangerous now again if to tagging it as a war without any shots fired, and of any lives lost in “battle.” We have it that Mrs. Clinton, however, is of damnable years of culpability and with it now that only some of them are yet of admitted “dangers” and improprieties like “lies.” We have it that Mrs. Clinton, however, is of damnable admitted “culpability” and yet we so far haven’t seen any however a new grand Mr. Smith or Atticus Finch get to a bottom.
If when ever you heard of or yet hear of a “RUSSIAN RESET” beware yet however you can muster!
The escapism the Administration of the Clintons seemed to have prescribed for the too embedded with them Saddam Hussein is lost on most still as not being damnable now and always. There was no fair compromise for a letting Saddam Hussein go so “scott free” as the Administration of the Clintons was tolerating and seemingly facilitating. It seems Mrs. C as President Obama’s SoS couldn’t see straight for her “duty” for she stayed too loyal to her spouse. It seems by the Laws of the The United States even if Mrs. C. could and should incriminate the Presidency of William Jefferson Clinton, and any “initiatives” global since so of an inappropriate “meddling” she isn’t yet allowed to speak freely and/or to speak the truth as it is inappropriate at best for her to “incriminate” her spouse.
The “RUSSIAN RESET” was misguided and a big enough mistake; Mrs. William J. Clinton is of worser crimes against the Constitution so as it now seems - and seems possibly to be got at judiciously by the bi-partisan Benghazi Select Committee.
To discern and even get close to fathoming her real and true “culpability” for so much even if ever justifiable as a “sacrifice” like due a future new “Memorial Day” of its own as however of “climate change” economies decimation “sacrifice” we are fit to be postured to the over cushioned tales of a “marketable” “Hillary” and to advantages in a vantage point where we see and consider the sights as that of she as “culpable” even for losses of life of the Cold War as of the Iran and Iraq wars, and too so for it that she so however as the old “crusader” incendiary as inciting FLOTUS or later as an “obedient” “Secretary” or seeable of it that the Ba’athist Saddam Hussein and too some Bashar Assad are of the Power ambitions however of the idealic origins of the Ba’athist - but so personally perverted in a too secular - of ascendencies around the thought of a United Arab Socialist State.
Capitalism did defeat the old expansionist Soviet styled socialism! Now it seems we have domestics culpable of a on-going domestic threat yet of “communists” or “socialists” of the The United States of tales yet understood as hardly yet told - told generally - of how it seemed some within our borders of actual “citizenship” “rights” seemed to have seen a way in their power to undermine the Constitution towards hoped for changes to socialisms at home. It seems we have that Mrs. Clinton - Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton - is not excusable from a fuller culpability as one of a “RUSSIAN RESET” that seemed to have been meant to pary with a parlay for Saddam Hussein, at least, and towards acceptable greater socialist powers for he, and his kin, in the socialism ideologic of the origins of Ba’athism however he had yet had already perverted them.
It seems that the problem of any “Hillary” is that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is actually more civilly and judiciously taggable as more a “Socialist” than President Barack Hussein Obama, or his own wife, yet can be. It seems for perspective to a “culpability” for any “Obama” we should brace ourselves for a consideration that any “Hillary” seems at best a dominatrix and one now taggable as if always and forever maybe arranged as Obama’s handler in “Soviet” “Socialisms.”
To double rabbit a justice about so many crossroads we’ld be cross, maybe, to not discern risings, and raisings, of the ups and downs footed at so many intersections, and there how so of overlay pathology, as to locking in a well joined apropos civility;
To a fitting justice, still set in joined civility of innocence until proven of specific guilt, we are still best to chisel lately at the rabbits’ overlays inaugural of George Washington’s prudent import at “…vicissitudes incident to life” immaturity prima facia. To avoid even a smidgen of guilt (for a crucifying cross) one needs to consider their footing and their words, and well:
May you be to lapping ups the joints to such, however, now firstly suggested, as if of two rabbits over-laid, to this joined raising for issues plus’d to capital punishment and apropos premeditation for avoidance from innocence lost.
Where any may be critical of mass it behoove any to see to having enough critical mass - in shared humanity.
Right? In U.S.A. U.S.C. no freedom FROM religion as such not humanly possible. Freedom OF religion as RELIGION = poetry, electric, of shared humanity?
Is it of genesis of APPLE that #Jobs struggle was firstly & always to bringing tablets & Bible into the palms of everyone #app’ly?
Prove “Order” so capitalized in preamble is a NOUN as @ The Constitution is a People’s Order — Dems “legality” falls! To be high with the Founders and their Lord now in a newer Year so of such God of the New Testament you may be prudent to be as engirthed in lines of Noah however so set so natural in hemp; Joseph as a carpenter, wherever of his Jobian struggles, needed like Noah to be good at rabbits and very stoked in joints, however.
Freedom OF religion as: RELIGION = poetry, electric, of shared humanity? When open the Ground Zero Museum of the September 11 Memorial keep will be charged to a keep for truth - and curiosity. When open at Ground Zero it will be devilish to some, and cross’dly so, how God is to be seen in capital punishment tool’d. To atheists however grounded, it, a cross, could be a cross as but a rabbited tool for justice as replaceable as by a noose or an electric chair - or guillotine. Rabbit holes of those among the vicissitudes incident to life can, and have, led many to God - not all, though. Tolerance too is chiseled, at least by a precedence set by U.S.A. Constituted first President under the People’s Order and so humbly under the subscribed set Lord, whence then in that Year as “done” so boldly as per modifying “to form a more perfect Union” ordering.
Though the joints of Noah and Joseph may have been long set in hemp, and more naturally than today’s, the parsed meants of the Founders’ parchment poetry as Law do not set asunder rabbiting writs for heaven on earth through believing in their highs. As established and ordained and set in writs cautiously to forewarn, to avoid yet, to pitfalls from (fogged) stumbles on paths however golden. It seems impossible for there but to be a freedom of religion as it seems, objectively, that there can be no freedom from religion, though a freedom from a religion is yet plausible - though if only by a stature of another. RELIGION = poetry, electric, of shared humanity; By an objective definition of RELIGION it seems impossible as it as of all humanity that any human can yet be free of RELIGION; It seems any can only be of it and not ever from it, objectively. It is but an old or new - good or bad - best poetry of shared humanity, to be judged - but not escaped from, wholly.
ART! Art, objectively, can be a great and grand tool, at least, to a better and broader crossroads and bridging for latitudes and attitudes better joined for a preservation and practice of prudence in a rectal sui juris akin to Sodom and Gomorrah curriculum to bestow benevolence in habeas corpus prophylactic governance bedded in innocent until proven guilty clausals. However your persuasion and choice natural biases it behoove yee to be a booster of ART as ART may help you when best to avoid innocence as lost to a cross’d crucifying, however — by ART there can be more room for a preserve of innocence.
There are Bishops on the boards of CHESS everywhere! It is as obvious an objective statement, it seems, as to suggest there cannot be a freedom from RELIGION - anywhere. Without a Rorchach, ever, however, most will see an intersections of the laid squares at times cross’dly, however their paths hopeful or hopeless whence. What though may yet be modern (ART) more as if at surgical strikes as yet moves meant to be less as at marbles and prudently at least as at CHESS? Did the Clintons’ lose their marble when graphically so to a standard as to stoked as if an “up yours” earthly to the European Union celestial’d circle in a rectangle; Didn’t the Clintons’ only think marbles while putting a circle in a rectangle anew as the Swastika had been in the fields of red of the Nazi of Hitler and The Third Reich?
(Note to self: Confirm that no Republican past President, is though like President Obama, also of a flag, as a standard their own as well, and also too that like the Clintons’, so as like Barack Hussein Obama’s, isn’t also like the Nazi flag as graphically imperialistic, objectively (in ART), as an earthly circle, not like the Europeans’ Union. nor Japan’s as humble in a celestial.).
Where any may be critical of mass it behoove any to see to having enough critical mass - in shared humanity.
Crimea, like Syria, however of Russia, is now hardly but a smidgen on the boards of shared humanity; Crimea it seems isn’t to be stoked as if President Vladimir Putin has somehow lost his marbles, and while only playing marbles. It seems this may be us of an intersection to be timed as too about a resurgent Russian Christian Orthodoxy. It seems this is among the vicissitudes incident to life expectant in the existential of the newly Constituted United States of President George Washington’s rabbiting for inescapable humanity by his orations firstly inaugural whence.
Does Vladimir Putin have a holy excuse so about Crimea however too as a strategic CHESS move? Does the Russian President have the words, even if a prudence to be covert and clever in strategery, to match the word of his Orthodox Christianity so Russian? How cross’d be he if the Ukrainian (and Crimean) people are not too cross’d? Is he about helping in their own jurisdictional rabbiting of consent more than terror?
Who is President Vladimir Putin - as per Syria and Crimea is he a TERRORIST or PEACEMAKER?
What are the particulars most prescient (in a divine) for those not themselves of a cross’d innocence lost joined, however, in ups and downs footed and rabbited? What are the particulars for those yet not cross’d yet of he that is cross’d?
Where there is a smidgen of guilt there may be a mountain of thought buried too taxing scandals.
By the words about the cross soon set commemorative we are gathered about Crimea as of new valleys to reason about before it maybe be too late for risen. Alfred Lord Tennyson, I presume, hadn’t lost his marbles, not a smidgen worth. President Obama may now be getting CHESS moves he hoped for without an apriori appreciation of a Russian potential about Syria policing maybe firstly wisely pre-staged by better defensive (naval) depths about the Crimean shores.
As President Barack Hussein Obama is past a smidgen worth of tagging as at only being of playing marbles isn’t it if President Vladimir Putin is a rising in the establishments of Russian Christian Orthodoxy maybe being preparatory to better crusading joined defensive new suppositions of naval deposits about the Crimea? If we are to expect a Russian responsibility for its (guilt) of years in enabling just President Bashar al-Assad as a Russian compassionate conservativism shouldn’t we think it may be safer for Ukrainian if Crimean only seen as the home port of the Russian Crusades?
Where there is a smidgen of guilt there may be a mountain of (thought) buried too taxing scandals.
Who is President Vladimir Putin - as per Syria and Crimea isn’t he also @ a/also TERRORIST or PEACEMAKER?
Where any may be critical of mass it behoove any to see to having enough critical mass - in shared humanity. Right? In U.S.A. U.S.C. no freedom FROM religion as such not humanly possible. Freedom OF religion - ONLY - as RELIGION = poetry, electric, of shared humanity?
Isn’t it to atheists that a cross’d just as well if displayed, displayed otherwise by a noose, an electric chair, syringe, or a guillotine? As ART yet of helping latitudes of attitudes for the preservation of realms of innocent until proven guilty? We are, where ever, yet, however, Constituted much about the rabbiting joined in the “Among the vicissitudes incident to life…” as the word of US by the first white President George Washington and his orations in New York City.
We are always at a crossroads - a cross’d - as of our walks and net mobility. Be careful, and forewarned yet to stay even, tall and from even a smidgen + of guilt! Long live a carpe diem Miranda’d established, ordained, subscribed boldly writ “done” more perfect Union!
* * *
[Yes, though as much about dadoes, or a dado paired pared, such here so chiseled sketchy of rabbits and rabbets.]
For any modern discussion of economics we must in a bi-partisan/non-partisan/cross-partisan be to spinning beyond TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS. We are stuck now as commenced to a new #MoralCapitalism of a rejoined humanity in #MoralMan historicals much and quite mostly for #UrbanMoralisms. Thanks to Martin Luther, however of a BE BOLD IN YOUR SINS, some may have taken past liberties in cruelty expectant that the day was then that even so so they could and would be forgiven.
It is that a morality is what has stewed better progress for Secretary Kerry than for Secretary Clinton. Since Madam Secretary is inseparable from Bill Clinton’s commitment to her, as recalled, that preceded a fidelity in marriage arrangement with their prior necessary condition to marriage of that he would promise that she would get her own Presidency after he got his, there is a forgivable possible and a forgivable not appropriate for a candidate or just historical Hillary Rodham Clinton; Mrs. Clinton cannot run yet for 2016 as if of a Christian forgiveness granted daily so that each day she can be like just a lawyer with new cases — the Clintons do have a running con - a decades long operable plan for the election of her that as a still kept plan greater than each of her/our days is such of a aura than should not and cannot be overlooked or of a forgiveness sponsoring. She is white - she is white collar - she may deserved being a white collared even if by an establishment morality separate from a State as a white collared posse.
President Barack Hussein Obama is a conundrum for historicals in economics. It is hard to say he has a philosophy of governance nor any “economics” his own but that of spend, spend, spend & tax & tax reset of old “tax & spend” that if Mrs. Clinton otherwise had been electable too would have been of a politically necessary to render herself of at too as Senators Obama & Clinton did make nearly all the same campaign promises. It is here ridiculous to try to relate to any TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS and especially if to be of a political spin doctoring attempt to show them in a possibly more moral light. It is ridiculous otherwise too now to much discuss TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS just because the marketing and pop culture of these days are not of the era of such economics and are not sustainable or supportive to a harmonics or synthesis currently. I propose that we now are to a new economics paradigm of at least a soft science discerning that can be responsibly tagged as a SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS.
A discussion of a SUPPOSITORY ECONOMICS vs. a DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS is seemingly apropos for these current social dynamics of the micro or macro and the local or global. A discussion and development of a general understanding and furtherance of quantifiable and applicable discourse though may be good for setting us forward back to at least a decade of growth economics yet while it seems that such cannot fare well for President Obama nor other so yet set other leading Democrats. It seems that we can focus how the Democrats in mass basically have been failing economically much because they have been lacking the understanding that should be generally solidified if and when to a full and detailed expose of that to do justice to it as a better and new economics as of SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS.
It can be said to be generally acceptable that President Obama did not rightly place the blame for the said “economics” he “inherited.” It can be said that politically President Obama trapped himself from a better economics by being from day one of a politics of covering up how much of the collapsing of economies was rooted and nurtured essentially of Clintonomics and the general political administering of the co-Presidency of the Clintons. The entire time since President Obama started off his first term with lies to the economics in play embedded and orated in his First Inaugural he has been of arresting any potential he may have had otherwise than has yet been demonstrable. The Democrats in mass have been of an immorality in their governance by ways of lies about the causals most significant to the problemas. They have only succeeded in pushing a “morality” agenda by a politics immoral as of them of falsely accusing and wrongly tagging the actual historical politics and economics.
Whom of white collars can be a posse? We if again to a growth economics need be not of a said old and tired SUPPLY SIDE and/or TRICKLE DOWN now. To be anew to a #MoralCapitalism we need to recognize we are not limited to the old Cold War Era prudent obedience to a TOP down guidance of/with assurities by Government that ones commerce wouldn’t be accidentally treasonous. The world is decidedly more flat now. The politics of a charge of liberatings in new federalism have become a global normative. We of America are of establishments that do quite require that an establishment morality exists separate from the State just so that the State can have a chance at operating morally.
It of us to a new economics as by ways of discerning as SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS is also necessarily of a historical setting to an affecting that Democrats have not understood the socio - nor economics of their days so charge in its administering. The world is decidedly more flat now. The politics of a new economics need not be of SUPPLY SIDE nor TRICKLE DOWN old Cold War era prudence that did much synch with the marketing and advertising harmonics whence. A new establishment economics can be of how the Democrats missed there were two economics to govern about while proffering their irresponsible climate and economic sciences — we have long been of a complex economics that is said of people playing games in the economies, however justified as if a hobby in doing God’s work, as by supposing things as possible and potential, and, we have long been to while so of such in our economics of the core of the “moral” in the “humanity” of commerce and governance of the more permanent socio-economic of people living only by what they did deposit as of the economics of subsistence more nearly.
A ripe fruit as a conundrum a problema as a prolegomena for prima facia for SUPPOSITORY vs. DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS is the unforgivable socio per the Clintons of the commitment keeping by Bill Clinton of his promise that Mrs. Clinton if she agreed to become his bride would have his fidelity at least to keeping his promise that she would get her own Presidency after he got his. [This is of a historical of my own experience and knowledge of the Clintons which dates to the early 1970s.] The plans and plots of the Clinton “two-fer” is mostly a running con that asks that they be of a Christian forgiveness fresh start each day from so many without any consideration that such is dominant and unforgivable. It is bad enough for any economics that the Clintons are both lawyered/esquired (still?) and of a politics of playing at governance as if even in the charges they are the lawyers and of the adage “the client goes to jail” not the lawyer, and as they are each other’s lawyer firstly and protected spousally from incriminating the other and all the while they like to ask the People to let them forget their own hands/culpability each day as if by being lawyers each day is just a new case and a blank slate in “professional” plausible deniability for them.
But this needn’t be so personal while the historical record still needs to be settled more correctly for the Clintons and President Obama’s year of administering as self arrested from a greater HOPE and POTENTIAL by his handcuffing of his presidency so with his most affecting cover-up cons for the Clintons on a presumption that their party needed the same protection for an associated guilt with the much unknown seeming husbandry of a most selfish and spousally set Clinton political machinations. The economics of these years of administering by the Obama administration are and have been corrupted. It is more considerable for any now beholden towards a morality reset for a renewed #MoralCapitalism though that the economics of the Clintons and Obama administration have missed the complexity of the real world economics as of a gaming and subsistence - a supposing and deposits limited - a SUPPOSITORY vs. DEPOSITORY.
For now I have broached a discourse on a better and new economics science tagging — I will apply now some empathy receptors towards a further consideration and to an end that a SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS can now mesh with the Laffer Curve logistics and yet be a different from and more time and place responsive adjusted socio-economic lingua.
In future elaborations we can discuss the old vs. new as the Cold War and current geo-politics respective of the Russian Federation and Iran. There is a necessary consideration to be worked through of President Putin as a Russian Orthodox Christian and of his engagements now in Syria and Iran affairs. Russia has rebuilt the grand Cathedral that Stalin tore asunder to make a permanent like monument to himself for the ages and his “governance.” Iran has cause to, however long of alliances with Russian powers, be firstly if to nuclear weapons to be of a morality that is considerate that “Russians” are due a targeting firstly and much before Americans or whomever otherwise of past opposing coalitions.
For any tagging of SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS to hold up and as if learned such much be applicable to a considerate historical at least as per Afghanistan and too how if the United States had not helped defeat the moves of expansionist communism/socialism by the old U.S.S.R. whence today Iran could too be just a satellite Soviet subject region.
{I wasn’t going to be expansive or historical to the early 90s recession recovery considerations but then today in 11:30 to Noon slot on The History Channel a short on Nelson Mandela confirmed an upside down of the politics and economics of the early 90s I had been considering but not meaning to also diss. Of that of my economic thought and efforts of said pre-Clinton Clinton 90s recovery architecture is much that I was essentially to musing and synching a counter culture marking that was of an empathy for the more real economics as upside down as it was that the people at the thought bottom were then more relaxed and having more fun than the said “rich” of the top. As per the Mandela documentary short they aired how he saw that the whites could be saved from themselves as a ticket forward his/theirs. There is though I was annoyed by the Nobel Prize for Economics circa near 1992 and then later also annoyed that my architecture that was meant to be played with a complexity of at least a first part and then a needed second moderated differently second part had those like of he of the Nobel prize whence also apprised from earlier of my “marketing” for “economics” then stuck and ignorant of the second part and so that I was never able to also influence such via the remainder of my considerations in economics and positive change politics.}
Fellow Democrats the party is in perilous trouble. We have only days left until the world as we know it is gone - is passe/over. 2016 is an open field for Democrats - this is the good news. #DemsAgainstHillary is assuredly of the proposition that any Democrat is better than a Clinton Democrat. It is an open field for 2016 - we need to ward heel the party to tilling of clear demarcation from the spoils/spoiled of the Clintons and of Mrs. Clinton as if a burlap bag walking yet as full of rotten apples.
Oh Virginia our Dear Lovers’d how spoiled the lot if too bagged of her spoils? Can there be no Bernoulli lift for all if she so the “rotten apple” in the barrel of politics? Is it to scurvy for all if she is set out with what little is left as if the fruit of our harvests? From Norfolk to Arlington, and from the Blue Ridge skylines of Appalachia to the mouth of the Anacostia, her reign as First Lady hasn’t gone away — her reign as First Lady is here to stay — she is compromised by her own baggage.
It isn’t as simple Dear Virginia of Democrats of a tale of two Hillarys. She has one near for even it seems seven colors.
Fellow Democrats it pains me for how long I have known dear Hillary and that it was I who played hardball at her while she of 2008 basis was of asking to be treated like the men — I still remember the hardball pressure I put upon her that should have knocked the Clintons out together but for her answer in avoidance by her New Hampshire tears. She was down and beaten though displayed and puffed up with fluffery as the ever ready “INEVITABLE HILLARY” and the pressure in my positioned distant question was then to be devastating if she had to answer it like all men before her had been expected to. She was being beaten more by the goodness of her party yet then by the new comer peer of next to no experience, Senator Obama. She was though cornered and wounded and fearing having to answer the pressure like a man — her tears conveniently kept her from having to tell the world: Right! Yes! I do not have any hobbies - I am not well rounded, you know I don’t like to stay at home and cook - I am just a lawyer who is a workaholic.
Fellow Democrats the end of our Party as we have come to know it is near over. Isn’t it a relief?
Dear Virginia is former Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton showing, however placed geo-politically, in your race - your heated Governors race, as like Terry McAuliffe’s “Madam”? From her ODYSSEY DAWN of women can fight as male monsters presented defensiveness to her culpability too set as near the shores of Tripoli she seems spoiled of the lot of Clinton Democrats as a “Madam” to “Bill” and “Anthony” and so as permanently exposed in the transparent and grey architecture of her Clintons’ Library.
The end of the world as we know it seem perilously close and troubling. As Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton of the Clinton Global Initiative it is sad how spoiled the lot seems with she a walking and talking burlap bag of rotten Democrat apples. It is too much of a forced structure in her recent dogmatic political strikes at “scorched earth” politics for it was indiscriminate - it specifically was a tag to ask people to be prejudiced against President Obama and to be discriminating so to see that he is not a Clinton - a Bill Clinton Democrat. Mrs. William Jefferson Clintons’ broad and reckless political jabs can only come from an arrogance of President Clinton thinking he is still in control of the whole Democratic Party. The First Lady of the CGI (the Clintons Global Initiative PAC - not the Canadian “CGI” responsible for the #Obamacare failings) was clearly lashing out at President Obama with any or all imagery and import in her “scorched earth” rhetoric.
My fellow Democrats we do have alternatives to the rotten spoils of the spoiled Clintons. Have you even begun to dream and imagine a Governor Deval Patrick teaming with inspirational Senator Cory Booker as a running team for 2016 from the first crack of the whip if too such a public stand? It may be that such is necessary to save our Democrat Party as these are the days threatening as of Republicans likely able to stand and with belief that they can and will deliver with a Senator Marco Rubio and Senator Ted Cruz ascension right as proud and less black as LATIN IS THE NEW BLACK.
Fellow Democrats we need at least a third way; President Obama is clearly now a lame duck about the Clinton resurgent political stewing. I don’t know where all the women who could be Democratic and President have gone; I don’t know how or when any that could be a rival to Mrs. Clinton have been buried by the Clintons - buried they must have been.
Fellow Democrats we need at least a third way; President Obama near ruined everthing by entertaining Clintons’ wants with the Mrs’ Secretarial posting. The Clintons have their eight years to be dissected by Democrats firstly in an attempt to stave off a party wide ruining; The Clintons did not practice equal rights for all across the Middle East - this is still most troubling.
Fellow Democrats we need at least a third way: President Obama quietly abided the soft and hard un-American “official” bigotry of the Clintons’ admin’s “Diplomacy.” Before we can protect them further from their fair share of blame we have to recognize that the Clintons were of at least a un-Constitutional bigotry in their abandonment of the Iraqi people for their eight years. Mrs. Clinton’s crusading for women’s right is most complicated in her complicit bigotry against the Shia people of Iraq. She has yet to politically answer for how it is supposed to be right for her to war to save the women of Afghanistan while wrong to use at least as much political effort and reasoned political will to also have helped the women of Iraq. It is that the Clintons lead with at least a political bigotry short of ideological bias as it was just more convenient to their “PEACE” lies if they stood officially of a religion based bias against the Shia of Iraq as justification for not bringing Saddam Hussein to Justice. It, however political, is historically real that the Clinton compromised President Obama and the USA in the Middle East with their old collusion and its ripe bigotry of official “Diplomacy” as a tag on Iraq status quo with them regularly of their strong arming as of: THE IRAQI SHIA PEOPLE ARE NOT CAPABLE OF GOVERNING THEMSELVES.
It has been a sad and compromising political game of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton that it can be right to war in Afghanistan on women’s rights and literacy and to not as well have been as justified and more righteous by waring away the years of the abandonment by the Clintons as “America” in Iraq. The Cold War changed everything.
Before the Clintons the engagement and disengagements as per Iraq and its religious make-up was kept to Cold War geo-politics and from the latent and blatant bigotry of the Clintons. We had a new world order emerging with the most unexpected rise of the Clintons in 1992; We had a new world order emergent of the fogs of wars passed cleared about the geo-politics of at least the Iraq and Iran region. The Clintons went bad early and bad, very bad when so. They liked governed abroad as if they missed the whole logic of the times which accidentally justified them a rising.
The simplest hypothesis to possibly suggest, fellow Democrats, is that Operation Iraqi Freedom was necessary because the Cold War had ended and because Saddam Hussein didn’t want to change with the times. There is little that can explain and justify the Clintons and their Iraq decisions; Operation Iraqi Freedom was a necessary Constitutional and moral move however that by the time that it commenced it was nearly too late to be clearly constituted anywhere; The clarity that was missing in a “morality” for OIF could only have present if it was marched out when due then about the third year of the Clintons’ first term. It is a conundrum that she that helped put so little “bite” in Middle East based United Nations sanctions did become President Obama’s “bite” “officer” as his Secretary for Diplomacy.
My Fellow DEMOCRATIC People we need a third way; President Obama embedded too many with his embrace of one more the root of all modern evils. The hard truth is that we should have enforced the UN sanctions on Saddam Hussein fully within just 3-5 years — we didn’t during the Clintons’ administration because Bill and Hillary didn’t want to NOT because they/we shouldn’t have.
* * *
*{readers - my fellow Democrats - bare with me as I still have to get to the part that we all are wrong to judge Operation Iraqi Freedom was wrong if we haven’t first gone month by month and year by year through the administration of the Clintons and fully of a probative analysis to how their “administering” of Carpe Diem was of not seizing the moments and to so much inaction and avoidance to the “DANGERS OF INACTION AND AVOIDANCE” President Obama tagged the Clintons with rightly and smartly with his NOBEL PEACE PRIZE acceptance speech.}
**TIME OUT! I SHALL RETURN - I HAVE MORE WAR THOUGHTS TO SYNTHESIS OF THE HISTORY AND PRESENT DANGERS ABOUT RESURGENT CLINTONS.
*** I did return. I will leave the above * & ** for Posterity though they were posted when I was writing as I went and was yet to even maybe four paragraphs.
It is an interesting NEW WORLD ORDER grand strategy consideration to now be tee’d off with a shot of Russian Vodka RESET versus a stout or lager beer stein, however, as if to a time for a new ISRAEL construct.
It seems we are of times to avoid too much nationalism.
Speaker John Boehner has much experience with slippery footing of realms most stereotypically of the type of “Depth Charges” Mrs. Clinton has been known of a preference for; Speaker Boehner comes from a large family of bar keeps.
If Syria can now be a better Palestine solution due to GLOBAL WARMING than Israel should it be still toasted regular as if more by Russian vodka than Aryan suds? It seems there is a new way forward in a post Clinton era where their too historic inaction and avoidance no longer dominate as nothings where some things needed; It is quite plausible to posit that Secretary of State John Kerry is amidst a simple rendering of the performance of Secretary Clinton as mediocre.
I am not ready to suggest a metaphor that we can all go stout with Irish America Kerry. There are places in this known world on the globe of earth that are best of people while of such climates to be in an absentia from alcohol however still’d or bake’d.
At this point as an American private content blogger I am of consideration that I should revisit the year 2006 and my public commentary mostly via threads of newsbusters.org as “uc” for both that Vladimir Putin did become the 2007 TIME Person of the Year after I had said “NO” in matching spirit to TIME as “uc” to their request for a picture of me for their cover as if for a story about “uc” for the nearly full year of arguing clearly for the Iraq Surge and then long in defense of it, also.
We have that a new charge of Federalism is actually now long been about globally without specifically being American.
I did say no to TIME in 2006 per their most spirited request but not without adding that a NO was appropriate because I wasn’t yet half through and they wouldn’t have sufficient space for the whole story if aired mid stream. I did consider that I liked the idea and quickly figured that if they could put a mirror on their cover instead I could though be to helping them with their intent while to thinking such the best story of that year, as per their “politics.”
At the time of this roughed out broadside for considerations seemingly fit or again anew fit today I do have no idea about Syria and Syrians as per a culture of consumption allowing and/or disfavoring alcoholic beverages.
Aryans are back in the news. But not for German beers, however lager’d or stout, as it is now more of a fresh democratic suds of the washing news of Iranian Aryans of a new and more moderated elected leader. Iran as well is of my current unchecked consideration as to a culture of consumption particular also to at least Russian vodka or maybe cheep American suds like say Milwaukee’s Best.
It does seem too early to “report” on consequences of so much no left an inheritance to Secretary Kerry on arguably simple and mediocre “diplomacy” of his most recent predecessor Secretary.
There is with my vast thinking and blogging just in 2006 as “uc” with newsbusters.org exposes on modern media and Operation Iraqi Freedom complications that I have a history of considering that we needed to get to prosecuting Saddam Hussein before the USA might get caught on the wrong side of the freedoms spreading technology revolutions (in social media) interconnectedness and so to as a wrong side as a global trending nation that avoided with too much inaction, for too long, and in an abandonment, near an infidelity, to its own Constitutional, and national values.
America may now be most threatened by thinking that either Clinton deserves to be floated as more possibly of offering solutions while it seems inescapable that we are of a time that needs more to discuss how they are mostly just (still) only part of the problems.
Yes, I do have years of personal history of American private content shared freely and independently much to these points.
I see though that Syria of today presents a problem that has been existent for a long time - for at least as long as it was that Americans were wise to consider how the US Constitution deserved more fidelity from President Bill Clinton than what can be recorded for posterity historically as rather a Clinton with American Infidelity to his own standards.
We have that people of the Middle East were given cause to call at least President Bill Clinton and “AMERICAN INFIDEL” for his years of abandonment in Iraq and Afghanistan with that long tagged and hashed of his inaction and avoidance. It is that we’ld be wiser as Americans to not let us, however, become associated with Clinton as an “AMERICAN INFIDEL” so and to a mashable guilt by association as if of a knowing accomplice status.
So how to toast or not to toast as per Syria now as a opportunity for a new grand strategy that Palestinian people of the wisdom they are capable might support — If the United States of America has to involve itself and a new global multi-national coalition of states in Syria it again would be best to avoid OCCUPIER status and reach towards only a LIBERATOR rap.
So what about Palestine and Palestinians? Does GLOBAL WARMING offer a Middle East ice breaker as per the wisdom Palestinian peoples are capable of? If the USA has to become involved it must likely be so to nation building with a new coalition and to such a scale as that which once led to the post WWII remapping of the Middle East for an Israel so of today.
Besides that if from a Russian Syria to a more Palestinian new Syria as a new Palestine there could be a shift from a predilection for vodka to a searching for Aryan suds of equanimous cultural consumption how now might a nation building for a new Syria as a NEW “Palestine” at least as per climate change wisdom be the only real alternative now to Assad?
Yes, I do think it still a good toast to lift up your socially acceptable local beverage in good cheer that the USA and coalition states did manage a prosecution of Saddam Hussein assisting standing with (in LIBERATION) before the rising conditions of the technology revolution (in social media) had at least American caught on the wrong side, and injustly as if also AMERICAN INFIDELS to their values so Constituted as standards as President William Jefferson Clinton is taggable.
It is inescapable that Bill Clinton is at heart the very politician that gave the filibuster like Democratic Party Convention Speech for the nomination of Governor Michael Dukakis. 1988 was a different time for Americans of the United States of America still in the longest of warring such as our Cold War. Governor Clinton of Arkansas in 1988 in Atlanta, Georgia, droned on and on, and on, by many reports.
By 1991 we were in a new global state of affairs heralded as a NEW WORLD ORDER. Many may have been dreading seeing Governor Clinton return to any national dais for another oration. There is a long story to tell that now fits with a Democrat Party in need of branding help. Today’s order as per intra-party Democrat worlds has a is segmented to a split about three identities; Today there are different biases about the brand as of a trichotomy between Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - Barack Hussein Obama Dems.
Some are grateful much more than others that Vice President George H. W. Bush was elected in 1988 and that Governor Michael Dukakis was not. As many may be grateful some about a retrospective that Governor Clinton may have cost Governor Dukakis the election with his convention speech still reported as of an air of a “Will it ever end?”
Students of the politics of the United States of America can hardly be to erudite posits and papers today in these times without having an understanding of the years 1988-1993. To some it was just the years that the U.S.A. became the sole superpower in the world, and, to others it was the years of a concern that a third world war would break out and be the foretold end - the end of the world as by fire.
Of at least an intra-party Democrat world set about with a dichotomy just between Bill Clinton Dems & Hillary Clinton Dems we have that the First Couple Clintons did leave after their eight years without having left, so it seems, any alternative plan for “bite” as per Saddam Hussein. We still have a vacuum about our political logic quite dangerously of roll outs of new policies and defense spending concerns endemic to the Administration of the Clintons and how they left President George W. Bush no entrance and/or exit strategy for Iraq and the considerable dust ups about a prosecution due for Saddam Hussein.
There is much hubris about so much over too many of these many years since Governor Clinton showed his true self with the nominating speech for Governor Dukakis that is of reports of some fearing it might never end, like. From this we have that students of American history of the politics of the United States of America have a dichotomy to consider and scrutinize too much just within that which is just singularly of the known history of Bill Clinton.
Iraq and Iran, logically speaking, now would likely be engaged in a mini cold war of their own with non U.S. global support of quite a different “new world order” than President George H. W. Bush managed us towards. Without the PERSIAN GULF WAR of President George H. W. Bush and OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM of President George W. Bush it is logical and supportable by known global sympathies that Saddam if still in power would now be in a cold war nuclear power and nuclear weapon race with Iran. It helps to understand the years between 1988 & 1993 and how so then about a major adjustment for the world to a NEW WORLD ORDER with the U.S.A. emerged from such long dust up with the U.S.S.R. as a sole global super power.
About so much of this is still that Hillary Clinton Dems of the above concerning trichotomy and or dichotomy is that which did the most flip flopping. She is also the Clinton, and Democrat, most culpable and mashable around a hashable #Iraq for she voted for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, logically, as one that as Mrs. Clinton the former FLOTUS of the most recent prior administration was of intimate enough “intelligence” to have known if “WMD” was or was not a lie. She is remembered for being of reports that she was so confident with “WMD” intelligence as former FLOTUS, it seems, that she didn’t even take it upon herself to read the provided “NEW” intelligence estimates.
In light of the recent vast democratic reset that happened when the U.S.A became the victor of the longest of wars - of the COLD WAR - and became in the years 1988 -1993 effectively the only super power it is quite relevant and concerning that logic can help us be to better understandings of our here and now if we dig into the old dust ups of a couple decades ago. Afghanistan can be said to have been the GETTYSBURG of the COLD WAR - the “turning point.”
In the mashable of our current problema challenging any now “Democrat” as of an “Intelligentsia” we have that we should consider that “WMD” may have been a genius stroke however a “LIE” for still we have that any entrance or exit about Iraq for a prosecution of Saddam Hussein and/or “bite” for United Nations’ sanctions was best to be booted as somehow definitively not of the U.S.A. or Coalition as to a HOLY WAR footing.
Hillary Clinton Dems are now quite past a reasonable deadline for proffering posits positively purposeful politically per prudent possible and probable prosecution of her past sworn officialdoms. It is logical that Hillary Clinton has been making the same mistakes over and over since she first flip flopped about OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM. When one accepts “Bush lied” it logically becomes both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton whom appear to look worse - worser even that President George W. Bush.
There is a dichotomy taggable as of a Bill Clinton’s Dems and Hillary Clinton’s Dems even from their Administration as the first stirrings of a dust up in Afghanistan had one more a dove and the other more hawkish. Together they abandoned Afghanistan for their eight years and such that once was manageable as of a too early exit by the United States of American became years of insult added to injury, like, such that now we may be there and for so long because they wanted to sell PEACE before its time and be coyly of an inaction and avoidance in Afghanistan and Iraq so that they could justify, somehow, PEACE DIVIDENDS during known unsettled times.
Yes there is a dichotomy at least just in Bill Clinton that is now still very relevant for it is not logical that he was himself truly while of his 1988 Democrat Party Convention speechifying and that he had been naturally as himself while of much of the exposure since their late entry into the 1992 Presidential race.
OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM would better to have been of ACTION by the Clintons in the first term of the Administration of the Clintons’ “two-fer” and then as well somehow clearly and definitively as of a “war” like posture not footed or booted as confusable as a HOLY WAR.
Saddam Hussein was like a father or godfather figure about Al Qaeda. How much this was strategic and purposefully politicked by Saddam Hussein to a consideration that he would be able to keep Kuwait despite the U.S.A. of treaties because Americans wouldn’t risk stirring up radicals known to be of geopolitical sensitivity and pride - like Al Qaeda. We have that we are still deciding politics with still too little consideration about how our 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT is flawed for having looked back only ten years at Al Qaeda all the while it was nearer 12 years old and formed specifically to be a response/reaction to politics and warring by Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein may have well like rocked the cradles of Al Qaeda against the United States of America towards gains like of his efforts in seizing Kuwait.
And today there is at least about Iraq and OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM an intra-party trichotomy among Democrats as of either Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - President Barack Hussein Obama Dems. These three still have different histories related to so much of what is now too effecting to our politics and these years of gridlock.
Logically there wouldn’t have been a 9/11 I or 9/11 II if Saddam Hussein hadn’t invaded Kuwait. Logically it seems 9/11 may have been kept like as a HOLY DAY for Jihadists of Al Qaeda 2001 sense of justice and so if as well an attack by them to being only then interpretable of an “intelligence” of a motive nearly identical to 9/11 I. There is more in just the broached “dichotomy” concern about Bill Clinton that relates to some of his earliest moral short comings of his first steps in the Middle East of his first year of his first term; it is actually mashable and logical that Al Qaeda attacked us on both 9/11 days as acts of war in a HOLY WAR or Jihad for a sense of justice related still to Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait.
And today there is still a concern about “LIES” of “WMD” and yet hardly enough discussion as to the religious and geopolitics variables that were better worked around to assure that any due prosecution of Saddam Hussein wouldn’t and couldn’t be seen as of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA of a wagging of HOLY WAR.
Again, there is a dichotomy just about Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton for their years of the Administration of the Clintons as per Afghanistan and Iraq. Again, most reports still are of us as having had power shift from the Clintons to President George W. Bush without there having been a plan of the Clintons’ eight years left for entering and exiting Iraq.
It seems that “BITE” for United Nations’ sanctions on Saddam Hussein, as an issue, as our history, does divide the house of Clintons still.
And, still we had the clock running. We were some to a new way of “liberation” for the United States of America, as of a new world order, and expectation to “police’” as a sole super power, as it became an expected way for Americans that had risks of the U.S.A. becoming punk’d by other nations to such while to such. We the People of the United States of America were uniquely fortified to a new way to “liberation” of other peoples where we had been compromised/engaged before much some just because we had (still had) an all volunteer force.
And now though with two acts of war by Al Qaeda on 9/11s are we to measure and consider the current intra-party trichotomy existant about a logical and historical divide between the politics of Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - President Barack Hussein Obama Dems?
And, again: It is remarkable that as the discussion goes from “Bush lied” to an acceptance that “Bush lied” it is the Clintons however similar and intimate and different are two that each are to politically looking worse that President George W. Bush!
So: Did we get attacked on both 9/11 because Bill Clinton failed to sufficiently prosecute Saddam Hussein per the sense of justice reasoning of Al Qaeda? Was the second act of war on such that may have been kept as a terrorist HOLY DAY then for Bill Clinton returned and not penitent so when again in a Democrat Party Convention - when at Charlotte as the charlatan yet of a history of having been of an Administration of the Clintons now proven to have been too much of an avoidance and inaction as per Afghanistan and Iraq?
We can accept that it is logical that Saddam Hussein fathered Al Qaeda by his violation of Kuwait - Right?
The days are numbered for writer critics of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton to pound #Hillary about Hillary Clinton as a clearly “PUBLIC FIGURE”.
The presumptive Democrat Party 2016 nominee for the office seeking of the United States of America Executive Branch Presidential see is not the still now Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. We have that she has been of a “TEAM OF RIVALS” of the first of the Obama’s “we…” consideration as likely of two of his “we…” Secretary’s to be considered towards 2016.
The presumptive Democrat Party 2016 nominee for their leadership to capture the American Presidency must be considered firstly to be Senator John Kerry if confirmed nominee to duty as another Obama rival as a Cabinet Officer bound of State Diplomatic duties. He should have the mantle of “Obama’s rival” at least as much as aspirant Mrs. Clinton of State husbandry, however, has or is presumed to be to a having towards 2016.
But for now it will be that “Hillary” is for a while no longer a public figure to kick around with fair criticisms and much due doubt — it is soon more that she will have been put out to pasture to idyllic retreating. Of course if she is really a “rival” we should expect official statements contrary and critical of now re-seated President Barack H. Obama.
Secretary of State John Kerry for President in 2016, though as “white” as a “Hillary” again for President, is what should be presumed firstly with bias based on sex, race, or age. He has the money - he’s run before - he likely has to be at least as much a rival to President Obama as still charged and sworn Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton and as well the re-sworn Vice President Joseph Biden.
Citizens United as been quite rendered a good and necessary ruling in light of the ease with which President Barack Hussein Obama raised and spent that sum in excess of a billion campaign dollars.
More concerning is any or all “foreign” “influence” now in our politics - and all global activities of both of Obama rivals - both “Bill” and “Hillary.” Secretary of State John Kerry as his Democrat Party Nominee in 2016 makes more democratic sense even though he can likely fund a billion dollar campaign with his own wealth.
Are the days now numbered as if “Hillary” soon no longer a “public political figure” to criticize as not due a privacy as if a lamb quietly set out to pasture in idyllic retreat? Are these the last days to fairly speak of due criticisms of Obama’s first Secretary of State?
“Kerry For President 2016″ is at least a halo Senator John Kerry deserves if also to be seen as an independent thinking Cabinet Officer also a wanted “rival” sworn to obedience to President Barack Hussein Obama, but how fronted as a challenger.
A due long continuous battle to unearth the cover-up air about the Obama’s State avoidance and inaction of Benghazi failures of his first “we…” now butter’d up for departure but not legal escape is afoot such that she is to remain suspect as a person of interest yet still much in the public domain and eyes.
Writers for politics and justice though, unless she steps out like now soon with a how and a why for consumption of “rivals” with specifics hers much to how and why she would have been a better President these past four years, are to consider civility and decorum and political politeness as if she is due an idyllic retreat as if placidly out to pasture as just a lamb.
It would behoove her to quietly retreat as much as possible now. Obama’s new “rival” Diplomat is hardly more “white” than she, and, of a more lore’d and well beaten step by step path and resume building towards a Presidency for himself.
It should much behoove both President Clinton and soon X-Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton to both quietly now try to just fade away from foreign and domestic entanglements at least now for high profile and long about pressures to justice and understanding of at least the first four years of “Foreign Policy” of the Administration of Barack H. Obama.
These days are numbered for writers to write as strongly as a “public figure” deserves about our former First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton unless besides a continued push by our honorable Congress as per a lingering haze of “cover-up” of fogs about Benghazi we soon see “Hillary” of official steps to directly set her self apart as having been an independent thinking “rival” these four years and of the aforementioned “how” at least speaking to what she would have done differently and better these past four years.
I will be freer without her as Secretary of State or otherwise a sworn officer of the United States of America to reach to much deeper and globally broader markets with my already written thousands of pages long of years yet maybe not of having been critical enough of Presidential aspirant Hillary Rodham Clinton. I will though myself until further developments be to considering her less now for new pieces as of “new” material.
I do look forward to finding my real audience for my book idea to publish past columns and commentary about “Hillary” and our 22nd Amendment towards a Guinness Book record for “most number of pieces written as to why Hillary Rodham Clinton should not become President.” And, I look forward to being more entertaining of comity and comedy as a political pundit and as well as a poet and political poet.
It seems reasonable to consider that most of my columns are as long here as a New York Times Op-Ed Columnist’s there - but yet three times wider and so nearly 3x the word count there. I have not yet compared word counts between my average length column and such as an industry standard. I am glad many of my pieces did not have to be reduced to such standards as theirs.
“Secretary of State John Kerry for President” has a ring of Boston Brahmin lore’d good will and wealth for much musing to considerations that he with his Yale pedigree could be a revolutionary American elder in four years of promises to a long necessary cleaning up of his own party. He will have to likely have to also run as a “rival” of President Barack H. Obama’s to assert that he as well at least as “Hillary” and “Joe” was not just a bureaucratic tool incapable of independent thinking.
The Clintons have been public figures long enough such that an idyllic retreat as if out to pasture not a lot fair or due either President William Jefferson Clinton nor soon X-Secretary of State Mrs. Hillary Clinton.
We have to write about and publicly long consider that Republicans couldn’t run clean enough campaigns in 2008 & 2012 because too many still of our Congress were about that had been too weak to avoid the corruptive collusion to political corruption worked politically by the machinations most political and new-tech of and by the Administration of the Clintons whence.
The Clintons with their Clintons’ global initiatives are due a near “monopoly” consideration to a new era of Congressional “trust busting” - can’t you say, yourself? We have that we have no idea how vast the left wing global conspiracy is now already towards further undermining of our Constitution and at least our Constitutional protections set to limit and check all foreign “contributions” or “gifts” like by foreigner or agents of foreign countries.
As Walt Whitman sung of us as of body electricities while electricity hardly but a novelty otherwise we have that the Clintons have already too long been to involved and meddling as term limited by our 22 Amendment by at least the prudent example set by “George” and “Martha” - however pre-Lincoln re-uniting.
As per Clintons vs. Kerry towards 2016 with “whiteness” so muted it seems we must be to measuring the “foreign” influence in at least President Clintons affecting as of a electricity (bought and built) of foreign gifts towards political electoral homeland effectings as bankable swingable “CHARISMA.”
And, yes the Republicans still have troubles for having been compromised and corruptive by the Administration of the Clintons at least while during the Clintons’ second term. We have yet to have a young enough Republican challenge to Democrat Party national ticket since President George W. Bush whom can stand up with enough inside the beltway Republicans without the Clinton having them not able to be free enough to speak against them without incriminating themselves.
The Clintons have to be the most long shot most “underdog” ticket to now measure towards 2016 hopes - right?
Long live F. Scott Fitzgerald — may he never be a Henry David Thoreau or an Edgar Allen Poe.
What is it you don’t want me to tell you today about the recent elections?
Though President Barack Obama hasn’t felt flexible enough to use his middle name Hussein these results suggest he has a GREEN REVOLUTION all his own - but for how others built it, more than he did.
He may have started less of a velvet touch even about Iran and lost in time with a naivete about Saddam Hussein and a future frontier for Iraq and Iran challenges, but we are here now all going forward but when backwards to learn from history to try to avoid repeating hard lessons already thought learned from.
I have long suggested a N.E.D.A. different from the Irani Neda mostly ignored by President Barack Hussein Obama and his Secretary of State more a Secretary of War. A NATURAL EMERGENCY DISASTER AGENCY - N.E.D.A. - to have a WEATHER CORP and some to replace or supplant some FEMA operations in ways outside of our Department of Homeland Defense regular organizational tree.
We don’t need a Constitutional convention to rebuild FEMA at least some as a N.E.D.A. - and an esprit de corps of this new weather normal that for now can be a global cooling change after a reported near 9% drop in concerned greenhouse gases since just 2007 - a change of weather patterns due to human causes by political affecting.
The numbers seem in already to suggest that Obama was elected by a mass of people all green and with him so as like a revolution green - a Green Revolution.
I do not know why so many voted for this Black FDR also from a Hyde Park and for another bought of AUSTERITY — It seems undeniable that Obama has won a second term to be still of his new conservationism to a GREEN first national AUSTERITY for all.
It seems a loss - win result for Republicans. This win for more of Obama’s national AUSTERITY with his priorities to a new conservationism comes with First Lady Michelle Obama as a leader for less and more home grown and homespun, still.
The best that might come from President Barack Hussein Obama new “flexibility” from re-election would be a loud and most public march against trial lawyers and malpractice litigation to effect a real and most needed Healthcare reform.
It seems the Republicans gained even more national ground securely in 2012 even though they didn’t get to inherit “OBAMA’S AUSTERITY” as hoped. A renaissance in state’s rights and our federalism basis seems here now to stay for the second term of President Obama. Since the Republicans succeeded in enough wins to block the Democrat Party take over of most of the possible redistricting across this nation they seem to have been gaining more ground, if only slowly.
Thomas Paine might think that there were two winners in 2012. A real winner by results and a sensed real visceral winner of causes moved forward more - more successfully.
I don’t know why so many voted for President Obama in 2012 with such to be a vote for gridlock.
As long as this President is first an environmentalist as “Teddy” Roosevelt might have himself thought as not excessive if it would just get him back in office for a third term, he is necessarily an AUSTERITY PRESIDENT more like Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Did you hear that there are now thirty Republican Governors of our fifty states?
Have you figured that President Obama has been so wrong about Saddam Hussein and for so long that too many didn’t figure their selection in 2012 enough about how Saddam Hussein if not for President George W. Bush’s FREEDOM AGENDA with OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM would now have support at least from some in Europe to have been back to nuclear power and maybe an arms race with Iran?
So Secretary of State Hillary Clinton > how is your “best advise” about THE BENGHAZI FOUR working for you? That advise to defensively have a DOCUMENT DUMP like a throwing of the kitchen sink at it all and your lies and naivete at least with old and early “I cannot believe that this happened in a country we liberated.”? Have you succeeded in your defense with the throwing everything at it to stall and bury your complicity legal strategy?
Hmmm? I think for everyone but Hillary Clinton the expression for defensive legal maneuvers should still be “threw everything but the kitchen sink at it” even though for her just “kitchen sink” seems too excessive and defensive.
We know how to make ice — we can build a fleet of NUCLEAR CHILLER SUBMARINES to be of a N.E.D.A. WEATHER CORP for scientific and emergency oceans temperature moderation — cooler surface temperatures can be effected to put risk of bigger storms down by changing the “warmth” they would feed on.
Is this a place for a mention of THE COLOR PURPLE or maybe an earlier era of our entertainment culture such as that of HALLE BERRY in STRICTLY BUSINESS. Alice Walker, sorry, I have not read your book yet. Halle - you were amazing in STRICTLY BUSINESS - that such was possible for you then did have me tearing up.
It seems aliens and space spending is now out mostly for the next four years after this GREEN REVOLUTION however without a velvet touch and core philosophy for haves and have not isms about this march forward to more years of OBAMA’S AUSTERITY as a Black FDR also from a Hyde Park.
As long as he all green and with his priorities set to a new conservationism with diets by FLOTUS Michelle his tune is ‘AUSTERITY FOR ALL!’.
I was just this morning sharing this thought on my Facebook friend Charles M. Blow’s blog link:
“Seems the Republicans have been big winners this year — at least as towards an American RESET to a restoration that we have rules and a Constitution that are not outdated and to be run over by a few elite ideological partisan Dems with hopes to change to a unstoppable autocratic global power. If only Mitt Romney had been born more a poor Mexican/American dream child or a poor black boy this message would be clearer and still likely a fair characterization for the party of Condoleezza Rice. Republicans have been winning since 2008 while losing - they beat the redistricting wave and have been continuing forward towards more and better community organizing towards a renaissance in state’s rights and federalism issues understanding.”
We can start the countdown to this approaching “Judgement Day” for the work wrought however many scores now by Barack Hussein Obama, Party leader of Democrat Party and the current President of the United States of America. Election day is near!
Has he succeeded in nearly making Joseph Kennedy, Prescott Bush, Charles Lindbergh, Allen Dulles, John Rockefeller, Andrew Mellon, Joseph V. Connolly Sr. and his boss William Randolph Hearst look like Tea Partiers in comparison? Election day is near!*
These men of a different era of different problems long before a 1984ish JOBIAN TABLET e-word capability did witness Hollerith punch cards too greatly enable and encourage Adolf Hitler. And they seemed unlike our modern Democrats to have been willing to bring about Nuremberg Trials for crimes against humanity that could have and should have been brought as well against Saddam Hussein within the first years of a new NEW WORLD ORDER as it was already during the first term of the administration of the Clintons.
And as I update with Facebook recently this thought now here too:
“Still about the Clintons and our 90s: DANGER > they thought that tech revolution gave them the power to start fooling most of the people most of the time and on top of how spousally they thought after all those years spousally plotting since law school to grab global power was to an inevitable and probable potential also of us too much to them thinking as well that Republicans had to work with them or get left behind with them only sharing their thought actually real power and ability to move forward newly able to fool most of the people most of the time. If only like they didn’t wax nostalgic all those years of a “charming boy in the school yard” whence - and to a keeping him of privy to their spousal and nearly secured closely secret ambitions.”
And, REALLY, what about Iran under its current leadership?
But as if a BULL MOOSE TEDDY ROOSEVELT herself alike, really aren’t we now to saying like: HILLARY IS NO BILL CLINTON?
We are stirred and shaken these days wondering how so much could have gone so wrong and now more to a late arrival at a due ponderance about a seeming missing number of years — Have you found the missing years 1993-2001 yet?
How can we have a 2012 “JUDGEMENT DAY” about so much with it seeming affected by Dems as if eight years and the work of Dem hands did not really exist but metaphysically?
With us supposed to now understand how we have a Navy with “ships” that can operate underwater we still have that it seems that President William Jefferson Clinton punk’d President Barack Hussein Obama into appearance with pronouncements that we should be to a NEW NATIONALISM in the spirit of BULL MOOSE TEDDY ROOSEVELT of 1910. I don’t think that President Obama would have on his own have decided to come out like an earlier like rabid Clintons as “Teddy” of 1910 just back in our states fresh from being the toast of most or all of the new pre-Nazi Fascists about Europe. No, it just seems it was a move Clintons did punk President Obama into as a move they needed likely as well to work a justification of their staying around for like a third term.
Really, I don’t know who stirred so much in past days about the failings of the Clintons and to me back to wondering how they just never could bring themselves to deal with one reportedly a new Hitler at least in their first term while our Coalition from the Persian Gulf War still at ready, nearly. How was it the list of men of an era after “Teddy” of 1910 shown above could be party to Nuremberg trials and yet the administration of the Clintons were more to letting the reported “New Hitler” Saddam Hussein nearly go scott free? I mean you can see that today we would have a nuclear arms race between Iran and a Iraq of Saddam Hussein or his sons if President George W. Bush hadn’t picked up our sanctioned swords and bayonets of UN rights and move many to a quite late prosecution of Saddam Hussein - RIGHT?
Did the Clintons reign in an era of as much “new tech” as Hitler did with Hollerith, and, did the Clintons show weakness and fall too temptations of such yet of their own times? It does seem it was President Barack Hussein Obama that wanted to go all Orwellian State Evangelist on the world. It does seem it was President Barack Hussein Obama that wanted his time and its new tech revolution with JOBIAN TABLETS more secular to allow him an hour a day of State broadcasts to evangelize as thought prohibited by our 1st Amendment.
For starters we still have the problem that when the Clintons left office there were then no reports of them having ever worked up an entrance or exit plan at least to effectively deal/prosecute Saddam Hussein.
For starters we still have the problem that with the Clintons in office Defense Department wasn’t given the money for up armoring troop vehicles nor troop body armor enough for the times of the intel in their intel reports.
How many dead are there in Arlington National Cemetary now who died at least in a fight to keep Communism from being forced or coerced upon Americans anywhere? How wrong by 2009 at least was it to suggest that after so many died to fight such a centralization from afar method of top down trickle or torrent Government from our minds that our best way forward was to choose to embrace what so many had died and suffered defending us from?
It seems TEA PARTIES of today can satisfy the demand of readers more everywhere. How safe is it to be a messenger now for citizens of the world with the Clintons about and their Boss Obama still thinking also that Saddam Hussein should have been let to go scott free? I mean like after President Clinton punk’d President Obama into NEW NATIONALISM pronouncements to us to embrace a new State Evangelism Secular by Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America, where can our thoughts go but to the Clintons as BULL MOOSE “TEDDYS” as a new Fascist too much himself already by then?
It does seem even romantic that we seem to be of an era more for PEACE DIVIDENDS than the years of the Clintons with PEACE DIVIDENDS - that we are of a time when and so that our best National Security Posture seems to also be to an embrace of a RENAISSANCE of Federalism and state’s rights.
What a mess the administration of the Clintons left for their successor and so now as we can consider maybe more clearly that such a mess was for internal Dem Party power struggles and meant as a mess to be left a President Al Gore in such a way that he would have to likely crawl to the Clintons and beg them to show him how he could fix a mess they had made - like to a built in come back for “Bill” at least like a mason of old when of building a chimney to have been to mortaring and pointing in a pane of glass until such time as his bill got paid.
There sure did seem a whole lot of smoke you could say after someone tried to be a President after the Clintons. Or better like between the Clintons - by their thinking.
Either as a BULL MOOSE new “TEDDY” is quite a problem! And, similarly a problem as well of someone(s) too far to wondering how to get the power of the Presidency back after two full terms had been had, however. For “Teddy” it seemed an embrace in 1910 of the new Fascism of Europe on the rise and a turn away from whom he had Governed as as President for two terms.
Election day is near! But why wasn’t their money in Defense Budget of Clintons for sufficient vehicle armoring or at least body armor enough for all?
{* The above list of names came from Googling ‘Joe Kennedy GM Hitler’ mostly with such from this link there: http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/american_supporters_of_the_europ.htm — That I added the name of Joseph V. Connolly Sr. is all mine. Joseph V. Connolly Sr. must have been a character for years after his early death near the age of 50 I was on Block Island in summers sleeping some many nights under a photo his son then had of Mussolini personally autographed to him - to Joseph V. Connolly Sr. that is. There were other pictures too and one of the Liberty Ship Christened the JOSEPH V. CONNOLLY (SR?). I do not know if such specific vessel that works on top of water was Bridgeport, Connecticut made while knowing/thinking that Bridgeport did build Liberty ships}
As we move through today realizing that we might have to move to impeach at least President Obama are we so to it that we might have a President John Boehner in lieu of a President Joe Biden for interim months before a new representative and informed electorate moves with decisions?
REMEMBER TO THINK!!!
Remember yesterday was the eleventh anniversary of 9/11 and the news today seems to most be that the Obama Administration at least of its State Department charge was too far inadequate securing of our embassies and our personnel in regions of known conflict on what should have been the calender day of the year when such are likely most at risk.
REMEMBER TO THINK - this is what I thought this morning and shared as my Facebook.com/jpeterhogan updates that also re-post automatically as tweets with first 140 characters or nearly and a bitty link to the rest available at Facebook link:
>Could America have looked any worse abroad during the Dem Convention? Take just Egypt - how did it go over to have power hungry Bill Clinton too clinging to attempts to have thirty years of too real power after eight of paling with their Hosni Mubarak? And with promises of that appearance to be loudly around about race for a while? And with Mrs. C of State but oddly actually looking too comfy with meetings with China and Russia in China and Russia? Just seems that the message of the Dem Convention has to have been heavy with an almost pining for days of old when Clintons could just embrace likes of Qadhaffi and Mubarak. What message are we letting slip out to the world letting Clintons be so visibly to attempts to be in power maybe for forty years despite them having little history of making things better?
>Before we go and all start talking about Egypt like we know anything about it because Hillary was happy to be recently sitting down with China and Russia >> Are we all better informed or just wrong now? Do Muslims as a practice tend not to tell outsiders or opposition what the real reason they are doing something as like a check and balance by them towards seeing if they really have cause to be doing what they won’t tell you they are really doing? Is this whole cloth home spun that as regards the Middle East we have to be able to divine the real whole reason they are doing something and not respond as if the reason they give is the real reason as for them are they checking us to see if a Holy War or protest is needed just because we cannot see the real reason they are to such? Just seems now Sec Clinton is about the worst person that we could have as our Top Diplomat - how say you? Do we have to find a way just to be more wholly about a understanding that will only be teased out and not explained simply as if to simpletons?
>Are we at that President Obama isn’t Muslim enough - not nearly as skilled in “Muslim” as he thinks he is cleverly? How do you see his Convention set and styling so much of a FORWARD but with a RESET with his chariot podium and DWS’s female Ramses II simple ware to a ruler of Egypt attitude maybe though of days before Ramses II started chasing Moses to get back his labor force? Just seems we may underestimate the import but can Egyptians afford underestimating President Obama of that Cairo speech I gave an “F” to years ago? Can they escape that he said FORWARD but went back so far to seem to try to RESET the stage as if he were the supreme ruler of lands of Egypt?
>Are we now at that we are better to be globally allied with our much Catholic brethren of Central and South America than visibly in bed against Middle Eastern freedom with secular socialist states like Russia or China, however so? Not to be about religion but not to not be about common values and shared energies of faith and ways? And, really where did Saddam’s WMD disappear to and does Iran already have a bomb? And how are we not to publicly condemn our Clintons - both of intimate political “two-fer” for they didn’t just get along with Hosni Mubarak and Muamar Qadhaffi they nearly were so with Saddam Hussein as the best to keep leading Iraq that they nearly left him be free to start what likely would have soon become a nuclear power and weapons race against Iran. ??? >RESIGN HILLARY!!! PLEASE DO WHAT IS RIGHT - FINALLY - RESIGN HILLARY!!! PRESIDENT OBAMA YOU DIDN’T NEGOTIATE AWAY YOUR RIGHT TO FIRE MRS. C DID YOU? RESIGN HILLARY? FIRE HILLARY? > > > > > > >What did I say yesterday - where did I say it? How can I have a day with one visit from a .edu domain and yet have this page showing such otherwise as first - most busiest domain of visits to http://jphogan.org on September 12, 2012 as recorded with most from “.ru” (Russia) domain - and that of over three hundred visits? >Has Sec. Clinton been too busy with her “JOBS DIPLOMACY” agenda attempts to usurp historic powers of our Commerce and Treasury departments of their over seas charges to have paid enough attention to the otherwise standard and necessary work/charge of just her own cabinet level department?
>I guess I could write a new column to refresh my nearly unique understanding of the Clintons and their ambitions and how it dates back to me polled one day in a school yard by them while single law students while they were walking by. See because Bill asked me to lie to back up his lie to be like a wing man to him with her smitten even with him having lied about what my honest youthful innocent answer had been and he then to asking me to lie about his lie and so lie about what I thought was truthful from me as I was that remembered iconic “charming boy in the school yard” carried by them for years like a circuit breaker for their plotting and so that I remember these two for years as mostly distant invisible friends I am still of my memories of them when they thought they may have been going “too far” and “plotting against our Constitution” with too much thinking of bending it but not breaking it as so as so as they would check like for another youthful innocent iconic opinion from me as of if they were to go that far could they both become President some day. And, since Bill asked me to lie from our first meeting and I to thinking we would be safer if I could learn how fully dastardly and diabolic their plotting might be I did regularly tell them from afar a “yes” again though really a “no.” And so Hillary and Bill may today have a misplaced confidence that they hadn’t plotted to bend our Constitution so far and that their decades of plotting and scheming were of misleading false truths offered in the spirit of the standards of their first impression. Oh, boy did I think with 1992 race that they were perfectly set up to be campaign foils and as one time use disposable politicians that we were best to throw out forever after that exposure. Yes, they have a confidence that they had the smartest plan and were the smartest that were plotting -but…???
>How can President Obama explain or now apologize for Sec. Clinton not having thought to have had sufficient security for our Embassies across such conflicted areas on an anniversary of 9/11? NOW: Mrs. Clinton you are FIRED?
REMEMBER TO THINK - and these were some of my thoughts on 11th Anniversary of 9/11:
>>It is the 11th year since 9/11 attacks. The Clinton are scum in my mind for trying to cling to power these years since instead of having faded away. See, from my perspective and with all I have already shared and shared officially with the appropriate authorities of the Bush Administration following the attacks it is that then and now I should be sharing that on the morning of 9/11 when I finally learned of the attacks I realized that I had been right not wrong about a threat since a move by Clintons nearly seven to eight years before. It seems what I knew was that when the Clintons decided a perspective or point of view didn’t need consideration or shouldn’t be considered or was of them not seen as apparently there for consideration back whence though such was a consideration of the integrated strategizing that launched them >> I was left with but if they ignore that consideration we will get attacked. On 9/10/01 I was as it were thinking finally that I must after seven plus years and even after having asked Philip Bobbitt “What about the threats we don’t see?” except that I had been wrong and that our government must have covered it all somehow. But on the morning of 9/11 I became a rare person then able to help the President and the media through that day and week and the months and years that followed for on that day I found out I had been right and that I had had a sense of what two targets were to be. This I had been trying to warn about but not with a knowing that these two “targets” weren’t actually two complexes that I shouldn’t have needed to waste a thought thinking about being secure and as informed. On 9/11 it made sense to me even though the night before and that morning I was wrong in thinking I must have been wrong. We know the Clintons are “BIG LIARS” and we should be looking at them and their years now thoroughly for the next ten years at least for thinking a whole consideration didn’t need to be considered whence. I seem to have known two of the targets for seven years and been of attempts to alert officials without so much energy to have had my little awareness be too noticed so that new targets and strategies would be employed to better work their plans. And, I did think DC had ways to defend from air from movies and didn’t think WTC would need amateur me. I do now have a coffee mug for Bush’s Air Force One - I traded with Rumsfeld’s chief of staff and his wife for one of my American Egg coffee mugs. Yes, I have spent these past 11 years helping in my own way as much as I could but for the Clintons about undermining progress and understanding in a necessary defensiveness of themselves. It seems what I knew was that if the targets I suspected for seven years were know other targets I couldn’t have figured would be selected and that maybe their “luck” would have them thinking more than two might be blessed. And this is probably the smartest way to pass the 11th year - especially since the Clintons are still holding on where and how they shouldn’t be. This does all go back to decisions they made seemingly together and some much of thinking considerations in the global political air didn’t need their consideration though they were being prompted to consider them, and while they had been considered in the thinking that launched the Clintons not original to the Clintons.
>>We have that after 9/11 those of the Admin. of the Clintons were of blaming red states and blue states and claiming innocence upon themselves quite ridiculous considering the nearness to their 8 years of questionable worked governance abroad and at home - and of claiming of innocence upon themselves with a blaming on Americans themselves with posits near “we just did what the people asked us to do.” And so how does a country survive after letting a past First Couple go on like this with their years those that preceded and most likely arose a “motivation”? Are we stuck trying to believe just lies and stuck economically for such from them hardly actually provides a working explanation for our down times? And, wait, didn’t they ask to be elected because they were so smart that they would know what to do and wouldn’t have to just be knee jerk figureheads at the top with all its spoils and perks just doing what the people asked them today - without any study, any real committees, or actual work and homework? Yes I do think I may want an office in new World Trade Tower so that I can look out and be about better to remembering what a mess our 90s really were. Yes we are now of days when it isn’t too late to look back and realize that very early the Clintons did, on their own, without being asked, did completely change our foreign relations path in the Middle East and so that for the rest of their administration there was no way back from such of them doing what they wanted to do for partisan political convenience. Yes, Bush was right to let the country heal before we looked to justly at the Clintons and the Administration by the Clintons’ “two-fer” — Now at eleven years past it is starting to seem long over due though.
>>The attacks of 9/11 were unnecessary - there were political avenues still open for grievances to be settled - there were as long as we were willing to look at Clintons at least for ignorance or negligence.
>>The attacks of 9/11 Hogan still holds as unnecessary as it seemed against one party of American politics not both and so room for settling grievances still was about and secured.
>>ON 9/11 THE 19 WERE UNTIL KNIVES OUT OF LIVING TO THE AMERICAN DREAM NEW FREEDOM SET & KEPT BY & OF THE CLINTONS! AND SO WHILE PRACTICING!
>>A JOE(SEPHINE) WILSON >> This may help stir the necessary long overdue thinking for the “before” 9/11. We have that our “PARTY OF NO” that I encouraged from like its day one is also maybe essential for our restoration of our USA along these lines as it was maybe that we had two different party lines before 9/11 and one necessary better for being more thorough and more globally compassionate. Our “PARTY OF NO” also stands against President Obama but in ways that can be said to be standing for justice and civility and against an ignorance and/or negligence by those he chose to associate with not of any “inheritance.” To preserve that 9/11 attacks were unnecessary we do still need to prove that grievances at least against the Presidency of the Clintons could have been or be still aired/heard and to an ignorance and/or negligence of them and just one of our two parties. The Clintons are remembered for one of their first foreign policy steps abroad of having been polarizing in new kind of extreme partisan politics by their asking Middle East leaders to like just blame all they wanted or felt just in a blame with upon just American Republicans. I don’t know how to label President Obama for his embrace of the Clintons but at least as of a political ignorance and naivete.
|
Originally of March 24, 2010 at commentary/blog page of jphogan.org - Yes, like of a headlines out of control theme.
“CHARLES FOSTER KANE IS DEAD” What will our Supreme Court do? Will they act as designed as a HEADLINER: HEADLINER: HEADLINER: HEADLINER: HEADLINER: HEADLINER: HEADLINER: HEADLINER: |
Perhaps I should try to work on my humor.
I am fresh off catching my old Facebook friend Don Wildman’s CITIES OF THE UNDERWORLD episode on Vlad the Impaler; - Don, if you see this please pass on greetings to your wife, - an even older friend.
As the annual White House Correspondents Dinner approaches we are at a conundrum of collusion or coup.
It seems we have an open political season now authorized upon President Clinton by President Clinton.
Why should France no longer of President Mitterrand nor Chirac allow Americans to suppose they accept Bill Clinton as the undisputed President Of The World and so of France at least to the America now of the world as we know it now? It seems it should be unnecessary and disloyal for France now to be having a provincial election with America so still led to believe that the world and Europe accepts that Bill Clinton is the undisputed leader of the world as Americans have been told to know it.
2012 is quite different from 2008 - the years 1993-2001 actually exist in 2012 campaign and political discussions. And so with that said I am at a loss trying to remember whom it was as the chosen leader of France - whether Mitterrand or Chirac, or both - that was Saddam’s ticket to freedom from the United States and quite nearly due to inaction and avoidance by Clintons nearly to hooking him up as if a supplier anew for a nuclear race between Iran and Iraq.
We and Afghanistan are fortunate that the global and domestic threats known and unknown still of the over reaching by just the Clintons, yet more as well by President Obama by crediting standards, are of the necessary build up to Socialism that first when working from such a condition it is better to first tease peoples with supposed freedoms in a federalism and individuality before as well working them over to a governance by an elite few in a new global socialism.
We don’t seem to be out of time.
What was meant with the suggestions in “three legs” of “stool” as of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton a chosen and confirmed vessel to a furtherance of all legs of President Clinton’s global initiatives? How was it that President Obama seemed to be to saying we all needed the “three legs” of President Clinton, and yet be to ignoring the years 1993-2001 as if they didn’t really exist?
We don’t seem to be out of time?
Are we all back to a due consideration of “THE CLINTONS” as political blood suckers and so that the very mention of more years for either does put in question a “sovereignty” even for French people no longer governed by one or another once more willing to seemingly give Saddam Hussein absolution and safe harbor and as if to a strategy to side line the USA whence it was new to being the world’s sole superpower and to an aim to work with Saddam Hussein to a hope and change to a new Euro-centric new world order?
Much of this seems to be of years President Obama has documented with early autobiography as those years he was a young idealist with his head stuck in the works of Marx. I don’t know even how to jest this week with President Obama being a Harvard Law grad and yet so regularly to “generalizations” when I thought lawyers are taught early and often to not generalize - it must have all started after he graduated from Harvard Law and as if a regressing or devolving, right?
There are reasons we may not like or trust the French - but none it seems actually elected since of terms coincident with the missing chapters of 1993 - 2001 of the Clintons’ intimate and inciting global “two-fer” power sharing and collusion.
If you are a foreigner have you actually yet measured quite how much the Clintons are being presented to Americans in the world as they are told to know it as if you are all fully in support of at least President Clinton as an undisputed and unelected President Of The World and over your sovereignty too? And, to their establishments that they are the chosen who know better how to make decisions for you? And, to their implications that we need them because you can’t do without them?
I know where are the racists - where are the feminists? President Clinton has declared political open season on himself and so compromised the very chartered “goodness” of a fronted “non-partisan” and “non-political” for his political and global initiative to maintaining and increasing personal power. President Clinton has opened season on himself politically speaking as a political public figure - where at least are the racist analysts or feminists as his efforts on their face suggest he sees himself near 2/5th more a person (man) than President Obama and Madam Secretary Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?
Bill Clinton is in the room - is it a coup? It is a conundrum that his feathers so fanned suggest that both President Obama and his wife needed him to step in and save them and as if they have proven themselves to be worth no more than as if they were each only 3/5th the person he is and was.
We have that President Obama did only maybe mention the years 1993 - 2001 critically when of accepting his Nobel Peace Prize and with his acceptance speech for “peace” — We have that at least in such speech he spoke of dangers of “inaction” and “avoidance” but not in the context of the Clintons’ 8 nor as of a pressing danger for Arizona re: immigration. We have that at least in such speech he spoke of dangers of “inaction” and “avoidance” specifically as a warning or condemnation of the Clintons’ 8 and how their left “inheritance” to successor administration was fraught with sit reps of too few options left especially for Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan.
If the Clintons had been Vlad The Impaler and not just the political blood suckers they were/are it figures they at least would have left either President Gore or President Bush and variety of plans fully psyched through as of entrance and exit plans for dealing with Saddam Hussein so that at least future sanctions could be said or thought to actually have “BITE!”
Is it now just silly that Mrs. Clinton still waxes submissive and while fronting President Obama as needing the “three legs” of President Clinton and not just as the ottoman for her favorite Ottoman?
This is no time to relitigate the past - we can get to that later, first we must just try to remember it - we must try, try, try and try even if feet up and rings on. This is a time to wonder as well about the Clintons and as of a conundrum as well of a complicity or naivete once of days of greater risks in French peoples choices of French leaders. We still have that our 9/11 Commission erred simply from an avoidance to an inaction dangerous for having worked a judging of complicated histories and geo-politics for a region that plans by decades as if a selective amnesia worked (accidentally) so with a committee think to “fullness” as possible with them to metrics and data reduced to small window of “just ten years” like.
Mr. President, I may have to work on my humor — however, do you happen to have an explanation for our 9/11 Commission as of a Muslim past for it thinking that it was at all proper or wise to have just looked back ten years?
I know, it retrospect it doesn’t seem funny.
Mr. President, it does seem you, not Governor Cuomo, is the one actually in a political and partisan contest with the Clintons and as if just against Hillary Clinton aka Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton. It does seem that while it seems a boon that President Clinton has set himself up as a “public figure” anew for 2012 and so to a new political “open season” upon himself it is almost sad.
Mr. President by appearing with President Clinton so that he could look like a caped crusader (superhero) you have let it look like you and your Secretary of State are feet up and rings on to President Clinton as if 2/5th more a person and still of the “three legs” of your vessel(s) of State. Was it a coup or did you freely and fully admit and accept you needed President Clinton to fill in for your inadequacy as if you were and are only 3/5th of what is needed?
Mr. President now that 2012 is set to be unlike 2008 as for it seems impossible that the years 1993 - 2001 can just disappear from our consideration again — Do you yet realize or have you yet remembered that First Lady Hillary Clinton did travel the turfs of Islamic radical and crusade with inciting rhetoric and imperialistic directives, and, did then return home and collude with her husband to the most irresponsible and illogical governance of undercutting and unfunding our intelligence and defense budgets and with most political and dangerous new walls of separation between enforcement and intelligence efforts at least as per our Federal Bureau of Investigations?
Mr. President can you make a joke of the Clintons’ 8 of the years from 1993 - 2001? I can not. Can you responsibly put your feet up on Hillary’s “stool” any longer with any confidence or sense of sovereignty? Can you even joke how a leader could go around the world inciting radicalism against America and then be simply to returning home to lobbying intimately for a reduction in our preparedness, safety, and securedness?
When I hear of Dracula these days I do still think of both the Clintons. That is an old story shared first of a realization that both Clintons were when contesting your un-inevitableness, mine, from when I still a resident of our District of Columbia, and to an opened minded reading of tales of Transylvania by Bram Stoker. It was then I read such of DRACULA and from an open minded consideration to a realization of a parallel to “Vlad” (?) as the Clintons were presenting as political blood (money) suckers - Vampires upon our naive body politic - upon our dumbed down nation of People not meant to be just “subjects.”
Yes I went to an inner city public school system kindergarten through twelfth grade - Yes, my American story is at times of an education as a white man near a minority among his classmates. Go Governors! Wilbur Cross Governors ROCK still.
Mr. President, yeh, what about our Governors - seems you are running against them defending their peoples powers and rights from their Creator more than you are running against a “lesser evil” megolomaniac Republican singularity.
*So how can we discuss “bite” in sanctions on Iran if we aren’t discussing and emphasizing that United Nations sanctions on Saddam’s Iraq should have only have been given 3-4 years for full compliance? How can we now so but without very publicly discussing how we should now to at least be claiming we should have been to so prosecuting Saddam Hussein within the Clintons’ first term?
*Well as per Trayvon comments by Pres O about “if I had a son he would look like him” it seems that he spoke inaccurately — I do believe he might have had a son or daughter that would maybe have looked white or at least Hispanic. I am commenting here on this in part because Bill Clinton hasn’t seemed to want to shake or give up the mantle of “First Black President” even for President Obama.
*To cover 2012 Romney vs. Obama race as if against Obama but Clintons would have been better is to play to racism and sexism - There seems no basis or rationale to suggest that Hillary though white and a woman would have been any better than first black President Obama. We have that most of what we find disagreeable about our first black President isn’t his high popularity for good personality but everything else more accurately about Washington Democrats and first white woman Speaker Pelosi governance and spinning.
*We have learned since Odyssey Dawn that Dems are now supportive of such idea that help from American and coalition countries can be with a compensation from people being “liberated” not “occupied” - right?
*It may have been better to be foggy on WMD with Saddam Hussein per cause and selling of war just for it helped assure that our efforts couldn’t be and wouldn’t be seen otherwise as if of “Holy War” bias following on Clintons’ years of becoming of un-American establishment of religion foreign politics and policies with religion and sect based bias new where old Cold War geo-politics had been otherwise long economic or Cold War-ish. The Clintons’ were wrong to be biased and bigoted much of their 8 years with pro-Sunni anti Shia “official” speak and policies. It was the Clintons who governed with this an American establishment to their avoidance and inaction: Iraqi Shia are incapable of governing themselves.
*If Madam Sec of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton shows strategizing to being next Dem Pres we are likely to have 2012 of the year we discuss how bad the Clintons actually were and how it is surprising they are both not guests of Gitmo already? We cannot see race against Obama with it also about Clintons even if only of the Clintons having been “A Couple of No - actually” and saboteurs of Obama admin since they most have been withholding advice and efforts to be separable and different from our first black President?
*You do get that if Saddam Hussein hadn’t gone into Kuwait they may never have been an Al Qaeda so organized to be reactive to Saddam Hussein and then America?
*I do believe WMD prefacing was important to giving Saddam Hussein a way out and to prepare America and Coalition states and their forces for what could be a soon upon us worse case scenario if Saddam Hussein failed to fully comply cooperatively. I do acknowledge we shouldn’t have given Saddam Hussein more than 3-4 years to comply and so that we should have had this discussion within the first term of the Clintons’ admin.
*Remember it was the spending side of Clintons’ Surplus that got us into much of this mess - and how Speaker Pelosi held such inviolate when President Bush was looking for ways to fix growing mess in time. There is little or nothing moral in the Clintons’ Surplus that took their cutting to near two trillion and at a time two trillion was available and otherwise budgeted. If you see a run down school or old school books - thank the Clintons - If you see a bad road or bridge - thank the Clintons.
*Because of the CLINTONS’ TRILLION cutting of two trillion - the BUSH TAX CUTS would have been just fine if 9/11 hadn’t been an actual inheritance left the President after the Clintons “two-fer” foreign and domestic administered meddling - well except how that it likely could have been the Al Gore Tax Cuts - since Clintons’ Surplus did justify them.
*The biggest problem with THE BUSH TAX CUTS is that they were justified by the Clintons’ SURPLUS - the moral was put into them by the two trillion the Clintons cut out of government spending all the while schools went needing and even bridges on or near condemned list were left otherwise unfunded “morally” and to attempts to “repair” too late what needed to be replaced.
*I know Pres Clinton set this mess up - do you? I know political trillion surplus unnecessary and shouldn’t have coexisted with his desire to have a housing boom economy with hyper consumerism. I know he willfully burned the economic candle from both ends at once to chase rare political popularity. I also get that without AL GORE GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM the spike in gas prices might not have been as bad and sudden and so this mess that Pres Clinton set up might have been more manageable while about an attempt to fix it. I did advise Pres Bush not to try to fix it and to just work to postpone what seemed a coming crash, and as long as he could so as not to also lose Iraq and other critical battles by trying to fix an impossible economic set-up. Bush never would have been allowed to fix it anyway since to fix it he would have had to demonstrate just how wrong and bad Clintonomics had been and by finding a way to counter Speaker Pelosi pride in Clintons’ surpluses and all its spending cuts - its spending side.
*We can say that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s “DIPLOMACY” has been so questionable that she could be called a Secretary of War - we can say that and now worry about her attempts to global over-reaching with something cleverly called “JOBS DIPLOMACY”.
*WHO’S TO BLAME FOR THIS “RECOVERY” — HILLARY WHOM IF ELECTED WOULD HAVE USED NEAR EXACTLY THE SAME “ECONOMIC TEAM” OF HAS BEENS FROM HER HUSBAND’S TIME AS NAMED HOLDER OF OFFICE WHILE SHE A HOLDER OF OFFICE TOO THERE AS WELL BY ELECTION AS “A HOLDER” OF NAMED HOLDER? OR PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA WHO DIDN’T KNOW BETTER THAN TO USE THE SAME TEAM OF CLINTON HAS BEENS AS THE CLINTONS WOULD HAVE USED THEMSELVES? HMMM?
As we wait with baited breaths for the decision of the century screen doors may already be slamming open and shut - almost shut.
Can it all turn us back to a reasoned Constitutionalism just for some one being too “leftie”?
The Clintons make simple piece work for trial lawyers - pity the fools?
How are we all now here?
We are of a complicated time of contrariness and not even much whispered rebelliousness.
President Obama once was a Constitutional Law professor.
President Obama studied law and our Constitution at Harvard Law School.
Both of the Clinton “two-fer” studied at Yale Law School.
Both the Clintons and Barack Obama have been rebelling from our Constitutional.
How are we all here now?
Can our “main stream media” learn to cover a new federalism?
Can our MSM learn to treat our Governors and state legs with equal rights - their full rights?
Can the Clintons and Barack Obama manage if MSM now work to cover states’ greater rights?
So gauche were and are Bill Clinton and Barack Obama - yet so too George H. W. Bush, it seems.
I don’t know the critical handing of Hillary Clinton - I do know she may have guilt.
On the one hand we have “Bill” & “Hillary” of fame for not spending.
On the other hand we have “Bill” & “Hillary” & “Barack” of excessive spending.
It does seem gauche that Clintons can be popular for crash and unnecessary cutting of near a trillion.
It does seem gauche that Clintons now can be offensive with spend, spend, spend & not defensive.
Our Supreme Court Justices are at risk of a “Political” ruling if to an upholding vote for ACA.
ACA use of “affordable” near as bad yet maybe worse than “Hillary’s” use of “universal”.
President Barack Hussein Obama is still wrong about spending for Iraq. And so too the Clintons.
The Clintons as per Iraq had been their 8 to official biased and bigoted religion based foreign policy.
The Clintons have guilt - they as well shouldn’t be of offensive spending without also being defensive.
We didn’t need the Clintons’ SUPRLUS of trillion of rash defunding - how can they say spend now?
Because we haven’t heard the Clintons did it - they may be the only ones left not yet found innocent.
Before the Presidency of the Clintons Iraq and Iran had been of a Cold War geopolitics.
During the Presidency of the Clintons our foreign policy as per Iraq and Iran became “religious” and bigoted.
We have that President Barack Hussein Obama has been a shill for the Clintons - to quite a cover-up defense.
We have that President Barack Hussein Obama has been a shill for Clintons more than they shills for him.
After the Persian Gulf War Clintons should have avoided foreign policy bias bigoted against Shia.
The Clintons’ Presidency wasn’t well reasoned or Constitutionally balanced.
The Obama Presidency isn’t defensive enough for its offensive spending and offensive defense of Clintons.
Where is Senator John Kerry when a real anti-war movement seems now deserved and calling?
It is offensive that the Clintons can be innocent with spend, spend, spend now while of rash defunding to Trillion surplus!
If we have “Bill” shill for “Hill” and “Hill” shill for PBO & PBO shill for “Bill” and “Hill” while “Hill” a shill for “Bill” - OH MY!
How are we all here now?
How are we to an entire party to such now a case of Un-Constitutional governance?
If President Barack Hussein Obama just to sworn “best of my ability…” is it Harvard’s Law School at fault?
As per the Clintons I have known “Bill” as a liar since he was a Yale Law student - Not sure Yale at fault.
As per Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton I remember she is whom’s face “Bill” lie to.
I am not sure Yale Law School can be blamed for the greasy watermelons that are these Clintons.
How are we all here now?
I know law student “Bill” lied to “Hillary” while walking & talking & polling law students - they polled me.
I know for he lied to her about what my honest answer so requested was amended to when they added without consideration to their polled question the complication that they were then of asking if they could both become president someday actually otherwise than first asked as if of two equal Yale Law Students with independent futures. I know for when they changed the question of their polling about whether they could both become president some day my answer did change to amend answer to their conclusion as per their poll response as if it had been to a different question — I know for when they changed nature of question with “Hillary” then of response to my first answer with “then I will marry you” my answer changed for they hadn’t asked me if they could both become President if they married each other and became a united “one”. I know this and know specifically that Yale Law School not as responsible for “Bill” as a liar and of that day for moving to lie to “Hillary” with his first words after her “then I will marry you” to a lying about my amended answer she hadn’t heard and then had been to asking him “what did he say” to such from “Bill” a lie about what I said. If you think it odd I took to an appreciation of our 22nd Amendment you should realize most of this happened because of the Clintons then polling me as like a “charming boy at play in the school yard” and then years remembering me as like a talisman to their over-reaching plotting and ambitions - still as like “that charming young boy” once playing after hours alone in the school yard in a neighborhood known to be a New Haven professionals neighborhood much populated by lawyers and law professors and many professors from other departments at Yale.
How did we get here now?
And really it ridiculous that the Clintons of their trillion in defunding can present as right with spend, spend, spend now!
Nine? Can we get ruling of nine justices against ACA - for otherwise justices are as political activism shilling for Dems?
Are we all at least agreed that they took an oath of office to treat the Constitution as our rules of their gaminess?
Well Ok! So you like Stalin? Did you hear yet that Moscow wants some of its past grandness back and now while near about one third its old size? If you like Stalin and just want to be part of a greater socialist system it seems President assumed Putin is looking for more citizens.
He is likely not the greatest threat to America right now so a move there under Clinton “RESET” “overcharged” sympathetic “diplomacy” - Altruism may actually be an idea threatening the global economy more now and freedom as collateral damage.
Russia is arguably now higher on Iran’s “anti” lists if you consider historical developments and “losers” that had Iran in past believing they would be winners. Now does seem a good and fair time to move to a new Stalinism by Putin - reports are he has the most number of billionaires in his smaller city than any other in the known world.
You have heard of Adam Smith and his “Invisible Hand Theory” of Economics and his arguments for rational and free people that a pursuit of self interest is best way to global peace and fair trade and freer markets? If you have heard that not all of it may actually be attributable to Adam Smith.
To simplify lets attempt to look at a very complicated con now ongoing seemingly as necessarily organized altruism - let us use the dangers of a CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE for example.
It simplifies some of these issues to reference supposed “altruism” of CGI that it isn’t seemingly allowed by charter to operate domestically.
It has been a while since I once tried to compare and contrast some of Adam Smith and many others especially Ayn Rand and originate an thinking some new and some anewly specific for different times. That CGI seems to be a Virtue of Selfishness and therefore a global and/or American “greater good” means that it may as well be more dangerous and a vice of selflessness.
Yes, I believe they do have skating and skiing in Moscow area - I know USSR had such but I do not know their actual geography and amenities locations. I have no idea about the state of their schools today.
Well these times are different!
Sure, with different vices apparently related to unique opportunities tempting at least those educated enough to see them. We know that Clintons must be selfish and of a selfishness political in their calculated appearance as altruists. We know that while Senator of New York Hillary Clinton was not of local federalist efforts to get state communities busy finding county friendly alternatives or state options to avoid a centralized socialized nationalized health care entitlement.
We know from many other moments in our history that Clintons have been heavy booted to a political selfishness and another, yet again, arguably unearned “comeback.”
You still awake?
You betcha.
So about Bill Clinton with CGI appearing to be altruistic when it was basically the last foot ware to heavy booted Clinton expansionism left him - when it was his last and maybe only option to selfishly hold on to as much executive global power as they could try to manage:
What now - pick your “Stalin” - pick the “greater of the two evils?”
Ok, you are definitely awake.
Well, on economics this rare appearance of otherwise less explainable “altruism” has to be “selfish” behavior by political power couple (”two-fer” if you prefer) masked as selflessness. It exists aberrant to our economic structures and general foundations - it unbalances a normal and common main street fairness with willful clouding.
So Putin as Stalin better than Bill as Gandhi?
You’re funny - we should have started hanging out years ago. So you see that for all the altruism of CGI it is maybe the most selfish attempt to appear selfless and economically stands unbalancing a global think of hold that used to hold markets together and nurture economic growth?
How is it even legal?
I mean how is it lawful for such to exist while his spouse - his other half of “two-fer” the “one” not a “half” as they like to legally suggest to a Descartian “separation” to allow them unbefore imagined legal latitude on otherwise unreasonable propositions - while “Hillary” is Secretary of State? Shouldn’t one have recused themselves or the other ceased and desisted?
Hey we should put this up on the net at least in a gallery of writing somewhere.
So are you going to move to Moscow instead?
Surely President Assumed Putin can offer a better Stalinism, right? I get that the Clintons have been acting much extra Constitutionally to compete with such and by selling themselves of a selflessness have been of a “vice” to such more a selfishness and dangerous economic and political thought for Americans — but clearly they have been losing ground to Putin as socialists, and well our United Peoples of these United States of American don’t need to or seem in a majority to want to move to a future globalness as competitors needing to prove themselves all to be better Socialists.
Maybe for the summer months:
Do you think Moscow and Russia will welcome us all - and with open arms and equality?Let’s not complicate this just yet. Gotta go for now, been a pleasure.
Despite what you think you are hearing today it may not be as autobiographical as otherwise. In spite of what you are reading there may be another Georgia still in the news.
These are the days to worry about, and wonder yet, to a consideration more gestalt about Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton’s hotspots. Is there no essence of the whole in the current global totality?
This is not our first rush about contraception and the defensible of Georgia during the challenges of the Obama Administration. An early thought V. Putin rising about Assetia - query South Ossetia - was a Sam Power’s hotspot as well as Madam Mrs. Clinton’s embarrassment, of sorts - of globally graphic sorts drawn out.
The way it was earlier drawn out visibly hot about contraception so to it was about oil pipelines but so it was and is with just one of the …stans. Afghanistan has seemingly been all hot about either Kandahar or Helmand with each graphically as poignant as that which stirred V. Putin professionally earlier.
Our Georgia is like a Massachusetts of The South with a concern for the breadth and beam of a bounty of the Atlantic and all about proper consummation or consumption. The Georgia of earlier piping stories or rights to a South Ossetia was clearly one cast as it laid as well as one of contraception and Power for though separated it was as if discarded by Mother Russia not dismembered from Father Moscow.
I don’t know how much was a proper governance of and by V. Putin then or how much was a timely Dmitry Medvedev intervention with import due. Their prudence to shape the issues by offering to reshape their discarded Georgia from what still now lays as if a spent Trojan into more a “seat of the pants” uncovered was moderated as well thence with governance issues about oil piping.
And so Ayn Rand left her Mother Land of the old Soviet Union whence and didn’t care to return to un-American ways.
I have to jump to conclusion offering here that as President Washington did seem to allude to such all as per the shape and vicissitudes of “American” when of his First Inaugural and his light tough poetic suggestive to a day already of use, rinse, and reuse skins or hides for pregnancy mediating of his days.
But seriously how and why? Seriously what about all the …stans about Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton’s hotspots? I get that Helmand is like when Georgia could be fully proud and covered and that Kandahar could be a quiet and cold moment even one of shrinkage concerns - but what about our Ohio too?
Now I have read all of Ayn Rand’s books and found them as formative to my thinking near as Leon Uris’ very informative historical novels. But it was in the mid 1990’s that twelve uniformed Ukrainian General marched by me in Cambridge - in Cambridge of our Massachusetts while a public speaking event at the Kennedy School at Harvard my draw, not theirs.
How can those far nearer the Caspian Sea and north of Afghanistan such as these …stans: Tajikistan - Turkmenistan - Kyrgyzstan - Uzbekistan - Kazakhstan be so insignificant while so strategically situated? How can Obama’s State Department not be priming us all daily with a …stan story or another …stan story or yet another …stan story with Afghanistan & Pakistan and Iran all otherwise posited as important?
It seems President Obama The Hopeful never really had a chance. With the Clintons embrace so (unwisely) he never had a chance to over-write or over-ride their decades of selfish spousal plotting. He may have been sold as The New JFK but it was President Clinton who got to be (trite) as the hero in the Bay of Pigs sequel set up by Al Gore with his spies that trespassed North Korea. It was President Bill Clinton that got to be the new JFK and the hero of such (trite) sequel THE BAY OF BABES.
How are we to Democrats with so little imagination? How aren’t we already to a new super spy secret agent man from Dubai or Saudi Arabia and dramatization parrying whence yet as a 700 tnega man theirs however best cast or alludingly named properly as if a “James Bond”? (700 tnega - if writing right to left and reversed is more familiar as “agent 007″)
I don’t know what the Clintons and Obama must have against the …stans. I don’t know how they could have been so publicly biased against them as if in comparison to a “RESET” button for Moscow they dished as if not actually “alive” or “relevant”. I don’t know how we can be in Afghanistan, another …stan a decade now and with a “RESET” button for Mother Russia without any visible concern for the …stans.
Is it that Madam Secretary Clinton being of the …stans today as if actually “living” - is she an anti-Randian but so?
And if you catch my usage to “un-American” as per current contraception over-reaching or sub-par legal briefs it is as if a serious black electrical switch of a barrier of prevention to being “un” (to “off”) in “un-American” as for being of a usage of a barrier to your full humanity as American.
If you fear I am waxing to Communist or Socialist perhaps you should look in the mirror.
I am an American - we are alive. I have had international influence in numerous fields and with original innovativeness - I will respect that I have an international basis - though hardly known or celebrated with coverage yet about so much.
I don’t know why those of the Obama administration have been publicly and comparatively treating Tajikistan - Turkmenistan - Kyrgyzstan - Uzbekistan - Kazakhstan all near as if they were not alive or relevant while so near to so much that is.
I do view contraception as a “barrier” to ones full humanity, that may be all I have to say on the matter. But! Well! If cost of contraception is an issue for Congressional review than there must be a “we” in the “living” and another that could go dutch. If there isn’t a “we” in legal medical and health defenses than there may just be a hoarder. It may be that all this gets too close for Ayn Rand and that it would have had her objectively educating as she might want to stirring dramatic moments suggestive that such could be only if ones body was actually their State’s body.
The way I see it Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton has a lot of explaining to do before I dare parry/say more re: hot spots. So I leave it now for others to decide their own fates and bias and as well how and if to fair usage of readily available “barriers.”
Again, some may be lost in translations but for Americans at least the fastest path to a new robust/growth economy may be to be of a new baby boom. Where we have learned through this austerity to get by on less there now may seem enough around soon for more children for yourself and even on premise child care at law schools for parent students.
In defense of my late maternal grandfather Arthur M. Menadier the above mentioned former Mad Man - he was of the side of Madison Avenue business that had to hold the highest of standards for he was near 25 years of running J&J advertising and marketing accounts, not the lighter accounts I think are of Mad Man show I may this new season find myself to catching my very first episode. But that is not how I would have sold his industry to friends and others of marketing interests.
Rock on!
By now we are actually safer because of the Bush administration - not the Clintons’ 8.
We have that the Clintons still had the option to act more responsibly as per Iran and Iraq and move forward in their first term after Saddam Hussein had at most three years to fully comply with United Nations Sanctions. We have that the Clinton Administration had eight years to prosecute Saddam Hussein and nip the Iran nuclear program in the bud.
It is a simple political consideration that the Clintons’ by nearly letting Saddam Hussein out from under the bite of sanctions were to increasing a sense of need for Iran for nuclear development. There is little also in hindsight I can yet figure to explain how we gave Iraq of Saddam more than three years for full compliance.
I am not here being a war monger or hawk, even — really you could say that above broaches a dovishness where action earlier would have seemed more honest and believable. I don’t know if the Clintons reworked Central Intelligence Agency efforts to lie about peace to get the popularity they wanted from “PEACE DIVIDENDS” — I don’t know how to explain their governance and especially concerns already pressing about Iran without thinking they must have knowingly been lying about peace.
We could have convened a new international court at least for Saddam Hussein - though an earlier effort such as Bush’s Operation Iraqi Freedom likely would have been better accepted and so for sooner being a stand with of the United States to facilitate a jury of his peers for Saddam Hussein and complicit Ba’athist Party regulars.
How one so comfortable hashing around a political psycho-babble, as was President Bill Clinton, could have let so much time pass as per Iran and Iraq and nuclear power and weapon vicissitudes is a great puzzler. Iran can be said to have felt an irreversible need to move towards a nuclear program largely because of the inaction and avoidance as per Saddam Hussein by the Clintons’ administration.
We heard that Saddam supposedly was a threat for having an ambition and effort to reconstitute his old nuclear programs.
We heard that Saddam had been at war with Iran - a viciousness his where he as a Ba’athist minority could send his country men of Shia majority off to Iran to kill their Shia brethren or be killed by their Shia brethren. I don’t know how we weren’t of hearing either Clinton of the Clintons’ 8 wax their psycho-babble about this as like genocide and a duty for a speedy prosecution.
If you were Iran and lived through the Clintons’ 8 with inaction and avoidance and near a full forgiveness of Saddam Hussein, and so with a population over 50% under or near the age of 26, would you be remembering their used to be near a million more of the generation that made up that for these fathers? We do have President Bush and his associations that considered and governed with a greater sense of reality as per Iraq and Iran. We have that he stopped related to Iran and nuclear developments from a jack booted callousness to some diplomatic soft shoe politics seemingly with the hope that by dealing with Saddam even so lately the United States of America would be visibly of a renewed moral character such that Iran would see a greatly diminished motivation to so work to nuclear weaponry.
Yes, I was of old medium of faxing when President Bush so stressed to find another well moderated new balance and position.
As long as it looked like Saddam Hussein could get out from under sanctions and essentially forgiven by more than U.S. Democrats and some other leaders from other countries it looked even to some in America as if Saddam Hussein would reconstitute his nuclear programs - and with suggestion that the “west” like us needed him to to balance Iran. So it would have been either that Saddam first moved towards nuclear power or then did only because Iran was and then so he would have global allowances in abundance to do likewise.
Because of President Bush’s moderation we have that by helping Iraqi people bring Saddam Hussein to justice and that trial by his peers he did remove most if not all of the fair or seemingly moral cause and justification Iran could consider towards cause to justify a nuclear weapons program. Because of the Clintons 8 of inaction and avoidance Iran may have feared that such wasn’t reliable enough to balance the contrary and whimsy possible again if USA back to Clintons and their psycho-babble selective politics.
Because we were so late to prosecuting Saddam Hussein - so late to assisting his people to prosecuting him, when we did finally move with a standing with as we did with Operation Iraqi Freedom and so that much of such hard work should have removed most of the moral cause or justification Iran otherwise might claim it likely may have not been soon enough.
Personally as per all this: It seems utterly ridiculous that former First Lady Hillary Clinton is at all now allowed near the issues of Iran and Iraq and especially as our top “diplomat.” Neither Clinton can offer a confidence that sanction can have bite unless you go as if “good cop - bad cop” scenario with an expectation that she could play the mad woman, madly.
We are safer now because of Operation Iraqi Freedom! Without it now not only would Iran also be having such nuclear ambitions, but as well without it Saddam Hussein would have had international support to be rebuilding Iraqi nuclear programs as well — this is simple political psycho-babble that must have been of the intellectual capacity of both Clintons during their 8.
As it is Operation Iraqi Freedom was a standing with towards liberation and not an occupation and so has President Bush administration creditable for a moderated Middle East policy where how we acted specifically regarding Iraq should have greatly reduced any sense for Iran to an continued or actual future need to possess nuclear weapons.
I don’t recall the specific numbers but seem to think it was near a million of Iran’s fathers that Saddam Hussein was responsible for eliminating by sending his Shia subjects off to kill or be killed by their Irani Shia brethren. I do recall that the Clintons did almost let Saddam Hussein slip out from any real prosecution.