The morning after the invasion, about one year ago, the President seemed happy to fatten up Russia.
Vladimir Putin had started something - not seemingly a monster, as conceived.
The President of Russia sought, it seems, an inflection point with “Little Russians” - Ukrainians.
In this year two thousand twenty and three we have reached the 75th anniversary of “THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS”.
What, today, is the state of religious freedom, here, and abroad?
How is it compatible with originalism upon our constitution?
The other day I was a visitor seated in the House of Representative Gallery as a resolution was discussed and passed towards restricting Representative Omar from the Foreign Affairs Committee, and as well for the passage of resolution H.R. Res. 9 offering the full House an opportunity to condemn the past horrors of socialism/socialists.
The days before I attended the “International Religious Freedom Summit”- #IRFSummit2023.
Representative Ilhan Omar history may too be in conflict on human dignity core of “The International Declaration of Human Rights”.
To reach a consensus on the complexity of these discussions we are wise to consider what history relates and if there amidst such isn’t a biased incorrect partisan spin that also compromises committee assignments.
Representative Omar is not firstly a woman of color, nor a Muslim. This Minneapolis politician is principally a Democrat. As a Democrat party operative her history can objectively be reconsidered upon where there are contradictions in her known biases, and even where such essentially admits into discussion/evidence past cover-ups for leaders of her party.
Protecting human dignity, and also religious freedom of each individual, how issues relate, is a global goal. These times have nationalisms and imperialisms rising as at least existential threats to what was written and agreed upon of the United Nations General Assembly 75 years ago.
Let us not forget how clever the founding fathers were, especially James Madison, in the establishment of the Peoples’ “Order” ordained a constitution for uniting states. Human dignity is in originalism much by that there is no right in this ordered liberty established “Order” for any to violate the 10 COMMANDMENTS. Though Thomas Jefferson opined the nation was not constituted as a Christian nation he yet did not write it – it of it was subscribed “done” in the “Year of our Lord”.
James Madison protected human dignity cleverly as well, shall we consider, to it of the First Amendment, the Bill of Rights generally, is redundant to the body of the Peoples’ “Order” established ordained a constitution. To any understanding “THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE” the originalism of the constituted is that each is firstly of their rights from their Creator.
The religious freedom constituted is not of the Nation is ordered as Christian, but yet is of the nation is a republic that secures each their rights to self-govern in the Lord’s Laws, and as vitally secured to be firstly particularly for neighbor amongst neighbor common neighborly considerations/jurisdictions.
The constitution respects that each is under God before under government, and secures protections from tyranny for the people for which it orders liberty. The real separation of church and states is not a “wall of separation” as Thomas Jefferson emphasized but the vertical separation written in by James Madison to the Government is also under God – not to be theocratic – not to play God – not even to say there is no God.
In 1941 we can argue the interpretation of “wall of separation” was tweaked to legally attempt to legalize SOCIALISM – towards there could be a secular equal standing for Franklin D. Roosevelt to stand up a “NEW DEAL” phat with social programs. Human dignity is firstly protected by originalism to such would be contrary to the constituted “Order” by to an otherwise stood up to as if citizens are more firstly just subjects and more to be presumed guilty – needing a NANNY STATE – and not innocent under God existentially.
With originalism read of a vertical separation the redundant in the Bill of Rights rightly reads of a snarky grammar. Any of an understanding that the American Revolution was fought for individual rights in the vein of each of rights from their Creator – of “a free state” as a human condition of LIBERTY in religious freedom – each by how united PLURIBUS is an individual an UNUM of rights to defend themselves from any violate of the 10 COMMANDMENT against them, and of too such is of First and Second Amendments distinctively of rights versus their own government.
Two Corinthians walk into a South Carolina Democrats Town Hall set for the Bernie Sanders vs Hillary Clinton battle, - one man wins! Who is _______________?
Too Galatians is most set relevant for there to be Christian sanctuaries of/from gaiety, - where there is “homosexual perversion” as in the Bible there then is the derivative logic of grammar there then must also be “homosexual” and “holy homosexual”! Why is alarmist Al Gore alarmism bad for Global Warming politics?
To Paul, there is credit due for letters, - words to word play to allow for liberal democracies, there is credit due Paulists for keeping the metaphors of place as metaphors of faith! Why shouldn’t you go/trip to Galatia for what Corinth is governed for in their “local”?
Why did so much go so wrong? How did the hope of the 1992 solutions to President George H. W. Bush get past said “NEW WORLD ORDER” as yet without a “new” “order” parsed/defined? How does the real story of the Clintons’ Presidency now still not truthfully or accurately explain that the answer cannot be good for their Posterity, - a their legacy? How is it the spun woven tales of the “THE CLINTON” is only Holy like Swiss Cheese wholly?
Are Bill and Hillary Clinton like two on the road to Corinthians, but yet politically after having laid low, - laid siege upon it, it the lay of land the lay of souls of Galatians, after two wrecked a practical deconstruction to devastation of how Christians’ liberalism is for how governed under God?
In the book of Bill Clinton there is that he cannot have wrecked all this havoc all alone, - the Clintons alone could not have set so much asunder by their lonesome “two-fer” as their united souls to one shared soul is historically of a cohorting of collaborations! This is far more dire than now just asking: Who is Al _____?
Generally the Clintons, necessarily with their sidekick, - their Sancho Panza, - their accomplice in their Quixotic, are contrary to democratic liberalism as Paulist for their work has been too secular as if purely for Power grabbing by undermining the constitutions of those of these united states of the Americas by spin to numb to even wreck a devolutionary for a convenient “Too Stupid”! Who is Massachusetts Institute of Technology Gruber? Why is “GruberGate” so not a political matter for laughs?
The general “THE CLINTON” is forward to be known for bad strategies, and even maybe soon enough a tag mashable on their Quixotic of former President William J. Clinton and former Vice President Albert A. Gore as worldly pressed of a fit’n rap of charges akin to CONDUCT UNBECOMING FORMER EXECUTIVES OF THE UNITED STATES.
Generally, they did, & do, hoof it with dramatic covers, much ado about windmills, while such cloaks how much they ride to set asunder the constitutions of the union of Americans as Constituted under God as Paulists as not allowed to be to secular socialism by that the Order that formed the “more perfect Union” did secure to the citizens that they are always to be under their Creator before ever under a Government of man, - they are to be of government by laws that are ordained as inviolate to God’s Law, - by though a structural and pledged to allegiance to and for due process for religious liberty to be workable of civility. Why is “Order” only readable as a word a noun in the preamble?
Specifically we must yet work to evolve the law, - we must work to be evolutionary, even progressive, to amending our laws forward to keep up with progress, and especially a innovative for the contrary to criminal! As this bad “Quixotic” has done more bad than harm by a tyranny in alarmist parlance to lingua divisive to comity and civility we must consider the “international” to the “global” now and to that both President Clinton, and Vice President Gore have exposed themselves to the International Criminal Courts jurisdictionally speaking and too while their activities raise if their post-office politics have to put them in real jeopardy! Can you even claim Al Gore didn’t commit fraud globally by a Climate Change solutions tyranny, - a politics unbecoming to former holders of U.S. high office?
Forward as any steps out, -emerges for a walk, - steps ahead for a daily constitutional, there is we all must look back to see how “THE CLINTON” set out to set asunder the Constitution, - our Constitutionals! With “Order” a noun and subscribed founding fathers as under God, so “done” in the “Year of our Lord”, and then President Washington’s letter to Newport, Rhode Island Jews, it is critical to antidote-ish that we shoulder the methodology (yes of the Clintons less “progressive” than revolutionary for monarchical powers to a new American way by a Autocracy of Clintons) and walk the talk of the word “establishment” in our first rights in our Bill Of Rights! Who is William Blythe III to such willful storied insurrections?
Why is “establishment” to mean “tenets of religion” & not “Establishment” as if of an organized in interpreted?
Why does “establishment” as for “tenets of religion” set asunder the “THE CLINTON” attempts to set asunder to a “post-Constitution” “extra-Constitution” new way of new Powers for an autocratic of them?
How by “establishment” as for “tenets of religion” are the Clintons beaten by it written that Congress shall make no Law respecting the tenets of religion for that is juri-loco prudently left for regionalism not a centralized Socialist Nationalism?
And, how is it the “THE CLINTON” and alarmist Al Gore, were of conduct unbecoming prosecutable, maybe as of fraud, by the I.C.C. by how they structured their “business” - technically speaking to the legal ifs?
And lastly: HOW?: Whom are the the worst of the lot of Democrats akin to such efforts to set asunder the Constitutional for extra-Constitution new Powers for a ruling class as set up by a jousting to “we are in a post-Constitutional world”?
And lastly newly: WHY? Whom to blame that you can’t get past the Constitution Article 1 without finding Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 8, as seemingly written to yet have worked prophylactically to have protected an impregnable fortitude from perversions to our Constituted by giving to Congress a DUTY to treat any “work” like of the Clintons’ global initiatives as so the work of the People’s Legislature that the Government is set upon to basically do any such if such extant a second time thoroughly just to then perform its due diligence to “whatever” high standard of by auditing and maybe approving essentially any “global initiatives” of even a former executive?
Has Bernie Sanders, and coincidentally the leading of a #NewGOP been to casting rightly the first stones at Clintons, and Gore? Are enough past Gruber’s reveal of slight on Democrat voters as if specifically “Hillary Clinton voters are too stupid to be consulted with per…”?
Can we get yet past how Hillary Clinton is only present in these races today by machinations like from the Socialist playbook, as like of it written to have Machiavellian Power a little princess too must first get hold of healthcare, and too much set asunder religion, - a faith in shared humanity Unity?
Can you at least trip up Hillary Clinton by asking her to explain the First Amendment as of “establishment” as for “tenets of religion” so, and so that then Congress is prohibited from making laws to take over an oldest establishment of religion, that which is the healthcare of the people and their souls?
Can Hillary Clinton ever, due her resume and known espoused condemnations for extra-Constitutional Power, yet ever herself dare to explain how the First Amendment is intended to sync to the body of the Constitution as of an Establishment under God’s Law by it “done” “subscribed” humbly under God so in the “Year of our Lord”?
Can candidate Clinton explain her part is these dramatizations “Quixotic”? If you dare explain “establishment” as for the “tenets of religion” she will self incriminate, and incriminate likely both President Clinton, and too Vice President Al Gore!!!
Whom can cast (a stone?) a second? Whom can believe the Clinton methodologies so machinations can abide the for sagacious of that the states are left the law making as pertains to at least the matters of the Ten Commandments?
I.e.: HOW DID SO MUCH GO SO WRONG? E.g.: WHO IS BILL CLINTON? AND: WHO IS ______________?
* * *
Political Constitutional conundrum:
MUST BERNIE SANDERS PROGRESS/EVOLVE TO BECOME STATIST AS IT BY THE PEOPLES ORDER THAT HEALTHCARE IS FOR JURI-LOCO AS BY ESTABLISHED THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS ARE THE COMMUNITY BUSINESS KEPT FROM THE NATIONAL CONGRESS?
If you are not a practicing American Catholic this Christmas season this rendition is not firstly about you (also), though principally you may have no way out, too. As respectful of traditions for a structural reign for TRUTH & GRACE my perspective may be of calls to DUTY while my observance is more distant but of the tips of my fingers as the tip of my pen. This is very much about an essential local in all (traffic) lines, and just pride of place in parish prudence in all jurisprudence.
When to where there always the whom of where’s of the of Rome when roaming in Rome; a why to the whom is to a fixation of liability for (Catholic) guilting even for whenever at where’s evers another is the outside of the lines. There is a brotherhood as much a sisterhood for those tasked of DUTY to be keepers of the local lines, even if of interstates, or parish to parish as intra-states; there is the robed for the hooded of JD’s em doctorated for jurisdictional particularities of organized of (parish) communities.
Where ever you roam you are roaming of another’s home more than your own, and more of other’s poetry of live and history, and more of others struggles to keep a reign for TRUTH & GRACE, - however the rocky “horrors” shows of dreamlands’.
Secretary John Kerry and deposed from Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi are Catholics of postures for Church dictum. As young (of even the Church) may be naive to borders and roam whence then careless and disrespectful to as them then nearer other’s parish homelands, others’ home communities, others’ more particular lines of nuanced for local jurisprudence to keep a reign for TRUTH & GRACE, it is more critically important at these days of Holidays to guilt to them of leadership them most contagious to others (more local) as to shoulder firstly the guilts of theirs as associable as guilts of all too silent from against.
American Catholics seem DUTY bound this Holiday to be of these todays as expressant upon the specific and numerous personal culpas for, however haunting, and to rejecting SATAN especially as Secretary Kerry and Representative Pelosi preside of offices as “leaders” with personal professional histories in contrariness to their Catholic, - their postured of moral dictum.
For the maintenance of for TRUTH & GRACE to reign we must look at specific ticketable liability for Catholic John Kerry and Catholic Nancy Pelosi both for failures to maintain safety by keeping up the painting of clear lines for “traffic” and too for a failures, seeming of each, to also of a failure to post, - a liability in having failed to POST approaching “roadway” DANGERS, even, like just “narrow road ahead”!
Yes these as metaphors for two Catholics “leaders” is to that which yet supersedes parish and local liabilities. The youth of (Catholic) hood’s keeps cannot even become “JEDI” if not respectful of the bars of JD’s especially to how it is American that there is legally that there are local laws by statutes and ordinances, at least; like: “IF YOU WON’T LEARN THE WAYS - DON’T EXPECT THE PAY!” - - - There are borders trespassers of must yet posture a respectful to, in spirit, and body.
To be curt, - to be brief, - to respect that youth may not understand their world enough, and not be able to in some cases, on some areas of Law, if not be becoming trained in Law, let us accept that these are more “dependents” whom cannot learn until by class, or by experience that won’t likely become theirs until they learn from being themselves parents, - or guardians.
The culpas of the fair share of guilt two Catholics now should be broadcast, even comically, even by cartooned satire, is vast and dark in the American Catholic GUILT that seems forensically uniquely of a clear pathology to a contrariness of John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi, as of an infidelity to their pledged allegiance to their republic, and too as a betrayal of their oaths of offices.
This is a new Holiday season of these todays again of days to let the youth of the hook, for so dependents, and to like cook, and cook, and cook, them firstly guilty as (Catholic) “leaders” as now we roast, to bake, the Catholic Guilt into the historic John Kerry, and Nancy Pelosi. [You can search HOGAN too to such for justice by just keyword: KERRY.] [More telling though may be how as critical search of KERRY and also of PELOSI can then better condemn and isolate unique Catholic’s guilt if such accompanied by thorough reading through what scrolls by keywords searches on CITIZENROSEBUD DOT COM by: First: DICHOTOMY; Second: TRICHOTOMY.]
{As young to some may be youth as brother, or sister, so much younger to be of a different (music) generation it is notable for the elders of such siblings how siblings so less of age, and experience, can be baited to revealing naivete, and at times by offering a music choice the elder knows should “trigger” / “set off” the (independent) minded much younger one.}
{At this moment, I, as the blogger blogging political writer, however observant beyond pressing as Catholic, too, do hope you have taken time to do your due (Catholic) diligence by having stopped at this reading to perform the (suggested) searching by PELOSI, KERRY, DICHOTOMY, TRICHOTOMY. For such would be prudent I will now continue upon an assumption that you will have done such (thoroughly?) before proceeding further with this tagging of (Catholic) guilting upon “leaders” John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi.}
To all whom desire to be a Jedi, or saved by a Jedi Believer, there is like for observant Catholics, this HOGAN adage:
Bible’s “NONSENSE” = “LIBERALISM”
“PRACTICED CHRISTIANITY IN SUFFICE TO NONSENSE!”
“GAY IS NOT A NOUN! - - - PAUL BAPTIZED GAIUS - IF ONE STUCK IN A GAIETY AS CHRISTIANS THEN THEN ARE STUCK IN A “PAUL” - - - A PAUL IS TO BE TEMPORARY GUARDED FOR BY ESTABLISHMENTS AND ORDAINED FOR KEEPS OF SANCTUARIES.
“IF ONE WON’T LEARN THE WAYS - - - DON’T EXPECT THE PAY!”
To whom celebrate the saints of clauses for youth to be “off the hook” for (Catholic) Holidays, and as when prudence in a jurisprudence of faith’s needs short of Christ Jesus begot of “dying for your sins” Santa Claus is forever alive and real. To keep Santa Claus alive, and so children and young adults the world abouts can be guarded as dependents while too ignorant in too many doctorated disciplines, it is for a reign of TRUTH & GRACE to endure that anew these todays of religious holidays it is a DUTY of all to assuage the guilt upon our leaders for Justice and fairness, only begets Happiness Posterity for Tranquility if the general Welfare is policed to how the leaders are them most flawed, them most the (Catholics’) guilty.
PLEASE TELL ME YOU HAVE NOW ALREADY READ THROUGH SITE ASSORTED SCROLLS BY LOCAL SEARCH AMASSED CRITERIA AS NAMED FOR CONVENIENCE AND FOR TRUTH & GRACE HONESTY BY TAGS SO: KERRY; PELOSI; DICHOTOMY; TRICHOTOMY!!!
For the youth, young adults, and (Christian) adults to yet be of an “off the hook” short of Christ Jesus dedicated as an embodiment of dying for his peoples’ sins, Santa Claus is too haunt all the other days of these Years of our Lord so constituted as established and ordained for due process, and civil procedure. Coal for naughty may not be “PC” - politically correct - anymore but the metaphor as if a gift can reset to refresh a “CO-ALL” must endure.
The greatest flaws as extant as enduring errors of Catholics John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi are it seems of leadership erring that is of rancor for the ranks as too when of hows of wheres and why that are stuck of inconvenient truth as of em whence, to present, as regards, as then firstly as contrary to their “religious” dictum.
John Kerry, Catholic, and Nancy Pelosi, Catholic, have been leaders both of negligence in not having “stayed between the lines” and too as for “leaders” em taggable and mashable for mash-up from collateral damages from them of failures to post “roadway” DANGERS signage, and too to have been culpable where jurisdiction relates to them for failures to maintain sufficient “roadway” marking, - where they did not manage to a sufficed, - where the did not “keep the lines” prudently maintained.
A shortcut to the dire of the “shortcuts” of from Massachussetts John Kerry, politician, firstly, is http://bit.ly/KerryByHogan!
{And, as usual for the convenience of political truths pressed for greater literacy and knowing of importance in learning the “ways” there is hopefully to you a “The Force” in HOGAN blogged as learned enough to rear you in time to DANGERS firstly in the contrariness of Catholics Kerry and Pelosi: Where such a assorted (by “bitly”) the queued linked “shortcut” does show firstly this column for worked then likewise of the subject of the keywords so for organized.}
All Americans, however now still young and ignorant, and however naive, it is for the annual haunting that Santa Claus lives on and endures in spirit of a home of the copacetic earthly poled. To carol for Justice short of “died for your sins” the “off the hook” is dependent firstly on assuaging, among the living, or dead, whom of these todays is a “the leader” most culpable (and to shoulder in real time the most (Catholic) guilt) for a still prudent practiced by public shame, - PUBLIC SHAMING.
Really! Hasn’t Simon and Garfunkel like always sung of Santa Claus as of the essential essence in a “A BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS”? The birth of Christ Jesus, as too the synchronized moons timed of the birth of Muhammad, yet is earthly for due process and for civility for all celebrants to know, or be judged to learn from, how there are “locals” beyond “neighbors” limitations in any considerations of copacetic “trespass”! Before any to be judged as more of God’s there is yet that before under Government, it reigns for TRUTH & GRACE than all are firstly under God, - under God before under a governing by man.
Of these we sing, - the global we of locals now tagged to judge the “leaders” and for erring most as contrary, to too of infidelity, to their republic, and their religion. John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi can be said to have erred more than President George Bush (even as odd Governor Jeb Bush, brother has failed from himself explaining).
How John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi have been (Catholic) “leaders” is controversial in it seems they have more erred on Muslims & Islamic relations than George W. Bush and as tagged so pathologically as if forensically noted as if particularly of the who, what, when, where, and how, as revealing em most culpable to “guilty” for when of infidelity to their republic, and to their Catholic dictum, the Catholic ways they thought sufficiently learned as regards (politics).
These todays of birthdays of great ones proofed long to have been real “leaders” it seems a condemnation is fitting to these em most bobbled “leadership” presently firstly. Long live Santa Claus!!! May he haunt all the days of the year to if a clause can be a mere good enough for humans anywhere to be “off the hook” around the Holidays, and short from more dire in eternals of Christ Jesus to have from birth risen to ways learned to being a good shepherd a good teacher a bridge builder, who knew he died for others sins.
As I wish a Happiness and Joy for World Peace, forward, it yet behoove even our reindeers to hoof it for Justice in a timely tagging of the mashed vast culpas fitting a knowing of Catholic Guilt as at the proper apportionment of “coal” for John Kerry, leader, and Nancy Pelosi, leader, - for prudent by firstly to apropos assuaging of each’s spirited, - traceable historical, for what is of their galactic “trespassed”!
I wish a Happiness and Joy for World Peace, forward! Please learn the ways of the lines, and stay between them, where firstly safest, - of greatest odds for “getting through” - getting over “troubled waters” too.
This is bigger than for any mall Santa! As a joyous season is now of Advent upon a shared humanity global anew, we must be bigger than commercialized and to a change of venue for a duly just discourse to philosophy of religiosity, & Awakenings galactic.
Brethren of the deserts severe of the what of the where and how known to Muhammad this is our season still a season hopeful for joyous upon your home fires. As the bells toll for JOY we hope all hearts can be lifted without insults from ignorance, ignorant.
Brethren of the galactic of the Force for a copacetic shared humanity, as long established, ordained, and maintained by the realm of religious adherents, a Happy Holidays in a Merry Christmas as for all now anew is for understanding and discerning where consciousness is in Faith and especially for Christians where it is for Islam that for Muslims of a Muslim trinity now onset to Shia, Sunni, and ISIL as if to Islamic State as a Union of Orthodox Islamic.
As it seems the lands of the Levant, and those populated by faithful of Islam globally, however sectarian, and now to a seeming trinity of an option to be for a puritanical Orthodoxy welcoming pilgrims “home” in towards an Islamic State, are awakening this season of JOY in Christ Jesus isn’t exclusive, nor of Jesus as an INFIDEL.
There can now be a parity to a comity in a JOYOUS season a Holiday Season around the birth of Christ Jesus that isn’t opposing to Islamic of any sectarian or rift, - it seems. There is for this to be copacetic, though, that a consciousness needs to be articulated as to the consciousness minimum in Islam before any act can be deemed to be warranted, where can be legally warranted, as to being an act of sufficient consciousness to be representative of a collective conscience for Justice for Muslims.
From my limited understandings, I offer that Muhammad does not decree a “kill first” as an “order to kill” that is to be a “license to kill” devoid of a contemplative measure of conscience and for humanity and society. From my limited history and understanding it seems that, and now as it much relates to millions of refugees (, and due climate change?), faithful of Islam are allowed to celebrate Santa Claus as the birth of Christ Jesus does not insult Islam nor Muhammad.
Isn’t it that Muslims of the world, however sectarian or of rifts to a Muslim trinity to now a rising an awakening with force to an attempt to establish a Orthodox Islamic as a home faith to an Islamic State, are free to celebrate Santa Claus? Are free as of Muhammad and faith in Islam to celebrate the birth of a great one not an infidel, by any prejudice or prejudgement writ?
Isn’t the JOY of a JOYOUS season now levered to reset for all in shared humanity, however galactic, to that Christians are only to be accused to be INFIDELS where there is an ignorance of the essence of Islam and as INVOLVED too much from just an expressed opine conversationally posited?
Isn’t the JOY of a JOYOUS season yet for Christians to remember on their own not to be ignorant nor insulting with ignorance the beliefs of others, and especially when critical and vital to their own struggles to find and keep open paths to a FORCE as a realm for the HOLY?
Islamic activists may now be trying the souls of Christians the world over, however galactic, by actions insufficient of words while heavy in acts seeming devoid of the adequate writ called for consciousness to be premeditated. Islamic activists yet still seem free to celebrate Santa Claus in it that JESUS is not an infidel while some Christians may be found to be too ignorant to have any insults taken as INFIDELITY.
Should faithful of Muhammad and Islam, however now as pilgrims for a puritan Islamic State to an Orthodox Islamic, rush to a cursing of Christians, while it is to be raised how conscious your oppositions should be expected to be if one of a luxury of time, and in of a safe enough place, to process if a teaching from an ignorance is acceptable for parties constitutions/beliefs?
How much thought is enough thought? If teaching is the better weapon, are words the chosen best defense?
Who should explain if it writ for all of Islam to that even besides of Sharia there is that each in Muslim celebrations are but “licensed to kill” not “Ordered to kill” and as then as well as in faith as knowing they are “licensed to be killed” (if so weak a link to shared humanity they then represent a threat to society - to a basic survival of a communal in a “society” endurance.
Whom among those free to also celebrate Santa Claus can best answer to a minimum level of consciousness to a conscience of these days for JOY and JOYOUS everywhere?
Whom can ascribe, by example, themselves as experts for shared humanity, and triggers from copacetic, to pare or peel like the lemons, or onions to fig’n the dates of these days tragic of terrorism, seeming of insufficient premeditated THINK to be to having affected “HOLY WAR”?
Are you one whom can help bridge an teach to a JOY for JOYOUS for all harmony for Happy Holidays and a Merry Christmas, and as to that even refugees Muslims are free to celebrate Santa Claus as free to respect the birth of Christ Jesus?
Whom now are our teachers our shepherds for travelers and homely flocks so to keep ignorance corralled and at bay?
As all seem “licensed” for JOY and to be JOYOUS with faith and religiosity whom now can work it, - can work it to it sufficed from ignorance and to spread an understanding related to tragedies of recent seeming just “terrorist” actions more “criminal” to how a metric is extant from such too a scandal, to any galactic force in shared humanity, as it seems the outcomes from these “terrorists” have been to the as Muslims as then more licensed to be killed, then represented fairly of their writ Islam of a “license to kill” where befitting a dire or severe in an exposed struggle of realities of time, and place?
* * * * *
{Developing today: “Licensed To Kill” - an essay to pair and pare Obamacare can only be Constitutional if of an unconstitutional “Muslim Exception” - as a right to kill, and right to be killed of Sharia, must supersede a “right” to healthcare. We have been going the wrong way so long by the end of this essay you should believe President Obama should resign in of an embarrassment for having so misunderstood the Constituted for so long, and how for so long so wrongly. As healthcare is an oldest establishment of religion there cannot in these united states of the Americas be a separate “right to healthcare” as a discussion of Islam cursorily can illuminate due faithful of even like of a writ license to kill, - even as it not mostly to be an Order to kill.}
President Barack Hussein Obama may not (yet) be to a post Presidency as dramatized with Gene Hackman in WELCOME TO MOOSEPORT - there yet is to be much considered a HOW BIG? - how big a library he may deserve/afford. PBHO may be all VIP to UK PM, as if of a singularity in importance, and not of “juice” @ #NoJuiceObama beyond questioned, but he is now checked by a Republican Congress and for checkered inconvenient truths.
Governor Mitt Romney shouldn’t look to be thought able to defeat the Clinton after not having been able to defeat PBHO; GMR should be embarrassed as a businessman for the last month of his 2012 campaign of PBHO of defining him unchecked. It is seeming an embarrassment that GMR defeated himself especially in his last month when most obviously of like rookie PR mistakes or hubris; GMR let PBHO be seeming erudite of proffers that Obamacare was Romneycare while GMR let himself seem played while declaring he would replace Obamacare with Romneycare.
Right! GMR for especially the last month let it seem ridiculous to elect him for if Obamacare was Romneycare and he was just going to like replace Obamacare with Romneycare than the only seeming issue was was it wrong for a black President to have brought the country Romneycare before white Governor brought the nation anything like such an “Affordable Care Act”?
Right! Piddly to the problems another white Governor seems beset of as a Bush; Right it seems Governor Jeb Bush is more in a pickle as in the pickle barrel banded about President William Jefferson Clinton and his Mrs., however, and President George Walker Bush. It seems rookie PR errs are to be trumped by a Governor a brother as like also a step brother while all the lot are to be like the work of the new Republican Congress (just for National Security needs) of accepting that there has been a cover-up at least of that of PWJC when Mrs. FLOTUS and that PBHO did at least inherit a (dangerous) cover-up from, quite the bulk of the Bush clan.
Right! GJB seems compromised by his brother and his father, at least as Presidents of record goes, for it seems a truth an inconvenient that there was a cover-up that needed a new cover-up after the United States of America was attacked on Benghazi properties for the lies for the PWJC sustaining were falling apart as lies no longer of sufficient constitution, at least.
Right! PBHO however of inheriting said cover-up so of such absolutes it is impossible to disprove or deny, is yet to be considered for a modest Presidential Library for too it seems to easy to prove he worked from hour one to improve the cover-up of the Clintons and to then like stab the Bush clan in the back towards trying to repair the Clintons to at least be able to bully their way forward evermore at least over any Republicans as under them as the Bush beset under them like so.
But today is of PM of UK of a pop across the pond to at least find intelligent allegiances upon Jenkins Hill as seated in the 114th Congress. PM of UK may need friends now as the 2016 campaign allowances are expected to be forward well defined and compartmentalized between “governing” and “political partisan campaigning.”
So where is the beef as for now we can leave the pork to less pressing but due deep probatives and debating?
So where is the beef in UK PM cross’d the pond per immediate security and policy concerns?
#IRAN - How not start here for there is actually “moral hazard” in it if allowed to be a brokered “improvement” if made or credited by Secretary of State John Kerry? Really there is “moral hazard” in there being a deal with Iran now, however reasonable, for SoSJK is of a past that is contrary to compromised for a Posterity for any deal to endure of a constitutional establismentary. Really there is a risk in SoSJK being a one or the one upon which such could be possible if to endure; His opposition to Operation Iraqi Freedom is contrary and too his years as of the PWJC years of the avoidance and inaction in years 1993-2001.
For a brevity as newly seated “leaders” are charged to sworn to these duties as of the majority of a bicameral People’d Congress I will try to wrap it for future nibbles upon the hard tack and how SoSJK isn’t quite the right bride for such a FP marriage - for FP progress by “agreement”! Here:
Iran should favor new deals with the The United States of America because of Operation Iraqi Freedom as right and just and at least as for a late by 8-10 years of offering something less than abandonment to the Iraqi Shia.
Iran if to a willingness to make a deal with the USA is yet of “moral hazard” to any such deal if not to stipulations of SoSJK an inconvenient “messenger” whose opposition to OIF should be apologized for writ large and concurrently.
As since for such to be with the new younger Iran so populated and currently constituted it behoove the poets of Irani nationalism, and hopes, be expressive to at least attempt to rap the bad in the past of Mrs. PWJC, however, however all the way back to 1993 when firstly FLOTUS Mrs. PWJC.
Operation Iraqi Freedom was necessary to any possible progress now with Iran - if rumors of such at a new threshold of a global copacetic are to be believed. The Democrats of these days are too much the Democrats of the days of abandonment from 1993-2001 of expectant of Iraq and Afghanistan; The Democrats have the history of PWJC of “official speak” as if fixed in his FP as per the ME such that to Iraqi concerns he was bigoted in Islam as biased to favors favoring the Sunni; The Democrats have that PWJC was officially of posturing that bigotry against Shia - against specifically all Shia of Iraq - against Shia so much he did declare like: THE (IRAQI) SHIA ARE NOT (PEOPLE) CAPABLE OF GOVERNING THEMSELVES.
For this to be of said brevity let me just tease a problem too relating to Syria and Ukraine:
At least: It for their history as part of the U.S.S.R. has baggage to check before allowance for being “separatists” morally. Ukraine is of the history of the Soviets as per the Cold War of Iran and Iraq played like pawns for the security of oil supplies was needed for a victory by one or the other - historically.
So for brevity:
What can be allowed however SoSJK of a “moral hazard” pertinent to UK PM DC visit to DC and USC & the WH both while a Posterity needs a strength of truth - of cause and effect development logic.
How can an deal be brokered by any Obama Democrat and especially his SoSJK, irregardless of it less of a “moral hazard” than if so hazard actually by Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton while SoSWJC aka “SoSHRC”?
Otherwise however, isn’t a first step to fixin’ Syria and Ukraine at least to settle the history most contested by Iran?
Mischief to be to undermining all of the above: If Iran isn’t to being convinced by Ukraine that the Holocaust was real then…?
PRESIDENT OBAMA? UK PM DC? USC? WH? NSA? PEOPLE’D PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?
On this the 13th anniversary of the Al Qaeda attacks by suicidal piloting of 9/11/2001 we should join in questioning our faith in Government - in the governance backwards so since 1993. The Government of The United States of America wasn’t alone in failing the world - yet is singular for having failed the People’d people of its citizenship. President George W. Bush endures as having been more right than President William J. Clinton, and quite corrective of WJC Administration errors.
Some now may be brand new to my old discoursing on Al Qaeda and not to yet realizing even what I have hosted as freely shared via http://bit.ly/AlQaeda_HOGAN - - - President Bush, and too Secretary Rumsfeld can freely speak of my past years of voluntary and unsolicited post 9-11 civic minded general assistance. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice can too remember me as a last professional thought in the moment before her aid is said to have walked into her office and shared that a plane had flown into one of the World Trade Towers. I also, as the story was real, have it that when Iraq later was at about its worst I was contracted to build a custom doll shelf for Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld’s Chief of Staff - and a new door, and some custom cabinet raised panel doors.
I was able to be so of assistance after such tragic events broke globally much for how I had been an architect of the early 1990’s recovery and of such, at such, as it is that making Governor Clinton electable was yet a mere part of a greater whole. I was able to be of such as so regular assistance after 911 events much for I had been haunted since the Clintons veered away from the more prudent balanced think that explains their 1992 surprising votary success both of a visceral tragic remembered as “IF THE CLINTONS GO THAT WAY THE USA WILL GET ATTACKED AT HOME” and too how about a year to year and half later in 1994 I was to such haunting of more concernedness, when I was to realizing, as a private citizen yet so voluntarily engaged in civic think, that it seemed no one else was seeing what I saw or worrying about it properly.
Senator Elizabeth Warren is now too on the back of the Clintons for JUSTICE; Senator E. Warren by proposing that bankers should go to jail is directly of a politics at incriminating at least Mr. & Mrs. Clinton as also of such culpability to be of an if so then so that if bankers belong in jail so too do the Clintons deserve imprisonment. I am not as alone as I used to be in my near two decades now of pursuing the wrong about and in the Clintons towards corrective politics after preventive efforts so failed.
But this has to be brief now, and much firstly to discoursing upon here to fore accepted think pertaining to just Flight 93. Into such is necessarily my understanding of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder history (as it was when then of it fresh and not as now more forgotten)! Of my voluntary in recovery think of near 700 faxes amassed as sent to the Bush White House via the NSC fax number known since during the Clinton Admin for use with such concerns, yet ahead of attacks, when some cordial with Philip Bobbitt following on after having heard him speak at Yale Law and been in a small party afterwards with myself for drinks and dinner afterwards. My query to him was so focused as “WHAT ABOUT THE THREATS WE DON’T SEE?” and as asked so that I could maybe figure a sensed known from a doubted of unknown yet visceral and haunting. For brevity the haunting that concluded on 9/10/2001 and then had me otherwise of think at the ready and re-engaged on 9/11/2001 did stem from my assistance to the Democrats to the 1992 win and how such more prudent balance think was then governed away from by elected William Jefferson Clinton.
To Flight 93 there is that in 1994 upon broaching with “WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF NO ONE IS WORKING ON THIS?” I was, as still only of my the civil voluntarily philosophizing for maximizing positive change to best grow the economy & improved republican politics in an air of opportunity of the days of a NEW WORLD ORDER, yet to real concern with the limits of my training, of that mostly mine as self taught, of the second haunting following on the first visceral tragic awareness of a known like an unknown so of the above shared “IF THE CLINTONS GO THAT WAY THE USA WILL GET ATTACKED AT HOME”! What burst through upon broaching such of a global querious was a sudden image of the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon.
To Flight 93 there is a pathology to 1994-1993 where such was only able to be “HOLY” OF “JIHAD” if also heading to fly suicidally into the Pentagon. I am known in some circles for a reputation like of such of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM unsolicited guidance in the pre-Clintons 1990s as (a/the) he who took down Saddam Hussein. When Saddam was found the story was breaking initially (coincidentally) like as “SADDAM HUSSEIN FOUND IN A HOGAN!” The world may more globally of heard such told so further but I was quick to my fax machine with a note to the Bush NSC to request that such story line be ceased and desisted from - STOPPED immediately. I had been, though, as it was (I think in Connecticut) about that time trying to like make Saddam radiate with his earlier admitted defeat by me as like lit up by me - me a HOGAN.
For brevity I share these thoughts today for too few realize even broadly how much they should be reconsidering the Clintons towards having better intelligence and understanding in a basis of history more about being resolved to look at and come to accept how much the Clintons did get wrong. I have earlier suggested the 911 Memorial & Museum could have the Clintons both duly displayed as encased in carbonite and/or at least with a banner/tag of GROUND ZERO as: HERE FOR HOW MUCH THE CLINTONS DID GET WRONG!
Senator Elizabeth Warren is not one I would vote for to a LA FEMME PRESIDENT WARREN - - - Yet though I do support her new boldness at tagging the bankers and so again and more seriously, at least by associated guilt/culpability, the “two-fer” BOGO Clinton. There is per 9/11 and the economic collapsing to a said NEW DEPRESSION that each decision the Administration of the Clintons made was corrupted in a spousal collusion to have the Presidency by Clintons properly named of Mr. Clinton be to planning and coordinating a succession ASAP to a Clinton resurrection yet under a renaming as then under a banner of thought different proper name - of Mrs. Clinton. It is for others to discern how President Clintons 1993 erring on Iraq was actually so early it likely wasn’t also corrupted as most of their other decisions as specifically figured towards lining up 16(+) years of Clintons instead of merely 4-8.
Right, for brevity, on this anniversary of such tragic events, and specifically to Flight 93 coincidentally heralding the year President Clinton set off the visceral tragic I experienced so of “IF THE CLINTONS GO THAT WAY THE USA WILL GET ATTACKED AT HOME!”, let me now lately share more generally that in 1994 when I broached and “IF THEN” global querious to possible outcomes from the Clintons “politics” it wasn’t until I got the images of the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon as an answer that I bristled and broadly reacted to stop such at two targets. I didn’t know what I knew for it seemed the thought “experts” were the “experts” and that such could have been me seeing the two places where the greatest defensive expertise was towards preventing such, and as if they were already on it all.
On the morning of 9/11/2001 I did finally know that I had known and too that I likely had been right in thinking that if beyond my attempts to share such haunting concerns there had been more obvious talk from me so like seeming crazy and alone in my thinking so contrary to the “popular” PEACE being pimp’d by the Clintons it likely would have been I was fast to knowing something no longer a known for if known it would have been if so of fears thought visceral to tragic then to NEW plans beyond at least my distant and cloudy awareness.
We of our humanity now are best to consider and deeply all the plotting of the Clintons since Yale Law School days as co-eds joined in separate ambitions to each someday figure a way (however Constitutional traditionally) to each have a Presidency as of each of their own proper names Mr. Clinton & Mrs. Clinton - albeit it that such was when it was Miss Rodham properly.
Also conveniently collated are past selections yet of my more voluminous that is earlier of 2006 and my saying “NO” to TIME when of disturbed waking thoughts to if they could have a picture of me as blogger “uc” for their cover for that years Person of The Year edition. I did say “NO” but then followed on to assist their interest for my year at publicly (leading) pressed commentary to argue for the Iraq SURGE and then to strongly persist in intelligent defense of it as yet though a new policy that should some have been an old policy - but then too maybe not. To find some of such also collated as (sordid) sorted by keyword or subject look to http://JPHogan.org and firstly the “THE ELEPHANTS” tab. At this also available via http://bit.ly/DonkeysGong are some as bitly of “IRAQbyJPHogan” “KerryByHogan” & “AlQaeda_HOGAN” linked.
In such vein, but yet permanently set for the record and history on paper, is it remembered as like heard that President George W. Bush, did to Hearst Corp CEO whence, “recommend” me as with “HE DID MORE FOR ME THAN ANY IN MY ADMINISTRATION!” I don’t know what such is fully imported to mean or detail - I worked from more than an arms length and voluntarily with unsolicited guidance, however quite voluminous in quantity if of such quality to the President. I do recall a visceral blow-back from the ego of Secretary Rumsfeld maybe of 9/12/2001 from after I faxed over a copy of my early 1990’s THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM with note “it worked for such and now is yet ready as refreshed to now work again” - I recall Secretary Rumsfeld was likely to the President or at least his NSA Rice of “IS HE TRYING TO PULL RANK ON ME?”!
At the time of the first plane striking the World Trade Towers I was in my 1988 Dodge B-250 white cargo van as a DC licenced general contractor driving up 17th Street N.W. almost nearly to along side the Old Executive Office Building and so with the above thinking of NSA Condoleezza Rice in her likely last thought before the first event now known of GROUND ZERO. I had the night before decided I had to stop being preoccupied with thinking I had been right since 1993 of such haunting thoughts to a coming tragedy and as it was as from bad decisions made by President Clinton in a contrary governing away from the prudent balanced think responsible for their election. I had the night before had a conversation with myself that I had to stop now after such near a decade of believing I knew a known yet an unknown and at least for no one seemed to also see it, and, for I likely would fall into personal bankruptcy if I further allowed so much time in each day to reassess concerns as to what might happen and need to happen yet if and when I proved to have been right.
That’s all for now folks. Yes, it may be fated so for Flight 93, and since 1994, and since after I bristled that maybe I was, though just an amateur civilian of a broached queriousness, as yet to being a one who could stop a sense of JUSTICE, for of a knowing of the issues, but only beyond it seeming through the broached, that the World Trade Towers, and the Pentagon, were though fairly to be targeted. Yes, I didn’t know of the 9/11 attacks until later in such morning for I didn’t have media on until after I was to that days job site and already to having removed the old front door beyond any point of putting the old back in and rescheduling when to yet build the new front door jambs and install the new front door and storm door.
This day thirteen years ago my client was one whom had years earlier been a dosen for tours of the THE OLD EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING. Right, the events of 9/11/01 did unfold to fit into my old visceral haunting specific to the above as of 1993 & 1994 specifically. Right, I learned I knew a known I thought yet too much maybe an unknown but yet queried to Feds about and to it playing out that I yet was much then ready for a response fully figured of a knowing, though also long doubted, and as it is that Flight 93 was then of such as if of “HOLY WAR” yet to only allowed for Posterity to succeed if also to flying so directed also into the PENTAGON. It has played out that Flight 93 seems to have been doomed if to attempts to broaden the Al Qaeda “justice” to more than those two of the World Trade Tower and the Pentagon which I yet was of thinking could maybe not have been of me seeing the targets but yet of a sharing of concern and preparedness with two venues I figured had to be among the most protected and to not needing a volunteer like myself but of bouncing haunting visceral also at them.
We may have to consider however Senator E. Warren could be a Senator a HERO as a LA FEMME E-WARR’N it yet that Mrs. William Jefferson Clintons vast culpability is engaged of two decades now for many errs at promoting herself, and accepting promotion of herself yet as if skilled and ready for/to a LA FEMME PRESIDENT MRS. CLINTON. Yes, I know as much as I can remember how much the help I proffed, however, to the Bush Administration was yet informed of knowing of Clintons’ mistakes and enough to be successful in offering corrective fixes in the right air of justice for all.
What are the attributes pertinent? What is the full range, and diversity, of so much this attributions valuation for corporate responsibility must be towards navigating? Has Time Warner persisted in undermining the value of some great assets by the too regular airing of CNN yet as if a “Clintons’ Nonsense Network”? This is serious business for this fall it isn’t just Dinesh D’Souza after his book “AMERICA” touring highs to be an author set low and to some time of arrested imprisonment.
So Jon Stewart is entertaining (with) thoughts of CNN worth buying as worth near $10 Billion smackers.
Indian born Dinesh D’ Souza is said to be staring down a possible two years in the “BIG HOUSE.”
For now not even CNN is known to have attributed enough seriousness to the Clintons’ cover-ups and the Benghazi Select Committee looming now ahead of Mrs. Clinton, author, for a fall of a very public fall too.
For now not even CNN is known to have asserted that Mrs. Clinton while “HARD CHOICES” bombing compared to the expectations as inevitable to success such that a $14 Million reported advanced (not as political - quid pro quo - patronage - campaign covert funding through CGI). So much is attributable to Mrs. Clinton that as Dinesh D’ Souza book, with accompanying movie, top her book he may take solace in how she, of the uncovered cover-up, and for her career of helping set and keep a Democrat standard for imprisonment of any of an admin found to be of a “cover-up” without murder.
This fall however of a fall for author D’Souza is justly now set up to be a fall too for a fall of author Mrs. Clinton. Mrs. Clinton is at risk of judgements rendered of the “WATERGATE” political standard seriousness and for the yet already partially uncovered cover-up that involves murdered far more significant that the possible two years for “AMERICA” author. Mrs. Clinton has already (inadvertently) admitted incompetence and too before Congress, while of her outbursts seeming of a contempt for Congress, of admitting culpability for the events of a prosecution due for illegal cover-up of the jurisdiction of the Benghazi Select Committee.
How and why is any attribution for considerations of the HARRY POTTER licensing now pertinent to CNN valuation? Who’s his daddy?
Is it that Mrs. Clinton, at least, has been uncovered to be a mortal more just a “muggle”? Is it also inconvenient that Mrs. & Mr. Clinton have too long been cloaked in attributions, generally, that cannot now be established as honestly fitting them, and so exposed uncovered from being able of use to mitigate comparative guilt in a spectacle to any “good character” - really?
To protect its licensing and grand asset associations with the standards and honor of “HOGWARTS” & the “HARRY POTTER” casts mustn’t CNN, at least of Time Warner, to be now ceasing and desisting from being too “CLINTONS’ NONSENSE NETWORK” forward and specifically away from attributions presumptions cloaking still? Right! It is that the idea of “HOGWARTS” was to fill a void in my neighborhood for a likewise small group of children when about 7 years from college and to opines of “don’t move away Peter - we have fun when you are around”?
The facts are that the legend of HARRY POTTER was fig’d and to the challenge to JK Rowling so to, for my benefit some, be yet (covertly) to proving I could repeat the breadth of musing I did before 1993 to make the Clintons seem electable enough, and, too to be to, while so knowing of the Clintons, to working a way to protect a new generation of the world’s youth from the Clintons. I have, as many of CNN must have born witness, however whence as my Facebook friends, or otherwise social media associated, yet established the point that where the Clintons have again and again proven themselves incapable of a repeat I have yet repeated and repeated but not towards maintaining still a cloaking of their errs.
It is too much so that CNN can be said to have long been too much to cloaking the Clintons and with attributions not pathologically honestly theirs or any theirs deservingly. It is too reasonable to posit that CNN has too long, to the detriment of many, been too much as if more a CLINTONS’ NONSENSE NETWORK than of agents for the real attributes of many of the stories yet worked and produced to much to cloaking them, & undermining my rightful too.
It is historical that “HOGWARTS” were so mused from me to me as the father of “HARRY POTTER” as he of the prophecy in marketing with confidence in vast and great reaping of sown to profits. To be what it was as both a filler of the void I was to leave such youths of my neighborhood, to be defensive against the Clintons as proof of my ability to repeat at such a global level, to also be a bulwark for a new generation as protection from the Clintons I know with any “cloaked”, and to protect how much else I was still doing politically for positive change, it is and was that JK Rowling was under directions to not attribute me at all as the muse and supporting source of so much about the challenge to 7 books to so replace me and have her as a distant mother yet towards my aim that such be to helping my young neighbors survive my absence and be yet to growing up less as dirt under my skin as if a wart and to being good wards, hopefully. And yet as JKR was under instructions to not attribute or expose me such was, as recalled, only contractually address for the publishing rights for the seven books, with any movie or theme park rights, and any merchandizing rights, too yet then of first book contract yet of such to be a bridge to maybe cross later.
I have no idea yet how or what I mean to do about all this. I have been also a musing of STRIKE known to JKR and so since Clintons first initiated HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT. I haven’t felt my rights at risk while yet it has been quite complicated for me to move to expose my attributes per such as to do so I much have to expose the Clintons firstly more as frauds of having been cloaked much. Yes, it was my hope that the seven book challenge as originally outlined would yet work without such a focus by JKR to yet be to my benefit - to be of my hopes to protect a new generation from the Clintons I have known since before “WATERGATE.”
It is still complicated news for my story to be told broadly without it of my history of more credibility to so much still too attributed to the Clintons. Right - HOGWARTS, however if from “HOGAN & WARTS” and of the new unknown author JKR of guarding herself if it were to fail by it so conveniently named yet to tag the muser of the 7 book challenge, is from my looking for an unknown foreign author willing to right about a “Peter Rowe-ling” and posse, as I started it, and around he then of starting magic study and while of round black glasses and black hair. “DUMBLEDORE” was animated for such basis for “HARRY” as for his home’s front door a double “Dutch” door to be also magical as of it a double door, and purple, where the top could open separate from the bottom.
So really Jon Stewart how can Time Warner or its CNN be worth clearly now any certain amount? Did you know “EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND” is also from a basis around a old New Haven, Connecticut friend as how GRIFFEN HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM DOORS became those animated for GRYFFINDOR and so to also balance how so many of the root character were so “medical” of Yale University Hospitals? This friend was in PR and yet because of having offered me a half a egg salad sandwich while concerned that I as Director of Support Services for the then commenced New Haven Area Special Olympic Games may have been forgetting to eat to my later cross-seeding for JKR and too the EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND as also around a real Officer Barone then also of games volunteering. Raymond was a fitting character name for such to be supportive of my media career while one of 28 grandchildren of Arthur M. Menadier who started his career as a Boston sports writer. Some of my cousins, much more of the global music scene then resided on a Raymond Place.
As I can and should uncloak the Clintons and for a full rendering of an arresting justice for at least Mrs. Clinton via the jurisdictions at least of the House Benghazi Select Committee it remains a conundrum for attributions as per CNN at least to how to now tell the truth without at least myself being to any inadvertent revaluation of the good of “HOGWARTS” and all about “HARRY POTTER.” It is some simplified as “CORMORAN STRIKE” now is alive to live a related characterization more as if the founder of “HOGWARTS” than as if a new “HARRY POTTER.” It is interesting too that my friend who used to be a chief accountant for ESPN is whom my friend who incidentally sparked me to concerns to concerns pushed for the creation of “EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND” - He now I believe is the top accountant for Ann Taylor.
Though I first crossed ambitious wiring with Commissioner Bill Bratton in 1987-1988 in Boston when news was that he was to be heading up Massachusetts state wide municipal force that was the most neglected and maybe ignored in the state - though I first crossed and worked ambitions collaboration with a wiring with him whence it is interesting and related that though his first thought was to me “don’t laugh at my fleet of green cruisers” (like) it is later when I emailed him while he was Commissioner in Los Angeles with my advice that he retire or resign so not to be caught as the Obama administrations top scapegoat for what I then was expecting to be statistically true for increases in crime - though, that is, while he first said not to laugh so to me it is while he was considering my later advice that he seemed to burst into a laugh realizing my “politics” was of taking on the “The Kennedy” - as if taking on the legacy of the late Kennedy brothers.
So, at least to me what can a value be for CNN? I mean it seems that there are historic corporate responsibility issues that may be justifying a “official” courtly to remediate if an amicable way not forthcoming as much of a prosecution for the fall of Mrs. Clinton should necessitate a revaluation of all said as if “news” as if properly attributable to either Mrs. or Mr. Clinton.
My “Mad Man” grandfather was an “Arthur” whose standards, however liberal American as Washington’s, yet seemed to be for me to be if likewise to his success as needing a courtly and general corporate standard even greater than the Kennedy brothers lost, and so really much higher that especially those said as of the “The Clintons” that they oddly are not generally known in “news” as long unable yet to repeat. What can any valuation of CNN be without a more honest one of Mrs. & Mr. Clinton and for not themselves enough at least of the higher standard of the “The Kennedys”? I was born to choose to be as much of any legend of my grandfather “Arthur” as I might yet attempt and maybe succeed to as of a wizardry in marketing prophecying.
Chances are there are very amicable ways for me, when clear of the inappropriate cloaking of the “The Clintons” “politics” not enough “news” and “history” to yet be known for that which was of my broadly and globally repeating with my 7bk challenge to JKR yet of my first go at it of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that now still best explains the successes and unexpected rise of the Clintons - yes, the Clintons I have known since about a first grader and they Yale Law co-eds not married and just Bill and Hillary.
It seems CNN isn’t alone now in a duty at “news” to separate the “The Clinton” from at least all this just shared of the “The Hogan” more pathologically honest and truly to the genesis or origins related. But, again, CNN isn’t supposed to undermine the valuation of the necessary and proper attributes of Time Warner vast licensing of assets, however, in the “HARRY POTTER.”
* * *
And, yet otherwise, to news of plagiarisms, by Democrats, but as for these imports, of Clintons’ inappropriate uses, and outright misuses, we have that Democrat Senator John Walsh story has refreshed my visceral experienced smarting of the 2004 Convention speechifying of “Barack Obama” as some of his breakout speech had me stirred in objection as the original thinker and writer of the rhyme and reasoned verse I was of hearing from afar a someone (maybe then Senator John Kerry) be to saying nearly “use these lines” “make them your own” and “put a black face on them.” I at least have learned since reading “DREAMS FROM MY FATHER” very early “memoir” that the “Barack Obama” if that his authentic personal style was so remarkably away from his own style when to that I so experienced with visceral smarting about he of his break out at the Democrat Party Convention of 2004. Such is of the essence of the above mentioned so yet of the actual written words in my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM which so later also had me needing to flex a polite cease and desist to Howard Dean when he wasn’t just misappropriating from such but so was to me, knowing my original compositions, was yet using my improved race relations new media writing yet by unauthorized use in speeches to inner city black youths with his message yet DON’T STEAL.” Again, I have known “Barack Obama” at least as “B.O.” of Hawaii to be four years older than me and of an interest in Presidential oratory since the late 1970s. He in now way, and still nor did the Clintons after the 1992 election, have any authorized use to present as if their own material so significantly or vastly similar in tone, timing, and message mine.
For now I too have yet to decide what to do about the specifics of President Barack Hussein Obama’s breakout speech of the Democrat Convention of 2004 and to the specifics of how with it experienced as an attempt to present mine as his and with it then forward as Democrat and black it is yet of them thinking lawyerly defensible as if similar and flattery and not identical - while yet so that such was visceral and smarting to me knowing the origins and political workability and practicable benefit in being enough just like to identical.
It is seemingly - seemingly rapidly becoming - seemingly rapidly becoming known - seemingly rapidly becoming known and self evident that Hillary Clinton is here to for becoming an out-cast untouchable. The “The Clinton” is now more a rock in the path of blockage, as if by political avalanche, than a common vine to any fruit from diplomacy now otherwise by the essence of Secretary John Kerry.
Any vitality of any diplomatic essence of Mrs. Clinton, from FLOTUS to First Mate of CGI, is now worlds apart from that being witness of her successor from Boston’s top echelon/caste. There may now be now clear and easy way towards understanding the taller standing of Secretary Kerry from Secretary Clinton due to the elephant of religion in their pathologies diplomatic; Secretary John Kerry isn’t a Methodist, isn’t from Chicago; Secretary Kerry is Catholic and from Boston. It is in more than one or simple ways that Secretary Kerry is now standing so much taller than Mrs. Clinton ever managed.
A cover ‘o cover reading for “HARD CHOICES” can be from it suggestive that she is only allowed publication much at talking and talking of process; HRC is quite arrested from truth being an option that being heavy on process is her only safe harbor. To a cover, of “HARD CHOICES”, each is initially, civilly, beset to ponder: IF “HARD” WHY “HARD”? HRC is not a Catholic; HRC is a Methodist. HRC iss the longest serving top Diplomat charged for diplomatic solutions by President Obama during the “longest war.” The “The Longest War” now is HRC’s “war” for it she who most failed to find a diplomatic solution the longest.
HRC is now so becoming an out-cast untouchable it is critical that we separate her as not of any American caste or nobility. Secretary Kerry, for being Catholic of Boston, may yet not be justifiably, however of Boston 1%, “Boston Brahmin.” Secretary Kerry has inherited from HRC’s predecessors much in opportunities for greater “Tranquility” that is not of or from the “diplomacy” or “skirting” of his predecessor. Secretary Kerry now with HOPE for CHANGE with IRAN, now so young a nation again, of standing more on the settled well foundations from the Bush Administration FREEDOM AGENDA ways than any “new foundation” of President Obama or his first top diplomat. We all may be behooved to look at the paths forward available and to work away from any beaten of the Clintons - HRC & the CGI corporate and to each person. The Clintons eitherwise of one or two paths distinguishable are yet present as obstructionists as if fallen to inconvenient barriers to any apropos “forward.”
Who is Secretary John Kerry now to us - to the President - to the U.S. - to Iran - to the world? Can he be now so much taller than his predecessor HRC just because he is Catholic and/or of Boston, however 1% or Brahmin caste? Do new words from his boss the President now, too much yet still of a daily emoting, yet work to undermine any path or way but for any stable now as yet built upon a well settled foundation much of, or from, the Bush Administration day about a FREEDOM AGENDA? As a Catholic working for the “Messiah” what is religion and what is politics? As a Catholic what is post-Clinton post-imperial socialism bias and returned to a basis in property rights and federalism parlance and nuance? As a Catholic, like Vice President Joseph Biden, yes of Delaware - The First State - how is Secretary Kerry maybe evangelizing “Messiah” President Obama globally?
Iran isn’t as complicated as HRC seems to have long implied. But as she never seemed to fathom the grand potential and opportunities so globally progressing that explains the Clintons most unexpected and late rise of the 1992 Presidential contest perhaps we should show mercy for her too much of an ignorance. To this there is flow as if a vine not from merely the Bush Administration while of a FREEDOM AGENDA but to President Reagan and how the expansionist socialism was stopped in its tracks in Afghanistan and then beyond, and how the expansionist socialism fell to a new world order rising to a reboot I’ve long tagged as a “CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM.” Coincidentally what best explains the Clinton unlikely old story yet of their 1992 rising is what HRC and WJC have long not proffered or posited as best for the way forward and yet it is that which is now of the foundations that Secretary Kerry now can best build upon.
Iran isn’t as complicated as HRC seems to have long implied - Iran is far simpler to understand if one learns to fathom how the Clintons and President Obama have been so wrong about Iraq and for so long that they can yet, if ever, be, for the records and Posterity, as “correct” about much at least across the Middle East, and, at least especially regarding or respecting Iran.
From where I sit informed to “expert” at least of my own perspective regarding such, as of a cover for retrospectives, for others, I must parse, for a greater parity, if not Tranquility too, how we must yet separate the “Bush” from the “Hogan” - the decidings rendered by the necessarily at “politics” of the Bush Administration from that as lay and unsolicited, however respecting “politics”, for that which I share is much of my opined and faxed to the Bush Administration via their NSC # as of my perspectives, private, and volunteered, yet more of the business or marketing perspective in a pre-politics rendition that then the office of the President would have to, if needed, modify for the charge “political” of his duty of the Presidency. I so put forth such qualifier for this of which I write now dates to it as common to the very advise to Middle East and Iran postures whence the hard choices had to be made by President Bush. Again, “HARD CHOICES” of HRC to each cover is yet tragically of her “politics” to easier choices less possible for decidings more of truths were not an option to Mrs. Clinton.
Secretary John Kerry is more than just now obviously to a self evident truth of standing far taller than his predecessor on the global and Middle East soap boxes of the duty a charge for diplomacy, President Barack H. Obama’s Secretary of State secondly is standing tall on merits that do yet run contrary still to the process and speak of the “The Obama” doctrinally yet. For more to how HRC didn’t affect a “new foundation” & nor so President Obama, himself, at least until newly to also building on the Reagan legacy yet as the Bush Administrations did, it may behoove a visit to http://JPHogan.org for the essay regarding Iraq set as “OBAMA’S RETREAT” as specifically at http://bit.ly/ObamasRetreat!
We hardly yet know if HRC failed the nation both as per the compensations for liberations as per OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM and too her “baby” ODYSSEY DAWN. It seems HRC is most culpable at least in association with the partisan leadership by Nancy Pelosi to how how both the liberation of Iraq (and Libya) were prudently commenced with plans that a country’s vast oil profits could be readily credited out in compensation to any of the liberating coalesced nations.
I have problems with the seeming progress of Secretary of State John Kerry as per Iran and the nuclear path(s) of the young again sovereign country. For the years of the COLD WAR they like Iraq were as if pawns (too much) in a geopolitics of the United States of America, with oil economics interests, to thwarting globally the expansionist socialism of the U.S.S.R.! Iran now is among the youngest of sovereign nations in the known world.
I do not know the sociological or demographic specifics to the root of the how or why such nation regirthed itself with its own baby boom. Iran so situated near the U.S.S.R. and yet while however once more aligned with Moscow seems now positioned and structured to see Russia as an enemy long before assuaging the The United States of America as a greater enemy. The USA is of the “lucky” for Secretary Kerry, however “Boston Brahmin” as per the Middle East and especially Iran in how Iran now is of less moral need for nuclear weapons because the Bush Administration (of #43) did remove the neighboring nuclear threat persisting of Saddam Hussein - of that which persisted and nearly became reborn while of the years mostly of avoidance and inaction of the Administration of the Clintons.
There is more differentiating HRC from her successor than how he morally, even, is of a most obvious standing taller than at least as per the Middle East and Iran. HRC was an inappropriate messenger for any diplomacy for her close and intimate association with the abandonment of Afghanistan and Iraq by the The United States of America as of the Administration of the Clintons as so of, and from, the avoidance and inaction root in the Clinton “political.” President Obama’s worst decision of his legacy maybe forever will be that of having rival HRC of the “House of Clinton” as ever a Secretary of State, and/or at all of his administration.
Secretary Clinton was compromised from the start. She was a compromised officer to any Tranquility abroad where history and truth could yet conquer. She was a compromised officer to any Tranquility much at least for how she didn’t confess while trying to bring bite to nuclear sanctions, and sanction at least specifically on Iran, of how there is the “BUT FOR OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM…” with no thanks to the “ABANDONMENT, AVOIDANCE, INACTION OF THE CLINTONS…” prescient to any progress in enforcement for she herself represented an expectation that escape from Justice was possible - too possible. It stands tall with the progress of HRC’s successor and any of his background reasoning that he is now more standing “lucky” on the foundation more of the Bush FREEDOM AGENDA than any “new foundation” of President Barack H. Obama and his first Top Diplomat of the “House of Clinton.”
To be brief while any “lucky” of Irish Catholic, of Boston, however of a “Boston Brahmin” 1% or caste, we yet must affect intellectual bulwarks to a slide to the old abandonment classically now “CLINTONESQUE” in a tragic historical/historicals; to be brief, while Secretary Kerry now stands more than just morally taller than his predecessor HRC, here we are yet of it more complicated that Mrs. Clinton is allowed to, or capable to, explain at least for every decision was always harder than it otherwise would have been for any other for she had it much that truth(s) not an option for long about she and her spouse have been liberal at politics at lies in cover-ups of their own culpability at least to negligence prior to the Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11 I. HRC’s decisions all had to be harder for she as a spouse of a former President is expected to be lawful firstly to the standard of marriage contracts and traditions of a spouse not allowed to or supposed to be to incriminating the other spouse.
Secretary of State John Kerry stands taller than any of the “House of Clintons” and still however as they persist in defensive global initiatives at global partisan and political meddling by ways corporal of CGI - of CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVES! Secretary Kerry though is yet to be understood of his progress so superior to his predecessor Clinton at least for it matters if and how his “taller” taller for he different as Catholic and/or of a global 1%. It isn’t yet convenient for HRC’s successor that he should be more honest and “taller” by confessing he is so more standing on Reagan’s “foundations” than any however yet of the Presidency of Barack H. Obama. Secretary Kerry is yet differentiable for intelligence and balance from of Maine, of New England and an elder, Senator George J. Mitchell now yet if Northern Ireland struggles have parallels currently to a “spring” or maybe “renaissance” in the Middle East.
The internet and social media was also arriving to the peoples of the Middle East however free or differently free and organized while it was arriving across the Americas.
It is foolish to not consider, at least that due to the necessary new world ordering to recover from the COLD WAR geopolitics and to the rise of interactive global machinery that OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM was necessary and remains as rightfully commenced. It will be for a long time that OIF is seriously debatable more for how it wasn’t operated well even as now we should be nearer to a consensus that it due to the rise of interactive global machinery it was absolutely of a necessary so that the The United States of America didn’t get caught on the wrong side of “progress” in the eyes of at least the young in the Middle East. I will not go into such here but will offer that it as a subject is at least more broached in the collection in the category of “IRAQ” as at http://CitRB.com here linked specifically more conveniently with http://bit.ly/IRAQbyJPHogan.
As the above established sharer of diplomatic perspectives as always just a private citizen of no “official” solicitation for help from the Bush Administration I persist still of the core of such as foundationally still standing true and level of my thinking and writing of the pre-Clinton days as organized of my privately shared THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM. I cannot, nor do I plan to attempt to, explain that which was either all “political” or any “partisan” of the relative decidings during the Bush Administration years of decidings. What I offered, and especially so of when I offered how not to go too far with Iran on nuclear power and weapons standing, necessarily left the “American” “political” to the filtering and prudence of President George W. Bush. I did though strongly suggest, at least via a material fax, when or how to stop as per Iran for the progress of the FREEDOM AGENDA in Iraq was setting up better possibilities for a greater moral parity nuclear within Iran so that one effort could undermine the other if too strongly individually pushed otherwise.
The Ukraine vs. Russian problems are different quite than any of the nuclear standing of Iran. It is considerable though that Russian with such as if new Soviet expansionism is yet now more “Christian” and “missionary” than “communistic” and to it that Iran now is being given an (unnecessary) justification for nuclear weapons (if not more allied with the USA) by Russia as a new threat. As to any “HOMELAND” associations there is yet that there may be an inherent path forward to better relations with the now newly young Iran, actually. Any opportunities for improved parity of morality with Iran now is yet of a path not obstructed like that of all paths walked historically of the “politics” of the Clintons. President Obama can still be said to have been so wrong (also) as per Iraq that he has hardly since been able to be right about anything in the Middle East, and too that the unrest between Ukraine & Russia is some to much of global instabilities risen from his failing economics, and the associated “politics” of the Clintons.
There was a Holocaust. Iran is of the Persian Gulf of Persians and so too as Aryans. I do not know the sociological or demographics, however related historically, to any necessary consideration of concern for the Irani people for they are blooded as Aryans as Germans of Hitler’s rise were blooded proudly as Aryans. There is the “moral” yet a conundrum of the Iran nuclear parity diplomatic concerns where though of years under the COLD WAR stuck as if too much pawns among a global human contesting they yet now are humans too to be considered as born equal. There is a morality as I expressed in an old material fax to the NSC # during the Bush Administration that I posited in my lay, however learned, to it that as a sovereign nation Iran of its people could be to a moral right to also have the technology and know how to nuclear power and a pride of knowing themselves also capable of the highest sciences of shared humanity, and yet while it though likely wouldn’t be “moral” to presume there was a prudence in also or ever also having nuclear weapons.
I only saw some of the last episodes of the last season of HOMELAND. I may now be looking forward to catching a new season that builds on there being actual possibilities for improved relations with such a newly young nation. I yet have always been only a lay private citizen despite my years of sharing timely and at times quite pro-active proven useful opines. I yet have always been so engaged with it all of a common core a consistent vine rooted to my pre-Clinton THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM thinking and writing.
As per HOMELAND and me I did though also fax the Administration of George W. Bush after seeing a WELCOME TO PENNSYLVANIA sign while state of the Governor Thomas Ridge a quick note whence then in the days when the idea of a Department of Homeland Defense was so initialized it wasn’t yet to a list (public to me) for any to be its first Director. I did fax a suggestion that Governor Thomas Ridge was at least well named to be a first ever top first director - the first head of such developing Department of Homeland Security.
It seems we are now here gathered of it as per Iran that what may be unlucky for us and Secretary of State John Kerry, however of he Catholic and/or of Boston as of a “Boston Brahmin” or 1%, is that he may be too inconveniently a compromised messenger for such possibilities if he cannot yet find a more historical and truthful “foundation” for his, at least public, sharing. It is for the historians, necessarily to differentiate any new Tranquility from the diplomacy of Secretary of State John Kerry and to how much he yet stood taller than Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, at least, rightly and morally, and, to how he could stand taller however while Catholic just because unlike HRC truth was not an option not an option in his choices.
However now we can together stand of new HOPE and CHANGE we cannot abide at least an attempt at greater intellectual standing ourselves by a clear eyed civility commenced with an appreciation that at least as per Ukraine such unrest is from the unsettled global economics that can be tagged as from the Administration of President Obama failed economics. It though is such to Democrats yet is sadly of them claiming successes in what seems failure, to others, for it seems incontrovertible that their pride was so of a GREEN AGENDA that much of this is to a person Democrat as if acceptable in an economic collateral damage rationalization - #FORWARD.
Where did she go wrong? How are our criticisms of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton enough “well informed”? Aren’t we at if we just compare her to whom she followed and who followed her that we are fair in reporting and chronicling that she was the worst of three?
We’ld be fools and unfairly so (and racist) if we are to ignore all the flip flops of Mrs. Clinton, however, and if to an affirming posit that it she be presumed that she was a better Secretary of State than the two most previously. Right?
We’ld be fools and unfairly to discerning differences in old white political elites and new white political elitism if to an avoidance to pare the pair of Secretaries of State of the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama. Both Clinton and Kerry brought hypocracy and baggage to the office for diplomacy - both Clinton and Kerry were inappropriate or devolutionary choices for such high office due to their personal conflicts - conflicts of interests - past positions as of entanglements.
We to start any due probative of Mrs. Clinton as a worst, at least of three, by remembering all her flip flops and too her executive decidings while crusading with the Powers of her office as First Lady. We should be aware of whom are Bedouins or Nubians and how Ja Ja Binks seems to have been cast as a new good Gunga Din. If I recall the setting correctly then it was when Lara Logan interviewed General Petraeus in Afghanistan when he spoke of then in his readings of reading Rudyard Kipling. It seems to be accounted of an if true how true that Mr. Binks was right when of parrying that if a people keep theirs sewers clear from clogging their murder rate should be lower. President Barack Hussein Obama in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech tagged the Clintons while parsing in oratory how there are dangers from inaction and avoidance (as like evident now from the Clintons’ own years of avoidance and inaction).
The Congress so far has the House nearly ready for the rendering of justice per the discovered and confirmed cover-up post Benghazi. I do not know when the Senate will also be ready. I expect due to the seriousness of any “cover-up” our Congress must soon be bicameral and in too a bipartisanship in the Senate, so charged, to also looking to how guilty Mrs. Clinton, however, and to how diabolical it is that a “cover-up” was thought her best strategy. Mrs. William Jefferson “Hillary” Clinton is the prime suspect in a commencing investigation to the extents in criminality and so that it must be now presumed that she was a worse Secretary of State than at least Condoleezza Rice.
To preserve some “innocent until proven guilty” for Mrs. Clinton, however, we should look firstly at the life and politics - war/anti-war politics of her successor Secretary of State John Kerry. We should look first at a comparative for prudence secured in “jurisprudence” to his positions re: “BOOTS ON THE GROUND” and her’s, however.
Still, and again, to be of a preserve for any innocence, despite Mrs. Clinton’s years of flip flops over boots on the ground, and indiscriminate droning warring, we can make this more about the life and story of John Kerry as of a query: TERRORIST OR PEACEMAKER? But we should behooved of another believed remembered Lara Logan interview that was with a supposed top Taliban leader - yes! before 9/11 II in Benghazi - as contradicting President Obama and Secretary Clinton with his pronouncements to it that the Taliban and Al Qaeda were now much as if one, and, yes, newly. For a sake of tonality and the horse race of this to a due fair measurement of the saddled guilt just of Mrs. Clinton let us just acknowledge that part of the cover-up relates to it that Benghazi could have been and may be a widening of the theater of war and a “counter-attack” in the Obama/Clinton war of choice in Afghanistan against primarily the (said) Taliban.
Still, and again, to be of a preserve for any innocence, despite Mrs. Clinton’s years of flip flops over boots on the ground, and indiscriminate droning warring, we should be organized as a posse for truths, and too bicamerally in a new bipartisan, yet recognize the evidence that she has set her self (themselves in Clinton) up as if the bad guys in a season of SOPRANOS. We can’t just jump on her successor if to keeping prudence in jurisprudence for she however measured for her guilt is still of her years as FLOTUS where she did go into rivals turf and incite with incendiary imperialist rhetoric the locals, however tribal, and to such inflaming that those radical already were more radicalized and pushed into corners as if called out by Mrs. Clinton, so, in a pride to a need to “respond.”
So about how bad a Secretary of State John Kerry is, and, too to how he was a most inappropriate selection for any high office in foreign affairs regarding the Middle East, and due to his past pulling of the rug out from under any real potential for success in OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, and so from near the very day and hours the country, with President George W. Bush, had become “committed” with boots on the ground - committed beyond the point of quiet return:
Secretary of State John Kerry while the primary ANTI-WAR SENATOR did do more than any other in the known world to undermine the potential and any ready success for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM. Mrs. Clinton can hardly have to shoulder all the blame for so much that went wrong much do to the betrayal in a late response as a revival in ANTI-WAR demonstrative tonality, but for her own flipping and flopping fickleness to prudence and loyalty to a committed administration too. Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha were a tag team that did by their politics so partisan (interpartisan too) were to being those, even more than the Clintons, that did put the lives of all with boots on the ground in Iraq into their unexpected greater peril. At the time Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha started their ANTI-WAR REVIVAL it was no longer appropriate to take issue with the matter Congress had already voted with, and however Senator Clinton is remembered for admitting that she herself didn’t read the intelligence reports regarding such before her vote.
Mrs. Clinton yet cannot escape that the cover-up seems still to have been necessary to save the cover-up of the culpability and negligence of the Administration of the Clintons. As it is the known “Benghazi Lies” seem of the worst case scenario need for the dangerous strategy of cover-up, and by Mrs. Clinton who had worked on the committees to impeach Nixon and as of the Clintons’ own Lewinski cover-up, arguably and in an seeming evidence based deciding for if not, as the lies of the Clintons’ cover-up were failing, only lies about their lack of intelligence and understanding about Al Qaeda, at least, needed more lies to preserve any chance of future electability of the Clintons for a retaking of the The White House.
Right! This is supposed to be an attempt to transfer Clinton guilt, presumed, unto her successor Secretary of State John Kerry, and however as necessary by a looking deeply back at least at his “politics” of his ANTI-WAR REVIVAL as causal to such that maybe can be said to be more, at least, of a Kerry negligence than a Clintons’ gross negligence.
We, if of the lay, should behooved to let the Federal Bureau of Investigation profilers and Defense Department Armed Forces Psychological operations experts take the lead to explaining how devastating Senator John Kerry’s ANTI-WAR REVIVAL, from hour one, was to moral and cooperation of the Iraqi people. We should expect that experts will be called to parse the level of negligence, at least, to the full measure of at least the guilt of Mrs. Clinton, however, and even towards passing the buck if passable to her successor for his past own culpability for lighting the fire of a belief that the U.S.A. was, due to his lead, ready to CUT AND RUN - REALLY!!!
RIGHT!!! Still, Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, just for the impeachment and disbarrment of the half she supposedly is the better half too, and however of a “great man” she supposedly the “great woman” behind, is even without her experience as Hillary Rodham Clinton of the committees to impeach President Richard Milhous Nixon like the political figure of the modern United States of America whom best should know cover-ups are to be avoided but in worse case political scenarios - She is whom seems best knows how bad things must really should be thought as bad if and when a cover-up is the uncovered strategy. That Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton herself chose to front with a cover-up does itself suggest so much guilt and a necessity that it may not matter how much blame we can yet transfer to her successor or continue to project upon the Bush Administration. SEEMS!!!
Where did she go wrong? How are our criticisms of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton enough “well informed”? Aren’t we at if we just compare her to whom she followed and who followed her that we are fair in reporting and chronicling that she was the worst of three?
The sheer tonality of the remarks from Secretary of State Clinton since the Benghazi lies started did, despite her strategy to run out the clock with Congress, yet have her of self-incrimination and even much that was admitting of ignorance and incompetence at least as to her (like the Administration of the Clintons’ too) as lacking in intelligence. It seems Congress has her already fit for orange and is now only ready for the House to assess its duty to a determination as to how long she should be fit to only wear orange - however a pants suit or jumpsuit.
NOTE: There is much to a much longer list if and when to looking only at Mrs. Clinton, however, and of the when-evers, to how that she risked a cover-up over her culpability for the keep of State per the Benghazi consulate, and personnel, that to must reach with the long arms of justice, by the charge and reach Constitutional of the Congress, straight to and also through Mr. William Jefferson Clinton, and any and all of his “foundations” and “initiatives.” It must be presumed due to a cover-up strategy that Mrs. Clinton while responsible for State & USA oversight of CGI likely was as a spouse afraid to incriminate herself for such seems naturally to also implicate her spouse for his “HOWEVERS” and “WHEN-EVERS” — and for just as long.
However, a STAR WARS defense a greater defense now for the Bushes and Reagan, it seems fair to illicit an imagery for the Clintons as now it seems of them of: A HOUSE OF CLINTONS WITH THEIR SEWERS CLOGGED!
RIGHT!!! It to Secretary of State John Kerry’s benefit that Mrs. Clinton is taggable, and mashable, and hashable as too much of: MRS. CLINTON LIED AND SOLDIERS AND DIPLOMATS, AT LEAST, DIED — SHE WAS MOST INDISCRIMINATE IN DRONING WARRING AND AS IN LIEU OF BOOTS ON THE GROUND PARITY OF MISSION.
NOTE: FOR MORE HISTORY & “BACKGROUND” SEE SORTED BY “CARNEGIE HALL” @ http://bit.ly/ChubbyHubby. Please get past confusion of voluminous thread opening yet with this same column as its lede or leading piece.
For any modern discussion of economics we must in a bi-partisan/non-partisan/cross-partisan be to spinning beyond TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS. We are stuck now as commenced to a new #MoralCapitalism of a rejoined humanity in #MoralMan historicals much and quite mostly for #UrbanMoralisms. Thanks to Martin Luther, however of a BE BOLD IN YOUR SINS, some may have taken past liberties in cruelty expectant that the day was then that even so so they could and would be forgiven.
It is that a morality is what has stewed better progress for Secretary Kerry than for Secretary Clinton. Since Madam Secretary is inseparable from Bill Clinton’s commitment to her, as recalled, that preceded a fidelity in marriage arrangement with their prior necessary condition to marriage of that he would promise that she would get her own Presidency after he got his, there is a forgivable possible and a forgivable not appropriate for a candidate or just historical Hillary Rodham Clinton; Mrs. Clinton cannot run yet for 2016 as if of a Christian forgiveness granted daily so that each day she can be like just a lawyer with new cases — the Clintons do have a running con - a decades long operable plan for the election of her that as a still kept plan greater than each of her/our days is such of a aura than should not and cannot be overlooked or of a forgiveness sponsoring. She is white - she is white collar - she may deserved being a white collared even if by an establishment morality separate from a State as a white collared posse.
President Barack Hussein Obama is a conundrum for historicals in economics. It is hard to say he has a philosophy of governance nor any “economics” his own but that of spend, spend, spend & tax & tax reset of old “tax & spend” that if Mrs. Clinton otherwise had been electable too would have been of a politically necessary to render herself of at too as Senators Obama & Clinton did make nearly all the same campaign promises. It is here ridiculous to try to relate to any TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS and especially if to be of a political spin doctoring attempt to show them in a possibly more moral light. It is ridiculous otherwise too now to much discuss TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS just because the marketing and pop culture of these days are not of the era of such economics and are not sustainable or supportive to a harmonics or synthesis currently. I propose that we now are to a new economics paradigm of at least a soft science discerning that can be responsibly tagged as a SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS.
A discussion of a SUPPOSITORY ECONOMICS vs. a DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS is seemingly apropos for these current social dynamics of the micro or macro and the local or global. A discussion and development of a general understanding and furtherance of quantifiable and applicable discourse though may be good for setting us forward back to at least a decade of growth economics yet while it seems that such cannot fare well for President Obama nor other so yet set other leading Democrats. It seems that we can focus how the Democrats in mass basically have been failing economically much because they have been lacking the understanding that should be generally solidified if and when to a full and detailed expose of that to do justice to it as a better and new economics as of SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS.
It can be said to be generally acceptable that President Obama did not rightly place the blame for the said “economics” he “inherited.” It can be said that politically President Obama trapped himself from a better economics by being from day one of a politics of covering up how much of the collapsing of economies was rooted and nurtured essentially of Clintonomics and the general political administering of the co-Presidency of the Clintons. The entire time since President Obama started off his first term with lies to the economics in play embedded and orated in his First Inaugural he has been of arresting any potential he may have had otherwise than has yet been demonstrable. The Democrats in mass have been of an immorality in their governance by ways of lies about the causals most significant to the problemas. They have only succeeded in pushing a “morality” agenda by a politics immoral as of them of falsely accusing and wrongly tagging the actual historical politics and economics.
Whom of white collars can be a posse? We if again to a growth economics need be not of a said old and tired SUPPLY SIDE and/or TRICKLE DOWN now. To be anew to a #MoralCapitalism we need to recognize we are not limited to the old Cold War Era prudent obedience to a TOP down guidance of/with assurities by Government that ones commerce wouldn’t be accidentally treasonous. The world is decidedly more flat now. The politics of a charge of liberatings in new federalism have become a global normative. We of America are of establishments that do quite require that an establishment morality exists separate from the State just so that the State can have a chance at operating morally.
It of us to a new economics as by ways of discerning as SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS is also necessarily of a historical setting to an affecting that Democrats have not understood the socio - nor economics of their days so charge in its administering. The world is decidedly more flat now. The politics of a new economics need not be of SUPPLY SIDE nor TRICKLE DOWN old Cold War era prudence that did much synch with the marketing and advertising harmonics whence. A new establishment economics can be of how the Democrats missed there were two economics to govern about while proffering their irresponsible climate and economic sciences — we have long been of a complex economics that is said of people playing games in the economies, however justified as if a hobby in doing God’s work, as by supposing things as possible and potential, and, we have long been to while so of such in our economics of the core of the “moral” in the “humanity” of commerce and governance of the more permanent socio-economic of people living only by what they did deposit as of the economics of subsistence more nearly.
A ripe fruit as a conundrum a problema as a prolegomena for prima facia for SUPPOSITORY vs. DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS is the unforgivable socio per the Clintons of the commitment keeping by Bill Clinton of his promise that Mrs. Clinton if she agreed to become his bride would have his fidelity at least to keeping his promise that she would get her own Presidency after he got his. [This is of a historical of my own experience and knowledge of the Clintons which dates to the early 1970s.] The plans and plots of the Clinton “two-fer” is mostly a running con that asks that they be of a Christian forgiveness fresh start each day from so many without any consideration that such is dominant and unforgivable. It is bad enough for any economics that the Clintons are both lawyered/esquired (still?) and of a politics of playing at governance as if even in the charges they are the lawyers and of the adage “the client goes to jail” not the lawyer, and as they are each other’s lawyer firstly and protected spousally from incriminating the other and all the while they like to ask the People to let them forget their own hands/culpability each day as if by being lawyers each day is just a new case and a blank slate in “professional” plausible deniability for them.
But this needn’t be so personal while the historical record still needs to be settled more correctly for the Clintons and President Obama’s year of administering as self arrested from a greater HOPE and POTENTIAL by his handcuffing of his presidency so with his most affecting cover-up cons for the Clintons on a presumption that their party needed the same protection for an associated guilt with the much unknown seeming husbandry of a most selfish and spousally set Clinton political machinations. The economics of these years of administering by the Obama administration are and have been corrupted. It is more considerable for any now beholden towards a morality reset for a renewed #MoralCapitalism though that the economics of the Clintons and Obama administration have missed the complexity of the real world economics as of a gaming and subsistence - a supposing and deposits limited - a SUPPOSITORY vs. DEPOSITORY.
For now I have broached a discourse on a better and new economics science tagging — I will apply now some empathy receptors towards a further consideration and to an end that a SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS can now mesh with the Laffer Curve logistics and yet be a different from and more time and place responsive adjusted socio-economic lingua.
In future elaborations we can discuss the old vs. new as the Cold War and current geo-politics respective of the Russian Federation and Iran. There is a necessary consideration to be worked through of President Putin as a Russian Orthodox Christian and of his engagements now in Syria and Iran affairs. Russia has rebuilt the grand Cathedral that Stalin tore asunder to make a permanent like monument to himself for the ages and his “governance.” Iran has cause to, however long of alliances with Russian powers, be firstly if to nuclear weapons to be of a morality that is considerate that “Russians” are due a targeting firstly and much before Americans or whomever otherwise of past opposing coalitions.
For any tagging of SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS to hold up and as if learned such much be applicable to a considerate historical at least as per Afghanistan and too how if the United States had not helped defeat the moves of expansionist communism/socialism by the old U.S.S.R. whence today Iran could too be just a satellite Soviet subject region.
{I wasn’t going to be expansive or historical to the early 90s recession recovery considerations but then today in 11:30 to Noon slot on The History Channel a short on Nelson Mandela confirmed an upside down of the politics and economics of the early 90s I had been considering but not meaning to also diss. Of that of my economic thought and efforts of said pre-Clinton Clinton 90s recovery architecture is much that I was essentially to musing and synching a counter culture marking that was of an empathy for the more real economics as upside down as it was that the people at the thought bottom were then more relaxed and having more fun than the said “rich” of the top. As per the Mandela documentary short they aired how he saw that the whites could be saved from themselves as a ticket forward his/theirs. There is though I was annoyed by the Nobel Prize for Economics circa near 1992 and then later also annoyed that my architecture that was meant to be played with a complexity of at least a first part and then a needed second moderated differently second part had those like of he of the Nobel prize whence also apprised from earlier of my “marketing” for “economics” then stuck and ignorant of the second part and so that I was never able to also influence such via the remainder of my considerations in economics and positive change politics.}
If you are to see Hillary Clinton, however, as if a Devilish this Halloween it is safer to step back and focus that such is of a real legacy not as a costume but more fashionable as her in an absence of costume. She has long been proud of her work as a “Devil’s advocate” - she has long either played a Devil’s advocate to Bill Clinton’s political briefery or she has been to depending on him for being one for hers. Their truths are more dangerous than their fictions - and even their posited purposefulness to be a “two-fer” of regularity of fictions to keep their seduced media all grease up and phat.
It is essential Clinton that the actual history of Bill and Hillary, since their Yale Law School Days, has been that one or the other was near always being the Devil’s advocate. It seemed certainly Devilish and a seditious act in denial of insubordination when Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as a barely Christened new “Diplomat” was to her personal remarks near: I WILL TAKE MY INSPIRATION FROM THE SAME PLACE DANTE FOUND HIS. This it seemed and seems still as if she was saying she wasn’t yet ready or ever planning to take “guidance” from he that was just recently the Clintons’ too successful opponent.
It did seem President Obama was a sympathetic figure when in his early stepping out with the Clintons on the Global stage of State was somehow behind his Secretary of “TOP DIPLOMACY” when she of her pronouncements near: WE WILL NOT BE MAKING HUMAN RIGHTS A PRIORITY.
Have you found #DemsAgainstHillary hash tag on the Twitter yet? And too have you found #NoJuiceObama and/or #RedFlagClintons?
I do not know how Hillary Clinton, however, can be thought of as a good lawyer now if she “officially” enters the 2016 Presidential race. It is impossible if her so beyond mere trespass on such politics to be considerable as a good lawyer for it will be that such introduces into evidence their past that until know they have kept mostly camouflaged or costumed. On official entry can only be bad lawyering that maybe for which she most will have her Devil’s advocate to blame. Congress now already has sufficient right and Power to probe deeply what has been politely brushed over for too many years of the real Clintons to match the failed Clintons. These days going forward are days to discern and deduce the how and why of the now more admitted negligence of both of the Clintons as now too inseparable in their confessed culpability.
Too we have that (but for recent developments per Saudi Arabia) President Barack Hussein Obama has benefited from a noticeable improvement in Foreign Affairs and “Diplomacy” since Catholic Democrat Former Senator John Kerry surpassed the previous “diplomacy” however of - as of - the embattled and entangled Clintons. It may be that the improvements in Obama’s Diplomacy since the Clintons were of his cleaning house have something to do with Vice President Joe Biden being freer to be of his Catholic morals globally and that he finally had another of such who wouldn’t be able to avoid casting “Catholic Guilt” upon the Clintons, some, despite their secularity - specific sects of Christianity walked of/by Bill and Hillary.
It is only a hypothesis I am not trained at proving that the said “New John Fitzgerald Kennedy” Barack Hussein Obama is as if he has become a better President at least around the Globe as more Catholics amassed around him and his “Diplomacy.”
What any Devil’s advocate knows about success and its discipline is that said as: THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS.
BUT? BUT? BUT?
It truly would be PANDORA’S box about any new attempt at a HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT now that Mrs. Clinton has been a TOP DIPLOMAT beyond the treasured and traditions of protections and honors for a First Lady. The rules to what is admissible as evidence against her of her own making and confessions of culpability are no long that of the soft handed - gloved hands the legacy of propriety about our institution as it is of the Presidency.
Neither President William Jefferson Clinton nor Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton can going forward quite be thought of as good lawyers or even smart Devil’s advocates if they trespass beyond their protections now as it would be if to a new HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT as protections then become improper in any American politics if yet permitted still to be covered as if costumed in the protectorate nature of the traditions of honors for former First Couples, and especially those long for former First Ladies.
Congress though has the Devil in their details rightly of a just purview as to jurisdiction and venue. Any subpoena that is likely or not still to be served is only a detail in process for a public case that will be heavily contested now probably even if the Clintons are not officially again to attempts to re-secure the Plantation of the White House as their’s again. The Clintons are publicly inseparable as entangled in global meddling of and by their Clintons’ Global Iniatives and as it is with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of her “JACK” Congressional outburst akin to her “culpability” shouldering.
It seems more the work as if of governance by man in lieu of laws that such a Clinton culpability can be of such personal entaglements where President Obama’s first TOP “Diplomat” seems wisely, however, lawyered up even as to explaining how it seems she cannot honestly answer Benghazi queries without at least incriminating the Clinton Presidency, and the more Devilish as if of autocratic global “governance” of man as in the international meddling and monies distributing by that of the CGI.
BUT! BUT! BUT?
Benghazi is a terrible tragedy that can hardly be explained by the Obama Administration. Libya was Mrs. Clinton’s ODYSSEY DAWY Arab Spring baby - Libya was “Hillary Clinton’s” chance to do as right for decapitating a sovereign state as a good credit taking as though still about her President Boss of saying such was wrong in practice for the Republican sandwiched between their Powers holding.
Benghazi can best be detailed as if “Hillary Clinton” was of having ignored her baby. And, as it was on a 9/11 Anniversary so booted it is that her past flip flopping as Senator Clinton as well as her crusading and inciting imperial First Lady agenda are all to be deeply probed and considered (finally). And, as it was on a 9/11 Anniversary it was Devilish and Dante-esque that her inferno was of a pathology as if it was her baby Libya and that she had been forgetting her baby’s birthday.
BUT YES! THIS IS ALL NOW ALREADY MOSTLY ADMISSIBLE AS EVIDENCE AGAINST THE CLINTONS.
I am not now harboring - nor have I ever harbored a fugitive Catholic Priest.
William Stringfellow is remember from near three years before he gave up his ghost. He is remembered for having been a client and he that taught me how to use a weed wacker - his weed wacker. I was a college student at the time of summer days to work and earn - I was a Villanova University student unaware though of Daniel Berrigan ties to nearby to V.U. King of Prussia - I was willing to work a month to tame his overgrown yards and landscaping after it seemed disloyal or immoral to stay a bike and moped mechanic so summered on Block Island.
Perchance it need not be just in a dream to learn from a once fugitive of the FBI Most Wanted list oddly or not as a Catholic Priest how one old anti-war activist may now judge the hawkish like ‘converted from’ Catholic Secretary John Kerry. By Wikipedia alone a presence seems still embodied for Daniel Berrigan though born in 1921 - by his Wiki page it may even still be teaching at Fordham University.
Secretary of State John Kerry, however once more seemingly in line with Rome as Catholic, and cats, now have Latin rivals for innocent cuteness in Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. The more hawkish and like converted and near due excommunication it may seem that former anti-war John Kerry steps these two Latins may only have that they are not Kennedy Democrat Catholics shorting their illuminosities. It wasn’t long ago that there was a dovish Catholic Senator John Kerry of the Rome writ Iraq posture that Catholic citizens of the United States of America were not called as of the global Catholic family to support Operation Iraqi Freedom - as it seems it was written that Catholics where ever are not as a family set called to intercede in a Muslim country to help save Muslims from Muslims - to help bring Justice to some Muslims as for or from the injusticed of other Muslims.
Senator Marco Rubio and Senator Ted Cruz are now being posted comparatively as LATIN LOVERS more of a MAKE LOVE NOT WARS politics that can rival on YouTube much the cuteness of cats - or at least puppies. That said: Senator Rand Paul may have enough coquettishness in a more dovish and prudent playfulness himself in an alternative politics.
It seems there as been a conversion by Secretary of State John Kerry. I don’t know how Jesuits and any trained and adorned of black robes can justly conflate the anti-war Kerry and the Diplomat Kerry. It seems that Rome is still frankly of a Catholic family as not set or called of a morality to beckon Christian souls to be heralded to hawkish warring if and when most considerately as if of a problema of a politics to interceding into a Muslim state in a conflict between Muslims. It seems at this point someone more in the know, say Secretary John Kerry, might explain that there are more Christian souls in jeopardy in Syria than there were in Iraq.
We have by the conversion to most hawkish “Diplomat” he born Catholic of Rome - John Kerry - must be conflicted. I don’t know past this queriousness a/the religious specificity appropriate to such. It is that President Obama, his Boss, and the servant of the People presiding anew in the plantation of the White House, may be calling the shots solely politically and irregardless of “moral” traditions but as by “international norms” of a conversion now of his own.
It isn’t with a coquettishness that the lights are bright upon Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton (see CV hers). The new “muscular” “Diplomacy” of the Obama administration by the chairing guidance of her successor Catholic John Kerry begets many to behoove apparent and mystical contradictions. It is that while the hawkish and converted march of guns of Obama by his loyal Catholic Secretary persist that all souls are confounded about how if it is now necessarily “muscular” in post “Hillary” days than what abomination are the days of Secretary Clinton to be decried of?
Has the United States of America while of the ‘leadership’ of President Barack Hussein Obama only gotten to such a moral - religious - political pickle by way of Mrs. Clinton “Diplomacy” of lacking in “muscle”? She has a record - a very public record - that makes in dangerous and inappropriate to proffer her a place to stand or sit each day as if each day is just a new day - and her of no troubles - and her of a clean slate without the reality of the Clintons together of a troubled past.
Senator Marco Rubio and Senator Ted Cruz are now being illuminated and posted comparitively of such an innocence that it is a wonder if they now are not now quite adorable globally as LATIN LOVERS possibly inevitable to be natural new heirs to the mystique and charm at least of Catholic Kennedy Democrats. It may be that as LATINS, however blooded so, that they will have a Catholic bump and a quite pedestrian and catholic embrace as if parochial and Catholics of the LATIN AMERICAN POPE - The new Pope - Pope Francis.
The hawkish interventionist “Diplomacy” of Catholic Secretary of State John Kerry is seeming of such a conversion for him and his storied anti-war activist past that there is a story somewhere maybe quite near of a threat of excommunication.
For now it is that he is being asked to be more moral than his predecessor Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton and to be of a “Diplomacy” less of her abortiveness and misbegotten bastardly “rival” spousaled selfish political machinations. Both John Kerry and Hillary Clinton seem to have been appointed by President Obama to impossible politics - to duty calls conflicted by them each some of instincts to try to serve at least two Bosses at the same time.
It is hard these days as so much of the fabricated propaganda of the Clintons’ Admin declarations of PEACE before its time lay decimated. President Barack Obama Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech decried the Clintons quite publicly of his posits of dangers to arise from inaction and avoidance. It is that President Obama has been quite poetic in his raps on the still rivaling Clintons and methaphorical about their administering of having been too morally flawed as of a political abortiveness as if of the “danger” of his orations writ Nobel to illuminate regarding their years of “inaction” and “avoidance.”
As we have that there seems to be a conversion or momentary weakness about a worshipping of a false and political idol of Catholic Secretary of State John Kerry and as a new “muscular” posture for the servant of the People President Obama - Latins and Catholic Kennedy Democrats are finding it easier to bear witness to a truth that much of the current calls to “morality” have arisen as of a misbegotten and bastardly conflicted politics of the Clintons - and more of the Clintons personally than generally of a Democrat Party ideological arresting by a stereotyping classification as by “The Clintons’ Administration.”
Hillary Clinton has baggage as a ball and chain to follow her dusk to dawn to work every day. She isn’t due a “clean slate” each morning as for these are days most trying for too many and of her quite of a denial that she gave birth to so much by her own forensically confirmable political intercoursing. As long as Hillary Clinton asks to be benefited an innocence and a clean slate because she is like just “still standing” it is immoral, it seems, to not talk about a need for a more hawkish and muscular “Diplomacy” as something at least bastardly theirs as long as they attempt a denial of origins.
Rest in peace William Stringfellow. You are remembered by many as a very short white guy whom after acquiring a Harvard Law Degree did break bread differently than most of his classed set as elite educated when you took to the street corners of Harlem to bring a equal jurisprudence and practice to its streets and street corners.
Daniel Berrigan - once notorious anti-war FBI most wanted fugitive - and endeared to some how while a Catholic Priest born of the year 1921 - Your Wiki page has you listed as undead and teaching - Daniel Berrigan has John Kerry “lost his stripes”?
It may be commendable that a former President is to be helping commemorate the 50th anniversary of the March On Washington this Wednesday. President William Jefferson Clinton is scheduled to have his “Got MLK!” soapbox moment.
There were earlier times in the history of the United States of America where a draft was thought a useful tool for what ailed urban areas. President Barack Hussein Obama, so a born son of Islam, if now to the visceral drum beat of his new Secretary of State likely should and will be to a new draft and one naturally of his “governance” as with a real college exemption.
Many things complicate the United States of America to any involvement now in Syria.
It may be all over again a “do your homework or you’ll end up in…” Democratic Party politics. Seems eerily familiar.
We have that Secretary John Kerry, though a Catholic Diplomat head and shoulders above Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, is breathing the same petrified heinous Democratic leadership exhaustings as that which riled the guts of normal Americans in earlier days. These times do have a beat now of and by a drummer President Obama that are dangerous for he as of his personal story as an apostate. These times though by the wrenching words of his new Secretary of State do rattle the bones - do rattle the old bones of the transgressions on the souls whence by then new President Clinton.
President Barack Hussein Obama hasn’t though as a self professed “Messiah” political figure yet been to explaining how his personal choice of Christianity over Islam has been formational to at least his governance views on theocracies or Islamic Dictatorships. Such seems more a cup half empty of the work of Martin Luther King even than how President Clinton when a new President wrenched the souls and troubled the guts of Americans and especially Iraqi people of the majority was to deciding he didn’t want to have to deal with Saddam Hussein’s heinous past, and not be even to an in absentia new Nuremberg like war crimes prosecution.
Secretary John Kerry has worked out the words and sentiment such as was once in the air in 1993 and so of a partisan political preference by the Clintons’ administration thence as America was told in a contrariness that they shouldn’t need to be bothered with such however heinous or gut wrenching. It was PEACE Bill Clinton wanted to sell and a dovish Presidency he most wanted to proceed with — I was to PEACE DIVIDENDS - full steam ahead but for the inconvenient crisis left the world about Bosnia and Herzegovina.
It is an inconvenient lesson plan now for any college now to be current and of an intellectual honesty about Syria without being to spilling so much milk about the still too propped up legacy of the Clintons. It is to President Obama though to now necessarily be to a believable proffering as to how and why his choice to abandon his faith from birth for Christianity now guides his senses as to a right and wrong at least per Syria.
I do not doubt Obama’s Catholic Secretary of State for his gut reaction and tagging of Syria for chemical weapons use as a truly heinous act. For me and I imagine many others it is like a deja vu all over again as it feels like that very irregularity that was Saddam Hussein when President William Jefferson Clinton came to town and like chose to prefer intelligence of a PEACE for his dovish wants of PEACE DIVIDENDS full glasses. The outrage of these “heinous” and “gut wrenching” events as per Syria are due but if a US politician is asked to be or expected to be of a consistency in “governance.”
President Barack Hussein Obama made a horrible choice in Secretary of State. When he set off on his “First Black” march with the unexpected drum of the Presidency the Clintons should have been relegated to the back rows for their actual history of global abandonment about moral causes - their history of unconscionable inaction and avoidance. It may have been better yet if President Obama hadn’t even let them in the building - or on his bus.
President Obama’s Catholic Secretary of State John Kerry has spoken well as to the unconscionable “governance” by Syria’s Assad. The problem quite though is — scratch that — The problems are quite that his words may move the US to a draft as well as how an election of Mrs. Clinton too would - and yet it is that these erudite expressions otherwise are contrary even to the older words of that “anti-war” Senator John Kerry when of his railing against Republicans for action - not inaction.
I don’t know if you have yet any idea how much all of this is essentially of milk spilled by Hillary Rodham Clinton - a Methodist, if I recall — one not an apostate as her former black boss is of his storied march to Christianity.
What does the religiousity of the Obama administrations have to do with current and past events? How is it Obama’s Catholic Secretary of State has braved a stand with strong moral language in ways former Methodist Secretary of State didn’t or couldn’t? How is it though the language seems appropriate to these events it oddly is contrary to past “views” on morality of John Kerry while Senator or Candidate for the Presidency?
It seems President Barack Hussein Obama is positioning himself as towards as great a new need for a Armed Forces draft as long feared that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was while beating her way, however Methodist, to a power grab like no other - to a power grab quite extra-Constitutional as if a seat for two BOGO “Two-fer” not a two but a united in marriage religiousness as a union of one.
I would mention that President William Jefferson Clinton may be a Southern Baptist but with the clamor or moral outrage now in the air it seems we first should look at him as a husband and lawyer who just didn’t want to do the moral work now said anew to be expected of our leaders in government. We know he loves to be loved as a politician who sold good and happy FAT (PHAT) times even though such was trumped by hard knocks learning - of real actual history — We know as a lawyer he was disbarred easily and yet forget to consider enough that Mrs. Clinton quite nearly as well was brought up so publicly too for at least a matching dishonesty while a lawyer.
The good news about Syria for citizens of the United States of America is that Hillary Clinton is no longer the Secretary of State. The goods news now be that if a draft is necessary it will have Obama’s name all over it likely, and as well Secretary Kerry’s, of having an incentive to “do your homework” — a draft now in the second term of President Obama just seems to have to exist if and only it can exist if it is to have a full blown college exemption.
These may be trying days to think learning about capitalism is “getting an education” but it must be harder now for everyone with such “heinous” and “gut wrenching” news being a calling for President Barack Hussein Obama to explain verse for verse even how his choice to be an apostate to Islam was and is right - and acceptable if he is to intervene at all in the sovereign matters of Syria.
It is like “IT IS ALL THE CLINTONS’ FAULT” clear as day with the new beat the drum beat their’s of old. The Clinton, for your education or refreshment, did choose to play Saddam Hussein as if for all their eight years his past of such war crimes was able to be overlooked. When President Bush came to town it seemed the Clintons left now war drums anywhere with an alternative for Saddam Hussein and to a prosecution or “justice” as history has long suggested that the Clintons’ did leave office without any entrance or exit plans for Iraq to be dusted off by President George W. Bush.
It is an interesting NEW WORLD ORDER grand strategy consideration to now be tee’d off with a shot of Russian Vodka RESET versus a stout or lager beer stein, however, as if to a time for a new ISRAEL construct.
It seems we are of times to avoid too much nationalism.
Speaker John Boehner has much experience with slippery footing of realms most stereotypically of the type of “Depth Charges” Mrs. Clinton has been known of a preference for; Speaker Boehner comes from a large family of bar keeps.
If Syria can now be a better Palestine solution due to GLOBAL WARMING than Israel should it be still toasted regular as if more by Russian vodka than Aryan suds? It seems there is a new way forward in a post Clinton era where their too historic inaction and avoidance no longer dominate as nothings where some things needed; It is quite plausible to posit that Secretary of State John Kerry is amidst a simple rendering of the performance of Secretary Clinton as mediocre.
I am not ready to suggest a metaphor that we can all go stout with Irish America Kerry. There are places in this known world on the globe of earth that are best of people while of such climates to be in an absentia from alcohol however still’d or bake’d.
At this point as an American private content blogger I am of consideration that I should revisit the year 2006 and my public commentary mostly via threads of newsbusters.org as “uc” for both that Vladimir Putin did become the 2007 TIME Person of the Year after I had said “NO” in matching spirit to TIME as “uc” to their request for a picture of me for their cover as if for a story about “uc” for the nearly full year of arguing clearly for the Iraq Surge and then long in defense of it, also.
We have that a new charge of Federalism is actually now long been about globally without specifically being American.
I did say no to TIME in 2006 per their most spirited request but not without adding that a NO was appropriate because I wasn’t yet half through and they wouldn’t have sufficient space for the whole story if aired mid stream. I did consider that I liked the idea and quickly figured that if they could put a mirror on their cover instead I could though be to helping them with their intent while to thinking such the best story of that year, as per their “politics.”
At the time of this roughed out broadside for considerations seemingly fit or again anew fit today I do have no idea about Syria and Syrians as per a culture of consumption allowing and/or disfavoring alcoholic beverages.
Aryans are back in the news. But not for German beers, however lager’d or stout, as it is now more of a fresh democratic suds of the washing news of Iranian Aryans of a new and more moderated elected leader. Iran as well is of my current unchecked consideration as to a culture of consumption particular also to at least Russian vodka or maybe cheep American suds like say Milwaukee’s Best.
It does seem too early to “report” on consequences of so much no left an inheritance to Secretary Kerry on arguably simple and mediocre “diplomacy” of his most recent predecessor Secretary.
There is with my vast thinking and blogging just in 2006 as “uc” with newsbusters.org exposes on modern media and Operation Iraqi Freedom complications that I have a history of considering that we needed to get to prosecuting Saddam Hussein before the USA might get caught on the wrong side of the freedoms spreading technology revolutions (in social media) interconnectedness and so to as a wrong side as a global trending nation that avoided with too much inaction, for too long, and in an abandonment, near an infidelity, to its own Constitutional, and national values.
America may now be most threatened by thinking that either Clinton deserves to be floated as more possibly of offering solutions while it seems inescapable that we are of a time that needs more to discuss how they are mostly just (still) only part of the problems.
Yes, I do have years of personal history of American private content shared freely and independently much to these points.
I see though that Syria of today presents a problem that has been existent for a long time - for at least as long as it was that Americans were wise to consider how the US Constitution deserved more fidelity from President Bill Clinton than what can be recorded for posterity historically as rather a Clinton with American Infidelity to his own standards.
We have that people of the Middle East were given cause to call at least President Bill Clinton and “AMERICAN INFIDEL” for his years of abandonment in Iraq and Afghanistan with that long tagged and hashed of his inaction and avoidance. It is that we’ld be wiser as Americans to not let us, however, become associated with Clinton as an “AMERICAN INFIDEL” so and to a mashable guilt by association as if of a knowing accomplice status.
So how to toast or not to toast as per Syria now as a opportunity for a new grand strategy that Palestinian people of the wisdom they are capable might support — If the United States of America has to involve itself and a new global multi-national coalition of states in Syria it again would be best to avoid OCCUPIER status and reach towards only a LIBERATOR rap.
So what about Palestine and Palestinians? Does GLOBAL WARMING offer a Middle East ice breaker as per the wisdom Palestinian peoples are capable of? If the USA has to become involved it must likely be so to nation building with a new coalition and to such a scale as that which once led to the post WWII remapping of the Middle East for an Israel so of today.
Besides that if from a Russian Syria to a more Palestinian new Syria as a new Palestine there could be a shift from a predilection for vodka to a searching for Aryan suds of equanimous cultural consumption how now might a nation building for a new Syria as a NEW “Palestine” at least as per climate change wisdom be the only real alternative now to Assad?
Yes, I do think it still a good toast to lift up your socially acceptable local beverage in good cheer that the USA and coalition states did manage a prosecution of Saddam Hussein assisting standing with (in LIBERATION) before the rising conditions of the technology revolution (in social media) had at least American caught on the wrong side, and injustly as if also AMERICAN INFIDELS to their values so Constituted as standards as President William Jefferson Clinton is taggable.
There were some sheer moments of Obama in a no-nonsense comedic self incrimination. These may be the times of better leg work by Secretary Kerry as Obama’s Secretary Clinton replacement than of the leg work of Obama while politically stuck to the hemming and fraying of the Clintons’ exploits.
You have been un-styled too long. If you haven’t fashioned a comity about politics of the American confederate republic of the years since Governor and Mrs. Clinton walked your way in a rudely late 1992 strutting it may be because the Clintons can not be styled for comity. We do now have Mrs. Clinton now infamous for “ready from day one” and “ready at 3am” runs contrary to how she warranted or guaranteed her “Hillary for President” vanity.
Maybe if Mrs. Clinton were now having to out model our Barack Obama for high office she might have that his “BUZZ FEED” 2am moments might be worse than her infamy for her as unable and unprepared when fateful 3am challenges dressed her down.
What of our Barack Obama’s walk of his second term as of his new Secretary of State struggling to helm the heeling of so much keeled over that he has inherited from Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?
It may have been political fashion faux pas for President Obama to ask either of the Clinton “two-fer” to walk more straight and with more honesty. He may have tuned out when he needed most to have tuned in back when stumbling or fumbling however to ‘BUZZ FEED” satisfaction celebration/consummation. But still it is that the Clinton “two-fer” is strung out now quite noticeably as they have to strut deniability and work it daily to avoid having to carry the weight and mass of their personal baggage just of their eight years as our highest in our confederate republic.
These are the days that must be trying Secretary John Kerry’s personal delights in kiting times as he is leeward bowed by an unjust innocent cloaking of two Clintons. He may have stories to tell of these inherited times tacked hard and back with less than stellar lines of Hillary Clinton’s heeled helming of State. He may be stirred by ghosts of an albatros fairly due about the neck of at least then FLOTUS Clinton. It is hard to say that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton while First Lady was more humane than the lore’d ancient mariner.
It is a stone cold sober reality that President George W. Bush and his father were no Reagans. And, it is still sobering that so much of the spending by President George W. Bush was simply necessary because the Clinton “two-fer” had created a disaster waiting to bust out by having cut two trillion too quickly and so with it of nearly one trillion too much cut. President Bush 43 was stuck with an economy the Clintons had treated as a candle that they could burn from both ends at once. Though the Bush Tax Cuts were justified and justifiable by the Clinton “two-fer” trillion in surpluses the CLINTONS’ SURPLUSES were not well figured nor judiciously fit for those days.
It seems it is a moral paradigm some how there seems to be a calculation that Bush was wrong and for lying and yet so such that the Clinton “two-fer” were necessary to that which too many have simply let walk as lies talked and strutted. It is sheer madness that there is much nonsense of our Barack Obama as of posturing that is suggestive that Hillary was/is not worth looking at. The years 1993-2001 were not years that justified the Clintons’ ploys of/to PEACE DIVIDENDS.
It may help the confederate republic still stand true if we boost Secretary John Kerry so that he feels freer to walk an erudite rendition of the Clintons as per their eight years and so that we can picture Mrs. Clinton with all her personal baggage as her’s to carry herself and towards a truer new fashioning that she may have been near our worst Secretary of State in the history of the United States of America.
Though we now have been refreshed that our Barack Obama by two in the mornings had likely tuned out in days he would have been better to have tuned in it is still that so much of the Clintons is revealable as more half baked. It is arguable that President Bush left a set-up for some due times for global tough love to allow the USA to better position itself going forward for parity and equality/fairness. As #SecClinton such set-up was squandered and now with it arguable that we didn’t need to improve relationships so as “Hillary’s” legwork as strutted as if well styled and necessary. It seems that “Hillary” just gave too much away and was too easy as she gave and gave.
It is still nonsense that President Obama didn’t herald the prudence of either of the Bush Presidents however they were yet short of Reagan while pimping the Clintons as if of a innocence that can be stoked but not quite reasoned. The slop of the tides and currents that are keeping Secretary John Kerry from an ecstasy in swift board kiting is also much of how the Clintons did corrupt our banks so to keenly politicize an unjust popularity to burn our economy as if a candle lit from both ends so that they could pass the bucks by stoking irregular branding. It isn’t just that FLOTUS Clinton was an incendiary imperialistic First Lady of global trotting and posting as if it were safe then to come home and unharness our defenses and intelligence realm with vast budget cuts for them to get a new fix from PEACE DIVIDENDS in times when old wars were being rewalked.
We may not have the luxury of avoiding looking closely at Hillary Clinton and the Clintons’ fashionings since 1993. It is ridiculous that “Hillary” did crusade as a inciting imperialistic First Lady and that she would then come home and support her husband fully as they they proceeded with sheer nonsense now all to haunting of having cut our defenses and intelligence realms after having traveled the world picking fights.
Really it may be a good first step towards 2014 & 2016 to look grossly at the leg work of the Clinton “two-fer” as much of utter nonsense, however it now may net out.
This is a time for a new REASON, MORALITY AND POWER discussion. And, now it seems President Carter as sold it that President Bush was from day one due more honors for fairness than either of the Clinton “two-fer” after their eight years.
It is reasonable to join a dressing down of at least Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton as a Secretary of State that can go down as near our worst ever in the history of the confederate republic of the United States of America. It may have been that our Barack Obama by two in the mornings was fumbling in a faux ecstasy with munchies his “BUZZ FEED” yet it is the infamy of our Hillary Clinton that is a stoking to be forewarned about.
Better it would have been if our Barack Obama served up that the Clintons can go down as “HALF BAKED” and that we should have prudently flushed them for such long long ago; it is concerning that for some reason she of the Clinton “two-fer” cooked up a squandering of days of righteous indignation opportunism that she inherited as a rare styling for a new prudence from global international tough love diplomacy.
A time it is and what a times it is to round up now the usual subjects and predicates. Oddly it seems no one knows enough about the scope and range of leading news even today. I may be much of such a class - such a subject much ado about President Obama as a politician from Chicago.
I had hardly given it much though on Patriots Day, as I set out for a long ten plus mile walk about in one of my pairs of hardly used FootJoy golf shoes, that such day was as well the annual day of the Boston Marathon. My dad did run in it once back in the 80s and I have been at or near the finish line because — I haven’t been in Boston since before the Big Dig got started but once maybe near its ground breaking. It was Tax Day of April 15th and the day after a remarkable Masters finale — my dad just had his first ever knee replacement surgery recently - I wasn’t thinking of him running or not running.
These times seem times of old but how, and too political in some ways, however, maybe more fitting for Dirty Harry in a hunt for bombers in Clinton masks - maybe firstly Hillary Clinton masks and then secondly a paired Bill and Hillary covering. Too little seems known of the suspects as per this subject and a class of “criminal” yet quite properly predicated, however. As it was I must have been finishing my long walk about the time of the ________________ that happened on the Boston Marathon route.
“It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.”
Right! Interesting start. Such a start fits with existing and potential “political” plot twists at least as too few or none know enough about such a tragic event, and, as so soon after she as Boston’s John Kerry’s predecessor was grilled about Benghazi culpability hers and to such pressured “Jack” moment as if of a Dirty Harry A COUPLE BAD WOMEN sequel to A FEW GOOD MEN with her of her outburst like “WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE - NOW???”, and, to proffering a weakness on terror - a softness on crime investigating.
Are Bill and Hillary Clinton the (political) type to not go down alone? And Hillary Rodham Clinton, like President Obama can be said to be from Chicago too - she was born there and maybe now still more naturally a “Chicago pol” of a greater likelihood to end up in prison. I don’t know how shameful these subjects - this class of subjects of Mrs. Clinton and President Obama should now be as per gun control with them both “from” Chicago and not of having made Chicago as a gun-land danger zone not a 100 Days Priority. It is twisted that President Obama as from Chicago more directly and as a recent “Chicago pol” tried to stand up a political show about gun control any time after his first 100 Days without having spent such time dedicated fully to such, and, then long still before he too was to proffering free healthcare coverage.
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. It is not believable that a Republican in Boston even on Patriots Day could have not been suspicious in a Mitt Romney even about the Boston Marathon. It seems it might have had to have been a domestic about such cookery and caldrons of security and as if so in a Clinton mask, however, jolly as if off to a party. I do not know myself if there were only two “potlucks” served up in-suspiciously or if more of of the subject for better predication now - or if there were actually two more cooked up that didn’t get served properly.
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. She reportedly doesn’t like to cook and doesn’t like exercise and is suffering politically at least some from her successor from Boston John Kerry’s Secretarial acumen being a beating on and of her as likely not much more than mediocre while of the charge previously. It seems the Clintons are more like Will Farrell in THE CAMPAIGN than most in our recent history and not to lightly let a hit go un-responded to - it seems if the Clintons are now going down (finally) they are still of posturing to make sure that they won’t go down alone, right? If the Clintons won’t go down alone by natural instinct how will they try to scare off truth seekers from exposing them too much on however many subjects with whichever class of predicates that could be peacefully employed?
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. It is not that she is a witch or ever practiced witchcraft at least in Salem. It isn’t even much about Bill for having been judiciously sewn a SCARLET A upon their presidency. It may be more like another Tripoli as if another convenient crisis like a WAG THE DOG and yet generously of a sisterhood of HILLARY WOMEN as with her first strike ODYSSEY DAWN it timed to have been as if a tail wagging a dog anew but as if for Anthony Weiner’s predilections as a devotee of his mentor Bill Clinton. I don’t know how this tragedy of a “just something I cooked up” crockery that got past the caldron of Boston’s finest could have transpired but as if of a non-state sponsor at least like the Clintons’ CGI in range and scope — it seems they couldn’t have been set by conservatives on Patriots Day in Boston on any April the 15th Tax Day without being suspect from the outer rims/perimeters - it seems logical that the perp(s) must have like been covered as if in masks of either a jolly Bill Clinton or Hillary Rodham Clinton.
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. I can with such limited knowledge of such even only surmise that a Democrat or non-Republican could have pulled off walking through such crowds and security as if with a “POT-LUCK” mantra however carried as if of a “JUST SOMETHING I COOKED UP”. I don’t get this incident as for it being so late in the marathon unless somehow the “cooks” were not able to get through earlier with such a mantra seeming innocent enough. It still seems days later that this tragedy could be nonsense of thrill seekers and/or an exercising of too radicalized Democrat expression towards justifying higher taxation. If it has Mrs. Clinton’s finger prints all over it, or just a generous and defensive husband in Clintons’, I haven’t reasoned that out past such as these starts towards consideration of subjects and predicates.
I do fear the Clintons have to try to drive the news too much if they are to have any chance in surviving intra-party comparisons during the second term of President Obama and the seeming trumping Diplomacy of Bostonian Secretary John Kerry. They can now only be considered non-state actors about such despite how much Bill may still be on our payroll as a past President.
I did mean to use this title to start towards summer full of fun and light to amorous golf witticisms for sporting consumption. I didn’t figure a pressure cooker as the news broke as but a heavy crock pot slow cooker, even though I have seen such oddly somehow in use on interesting cooking channel shows. I was not aware that a “BOMB” could be tagged as if a POT-LUCK and carried into crowds anywhere, however, as if a jolly contribution as innocently “JUST SOMETHING I COOKED UP.”
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. She is the one that whined to Congress as if pleading that they tolerate her being light and/or soft on terror. Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton must have been despite her dislike of staying at home and cooking preeminently aware that bad actors as even HILLARY’S WOMEN could be carrying off “BOMBING” as if of sympathetic and timely political cooking.
I do wish my quiet April 15th activities of a long walk near a half marathon hadn’t become so disturbed by more tragic news seemingly somehow (yet explained) of inheritances from Hillary diplomacy and politics. It seems it could have been thrill seekers who just couldn’t resist trying to walk around with a “BOMB” as if a “POT-LUCK” - and that any conservative or Republican even if not in a Mitt Romney mask would have been naturally too suspect in such pressure caldron of Boston’s finest.
I too have not yet heard of a justification about these subjects and predications for a USUAL SUSPECTS that could explain how it is more likely of foreign elements or motives. It was both Tax Day and Patriots Day and seemingly only of outcomes to justify more taxes as per Democrats agendas - and even so if to keep taxes justified to a new high so that funding will still be there to like go after terrorists that Boston’s John Kerry’s Diplomacy now won’t be as soft as Chicago’s Hillary Rodham Clinton had been.
“It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.” And how really we shouldn’t treat this as just a teased perspective on another maybe “terror” related event that still has to be as well some of a “too political” consideration and judging - like RIGHT?
It is undeniable that Hillary Rodham Clinton was born to be a Chicago politician, such that she has become, however, and so that she among her peers, however less prone, is of a higher likelihood to be eventually imprisoned. It was documented that she was both raised as a young girl to hit her peers and to hit first - I will have to look up whom documented that she was raised to hit boys and to hit them first. It is now too much of a new record for the United States of America that she lacked in “diplomacy” while of such charge and to State based too “political” renderings as if a Secretary of War to a new way for the USA in a time of first strikes.
How have Obama’s days been of times more of a Hillary Doctrine to strike first and ask any questions later if someone disliked is still too alive to be conveniently handled? Is it only President Obama’s fault that he ushered the USA to a first strike standing with far less due process or is this what he dealt away before first being sworn in as a political solution to keep the Clintons from sabotaging his administration from like day one?
Poor Obama for he seems to have been played by the Clinton “two-fer” - really played.
It seems considerable that the Clintons did together what GOPers sought to. The Clintons in their own way seem to have effectively made Obama a one term executive and a second term Clinton stooge as some a “lame duck” executive.
Nothing POPS a “whose your daddy?” now better than a new DPRK CRISIS. It seems that President Obama is now stuck having once needed the superior political skills of President William Jefferson Clinton to bring USA back from a nuclear brink again. This is the President Obama who had to visit President Clinton in his Harlem office and as I recall bow before him and with a recording of him calling President Clinton “The President” who then needed the Clintons’ superior political skill to save his administration from the crisis brought on after Clintons’ VP Al Gore as a private citizen had his babe private spies caught in North Korea with inadequate training.
In the coming days it will be as if a trial has started and the Clintons are burying President Obama as if a weaker lawyer - if not already.
Where is Bill? Where is nearly self proclaimed “PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD” Bill Clinton? Where is Bill and how is he now coping without his spouse his overseer at State there more effectively as if just running another Clinton Travel Office? We now have Secretary John Kerry charged with overseeing the foreign policy meddling of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE - Where is Bill?
He called them rivals. How much is that turning out to have been an understatement? I called the Obama save of the first DPRK CRISIS of this administration the BAY OF BABES for it seemed meant to be sold as if as dramatic and as a sequel so to our old BAY OF PIGS. And, yet young and inexperienced President Barack Hussein Obama needed to call in President Clinton to save the day and bring us then back from the brink of WAR - yet just by being a grand escort service to collect and babysit Al Gore’s private spies who got caught maybe for having had the wrong training, or not enough training.
These days stories just don’t write themselves naturally about the Clintons to present them in a good light. I mean unless you like the idea that the may have until now succeeded in high-jacking USA executive power since they were thought to have been officially term limited from such, from such anymore for evermore. I don’t have time now to discuss the “HOW” about that they may have successfully high-jacked USA foreign policy at least since 2001 - that does now though some want to write itself unlike stories that would be readable as of a “good light” for the Clintons.
But what about Mrs. Clinton’s private Hell these days? If you are on the road or a run with her (political run not “exercised”) can you figure out who or what she is? It writes itself that she isn’t a good example for an independent feminism as she has put being under her husband as her primary ceiling her whole life since Yale Law School. She is the enabler of Bill Clinton most obviously — her primary character is that of having made herself and her career submissive to the ambitions and career of her husband and only stepped out as if maybe otherwise when our 22nd Amendment got in the way of his being able to “officially” stay her visibly dominant main man.
But what about President Obama’s public Hell these days? Did he miss that Mrs. Clinton was firstly loyal to her husband with her earliest of public decrees as his Secretary of State and top “rival”? I mean he had to humble himself before President Clinton in the Harlem office of the Clintons’ continuing global political activities and for public consumption with a record of a bowing some then with a calling of a former President as “The President” - such that I recall. I mean when former First Lady Clinton started as promised “rival” in his new Cabinet she set up a Hellish but clever insubordination on her new boss by using Dante. One of his first mile markers on this road to Hell with the Clintons must still be of record of her saying that as Obama’s Secretary of State she would be taking her direction from that whom Dante did and much more so than as if listening to her new most inexperienced upstart of a politician boss.
Is President Barack Hussein Obama now stuck again in a political dependence that again will have him have to call in President William Jefferson Clinton to restore world peace at least as per the DPRK new but familiar CRISIS? If it will make her man happy Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton now more as just a public private person as now a First Lady of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INIITIATIVES, as it seems, is likely to be fully submissive again in her man getting all the credit and pomp and circumstance.
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a dangerous and quite faux feminist figure. It is not a fair lesson or example to sell her other than as her story wants to write itself respective of all the conflicting details. It is not even fair that to be for Hillary For President you have to explain to young girls everywhere that to be like her is to put your husband first and for as long as your government will allow and then be to needing the full pomp and ceremony at least of a full Presidential Secret Service division in order to win any office registered for with your name more than his.
There is that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s story doesn’t write itself well but as a blob of FRIENDS OF BILL still somehow holding on and moving forward as a political mass.
We have maybe that we should hear of still political Clintons that they will at least take a lead from President Barack Hussein Obama and to a doubling down rivaling with a promise to give back 10% of the Federal Funds being spent annually at least for New York rents for former President Clinton. I do not know how we tolerate so much foreign policy meddling from a former President and especially for those years that his spouse was running the real State Department - but for us to be however to paying the rents for operations of such and with such allowed an grandstanding of an annual meeting schedule to rival the United Nations as also a politically mandatory meeting is quite ridiculous in an American traditional consideration.
What seems to write itself now is that the Clintons have been the bigger rivals to President Obama than the GOPers and that now we have it on our plates too that Mrs. Clinton’s culpability for Benghazi as Secretary of State should be forever joined with a tag for the DPRK CRISIS as necessarily some or much of other failures in her while charge with being Obama’s Top Diplomat.
What has happened to President Barack Hussein Obama - how has he come to looking so much as if just a stooge of the Clintons’ “two-fer” and under Dante still as she decreed she’ld be, however inflaming.
No really we have to now sweat detail about Mrs. Hillary Clinton - private citizen. Good stories about her or for her just don’t write themselves well or naturally - you can say - you could say - anymore.
This whole North Korea sit rep so soon after her Congressional “JACK” outburst is most concerning. As you may recall she was like “you can’t handle the truth” but as more a ‘I can’t handle the truth’ in her “what’s the difference now?” And, quite so especially if she really is all the rival she and President Clinton rode an independent world wide popularity for.
What to make of Hillary Clinton now as private citizen with DPRK maybe an “official” reaction to her time as Secretary of State and with too imperialistic a Diplomacy? Surely we now as stories aren’t writing themselves (well) about her have to look at real details about her reign as President Obama’s Secretary of State. It is too much a “rival” story that wants to be written now as if she of a pride that she and Bill were able to keep or make peace with North Korea and yet her “rivals” of President Obama, Vice President Biden and Secretary of State Kerry seem otherwise less capable.
On the heels of her “culpability” and questions quite to wondering if she saw an Ambassador as a martyr for her cause and expendable by her own thinking, about herself of a self importance greater, it seems the DPRK raises more issues that go to competence about her service while of duties as President Obama’s Secretary.
It is very confusing thinking about how we now should be covering Hillary Clinton as a private citizen still as a public figure and out as if of her USA should go gay decree too much as if speaking as a First Lady of the CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE while it still of offering of political cover as if President Clinton is an unelected President of the World.
It seems a good story now for Hillary Clinton just doen’t want to write itself. It is confusing how many ways it seems details matter that are being willingly overlooked. It is confusing especially now as well with DPRK nuclear posturing that we have to wonder rightly if it can be in part due to Secretary Clinton time of a too imperialistic Diplomacy now then moderated globally with her of her decree like that the USA should go gay. Aren’t we at wondering if she either was dictating a strong suggestion at least to all foreign nationals she had relations with that they now were to presume she was also talking to them and about them? And about DPRK people too?
What we have for starters as “details” about Hillary is that she seems not to have a single hobby other than a once mentioned and infrequent use of a said home kept elliptical stationary “exercise” machine. She isn’t a concert pianist or musician of any said capability or interest and nor is she a real golfer or even a bad golfer. She by her New Hampshire tears was revealing of real electoral pressures then put to her to answer for some details - I remember such as stirred by queries as to whether she was at all well rounded and with a hobby or two or any extracurricular personal interests. It seemed she had to cry for political cover as now she has to run for new political cover. It seems she really isn’t well rounded or even nearly as personally engaged in non work activities as we long have expected from male “candidates” at least.
As per her being out as public figure still and with a globally stirring decree that at least the USA should go gay we have as well that it seems as if she is lobbying for CGI and as if now a First Lady again to President Clinton as he rides high still too much as if an unelected and unchecked President of the World.
We have to remember that President Clinton got the high drama like of a new BAY OF PIGS stand off as it was awhile ago with an earlier DPRK CRISIS that seemed fit to be called a BAY OF BABES for Bill Clinton as called into a public relevance to be of a grand escort service to collect and babysit Al Gore’s private spies after they had been caught without enough training illegally in the DPRK. We have now that President Obama may have no choice but to call in Bill Clinton as a private citizen to negotiate a peace and as if it is needed for details that tell of more than Benghazi failures for Mrs. Clinton.
It seems Hillary Clinton was supposed to be an inevitable first female President much of a thought that stories would just write themselves well. It seems now that she has to run just to have cover and that it is hard to find a way around so many concerning “details” to cover competently.
It seems we have to consider that her recent decree as though acceptable as a rival while in a no woman’s land as a public private citizen still seems out of order so soon as of a meddling in foreign policy while a new successor still so new. As Hillary Clinton however now a lobbyist at all or too soon by our standards with efforts of or the mission of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE we have her as Hillary of any domestic comment as a decree as well meant to be a foreign dictate or STRONG SUGGESTION.
I don’t know how yet to write about the tough spots she has her former boss now in. I don’t yet know how to cover President Obama so soon after losing Mrs. Clinton as of whatever allegiance she as a rival so whence. I don’t yet know how to cover much of this but to try to think about all the details of Hillary’s story so far and as of her as if a typical wife of a cheating spouse who coped by busying herself with work - only with work. It seems we have to explain away that she doesn’t seem to have a single hobby of record and is yet celebrated as being a workaholic.
Right, at least we know, it seems, that she doesn’t hit the players or throw balls at them with a foul mouth. Right we know, it seems, that she isn’t a concert pianist or musician of any note and nor an athlete even in golf sport.
What we seem to have as a concerning detail is that she may need to run as if running for cover. And, that now like after 9/11 we may have our Democrats saying they just did what the people asked them to do, and, even while it seemed that they had asked to be elected as if smarter and smart enough to know not to do just what the people were asking them to do. After 9/11 the Democrats did meddle in foreign affairs while such the matters of State of a new administration of a different party - they even did shed any claims of blame upon them by casting it carelessly on Americans quite innocent in comparison.
I am confused - I don’t know how we as Americans have gotten so to a time like now with it so complicated as per a now public private citizen such specifically as Hillary Rodham Clinton. It seems she is running much just to run for cover and yet that seems the story that writes itself and yet oddly the story that isn’t being told.
Speaking first in a secular analytical erudition there is that without the vast bureaucracy of the Church President Ronald Reagan wouldn’t have been free to be so successful as himself as he was in winning the Cold War, at least.
With that said: We have secondly a problem with Secretary John Kerry and as a Catholic of a good and a bad as per Operation Iraqi Freedom. It can be said that he singularly with his single note Johnny come late to an opposition did with his anti-war revival efforts do more than any individual in the world to undermine the success that was thought to be possible from near day one. It is that Senator John Kerry, was, near day one, of us with President Bush, and those of the new coalition more then of Countries with volunteer defenses than of larger earlier world wide aligned defensively for the Persian Gulf War, to an dumbed down one beat new anti-war movement nearly from the moment we all became committed in OIF as “boots down”!
President William Jefferson Clinton may have gone to Georgetown for some Catholic education, or not. He did study abroad where a tradition for totalitarianism may have been more the standard and legacy. His trillion dollar surplus may have greatly undermined our intelligence and defenses as well as possible enforcement when also of his “walls of separation” efforts to separate FBI Intelligence branch from the FBI Enforcement branch. Without his trillion dollar surplus 9/11 terrorist likely would have had maybe a fifty percent lesser chance of success. There is the “morality” to have someone learned to discuss about President Clinton for having worked a trillion dollar surplus too soon and knowingly after a nearly too quick cutting by Republicans of a trillion to that thought impossible feat of balancing of our Federal Budget whence.
Senator John Kerry wasn’t alone as a Catholic - he had Representative from Pennsylvania John Murtha with him radicalizing Americans to a disloyalty to our Operation Iraqi Freedom as well nearly from day one - as from like the first day that we all were committed in Iraq with coalition boots on the ground. It isn’t that the Pope was fallible for his dictates to American Catholics to the ordering so religiously familial that as so blessed and together they did not have a responsibility to support Operation Iraqi Freedom. The Pope seem to speak only to American Catholics as of the worldly family of Catholicism as not of a moral calling to go to a Muslim country to help some Muslims get justice from other Muslims. As I recall the Pope didn’t address that Senator John Kerry and Representative John Murtha may have been of immoral American efforts while close minded to that American Catholics otherwise organized as Americans with historical precedence were so called by reconstruction and judicial precedence to as Americans to a prosecution for Saddam Hussein, assistance, at least.
I don’t know if it can be said to have been like Franciscan to have committed so many brave souls of foreign and domestic honors and colors to Operation Iraqi Freedom as of a “standing with” of “boots on the ground” war morality. It at least seems less of a new Cold War bunker mentality of however too much a distant comfort for less that fully just remote droning.
We may now be in all this economic mess for many reasons — many different reasons - for reasons of too many reasons existing at the same time for the same thing and while not yet understood as if so for just such. We have that it has likely cost us besides the costs from us not having been prepared for the 9/11 I & II by Democrat budgeting much by multiples of what it would have if we hadn’t let the Clintons chase rare SURPLUS political popularity so then as they mostly did for personal political gains. I have to doubt that President Clinton’s Georgetown domestic education taught him that such could be “moral” or that as well his foreign rearing more of a legacy of autocracy and totalitarianism would have strategically advised such even on secular political lines.
It is hard to consider the spin that Operation Iraqi Freedom has been to costing between 4-6 Trillion US dollars unless you add yourself all that should be subtracted and/or credited to costs of war from Clintons’ spending cuts and as well those from how Catholics Kerry and Murtha destabilized OIF from the first day we all were past the point of no return about such.
As a Catholic though Senator John Kerry and Representative John Murtha did have a maybe just calling that a learned few can explain to have taken up a protestation against “Bush’s War” as of having been too much started on lies. If we can find a few learned moralists we can move to a very late but public scrutiny and litigation of the seeming missing years 1993 - 2001, and, how but for it of a Johnny one beat dumbing down the Kerry ANTI-WAR REVIVAL had a Catholic morality thence because President Bush had taken the easy way to such liberation and late prosecution of Saddam Hussein. President Bush let some glee slip, it seems, as of a happiness that lying to get the agreeable votes had worked before Senator Kerry’s maybe Catholic morality (guilt?) had him rightly, but for it so much of a dumbing down, to standing up against OIF as a war commenced by lies by a President.
What we have now is a general populace aware that the Clintons’ “PEACE” for “PEACE DIVIDENDS” was a lark and a fraud. We have that Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha did Americans a service and great disservice with their most Catholic but to parochial interpretations of right and wrong as per Operation Iraqi Freedom, so it seems. They seem to have forgotten to remember Nuremberg and war reconstructions of Germany and Japan, and, Thomas Jefferson, at least.
There seems, if we can find some learned moralists, a morality near Franciscan in Bush’s boots on the ground “standing with”!
There seems, for all the lay and learned a simple and un-American like immorality to the maybe too random remote droning and kill lists of President Obama of his BEER SUMMIT history as one necessarily to earlier retractions and apologies for too publicly having shown himself to be of wants to be judge, jury and executioner of judgements.
It seems establish history that President Bush did take the agreeable to Congress shortcut to Operation Iraqi Freedom of such by convenient lies also arguably a bolstering pre-war to a readiness for what could be the worst case scenario all should be guarding themselves for. And yet we have that when you accept that Bush lied us into such war it is the Clintons that start to look worse. And yet though Bush “lied” the Clintons had to be less moral in an American way for they needed to lie with him for such shortcut to such late prosecution to be effectual. And yet there is the politics of this that if President Bush didn’t take the path of such a dramatic causal means basis preparatory for a possible worst case scenario the only other means to such end would have required many learned moralists to work the public establishment about the Clintons and their now too missing still years 1993 - 2001 as of executive gross negligence, at least.
With the plentiful “analysis” now about Operation Iraqi Freedom ten years later we still are missing the brassy mathematics to explain how if it does go down as of a 4-6 Trillion Dollar War much of that has to be figured as Bush of mulitiples of costs for “defense” and “intelligence” than if Clintons had not willy nilly cut an extra trillion for a popularity chasing surplus politics.
Of any and all costs of “Bush’s War” is that he had to refund so much cut by the Clintons as said “unnecessary” defense and intelligence spending as it was found too late to have been too much “necessary” security spending costs. It seems it fair to say of any cost analysis for OIF that some parts did cost 3-4 x as much because such had to be put back into our budgets after having been cut and after such cutting had left America after the Clintons too much like with its pants down.
And again, there is that Secretary John Kerry may more than any other in the world have caused such a loud Johnny one beat ruckus with his Anti-War Revival (however justified in a Catholic morality once Bush let glee slip that he was happy his lying had worked) so that in Iraq a real and palpable fear set in unexpectedly from like day one that the USA was going to just Cut&Run again and again abandon justice and freedom seeking Iraqi majorities like again to eight years of avoidance and inaction like of the Clintons’ eight years. It seems all costs about OIF now have to have a Kerry factor for all the variables effected by his stoking of a dumbed up or down new Cut&Run lobby with his Anti-War Revival, however justified in a Catholic morality.
Have you heard the one about how we now as per our much better and fuller understanding of how President Clinton though educated by Catholics of Georgetown was of more lies with “PEACE DIVIDENDS” while chasing popularity with lies so easy for such so of falsities that “war” wasn’t necessary while it actually was, at least as a liberation for proesecutions in our Nuremberg tradition and reconstruction precedence?
Have you heard the one about how, now with so many refreshed to our Constitution, and, with a more generally learned understanding of the real situation of the still too missing years 1993 - 2001 complexity, that citizens of the United States of America can push back from efforts about to all to work most as if more just State subjects, and rightly now as while of a best national security posture as of a renaissance in states’ rights and maybe as well a Holy Americas Doctrine some with an Axis of Catholics (reset)?
The Governors are my mascot. I was publicly educated through the twelfth grade to my graduation from New Haven’s Wilbur Cross High School. We were/are THE GOVERNORS.
What is a WEATHER TERRORIST?
What is too low a standard morally or ethically speaking for a former US Executive to be at without it “charming” while lower than we should expect? When is a former Executive of our United States exposed to personal suits for having been of conduct unbecoming a former officer of our Executive Branch?
What is a TERRORIST?
Whom are our referees for all this that is of an air of our protections secured for JUSTICE more than a willy nilly of our POLITICS? Where are the flags from our referees however where ever they are for LIES unbecoming a former officer of our Executive Branch?
Before I graduated as a GOVERNOR from New Haven’s Wilbur Cross Public High School I already knew of “B.O.” of Hawaii of interests in presidential oratory and as well already knew there was a Sarah Heath of a Bush, Conn & Heath title IX basketball passion in Alaska. I have cousins related to Connecticut’s second Governor after the Great Independence & Revolution & original Constituting. While a high schooler if I was to asking someone to pick up my down winter coat I had to ask them to like grab the “Jerry Brown” coat - for it is I had/have a Gerry brown down winter coat.
By 1971 I had picked a good career path for myself that was much in my mind in 1983 while near to HS graduation. My grandfather Arthur M. Menadier was to mandatory retirement as a top “Mad Man” of his day (show’s era) as the primary account chieftain for the consolidated work for Johnson & Johnson then at Young & Rubicam. In 1971 I asked him to take me under his wing and teach me to become like him - with an agreement of “but without your vice of smoking.”
I am John Peter Hogan as named “John” of the oldest son of my paternal grandfather John W. Hogan Sr. and oldest son of his oldest son - my dad named more for his father as John W. Hogan Jr. Esq. I wanted by 1983 to grow up to be like both of my grandfathers as a merger of their uniquenesses as responsible contributing honorable citizens.
Today is also my dad’s 74th birthday. The “B.O.” of Hawaii I have known since the late seventies of when I was to the middle school school wide East Rock Community School New Haven Public School’s Oratory Contest with President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s DAY OF INFAMY Declaration of War Speech did become known only more recently for having my same birthday of August 4 though I have all along known him to be four years ahead of me.
I did grow up wanting or needing to be ambitious at least because of my family and our neighborhood and its neighbors and legacy. While growing up Richard Hegel was of hosting of Holiday Parties we were invited to and while he was New Haven’s official Historian. It was my old classmate Steve who started dating another old friend who lived across the street from another of BO a “Bo” — Steve Brennen is still a professional artist and now as well a Hamden Fireman, last I knew. Steve Brennen is the old seventh grade pal whom is responsible for he of “Are you ready for the Oratory Contest? and Are you ready as well to compete in any school wide competition with it also in Hawaii?” queriousness with a like Operator for Hawaii broadcast to all whom might want to compete in presidential oratory against me.
I get it is funny that I have known so many characters for so long and while of interests to a career like both of my grandfathers somehow to a touch as an international marketer of the highest ordering. I am not sure though it is funny that if you change two “e”s to two “a”s you get “Hagel” from “Hegel” and “Brennan” from “Brennen.”
It is still relevant that I have know Bill and Hillary since 1971 or 1972 and for them of days as students not yet engaged to each other and both to walking my neighborhood with wondering and querying about whether they both might be able to become President someday. They asked me about such and effectively, to make a long story short and while this is more about Governors today, I like said “NO - if you marry each other be careful who goes first in attempt as the 22nd Amendment should keep you if married to each other from both becoming elected.” I still don’t know how as a near 1st Grader I was to such a comment - but do get that I was wised up enough to realize I should never let myself forget two people who would ask such a question of anyone.
Is Al Gore a WEATHER TERRORIST? Was Hillary Clinton with HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT, from near day one, also effectively acting as if a WEATHER TERRORIST?
As our Diplomacy standing rule is like - THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PERMANENT ENEMIES OR PERMANENT FRIENDS - JUST PERMANENT INTERESTS - Secretary Kerry with “we have now permanent enemies” is maybe more of the “rule” than a practicable reality.
The Clintons were wrong not to proceed against Saddam Hussein in their first term to a full compliance with all United Nations sanctions. We have that President Bush was wise not to proceed immediately into Baghdad with THE PERSIAN GULF WAR as until the United States of America started saving its own cities like New York City and its Time Square and as well Las Vegas Saddam Hussein had a way to win. Saddam Hussein had enough cards up his sleeve to turn the world to his side if we had proceeded immediately at him and Baghdad and with sympathetic marketing to ask peoples of his region and the broader world about whether he wasn’t able to better manage Baghdad than Americans were able to manage their own big cities.
Within the first term of the Clintons we were ready to stand up our cities as at least as well run as his and able to defeat his PR advantage and then move at him for a WWII like post world war RECONSTRUCTION with trials like Nuremberg’s but then for him. In hindsight we can see many troublesome “official” acts by the Clintons different from this and contributive to so many problems that we have had since that were otherwise able to have been checked and addressed better sooner.
John Kerry, Secretary of State, was smart to remark about how well Japan and Germany are after we defeated their earlier constitutednesses and then worked post world war RECONSTRUCTIONS about. It is remarkable though that his location was a slap at the Clintons of them more like William Blygh or Bov. George Clinton as well as his mention of RECONSTRUCTION good will of at least the Japanese and Germans as proven to not be “permanent enemies.” Such begets the late query as to how or why the Clintons didn’t prosecute Saddam Hussein for war crimes in a timely manor nor proceed ASAP to a POST WWWIII RECONSTRUCTION for Iraq once we had started our COMMUNITY POLICING & LIVEABLE CITIES INITIATIVES.
We have our Governors may now want and get their own drones. We have that President Obama’s foreign policies with Secretary Clinton are suspect and with Mrs. Clinton of acceptance of a “culpability” for her intelligence and leadership failures as per the BENGHAZI FOUR and our 9/11 II.
If they cannot explain whom is a terrorist as per BENGHAZI acts of war on like a Holy Day for Al Qaeda how can they or we be sure they know a “terrorist” when tasking a “kill” off their “Kill List” by drone(s)?
If we cannot be clear yet about what a “TERRORIST” is or isn’t still - is it because a defiinition of such will tag both Al Gore and former candidate for President Hillary Clinton of then HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT while Senator Clinton as well as ‘TERRORIST” - but more as WEATHER TERRORISTS?
What is a TERRORIST?
What is a WEATHER TERRORIST?
What is “MATERIAL SUPPORT OF TERRORISTS” and how isn’t Bill Clinton’s CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE while so modeled for “support” like Al Qaeda’s purported “banking system” maybe incidentally or accidentally to casual or real “material support of terrorists”?
Who are our referees? Where are our referees? Where are the flags for conduct unbecoming a former Executive Branch Officer of The United States of America? Where are the penalty flags for all the LIES?
Did I tell you already that today is also my dad’s birthday?
Brennen is a friend - he married the Geller friend once a co-tri Governors swim-team captain with myself and another swimmer David. This female Geller and other swimmer David were the basis for my musing FRIENDS show into existence as bulwark for friends and a guards against foes. Bo was and is likely still big into pick-up urban B-ball games though a Professor of Marketing now - as I recall.
Yes we needed to start fixing New York City, Time Square and some Las Vegas before we proceeded to a prosecution of Saddam Hussein and an attempt to run his Baghdad. Yes we could have and should have moved to a full enforcement of all United Nations sanctions on Iraq within the Administration of the Clintons’ first term and to a RECONSTRUCTION like that for Japan and Germany after the earlier last world war.
Secretary Kerry as opened up a can of political worms now with such as in his inaugural speech and with it from the University of Virginia.
What is “material support of terrorists”?
What is a WEATHER TERRORIST?
What is a TERRORIST?
How much has it cost us since the Clintons acted official with an infidelity to our own Justice standards abroad for their eight years as regards Iraq and Saddam Hussein? How can it be right to have these years be to helping Afghani women and girls and not right for President Bush to have tried to help Iraqi women and girls? How wrong was it for the Clintons’s official “State” speak to have been religiously bases with a bias against Shia peoples and especially the Shia majority of Iraq oppressed and suppressed by Saddam Hussein and as official speech of “Iraqi Shia are not capable of governing themselves”?
Are we ready for a book BILL AND HILLARY - TERRORISTS OR PEACEMAKERS?
Their foreign policy now also in hindsight is horrendous for a religious basis with sectarian bias contrary to our own established Justice and rights. It is scary that we let them sell PEACE and PEACE DIVIDENDS while such morally questionable with Middle East region realities quite different.
It seems we have that Bill Clinton was at least an AMERICAN INFIDEL to our own Justice standards - and that too many are at risk of a guilt by association now as he thinks we and others have permanently forgotten.
Call me J.P. Hogan!
I did not just give my first inaugural address as a new Secretary of State today. I do not think that I am an Imperialist.
We can all be empirical forwards and backwards now comparatively on some whales of issues paddled by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton versus those now postured for a new rowing by John Kerry - Secretary of State.
We have an obligation as Americans and/or global citizens to figure out what are the important questions that need to be asked if we are to try to get the answers that are not just random talking points.
If you are not yet away of how a new journey has already started today and how from the inland historical helm of considerations of and by Thomas Jefferson - you can accept as a known fact that John Kerry gave his first speech as President Barack H. Obama’s new Secretary of State from the University of Virginia today.
He as an inheritor of the questionable years of his predecessor’s over-reaching is now of an inaugural addressing of a Jeffersonian quality not measured just by a sextant’s metrics — President Obama’s new Secretary of State (#SecKerry) broached issues quite modern and old and foggy still while Obama’s.
I do not take him to be a maddening Captain William Blygh of a Bounty helmsmanship nor a mad whale hunter for a great white ways. Sec Clinton could have been as by William Jefferson Clinton otherwise still much the same but how as Mrs. Hillary Rodham Blythe III - as William Blythe III is President Clinton’s original Christian name. The HMS Bounty however fated to a mutiny as it was did set sail historically so before the embers of our Tea Party styled independence started struggle burned out to an effected Independence of once mere colonies.
I like Thomas Jefferson for many reasons - I as J.P. Hogan one not an imperialist to the best of his knowledge. He was inventive besides being an erudite and practical scribe of writs that could endure in a Posterity. He did as I recall invent a coat hanger and as well a way for French double doors to simultaneously open with a push on just one of them for his Monticello manse. Thomas Jefferson as well that I remember is credited for the architectural credit about having brought sky lights to America.
But did Secretary of State John Kerry with his inaugural address bury Caesar or praise him with “Hillary” a “Caesar” put to fade away? What are the whales of the issues in his inheritance from her that will most unsettle his own crews, and, while however once hers?
I am on board some with #SecKerry as I couldn’t be with President Obama’s 1st Secretary of State for she arguably too imperialist at least while of her crusading days as FLOTUS Clinton of her global dictates and trespassing on women’s rights. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as she could have been Senator Hillary Rodham Blythe III otherwise, maybe, did bring too much baggage with her to our ship of State.
Call me maybe “the narrator”?
There is a whale of an elephant still about the china shop of Diplomacy of State as long as the Clintons’ Global Initiative is still operational as if a shadow government or at least a shadow Department of State. I am not sure if Mrs. Clinton is yet allowed to start lobbying for their CGI for at least a year or if she will immediately put on airs as if the First Lady of the Clintons’ Global Initiative.
I may not be ready to narrate on all of this empirically enough yet - call be a “blogger” for now, maybe?
Did you hear about #SecClintons “JOBS DIPLOMACY” yet? Mustn’t #SecKerry disband this merry mutinous over-reaching immediately if his helmsmanship didn’t first commence effectively already so?
John Kerry, Secretary of State, the newly “foggy” as of Tea Party common sense sympathies old and now new, has inherited a bunch of new blubber energy snags and turbulence. I as a “narrator” or just a “blogger” appreciate his freshness as believable, unlike his predecessor, with his ordering and posits of his State of he as no longer “political.” Legends will be made on all the ways that the Clintons fogged up our State and Diplomacy spousally in ways that “not in politics” effectively sounded no more believable that “it depends what the definition of is is.”
I cannot myself abide that there was not a running conflict of interest with Mrs. Clinton as Secretary of State while her Husband as if “President of the World” and reigning still “executively” with their CGI.
Today’s inaugural address from the University of Virginia by John Kerry, Secretary of State wafts over those already exposed as a breath of fresh air yet not explainable as part of a continuous philosophy of governance by President Barack H. Obama. There is a whale of an elephant in the china shop of our State — Has President Obama been liberated by John Kerry and from a tyranny of and by the Clintons and such that now he is free to be his better self?
Did the Clintons have President Barack H. Obama essentially chained to them and their global plots set too much in motion too imperialistically too long ago?
How can President Obama’s NEW #State Top Diplomat now seem so different and already so much more intelligent?
It is now that you can nearly call President Obama’s new Top Diplomat a Tea Partier or a great Jeffersonian sympathizer, and, while the Clintons together seems set adrift to fade away as too autocratic and of too great over-reaching extra-Constitutional plotting and scheming as if they were HMS keeled and “majesties” in their own minds. So much of the era of William Blygh and his HMS Bounty with sympathies more akin to George Clinton then about as in opposition to the ideas of America as the Governor of New York.
But of the whale of the elephant as if in a china shop about our foreign services left over of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clintons bureaucratic and imperialistic over-reaching such as her JOBS DIPLOMACY empirically heels:
Was #SecClinton mutinous for all of her four years as President Barack H. Obama’s Top Diplomat? Was her JOBS DIPLOMACY bad economics and not of the spirit of our Constitution - at least as figured by Thomas Jefferson?
You can call me stirred and shaken by her and her JOBS DIPLOMACY and yet consider me less informed than I do desire as we all seem too much of random talking points while back room plots were being hatched and maybe after a special spousal setting keeled by and of the “two-fer” of Clintons as whence thence our reigning First Couple.
I do answer to “J. P. Hogan” and am most easily Googleable so. But now what of the over-reaching of “Hillary’s” JOBS DIPLOMACY of it empirically it seems of an attempt to usurp legacy global powers of two other cabinet level departments?
Secretary Kerry can you assure me that you will not continue the imperialistic scheming to bring Commerce and Treasury legacy global yet separated Powers under the “Diplomatic” seat of duty and obedience as however you now find it with as the inheritor of dangerous over-reaching ambitions long of the Clintons’ politics to a new dawn of Powers for them if they could just effect a “Post-Constitutional Era” acceptance as a “new necessary” way?
I will have to bed down tonight believing that John Kerry has liberated President Obama from the shackles of the Clintons politics and decades of plotting as a “two-fer” never not “Political.” I know not what else there is to believe tonight after Secretary John Kerry spoke intelligently and eruditely as if of Tea Party sympathies old and new.
As a blogger I gander empirically a sense about much of this as if a sea change about President Obama.
I am more an observer seeing them prepare anew to cast off to foreign ports of call Diplomatically, however. But as per “Hillary’s” JOBS DIPLOMACY danger lurks deep beneath our keel of State — while it of a too imperialistic heeling and not yet already or soon righted or arrested.
We know “Hillary” wanted the BIG job in the BIG house — and that it figures it would be as logical to close down our Department of Education as to let a Secretary of State be about usurping however enumerated Powers of Commerce and Treasury while of wants hungover to the REAL power of the BIG house.
He is now at the helm of State - he is now the captain of our Diplomacy - he is John Kerry, Secretary of State.
A new day has dawned! - but? - and, yet: Does President Barack H. Obama have a philosophy of governance?
The days are numbered for writer critics of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton to pound #Hillary about Hillary Clinton as a clearly “PUBLIC FIGURE”.
The presumptive Democrat Party 2016 nominee for the office seeking of the United States of America Executive Branch Presidential see is not the still now Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. We have that she has been of a “TEAM OF RIVALS” of the first of the Obama’s “we…” consideration as likely of two of his “we…” Secretary’s to be considered towards 2016.
The presumptive Democrat Party 2016 nominee for their leadership to capture the American Presidency must be considered firstly to be Senator John Kerry if confirmed nominee to duty as another Obama rival as a Cabinet Officer bound of State Diplomatic duties. He should have the mantle of “Obama’s rival” at least as much as aspirant Mrs. Clinton of State husbandry, however, has or is presumed to be to a having towards 2016.
But for now it will be that “Hillary” is for a while no longer a public figure to kick around with fair criticisms and much due doubt — it is soon more that she will have been put out to pasture to idyllic retreating. Of course if she is really a “rival” we should expect official statements contrary and critical of now re-seated President Barack H. Obama.
Secretary of State John Kerry for President in 2016, though as “white” as a “Hillary” again for President, is what should be presumed firstly with bias based on sex, race, or age. He has the money - he’s run before - he likely has to be at least as much a rival to President Obama as still charged and sworn Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton and as well the re-sworn Vice President Joseph Biden.
Citizens United as been quite rendered a good and necessary ruling in light of the ease with which President Barack Hussein Obama raised and spent that sum in excess of a billion campaign dollars.
More concerning is any or all “foreign” “influence” now in our politics - and all global activities of both of Obama rivals - both “Bill” and “Hillary.” Secretary of State John Kerry as his Democrat Party Nominee in 2016 makes more democratic sense even though he can likely fund a billion dollar campaign with his own wealth.
Are the days now numbered as if “Hillary” soon no longer a “public political figure” to criticize as not due a privacy as if a lamb quietly set out to pasture in idyllic retreat? Are these the last days to fairly speak of due criticisms of Obama’s first Secretary of State?
“Kerry For President 2016″ is at least a halo Senator John Kerry deserves if also to be seen as an independent thinking Cabinet Officer also a wanted “rival” sworn to obedience to President Barack Hussein Obama, but how fronted as a challenger.
A due long continuous battle to unearth the cover-up air about the Obama’s State avoidance and inaction of Benghazi failures of his first “we…” now butter’d up for departure but not legal escape is afoot such that she is to remain suspect as a person of interest yet still much in the public domain and eyes.
Writers for politics and justice though, unless she steps out like now soon with a how and a why for consumption of “rivals” with specifics hers much to how and why she would have been a better President these past four years, are to consider civility and decorum and political politeness as if she is due an idyllic retreat as if placidly out to pasture as just a lamb.
It would behoove her to quietly retreat as much as possible now. Obama’s new “rival” Diplomat is hardly more “white” than she, and, of a more lore’d and well beaten step by step path and resume building towards a Presidency for himself.
It should much behoove both President Clinton and soon X-Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton to both quietly now try to just fade away from foreign and domestic entanglements at least now for high profile and long about pressures to justice and understanding of at least the first four years of “Foreign Policy” of the Administration of Barack H. Obama.
These days are numbered for writers to write as strongly as a “public figure” deserves about our former First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton unless besides a continued push by our honorable Congress as per a lingering haze of “cover-up” of fogs about Benghazi we soon see “Hillary” of official steps to directly set her self apart as having been an independent thinking “rival” these four years and of the aforementioned “how” at least speaking to what she would have done differently and better these past four years.
I will be freer without her as Secretary of State or otherwise a sworn officer of the United States of America to reach to much deeper and globally broader markets with my already written thousands of pages long of years yet maybe not of having been critical enough of Presidential aspirant Hillary Rodham Clinton. I will though myself until further developments be to considering her less now for new pieces as of “new” material.
I do look forward to finding my real audience for my book idea to publish past columns and commentary about “Hillary” and our 22nd Amendment towards a Guinness Book record for “most number of pieces written as to why Hillary Rodham Clinton should not become President.” And, I look forward to being more entertaining of comity and comedy as a political pundit and as well as a poet and political poet.
It seems reasonable to consider that most of my columns are as long here as a New York Times Op-Ed Columnist’s there - but yet three times wider and so nearly 3x the word count there. I have not yet compared word counts between my average length column and such as an industry standard. I am glad many of my pieces did not have to be reduced to such standards as theirs.
“Secretary of State John Kerry for President” has a ring of Boston Brahmin lore’d good will and wealth for much musing to considerations that he with his Yale pedigree could be a revolutionary American elder in four years of promises to a long necessary cleaning up of his own party. He will have to likely have to also run as a “rival” of President Barack H. Obama’s to assert that he as well at least as “Hillary” and “Joe” was not just a bureaucratic tool incapable of independent thinking.
The Clintons have been public figures long enough such that an idyllic retreat as if out to pasture not a lot fair or due either President William Jefferson Clinton nor soon X-Secretary of State Mrs. Hillary Clinton.
We have to write about and publicly long consider that Republicans couldn’t run clean enough campaigns in 2008 & 2012 because too many still of our Congress were about that had been too weak to avoid the corruptive collusion to political corruption worked politically by the machinations most political and new-tech of and by the Administration of the Clintons whence.
The Clintons with their Clintons’ global initiatives are due a near “monopoly” consideration to a new era of Congressional “trust busting” - can’t you say, yourself? We have that we have no idea how vast the left wing global conspiracy is now already towards further undermining of our Constitution and at least our Constitutional protections set to limit and check all foreign “contributions” or “gifts” like by foreigner or agents of foreign countries.
As Walt Whitman sung of us as of body electricities while electricity hardly but a novelty otherwise we have that the Clintons have already too long been to involved and meddling as term limited by our 22 Amendment by at least the prudent example set by “George” and “Martha” - however pre-Lincoln re-uniting.
As per Clintons vs. Kerry towards 2016 with “whiteness” so muted it seems we must be to measuring the “foreign” influence in at least President Clintons affecting as of a electricity (bought and built) of foreign gifts towards political electoral homeland effectings as bankable swingable “CHARISMA.”
And, yes the Republicans still have troubles for having been compromised and corruptive by the Administration of the Clintons at least while during the Clintons’ second term. We have yet to have a young enough Republican challenge to Democrat Party national ticket since President George W. Bush whom can stand up with enough inside the beltway Republicans without the Clinton having them not able to be free enough to speak against them without incriminating themselves.
The Clintons have to be the most long shot most “underdog” ticket to now measure towards 2016 hopes - right?
This is not about Sarah Palin!
Senator John McCain vis a vis so with the introduction of Senator John Kerry as President Barack H. Obama’s Secretary of State nominee begets that this is instead cleanly about a wrap of a first term for President John McCain if he had been elected - and figured since he looks stronger not weaker while so old four years later.
There was another way.
As responsible global citizens we have a responsibility to consider now, now that we see McCain was fit, and enduring, how had if he been elected in 2008, to what, and where otherwise, we could or would be now.
The tao of Barack Hussein Obama as questioned leader of his own party though publicly set officially as our President has been of the party group think of an elite few that radical change had to happen and very quickly - had to happen like in only two years.
There was another way - not as tortured - as tortured as Senator John McCain’s own proud and patriotic past of sacrifice in the service of truth.
There was another way.
President Obama as our new executive did attempt to evangelize all global citizens while hoping to captivate Americans with his near daily one hour interruptions of regularly scheduled broadcasts. There is that had he had a state run media for all of America contrary officially to our preserved rightly by our First Amendment he would have had a better chance at success.
President John McCain, if so, was of a way for Americans to zen and organize as proud and American Free.
This is not about President George W. Bush nor specifically of his Administration.
We do have that because Democrat elite were able to railroad our new President Barack H. Obama as if he were not the head of his own party and so to the GREEN AGENDA etcetera we are now as global citizens best postured if fully to a consideration that effectively the Administration of George Bush must have been “GREEN” itself much somehow. It is inescapable that all the rushed idealistic change of just the first two years of the Democrats back in power in DC couldn’t have been mechanically or physically possible if President Bush hadn’t been to institutional support of so much suddenly “new technology.”
There was another way.
Senator McCain had been selling a renaissance in state’s rights and a economic way forward that could have turned our economy around in just two years. We shouldn’t take President Bill Clinton’s word that such was not possible — there is that a quick and “GREEN” economic recovery was possible with the direction a President McCain was towards as an new “executive” directing. The caveat though as per such is that a faster recovery would have needed an official reforming of our banks more publicly otherwise than that which happened and with a real tagging of our banking problems having actually much having been of and by Clintons’ and their “CLINTONOMICS.”
By the heavy hand of elite Democrats as they seemingly were to railroading new and hopeful President Barack Hussein Obama we got a rush to political and partisan economics that could only lead to a slow recovery like our “JOBLESS RECOVERY.”
These hands called us to their tao as if President’s change all along - like. Yet we ignore still at our expense and at pains to the global economy a perspective ignorant for all global citizens if so without recollection that such was marched as our marching orders even though in Spain such was earlier proven to have cost two jobs for every new one that it could produce.
I don’t know why we went the way of Spain and so blindly quickly - so politically and in a polarizing partisan forced march.
A once tortured President John McCain was reared years as a U.S. military brat, arguably. Our military was our new frontier for most of our best integration as a nation as a melting pot. A President John McCain could only have been at least as much a President of all our people as President Barack Hussein Obama has been, it seems. Senator McCain was reared institutionally to be none other than such, it seems.
There were and are other and better ways to have changed our economy around real and imagined concerns about GLOBAL WARMING. Senator John McCain as a candidate for President was standing receptive and leaning it seems as if responsibly to a more open minded approach as well on the possible uses of so much investment in GREEN technology as that which must have been long of the Administration of President George W. Bush and the Congresses convened those years.
There was another way.
It can be said that our economies haven’t been able to recover yet because the Democrats of the United States of America rushed too quickly ahead with too much unfigured and yet properly considered change.
As I tweeted recently:
>”What of 150,000 troops? For #Bush enough to liberate an oldest of sovereign nations & for #OBAMA enough to chase 50 Al Qaeda.”
>“Time rprtd a 9% drop in USA carbon emissions since 2007 & others a USA warming as gas levels dropped. What up w/ that? #OBAMA #CONGRESS #USA“
There was another way.
More condemning of Secretary of State Mrs. Hillary Clinton than her outburst like “JACK” of A FEW GOOD MEN with her’s nearer to an “I cannot handle the truth!” is that which you can find by visiting citizenrosebud.com and with use of search pane to gathering from keyword prompting with “9/11 II”. See: http://bit.ly/Tyzzlk (& scroll past this column also in results for 9/11 II) It seems it still makes more sense and is more condemning of her that Al Qaeda attacked on another 9/11 for reasons similar to the first 9/11 - Right?
As I posted on Facebook the other day:
>“Tease: There would have been a “new nationalism” w/ Prez McCain - with THNX to troops rotated home reasonably & to nation’s thnx with: This is why OIF right and necessary uniting! late but not too late, and with McCain Admin of promises to keep to have at home as well stirred the spirit of federalism with what seemed his paths then to a renaissance in state’s rights. We wouldn’t have needed Obama’s Liberal ideas of New Nationalism as then we were a better informed general populace capable finally of learning of real complexities that necessitated OIF at least so that the United States of America didn’t get trapped on the wrong side of all this change happening across the general Middle East.“
>”Prez McCain would have been a healthcare for all President too - but with Americans and returned troops encouraged to show proudly what it means to be American Free and of states as incubators to better government of and by the People. See we already had Romneycare in Massachusetts, and, Utah is much of a Mormon tything and we were just missing other states stepping up competitively with inventive new healthcare coverage for all models of their own.”
There was another way.
This Saturday January 26, 2013 in the wee hours near 3am I posted this on #davos2013 venue for the World Economic Forum on a couple of their Facebook updates:
>”That is a tough one to answer as the US internal politics still in disarray with people not considering or having realized that WMD argument by President Bush needed Senator Hillary Clinton’s vote as affirmation that the intelligence of the Administration of the Clintons did not contradict his basis for Operation Iraqi Freedom. Senator Clinton’s vote for Operation Iraqi Freedom is more condemning of her and her husband than President Bush if WMD basis was a lie. She voted as reported without reading any newer intelligence reports than she would have been at least intimately privy to via Clintons’ administration. Cooperation is a tricky issue now since USA is waking up to it not possible that “it was all Bush’s fault” and to that it likely was more than half the fault of the Clintons. There was never an argument that Saddam got WMD in only the few months since the Clintons left office so Senator Clinton’s vote was affirmation that the Clintons agreed with the Bush intelligence about WMD. @jphoganorg . of http://jphogan.org etc…”
There was another way — I was ready to work with a President John McCain along all of these lines whence.
Earlier I shared probably via Facebook the historical perspective that the housing crisis and down economy started with Hillary and Al spiking the price of gas with their global campaigns. Clintons and CLINTONOMICS had encouraged Americans to spend more than every penny they had and recklessly such that there was no room for higher fuel prices in their fixed incomes when the price of gas did spike and keep spiking due to so much subjectivity and politics slammed into our markets with Hillary’s and Al’s global campaigning. When the price of gas went up the hyper consumerism at the core of CLINTONOMICS had to stop and while the fuel prices had yet to cause so much more to cost so much more due to higher energy and transportation costs then added to once otherwise budgeted basics.
When you figure finally how it all started it becomes rational to consider that Bush could basically do nothing once it started as related to the spike in gas prices caused by the politics and subjectivity of Hillary and Al and their global campaigning against carbon based fuels. The last thing Republicans were to wanting then before an election in 2008 were higher gas prices as then they could get re-elected simply due to economics. And, as long as the price of gas was part of the ideology for rushed change by the Democrats there was no way really to turn back the prices in time to prevent the housing collapsing first around those that had bought into spending more than every penny as urged by CLINTONOMICS then on fixed incomes.
There is as well, to help McCain’s case and incidentally President Bush and his legacy, that Speaker Nancy Pelosi was wrongly a devotee of the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of that extra trillion cut that never should have been touched for cuts. Speaker Pelosi as a devotee was also a wall up against President Bush having political room to attempt to prevent the housing collapse being as great with some quick spending — he was not allowed by her to call for spending like on anything the Clintons had said could be cut for their SURPLUSES.
{IT IS NOW SUNDAY - I WILL LEAVE THE REST TO BE SAID BY OTHERS - EVEN SENATOR McCAIN.}
*[I will stop now and consider style and content and possible edits though space and word count not here limited to me. This is supposed to be a column ready for Sunday - the first Sunday of the Second Term of President Obama yet maybe as if it were otherwise to being now a second term for still strong still Senator John McCain.]
I personally am not versed enough in particularities in scholarly discussions of “FREE WILL” as per a polarizing of global relations between different people of varied histories and levels of living under tyranny. Appearances by Secretary Clinton do stir wonderment as to what meats may go into her sausage making - and to how kosher or FDA certifiable as if a policy approval of and by the people for that which is less read about such as her of global work to divide the world along polarized partisan political lines firstly much to assimilations to “Clintonites.” This is a mess we are witnessing.
I do not know enough about Senator John Kerry to know of his views to an importance of “FREE WILL” and nor how he may be different and maybe better at State leadership than Hillary Rodham Clinton specifically because of his religiousness as Roman Catholic. As Secretary of State if his kited appointment sails through he will inherit a duty global of much seized opportunities by the Clintons together to establish loyalties to Clintons and the Clintons Global Initiative and intimately also shared political operations of just their Foundation. I am not even sure, in light of the recent Congressional hearings on Clinton failures, that he as a new Secretary of State will have half the global “FREE WILL” our office of State Diplomacy harbored prior to the over-reaching post office international political meddling of just President Bill Clinton.
Seldom is discussed, so that I am yet aware, how we are of these years of conflicts and a new “Longest War” much as a related due discourse to consider that our Bush Administration and its standardized FREEDOM AGENDA was at least of a visible method of building with foreign peoples from the ground up. The years of Clintons’ “diplomacy” strike more as a call to hold on high and herald politicians as lawyers as ready compromisers - not steady and considered builders. We could use more public discussion as oddly as it may sound to a chit chat where ever about how the chase of “POPULARITY” as the end all for a Clinton be all of the Obama 1st term was actually a “WRONG” way to proceed “DIPLOMATICALLY” after the hard work and years of the Bush Administration nurturing of freedom with bottom up “standing with” boots on the ground developmental compassionate progressive conservativism.
The Compassionate Conservative George W. Bush as President was quite progressive internationally. But now as per the rap on Hillary Clinton of a SLAUGHTERHOUSE STATE it is time we peel back some truths and look at lies for what they were. Against the better judgement of Secretary Clinton however prejudiced still from her days “international” as FLOTUS Clinton we have to contrast how we are now of permanent truths contrary enough to ask about said “lying into war” by President George W. Bush. Like: So if President Bush lied us into OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM and now it looks like such was a necessary but late due prosecution of Saddam Hussein - why did he think it necessary to “lie” us into a proven to have been necessary execution of American sense of fairness? What were the politics he had to fight and/or the ignorance in our Washington or general Peopleness that he for some reason needed to proceed with lies duly because of in order to be so progressive and to doing what has it seems been proven to have been necessary?
Besides that it can be put upon Senator John Kerry much for his/a disloyalty to our President whence then after our President had committed us all albeit with lying us into OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM for having started his very disruptive ANTI-WAR REVIVAL with questions of voracity marched at President Bush only after the USA and coalition states had become actually committed into OIF with boots on the ground — we have that so from such it may be ANTI-WAR ACTIVIST KERRY that so undermined confidence at home and abroad that he on his shoulders most should carry our weight of OIF taking so much longer and costing so much more. He seems to have it as his culpability that he so spread fear across Iraq that liberated people we expected ready cooperation from with their liberation tucked away rightly with stirred fears by Kerry’s ANTI-WAR proffering that they best lay low as long as it looked like he, Senator John Kerry, would succeed at a quick CUTTING AND RUNNING again by the seeming there to see it through of a global coalition.
A most strategically puzzling of today’s partisan softball cordial queriousness is that line of support taken nobly by Senator form Illinois Dick Durbin when of a sparring softly supportively with his own Pandora’s Box mine field of Operation Iraqi Freedom being of lies about still unfound WMDs (Weapons of Mass Destruction). Since Senator Hillary Clinton didn’t offer a diplomatic honesty intellectually in defense of truths of the circumstances of her having voted for Operation Iraqi Freedom: It is most puzzling today amidst all this that WMD issue can be raised at all to help free Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton from her Senate vote as Senator Clinton of New York while such vote then was proffered by her with so much confidence in her own understanding of the issue that she cast a vote for a war by such reasoning and without thinking she needed to read the intelligence reports for such voting whence. WMD as per Iraq should be a weight to sink her in any “intelligence” queriousness now at all about worsening sit reps for the Middle East, at least. Right? Hillary voted for Operation Iraqi Freedom confident in her own political understanding and without feeling beholden to question herself by reading a fresh post Administration of the Clintons new intelligence report - Right?
In Hillary’s tears more the guilt of the Clintons’ avoidance & inaction of the 90s as causal following on from her speaking of dangers from avoidance and inaction - that still follow on from President Obama’s Nobel Acceptance Speech as a slap at the Clintons for their avoidance and inaction on Afghanistan and Iraq while of his charge earlier in our 90s. President Barack Hussein Obama with his Nobel Acceptance Speech spoke pointedly but coyly of “dangers of inaction and avoidance” much as Hillary today did while prefacing her tears for those affected by loses from her negligence years after such path towards such became trodden by the dangers that grew from the Administration of the Clintons inaction and avoidance as just per Afghanistan and Iraq. Her use of word “husbandry” is quite a clever way to like hide that the Clintons for four years may have been overtly getting away with serious and dangerous like official conflicts of interests - at least. She did bristle when her tears fell flat and she had to go on the defensive - quite so! As one who remembers her New Hampshire tears as those triggered by her sliding in pols and with then a hit about if she was at all well rounded with even at least one hobby so stressing her so whence - as I recall from having been one of pressuring her before her New Hampshire tears for not at least having a hobby - but not to expecting she could shed tears for not having time for her stationary walker machine to avoid her inaction and lack of well roundedness - a less well roundedness than such campaigns long had insisted for its male entrants.
Those of the Administration of George W. Bush demonstrated a very different social norm globally and expandingly with their FREEDOM AGENDA respective of ‘FREE WILL’ as if at least the majority of Iraqi should and could be endowed by their creator as Americans free by theirs - a very different and even more progressive but yet not “socialist” than the heavy hands of change of Obama/Clinton FP with fear and pressure kept more distantly centralized, and, quite of the same governance sense that Government (by them) knows best. Surprisingly these hearings may help peoples all around the world better see now that American Republicans are better protectors of individuals and their God given “FREE WILL” than at least President Barack Hussein Obama while of such rivalrous Clintons pulling him down.
I do not know if with Secretary of State as seems now inevitable of a turnover to the charge and such duty boundedness for John Kerry we can see HOPE return to the Administration of President Barack H. Obama. I do not know if the assault on due process and developmental threats to “FREE WILL” as perpetrated by the Clintons’ “two-fer” are now bound to keep em shackled even so.
[I think that wraps up SLAUGHTERHOUSE STATE composition. {Well I’ve gotten this new column started. Please check back throughout rest of day and evening and tomorrow as I work out the necessary bulwarks to ideas so broached already.}]
I may have to walk this off slowly as new readers are about without having followed along over the past 6,000 or so pages of political discourse these past five years blogging.
There are more from years earlier elsewhere like such that had me being of suggestion for the TIME “Mirror” of the Year cover, but that is more a story for later as to why I did turn them down with their query for a picture of me as “uc” and be to offering that if they could put a mirror on their cover I could help them with their intents.
Today this column starts slowly with measured steps first about Bill Clinton and then likely next about Senator John Kerry and as well a discussion of the late John Murtha. I don’t know if you Google or otherwise search “HE WAS MURTHANIZED” if you will immediately find an old informative peace discussing seeming important finer nuances as to the Pope’s old messaging in a familiar Catholic against American Catholics needed to support an operation as Catholics to help some Muslims get justice from other Muslims in a Muslim country. (Also here via: http://bit.ly/HeWasMurthanized)
For now we should start with Bill Clinton — oh but where to start?
How is he of “TEAM”?
How is he while so just of “I” actually of real life historical non-fantasy (imagined) “TEAM”?
The old “Bill” is the real “Bill”?
Today to start slowly the later seems most condemning since we shouldn’t be hearing him speak about the economy with any confidence given his storied history. We should not have confidence in him as an “expert” “I” nor as a “TEAM” affiliated spox. President Bill Clinton, the old, is still the Bill Clinton as a President that just won’t go away. As President as per the economy where it wasn’t of him fattening up an otherwise fit and working for “politics” he himself would admit and even cherish that Allen Greenspan was making it work and that he basically just let someone that knew what they were talking about work it.
It is hard, going slowly for our economy is in a mess arguably much some because of Senator John Kerry and his anti-war revival. That I have to leave for tomorrow when I expect to revise, edit and finish this now started new column.
For now we while walking slowly should look around and look of concern and paranoia maybe to a possibility of being punk’d by former President Bill Clinton.
He cannot now be an expert on the economy. He used to confess that he wasn’t while President. He cannot be an Obama “team player” now for he of so many “I” moments as if he now is the expert he never was and while President Obama had been to these economic failures with those of the old Clinton “TEAM.”
There is more to walk out slowly here - but not too much as your imaginations might settle your doubts quickly enough to a clearer and dangerous political reality.
Bill Clinton as well as trying to be the “I” and the “TEAM” while of such as a political impossibility is also or somewhat recent explanations economic as well to contest by his claimed expertise, economic, that it can at all be an “expertise economic.” Somewhat recently he was to walking and talking while seated of a grand explanation that economic events like these are known to need a certain amount of time to “recover.” And, with that remembered the real conundrum or paradoxical for if he knows that now and wants us to believe he knew it while President then he with such was confessing that he knew he shouldn’t have worked the very economic mix of policies he did while at least of his second term.
{more to come tomorrow!}
I DECIDED THAT ABOVE IS ALL THERE WILL BE WITH THIS TITLE. THAT SAID I DID LINK EARLIER COLUMNS WITH MY TWID (TWITTER ID) @JPHOGANORG WHICH WERE NEAR ENOUGH TO WHAT I MAY HAVE GOTTEN TO ADDING.
HTTP://CITIZENROSEBUD.MOBI http://citizenrosebud.mobi
It is now a quiet late Friday morning near the shores of America, feet dry. I am a good “white” and President Obama seems to be a bad “black”! Do not worry this isn’t supposed to be about race nor “racist” — we have cause to check on President Barack Hussein Obama as for driving “white” as a “bad”!
It must have been a tough 100th birthday for the President - considering the implications of these times; It must have been a tough week as his past term as President is remembered too much of a “cover-up” politics while lessons so fresh that it is still “the cover-up” to be the ruinous.
It seems President Obama is still in a ditch and while of a “driving while white” Democrat Party economic think.
President Richard Milhous Nixon did, surprisingly to many, have a very good week. Again: As I have posted for a while: “It is not that Nixon was guilty but that Democrats are at least as guilty.”
The anatomy of Hillary of these times is this week again of echoes of her once of part in taking down President Nixon (though no more guilty than say the JF Kennedy Presidency) as the Watergate saga was. The specific considerations of problema of our times as to covers of and for at least “Hillary” are of an anatomy of scandal more murderous and unchecked.
The anatomy of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is now of “FLASHING RED(S)” as if she pinned to have been President herself with RED “hot phones” to the Kremlin as if a magical “Bat Phone.” (Right - It doesn’t seem she wanted to be a Cat Woman)
Her gifted and scandalous “RESET” of actual translations as “OVERCHARGED” by their tongues might have been another “FLASHING RED” per her activated imagination. We have though that we are of murderous times with she of an anatomy of “assault” at least. We have that it is undeniable that he once of Hope and Change started his administration with a “COVER-UP” messaging too CYA just for the former first coupled “two-fer” Clintons, we have that it is undeniable that “IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT” was an overwriting attempt to cloak the eight years of the co-Administration of the Clintons (in a preposterous impossible innocence quite unreasonable).
As pop culture goes we are stuck if of those that watched the last season of “24″ with shock and awe of a ridiculous that such a plot could have been so aired as if a prophetic warning of what was to come if “Hillary” were to be elected, and yet us now all to such real times as now (so similar).
President Barack Hussein Obama did get elected as foretold to a mandate to austerity and grid lock, by my perspective and past commentary. He did not get re-elected for having succeeded in his attempt to “COVER-UP” for the Clintons and at least their “executive” like “two-fer” power plays. He did fail to rewrite the facts of our past couple decades to affect the attempted yet ridiculous (desperate) preposterous irrational impossibility that his too generous polarizing partisan political “IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT” did attempt.
It does seem that blacks around the world are now getting a bad associated incriminating rap however about traversing metaphorically or politically vehicled; it does seem it isn’t fair that President Obama is so “pulled over” as if he is “driving while black”!
There is that President of Hope and Change “Barry” Obama by embracing the beat’n as “BIG LIARS” Clintons did himself pick the “whitest” of “white” of all possible nominees for the special “Obama” representing charge of our State Department.
Did you see the last season of “24″? Are you puzzled now as to how we could be in this pickle now?
President Barack (”Barry”) Hussein Obama, as of his tales of earlier rise as not too innocent to have avoided at least political confessions of personal failings per illegal substance abuse, did fail as a first term President to rewrite our actual history and enough of the facts of the past twenty years of specific plotting and rascalishness for his attempt to “COVER-UP” for the Clintons to now flash but “RED!!!”!
We can leave that the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE is a danger to our State and our Constitution as it is to a purpose and practice now too long of a privatization of some of our reserved to just “EXECUTIVE POWERS” at a loss of potential prestige now for any actual sworn President.
This week must have President once of “Hope and Change Obama” smarting with Nixon turned 100 and having by most reports, it seems, a very good week.
I don’t know how there could have been enough “wool over their eyes” and/or plain ignorance or arrogance to have thought that they could have all rewritten enough of the past “hands on” by the Clintons’ “two-fer” to have effected the needed vast conspiracy to a partisan man made “innocence” for such now exposed of anatomies of negligence - even gross negligence.
With it this week that President Obama has President Nixon in his face to remind him “it is the cover-up” STUPID! — we have ourselves to likely seeing “red” otherwise just about the economics of Obama far longer for the loyalty and fidelity to Jack Lew once of the blunders that were the Clintons’ SURPLUSES.
Is President Barack Hussein Obama “in the ditch” still because he is “driving black” or because he has been “driving white” - as white or whiter than the Administration of the Clintons?
[I can write here that I am “good ‘white’” as per this new battle between good and evil - a ying and a yang, political - for I write of the Clintons of having been so wrong and for so long without now having a different perspective from when they made the decisions towards us being now stuck so by their say “negligent” governance whence. I write of the perspective that I thought their decisions were this bad when they made them whence in the 90s, and, now, with affirmation that they did end up near as bad as feared.]
This Friday a morning thought to help focus anyone stirred to read it as shared via Facebook and Twitter was about how we could all become safer suddenly if Bill and Hillary were to defect to Russia.
A reasoning about such could be bolstered for the shame they should share for having asked or maybe coerced a new Hope President to an Adminstration to “COVER-UP” for them and their co-Administering as a political “BOGO ‘two-fer’”. If either Bill or Hillary were a Samurai an “honor code” could have had them of “seppuku” a hundred times each already.
Though it was politically selfish of the Clintons to have however worked a “New Hope” to a contagion of an anatomy of negligence covering for them it is hard to understand how but by coercion they could have bent President Barack Hussein Obama to such a ridiculous and preposterous attempt at such an irrational impossible political “COVER”.
It is hard to say that President Obama isn’t starting off his second term to “driving white” even more so.
Flashing hot spots of “Hillary” still “Hillary’s” and not yet ever, hopefully, to be as well negligence of or by succeeding likely Secretary John Kerry - now have us wise to consider and long debate how we could be safer if Bill and Hillary were to defect to Russia now for it seems we might be safer if we were to open up all the files of the co-Administration of the Clintons NOW and not hardly put at risk more so by what they could or might willingly be able to “share” as if “intelligent” as “Russians”!!!
Happy 100th Birthday President Richard Milhous Nixon!!! It is hard, this January 11th in the Year of our Lord two thousand ten and three, to say that President Obama isn’t starting off his second term to “driving white” even more so.
Our hopes are upon him now as another set soon so out to pasture and reflection; these days soon to dawn for hopes not too bogged down. And, by the embers of his peats a shared stoking for the she fires before now but out to pastures, soon.
If Governor Andrew Cuomo is to run for President in 2016 there isn’t much he now need to do about Hillary Clinton.
This is not to be a “metrosexual” new age piece like a vagina diatribe by Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton; President Obama after nearly four years had only one “foreign policy” success to run on - right? Mrs. Clinton is today to be covered as a woman and following on the Governor of New York State being of his State of the State about sexual equality and pay as if equals.
Yes, that is right — after four years President Obama only had the overseas military success of having done more than catch Osama Bin Ladin to run on despite Madam Secretary Clinton as his top “DIPLOMAT.” We can off blog get down to discussing how she has been heralded as a success despite such and yet with such usually of commentary with metrics as that only maybe related professionally since the measure it seems for her has oddly been to whether “Bill and Hillary” have become “more popular” globally.
Has she been more a “terrorist” than a “peacemaker”? Has she been the “moody” and “irrational” decider thought now only of past chauvenistic bygone era - actually? Has she been all of a personal vendetta and vengence - as it can be reasoned with the co-Administration of the Clintons so fresh still and yet so incredibly contrary?
How can there be a bucolic reign for Senator John Kerry turned Statesman with the irregularity left of the long era of his predecessor? Can Madam Secretary be just considered as “put out to pasture” if not also penned that way with “Bill” and their CGI? Where are the ‘happy places’ - ‘happy fields’ - for a Secretary Kerry and his Boss Obama?
Governor Cuomo, while recently of having to unlearn most of what was his “expertise” while in the Clintons’ administration and to finding workable ways otherwise so as a new governor, is of his prudent political posture that there sould be sexual equality and equal pay regardless of ones sex. But Hillary stands as a failed Secretary of State to enough and yet while still oddly championed as a better “next President” than now Governor Andrew Cuomo.
Can there be a bucolic political landscape - can there be one at least until some of the wounds of the hawkish “Hillary” have had care and time to heal?
It seems we all should be of real concern about our “Hillary” and now look back at her irregularity and contrariness as at least of her being a woman - a woman though specific to her past and its “emotions” political not because of her and menopause.
She did show in these four years a “Hillary Before” and a “Hillary After” that is still hard to explain but by discussing deeply a need for Clinton CYA and for it seeming that such now so as “different” or “moody” stuck like vengence around the world on those still standing as if standing was an embarrassment personally to “Bill and Hillary” of their eight years of the co-Administration of the Clintons.
It does seem just wrong to suggest Madam Secretary Clinton has been a success because the “CLINTONS” global brand stock is up around the world. It seems unfair to President Barack Hussein Obama that she otherwise has left him hardly a campaignable success but for whatever “hands on” roll she might have diplomatically or undiplomatically played towards the assassination of Osama Bin Ladin.
There is all the “moodiness” that cannot now be like a tool in the shed of diplomacy for Senator John Kerry if and when Secretary of State - he will be expected not to change his hair style willy nilly per his personal whimsy and nor will he be seen as stable if he dons even a small fraction of the irregular and inconsistent wardrobe stylings of his predecessor.
It is arguable that Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has despite clearing up the “Saddam Hussein” specifics been to targeting foreign leaders that make she and her husband look bad for having been so cozy and like ‘in bed’ with during the eight years of the co-administration of the Clintons.
But can a bucolic now be possible if we are just of a letting of our “Hillary” be to as if just put out to pasture? Isn’t the Clintons’ BRAND now globally a conflict of interest whether she is Secretary of State or just like afterwards the “FIRST LADY” of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE?
We have that many can hope so many now won’t just be like “lambs” to a Secretary Kerry as if “lambs” as “pawns” these years - long years - of Secretary Clinton.
It may be suggestive of a possible political bucolic to see “Hillary” as a peaceable lamb tucked away in some fields of Ireland’s Kerry — But, we are talking about the Clintons and should be talking about Hillary as a woman - and as one that had too many “POLITICAL” emotions to carry after having been FLOTUS Mrs. Clinton for eight.
Governor Cuomo has prudently spoken to an agenda for sexual equality and equal pay regardless of sex, and, he knows better than most that he had to learn a new “expertise” to Govern after that of the era of the co-Administration of the Clintons and his charges about such couldn’t carry water.
It seems Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton can be tagged and/or branded to near historic chauvenistic stereotypes for and of women. I don’t know which of our politicians now has the greatest ambitions against more favoritism for her at their own expense - Senator John Kerry if her successor will have her “womanness” hard to avoid, and difficult politically to fix.
Though the timing of her baby as it was “ODYSSEY DAWN” did broadcast like simultaneously with the Twitter scandal of her top Middle East Advisor’s husbands “tri - pol - I” pixilated infidelity it may not be another WAG THE DOG Clintons CYA for the French needed to take the lead on Tripoli. Much more has been to getting more hazy.
She needed the French as did President Obama it seems; they needed the French to take the lead because they didn’t have the necessary leadership skills and experience themselves to have taken the lead so.
So it seems, still.
But as per our “Hillary” as not a too emotional (woman) politician prone to hot spots/flashes and irregularities we have that she leaves to the likely nominee Senator John Kerry a fog of Diplomacy and international politics much ado about how if we were right to proceed towards the killing of Osama Bin Ladin and Qadhaffi and to the stand-offishness about Egypt than we must have been justified earlier towards a similar pursuit, however, against Saddam Hussein, and, as he to many was considered worse.
As per our “Hillary” this may all about her just a vengence seeking hawk and as a former First Spouse scorned, and, not otherwise specifically about her as an irregular female and too moody a woman. There is the “HILLARY BEFORE” and the “HILLARY AFTER” and still so much worrisome as to how she can be so different now than she was while First Lady.
So it seems, still.
A longer title could or should be NEW WORLD ORDER TABLETS. Our world has changed and we have by one party more than another been encouraged to change with them in ways contrary to our long established systems of checks and balances.
Happy New Year 2013 — it may actually be “leaders” long of your own party that have the most guilt about avoiding to bring us all into these new times as teased and informed as they could have or should have.
A retrospective on President Obama should now at least dig up how his famed “SPEECH TO THE MUSLIM WORLD” CAIRO SPEECH oddly proffered like: American slaves got out of their bondage peacefully and without violence.
The complexity of this recently re-elected President who wanted to have a “personality” based Presidency has another grand oratory moment of international concern for any world order. Some how Senator Barack H. Obama spoke to a large crowd in Berlin, Germany and with linguistic oratorical looseness such that he closed out his rendition of history as if his father as a army cook was critical to the success of the Berlin Air Lift and so that he the son now can stand and inherit from his father and all listening a personal empowerment of having saved the World - or just Berlin, himself.
We are of days of wonderful new communication tools that don’t just have to be wired by Government as tools for mass partisan assimilations. As tablets are of our past carried morality now new tablets are there yet to be used for a better modern morality.
President Obama now has a problema much like that visceral for his predecessor while himself no long re-electable — The Clintons as like “family” - adopted and embraced step children/brethren - by the Bush clan did turn out knives as if back stabbing political opportunists even though Bush was no longer “electable.” President Obama now himself no longer re-electable has the Clintons as his greatest threat and as an internecine Democrat divided house — as the Clintons were willing to back stab the Bush as “family” as “rivals” of Administration of President Obama what won’t they be willing to try to do, politically just within their own party?
President Obama may have the greatest friend as of the adage “an enemy of my enemy is my friend” with Senator John Kerry if approved to be Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton’s successor. He should after Benghazi failures now of problems and unpreparedness within some of her own “pet” issues be called to a cleaning of her houses of State. A Secretary of State John Kerry is a perfect political ally for President Obama against an expected internecine power struggle (for legacies - over legacies).
Most concerning, despite how dangerously framed, in these complicated times, by the real international and geo-regional politics more real than some of the above oratorical confounding profferings, and as if we are working on a tower of policies on shifting sands and without an adequate foundation, remains, though little pressed, to be how we have been of Mrs. Clintons our “oversight” head for Mr. Clinton while of all his CGI and Library and/or Foundations’ global machinations.
I don’t know that our system with checks and balances and its three equal branches of Government ever failed to consider that a wife is not supposed to be our “policing” agent for a “hen house” of global egg laying of her husband. I do think that is like having put an known egg thief in charge of securing our eggs.
We can recall how I and others did give the orator of at least the above mentioned past Obama speeches very low grades or failiing grades for one or the other - and how others gave him glowing like A++ s even though he spoke as if orating a denial that our Civil War had actually been at all about slavery.
We can though still look at how our Executive Department has historically worked with more checks and balances and too more transparency over our history — We can look at how almost all of President Obama’s weak or faulted international moments and especially of his speaking with prepared remarks has his top Diplomat as Secretary of State as a Cabinet level “officer” at least primarily a suspect for each as each fault had her of a job to see it and say something about each before each and even maybe to have been an “expert” with “edits” proffered.
Politically speaking just about the very concerning above problema intertwined in much of what isn’t working now while of “national” or “federal” hands we have that a Secretary of State John Kerry can come in and blame his predecessor for most if not all of his new boss’s past international foibles - and domestic messaging as per them all.
I was disappointed recently when I quickly Googled “modern moralists” and didn’t see any “modern” moralists then in the first page of results. Again, it may be “leaders” of your party that are using new “tablets” to attempt to work a mass hysteria to an acceptance of methodologies contrary to our system and still writ regulatory ways.
But about President Obama — has he been an imperialistic neo-colonialist? Was he trapped by internecine Democrat Party machinations hung-over from the Clintons’ spousal plotting to a having of his “governance” hands greatly tied up by the Clintons? Is President Obama though of a desire to be of a “personality” based Presidency and despite how a “cabinet of rivals” rivaled such as a contradicting paradigm/conundrum but now of a legacy near exactly as that which we would have had if of an extention of the Administration of the Clintons as attempted?
With former President William Jefferson Clinton, here to fore protected by his spouse, while she the cabinet level officer charged with oversight of organizations like his creatively established CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE, still of his CGI as if a privately operated “State Department” can Senator Kerry start at State as the successor of such charge now without calling rightly for a full and complete audit of all the overseas activities of our former President William Jefferson Clinton?
Even though like President Bush in years past we have that President Obama is no longer also re-electable can that the Clintons are of his own party keep them from behaving just as disloyal or even more of a lack of loyalty?
Though our new tablets are now of us still of a lasting legacy of foundations in earlier tablets we have problems now in part for international “relations” are so borderless that we are of a new world more of “international politics” than as before of and for “global diplomacy” for relationships between peoples.
Again we have had administration by Democrats where they have worked less than possible and/or prudent towards an national awareness raising to better “informed” “citizens” as all of a “towards such” reality. These Democrats new and or compromised so, as of a before when a “before” wasn’t too early, have been contrary to our basic methodologies secured by our Constitution by policies and practices more towards a shift at home and abroad to as many as possible more to as if just “subjects.”
These are days of us of new world order with tablets old and new — and of people in a world more already of an “international politics” than the “Diplomacy” so far of the Obama administration’s State Department has pressed, itself.
We have that we are of dangers just from a lack of sharable understanding of the attacks to the loss of THE BENGHAZI FOUR as such is going down rightly, it seems, as an “ACT OF WAR” in a known ongoing war and not as a random act by unknown unaffiliated “terrorists” as spewed in amateur fashions by those we accepted (wrongly) as experts.
The new order possible for President Obama in his second term with Senator John Kerry if confirmed to be our next Secretary of State remains of opportunities for the both of them to blame Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton for most of the past “shortcomings” or “failures” - yet to allow President Obama an escape for near un-American “management” methods of his having let Mrs. Clinton be the policing “officer” of his cabinet for all “foreign” activities of her husband has to rest on his shoulders as of his naivete and bad managerial and legal judgement.
We are so of new tablets and a new world order our Democrat Party leaders are trying to subdue but when to mass assimilations to dictatorial obedience as if of more “subjects” than “citizens” below them, and while of an opportunity to govern more as if a media corporation of “pop” artistry in lieu of due process by governance still of and by laws, not man or woman.
It is if, some at least, that President Obama thought he of a “personality” based Presidency wouldn’t have to make consideration for “management” or “cost consciousness” that actually recognized “temptations” as a human problema necessitating a governance by laws not by will or tyranny of a man or woman - or an elite troika.
Again: Happy New Year 2013 — it may actually be “leaders” long of your own party that have the most guilt about avoiding to bring us all into these new times as teased and informed as they could have or should have.
A social contract was thought our standard; a contract to not be breached our ways secured. These days that try souls of so many are fraught with lawyers as “leaders” to fewer of keep in pillars of justice.
It is maddening to normal minds the “reconstructions” of fact that our “leaders” of our Democrat Party national “leadership” have been slamming home and marching out - however successfully. It may not be long before we can have “results” of “scientific” studies that attest a finding that our nation has had a measurable increase in autism at least under Democrat “leadership” of our nation.
Whether you see them as “brassy” or “too brassy” — as of a “deconstruction” or “reconstruction” — they are inescapable as a lot of lawyers also taggable as of a lowering of standards once thought an evolving keep of “pillars of justice.”
President Barack Hussein Obama has been in breach of our contracts about social contracts with our Government ever since his oration of his 1st inaugural speech. He has been of a bearing of false witness as if a “reconstruction” of our facts and history towards a more politically convenient “history” was of a power of his pen - a power of the pen as over the governance of and by laws - our laws.
Possible candidate nominee for appointment to Secretary of State Cabinet Officer posting Senator John Kerry is too long and too long of convenient “reconstructions” and some of “deconstructions” of visible and thought logical historical truths as if lying were not lying nor a bearing of false witness. Former Candidate for President Senator John Kerry is known to some editorial boards for of his eleventh hour election eve attempts to get published new best like “reconstructions” (lies) to be out without time to check or fathom by election day.
President Obama has long since day one of his Presidency been of a bearing of false witness as like a known COVER-UP attempt and conspiring to rewrite a false and unearned absolution of guilt due a load bearing by the hips and shoulders of the former First Couple Clintons. It has been a bearing of false witness and of posits impossible everytime President Obama has assaulted our reason and logical inferings of what was in the air otherwise as “truths” — President Obama has been disturbing the “FORCE” each and everytime he offered “it is all Bush’s fault” as a defensive cover-up of and for the Clintons and their years and avoidances that far better and more simply in an honestly explain so much far superiorly.
Senator John Kerry might have won his Presidential campaign if he had gotten editorial boards to go with what were his new best lies (legal argument/defense fabrications?) for press spewing on or just before election day that year.
It is maddening quite how Democrats have been to attempts to “deconstruct” and/or “reconstruct” to new facts and histories more convenient to their aspirations otherwise challenged by truths already much naturally about and subconsiously at least already hardwired in our People.
The Clintons are know “LIARS” and even most publicly tagged by “friends” as “BIG LIARS” — Senator John Kerry’s best selling point as to being a successor to Hillary Clinton can be that he cannot be worse than she has been. He has lied but not as much as he did try to lie (offer defensive legal fabrications). He so though has likely lied less than either Bill or Hillary and while an officer however of an oath of our Constitution. He is packageable as purer than either Clinton and for being now of less political “constructions” or “deconstructions” or “reconstructions.”
It is a further lowering of our standards and to a new “maddening” risk to allow Democrats to be so long of breaches to our social contracts for political expediency for their selfish political needs. Senator Kerry should be able to be a better Secretary of State than Hillary Clinton has been and as well then be able to be a strong alternative to Hillary if Bill works her up again to running to attempt to re-seat him again in the White House.
> “It is “brassy” too for President Obama to
quote scripture all the while long from day one of bearing false witness
for the Clintons (& Dems)? #truth”
*{This a morning social media posted thought of this morning}
> Some times it is not that a leader isn’t doing
enough but that they have been doing too much of something else but
related somehow. #truth
When former President Clinton stood up in Charlotte at the Demcrat Party Convention he did so quite “brassy” of lies about lies to cover his lies as by projection and transference again by calling someone else “brassy” to cover his own “brassy” lying.
President Clinton has so long been in the breach to the voiding of our consciousness of a keep of pillars of justice of a social contract that he as a charlatan in Charlotte a breach of a normality for nearly everyone else.
For the purposes of checking our breaches and the diminished capacity across this nation as the Dems have been maddening the masses with “reconstructions” unconscionable consciously we do have as well to consider that “Bush lied…” as legs of understatements regarding “truths” — And, yet we have really to worry more about these years long now of it unchecked mostly that “leaders” of Democrat Party national “leadership” have been slamming home legal defenses for their selves that are quantitatively and qualitatively far in excess of what President George W. Bush has yet been accused of.
Howard Dean has before after a defeat issued a mea culpa of the order of “I was in conflict/trouble with the Mental Health Clarity Acts” as of training and past time served as a medical professional unable to claim ignorance of the consequences of lying for political convenience about such much already hardwired at least into electorate’s subconscience.
Howard Dean seems to be back but now with more Democrats than just the Clintons to “reconstructions” much as if a necessary legal defense and cover-up at least for the Clintons that are better to be now re-aired and litigated or relitigated as of lies and lying quite dangerous to the maintenance of our civil ways - of our FORCE.
We have too long now of some of our Democrat Party leadership of disturbances of our FORCE - by “LIES” however packaged as new and necessary “legal fabrications” of a allowable “politics.” Dems have been at least as guilty as Republicans of these as if breaches of our social contracts with our government and each other.
Senator John Kerry, in his defense, should be, though so compromised, yet of a cleaner potential now to have a chance to be a better Secretary of State than Hillary Clinton has been and so then to being a stronger and “forgiven” new candidate challenger maybe to Hillary Clinton if so allowed towards 2016.
If it is all about doing wrong while trying to do right and then being forgiven for what they did that was maddening and wrong and even if it was of a priori purposeful premeditations then it is but now for them to ask us all for forgiveness for such and yet with it a great big chasm of a hole like a breach — that about all they should first confess to as for a cleansing from an asked for but maybe not deserved forgiving.
Originally posted at http://2012us.jphogan.org 08/22/11
So you know me, mostly, already as a
Citizen Rosebud. That said do you know how to read or re-read these
following paragraphs now presented out of original order and all from
just before collapse of U.S.S.R.?
August 1991 had me of two political
letters written to Washington and following on a letter to the editors
from June 1991, attached so though original to New Haven, CT
market/readers.
That said something written for New Haven with Yale so
much of such can be said by those who at least attempt such to actually
be knowingly have been written though as of New Haven as really a useful
global metaphor.
The trick in starting out to challenge
our current politicians and our media of such day was much in part to
intentionally avoid yellow journalism. I may have erred too much to
another extreme with some flattery or golden journalism, not quite yet
earned by those seemingly being spotlighted.
President Obama was about such time,
still hardly out of Harvard Law School and much an unknown Russian
Studies Love Child named Barry, maybe more of the dreams of his mother
than his father. I don’t recall where he was living by August of 1991.
He was born to salt and pepper parents as collatoral from their shared
passions then from meeting as students engrossed in Russian Studies. He
may have had an Oedipal need to RESET with the Russia of his weening
while his Secretary of State had a personal an autocratic need for her
two-fer sustaining.
So for me to still avoid Stockholm - a syndrom that would have me now liking and needing the Clintons that should be avoided:
From 1991 and the pen of J.P. Hogan - then a little known closet poet:
*Have you considered that Bush may not
want to be reelected; at least not with one hundred or probably even
eighty percent conviction. He, himself, shortly after his election
visited the Lincoln memorial and said something to the effect that he
wondered if he too would be tested by the fire as was Lincoln.
Now like Lincoln he has and he has
come to international fame for helping to unite the world, not just a
nation. We have a new world order and now our nation needs to undergo a
type of reconstruction.
I am at this moment reading KINGS OF
THE HILL by Cheney. The chapter on Thaddeus Stevens. At the top of
page 63, Cheney wrote: who had given the president the right to
determine the terms of reconstruction? Stevens wasn’t alone in thinking
the matter belonged to the Congress and in resenting executive
incursion.
*With the reconstruction needed in
America to ready it for the increasing global competition the Executive
will need the ability to work effectively with the Hill. We need a
strong democrat.
*New Haven is a great city, with
problems yes, but none that the culturally diverse and talented peoples
and businesses of the greater New Haven area can’t address and solve
together.
*It is getting tiresome to listen to
the candidates for mayor speaking of an either/or world, one in which
the problems are seen in black and white simplicity. There is a NEW
WORLD ORDER emerging and what it amounts to is that if we, the people of
the greater New Haven area, are to survive let alone prosper in the
world economy we have to, out of economic necessity, resolve our
differences. We don’t have to like each other but we do have to learn
to respect each other and our different backgrounds. It is our great
cultural diversity in New Haven that already make the city great,
regionally.
*It is no wonder then that campaigning
has become negative when the democratic party and the republican party
instead of worrying about the needs of the community, state and nation
have instead focused on how to make themselves appear different and
better than the other party. It is about time that they realize the
voters want substance in their representation. We know what we need,
and we know what we want. So Candidates, if you want to succeed show us
you know how to listen, and know how to lead. In a Democracy we aim to
elect the candidate who will best serve our needs. [Yes, this is out of
place in original letter for being of a GLOBAL or NATIONAL while
structure of letter seeming just about a mayoral race]
*It is because of our successes as a
nation that the dollar sign is such a powerful and important symbol. It
is a pity that so few people know where we got this symbol. It is
nothing but the abbreviation for out nation… It represents capitalism,
its successes as well as its failures, but most importantly it
represents our leadership in the world. The power behind the dollar is
WE THE PEOPLE, the democratic ideal. {I learned of dollar sign origins
from reading Ayn Rand}
[[ AGAIN THESE EXERPTS ARE ALL FROM
BEFORE COLLAPSE OF U.S.S.R., BY ME, AND NOT MOSTLY IN ORIGINAL ORDER,
AND QUITE HAND PICKED FROM THREE DIFFERENT LETTERS FROM JUNE TO AUGUST
OF 1991. THESE ARE HOW REPRESENTATIVE GEPHARDTS OFFICE CAME TO KNOW ME
JUST THEN AND SO GEORGE STEPHANOPOULUS AND DORA BUSH’S FIANCE THAT WAS
GEORGE’S EQUAL IN SUCH HILL OFFICE, THOUGH A KOCH.]]
*(FLATTERY???) Personally, I think
you are the only democratic candidate that can defeat George Bush.
Though I want to help you accomplish this feat, I’ll wait until later,
after I have proven my usefulness, to take up such an ambition. For now
I’ll just try to offer encouragement. (Yikes, this is one of the
funniest political sentences I may ever have written so slanted to be
about Rep. Gephardt yet statistically because he was the only one that
had run before still left from Democrats A team to not seem maybe an
afterthought.) (I was a Reagan and Bush supported then and much of
concerns mentioned in blog before this one.) (My use of lower case
democratic when a upper case Democratic seemingly desired and vice versa
was intentional and poetic/telling not a typo.)
*Unless we get a democrat in office we
are likely to lose our role as leader in social structures. Now that
the world is copying our example our job becomes more difficult. We can
no longer rest on our laurels, other cities, states, and nations are
now closing the gap and are eager to try to show the U.S.A. a better
way. We are history if we lose this lead. Unlike our position in the
market which we can regain, I fear our social lead if lost would be lost
forever. Let us never fail to be the greatest union of peoples united
through self-interest!
*It seems people are getting tired of
hearing about our great international relations and benevolence. WE THE
PEOPLE will soon demand to know what’s in it for us. I just hope it is a
Democrat who can tie the big picture together and communicate it to ‘we
the people’. To borrow a phrase: We must think globally but act locally, in
the cities and the states. (Maybe even funnier. My hope for it
Democrat not to favor a Democrat over President Bush and Republicans but
specifically because our greatest threat may have been that the
Democrats seemed furthest from and near incapable of such at such time.)
*New Haven, Connecticut is a city to
watch. There is a subtle movement underway that might just set an
example for all cities to follow. The people are standing up for their
rights and beliefs and are striving to improve their lot. The city is
becoming a team which is also just starting to recruit the suburbs. The
Greater New Haven Area is just starting to realize the issues are not as
simple as black and white. There seems to be a growing understanding
that in order to protect our local economy we will have to all work
together as a team to compete globally. The local paper has gotten
behind this effort.
Note: I have now finished KNOWN AND
UNKNOWN and appreciate that such memoir neither confirms nor denies nor
walks all over or walks much at all over my story from same years. My
story does fit uncontested yet untold around all that I have just read.
My story though is complicated for all of above was written to play
politics, Democrat Party politics, for my Dad and my sister then on
Senator Dodd’s staff, without my playing politics, and bipartisan and
Republican politics being a hindrence to my efforts to help them enhance
and improve so politically at risk, and while the Mayor of New Haven
was its first black mayor and like me also a Villanova University
alum. Bud Connolly was Joseph V. Connolly Sr.’s son and a Block Island
Times columnist those years he and his wife (bride) Violette hosted me
summers as their SUMMER SON. Bud Connolly had a big band while his
father was still alive and running much of Hearst during those years
around dramatization of CITIZEN KANE, but I had already been at least a
year into calling myself: More a Citizen Rosebud than a CITIZEN KANE.
Joe’s (Bud’s) father JVC Sr. suggested there were not enough old
successful drummers for his son to keep up his (successful) big band
leading days as a real career - Joe’s father died early, and maybe from
efforts trying from turning around Hearst in the years its founder was
fading and passing and being treated as he was with CITIZEN KANE. If you
want to understand CITIZEN ROSEBUD better you may have to ask both
Patty and Anne Hearst and about hopes and alliances for good kept since
near about 1983, I can only give you my side.
Oh, yeh, Donald Rumsfeld, and, Bush
Admin were offered this collection drawn from here, in complete, both to
help America after 9/11 and as well to fix so much that the Clintons
had gotten wrong, and dangerously wrong. It wasn’t an ordained solution
already ready but it was American and reusable from days of its original
conception as about mostly same balances and issues around days of
PERSIAN GULF WAR. We may have known who our enemies were by 9/12 and
maybe a already worked out once way to check their ambitions and
strategies.
Once written and shared, though, the
above was best to be kept from ever helping my Dad or sister try to pull
rank on me, they just think differently and may be incapable of
understanding all its nuance at once. Such though is more a real
criticism of political skill specifically deficient in Clintons, and
their mea culpas.
Also: Recently it was Senator John
Kerry who seemed to actually confess to war crimes in a Senate hearing
with him near of (to Republicans & world): You have us on our drone
use and lack of due process.
Democrats and Republicans are very noticeably different and distinctly so these days, thankfully.
[NOTE: THE HARD JUSTIFIED LEFT MARGIN WITH IRREGULAR RIGHT MARGINS IS AN INCIDENTAL RESULTANT FROM COPY & PASTE REPOSTING - IT IS NOT BY DESIGN AND IS A LOT OF WORK TO GO THROUGH AND CORRECT.]
{WARNING: This is written with a style that is supposed to have been worked well to be as taxing as the subject “taxing”}
At least after Pres’ comments towards CLINTONS’ TAX RATES yesterday the people should not be the “oversight” committee to finally lead us to the long needed and much seemingly avoided discussion of how the 90s were a mess with the CLINTONS’ SURPLUS more to a financial GROSS NEGLIGENCE and the budgeting to balance and then to surpluses an eight year bi-partisan story of too much cut too quickly.
If we don’t go after methodology of Clintons as per their tax rates and with a discussion of whether their spending cuts were irresponsible we will be moving forward reinforcing the very behavior we now need to get over and past. We shouldn’t reinforce the behavior of the politicians in Washington of the 90s regardless of their party - yet especially if the Clintons.
Were yesterday’s remarks from President Obama a cry for help?
It is bad enough the THE BIG GULP TWO BIG MAC A DAY WITH LARGE FRIES FIRST COUPLE tried to upstage elegant new Democratic Party “mother” the still FLOTUS MICHELLE OBAMA back when she first announced a new compassionate program to help curb the laxity and sloth encouraged and supported by the Clintons - so with her diet and “move” commands.
Yet, however, as per that day that was supposed to be the Democratic Party’s successor to FLOTUS CLINTON “BIG DAY” it still seems reported that President Clinton scheduled a duel for press dominance by electing to schedule elective surgery for his clogged arteries or veins.
Maybe it was a “biblical” day where he felt the guilt pangs for his irresponsible guidance to great advances in obesity - yet still it seems reported that Bill Clinton elected an elective emoting with elective surgery to steal the show from the Obama’s and Mrs. Clinton’s successor.
It seems yesterday is a cry for help from President Obama - It seems as if he has figured that he and his Mrs. cannot handle their rivals the Clintons, and is now trying to stir up allegiances against them by drawing their years out and finally into a current political mash up.
As it is possible that Bill Clinton, former President, may have had a “biblical” moment with guilt pangs either at the four points of max emphasis for all those years he promised his Mrs. with an “I cross my heart and hope to die…” pledging as maybe with a X-ray overlay possible to attest with some physical traits observations if we were to get Bill to “cross his heart” again for his Mrs. with a pledge of honesty.
And, so the recent heat wave reported more as a “HEAT RELATED” storming maybe as well “biblical” for its timing and pathology across the Obama White House netherlands might have been more “HEAT RELATED” than of a “CLIMATE CHANGE” and “GLOBAL WARMING.
I don’t know if we have any experts in such area in America anymore. I do get that ministry studies of all faiths and foreign language studies have the greatest potential now each as growth industries - as areas of and for job creation in and about a growth economy hoping.
Federalists v Republicans is now as if Democrats as Republicans or Federalists or maybe if Republicans aren’t now yet enough Republicans and still too much the new Federalists that Democrats would rather most not see them as.
As it is possible that Bill Clinton, former President, may have had a “biblical” moment with guilt pangs that day that was meant to be FLOTUS MICHELLE OBAMA’S big day to step out and above Mrs. Clinton and with a better diet and physical example for all the world as us expanded to “GLOBAL CITIZENS” — It still seems reported that President Clinton elected that day to try to upstage his Mrs. successor to Democratic Party “motherhood” with his dueling scheduling of a stirring of emotions “Oh, SURGERY” and “HOSPITAL” trip for PRESIDENT CLINTON.
Yes, it does fit that story could have been reported that THE BIG GULP TWO BIG MAC A DAY WITH LARGE FRIES FIRST COUPLE PATRIARCH CLINTON and his health concern could be ’supportive’ of his Mrs.’ successor to Democratic Party “motherhood” as an example to learn from - as an example of costs of walking President Clinton’s walk and talk.
Were yesterday’s remarks from President Obama a cry for help?
As we consider how much of Obamacare has to go as per a due reflection upon Federalists and Republicans of our original quite fully considered condition and wisdoms we do have that the greatest danger of the Party control duel by the term limited FIRST COUPLE CLINTONS even so was that the message from the BIG GULP TWO BIG MAC A DAY WITH LARGE FRIES FIRST COUPLE was that free healthcare and free healthcare coverage was their solution for the American people and that Michelle’s dieting just shouldn’t be seen as COOL.
Federalists v Republicans is now as if Democrats as Republicans or Federalists or maybe if Republicans aren’t now yet enough Republicans and still too much the new Federalists that Democrats would rather most not see them as.
At the time of THE PERFECT STORM - the actual storm that took out the first floor of Kennebunkport that storm could have been reported as a HOLY mess maybe not “biblical” enough. Those were the days of fears and storification of a possible end of the world by fire third world war originating out of the Middle East and with George Bush, President, the target of angst “biblical” (also) as the BIG tribal leader of an arrogant suddenly “sole” superpower of the world. That storm was so upon Bush’s Maine manse as that of three storms converging - as I recall.
And for these trying days with President Obama braving a “re-litigation” or “first litigation” of the Clintons’ 8 and the tax rates of such years, however: If we are asked to look at the tax rates then we are smartly it seems heralded to a querying as well as to the conditions of the budgeting then and all the spending cuts that did or did not justify such past tax rates.
We have as a starting point for this likely bi-partisan attack line at the terrible 90s that the BUSH TAX CUTS were justified by the CLINTONS’ SURPLUSES and passed in pre-9/11 budgeting parameters.
Were yesterday’s remarks from President Obama a cry for help?
It is amazing now in the same calender as our Constitution was ordained within yet now to us at the Year of our Lord two thousand ten and Two that Americans and maybe most “GLOBAL CITIZENS” are actually now fit thinkers already stirred enough to be maybe the most informed set if voters for 2012 than maybe since the days of Publius.
It is amazing now in 2012 that Americans can intelligently discuss so much that the Pelosi Congress tried to ram rod through without respect to a Jeffersonian Republican grounding or a respect actually of the peoples intelligence as per such.
2008 may go down in history as an election year for the record books where it was a whence with the electorate the most uninformed and misinformed ever in America’s still short story. Senator John Kerry may have to carry the cross about such the most for he seemed more interested in having an ANTI-WAR REVIVAL than an intelligent discussion of issues nearly ten times more complex and pressing.
America we seem to be oddly smart enough this year to handle the over due litigation of the Clintons’ 8 as per their TAX RATES and all their SPENDING CUTS and to the crucial points we have been being distracted and redirected from that may turn to be more a problem of Dems’ spending cuts than GOPer’s cuts and so to a new dawn where we can see that the 90s were a mess and much a bi-partisan mess with GOPers’ nearly as corrupted as Clintons’ Dems and the BIG GULP TWO BIG MAC A DAY WITH LARGE FRIES FIRST COUPLE.
It is amazing that we seem informed enough and intelligent enough for this stirred and overdue scrutinizing of the Clintons and the budgeting of the 90s and to us all thoroughly to a litigation even to consideration of whether that decade wasn’t dangerously of careless budgeting too political (even if bi-partisan) of a cutting of too much too quickly.
But is it actually too much for you now - do you need likes of Speaker Pelosi to make all your decisions for you?
And yet you/we at least seem to understand this paragraph by Ron Chernow in his biography of George Washington from WASHINGTON and page 671 of hard bound edition in its time:
“Before long the two factions took on revealing names. The Hamiltonian party called itself Federalists, implying that it alone supported the Constitution and national unity. It took a robust view of federal power and a strong executive branch, and it favored banks and manufacturing as well as agriculture. Elitist in its politics, it tended to doubt the wisdom of the common people, but it also included a large number of northerners opposed to slavery. The Jeffersonians called themselves Republicans to suggest that they alone could save the Constitution from monarchical encroachments. They believed in limited federal power, a dominant Congress, states’ rights, and an agrarian nation free of the corrupting influence of banks, federal debt, and manufacturing. While led by slaveholders such as Jefferson and Madison, the Republicans credited the wisdom of the common people. Washington and Hamilton believed wholeheartedly in an energetic federal government, whereas Jefferson and Madison feared concentrated power.”
Were yesterday’s remarks from President Obama a cry for help?
Did the Clintons’ corrupt both parties so much in our actually terrible 90s such that our labels and party tags are now more part of the problem than the solution?
Were yesterday’s remarks from President Obama a cry for help?
The important equity figure is near 6 Trillion. When President Obama took office there was a reported 6 Trillion available but sitting idle in private equity. When President Obama took office he may still have not realized how unfair it would be that some made it look far easier for Clintons to be First Couple in administering executively during their 8 than it actually was for those years.
Though there was a reported 6 Trillion of private equity available at the time President Obama took office there was little he could do with it as a new Democrat now to SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & THE TAX for after first round of new Dem spending private equity was smart enough to see their mattresses as offering better “return” on investment even if only offering zero return.
Besides it quite unreasonable and not preposterous or of an injustice to note that the Clintons were made to be better than they were for of a time others were making it be too easy, relatively speaking of the challenges of those years, and seem easier to be a successful President than the work of the Clintons can explain, still. No it may not be fair to Obama that it was made to look far easier to be President those years than the actual workings for America now will attest.
President Obama did come into office and move from old Dems “TAX AND SPEND” to a more progressive and irresponsible “SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & TAX” loose affiliation with limiting principles and financial prudence. He did come into office with a reported 6 Trillion in private equity available for investment if a profit could be reasonably and justly expected. He did come into office where that 6 Trillion was beyond he reach and reasoning as of private wealth. He is still in an office limited to spending mostly on a basis for revenues from profits or income or capital gains.
Yes, GREAT WALLS can make good neighbors. Yes fences have also been to expressions that they too make better communities. Yes, President Obama had mattresses offering at zero predicted return more reasonable return than “investing” in an Obama economy - and so while he without “wealth” or “property” taxing that in America is kept to the preserves of much more local governance revenue long arms of collections. Our federalist system with its different revenue collection methods does act like a fence or wall to defend our confederated republic and enumerated and protected freedoms and rights - and as well a general Welfare in common sense.
Yes, it is reasonable to have at least considered that President elect Obama would have known of Nixon and the lesson most are if in politics supposed to take away about it being the cover-up that should ruin. But President elect Obama did commence to President Obama with clear efforts that can only best be described as of an attempt to cover-up for the Clintons.
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?
I don’t remember when the BIG DIG finished in Massachusetts nor when its vast sums of other states people’s money stopped flowing in excessive sums into such state, and, nor do I recall when the DOT COM BUST happened and how it directly effected the tech corridor about Boston and Massachusetts’ economy in general. These both seem to be big factors of a relevant chronology precedent to Massachusetts having Mitt Romney as a Republican Governor. For his state to have been at 51st place for job growth I am guessing that I am correct in remembering such preceded his governance.
2012 really is seeming to be a year where people will be wondering again about the Clintons and their 8 years and finally maybe to realizing that they still don’t know how they were successful with many of their sold “successes” and be to relating with such as it seems clearer now that they have failed in attempts to help Dems with President Obama effect a repeat.
Yes, it may be unfair still to President Obama that the Clintons were made to look better than they were and that those difficult years were made to look as if of an easy street of easy governance for our Executive leadership. Yes, it may be unfair that so many let it be thought that it could be that easy to be President.
Our income and profit based federal revenue system may be all that saved us from this over-reaching initiated by the Clintons and carried further and too far by the Executive governance of Obama. Our states and localities have the authority to mend and/or maintain their “communities” and “civility” with “wealth” and “property” taxation - the new Dems proceeded with policies that needed “wealth” or “property” taxing power to “redistribution” - the new Dems by trying to do such still with an profits or income or capital gains limited authority did self construct a wall or fence between their ideals and their workability.
It may go down in our future history books that President Obama’s biggest mistake was his work so polarizing and partisan in a political with a capital “P” to attempts to effect a cover-up for the Clintons.
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?
His efforts at job killing have been far stronger than his efforts to job creation and his “save” of GM may have been more about trying to effect a political remaking of such company than a “financial save” of such.
We still have that before he commenced with his GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM platform to green energy we had as precedence that a similar green energy political push in Spain had cost at least two old economy jobs for each one new “green” job created. We have that there was precedence to expect that Obama meant to cut more jobs than he planned to create and multiples so for his aggressive politicizing was mixed with an austerity message with a call to a great new conservationism such that Americans should honestly have been warned by President Obama to expect that his furtherance of Dem ideology was set to actually kill off at least three to four jobs for each of the new politically correct green jobs.
We can thank our founders and later geniuses who limited our federal government spending to revenues bases so on profits or income or capital gains. This doesn’t help President Obama with Dem ideology or actually help further the attempts to cover-up for the Clintons but it did allow people free economic expression and even a shift if of investment equity to otherwise shift plans to long term development where losses would be planned for next 4 - 8 years but with enough profit to be expected there after if it then seemed safe and/or profitable to be at least so endeaverous within American borders.
But have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?
Have you also yet considered that a national or federal effort to a new growth economy may do now more harm than good and that Americans now have to find ways closer to home and for a while more with any “redistribution” debate kept to where “wealth” or “property” taxation the revenue basis for community maintenance and civility bolstering?
Yes I do believe the reports that there was near 6 Trillion in private equity sitting available and hungry for rational investing to reasonable returns for risk. I do believe that Dems some how missed that their ideology and SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & TAX new ways forewarned capitalists to days where their mattresses likely would be a better “investment” and for a while.
They were the good guys and gals and well private equity capitalists were supposed to be the bad guys and gals.
I still have no idea how the Dems did expect their “economic” ideas to actually work - it still seems clear that their aggressiveness was meant to cause this very economic condition and its austerity/conservationism.
I still have no idea how the Dems while attempting a cover-up for Clintons did expect any Republican to naively partake in a bi-partisan self destructive politics.
They tried the claiming to themselves as being the HEROES and the job creators of private sector as the VILLAINS.
Our Internal Revenue Service was supposed to get the funding for new massive armies of tax collectors - and yet since our federal revenues are not of a basis from “wealth” or “property” such was as self defeating as so much else of Dems’ ideology.
I still have no idea how Dems did think it would have worked if it could have worked - especially since it seems to be working exactly as it should have worked with so much “political” and “socialistic” injected preposterously and unjustly into and about our economy.
I don’t know about MARX as per “KILL LISTS” his - I did learn a new phrase this morning from Andrew Sullivan seemingly quoting Cardinal Dolan - I did realize this new term and its usage suggest a call to consideration to due process and as of an innocence until a guilt proven. When you hear “preposterous and unjust” phrase do you first assume guilt or do you suspect a denial of due process or prejudice of a prejudgement maybe as unfair as that which its usage proffered regarding?
As per the Dems misplaced ideology and practice these past few years we have that Dems as a class of subjects can be said to have caused the economic down turn while as an individual suspect President Obama more insulated and isolated though clearly of a willful association.
A SIT REP now beyond the cover-up problem President Obama has with the rival class in his cabinet inclusive of at least a party to “two-fer” in person of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is that which is of his foreign policies of so much denial of due process and soft money redistributing. But this is punctuated in ways due clear emphasis.
A SIT REP now beyond the cover-up problem President Obama has with the rival class in his cabinet inclusive of at least a party to “two-fer” in person of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is as well is an election year oddity especially for the Clintons that had half their supposed Hollywood friends rat them out as “BIG LIARS” and now as with fatality reports regularly still flowing as evidence as failures in a Diplomacy we have a messaging somehow still allowed near: Hillary lied and lies and soldiers are dying - Wow, what a great job Hillary is doing.
A SIT REP now towards 2012 deciding now must encourage a less Marxist BLIND FAITH in Obama Diplomacy and get around to asking if we were once recently of Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts of regular disloyal assertions to his anti-war revival efforts of an earlier Communist scare so with “Bush lied soldiers died” how long can we now still tolerate the indiscriminate political “diplomacy” so partisan of Madam Secretary of State but as also to a “Hillary lies - more soldiers are dying.”?
How did the Clinton economic team embraced by Obama White House as if it were the expected inevitable return of the Clintons fail? I can be said that their economic policies should have brought us all just here but that isn’t how they are telling their own stories. We have that if they could have back in 1993 they would have commenced earlier to this mess - they by not learning by the easy times they still can hardly well explain do seem still to fail to understand what was the “successes” of those years.
We have that we could have had this fine mess in their first term if they had managed to have their way then - and so quite so much because our federal revenues are not based on “wealth” or “property” but are responsive to motivations of the People and their willingness to associate and cooperate economically. We have that the People likely would have gone on strike as well against such Dem “management” back as early as Clintons’ first term if they had managed to have had their way whence then.
[Note: Version of “MARX IS BURNING” in 33 #economics @ CitizenRosebud.net may have edits as later draft.]
As we wait with baited breaths for the decision of the century screen doors may already be slamming open and shut - almost shut.
Can it all turn us back to a reasoned Constitutionalism just for some one being too “leftie”?
The Clintons make simple piece work for trial lawyers - pity the fools?
How are we all now here?
We are of a complicated time of contrariness and not even much whispered rebelliousness.
President Obama once was a Constitutional Law professor.
President Obama studied law and our Constitution at Harvard Law School.
Both of the Clinton “two-fer” studied at Yale Law School.
Both the Clintons and Barack Obama have been rebelling from our Constitutional.
How are we all here now?
Can our “main stream media” learn to cover a new federalism?
Can our MSM learn to treat our Governors and state legs with equal rights - their full rights?
Can the Clintons and Barack Obama manage if MSM now work to cover states’ greater rights?
So gauche were and are Bill Clinton and Barack Obama - yet so too George H. W. Bush, it seems.
I don’t know the critical handing of Hillary Clinton - I do know she may have guilt.
On the one hand we have “Bill” & “Hillary” of fame for not spending.
On the other hand we have “Bill” & “Hillary” & “Barack” of excessive spending.
It does seem gauche that Clintons can be popular for crash and unnecessary cutting of near a trillion.
It does seem gauche that Clintons now can be offensive with spend, spend, spend & not defensive.
Our Supreme Court Justices are at risk of a “Political” ruling if to an upholding vote for ACA.
ACA use of “affordable” near as bad yet maybe worse than “Hillary’s” use of “universal”.
President Barack Hussein Obama is still wrong about spending for Iraq. And so too the Clintons.
The Clintons as per Iraq had been their 8 to official biased and bigoted religion based foreign policy.
The Clintons have guilt - they as well shouldn’t be of offensive spending without also being defensive.
We didn’t need the Clintons’ SUPRLUS of trillion of rash defunding - how can they say spend now?
Because we haven’t heard the Clintons did it - they may be the only ones left not yet found innocent.
Before the Presidency of the Clintons Iraq and Iran had been of a Cold War geopolitics.
During the Presidency of the Clintons our foreign policy as per Iraq and Iran became “religious” and bigoted.
We have that President Barack Hussein Obama has been a shill for the Clintons - to quite a cover-up defense.
We have that President Barack Hussein Obama has been a shill for Clintons more than they shills for him.
After the Persian Gulf War Clintons should have avoided foreign policy bias bigoted against Shia.
The Clintons’ Presidency wasn’t well reasoned or Constitutionally balanced.
The Obama Presidency isn’t defensive enough for its offensive spending and offensive defense of Clintons.
Where is Senator John Kerry when a real anti-war movement seems now deserved and calling?
It is offensive that the Clintons can be innocent with spend, spend, spend now while of rash defunding to Trillion surplus!
If we have “Bill” shill for “Hill” and “Hill” shill for PBO & PBO shill for “Bill” and “Hill” while “Hill” a shill for “Bill” - OH MY!
How are we all here now?
How are we to an entire party to such now a case of Un-Constitutional governance?
If President Barack Hussein Obama just to sworn “best of my ability…” is it Harvard’s Law School at fault?
As per the Clintons I have known “Bill” as a liar since he was a Yale Law student - Not sure Yale at fault.
As per Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton I remember she is whom’s face “Bill” lie to.
I am not sure Yale Law School can be blamed for the greasy watermelons that are these Clintons.
How are we all here now?
I know law student “Bill” lied to “Hillary” while walking & talking & polling law students - they polled me.
I know for he lied to her about what my honest answer so requested was amended to when they added without consideration to their polled question the complication that they were then of asking if they could both become president someday actually otherwise than first asked as if of two equal Yale Law Students with independent futures. I know for when they changed the question of their polling about whether they could both become president some day my answer did change to amend answer to their conclusion as per their poll response as if it had been to a different question — I know for when they changed nature of question with “Hillary” then of response to my first answer with “then I will marry you” my answer changed for they hadn’t asked me if they could both become President if they married each other and became a united “one”. I know this and know specifically that Yale Law School not as responsible for “Bill” as a liar and of that day for moving to lie to “Hillary” with his first words after her “then I will marry you” to a lying about my amended answer she hadn’t heard and then had been to asking him “what did he say” to such from “Bill” a lie about what I said. If you think it odd I took to an appreciation of our 22nd Amendment you should realize most of this happened because of the Clintons then polling me as like a “charming boy at play in the school yard” and then years remembering me as like a talisman to their over-reaching plotting and ambitions - still as like “that charming young boy” once playing after hours alone in the school yard in a neighborhood known to be a New Haven professionals neighborhood much populated by lawyers and law professors and many professors from other departments at Yale.
How did we get here now?
And really it ridiculous that the Clintons of their trillion in defunding can present as right with spend, spend, spend now!
Nine? Can we get ruling of nine justices against ACA - for otherwise justices are as political activism shilling for Dems?
Are we all at least agreed that they took an oath of office to treat the Constitution as our rules of their gaminess?