hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
June 2012
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
06/29/12
DOG EATS BOY - LIKE?
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, OBAMACARE, CLIMATE CHANGE, #MORALS, #AUSTERITY, #ISLAM SQUIBS, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 6:38 pm

There is a missing moral fiber in this diet of compassionate conservatism.  We have that a rascal - a young rascal of a President has had his hands slapped by better lawyers - all served up - aired out - debated & affirmed with strong dissent.

To some this is like a CADDY SHACK “X” or another GROUNDHOG DAY for gophers.

For membership in this buffet of over coddling especially Warren Buffett you don’t have to also get served - like maybe.

If you are a billionaire in Moscow you may be sitting pretty and above all this.

If you are a billionaire in Moscow you have been reported at least by foreign press to be of a conclave locally as the largest class of world’s richest - as like:  The city with the most number of billionaires is Moscow.

The rascal that is “boy wonder” Barack Hussein Obama, President, has a dog of a barked ruling to live down while trying to now live up to it and it so much of an era known for compassionate conservatism.  What this dog needs is more fiber - some moral bits of fiber.

What is likely to really set its teeth with bite now upon Presidency of Obama and his moral stature is really that besides his complexity with his fog of religiousness he sits as President as a man born a Muslim boy who chose Christianity as a better religion - while of his right mind.

We have that this rascal does want to be a hero for saving the entire world as we know it from a sudden end and doom due to supposedly unchecked global warming and/or climate change.   In some ways his is a JETSON - a rascal as a still young “Barry Jetson” - yet a “Jetson” getting affirmative action to talk about.  He is futuristic, even too futuristic, but in the compassionate conservatism of his embrace of tenets of Romneycare.

I don’t know if you can say the recent opinions and ruling from the ACA - Obamacare, as a BACK TO SCHOOL like embarrassment for young rascal of a President the “boy wonder” who chose Christianity over Islam - the “Barry Jetson” of a futurism in his own time - the one and only Barack Hussein Obama, are not now a dog about him for what was ruled Un-Constitutional yet of these efforts rascalish yet of a compassionate conservatism his to own forever as work of an inadequate legal professionalism.

It is the economy that is a bigger dog about this election year and as implied by Warren Buffett no less as much because Democrats had been over coddling him and for too long.  So it took a Republican to get us here - but how.

Obamacare is a dog of a work of inadequate legal professionalism with bite yes and big teeth - is it the young rascal of a President that wants to be a planetary hero for saving the earth able to run fleetly enough from its likeliness to catch him from behind?

Yes I do believe it has been confirmed that Moscow is home to the “most number of billionaires” for one of our world as we know it per one city - one greater metropolitan area.  They do seem protected from and above all this - but how?  But why?  Where is a reasoned and cohesive moral fiber as a visible intelligent strand through all this American politics about ACA - Obamacare?

It is the economy that is a bigger dog about this election year and as some know it isn’t President Obama’s explanations or excuses you should be believing - some know better - some to many have better legal professionalism too.   It is a more simple and so believable truth that the Dems with excessive liberalism and the already some admonished or scolded “over-reaching” are actually already sized up as those that caused the down economy and all their convenient CRISIS moments.

Do you like this rascal of a young Presidency as fleet enough to outrun this dog now to daily alarms as if each new day was just yesterday all over again?  Do you like him as a futuristic “Barry Jetson” “boy wonder” that managed to save and entire planet single handedly and in time for his next election?  Do you get that he is the uncontested self proclaimed new New Deal Austerity inheritor of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt social state madness?

How big a dog is Obamacare?  Romneycare didn’t tank the Massachusetts’ economy but it seems you cannot quite say the same about Obamacare for his pronounced Un-Constitutional over-reaching of embarrassing inadequate professional legal erudity - can you?

So its a TAX - a morally as it stands as a Federal Tax power that cannot really be denied as long as Presidents are willy nilly allowed taxing powers to revenues to wars of choice and/or unnecessary wars.  There can be a war on health - like - but there is not a Constitutional RIGHT to healthcare - right?   And yet we have President Obama also rascalish each day he wakes and leans on the kept closer to the citizen people compassionate conservatism that is historically Romneycare.

Obamacare is a dog with teeth and now bite!  Obamanomics is still a dog - is a dog as well he may not be able to shake.

Until November each new day will seem an awakening alarmed as if it was yesterday all over again - and again - Right?

It is a TAX - and one he cannot outrun now for it morally as a tax is one that all - everyone is of a duty to pay - EVERYONE.

IT IS A TAX ON EVERYONE!  It has to be morally speaking - speaking though with compassion - Right?

I know he our President that chose Christianity over the religion of his birth may dog him in more than one way too.

I know he our President does seem to have needed every dollar the Bush Administration expended to research and development of new technologies more efficient and even say “green”.

I know if he tries to be a “Barry Jetson” as a “wonder boy” that saved the entire planet he too may be to running from another dog after at bite at his “moralisms” for it seems to have done gone and save the entire planet in just that year or two he must know something that we don’t - he must know that President Bush must have prudently been actually a “green” President, right?

Mr. President - about Moscow - about so many billionaires seeming safely above and beyond this - how could you?  Can you explain the global moral inconsistencies? 

Why are you running Mr. President? 

But for your golfing - we see you can “dress” like a Compassionate Conservative - but can you out run your dogs? 

Should you be able to outrun these dogs - your dogs?  

And while BACK TO SCHOOL on the Constitution so embarrassingly at least for your Dem legislators and their lawyers?  

How is it this is legal more if a state does it than if the State so attempts such over-reaching?

Comments Off
06/27/12
SOCK IT TO ME?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, OBAMACARE, #CGI, #SUSPECT, WAR ON WOMEN, #MORALS, #PUTIN ESSAYS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:21 am

What is it said about “plans” and “war” - about “a plan” as soon as an actual war starts?

President Obama as Candidate Barack Hussein Obama - BHO - planned to be a new JFK, right?

And now how while BHO is seeming more pasty and unprepared for prime time You Tube video streams?

Looking at 2012 complexity:

> Are we to define “working class” as those of class as per governance that have work that pays taxes - and so “working class” is those busy as the reported less than fifty percent that pay taxes into a …? When President Obama says - “get back to work” is he speaking to the “rich” as his “working class” as it is they he needs working to afford his own “work”?

> So bike and pedestrian projects are “local” - pedestrian bridges and bike paths are best kept or made “local” projects and as near to “public/private” partnerships as economically reasonable as alternative and “better” commuting routes to businesses - businesses especially local fitness centers and eating establishments?

> More on the survival of our Constitution: #SCOTUS today with Arizona case set up ACA ruling seriously well >> from today’s decision and especially siding by Chief Justice Roberts we have established practically that if you can’t use race or “legal” status in Arizona then it cannot then be used by doctors under any Obamacare even for “family” or “genetic” factors and that Obama wants our borders open so that any can have American care since well after today they don’t have to carry proof of legal presence.

> Query: Re: Arizona dec - Conservative Justices could so support such for by supporting such they reinforce deciding against Obamacare - ACA - for having no limiting principles like with Arizona an example since of no power to establish whom therefore is “legal” and limited to Obamacare???

> Anyone have the numbers for this yet?: Is Obama running for re-election hoping for votes from recently unemployed or is he running for votes for millions grateful for a near three year paid vacation?  Are women for Obama grateful and willing to vote for him for having thinned down the jobs market so much they have him as an excuse to stay at home with more “me time” - or are they considering re-electing him thinking he knows what work they are better to be doing and believable with promises of finding non “me time” work for women?

> If I were moderating a Presidential Debate tonight I would have or hope for a question about immigration and self deportation of these economic times as it seems since immigration wasn’t worked out and fixed before ACA - Obamacare hysterics our economy may not start growing the new jobs in a new growth economy than some that haven’t self deported are maybe still waiting for, and so that we are to ask and get an answer about whether it is possible that until immigration is fixed the jobs won’t come back and that if a new immigration or re-immigrate legally system can be worked out it may be smarter and more self serving to self deport just so so much that Dems did backwards can be fixed and to unleash a new attractive growth economy.

Hmmm? Anyone - anyone with the last name Romney or Obama?

> Related to “SOVEREIGN STATE” powers and rights we have actually inseparable and relative philosophically at least - as least socially speaking comparatively - that therefore when a state is sovereign whom is “legal” is a particular particular - say for if Obamacare isn’t overturned if the United States of America is to have enough armed forces in another country another “sovereign state” and enough force to “OCCUPY” such state regardless of the stated state of such forces as if not combat though combat ready - hmmm?  It follows whom is “legal” or a “subject” critical for by the very lack of a complete philosophy of governance with sufficient checks and balances of limiting principles then therefore it stands that if the United States or another state is to have enough armed forces in another sovereign state but so that then morally all the people of that sovereign state have a right to expect for the duration of effective “OCCUPATION” the same full rights to medical coverage and American medical care.  So it seems #SCOTUS - how can it not be so based on the inadequate limits herefore so far writ?

> The easiest way I have of remembering the troop size considered by some to have been an Iraq OCCUPATION force of United States of American stand up citizens is to remember than during the primary race between junior Senator Clinton and junior Senator Obama in just Massachusetts’ primary the gap between them that primary election day was about 150,000 - about the same number of US troops at highest level of deployed whence.

> With efforts to ACA - Obamacare was much about a federal IMAC clearinghouse of all legal citizens and their personal medical files and medical histories and maybe as well to required annual or semi-annual check-ups #SCOTUS to the Thursday a wonder where we may be to hearing as well how IMAC so conceived as a Big Brother centralized computer database system to cost efficiencies isn’t to our Government to illegal search and seizure of incriminating personal information like urine - stool - and blood tests for all the substances legal and illegal then most a political and/or health concern. I mean didn’t Obamacare get set up to allow the new Big Brother Centralized Main Frame IMAC concept to be to comparing and contrasting details of individual citizen’s current and past medical facts without warrants otherwise to such and so to cost analysis maybe not just down to zip code but maybe per street to an objectivity not based on name that would at least be allowed to legally publish sharable analytics with “detail” down to at least a side of a particular street within a particular zip code or subset per zip-code?

> So as per #SCOTUS is it Thursday we may be reading lines about how in America and these United States you cannot claim “Under God” that an individual citizen’s soul or sexuality is free and locally set asunder in rights and yet have their body and its “jurisdiction” as per “their” body be to “their” body being of a soulless national body physically of national jurisdiction and Supreme Powers and even to a control of its arms via dictates adapted may as well to limit control of arms as per our thought preserved Second Amendment rights? #commonsense It is Thursday we may have to wonder how our nation can separate our body from our freedoms and our soul?

> Wow - aren’t we to the Clintons are suspect as towards all this and much of their 8 now vacuous of waste - time lost on a wrong path - to a post Constitutional era that isn’t?

> There is a big diff between how CGI was set up and how it is being run - Mr C claimed he would not use it to partisan or political powers - and yet really he is and is regularly - most regularly to an irregular especially when of his annual mandatory meeting of world leaders then able to be in town also for the meeting of the over-shadowed so United
Nations???

> With this (Major Lawsuit Claims Dodd-Frank Is Unconstitutional) as long as some of ACA - Obamacare Unconstitutional - we have that Clinton Global Initiative as operating can also be challenge and separation of powers concerns and especially since it is operating while Mrs C is Madam Sec Mrs. C. — they thought they had the Constitution beat as no longer relevant and tried to do how much???  And Mrs. C our top officer responsible for saying whether Mr. C is operating completely within the intent of our protections and for saying whether anyone should be even looking at Mr. C so?

> And so yes - Operation Iraqi Freedom was needed and with us in the right to be about it so.  Yes Bush admin though of a good feeling that it was right was not all that great at selling us on it as right - that said, the time to sell it rightly and timely was the first term of the Clintons’ admin thought maybe easiest if actually the second term of President George H. W. Bush.  Don’t know if I have written this all out fully yet but I have addressed it much now many places for a long while and in some of columns of just past few years.

Hmmm?  Yes it was right but not sold well - and I had confidence that Bush 43 had a feeling that it was right though he maybe could have sold it better even though the best time to sell it and only easy time was likely during what was the Clintons’ first term.

> And so still yes - Operation Iraqi Freedom was right and necessary and yet not to cause a peoples movement across the Middle East but so that we didn’t get trapped morally and hypocritically on the wrong side of it - and maybe as Saddam Hussein had considered or hoped he could trap us and as of a thinking that he had a way to keep Kuwait after invading it.  Hmmm?  Yeh a re-election of the Clintons would have been maybe America’s biggest ever mistake too - a return of the Clintons with suggestions that they were wise of a Grand Strategy needing continuity even though there was an actual ‘GRAND’ strategy - and nor a left entrance or exit plan for dealing with Iraq to leave to their successor whom ever - and so no real alternative by the Clintons and only a weak supposition of “bite” by Clintons for sanctions even just for human rights violations.

> Well, that was an interesting line in Foreign Affairs by Brooking xprts to find today about how Arab Spring was an unexpected curve ball to Pres O and therefore necessarily also former FLOTUS Madam Sec Mrs. C.  I thought they had been trying to take credit for it and not have their favorite institute of xprts say it was a ‘CURVE BALL’ unexpected.  See this is where it gets very interesting - if you have been to un-hid {maybe again “hidden”}commentary/blog page at jphogan.org as enticed you likely saw a composition mentioning a 2007ish conversation I had with Serbian Ambassador Ivan Vujacic about Hillary and Operation Iraqi Freedom - about why even though if AEI had “top Republicans” seeming already defeated that they were so early saying he should expect Hillary to be the next US President - - about Operation Iraqi Freedom while I told him Hillary shouldn’t or couldn’t win while then adapting for the only time anyone asked me to explain and defend Operation Iraqi Freedom and Bush admin as per Serbia and me to telling him my personal thoughts and how such was with needing that Clintons were not elected and to that way a way that Serbia would be able to be best positioned for the type of peoples movement I had a hunch had to be allowed for - sort of like the Arab Spring.  Seems my advice is admitable now as right then for how we did the necessary thing with Operation Iraqi Freedom even if it wasn’t sold as well as it could have been.

Hmmm? I guess Obama’s favorite xprts aren’t also going with:  Neither Obama nor Clinton were prepared for such.

Hmmm?  Did you hear the one about Obama policies expert Vladimir Putin and how he suggested that if President Obama didn’t beat his addiction to Soviet socialism he could cause the United States to fall apart into six separate regional realms?  @jphoganorg of http://jphogan.org/ & …

Comments Off
06/26/12
THE GREAT BEAVER…
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:54 am

THE GREAT BEAVER AND THE BEAVER WARS

Filed under: 11/17/2010  at http://myblog.jphogan.org

— @jphoganorg @ 9:29 pm
Originally posted within a series soon after November 2010 elections.

THE GREAT BEAVER…

So it is told, so it was written.

This town of settled spirit still fresh with frontier sense and sensibilities does have its quirks, and sure has a few experts.

Once a new leader hit the tablets and presses or stories of just blaming the president before him, and this town was a laughing, this whole town was a laughing with their own sorts of “no he didn’t!”

Borough of Jeffersonville did have a down economic period with a noticeable reduction in economic “energy” and not at same time as other towns they were reading about.  They realized they had to look locally for the causes and that they did.

You heard told that most in borough have taken to carrying a piece of chalk with them at all times, yes?

Well, the year of the great Jeffersonville recession near the first “indicator” as it became that they found being forensic in their own markets was a reduction in sales of chalk at BBB - Beatrice Boxer Business of packing and supplies.

Really not since the first production of THE GREAT BEAVER AND THE BEAVER WARS, as written by Nancy Potter and directed by school’s teacher of English languages, as the first production at the then new Beaver Playhouse has the town had such a laugh, such a laugh as that again heard with stories of a new president blaming everything under the sun that was wrong on just the former president.  Jeffersonville just thought it had been written as humor, necessarily, they were not ready to fully question a new president.

See, Jeffersonville had long been of critical discussions of the tempestuous policies and politics of the president before the now before, and now with new president after such of same party as that of the before the before, the not blamed, also to speaking of not wanting an economy of booms and busts - an economy of even and scheduled and dictated growth and wages Jeffersonville readers just had to laugh.

See, Jeffersonville had long been wise to that the before the before to intentionally running a reckless boom economy around irresponsible budget cuts while with a specific effort in empowerment to encouragement of most in country to imprudent spending.

It just had to be a big joke like the first production of THE GREAT BEAVER AND THE BEAVER WARS, it had to be – the “boom economy” president, the before the before was with graphics showing policies three times above new president’s ideal scheduled “growth economy” and yet the before such only a single click below such - it just had to be a joke, this public attempt to blame just the president before.

The last thing Borough of Jeffersonville would attempt to market is an economy without booms and busts, and that while still a town worrying that the Iroquois 70 years war might actually not really be over yet.

Town governors of the town council did discern that the reduced chalk sales was now the “indicator” to watch before all others in the Borough of Jeffersonville if another recession to be averted.  Conclusions were reached after some casual studies not quite dispositions around boroughs kitchen tables and fires, and even regularly in the Gullybuck anteroom at Berliner Bakery at peak times for Gullybuck’s Coffee and Fancy Teas proprietry.  The Berliner has long also had a slate inside and outside for sense of community, but makes no use of it themselves for news, or broadcasts.

Town learned that they were late to learning that citizens had stopped carrying chalk and also stopped their spirit use of it.  Tow
used some story telling not issuance of new edicts to return sense of community around apt applications of eruditions in chalk, by many.

So it was told, so it had been written and produced with the direction of teacher Rosie Greenberg.

And so the town lost the carpenters they thought they had convinced to stay and stay after having been convinced and partly bartered into construction of the Beaver Playhouse.

Some say Nancy Potter doesn’t want carpenters regular in here’s
economy and say so remembering the days of the last carpenter migration were those she was still in the dress business.  Those who know the production and/or story of THE GREAT BEAVER AND THE BEAVER WARS are much in agreement, for it was just a couple days after opening night with such production until then well a town secret that those carpenters found themselves to the one all mocked by the town they had just built a playhouse in and they thought for, it was just a couple days until they to the one did pack up and leave in the dark of the night.

Some visiting carpenters have been known to laugh at later productions not knowing its bite was specific to some til then traveling carpenters lead to think to calling Jeffersonville home.  

The Beaver Wars did last at least 70 years and the play on opening night more than most did present to futility in building with so many beavers around.

Chief Beavertail gained the most in these fiascos for he was the property owner carpenters were seduced into building upon with their finest skill in barter for future trades with their new town.  Chief Beavertail really made out the best when the town decided he could rightfully be considered the owner of such building if only he were to pay the remaining debt for material and transit of such materials from mill a few days ride away.

What could THE COURANT CHRONICLE HERALD NEWS lead off with next paper but “If only Nancy Potter hadn’t rammed through an approval for THE GREAT BEAVER AND THE BEAVER WARS with the town governors as its opening production” - oy!

So it is told, so it was written?

                    *  *  *

{For greater “context” you should visit http://myblog.jphogan.org and click on “November” in archives offering in left margins - that and scroll to near “Election Day 2010″ and find where the scene is set and characters introduced towards maybe a Ohio &  Kentucky centric new like “Little House on the Prairie” storification for our times.  Yes there are other pieces of political punditry maybe of interest as well just in that 2010 post election month of November.  I don’t recall if a discussion is there on how our Constitution is prefaced with its preamble to an “ordained” and how when signed by all with their subscriptions it was quite a Lordly wonder since they did so “ordain” our Constitution “in the Year of our Lord…” specifically with a Christian calender agreed to - so it seems.}

Comments Off
06/25/12
THE TROJAN DONKEY?
Filed under: POLITICS, AUTO-BIO'D, IRAQ, OBAMACARE, TREASON, #CGI, #QUEEN, #MORALS, #MAGIC
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:03 am

I accept that some new readers are finding my blogs due to links about Harry Potter - I accept that some are wondering now with “I thought it was about Prince Harry”!  That said:  It still was and is but in the spirit of Mark Twain’s A CONNECTICUT YANKEE IN KING ARTHUR’S COURT and from another from Connecticut with wizardry a guidance - yet as much for a second son of another Charles maybe never to be a King. 

Yes J.K. Rowling has a sister named Di and I at times thought myself a kept “friend” of Princess Diana since youthful floating of “are you sure you would rather be with an American” well considered before she was Mrs. Charles… - Princess Di.  I will for a long time remember the day of her passing for the unusual happenstance that occurred to me with the Queen in my beingness with a “you are on the Queen’s notify list.”  It was so moving that I walked inside and turned on the TV to try to figure out such a concerning happenstance. 

Yes, my challenge to J.K. Rowling for seven books for seven years of advancing curriculum in magic and such can be said to have been “for” Prince Harry” but not “about” Prince Harry any more than most others - but as one ambitious to be a future top Mad Man (Madison Avenue Marketing Man Wizard) or media ideas person professionally as myself a fan of A CONNECTICUT YANKEE IN KING ARTHUR’S COURT and also from Connecticut and with a maternal grandfather who had been and “Arthur” and a once top Mad Man himself - to a friendship kept along the lines of being as if a lay wizard to the sons of Princess Di.

But this is about borders and distant states and whom people belong to actually as “citizens” or “subjects.”

Yes we have that the Clintons and their eight years are seeming a vacuous waste - a wasted eight of ambitions and plotting and worse of wants and workings to a hoped for post-Constitutional era with less limited Powers and opportunities to spring surprises contrary to that we once practiced jurisprudently as a Constitution - a Constitutional.

A mass of donkeys full of surprises - even a construct of one big “DONKEY” for Constitutionals surprise and less restraint - we now still may see and hear in time.  Who are they?  Where did they come from?  Are they subjects - are they of distant small cells of non-state actors of ill intents?  Where oh where were the Clintons during their eight?

Are we now of a vacuous waste - a wasted eight of the Clintons eight - not but for the attempts to a post Constitutional new age of laws of person(s) few more than governance of laws?  A Query: THIS DECISION IS THAT LOCAL OFFICERS ARE STILL ALLOWED TO BE “AMERICANS” AND NOT OTHERWISE A SUB CLASS IN AN EXTRA CONSTITUTIONAL NEW CLASS SYSTEM?

The Constitution of the United States of America does bar us all from a class system of “titling” and “knighting” and the like.

Is there now obviously a likeness of a great “DONKEY” rolling about to surprise us to a HOPED and WANTED post Constitutional era - a new era of Czars at least as if a titled class above at least local officers, and untouchable?

And the next case as much a TROJAN DONKEY ??? >> ACA - Obamacare not about an economic tending to the forgotten elderly and forgotten youth as other Government programs have been - but a move to be all reaching and to the “of age and able bodied” masses and their freedoms.  A right to help different for each class - economically and socially speaking - judiciously - RIGHT?

This is not about a new THE BRITISH ARE COMING!!! or a THE BRITISH ARE INTOLERABLE and too quartered in our quarters.

We definitely are of a time of concerns about seats of power and distant meddling in local affairs and with a wonder about how - a how can we be here now without the Clintons and their eight a vacuous waste.

And if you were yourself to put in “messianic” into 2012us search pane this trinity you would find?  THE BOOK OF BARACK & … @ http://2012us.jphogan.org/

There is a big diff between how CGI was set up and how it is being run - Mr C. claimed he would not use it to partisan or political powers - and yet really he is and is regularly - most regularly to an irregular especially when of his annual mandatory meeting of world leaders then able to be in town also for the meeting of the over-shadowed so United Nations???

Is the Clintons’ Global Initiative another TROJAN DONKEY - the biggest and most Constitutionally concerning of all the TROJAN DONKEYS?

Yes, I started the link up to J.K. Rowling with a “searching” pre-google for an unknown author willing to write about a characterization of a Pete “Rowe-ling” and his magical posse and for seven books for seven years of advancing curriculum in magic and to seven because after that click of youth did protest my announcement of a planned moving away were of a “but we don’t want you to move away - we have fun when you are around” for those all aka to “Rowe-lings” were then about seven years from likely attending Yale University and its castle like halls if they so chose.  It was to “Rowe-lings” for a protection under Pete Rowe M.D. the late founder and proprietor of the Yale Student Health Clinic - a grandfather to two of original “Rowe-ling” characterization.

Yes, I found an unknown author remarkably just a few or so days older than myself, as I had hoped when looking for one willing to write about a “Peter Rowe-ling” and as if a second son of a Charles that might never be a King with concerns heartfelt for Di.  Yes as per J.K. Rowling she was then a single mother who with a sister Di and they with their father Peter Rowling already among the passed souls of our world.

Yes, as I worked it out so much of my musing was purposeful most to protecting at least one generation from the Clintons I had already known since the early 70s and as well from concerns that at least a generation might need protections from their works and hopes and wants to a post Constitutional era and days with more flexibility for them and maybe TROJAN DONKEY politicing.

Yes, as per the seven books - which I still have not read and likely won’t until I know a first generation of readers have read more of me and such as above and now known to be real Constitutional concerns once considered maybe too much a fancy or distraction, mine - J.K. Rowling had hoped I would give her as much for the last two books as I had for the first five.  Yes, J.K. is remembered for not liking my instructions that she had to find her way to the last two herself even if it meant more worked than she first expected - for I needed an objectivity and distance that I would only get if she read her audience and fans and figured in a feminine “maternal” way how much she should offer and how much she should avoid offering a disillusioning.

And so still yes - Operation Iraqi Freedom was right and necessary and yet not to cause a peoples movement across the Middle East but so that we didn’t get trapped morally and hypocritically on the wrong side of it - and maybe as Saddam Hussein had considered or hoped he could trap us and as of a thinking that he had a way to keep Kuwait after invading it.  Hmmm?  Yeh a re-election of the Clintons would have been maybe America’s biggest ever mistake too - a return of the Clintons with suggestions that they were wise of a Grand Strategy needing continuity even though there was an actual ‘GRAND’ strategy - and nor a left entrance or exit plan for dealing with Iraq to leave to their successor whom ever - and so no real alternative by the Clintons and only a weak supposition of “bite” by Clintons for sanctions even just for human rights violations.

And so as this was written we are forewarned to look at the Clintons and their eight and all that may be about them as of dangers and of a vacuous waste.  

Beware THE TROJAN DONKEY(S) - LIKE, REALLY!!!

And please share with your friends - tweet or share or retweet at least to free for all still of compositions at http://citizenrosebud.us

Comments Off
06/23/12
THE 2 BILLS
Filed under: POLITICS, CLIMATE CHANGE, #MORALS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:36 am

We have the one BILL and the other BILL -
A good BILL - A bad BILL -
A right BILL and a wrong BILL.

IT IS SURPLUS SATURDAY -
ARE YOU READY? 

WE HAVE JUST ONE BILL - REALLY.

We have the one BILL and the other BILL -
A good BILL - A bad BILL -
A right BILL and a wrong BILL.

IT IS SURPLUS SATURDAY -
ARE YOU READY?

Heard of BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES?

Heard about IMMIGRATION?

Heard of MR GO?

And BILL and his 1 Trillion?

We have the one BILL and the other BILL -
A good BILL - A bad BILL -
A right BILL and a wrong BILL.

IT IS SURPLUS SATURDAY -
ARE YOU READY?

Heard of BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES?

Heard about IMMIGRATION?

Heard of MR GO?

And BILL and his 1 Trillion?

We have the one BILL and the other BILL -

IT IS SURPLUS SATURDAY -
ARE YOU READY? 

WE HAVE JUST ONE BILL - REALLY.

We have the one BILL and the other BILL -
A good BILL - A bad BILL -
A right BILL and a wrong BILL.

IT IS SURPLUS SATURDAY -
ARE YOU READY?

Heard of BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES?

Heard about IMMIGRATION?

Heard of MR GO?

And BILL and his 1 Trillion?

Without BILL’S TRILLION all’ld be fine?

And BILL and his 1 Trillion?

Or:  With BILL’S TRILLION all’ld be fine?

Heard about IMMIGRATION?

Heard of MR GO?

And BILL and his 1 Trillion?

IT IS SURPLUS SATURDAY -
ARE YOU READY?

Heard of BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES?

And BILL and his 1 Trillion?

We have the one BILL and the other BILL -
A good BILL - A bad BILL -
A right BILL and a wrong BILL.

If I had a TRILLION I’ld hammer in the morning - like?

If I had a TRILLION I’ld write for $s & heart’s delight?

WE HAVE JUST ONE BILL - REALLY.

IT IS SURPLUS SATURDAY -
ARE YOU READY?

Oh IMMIGRATION? - Oh MR GO? -
WHERE, JUST, WERE YOUR MILLIONS?

Heard of BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES?

Oh, me darling - where did that TRILLION go? -
Long time suffering - long time still -
Where did that TRILLION go?

We have the one BILL and the other BILL -
A good BILL - A bad BILL -
A right BILL and a wrong BILL.

If I had a TRILLION I’ld hammer in the morning - like?

If I had a TRILLION I’ld write for $s & heart’s delight?

WE HAVE JUST ONE BILL - REALLY.

Oh, me darling - where did that TRILLION go? -
Long time suffering - long time still -
Where did that TRILLION go?

IT IS SURPLUS SATURDAY -
ARE YOU READY?

Oh IMMIGRATION? - Oh MR GO? -
WHERE, JUST, WERE YOUR MILLIONS?

BLOCK GRANTS FOR STATES???

WHERE DID - WERE ME DARLING DID -
WHERE ME COUNTRYMEN - WHERE? -
WHERE DID OUR TRILLION GO?

WHY NOT JUST FOR ONE BILL -
WHY NOT EVEN JUST FOR TWO?
IT IS SURPLUS SATURDAY -
WHERE DID THAT TRILLION GO?

OH ???  BILL ???

Did you just plum forget about the schools -
the bridges -
the roads -
global warming and climate change -
the levies & and the levies -
and IMMIGRATION?
Why - why still?
Why your surplus - WHY YOUR SURPLUS?
WHERE DID THAT TRILLION GO?

OH ???  BILL ???

              *  *  *

{Budget note:  as per our records as per Presidents and President’s budgeting back as far as 1983 we have that for from the Honorable judge and his decision regarding the flooding of New Orleans as per the failure of already maybe condemned Mississippi River Gulf Outlet - aka MR GO - that for his finding of “gross negligence” against our Government we have that a simple truth is existent that President Clinton of all the pre Katrina Presidents is the one most immoral as per budgets and because his TRILLION of four years of “SURPLUS” clearly of such “gross negligence” and loudly since he had the money - he was a President since 1983 that had the money - had determined it was available - was concerned some about climate change and so we should expect aware of increased dangers to inadequate and aged levy systems like MR GO even without his having been so “LOCAL” as a past Arkansas Governor “neighbor” - really had the money available to avoid “gross negligence” in his budgeting — such that because of the Clintons’ four years of “SURPLUS” and their TRILLION in many small and large cuts we therefore have in the finding of Katrina failure of MR GO of a “GROSS NEGLIGENCE” an essential simple deduction that then the Clintons as per “since 1983″ stipulation are our MOST NEGLIGENT FCOTUS since 1983 and specifically because of their SURPLUSES OF A TRILLION UNNECESSARY CUTS.  *** They had the money and they chose not to spend it despite all the warning and bureaucratically shared “dangers” of “condemned” lists or those nearly so.  And while they of all politicians warning most then of DANGERS of greater storms due to GLOBAL WARMING. ***}

Comments Off
06/20/12
GONE CARNEY
Filed under: POLITICS, WAR ON WOMEN, #AUSTERITY, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:57 am

AN ALTERNATE TITLE FOR THIS COLLECTION/COMPOSITION COULD BE OR SHOULD BE “FROST - HOLDER”.

We are at a deja view “all over again.” 

Though it is very concerning that between now and November 2012 decidings our nation is to familiar battles between generations old and new and old and unborn, it is also very concerning as candidate and party choices for this fall decidings are to the oldest generations to be reviewed familiarly by their own of younger generations and as to their needs and spending habits and if it might actually be fair to abide by the absence of limiting principles in Obamanomics and Obama’s policies so that the youngest and the unborn even if not eighteen are being asked if it should be fair that they are to shoulder near $40,000 in national debt as “per capita” and soon as from birth.

Besides this challenge mult-generational to all American families to be to judging whether the oldest in their clan deserves the youngest and even unborn to be conceived to a near $40,000 personal national share of debt just because of an “unlimited” lifestyle and nationalism without limiting principles doctrinated though ordained to be.

We have at least two cases already under review by our highest court concerning the Obama administrations efforts to work legislatively to presumptions to new Constitutional Powers lacking in limiting principles so much that like the “Executive Privilege” claim today we are again some how just to looking at Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama and his henchmen/henchwomen as of airs Un-Constitutional of wants and actual practice seemingly to an:  If the President says it is legal then it is legal!!!

President Obama is likenable to a circus Ring Master more than a Captain of a cruise ship ship shape and in order in a wheelhouse.  As “slow and patient” now for so much seems afoot though of riling with much about “Fast and Furious”!  We have that we have President Obama so of a gone carney taggable even suggested with Mr. Carney as his official press mouthpiece.  As a circus Ring Master and known attempts to razzle and dazzle and distract with CRISIS and ALARMISM we still have the problem that he wanted to run and operate as President with a “PERSONALITY BASED PRESIDENCY”.

President Obama has become taggable and mashable and tweetable as if of clear and certain wants to dictatorial Powers so that if he says it is legal then it is legal.  I don’t know why he has proceeded so since his very first day with cover-up attempts so partisan and polarizing only Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton has yet maybe been already so greatly tagged for being so “polarizing.”

I don’t know how the Democrats now of the federal based calls for New Nationalism can work through all their own muck raking yet to even November decidings now with a forced familiar for so many to decide if the oldest about them just in their family are all being also too reckless and irresponsible with their spending and wants and while Obama as a New Deal Austerity President an allowance to at least disruptive whispers.

These are days to call us to remember - these are days of echoes of FROST - NIXON and others once wrong for lesser “if a President says it is legal then it is legal” politics.  These are days of a “deja view all over again” and yet just as per limiting principles missing grandly from policies already under review as that of Obama’s Administration and their sense of Justice now before our Honorable of our Highest Court - our Supreme Court of the United States.

I don’t know why President Obama and his henchmen/henchwomen have insisted on taking so many low percentage shots and to expectations of Powers Constitutional and NEW though still questionable and under review as merely legislated. 

As it is our new President has “GONE CARNEY” we are all best to be wised up to this visibly a cover to cover as to “cover-up”!  It is not entertaining that a President would attempt to Govern as if the Harlem Globetrotters with all low percentage shots and the Washington Generals left almost daily to suffer the visible defeats. 

It is worse still that basketball player young President Barack Hussein Obama with his Hero Complex if so is of wants to not just be successful as if the Harlem Globetrotters with only low percentage shots but to be a one man team with “executive privilege” now “Frosty” suggestive that families and all their generations should consider his “play” believable and of his superior skill evidenced by daily suffered defeatism by say the Washington Generals and all their “players”!

This hasn’t been at all entertaining for me - this “Frost -Holder” or “Gone Carney”!

It is not a circus to me - but that this administration has “gone carney” since day one — I can call the President a liar and since his day one first moments post swearing his oath, however, for his speechifying with his inaugural orations lacking in erudity or class and with such an absence of bi-partisan spirit for his marked words and diction about accusations to “it is all Bush’s fault”!

This is a lie!  This is a lie that I can proclaim such for my two decades of involvements, however, and those so, however, to having been involved and useful to both the Clinton Administration and the Bush Administration.   “It is all Bush’s fault” was and stands as a diabolical political lie of new low standard for polarizing partisan politics - and one that I can attest is a lie just because of what I know about my own story of assistance and involvements, however, to both parties and both preceding administrations. 

And besides now with “Executive Privilege” claim that stinks of a guilt and a need to plead the fifth it now echoes of still under review other policies with similar Constitutional problems for us due to absence of Constitutional principles of checks and balances with “limiting principles”!

There is a lot more somehow of these concerns on my facebook.com/jpeterhogan “timeline” and so with tweeting links via my “twid” (twitter ID) @jphoganorg.

I don’t know how to offer objective punditry myself for what has to be so many familial political decisions and with discussions about an austerity of a New Deal Austerity or a new conservationism of their CRISIS GOVERNANCE and its ALARMISM with GLOBAL WARMING - END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT SCARING. 

Shock and awe?  -  Razzle Dazzle?  -  Fast and Furious?  Slow and Patient? 

With them so now of “Executive Privilege” assertion - where are we wisest now to start looking - where were we supposed to have successfully been distracted from looking that now we all are wisest to start looking first?

Yes,  I can assert that President Obama is a liar.  I do remember that the Clintons lost their machinations then with an over confidence of a underestimation while of mantle of “inevitable” a while ago to opponent Obama and after half their Hollywood “friends” seemed all to echo that far above whispers heard of “THE CLINTONS ARE BIG LIARS!”!

I know that for President Obama to have officially asserted the actual quite impossible propositon “It is all Bush’s fault!” was an official lying from day one.  I know this personally to be so - I have much just at http://jphogan.org also available via http://citizenrosebud.us that speaks to such maybe as well as just more of a want of grandeur with success with a fascination of tales of making low percentage shots as if high percentage and prudent, actually.

We are at a deja view “all over again.”  And we don’t even have to look back more than three years to have a very visible history now as it becomes even more concerning and less comedic or entertaining.

Comments Off
06/16/12
ON HONOR
Filed under: POLITICS, OBAMACARE, #AUSTERITY
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:15 am

We have afoot that Mitt Romney may be at home in the wheelhouse as an American De Gaulle.  We seem of times recently not of leaders in exile like De Gaulle able so to “return” and so revive a national spirit but more of a fog of war at home where our national spirit as founded was under attack and at risk. 

Maybe Mitt’s having been in Massachusetts is like De Gaulle having not been in France — more for you to say/decide, I guess.

But this composition isn’t about Mitt Romney - Candidate Mitt whom whose readiness to catch SCOTUS findings soon should have us reviewing his tact - his tacking - his tack - his tackticks.

No this is more about a COMING HOME for the Democrats - a real discussion of common sense and of “inheritance” abuse.

Just this morning I did hear a caller to a morning C-Span show cut to the quick about the Obama administration leadership of the Democrat Party that had enough votes in the Senate and House all the way until that other “41″ from Massachusetts.  Such caller was to simply stating a query to alight more to the dimness of immigration move now by President Obama for it riles and ralphs of a roughness of sloppy sea sloppy seamanship.  Such caller was the first I was to hear since upon such politics by President Obama to ask simply about a judgement about such now respective to his course in first years where he had the votes and the pen to have made such law - actual law.

Maybe though we should ask about Mitt Romney as an American De Gualle.  Maybe we should ask:  We can be American again like the French and Mitt is our man to have us know how to be French to be American again, yes?

Viva la revolucion?  Viva le resistance?  Play it again, America?

If we are to talk about HONOR are we necessarily to talking about “inheritance” and even “fair play”?

If what is good for the goosing is great for the gandering - is their a quorum for the gaggling?

How will Mitt Romney tactfully field the soon expected SCOTUS hit(s) he most will be expected to catch?

Just this morning did reflect - I did think to either relitigate the past or see it finally for a first time litigated.  No, until this moment I wasn’t as well so about the French having saved us about our independence coursing.  No, just this morning I was as well remembering the arrogance of the first years of Democrat Party control of Washington and how immigration should have been their first issue if cost cutting and cost savings were to be believable as the actual purpose of their ACA - their Obamacare.

They sure did give cause for a revolution - a RENAISSANCE IN TEA even.  And, now as the wars are passing and the fog of wars are lifting or parting we have the Democrat Party visibly in disarray and disparaged by their own cowing and coursing.

It is self evident that President Obama has been a NEW DEAL AUSTERITY President.  It is also figurable that former Speaker Nancy Pelosi just for her wide stance on Clintons’ SURPLUSES has been an willing vessel or instrument to austerity herself - for to be so proud of and for the Clintons’ SURPLUSES is to be anti-Obama but for an “austerity”.  We have that the Clintons with their SURPLUSES were vast left wing spending cutting fools and with then Speaker Pelosi so of such a pride there is no “fog” about her “austerity” cred for only “austerity” possible if the Clintons’ cutting to be heralded so.

But this isn’t supposed to be about Mitt Romney or if he now is to be an American De Gaulle.  No this is about HONOR.

Mitt Romney’s “wheelhouse” may still be ship shape and proper for a shining small “city” afloat on our seas, but this is supposed to be more of a “fog of war” clearing and about the lack of HONOR at least inherent in the Clintons.

There is danger in his “inheritance”!!!  There is danger in his “inheritance”!!!  There is danger in his “inheritance”!!!

And all three are separately to an erudity each individually specifically for a diction to discern critical variants.  

First, President Clinton “inherited” a time from President Bush 41 that did not justify such PEACE DIVIDENDS.

Second, President Clinton “inherited” a rare moment in history of civilizations of our the USA broaching to sole superpower status - due little if any to any works or bulwarks or breastworks his own.

Third, President Clinton did not leave things better than he had “inherited” them!  Look at 9/11 and now litigate?

Comments Off
06/14/12
MODERN MEDIA
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:11 am

This Flag Day 2012 I offer:  IT IS NOT THAT NIXON WAS GUILTY - IT IS THAT DEMOCRATS ARE AT LEAST AS GUILTY.

THAT SAID:  NOW IT SHOULD BE EASIER TO FIGURE I AM NOW AT A CLASSIC AMERICAN CROSSROADS WHERE I DON’T REALLY KNOW WHO THE REPUBLICANS ARE YET OR WHAT THEY WOULD DO.  I AM NOW AT I DON’T OWE THE DEMOCRATS ANYTHING AND THEY SHOULD FEEL THEY DO STILL OWE ME.  I AM AT SUCH A CROSSROADS NOW THAT I ALSO DON’T OWE THE REPUBLICANS ANYTHING.

I MAY NOW BE PERFECTLY POSITIONED FOR SPORT AND MEDIA/ENTERTAINMENT (AGAIN)!

MITT CALLS FOR SPORT - SPORT A GOOD CALL FOR MITT.

ROMNEY RAN OLYMPICS WHERE DANGEROUS TO ASK OTHER THAN:  “WHAT ‘SPORT’ ARE YOU IN?” LIKE BY USING “SPORTS” TO THE BEST LIKE:  “WHAT SPORTS ARE YOU IN?”

OK, I AM AT A POINT - AN AMERICAN CROSSROADS - WHERE I SEEM TO OWE NEITHER PARTY AND HAVE RESTORED MYSELF TO A MEDIA OBJECTIVITY ALSO APPROPRIATE FOR SPORT.

LINKS THAT WORK EACH DIFFERENTLY:

http://citizenrosebud.us
http://citizenrosebud.mobi
http://citizenrosebud.net
http://citizenrosebud.com
http://citizenrosebud.org

http://twitter.com/jphoganorg
http://facebook.com/jpeterhogan
http://linkedin.com  - i forget

Comments Off
06/12/12
EDUCATING GEORGE
Filed under: POLITICS, CLIMATE CHANGE, #STUPID SQUIBS, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:35 am

It is a wonder these economic times we are in.   For starters we have that George Stephanopoulus appeared liberated last week.

George, shall I report, was very much early to and long a part of “it’s the economy, Stupid!”  This dates him back to the early 1990s and so to a party participation before there was a candidate Clintons.

About the ECONOMY:  About the Clintons et al:  George, shall I report, did seem liberated last week.

As Mrs. Merkel may be to scuttling tankers, I have long been to an economy with NUCLEAR CHILLER SUBMARINES and an international fleet justified by climate threats.   George did seem liberated by his former boss last week stumbling and back stepping so much he tried to float as if an “expert” about the economy, now and before.

Last Sunday’s ABC Sunday political talk with George Stephanopoulus where he felt he no longer dared to offer or feel obliged to a loyalty to either Clinton of the Clintons’ BOGO “two-fer” - he seemed quite different - quite liberated - less of the “economic” “stupid.”

We have had a serious CRISIS OF VALUATION - for sure - both parties have due still “mea culpa’s” for the workings bi-partisan of the Clintons’ second term.

You can decide yourselves if you have or can get past the facts that in 2008 more Americans went to the pols and voted with opinions driven by false and misleading information and propositions.

I don’t know that I have changed my views on economics since I was to offering at least allusions to such in letters to Representative Gephardt’s offices when this George was there hardly a “national” figure, yet.  The “we need a more level playing field” internationally and my call for a “back to basics” survive to me as well reasoned but corrupted by more than a few at least of the Clinton set of new Democrats.

As per this “stupid” and general economics I do alert that George Stephanopoulus seems liberated and now maybe unpredictable.  For the record this past Sunday due to the French Open broadcasts I did switch to viewing Stephanopoulus’ renditions and not a quick channel channel with disgust and intellectual caution those so many past moments where for years I managed to turn the channel within seconds of realizing I had even risked a few seconds of hearing the George still stuck under Clintons and seemingly working too much to a loyalty than a reasoned economic science.

Though our economy is in part down just because the Clintons either shouldn’t have worked politically to a trillion dollars of surplus crass cutting to “survive” politically after the Republicans during first term had worked a miracle and proven that a balanced budget was actually possible and that a trillion could safely be found for cuts in spending, or, because they shouldn’t have worked to the HOUSING BUBBLE RISKY LOAN HYPER CONSUMERISM pimping with their specific and personal politics, or, shouldn’t have worked so politically thinking the new dot com boom meant that the seated pols of those days regardless of party had best to get with the tech that could finally be used to fool all of the people most of the time unless it would be used to work them out and down.

George did seem tolerable and liberated this past Sunday - necessarily, since I still would have changed channels if he had seems a new and freer “journalist” aboard with anti-Clinton “analysis.

I stand still with my opinion that the Clintons and their meddling and economics with their contrary politics did set up most of this economic mess and maybe with diabolical purposes a part of such and to a discussable premeditation selfish in scheming, personal for and between Clinton spouses.

We also besides all this have that banks may have been to what corruption we have now long been reading about without the Clintons and maybe as a bad era generally of a national cross party glee.  We have that George’s boss did ask banks to “find a way to gamble away risks” expected from a housing bubble push he/they thought they better shouldn’t have been to, and, that so still we have that they shouldn’t have been so stupid to such economics while also being to rashly and crassly cutting a trillion more from budgets to have a partisan  political balance to save Mrs. Clinton’s ambitions in a SURPLUS to look as much the heroes as Republicans after Republicans had miraculously found a safe trillion to cut to “BALANCED.”

We have had a CRISIS OF VALUATION because of the Clintons.   Sure maybe only because Hillary the Mrs. announced she would run to return “two-fer” back to our White House, and, sure maybe only because former VP Al Gore worked so hard at an ALARMISM he spiked the gas prices so high that the Clintonomics’ dependence on hyper-consumerism became undermined - but still because of the Clintons - because of the Clintons maybe as best explained with former President Clinton’s economic “expert” remarks this past week or so.

We have, economically speaking, that companies and businesses and especially lenders can become too focused and impersonal to an inhumane business practice if they look at receivables and “contracts” too objectively and fail to go gestalt and whole business bodies with inside - outside vigilance to never forget while looking at an single receivable by contract somehow to also consider still a cost - benefit analysis related to the air of their accounts and a customer that may have a debit not as great as the “benefit” debit not of a contract that may be otherwise too great a “cost” to an inhumane consideration of just “costs.”

Our banks may have been on the way to being too corrupt without the corrupting selfish politics of the Clintons but after last week with former President Clinton insubordinate to party politics and a united partisan front for President Obama on the economy and possible solutions shouldn’t we also be considering that with the dot com boom the Clintons were able to corrupt too many Republicans during their second term?

I don’t know what George knew or when he knew it.  I know more than most about some that he knew that others still don’t.  I don’t know though with him seeming so liberated this past Sunday how he now will proceed towards covering better claims of economic “expertise” by his former boss and the suggestions by President Clinton to his “expertise” about his knowing now supposedly so much better and with a suggestion that he knew such earlier - such back in his “two-fer’s” second term.

There are at times economic benefits to companies that are bold and generous and volunteered but more as if of an Amateur with a hobby.   There are times that a company may have a simple contract with a person, an individual, with balances and due dates that is otherwise in the air of such a single entity having far greater benefit voluntarily to their profits and the general economy such that a step back and consider and a reconsider may be best before pushing for collection on a simple contract against such person who was greatly helping just voluntarily and with no obligation to continue helping if annoyed or angered by those he/she knows to be to millions and millions related to a general economic good will and integration of a united branding.

When a simple debt of contract may not be so simple how is it a business now can be so insensitive to push back made to help them remember to look newly and freshly at bigger picture of costs versus benefits analysis.  When a simple debt become impolitic how can a company not see it may be “shooting itself in at least one of its feet”?  How can a body politic but for a past corruption not yet publicly analyzed as well be to such a desensitized “stupid”?  

As we learn now that J P Morgan Chase has also been to lower standards and yet unthought of practices aren’t we all best to be now asking not just ourselves to ponder how long such may really have been going on?  Are we wise now to fight off another “stupid” and even consider that Chase may as far back as 2006 been to collections corrupted or too insensitive because they had been corrupted by the Clinton administration request by President Clinton to find ways to gamble away the risks in the economics he politically and selfishly wanted political popularity and a political save with?

I don’t know if it isn’t too early to call George now better educated - but he was seeming liberated last week.

Where there has been good will efforts and past huntings and of economic growth worked as an unrecognized individual’s personal efforts more as an amateur and independent we have that business should be always sensitive more to cost versus benefit feelings than a persistence to a cold simple contracts domination and objective stupidity.

If we are also to become as liberated we too may want to become, finally, as wised to what President Clinton claimed recently as of an economic “expertise” and as well to a pondering regarding what he knew and when he knew it.  For it seems even George may now get that it looks that if President Clinton knew this that then then that this now means then that this then had him knowingly setting up a general and at least national economic condition that should or would by his “expertise” be to a construct for our markets such that an election of Al Gore or George Bush both would have been to 7-8 years with an economy that was stuck not able to “recover” for that “five to ten years” with the emphasis on “ten” seeming more of such a supposition.

Educating George?  What did he know?  When did he know it?

If President Clinton is right and the “expert” he claims then it looks like this down economy was premeditated and meant politically to position the Mrs. for a take over of the national politics to a return of Clintons to our White House, on schedule, and so with timing such that they could look like economic experts for fixing their own “mistakes” or catching them just as the wave of recovering from them set.

What do they know?  When did they know it?  Really, based on President Clintons recent economic claims it does look like Clitnons would have had a President Al Gore just as stuck with a down economic inheritance so.

I don’t know what to say about GE or Mr. Jobs Czar or the others now titled un-Constitutionally as czars since our Constitution dis-allowes “titling”  per class - Jeffrey Immelt seems to have missed fortunes of opportunities to environmental cooling and even my idea for and international fleet for a WEATHER CORPS - with NUCLEAR CHILLER SUBMARINES - like actually submersible inside out refrigerators.

Just seems as well that GE could have been to so many more profits these past few years at least and maybe even to actually paying some fair taxes.

Comments Off
06/10/12
LYE SOAP - THE LAOS II
Filed under: POLITICS, #STUPID SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 6:00 am

LIE SOAP - THE LAOS

Filed under: POLITICS — @ 5:18 am

Body bags really are piling up about State.  I don’t know what is
worse - the lies told by President Obama or the quiet acquiescence by
either Clinton.

These are the times of working days to trying times ahead as much
supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to separate one Clinton
from the other as a less of a louse.

Remember the Alamo doesn’t seem to quite cut it since 2009.

Stupid is what stupid does…

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let…

Point one for future budgets:  THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED!

Point two for future budgets:  THE CLINTONS ARE NOT PREPARED!

Remember the CJ 7 - the GI ramblers - the THE NEW WORLD ORDER?

What is in the lie but too much need for lye - how about these louses, is there any way to delouse?

Stupid is what stupid does…

It is the economy, …

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let them…

Doesn’t  really matter if you are for Vietnam!  Doesn’t really matter if this is a new Vietnam!

BRING OUR TROOPS HOME?  BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW!?

Stupid is what stupid does…

The body bags are really piling up around State.  THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED!

THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED?

However you flip her burgers - Hillary was not prepared, like?

Remember Kuwait!  That might work.  Again:  REMEMBER KUWAIT!

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let them live…

REMEMBER THE PERSIAN GULF WAR?  HMMM?  REMEMBER THE PERSIAN GULF WAR!

That’s amore’d!  That’s amore’d!  THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED - NO AMORE’D!

Stupid is what stupid does…

These are the times of working days to trying times ahead as much
supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to separate one Clinton
from the other as a less of a louse.

However you flip your burgers - the Clintons had no BITE - THE CLINTONS HAD NO BITE!

THE CLINTONS HAD NO BITE?  - HOW NOW TO DELOUSE? 

OH, ALL THE LIES - WHY SO MUCH FOR LYE?  OH HER BURMA - HER SADDAM!

These are the times of working days to trying times ahead as much
supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to separate one Clinton
from the other as a less of a louse.

Stupid is what stupid does…

However you flip her burgers - Hillary was not prepared, like?

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let…

Oh but for the AMORE’D - THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED!

OH BUT FOR THE UN-AMORE’D - Oh so much lye for some many Clinton lies.

REMEMBER THE LAOS - REMEMBER KUWAIT!

How now to delouse - can there be enough lye?

So much for “MISSION CREEP” - this is just creepy.

Body bags really are piling up about State.  I don’t know what is worse -
the lies told by President Obama or the quiet acquiescence by either
Clinton.

These are the times of working days to trying times
ahead as much supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to
separate one Clinton from the other as a less of a louse.

Remember the Alamo doesn’t seem to quite cut it since 2009.

Stupid is what stupid does…  It’s the economy. 

Oh, Bush dear Bush my captain - why was it you that had finally to spend so much for an amore’d?

Rock on!  Yeh I know the Clintons lied and soldiers are dying - Rock on!

HILLARY LIED - SOLDIERS DIE - ROCK ON!  WOW WHAT A GREAT JOB HILLARY!

WHAT A GREAT JOB HILLARY?  SOLDIERS DIED - HILLARY LIES.  ROCK ON?

These are the times of working days to trying times ahead as much
supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to separate one Clinton
from the other as a less of a louse.

WHY WAS IT BUSH - ALL JUST BUSH - ALL ABOUT BUSH AND HE TO AMORE’D?

Remember the CJ 7 - the GI ramblers - the THE NEW WORLD ORDER?

Stupid is what stupid does…

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let…

Point one for future budgets:  THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED!

Point two for future budgets:  THE CLINTONS ARE NOT PREPARED!

Remember the CJ 7 - the GI ramblers - the THE NEW WORLD ORDER?

Body bags really are piling up about State.  I don’t know what is
worse - the lies told by President Obama or the quiet acquiescence by
either Clinton.

These are the times of working days to trying times ahead as much
supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to separate one Clinton
from the other as a less of a louse.

Remember the Alamo doesn’t seem to quite cut it since 2009.

Doesn’t  really matter if you are for Vietnam!  Doesn’t really matter if this is a new Vietnam!

BRING OUR TROOPS HOME?  BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW!?

Stupid is what stupid does…

The body bags are really piling up around State.  THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED!

WHY WAS IT BUSH - ALL JUST BUSH - ALL ABOUT BUSH AND HE TO AMORE’D?

Remember the CJ 7 - the GI ramblers - the THE NEW WORLD ORDER?

Stupid is what stupid does…

However you flip her burger - no matta how use spell or cut it. 

They lies - they louses.  REMEMBER LAOS - REMEMBER THE LYE.

It’s the economy, stupid?

CLINTONS HAD NO BITE - HUNG BUSH OUT TO DRY - TO MUCH ARMORE’D UP.

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let them know the lies.

However you flip her burgers - Hillary was not prepared, like?

Remember Kuwait!  That might work.  Again:  REMEMBER KUWAIT!

Oh but for the AMORE’D - THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED!

OH BUT FOR THE UN-AMORE’D - Oh so much lye for some many Clinton lies.

REMEMBER THE LAOS - REMEMBER KUWAIT!

Comments Off
LIE SOAP - THE LAOS
Filed under: POLITICS, #STUPID SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 5:18 am

Body bags really are piling up about State.  I don’t know what is worse - the lies told by President Obama or the quiet acquiescence by either Clinton.

These are the times of working days to trying times ahead as much supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to separate one Clinton from the other as a less of a louse.

Remember the Alamo doesn’t seem to quite cut it since 2009.

Stupid is what stupid does…

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let…

Point one for future budgets:  THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED!

Point two for future budgets:  THE CLINTONS ARE NOT PREPARED!

Remember the CJ 7 - the GI ramblers - the THE NEW WORLD ORDER?

What is in the lie but too much need for lye - how about these louses, is there any way to delouse?

Stupid is what stupid does…

It is the economy, …

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let them…

Doesn’t  really matter if you are for Vietnam!  Doesn’t really matter if this is a new Vietnam!

BRING OUR TROOPS HOME?  BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW!?

Stupid is what stupid does…

The body bags are really piling up around State.  THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED!

THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED?

However you flip her burgers - Hillary was not prepared, like?

Remember Kuwait!  That might work.  Again:  REMEMBER KUWAIT!

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let them live…

REMEMBER THE PERSIAN GULF WAR?  HMMM?  REMEMBER THE PERSIAN GULF WAR!

That’s amore’d!  That’s amore’d!  THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED - NO AMORE’D!

Stupid is what stupid does…

These are the times of working days to trying times ahead as much
supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to separate one Clinton
from the other as a less of a louse.

However you flip your burgers - the Clintons had no BITE - THE CLINTONS HAD NO BITE!

THE CLINTONS HAD NO BITE?  - HOW NOW TO DELOUSE? 

OH, ALL THE LIES - WHY SO MUCH FOR LYE?  OH HER BURMA - HER SADDAM!

These are the times of working days to trying times ahead as much
supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to separate one Clinton
from the other as a less of a louse.

Stupid is what stupid does…

However you flip her burgers - Hillary was not prepared, like?

Our children are the future - teach them well, teach them well and let…

Oh but for the AMORE’D - THE CLINTONS WERE NOT PREPARED!

OH BUT FOR THE UN-AMORE’D - Oh so much lye for some many Clinton lies.

REMEMBER THE LAOS - REMEMBER KUWAIT!

How now to delouse - can there be enough lye?

So much for “MISSION CREEP” - this is just creepy.

Body bags really are piling up about State.  I don’t know what is worse -
the lies told by President Obama or the quiet acquiescence by either
Clinton.

These are the times of working days to trying times
ahead as much supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to
separate one Clinton from the other as a less of a louse.

Remember the Alamo doesn’t seem to quite cut it since 2009.

Stupid is what stupid does…  It’s the economy. 

Oh, Bush dear Bush my captain - why was it you that had finally to spend so much for an amore’d?

Rock on!  Yeh I know the Clintons lied and soldiers are dying - Rock on!

HILLARY LIED - SOLDIERS DIE - ROCK ON!  WOW WHAT A GREAT JOB HILLARY!

WHAT A GREAT JOB HILLARY?  SOLDIERS DIED - HILLARY LIES.  ROCK ON?

These are the times of working days to trying times ahead as much
supposedly about rational budgeting.  It is hard to separate one Clinton
from the other as a less of a louse.

Comments Off
06/06/12
THROW THE BUM(S) OUT
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:26 am

There have been quite some tail fathers of plumage pride challenges this week.

As Democrats squawk about divided about the presentations of claims of political “assets” pols show President Clinton on top, right?

This week it is concerning that we have a pecked at legislative discussion about fairness for women.  It is much concerning this week that women are being over shadowed and squawked about with plumage pride challenges by their males so public and divisive.

Has the Democrat Party gone to the birds?  What does that even mean?

What does “on the square” mean?  How is that related to old expression “court house politicians” as like descriptive of the citizens with extra time or callings about an old court house as a gaggle publicly out on the square near the court house talking politics?

Are “court house politicians” our citizen class best for regularity at it to discerning pecking order among people as birds?

I am not sure it is time yet to say that President Clinton and President Obama are in a cock fight - this all seems more like fore play and circling so far this week.  They either don’t have a full plumage it seems or it isn’t yet showing.

It does seems now that what ever each of these men actually have as political assets ordinary court house politicians can read the pols stating that President Bill Clinton is supposedly on top.  Such may so then be troubled about a legal and proper “pecking order” jurisprudence.

And as for the poor women of these parties in dispute and plumage pride circling or foreplay  - who among them will step out of line and cry or squawk themselves - who of these poor women for the scene so far this week either is of President Obama wanting to have his female bird Secretary of State look worth no more than 3/5ths his plumage or of Mr. President Clinton stirred to parade and challenge to appear still to be worth at least 2/5ths more than his mate specifically as of a herd alike?

It seems this circling or foreplay of Democrat male plumage on parade with what pride they can muster have timed in accidentally or purposefully to overshadow at least the women in their ranks, however, in their ranks, however in their ranks as quite confusing “in their ranks” now must be and seem.

Are you of the tail feathers of President Clinton?

Are you of the tail feathers of President Obama?

Have you also maybe divided Mrs. Hillary Clinton in half - as they seem to be about trying as per at least loyalty?

Civilly speaking to civics and even old “court house politicians” likely about a square — Does the commercial and social expression “we are all square” or “are we on the square with each other” originally derived from early American (at least) common place of a dealing or adjustment civil in kind that would pass a passing or idling on a town green amidst the “court house politicians”?

Today we wake all to political news - but are you more of plumage and paraded pride of President Obama or his seeming challenger President Clinton?  With the pols showing President Clinton popularly more “on top” do you think to referees and yellow flags or red cards - are you squawking yourself maybe “extra player on the field”?

There seems to be only one fair way to get all square about this as it is touching all our community politics.  There seems to be that we all are called out to our squares figuratively speaking to poke and prod both the plumage pride of President Clinton and President Obama and to comb through any seeming irregularities in a Constitutional field for proper and legal pecking order.  We have now that it seems so necessary as one or both of them seem to have been at this just to make at least Mrs. Secretary Clinton appear to be worth at least 2/5ths less than either of them.

Comments Off
06/05/12
OBAMA’S BLUE DRESS
Filed under: POLITICS, #MORALS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:39 am

It is here already, but can we see it yet?

President Clinton is messing all over his new chum - his new bed mate - but how can any Democrat sell or spin it now?

Sure we can imagine that President Clinton is holding back and not yet ready to share cigars with President Obama, but for President Clinton to attempt a posture of “not in politics” begets a mess all by itself.

A former President not even term limited still within at least the first thirty years post office embrace, legal, is quite necessarily still “in politics” - in our politics - even if we were not so still living with political inheritances like 9/11 from such.

I am tempted to say that for President Clinton to attempt “I am not now in politics” is near enough accurate such that Hitler might have so said he wasn’t in Poland - at least as a political leader.

You may be willing to split hairs with Bill Clinton, former President, the most immoral of our Executive budgeters since 1983, and get a tingle in your leg now for him as one parsing as if “not in legal politics” or “Constitutional” politics while visibly tucked in to much the same global “work” as if still a President. 

I don’t know how to explain his “I am not in politics.”

And it may now be only because he has been getting his way globally and domestically so much, politically speaking, that he can feel he isn’t in politics actually now because as a former and term limited past President the work of politics seems to be so much less and devoid of refreshing with new “representitive” bulwarks of flesh pressing pol work.  He may be himself only able to believe he isn’t in politics now because it is an existence in politics still but without enough actual work to still FEEL like POLITICS. 

And it may now be only reasonable to him so because everything political seems to be going his way - that he isn’t in politics because as a term limited past president a reputation and expectation precedes him so much that he can feel now as if he is just above it all.

Comments Off
06/03/12
MARX IS BURNING
Filed under: POLITICS, #KERRY, #SUSPECT, #AUSTERITY, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:17 am

The important equity figure is near 6 Trillion.  When President Obama took office there was a reported 6 Trillion available but sitting idle in private equity.  When President Obama took office he may still have not realized how unfair it would be that some made it look far easier for Clintons to be First Couple in administering executively during their 8 than it actually was for those years.

Though there was a reported 6 Trillion of private equity available at the time President Obama took office there was little he could do with it as a new Democrat now to SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & THE TAX for after first round of new Dem spending private equity was smart enough to see their mattresses as offering better “return” on investment even if only offering zero return.

Besides it quite unreasonable and not preposterous or of an injustice to note that the Clintons were made to be better than they were for of a time others were making it be too easy, relatively speaking of the challenges of those years, and seem easier to be a successful President than the work of the Clintons can explain, still.  No it may not be fair to Obama that it was made to look far easier to be President those years than the actual workings for America now will attest.

President Obama did come into office and move from old Dems “TAX AND SPEND” to a more progressive and irresponsible “SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & TAX” loose affiliation with limiting principles and financial prudence.  He did come into office with a reported 6 Trillion in private equity available for investment if a profit could be reasonably and justly expected.  He did come into office where that 6 Trillion was beyond he reach and reasoning as of private wealth.  He is still in an office limited to spending mostly on a basis for revenues from profits or income or capital gains.

Yes, GREAT WALLS can make good neighbors.  Yes fences have also been to expressions that they too make better communities.  Yes, President Obama had mattresses offering at zero predicted return more reasonable return than “investing” in an Obama economy - and so while he without “wealth” or “property” taxing that in America is kept to the preserves of much more local governance revenue long arms of collections.  Our federalist system with its different revenue collection methods does act like a fence or wall to defend our confederated republic and enumerated and protected freedoms and rights - and as well a general Welfare in common sense.

Yes, it is reasonable to have at least considered that President elect Obama would have known of Nixon and the lesson most are if in politics supposed to take away about it being the cover-up that should ruin.  But President elect Obama did commence to President Obama with clear efforts that can only best be described as of an attempt to cover-up for the Clintons.

Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet? 

I don’t remember when the BIG DIG finished in Massachusetts nor when its vast sums of other states people’s money stopped flowing in excessive sums into such state, and, nor do I recall when the DOT COM BUST happened and how it directly effected the tech corridor about Boston and Massachusetts’ economy in general.  These both seem to be big factors of a relevant chronology precedent to Massachusetts having Mitt Romney as a Republican Governor.  For his state to have been at 51st place for job growth I am guessing that I am correct in remembering such preceded his governance.

2012 really is seeming to be a year where people will be wondering again about the Clintons and their 8 years and finally maybe to realizing that they still don’t know how they were successful with many of their sold “successes” and be to relating with such as it seems clearer now that they have failed in attempts to help Dems with President Obama effect a repeat.

Yes, it may be unfair still to President Obama that the Clintons were made to look better than they were and that those difficult years were made to look as if of an easy street of easy governance for our Executive leadership.  Yes, it may be unfair that so many let it be thought that it could be that easy to be President.

Our income and profit based federal revenue system may be all that saved us from this over-reaching initiated by the Clintons and carried further and too far by the Executive governance of Obama.  Our states and localities have the authority to mend and/or maintain their “communities” and “civility” with “wealth” and “property” taxation - the new Dems proceeded with policies that needed “wealth” or “property” taxing power to “redistribution” - the new Dems by trying to do such still with an profits or income or capital gains limited authority did self construct a wall or fence between their ideals and their workability.

It may go down in our future history books that President Obama’s biggest mistake was his work so polarizing and partisan in a political with a capital “P” to attempts to effect a cover-up for the Clintons.

Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?

His efforts at job killing have been far stronger than his efforts to job creation and his “save” of GM may have been more about trying to effect a political remaking of such company than a “financial save” of such.

We still have that before he commenced with his GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM platform to green energy we had as precedence that a similar green energy political push in Spain had cost at least two old economy jobs for each one new “green” job created.  We have that there was precedence to expect that Obama meant to cut more jobs than he planned to create and multiples so for his aggressive politicizing was mixed with an austerity message with a call to a great new conservationism such that Americans should honestly have been warned by President Obama to expect that his furtherance of Dem ideology was set to actually kill off at least three to four jobs for each of the new politically correct green jobs.

We can thank our founders and later geniuses who limited our federal government spending to revenues bases so on profits or income or capital gains.  This doesn’t help President Obama with Dem ideology or actually help further the attempts to cover-up for the Clintons but it did allow people free economic expression and even a shift if of investment equity to otherwise shift plans to long term development where losses would be planned for next 4 - 8 years but with enough profit to be expected there after if it then seemed safe and/or profitable to be at least so endeaverous within American borders.

But have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?

Have you also yet considered that a national or federal effort to a new growth economy may do now more harm than good and that Americans now have to find ways closer to home and for a while more with any “redistribution” debate kept to where “wealth” or “property” taxation the revenue basis for community maintenance and civility bolstering?

Yes I do believe the reports that there was near 6 Trillion in private equity sitting available and hungry for rational investing to reasonable returns for risk.  I do believe that Dems some how missed that their ideology and SPEND, SPEND, SPEND & TAX new ways forewarned capitalists to days where their mattresses likely would be a better “investment” and for a while.

They were the good guys and gals and well private equity capitalists were supposed to be the bad guys and gals. 

I still have no idea how the Dems did expect their “economic” ideas to actually work - it still seems clear that their aggressiveness was meant to cause this very economic condition and its austerity/conservationism.

I still have no idea how the Dems while attempting a cover-up for Clintons did expect any Republican to naively partake in a bi-partisan self destructive politics.

They tried the claiming to themselves as being the HEROES and the job creators of private sector as the VILLAINS.

Our Internal Revenue Service was supposed to get the funding for new massive armies of tax collectors - and yet since our federal revenues are not of a basis from “wealth” or “property” such was as self defeating as so much else of Dems’ ideology.

I still have no idea how Dems did think it would have worked if it could have worked - especially since it seems to be working exactly as it should have worked with so much “political” and “socialistic” injected preposterously and unjustly into and about our economy.

I don’t know about MARX as per “KILL LISTS” his - I did learn a new phrase this morning from Andrew Sullivan seemingly quoting Cardinal Dolan - I did realize this new term and its usage suggest a call to consideration to due process and as of an innocence until a guilt proven.  When you hear “preposterous and unjust” phrase do you first assume guilt or do you suspect a denial of due process or prejudice of a prejudgement maybe as unfair as that which its usage proffered regarding?

As per the Dems misplaced ideology and practice these past few years we have that Dems as a class of subjects can be said to have caused the economic down turn while as an individual suspect President Obama more insulated and isolated though clearly of a willful association. 

A SIT REP now beyond the cover-up problem President Obama has with the rival class in his cabinet inclusive of at least a party to “two-fer” in person of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is that which is of his foreign policies of so much denial of due process and soft money redistributing.  But this is punctuated in ways due clear emphasis.

A SIT REP now beyond the cover-up problem President Obama has with the rival class in his cabinet inclusive of at least a party to “two-fer” in person of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is as well is an election year oddity especially for the Clintons that had half their supposed Hollywood friends rat them out as “BIG LIARS” and now as with fatality reports regularly still flowing as evidence as failures in a Diplomacy we have a messaging somehow still allowed near:  Hillary lied and lies and soldiers are dying - Wow, what a great job Hillary is doing.  

A SIT REP now towards 2012 deciding now must encourage a less Marxist BLIND FAITH in Obama Diplomacy and get around to asking if we were once recently of Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts of regular disloyal assertions to his anti-war revival efforts of an earlier Communist scare so with “Bush lied soldiers died” how long can we now still tolerate the indiscriminate political “diplomacy” so partisan of Madam Secretary of State but as also to a “Hillary lies - more soldiers are dying.”?

How did the Clinton economic team embraced by Obama White House as if it were the expected inevitable return of the Clintons fail?  I can be said that their economic policies should have brought us all just here but that isn’t how they are telling their own stories.  We have that if they could have back in 1993 they would have commenced earlier to this mess - they by not learning by the easy times they still can hardly well explain do seem still to fail to understand what was the “successes” of those years. 

We have that we could have had this fine mess in their first term if they had managed to have their way then - and so quite so much because our federal revenues are not based on “wealth” or “property” but are responsive to motivations of the People and their willingness to associate and cooperate economically.  We have that the People likely would have gone on strike as well against such Dem “management” back as early as Clintons’ first term if they had managed to have had their way whence then.

[Note: Version of “MARX IS BURNING” in 33 #economics @ CitizenRosebud.net may have edits as later draft.]

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Comments Off
06/02/12
ALL IN THE FAMILY - REPOSTED
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:36 am
09/11/11
ALL IN THE FAMILY
Filed under: POLITICS  @ http://2012us.jphogan.org 9/11/11
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 12:30 pm

Our days of “bigotry sells” -

Our days of “bigotry sells” have passed.

The dirty laundry - of our past - on trial everyday - evermore -

Cycles of forgiveness can pass and wash away.

DeWitt who?  Jefferson what?

We were no “300″ - we are more a three thousand -

Governors for Empire - checked again.

King James II, where art thee,

King James II where were you - off in your gardens?

The dirty laundry - of our past - on trial everyday - evermore - 

Cycles of forgiveness can pass and wash away.

Governors for Empire,

Duels for honor - the pens were as mighty as the swords.

From swords to plowshares,

Our days of bigotry sells have passed.

We wake anew to Empire builders,

We awake anew to charges of Federalism.

DeWitt who?  Jefferson what?

We were no “300″ - we are more a three thousand,

Governors for Empire - checked again.

Souls were stirred,

Souls were stirring.

The dirty laundry - of our past - on trial everday - evermore -

Cycles of forgiveness can pass and wash away.

Our days of “bigotry sells” -

Our days of “bigotry sells” have passed.

King James II where art thee,

King James II where are thee now - off in your gardens?

Governors for Empire,

Duels for honor - the pens were as mighty as the swords.

The dirty laundry - of our past - on trial everday - evermore -

Cycles of forgiveness can pass and wash away.

Screams against Clintons,

Screams well earned again - neo-colonialism an echo of old.

DeWitt who?  Jefferson what?

Souls were stirred,

Souls were stirring.

Rock the morning,

Rise the dawn - “Jefferson” sowing what he reaped?

Better angels there have been,

Better Governors than the Clintons - RISE O FEDERALISM - RISE!

The dirty laundry - of our past - on trial everyday - evermore,

Cycles of forgiveness can pass and wash away.

Rock the morning,

Rise the dawn - “Jefferson” sowing what he reaped?

Better angels there have been,

Better Governors than the Clintons - RISE O FEDERALISM -RISE!

We were no “300″ - we are more a three thousand,

Governors for Empire - checked again.

DeWitt who?  Jefferson what?

Our Bunkers,  Our Bunkers -

Our Bunkers and our “bigotry sells” has passed - all in the family.

We wake anew to Empire builders,

We awake anew to charges of Federalism.

The dirty laundry - of our past - on trial everyday - evermore -

Cycles of forgiveness can pass and wash away.

DeWitt who?  Jefferson what?

Souls were stirred,

Souls were stirring.

Rock the morning,

Rise the dawn - “Jefferson” sowing what he reaped?

King James II where art thee,

King James II where are thee now - off in your gardens?

We were no “300″ - we are more a three thousand,

Governors for Empire - checked again.

The dirty laundry - of our past - on trial everyday - evermore -

Cycles of forgiveness can pass and wash away.

Governors for Empire,

Duels for honor - the pens were as mighty as the swords.

We wake anew to Empire builders,

We awake anew to charges of Federalism.

Rock the morning,

Rise the dawn - “Jefferson” sowing what he reaped?

DeWitt who?  Jefferson what?

Screams against Clintons,

Screams well earned again - neo-colonialism an echo of old.

Souls were stirred,

Souls were stirring.

What is it said,

What is it said about hangin’ your dirty laundry?

Family was stirred,

Family laundry - kept anew - just family laundry?

DeWitt who?  Jefferson what?

We wake anew to Empire builders,

We awake anew to charges of Federalism.

The dirty laundry - of our past - on trial everyday - evermore -

How are Clintons still in our families’ dirty laundry - again & again.

Better Governors there have been! -

DeWitt who?  Jefferson what?  Rock the morning - Rock the vote.

We were no “300″ - we are more a three thousand,

Governors for Empire - checked again.

Souls were stirred,

Souls are stirring - let “bigotry sells” be passed.

Comments Off