hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
June 2017
S M T W T F S
« May    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
09/30/14
THE INEFFECTUAL FEMINIST?
Filed under: POLITICS, TREASON, #WHITEPRIDE, WAR ON WOMEN, QUID PRO QUO, #FEMINISM, #SLICKWILLY, #NEW_YORK, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:48 am

Women - yes, women most specifically - these times are different;  these are times now of #EqualPay with a new conundrum;  these are times of a paradigm for equal justice for all newly due an algorithm for feminism forward;  these are times for women to look at women as hard and long as any man should now judgementally;  these are times for all to look at women, however themselves a feminist or female lawyer of “professional” service, and frankly to discern that some women now should be so “accomplished” that it is fair for Posterity to decide them equal the worst men in history - due paying equally for being practicable as due the most severe penal!  Women, most specifically women, these times are different.

To preface the dire to follow, of straits most trespassed, and as to pay equal now as equal a worst man, let me suggest this link for a quick view of a YouTube entombed to help tune all to a solemn mood.  Here is a link to an old SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE #SNL skit;  http://bit.ly/PAXIL_SNL!

To be “in a Christian mood” let us see the beginning of life outside of Chelsea’s womb of Charlotte Clinton Mezvinsky as blessed in being of a good Christian name and the responsibility of communities and even villages therefore expectant;  To be “Christian” now, and yet judicial and prudent of a fair feminism forward, let us consider she a newest female of “Clinton” is named with premeditated Christian intent of a good Christian name - not just of a (secular) Power moniker;  To be “Christian” forward let us welcome #CCM “Charlotte Clinton Mezvinsky” but recognize a Duty therefore may be to be to many, many, many prayers for her grandparents that they can yet be redeemed - let us, for Charlotte, accept a need, forward, of her grandparents of redemption beyond mere “political redemption”!

To be judicial this too is now prescribed by concurrence of women now so progressed in feminism gains that Attorney General Eric Holder as a first black of such high office may find it unwise to leave office without preceding legally against top women.

Not to do the work of Eric Holder, as the Attorney General of the Obama Justice Department, and however firstly black and so also of concerns like around Mrs. Clinton, of pitfalls in practice from racing to the top in affirmative action plus plus banding, it is that this is to be structural for Justice but more in a #TopTen or #DirtiestDozen befitting a comedic satirical of late night television, but not only for paid cable channel standards.

Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, as #FLOTUS - First Lady of The United States - is more now as if in a pickle barrel than merely “in a pickle” judicially.  Mrs. William J. Clinton, as #FLOTUS, did incite across the Middle East, at least, and as chided by President Barack Hussein Obama with his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech targeting of a foreign policy adage of there dangers from avoidance and inaction.  Mrs. Clinton, however, is now no longer of a staff position in an administration nor a seat in Congress;  Mrs. Clinton is now herself also removed from National Security buffers for personal liability in culpability;  Mrs. Clinton did really incite rather than act during her reigning with WJC in their Power intimacy;  Mrs. Clinton did really incite across the Middle East, at least, and when it was more dangerous even than the real dangers palpable from their (joined) decision to be more of avoidance and inaction and of the tag of “American abandonment”!

See, now, why it may help to have viewed the Paxil_SNL video?  See, now, how it may behoove all to review too President Barack H.Obama oratory as archived as his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech?  Or as conveniently bitly here with http://bit.ly/Nobel_Obama?

Though President BHO did admonish and chide the Clintons’ eight years he didn’t specify how his Secretary of State choice was too compromised for having a legacy already too much of marshaling greater dangers and more dangerous times by at least a collusion in intimate avoidance and inaction - of being of eight years of abandonment of just the women of Afghanistan and Iraq while it was simple “diplomacy” that the The United States of America for recent past of in country involvements was thus of a right to return and show timely care - timely caring!

We are now progressed with feminism so far that we must also look at there being problems in any Mrs. Clinton, candidate, of at least ten realities also necessary of a due querious too in lingua franca concurrence that are irreconcilable from all discussions of perils of too much affirmative action for any.  I do not, in my lay, see how the “First Black Attorney General” can leave his office with chin up and of pride if he isn’t to looking at Mrs. WJC, at least, as a woman now equal some of the worlds worst ever men and due to pay equally for being equally of guilt;  I do not, in my lay think, fathom any twaining for the last stretch of AG Eric Holder if it without marking off a comparable while others have jurisdictions to compete per rending justice upon Mrs. WJC, at least.

A child has been born - a new Clinton has begun its life/living outside of her womb - a child may now to be of the Hope in Christianity of people of the known world, where ever, of praying and prayers that her grandparents despite these #TopTen tags of culpability are yet enough of a potential for redemption however such beset in the reality of politics and Justice that Mr. WJC & Mrs. WJC are soiled in a stink of their own historical at least as for being of a clear pathology of PBHO’s “dangers” from “avoidance” and “inaction” as if the parents of the terror attacks of 9/11 I & II.  It is inescapable, for any redeeming for Charlotte of her grandparents, how the logic Nobel of PBHO is that their historical avoidance and inaction was at least causal to catastrophes of them at least of negligence to gross negligence each in their own ways, however, manly or feminine.

RELIGION:  For Charlotte Clinton Mezvinsky to have the potential of a great Christian life now and forever forward many many many prayers will be needed for redemption to be of Mr. WJC & Mrs. WJC if and when they too join in a penitence practicable to being redeemed, however. 

FEDERAL ELECTIONS:  For parity and Justice there can be no candidate Clinton for a new HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT, and as it is that there never was any for the first of 2008.  As long as the 22nd Amendment is undecided Constitutional writ it remains that a wife is a spouse and equal under the Constitution inseparable as a half an equal and so that until the Supreme Court renders some specifics to decide initially its import to elections it is fair and a People’s Duty to tag any HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT as ILLEGAL, CRIMINAL, even TREASON.

AFGHANISTAN:  First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton (Mrs. WJC) did wrong as a President’s equal under the marriage laws and traditions, of one for all and all for one, by not speaking up against PWJC official practices of abandonment of the people, and especially the women, of Afghanistan.

IRAQ:  First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton (Mrs. WJC) did wrong as a President’s equal under the marriage laws and traditions, of one for all and all for one, by not speaking up against PWJC official practices of abandonment of the people, and especially the Shia women of Iraq.

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT:  Mrs. WJC did by insisting on having a West Wing staffer job while the #FLOTUS did undermine feminism and workplace standards for equality.  It was a big mistake that Mrs. WJC was of a “staffer” position while the spouse to the Presidency indivisible.  It is a big mistake to not look at her so as of a bad “feminist” model for workplaces anywhere, however, for having asked to be officially subjugated under her husband while “officially” indivisible as an equal by the marriage laws of their union. As First Lady the President as a male spouse was yet of the Law of the lands that his practices political, however “executive” precisely, were so that marriage equality wasn’t allowed to be set asunder even as so in tasking his spouse as an “official” underling subjugated in Duty in an office hierarchy of the West Wing structures.

SECURITIES/SHARED WEALTH:  Whether for the FBI, SEC, FEC, or just Justice we have it now that all the finances of the “The Clinton” are fair game and of a Duty too of Congress in oversight in rights to preserve and protect the Union under Article One prescriptions.  These days post a QUID PRO QUO rendered upon one Virginian Governor now alights it too of the Clintons that another Virginia Governor has too long also been like too much of political QUID PRO QUO, however it more the Clintons in his pocket then him firstly in their pockets.  It is that was have the Clintons move to New York and as if the New York Senate seat of Senator Patrick Moynihan had been arranged to be next for Mrs. WJC - by political partisan dealing done, it seems, from within the Clintons’ White House.  It is that there is said a “DEAD BROKE” motivation behind all the potential servable as improper QUID PRO QUO how the Clintons to be in New York City, however as carpetbaggers charm, were to asking Big Bank friends (political associates merely?) to be to like gifting PWJC for Carnegie Hall Tower near penthouse rents as gratuities for the Clintons have like made them all so much money with their derivatives politics.  Mrs. WJC is inseparable for a bad feminism for being so to being Senator at least for having been too nearly so clearly and like permanently of an obvious QUID PRO QUO just of being party to the asking of banks to be to paying, again gratuitously, as much of the rent for a Time Square near penthouse suite for her spouse.

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS:  #ICC is now likely of a jurisdiction around and ready to be over Mr. & Mrs. Clinton as corporate global people of their meddling international “initiatives” of their CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVES.  It seems the ICC can rival even Attorney General Eric Holder now for prudence more judicial of the “The Clinton” as arrestable at least some for fraud, and more maybe for negligence of conduct(s) unbecoming a former First Couple of The United States of America.  It seems even if the Clintons do not step across newly the threshold of candidacy for President they are of such a fog of culpability that the ICC should at least be to considering an officially worked airing through “audits” to discern in a spirit of trust busting some being allowed to much trust internationally.

CONGRESS:  Per the Duty of the BENGHAZI SELECT COMMITTEE there is that beyond a cover-up having been enough found to proceed towards a “HOW CRIMINAL” such as a new criminal cover-up it is that the “feminist” in Mrs. WJC is long inconveniently proud of a hard line against President Richard Milhaus Nixon of it that people need go to jail when a President is determined even of such as a lesser and less tragic cover-up practices.  Mrs. WJC has much floated the boat that now is rightly of her to be beset upon as a prison ship however;  Mrs. WJC had vast motives to be so necessarily of a cover-up after the Benghazi attacks and so that the President now may be more protected than President Richard M. Nixon was whence priorly.  Though a cover-up was seemingly necessary, even though a worst case scenario always, especially, it is that it wouldn’t be fair to prosecute the President until his Secretary of State firstly is fully implicated beyond an already admitted sad culpability.  It may not be fair considering the fog of marriage of a joined culpability for Mr. & Mrs. Clinton, due their political ambitions and on going selfish global machinations for Powers, to even ever maybe specifically dissect PBHO as much as PRMN was for it would be too complicated and unfair of all affirmative action standards to separate an clear Obama guilt from the already broached and confessed iceberg of Clinton culpability, at least also of an executive negligence.  It seems prescribed by the Clintons own history and campaigned on pride that the House is well within its rights and of a Duty to actually move that Mrs. WJC at least is due prison time;  Mrs. WJC had the mean, motives, and opportunity so of the already enough admitted improper (illegal) cover-up.  Mrs. WJC essentially had to lie from the start to hide how the Clintons had (trapped?) PBHO into lying for them from hour one of day one and so by a cover-up effected as initialized within his First Inaugural oratory.  She played, however if “feminist” as in feminine, yet with absolutes that makes Congress’ work at imprisoning simple and easy;  Mrs. WJC dangerous set up the “The Clinton” in an absolute as if “IT COULD BE NONE OF THE CLINTONS’ FAULT” by being party to it as “ALL BUSH’S FAULT” as taggable as an illegal and imprudent actual “cover-up” where only a simple lie like now being investigated around any lies just of the Benghazi Cover-Up as a lie big enough in a contrary that was needed to repair and maintain newly the bigger cover-up of the Clintons then to fall apart if a new cover-up not affected.

BREAK:  So where were we?  So where are we?  Need I spell out a ten of a #TopTen or even be to a dozen of a #DirtiestDozen?

RACISM - EQUALITY:  Can we yet imagine that Attorney General Eric Holder, however or especially for being a “first black”, is possibly to leave his high office as said in December without moving ranks towards a servicing on the Clintons even maybe justly for charges of TREASON?  AGEH has competition and a clock running for legacy;  AGEH may not want to let even the Congress or the ICC steal the show now seeming staged and quite ready for a rending of justice, however lately, upon the “The Clinton” at least as on Mrs. WJC but as is seems inconscionable that Mr. & Mrs. Clinton aren’t enough from sharing, however - however a parity to be figured beyond comity in comedy of what would be equal paying for the man or woman?

ME / MINE:  And this now, all in the light concurrent that both Clintons are not of “official” executives, or of Congressional Duty, or offices but of the offices of Trust and Profit they are maintained in, with vast taxpayer allowances, there is that I must consider I have been two decades plus at defending my intellectual property from seemingly provable felonious premeditated property “theft” by the BOGO “two-fer” First Couple and since Clintons, and so that I may be now well in my rights to move to sue them and maybe for damages in lossed profits that could be fairly measurable as just even if over $100 Millions.  See Attorney General Eric Holder did support my rights so to such while initially with PBHO of a dictate to him that I was in my rights to stop him from use of my intellectual property.  This is a story now of the Clintons also more easily in my reach as the Government of the The United States of America is Constituted to be likely soon to rivaling what we could too be seeing to ragging on any righteous “feminism” of Mrs. WJC, as if such should trump - trump especially as due her in affirmative action.  This is now a story of 2008 of the struggles mine to protect me/mine from further uses and reuses, improper and unauthorized by the Clintons, specifically yet as it is that the Bush Administration, towards Justice Posterity, and too Attorney General Eric Holder, have stood up my rights such that the Clintons old uses and attempts, however successful, in reuses were of them now seemingly affirmed as necessarily then, however, of such that I can now pursue maybe too as if felonious premeditated thieving.

NOTE:  For now as it though seems I could seek #DAMAGES of $100 Million plus from any assets “CLINTON” it may too I have many other agencies who could get in line first and firstly lay claim to that much or actually all of the personal wealth of Mr. & Mrs. Clinton.  For how many can now maybe compete and to fines or compensation from the assets of Mr. & Mrs. Clinton it may not be rational for me myself to yet pursue for a mine in Justice due to how many official NEGLIGENCES may also need be proofed towards such to maximizing damages from exposing all aspects of cover-ups and negligence - at least all motives for a Benghazi cover-up to further hide too many lies also maybe righteously of fraud that SIMON & SCHUSTER could join against “HILLARY” just for false representations in her HARD CHOICES.

GUIDANCE:  PLEASE RESPECT - BE REPSECTFUL - RE: http://JPHogan.org!!!  Many also conveniently sourced by http://bit.ly/TheElephants could be just as easily ordered as a DIRTIEST DOZEN in object and satired yet - especially links of http://bit.ly/SLICKWILLY; http://bit.ly/PettyTreason; http://bit.ly/TheEnabler; http://bit.ly/ReadyForHillary; http://bit.ly/LongestWarhttp://bit.ly/RUNFORCOVER; and, http://bit.ly/MadamSecretary all can yet be ranked at least for a fuller #TopTen causal to any praying now for any possible redemption metrics if right to be however meted for Mr. & Mrs. Clinton.  Note: It is now for these so linked that this new column presents on many of these links yet as the newest now sorted among such collections, however some are quite more damming and voluminous than others.

Comments Off
09/04/14
P.O.W. CLINTON!
Filed under: POLITICS, #CGI, WAR ON WOMEN, QUID PRO QUO, #NEW_YORK
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:24 am

Friday may be too late.  As it may be an “IS” of jealousies of an us of New York guilty, of anti-federalist sentiment, and practices, it may be we should commence, this Thursday, respectful to how much it has been seeded of U.S. of a bad big apple.  A NOW concurrent must be as trapped of BABY KILLERS and too an “IT” of a “CASTLE’D CLINTON”!

IT may be most, or firstly, originally, an IS of an us of New York again too much not prefaced sufficient for Constitution.  Another Clinton may be now again an us of U.S. newly as a greatest threat to “federal” or “national.”  A NOW concurrent may not have the nation generally in a new war and trapped or imprisoned yet secured enough from a freedom born yet of the U.S. original Federalist bulwarks.  IT newly, of a NOW of New York, especially, an IS Political, so yet registers while supposed to have been fenced out by a more perfect Posterity by the order of the People’d in Union.  IT, an IS of a “VESSEL’D CLINTON” - begotten of a too be much storied rearing of consummated whence “CLINTON” - of the years 1993-2001 yet, befits deconstructive scrutiny.

The Politics of 2014, however so John Jay a PUBLIUS FEDERALIST of words set out as prophylactics to national sins seeding, are yet of the “THE CLINTON” and what too much has already gotten by - gotten by in their foreplay for a Posterity in Mrs. Clinton crowning.  IT begotten an IS beset so bosomed (however anti-federalist newly) is yet of an air of teasing for jealousies of Jay’s penned though addressed and de-styled where Mrs. C. is an enabler - if not champion - for President Of World status for Mr. C. and so as if a guard to BABY KILLERS priority FORWARD Politics yet too as a defense of the misogynistic, chauvinistic, impeachable conduct unbecoming a hallmark of her Union.  P.O.W. CLINTON cannot rightly now be on any stage without a reconciling - without a consideration of a HER PRIORITIES of conflicts with HIS PRIORITIES.

We may be able to readily dispense the BABY KILLERS (PILLS) of Democrats seeded national Politics - we may be able to readily now degrade any imprudence of an IS an IT to: Tranquility can endear or endure if just a new federalist less becoming, or more becoming, by edicts to at least the women People’d are asked or corralled to have to think less - think less wholly of consequences akin to a reliance on BABY KILLERS, and especially if teased in un-Jay jealousies under false flags as defensive not offensive Power.  Friday now be too late - Today we should seize any “apple” of the Constituted and try to be with New York to a new need to think beyond any Clinton an anti-federalist more towards multiple confederacies and playing or states’ particular jealousies.

We must accept a conundrum now for deconstruction as it wouldn’t be fair to bypass the “THE CLINTON” and go straight to a the “THE OBAMA” as firstly or mostly the most culpable of begotten now.  We must recognize the fog of these times as in the way of yet finally seeing a shape and originality of the root problematic set terra firma in time so of a yet seeming lost decade - of a yet seeming missing years of 1993-2001.  We have been teased by an enabler a nester guardian of the “THE CLINTON” of the “THE BILL” vessel’d as castle’d Clinton to it prudent to pimp misgyinistic, chauvinistic, too much as if accepted of it right or good to have a harem, politics of BABY KILLERS as without any MEA CULPA conscience, and, yet now aren’t enough more the wiser.  IT a pressing IS so NOW forward is that P.O.W. (President Of World Clinton) is yet a worser Executive than now concurrent to the Constituted so sworn into high office Barack Hussein Obama

The “THE CLINTON” isn’t possibly better than or to besting yet the “THE OBAMA” as per governance!  A posit to check and recheck for Posterity that now must be commenced yet of a Politics prudent to a defensive for the current firstly over any of priors to be yet pressed.  We can foot this tipping off of proper Political plays - we can toe the line for Posterity forward - we can seek knowledge and smarts from John Jay and firstly by the preponderance of his writ 2-5 as PUBLIUS.

The “THE CLINTON”?  The “THE CLINTONS”?  “VESSEL’D CLINTON”?  “CASTLE’D CLINTONS”?  JAY birds not - NOT NOW! - BUT TWO TOO:  NOW not maybe for long either, anymore, forever more, evermore?  We have been unknowingly imprisoned by the P.O.W. CLINTON, of a long conspired spousally, of a global NOW newly anti-federalist, and much as a simple reading of JOHN JAY, as PUBLIUS,of a “THE FEDERALIST PAPERS” 2-5 bolstering, of a young national prudential for Providence best prescribed to Tranquility, in a general Welfare, by a more perfect Union, at least than the Articles of Confederation, and imprisoned so unawares of a fog and dangers in ignoring that rooted or at least seeded “CLINTON” in the predating causal years 1993-2001.

How we are ignorant of the threats risen of such “THE CLINTON” and these years of them of the tilling is also to be yet more conscionable as measured after a querious to how a near million per year in rents was thought a proper allowance by taxpayers forever forward for just those annuals of eight so quarted yet of a emoluments pecuniary to the personal of more just a fifth to the burdened masses.  The Clinton coy pimping of BABY KILLERS as more the proper “governance” than a prudent prophylactic befits a political need theirs, yet, to have it seem safe to even tease the “THE CLINTON” of a “VESSEL’D” too “CASTLE’D” Mrs. or Mr. C. as a celebratory in misogyny, chauvinism, and too acceptable for American “Presidential” harems.

John Jay, so of New York, and yet so contrary and worked up to help more than tease out a preventative to the general empirical anti-federalist bent of Governor Clinton, persists in Posterity for having warned us - and still of warning us of any IT like of the IS now quite coying covered by FOGS of Clintons and a superiority set for jealousies of “BILL” as a “P.O.W. CLINTON” - of the Clintons yet, however “castle’d” yet, as if royal in Providence of rites newly as if of rival confederacies with an extant of them of acceptance for PRESIDENT OF WORLD CLINTON… begetting.

Aren’t we all now too much imprisoned by any at a the for an IT an IS a THE of “THE CLINTON” of “THE BILL” as a “P.O.W. CLINTON” at least as we are asked to accept all the teasing suggestive to a “VESSEL’D HILLARY” a “VESSEL’D CLINTON” for a biased prejudiced intra-partisan, just, if too prescribed but not regulated in floating a PRESIDENT CLINTON WAS A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN PRESIDENT OBAMA, AND AS PRESIDENT OF WORLD SINCE?

Any now “P.O.W.” of PRESIDENT OF WORLD status globally can read of New York like immortal John Jay, or say of just the first five of the ‘THE FEDERALIST PAPERS” - either of a Cornell Clinton Rossiter or Columbia Robert Ferguson edition - to find a common sense meant to be yet a prophylactic at least to any newly at trying to seed old Clintonian anti-federalisms.  That of an essence of P.O.W. forward should yet stick of HELL on EARTH at least to any so Constituted in Prudentials of PUBLIUS originality.  It is wrong to have such as a “P.O.W.” as their #CGI for to at least the bulwarks of #JAY such is a rival confederacy to the Federal and National.

The extant of the ‘THE CLINTON” - however yet harvested - begotten of the too ignored causal years 1993-2001 - is not FOREIGN to the Federalist John Jay but too as it can be confused as writ and pressed into Constitutional about “foreign threats” and any disambiguous unsettled regarded of the “intitiatives” said of an IS an IT of the NOW of CGI as CLINTON(S) for it shouldn’t be acceptable as innocent or coincidental that there are perils in their rival POLITICS much of 2-5 as per dividing and conquering threats from hands at #RIVAL initiatives by playing at and off of state(s) jealousies.

The very IS of the IT of #CGI is about a construct that is of a P.O.W. CLINTON as if yet CONSTITUTIONAL. PUBLIUS did secure an anti-Clinton forward that was supposed to yet protect the People’d people for Posterity from any imprisonment, however now so otherwise GLOBAL, by an establishment as now ripe for a Government abortive prosecutionary.

Comments Off
09/02/14
MUY MAL? - - - RATS???
Filed under: POLITICS, CLIMATE CHANGE, QUID PRO QUO, POPE, #ISLAM SQUIBS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:57 am

However the Democrats now proceed as desperados, of red lines a new fence line, we have it united in Clinton as gringos as improper messengers. We are joined today of a common struggle, yet so of a “We” of North America, of the totem of Obama as three headed and so of confused my-antics.  So “capped” as basic as if in totemed Mrs. Clinton too is the beast of burden a burrow a donkey at the gate and neither a Clinton nor an Obama atop of deliverance in prophecies.

William Howard Taft would likely see it as self-evident that such a troika of an Obama totem is of a body to be trust busted. Taft, as President, would have seen desperados as rats and too as gringos even if of a black sheep prima facia totem politics.

As we are now long - too long - of a President, however singular or unique, of his leading from behind it is of an essence of journalism that I too now should follow from behind. It is confused enough that the “THE OBAMA” is so three headed and contrary of irreconcilable differences in any legacy of William Jefferson Clinton, Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, and Barack Hussein Obama.  There is a blooded in the supposed joined fences where there must yet be corralled a differentiation for each now a desperado however “gringo” or “black sheep” as rats each with their own tales.

It behoove us to transit prudent and open eyed to the humanity in the forces so united as if an American troika of one body Democrat;  Prudent it be to see the wolves as wolves - coyotes as coyotes - donkeys as donkeys - rats as rats!  However pedestrian and catholic, any discussion of trespassing must now be at what is of a “GOOD” in the Americas.

The worst nightmare for and Democrat of such systemic contrary ways is that there is now set up, however accidentally, a stage global where contrast and differentiation is otherwise conveniently scripted as of a threshold seen but maybe as of a point of no return not to be trespassed.  These are trying times where the worse possible “totem” for the The United States of America is to be confused as of a troika yet of one body where there can be a rival, a rival, and another rival all yet as rats;  There are great dangers in any “American” face as if prima facia of three heads concurrent to “National” initiative deciding, and especially with three so as differentiable as Mr. Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, and President Obama.

We as of the “We” of “American” yet colloquial of the USA continental biased pride are called out to each a People’d to rationalized through an irrational even as it presents that it may be reasonable to think it now doesn’t matter how bad the Republicans in mass, or specifically, are for it is borrowed and trespassed of Democrats as desperados now too established as the worser - more the worst.  The Democrats, as establishment, are now too much cooked up of rats.  However Catholic the Democrats, so, have much transited a new-coding to over-write or supplicate the old codes - the original coded for shared humanity.

We as of the “We” of the Americas have a Constitutional conundrum to parse and debate:  IT MAY BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR THE CONGRESS TO MAKE A LAW FOR A DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST ISIS AS THAT WOULD VIOLATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT AS A LAW MADE RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION.

We as of the “We” of the Americas, however sympathetic to the “THE ITALIAN” of the HOLY SEE OF ROME, must maybe now settle back as more Randian yet not as “isolationists” technically.  Where the USC of the USA may prohibit a specific declaration of war as for such would be maybe a declaration of to “HOLY WAR” as set up by an adversarial of Sunni sectarian faith in Islamic writs it may be that the Constitution is better than any Democrat totem, however.  We are near, but not yet it seems, at Saudi Arabia of declaring war or open hostility for enforcement upon/against ISIS;  We are near at it that we must be cautious and to a belief that Saudi Sunni and ISIS are to brethren and uniformly “nationalistic.”

Rats!!!  As the President, however a desperado a rat of a totem of an improper and confused apparent troika, persists of a “leading from behind” it for journalism much that parsing particulars have to be some constructed to a following from behind.  Rats!!!  This could be very bad for many!!!

Already breached seems to be a fact that President Obama, however the “leader” of a rat pack, of desperados, gringos but as of a black sheep, is that the politics of the The United States of America are without yet a strategy for countering the faith based “Justice” uniformed marching that for now seems maybe to be actually too nearly of Saudi Sunni “nationalism” to be maybe not “terrorism” but warring by “uniformed armed forces of a nation.”

To cover from behind we now are left to talk about the vacuous - the absence of leadership - the failures from avoidance and inaction.  For starters we are prudent to rap this so of rats as of a pack of desperados now to desperate to police their partisan fence lines than to perform on Constitutional coded prescribed duties.  As a pack of rats so too much at CYA generally, and specifically, much always globally, it is yet modern that “MS” is abreviated in “MSNBC” and that we have already too long experienced, if not consciously witnessed, that Democrats have been at an attempts to be nearly of conquests of “Un-American” as if new and more coded and newly otherwise nationally programmed (in a secular) as acceptable as new of extra-Constitutionals in a Post-Constitutional as NEW “AMERICAN”!

Are the Sunni of ISIS (and Saudi Arabia) now ready to speak Italian, Portuguese, or Spanish (of Argentina) firstly?  If we now are behind the President as behind in leading aren’t we yet of a concern about Saudi Arabian “official” speak of a warning to Europe and the USA of threats from ISIS without themselves firstly at a clear differentiation to establish that ISIS is not actually merely as more a unified uniformed force yet of the “national” bulwarks theirs?  Have the Saudis now put to the perceptiveness of President Obama an apparent extant that their horses are ahead of any ISIS carts?

The “Greatest Generation” had their “Rat Patrols” - now like so much else of USA so far progressed as if the originality and original pragmatic so coded as the “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” “American” were passe we have it a conundrum that Democrats have us embroiled and in dire straits from too many cookies or wrenches like now in the gears of our original coding of it now more self-evident that there has been an attempt too generally (and of a conspiring) to be effectual to a re-coding re-programing from the prudent balanced think still writ workable of the USA USC so “done” as established and ordained “code.”

It is the Democrats worst nightmare that there is now globally and locally set up a staged demonstrable in contrariness to air out and discern the differences at least of the “BLOOD FEUD” where it desperate for each at least as Mr. Clinton, and Mr. President Obama, that they become remember of a different legacy and one superior somehow to the others.  It is so great a problem that this week commenced as if Mr. Clinton had Mrs. Clinton held by a tail and so safely yet guarded from an onslaught of intra-party assaults by President Obama - or his henchpeople squad/pack.

Further yet in following from behind the behind leading of the Democrats, so of a dangerous extant as if us of the US as a three headed troika, we may be freer now to be a nation like in isolation but globally to Republicans offering a best peace in international leadership to saving the planet, otherwise more reasoned to better climate change solutions, and quite while we as “American” of the our “We” are if to be targeted yet likely to be targeted less or even lastly per the “faith” or “Holy” of ISIS even if not now more to be assumed to be yet armed and uniformed forces of Saudi Arabia.

There is a serious lack of leadership from this troika a dangerous three headed “national” in the leading from behind of President Barack Hussein Obama.  There is that now I am trying to figure myself how to follow from behind of journalistic standards and to not be too much to a Corp Speak like too many of the Democrat CYA propaganda however of a failing attempt long at reprogramming the “American” by new pop media “governance” too much of an infidelity to the Constitution and as of re-coding from a still workable and superior original “recipe” coded.  To “report” but not be of too much Corp Speak devoid of defense of a “FORCE” and of Corporate forces (too partisan) aren’t we now left to follow by branding too much of the Democrats as “very bad” and of a troika a rat pack yet otherwise as of irreconcilable feuding for differentiated “legacies”?

From behind, and as it may be that Russia should be more firstly a targeted by ISIS as idyllic of a shared Sunni mission to yet be “officially” differentiated from “Saudi” and “Uniformed” as “National” and that Europe as been warned seemingly by Saudi Arabian “posts” we of the USA USC have it that it gets Constitutionally concerning that we may have to sit any “Holy War” so out for our Congress though of the Power of declaring War is yet barred firstly by the First Amendment from any Law making however “respecting” and “establishment” of “religion.”

We may as a Nation be best now to accept we are less and enemy of ISIS and Saudi Arabia and to it better for us all now to busy ourselves as earth firsters to trying to save the planet while humanity is yet struggling as if devolving or evolving “religions” elsewhere.

We may, however ISIS now seeming too much as if “uniformly” of a brethren of “National” of that of Saudi Arabia, now be safely too remotely a reasonable “enemy” and to be busy at our own “nationalism” where it seems only by a Presidential decree could USA armed forces get deployed in disrespect to the “religious” protections Constituted in the First Amendment prudence.

So:  RIGHT!!!  Are the Sunni however of ISIS and Saudi Arabia now willing to risk less certainty as of a “HOLY WAR” more pedestrian and catholic of spurring Catholics to a defense of Europe - of Catholics where ever to a co-defense of Italy - of Spanish speaking at least of Argentina to be mobilized with the Italians in a defense of the American Pope?

To November, however we now are to get there safely, it seems despite the suggestion of sweetness the Democrat Party is to evidenced of most biased towards harvests of too empty cornucopias.  To November and beyond it seems irreversible that Democrats however totemed of ranks are now dangerously a threat to national security as of a confused prima facia in a conundrum as a three headed but of one National “body.”

To November it is precious that a ghost of William Howard Taft is pre-staged and ready with a big stick to trust bust the “Corporate” of any to all reprogramming initiatives of at least the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVES corporate and too now necessarily at least a complicity in “Corporate Speak” “Corporate Power” of at least the brand “MSNBC” as not “Media” but “Public Relations” and too much collaborative in propaganda differentiable from “free speech.”

RATS???  And, now ironic that if CITIZENS UNITED is to overturned it may be for exercised “speech” too contrary to “American” and by the “corporate” however most clearly or specifically of a CLINTONS’ “MACHINE”?  And, now as Governor Terry McAuliffe seems by any QUID PRO QUO standards to be profiting politically in office now since having like having bailed out the “dead broke” Clintons by at least guaranteeing them one or two houses - or more lay as if of “buying” them such as “improper gifts”?

                                           *     *     *

Note:  This seems all that may be appropriate now to yet “report” rightly from behind the leading from behind of these so confused and yet packed “DEMOCRATIC” also remarkable as a troika in totemed intra-party feuding as rats as desperados too busy at attempts to a new sweetness by brainwashing hoards reprogrammed to a Post-Constitutional new Democrat Corporate Speak Power, and yet as it seems the original recipe is already proofed better and ready to be rebooted (reset) by Republicans or at least a “New Democrat”?

Comments Off
08/19/14
THE FERGUSON SIX
Filed under: POLITICS, #BLACKS, QUID PRO QUO, #BLAME, #NEW_YORK, #PUTIN ESSAYS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, RIVAL LEGACIES, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:45 am

Is Ferguson, Missouri a God forsaken oasis in middle America where too many live as if on a reservation limited also in a fear of the Law for having to too many a body been to abstention from lawful behavior?

The national politics of such isn’t for a comparison of an unknown Mrs. Clinton and a known President Obama on race - the only comparison justified to if a Democrat has the backs of the blacks of Ferguson is yet of the rivalry of the knowable of white President Clinton and a knowable of black President Obama.

President Vladimir Putin may be spoken of instructionally if not without actual praise though too comparatively at least on marches in nationalism.  It seems that President Putin can be discussed as capable of eclipsing President Clinton and President Obama.  There is that President Putin has Socialism to recover from and the perils from such as per Ukraine at least of a reported 60% + of irreligious where in the western there is yet Greek Orthodoxy and the eastern there is Moscow Russian Orthodoxy.

Though I write as a white male of Connecticut of New England of the New York City general Metropolitanism of the The United States of America I write as one who share “sugar” if not “honey” in friendship knowing of Michelle Obama, First Lady, since she was in her third year at Harvard Law School.  But for the hopes and dreams shared it was only in my dreams that I went back - that we went back - after she learned I didn’t discriminate because she was black.

Though I write now to suggest we must ask per Ferguson misery and tragedy if it that President Obama has his subjects backs there or otherwise if President Clinton can be said to now or ever have had such peoples backs. I know near nothing of the said new Black Panthers but when Michelle and I smiled at each other in Grendel’s of Harvard Square I was of standing in knowing Augustus A. White M.D. since I was about five years old and he of “Dr. White at your service” in a public social setting as a friend of my father’s while yet the tallest person and tallest black person I had yet or ever made such a connection.

Right!  Though I know nothing of the said new Black Panthers I am one who since about age five had a friendship with he whom was of record as the original Black Panther’s physician.  What I found scary about Dr. White wasn’t that he was so tall or black but that he was both a doctor and a Dr. White though black.  The only other Dr. White I have known was a neighbor who cared for Veterans who let me use his Parks Bike Truing Stand, and as later learned had been a pal of George W. Bush while a Yale classmate.

For the blacks of Ferguson the politics are now that it is either President Clintons has and had their backs or that President Obama has their backs - it cannot be that they both have their backs as these two are known of a rivalry since day one that to others is so serious it is a “BLOOD FEUD.”  If the incident had been of a say near 100 Lbs black female officer also called to enforce in the spirit of to serve and to protect fidelity - a near 100 Lbs black female of smaller stature of such weight so without her belt and tools of the enforcement duty - we may have cause to compare Mrs. Clinton to President Obama and President Clinton - to also compare her.

Whom among us can in a scholarly expose a proffering to it that Ferguson is like Ukraine and of problems from years of too much socialism to too much irreligiousness among its subjects?  Is it that a Putinesque intervention is what Ferguson now needs?  How is it that President Clinton’s trillion in cuts for surpluses maybe better explain an economic plight of Missouri blacks for of years of a leader too much in cold blooded imperial totalitarian wanton governance?  How is it that President Obama can blame President Clinton for economic gross negligence and yet isn’t yet, and, now as it may be per Ferguson that such is such an economic outlier that for all the economic ruinous the Clintons’ surpluses wrought such of Missouri eitherwise yet would be just as stricken and down?

Is Ferguson a too irreligious hell hole like the now also economically depressed Ukraine, and also due to the economics of President Clinton too much at cold totalitarian selfish political decidings?  Is Ferguson at all an irreligious hell hole to its own People’d peoples or has it been too long just left out and necessarily so much because the national leadership from a “top” was of the Clintons at their cutting of an extra trillion from budgeted and affordable programs to generally fating Ferguson to a new greater depressing “economics”?  As I like only so far pressed concerning the tragedy of fallen Michael Brown:  I queried:  Was this a case of a college bound teen Michael Brown of copping an attitude for his last days in the say “‘hood” of a getting out before having gotten out and of a general like F&^@ YOU at least to those of local governance and enforcement?

President Obama in recent speaking to the issues of race and unrest seems to be borrowing the very words and import of such in “shared humanity” as I have been myself publicly of usage generally for a while.  I am not offering that I have any answers and suggest President Obama if just borrowing such from me so also isn’t with answers but now maybe closer for being near possibly to better language that may bring us closer to better - or the right - questions.

The Clintons have since day one positioned themselves to be “political rivals” and only in Obama’s house as rivals of he thinking he needed them and needed a TEAM OF RIVALS.  The race and economic issues of Ferguson are now essentially peculiar to either a story of rivalry of it either that President Clinton or President Obama has such subjects backs.

For both the Clinton and Obama administrations it is arguable that any of Ferguson were considered more “subjects” than “citizens.”  It is unreasonable to proffer that both President Clinton and President Obama have had or do have the backs of the People’d people of Ferguson - they have firstly and continuously been of standing as “RIVALS” so any discussion must flush out the known and unknown of all knowable yet that is historical to how they have been different - to also how while different they have been more to betrayal and abandonment of such Americans even if not of a perils like Ukraine of too many too long of socialism and a nationalism to assimilation in obedience of irreligiosity in lieu of faith and community.

As President Clinton now due to be in the Ferguson HOT SEAT we have that Mrs. Clinton is an unknown as per racial oppression in Missouri while yet also of HOT SPOTS of a comparable culpability as per Russia and Ukraine, at least.  It would be wrong to discuss Mrs. Clinton now as per domestic issues where President Mr. Clinton has knowns and posited in rivalry that should dominate any discussion of culpability or innocence yet for black President Obama.  President Obama should too, as per Mrs. Clinton, be allowed an innocent until proven more guilty than a Clinton in regards to Ukraine, at least.

I don’t know why black President-Elect Senator Barack Hussein Obama was to coddling the Clintons or allowing an dominatrix of offer coddling by Mrs. Clinton — I don’t know why PBO both proceeded forward from the start with the economic team of Clintons’ economic experts as his “team” and while of “politics” and “office politics” of standing for the Clintons as rivals and he dependent on them so much that he so seemingly necessarily to an attempt at a legacy in administering a “THE OBAMA” yet while very publicly yet of floating the “THE CLINTON” as at least equal, or superior, and extant in a TEAM OF RIVALS.

The Clintons’ surpluses as from an extra trillion found and cut from the budgeted and then affordable may be that which best explains how Ferguson and Ukraine are now suffering so much and so vulnerable.  President Obama yet embraced those of the evils of the surpluses at least as necessary evils in his TEAM OF RIVALS so that he maybe firstly should attempt to explain himself as more innocent yet and less culpable to any Executive gross negligence than at least President Clinton.

Again:  The politics of race now for the nation too much to a private rivalry in totalitarian Power Clintons’ are yet beset by the possible perils of a people too yet too far in socialism to be also of a perils from irreligiosity at seemingly at least the eastern third of Ukraine.

Again:  The politics of race now for the nation too much to a private rivalry have it only reasonable, for starters, that it is either that President did and does have Ferguson’s six or that President Obama did ever or does now finally.

Again:  The politics are that it is not possible that both President Clinton and President Obama have the backs of the People’d people of Ferguson in Missouri of the The United States of America.

Again:  The DOMINANT politics is that the “THE CLINTON” and the “THE OBAMA” are as “RIVALS” of a “DEMOCRAT” HOUSE divided.

Comments Off
08/18/14
CURLY, LARRY, & MO’
Filed under: POLITICS, #CGI, QUID PRO QUO, #NEW_YORK, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:53 am

You’ve been monetized!

On McDonnell’s farm there is a greater beast - greater beasts:  “THE CLINTON” / the Clintons.  Let us differentiate the monetary!  Let us now, all together, litigate what should never be decided at the ballot boxes!  Let us look fairly and clear eyed at the raised issues of QUID PRO QUO but as also in a historical peculiar to the bones of the Clintons.  Peculiar to the Clintons is much that the issue of “THE CLINTON” isn’t yet perceived as greater of the predicament of the “THE McDONNELL”!

William Jefferson Clinton may have taken further than any President yet a wanton wayward beset firmly in a wanting more to be “KING”!  On McDonnell’s farm the McDonnells are small potatoes to the strategery and practiced of the Clintons to powers to rival globally affixed as structurally quite autocratic.  The “corporate” of the Clintons is quite a brand of a totalitarianism.

For Posterity we still should be asking for President Barack Obama’s college and Harvard Law School papers, and we should really be to probing the Clinton Rhodes scholarship as time spent in England towards learning how, though American, to work the think towards the possibility that an American white of the South could yet bring back a more monarchical “governance” to the otherwise yet united republic.

William Jefferson Clinton is more than and “Hillary Clinton” - William Jefferson Clinton, born William Blythe III, seems to have studied and studied towards effecting a post-Constitutional dismembering of the prudence of original Federalism of the confederated republic The United States of America. WJC seems to have a pedigree, and of his Rhodes scholarship, that was forward for establishments of anti-Constitutional new anti-Federalist root programming so that he could seem more like Thomas Jefferson but effect as if Governor George Clinton of New York, of the founding days, yet got his way.

I am not sure it matters for any “scholarship” of these issues if “Bill” is more “Larry” “Hillary” more “Mo’” and if so such then than President Barack Obama is best then “Curly.”  For these purposes either quite can be any or any either other of a threesome in Curly, Larry, & Mo’.  Right — we’ve all become monetized!  We’ve all become at least monetized by the “THE CLINTON”!

With such a monarchical want scholarship in the pedigree of the “THE CLINTON” it may be dangerous to over-simplify any running con by a presumption that such now entertain as if slap-stick appropriate can be other than set up root to character shifting politics. It may not be what WJC was taught at Oxford but much what he learned - learned from studying under the legacy of monarchical governance for empire building.

It may be wisest to let is be “open” as if any WJC, HRC, PBO is either a Curly, Larry, Mo’ or a Larry, Curly, Mo’ or a Mo’, Larry, Curly or a Larry, Mo’, Curly.  PBO though is a complication unplanned or fig’d, it seems, in the plotting and practices to Americans in totalitarianisms newly beset globally in an autocracy affected “CLINTON”!

It still seems inconvenient to the Clintons that any plan theirs however as original to scholarship by initiative of Rhodes was yet never calculated enough to plan for or prepare for a possibility that any black like PBO could become elected in between the workings for a Presidency in proper name of Mrs. Clinton through a planned succession in an ASAP from the Presidency as named proper in Mr. Clinton.

To keep this simple and yet guarded enough from the post-Constitutionals however yet covered by political slap-stick entertainment we should return to the McDonnell’s “farm” basis of the “THE CLINTON” the greater beast!

Again, the issues around being monetized are of QUID PRO QUO but more greatly of the bumbling of the Clintons!

Again, these issues are pressing and fresh at least for now balance for scales of Justice seems possible if we aren’t to litigate the Clintons and towards the prudence that such of their searchable forensic pathology is some to much quantifiable as totalitarian, at least in wants, and seemingly of a QUID PRO QUO so grand it is hard to see for its breadth and scope!

For starters there is comparison necessary and prudent with the prosecution of Governor McDonnell in Virginia as it seems reported and spoken of by Mrs.Clinton that the current Governor of Virginia, a Democrat, did so help them financially (and Politically) when said “Dead Broke” that it is hard not to tag Governor McAuliffe and the Clintons for its seems too much that he now a Democrat Governor, somehow, in comparison was like to buying the Clintons a house or two.

Right!  Where does President Barack Hussein Obama fit in here as to a “Curly, Larry, & Mo’” too Political while yet seeming so specifically and peculiar more just to the Clintons?  Simply PBO is aiding and maybe abetting the seeming wanton of the Clintons by offering distractions when he and his Justice Department should be practicing enforcement upon the “THE CLINTON”!

It is too late to now leave Governor Rich Perry out of this.  I agree that some matters are to be left to the ballot boxes and eschewed from litigation.  But, this however is quite peculiar in it of a Clintons peculiarity such that a litigation (and Congressional probe?) is necessary and proper as fitting issues apparently disqualifying for ballot box decidings.

The vast emoluments so pecuniary in a pre-specified monetary in valuation for Clintons speaking are numerous in stand alone examples of the “THE CLINTON” of practicing a “Politics” of everyone now being monetized to them!

Not in a defense of Governor McDonnell, so offered, these are yet points of order for balance in Justice here so checked and pressed.  It seems that a “speaking” by an of the “THE CLINTON” now is priced to be of them of greater importance and Powers now than when the “First Couple” of a People’d peoples allowance per year as less than now what they demand for nearly a single hour.

President Barack Hussein Obama has too much and for too long participated in this so entertained yet as a charade not an actual improper “cover-up” so that now and forward he must be either Curly, Larry, or Mo’ to “Bill” and “Hillary” however!

More history to the imbalance now beset in the defense of Governor McDonnell is at least the story to how it seemed arranged in the Clinton White House that a New York Senate seat would be bought for Mrs. Clinton.

Too:  It is a matter of record, for these improprieties posited, that President Clinton, while not content with a post-office taxpayer payed rental allowance, when yet he asked for more per year that that as a total for all past Presidents’ annuals combined, was yet to compromising the “Senator” for Mrs. Clinton, by asking his BIG BANK associated for gratuities in thanks for his having made them so much money in the story of his having pushed them into derivatives “gambling” as towards quantifiable emoluments towards a reported near one million per year “rent” necessary if he was to get the near regal spacious quite like penthouse leasehold in the Carnegie Hall Tower high above the RUSSIAN TEA ROOM.

Too:  It is much searchable for a forensic pathology of the Clintons as too clever, still, it seems with “HUG IT OUT” and other slap-stick distractive politics that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES offer a $1-2 Trillion spectrum of “corruption” that at least offers 1 Trillion unit points per dollar to counter any “claim” of “charitable” now or ever of the “THE CLINTON”! 

Right!  How can the Clintons speaking funds if funnelled through the Clintons’ Global Initiatives as for “charity” be for “charity” if their personality and past record, however publicly yet clear, speaks loudly in a contrary?  It may be a stretched to posit that the record speaks loudly to it that the Clintons have always seen people as to be monetized and that any money “politically” through them is always firstly as “patronage” and lastly at all “charity”! 

Right!  It so may not be a stretch at all.  After all a learned perspective on the 1 Trillion in unit points per dollar of the Clintons’ SURPLUSES barks out - even roars - of impropriety towards QUID PRO QUO recklessness!

Right!  It so may not be a stretch at all.  After all a learned perspective on the 1 Trillion in unit points per dollar rest as of the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of a time when the politics generally and the economics globally and locally had no peculiar need for surpluses by cutting an extra trillion but that peculiarly of the selfish spousal politics of the “THE CLINTON” of needing to prove they could find as much as the Republicans had yet found to balance the budget.

Right!  It is hardly a stretch which so much now far more public and out about a “real” Clintons!  It seems that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES were only needed by the “politics” spousal and selfish of the Clintons, and even despite their “totalitarian” wants to global autocratic Powers in a worked “Post-Constitutional” “working” “philosophy” of “governance”!  Without finding an extra trillion to cut after the Republicans has worked responsibly to find a first trillion to cut to balance the budget it is essentially an inconvenient fact for the Clintons that their seeming “need” for the vast irresponsible cuts of an extra trillion was to protect the “THE CLINTON” to protect any planning and plotting in said “his” Presidency to protect yet a set up for “her” Presidency.

Too:  Simply:  Essentially:  THERE WAS NO “CHARITY” IN THE CLINTONS CUTTING OF AN EXTRA TRILLION DOLLARS FROM THE BUDGETED AND AFFORDABLE!  THERE WAS COLD BLOODED AND SELFISH CRUEL ECONOMIC DESTRUCTIVENESS THAT BRIDGES, NECESSARILY NOW TO THAT WHICH SHOULD BE LITIGATED EVEN AS SO CONFUSED AS LIKE “QUID PRO QUO” BETWEEN SPOUSES WHILE ALSO TOO MUCH AS IF NEPOTISM - AS IF NEPOTIC!  THERE IS SUCH AN ABSENCE OF “CHARITABLE” IN THEIR SURPLUS EFFECTING THAT ANY SPEAKING FEE NOW SO HOWEVER IN A PER HOUR IN EXCESS OF THEIR OLD PER YEAR COMPENSATION AS “FIRST COUPLE” THAT JUST THEIR “SPEAKING FEES” PRESENT AS EMOLUMENTS PECUNIARY OF A SEARCHABLE FORENSICS OF THEM AT A TOTALITARIAN MONETIZING OF EACH PERSON AND THEIR OWN “VALUE” AS BILLED “SUPERIOR”!

Too:  Right!  This is yet too much accepted as unequal or yet greater assaults on proper governance. Right!  PBO is under the arm of contempt for the Peoples House by litigation by suits and such is only the tip of the bulge of the breached Constitutionals of the “THE CLINTON” of which an inappropriate “COVER-UP” has been uncovered and moved “officially” towards prosecution from that yet kept too much as acceptable politics in slap-stick.

Right!  To keep it simple for starters as balance becomes the issue of a prosecution of any McDonnell’s “farm” the Clintons expected, it seems, to be safely now in a “post-Constitutional” United States of America that was to have been entertained and laughed away from considering them of impropriety and willful undermining of prudent Constitutional “politics”!

Right!  To keep it simple:  Yes look at what William Jefferson Clinton tried to learn at Oxford as a Rhode Scholar and specifically if different and more towards a totalitarian practicable than what was curricular as of a lesson plan.  Yes look now beyond these three bold examples of the “THE CLINTON” as at a think that every person must be monetized by their self valuation for political influence and global patronage.

Right!  Beyond all the seeming ready examples of the Clintons at “money” in improprieties far worse than any Republican Governor Bob McDonnell yet seems accused we still should be first most worried as to them globally of patronage, however naively forgetting “no such thing as permanent friends or enemies - just permanent interests” (like) when Mrs. Clinton, however now, presents herself as if prime for Presidential politics because of the number of foreign leaders she, at least, is already now in bed with.  See it is still to be mostly or generally reported how any so name dropped by Mrs. Clinton is yet a friend much just because of emoluments flowing as “patronage” covered however at times as “charity” to the people or the causes of the people whose names she is dropping for benefit at home for of foreign influence Power.

Right!  It is that a cover-up has been found to have occurred and such is now near ready for a prosecution more litigation such as is proper to prevent inappropriate candidates from corrupt advantage in the ballot boxes.  For now it is too much a “CURLY, LARRY, & MO’” where WJC is called up as HRC’s character reference and while HRC yet is slamming into PBO and then as if comedic to a “HUG IT OUT” acceptable or believable comity.

Right!  FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!

Right!  FOLLOW THE MONEY - ESPECIALLY THE MONEY THAT FLOWS AS IF “BILL’S” WHILE YET ALSO TOO MUCH AS IF “HILLARY’S” AND/OR PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S CONTROLLED!!!

Right!  FOLLOW THE MONEY BUT DON’T EVER FORGET TO LOOK AT THE SIMPLE AND A LOGICAL IN A PATTERN OF THE CLINTONS, AT LEAST, OF A “PHILOSOPHY” AND “MOTIVE” IN THEIR MEANS AND OPPORTUNITIES.  DON’T FORGET TO LOOK BEYOND A SEEMING INNOCENT COMEDIC FOR SERIOUS THREATS TO THE CONSTITUTION THAT EXPLAIN A WHY THE CLINTONS SO LONG WORKED TO HAVE A YET MORE CONVENIENT TO THEIR PURPOSES NEW AMERICA OF A NEW “GOVERNANCE” IN A YET REVOLUTIONARY NEW “POST-CONSTITUTIONAL” ATTITUDE!

Right!  As per “balance” to the charges at least against Governor Bob McDonnell (R) mustn’t we consider how implausible that $250,000.00 for an hour of speaking can be for “charity” and not more “patronage” just because the 1 Trillion unit points per dollar in the Clintons’ cutting unnecessarily of an extra trillion for surpluses was not at all “charitable”?

And, again isn’t it that WJC essentially arranged from the The White House while President “Bill” Clinton the buying of a New York Senate seat as a improper “gift” to Mrs. Clinton?  And again as PBO plays along too much in a comedy too slap-stick how do any fairly explain any “proper” in President Clintons’ asking the BIG BANK “FOB” for rent gratuities as emoluments freely towards an annual near penthouse rent as not also improper at least for “MONEY” in a marriage as for seeming “influence” at least of/for a New York Senator?

Right!  It seems now that President Barack Hussein Obama is trapped in an inconvenient trio of a politics befitting prosecution for such if of concerns that experts are supposed to investigate before lay can rightly trust a candidate or ballot boxes!

Comments Off
07/26/14
CNN FOR $1
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, #CGI, #KERRY, #MUSIC, QUID PRO QUO, #FEMINISM, #MAGIC, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:55 am

What are the attributes pertinent?  What is the full range, and diversity, of so much this attributions valuation for corporate responsibility must be towards navigating?  Has Time Warner persisted in undermining the value of some great assets by the too regular airing of CNN yet as if a “Clintons’ Nonsense Network”?  This is serious business for this fall it isn’t just Dinesh D’Souza after his book “AMERICA” touring highs to be an author set low and to some time of arrested imprisonment.

So Jon Stewart is entertaining (with) thoughts of CNN worth buying as worth near $10 Billion smackers.

Indian born Dinesh D’ Souza is said to be staring down a possible two years in the “BIG HOUSE.”

For now not even CNN is known to have attributed enough seriousness to the Clintons’ cover-ups and the Benghazi Select Committee looming now ahead of Mrs. Clinton, author, for a fall of a very public fall too.

For now not even CNN is known to have asserted that Mrs. Clinton while “HARD CHOICES” bombing compared to the expectations as inevitable to success such that a $14 Million reported advanced (not as political - quid pro quo - patronage - campaign covert funding through CGI).  So much is attributable to Mrs. Clinton that as Dinesh D’ Souza book, with accompanying movie, top her book he may take solace in how she, of the uncovered cover-up, and for her career of helping set and keep a Democrat standard for imprisonment of any of an admin found to be of a “cover-up” without murder.

This fall however of a fall for author D’Souza is justly now set up to be a fall too for a fall of author Mrs. Clinton.  Mrs. Clinton is at risk of judgements rendered of the “WATERGATE” political standard seriousness and for the yet already partially uncovered cover-up that involves murdered far more significant that the possible two years for “AMERICA” author.  Mrs. Clinton has already (inadvertently) admitted incompetence and too before Congress, while of her outbursts seeming of a contempt for Congress, of admitting culpability for the events of a prosecution due for illegal cover-up of the jurisdiction of the Benghazi Select Committee.

How and why is any attribution for considerations of the HARRY POTTER licensing now pertinent to CNN valuation? Who’s his daddy?

Is it that Mrs. Clinton, at least, has been uncovered to be a mortal more just a “muggle”?  Is it also inconvenient that Mrs. & Mr. Clinton have too long been cloaked in attributions, generally, that cannot now be established as honestly fitting them, and so exposed uncovered from being able of use to mitigate comparative guilt in a spectacle to any “good character” - really?

To protect its licensing and grand asset associations with the standards and honor of “HOGWARTS” & the “HARRY POTTER” casts mustn’t CNN, at least of Time Warner, to be now ceasing and desisting from being too “CLINTONS’ NONSENSE NETWORK” forward and specifically away from attributions presumptions cloaking still?  Right!  It is that the idea of “HOGWARTS” was to fill a void in my neighborhood for a likewise small group of children when about 7 years from college and to opines of “don’t move away Peter - we have fun when you are around”?

The facts are that the legend of HARRY POTTER was fig’d and to the challenge to JK Rowling so to, for my benefit some, be yet (covertly) to proving I could repeat the breadth of musing I did before 1993 to make the Clintons seem electable enough, and, too to be to, while so knowing of the Clintons, to working a way to protect a new generation of the world’s youth from the Clintons.  I have, as many of CNN must have born witness, however whence as my Facebook friends, or otherwise social media associated, yet established the point that where the Clintons have again and again proven themselves incapable of a repeat I have yet repeated and repeated but not towards maintaining still a cloaking of their errs.

It is too much so that CNN can be said to have long been too much to cloaking the Clintons and with attributions not pathologically honestly theirs or any theirs deservingly.  It is too reasonable to posit that CNN has too long, to the detriment of many, been too much as if more a CLINTONS’ NONSENSE NETWORK than of agents for the real attributes of many of the stories yet worked and produced to much to cloaking them, & undermining my rightful too.

It is historical that “HOGWARTS” were so mused from me to me as the father of “HARRY POTTER” as he of the prophecy in marketing with confidence in vast and great reaping of sown to profits.  To be what it was as both a filler of the void I was to leave such youths of my neighborhood, to be defensive against the Clintons as proof of my ability to repeat at such a global level, to also be a bulwark for a new generation as protection from the Clintons I know with any “cloaked”, and to protect how much else I was still doing politically for positive change, it is and was that JK Rowling was under directions to not attribute me at all as the muse and supporting source of so much about the challenge to 7 books to so replace me and have her as a distant mother yet towards my aim that such be to helping my young neighbors survive my absence and be yet to growing up less as dirt under my skin as if a wart and to being good wards, hopefully.  And yet as JKR was under instructions to not attribute or expose me such was, as recalled, only contractually address for the publishing rights for the seven books, with any movie or theme park rights, and any merchandizing rights, too yet then of first book contract yet of such to be a bridge to maybe cross later.

I have no idea yet how or what I mean to do about all this.  I have been also a musing of STRIKE known to JKR and so since Clintons first initiated HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT.  I haven’t felt my rights at risk while yet it has been quite complicated for me to move to expose my attributes per such as to do so I much have to expose the Clintons firstly more as frauds of having been cloaked much.  Yes, it was my hope that the seven book challenge as originally outlined would yet work without such a focus by JKR to yet be to my benefit - to be of my hopes to protect a new generation from the Clintons I have known since before “WATERGATE.”

It is still complicated news for my story to be told broadly without it of my history of more credibility to so much still too attributed to the Clintons.  Right - HOGWARTS, however if from “HOGAN & WARTS” and of the new unknown author JKR of guarding herself if it were to fail by it so conveniently named yet to tag the muser of the 7 book challenge, is from my looking for an unknown foreign author willing to right about a “Peter Rowe-ling” and posse, as I started it, and around he then of starting magic study and while of round black glasses and black hair.  “DUMBLEDORE” was animated for such basis for “HARRY” as for his home’s front door a double “Dutch” door to be also magical as of it a double door, and purple, where the top could open separate from the bottom.

So really Jon Stewart how can Time Warner or its CNN be worth clearly now any certain amount?  Did you know “EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND” is also from a basis around a old New Haven, Connecticut friend as how GRIFFEN HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM DOORS became those animated for GRYFFINDOR and so to also balance how so many of the root character were so “medical” of Yale University Hospitals?  This friend was in PR and yet because of having offered me a half a egg salad sandwich while concerned that I as Director of Support Services for the then commenced New Haven Area Special Olympic Games may have been forgetting to eat to my later cross-seeding for JKR and too the EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND as also around a real Officer Barone then also of games volunteering.  Raymond was a fitting character name for such to be supportive of my media career while one of 28 grandchildren of Arthur M. Menadier who started his career as a Boston sports writer.  Some of my cousins, much more of the global music scene then resided on a Raymond Place.

As I can and should uncloak the Clintons and for a full rendering of an arresting justice for at least Mrs. Clinton via the jurisdictions at least of the House Benghazi Select Committee it remains a conundrum for attributions as per CNN at least to how to now tell the truth without at least myself being to any inadvertent revaluation of the good of “HOGWARTS” and all about “HARRY POTTER.”  It is some simplified as “CORMORAN STRIKE” now is alive to live a related characterization more as if the founder of “HOGWARTS” than as if a new “HARRY POTTER.”  It is interesting too that my friend who used to be a chief accountant for ESPN is whom my friend who incidentally sparked me to concerns to concerns pushed for the creation of “EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND” - He now I believe is the top accountant for Ann Taylor.

Though I first crossed ambitious wiring with Commissioner Bill Bratton in 1987-1988 in Boston when news was that he was to be heading up Massachusetts state wide municipal force that was the most neglected and maybe ignored in the state - though I first crossed and worked ambitions collaboration with a wiring with him whence it is interesting and related that though his first thought was to me “don’t laugh at my fleet of green cruisers” (like) it is later when I emailed him while he was Commissioner in Los Angeles with my advice that he retire or resign so not to be caught as the Obama administrations top scapegoat for what I then was expecting to be statistically true for increases in crime - though, that is, while he first said not to laugh so to me it is while he was considering my later advice that he seemed to burst into a laugh realizing my “politics” was of taking on the “The Kennedy” - as if taking on the legacy of the late Kennedy brothers.

So, at least to me what can a value be for CNN?  I mean it seems that there are historic corporate responsibility issues that may be justifying a “official” courtly to remediate if an amicable way not forthcoming as much of a prosecution for the fall of Mrs. Clinton should necessitate a revaluation of all said as if “news” as if properly attributable to either Mrs. or Mr. Clinton.

My “Mad Man” grandfather was an “Arthur” whose standards, however liberal American as Washington’s, yet seemed to be for me to be if likewise to his success as needing a courtly and general corporate standard even greater than the Kennedy brothers lost, and so really much higher that especially those said as of the “The Clintons” that they oddly are not generally known in “news” as long unable yet to repeat.  What can any valuation of CNN be without a more honest one of Mrs. & Mr. Clinton and for not themselves enough at least of the higher standard of the “The Kennedys”?  I was born to choose to be as much of any legend of my grandfather “Arthur” as I might yet attempt and maybe succeed to as of a wizardry in marketing prophecying.

Chances are there are very amicable ways for me, when clear of the inappropriate cloaking of the “The Clintons” “politics” not enough “news” and “history” to yet be known for that which was of my broadly and globally repeating with my 7bk challenge to JKR yet of my first go at it of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that now still best explains the successes and unexpected rise of the Clintons - yes, the Clintons I have known since about a first grader and they Yale Law co-eds not married and just Bill and Hillary.

It seems CNN isn’t alone now in a duty at “news” to separate the “The Clinton” from at least all this just shared of the “The Hogan” more pathologically honest and truly to the genesis or origins related.  But, again, CNN isn’t supposed to undermine the valuation of the necessary and proper attributes of Time Warner vast licensing of assets, however, in the “HARRY POTTER.”

                                         *     *     *

And, yet otherwise, to news of plagiarisms, by Democrats, but as for these imports, of Clintons’ inappropriate uses, and outright misuses, we have that Democrat Senator John Walsh story has refreshed my visceral experienced smarting of the 2004 Convention speechifying of “Barack Obama” as some of his breakout speech had me stirred in objection as the original thinker and writer of the rhyme and reasoned verse I was of hearing from afar a someone (maybe then Senator John Kerry) be to saying nearly “use these lines” “make them your own” and “put a black face on them.”  I at least have learned since reading “DREAMS FROM MY FATHER” very early “memoir” that the “Barack Obama” if that his authentic personal style was so remarkably away from his own style when to that I so experienced with visceral smarting about he of his break out at the Democrat Party Convention of 2004.  Such is of the essence of the above mentioned so yet of the actual written words in my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM which so later also had me needing to flex a polite cease and desist to Howard Dean when he wasn’t just misappropriating from such but so was to me, knowing my original compositions, was yet using my improved race relations new media writing yet by unauthorized use in speeches to inner city black youths with his message yet DON’T STEAL.”  Again, I have known “Barack Obama” at least as “B.O.” of Hawaii to be four years older than me and of an interest in Presidential oratory since the late 1970s.  He in now way, and still nor did the Clintons after the 1992 election, have any authorized use to present as if their own material so significantly or vastly similar in tone, timing, and message mine.

For now I too have yet to decide what to do about the specifics of President Barack Hussein Obama’s breakout speech of the Democrat Convention of 2004 and to the specifics of how with it experienced as an attempt to present mine as his and with it then forward as Democrat and black it is yet of them thinking lawyerly defensible as if similar and flattery and not identical - while yet so that such was visceral and smarting to me knowing the origins and political workability and practicable benefit in being enough just like to identical.

Comments Off
07/22/14
MO’ DEF’D #LOVE
Filed under: POLITICS, #CGI, #BLACKS, QUID PRO QUO, #FEMINISM, #BLAME, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:37 am

Once we all broke the banks, however lately, in the early 1990s, from their too @ “untouchables” zoning with red lines we were free, more together as equals, and set on these paths to all homes a castle of where the hearts are.  Once we all broke the banks so of their old tired and too true as zoned in differents aparts walled we were too on the path to a politics now firstly to asking if at least successful blacks are not now guilty, as guilty, for not “giving back” enough.

We are all too much of a 99% as an ignorant people to how much of all this the Administration of the Clintons just inherited.  We are fit to be reunited to truths, more reasonable, than the politics since, now sooner than later.  We are fit to be freely pressed to a new awareness of the Clinton 1990s more historically accurate as a THE TERRIBLE NINETIES.  As much as the “The Clinton” inherited blessings of so many of so many chains coming off the old of banking zone defenses it is yet too true how the Clintons are of an essence, political, and as if economic, to setting up days for the old bondage to be resecured.

This essay is for a treatment of corporate responsibility and parameters not to be to fully undressing the history of whether successful blacks or the Southern white “Clinton” most to blame for such bad times returning - for so many of times of assets appreciated to heart filled homes depreciated.  #FORWARD our first steps are best at the threshold of how so much of these days of suffraged suffering of from the “House of Clintons.”  This would be more self evident if “The Clinton” not now so #HARLEM and to having had the #Clinton #BigBank “friends” agree to cover the near penthouse suite rents of his desires so high above the THE RUSSIAN TEA ROOM of CARNEGIE HALL TOWER.  There is little for them to deny while so much they may first and for years attempt to deny;  The Clintons, so, would be so more self evidently if of CHT and set in their splendor so regally of public knowledge of rent paid gratuitously by the Big Banks as emoluments for their “politics” of asking for the derivatives gambling.

It is not now of IF WE NEED BLAME THEM but to now, finally - near finally of our national politics - that we discern for Posterity how much we all everywhere need realize they are all or mostly actually to be squarely blamed.  It is time to curb the blessings of what they inherited so that the doors are open so all can more clearly see what was of their times beneficial and that which was just of them and their own capability.  Right!  Instead of being in Harlem so like of a political camouflage the “The Clinton” could be so high above the “PRACTICE! PRACTICE! PRACTICE!” prudence ensconced in luxury afforded seemingly as from bank quid pro quo, or maybe derivatives graft.

What is a JOB?  What if you were the founding framers with GOOGLE or BING and a BIBLE app would you find if of searching the Testaments by “JOB”?  Is a “JOB” but that of People’d people and the shared human electric as poetry electric as “religion” of the forces and wattage/voltage of the electricity of shared humanity songs of bodies electric?  By what ones find in “JOB” searching mustn’t all be so of doubts and doubting of a reality that there can only be freedom “of religion” not freedom “from religion” for it of a He as of a shared “Force” field where all are apart however not wholly?  Mustn’t a “JOB” in any corporation yet be of a fit to the rights in commissioning of a mission corporal in at least the rights by The United States of America constituted as in rights established and ordained of rights at assembly and expression?  Can any said “JOB” be separated from His “JOB” and His rites?

The “The Clinton” may have cornered the political benefits of them more at inheriting the undoing of the zoned bondage in the old chains of banking with discriminatory red lines.  Seems!  But, the “The Clinton” showed truer colors for traditional ways to their vast patronage banking - as now so questionable while however clearly evident of CGI accountability - of a common core so intimate and rotten in the selfish politics for short-term gains from unnecessary and dangerous surpluses.  Again, we are much past the threshold of it actually more the Clintons fault than yet the fault of the Republicans or just the Administration of George W. Bush.  We are now to metrics of straws - of straws weighing one by one anewly accounting more fairly so that none under such so Constituted is yet communally befallen too alone as if pre-destined or fated to carry more than their fair share.

What did I know?  When did I know it?  How did I actually helped the Clintons become electable in 1992 yet of a defensive awareness that we of We the People needed to be protected from them and their selfish political wants to presidency firstly for each a spouse and a spouse?  To all corporate I have my options tied or limited as for any “employment” I have my “JOBIAN” of my historicals where I firstly think and write of the truths so regarding respecting so much just inherited by the Clintons, and personally as set about for once inaugurated in 1993 their use and reuse was unauthorized and inappropriate so much so that I firstly am of any “JOBIAN” to “JOBS” of a truth self evident that to me the Clintons have been long of thievery.

THIEVERY is a big word to pen or press so publically.  These days of the Courts and United States as of barristers have a trending to my favor of such tagging.  These days have it Courtly that “reuse” must be as authorized, it seems, as any “first use” such that the “The Clintons” may be further know more of the differentiation between what is of “THE HOGAN” - “THE CITIZEN ROSEBUD” - and yet ever again as rightly of the “THE CLINTON.”  The barred and esquired set too are in the mix towards restitution of artful properties as evidenced by a recent cursory read of the ABA Journal as to trends in “repatriation” in the ranks of officers of the Law.  I have since 2007 been of intellectual property defensive postures against many attempts at reuse further of that which I still claim the Clintons never garnered first use rights for, and so with the honor and duty of the Administration of George W. Bush and too by the judgment proffered by Attorney General Eric Holder, as recalled from early in the Administration of Barack H. Obama.

As big a word as THIEVERY it is the word I have to wrestle with for any and all “JOBIAN” mine towards corporate however of “JOB”!  I must, forward, yet always be firstly of a reboot to the days of the early 1990s that pre-date the late entrance of Governor William J. Clinton to the trying contestations of what is Presidential and critical nationally.  I know what the Clintons did more inherit than wrought themselves - I know what I know from what I know that came originally from me, and sadly I know from their misuse so unauthorized and inappropriate how it made future problems for so many predictable for their use never amounted to the fullness and prudence of the whole from which they took use and reuse and attempts for years at reuse wrongly pf in just partial appreciation of the full gestalt qualities.

There is in the inappropriateness of the Clintons’ first use also the selfish politics of their attempts to pass reuse rights never yet acquired from spouse to spouse, and to such complication then of so much also reasoned as of a J. P. Hogan feminism boosting in a pressed affirmative acting.  Sadly, I cannot look or speak well of the Clintons and am likely to be to documentary shows to how the Clinton 1990s are in the GOOD less as a rightfully possessive as the “Clintons’ 1990s” and quite of a bad so bad and destructive to the progress they inherited that such is fitting for Posterity the above title as THE TERRIBLE NINETIES.

To be so to a greater - a better - a yet more defining of #LOVE not earned but yet given in #BLESSING:  There is the not enough evident of the politics so these days to be for a while confused as also of the quandries IF SUCCESSFUL BLACKS ARE NOT “GIVING BACK” ENOUGH while too towards a more transparent #FORWARD knowing how so much inherited as built and restored of a pre-Clinton 90s is of an architecture grander than convenient to their selfish and too partisan politics.

Towards a #FORWARD better and more defined #LOVE there is for any “JOB” mine a “JOBIAN” modern of a couple decades struggling to keep a wholly about so much for maximum positive change convenient and of opportunity from the end of the COLD WAR as to a NEW WORLD ORDER.  I, not they, firstly set up so much for a pre-Clinton Clinton 1990s recovery by marketing with a penning and pressing for a new urban focused @ NEW WORLD ORDER parlance around NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT.  I, not they, so it seems, know of what the full potential - gestalt - of such of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM - was structured to see established of a more global more level playing field metaphorical, and how, sadly, I know for such while of the unauthorized use and regular inappropriate misuse that much was rendered of less value to a lesser greater good by the decidings so selfish and self serving politically of or by the Clintons.

My first “JOB” forward is now still too “JOBIAN” as for any and all “corporate” I am so of a knowing that I must firstly be to tagging the historicals of how the Clintons undermined progress in medicine around POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER new media enabling and too how they did also undermine improvements to a more level and broader more fair law and order with at least their vast defunding of intelligence and defense budgets, and too their politics administrative to walls of separation at the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS between the intelligence and enforcement arms.  (Such is of details that are really a much longer story - such is of what I hope, personally, however JOBIAN yet isn’t of too many straws.)

It is established and ordained as “done” by the People’s Order with “Order” a noun in the preamble that the founding framers structured the Constitution as at least of an accompaniment of religion with separation “of religion” that is with the NEW TESTAMENT as unanimously subscribed that Year of their Lord as the “Year of our Lord” whence.  Any “JOB” “American” must be to as of “JOB” and “JOBIAN” however corporate or of individuals together of #LOVE initiatives #FORWARD.

It is of their KING JAMES version by their CORINTHIANS, it seems, that any man only  to profits if successful as established forward in prophecy.  To which any “not for profit” endeavor is of taxing standards of too much of reality of the here and now predicaments certain while “for profits” are yet of missions in unions of people of rights in assembly and expression of hopes at least for change from proofed positive reaping of from having sown in prophecy with planning and organization to what yet might be of a general Welfare for Posterity and Tranquility - of the unknown work at doing good forward.

However one defines #LOVE - more defines #LOVE - we each may be of a “JOBIAN” “JOB” however yet if of a tax paying for profit endeavor or yet in the daily grind where “not for profits” must endure.  I myself get to struggle knowing personally I cannot abide the past decades of Clintons’ use and reuse, and regular yet attempts at even further unauthorized reuse as but of art that I am some to much of entitlment to official repatriating valuation, at least.  #FORWARD yet it seems we all need to reboot around what was more just “inherited” said of the “THE CLINTON” and yet still really more and more vastly as really originally the property, intellectual, of the lesser known the “THE HOGAN.” 

RIGHT!!!  #HOWRICH! #DEADBROKE #HARDCHOICES #CLINTONS ALL TAGS TELLING A JUSTIFIABLE, HOWEVER SADLY LATE, FOR SADLY SO OF SO MUCH SET ASUNDER THAT COULD HAVE YET STAYED GENERAL BANK AND COIN OF “HOME” - HOMES WHEREEVER - BUT FOR THE SELFISH POLITICS OF THE CLINTON “TWO-FER” THOUGHT #LOVE!

GENERALLY, TOO, WE ARE LUCKY AS A NATION IN “AMERICAN” THAT WE ARE NOT NOW AS IGNORANT AS WE WERE AS A PEOPLE IN THE PRE-CLINTON 90S AND WISELY NOW #FORWARD TO A BEHOOVED MORE OF A TRUTH THAT THE CLINTONS DID TOO MUCH BANK ON OUR IGNORANCE.

AND AGAIN:  THE CLINTONS HAVE TOO LONG NOW BENEFITED FROM BEING DRAGGED, SO NEAR TEARS, UP TO HARLEM, AND TOO HOW EVER SINCE SENATOR’D CLINTON TO MRS. CLINTON, CGI’D, HAS BEEN, WITH THE “THE CLINTON”, COVERED BY HARLEM’S ZIP’D AS IF OF UNEARNED CAMOUFLAGE, AT LEAST AS COIN, AND BANK.

Comments Off
07/15/14
BLACK BEATINGS
Filed under: POLITICS, #MUSIC, QUID PRO QUO, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:50 am

Now that President B.H.O. has established his tone as discordant in lies as did white President William Jefferson Clinton the beatings must continue in lieu of a tonalism for economic recovery;  for so many of such a keyed in lies each day we wake anew of the economy of politics of us united daily in smarting starts yet still more as if of reboot in diagnostic mode restrictions.

President B.H.O. has established himself mostly in a harmony as a liar in beats and steps mostly with the lies of the white Clintons long of cover-ups corruptive to a full and lively portfolio of common syncopathy forward.  There is no music or soul for recovery as long as we are stuck daily in a reboot in diagnostic mode restrictive basics due to so many viral intrusions in the shared societal as from lies now know of President B.H.O. as if as bad or worse (more dangerous) than of white President William Jefferson Clinton.

Democrats protested when the Republicans tried a save in time by remixing the metaphorical beats of liberal sets by offering examples of how they too yet move when in conventions to beatings so yet scored by “artists” of a Democrat persuasion.  The Democrats so as a lot did undermine the economy and beats for growth in shared humanity when they try to prohibit music beats from the Republicans.  We do wake still of President B.H.O. and still of how the music for growth has been dead or of beatings in discordance only, and, now with less hope as it is established that he has become known to be nearly as much of lies as white President William Jefferson Clinton.

King James was much of the rap of the founders and a tonalist to the keyed in their renditions from his edition.  President B.H.O. seems more protestant in Martin Luther, but for lacking clear and written dictates, than pure and Puritanical.  Republican rap may now be our best hope forward to any new post diagnostic growth beating.  There is no “work ethic” now in the Democrat green minimalism.  They are not being constructive in their beatings - just deconstructive and austere while set chorded, however, to class warfare.

Republican rap may be our best hope to new constitutionals in Constitutionals.  Taxed - taxed enough - taxed enough already - taxed now nationally with even less representation?  Are those of the drum beats major of the Tea Party now drum majors forward now already most keyed for republican rap to a new growth tone?  Who can be a new drum major forward if and when we can recover from daily restarts of reboots necessary as to be of anti-viral diagnostics basic cautions?  Democrat music may have killed the growth beats and all of so many beatings now so suffered for their “music” became partisan and so necessarily corrupt from a shared soul republican and to be now probed and even of rendition for a base clef clarity for what likely might be wrongful in a quid pro quo by creative artists.

Despite the spiffs intra-Republican now between Governor Perry and Senator Paul their is together they should be tagging the Democrats to show their house divided, firstly, and to how the “music” of President B.H.O. per economic harmony is different from the beatings by white President William Jefferson Clinton, and too the beatings, however scaled feminine, by white Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton.  There is in Senator Paul’s foreign policy ramparts to a more at home celebration that it echoes to it that Senator McCain if elected was yet tuned to beat and beat and beat as a drum major an economic recovery within just a couple years.  Senator Paul has in his homely beats a federalism that echoes how President McCain was ready to lead a resounding recovery within just a couple years.  Senator Paul’s said homely beats can be said to be noted and keyed yet in an American celebration of freedom and federalism prudence to be an example while also a best defensive posture as of a song of PROUD TO BE FREE.

There is too much to the spiff between sects of republican so Republican between Governor Perry and Senator Paul for a full scoring in this scripting.  Governor Romney is a tri- to this so bi-partite - Governor Romney may rock again and better if a common shared soul beating can be measured and coalesced, but, he for the sake of this beating propounding isn’t that whom President McCain was well endowed in measured federalism Constitutional to be a drum major for recovery generally. Governor Romney may now be a good option if he can find a shared soul beat but these are days now trying that would be not of the President McCain developments to also a song of PROUD TO BE FREE homely, however pre-Paul, but to a consideration that a recovery specialist may now be the type of drum major the united states now need for the republic.

Any “music” as beating by white President William Jefferson Clinton or by any feminist also different by white Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton, however, now can only be a beating on the backs of black and of the red of the country so in the red.  The music as differentiable between the white Mr. male Clinton and white Mrs. female Clinton is wholly of the derivative mess and keyed major in the beset discord so necessarily each day of a nation a republic anew in a repairing reboot in anti-Clinton partisan feuding and intra-partisan feuding as if restarts only in basic mode as by REBOOT IN DIAGNOSTIC MODE economics of limited operations while undergoing repairs.  The Clintons as differentiable are yet each of sufficient discordance such that the Republican drum majors have them firstly to take apart and rap for a recovery to a republican of growth.

The Clintons tolerated a musical boycott of republican Republicans such as it may have cost the economy by beating “President B.H.O.” as if of a soul for harmony more so than the Grand Old Party postured for “President McCain.”!  The Clintons though now quite differentiable are yet each fit to be tagged as per “music” bias as of tolerable of bigotry in politics if/when it meant they could march a cacophony en masse more global than republican.  The Clintons beatings since white President William Jefferson Clinton first seductions of media and music people has rendered too many of redded, and however once black or otherwise to a back in black greater potential of that which could have been of a white President McCain.  The Clintons’ political and partisan keying and grouping for “music” have wrecked the economy by setting asunder Constitutionals.

The white Clintons’ hackery now is political for so much beating has corrupted black President B.H.O. to also being known as a big liar of discord not harmony or soul.  The beatings from black to so many and so much in the red so redded is of the marching of the Clintons firstly, and even however differentiable from black President B.H.O., is yet secondly of the marching dictates of black President B.H.O. secondly.  The beatings were preventable much for that echoed by Senator Paul that was to be constructive and harmonic for growth if whence Senator McCain became President McCain.  Governor Romney may now be back in the mix but not as a Senator McCain nor Senator Paul - he can offer beatings forward for of a resume as a recovery specialist.

The white Clitnons’ hackery now is political and diabolical for music and creative artists, however fodder for comedians.  Now forward it is to the People’d people to discern the “different” and “separate” between white Mr. male Clinton and white Mrs. female Clinton as at least to marching beatings more global than constitutional in Constitutional as republican.  The hackery of the Clintons’ has corrupted the media and musical as now to discern them for renditions we as a united people must be to officially probing deeply how their “politics” of “musical” biased has it that at least musical artists are now among a class of creative artists that need be look at long and hard for a disparity for democracy as too much of a quid pro quo accountable measured scored.

Today we are best to ask, of so much also of black beating:  What by a musician, and any creative artist, if not for all souls, is actually an improperly yet gifted propaganda, in kind, of campaign influence, and not as if a clear contribution, and so as a yet inappropriate and less accounted quid pro quo?  We cannot abide, however, that we/any now avoid looking at the well established scores of the character of President B.H.O. yet because of the color of his skin and he half-blooded as “black”!

Comments Off
06/11/14
THE HIGH PRIEST?
Filed under: POLITICS, OBAMACARE, CLIMATE CHANGE, #MUSIC, QUID PRO QUO, POPE
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:01 am
[DESPITE WHAT YOU READ HERE IT WILL BE WRONG TO PUT ME ON WRONG SIDE OF CLIMATE CHANGE. I WITH MY VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY BA IN ECONOMICS AND UNDECLARED PHILOSOPHY MINOR, WITH MY YEARS WHENCE IN HOME IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTING, HAVE BEEN ON RIGHT SIDE OF CLEANER AIR BUT WITH POLITICS OF SCARCITY OF RESOURCES PERSUASION IN LIEU OF AL GORE’S SLOPPY IDEOLOGICAL BLIND FAITH “POLITICS.”  I’VE BEEN OF THE “R” FACTORS SO INSULATING AND ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOWS & DOORS SINCE THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION.  I ACCEPT THAT PRESIDENT BUSH MUST HAVE BEEN “GREEN” SINCE IT ONLY TOOK ABOUT A YEAR SINCE HE LEFT OFFICE TO BRING TO MARKET SO MUCH “IMPROVED” HE MUST TOO HAVE BEEN LONG AT PROVIDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDING TO.]


It started as an interesting enough morning after I realized, after the fact, that my social media commentary was, unusually for me, on a Media Matters link.  I ended up so in a defensiveness to having to explain the separation of church and state of the First Amendment - because.

Recently we all should have been shocked to our senses with the new Pope, as yet Francis, of the olive tree planting in an interfaith shoveling of new hope.  To understand the politics of the Democrat Party leadership in the The United States of America one should be guarded in their faith and gullibility?  To understand the first thing about the Democrat Party today maybe one should ask how the Pope like slapped Climate Change in the face by not having Al Gore also at the interfaith summit for his preaching of an alternative way by “caps” & “trades” as also “guilt” based and to superstitious and to blind obedience?

Let us discuss a how and why to it that Al Gore didn’t make the list.  Mustn’t we conclude that Al Gore is inconveniently so not to be (globally) perceived to be enough a “global figure” nor successful in his attempt to become like the new leader of a new religiosity?

Again, it is economically too true for even evidence based deciding that the Republicans are better on the economy and jobs for they sell SIN, SEX, SANCTUARIES, JUSTICE, & FORGIVENESS while “modern” Democrats otherwise are of their attempts still to a new too hyper and “pop” dogmatic based mostly in just selling SIN & ESCAPISM.  We are of times when George Orwell’s “1984″ like meets Ayn Rand’s “ATLAS SHRUGGED” and the Democrats to rightly slide from grace.

Besides my BA in economics studies I have my extra-curricular of reading all of Ayn Rand’s books coincidentally, mostly.  From such I can posture that Ayn Rand was/is GREEN in a good way and in “capitalism” still.  Ayn Rand was for efficiencies, yes, and truly liked those “progressive” as to better ways pursued smartly.  Ayn Rand likely if alive in these days would be also otherwise to selling a “climate change” prudence and yet by a celebration of economics also around the wisdom at decidings related to scarcity of resources.

How is it that Al Gore as the “godfather” of GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM new dogmatic where he was to be set up as if above all others as the most high “official” didn’t get invited also to ROME?  We have it already that he wasn’t earlier invited to proffer at his alma mater Harvard University - but?  Is it Al Gore is too fallen and passe a human figure today?

“WORD SOUP” to stew on here verbatim from my sharing on Media Matters Facebook status update:

“There is the First Amendment concern with Immigration as per Obamacare where the Democrats are insisting that what has been of the “establishments” of “religion” is now theirs to make any Law in Congress regarding and so that though Obamacare defended as necessary due to “spill-over” interstate problems they left the spill-over of international of illegal immigration so too open to being healthcare “universally” if you can get here.  There never should have been such a vast healthcare reform such as the barely legal as a war powers tax Obamacare until there was a securing of all borders as the spill-over international is a bigger issue at healthcare costs than that of state to state spill-over used to pass it.  Essentially the Democrats have it so violate of the First Amendment as by making what was the realm of religion is now the Congress’ to establishments however violate also of federalism and states’ rights prudence.”

The separation is that there is a freedom of religion not a freedom from religion for religion is the poetry electric of the electric of shared humanity.  The separation is that the Congress is barred from assuming a more “Godly” than the People and that it is barred from establishments affecting as if it more than the People have a divine right and any greater superiority in interpreting the “establishments” of “religion” as set in the New Testament - at least.”

To associate all this with the times Al Gore is actually living in let us consider Virginia’s new representative elect for their 7th district Dave Brat.  He speaks with word “GOD” in traditional literary context of the founders and yet not in the new “religious” as by “GOD” replaced by “Cap N Trade”.  Many many books and songs are literally based on the a textual and the texture of the Bible - He speaks in a traditional “progressive” of humanity under GOD of a depth of thousands of years.  In these times that Al Gore is actually living it is DANGEROUS that Democrats of the The United States have postured and presumed a right to govern as if GOD were dead.  Democrats GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM & ACA aka OBAMACARE seem enduring in their suffraged as if made Law to replace any establishments of religion.

Yet!!! No the First Amendment is a clever affirmation despite Jefferson’s criticism to how as the first in amending the body of the Constitution it affirms that the Articles were/are the People’s “Order” to establish and ordain in the Year of the founders’ Lord that such was in an establishment in the New Testament as in the Christian Calendar and as said so “done” before the unanimous subscribing then affirmed by the 1st to how it especially important that Congress was to be seen as barred from changing that such is and should be the “establishment of religion” that it then is to have no superior right in interpretation of “religiousness” than the “People.” {I am realizing I have commented on a Media Matters thread.}”

There is a common thread in the “progressive” of the Democrats now trying to govern ideologically actually in their own times.  The Democrats are trying to give Congress and themselves the Power of religion which the Constitution by the founding fathers, and all the years in consecrating and affirming by whomever, is specifically barred from by the establishment ordained in the People’s Order and so affirmed by the First Amendment.  Again, Obamacare never should have been passed at least for it passed before an immigration solution was first passed to handle the too “universal” risks from too open borders.

So much of the Democrats’ agenda is so to a new dogmatic as if to a new religion it is a wonderment they otherwise seem less religious and acquiescent to the attempts to be just to an economics as if by a new “pop” governance with Clinton allowed, at least, to be too autocratic as too important in just a selling of SIN & ESCAPISM of creative artists too co-opted and too to a dangerous quid pro quo to hyper-pop media-conglomerate based “governance.”

How the Democrats have destroyed an economy, that despite the housing collapsing chaos while they were spiking the gas prices, and to their long desired much hire GREEN AGENDA pricing, and as it was we were to it by their forced inflation, remains an elephant in the donkeys’ pens.  There are a trillion unit points per dollar of the unnecessary Clintons’ surpluses to also look at with any discussion of either Clintons or Gore as per a culpability for destruction by GREEN TERRORISM.  For each dollar of their surpluses of the two trillion in cuts during the Administration of the Clintons there is a question mark as to how it could have been right to cut and cut and cut and cut while the climate, at least, was known to be in such jeopardy.  Particularly too as for they profess a prior knowledge that bigger storms were coming and yet didn’t even afford the peoples of New Orleans some of such funds so to do the recommended repairs to MR GO.

So I leave you as it seems Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton aka Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton seems stuck with her defeat already written and too as it seems while the words of her defeat in 2008, and such as I should have a Guinness Record Book record for, are also now ready again to defeat her as well.  We have work ahead of ourselves yet for the economy and governance seems stuck in the same old ditch much due to a real drop in voter and consumer confidence much for the music of the Constitution as keyed in the Christian Calendar now too aborted.

Comments Off
05/28/14
HOW NOT TO PHILANTHROPY!
Filed under: POLITICS, #CGI, #SUSPECT, QUID PRO QUO, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:47 am

You’ld think you should call ‘em “charitable”?  You’ld suppose if it is called “philanthropy” it should net out some greater good advantaged.  These are rough days for philanthropy much due it “philanthropy” the Clintons proposition themselves as at.

There should be a jeopardy - a danger - in associating with the Clintons purported “charity”! It is confused and quite confusing how that what the primary purpose of the Clintons’ politics it that any of their Clintons’ Global Initiatives aren’t firstly by the IRS as if a PAC or a 501c(4) - or another.  To host a Clinton under a guise of “charity” and “philanthropy” seems risky legally and to a dawning new appreciation that quid pro quo at least in creative arts is due a new accounting.

Any familiar with that supposed of a “good” of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives, however charitable, is oddly firstly as of two so so so “Political” and “Partisan” of standing up in public relations of damage control and spin doctoring too seemingly of a need to appear to be doing “good” to cover - cover-up - a legacy of failing to net out in greater good accountancy.

It seems of a poisoned tree that any associate “philanthropically” around the so so so political and partisan Clintons. Such as any “charitable” association with the “The Clintons” seems too much “political” and “campaign” activities to be actually fit for charity registering.

The history of this supposed “charitable” of a foundation in Clintons began with a promise that such was not to be operated by William Jefferson Clinton in a political or partisan manner.  The history has been that it is ridiculous, especially lately, to posit that the Clintons haven’t been specifically using these appearances of doing good for political and partisan personal gain.

There is a danger in the global philanthropic of a pair a power couple playing at “philanthropy” and “charity” in ways that allow them to act contrary to the Constitutional prudence as if a Congress bypass as an organized too autocratic totalitarianistic.

There is a danger in the message in their standard - their banner/flag - as the “C” so violated as if of a bosoming in Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton smarts artlessly as too like of “imperialism” and as an affront to the European Union yet with a circle of stars as grounded away from “imperialism.”  By the masthead of the Clintons it seems inappropriate to conclude their CGI is for “philanthropy” or “charity” firstly and to any net profit in a “greater good” mission.

By the very existence of the so false flag organizing of the Clintons as seemingly of an attempt to actually be like the first American global autocrats in an Autocracy of Clintons the process and prudence of the Washington based democratic lives as set asunder and undermined.  The Clintons even as when so of “believable” in “charity” still are those so publicly know to be “Big Liars” that they lost near half of their old “Hollywood” “friends” and friends’ money to the Democrat Party alternative so junior and inexperienced - they lost half their thought “friends” to candidate Barack Hussein Obama.

We are to be behooved to a more prudent safe “philanthropy” if and when we become more saddled of the old Constitutional prudence which the “politics” and “partisan” of the Clintons so daily undermines.  It seems so wrong if it called “philanthropy” as the Clintons are suspected of cover-ups and known of lies that undermine a reset in consumer confidence and confidence in politics all over the world.

The Clinton Global Initiative was inaugurated with a promise that it would not be operated of “politics” and “partisan politics” and yet that is largely all it has ever been convenient for William Jefferson Clinton, and so now too so Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.  It seems impossible to now suggest there is any real legal separation between “political” and “campaign” and the appearance of the Clintons as in “charity” and “philanthropy” while the real politics are of it that they need good public relations like of appearing to be so actually engaged to balance a now fairly growing understanding of how much they already should have been doing political penance for - each, and personally.

It seems as good as philanthropy can be and should be we are of days where it generally is undermined by the existence of the Clinton of an extant as of doing more good then harm while them so at such defensive work to appear at doing good is poisoning the boughs of the trees of giving.  There too is that a global economy with too much “philanthropic” can be to depressing much opportunity for economic growth — As by first post in thread at http://CitizenRosebud.net as WHITE COLLARED POSSE there is an economic dynamic expressed originally as of SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECNOMICS.

There is that any associating now with any familiar to the Clintons Global Initiatives, however “charitable” or “philanthropic” are themselves too much to enabling the “politics” of such an dangerous alliance for it does by how it is extant undermine the regular process and practices of the Constitutional Congress.  The low public opinion now held of the Congress is interestingly related, it seems, to how the Clintons have by their appearance as “do gooders” been short of due accounting and as they persist and persist and with annual (mandatory) meetings so crossed in “import” as if of a right of King yet timed to the United Nations annual gaggle.

It seems by supporting the Clintons as if of “philanthropy” any so at least familiar to such is also working for personal gain towards a constituted Power extra-Constitutional and so actually quite so in a rivalry with the Congress and accountable mostly as if consecrated to be firstly for “Power” and as too like the early Clintons of the American unifying as more for empire than freedom in independence, and as too like it as of Clintons yet now having a power too nearly real though set in The United States while operating as if a Autocracy of Clintons & too much as if above the Laws.

Comments Off
01/27/14
THE MAL TEASED BILLET
Filed under: POLITICS, AUTO-BIO'D, IRAQ, AL QAEDA, #MUSIC, QUID PRO QUO, #MORALS, #NEW_YORK, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:17 am

That is them - they are the ones - stop them - it is them, stop them - it is they that did it.

Al Gore cannot be your hero.  Before he was Vice President he was a cut and run runner of initiating a dangerous vacuous breach in the sustainable Constitutional.  Before he was the loser of the Constitutional challenge of the 2000 Presidential race he was, though the VP to the Clintons, less than a sponsored favorite “son” of them;  VP Gore did create the Constitutional crisis that best explains his inferior case at the Supreme Court by his cutting and running catalyzed vacuous that predates the Clintons entrance into the 1992 Presidential contest. Al Gore is Al Gore’s biggest problem second only maybe to the Clintons.

To listen to an authority on the 1992 rise of the Clintons - to read of truths of such - can be to cacophony of surprises in literate and confounding explainings of oddly yet little known or even little considered truths.  The full dynamic of those times and such as per the rise of the Clintons is generally still unknown.  When on election day in November 2000 I while in James Carville and Mary Matalin’s WEST 23RD Washington DC Foggy Bottom eatery from lunch to near closing I was to telling James that I wasn’t sure Governor Bush was ready, and, too, that if VP Al Gore was elected I very well might move out of the USA and even surrender my citizenship.  The real story of the rise of the Clintons in 1992 is known to me and not hardly flattering to Al Gore.

There is a story that still needs to be told to how the Democrats needed to be saved from themselves in the early 1990s and how the nation of The United States of America too needed to be saved and saved from a greatest threat to its national security by a dangerous from the Democrats being so too predictable (and bitter).  There have been Democrats that have been defeated - needed to be defeated - not for having a partisan ideology but because they were so predictable in a methodology trenchant that they presented a great threat to the national security of The United States of America.

Enter Stanley Greenberg and too the then Op-Ed columnists of The New York Times, and the imparted wisdom from the late Arthur M. Menadier and too the late Joseph V. Connolly Jr. - an imparted hooked-up “Mad Men” like New York City multi-national corporate marketing sense/prudence.  Per the rise of the Clintons in 1992 Stanley Greenberg is more the cart and a passenger on it than a horse at being in the lead — per an authority on the hardly well explained rise of the Clintons in 1992 and success up against President Bush while near of an earned 87% popularity it is that Stanley Greenberg should have been able to help the Clintons by seeing what was stirred in the spirit of old top Madison Ave “Mad Men” for him to see and see without knowing its origins and genius as set up for him yet to be able to see and measure.  The rise of the Clintons in 1992 is some of that hardly yet known generally of initiatives for positive and necessary change in a nick of time that was at times a good six months ahead of any polls by Stanley Greenberg my old, and then still, neighbor.

Hillary Clinton would be a fool to enter the 2016 Presidential race.  President Bill Clinton would not be wise to push his wife into entering even as great as his need to be seen as globally back on top may be.  The story to be still told in an authority of the rise of the Clintons in 1992 and as a more deep explanation of the politics and new world order of those days will only diminish the Clintons and their legacy further.  It is sad for President Obama that the fuller and deeper telling of these years before the Clintons succeeded surprisingly in 1992 will quit clearly explain that he has been wrong with the foreign policy and even statements much of his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton massively since day one and so of a faulty think rooted in an ignorance of the early 1990s and real but still too little known considerable threats to The United States of America.

President Barack Hussein Obama now has a quid pro quo problem that too belongs to the Clintons and such as should be to dwarfing yet the accusations of a Virginia based quid pro quo if so by Governor Bob McDonnell.  With quid pro quo the new Monica we are asked to consider what is or is not quid pro quo and or craftsmanship or art versus what might be free speech or clean enough politics.  It seems per the Grammys that artists of the musical have reached beyond the Democrats marches to a new nationalism (musical) mash and themselves quite liberatingly to a new bi-partisan or non-partisan or cross-partisan.  Them Democrats too much too long to a convenient crisis beats to a Machiavellian “how to stay the one in power” conductive are those that did it - are they that decimated so many to new notations more humbled and too assimilated under them.

Can it be illegal for a Governor Bob McDonnell to appreciate the artisan craftsmanship of a Rolex or a Ferrari and not illegal as grossly more generous in an improper gifting too much as of a Hollywood or musical propaganda as a quid pro quo of Democrats?  How can a creative artist be not of a quid pro quo if of a political art beat out too much as propaganda and a material artist say of craftsmanship of a watch or luxury car not equally be celebrated and appreciated as yet a form of free speech?

It is alarming that they did it - that they are the ones - the ones that should be stopped - those that did it ten fold to a hundred fold more of a quid pro quo, at least.  It is already quit damning for the Clintons how they did operate and administration (too) close to Hollywood (at least) and be to having Philip Bobbitt as one of their of their National Security Council report and support in his TERROR AND CONSENT how they can be said by their lies to have begotten terrorism by being too closely politically operating with the creative artists of Hollywood — Right!  A Clintons’ own NSC member by his book has told the world that there are real dangers from a White House working politically too close with Hollywood and that such dangers as from his experience at least under the Clintons is the danger from such “work” begetting real terrorism.

Philip Bobbitt is not as uniformed as per the rise of the Clintons as most - he had drinks with this “authority” of the such era in US History when it was that it was wise to consider that some to too many Democrats constituted the greatest threat to national security by their predicability.  Yes, I did try to lead the polls taken and reported whence by at least Stanley Greenberg and some with a choreography more complex and out of time with time warp complexity beyond a fathoming (yet) at least by President Barack Obama and nor it seems by either of the Clinton “two-fer.”  It is that I did have drinks with Philip Bobbitt in New Haven after he spoke in an open to the public regular class turned lecture of Ruth Wedgewood’s Yale Law class and was then to some explaining that there was a time warp (of a private sector “Mad Men” like marketing initiative) that he too may not be yet considering and as critically important to knowing if to build on the early 1990s more to how if at all it could be to safely building so upon.  In such class that I visited as of the “public” invited at Yale Law School during the Clintons’ administration my question to Philip Bobbitt was near: 

WHAT ABOUT THE THREATS WE CANNOT SEE? 

(This was a query from a gut feeling but not a seeing that haunted until 9/10/2001 as the evening of 9/11 that I was of to feeling an attack was coming that the Clintons were not even seriously considering. As it is I was on 9/10/2001 in the evening considering that while still concerned I was near to going personally bankrupt from keeping so much time towards such concern as if it were still a real concern that developed from the early first moves of the Clintons per the Middle East and Iraq.  As it is I decided to have a reality check with myself as per such suspicion of an unseen but sense threat from the politics and foreign policy of decisions by President Clinton in his first days and that I should decide going forward starting on the morning of 9/11/2001 that I must have been wrong about such a threat of being of any real likelihood or potential.)

Right, I woke on 9/11/2001 and decided to travel across town in DC from my apartment near Eastern Market on Capitol Hill to the home the job site for that day in the Georgetown area by ways of the Mall and then up 17th Street NW along side the Old Executive Office Building and so as near to The White House.  As it is Condoleezza Rice had already been a construction client through a subcontracting of me for new closet doors in The Watergate and since my current client used to be a dosen (tour guide) in The Old Executive Office Building I was to thinking of Bush’s NSA Rice as it seems as her last thought prior to her assistant notifying her of a plane striking one of the World Trade towers.  I only later learned of such timing as I didn’t know of the terrorist attacks until later in the morning and after I had seriously and completely removed permanently the front door at such site.  I did recall the time I passed by The White House on 17th Street NW and for a thought to a professional referral spiriting from my former client Bush’s NSA Rice - but right, I didn’t know until later and after I had to stay and work through the events while being at installing a new front door in the Georgetown area.

I am an authority on the 1992 unexpected rise and surprising success by the Clintons.  It is what my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM was written to make possible.  That said:  President Obama is still politically in jeopardy from an ignorance of a greater truth about such years, and has been by such history actually transpired now been too long too wrong and originally wrong quite on much if not all of that as foreign policy and diplomacy with his first Secretary of State.  I know what I tried to do - I know what I meant to accomplish - I fairly well know how and when I succeeded - and, yes I know that a greatest threat to the national security of The United States of America did much to motivate me to such of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM crisis management volunteered political corrective writing to max positive change upon the waves of the new world order and while so of a concern that too many Democrats were a great danger from being themselves too predictable.

This is them - this is of a real them - it is they whom did it more than most - it is they whom most did it - did it poorly.

We have that the Presidency of the Clintons took to much as able to be teased and ignored, and that it is that they did and still do work at falsely blaming others and too many of the Republican Party for what was malicious as from them at begetting terrorism however by a now to be generally discussed defining of what is or is not illegal quid pro quo.

                                         *     *     *

Note:  Best that I recall the decision by new President William Jefferson Clinton that I air here was pertaining to the Middle East and specifically Iraq and Saddam Hussein.  Best that I recall this decision was of he deciding not a should or shouldn’t become engaged but of a deciding that he didn’t want to personally and so wouldn’t.  Best that I recall this very decision did diverge from my otherwise considerate think and strategizing of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that does itself help explain the times and the unexpected rise of the Clintons in 1992.  Best that I recall it was that I became aware of such decision and a to a sense of doom from it of a visceral resonance akin to the thought IF HE GOES THAT WAY AMERICA WILL GET ATTACKED.  Best that I recall, and to now as time has elapsed to confirm by other efforts that my advice otherwise would have held up/worked out, President Clinton did decide to diverge from the road of my political writing and poetry much as it though does still best explain his 1992 success and that when he did so decide to not be as serious as it was he left me so with a sense of doom that for his selfish deciding America was to then be even maybe justified by his avoidance as a target for an attack and one on its homelands.  Really, this is how the original thought haunted me from such day President Clinton seemed to decisively diverge from the more serious reasoning of his getting elected to the eve of 9/11.

As I live it still it is that though I considered and penned my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM to mediate and prevent through a curative positive change new world order politics and political correctness and as of an offered new way for the media to write more simple as of by race in a black and white simplicity due to the selfish political early decision of President Clinton it became from such original purpose otherwise to be guarded then forward for it and me to be prepared as best as possible for its use for a recovery if perchance my haunting gut visceral doom sense did turn out to be right. As I live it still such did then get used after 9/11 towards a knowing considerate expedited recovery even though the thinking had been in the 1992 era as originally meant to be prophylactic.  As I live I know the Clintons too well to ever advise anyone to vote again for them.

CAUTION READERS:  THE ABOVE IS NOT A JUSTIFICATION OF THE AL QAEDA ATTACKS OF 9/11 FOR BECAUSE THE ATTACKS OCCURRED AFTER A JUSTIFYING CLINTON REIGN AND IN A NEW ERA OF LEADERSHIP BY A DIFFERENT PARTY THERE CANNOT BE A MORAL JIHAD IT SEEMS AS LONG AS AT LEAST ONE PERSON KNEW THAT OTHER AND MORE CIVIL OPTIONS WERE THEN (NEWLY THOUGH) AVAILABLE FOR ANY THOUGHT JUST GRIEVANCE.

Comments Off