hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
June 2014
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
06/28/14
DAS FEMME SMEAGOL
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, 22ND AMENDMENT, #CGI, WAR ON WOMEN, #FEMINISM
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:00 am

[THE FOLLOWING IS FOR MATURE AUDIENCES - READ WITH DISCRETION - MAYBE NOT APPROPRIATE FOR ALL AGES]

BILL CLINTON IS GAY!

Like a dog to a bone?  Like a cat to a mouse?  Like a anteater to ants?  Like a crocodile to pray?  Like a bluefish to bunker?

The political beast that is Bill Clinton is not separable from his “beast” now so eyes on Barack Obama.  How sweet it is - - -  WOOPS!!! - - - I mean:  How sweet is it?

How hasn’t Bill postured as the dominant even/ever since Barack so got over (politically) on his Mrs.?  Can it be L-O-V-E-?

The ring of his power is yet on Hillary’s finger - his ring is her - is her M-Y   P-R-E-C-I-O-U-S - - - her MY PRECIOUS!.  She has described her troubles at times of “careening” haphazardly in a like uncontrollable back and forth.  Her ring’s power may be explanatory as having been thought sufficient but determined time and again to be yet insufficient.  Is it really, or only, just the Power of the Presidency she wants back?

Can it be that Bill is just trying to stare down Barack - one too still as if a peer?  Mustn’t it be more personal than that - than if Bill can control his “beast”?  Its seems current events that there is incivility in the intra-party Democrat Party “politics” - - - that it is that Bill is strutting (too much) as if he, and he alone, now again, is the only titular head of the Democrats.

Really?  Isn’t he being so obvious?  Isn’t he being too proud and politically (at least) assertive at least while the traditions favor Barack as still the main man proper dictate of all things Democrat Party as its head for its pourage?

There are woman issues in these days so much of an apparent weakness of President Obama - of the “The Barack”!  Despite the aspirations of Bill and how it seems he is supposed to be an indispensable former President for the world to thank and praise for he willing to suffer the imperial of having a CGI and a CGI America - - - for women of the known world, and yes in Clintons’ America, these are of moons in their own times for a querious probative interogatory to at least this:

“In a progressive feminism proffer isn’t it if #HillaryClinton seen of IT ALL HER FAULT credit it as much progress as if she elected Prez?

We are in a new world of new human potential for greater humanity and civility more due to mysteries of faith having been reduced to bits and bytes and rams - - - of faith’s mysteries being computable as just as real however the world seems to be getting smaller and smaller.  That the internet and social media was rising to the Arab Spring long before Operation Iraqi Freedom is CONTEXT & TEXTURE to how “GAY” Bill can be said to be seemingly now.

How querious now to so much trans-political in the “THE BILL”?  What is “THIS MEANS WAR” and/or “THIS IS WAR” and what is just Bill wanting to dominate Barack - the “THE BARACK” - at least?  Can this become more comely and civil or only (due to politics and human nature) just more comely and less civil?

Whatever his - the “THE BILL’S” - positions are, and of hopes to be, when is a FIRST ALERT supposed to alert the “THE BARACK” to it at least violate of a “frenemy” of a hostility while becoming, when firstly, a pain in his rear?  How and when is the President to be notified or conditioned to a violate and to stay clear eyed especially while his ranks had been fogged with a “spouse” of an aggressor rival in his “house”?

It seems however happy he may have been with her around it too can be confused as “gay” to be welcoming of her man?  “GAY” still seems in a legend of protest lingua - in protest language - and much these days when normalizing is of the pride and the other worldly of the CGI America provincial.  Is there now a greater normalized/normalization tone for a clearer less foggy civility in a post-protest lingua where what it is is what it is called more specifically and with pride as if “HEWS” for “HAPPY EVEN WHEN SODOMIZED” as like ‘HETEROSEXUAL” for “HETEROSEXUAL”?  “GAY” is a risky misnomer as the story of “BILL CLINTON IS GAY” lights - it seems a risky misnomer that can fade away as “protest language” no longer civilly most appropriate for any copacetics.

Just airing an intellectual proffer attempt can not now be sufficient or like equanimous if of dictates or bullying.  A question can be tabled now as just a question while the answers may prudently take some time.  But, really, how is the “THE BILL” now posturing despite his Mrs. “careening” confessed in her culpability of short comings as his Secretary - as the “THE BARACK’S” Secretary - to be dominant and now already the “TOP DOG” of the pack mentality of the Democrat Party?

If Bill isn’t actually of KICKING BUTT AND TAKING NAMES per an insurgency of the rivalry to Barack isn’t it that the “THE BARACK” should be daily waking cautious and defensive anew to worries of a party violate of his “See” and to flexing however a “BACK OFF” at least to the “THE BILL” however fronted as if of the bosom of his Mrs.?

There may be an out for Barack - for President Barack Hussein Obama.  Feminism and its pride may be an out for the “THE BARACK”.  Feminism shouldn’t miss the obvious and clear “POLITICAL” in how:

“In a progressive feminism proffer isn’t it if #HillaryClinton seen of IT ALL HER FAULT credit it as much progress as if she elected Prez?

IF Bill isn’t a “HEWS” if acceptable as a post-protest normalized more proud and specific “GAY” than what and how is his “business” with his trying now again to so parade himself as if rightly taller - taller even in the saddle - than Barack?  Peer to peer as if Bill to Barack is still “POLITICAL” and “PERSONAL” as DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT to DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT and LEADER OF THE DEMOCRATS to LEADER OF THE DEMOCRATS.

Concurrently we are very publicly at Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton is so bad besides her many admissions in ignorance and incompetence while of “accpeting” “responsibility” and come “culpability” she has yet attempted a proffer in a passing the buck to where the buck supposedly stops.  Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, while parading of a #HardChoices book pride, is yet of a false or improper “proud” when suggesting it was of a “getting the job done” by her of her (defensive) parries with her view voiced of that she like:  delegated the decisions to the experts since she wasn’t expert enough for her office and well the buck stops with the President so it was either his rear on the line or her experts - NOT HERS.

Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton can make women proud for being so accomplished as if now a new WORST of the femmes of history.  But, so yet, where is Bill? and what are his feelings? what are his intentions? what would be his unbridaled?

If the buck is so?  If the buck is so to be for Posterity and Tranquility at least as stoppable in a resolute civil at the desk of the President of The United States of America when is a buck a buck and a buck firstly to be like stopped if frisky - too frisky for a proper and prudent greater civility?  How is it that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is so publicly of a pride just of her own being as a officer of the Cabinet of the “THE BARACK” yet as one so regularly of passing the bucks?

{readers:  I think I mean to find other earlier thoughts for this treatment and essay that now escape - I will break away now to consider and discern per this context what else I thought to embed here that yet is here as probative.  Please check back later, and then maybe later again to this as DAS FEMME SMEAGOL.}

Comments Off
06/26/14
SADDAM’S FRANCO-GERMAN
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, 22ND AMENDMENT, AL QAEDA, IRAN, #WHITEPRIDE, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:47 am

What gave rise to the Clintons in 1991 does and will best explain their now so public arresting falls.  Iraq of today is far removed from the Iraq the Administration of the Clintons inherited - and then it is not. We can learn from Vice President Cheney’s recent air time, historical and personal, about those years of “exiting” the Persian Gulf War.

The reputation of William Jefferson Clinton may weigh heavy now on all “Americans” however a spotlight may now locally or globally be lit to highlight their personal honor and acuity and agility.  Where Republicans and Richard Cheney may have “gone wrong” it now is very late breaking news that WJC yet didn’t “go right.”  1993 may be the most important or just easiest year to focus on to have it be copacetic and sporting - and intelligent and honest - while of retrospectives of “war(s)” talk.

It is now more publicly known as of a reputation of Republicans or just Richard Cheney that Saddam Hussein was underestimated as a “spin-doctor” as we have the Cheney versus Clinton histories fielded.  [I have long (for sanity) tried to downplay myself, to myself, how it seems I of regular experiences of my reputation preceding me in an air of tongues at “He took down Saddam Hussein.”  Today it seems a more sane “reputation” even for me to accept.]

Most people do not know a real history of such times and are too much of many mornings and dusks of fresh fogs of war.

For a sake of brevity with so much kicked off now as if possibly sport (in politics) (and philosophy) let us entertain that for Posterity it should be that WJC was worse at leading - leading by example specifically too - than RBC (Richard Bruce Cheney). And that there is an honor legend too of such spotlighting where a father and son tale can echo for all times in how President Bush was able to pick up his father’s “sword” of him too President Bush as if from a stone that WJC hadn’t even thought to look for and look as if too for a higher caliber of Camelot.  It may be much either all Germany’s fault or of it also much Germany’s fault that President Bush could be later honored by his son as if to his “x” caliber years after the USA started suddenly to learn how to be a sole superpower in the known world.

The United States of America is the sole superpower of the known world!  Right!!!  These are the days the USA began to have such a target upon it where ever the idea and presence of “American” colors heralded.  We shouldn’t completely forget the Japan of such days, as there is still a haunting of Japanese like Germans (maybe as “leading” “private” citizens in pride) to how especially in these past days a new Axis was stirring as if to yet win WWII and by other means.  As the Persian Gulf War was oft reckoned as if a World War III we too are behooved to reconsider it was at times still World War II all over again.  But we shouldn’t forget to at least consider that Saddam Hussein post the wrap of the Persian Gulf War may have had a new Franco-French siding towards assistance with Iraq towards them of their own nuclear program - forward.

The good news, but for how little this is all copacetic in a public governance, and for too few yet have even pondered how much was of fields of battles and regular fresh fogs whence, is that we are now in the stadiums of history with it that such of such times (however of a pride of private French, German and/or Japanese citizens’ hopes) are now too also “old” thems - these days are times of at least France, Germany and Japan of having moved past such days haunting in a deja vu to renaissances, like, of their “nationalisms” to teams of better Posterity.  RBC did, with Charlie Rose, admit to having been surprised at how Saddam Hussein had been able to turn a “BFD DEFEAT” into a win after the “exiting” from the Persian Gulf War.

As I have fielded for a pro USA Tranquility of old and new challengers:  Check your goalie gloves of civil sport and too your 100% ID check systemology.  However whence there may have been global initiatives of a resurgent “GERMAN” and “JAPANESE” by strategery of private citizens and their personal ideas of national pride we have that as RBC refreshed Saddam Hussein and Iraq have had years when they were very near to having a nuclear arsenal ready.  Whom were those willing to be of a nuclear axis with IRAQ’s Saddam Hussein then in those days when the USA was concurrently like a too big and newly so sole superpower of the world - a target?

We should not forget whom the French were as French whence and how they were (stereotypically) ready for a new Franco even if a Euro-centric new Franco-German within an axis global with Iraq as nuclear and secured in oil Power.  RBC has, with his recent challenging of the too long accepted WJC talking points, torn the “American” colors honor off of WJC and the Administration of the Clintons.  That RBC is now talking so calmly in a historical begets that WJC has been too long just full of hot air and more just careening in “fogs of warrings” dated to whence and then forward to concurrently.  The French are remembered now for having had a leader who seemed at least willing to work with Saddam Hussein and with he to a nuclear program in a shared “war” motive to reset the global balance of power from of the USA as the sole superpower to a new Euro-centric axis possible if at least a few European “leaders” could shift the economic Power of oil supplies and demand valuations upon their colors.

That RBC had expressed sincere past surprise to how Saddam Hussein turned a thought “BFD DEFEAT” by a world wide coalition as if in a World War III into his “VICTORY” is “NEWS”!  I was after Saddam Hussein first invaded Kuwait to a personal intelligence exercising of philosophizing cause and effect scenarios as if to wondering on SH’s “chesss” and specifically to asking and attempting to answer “WHY DID SADDAM HUSSEIN THINK HE COULD KEEP KUWAIT?”

RBC is showing the WJC “Clinton” colors to be soiled and near already of a tag of “FOOLS”.  But now we have it we need to consider there were whence possible new axis muscle ready for at least a new balance of powers in a SADDAM-GERMAN.  But now we too have to consider that RBC has been admitting he and the Bush Administration so charged more specifically had been to underestimating SH.  RBC has reminded many now already that Saddam Hussein was nearly whence to becoming (too powerfully) of a new axis of Power with help to being a nuclear power.

What RBC seems to be admitting now is news and yet of that which I had myself considered whence. RBC has now exposed the Administration of the Bushes as likely both of having not figured fully enough that SH’s surprising reversal of “BFD DEFEAT” shouldn’t have been a surprise for it likely was of his strategy and plans as I considered as to the hows and whys he invaded Kuwait and seemingly thinking that he would be able to keep Kuwait.  We have hardly talked of all the airs and fogs of war that now are yet explanatory to how HRC (Hillary Rodham Clinton) could have been so regularly “careening” due to a general and pervasive ignorance.

For now the resurgent national prides so fielded as of the era of when the “AMERICAN” was maybe to an intolerable globally of many willing to be newly “friends” as from feeling sympatico as if common in “enemy” as also “enemies of their enimies” seems bettered and bested and quieted to gone for good.  OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM though too was necessary for without it Saddam Hussein, as excused by WJC (& HRC) “policies” of the administration of the Clintons, was ready to start anew, it still seems, and with some global “axis” alliances, to being to a nuclear power and arms race with IRAN.

In RBC defense:  The Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11 I & II do justify a OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM WAS NECESSARY.  That it was right and just to be to such a late prosecution of Saddam Hussein though is complicated as 9/11 I made the public selling that SH needed prosecution and an intervention so much more complicated.  It is telling that such attacks have shown WJC and HRC to have benefited politically specifically from such and far more than any Republican especially as the attacks made doing the right thing, however so “lately”, so much more difficult to do and sell.  The only other way to “sell” OIF was likely to directly explain how there is and was a gross negligence in foreign policy at least of the Administration of the Clintons while looking to bipartisan support in Congress to do a right thing by standing the “AMERICAN” up with a sole superpower status so with it as the USA wouldn’t compromise EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL still abroad so.

[Right!  I have decades now of sharing my thoughts with administrations and especially with the Bush Administration of Vice President Richard Bruce Cheney from like moments immediately after 9/11 I’s THE DAY AFTER.  As recalled:  After faxing the White House number for the NSC offices my circa such old times THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM with note like  “It worked for such issues global nuancing then much and is now ready to work again.” my visceral awareness was alighted with a seeming smarting Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to whomever then in that company across town of he with a “Is he trying to pull rank on me?” and me to in unison from afar so near with “NO!”]

For now any USA versus GERMANY seems safely sporting in a post adjustment era of times when the “AMERICAN” may have actually deserved new axis mainlining to check as if by a bold “intervention” a too proud sole superpower “AMERICA.”

But if we do not know history and learn from history and especially are to burying inconvenient historical resurgent colors and fogs then we may still have new problems too much as if the old problems.  By the wrap of the PERSIAN GULF WAR it was wrong for the USA and Coalition nations to not have more fully considered that the surprising “spin doctoring” by SH acumen was part of his plan and strategy from the start when he tipped the scales of civility and justice with his invasion of Kuwait.

[Of my strategy so private and individualistic at endeavoring to understand SH’s chess I was to thinking that the USA was maybe to a bait and switch fitting such concerns and to a electoral upset of President George H.W. Bush, as a new Lincoln of having yet though held the world together, with the propositions that WJC could be right as the USA may then be best to a weak President and a do nothing Presidency.]

[Right!  As I am of my Menadier genes - I am maybe while however of “Irish” character and pride of dominant traits in Franco-German blooded lines.  It may be my worked at “Irish” comity that had me like Reagan of his times in his times of an “IT TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE” at least as per “spin doctors” as “Mad Men” as my maternal grandfather had been a top Madison Avenue Ad man until his retirement from having run a consolidated Johnson & Johnson account for his last 25 years so wrapped as of Young & Rubicam (Y&R).]

[Right!  To the raising of my blind ear to a reputation mine preceding me at times and at times very regularly:  I have the memories still of my surprise one night years after I started a private sector spinning to close breaches in our “AMERICAN” artfully and voluntarily and quietly, however some of my pushing to pull likes of the Clintons into the 1992 race, as for an option to a needed weak Presidency, and one of time for a DO NOTHING PRESIDENT, now less haunting of how I was surprised by a bedtime presence of no other than Saddam Hussein smarting with a “YOU DEFEATED ME” - “WHAT IS NOW TO HAPPEN?” and my at least while tired and near sleep among things about so to “responding” “WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO COME FOR YOU.”]

Go USA - you have survived the convenient years of WJC being perfectly and naturally a weak President much of a do nothing Presidency, and yet hardly know it historically for what it was, and how WJC & HRC were tools not leaders, and yet chosen by the public freely - however ignorant of “wars” and “fogs of war” causal to political careening. Go USA!!!

However SH had at least French, German or Japanese governments or private citizens of global initiatives ambition at the ready to help him whence reset the balance of powers and too as it still haunts to a new Euro-centric it is that RBC is right that OIF was right and that the PERSIAN GULF WAR was right to wrap (temporarily) short of Baghdad.  It is too true and historical that SH if allowed to escape JUSTICE as bedded forward as possible and likely by WJC & HRC we instead now would have it that the world was generally behind SH and IRAQ having a right to be a nuclear state to balance, however a new COLD WAR, that IRAN asserts (in historic victimhood at least) that it has a right to be NUCLEAR.

GO USA!!!  PLEASE, SOCCER FANS AND PLAYERS AND OFFICIALS, LET US KEEP IT SPORTING!!!

Comments Off
06/25/14
THE FOOL - - - OR WORSE
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, 22ND AMENDMENT, #QUEEN, #WHITEPRIDE, CRUSADES, #ISLAM SQUIBS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:43 am

Now he’s done it!  Bill Clinton has subjugated Hillary Rodham in all matters - even 2016.  A reading of Bible App American Edition of 1 Corinthians 14 now too is of a: ‘How profit Mr. Clinton by stepping with tongue proudly over Mrs. Clinton?’

As lyrical of old MY BONNIE LIES OVER THE OCEAN as tonalistic first a beaming with “D | B A G | A G E | D …” WJC born WJB III has always had too much General Clinton and Captain Blygh in him.

At this moment we all may be most progressive to if of 1 Corinthians 14 as if just a chapter and versology as a guide book for male Posterity and foreplay - for males - to be bolstered and buttressed for the natural power of women of the powers of the female.  But how to cover the trumpet blurts of the Administration of the Clintons, and if them of a soul - a married soul of two as one?

Was it that Bill Clinton’s sax-a-phonics was always of harmonics to fill a blasphemy to profit from tongues not in prophecy-ing but in edifying only a new too socialistic totalitarian economics only to be timed to key a selling of SIN & ESCAPISMS?  Isn’t it, however, that the corporations of the world as under the Government of the The United States of America by the USA USC plus are so then not in business “just to make money” but to bear fruits as evidence that their endeavors in prophecy-ing sowing are prescribed to rightly account to profits collectable?  The Clintons united soul is dually culpable for compromises of EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL and too of a common erring illuminable by economic prophecy standards more Republican of selling SIN, SEX, SANCTUARY, JUSTICE, AND FORGIVENESS.

It is now all President Clinton’s fault that he has edified himself as to be the most criticized at least as per operations to liberate the Iraqi people(s).  Clinton, like President Obama as satired in http://bit.ly/BookOfObama, is now of a prophecy bust - President Clinton and Obama now are two, however four, afoul of the three in such guidance writ long.  Clinton too is of a political prolegomena afoot before any philosophizing of heathen brethren or established faith - President Clinton is now anewly offering a pride in a way that is yet not described or enumerated as of his supposed establishment and its tongues in prophecy.

As per the mused guidance, however chapter and verse for males to buttress them for the Tranquility of the woman and female powers, it is much of 1 Corinthians 14 as prophylactic for Iraq - nows and befores.  How their trumpets may be horned in a ready the Presidents Clinton and Obama are evidenced - are showing in a gaudy pedestrian infidelity to at least the “American” concept of EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL - - - These two are two at least alike in undermining the honors and traditions of the United States defenses by politics and playing politics so that a military discipline, even just in horns, is less than ready to march.

This specific discourse on the culpability so historical of Bill Clinton if however or now of a heaven in Hillary Rodham is now conveniently to be found via its own bit.ly by THE FOOL only in all caps as: http://bit.ly/THEFOOL.  At JPHogan.org however via http://bit.ly/JPHogan there is more to edify this “FOOL” edifice of tongues to selfish in a spousal playing of politics of the House of Clintons - - - See:  OBAMA’S RETREAT; SUMMER FARE; SURPLUS’D QUEEN; FUZZY MATH; SWADDLED TOGAS; MARXISM; C.C.C.P.? - and at least to edifice a separation of the Clintons’ mind(s) and soul(s). [At, though, CitizenRosebud.net or CitRB.net however via http://bit.ly/CitRBnet at least a more grammatical and literate CHARITY & THE C.C.C.P.? can be “discovered.”]

It is impossible, Constitutionally with fidelity to governance by LAWS, that William Jefferson (Davis?) Clinton can be right about having been right about either Iraq or it as about Saddam Hussein.  There are serious woman issues in this tag.  There are serious EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL precedence too in this tag.  There is that even Vice President Richard Cheney can be edified as “more right” per what is and was right than WJC born however WJB III - and as a white man of the South - the old Confederate States once of President Jefferson Davis.

It is complicated how complicated the “Bill Clinton” is and now quite time for all to strip him of his convenient covers long too much as seeming good while seeming about being about so many simultaneous and politically.  There are dichotomies and trichotomies to discern for infidelities at least to the establishments in Law as the Constitution of the The United States of American as a written and subscribed under God “Order” of the People’d people since that year so the “Year of our Lord” since the apostolic spectacle the spectacle edified by the founding fathers was posted for Posterity and Tranquility.

It is complicated how duplicitous the “Bill Clinton” can present and especially when of triangulating and projection.  It is complicated, yet now of a convenient, how WJC of the “Bill Clinton” is now exposed in infidelities more systematic than intimate or personal and for the years he now opens a Pandora’s Box of as too the years of Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton as First Lady and global imperial CRUSADER.

President Clinton cannot be right about being right about Iraq for his avoidance and inaction in his (their?) eight years too was of how she was traveling to turfs known as hot spots for radicals to incite in incendiary spurring that logically and in a lay psychopathy seem most taggable and mashable as causal to “responses” to how the Clintons were at least to undermining EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL by ignoring for his (their?) eight years the sentiments of American Abandonment of its own and expected principles by at least the Afghani and Iraqi peoples.

President Clinton cannot be right, at least as per a Christian and Islamic commonality in how men are like said as buttressed to female powers at least by commonality in 1 Corinthians 14, for it was less than edifying and imprudent how he, while she his abroad inciting to incendiary with her imperialistic incendiary cornering in pride of prides, was to staying at home and busy like a bee to so much un-funding of the budget specifics to bolster a harmonics base for a intelligent and disciplined defense. 

President Clinton(s) cannot be of a he (they?) right about Iraq at least for how complicated it is to how it seems these fires burn for his she lit them and because he impeded by his budget sword too much necessary for any intelligent intervening and too an actual preparedness in an armed forces readiness to march.  He much left his successor that seemed at first expected to be a subdued Al Gore little maneuverability in all domestic and foreign realms for they left nearly only one option left on the tables of established establishments as long only tonalistic when the Constitution was seen and read as an accompaniment to the New Testament, at least, and especially the idea of “profit” as in 1 Corinthians 14.

Comments Off
06/21/14
OBAMA’S 2014
Filed under: POLITICS, AUTO-BIO'D, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, #STUPID SQUIBS, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 4:12 am

There are four people whom I still hope never to be in the same room with even if of a 500 person plus capacity and to be FULL.  The first is Al Gore; the second is Hillary Clinton; the third is Bill Clinton; the forth is George Stephanopoulus.

This is one of my most historical and informed positions and so as full of reasons dating back at least as far as 1991.  There isn’t much gap between these four and for how Al Gore is first speaks to how much as the others are deserving he is more deserving and historically.  This is a depressing year - 2014 is a depressing year and President Obama isn’t in the top four because these four may be more responsible than he for his inadequacies.

Authors David Boise & Ted Olson helped refresh how reviling I find these four, and how historically, with their appearance caught in reran of Charlie Rose.  These four are not despise for their “positions” as this is much of my informed perspective while of helping make them better and for positive change I saw possible.  For example it is now easier to support gay marriage by contrasting the good sought by parties to it as contrasted to the bad “marriage” postured by the Clintons for “maximum” person political allowances.  It is quite easy to point to the ideal of marriage as sought as if “equality” by those of LGBT as a GOOD if one is to relate it to the Clinton affected “interpretations” for their own as a BAD.  A simple legal lay perspective is that the Clintons posture their own marriage as if it has no soul - that it is just two lawyers in a maximized legal construct.

Poor George Stephanopoulus is so despised by me that when he got his job at ABC I ceased having any interest in working anywhere at ABC - even as it seems recalled:  anywhere within the parent company that owned ABC.  I have been “political” with George S. since before the Clintons surprised so many with their very late entry into the 1992 campaign as it was in letters to Representative Richard Gephardt’s office where he worked with a Charles Koch son that I offered that a Democrat could win if they were to learn to sound like me as I postured sounding for 1992 in my letters.  Again, as with George S. my despising so is hardly based on the policies of the politics but on the people and character of the historicals.

Al Gore deserved the The Supreme Court of The United States of America Bush v. Gore decision as it was karma payback for his vacuous ‘leadership” when the supposed A Team of the Democrats and the to be expected challenger to President George H. W. Bush (#41).  We are of too few in the know of proper considerations in historicals of the ill fatedness much solely of a despicable political as the shoes that fit Al Gore from the months before the Clintons stepped in in his place.  2014, despite how Paul Krugman is also despised, and yet not worthy while so to be yet in such company, is hardly seemingly possibly to be a good year for President Barack Obama.

We largely wouldn’t be in much of these messes if George S. with his platform at ABC hadn’t been so easy of the lies as if to be allowed “political” “perspectives.”  From my historical perspective I knew the lies building even when set up to mostly be lies by omissions.  And, so it is that I yet though have nearly never watched George S. shows but for those first seconds when I was to realizing what channel I had on at a time I didn’t care to have such channel on.  President Obama is also trapped by the Clintons and their machinations so soul-less in their idea of “marriage” for his loyalty seems yet always to their propositions that Bill Clinton’s Presidency was rightly supposed to be as, and still, in allowances that every decision then could and should be moderated to use all those eight years to set up an as planned as possible succession to such in the name of Hillary Clinton.

President Obama has no where to go in 2014.  He is essentially, like George S. too compromised already by the Clintons.  Once he started his first term in its first hours with tag line lying of ALL BUSH’S FAULT in his oratory he was already across a threshold for impeachability.  As a trained lawyer he should be wise at least to dangers from absolutes like “ALL…”!  Al Gore though is so much worse in my paragon of considerations of worst four that for the most part I have found him too depressing to even include in my writing.  What he set up so to a dangerous vacuous when the supposed Democrat A Team front runner for 1992 is no greater exposed than if and when one is fully to considering the 9/11 and post 9/11 politics and how we are, it seems, to only expect that President Albert A. Gore would only have used such events an excuse for warring in Afghanistan and too, it seems, as yet a war of a totality more against all of Afghanistan.  There are dangers still too present from so much avoidance and inaction much akin to dangers from broadcasting of lies by omissions.

I have to despise Al Gore the most for it is from his vacuous leadership that I felt it necessary in an imminent dire to stop my business and begin writing to arrest his short-comings as perceived possible collateral damage.  I personally put on a happy face with penned offerings to even Representative Gephardt’s office of a happier way forward just because I feared so much what seemed risks of a global that seemed devoid of other company at considerations.  On election day & night of 2000 contest between Governor Bush & Vice President Gore I was in the West 23rd eatery proprietored by James & Mary and to telling James Carville around lunch time that if Al Gore was elected I expected I would move out of the country so not to be here when the crap was expected to hit the fan, and, too how I wasn’t sure Governor Bush was yet ready to be President himself with my tone that he though would be safer when the crap did get to hitting the fan.

The greatest risk to The United States of America in the 1992 race era was still too much how in 1990 and 1991 it had been largely that the Democrat “leaders” were so predictable that one like Saddam Hussein could play them like puppets by their predictability.  It seems that the Democrats of this era were actually the greatest threat to the U.S.A..  My despising these four is of my experience of such fears and for the years so quite of confirming each and every one of the significant parts of such fears.  The story of course is complicated for I saw in my “Mad Man” covert future ambitiousness of my quite intended career path that the best way to reduce such apparent risks was to offer to much be to trying to save the Democrats from themselves.  I despise these four in a TOPS for having seen them as of the danger and then of having helped them seem better than themselves and enough for the election in 1992 that President Bush whom I did respect and vote for was then defeated by attempts to save his policies and progress however oddly in such a seeming necessary.

2014 is the year President Obama is clearly stuck due to ill advised to just stupid absolutes.  Due to his early and kept politics of “ALL BUSH’S FAULT” he was of an impeachable cover-up for the Clintons as such was to suppose a People’d people pre-disposition that it was possible that after eight years of the Clintons “it” could be of an “it” as “NONE OF THE FAULT OF THE CLINTONS.”  2014 is the year now where all are seeing it was preposterous that “it” was and “it” of NONE OF THE CLINTONS FAULT and soon better to how Benghazi became a Gettysburg of cover-up warring as their loss a turning point for truths of the Republicans for once a second 9/11 happened the lies needed new lies to cover-up that the earlier lies were no longer working and workable. 

2014 is the year of the cover-ups!  President Obama has been impeachable like for not firing Secretary of State Clinton for many years and too for his partisan politics of lies before truth so that she could be acceptable as a cabinet officer despite her earned defeat by a near nobody yet a peer.  I was there in a postured standing where ever for the truth during the Obama First Inaugural and to the exercising of Posterity that his lies so spoken shouldn’t stand nor long endure.  President Obama yet may be the only President of The United States of America to have become impeachable within the first hour after his oath of office.

To now proceed as we must at all the cover-up scandals now under way we are behooved to be stirrups ready however saddling is made difficult by so many so muddied and rutted routings.  We should be behooved to be at the reigns for restorations to a minimum necessary level of truth in government, and now more as if of a new romantic age than when such would have more befit the new renaissance spirit of the 1992 course corrections away from then such being a time too much too civilly supposedly anew as if a time of RECONSTRUCTION.  We’ld be wise to fully consider it seems 9/11 was planned to be operational on September 11, 2001 when it was widely supposed and even thought accepted that those were to be the days of a Presidency of Albert A. Gore.

I don’t yet know how I can shift to being paid for these historical insights and offerings in my artful blogging even as when poetry of me as Poet J.P. Hogan without myself being expected to violate my kept Posterity of a visceral basis about despising not just the thought of having to be in the same room, however large and full, with Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and George Stephanopoulus.  These are at least four whom people should harangue upon the times more of the world learn of my story and the depths of history and understanding of its effectings, and, harangue as for it should seem that they are tops among a greater to be churned when to mashing about the sentiments of how wrong it is that at least these didn’t tell people generally about me, and for so long.

To be brief and of the consideration that if you are finding this you already know a necessary some to much of the telling that relates to such.  It is though that how I have avoided Al Gore with so much already written is speaking quietly to the proposition that historically he is so bad he has been too depressing to include.

There is now way out now finally in 2014 for President Barack Hussein Obama.  He has told and pimp’d the BIG LIE that “it” was and “it” of NONE OF THE CLINTONS’ FAULT since his first hour when he wrongly trespassed campaign rhetoric in slights into the body politick as if a new TRUTH established.  This lie is as big as it gets as cover-ups go for the size of the cover-up largely suggests the necessity for a cover-up and really there is hardly a bigger cover-up possible than to stand up a irrational too simple revisionist history as the only TRUTH by ways of suggesting an “it” otherwise as only an “it” of his “it” as unraveling of those IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT.  At least one cover-up minor to such COVER-UP has been unearthed and now 2014 is much ado about the somethings of how a cover-up is the worse case scenario to be avoided unless a cover-up is needed.

There is now that President Obama in his first hour didn’t need to cover-up for the Clintons as he could have championed cleaning up Washington DC for a new Hope in Change with a bipartisan call to start by cleaning up the BAD in his own party at least simultaneously from the start.  President Barack Hussein Obama didn’t need to risk his own Presidency from the start as he did by lying in an impeachable from his first hour to satisfy the Clintons’ need for a cover-up of their real culpabilities and how at least to be considered diabolical in a gross negligence if allowed to be for public consumption.

Al Gore is still a very depressing subject.  I still know what I know from thinking at and through my offered solutions at saving Democrats from Democrats - Democrats from themselves - as by my years of tiring philosophizing and marketing wizardry considerates that fit in my reduced instruction set computed as poetry of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM so consolidated.  2014 is a year too when it does behoove any saddled so for TRUTHS to be stirrups ready and muddy ways alert to how it also ridiculous to proffer IT ALL BUSH’S FAULT, however, while it seems a simple and inconvenient truth that Albert Gore was expected to be the President at the time of the long planed attacks of September 11, 2001.

These are the days of revitalized FAITH & FREEDOM voters.  Too to the despising of these four is yet a historical consideration that my efforts to so be of such as it seems of my having pulled the Clintons into the1992 race and via letters read by George S. while then in Representative Gephardt’s offices that the TRUTHS are darker for as bad as this has worked out it may be that this wasn’t the worst case scenario so motivational to my redirection of my entrepreneurial efforts and expediting of some of my personal career path plans so for others.  Now that we all should be at how much we need to look at Al Gore as a problem and historically so 2014, however Krugman over writes low excuses, is the year President Obama must answer to why at cover-ups and while cover-ups are supposed to be presumed to be the known worse case scenario to be at only when much need be hidden (at least to protect in a too partisan of party politics playing politics as politics put ahead of governance.).

Yes, I would welcome being in the same room with David Boise and Theodore Olson however as lawyers or authors.  I have since whence been sympatico with progress and governance in reasoned equality around a species at civilly singing songs of the “body electric”.  Of the Clintons yet it seems they saw 3.8% as fit for a politics of convenient rabble rousing while yet as per Iraq of not seeing or hearing the cries of abandonment of a majority of a nation.  Was President Gore too to be so pro Sunni to be still officially bigoted as the Administration of the Clintons agains the Iraqi Shia as said to be inferior people “unable to govern themselves”?  I would welcome being in a room with Boise and Olson to yet discuss to where yet we may have differences of opinion as to processes and Constitutional interpretation as to what is written law and what new writings may be prudent.

Forward:  Now you know I really, really, have no interest in ever being in the same room with Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and nor George Stephanopoulus.  This is a very informed position/opinion.  I haven’t yet gone to the whole of it fully.

Forward:  Due to the laws of absolutes once a cover-up has been determined to have actually have been running a year like 2014 must go down in history as a win for absolute basics as only a little lie need be proven for the whole Party/House of the COVER-UP to fall.  In the specific of a 2014 for President Obama it seems now there are multiple cover-ups passed such basic and resolute absolute intolerance.  Again, for Posterity, President Obama once elected was not necessarily to his desicion to so be engaged in these now more apparent attempts to cover up for the Clintons and at least their eight years of the Administration conjoined of the Clintons. 

Forward:  For such maybe I should despise him as much as Al Gore - I am not there yet.

Comments Off
06/17/14
DREAMS OF HIS ‘FATHER’?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AL QAEDA, #BLACKS, SYRIA, #BLAME, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:28 am

The truth is that President Barack Hussein Obama these years self tagged as to a “New Foundation” is he most physically in a political responsibility he most culpable for how he has destroyed the better foundations that better structured a ‘global’ America.

We can not and should not forget what it can be said he too inherited from the years 1993-2001 of the Administrations of the Clintons.  President Obama is he whom started afoot in the foreign and domestic of professing he desired so to have a personality based presidency.  President Obama firstly should be now, as to “personality”, at blaming himself.

In the news and off the grid, so of the grapevines of blogs, there are discussions to religiosity more Constitutionally restored and vitally in a refreshed People’d peoples civic engagements.  It may help President Obama now more than Mrs. Clinton, however, that too by Susan B. Anthony List standing at The Supreme Court of The United States of America there is now with such originality refreshed of the logic and faith of the Founding Fathers that the Bill of Rights is an accompaniment to the New Testament at least and so that lying is cover-ed by the Ten Commandments, however, written by a man.  Something about ‘bearing false witness’ seems akin to the ‘legacy’ of the House of Clintons.

There may be much President Obama can blame on Secretary Clinton and as well on the years of the terms of the Administration of the Clintons.  Yet though, for now President Obama has himself most to blame.  Yet though, for now President Obama is a he more responsible than she, yes too as a she, as Secretary Clinton and Mrs. Clinton, however.  President Obama, however he proffered an “I inherited this…” has it that regardless of which history he said he “inherited” he chose between available options and much it seems without considering many of his options.

This is not about Mr. Obama - Father Obama - Dad biological to the President.  It however cannot escape the prima facia dramatic that Mrs. Clinton to President Clinton offered a resolution for an Oedipal as if a surrogate white mother figure.  President Clinton is more a ‘father’ for the sake of necessary and timely governance purview discourse - and too still the earlier ‘fathers’ back to the founding fathers - the ‘Founding Fathers.”

The foundations to the problems President Obama is facing about obvious failures at his “New Foundation” have his roots of he a sprouting Harvard Law Student near about the time Al Qaeda was so born - born to become ISIS as is an is like of Osama Bin Laden, however a ‘father’ to it, as an is an is like of a JIHAD against American Infidels too much of “is”s not as “is”s.  The 9/11 Commission Report is hopefully not relied upon by President Obama;  President Obama may be better served to ignore it an yet consider the tome of TERROR AND CONSENT by Philip Bobbitt as a Clinton NSC adviser whom tagged it dangerous as to a begetting terrorism of an if and when the The White House is of an administration working too closely with Hollywood.  Al Qaeda wasn’t covered enough or far enough back by the 9/11 Commission to now have enough in a know as to how the ISIS of today is like of proud sons of OBL living out the purpose that Al Qaeda was formed and originally of asking Saudi Arabian leaders for their blessings to become - to grow into.

To the religiosity yet of the unexpected ‘domestic’ elements of the quandary and conundrums particular to the insufficeincies in his “New Foundation” politics of his sought “personality based presidency” we can consider that it is helpful that the People’d people of the The United States of America are refreshed to how the Bill of Rights is a ten like the Ten Commandments and how the First Amendment affirms that the separation of church and state is so of them as presumed of an equal or greater right at interpretation of God’s will and establishments than the Congress.  The First Amendment affirms that the body of the Constitution by the preamble is the Peoples’ “Order” [with order here as a noun] “done” as a “more perfect Union” than the United Kingdom’s, at least, and so as “subscribed” unanimously while “agreed” or “so agreed” could have otherwise sustained the liberal wants of it set secular.

It should help the People’d people that it has become refreshed that the founding ‘fathers’ secured the ordained and established more perfect “Order” under God by their specified subscribing so in that year of the Christian calendar so of the New Testament as “done” “in the Year of our Lord…”!  So established the separation of church and state and free speech protections of the Bill of Rights by its First has it that “lying” is not to be “legal” (maybe at least in politics of campaigns - campaign advertising) as the Constitution is of the accompaniment writ so to the New Testament, at least.

It should help President Obama and yet not likely his ‘mother’ Clinton nor his ‘father’ Clinton as so refreshed of the original American Dream so conceived and long consecrated the The United States of America is not writ large to an infidelity to Holy words and guidance;  It should help President Obama for such “America” has standing in the Middle East with any “justice” core common of ISIS so that we can stand comparatively to be at the borders edges to Syria and Iraq of an alternative and example that their ‘foundations’ and any success at ‘governance’ can be then related and digressed over, firstly - firstly before there yet could be a more ‘global’ campaign as rationally reasoned in a ‘justice’ against the idea that is “The United States of America.”

President Clinton has been a bad ‘father’ to President Obama.  It seems President Obama has been falling and failing where he may have like accepted advice or “dreams” from President William Jefferson Clinton - he born as conflicted as William Jefferson (Davis) Blythe III — so it seems.

The milk and any cream of the days of Secretary Clinton as of “hard choices” have spoiled on poor President Barack Hussein Obama, however she a ‘mother’ and even too much to an Oedipal as he of any sought of seeking a surrogate elderly white mother figure.  She and he the ‘father’ to her a ‘mother’ of the House of Clintons is embroiled forever forward and backwards of a compromised legacy and of basic wants that will not be favored judiciously or by many People’d peoples while she and he are of the BIG establishments as both known to be revealed and tagged as “Big Liars.”

President Thomas Jefferson did lead a politics for 40 years after 1800 as if its ‘father’ - is it as a ‘father’ of Jeffersonian Republicans?  But while the “Founding Fathers” were dedicated and joined to their historic establishment and ordaining of a People’d Order [again with “Order” as a noun] Thomas Jefferson was over seas and out of their hair/wigs.  The “Founding Fathers” found Thomas Jefferson on his return and Constitutional perusals has issues with their writ;  The writing as the first moderation of the body as the People’s Order of the First Amendment is cleverly penned in unusual first language so to seem to appease the “issues” of Jefferson’s complaints - and yet not to at all.

By Jefferson’s practice and the devotions like apostolic by Jeffersonian Republicans of 1800-1840 quite we have an elephant in the room about how to interpret maybe otherwise than the original intent the specific words of the body and the first amending.  We have that though the Constitution reads as set under God as to an meant accompaniment with the New Testament and as the context of the times affirm such is a natural development of the idea of the colonies independent it is still that how Jefferson governed and his ’sons’ like later may have been only of success for being of a parsed and nuanced otherness.

Comments Off
06/16/14
SLICK WILLY IV
Filed under: POLITICS, #SLICKWILLY, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 6:35 am

How is it in these troubled times that all roads seem to lead to William J. Clinton?  How cowed now, so it seems, have been tread upon long and hard while WJC a head of a snake of Hillary R. Clinton so convincingly as a new Marie Antoinette - even without her hats?  How can it be that in these of the banner “Clinton Democrats” there lay no real standard in old glory?  How, in these troubled times, is it that as the head of such snake, on all these roads long suffered, WJC, yet, is more a dog than so far accepted?

She wears her houses like Marie wore her hats - she strutted herself so doggedly it dogs them how they raised themselves to such a self evident “out of touch.”  She/they destroyed the middle class and lower eschewed social ranks.  She/they had Albert A. Gore as either just a Don Quixote or a side-kick like a Sancho Panza. She/they as the titular of the “Clinton Democrats” have how they are at windmills, with gas pumps the antagonists, in how they poor out to the People of the suffrage so much to suffer for their GREEN insurgency of forced inflation across the carbon monsters.  She/they did spear and poke and spear and poke at oiled profits while the more common known of fixed income Americana had no place to yet go when so much about them became so inflated.

Her chivalry and chauvinism is beyond Camelot and hardly, in a good way, yet of Penelope or of Penelope’s monster slayer hero protagonist Odysseus.  She is, it seems, while of such jousting at the carbon monsters, yet of a house devoid of the old glory of the old Ironsides original Constitutional intents and logic/rationality.  She has been both the bad actor and a Penelope not a Helen nor a Penelope while quite a new Marie Antoinette so out of touch, or worse to diabolical of callous intents, as evidentially in how her/their coat-tails hemmed the pathological to how their tagging for GREEN insurgency GREEN AGENDA wanton GREEN ENERGY price inflation were of direct and premeditated strikes at the middle class and lower eschewed social ranks.  It is she whom most led, albeit with AAG along side however, the near quadrupling inflation about the carbon monsters for a gross vanity in greeness partisan politics - she/they spiked the valuations through too subjective campaigning so that all those on fixed incomes, despite their ranks, were caught up in her hardly thoroughly considered - unless her intents were always just diabolical.

She persists and persists in an oddity so devoid of old glory and with theatrics too dramatic, fallen, and falling. She persists and persists in oddities as her standard so devoid is evidently too imperialistic - too new nationalistic - too globally anti-Constitution.  WJC seems more the more a dog and as embedded in the HRC new Marie Antoinette separations that show her/them rivaling the old for how out of touch they are in their own times.  WJC does dog the issues concurrently, and yet as it seems, even of HRC prima facia at booked parading, as if of a new too vanglorious campaign, as the real head of the snake to which the forensic pathologies seem logically free highways barely still for a common defense.

She/they of the House of Clinton Democrats, so evidently devoid of old glory, have to answer for if intently callous in a diabolical cold calculus it was when they were firstly at HILLARY 4 PRESIDENT, and as such times Barack H. Obama was so a nobody to her/them his SURPRISE was a SURPRISE too to them, and, were then so firstly to their forced inflation vast and radical left partisan politics trodding by ways at a realm of “carbon monsters”.  Their force inflation wasn’t alone in their saddled bags of tricks as it was as 2008 November neared fear was in their ranks so soundly rabble roused to market shorting in a common insurgency too on high.  What did she know?  When did she know it?

What did she/they know?  When did she/they know it?  Was it with pure innocence of a deluded greater good fog of vanity with which the Clinton Democrats with the titular HRC so raised the costs of living too radically and rashly across any ranks of those stuck over-extended on fixed incomes?  Wasn’t it otherwise and really diabolical?  Mustn’t she/they of the House of Clinton Democrats partisan polarizing politicking have been aware that they would trap and ruin so many by forcing the inflation by tales of carbon monsters so that People’d peoples and peoples everywhere of the known world wouldn’t be able forward to afford the new GREEN prices, even just their inflated prices for gasoline, and still afford their keeps?

How criminal were/are these so seemingly rightly taggable as of a “criminal intent” by at least the standard of Old Glory as actually Constituted?

How can it really matter now whom between WJC and HRC is more the more the dog, politically speaking, as so compromised while as if thee the head of the snake of betrayals?

How can’t it be now exposed, debated, countered, debated, probed again, and prosecuted yet, and by Congress too, how the Clinton Democrats however of collusions of others too embedded in a carbon insurgency (too imperialistic) that the Clintons are titular to the collapses so global. 

How can’t it be now so rendered by the People’d peoples and worldly where ever, and with the Congress of The United States of America, that the Clinton Democrats most had the means, motive, and opportunity and most clearly have a pathology evidently that affirms it was they, however, at their purported “monsters” most now and forward primarily culpable?

She/they now drone on, and drone on.  The glory of the U.S.A. Bill of Rights has been more than poked at by them at their House of Clinton Democrats’ too imperialistic ideological escapades parading.  WJC is in jeopardy as a head of a snake so of such dogging in his dogged “Top Dog” rivalry for he has expressed enough to affirm he has long known it was mostly his&her fault while yet believing, it seems still, that he had, was, and would keep be GETTING AWAY WITH IT(S).

And, yet it is his first lady HRC now of her battling at carbon monsters still whom may best rest the cases when justice looms nearer.  It is his first lady HRC now whom is firstly of the poking at the troubled suffraged sufferings.  It is he first lady HRC so now showing herself more clearly as too really a historical rival to Marie Antoinette and her own legend as out of touch.

Whom is she but the she of the sordid sorted set collated by “ENABLER” at Citizen Rosebud dot com gallery of artful exposes to catch and/or tag the artful and inartful dodgers?  Whom is she but the she of the legends in http://bit.ly/TheEnabler?  There is the common tale of a union of two so intimate in them self-proclaimed a “two-fer” also so as exposed and metered by the sordid sorted set yet of http://bit.ly/ChubbyHubby.  And too much to see more clearly in the shared economics realities of those treatments a SAMPLER at http://CitizenRosebud.net and too so as anchored for news parying at http://JPHogan.org.

“IT A SIMPLE & APPROPRIATE CATEGORY FOR SO MUCH NOW AWRY:   “THINGS BILL CLINTON @: THOUGHT I GOT AWAY WITH THAT!” // #USA“  {See;  http://Facebook.com/jpeterhogan and http://CitizenRosebud.mobi for social media context of quote.}

Comments Off
06/11/14
THE HIGH PRIEST?
Filed under: POLITICS, OBAMACARE, CLIMATE CHANGE, #MUSIC, QUID PRO QUO, POPE
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:01 am
[DESPITE WHAT YOU READ HERE IT WILL BE WRONG TO PUT ME ON WRONG SIDE OF CLIMATE CHANGE. I WITH MY VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY BA IN ECONOMICS AND UNDECLARED PHILOSOPHY MINOR, WITH MY YEARS WHENCE IN HOME IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTING, HAVE BEEN ON RIGHT SIDE OF CLEANER AIR BUT WITH POLITICS OF SCARCITY OF RESOURCES PERSUASION IN LIEU OF AL GORE’S SLOPPY IDEOLOGICAL BLIND FAITH “POLITICS.”  I’VE BEEN OF THE “R” FACTORS SO INSULATING AND ENERGY EFFICIENT WINDOWS & DOORS SINCE THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION.  I ACCEPT THAT PRESIDENT BUSH MUST HAVE BEEN “GREEN” SINCE IT ONLY TOOK ABOUT A YEAR SINCE HE LEFT OFFICE TO BRING TO MARKET SO MUCH “IMPROVED” HE MUST TOO HAVE BEEN LONG AT PROVIDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDING TO.]


It started as an interesting enough morning after I realized, after the fact, that my social media commentary was, unusually for me, on a Media Matters link.  I ended up so in a defensiveness to having to explain the separation of church and state of the First Amendment - because.

Recently we all should have been shocked to our senses with the new Pope, as yet Francis, of the olive tree planting in an interfaith shoveling of new hope.  To understand the politics of the Democrat Party leadership in the The United States of America one should be guarded in their faith and gullibility?  To understand the first thing about the Democrat Party today maybe one should ask how the Pope like slapped Climate Change in the face by not having Al Gore also at the interfaith summit for his preaching of an alternative way by “caps” & “trades” as also “guilt” based and to superstitious and to blind obedience?

Let us discuss a how and why to it that Al Gore didn’t make the list.  Mustn’t we conclude that Al Gore is inconveniently so not to be (globally) perceived to be enough a “global figure” nor successful in his attempt to become like the new leader of a new religiosity?

Again, it is economically too true for even evidence based deciding that the Republicans are better on the economy and jobs for they sell SIN, SEX, SANCTUARIES, JUSTICE, & FORGIVENESS while “modern” Democrats otherwise are of their attempts still to a new too hyper and “pop” dogmatic based mostly in just selling SIN & ESCAPISM.  We are of times when George Orwell’s “1984″ like meets Ayn Rand’s “ATLAS SHRUGGED” and the Democrats to rightly slide from grace.

Besides my BA in economics studies I have my extra-curricular of reading all of Ayn Rand’s books coincidentally, mostly.  From such I can posture that Ayn Rand was/is GREEN in a good way and in “capitalism” still.  Ayn Rand was for efficiencies, yes, and truly liked those “progressive” as to better ways pursued smartly.  Ayn Rand likely if alive in these days would be also otherwise to selling a “climate change” prudence and yet by a celebration of economics also around the wisdom at decidings related to scarcity of resources.

How is it that Al Gore as the “godfather” of GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM new dogmatic where he was to be set up as if above all others as the most high “official” didn’t get invited also to ROME?  We have it already that he wasn’t earlier invited to proffer at his alma mater Harvard University - but?  Is it Al Gore is too fallen and passe a human figure today?

“WORD SOUP” to stew on here verbatim from my sharing on Media Matters Facebook status update:

“There is the First Amendment concern with Immigration as per Obamacare where the Democrats are insisting that what has been of the “establishments” of “religion” is now theirs to make any Law in Congress regarding and so that though Obamacare defended as necessary due to “spill-over” interstate problems they left the spill-over of international of illegal immigration so too open to being healthcare “universally” if you can get here.  There never should have been such a vast healthcare reform such as the barely legal as a war powers tax Obamacare until there was a securing of all borders as the spill-over international is a bigger issue at healthcare costs than that of state to state spill-over used to pass it.  Essentially the Democrats have it so violate of the First Amendment as by making what was the realm of religion is now the Congress’ to establishments however violate also of federalism and states’ rights prudence.”

The separation is that there is a freedom of religion not a freedom from religion for religion is the poetry electric of the electric of shared humanity.  The separation is that the Congress is barred from assuming a more “Godly” than the People and that it is barred from establishments affecting as if it more than the People have a divine right and any greater superiority in interpreting the “establishments” of “religion” as set in the New Testament - at least.”

To associate all this with the times Al Gore is actually living in let us consider Virginia’s new representative elect for their 7th district Dave Brat.  He speaks with word “GOD” in traditional literary context of the founders and yet not in the new “religious” as by “GOD” replaced by “Cap N Trade”.  Many many books and songs are literally based on the a textual and the texture of the Bible - He speaks in a traditional “progressive” of humanity under GOD of a depth of thousands of years.  In these times that Al Gore is actually living it is DANGEROUS that Democrats of the The United States have postured and presumed a right to govern as if GOD were dead.  Democrats GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM & ACA aka OBAMACARE seem enduring in their suffraged as if made Law to replace any establishments of religion.

Yet!!! No the First Amendment is a clever affirmation despite Jefferson’s criticism to how as the first in amending the body of the Constitution it affirms that the Articles were/are the People’s “Order” to establish and ordain in the Year of the founders’ Lord that such was in an establishment in the New Testament as in the Christian Calendar and as said so “done” before the unanimous subscribing then affirmed by the 1st to how it especially important that Congress was to be seen as barred from changing that such is and should be the “establishment of religion” that it then is to have no superior right in interpretation of “religiousness” than the “People.” {I am realizing I have commented on a Media Matters thread.}”

There is a common thread in the “progressive” of the Democrats now trying to govern ideologically actually in their own times.  The Democrats are trying to give Congress and themselves the Power of religion which the Constitution by the founding fathers, and all the years in consecrating and affirming by whomever, is specifically barred from by the establishment ordained in the People’s Order and so affirmed by the First Amendment.  Again, Obamacare never should have been passed at least for it passed before an immigration solution was first passed to handle the too “universal” risks from too open borders.

So much of the Democrats’ agenda is so to a new dogmatic as if to a new religion it is a wonderment they otherwise seem less religious and acquiescent to the attempts to be just to an economics as if by a new “pop” governance with Clinton allowed, at least, to be too autocratic as too important in just a selling of SIN & ESCAPISM of creative artists too co-opted and too to a dangerous quid pro quo to hyper-pop media-conglomerate based “governance.”

How the Democrats have destroyed an economy, that despite the housing collapsing chaos while they were spiking the gas prices, and to their long desired much hire GREEN AGENDA pricing, and as it was we were to it by their forced inflation, remains an elephant in the donkeys’ pens.  There are a trillion unit points per dollar of the unnecessary Clintons’ surpluses to also look at with any discussion of either Clintons or Gore as per a culpability for destruction by GREEN TERRORISM.  For each dollar of their surpluses of the two trillion in cuts during the Administration of the Clintons there is a question mark as to how it could have been right to cut and cut and cut and cut while the climate, at least, was known to be in such jeopardy.  Particularly too as for they profess a prior knowledge that bigger storms were coming and yet didn’t even afford the peoples of New Orleans some of such funds so to do the recommended repairs to MR GO.

So I leave you as it seems Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton aka Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton seems stuck with her defeat already written and too as it seems while the words of her defeat in 2008, and such as I should have a Guinness Record Book record for, are also now ready again to defeat her as well.  We have work ahead of ourselves yet for the economy and governance seems stuck in the same old ditch much due to a real drop in voter and consumer confidence much for the music of the Constitution as keyed in the Christian Calendar now too aborted.

Comments Off
06/08/14
OUR PRIME SUSPECT!
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, AL QAEDA, #CGI, #KERRY, #SUSPECT, #WHITEPRIDE, #BLAME, #MORALS, COVER UPS, SANS SCRIPTS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:53 am

Where did she go wrong?  How are our criticisms of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton enough “well informed”?  Aren’t we at if we just compare her to whom she followed and who followed her that we are fair in reporting and chronicling that she was the worst of three?

We’ld be fools and unfairly so (and racist) if we are to ignore all the flip flops of Mrs. Clinton, however, and if to an affirming posit that it she be presumed that she was a better Secretary of State than the two most previously.  Right?

We’ld be fools and unfairly to discerning differences in old white political elites and new white political elitism if to an avoidance to pare the pair of Secretaries of State of the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama.  Both Clinton and Kerry brought hypocracy and baggage to the office for diplomacy - both Clinton and Kerry were inappropriate or devolutionary choices for such high office due to their personal conflicts - conflicts of interests - past positions as of entanglements.

We to start any due probative of Mrs. Clinton as a worst, at least of three, by remembering all her flip flops and too her executive decidings while crusading with the Powers of her office as First Lady.  We should be aware of whom are Bedouins or Nubians and how Ja Ja Binks seems to have been cast as a new good Gunga Din.  If I recall the setting correctly then it was when Lara Logan interviewed General Petraeus in Afghanistan when he spoke of then in his readings of reading Rudyard Kipling.  It seems to be accounted of an if true how true that Mr. Binks was right when of parrying that if a people keep theirs sewers clear from clogging their murder rate should be lower.  President Barack Hussein Obama in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech tagged the Clintons while parsing in oratory how there are dangers from inaction and avoidance (as like evident now from the Clintons’ own years of avoidance and inaction).

The Congress so far has the House nearly ready for the rendering of justice per the discovered and confirmed cover-up post Benghazi.  I do not know when the Senate will also be ready.  I expect due to the seriousness of any “cover-up” our Congress must soon be bicameral and in too a bipartisanship in the Senate, so charged, to also looking to how guilty Mrs. Clinton, however, and to how diabolical it is that a “cover-up” was thought her best strategy.  Mrs. William Jefferson “Hillary” Clinton is the prime suspect in a commencing investigation to the extents in criminality and so that it must be now presumed that she was a worse Secretary of State than at least Condoleezza Rice.

To preserve some “innocent until proven guilty” for Mrs. Clinton, however, we should look firstly at the life and politics - war/anti-war politics of her successor Secretary of State John Kerry.  We should look first at a comparative for prudence secured in “jurisprudence” to his positions re: “BOOTS ON THE GROUND” and her’s, however.

Still, and again, to be of a preserve for any innocence, despite Mrs. Clinton’s years of flip flops over boots on the ground, and indiscriminate droning warring, we can make this more about the life and story of John Kerry as of a query:  TERRORIST OR PEACEMAKER?  But we should behooved of another believed remembered Lara Logan interview that was with a supposed top Taliban leader - yes! before 9/11 II in Benghazi - as contradicting President Obama and Secretary Clinton with his pronouncements to it that the Taliban and Al Qaeda were now much as if one, and, yes, newly.  For a sake of tonality and the horse race of this to a due fair measurement of the saddled guilt just of Mrs. Clinton let us just acknowledge that part of the cover-up relates to it that Benghazi could have been and may be a widening of the theater of war and a “counter-attack” in the Obama/Clinton war of choice in Afghanistan against primarily the (said) Taliban.

Still, and again, to be of a preserve for any innocence, despite Mrs. Clinton’s years of flip flops over boots on the ground, and indiscriminate droning warring, we should be organized as a posse for truths, and too bicamerally in a new bipartisan, yet recognize the evidence that she has set her self (themselves in Clinton) up as if the bad guys in a season of SOPRANOS.  We can’t just jump on her successor if to keeping prudence in jurisprudence for she however measured for her guilt is still of her years as FLOTUS where she did go into rivals turf and incite with incendiary imperialist rhetoric the locals, however tribal, and to such inflaming that those radical already were more radicalized and pushed into corners as if called out by Mrs. Clinton, so, in a pride to a need to “respond.”

So about how bad a Secretary of State John Kerry is, and, too to how he was a most inappropriate selection for any high office in foreign affairs regarding the Middle East, and due to his past pulling of the rug out from under any real potential for success in OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, and so from near the very day and hours the country, with President George W. Bush, had become “committed” with boots on the ground - committed beyond the point of quiet return:

Secretary of State John Kerry while the primary ANTI-WAR SENATOR did do more than any other in the known world to undermine the potential and any ready success for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM.  Mrs. Clinton can hardly have to shoulder all the blame for so much that went wrong much do to the betrayal in a late response as a revival in ANTI-WAR demonstrative tonality, but for her own flipping and flopping fickleness to prudence and loyalty to a committed administration too.  Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha were a tag team that did by their politics so partisan (interpartisan too) were to being those, even more than the Clintons, that did put the lives of all with boots on the ground in Iraq into their unexpected greater peril.  At the time Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha started their ANTI-WAR REVIVAL it was no longer appropriate to take issue with the matter Congress had already voted with, and however Senator Clinton is remembered for admitting that she herself didn’t read the intelligence reports regarding such before her vote.

Mrs. Clinton yet cannot escape that the cover-up seems still to have been necessary to save the cover-up of the culpability and negligence of the Administration of the Clintons.  As it is the known “Benghazi Lies” seem of the worst case scenario need for the dangerous strategy of cover-up, and by Mrs. Clinton who had worked on the committees to impeach Nixon and as of the Clintons’ own Lewinski cover-up, arguably and in an seeming evidence based deciding for if not, as the lies of the Clintons’ cover-up were failing, only lies about their lack of intelligence and understanding about Al Qaeda, at least, needed more lies to preserve any chance of future electability of the Clintons for a retaking of the The White House.

Right!  This is supposed to be an attempt to transfer Clinton guilt, presumed, unto her successor Secretary of State John Kerry, and however as necessary by a looking deeply back at least at his “politics” of his ANTI-WAR REVIVAL as causal to such that maybe can be said to be more, at least, of a Kerry negligence than a Clintons’ gross negligence.

We, if of the lay, should behooved to let the Federal Bureau of Investigation profilers and Defense Department Armed Forces Psychological operations experts take the lead to explaining how devastating Senator John Kerry’s ANTI-WAR REVIVAL, from hour one, was to moral and cooperation of the Iraqi people.  We should expect that experts will be called to parse the level of negligence, at least, to the full measure of at least the guilt of Mrs. Clinton, however, and even towards passing the buck if passable to her successor for his past own culpability for lighting the fire of a belief that the U.S.A. was, due to his lead, ready to CUT AND RUN - REALLY!!!

RIGHT!!! Still, Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, just for the impeachment and disbarrment of the half she supposedly is the better half too, and however of a “great man” she supposedly the “great woman” behind, is even without her experience as Hillary Rodham Clinton of the committees to impeach President Richard Milhous Nixon like the political figure of the modern United States of America whom best should know cover-ups are to be avoided but in worse case political scenarios - She is whom seems best knows how bad things must really should be thought as bad if and when a cover-up is the uncovered strategy.  That Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton herself chose to front with a cover-up does itself suggest so much guilt and a necessity that it may not matter how much blame we can yet transfer to her successor or continue to project upon the Bush Administration. SEEMS!!!

Where did she go wrong?  How are our criticisms of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton enough “well informed”?  Aren’t we at if we just compare her to whom she followed and who followed her that we are fair in reporting and chronicling that she was the worst of three?

The sheer tonality of the remarks from Secretary of State Clinton since the Benghazi lies started did, despite her strategy to run out the clock with Congress, yet have her of self-incrimination and even much that was admitting of ignorance and incompetence at least as to her (like the Administration of the Clintons’ too) as lacking in intelligence.  It seems Congress has her already fit for orange and is now only ready for the House to assess its duty to a determination as to how long she should be fit to only wear orange - however a pants suit or jumpsuit.

NOTE:  There is much to a much longer list if and when to looking only at Mrs. Clinton, however, and of the when-evers, to how that she risked a cover-up over her culpability for the keep of State per the Benghazi consulate, and personnel, that to must reach with the long arms of justice, by the charge and reach Constitutional of the Congress, straight to and also through Mr. William Jefferson Clinton, and any and all of his “foundations” and “initiatives.”  It must be presumed due to a cover-up strategy that Mrs. Clinton while responsible for State & USA oversight of CGI likely was as a spouse afraid to incriminate herself for such seems naturally to also implicate her spouse for his “HOWEVERS” and “WHEN-EVERS” — and for just as long.

However, a STAR WARS defense a greater defense now for the Bushes and Reagan, it seems fair to illicit an imagery for the Clintons as now it seems of them of: A HOUSE OF CLINTONS WITH THEIR SEWERS CLOGGED!

RIGHT!!!  It to Secretary of State John Kerry’s benefit that Mrs. Clinton is taggable, and mashable, and hashable as too much of:  MRS. CLINTON LIED AND SOLDIERS AND DIPLOMATS, AT LEAST, DIED — SHE WAS MOST INDISCRIMINATE IN DRONING WARRING AND AS IN LIEU OF BOOTS ON THE GROUND PARITY OF MISSION.

NOTE:  FOR MORE HISTORY & “BACKGROUND” SEE SORTED BY “CARNEGIE HALL” @ http://bit.ly/ChubbyHubby.  Please get past confusion of voluminous thread opening yet with this same column as its lede or leading piece.

Comments Off
06/04/14
THE PATERNITY TESTING?
Filed under: AUTO-BIO'D, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, TREASON, #WHITEPRIDE, #BLAME, #MAGIC, #NEW_YORK, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:23 am

CAPITALISM is better than the too existent (Clinton / Democrats) POLITICS by THEFT and LIES!

This is so about “capitalism” as it is of what paternity tests around supposed Clinton “off-spring” would reveal as not actually their’s.

We are of trying economic days from tragedies of error by Democrats at attempts in governance while pretenders.  It will start to seem especially politically tragic when I expose how the Clintons as such “pretenders” created a realm of “over-confidence” that then had Barack Hussein Obama too presumptuous as to what wasn’t that of “capitalists” and as if that of “government.”

This is not now being exposed as an official report of a still covert or mysterious actual paternity of so much long in creation of great goods through maximizing positive change and its potential as a most evolutionary way for the The United State of America to progress after becoming the sole super-power in the known world.  This is written in a sharing so that people can make better decisions by knowing truths about “parenting” falsely prided too long by politicians.  This is written today as Father’s Day is approaching for it relates to “politics” without being “partisan” to how some Democrats do belong under serious investigation and towards real jail time in an incarcerated imprisonment some respective of fraud and truth in advertising “standards” at least.

Yes CAPITALISM, at least as per my interpretation and ambition to my own story of “business plans”, is better than how the Clintons alone did render me no longer able to afford to be in business to fix my legacy so that it was still available for them to pilfer to still look as good as it used to make them “officially” appear.  Because the Clintons were of priding and preening themselves from misuse and misappropriation of a capitalism of one trying to set a new and improved evolved and progressive standard for “media moguls” there are some like George Stephanopoulus whom likely is now still too “associated.”

My work at making the Clintons electable in 1992 was serious work of my CITIZEN ROSEBUD capitalist ambitions and by then already tested business plan.  My story of “parenting” evolved positive change is of a greater to the lesser of that which the Clintons were of a lesser of the whole of what it was I was at in a “capitalism” patriotic.  The Benghazi Select Committee seems sufficiently endowed and purposed to Duty such to discern whom is also wrongly of a pride (or gaggle) of the Clintons.

There is - there are many paper trails to reveal this pathology of falsity in the pride(s) of the Clintons / Democrats.  There are interesting political twists involving Governor Sarah Heath Palin as for so much of my decades to such in my “capitalism” was of “controls” and/or “checks” such as how I was covertly being like a grandfather to my sister while being a covert and pro-active (like) father to my father I was to giving away the same idea(s) many times otherwise to others on more Republican or “conservative” tracks like Sarah Palin known to me since the winter of 1982-83.

The sad but eventually laughable is how Barack Hussein Obama got trapped and fell to associations like with Secretary Chuck Hagel and Director Brennan after I had shut down my “capitalism” for I couldn’t afford then to be in business once the Clintons announced their intent to retake the The White House in 2007.  There is a name association that relates to President Obama as like Sarah Palin but with he one whom benefited from my knowing him of Presidential oratory challenge interests since he was in High School and I in 7th grade.  Of my “capitalism” was the business smarts to never forget a classmate named Steven Brennen the wise aleck who like play pre-Google “operator” to all “orator” “competitors” in Hawaii from our classroom in New Haven, and as it was to be wise in New Haven while so ambitious in “media mogul” ambitions in capitalism to not ignore the proud Richard Hegel, New Haven Historian, whose Christmas parties my family had long attended.

When I had to shut down due to the Clintons I then was no longer in business and the covert hobby of being so a grand parent to my sister and her “work” and “politics” and nor then as well as it long was the father to my father in creative and mostly pro-active covert wizardry in networked web weaving.  Senator Obama got caught for when I stopped the “magic” stopped flowing as already “fixed” through my father and my sister to him.  I hadn’t, while fighting the Clintons further attempts to render my “capitalism” as their personal but “government property”, so by needing to shut down in like what I otherwise call my RANDIAN STRIKE from the day “HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT” was born just of them, been wise to need to fight the old know B.O. four years older from Hawaii so.  It was between his entry into the Presidential race and then after my incidentally helping him by working myself to defeat the Clintons to protect my intellectual property rights that I finally realized too late that he was getting free help from me through my sister because I hadn’t yet associated Barack Obama with the B.O. known so since the late 1970s.

I have known the Clintons longer yet than Sarah Heath Palin and Barack Hussein Obama for I have known them and been alarmed with them since I met them while I was a first grader in New Haven about a year, maybe before Watergate.  I can hardly blame my father or my sister so for what I was at was developmental and in a covert that had much that was to lift their “boats” up as I worked and worked to my greater ambitions of my networking at CITIZEN ROSEBUD capitalism as cleaner than politics for wanting “success” from people choosing to buy what I thought I should try to sell.  But for President Obama when I asserted with AG Holder my rights in intellectual property and “capitalism” so to it that President Obama was told I had a right to keep him from a free use of my “capitalism” “off-spring” it was he got kind of stuck.

President Obama was not barred from arranging a contractual and agreed to use at full market value.  As it was I would have stipulated I needed to be made whole from the decade plus of the Clintons’ misappropriations and reuses and attempts yet to further unauthorized reuses.  As it was President Obama couldn’t very well be of his “First Black” “personality presidency” if he had to acknowledge me and contract a fair and severely limited use “arrangement” in “capitalism.”

For the purposes of today and the approaching Father’s Day it behoove you to test yourselves, however, to discover how President William Jefferson Clinton is really not the “father” you have believed him to be and nor he that his Mrs. has continued to persist in purporting him as.  Just my 7 book challenge to JK Rowling for progressing books as if school years was of such entire “covert” realm and my wizardry and yet also moderated in its unspoken of purposes to be yet one way I could assert in a repeat a capability in such as the above jurisdictions.  To be brief that I am the father of the HARRY POTTER books and magic “realm” it behoove all to see that it was figured too in an attempt to yet protect a new generation from the Clintons I so knew - knew too well.

There are complications in my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM when I was so afoot stealthily in my CITIZEN ROSEBUD media mogul ambitions with my fall back to be just a top Madison Avenue Ad Man - “Mad Man”.  I pretty much cut off my fall back within my fall back after 1994 sweep for my sister so to have some place to go after abruptly leaving Senator Dodd’s State Office as his State Director like as due a “political” “Peter Principle.”  I was shifting to “political writing” and further overt and covert efforts at such post New World Order birthing of the The United States of America yet reborn as a sole super-power and knew by then I wouldn’t need my fall back to my fall back, and even as it were the Clintons “governance” too much of inappropriate misappropriation and misuse and sub-optimal use of my “capitalism.”

There are complications that go to also past relationships as too “personal” and “private” and “complicated” for one alone became of my agreeing to help the daughter then of the CFO of IBM with her father while it was that I saw a way to help him with my “capitalism” and tested business plan to performing in such agreement by helping him fix IBM from afar and at times still too covertly in “marketing” “wizardry” “magic” unsolicited “guidance.”  James Burke who later led the search for Akers & Metz - CEO & CFO replacements at IBM was the last top Johnson & Johnson executive I think my maternal grandfather as a top New York City Madison Avenue Marketing and Advertising executive with Young & Rubicam had last professionally associated.

For now there is that I can never in one day recall all that I “parented” in a “paternity” pathology of my “capitalism” of and to my CITIZEN ROSEBUD media mogul ambitions and how so much I gave away and gave away to others not the Clintons for I was expecting to be able to keep what the Clintons mistook for myself.  President Obama still is facing that he wanted a “personality presidency” and any public use of my vast creative successes wound necessarily be needing a stipulation contractual that I in some way become made whole from the Clintons and their pride’s misappropriate or kidnapped uses.

Just in the category of what I gave to NBC and about GE CEO Jack Welch is a category of mused to great successes I too cannot fully recall yet in any singular day.  And, with that is too how American Corporate “leaders” needed to be saved from themselves as we were like in a war none of them had seen coming.  This though is a part of the story that precedes the Clintons but then explains as foundational to their unexpected rise how it is that they of Governor Clinton true self like of his 1988 Democratic Party Convention speech did actually SURPRISE in 1992.

There is, to be still brief, besides many most successful sitcoms also my godfathering the modern snowboard design and the half-pipe, the Stanley Tools reinvention of the hand saw, and mass market broadcast to tell my “capitalist” network I liked the start-up “LIFE IS GOOD” brand that my old but not known until 5th reunion Villanova University classmate was of three years trying to launch with his brother but yet unsuccessfully.  There is more and more and more and more somewhere at least partly at http://CitizenRosebud.info of category 4 as my AUTO BIO’D marginalized “category.”

WARNING!!!  Many of my “birthed” successes were cross pollinated - like - like as that some that I mused around for one of such was also otherwise a basis and commonality for other(s).

Comments Off
06/03/14
THERE SHE BLOWS?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, #CGI, #QUEEN, WAR ON WOMEN, #NEW_YORK
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 1:03 pm

With an American in Poland old freshness now soured rises anew of the “among the vicissitudes incident to life” parity of President George Washington firstly speaking so in New York City - and so metaphorically for a new born nation.  We are forced to a consideration of Herman Melville if only of any “Moby Dick” as a “Great White…” - seems.

Let us get to some technicalities in a measurement of any said a “Longest War”!  Now:

When did this “Longest War” not a “longest war” start but under the “Diplomacy” (failed) of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton?  She seemed to start with a forced (political) surge as if “diplomatic” and postured and postured as if of a violate actually a declared (necessary) war.  She seemed to have left her office in a worsened “Diplomatic” state than she found it;  Hillary Rodham Clinton, however, must have failed at any and all “diplomatic solutions” for such as (”Hillary’s War) to be a “war” and a “longest war” however hardly actually a “longest” or “declared” war.

This “Longest War” didn’t start under/during the Presidential administering of President George W. Bush.  President Bush traded for trespass rights with the sovereign of Afghanistan to be “in country” investigatively and purposely looking for about 50 foreigners as “campers” and some to much “trespassers” themselves.  A fact of Afghanistan is how tribal it is so that it seems Al Qaeda “campers” didn’t need or have any cooperation or real authorization in shared purposes with a majority.

To get to the metric and an honesty of chronological measurement to a/the failure in “Diplomatic” by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton however not a “Longest War” it behoove any to frame and key their probatives around a postulating that it could only have been so if she was of failing and failing and failing and failing and failing years at finding (as like now) a “diplomatic” end/solution.  For purposes of ratio - it seems as now with “war” announced as like “over” that she herself just needed all those long years to herself just offer to declare “war is over” to have “reset” the Clinton PEACE.

We can hardly presume Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton of a accepted “innocence” or “authority” in “rightness” for it is her State Department of the OBAMA RETREAT from Iraq - so injudiciously and prematurely.  What for the sake of measuring the body of Mrs. Clinton’s “Diplomacy” have been the costs of such a brutal abandonment of Iraq and so after so much was spent to build a new - a brand new and like most expensive newest and largest newest - Embassy in Iraq?  Her numbers of any metric so far seem far from actually flattering.

Perchance a parsing to it best to brine to thin the fats of any meat on the thighs of the leg work “diplomatic” of Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton before any roasting or exposing of her as if already too fried?  Right!!! It seems there are no “wings of Hillary”!  It seems she can be judged to for it having to be her and her alone and such to that now it “evidence based” deciding to discern there is not a flock at the ready as lifted to by her drafts as of a keep of a flock as a metaphor as of any if “under another’s wings”!  It seems the Clintons have buried any Democrat woman who could be a threat to Mrs. Clinton;  It seems there are bodies of women Democratic in Party to yet look for as subdued and like “buried” by the Clintons.

She walks in shadows of valleys of death of so many of suffrage and suffering from a darkness in the eclipse of President William Jefferson Clinton still at blocking so many from a clear “light”!  It is yet publicly clear how it is that it seems there are no Democrat Party women to “challenge” Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as if she is only the queen bee of Democrat female bees and of a power only possible if there are not any that haven’t like also compromised themselves from a bedding with he whom as also presumed to be a first President of the World.

So until recently Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was supposed to see President Barack Hussein Obama as her “BOSS” and however like either “Ahab” or a “Great White Whale” himself.  It was odd and awkward from the start of her submissiveness that she both as Mr. & Mrs. Clinton were of political & party pressure to have her boss tag her “two-fer” as “rivals” and how while so was of incredible insubordination to President Obama as her “Moby Dick” that she declared she was to be so of her declaration to be of “leadership” from taking her “inspiration” (seems) from the same place Dante found his (for his Inferno?).

Again her measurements for her body in “diplomatic” treading are not flattering.  Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton, however, however now more “first lady” in all corporated appearances to Mr. William Jefferson Clinton, did neither have “Hard Choices” of a “war” nor “necessary war” nor of an operating actually a “longest war.”  Before there was a Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton however the “great woman” behind and success of her “BOSS” President Obama there was mostly just “operations” in Afghanistan of trespass rights from trading building roads and schools endeavors.

As it seems too measurable that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as a Cabinet Officer and “executive” is of so many short comings “evidently” when an “evidence based” review is past even an initial probative it therefore is transparent that she (and more than President Barack Hussein Obama) is of having #FAILED!

But in the failures and failing of Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, however, aren’t we behooved to be to a:

1.  WHAT WAS HER MANAGEMENT STYLE?
2.  WAS SHE A BROWN NOSER?
3.  WAS SHE A SUCK-UP?
4.  WAS SHE TOO EASY?
5.  WAS IS THAT SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE CLEARLY
     SEEN IN A LIGHT OF “FAILURE” FAR EARLIER IF HER
     HUSBAND VIA APPEARANCES OF #CGI WASN’T A
     SUGAR DADDY OF “BROWN BAG” GLOBAL POLITICS
     TO GREASE THE FOREIGN INFLUENCES (TO PERSONAL
     EMOLUMENTS THEY THOUGH THEY COULD CALL
     “POLITICAL CAPITAL”?)
6.  IF SHE DID “IMPROVE” (LEGALLY) “FOREIGN RELATIONS”
     ANYWHERE - HOW DID SHE?
7.  DID SHE PUT HER HUSBAND FIRST OVER HER “BOSS”
     ALWAYS?

Is it now the country is in a pickle for a divided Democrat “house” of a “party divided” and some for she having lived up to the “Hillary is too polarizing” tag so that her rap is judicious and a queriousness risen to how now Democrat female under her of “wings” as if all Democrat women have been corrupted by the Clintons and unable to rise without tagging themselves in a self-incrimination if at attempting to boldly step out to incriminate Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, however?

Where are all the Democrat female leaders buried - where is Mrs. Clinton’s female “competition”?  Is it that only the Republicans have now grown new party boughs free of the tree of Clintons’ corruption where whence it was the GOP had near none whom could rise to incriminate the “The Clinton” without also self-incrimination?

O Democrats, O Democrats — Where for art thee a one you can smartly call a “Captain”?

Comments Off