hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
May 2013
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
05/31/13
> #BLAME&GO <
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:01 am
> A MUCH DUE TREATMENT 4 #OBAMA <

>>> A TRAGIC NOT COMIC TAG <<<

>  STORIES COMING SOME SOON  <
Comments Off
05/30/13
PILGRIMS
Filed under: POLITICS, TWO HISTORIES, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:50 am

With a corn cob pipe*, and a good community not too bent to a new nationalism unnecessary for these days, many churn as much philosophically and/or theologically as those whence thence as of trying days that shackled many while however of colonial English of the Mayflower, Oliver Cromwell and yes, Rene Descartes.

This should be a hard, very hard, summer for nationalist Democrats however Clinton loyalists or Obama loyalists.  These are days of intra-party battles like of a war for legacy now necessary between the clan of Bill and Hillary and that of @BarackObama.  They cannot both be right - it doesn’t figure and/or fit intelligently with histories of the past couple decades.

I don’t know what you would think of a member of your own working community if they needed a philosophy of governance for their job and yet proceeded to till only as if their personality and all its emotional whimsy should be sufficient for prudent organizing.

Rene Descartes either made the warped keel’d ship of states of the Clintons or the made it plain that their “separations” have many now born witness of a time attitudinal for a new separatist philosopher of philosophical reckoning nearer to Descartes than justified since at least the first Tea Party by freedom loving people of American shores.

These sands of time so set whence, how then thence so newly by the Founding Fathers of the Constitution of the United States, as their ramblings set by preamble “do ordain and establish” so under God as by their God of the New Testament are coincidentally again of times of concern for excess taxation from sees too distant to be proper and prudent for their reworked sense of community, secured and long protected as set constituted in the “Year of our Lord” of the unanimously scribed set specially officially.

Politically speaking it may be strategically simpler to dissect and deconstruct the co-Presidency of the Clinton “two-fer” philosophically than to find philosophy and logic a reasonable tool to unshackle President Obama now from a time of arresting politics his.  President Obama is too much as if subjective than objective while holding so loosely to a governance styled more as if of man than laws while stubbornly trenchant of his will to be a PERSONALITY BASED PRESIDENT.  The Clitntons at least have an elaborate political con of decades of selfish spousal ambition to thrash here and there to unearth as many buried stores they spirit where ever however.  The Clintons and their institutional “two-fer” is set to be objective and separate from subjective;  The Clintons are ripe for a long overdue harvest of critical pickings and mashing.

Politically speaking it is remarkable that President Barack Hussein Obama, with his Harvard Law Degree, is due to be stripped down bare to the bones, politically, and sold newly in these times newly fit for community based raising for concerns for excess taxation and with the distance to sees of power again a intellectual condition.  It is remarkable too that President Obama while only able to carry himself so in these times while so exposed is of his hootin’ and hollerin’ better to have been prepared for with a Harvard Divinity School degree than his taken law degree.

A walking talking dandy of a socialist interpretation of the US Constitution he has turned out to be.  And a conundrum about our First Amendment more emotional and subjective than logically or philosophically - he is.  It is this summer we are to pull ourselves up by the proverbial bootstraps of a necessary intellectualism and political criticism of Rene Descartes and the Clintons, and President Obama and a subjective governance evidently lacking a philosophy of governance - seems.

It may be that it is easier to judge President B. O. as like a book by its cover than to reckon President Clinton and the co-Presidency of the Clinton “two-fer’ for a popularity that can be dissected live and slowly, now, now because of so much Clinton propaganda too viewed already.  It does seem President B. H. Obama was of a personality that needed he to have the highest of possible theological disciplinary training say from Harvard Divinity School and that his law degree has just been causing him perspective problems.  It was odd to see a President regardless of our said separations for Church and State as a conundrum about religiousity as a lawyer so long in those first broadcast interruptions for hour long evangelizing so.  It may have been more odd for him to have been a minister and to such attempts to evangelize as still as if a new messiah - but he likely would have had the training prerequisite for a selling of himself and his worth thence - and maybe still.

If he were a Pilgrim, or just of those days and times, however kept in time by sands - Hmmm?

Would he have refused to plant and harvest - would he have avoided labors even of collecting fuel/firewood?

President Barack Hussein Obama - if you were of the days of those that were of the Mayflower and the Pilgrims would you have been too much an outsider to be yourself Oliver Cromwell?  Mr. President, as it is easier to dissect either and both Clintons most critically logically, and philosophically, it remains that you may be too much a subjective conundrum consideration as if you would have yourself if of day whence thence to have been more a recluse separatist elite like Rene Descartes. 

We are Americans of the Northern continent, to be frank, we are, and the President, so asserted, are together citizens of the Constitution of the United States as respective of Pilgrims here and forever as a home for freedoms prudently set to stay for Posterity.  What the Founders harvested from that sown by the Pilgrims is still the Law of the Presidency however its distant holder now may be bent of labors to reconstruct so much as if always meant to be otherwise nearer quite Marxist or nationalist socialist. 

What is philosophy, and how can President Obama have been better served to have been of a keep of Pilgrim and Puritan harvests spiritually had he taken a divinity degree and not his law degree?  Is it because he could have been a black Rene Descartes newly or whence thence if so that I stoke these colonial sparks around issues of he as seems sold without being of a philosophy of governance?

One who professes to be to a PERSONALITY BASED PRESIDENCY as whether up worthingly as a new messianic should have had a Pilgrim sense at least a priori that such would be likely to him as of a governance too subjective and threateningly too near a government of man while a Constituted Government of Laws still of these Pilgrims’ seeds and lands.

These are days for a hard summer for Democrats.  A live dissection of the Clintons has some already commenced, and, so at a pace to be most thorough and slow.  Did you know that the Pilgrims are of a time like these and that such a time did thence produce Oliver Cromwell legacy and the limited separatist philosophical and/or theological writings of Rene Descartes?

Mr. President wasn’t our Constitution unanimously subsribed under God in the Year of the Founders’ Lord so as a protection for existent and future Pilgrims however within a sovereignty of the United States of North America?

*{corn cob pipe mention is as prop/propism - it is not meant to be or not be an endorsement for/of tobacco}

Comments Off
05/27/13
BEYOND THE PALE
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, OBAMACARE, #SUSPECT, #WHITEPRIDE, #MORALS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:57 am

Happy Memorial Day 2013.

Today seems a very good day to press out some not too simple reasoned thoughts about the state of the United States of America and/or it Politics - political history.

I don’t want this piece to be about race or specifically about failures of the first actually “black” President of the United States.  It may be beyond a pale to discuss his darkness as of his darkness, however black enough or maybe not black enough.

It isn’t on a proud readiness of the citizens of the United States of America to which this presser broadside is primarily to be worked through as about the “pride” citizens should have that the USA was ready to elect a black president.

It is inescapable that Barack Hussein Obama is black and also now too much that he is justly being compared to a white tagged as “Criminal” Richard Milhous Nixon.  Impeachment may be looming - looming large and realistically for Harvard Law Grad and former Constitutional Law Professor B. Obama.

So let’s just look at the whites of the team of rivals of the USA’s first black President. 

All that now is actionable, however just this far, and just as for an administration a “the most corrupt ever” as beyond a pale of political decency may be most of a culpability of the paler whiter of his careful selection and management.  It may be hard to step so far so fast as to a “it is all Hillary Clinton’s fault” but yet that may be a more just broadcast presser.  It could be too much affirmative action for a hoped for 1st female to assert first an affirmative action for a US executive to be slammed firstly though as due at least an equally affirming action as a 1st black as a 1st female might get, however wrong or right.

It wasn’t the first black President whom after 9/11 II showed a deep ignorance still about 9/11 I and intelligence per the Middle East since.  No!  That was his paler white female Secretary of State Madam Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton - Former First Lady.  It is worse than all the “PLAYING POLITICS” both are now seriously suspect of while officially expected to be above such a pale - embarrassment;  President Obama’s Secretary of State though with some outburst @ Congress did admit to a culpability for the senseless loss of the Benghazi Four. 

It was Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, Former First Lady Hillary, who embarrassed herself and the United States of America or at least its State Department with her first official remarks after the dreadful tragic loss of the American Consulate in Libya and the Benghazi Four.  It is unthinkable how she could have had such a naive perspective in her official remarks posited from the dais of the seventh floor at State. 

It was Obama’s “Hillary” who wasn’t ready for a 9/11 II whether on day one or at 3 am - as it turns out.  It was naive and embarrassing that she officially spoke about the attacks of September 11, 2012 with a too personal addendum integral to her speechifying like:  I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS COULD HAPPEN IN A  COUNTRY I LIBERATED.

For now it seems that black President Obama is above the fray and beyond the pale - whites - more central to the too criminal sloppy management across different departments within his team of rivals officialdom.  It may not be quite believable that he as his long shown self of a desire to have a “personality based” Presidency and to need BEER SUMMITS for speaking out too early as if a ready judge, jury and executioner can not get pulled down at least by white Hillary Clinton for her also sloppy “customer service” (management).  His “Hillary” showed her intelligence and foundation was flawed with her too personal official and naive remark after the tragic loss of Americans in Benghazi.  Hillary Rodham Clinton as Secretary of State in President Barack Hussein Obama’s TEAM OF RIVALS admitted to having a ridiculous and impossible view of the Middle East and for her Diplomatic Mission when of orating that she couldn’t believe such an attack could happen.

This has to go above the seventh floor of the State Department and all the way up to however raised a dais of the President is.

He has to himself really be wondering sure like:  WHAT DID SHE KNOW AND WHEN DID SHE KNOW IT.

But he has to be able to have the buck stop at his however raised dais of the Presidency as well with a consideration that he is not beyond the pale & beyond a due process for official embarrassment at least for his “Hillary” for having had on blinders - so it seems.

He has to himself be now more concerned of a:  WHAT DIDN’T SHE KNOW?  HOW LONG HASN’T SHE KNOWN?  HOW COULD SHE NOT HAVE KNOWN?  HOW LONG COULD HE HAVE NOT SEEN THAT SHE DIDN’T KNOW?

President Barack Hussein Obama, however black, and due an American celebration by its people for themselves of having shown the world that citizens of the United States of America are modern and compassionate already enough to be beyond accepting black leadership. 

But “Hillary” isn’t alone in being a more pale embarrassment while of the Black President’s TEAM OF RIVALS. 

But with that said we can this Memorial Day remember that Governor Mitt Romney cost himself the last election and maybe for driving to much as if black Obama - on healthcare. 

It is difficult to believe that after Governor Mitt Romney suggested that if white he were elected and black President Obama defeated he would repeal and replace OBAMACARE with ROMNEYCARE he had a chance with common sense citizens.

Governor Mitt Romney only offered basically that citizens of the United States should elect him to solve healthcare because he was white, maybe.  It could be a fairness thing that since he was white when he got ROMNEYCARE passed in a liberal Massachusetts he thought that as long as President Barack H. Obama was saying OBAMACARE IS ROMNEYCARE then he should be voted to a defeat of black President Obama because it wasn’t honorable for his ROMENYCARE to be stolen from him and taken as if that the work of another.

But beyond that Governor Mitt Romney may have had a moral case, after President Obama himself asserted that OBAMACARE is ROMNEYCARE, such that since so it should be returned to its rightful owner and he that admitted/confessed a stealing should at least be defeated it rests that as long as OBAMACARE WAS ROMNEYCARE and Governor Mitt Romney yet was saying that if he was elected he would repeal and replace OBAMACARE with ROMNEYCARE it actually seemed simply political that it would have been racist to have elected Mitt Romney unless of a moral standing that OBAMACARE was a theft of ROMNEYCARE.

So simply the field is set and there seems an impossibility in our modern politics that Democrats can offer a road of any sort back to a bi-partisan politics in Washington DC.

It is impossible to believe that Obama’s Secretary of State couldn’t have known about Iraq and years of attacks on State Department facilities or people.  It is irrational to believe that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as former First Lady or Secretary of State had any reasonable basis to believe an attack like that of 9/11 II couldn’t happen in a country she liberated.

It is beyond a pale for US politics and Diplomacy that “Hillary” however now culpable also for PLAYING POLITICS at least with the deaths of the BENGHAZI FOUR isn’t of having been at President Obama’s side for so long, however in a TEAM OF RIVALS, is an embarrassment due a subpoena by Congress and with her Middle East expert too, as the wife of Bill Clintons’ protege Anthony Weiner, if “Hillary” wasn’t just PLAYING POLITICS, must, it seems, have been the Secretary’s go to person to be best able to explain the events of our second 9/11.

It may have been all the white people whom have seemingly taken black President Barack H. Obama beyond the pale to such official and embarrassing days as these with a potpourri of scandals, and, all worst when each looked at as to consider if the President of the United States wasn’t just PLAYING POLITICS.

And, yes!  Yes Governor Mitt Romney lost the last election less because he was white and the President was black but that he himself blurred the lines and issues while maybe too prideful with his campaigning on his desires to basically repeal and replace OBAMACARE with ROMNEYCARE and while the country was believing that OBAMACARE was ROMNEYCARE.

Comments Off
05/23/13
“PEACE” NIXS
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, OBAMACARE, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, #NEW_YORK, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:24 am

As a political writer I am sitting here with Memorial Day Weekend near wondering how to cover Democrat Leaders fresh and stale as of their Obamacare of Darwinian concerns.

Are we of days of lesser weevils like rotten apples about a Bernoulli greater evils of like rotten apples in your bushels?

Oh my!  Are these days of lifts or down drafts - more days of political dark clouds nearer than the horizon?  Can I even remember how or why a old college Economics Professor did once call the Bernoulli Principle a “bad apple theorem”?  May be easier now to just wonder how a new municipal politics is afoot for a Big Apple - and due some damming.  Whom may crowe about lesser or greater weevils may be ravenous too much of old evils said of an Axis of Evil.

How Manhattan may all memorialize a loose Union anew in 2013 seems now for the picking as about East Egg & West Egg escapism of old fashioned Leonardoesque capping.  What is the weevil in the barrels truly of the Clintons’ evil of old avoidance and inaction than cannot long support still their old “PEACE” for “PEACE DIVIDENDS”?

Has it been seventeen years already since when Bill and Hillary Clinton should have measure Saddam Hussein as a serpent in their garden and but how Biblical moved so judiciously and civilly prudently for a prosecution in full of all sanctions and crimes held up against Iraq’s tyrannical leader?

Do New Yorkers have among them already a perfect Super Bowl Mayor candidate for 2013 political harvesting?

Among the ebb and flow and thermodynamics of our current political pickings there may be a need to dam some old currents to stem a re-streaming of conditions from the conscious politics of the Clintons still to causing turbulence of/from unstable “hot-air.”

It may this weekend be more difficult to pick through the Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama for “good fruit” even if of like Mr. Binks of Rudyard Kipling’s MUNICIPAL sewers keeping.  Yes Ja Ja Binks seems to be still quite a Gunga Din.  Yes, President Barack H. Obama did receive a Nobel Peace Prize.  Yes, the President of the United States, currently, when of his acceptance speech for his Peace Prize was early to a damming of old lingering dangerous fruits of Clintons’ evils in their avoidance and inaction, globally.

Do you - all New Yorkers - take Bill and Hillary to be yours - yours as embraced New Yorkers?  Do you take carpetbagger Hillary Clinton of a bought nepotic Senate acquisition by Executive arrangements of and by her spouse while then a seated President of the United States of America?  How whether you take them as your own is it that it was fair that she Hillary was allowed to campaign for Senate and the Presidency legally at least while of the full protection and its pomp and circumstancing luxury of the details for a term limited President?  What is “not fair” - what is “NOT FAIR!!!”?

Do you yet get the import of the apple of the eyes of the Eightieth Congress as entrenched for now still by the existent 22nd Amendment of a careful “holding” poetic legalese to keep our term limits Amendment supposedly from being just a loop hole say for FDR to have just run again after two terms on his wife’s name Eleanor Roosevelt?  Our Constitutional Amendment for term limits upon our President was a reaction to Franklin and Eleanor.  Our Constitutional Amendment so written by the Eightieth Congress and ratified by the nation does respect that marriage laws and “holding” of united souls in marriage unions can not be set asunder for an interpretation of their limiting writ as if an election of one spouse to a holding isn’t actually also an indivisible by election working to a “some” or maybe “much” “holding” of such office by the other spouse.

There is a serpent of knowledge awaiting our Constitution as our 22nd Amendment is still on the books yet as undecided law.

By it being now undecided law so much can be said as if its original or derived intent to tag current politicians with labeling as if Criminal - Un-Constitutional - Treasonous.  But for now it is a knowledge of a united two in marriage union that can not be set asunder by its legal “holding” so that the “holding” of the 22nd Amendment can reasonably be to allowing legally for Hillary Clinton to run for President as an election of her would then effect a by election “holding” some or much of office again by her spouse.  Bill Clinton is not allowed to be returned to any holding of the office of the President by election and as he is indivisible from his marriage holding and union Hillary Clinton is not a legal eligible candidate for an election of her would return Bill Clinton by election to at least some “holding” Constitutionally barred.

But New Yorkers this is more about the Big Apple and so much long fought for since THE FEDERALIST PAPERS were written as if by Publius to defend the hopes of a more perfect Union of the Founding Fathers, and, as written to defend such from an earlier Clinton of New York politics who had more empirical and/or imperialistic designs too like these still in our faces newer Clintons.  We have that these days are much like the days of the Founding Fathers of the United States and yet now with it just a new Clintons about a similar resistance but now as per more global opportunities to less than Constitutional designs.

Enter again our concerns about President Barack H. Obama even as he seemed smarter (smart enough) earlier at least when to tagging the Clintons with a global guilt from their years of administering with so much international inaction and avoidance.  Enter again the current President who early did so speak seemingly erudite about DANGERS!!! from politics like that of the real legacy of Bill and Hillary and their Presidency.

It may be necessary to go all Darwinian “survival of the species” political in 2013 at least while discussing how important it may be to over-turn Obamacare.  It may be about what has to be dammed that is of old unstable turbulence from “hot-air” of the Clintons’ administering - Quite!  It may now be seriously that we have to dam both the Clintons and their protege(s) and as well Obamacare - REALLY!  We have that we aren’t getting economic lift maybe because the Apple of the Clintons is spoiling the whole lots of bushels.

There was no real “PEACE” in their days as “two-fer” intimates engaged however properly or devilishly in a holding of the office of the President of the United States of America.  Their “PEACE DIVIDENDS” were more conjured as of evil spirits then and of a poisonous fruit of “PEACE” then as a BIG LIE.  The already recorded “legacy” of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is coincidentally also able to be of a tag on Clintons as of too much hedging and too little fruit baring economics.  New Yorkers may better than most recall that in 1993 when sworn in the “two-fer” Clintons were to inheriting a almost already recovered from recession economy.  What happened after 1993 was that they worked an evil devilish selfish politics of a fattening of a recovered economy so that they could have headlines to make people around the world believe that they had made the economy better. 

By now it may be that New Yorkers are the ones behind the bad air and drafts of the Clintons and some how of political blinders to an ignorance that the Clintons did actually cause most of the economic conditions that made the collapse possible.

They while wanting to be loved as like PEACENIKS are actually of such as of theirs as of “PEACE” then actually of the rot with the collapse much of from their pickings to PEACE DIVIDEND popularity from now more obviously questionable (lies) about “peace.”

Afghanistan and Iraq are the two greatest failures about such BIG LIES by the administration of the Clinton “two-fer” and specifically what our current President was admonishing when with his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech was to careful tagging of DANGERS from “inaction” and “avoidance.”  Yes these are the same Clintons that after eight years didn’t even leave a succeeding President a single option on the table as per even just Saddam Hussein and a full prosecution or enforcement of him by rights established with United Nations agreements.

The politics of both the Clintons and Obama as per ACA - Obamacare is such that a devolution may now result from an over coddling new nationalism with their centralized near BIG BROTHER/BIG SISTER “caring” governance.  The more they get citizens (subjects) to let the Government do for them the less capable such as a species of Americans should then develop and evolve in years with as still of a natural selection “survivor” trait(s).  The old “AMERICAN” may be a dying bread - Quite!

The Clintons’ “PEACE” for their desired devilish wants for a rare popularity for/from “PEACE DIVIDENDS” can be said to be a bigger and proven more dangerous lie than that of President Bush when after the Presidency of the Clintons seemed to be with Americans down to near only one way left to proceed with a due prosecution of Saddam Hussein, and to tagging as “Bush lied - soldiers died.”

As the Clintons’ “PEACE” was maybe the biggest and most dangerous lie by an American leader in the past twenty years, and seemingly because “Bill” just wanted to be lovable as like a Dove, it is still dangerous that the Clintons seem too institutionalized in their marriage and of a plot to allow “Bill” to be the “Dove” and then to shock and awe with “Hillary” later allowed to be the “Hawk.”

But will the over-coddling socialism reaching centralizing attempts by the lot of Democrat leaders lead to a devolution of the American species?  With the Government trying to have power to do more for Americans of that which Americans were long strong and proud for being of a self sufficiency won’t it be more of a survival of the species Darwinism to Americans to devolving not evolving as a class or species?

This Memorial Day Weekend it would behoove New Yorkers of Mayoral Race of 2013 much also to consider that the world has not become a better place with the new Clintons trying to effect globally quite what an earlier New York politician Clinton did once unsuccessfully after being confronted by Publius and his THE FEDERALIST PAPERS.

The bad apples now possibly about the Big Apple municipal political reset are of turbulence that needs to be dammed or damned still of an inferno of Hillary and her crusading while FLOTUS.  She was having trouble being right recently on foreign affairs and the Middle East not just because of limits of her “experts” - she is quite able to be tagged as blinded as well by the hot-air streaming nonsense of the “PEACE” they pimp’d that never actually existed.

New Yorkers if you do still take the Clintons as yours will you if and when the Congress deems it wise to subpoena maybe both Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and dig deep into as well all matters and monies movements via the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVES?  Benghazi is a scandal that for its cover-up opens up a concern that the cover-up was politically needed because they had been wrong about intelligence and history and at risk each or all as possibly of being to naively funding like a by material support the very terrorism they were supposedly fighting.

Please do consider either whether right to choose the less of the two weevils and how to now choice something better than a consideration just politically as a “lesser of the two evils.”

[note:  I am still of the strategic opinion I figured since before the Clintons did enter 1992 race and so of from before I helped make them electable in part because of such concerns in my philosophical strategizing about my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that the Clintons or a re-elected President Bush was best to move to prosecute Saddam Hussein within that new term.  What was needed after the Persian Gulf War to be done before it was likely safe to move finally against Saddam Hussein was that at least New York City and its Time Square and Las Vegas had to first have started a real revival and urban renewal with Community Policing.  It still seems plausible that Saddam Hussein had a way to defeat the new sole superpower USA in a global PR war if we didn’t show the world that Americans could fix their own cities before asserting that they could run Baghdad better than he.  It still hasn’t made sense to me for USA to have not moved for a full enforcement of the United Nations sanction on Saddam Hussein and his Iraq within what was the first term of the Clintons’ “two-fer.”]

Comments Off
05/14/13
THE RECOVERY
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, #CGI, #MUSIC
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:36 am

The worse news possible for President Obama and the Clintons’ machine is that a Republican RECOVERY is already stoked and ready.  It may be unseen by most and yet quite entrenched and ready - already.  These are bad days for the Democrats.

Much of the economy when allowed to work free of Government suppression is based on teams and competition.  Obama & Democrats have been to a politically controllable “THE GOVERNMENT MADE IT” and as of Obama’s airey spiriting to spread “you didn’t build it” over-lording.  It may be as simple now to recover our economy of citizens from his as if of “subjects” most quickly by showing that he and they are just obstacles blocking the way back to a vibrant economy.

There is your faith now - your trust now too - much to be concerned with if such can be so simply true.  It may help to start by asking yourself if President Bill Clinton isn’t now working so hard to appear to be being of a doing of good primarily because of a great need from a guilt to be to assuaging his own culpability - a vast social guilt his.

The down economy can come back quickly, and, Republicans have teams of teams ready at our state level if you are just ready to trust that you are best actually now to look at the state level not the national level to have a renaissance in vibrancy of free market economic growth.  The Democrats do want you to think you have to look for a national solution and yet for the economies to come back we need less need of national taxation because we need more teams of teams more locally and community and state based to be at economic competitions amongst others so sized around the entire known world.

With the popularity down for Congress we have that it may best come back too by standing for a renaissance in state’s rights firstly.  Our best national security and economic posture seems still to be to have a renaissance in state’s rights.  Our Constitution can be celebrated so while about such as a charge in new Federalism.  Yes I still have this as thinking of my collection titled THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that was written before the Presidency of the Clintons and now long tested of these administerings since.  Republican Governors are poised at least of thirty of our fifty states to be to local bellowing for a full and enlighting new sustainable era of economic growth.

We may now need people in Washington DC whom most do not want power in Washington DC seats.  It is a music for growth that is ready to be set free even if now the hard way by prosecutions of Democrats generally and the administration specifically for too many efforts much of effrontery to our Constitution.

President Barack Hussein Obama and his loyal subjects however “Czar’d” or more common subjects has been an obstacle to an enlightened economic stoking for a re-birth in economic growth - for a RECOVERY.  We do have to arrest the Democrats’ efforts at random higher taxation of their newest boldness these past four years that had them go from having been the TAX AND SPEND lots to their reckless SPEND, SPEND, SPEND TO JUSTIFY “NECESSARY” NEW VAST TAXATION - SPEND & TAX tag.  The problem much specifically with their new nationalism is that it asks for a national centralized controllable assimilated masses then smothered from natural freer economic growth of the old American standard of by competition and local community and faith based solidarity.

The specific team of whom you and I may best be to having as national Republican leaders is still not figured yet.  Whom we are to have next is critical and as while it is mostly our Governors of the thirty states with Republican Governors that have us stoked and ready for a strong and vast RECOVERY.  Obama’s over-lording to a national loyalty of a forced assimilation is an obstacle smothering home fires across the world - and especially in the United States of America.  But whom can be right for a new national leadership of Republican credits going forward as it is a renaissance in state’s rights best for our national security and economies? 

Whom are those who can come together as an executive team of the Executive Branch soon as trusted and effective experts?  It is for our economy and communities our national debate has to trend now to Washington based pols as gifted to ask people to look away from Washington to more local community and faith based common sense governance.  For our economy to again glow an enlightenment of a vibrant and workable E Pluribus Unum solidarity in looser pursuits of individuals about selfish personal economic interests it is best to look at our Governors for a moderated bellowing to stoke an over-due renaissance in state’s rights.

These are bad days for Democrats.  It is that President William Jefferson Clinton with his CGI is much motivated to be appearing to be at doing good just from a great guilt and as to assuage himself for much of an earlier GROSS NEGLIGENCE, at least.  His pimping of “PEACE” for his “PEACE DIVIDENDS” is nearer the worst Government LIE of the past twenty years even than Democrat successor President Obama with his Benghazi talking points suggesting it could have been just about a video.  But economically more concerning is that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of an unnecessary extra trillion cut now is quite the greatest economic blunder of the past century.  He cut too much too quickly and while tagging necessary spending for economic growth and jobs stability as un-necessary spending so that he could cut so so so much of it.

President Clinton did do much of what it was of our Government that was responsible for as per our banks - Big Banks - and how they became too corrupted to have kept the economy from recovering nearer 2008.  Republicans then likely could have turned the economy around in a couple of years if while about such with an election of McCain/Palin and President McCain to his promises to revitalize state’s independence there had been also a very public call for bank reforms and with such of a prosecution of Democrats of banking executive decisions starting with President Clinton.

We are poised to have a vibrant recovery now most in thanks to maybe all of the thirty Republican Governors.  The Democrats are now as grand new nationalists quite still too much of a centralized suppression of economic growth by community and faith based competition.  The Democrats are in the way blocking with their trenchant partisan politics.  And, yes there is no sense of whom now would be a team of a national Republican leadership fitting for a enlightened renaissance more of the kindling and stoking of state’s homefires.

As these troubles gather about the Democrats long too nationalistic as if a hellishly hot inferno it may be that even Democrats can benefit from looking away from Washington for solutions and warm hearths of less centralized assimilation in states and communities across the United States of America.  And, too it may be that we have Republicans in Washington fit to be feeders of timbers more set for a ready bellowing of our Governors and their more locally stoked and kept teams of teams still endearing as of competition economics.

Comments Off
05/09/13
OHIO STATE - TYRANTS?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, AFGHANISTAN, #WHITEPRIDE, WAR ON WOMEN, CRUSADES, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:52 am

HONEST JOHN, of the Beaver Wars pride, stands tall of the felted beaver pelted topping of Abraham Lincoln as a bundle of flesh and bones quite more an embodiment of personality as to the HEDGER TYRANNICAL HILLARY now being processed as too institutionalized.

The hide of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is being metaphorically, at least, justly processed/peeled back not as if a quite dry autopsy of the Republican Party but as if of long due deep cutting for a not too political live dissection of so much of/from the Clintons inhibiting much as if a cancer on our politics and economy.

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?

Is Hillary Clinton more of a hedge fruitless global Diplomacy such that it has hardly been “Diplomacy” baring?

Is President Bill Clinton nearer to admitting it was more all his fault?  What of their foggy bottoms of Clinton two-fer?

{Enter President Barack Hussein Obama - as if newly present at Ohio State as if erudite about tyranny:   Puffed up.}

It is like a new kind of Beaver War that young Ohioans have been pulled into with their President of no tyranny claims while a tyranny of the Clintons reigns within his own Democrat Party for Party control and for rants of keeping whom they mean to as lower Democrats barred from higher Party status or institutional acclamation and rank.  It seems it is quite tyrannical how the Clinton have been trying to hold onto inappropriate executive power since leaving office in 2001.  It seems President Obama has a tyranny of his “team of rivals” and that this is some revealed in the live dissection of the Democrat’s cover-up pertaining to Benghazi.

If Americans are to find justice from the commenced live dissection of some rants of Mrs. Clinton and her keeps - of others less politically favored or protected while also her keeps - and a Shakespearean JUSTICE of a pound of flesh from around her heart it must now be set before that her blood may spill however while accruing the just full pound of flesh and no more — that her blood may now spill too if and when it a pound of flesh, a half pound or pounds of flesh judged fair.

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

This is not just a literary technique.  House Speaker John Boehner is both of these new Beaver Wars and of Ohio and the old Beaver Wars pride and tall honor much of Abraham Lincoln standing long so tall as a Republican in beaver felted pelted topping.  I do not know if Ohio can claim to have been the home of Lincoln’s own beavered tall standing.

Are the Benghazi hearing now as a live dissection of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton also about how the Clinton two-fer is now long as a tyrannical political power of a reigning about just Democrats as the keepers of the party gates for passage of young to Party places and classier ranks?  In Ohio President Barack Hussein Obama spoke as if there was no tryanny to worry about and not even that long now of the proximity of his “team of rivals” Clintons.

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

This is not just a literary technique.  There is a tyranny over at least the minds of Democrat Party women now just of and by the concerned “Diplomacy” of Hillary Clinton as fruitless in hedging it has been.  There is a more political and partisan tyranny as well over at least Democrat Party women of and by the reigning of the Clinton two-fer however concerning as of President Barack Hussein Obama’s “team of rivals.”

With Benghazi the first real surgical cutting of the now much late live dissection of the political and “Diplomacy” of just Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton we have peeled back the ribbing and spine of a Party tyranny, much - already.

I dug out this of 9/18/2012 called TREASON SELLS while looking for a specific different piece more about #Benghazi > http://bit.ly/10jc6kk
.  I still recommend stretching your mental muscles against tyrannies over minds of men, and women too, with a visit to http://CitRB.com and a reading of all that queues after a local site search by BENGHAZI.

“Of #Hillary #Benghazi “WHAT DIFF …” IF THIS OR THAT clever defense - Really if that or that not big diff - BUT!!!, if TERROR or WAR BIG DIFF.“*

#Hillary LIKE REALLY? BEST YOU HAD FOR #CONGRESS #BENGHAZI WAS LIKE “or maybe just some guy walking down the street” possibility?”*

#Benghazi is about same Clintons that had their Prez Library designed in a gun shape & skinned in Confederate Gray & who planted on Whitehaven?”*

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

This in not just a literary technique!  There is a diabolical dichotomy nearer a trichotomy of the Clintons and their triangulations.

Re: #Benghazi much that GAME CHANGE book a vast lie about Hillary as she & Bill consummated their marriage towards both becoming President.”*

Re: #Benghazi “it’s for the video” - but isn’t it more insulting to Muslims to say brutality of video motives so more than insult video actually was?”*

[note: an “*” here denotes a quoting reposting of a recent #Benghazi related tweet of me with my twid (Twitter ID) @jphoganorg and as readable in bulleted of http://citizenrosebud.mobi]

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has been a hedger and arguably of a Diplomacy that hasn’t been baring fruits - at least as promised or as her rants and tying of rants bosoms yet of cold suggestions too institutionalized.

It is not fair to even just the young of Ohio State to let Hillary Clinton be as if of a new pride in a new Beaver Wars - it is safer and politically more prudent to still talk more of her as tyrannical in an imperialistic socialism as a Crusader with a history as FLOTUS as having been globally to much too inciting and too polarizing.

“THAT ONLY 2 SENATORS VOTED TO NOT THROW SEN CLINTON OUT OF SENATE DOESN’T ACTUALLY LEGALLY MEAN IT WAS CONSTITUTIONAL FOR HER TO BE SOS.“*

Seems an important day to remember Operation Iraqi Freedom as figured originally to be a new bold step for global relations with the liberation not to be an occupation and it to be of compensation after the fact by a freed Iraqi People with their profits from their oil output.  Odd how Dems say Iraq wasn’t paid for while it was Pelosi Congress that mostly killed how it was to be paid for by those liberated.  Even odder that we were supposed to believe that Hillary’s bold State move on Libya of her Odyssey Dawn was then set up and sold as if it were a brand new idea and a Democrat idea to have a liberation of a sovereign people and to have it set up supposedly to be as if a liberation compensated for by oil outputs of such country and its people. Hmmm?  Something not quite politically right about this as it seems at least Hillary can not hide she was playing politics with Libya & Benghazi.”*

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

[Note: a “*” could as well be for a posted sharing longer than 140 characters and yet also a tweeted by me as with twid @jphoganorg as originally a Facebook status update that re-posted to Twitter.]

House Speaker John Boehner is an honorable man and maybe due a tag too as of “honest” like say HONEST JOHN.  We have that the known history and legacy of the Clintons’ two-fer is now of the commenced late live dissection inseparable from their personal reputations as known liars and “Big Liars.”

#SecClinton per #Benghazi may have been too busy trying to usurp legacy global powers of Treasury & Commerce to do Diplomatic Mission well!”*

Oh #SecClinton per #Benghazi I guess it just used to be AMERICAN to think that our SoS would take daily threat ass. in countries they invaded?”*

I think that like Economic Statecraft idea of Hillary’s Diplomatic nonsense & dangerous as necessarily a restructuring of Exec Branch.”*

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?

Is President Bill Clinton now nearer to admitting it is much really all his fault?  Would that be fair or accurate analysis of the diabolical dichotomy of the Clintons’ two-fer triangulating trichotomies?

President Barack Hussein Obama as now still as if of Ohio seems to have missed the very dangers of his own “team of rivals” as of an actual and affecting modern tyranny of and by the Clintons at least still within his own Democrat Party.

“It was a cover-up method of & tall tales > but so they could avoid an appropriate necessary measured RESPONSE?”*

“The hardest hitting tweets - tweets with background to stand on links - on now threaded at - “*

“Of lies that if TERROR or ACT OF WAR then they might have had to bomb Meca or all the Afghan opium stores/crops.”*

“1/2 million may have already read my THE BIG TENT here linked > REALLY speaks to & Clintons as haphazards > “*

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?

& foggy bottoms of two-fer intel > so wrong about it still hard for him to be right bout anything in region”*

“Per & best we’d prosecuted Saddam in Clintons’ 1st term with a bring of Community Policing then & not just when SURGED”*

“Of “WHAT DIFF” If THIS or THAT clever defense - Really if THAT or THAT not big diff - BUT!!!, if TERROR or WAR -BIG DIFF”*

And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts:  Really it seems a tyranny over minds and bodies of Democrat women at least that we are of a President Obama embraced by a tyrannical rivalry he may not even recognized as such.  Really it seems a tyranny over at least minds and bodies of Democrat women how the rants of Clintons’ two-fer are of their attempts to keep a party keep by rants tying and lashing down to hopes of so many they institutionally need to keep as a keep beneath them

And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts:  Of Benghazi we see cracks in the cover-up of the Clintons by President Obama as well as an actual “played politics” tyranny of a political election count-down fields of conflicts and competition.

And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts:  Of the modern sit rep of just Democrat Party politics, however of a tyranny while our President says to not worry yourselves about tyranny, it is ridiculous that with #Benghazi streaming, however now commenced as a late but due “pound of flesh” live dissection, of at least an arguable fruitless hedged “diplomacy” by Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, that you are not alone in a time of tyrannies.

And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts:  Really!!!  And how can it not be so while Hillary Clinton is so INSTITUTIONALIZED!?  How now as maybe we have that President William Jefferson Clinton may be nearer to admitting it was much all his own fault?  And, how, now as we have a state of Democrat Party Politics such that a tyranny likely explains best how it seems there are no other women than Hillary Clinton now allowed to be see as capable of becoming President.  And, how, as it is prudent and important to ask if there is even another women that hasn’t slept with Bill Clinton whom can be said now to be at least as capable as Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?

{IF YOU ARE NEW NOW TO FINDING THE POLITICAL PUNDITRY OF POET PUNDIT JP HOGAN I DO NOW STRONGLY SUGGEST YOU VISIT AT LEAST ALSO http://CitizenRosebud.org AND FIND YOUR WAY TO ALSO ENJOYING THE SAMPLER THERE.}

Comments Off
05/02/13
WHO’S YOUR MOMMY?
Filed under: POLITICS, 22ND AMENDMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE, #QUEEN, WAR ON WOMEN, #AUSTERITY, #STUPID SQUIBS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:04 am

For the sake of controversy and selling of truths it is that we are now here to read and discuss white chocolate politically, maybe.

As Mother’s Day is fast approaching and a big hat day of the year too we have that for Mrs. Clinton to run again she will have to hoof it all as either her racing against her own mothering or against First Lady Michelle Obama’s mothering.  It is not appropriate to be to stereotypically shoeing Mrs. Clinton as a “white chocolate” and our current wife of an also “the first black President” so as First Lady Michelle is as if she a “dark chocolate.”  It may be insensitive too, and while still it may be too confusing to compare them as equally of a milk chocolate.

Mrs. Clinton and First Lady Michelle Obama do seem as different as night and day - as different as black and white - as per playing the woman cards in our politics.  With our current FLOTUS we have culinary greatness of grown at home healthiness and wholesomeness to consummate while Mrs. Clinton is still so served as our Fast Food Queen to super-sized McDonald’s Big Mac meals for her like “Mac Daddy” spouse.

It has been reported that if only we like could get back as a nation to before the influences of dietary corruption of once First Lady Mrs. Clinton our nation could be to saving a trillion dollars in healthcare costs by having been without the vast increase in obesity of the incredible national increase in personal body weight average of her mothering.

We will somehow have to discuss President Clinton as having been the “First Black President” and comparatively and contrastingly while it seems on its face that honestly President Obama has been the United States of America’s first black President, still going forward.

But really while it may be a confounding conundrum of politics to broach how Mrs. Clinton will have to either race against her own reputation or race against First Lady Michelle Obama’s example and mothering we have that there are economic consideration that are of President Obama’s governance and governing these years fundamentally so as absent a philosophy of governance.  It may be the fault of “Hillary” or “Michelle” somehow - somehow as we have to consider that Mrs. Clinton did make as many impossible campaign promises as “Obama” and was set to have had nearly the same Clintons’ alumni as her own economic advisers.

As you should decide whose mothering you think is better and how, however, you may prefer one personally more than the other there is a problem with the economics now that likely would have arrived by either the mothering of “Hillary” or as it has with the “fathering” of “Obama.”  We may now be necessarily to a second wave of economic shrinkage.

It is remarkable that a suggestion is about a candidacy for “Hillary” that there are no other Democrat women capable of such challenge - that there are none able to competently stand up to Mrs. Clinton.  I don’t know how yet to write sufficiently politically about the Democrat Party of such a paradigm where it seems that President Clinton with his recent politics is standing too much with powers he was supposed to have been limited from as of executive domains generally and so that it seems he is flexing muscle that it must be “Hillary” for she can be thought to have slept with him the most.

There is an intra-party war for political legacy between the Clintons and Obamas already commenced and with it now that President Obama is maybe trapped with the Clintons seeming possibly re-ascendant and so that he and his family will be then forward politically back under Democrat Party Leadership dominance of at least President Bill Clinton.

But speaking to the economy and the resultant down economy that started much with the announcement of HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT and she then with a promise to violate capitalism with a seizing of all oil company profits >> President Obama still seems to have until the end of a second term as at the helm of our economy as so that a President is such juiced.  And, oddly he has set up a new economic situation where if the Republicans do not decide to keep offering a rivaling economic method in capitalism personally then Obama’s socialism will bankrupt the United States of America.

See this isn’t about “Hillary” as white chocolate or “Michelle” as dark chocolate. 

This is black and white along the lines of economics and common sense.  President Obama (or President Clinton) now needs the Republicans and Independents to not do as he says but to do stupidly as they would if capitalism rules were still our economic rules.  For the Democrats socialism to work they need even just the Republicans to blindly still live their profitable capitalism American Dreams.

A candidacy for Mrs. Clinton cannot offer us a respite from this new economic way from the united Democrat Party game changing.  Simply from now until 2016 it makes more sense for at least Republicans to do as the President has said and to not do as he needs them to as of a idiotic staying the course in profitable capitalism.   To also help save the planet and gird us all for these years of climate change there is a moral and patriotic duty now much for at least the Republicans too to do as the President has said, however so with alarmism.

You may want to use this time of the NEW DEAL AUSTERITY of these in governance with the current Democrat Party unity to yourself figure how much less you need others to do for you and how much less raw resources you really will quite need as these times of Democrat Eco Alarmism stay politically justified.  It may though be maddening to try to understand how Mrs. Clinton really will either have to race against her own reputation or specifically race against the mothering of/by First Lady Michelle Obama.  (I still assert all have the right as long as our 22nd Amendment is undecided law to protest that any campaign by Clintons whenever to returning to a co-holding of the Presidency can and should be called criminal, un-Constitutional, and/or treasonous.)

Our Federal Government’s revenue streams come mostly from income and profits - not wealth or property taxation. 

The worst economic reality for President Obama as he attempts to prove he can afford such “idealism” is that the Republicans, at least, will do as he says to a new flatter economy with a new greenness in conservationism their way too.  We as a nation cannot and likely will not be able to afford these new entitlements of the recent rush to a NEW NATIONALISM of socialism if at least Republican don’t idiotically keep to blindly being capitalists. 

We have to consider that First Lady Michelle Obama is a dominant women in the Obama marriage and maybe as responsible as her husband for this confounding new economics - as responsible as Mrs. Clinton for her mothering as if two super-sized Big Mac meals a day was good politics - even before it seems to have increased national medical costs with an increase in obesity to us of now having been able to save a trillion dollars if she hadn’t been such a ham for President Clinton’s dietary excesses.

I have to believe, whomever your political “Mother” preference is, and however you have been weened and reared by a real mother, you are ready to politically consider at least that Mrs. Clinton likely has to run against First Lady Michelle Obama’s legacy as it would be quite ridiculous for her to run against herself as if she is politically not defensible.

It may now be that Democrats have done more to bring “family values” back at least to realm of family and home economics.  It is that at least Republicans have been also asked to assimilate patriotically in a new austerity and conservationism and that now are times when they have less need to stand in defense of capitalism themselves.  It figures though quite confoundingly that President Obama and Democrats forward are stuck unable to see our nation afford their idealism if at least Republicans don’t blindly still pursue profits and income from capitalism.  It is that Republicans seem the more important class of economic taggables to be firstly and mostly to a full Obama conservationism, however it may also now be seen as socialism.

Mother’s Day is near - Please don’t ask me to decide for you whom you should respect more - whether your mother or First Lady Michelle Obama or even possibly Mrs. Clinton.

Comments Off