hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
August 2017
S M T W T F S
« Jul    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
10/09/15
BILL’S & HILLARY’S 911S
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, #CGI, #QUEEN, CRUSADES, #FEMINISM, #BLAME, #NEW_YORK, #ISLAM SQUIBS, COVER UPS, SANS SCRIPTS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:59 am

Let us consider how wrong we were, - - - and how OCCUPY should have occupied CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVES - as much as any where else!

Let us consider that Michael Moore may have confused 911 accidentally, - - - Michael Moore may have grossly erred thinking President Bush seemed of some one able to advise his as too prepared with a supposition that since “W” seemed so prepared he must then have been behind the attacks by Al Qaeda.

Let us consider why after 911 I the Clintons blamed Americans, - - - how journalists seems devoid of sufficient pressed queriousness as to why it was Bill & Hillary, elected as the smartest in America, bounced bucks down with near “blue states said do this, and, red states said do that”?

Now!  How much truth is needed in a nations daily business for there to be a “shining city”?  How much lying and basis in lies is too little truth to too much dark energy gigs?

The dark days after the attacks of 911 I are not remember enough in a politically correct historical;  - - - Too many know only the lies and the spin and have been amiss devoid of deeds at digging for greater understanding of American players.

I do not offer a metric for how much slack President George W. Bush, and his cadre as GOP Establishment, deserve; - - - To you it is vital - vitally important - presently critical that you do consider THE GREAT SATAN HILLARY CLINTON; - - - To you there is the we - the global we - presently collective us betwixt a REAL CLINTON, &, THE YARN, CLINTONS’!

Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is like of the movie THE DOUBLE; - - - The real Hillary Clinton is like in all the pictures of all the big disasters, and yet no one is asking the right questions as to such coincidences!  Mrs. Clinton as New York United States Senator is quite simply tag’d as THE WOMAN IN WORLD OF MOST 911 FAULT, AND, THE AMERICAN POLITICIAN WHOSE CAREER MOST BENEFITED FROM THE CRISIS.

President George W. Bush will have to defend himself !!!  President Bush was of elected of a ambition to prepare for prosecuting Saddam Hussein, and to bluffing him to full compliance, but, the attacks of 911 made this more difficult, not less! The Clintons benefited from the attacks politically most; - - -  Bush wasn’t ready for Afghanistan, even if he is thought to have been ready for Al Qaeda “justice.”  President Bush had 911 attacks complicate his ambition to see Saddam Hussein fully prosecuted.

Behoove ye forevermore to always now firstly forward be keyed to a consideration of Clintons’ culpability, & too motives!

Perk up global citizens!  Become more intelligent (than the Clintons want you)! Become questioners of the obvious!

Perk up America - citizens of these united states! Bush didn’t need 911 attacks to fulfill ambition to prosecute Saddam H.!

It can be quite depressing tag’g the Clintons in a fuller more apropos historical; - - - Did the Clintons need Al Qaeda attacks so Mrs. Clinton could have an extreme makeover to overcome the Senate seniority traditions, by as an untouchable as GROUND ZERO SENATOR, and, as to gravitas beyond First Lady pomp & ceremony?

What questions should CNN have ready when Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton presented for Democrats Debate in Vegas?

How sad is it that the Clintons since 1992 campaigns were of running together as if they were the smartest two people in at least the United States of America proper?  How sad is it that two so proud and narcissistic did after the Al Qaeda attacks in “holy war” so as “jihad” were so not to be firstly to terror for terror sake but were to acts for JUSTICE even if in terrorizing?  How sad is it still that, though elected as promised to be leaders smart enough to make best most intelligent decisions, Bill & Hillary, and their teams of minions, were to blaming United States citizens firstly?  how sad the Clintons, thanks to Michael Moore?, have been getting by on ridiculous lies so ridiculous their lies suggest an impossible truth of a “PERFECT CLINTON”?

The simplest explanation, that also rings true, of the Al Qaeda attacks as most benefiting the Clintons, is in the lay of “Jihad” as “HOLY WAR” for “JUSTICE” and so enough to support a tag THE GREAT SATAN HILLARY CLINTON, - but not exclusively. Al Qaeda to suicide attacks in “Jihad” were then on a mission for JUSTICE, - RIGHT?  Al Qaeda so as for “JUSTICE” have their simplest explanation that which times to 1993 and to a deciding that the USA homeland deserved to be attacked because President William J. Clinton had decided that he would NOT prosecute Saddam Hussein, or reconstruct Iraq like Japan & Germany after an earlier world warring as akin to the coalition for the Persian Gulf War.

Right it is very sad and very complicated, as per The Clintons, or just Mrs. Clinton as Richard Gere in THE DOUBLE.  Right!  President Clinton in 1993 decided since he had Bosnia war left to him he much was like not wanting to have to bother with Iraq and another war, - and for all of his years, - and as he and his wife were so like self casting to be BILL THE DOVE, and to later a CLINTON HAWK in the being planned for HILLARY THE HAWK. (Again: I have known Bill & Hillary since the early 1970s and specifically because they each then as Yale Law coeds wanted to know if they both could have their own presidency some day. This is how I know such as Bill & Hillary.)

In a limited President Bush defense:  He ended up bluffing Saddam Hussein into the need for war, yes, but it is more on the Clintons’ surpluses as of $2 Trillion cut, at least far to vastly and quickly, and on the Clintons at least for defense cuts that to prosecute the United Nations sanctions fully when so it was the Military he went to war with was that which the Clintons’ administering had rendered to unprepared for modern times as of lacking in sufficient body armor, and too vehicle armoring. (How much the problems of Bush’s Wars is rooted in Clintons 1993-2001 and to a gross negligence is really too much to detail in this cursory expose as a pre-debate exclamation for a restoration of common sense.)

If I yet am acknowledged for how long I have known such perspective and to how much guidance to making the Clintons electable in 1992 then syncs to how much I did help advise President Bush after Al Qaeda attacks, and shortly, there is a new way to an American President I hadn’t known of.  The Speaker of the House surprises have been surprising, - - -  I was unaware the House could elect a non-member, even a one like myself a privately sharing poet, +++. It seems I have had waking thoughts in teasing the House should elect me to how if they did the Clintons would have to be indicted, as finally exposed, and too that President Barack H. Obama (, & VP Joseph Biden,) would be due impeachment.

Michael Moore may appreciate how Bush some seemed too ready after Al Qaeda attacks because I had since 1993 been wondering what I heard when I heard of Bill Clinton decision to not prosecute Saddam Hussein, and to the viscerally experienced thought of: IF WE GO THAT WAY AMERICA WILL GET ATTACKED AT HOME.

Michael Moore may, though, be needed now to straighten out a Clinton culpability washed over by FAHRENHEIT 911, and while it is that on September 10, 2001 I was not unprepared but thinking I had to accept that I had been wrong to believe that I was right in preparing.  Seems, due the Speaker rules, the HOUSE could elect me to SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE even as such acknowledgement should necessitate an impeachment of President Obama (,& VP Biden) to that then it would be Constitutional, if so honored, that JP Hogan could become SPEAKER and then shortly there after PRESIDENT, and all before November 2016 general elections. I would have to insist for my potential for bipartisanship restoration that if so how so as me as currently as, I believe, a registered Connecticut (I) “independent” though maybe as “unaffiliated” by registration.

There is for the CNN Debate of the field of Democrats, small and limited, by comparison, that Bill and Hillary have earned the doubt and queriousness to forevermore tag’d as per Al Qaeda and Terrorism, generally, of this titled as “BILL’S & HILLARY’S 911S”!

There is far more to this in the categories & searchable archives of http://CitRB.com - - - far more in #Cats of #BENGHAZI #SYRIA #KERRY #QUEEN #CGI #SUSPECT #IRAN #IRAQ #LONGESTWAR #TREASON #AFGHANISTAN #QUIDPROQUO #CRUSADES #22NDAMENDMENT #ALQAEDA #AUTOBIOD. +++

The Clintons prevent any “SHINING CITY ON A HILL” potential for, as Pope Francis seems of tag’d, Bill Clinton is too a Barabas of golden calf, - his hyper-consumerism and risky loan “economics” were also of the Clintons having so fattened up the children of these united states that it wasn’t just as in http://bit.ly/Clinton_PHAT that the Clintons together fosters a diabetic problema, and later attacks, of them of a mea culpas!

Vice President Joseph Biden may be safe enough, - - - But! But then how can he be enough removed from dark energy of the Clintons’ machinations in decades of lies, and also not to in bed with the Obama Administration, of a Clinton #FOB52 at least, for having since inauguration in 2009 having been thence since President Obama hour one as impeachable for lies effected to effecting a greater cover-up of the Clintons, and as 911 II was of such failing and falling to new cover-up(s) efforts so needed?

Vice President Joseph Biden may be safe now even if Michael Moore historically corrects bias of FAHRENHEIT 911!

Vice President Joseph Biden seems not for a moment to have benefited like the Clintons since 911 I to what now is fodder for true journalists freed from the Bill & Hillary seductions?  The Clintons did blame Americans, not Senator Biden, after 911 I, - - - Vice President Biden may yet get to be President if only for months leading up to the November 2016 general election?

Bill’s & Hillary’s 911 I&II are of an already admitted culpabIlity and the ridiculous still postured proposition of a “PERFECT CLINTON.”  Bill’s & Hillary’s fate seems being corrected from “PERFECT” to “INDICTED” and as it is becoming more preposterous that there could ever have been a Bill Clinton but as too a Barbaras, - not “PERFECT” or suited to any SHINING CITY ON A HILL (metaphor)!  Bill’s & Hillary’s fate is that already it is extant that the scandal is of a house of cards of the Clintons as if allowed to be autocratic in a post-Constitutional extra-Constitutional game of thrones Power.

Michael Moore, you at least did not figure the how, and why, to the who, when & betwixt of JP Hogan story when biasing 911 I as to all President George W. Bush’s fault.  The Clintons post attack behavior does still suggest greater a priori awareness, - premeditated low/base politics in a personal mantra/tao as if their law JDs were licenses to lie.

Comments Off
09/12/14
LEARN ANYTHING YET?
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, AL QAEDA, TWO HISTORIES, #WHITEPRIDE, #BLAME, #MORALS, #ISLAM SQUIBS, #PUTIN ESSAYS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 12:39 pm

Attorney General Eric Holder isn’t alone in a blasphemy to the Founding Fathers’ ordained Order;  Democrats generally have been afoul of “Constitutional” in all their attempts to a progressive when as if justified because thought to a more perfect Union.  The Constitution is the is that is the Order that forms the “the more perfect Union.”  It has been nearly arrested how Democrats since 2009 have been of erring for process and practices as if the mere thought that an initiative can be said  to a “more perfect” than the Constitution as if forward by “in order to…” as active forward as licensed as of a trumping of “Constitutional” yet.

I may be impossible to combat, or debate, an Islamic State, any IS too insurgent, if and when such as “American” is undermined and diminished from more prudent practice and proper established republican procedures original and foundational to national morality.  Blaspheme may be too strong but as allegorical but yet poetic for a brevity like of reduced instruction set computing coding.  Blaspheme may relate for it seems to have endured and endearing that the Founding Fathers’ thought themselves of apostolic work in convention so dedicated to it the Constitution as a SPECTACLE of faith set forward as a THE MORE PERFECT humbly subscribed as established as “done” so ordained that Year of US Lord.  If it is then that the Constitution as the “Order” “to form a” such “more perfect Union” is so a SPECTACLE apostolic in harmony to the Lord of the New Testament morality then it may be some but not too severely yet of a blaspheme - seems!

Though as seeming meant as a bar to any so now of a “Socialism” the “Order” so is for a Nation a Union under God and so that such as ‘in order to form a more perfect Union” is as so of “Order” originally and not a license as if a loophole for any new (progressive) idea to be as if Constitutional by being as if profferable as “more perfect”!

So the most alarming Democrat Party posture is now that with their any Islamic State however Islamic there is the is that if she is, as Mrs. Clinton, posited as a desirable for again of high office that she then is an is to the is the ISIS that is an embodiment political and historic to amount to the worst thing the The United States of America could yet proceed to in their interests to becoming yet safer, if safer by Democrat Party leadership can amass more security.  Yes, if there were not the 22nd Amendment and so the affected term limits to William J. Clinton being a “TOP DOG” or “TOP GUN” political newly to the offices at the The White House it would be considerable as a task to yet discern if a return of Mr. Clinton wouldn’t increase the risks to safety yet more than the return of Mrs. Clinton.

For some perspective to such, and by way of historical coincidences, please first consider there are now two 9/11 events to anniversary of a common enemy.  And, that due to the rise of the “THE CLINTON” in Charlotte, North Carolina at the last Democrat Party Convention, and such rise as of a “RETURNED” President Clinton (however to introduce President Obama) it is too coincidental that the attacks on the “STATE” “HOUSE OF CLINTON” as the “STATE” “BENGHAZI COMPOUND” seem to relate 9/11 II to 9/11 I and as if of a vigilantism and response to it then global of too much of a return (of unrepentant) President Clinton.  For perspective:  If ISIS is an is at all an is like Al Qaeda was/is and is then the worst thing any of such “American” can now do is to promote that there should be a return of either Clinton and any resurrection of either while at least the Democrat Party Convention speech by President William J. Clinton showed him as unrepentant and RETURNED.

There is that if we are at all “more safer” now it may only be an is and is because the Clintons seem enough arrested from renewed insufficient global executive decidings for the People’d people Constituted by the Order that formed the “more perfect Union” so.  9/11 II was the first anniversary after that Charlotte convened that promoted the too charlatan “Bill” as RETURNED and UNREPENTANT.  It stands to be at least long queried that 9/11 may have been kept in a (vigilante) pride as of “Jihad” so “Holy” it was to be a (Terrorist) Holy Day forever where any of Allah then could only proceed if of proceeding in the same Holy cry for Justice original to the (thought) injustices motivating the first. 

We at least have a problem for “TRUTH ROLLING ON” #TRUTHS for a National Posterity so Constituted “more perfect” in how there now is a politics so divided and necessarily for there are two rival histories now operational concurrently to all governance deciding.  It is that there are two histories now concurrent and incompatible that go beyond a “freedom of opinion” and straight to why and how any administration cover-up could and should be considered illegal.

We can hardly actually be now a Nation a Constituted an is an is now safer, however as if an is an enemy actually of an ISIS.  As we are of two histories and one quite workable of TRUTH yet politically workable for governance forward, and then the other “history” of the false narratives long postured Democrat as if TRUTH and as evidenced, yet, of the impropriety in cover-ups, we cannot be of one face, however United, or broadly of a coalition of 9, for the lies of the Democrats are not matters of opinion but of long worked false narratives constructed in attempts to succeed in cover-ups at least for all the ways the Clintons were wrong and are culpable at least of some negligence for at least the days from their first inauguration to the eve of the first - the eve of 9/11 I.  Not in their cover-up rival “history” is that it makes simple sense that 9/11 I & 9/11 II are related and that it makes sense in a most common sense that Mr. and/or Mrs. Clinton are a common denominator a motivation to a vigilantism as if justifiable as “Jihad.”

I do find it far easier to find, however, that President Obama is likable - more likable than either Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Clinton.

But to the issues of ISIS as an is an IS and even if actually religious and Islamic as if more or most firstly an enemy to the The United States of America as it can endear and endure as originally ordained and established so Ordered:  To be or become - to become as if more “safer” conscionably - there are some interest thoughts to posit as hypotheses to test to see if they can yet surmount doubts as workable theorems.

It seemed reported just the other day that the Islamic State stood on Islam as of a religiosity that constitutes terrorism as a methodology for greater civility in community for Posterity.  It seems though then that if such is so then they are of an think that then presumes upon even the Constituted United States not just a right to act as if with terrorism themselves but to be expected as a Nation of such secured People that such of “terrorism” is an acceptable not first objectionable methodology for such.

It seems for there to be an US an us more safer it has to be structural in a moral footing of the People of the United States not associated as also of any guilt or culpability yet motivational to any Islamic in an is an is ISIS as an Islamic State.  It seems if we are safer it can only be for our thought enemy sees our current or former “LEADERS” as more personally wrong if wrong at all and not any a People’d person just generally.  If we support a resurrection of either Mrs. or Mr. Clinton anewly to a Constitutional high office - such hypothesis cannot endure as a workable theorem in practice for so then forward the People’d people will have become also first culpable for having decided by votaries sufficient to put two wrongs ahead of a thought necessary right.

It shouldn’t just be a mistake to allow a rise to resurrection of either Clinton - - - IT LIKELY WOULD BE A HUGE DISASTER OF A MISTAKE - logically speaking.

There is some interesting history in the first history of TRUTHS that rival for safety the false narratives of the cover-up lies so constructed and too long enduring as if believable for it is that unless US an us to being become so compromised, abroad, and broadly, by a mashable hashable taggable, associated with, it reigns a truth that President William Jefferson Clinton was and is still rappable as an AMERICAN INFIDEL for his own unique insurrections against Constitutional.

Without a resurrection for either Clinton we can yet be safer for that which could justify further “attacks” as if justified in “terrorism” by a motivated vigilantism for though the Clintons may have a personal fault and guilt it isn’t generally yet transferable to the People generally, and much because leaders of the Middle East for the duration of the Clintons’ years and hence forward are to be firstly morally associated with a guilt superior for having remained silent at least to their own peoples as to the specific problems unique of the Clintons hands.

So there is that the People’d people, of the The United States of America, at least as enduring, as endearing, as originally Constituted to moral people, as by reasoning, structured also of Adam Smith philosophy, and economics, where the first selfish interest of an individual is to decide it best to be of a community, and of a morality hence with forward in any industriousness, or even, maybe, merchantile work.  It seems prescribed that there can be a blaspheme to the Founding Fathers as if too it wouldn’t be necessary and proper for any wealth of nations if any and all individuals not just nomads tribal or an island unto themselves not to be whenever possible of weekly community gathering at least to commune of a common market place to sing together and at least say once “PEACE BE WITH YOU.”

It seems fraught with peril to even publicly entertain a resurrection, even just political, for any too of the BOGO “two-fer” of the union (not as perfect) of Mrs. & Mr. Clinton.  For now the us in US to a person may be safer and with it that to the is as ISIS, however if truly Islamic and religious, we so are not firstly or yet philosophically primarily an “enemy.”

For now it is more any a “TOP DIPLOMAT” of the Obama diplomacy by distants hands at any questionable droning “morality” whom are to be firstly dressed down with specific words for it is that the People’d people have a safe harbor from too associated guilt as long as it endears that the Saudi Arabian Powers did ask the Christian Constituted so “AMERICAN” whence to become so enmeshed forward from a necessary push-back as the Persian Gulf War to correct the wrongs unleashed by Secular Socialist Ba’athist (Sunni?) Saddam Hussein.

And again:  Yes we can now be safer as long as we prohibit ourselves from promoting the Clintons as clean politicians.  Yes we can be safer for in the convenience that TRUTH can endure as more workable than yet the still concurrent rival history of the failures to affect a permanent false narrative just in the complicated of the Clintons years of having asked Middle East leaders generally for promises to like just blame Republicans, and then more truly for how the Clintons seemed to ever since hold these so of assuaged promises to lines more lies than truths due to the hows and whats of the Clintons post the intitial promises securing.  We are safer now from an associated guilt for there seem to be some Middle East leaders whom should have long ago or more recently exposed the Clintons even as the Clintons persisted seemingly of selfish promises in holding such honorable on their honor for a promise made even as the promise became corrupted by those who asked for the promise as an is as if an is forever to be the is despite however Islam may have suggested morals trump selfish politics.

As John Jay warned like of alarming when of totalitarian rule whimsy it behoove all to realize if America so foolish to promote even just Mrs. Clinton newly it to it then moral to any so argued an “enemy” that then President Mrs. Clinton, however Un-Constitutional, would yet have 300 Million plus souls beholden to (fight and) die as if for her “HONOR.”  Any promotion now however of either Clinton, Mrs. or Mr., does yet risk peril so to it maybe a dream for any so arguably to “our enemy” that we by such “politics” allow all of the People’d to each personal soul to be called to defend the Clinton honor however even if HONORABLE.

It really is most important that the 1-5 of PUBLIUS of THE FEDERALIST PAPERS are to be considered important and forever warning and critical.  A promotion of the Clintons, yes, could really be more in our possible (just foreign?) enemies interests than at all actually to any “American” individual’s self interest.

Comments Off
07/26/14
CNN FOR $1
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, #CGI, #KERRY, #MUSIC, QUID PRO QUO, #FEMINISM, #MAGIC, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:55 am

What are the attributes pertinent?  What is the full range, and diversity, of so much this attributions valuation for corporate responsibility must be towards navigating?  Has Time Warner persisted in undermining the value of some great assets by the too regular airing of CNN yet as if a “Clintons’ Nonsense Network”?  This is serious business for this fall it isn’t just Dinesh D’Souza after his book “AMERICA” touring highs to be an author set low and to some time of arrested imprisonment.

So Jon Stewart is entertaining (with) thoughts of CNN worth buying as worth near $10 Billion smackers.

Indian born Dinesh D’ Souza is said to be staring down a possible two years in the “BIG HOUSE.”

For now not even CNN is known to have attributed enough seriousness to the Clintons’ cover-ups and the Benghazi Select Committee looming now ahead of Mrs. Clinton, author, for a fall of a very public fall too.

For now not even CNN is known to have asserted that Mrs. Clinton while “HARD CHOICES” bombing compared to the expectations as inevitable to success such that a $14 Million reported advanced (not as political - quid pro quo - patronage - campaign covert funding through CGI).  So much is attributable to Mrs. Clinton that as Dinesh D’ Souza book, with accompanying movie, top her book he may take solace in how she, of the uncovered cover-up, and for her career of helping set and keep a Democrat standard for imprisonment of any of an admin found to be of a “cover-up” without murder.

This fall however of a fall for author D’Souza is justly now set up to be a fall too for a fall of author Mrs. Clinton.  Mrs. Clinton is at risk of judgements rendered of the “WATERGATE” political standard seriousness and for the yet already partially uncovered cover-up that involves murdered far more significant that the possible two years for “AMERICA” author.  Mrs. Clinton has already (inadvertently) admitted incompetence and too before Congress, while of her outbursts seeming of a contempt for Congress, of admitting culpability for the events of a prosecution due for illegal cover-up of the jurisdiction of the Benghazi Select Committee.

How and why is any attribution for considerations of the HARRY POTTER licensing now pertinent to CNN valuation? Who’s his daddy?

Is it that Mrs. Clinton, at least, has been uncovered to be a mortal more just a “muggle”?  Is it also inconvenient that Mrs. & Mr. Clinton have too long been cloaked in attributions, generally, that cannot now be established as honestly fitting them, and so exposed uncovered from being able of use to mitigate comparative guilt in a spectacle to any “good character” - really?

To protect its licensing and grand asset associations with the standards and honor of “HOGWARTS” & the “HARRY POTTER” casts mustn’t CNN, at least of Time Warner, to be now ceasing and desisting from being too “CLINTONS’ NONSENSE NETWORK” forward and specifically away from attributions presumptions cloaking still?  Right!  It is that the idea of “HOGWARTS” was to fill a void in my neighborhood for a likewise small group of children when about 7 years from college and to opines of “don’t move away Peter - we have fun when you are around”?

The facts are that the legend of HARRY POTTER was fig’d and to the challenge to JK Rowling so to, for my benefit some, be yet (covertly) to proving I could repeat the breadth of musing I did before 1993 to make the Clintons seem electable enough, and, too to be to, while so knowing of the Clintons, to working a way to protect a new generation of the world’s youth from the Clintons.  I have, as many of CNN must have born witness, however whence as my Facebook friends, or otherwise social media associated, yet established the point that where the Clintons have again and again proven themselves incapable of a repeat I have yet repeated and repeated but not towards maintaining still a cloaking of their errs.

It is too much so that CNN can be said to have long been too much to cloaking the Clintons and with attributions not pathologically honestly theirs or any theirs deservingly.  It is too reasonable to posit that CNN has too long, to the detriment of many, been too much as if more a CLINTONS’ NONSENSE NETWORK than of agents for the real attributes of many of the stories yet worked and produced to much to cloaking them, & undermining my rightful too.

It is historical that “HOGWARTS” were so mused from me to me as the father of “HARRY POTTER” as he of the prophecy in marketing with confidence in vast and great reaping of sown to profits.  To be what it was as both a filler of the void I was to leave such youths of my neighborhood, to be defensive against the Clintons as proof of my ability to repeat at such a global level, to also be a bulwark for a new generation as protection from the Clintons I know with any “cloaked”, and to protect how much else I was still doing politically for positive change, it is and was that JK Rowling was under directions to not attribute me at all as the muse and supporting source of so much about the challenge to 7 books to so replace me and have her as a distant mother yet towards my aim that such be to helping my young neighbors survive my absence and be yet to growing up less as dirt under my skin as if a wart and to being good wards, hopefully.  And yet as JKR was under instructions to not attribute or expose me such was, as recalled, only contractually address for the publishing rights for the seven books, with any movie or theme park rights, and any merchandizing rights, too yet then of first book contract yet of such to be a bridge to maybe cross later.

I have no idea yet how or what I mean to do about all this.  I have been also a musing of STRIKE known to JKR and so since Clintons first initiated HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT.  I haven’t felt my rights at risk while yet it has been quite complicated for me to move to expose my attributes per such as to do so I much have to expose the Clintons firstly more as frauds of having been cloaked much.  Yes, it was my hope that the seven book challenge as originally outlined would yet work without such a focus by JKR to yet be to my benefit - to be of my hopes to protect a new generation from the Clintons I have known since before “WATERGATE.”

It is still complicated news for my story to be told broadly without it of my history of more credibility to so much still too attributed to the Clintons.  Right - HOGWARTS, however if from “HOGAN & WARTS” and of the new unknown author JKR of guarding herself if it were to fail by it so conveniently named yet to tag the muser of the 7 book challenge, is from my looking for an unknown foreign author willing to right about a “Peter Rowe-ling” and posse, as I started it, and around he then of starting magic study and while of round black glasses and black hair.  “DUMBLEDORE” was animated for such basis for “HARRY” as for his home’s front door a double “Dutch” door to be also magical as of it a double door, and purple, where the top could open separate from the bottom.

So really Jon Stewart how can Time Warner or its CNN be worth clearly now any certain amount?  Did you know “EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND” is also from a basis around a old New Haven, Connecticut friend as how GRIFFEN HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM DOORS became those animated for GRYFFINDOR and so to also balance how so many of the root character were so “medical” of Yale University Hospitals?  This friend was in PR and yet because of having offered me a half a egg salad sandwich while concerned that I as Director of Support Services for the then commenced New Haven Area Special Olympic Games may have been forgetting to eat to my later cross-seeding for JKR and too the EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND as also around a real Officer Barone then also of games volunteering.  Raymond was a fitting character name for such to be supportive of my media career while one of 28 grandchildren of Arthur M. Menadier who started his career as a Boston sports writer.  Some of my cousins, much more of the global music scene then resided on a Raymond Place.

As I can and should uncloak the Clintons and for a full rendering of an arresting justice for at least Mrs. Clinton via the jurisdictions at least of the House Benghazi Select Committee it remains a conundrum for attributions as per CNN at least to how to now tell the truth without at least myself being to any inadvertent revaluation of the good of “HOGWARTS” and all about “HARRY POTTER.”  It is some simplified as “CORMORAN STRIKE” now is alive to live a related characterization more as if the founder of “HOGWARTS” than as if a new “HARRY POTTER.”  It is interesting too that my friend who used to be a chief accountant for ESPN is whom my friend who incidentally sparked me to concerns to concerns pushed for the creation of “EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND” - He now I believe is the top accountant for Ann Taylor.

Though I first crossed ambitious wiring with Commissioner Bill Bratton in 1987-1988 in Boston when news was that he was to be heading up Massachusetts state wide municipal force that was the most neglected and maybe ignored in the state - though I first crossed and worked ambitions collaboration with a wiring with him whence it is interesting and related that though his first thought was to me “don’t laugh at my fleet of green cruisers” (like) it is later when I emailed him while he was Commissioner in Los Angeles with my advice that he retire or resign so not to be caught as the Obama administrations top scapegoat for what I then was expecting to be statistically true for increases in crime - though, that is, while he first said not to laugh so to me it is while he was considering my later advice that he seemed to burst into a laugh realizing my “politics” was of taking on the “The Kennedy” - as if taking on the legacy of the late Kennedy brothers.

So, at least to me what can a value be for CNN?  I mean it seems that there are historic corporate responsibility issues that may be justifying a “official” courtly to remediate if an amicable way not forthcoming as much of a prosecution for the fall of Mrs. Clinton should necessitate a revaluation of all said as if “news” as if properly attributable to either Mrs. or Mr. Clinton.

My “Mad Man” grandfather was an “Arthur” whose standards, however liberal American as Washington’s, yet seemed to be for me to be if likewise to his success as needing a courtly and general corporate standard even greater than the Kennedy brothers lost, and so really much higher that especially those said as of the “The Clintons” that they oddly are not generally known in “news” as long unable yet to repeat.  What can any valuation of CNN be without a more honest one of Mrs. & Mr. Clinton and for not themselves enough at least of the higher standard of the “The Kennedys”?  I was born to choose to be as much of any legend of my grandfather “Arthur” as I might yet attempt and maybe succeed to as of a wizardry in marketing prophecying.

Chances are there are very amicable ways for me, when clear of the inappropriate cloaking of the “The Clintons” “politics” not enough “news” and “history” to yet be known for that which was of my broadly and globally repeating with my 7bk challenge to JKR yet of my first go at it of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that now still best explains the successes and unexpected rise of the Clintons - yes, the Clintons I have known since about a first grader and they Yale Law co-eds not married and just Bill and Hillary.

It seems CNN isn’t alone now in a duty at “news” to separate the “The Clinton” from at least all this just shared of the “The Hogan” more pathologically honest and truly to the genesis or origins related.  But, again, CNN isn’t supposed to undermine the valuation of the necessary and proper attributes of Time Warner vast licensing of assets, however, in the “HARRY POTTER.”

                                         *     *     *

And, yet otherwise, to news of plagiarisms, by Democrats, but as for these imports, of Clintons’ inappropriate uses, and outright misuses, we have that Democrat Senator John Walsh story has refreshed my visceral experienced smarting of the 2004 Convention speechifying of “Barack Obama” as some of his breakout speech had me stirred in objection as the original thinker and writer of the rhyme and reasoned verse I was of hearing from afar a someone (maybe then Senator John Kerry) be to saying nearly “use these lines” “make them your own” and “put a black face on them.”  I at least have learned since reading “DREAMS FROM MY FATHER” very early “memoir” that the “Barack Obama” if that his authentic personal style was so remarkably away from his own style when to that I so experienced with visceral smarting about he of his break out at the Democrat Party Convention of 2004.  Such is of the essence of the above mentioned so yet of the actual written words in my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM which so later also had me needing to flex a polite cease and desist to Howard Dean when he wasn’t just misappropriating from such but so was to me, knowing my original compositions, was yet using my improved race relations new media writing yet by unauthorized use in speeches to inner city black youths with his message yet DON’T STEAL.”  Again, I have known “Barack Obama” at least as “B.O.” of Hawaii to be four years older than me and of an interest in Presidential oratory since the late 1970s.  He in now way, and still nor did the Clintons after the 1992 election, have any authorized use to present as if their own material so significantly or vastly similar in tone, timing, and message mine.

For now I too have yet to decide what to do about the specifics of President Barack Hussein Obama’s breakout speech of the Democrat Convention of 2004 and to the specifics of how with it experienced as an attempt to present mine as his and with it then forward as Democrat and black it is yet of them thinking lawyerly defensible as if similar and flattery and not identical - while yet so that such was visceral and smarting to me knowing the origins and political workability and practicable benefit in being enough just like to identical.

Comments Off
06/21/14
OBAMA’S 2014
Filed under: POLITICS, AUTO-BIO'D, BENGHAZI, #STUPID SQUIBS, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 4:12 am

There are four people whom I still hope never to be in the same room with even if of a 500 person plus capacity and to be FULL.  The first is Al Gore;  The second is Hillary Clinton;  The third is Bill Clinton;  The forth is George Stephanopoulus.

This is one of my most historical and informed positions and so as full of reasons dating back at least as far as 1991.  There isn’t much gap between these four and for how Al Gore is first speaks to how much as the others are deserving he is more deserving and historically.  This is a depressing year - 2014 is a depressing year and President Obama isn’t in the top four because these four may be more responsible than he for his inadequacies.

Authors David Boise & Ted Olson helped refresh how reviling I find these four, and how historically, with their appearance caught in reran of Charlie Rose.  These four are not despise for their “positions” as this is much of my informed perspective while of helping make them better and for positive change I saw possible.  For example it is now easier to support gay marriage by contrasting the good sought by parties to it as contrasted to the bad “marriage” postured by the Clintons for “maximum” person political allowances.  It is quite easy to point to the ideal of marriage as sought as if “equality” by those of LGBT as a GOOD if one is to relate it to the Clinton affected “interpretations” for their own as a BAD.  A simple legal lay perspective is that the Clintons posture their own marriage as if it has no soul - that it is just two lawyers in a maximized legal construct.

Poor George Stephanopoulus is so despised by me that when he got his job at ABC I ceased having any interest in working anywhere at ABC - even as it seems recalled:  anywhere within the parent company that owned ABC.  I have been “political” with George S. since before the Clintons surprised so many with their very late entry into the 1992 campaign as it was in letters to Representative Richard Gephardt’s office where he worked with a Charles Koch son that I offered that a Democrat could win if they were to learn to sound like me as I postured sounding for 1992 in my letters.  Again, as with George S. my despising so is hardly based on the policies of the politics but on the people and character of the historicals.

Al Gore deserved the The Supreme Court of The United States of America Bush v. Gore decision as it was karma payback for his vacuous ‘leadership” when the supposed A Team of the Democrats and the to be expected challenger to President George H. W. Bush (#41).  We are of too few in the know of proper considerations in historicals of the ill fatedness much solely of a despicable political as the shoes that fit Al Gore from the months before the Clintons stepped in in his place.  2014, despite how Paul Krugman is also despised, and yet not worthy while so to be yet in such company, is hardly seemingly possibly to be a good year for President Barack Obama.

We largely wouldn’t be in much of these messes if George S. with his platform at ABC hadn’t been so easy of the lies as if to be allowed “political” “perspectives.”  From my historical perspective I knew the lies building even when set up to mostly be lies by omissions.  And, so it is that I yet though have nearly never watched George S. shows but for those first seconds when I was to realizing what channel I had on at a time I didn’t care to have such channel on.  President Obama is also trapped by the Clintons and their machinations so soul-less in their idea of “marriage” for his loyalty seems yet always to their propositions that Bill Clinton’s Presidency was rightly supposed to be as, and still, in allowances that every decision then could and should be moderated to use all those eight years to set up an as planned as possible succession to such in the name of Hillary Clinton.

President Obama has no where to go in 2014.  He is essentially, like George S. too compromised already by the Clintons.  Once he started his first term in its first hours with tag line lying of ALL BUSH’S FAULT in his oratory he was already across a threshold for impeachability.  As a trained lawyer he should be wise at least to dangers from absolutes like “ALL…”!  Al Gore though is so much worse in my paragon of considerations of worst four that for the most part I have found him too depressing to even include in my writing.  What he set up so to a dangerous vacuous when the supposed Democrat A Team front runner for 1992 is no greater exposed than if and when one is fully to considering the 9/11 and post 9/11 politics and how we are, it seems, to only expect that President Albert A. Gore would only have used such events an excuse for warring in Afghanistan and too, it seems, as yet a war of a totality more against all of Afghanistan.  There are dangers still too present from so much avoidance and inaction much akin to dangers from broadcasting of lies by omissions.

I have to despise Al Gore the most for it is from his vacuous leadership that I felt it necessary in an imminent dire to stop my business and begin writing to arrest his short-comings as perceived possible collateral damage.  I personally put on a happy face with penned offerings to even Representative Gephardt’s office of a happier way forward just because I feared so much what seemed risks of a global that seemed devoid of other company at considerations.  On election day & night of 2000 contest between Governor Bush & Vice President Gore I was in the West 23rd eatery proprietored by James & Mary and to telling James Carville around lunch time that if Al Gore was elected I expected I would move out of the country so not to be here when the crap was expected to hit the fan, and, too how I wasn’t sure Governor Bush was yet ready to be President himself with my tone that he though would be safer when the crap did get to hitting the fan.

The greatest risk to The United States of America in the 1992 race era was still too much how in 1990 and 1991 it had been largely that the Democrat “leaders” were so predictable that one like Saddam Hussein could play them like puppets by their predictability.  It seems that the Democrats of this era were actually the greatest threat to the U.S.A..  My despising these four is of my experience of such fears and for the years so quite of confirming each and every one of the significant parts of such fears.  The story of course is complicated for I saw in my “Mad Man” covert future ambitiousness of my quite intended career path that the best way to reduce such apparent risks was to offer to much be to trying to save the Democrats from themselves.  I despise these four in a TOPS for having seen them as of the danger and then of having helped them seem better than themselves and enough for the election in 1992 that President Bush whom I did respect and vote for was then defeated by attempts to save his policies and progress however oddly in such a seeming necessary.

2014 is the year President Obama is clearly stuck due to ill advised to just stupid absolutes.  Due to his early and kept politics of “ALL BUSH’S FAULT” he was of an impeachable cover-up for the Clintons as such was to suppose a People’d people pre-disposition that it was possible that after eight years of the Clintons “it” could be of an “it” as “NONE OF THE FAULT OF THE CLINTONS.”  2014 is the year now where all are seeing it was preposterous that “it” was and “it” of NONE OF THE CLINTONS FAULT and soon better to how Benghazi became a Gettysburg of cover-up warring as their loss a turning point for truths of the Republicans for once a second 9/11 happened the lies needed new lies to cover-up that the earlier lies were no longer working and workable. 

2014 is the year of the cover-ups!  President Obama has been impeachable like for not firing Secretary of State Clinton for many years and too for his partisan politics of lies before truth so that she could be acceptable as a cabinet officer despite her earned defeat by a near nobody yet a peer.  I was there in a postured standing where ever for the truth during the Obama First Inaugural and to the exercising of Posterity that his lies so spoken shouldn’t stand nor long endure.  President Obama yet may be the only President of The United States of America to have become impeachable within the first hour after his oath of office.

To now proceed as we must at all the cover-up scandals now under way we are behooved to be stirrups ready however saddling is made difficult by so many so muddied and rutted routings.  We should be behooved to be at the reigns for restorations to a minimum necessary level of truth in government, and now more as if of a new romantic age than when such would have more befit the new renaissance spirit of the 1992 course corrections away from then such being a time too much too civilly supposedly anew as if a time of RECONSTRUCTION.  We’ld be wise to fully consider it seems 9/11 was planned to be operational on September 11, 2001 when it was widely supposed and even thought accepted that those were to be the days of a Presidency of Albert A. Gore.

I don’t yet know how I can shift to being paid for these historical insights and offerings in my artful blogging even as when poetry of me as Poet J.P. Hogan without myself being expected to violate my kept Posterity of a visceral basis about despising not just the thought of having to be in the same room, however large and full, with Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and George Stephanopoulus.  These are at least four whom people should harangue upon the times more of the world learn of my story and the depths of history and understanding of its effectings, and, harangue as for it should seem that they are tops among a greater to be churned when to mashing about the sentiments of how wrong it is that at least these didn’t tell people generally about me, and for so long.

To be brief and of the consideration that if you are finding this you already know a necessary some to much of the telling that relates to such.  It is though that how I have avoided Al Gore with so much already written is speaking quietly to the proposition that historically he is so bad he has been too depressing to include.

There is now way out now finally in 2014 for President Barack Hussein Obama.  He has told and pimp’d the BIG LIE that “it” was and “it” of NONE OF THE CLINTONS’ FAULT since his first hour when he wrongly trespassed campaign rhetoric in slights into the body politick as if a new TRUTH established.  This lie is as big as it gets as cover-ups go for the size of the cover-up largely suggests the necessity for a cover-up and really there is hardly a bigger cover-up possible than to stand up a irrational too simple revisionist history as the only TRUTH by ways of suggesting an “it” otherwise as only an “it” of his “it” as unraveling of those IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT.  At least one cover-up minor to such COVER-UP has been unearthed and now 2014 is much ado about the somethings of how a cover-up is the worse case scenario to be avoided unless a cover-up is needed.

There is now that President Obama in his first hour didn’t need to cover-up for the Clintons as he could have championed cleaning up Washington DC for a new Hope in Change with a bipartisan call to start by cleaning up the BAD in his own party at least simultaneously from the start.  President Barack Hussein Obama didn’t need to risk his own Presidency from the start as he did by lying in an impeachable from his first hour to satisfy the Clintons’ need for a cover-up of their real culpabilities and how at least to be considered diabolical in a gross negligence if allowed to be for public consumption.

Al Gore is still a very depressing subject.  I still know what I know from thinking at and through my offered solutions at saving Democrats from Democrats - Democrats from themselves - as by my years of tiring philosophizing and marketing wizardry considerates that fit in my reduced instruction set computed as poetry of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM so consolidated.  2014 is a year too when it does behoove any saddled so for TRUTHS to be stirrups ready and muddy ways alert to how it also ridiculous to proffer IT ALL BUSH’S FAULT, however, while it seems a simple and inconvenient truth that Albert Gore was expected to be the President at the time of the long planed attacks of September 11, 2001.

These are the days of revitalized FAITH & FREEDOM voters.  Too to the despising of these four is yet a historical consideration that my efforts to so be of such as it seems of my having pulled the Clintons into the1992 race and via letters read by George S. while then in Representative Gephardt’s offices that the TRUTHS are darker for as bad as this has worked out it may be that this wasn’t the worst case scenario so motivational to my redirection of my entrepreneurial efforts and expediting of some of my personal career path plans so for others.  Now that we all should be at how much we need to look at Al Gore as a problem and historically so 2014, however Krugman over writes low excuses, is the year President Obama must answer to why at cover-ups and while cover-ups are supposed to be presumed to be the known worse case scenario to be at only when much need be hidden (at least to protect in a too partisan of party politics playing politics as politics put ahead of governance.).

Yes, I would welcome being in the same room with David Boise and Theodore Olson however as lawyers or authors.  I have since whence been sympatico with progress and governance in reasoned equality around a species at civilly singing songs of the “body electric”.  Of the Clintons yet it seems they saw 3.8% as fit for a politics of convenient rabble rousing while yet as per Iraq of not seeing or hearing the cries of abandonment of a majority of a nation.  Was President Gore too to be so pro Sunni to be still officially bigoted as the Administration of the Clintons agains the Iraqi Shia as said to be inferior people “unable to govern themselves”?  I would welcome being in a room with Boise and Olson to yet discuss to where yet we may have differences of opinion as to processes and Constitutional interpretation as to what is written law and what new writings may be prudent.

Forward:  Now you know I really, really, have no interest in ever being in the same room with Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and nor George Stephanopoulus.  This is a very informed position/opinion.  I haven’t yet gone to the whole of it fully.

Forward:  Due to the laws of absolutes once a cover-up has been determined to have actually have been running a year like 2014 must go down in history as a win for absolute basics as only a little lie need be proven for the whole Party/House of the COVER-UP to fall.  In the specific of a 2014 for President Obama it seems now there are multiple cover-ups passed such basic and resolute absolute intolerance.  Again, for Posterity, President Obama once elected was not necessarily to his desicion to so be engaged in these now more apparent attempts to cover up for the Clintons and at least their eight years of the Administration conjoined of the Clintons. 

Forward:  For such maybe I should despise him as much as Al Gore - I am not there yet.

Comments Off
06/17/14
DREAMS OF HIS ‘FATHER’?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AL QAEDA, #BLACKS, SYRIA, #BLAME, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:28 am

The truth is that President Barack Hussein Obama these years self tagged as to a “New Foundation” is he most physically in a political responsibility he most culpable for how he has destroyed the better foundations that better structured a ‘global’ America.

We can not and should not forget what it can be said he too inherited from the years 1993-2001 of the Administrations of the Clintons.  President Obama is he whom started afoot in the foreign and domestic of professing he desired so to have a personality based presidency.  President Obama firstly should be now, as to “personality”, at blaming himself.

In the news and off the grid, so of the grapevines of blogs, there are discussions to religiosity more Constitutionally restored and vitally in a refreshed People’d peoples civic engagements.  It may help President Obama now more than Mrs. Clinton, however, that too by Susan B. Anthony List standing at The Supreme Court of The United States of America there is now with such originality refreshed of the logic and faith of the Founding Fathers that the Bill of Rights is an accompaniment to the New Testament at least and so that lying is cover-ed by the Ten Commandments, however, written by a man.  Something about ‘bearing false witness’ seems akin to the ‘legacy’ of the House of Clintons.

There may be much President Obama can blame on Secretary Clinton and as well on the years of the terms of the Administration of the Clintons.  Yet though, for now President Obama has himself most to blame.  Yet though, for now President Obama is a he more responsible than she, yes too as a she, as Secretary Clinton and Mrs. Clinton, however.  President Obama, however he proffered an “I inherited this…” has it that regardless of which history he said he “inherited” he chose between available options and much it seems without considering many of his options.

This is not about Mr. Obama - Father Obama - Dad biological to the President.  It however cannot escape the prima facia dramatic that Mrs. Clinton to President Clinton offered a resolution for an Oedipal as if a surrogate white mother figure.  President Clinton is more a ‘father’ for the sake of necessary and timely governance purview discourse - and too still the earlier ‘fathers’ back to the founding fathers - the ‘Founding Fathers.”

The foundations to the problems President Obama is facing about obvious failures at his “New Foundation” have his roots of he a sprouting Harvard Law Student near about the time Al Qaeda was so born - born to become ISIS as is an is like of Osama Bin Laden, however a ‘father’ to it, as an is an is like of a JIHAD against American Infidels too much of “is”s not as “is”s.  The 9/11 Commission Report is hopefully not relied upon by President Obama;  President Obama may be better served to ignore it an yet consider the tome of TERROR AND CONSENT by Philip Bobbitt as a Clinton NSC adviser whom tagged it dangerous as to a begetting terrorism of an if and when the The White House is of an administration working too closely with Hollywood.  Al Qaeda wasn’t covered enough or far enough back by the 9/11 Commission to now have enough in a know as to how the ISIS of today is like of proud sons of OBL living out the purpose that Al Qaeda was formed and originally of asking Saudi Arabian leaders for their blessings to become - to grow into.

To the religiosity yet of the unexpected ‘domestic’ elements of the quandary and conundrums particular to the insufficeincies in his “New Foundation” politics of his sought “personality based presidency” we can consider that it is helpful that the People’d people of the The United States of America are refreshed to how the Bill of Rights is a ten like the Ten Commandments and how the First Amendment affirms that the separation of church and state is so of them as presumed of an equal or greater right at interpretation of God’s will and establishments than the Congress.  The First Amendment affirms that the body of the Constitution by the preamble is the Peoples’ “Order” [with order here as a noun] “done” as a “more perfect Union” than the United Kingdom’s, at least, and so as “subscribed” unanimously while “agreed” or “so agreed” could have otherwise sustained the liberal wants of it set secular.

It should help the People’d people that it has become refreshed that the founding ‘fathers’ secured the ordained and established more perfect “Order” under God by their specified subscribing so in that year of the Christian calendar so of the New Testament as “done” “in the Year of our Lord…”!  So established the separation of church and state and free speech protections of the Bill of Rights by its First has it that “lying” is not to be “legal” (maybe at least in politics of campaigns - campaign advertising) as the Constitution is of the accompaniment writ so to the New Testament, at least.

It should help President Obama and yet not likely his ‘mother’ Clinton nor his ‘father’ Clinton as so refreshed of the original American Dream so conceived and long consecrated the The United States of America is not writ large to an infidelity to Holy words and guidance;  It should help President Obama for such “America” has standing in the Middle East with any “justice” core common of ISIS so that we can stand comparatively to be at the borders edges to Syria and Iraq of an alternative and example that their ‘foundations’ and any success at ‘governance’ can be then related and digressed over, firstly - firstly before there yet could be a more ‘global’ campaign as rationally reasoned in a ‘justice’ against the idea that is “The United States of America.”

President Clinton has been a bad ‘father’ to President Obama.  It seems President Obama has been falling and failing where he may have like accepted advice or “dreams” from President William Jefferson Clinton - he born as conflicted as William Jefferson (Davis) Blythe III — so it seems.

The milk and any cream of the days of Secretary Clinton as of “hard choices” have spoiled on poor President Barack Hussein Obama, however she a ‘mother’ and even too much to an Oedipal as he of any sought of seeking a surrogate elderly white mother figure.  She and he the ‘father’ to her a ‘mother’ of the House of Clintons is embroiled forever forward and backwards of a compromised legacy and of basic wants that will not be favored judiciously or by many People’d peoples while she and he are of the BIG establishments as both known to be revealed and tagged as “Big Liars.”

President Thomas Jefferson did lead a politics for 40 years after 1800 as if its ‘father’ - is it as a ‘father’ of Jeffersonian Republicans?  But while the “Founding Fathers” were dedicated and joined to their historic establishment and ordaining of a People’d Order [again with “Order” as a noun] Thomas Jefferson was over seas and out of their hair/wigs.  The “Founding Fathers” found Thomas Jefferson on his return and Constitutional perusals has issues with their writ;  The writing as the first moderation of the body as the People’s Order of the First Amendment is cleverly penned in unusual first language so to seem to appease the “issues” of Jefferson’s complaints - and yet not to at all.

By Jefferson’s practice and the devotions like apostolic by Jeffersonian Republicans of 1800-1840 quite we have an elephant in the room about how to interpret maybe otherwise than the original intent the specific words of the body and the first amending.  We have that though the Constitution reads as set under God as to an meant accompaniment with the New Testament and as the context of the times affirm such is a natural development of the idea of the colonies independent it is still that how Jefferson governed and his ’sons’ like later may have been only of success for being of a parsed and nuanced otherness.

Comments Off
06/08/14
OUR PRIME SUSPECT!
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, AL QAEDA, #CGI, #KERRY, #SUSPECT, #WHITEPRIDE, #BLAME, #MORALS, COVER UPS, SANS SCRIPTS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:53 am

Where did she go wrong?  How are our criticisms of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton enough “well informed”?  Aren’t we at if we just compare her to whom she followed and who followed her that we are fair in reporting and chronicling that she was the worst of three?

We’ld be fools and unfairly so (and racist) if we are to ignore all the flip flops of Mrs. Clinton, however, and if to an affirming posit that it she be presumed that she was a better Secretary of State than the two most previously.  Right?

We’ld be fools and unfairly to discerning differences in old white political elites and new white political elitism if to an avoidance to pare the pair of Secretaries of State of the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama.  Both Clinton and Kerry brought hypocracy and baggage to the office for diplomacy - both Clinton and Kerry were inappropriate or devolutionary choices for such high office due to their personal conflicts - conflicts of interests - past positions as of entanglements.

We to start any due probative of Mrs. Clinton as a worst, at least of three, by remembering all her flip flops and too her executive decidings while crusading with the Powers of her office as First Lady.  We should be aware of whom are Bedouins or Nubians and how Ja Ja Binks seems to have been cast as a new good Gunga Din.  If I recall the setting correctly then it was when Lara Logan interviewed General Petraeus in Afghanistan when he spoke of then in his readings of reading Rudyard Kipling.  It seems to be accounted of an if true how true that Mr. Binks was right when of parrying that if a people keep theirs sewers clear from clogging their murder rate should be lower.  President Barack Hussein Obama in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech tagged the Clintons while parsing in oratory how there are dangers from inaction and avoidance (as like evident now from the Clintons’ own years of avoidance and inaction).

The Congress so far has the House nearly ready for the rendering of justice per the discovered and confirmed cover-up post Benghazi.  I do not know when the Senate will also be ready.  I expect due to the seriousness of any “cover-up” our Congress must soon be bicameral and in too a bipartisanship in the Senate, so charged, to also looking to how guilty Mrs. Clinton, however, and to how diabolical it is that a “cover-up” was thought her best strategy.  Mrs. William Jefferson “Hillary” Clinton is the prime suspect in a commencing investigation to the extents in criminality and so that it must be now presumed that she was a worse Secretary of State than at least Condoleezza Rice.

To preserve some “innocent until proven guilty” for Mrs. Clinton, however, we should look firstly at the life and politics - war/anti-war politics of her successor Secretary of State John Kerry.  We should look first at a comparative for prudence secured in “jurisprudence” to his positions re: “BOOTS ON THE GROUND” and her’s, however.

Still, and again, to be of a preserve for any innocence, despite Mrs. Clinton’s years of flip flops over boots on the ground, and indiscriminate droning warring, we can make this more about the life and story of John Kerry as of a query:  TERRORIST OR PEACEMAKER?  But we should behooved of another believed remembered Lara Logan interview that was with a supposed top Taliban leader - yes! before 9/11 II in Benghazi - as contradicting President Obama and Secretary Clinton with his pronouncements to it that the Taliban and Al Qaeda were now much as if one, and, yes, newly.  For a sake of tonality and the horse race of this to a due fair measurement of the saddled guilt just of Mrs. Clinton let us just acknowledge that part of the cover-up relates to it that Benghazi could have been and may be a widening of the theater of war and a “counter-attack” in the Obama/Clinton war of choice in Afghanistan against primarily the (said) Taliban.

Still, and again, to be of a preserve for any innocence, despite Mrs. Clinton’s years of flip flops over boots on the ground, and indiscriminate droning warring, we should be organized as a posse for truths, and too bicamerally in a new bipartisan, yet recognize the evidence that she has set her self (themselves in Clinton) up as if the bad guys in a season of SOPRANOS.  We can’t just jump on her successor if to keeping prudence in jurisprudence for she however measured for her guilt is still of her years as FLOTUS where she did go into rivals turf and incite with incendiary imperialist rhetoric the locals, however tribal, and to such inflaming that those radical already were more radicalized and pushed into corners as if called out by Mrs. Clinton, so, in a pride to a need to “respond.”

So about how bad a Secretary of State John Kerry is, and, too to how he was a most inappropriate selection for any high office in foreign affairs regarding the Middle East, and due to his past pulling of the rug out from under any real potential for success in OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, and so from near the very day and hours the country, with President George W. Bush, had become “committed” with boots on the ground - committed beyond the point of quiet return:

Secretary of State John Kerry while the primary ANTI-WAR SENATOR did do more than any other in the known world to undermine the potential and any ready success for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM.  Mrs. Clinton can hardly have to shoulder all the blame for so much that went wrong much do to the betrayal in a late response as a revival in ANTI-WAR demonstrative tonality, but for her own flipping and flopping fickleness to prudence and loyalty to a committed administration too.  Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha were a tag team that did by their politics so partisan (interpartisan too) were to being those, even more than the Clintons, that did put the lives of all with boots on the ground in Iraq into their unexpected greater peril.  At the time Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha started their ANTI-WAR REVIVAL it was no longer appropriate to take issue with the matter Congress had already voted with, and however Senator Clinton is remembered for admitting that she herself didn’t read the intelligence reports regarding such before her vote.

Mrs. Clinton yet cannot escape that the cover-up seems still to have been necessary to save the cover-up of the culpability and negligence of the Administration of the Clintons.  As it is the known “Benghazi Lies” seem of the worst case scenario need for the dangerous strategy of cover-up, and by Mrs. Clinton who had worked on the committees to impeach Nixon and as of the Clintons’ own Lewinski cover-up, arguably and in an seeming evidence based deciding for if not, as the lies of the Clintons’ cover-up were failing, only lies about their lack of intelligence and understanding about Al Qaeda, at least, needed more lies to preserve any chance of future electability of the Clintons for a retaking of the The White House.

Right!  This is supposed to be an attempt to transfer Clinton guilt, presumed, unto her successor Secretary of State John Kerry, and however as necessary by a looking deeply back at least at his “politics” of his ANTI-WAR REVIVAL as causal to such that maybe can be said to be more, at least, of a Kerry negligence than a Clintons’ gross negligence.

We, if of the lay, should behooved to let the Federal Bureau of Investigation profilers and Defense Department Armed Forces Psychological operations experts take the lead to explaining how devastating Senator John Kerry’s ANTI-WAR REVIVAL, from hour one, was to moral and cooperation of the Iraqi people.  We should expect that experts will be called to parse the level of negligence, at least, to the full measure of at least the guilt of Mrs. Clinton, however, and even towards passing the buck if passable to her successor for his past own culpability for lighting the fire of a belief that the U.S.A. was, due to his lead, ready to CUT AND RUN - REALLY!!!

RIGHT!!! Still, Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, just for the impeachment and disbarrment of the half she supposedly is the better half too, and however of a “great man” she supposedly the “great woman” behind, is even without her experience as Hillary Rodham Clinton of the committees to impeach President Richard Milhous Nixon like the political figure of the modern United States of America whom best should know cover-ups are to be avoided but in worse case political scenarios - She is whom seems best knows how bad things must really should be thought as bad if and when a cover-up is the uncovered strategy.  That Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton herself chose to front with a cover-up does itself suggest so much guilt and a necessity that it may not matter how much blame we can yet transfer to her successor or continue to project upon the Bush Administration. SEEMS!!!

Where did she go wrong?  How are our criticisms of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton enough “well informed”?  Aren’t we at if we just compare her to whom she followed and who followed her that we are fair in reporting and chronicling that she was the worst of three?

The sheer tonality of the remarks from Secretary of State Clinton since the Benghazi lies started did, despite her strategy to run out the clock with Congress, yet have her of self-incrimination and even much that was admitting of ignorance and incompetence at least as to her (like the Administration of the Clintons’ too) as lacking in intelligence.  It seems Congress has her already fit for orange and is now only ready for the House to assess its duty to a determination as to how long she should be fit to only wear orange - however a pants suit or jumpsuit.

NOTE:  There is much to a much longer list if and when to looking only at Mrs. Clinton, however, and of the when-evers, to how that she risked a cover-up over her culpability for the keep of State per the Benghazi consulate, and personnel, that to must reach with the long arms of justice, by the charge and reach Constitutional of the Congress, straight to and also through Mr. William Jefferson Clinton, and any and all of his “foundations” and “initiatives.”  It must be presumed due to a cover-up strategy that Mrs. Clinton while responsible for State & USA oversight of CGI likely was as a spouse afraid to incriminate herself for such seems naturally to also implicate her spouse for his “HOWEVERS” and “WHEN-EVERS” — and for just as long.

However, a STAR WARS defense a greater defense now for the Bushes and Reagan, it seems fair to illicit an imagery for the Clintons as now it seems of them of: A HOUSE OF CLINTONS WITH THEIR SEWERS CLOGGED!

RIGHT!!!  It to Secretary of State John Kerry’s benefit that Mrs. Clinton is taggable, and mashable, and hashable as too much of:  MRS. CLINTON LIED AND SOLDIERS AND DIPLOMATS, AT LEAST, DIED — SHE WAS MOST INDISCRIMINATE IN DRONING WARRING AND AS IN LIEU OF BOOTS ON THE GROUND PARITY OF MISSION.

NOTE:  FOR MORE HISTORY & “BACKGROUND” SEE SORTED BY “CARNEGIE HALL” @ http://bit.ly/ChubbyHubby.  Please get past confusion of voluminous thread opening yet with this same column as its lede or leading piece.

Comments Off
06/04/14
THE PATERNITY TESTING?
Filed under: AUTO-BIO'D, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, TREASON, #WHITEPRIDE, #BLAME, #MAGIC, #NEW_YORK, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:23 am

CAPITALISM is better than the too existent (Clinton / Democrats) POLITICS by THEFT and LIES!

This is so about “capitalism” as it is of what paternity tests around supposed Clinton “off-spring” would reveal as not actually their’s.

We are of trying economic days from tragedies of error by Democrats at attempts in governance while pretenders.  It will start to seem especially politically tragic when I expose how the Clintons as such “pretenders” created a realm of “over-confidence” that then had Barack Hussein Obama too presumptuous as to what wasn’t that of “capitalists” and as if that of “government.”

This is not now being exposed as an official report of a still covert or mysterious actual paternity of so much long in creation of great goods through maximizing positive change and its potential as a most evolutionary way for the The United State of America to progress after becoming the sole super-power in the known world.  This is written in a sharing so that people can make better decisions by knowing truths about “parenting” falsely prided too long by politicians.  This is written today as Father’s Day is approaching for it relates to “politics” without being “partisan” to how some Democrats do belong under serious investigation and towards real jail time in an incarcerated imprisonment some respective of fraud and truth in advertising “standards” at least.

Yes CAPITALISM, at least as per my interpretation and ambition to my own story of “business plans”, is better than how the Clintons alone did render me no longer able to afford to be in business to fix my legacy so that it was still available for them to pilfer to still look as good as it used to make them “officially” appear.  Because the Clintons were of priding and preening themselves from misuse and misappropriation of a capitalism of one trying to set a new and improved evolved and progressive standard for “media moguls” there are some like George Stephanopoulus whom likely is now still too “associated.”

My work at making the Clintons electable in 1992 was serious work of my CITIZEN ROSEBUD capitalist ambitions and by then already tested business plan.  My story of “parenting” evolved positive change is of a greater to the lesser of that which the Clintons were of a lesser of the whole of what it was I was at in a “capitalism” patriotic.  The Benghazi Select Committee seems sufficiently endowed and purposed to Duty such to discern whom is also wrongly of a pride (or gaggle) of the Clintons.

There is - there are many paper trails to reveal this pathology of falsity in the pride(s) of the Clintons / Democrats.  There are interesting political twists involving Governor Sarah Heath Palin as for so much of my decades to such in my “capitalism” was of “controls” and/or “checks” such as how I was covertly being like a grandfather to my sister while being a covert and pro-active (like) father to my father I was to giving away the same idea(s) many times otherwise to others on more Republican or “conservative” tracks like Sarah Palin known to me since the winter of 1982-83.

The sad but eventually laughable is how Barack Hussein Obama got trapped and fell to associations like with Secretary Chuck Hagel and Director Brennan after I had shut down my “capitalism” for I couldn’t afford then to be in business once the Clintons announced their intent to retake the The White House in 2007.  There is a name association that relates to President Obama as like Sarah Palin but with he one whom benefited from my knowing him of Presidential oratory challenge interests since he was in High School and I in 7th grade.  Of my “capitalism” was the business smarts to never forget a classmate named Steven Brennen the wise aleck who like play pre-Google “operator” to all “orator” “competitors” in Hawaii from our classroom in New Haven, and as it was to be wise in New Haven while so ambitious in “media mogul” ambitions in capitalism to not ignore the proud Richard Hegel, New Haven Historian, whose Christmas parties my family had long attended.

When I had to shut down due to the Clintons I then was no longer in business and the covert hobby of being so a grand parent to my sister and her “work” and “politics” and nor then as well as it long was the father to my father in creative and mostly pro-active covert wizardry in networked web weaving.  Senator Obama got caught for when I stopped the “magic” stopped flowing as already “fixed” through my father and my sister to him.  I hadn’t, while fighting the Clintons further attempts to render my “capitalism” as their personal but “government property”, so by needing to shut down in like what I otherwise call my RANDIAN STRIKE from the day “HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT” was born just of them, been wise to need to fight the old know B.O. four years older from Hawaii so.  It was between his entry into the Presidential race and then after my incidentally helping him by working myself to defeat the Clintons to protect my intellectual property rights that I finally realized too late that he was getting free help from me through my sister because I hadn’t yet associated Barack Obama with the B.O. known so since the late 1970s.

I have known the Clintons longer yet than Sarah Heath Palin and Barack Hussein Obama for I have known them and been alarmed with them since I met them while I was a first grader in New Haven about a year, maybe before Watergate.  I can hardly blame my father or my sister so for what I was at was developmental and in a covert that had much that was to lift their “boats” up as I worked and worked to my greater ambitions of my networking at CITIZEN ROSEBUD capitalism as cleaner than politics for wanting “success” from people choosing to buy what I thought I should try to sell.  But for President Obama when I asserted with AG Holder my rights in intellectual property and “capitalism” so to it that President Obama was told I had a right to keep him from a free use of my “capitalism” “off-spring” it was he got kind of stuck.

President Obama was not barred from arranging a contractual and agreed to use at full market value.  As it was I would have stipulated I needed to be made whole from the decade plus of the Clintons’ misappropriations and reuses and attempts yet to further unauthorized reuses.  As it was President Obama couldn’t very well be of his “First Black” “personality presidency” if he had to acknowledge me and contract a fair and severely limited use “arrangement” in “capitalism.”

For the purposes of today and the approaching Father’s Day it behoove you to test yourselves, however, to discover how President William Jefferson Clinton is really not the “father” you have believed him to be and nor he that his Mrs. has continued to persist in purporting him as.  Just my 7 book challenge to JK Rowling for progressing books as if school years was of such entire “covert” realm and my wizardry and yet also moderated in its unspoken of purposes to be yet one way I could assert in a repeat a capability in such as the above jurisdictions.  To be brief that I am the father of the HARRY POTTER books and magic “realm” it behoove all to see that it was figured too in an attempt to yet protect a new generation from the Clintons I so knew - knew too well.

There are complications in my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM when I was so afoot stealthily in my CITIZEN ROSEBUD media mogul ambitions with my fall back to be just a top Madison Avenue Ad Man - “Mad Man”.  I pretty much cut off my fall back within my fall back after 1994 sweep for my sister so to have some place to go after abruptly leaving Senator Dodd’s State Office as his State Director like as due a “political” “Peter Principle.”  I was shifting to “political writing” and further overt and covert efforts at such post New World Order birthing of the The United States of America yet reborn as a sole super-power and knew by then I wouldn’t need my fall back to my fall back, and even as it were the Clintons “governance” too much of inappropriate misappropriation and misuse and sub-optimal use of my “capitalism.”

There are complications that go to also past relationships as too “personal” and “private” and “complicated” for one alone became of my agreeing to help the daughter then of the CFO of IBM with her father while it was that I saw a way to help him with my “capitalism” and tested business plan to performing in such agreement by helping him fix IBM from afar and at times still too covertly in “marketing” “wizardry” “magic” unsolicited “guidance.”  James Burke who later led the search for Akers & Metz - CEO & CFO replacements at IBM was the last top Johnson & Johnson executive I think my maternal grandfather as a top New York City Madison Avenue Marketing and Advertising executive with Young & Rubicam had last professionally associated.

For now there is that I can never in one day recall all that I “parented” in a “paternity” pathology of my “capitalism” of and to my CITIZEN ROSEBUD media mogul ambitions and how so much I gave away and gave away to others not the Clintons for I was expecting to be able to keep what the Clintons mistook for myself.  President Obama still is facing that he wanted a “personality presidency” and any public use of my vast creative successes wound necessarily be needing a stipulation contractual that I in some way become made whole from the Clintons and their pride’s misappropriate or kidnapped uses.

Just in the category of what I gave to NBC and about GE CEO Jack Welch is a category of mused to great successes I too cannot fully recall yet in any singular day.  And, with that is too how American Corporate “leaders” needed to be saved from themselves as we were like in a war none of them had seen coming.  This though is a part of the story that precedes the Clintons but then explains as foundational to their unexpected rise how it is that they of Governor Clinton true self like of his 1988 Democratic Party Convention speech did actually SURPRISE in 1992.

There is, to be still brief, besides many most successful sitcoms also my godfathering the modern snowboard design and the half-pipe, the Stanley Tools reinvention of the hand saw, and mass market broadcast to tell my “capitalist” network I liked the start-up “LIFE IS GOOD” brand that my old but not known until 5th reunion Villanova University classmate was of three years trying to launch with his brother but yet unsuccessfully.  There is more and more and more and more somewhere at least partly at http://CitizenRosebud.info of category 4 as my AUTO BIO’D marginalized “category.”

WARNING!!!  Many of my “birthed” successes were cross pollinated - like - like as that some that I mused around for one of such was also otherwise a basis and commonality for other(s).

Comments Off
06/03/14
THERE SHE BLOWS?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, #CGI, #QUEEN, WAR ON WOMEN, #NEW_YORK
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 1:03 pm

With an American in Poland old freshness now soured rises anew of the “among the vicissitudes incident to life” parity of President George Washington firstly speaking so in New York City - and so metaphorically for a new born nation.  We are forced to a consideration of Herman Melville if only of any “Moby Dick” as a “Great White…” - seems.

Let us get to some technicalities in a measurement of any said a “Longest War”!  Now:

When did this “Longest War” not a “longest war” start but under the “Diplomacy” (failed) of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton?  She seemed to start with a forced (political) surge as if “diplomatic” and postured and postured as if of a violate actually a declared (necessary) war.  She seemed to have left her office in a worsened “Diplomatic” state than she found it;  Hillary Rodham Clinton, however, must have failed at any and all “diplomatic solutions” for such as (”Hillary’s War) to be a “war” and a “longest war” however hardly actually a “longest” or “declared” war.

This “Longest War” didn’t start under/during the Presidential administering of President George W. Bush.  President Bush traded for trespass rights with the sovereign of Afghanistan to be “in country” investigatively and purposely looking for about 50 foreigners as “campers” and some to much “trespassers” themselves.  A fact of Afghanistan is how tribal it is so that it seems Al Qaeda “campers” didn’t need or have any cooperation or real authorization in shared purposes with a majority.

To get to the metric and an honesty of chronological measurement to a/the failure in “Diplomatic” by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton however not a “Longest War” it behoove any to frame and key their probatives around a postulating that it could only have been so if she was of failing and failing and failing and failing and failing years at finding (as like now) a “diplomatic” end/solution.  For purposes of ratio - it seems as now with “war” announced as like “over” that she herself just needed all those long years to herself just offer to declare “war is over” to have “reset” the Clinton PEACE.

We can hardly presume Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton of a accepted “innocence” or “authority” in “rightness” for it is her State Department of the OBAMA RETREAT from Iraq - so injudiciously and prematurely.  What for the sake of measuring the body of Mrs. Clinton’s “Diplomacy” have been the costs of such a brutal abandonment of Iraq and so after so much was spent to build a new - a brand new and like most expensive newest and largest newest - Embassy in Iraq?  Her numbers of any metric so far seem far from actually flattering.

Perchance a parsing to it best to brine to thin the fats of any meat on the thighs of the leg work “diplomatic” of Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton before any roasting or exposing of her as if already too fried?  Right!!! It seems there are no “wings of Hillary”!  It seems she can be judged to for it having to be her and her alone and such to that now it “evidence based” deciding to discern there is not a flock at the ready as lifted to by her drafts as of a keep of a flock as a metaphor as of any if “under another’s wings”!  It seems the Clintons have buried any Democrat woman who could be a threat to Mrs. Clinton;  It seems there are bodies of women Democratic in Party to yet look for as subdued and like “buried” by the Clintons.

She walks in shadows of valleys of death of so many of suffrage and suffering from a darkness in the eclipse of President William Jefferson Clinton still at blocking so many from a clear “light”!  It is yet publicly clear how it is that it seems there are no Democrat Party women to “challenge” Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as if she is only the queen bee of Democrat female bees and of a power only possible if there are not any that haven’t like also compromised themselves from a bedding with he whom as also presumed to be a first President of the World.

So until recently Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was supposed to see President Barack Hussein Obama as her “BOSS” and however like either “Ahab” or a “Great White Whale” himself.  It was odd and awkward from the start of her submissiveness that she both as Mr. & Mrs. Clinton were of political & party pressure to have her boss tag her “two-fer” as “rivals” and how while so was of incredible insubordination to President Obama as her “Moby Dick” that she declared she was to be so of her declaration to be of “leadership” from taking her “inspiration” (seems) from the same place Dante found his (for his Inferno?).

Again her measurements for her body in “diplomatic” treading are not flattering.  Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton, however, however now more “first lady” in all corporated appearances to Mr. William Jefferson Clinton, did neither have “Hard Choices” of a “war” nor “necessary war” nor of an operating actually a “longest war.”  Before there was a Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton however the “great woman” behind and success of her “BOSS” President Obama there was mostly just “operations” in Afghanistan of trespass rights from trading building roads and schools endeavors.

As it seems too measurable that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as a Cabinet Officer and “executive” is of so many short comings “evidently” when an “evidence based” review is past even an initial probative it therefore is transparent that she (and more than President Barack Hussein Obama) is of having #FAILED!

But in the failures and failing of Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, however, aren’t we behooved to be to a:

1.  WHAT WAS HER MANAGEMENT STYLE?
2.  WAS SHE A BROWN NOSER?
3.  WAS SHE A SUCK-UP?
4.  WAS SHE TOO EASY?
5.  WAS IS THAT SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE CLEARLY
     SEEN IN A LIGHT OF “FAILURE” FAR EARLIER IF HER
     HUSBAND VIA APPEARANCES OF #CGI WASN’T A
     SUGAR DADDY OF “BROWN BAG” GLOBAL POLITICS
     TO GREASE THE FOREIGN INFLUENCES (TO PERSONAL
     EMOLUMENTS THEY THOUGH THEY COULD CALL
     “POLITICAL CAPITAL”?)
6.  IF SHE DID “IMPROVE” (LEGALLY) “FOREIGN RELATIONS”
     ANYWHERE - HOW DID SHE?
7.  DID SHE PUT HER HUSBAND FIRST OVER HER “BOSS”
     ALWAYS?

Is it now the country is in a pickle for a divided Democrat “house” of a “party divided” and some for she having lived up to the “Hillary is too polarizing” tag so that her rap is judicious and a queriousness risen to how now Democrat female under her of “wings” as if all Democrat women have been corrupted by the Clintons and unable to rise without tagging themselves in a self-incrimination if at attempting to boldly step out to incriminate Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, however?

Where are all the Democrat female leaders buried - where is Mrs. Clinton’s female “competition”?  Is it that only the Republicans have now grown new party boughs free of the tree of Clintons’ corruption where whence it was the GOP had near none whom could rise to incriminate the “The Clinton” without also self-incrimination?

O Democrats, O Democrats — Where for art thee a one you can smartly call a “Captain”?

Comments Off
05/29/14
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AFGHANISTAN, #QUEEN, WAR ON WOMEN, #FEMINISM, #STUPID SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:08 am

What is a Democrat today?  I mean it seems established that President Obama nor President Clinton are or have ever been ‘Philosopher Kings’.  And, today we are of a fallen Mrs. Clinton of having been allowed to fail - luckily in a lesser job than President - who failed.  I do not know if I can be charitable to President Obama - now - now following his address in commencement at the West Point Military Academy.

Before we break bread for a old civility too around feminism we have it maybe that we need to avoid asking if ever there has been or yet could be any “philosopher queen(s)” - philosophically speaking.  And so let it be written that we can here dispense with Mrs. Clinton at least for never yet having been a “queen” however.

It yet isn’t lucky for Mrs. Clinton that President Barack Hussein Obama’s Commander in Chief grandstanding as if of a new foreign policy also has to be considered as an inappropriate “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!”.  Mrs. Clinton’s pedestrian hands are dirty of the likes of it and with culpability in carbon dating that long precedes even Senator Obama’s getting his feet the least wet per.

As she has yet never been a “queen” however it is too that we cannot quite tag her even as a “philosopher queen.”  No!  No she is an embodiment of the “COMPROMISE” - she is yet, however not a queen, of the same tag of her former boss as one, though a male, whom has been said to have been evidently witnessed as not having a philosophy of governance.

I concur.  I too have never seen enough premeditation of an intellectual beyond knee jerk defensive convenient compromising from at least President Obama for even a hypothesis at a “philosophy” of governance.  Though attempted at “proffered” the former Constitution Law Professor President Obama waned globally while commencing at West Point as if of a shouldered pride full of personal doing/building as if of all the pomp and circumstance as his “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!”.

Should we talk about the women?  Need we talk about the women differently?  Mustn’t we now at least talk about the women as differently and globally as Mrs. Clinton has in her practiced political & ‘diplomatic’?  Is a life of the soul of an Afghani women so worth more than Mrs. Clinton, however, treated the value of Iraqi women?  Mustn’t it be female Clinton’s fault that President Obama had a foreign policy that too allowed Iraqi women to be devalued relative to Afghani women?

So if she is all about the “COMPROMISE” where are all the compromises sold or pimped as greater goods as if intelligent?

To all the brave souls as of the The United States Armed Forces, however, and however if too much as collateral to the Democrats as family of the bravest:  Right - philosophically speaking the Democrats have devalued Iraqi women while using an excuse for a war of choice against the Taliban as by lies about 9/11 deductions and so that the intelligent and any of common sense can discern that the argument for the Democrats said “necessary” war of choice against the Taliban does smartly work for Operation Iraqi Freedom justifying, but.  When we now accept the Democrats lied and soldiers and diplomats, at least, died it is odd that their lie for a war of choice as if deduced from 9/11 “politics” is actually, however an “argument”, a better justification for the involvement, prior to the Obama Iraqi abortive, of OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM.

Right - best for now to leave it to the still much unconsidered intellectual contrasting as too how the Clintons, at least together in their 8 years of the Administration of the Clintons, were to likely then also of devaluing Iraqi women while of abandonment of both Afghani and Iraqi women & children.  It is odd that Mrs. Clinton as “@HillaryClinton has her avatar of publicly stating she isn’t an advocate for men - that she is self bio’d as just an “advocate” of “women & kids”.

We should have asked the Clintons years ago for seeming lies about “PEACE” to justify their convenient compromised politics of “PEACE DIVIDENDS” while the women and “kids” of Afghanistan and Iraq suffered in the ABANDONMENT by the The United States of America.  It seems, but seems as yet to be “officially” concluded, that the Clintons must have used the CIA to lie about “PEACE” so that they could sell abandoning so many souls in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Now, as the commenced MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! (false) pride of President Commander in Chief Barack Hussein Obama falls even flatter, it has us called to march for freedom, and renewed honesty;  Now, as the commenced extant in that Mrs. Clinton likes to tag as at “evidence based deciding”, we have the globally evident contrariness to discern.  I am not now willing to assert that President George W. Bush was greater than working to a standard operating methodology, even such as he was to yet being of a “philosophy of governance”!  Such may have to wait for the discussion of any woman if a woman yet a “philosopher queen.”

Let me be clear: to keep it simple: to let us work at stupid simple:  The Democrats lied worse as at a lying to the People for a war of choice not a war of necessity so such as Afghanistan now as a “longest war.”  There is no argument for their war of choice that needed a clever misdirection deduction from the events of 9/11 that isn’t more real as so of how it so then was proper and justified more so for the Administration of the Clintons to have been in Afghanistan for such reasons even as early as their 1993-1997 term.  We avoid talking “common sense” if we disavow ourselves from talking about how we were justified if so justified by such a justifying to have been there in Afghanistan before 9/11.  Let me be clear, and to the “evidence based deciding” Mrs. Clinton is loosely posturing:  Because the Clintons, however, so seemed at best to have been lying about “PEACE” and for political popularity in “PEACE DIVIDENDS” that they lied is that they lied worse than any of the Bush Administrations.

I leave you to accept that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has never yet been a “queen” however, and, to ask yourselves how bad the Democrats have been as their arguments as if of a justifying do “evidently” undermine their own (if an attempt at philosophy) “philosophy.”  The lies told so the Democrats could have timely “operations” in Afghanistan for the “women & kids” do work as a better argument for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM and yet though for how the said “lies” of the Adminstration of George W. Bush were evidently told in a “BLUFFING” to show a seriousness and towards avoiding any operation so better justifiable if justified by what was more lies by the Democrats as if “proffered” as able to justify a longest warring in Afghanistan and not though any operation even for the long abandoned “women & kids” of Iraq.

There now can hardly be any due “evidence” fairly at a justifying of sanction for any of the Clintons, and some of the Obama “Democrats”, for the failure to stand up a defense of the United Nations agreed sanctions in a timely manner in an enforcement of Saddam Hussein.  I disagree with President Obama’s commenced remarks that there is “history” that can defend both sides’ sides, and I assert that “evidence based deciding” is not a civility nor weapon ready at his chest - ready to support any “philosophy.”

For more reading please visit http://JPHogan.org and at least attempt to juxtapose OBAMA’S RETREAT.

The said lies about “evidence” of/for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM are also more excusable as well for while of a due “enforcement” flexing of United Nations’ agreed sanctions such were preparatory for a worse case scenario state of mind that should be reasonable and acceptable before any commencing that could go as wrong as such could be considered wrong and then considered as if whom was yet of underestimating the risks.  Those we now accept as “Democrats” told worser lies and so as if their lies could only work on a local “evidence” convenient and not generally at all the areas they had already equally been of unjust abandoment.

Comments Off
05/27/14
THE GREAT CAPITALISM?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, TREASON, CLIMATE CHANGE, IRAN, CRUSADES, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 12:59 pm

Grab a seat - sit down - get comfortable; This may take a while!

As you settle in and down let us preface this of a consideration that Mr. William J. Clinton and Mrs. William J. Clinton, by the time we are done here, should seem not as if they do belong in prison but more so to that they have already long deserved to be “checked” & “balanced” and “policed” to such of justifying incarceration.

Any Atticus Finch now is beyond any “free at last” for the feminine lawyer Clinton “Hillary” even if she however of being off/other handed than her culpability defense yet has allowed, as affirming for something other than any “innocence.”  It may be she is most “guilty” for beating our economies to these pulps but that such isn’t what is most egregious of her “guilts” - even her “guilty pleasures.”

She has no place in Ayn Rand’s literary accomplishment but as a worse & worst female antagonist as a feminine Peter Keating & yet as of a more trying and compromising older profession - older it seems than considerate “architecture.”

I do not know in any learnedness if she can be cast in any better light by Russian or Soviet literature - even if at all by WAR & PEACE or FATHERS & SONS.  Her “RUSSIAN RESET” has us nearest her greatest infidelity and compromising of American traditions as yet still fashionable as Constitutional; She may now be dammed and ruined yet still we may not as a People generally know enough about her “hows” and “whys” to so much now publicly marketable as too if too as if like at least a “treasonous.”  It may be that her “RUSSIAN RESET” may best explain the fall of the houses of Clinton and Obama, and yet today we need consider with open minds if and how her other ‘machinations’ might yet be more diabolical and appropriately more her “hanging offense.”

So you’ve heard the one about the Cold War having ended without a like loss of life on any battlefield?  So you’ve yet to fathom how ridiculous such a posit is even if so proffered to you whence and however ‘learnedly’?  For the purposes of celebrating the USA victory over the old Soviet styled Russia as the victory of capitalism over expansionist socialism let us now tip our spirits, however, to swirling the body of HRC as best left for spittle.  There is so much in her even just admitted “culpability” as per Benghazi’s tragic and unnecessary loss of people staffers of her “house” of State that has a relativity to undo her past any hypothetical to inconvenient theoreticals as it seems historical that she has made what seems the same intelligence mistakes her spouse did years earlier.  Mrs. William J. Clinton as for just her years as President Obama’s Secretary of State has it damnable that her Benghazi culpability fits with the ignorant American pushed perspective that the Cold War ended without a shot fired, and yet it is that the Iran & Iraq years of war with the million plus lives lost is essential “Cold War” in all related “geopoliticals.”

Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is so “culpable” in other times such likely would have been such a “hanging offense” that heads would already have rolled and rolled with and among her own head.

The essential “Hillary” however now newly posited as firstly Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton conveniently of close and intimate global initiatives inclusive of domestic partisan political operations is of a incomparable “guilt” fitting her like better than any ball slipper ever otherwise yet opined a hopeful for a more real Cinderella.  The ashes of the Mrs. C are see-able and seen as of tragic and, yes, unnecessary losses of lives of those truly America’s brave and courageous.

It is truly sad how much can now be properly eschewed upon the capacity of the Clintons’ shoulders and as such is truly inhumane in their heft to be so long so well past any risk of “a last straw”!  I can only be, so seemingly, that any “rhetoric” of a the “Hillary Clinton” now is fore set as drivel too fit as spittle for a spittoon.  She may yaw and knaw on a hopeful but she is of her years as FLOTUS Clinton too much of the “danger” President Barack Hussein Obama spoke to so Nobelly with his Nobel acceptance speech with it so of suggestive as extant and of “evident” from “inaction” and “avoidance” such as so much of the “politics” of the Administration of the Clintons.

Her (beloved) Saddam Hussein - as suggested from the Administration of the Clintons too embeddedness and seeming “forgiveness” - is a greater hand specific culpability a stain upon her hands yet now than Benghazi.  It seems we are behooved to fathom her of dark depths that have it that she became like “lips locked” and “tongue tied” after the first moments of the dire set upon her “house” at the Libyan consulate there abouts in Benghazi, and so as for a concern that she couldn’t speak any truth without implicating her days as FLOTUS and worse so that she couldn’t without then being a spouse betraying the other spouse as with comments that would have too simply implicated and incriminated her spouse - at least.

We have that there was a Cold War and that it is dangerous now again if to tagging it as a war without any shots fired, and of any lives lost in “battle.”  We have it that Mrs. Clinton, however, is of damnable years of culpability and with it now that only some of them are yet of admitted “dangers” and improprieties like “lies.”  We have it that Mrs. Clinton, however, is of damnable admitted “culpability” and yet we so far haven’t seen any however a new grand Mr. Smith or Atticus Finch get to a bottom.

If when ever you heard of or yet hear of a “RUSSIAN RESET” beware yet however you can muster!

The escapism the Administration of the Clintons seemed to have prescribed for the too embedded with them Saddam Hussein is lost on most still as not being damnable now and always. There was no fair compromise for a letting Saddam Hussein go so “scott free” as the Administration of the Clintons was tolerating and seemingly facilitating.  It seems Mrs. C as President Obama’s SoS couldn’t see straight for her “duty” for she stayed too loyal to her spouse.  It seems by the Laws of the The United States even if Mrs. C. could and should incriminate the Presidency of William Jefferson Clinton, and any “initiatives” global since so of an inappropriate “meddling” she isn’t yet allowed to speak freely and/or to speak the truth as it is inappropriate at best for her to “incriminate” her spouse.

The “RUSSIAN RESET” was misguided and a big enough mistake;  Mrs. William J. Clinton is of worser crimes against the Constitution so as it now seems - and seems possibly to be got at judiciously by the bi-partisan Benghazi Select Committee.

To discern and even get close to fathoming her real and true “culpability” for so much even if ever justifiable as a “sacrifice” like due a future new “Memorial Day” of its own as however of “climate change” economies decimation “sacrifice” we are fit to be postured to the over cushioned tales of a “marketable” “Hillary” and to advantages in a vantage point where we see and consider the sights as that of she as “culpable” even for losses of life of the Cold War as of the Iran and Iraq wars, and too so for it that she so however as the old “crusader” incendiary as inciting FLOTUS or later as an “obedient” “Secretary” or seeable of it that the Ba’athist Saddam Hussein and too some Bashar Assad are of the Power ambitions however of the idealic origins of the Ba’athist - but so personally perverted in a too secular - of ascendencies around the thought of a United Arab Socialist State.

Capitalism did defeat the old expansionist Soviet styled socialism!  Now it seems we have domestics culpable of a on-going domestic threat yet of “communists” or “socialists” of the The United States of tales yet understood as hardly yet told - told generally - of how it seemed some within our borders of actual “citizenship” “rights” seemed to have seen a way in their power to undermine the Constitution towards hoped for changes to socialisms at home.  It seems we have that Mrs. Clinton - Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton - is not excusable from a fuller culpability as one of a “RUSSIAN RESET” that seemed to have been meant to pary with a parlay for Saddam Hussein, at least, and towards acceptable greater socialist powers for he, and his kin, in the socialism ideologic of the origins of Ba’athism however he had yet had already perverted them.

It seems that the problem of any “Hillary” is that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is actually more civilly and judiciously taggable as more a “Socialist” than President Barack Hussein Obama, or his own wife, yet can be.  It seems for perspective to a “culpability” for any “Obama” we should brace ourselves for a consideration that any “Hillary” seems at best a dominatrix and one now taggable as if always and forever maybe arranged as Obama’s handler in “Soviet” “Socialisms.”

Comments Off
05/19/14
HER BLACK PROBLEM
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, AL QAEDA, #CGI, #SUSPECT, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:01 am

There is a grimy - a real grimy - in the slow walk political of the Clintons.  We are beyond, with the Clintons, any “greased pigs” mud as of an innocence, even an innocence lost; we are still at the greased water melons of the Clintons’ courting; we are now of the grime - the dirt - the mud - the controversy - the scandals under Mrs. Clinton’s nails, at least.

Mrs. Clinton has become the newest “Baghdad Bob” for the cliche politics of her’s and our’s defenses.  She has now, as of this Monday morning, post the week of ‘Hillary Clinton has/had brain damage’ flushing, availed herself of her greatest defense forward while we all patiently await hearing whom of the Democrats will be joining the Benghazi Select Committee to investigate especially Mrs. Clinton quite towards concerns regarding a new low in political grime akin to Nixon’s tags.  Mrs. Clinton has now availed herself of a medical excuse for her Benghazi defense in coming bipartisan criminal probatives.

Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton with her first remarks after the second 9/11 was to admitting she lacked intelligence and so of an admission apparently of incompetence.  As recalled she closed out her first remarks as from outside her office, at State on the seventh floor, so then hours before joining the President in the Rose Garden, with words surprisingly, considering just recent history, of near ‘I did not believe this could happen in a country I liberated.’

Mrs. Clinton cannot position herself as a “Great White Hope” to succeed the first black President. If she really didn’t believe “this” as “Benghazi” could happen in a country she had liberated President Obama still has her ignorance as a crutch to lean on to yet stand up a legacy for himself independent of any the Clintons may be losing.  In the cases pertaining now to the culpability of Mrs. Clinton there, as evident this weekend, now is a new grimy in our politics more as if Mr. & Mrs. Clinton are as if a two headed “Baghdad Bob.”

The Clintons are so muddy and muddied by their own sloth and trophs and how they rolled and rolled that being each others character reference is now, however grimy in their old cliche, that they have to scamper around and around Senator Harry Reid and his penned up also dirtied by the Clintons that they cannot take the “medical excuse” path nor not enter 2016 without such either and however “exit” seeming too much a pleading of guilty to criminal cover-ups of the purview at least of the still forming bipartisan & maybe bicameral Benghazi Select Committee.

Though the timing of the supposed brain damage that afflicted Mrs. Clinton did time to the post 9/11 II pressures as conveniently of an incident that kept her away from personal scrutiny when the heat was on most heavily weighing on her to struggles at standing up an explanation at least how it was that when there was a second 9/11 she was so (necessarily) it seemed to denying and denying that it could be Al Qaeda again responsible.

It is remarkable for the Clintons that they have a “black problem” like no body would want as also their ‘business’!  This goes beyond the rehashed of the dalliances in infidelity of her spouse in the offices of the highest office in our land as specifically of Monica Lewinsky;  forward this also goes to now a dirtier tucking concern of the “The Clinton” of grimy infidelity yet to date not celebrated among the “Comeback Clinton” mud when trying to clean ‘em up for 2016 and yet now when black is in how it seems historical that President William J. Clinton has not yet had an affair with a black woman.

Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton’s greatest infidelity may have been to the first black President - to her duty to serve fully and wholly he and the People’d.  She can not now be a “Great White Hope” unless she has been holding back all these years since the Clintons’ presidency ended and was especially holding back and holding out on President Barack Hussein Obama.  Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton should not have anything to offer now that is new and possibly better than that of he whom she supposed served (though a “rival”) wholly and without reservations.

Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton would have us believe, as now it is that she isn’t admitting herself a ‘medical excuse’, that she can run, though white, in 2016 with a tagging as if she is expected to be told of near and broadly as if of a potential and a legacy where she can be better that the first black president, and was a better Secretary of State than the first female black Secretary of State and to as if at least she should be politically considered to have been a better First Lady than the first black First Lady Mrs. Barack Hussein Obama.

We are of days of a new grimy and too cliche Clinton politics where a criminality is likely to be proffered as a due tag on at least Mrs. Clinton for her days, however of health and full capacity, regarding cover-ups that go to a not seen criminal basis like since she helped impeach President Richard Milhous Nixon. Mrs. Clinton has her own legacy as of a partisan politics at setting the very standards that now apply to herself as the Benghazi Select Committee, however yet not clearly bipartisan or bicameral, and to be publicly discerned in all the grime of the post 9/11 II Benghazi cover-ups.  In the case of Mrs. Clinton as per real culpability she is now hardly expected to be as hard to grasp as a muddy and grimy greased pig.

Essentially Mrs. Clinton has availed herself of her best defense as a defense in limited mental capacity.  Now as it seems we are of a politics, where she too must avail herself of any “not running” so to avoid seemingly to preface the due full probative, of the Select Committee to investigate her, at least for criminal cover-ups, she is shadowed with a prima facia like a pleading in GUILTY, however of “NOT.”  It is now that the Clintons are persisting as if a two headed new “Baghdad Bob” extant in a new grime and muddy that the “BLACK” in the house is also that her spouse supposedly hasn’t (yet) had any of his celebrated infidelities with a black woman.

Her biggest “Black Problem” must though be Benghazi as at least since her own first remarks spoken were of such ignorance and incompetence when of closing with quips of her speaking to she couldn’t believe such could happen in a country she had liberated — She made the first black President look innocent at least in comparison to her.

President Barack Hussein Obama may now be saved the worst fate from any Benghazi Select Committee because Mrs. Clinton helped set the very standards for “criminality” and “jail time” for politicians of any cover-up at least as bad as that figured as Nixon’s.  It will likely be years before the fully established Benghazi Select Committee, whence established as bipartisan and bicameral, can yet proceed to any case or issues of grime and mud specifically fitting President Barack Hussein Obama — Mr. & Mrs. Clinton have themselves kinda penned in and center ring for this committee’s duty and so that it could be years of just looking at them and even the CGI as Clintons’ Global Initiatives for dirty prints in a criminality of what now seems confirmed to have been at least an improper political cover-up.

By the standards for “criminality” long of the legacy celebrated of Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton due her professional work at impeaching President Richard Milhous Nixon over a “cover-up” just relating to botching a Federal Investigation into the Democrat Party as botched while probing their Watergate Headquarters it is that she a lady will go first and that her man too will need be looked at long before the first black President becomes personally also so penned and processed.

As any Benghazi probe of Mrs. Clinton, however as the first black President’s “rival” is of her duty such is grimy in a new muddy for she had a spouse globally of initiatives that seem still to have inhibited her professionalism as Secretary of State.  As Secretary of State, I seem to understand, she was the Obama cabinet officer whom had the People’s duty to oversee all the activities of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives and even as it seemed their CGI was being run as a rival executive branch by a rival like still First Couple and as if President William Jefferson Clinton was to be heralded as the first President of the World.

It seems as Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is of her legacy of celebrating that President Richard Milhous Nixon deserved to be impeached for a cover-up of an event that was less political than her Benghazi cover-up and too was without the loss of life of her Benghazi cover-up we must consider that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is a criminal suspect - the primary suspect - suspect of offenses that can lead to imprisonment.  It seems that President William Jefferson Clinton has to also be long ahead of President Barack Hussein Obama on any march to being orange suited too;  President Clinton seemed to have so meddled in foreign affairs since leaving office in 2001 that he is of “initiatives” his spouse should have investigated while the People’s Secretary as President Obama’s Secretary of official duty to “oversee” such of her spouse, now even more concerning as newly her repose as also of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives.

The Benghazi Select Committee has the white people to look at first - such is a real problem for Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, at least.  Unlike Watergate people died!  Like Watergate politicians are known to have been of a cover-up!  Unlike Watergate it is that there seems to have also have been official obstruction of justice as part of the cover-up and so sadly of a new grime and muddy politics worse than any of Nixon’s supposed as of it now that Obama’s white Secretary of State has to face her own lower standards now when her cover-up impeded the due Federal investigation of murdered/killed of her “house” of State.

Comments Off
05/17/14
OBAMA’S HAPPY MIRAGE?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, #BLACKS, TWO HISTORIES, WAR ON WOMEN, #BLAME, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:30 am

President George W. Bush and his henchmen are poor messengers of how the Afghanistan War has been an unnecessary, improper, and poorly run “war” however run these years on a credit card.

President Bush and his henchmen are not the guiltiest party;  The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is now open;  People’d of the world cannot long ignore a real history of the Clintons and their Clinton 8.

Though Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton’s - Hillary R. Clinton’s - “Jack” moment of herself like ‘not able to handle the truth’ while before Congress, as if of a “A Few Good Men” prosecution, still sits heavy as a telling outburst about war and wars by political leadership.

President Barack H. Obama’s first Secretary of State did run out the clock so as per learning of how poorly she operated regarding Benghazi & Libya and too Obama’s war of choice theirs differently from Bush’s as that changed in Afghanistan to a war against the Taliban.  She only got to a Congressional “review” when she could tick-tock a clocketh runneth outeth defense.

There is hardly a way to put a happy face on how its seems confirmed that Democrats do not know how to operate a war nor win a war, still.  There is comfort for Democrats now only if still it can be said that President Bush and his henchmen operated worsely.

The Clinton “two-fer” presence at the opening & dedication of The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is characteristic of them of willing to do (and say?) anything that will help them to appear later better as they should appear for that actually of their ‘before.”  The museum has a duty now to open each day to curate the querious of truth seekers, and, the museum cannot ignore the still too missing years 1993-2001.

It is a fair question causal about the attacks of 9/11/01 if it isn’t that had President William Jefferson Clinton not been at dalliances of the blue dress of Monica Lewinsky would he yet have put in the time to have prevented such diabolical expounding upon the United States of America homeland?  That there are near a trillion unit points per dollar to otherwise asses for a liability or gross negligence, at least as when accounting for the rash cuts to defense and intelligence, pairs with his dalliances.  Too, President Clinton, besides his unnecessary surpluses, if of his “walls of separation” affected at the F.B.I. between Enforcement & Intelligence, to abide a tagging that runneth to ‘accomplice.”

The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is now open!  President Barack Hussein Obama with his Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton did expand/broaden the theater of war of the Bush’s operated GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM in Afghanistan from the original trespass to find and kill or capture about 50 thought “campers” of Al Qaeda.  President Obama with Secretary Clinton did alter operations in Afghanistan for a Democrats war of choice, too on a credit card, as a war without due process too much like as a genocide upon the Taliban women hating illiterate natives.

The ugly face of Obama’s war of choice against the Taliban is that he was operated too much devoid of civil procedure and too much as if of a “feminist envy” effected like exterminators of bugs.  The pretty face is supposedly that because it was a picturesque region for still shots of “war” unlike the slog of Iraq and its urban jungles the Democrats of Obama & Clinton(s) could sell they could run a like ‘cleaner’ war.

Still President Bush and his henchmen are not the best messengers for how bad and how long so bad the Democrats have been so ugly and base in their bad even as just as per the ‘theater’ of ‘war’ of Afghanistan.  The Republicans are poor messengers for the good and better they were at much for they themselves hardly found the words to explain how they were better or best - just more of a ‘good.’  That the Republicans were or are better is hard to believe for they have so far much failed to even sell that they were right while the flip flip of calendars has clocked them as more right.

The Obama AFGHANISTAN WAR has been from day one of the Democrats’ political management as a war of choice of the mission creep from Bush and his henchmen at the GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR so within the sovereign lands of Afghanistan.  The Obama administration moved from trading the building of roads and schools for trespass rights to find the expected near about 50 of Al Qaeda, as foreigners literate among the mostly illiterate natives, to a SURGE for an a war not justified by the 911 attacks as a war generally against the Taliban.

President Obama and Secretary Clinton put a happy face on their plans to much be at exterminating the too misogynistic & too illiterate Taliban by selling that theirs was a ‘right’ war and Bush’s late policing of Saddam Hussein and Iraq was a ‘wrong’ war.

As the The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is now open the Clintons, mostly, and primarily, now have no place to hide;  The “911 Museum” is a permanent “wrench in their gears” of political operations - forward;  The “911 Museum” has the blue dress controversy among its hauntings and curatory duty and all the while the trillion unit points ghost the years whence from trouble brewed and stirred much because President William Jefferson Clinton decided, it seems (still) that he would not prosecute Saddam Hussein because he didn’t want to, and, he wouldn’t prosecute Saddam Hussein because he already had Bosnia and Herzegovina undesirably on his desk.

President William J. Clinton may be most to blame for their being now the The National September 11 Memorial & Museum.  President George W. Bush may be most to blame for not being able to ’sell’ in real time and still how it was right that he was as he said of doing right.  President Barack H. Obama may be most to blame for having a war of choice so in Afghanistan now as a “Longest War” as it though seems maybe inherited from FLOTUS Clinton crusading as a meant AFGHANISTAN WAR to target and subdue the too misogynistic and illiterate Taliban.

It figures when one looks more seriously at the history of Al Qaeda, than the 9/11 Commission so did in choosing to look only ten years back, that the 9/11 attacks may have been planned since 1993 and the very day President Clinton likely decided his didn’t want to do the messy work of prosecuting Saddam Hussein so he wouldn’t - wouldn’t for however long he was in office.

A queriousness due of every visit to the The National September 11 Memorial & Museum is prudent upon the “good” of President Clinton still too much as a “mirage” of the cover-up of the Clintons President Obama was wrongly more at than President Bush had been yet at too long.  It is now improper to hide the Clintons’ vast culpabilities and as it is historic that there are a 9/11 I & 9/11 II with Clinton paw prints all over ‘em.  We are now beyond “if” to a but “how” expected - expected daily.

It figures most clearly, however revealing in real time whence could have compromised “mission”, that Iraq as by OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM was not a “war of choice” for Al Qaeda seemed bent to prosecuting the United States of America on its homeland ever since the day President Clinton shrugged from doing right with his decision to do next to nothing towards prosecuting Saddam Hussein.  It seems in comparison President Obama & Secretary Clinton of their warring on the Taliban are those of a “war of choice” run unnecessarily and improperly and poorly run while diabolically run on a credit card.

The THE NATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL & MUSEUM is duty bound to curate for truth and honest forward.  Its doors however open or closed represent a thresholds of history and while it only a dangerous mirage that there are yet these two histories coexistent and with the Democrats affectings not yet known as mostly all a too political and partisan mirage.

The THE NATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL & MUSEUM is now ground zero to GROUND ZERO of it that each day by each visitor a queriousness should arise of:  HERE FOR HOW MUCH THE CLINTONS GOT WRONG IN THE 1990S?

There has too long been miscarriages of American “justice” by the politics so slanted and distorted by the Clintons, and now the Presidency of Obama.  If Al Qaeda so decided the American homeland deserved attacking so on that day that President William J. Clinton in 1993 decided he would evade and ignore the issues of rendering justice upon Saddam Hussein it becomes clearer finally that OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM was a necessary war and the Democrats warring on the too misogynistic and illiterate Taliban was just a political convenient coy war distraction as a unpaid for war of choice.

There has too long been miscarriages of American “justice” by the politics so slanted and polarized by Democrats’ defensive partisan machinations in spin;  As the history of Al Qaeda supersedes the “report” of the 9/11 Commission since its “investigation” looked back only 10 years it becomes excusable that President George W. Bush couldn’t explain how right he was while the President more rightly at war. If we still ignore the history of the organizing of Al Qaeda of Osama Bin Laden’s hopes to change the Middle East by an allowance for himself to general the prosecution of Saddam Hussein as a justice of and by Muslims we will become in greater peril from a continuance in these mirages beset in ignorance.

The now “THE LONGEST WAR - THE AFGHANISTAN WAR” is outed as President Barack H. Obama’s war of choice.  It is now, as the “911 Museum” thresholds, that OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM was a necessary war, even as contrary to the 9/11 Commission, for the pathology forensic of the causal rests forever in a simple consideration that the USA got “policed” on 9/11 because President William Jefferson Clinton had decided in 1993 that he wouldn’t “police” Iraq and Saddam Hussein, and as such decision then necessarily was to be for the remainder of his terms. 

The mirage is sad as the Democrats now can hardly justify the lack of jurisprudence and due process party to their party warring for politics in Afghanistan.  The Clintons have already shown themselves to fit in an episode of a THE SOPRANOS and yet where is the talk of “Politics” or “Diplomacy” of it that Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was responsible for the “diplomacy” of having such control over 80% of the world opium production during her “service” to President Barack Hussein Obama?  Secretary Clinton served President Obama more as if of BREAKING BAD in a drug trade to diabolically while she more as if a SECRETARY OF WAR than of “diplomacy.”

Comments Off
04/29/14
JIHAD? SO TONY?
Filed under: POLITICS, AUTO-BIO'D, BENGHAZI, AL QAEDA, WAR ON WOMEN, CRUSADES, #BLAME, #MORALS, #ISLAM SQUIBS, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:41 am

This cannot be good for William Jefferson Clinton.  A time for atonement should only be for those among the still living of statutes of limitations, and yet with death bed conversions.  Any he or she of these many years, such as of WJC & HRC politics, should have no way out until them of late atonement by death bed conversions!  At least when WTC initiates its curatory of the mission of the Ground Zero Museum it again will seem too late for the Clintons to come clean;  It seems just for the CRUSADING of FLOTUS HRC whence JIHAD will stick with her like BENGHAZI to her grave.  And, too, there is WJC.

The songs of the Clintons have coy misdirections and are simply of too much political escapism that can not resonate as of TRUTH.

The tone of the pre-Clinton early 1990s were of proportions of great storms and fears of a predicted end of the world by fire maybe ablaze initially near Mesopotamia, newly.  The heralding of a right and wrong and the alignments of parties and as States/Nations were of such time of a call to tables for proactive discourse as to common and/or general mores.

This cannot be good for Hillary Rodham Clinton.  Though it seems wrong that her admitted culpability about the BENGHAZI failures should be regrettable it seems there are more regrettable than such for her to regret more as of her duty and time as President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State.  Secretary Clinton seems to have failed the first black President quite as per the BENGHAZI attacks and so as such seems to have revealed that she didn’t understand before, during, or after much of the essence of the realm of Al Qaeda & JIHAD (still).

The songs of the Clintons are fraught with over-lays of discord hidden by beats set “POP” and yet still there in an inappropriate as their harmony is dishonesty in a tagging of others as at JIHAD without incriminating their own CRUSADING.

What can be honestly known?  How can the dishonesty of WJC & HRC now be more broadly known?  What is the still unknown about the hands Clinton that people everywhere should table of the unleaven and leaven dough to kneed for parity?

The tone and beat downs of the imperialist FLOTUS HRC were wrenched upon peoples consciousness as if by a trespasser of brash dictates while violate of sovereignty as a visitor on foreign turfs.  WJC & HRC are those of CRUSADES now far more concurrently, still of the unsettled, otherwise now oddly yet as if transference upon PM Tony Blair & President George W. Bush were warranted.

“It is broached…” is apropos to the CRUSADES of WJC & HRC as it seemed impolite and imperialistic (and of a CRUSADES BEAT) that so regularly broached Secretary Madeleine Albright of a tonage as if of the phonetics of the era as if the import was a dictate so of “WOMEN / MADAMS @ LINES TO ALL BRIGHT” missionary positions post warring on Christ-o-for Secretary Warren Christopher days preceding.  It was broached as if of a CRUSADES but without WJC or HRC of limiting principles even for any statute of limitations for a righteous prosecution of Saddam Hussein for United Nations sanctions violations nor his many known crimes.

What should be better said of Prime Minister Tony Blair as per CRUSADES?  Is it not more honest and truthful that President George Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair inherited a CRUSADES - is it not more so that they did not build a CRUSADES?

There seems no way out for WJC & HRC as atonement for JIHAD has passed a reasonable however a statute of limitations may concur.  It seems wrong and now dangerous to persist in a “POP” beat ignorance as the songs of WJC & HRC are base in a cacophony for all times.  It seems so wrong to allow the Clintons to yet posit triangulated transference, and especially per any CRUSADE, upon any others “leaders” and even, yes, too if upon President George Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair.

There is a guilt by association locked into the culpability of HRC as per BENGHAZI as too of a incrimination of WJC and all of the Clintons’ years of executive decidings. Now it would be as inappropriate as how they lifted a statute of limitations for the murders by Saddam Hussein for them to escape themselves from the foibles of their so evident CRUSADES.

To meter any innocence upon either WJC or HRC there is the atmosphere of the tune of their times (too Tony) as per the conduct unbecoming a President of the Monica Lewinsky scandals, and so as such became Nixonian as a scandal too as by cover-up and lies; there is that the message in the scandals also the times of the conduct unbecoming as those of concerns about our Middle East engagements as of times newly sensitive to grand and common holy mores.  The notation of WJC must be measured for it that his conduct unbecoming a President was even more dangerous as of a time when infidels/infidelities were the leading politics of tables international.

Right!!!  As HRC was violate of peoples’ sovereignty with her imperialistic crusades of feminist dictates towards respecting women more equally even so regionally in those Islamic domains so of known radicals it yet was that WJC was domestically beset begetting controversy about disrespecting mores and women, specifically.  But yet how flawed WJC was is minor to the current JIHAD expose, generally, and too personal, and too specific of subjective marital infidelity.

What incriminates them the most?  How are they most culpable yet?  Whom is implicated by JIHAD curation when the Ground Zero museum is open and of the mission in curatory but WJC & HRC and also a cadre of “Middle East Leaders” of their 8 years and an associated guilt?  As it seems any CRUSADE was not made by President George Bush & Prime Minister Tony Blair it is yet tony how they have been of a triangulated transference of supposed guilt from WJC & HRC politically - generally.

The missionary positions of the CRUSADES of the Clinton 8 however more as of WJC or HRC begot terrorism and JIHAD.  It is their former National Security Counselor Philip Bobbitt whom with his TERRORISM OR CONSENT proffered from his experiences with the Clinton 8 that like a White House that works too closely with Hollywood begets terrorism.  But how tony now the pomp of the past triangulations in coy misdirections whence a mission in curation begins with an opening of WTC doors of the Ground Zero museum?  What can be said to be JIHAD?  Whatever JIHAD is to be said as of whom?  If it be JIHAD, however,  was it successful or yet was it that the attacks by Al Qaeda succeeded while there expectations of a general Justice in JIHAD did fail?  Is it that the JIHAD element of the attacks so now to fore as failed could yet succeed by improper fidelity to truth and mores if to a presentation of the coy and deceptive “history” notations of the Clintons yet endure?

President George Bush & Prime Minister Tony Blair, though they inherited a time beset of unnecessary imperial crusading, did work in a general Welfare objective jurisprudence of engagements in prosecutorial and principles of statutes of limitations along the lines of offering a policing devoid of religiosity and sectarian bigotry.  Any “lies” these two “leaders” said supposedly of as if of coy misdirections yet otherwise metered to a more honest than those of WJC & HRC.  The Clintons’ 8 left fewer to no good options for objective and prudent enforcement of United Nations sanctions endeavorings;  The Clintons left these two hardly any way to execute a prosecution of Saddam Hussein even by his people as his peers but as if in a HOLY WAR JIHAD their own if not by heavy specifics at calling out SH by bluff.

After the CRUSADING of WJC and by FLOTUS HRC there was little if any way to civilly proceed with a albeit late enforcement of the United Nations sanctions left for President George Bush & Prime Minister Tony Blair.

But for these days now necessary of a new predicating as per JIHAD and how any curator must proceed at the teaching of 9/11 Al Qaeda attacks we must look to whom is associated in a guilt as the Clintons CRUSADES are extant and justifying.  It seems that the Ground Zero museum must offer a querious to ‘HERE FOR HOW MUCH THE CLINTONS GOT WRONG IN THE 1990S’ and be girded to an apropos associated implied guilt for “leaders” of the Middle East at least as from agreements and promises made to President William Jefferson Clinton in early 1993.

The songs of the Clintons howbeit by them coy and of misdirection are yet of over-laid tunes that set a more tony for President George Bush & Prime Minister Tony Blair of a resonance in innocence.  As JIHAD a tag upon the house of Clinton rightly and without escape but maybe by death bed conversions it is that the museum of 9/11 attacks by Al Qaeda do implicate WJC & HRC and some Middle East “leaders” of promises made circa 1993 that the Clintons then were unjustly to persistent dogging through their 8 until 2001 for a “contractual” keeping of promised to much like “lies.”

The United States may now endure the opening and curatory of the Ground Zero museum as per JIHAD and CRUSADES as it remains a general Justice consideration that as long as such (compromised) (former?) Middle East leaders of such past political and partisan pressures from the Presidency of the Clintons remain silent as to the culpability of the Clintons it follows that they are more guilty as per a knowing prior to 9/11 attacks than WJC & HRC.

The United States may now be of a safety even in Governor Sarah H. Palin as of “waterboarding” a “baptism of terrorists” and all the while it more historical and yes tony that President George Bush & Prime Minister Tony Blair are of less culpability and real guilt than at least those of the Presidency of the Clintons.  A curation of 9/11 as of JIHAD now will implicate both WJC & HRC and too any so whence held to their improper promises to like just blame Republicans and be in agreement to not attack The United States during the Clintons’ 8.*  (*This is as I recall when first viscerally to such concern circa 1993 as whence WJC first trespassed a general prudence with a like worst of used car salesmen convenient coy “politics”!)

There is that President George Bush & Prime Minister Tony Blair enforced the United Nations sanctions, however controversially, and yet as such would better to have been limited to a statutory period say of that of the first term Clintons’.

There is that President George Bush & Prime Minister Tony Blair are less culpable than either WJC or HRC as per JIHAD and as it seems too logical that if Al Qaeda was of 9/11 attacks as successful in effecting retribution it yet is considerable that Al Qaeda seems to have (for now) failed at JIHAD Justice.*  (*This still fits with my said first visceral as per missteps of the Presidency of the Clintons and so as I of my tale that on the eve of 9/11/2001 as September 10th so as so many years of concerns shared since 1993 I was yet to telling myself I must have been wrong all those years to have been preoccupied with concern and so that the next morning I should wake up and move on - and to maybe avoid personal bankruptcy. Yes, this is the same tale of mine as having been in DC and driving up 17th Street by the White House and Old Executive Office Building then unaware such was at the same moment that the first plane struck. Yes this is still the same tale mine that had me so likely the last thought of NSA C. Rice before her assistant notified her and so as such was as she a recent former client & I thinking to a professional referral and like a passing of the gut felt visceral of concerns from the Clintons political improprieties.)

A curation of Al Qaeda as at JIHAD by the Ground Zero museum will necessarily implicate WJC & HRC and as well those Middle East leaders so of the Clintons worked impropriety political at partisan blaming promising.  For now the USA can be of teaching Al Qaeda as at JIHAD and unsuccessfully as it seems highly set in reasoning Justice that Middle East leaders still too quiet as to implicating the Presidency of the Clintons will be to assumptions of greater guilt/culpability upon themselves and peoples of their own faith.

Right!!!  My tale is of years since hearing Clintons’ NSC counselor Philip Bobbitt speak to an open group at the venue Yale Law School in about 1997 having been to faxing the White Houses of the Clintons and George Bush of concerns that there were real threats we were not as a nation yet seeing.  When I heard, and then also joined some of such group for cocktails Philip Bobbitt whence I was so of publicly asking near “what about the threats we do not see?”.

For the tony of any tune for Justice by JIHAD must implicate WJC & HRC mostly and yet too a cadre of (past) Middle East leaders of their worked promise and held to promise keeping.  It was imprudent to have a Secretary of State so phonetically as “warring Christ of fors” and too one as if “madams to lines in all bright”!  Yet the mores of morality of Justice by JIHAD seems honestly only possible if an injustice lives in a spirit realm as unsettled and known to the like high priests as Imams too.

It seems for any and all museum curation as per JIHAD such has to give rise to the heights of culpability of the Presidency of the Clintons and too, if not specifically to those of said recalled Clinton partisan shenanigans as “leaders”, to those as the keepers of the faith of Islam.  It seems Al Qaeda cannot have been successful if at JIHAD if the keepers of their faith were not yet keepers of a sense of injustice for a Justice rendering yet.

How tony is it to be that a greater innocence and morality of purpose seems keyed for the legends of President George Bush & Prime Minister Tony Blair and as the coy misdirection of political and partisan over-laid of WJC & HRC notations so implicate more than just themselves as per JIHAD & Justice?

Comments Off
03/31/14
THE BAD APPLE - BUSH’L'D
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, AL QAEDA, #MORALS, #ISLAM SQUIBS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:15 am

What, perchance, is the recipe for disaster?  How is it we are now cast so adrift newly as if in the old times of NOAH of bodies electric signing safely to discern if forsaken?  If it is that we are of forces of good and even in our domestic politics mustn’t it be that we yet are of fields of danger from excess catalytics?

For now it seems safe to particulate that Russell Crowe seems to have chosen wisely, and yet that George Clooney, for his own deciding, erred for going out too much as if all entertainment and all for one only with the Clintons.

We are not just in Kansas when risking the forces of the People in politics and campaigns.  But May of 2007 should be remembered with prudence trepidations of Greensburgs and Greenbergs, seems.  As Walt Whitman penned of the Civil War era: “We sing the body electric…”  As Alfred Lord Tennyson scribed for all to fret of fate and powers of ‘God’ when sons so seem to be so humbled to be so tinny and of the Crimean War:  Some things are past reasoning - Some things are of ‘charges’ of ‘Light’ too of wars.

Can any storm be a Perfect Storm?  How poorly did George Clooney choose for himself when siding with the loose wires and fields of the Clintons?  The Charge Of New Federalism is actually historically about such storm and its foreign and domestic energies - George Clooney may have been fated to a metaphor as a captain of such storm but doomed only for having chosen a siding to the negative grounding of the Clintons.  The Perfect Storm was cheered in the Middle East by some nearly as much as 9/11 - The Perfect Storm took like dead aim at Kennebunkport as by a polarity serious upon the Bush dynastic shored.

In The Charge Of New Federalism as per the reasoning it too harkens to the Crimean valleys of death however covered as by Balaclava yet to a greater freedom potential resolute energy as with OUR’S IS TO REASON WHY, NOT, TO DO AND DIE, LEAST, BEFORE OUR TIMES.  (Pardon the absence of quotes — these are my own words, however poetic.)

From a quicky search via Wikipedia to confirm the year of energy and trepidations of The Perfect Storm I offer you, however eruditely, that such was also appropriately, it seems, tagged as THE HALLOWEEN NOR’EASTER OF 1991.  What complicates the The Charge Of New Federalism more currently than the Crimean War of those made “tenny sons” of the “valley” of “death” is that it is also more towards a lay Freudian as its “charge” to is a concern for the capacitors and capacity of the neurons and electrons of the mind of President George H. W. Bush as vesseled in his body of Kennebunkport seriousness.

Global Warming as fronted in the CRISIS DOOM ALARMISM by Al Gore is yet but more as if a lark - a worked fraud to addict people newly to a Gore “product” of nick of time tricks quite like the legend of the Gore Plantation & its capitalism in Tabacco.  It seems his “END OF THE WORLD (AS WE KNOW IT)” alarmism should have him now personally liable for storms and damages from a gross negligence and leadership unbecoming a former Vice President as lacking in a proper grounding in democratic debate.  It seems man made carbon reductions too cause climate change - shouldn’t be carelessly rushed.

The Charge Of New Federalism has moderated, and however when of forecasting much of the global political change since the stirrings of those three storms, that infamously joined to be such a dire and focused THE PERFECT STORM, quite accurately though Democrats and persons of the Clintons’ junctions have remained hell bent to positing that like “no one saw such coming” and while what explains their 1992 “coming” is that such still well explains both, however if in a “moral” context.  As you can read of a “Bush on fire” in LOS ANGELES poem of The Charge Of New Federalism it is otherwise than homage to Moses or Noah as of attempt cerebral to be considerate of the angels gathered about the mind of man of President Bush to be forewarned and temperant to the possibly excesses of the day and how such could quickly become of energy too excessive for the electrical fields as the battle fields of the wiring he only has of his one mind, under God.

However, now The Charge Of New Federalism may be presenting as a trap for the Clintons it can only be by them of deceit and envious coveting of goods not their own, and politically, and as a running con of cover-ups of their years of impropriety.  The Clintons seem to sense themselves now as if of walking into a trap, politically, and now as set almost with sufficient field strength and wattage and voltage however years covertly more on low voltage systematics.  The Clintons now are likely in a real jeopardy but of a civility in a “managed storm” of People’s Governance of prudence of jurisprudence kept Constitutional and honest.  The Clintons if now “trapped” (as they seem to fear) can only be trapped from years of misappropriations and of a political whimsy truly at only thinking “bush on fire” could only be about sex - sexual energy, and at times about a ‘the wrong woman.”

George Clooney is no Russell Crowe.  He may have been fated to be a captain in THE PERFECT STORM but how he let himself get played as if cast in a partisan to be firstly polar for the junction boxes of entertainment of the Clintons has to be on him as Noah now is on Crowe.  Write my old neighbors, yes, of the times I attempted an in time energy management by grounding serious series in poetry by The Charge Of New Federalism, in the early 1990s, are the Greenbergs of the front lines too for of the Clintons newly in 2007.  I was of the Mad Man attitude since the early 1970s as for having asking a great one to be my guide and mentor as my soon to retire grandfather.  The coincidental is that from about that same day I also became knowing of Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham though quite still a First Grader of Hooker School.  Stanley Greenberg’s daughters were behind me in school but friends and also of my Wilbur Cross Governors High School swim team when I was one of three of the Co-Tri-Captains of the 1982-1983 season.

My grandfather who kept his promise to teach me how to become a “Mad Man” (colloquially) like himself actually grew up in or near Gloucester. Some one of my heritage did die early by slipping on the ice near his boat an to have a watery winter fate/end.  My grandfather wired me into the standards and standard bearers of his legacy and so to higher standards than I yet have witness the Clintons ever consistently of - of an extant.

That I did set up the FRIENDS show request as around the friendship of the other two of my Governor’s HS swim team - a female Geller, and another swimmer, David - was of the respect for the standards and authority of Madison Avenue as I still managed to walk among while outside gracefully as guided from lessons from my grandfather Arthur M. Menadier.  By setting up shows that would succeed around my (moral?) anchoring of feeding plot lines for known casts I was able to maintain good energy around me and my associations as though neutrally as about a great good, like.

I know the Clintons to be beneath their skin “bad apples” at least as of a compromised Constitutional common core.  I have known them to be presidential in a bad way since we first met in the early 70s when I was but a First Grader as they asked me point on seriousness if they could each become President someday.  I know them of being so more goal driven ambitious than naturally set to surf their times and ride their times as their times dictated most - I know Bill Clinton as of a willingness and core rotten of a easy baugh broken from morality - I know Bill Clinton was willing to ask a First Grader like myself to lie and to lie about what his revised “God’s honest answer” had actually been rendered truthfully as.

Religion is inescapable.  The THE PERFECT STORM maybe was more “biblical” to those who walk in Islam and cheered on as much by some as the later storms of the 9/11 I & 9/11 II - as yet still to be discerned and timed of the Clintons too of a gross negligence and a more civil jeopardy than that which lifted all those, however, of the flood but not of the ark.

Right, the The Charge Of New Federalism is poetic of the valley of death akin to the neurons and electrons of the field of the mind of man, and specifically one President Bush pushing and pushing the grounding of a greater morality - in war’s time.

“We sing the body electric” and we now are like in a new civil war energetic domestically in the bushels of Mrs. Clinton, however, and her American pie(s).  The Clintons may be justly trapped and for them of walking themselves into their own jeopardy.  The Clintons deserve (each, and together) their days in court.  We should be more prudent than them or ourselves lately when of thinking them of good fruit while quite dangerous more of poison fruit of hedges and bush rows.

Does Hillary Clinton - Mrs. Clinton, however - yet know of any ‘recipe’ not a recipe for disaster?  Isn’t the “storm” of the Clintons already experienced by too many, and disastrously?  It wasn’t only for those of May 2007 of Greensburg of the Clintons of the Greenberg familiarity of wrought political endangermeants about the imprudent resurrection of their global initiatives of wants to being more like a “First American Autocratic Clan” rooted too much in (morals) hedging.

It seems the story of the Clintons and storms has already by experienced yet not yet told, however, lesser than Biblical.  It seems, as I recall, that the seasons of the insurrections, political, to the process, and prudence, of the common righteous more perfect core of the Constitution, such as that of their “social welfare” socialism chargings, were to a popular power, albeit, yet, a post-Constitutional extra-Constitutional ‘electric’ ‘power’, and of the Clintons, as of Mrs. Clinton more than 3/5th as person, though just half of President Clinton - and it seems not the better half - as I recall - it seems:  There was devastation and destruction of The Natural State of the Clintons as if they were of forces of an axis polar to them of evil as “God” it seems to at least rain heavily down in tormentuousness upon each of the many places they did rise from and abide in. 

It seems as I recall, as per “biblical” storms that the Clintons as like of a complicity for a doom upon Greensburg, if the charges of the Bible, Tennyson & at least Whitman are factual, was of a too polarized excess of the energy electric but not (morally) grounded of the ambitions and wants to more “pie” of the Clintons.  Little of this is new to me for much of the above history here shared is that once I crossed the threshold of from “marketing ambition” to “poetry” and “poet” I was at least knowing of the fields of politics if but as like a non contact volt meter potential.

The poem of the The Charge Of New Federalism as timed and regulated as LOS ANGELES has a happier ending than that of Tennyson’s THE CHARGE OF THE LIGHT BRIGADE.  As it closes as a ponderance in morality of a realm of earthly angels with WITH A BUSH - ON FIRE - WHAT DID WE SEE?  It closes with President George H. W. Bush still alive though of times like a new more global civil war of Walt Whitman’s Captain Lincoln carpe diem bodies so “electric” and to live on to tell the tale contrary to the Clintons and President Barack Hussein Obama of old storms at least ‘biblical’ like to people of Islam more about the real risks that Saddam Hussein presented and as like the father of a bastards brotherhood of Al Qaeda.

It seems the Clintons were those who, however dimly, yet alighted to the coincidences like of Greensburg storms such as it was of their historicals like laid low all across their old “arks” as “homes” of Arkansas.  It seems it was either the better half as Bill Clinton or the better half as Hillary Rodham Clinton that opined a ’storm’ reflective, short of an admission of guilt, to how it seemed that like every place they had earlier lived had been “targeted” by “God.”

For now there may be a recipe to avoid disaster - there may be more than a few long set and kept long in a “HOLY” however particular and specifically somewhat “regional” or of “regional” “success” to be metered still and when sifting through in an a priori.  It seems inescapable that the Clintons seem in a real political and civil jeopardy and for how they ‘chose’ to walk and talk.  It seems that there have been many storms about the Clintons as “bad apples” in just American politics of the northern continent of The United States so still Constituted in ‘prudence’ a portioned.  All that may now be missing is like the guillotine of Marie Antoinette and/or the hangmen of a new ‘apocalypse’ and as for a common core of trees of civilly rendered jurisprudence.

LOS ANGELES, poem, however, is otherwise also poetic and news as it parallels its self in multiple interpretive threads as firstly structured to ‘journalism’ of covering the beats of Rodney King and so of also the streets of the angels “on fire.”

George Clooney is no Russell Crowe - they both may have been fated to ‘valleys’ of ’storms.’  The Clintons have paths of past destructiveness still to bear witness to them too much in some fields as of forces electric too ungrounded - it seems hands of fate have leveled them by a lighting their auras as if as them as “bad apples” of having reigned ruinousness in rains, at least, in the temperments of shared morality by recipes about pies, some, of bodily charges, however neuronic.

The Clintons seem to have been those most at fault of a said foulness by ruining bushels of so many now so long.  It seems Mrs. Clinton, herself, knows but recipes for disaster and still just can’t bring herself to judiciously being grounded in the common core of the Constitutional constitution.  To all of The United States we are set “ordained and established” by the “People” “Order” as one nation under God, and so then however industrious or hobbied/crafty, as formed with all corporations under the “Union” but so by the First Amendment that all corporations must therefore be “religious” as under the nation under God and yet with the Congress of the “Union” barred from any Law to discern how a corporation is respecting an establishment of religion.

Personally, it seems, still too “biblical” how the energy of truths worked also poetic of the THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM beget an understanding of the times that otherwise show to strongly as misbegotten and misunderstood by President Barack Hussein Obama  — it still reads, to me, that President Obama has been so wrong about Iraq he has hardly had even a chance to be right about anything ‘political’ and ‘historical’ across the Middle East.

Personally, it seems served that Mrs. Clinton, however Bill Clinton maybe the better half of their “apple” BOGO, and as Secretary Clinton, however imprudently and Constitutionally improperly ((long story for later too)), did electrify the People and debates by her exposure on Benghazi while Libya was her baby expect to be carried more prudently to term.  It seems undeniable that her Benghazi has rendered her of no “recipe” but for disaster as it seems her “baking” “diplomatic” can only fall and collapse upon itself.  It seems by her “fruit” President Obama “politics” became poisoned and it like “biblical” how her baby Libya by the abortive about Benghazi stands extant and evidential that she before, during, and after was deficient, unknowing, and, yes, even grossly negligent - by the bushels.

Comments Off
01/14/14
MASTER OF DISASTER
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AL QAEDA, WAR ON WOMEN, CRUSADES, #FEMINISM, #MORALS, #ISLAM SQUIBS, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:04 am

A FEMIFEST DESTINY to excuse even the past twenty plus years of Democrat Party national politics is far more inexcusable than a charge up San Juan Hill as if a Roosevelt’s convenient wag the dog war of choice.

Is Hillary Rodham Clinton forgivable as a MASTER OF DISASTER if it is to be politically excusable as figured and affected as if a THE FEMIFEST DESTINY?  I think not!

How in a Constitutional jeopardy are the People of The United States of America now free and proper to asserting if to asserting such just about Hillary Rodham Clinton?  There must be considerable jeopardy hemming in the Clintons and remarkably for times they were not actually of the Executive in the months between their departure from The White House and the very moments of the first 9/11 attacks.  These times are maybe as critical to understanding the real Clintons as the those unread missing Faulkner chapters may be to understanding him.  There is a jeopardy for the Clintons much just in the public record theirs since 9/11 and especially about those remarks they shouldn’t have made at all unless they needed to cover-up a reality wrought of their own knowing and willful politics.  The most serious jeopardy possible for the “two-fer” Clintons likely has to be for these months between their exit and the commencement of the long planned Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11 I. 

It may be that a MASTER OF DISASTER may have been a best hope for a global war on women politics, and, yet it may be that it is that at least Hillary Rodham Clinton failed to master a mastery if so of any ends justifying the means disaster ‘politics.”  I believe there are enough public statements made by either President or Mrs. Clinton now that compromise a possible forgiveness for even inciting discord abroad theirs — it seems that the Clintons have already said too much and so enough that the months here broached of their firstly without Executive privileged are smoking gun days to a negligence for them and at least for their surpluses as per 9/11 attacks.  It seems the Clintons did not let go of executive power as expected and have since compromised a presumption of innocence defense for themselves for the months before 9/11.  If a MASTER OF DISASTER either or both of the Clinton “two-fer” would not have to still rate as if the smartest person in the room about such — this ship of superiority has sailed long ago without them.

The 9/11 Commission Report was seriously flawed and somehow maybe by a political defensiveness coy enough by the Clintons as by only looking back 10 years at Al Qaeda that was then at least 2-3 years older than 10 it became possible to look away from the Clintons when looking for negligence and/or gross negligence of/by any Presidency.  I still have no idea how Congress did abide or sanction a 9/11 Commission Report that would not at least look back far enough to be looking at it as it was born/conceived firstly.  If one looks back to the birth of Al Qaeda as so to be an Islamic response to Saddam Hussein and his invasion of Kuwait and so to at least more years than the Commission did then one likely has to then grapple with a conundrum about a negligence for the Clintons more specifically as of an idea that The United States of America did get attacked on 9/11 because the Clintons’ Administration had failed to sufficiently bring justice upon Saddam Hussein by a thinking of justice by Al Qaeda ideology.

Wars on women rights and for literacy if of a core scheme since the Clintons’ first days at the helm can only maybe offer a political forgiveness - can only go so far politically.  It seems that if their is a core like of a FEMIFEST DESTINY as like a Presidency set-up as Teddy Roosevelt Rough Riding coincidences there is now a problem that the Clintons seemed to have failed to be smart enough to pull off what might yet be also now of a means justifying the ends forgivable politics.  There are really a trillion reasons why the Clintons can be said to have come up short from being smart enough - say from being as smart as they needed to be and as smart as they may have thought that they were.  We can hardly now justify Afghanistan as a just war of choice in keeping with the too imperialist feminist crusading by First Lady Clinton whence — As convenient as such seemed for her if due a Presidency we all have to query how it can be right to have been at such and yet not right to have been as well firstly in Iraq for the majority of its women so of its majority Shia populace.

To really be condemnable as a MASTER OF DESTRUCTION we must look at Hillary Rodham Clinton as possibly or likely causal to 9/11 attacks by an incited Al Qaeda.  We have a trillion reasons to justly tag the administration by the Clintons as negligent due to their surplus at near a trillion cut that can be said to have been necessary spending cut that time has established  a Posterity about as best if yet it had not been cut.  Yet as per 9/11 attacks we have to consider that the Clintons were smart enough, albeit, to know they international crusading on women’s rights was also incendiary and inciting and especially for those times that First Lady Clinton when into the turf of the quite radicalized and dictated that they needed to learn to behave and treat women the way she said so.

It seems in light of public comments made by the Clintons and their old team that such were only justifiable or rational comments as per past disasters if they were that the Clintons knew they had at least a negligence about such.  The Clintons and their people have a trail of remarks that shouldn’t have been made unless they had to be defensive in/of a known guilt.  As for the months between the Presidency of the Clintons and 9/11 it seems due to later made comments that these are days they may have been enough in a know about threats and yet immoral in an acquiescence at least of a negligence for a silence — the Clintons seem to have done enough knowingly to have knowingly been about a premeditation at taunting radicals in the Middle East towards action by way of First Lady Clinton and her crusading for her idea of women’s rights.

If she is of a grand plan like a THE FEMIFEST DESTINY suggested, as coined by me, we have that though she maybe forgivable for noble ends her means can hardly now be forgiven.  She has been far from uniform or universal in a general Welfare application, however.  She is now of a history of remarks her own that can condemn her and seriously self incriminate however lately yet.  She it seems hasn’t been as smart as she thought herself to be nor smart enough for what at least became duties of her political charges.  Whether she had a master plan to expedite her universal feminist crusade we have to be doubters as now it seems however if so there yet never has been enough uniformity globally.

There is a problem now just because the Clintons have a record of saying things that no politician should have said rationally unless they had something very serious to hide.  We have that for all these years that President Barack Obama compromised his own Presidency with a cover-up like “all Bush’s fault” presumption of immunity and innocence for the Clintons there yet now is a public trail of remarks by the Clintons that stand as contrary and self incriminating.

I do not believe Hillary Rodham Clinton has it in her to sufficiently explain her political life of at least the past 20 plus years as if of an ends justifying the means and as if a FEMIFEST DESTINY dogmatic where intervention anywhere is to be justified for her if she asserts a political purposefulness as about a liberation in feminism.

To Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as taggable as a MASTER OF DISASTER we have 2014 & 2016 politics to work a discover about.  It seems that for her to be actually electable she herself has to present and sell herself as if a MASTER OF DISASTER for otherwise it seems she has failed her way to the top so far and otherwise of a tragedy of errors culpability that must be said to have bordered on incompetence.  And, since her she wrapped up her first Benghazi attacks remarks from outside the office of the Secretary of State with near “I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT THIS COULD HAPPEN IN A COUNTRY THAT I LIBERATED” it may be that she has herself admitted to not have been a master of the many disasters or even the two 9/11s, and that she has basically since 9/11 II admitted an ignorance and incompetence as per the Middle East politics and especially all things relating to Al Qaeda.

But yet it behoove us all not to yet fully consider that the Clintons do have a incriminating past as per a negligence to gross negligence prior to the first 9/11 attacks.  As per any candidate Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton now it must be that we be thorough and diligent and to seriously considering how the administration of the Clintons does better explain how and why so much went wrong - does still better explain causals that the here to fore tagging of just the President Bush decidings.

It is hard to say the Clinton Presidency wasn’t knowingly to inciting Al Qaeda as if by cornering in trapping.  It may be that 9/11 did happen because of a crusading too imperialistic First Lady Clinton, and so that we should think that she must have been intelligent enough to know that at least while she was so crusading it was then negligent to grossly negligent for she to be back in the US then knowingly supporting President Clintons defunding of so many budget items that secure the USA from threats foreign and domestic.  It seems that a MASTER OF DISASTER wouldn’t have knowingly incited and as well partaken in such as it was the great defunding of intelligence and defense programs coincidentally, the coupled and compromised further with the real work of the Clintons to establish walls of separation at the FBI between intelligence and enforcement.

If she has felt justified as if of a FEMIFEST DESTINY to be as a steward of disasters it at least now for political purposes seems as if looking forward we can all say that looking back she has failed to be a master of many past disasters.  For forward or backwards if she/they didn’t understand that First Lady Clinton’s global feminist crusades were inciting and incendiary these disasters are likely it seems more to a gross incompetence and not mere at a gross negligence.

Comments Off
12/20/13
THE PROUD NAIL
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, CLIMATE CHANGE, AL QAEDA, #CGI, #BLAME
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:30 am

It is not a simple political task to establish conclusively that President Clinton had a role in the Benghazi scandalous;  President Bill Clinton has been, as like a proud nail since the rise of President Barack Obama, as one that has had the President fumbling or stumbling causally much since day one.

Bill Clinton has been ever present in a unprecedented as a former President whom just won’t recede - that won’t stand down;  President Barack Obama has been, you can say, of a recidivism to a politics unexpectedly too much of returning to what were the bad and avoidable of the Clintons.

At least Bill Clinton as the spouse of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton while of a his global initiatives and United Nations stature has been too proud and as if he was effectively operating a private Diplomacy while his wife was supposedly loyally operating the Obama Diplomacy;  President Bill Clinton is inseparable from the still unsettled realm of issues as per Benghazi and as a former President of the same Party of the current President as well as for the complicatedness spousal of the State husbandry of Mrs. Clinton as President Obama’s Secretary.

R.I.P. THE BENGHAZI FOUR & best wishes for a full recovery to all whom may have been injured on the 9/11 II.  Mrs. Clinton as now more a First Mate as a First Lady of The Clintons’ Global Initiative is yet compromised for her days as their days of global meddling while spousally embedded with many lines quite or too blurred.  The Clintons’ silence after the 9/11 II attacks are quite suggestive of them of a defensive posture, and, the Clintons’ tend to be a “two-fer” that likes to talk their walk and yet as per 9/11 II really seemed quite in a defensiveness.  Really it has to be an open committee item that Obama’s Secretary may have been hesitant or fearing of open dialogue much because she is President Clinton’s wife.  Benghazi is just one example of a problem of a former administration being tasked at being so intimately involved in a new administration.

Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton while however now more as if First Lady Clinton again and yet as a non government organized meddler seemed unable to speak freely after Benghazi in some for it so was an event that opened minds to how if President Obama could be this wrong about Al Qaeda wasn’t it / isn’t it that then he must have been that wrong and incidentally then wrong about Iraq nearly all along?  It is simpler to establish to a conclusiveness that 9/11 I attacks were an inheritance left for either a President Al Gore or so as witnessed and suffered to President George Bush, and as an inheritance that was of knowing hands on manipulations by the co-Administering of global initiatives by the Clintons while of their co-Presidency.

President Barack Hussein Obama has been stumbling and fumbling since near day one and much for having to navigate even just in his own Party platforms about the Clintons with President Clinton too much a still present proud nail.

It is quite unprecedented how President Clinton has been a former President that just has refused to recede and/or fade away.  It is considerable how he so as a proud nail was of the first days of the first black President of The United States of America to a politics with such of that seen on TV of having it seemed demanded that however elected Barack Obama must prostrate himself with a visit to former President Bill Clinton’s Harlem offices and be to a permanent record made at least digitally of bowing to a superiority in Clinton and as if he wouldn’t have a chance to pass him (safely).  I hope I am not alone both in remembering that as elected President he so a first black President did it seems have to visit President Clinton of his own Party in his offices in Harlem and be to calling President Clinton quite “The President.”  However this is for Posterity it is remembered as politically odd and as if President Clinton was saying he was expecting the first black President Barack Hussein Obama to consider him superior and still of enough global political power to be bowed to and brown nosed.

As per the Clintons and Benghazi it seemed that Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton however of a husbandry of the tragedy maybe more of the mind and hands of her boss President Obama was afterwards and since unable to speak freely for the mistakes made did open up the politics beyond a State diabolical to a strictly partisan posterity then too tilted of an apparent compromised complexity of a guilt rooted in the diplomacy and foreign policies of President Clinton.  It seemed that after 9/11 II it became considerable that it seemed simply suggestible that the Clintons seemed together to have made the same types of proud mistakes before 9/11 I & 9/11 II.

President Barack Hussein Obama was stirring for many as if a new Messiah and as well a new President John F. Kennedy.  It is considerable how much President Obama has been doing incidentally and accidentally to reset a renaissance or restoration in family values, and it seems a refreshing Catholicism for even Americans.  It is considerable and quite concludable that President Obama has been being good for religion in The United States of America and the old standards of family values of the Republican (other) party and mostly accidentally by his politics of having an opposite outcome than he and his experts seemed to proffer and attempt to effect.  It may be that President Obama is currently on a path to do more for American Catholics than President Kennedy ever was able to during his life on earth.

Historically speaking President Barack Hussein Obama is remembered for having been of early days in his earliest first months of a government/leadership opportunity to stem or stop the economy sliding to full depressionary collapse.  It was that much of the down economy was of market meddling as campaign expression like as by liberal institutions of shorting endowments when it seemed their success at spiking gas prices wasn’t yet maybe enough to tag all Republicans as bad Bush Oil Republicans as per electoral November Democrat Party favoring.  If President Obama is now actually though accidentally responsible for doing more for Christians and faith across The United States of America than President Kennedy was able to it is still considerable that when he as the new President of The United States of America and of those days or weeks of an ability to stem or stop the economic sliding he didn’t for he would have had to martyr himself politically with self incriminating admittances as to how he and his party had actually intentionally set up the collapse, mostly, as for November 2008 electoral advantage, and be to explaining that they had arrogantly thought anything that was that easy to start would be just as easy to stop.

There is enough blame and fault to go around between President Barack H. Obama and the Clinton “two-fer” like a now First Couple anew yet more just globally as by the CGI of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives.  It is considerable that President Obama has regularly been to barely avoiding the unprecedented global meddling of President Clinton or to visibly fumbling or stumbling over a still too present and too proud politics of at least President William Jefferson Clinton.

Right!  As per the whole like PRESIDENT OBAMA COULD HAVE STOPPED THE RECESSION IN HIS FIRST MONTHS “MARTYR ISSUE” it is considerable that such was it seems originally the plot and coy plans of the Clinton political machine as a winning strategy to have gotten Mrs. Clinton elected from a most junior Senator seat lacking in seniority like suddenly to the highest office in the land.

It isn’t now that we have to ask whom of the Democrat Party to blame - but quite more now of whom to blame first and blame mostly and if it isn’t now during the Presidency of the first black President that we have the white Clintons whom let people tag them as if Bill Clinton were the first black President now conclusively to blame the most.  It is considerable that firstly we may have even among just Democrats a need to new ordering politically of President Clinton firstly at fault, Mrs. Clinton of CGI (as First Mate or newly First Lady) secondly in guilt, and then and only then to a parity and fair assessment of guilt even just for Benghazi as the 9/11 II for President Barack H. Obama.

President Barack H. Obama may have been long of a shared ideological with at least Mrs. Clinton now of CGI yet it is irreconcilable that spousally there is a husbandry of the Clintons that has been causally and historically so of being in an unprecedented for The United States of America of President William J. Clinton as a proud nail - a too proud still politically meddling former President.

It is no joke or gift of the American People that the Clinton First Couple arranged a post-office support allowance that nearly suggests that they both become American TITLED and as if they were to be forever the first First Couple promoted from the highest office of The United States of America to a yet higher political position even as too autocratic and not democratic as of President Clinton more than an Ambassador to the World as at least a self proclaimed first President of the World.

At least as per the Constitution and Article 1 Section 9 Paragraph 8 it seems Constitutionally that at least President William Jefferson Clinton is un-Constitutionally set up too much as if titled and of emoluments and pecuniary quite selfishly rendered and quite in a Posterity that has been dangerous to American Tranquility as with him a too proud nail like and quite unprecedentally and especially by the Clintons as transgressors of the example of President George & First Lady Martha Washington.

R.I.P. THE BENGHAZI FOUR - toward 2016 Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton of the CGI seems to have a “roadkill” smell of death politically about her.  It may be soon concluded that 9/11 I & 9/11 II happened by a causal both times as of faulting to a guilt for at least a similar negligence or gross negligence upon the shoulders of the Clintons.

But as per President William Jefferson Clinton it seems that they did manage to get a substantial enough post-office tax payers allotted “allowance” so that he can keep himself convinced that he by the dollars so cumulative must have been promoted from the office of the president of The United States of America to be freely (yet still an “agent” as per the Constitution Article 1 Section 9 Paragraph 8) of international meddling, however of accounted for pecuniary and “political.”

But as per President William Jefferson Clinton it is still that Harlem has been saving him and that he firstly hoped to now be otherwise high above Time Square in the media hub as well regally set high above The Russian Tea Room in a penthouse near leasehold in the luxurious Carnegie Hall Tower.  It is considerable that before he was dragged up to the Harlem zippiness that has endeared him politically as an unearned camouflage he/they did try to get the Big Bank Friends of Bill to provide annual pecuniaries in emoluments to cover gratuitously the higher and too high rents for such nearly a penthouse suite high above Time Square.  Harlem was owed more by the Clintons than Harlem owed the Clintons and yet Harlem now has been covering and/or saving the Clintons’ public image, at least.

                                                    *    *     *

[Somewhere there is video of that fateful Harlem office too prostrated newly elected President Barack Hussein Obama as of a politics of having it seemed been required to visit President William Jefferson Clinton on his “turf” and be so to such posturing of like calling Bill Clinton then “The President.”]

Comments Off
11/26/13
FLOTUS’S POTUS’D
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, OBAMACARE, #CGI, #FEMINISM, #MORALS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:16 am

How she wasn’t for the garden, the solar @ home, the kitchen, & stitches in time is much the humble pie of these humbled Thanksgivings.

Beware a missing Puritanical marbling in you marbled cakes.  From whence they came arose did whole-istic so Oliver Cromwell and a odd fellow divider Rene Descartes rise.  Of the still living and passed First Ladies of The United States of America 2013 should be the most trying re-ordeal social mashable for Mrs. Clinton.  Benghazi is far beyond a simple humble pie now for any and/or Mrs. Clinton.

We have bared witness these past weeks to honors for past Presidents Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy; we have had a reconsecration of a 150th of the Gettysburg Address and a solemn soulful expounding of the 50th of the tragedy of President Kennedy’s last living day.  President Richard Nixon was firstly of the 80th Congress and so ever present while it so concerned with term limiting the Executive and in many ways to prohibit another President Roosevelt.

First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton is a hemmed and hawed buttered and stewed roughly booted Foggy’d Bottom of a political figure.  It hasn’t been churned enough how she as “management” her yarns have unfurled as poorly figure’d and concocted.  There is too much of her “ingredients” of feminism still set out and passed of her as Mrs. Clinton however of a “feminism” haltered and bridaled yet so bunched up and clumpy as an unmixed and never synthesized whole.  For FLOTUS Clinton her “feminism” is a sunken souffle at best — in reality it is a pile of unused yet parsed divided bits on her carts served as together while kept separate for her spousal’d “two-fer” Descartean political defensiveness.

The tragedy of the Kennedys is also of John F. Kennedy Jr. who may have been too great of a Catholic morality on the night he died and not alone.  He may have been goofing before night flight certified and dropped like a cued brick of his eyes wide shut.  It may be more on FLOTUS Clinton for the wayward ways of JFK Jr. — as First Ladies go Mrs. Clinton may have killed JFK Jr.  The night was set for controversy though anticipatory for Rory Kennedy and the gathering family for it was expanding through marriage - through a love story of Rory’s.  The night was set for controversy about publisher of GEORGE magazine so of John F. Kennedy Jr. and how such was intermingled with a too great moral laxity of Kubrick and the Cruise - Kidman EYES WIDE SHUT.  The night of fall of JFK Jr. and his familiar trusted passengers of their night flight some so of near Gay Head was the night of the rise of the Kubrick EYES WIDE SHUT.  I don’t know how these two can relate as per the tragedy of a Kennedy gathering set to be of hope and marriage.  It was under the “mothering” of FLOTUS Clinton that prudence and morality was stirred as it was said to be art and still acting for a husband and wife to be in EYES WIDE SHUT as teased of being husband and wife porn.

In the expectations of a FLOTUS or a POTUS as a woman there is still a duty to be hard and soft but definitely “white” in a “morality” to bring out the brightness of The White House.  I remember being most strategically and politically annoyed with all the liberal teasing for EYES WIDE SHUT as one whom still cannot serve up an “art” of “acting” for such as it was being sold and opened so controversially and dominantly until the new Kennedy tragedy took center stage.  I have yet to want to or end up seeing EYES WIDE SHUT by Kubrick, Cruise, & Kidman and still since JFK Jr. and company seemingly dropped from heights as if a brick accidentally or by goofing of and eyes wide shut. The year was more recent than 50 passed - it was 1999 - First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton was supposedly the feminine better half and moral anchor of the liberal and/or Democrat family large.

I only know how EYES WIDE SHUT was being teased.  I was receptive to it being interpreted more as a new immoral social mores for the Clintons’ America - of the FLOTUS’D “universal” - as started too much in a partisan with Madonna as George on GEORGE - maybe.  These were the years the Middle East was saying America was of infidels — time has established it was FLOTUS’D Clintons’ harvests of an American Infidelity and of her POTUS’D as an infidel as per such very much to the Constitution. {Ok that was funny.  I just to check started a search “Madonna on…”}  It was American infidel-ism of the FLOTUS’ & POTUS’D blessed Kubrick EYES WIDE SHUT and part of the evidence against Mrs. Clinton of the serving trying cornucopia of this Thanksgiving another year to doubt being thankful for Mrs. C. — It is of our trying struggles served now in the spirit of her not of a wisdom of the garden, a solar house, the kitchen, and being true of stitches in time.

She helped steward a quite un-American revolution to a hyper-pop-entertainment-monarchistic autocratic new world order and by using as pawns maybe the though un-impeachable “American” of John F. Kennedy Jr.  The FLOTUS’D & POTUS’D Clinton have been not yet guarded well enough against.  The Clinton Presidency is best to be served as having been of an infidelity to America as “American” of the actual Constitution — they still need the People to bend with their need to be of a post-Constitutional world so that their extra-Constitutional ways stay save and secured from prosecution.

There is still a fallen 4th estate, however also of esquired squiredom, entrenched and trenchant as compromised into collusion with the Clintons revolutionary corruptions as a smitten and softly over coddled FLOTUS’D Clinton seduced media.  The Clintons are still trying to become effectively the global autocrats apparently to too few of their original sinning since Yale Law school of plots to get around or over the 22nd Amendment of Richard Nixon’s 80th Congress.

This Thanksgiving the original story is better set and celebrated in its originality however such also of the times of Oliver Cromwell and Rene Descartes than at all served but of “humble pie” in still humbled times in anything pro-Clintonian.  FLOTUS’D Clinton did render POTUS’D Barack Hussein Obama an unhappy lark of lard more than pork. FLOTUS’D Michelle Obama may have little reason to give thanks for SECRETARIALIZED FLOTUS’D Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.

FLOTUS’D Obama did throw here better half support behind a reckless and unnecessary trillion in surpluses of cuts that removed the very pipe line spending from being there years later when needed for the risky loan pimp’n of POTUS’D Clinton - FLOTUS’D Clinton did not serve well as “Bill’s” “better half” - “Bill” may be the better half or separated whole of the Clinton “two-fer.”  Even FLOTUS’D Clinton “feminist” “cooking” is still a mix of separated and unsynthesized parts that have to be mashed for her revolution to progress or conclude.  It seems “Hillary” needs her “recipe” to be just a “recipe” for her to present well and to keep it even from others from trying to be of a real consecration for public and/or private consumption.  Feminists, however, have stopped short of finishing their revolution and for unfair political practicalities inconvenient maybe if otherwise.

RIP John F. Kennedy Jr. and your trusted also fallen airborne familial keeps - it may be that you were just goofing and unprepared, and, yet it was FLOTUS’D Clinton whom can be said of the boson that led you stray too far.  These still may be years we are better to be “governed” by only a free press or the first 100 people in the Boston phone book than by a rile’d and spoiled POTUS’D Obama fraught long and long compromised by the FLOTUS’D Clinton.

How she wasn’t for the garden, the solar @ home, the kitchen, & stitches in time is much the humble pie of these humbled Thanksgivings?  Again? 

Times of these of the humbled Thanksgivings of the years of attempts to keep the promises of candidates Clinton & Obama of the 2007& 2008 servings leave too many again anew of humble pie best it seems at least served firstly to FLOTUS’D Clinton and then only maybe secondly to POTUS’D Obama.  It seems President Barack Hussein Obama was trapped by the Clintons and their too clever carting in a covert Descartean Cromwellian.  It seems President Barack Hussein Obama may have been forced to make all the campaign promises that his peer Senator the FLOTUS’D Mrs. Clinton had and then as well trapped into these years of trying to make contradictory and contrary programs work at all and work together while of a natural economy to be set to be in opposition and counter productive to a harvest good of either.

The lacking cornucopia of the FLOTUS’D Obama is much for the spoiled and ruined fields and field work of Mrs. C.

You and I may still too much be the “turkey” this new FLOTUS’D & POTUS’D Obama Thanksgiving - if we do not yet account for it that President Barack Hussein Obama has trapped us all in how he seemed caught and plucked by Mr. & Mrs. Clinton of CGI  then next year too may just be more of same humble pie of humbled days rolled out by the Clintons’ economic “experts” under POTUS’D Obama.

Until President Barack Hussein Obama or Mrs. FLOTUS’D Obama scour the global media and scrub away any remaining lard or vestiges of the once substantial subverted 4th estate of the colluded to a hyper-pop-entertainment new revolutionary “governance” to again be superior as the first 100 of the Boston phone book.  The attempt to bring the Constitution to a trash heap of history so that a few elite esquired (lawyers/lawyered) could consecrate and affirm a new “media” model disrepective of Federalism and Prudence is still a real and present threat to the Constituted in democratic republican Jeffersonian independent ways.

By the Clintons harvest was supposed to come a new infidel “American” of President William Jefferson Clinton’s (at least) infidelity to the Constitution.  It may be we have all been saved as a nation from being THE AMERICAN INFIDEL but only if and when we realize that the Clintons are at least still busy trying to hide how at least “Bill” was of a governance and a presidency as an American infidel.

Happy Thanksgiving to you all - irrespective of which side of our tables you now prefer or by happenstance find yourself on.  It is that Obamacare is served and served also as “not ready.”  It is that Obamacare is served and yet little “cool” as it is more a tool for a new “governance” of a post-Constitutional hyper-pop-entertainment borderless Hamiltonian autocrat monarchisms. 

The fight of Obamacare is a fight to keep this from being a tool in the shed of the anti-Constitutionalists and so that too many become mere pawns or socialist subjects anew that would wrongly blur the country well beyond 50 shades of gray - a blob of blobs of tasteless whatevers.

One is not a “crazy uncle” of a Thanksgiving however unread of 50 SHADES OF GRAY to explain a historical and dramatic in “ART” and “tragedy” if of talk of the silver screen as no place for a husband and wife to team up actually for bedroom scenes teased as if to be actually porn.  “Acting” has to be less of “foggy bottoms” and of some unimpeachable lines at least so that there still a word mores even if not pure as Puritanical of a return to what the Bible specifically says.

Comments Off
11/18/13
SLEAZEBALL
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, #CGI, #NEW_YORK, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:12 am

This is not personal.

It is no longer about Mrs. Clinton showing a little leg for 2016 - it is as real as a fallen angel.  We all have to look at her though either as “the next Clooney girl” or “not a Clooney girl now or ever.”  We have to look at her through the prism of the Presidency of the Clintons and quite of all the colors and grays of the “politics” of William Jefferson Clinton.  We all have to now finally come to terms with it that it hasn’t proven to have been fair to President Barack H. Obama that the 1990s, not the Clintons actually, made it appear too easy to actually be a President.

This is not personal — The Presidency of the Clintons was a bad administration - President William Jefferson Clinton really was a bad President.  Mr. and Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton were corrupt in their Presidency since day one — this piece can and should be a fair but too brief treatment to such effect - to such as too late breaking news.  SLEAZEBALL tag fits not because of a personal infidelity a light flaw to be overlooked forever but because the known personal infidelity is better looked at through the lens of it a symptom of a sleazy “politics.”

President Barack Hussein Obama should never had had his HOPE hands so forced into a Secretarial job for Mrs. Clinton of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives.  He never should have been trapped as by Benghazi attacks with such an inferior “diplomat” at the helm of his stewardship abroad — Whenever she stepped out of her Stately office after the tragedy and debacle of the Benghazi, Libya attacks and volunteered as she did to the Press nearly this diabolical “I couldn’t believe this could happen in a country I liberated” was the tolling of the hour near for President Barack Obama to ring her bell and fire her, and easily for she had just publicly admitted gross incompetence.  It is the “sleaze” and “sleazy” of the Clintons’ “politics” only that have her still so highly maintained otherwise than honestly.

Right, in keeping this from being personal and still as it is intended to be an expose primarily on the “business” and “politics” of the public William Jefferson Clinton and his “legacy” I should get back now to speaking more of the inherent and explanatory of the “sleaze” of Clinton that explains these troubled days much as of still and from still the “politics” of President Clinton and of the truth that he is better to be thought of for having actually having been a bad President.  Right,  I write here objectively and bolster such truth now by offering that later I will go into another treatment that may explain that despite the “sleaze” we had it may have been the lesser of the dangers of the limited choice the American people had in 1992.  I just have to save for later the explanatory to how that if Republicans had won in 1992 things actually could have ended up much worse than what I will essentially brush out now objectively and historically of it due and overdue that we all open our minds and get real with an acceptance that these bad times are explained by the proof to the hypothesis that Bill Clinton was in fact a bad President and for being generally of sleazy “politics.”

Readers the history is that it may be doubly condemning and doubly sleazy that the “politics” of Clintons followed on from the late entry and still to be rightly explained 1992 victory as the times were that President George Bush was near at 87% popularity but of a political conundrum in that the new world order seemed to be inhabited with Republicans whom if he was re-elected were idealistically too greatly of a “politics” just for his own party that he had he been the 1992 victor was likely then to be no longer capable of moderating a/the Prudence he was known for even in his own ranks.

To also trip the “doubly” bad you need to get with the breaking objectivity that Governor Bill Clinton knew he won in 1992 as a sleazeball of known infidelity at least in his personal political habits and that he won only with a minority vote.  It is doubly bad that he as a knowing sleazeball won of sorts classically as if the lesser of the two (three) evils toed in and then governed and “politiked” still then as if since sleaze won as the lesser of evils long live sleaze - his flaws however and where ever they may have been born.

It is no where more concerning that the Clintons’ Global Initiative persists now with Mrs. Clinton now back primarily as it seems as Bill Clinton’s first mate than of the global politics of it very sleazy that the CGI overlaps its meeting as a vessel Clinton of the “woman” “Hillary” with the otherwise more LADY LIBERTY meeting of the thought independent United Nations.

It is impossible, it seems, that the politics of the CGI of the Clintons can actually be legally copacetic globally or locally - it seems impossible to account for it and its practices as other than a PAC for the “WOMAN HILLARY” as a sleazy Clinton vessel first and last.  I can only imagine how furious President Barack Hussein Obama must be in the Republicans for their arresting of his abuse of the IRS taxing authority to look into political rivals — President Obama must be quite beside himself that he can now hardly use the IRS covertly to peel back the truths and plots of the Clintons and their intimacy in CGI global meddling and monies moving.

Right!  How now to arrest the truths inherent in the Clintons “politics” and as them of essentially a jeopardy of a running, not a one time on then off, con?  The Clintons’ administration became corrupt on day one because the Clintons had been of corrupt thoughts ever since their law school days — on day one they had to initiate their plots so schemed over and about since the 70s, at least, or give up their “dream.”  It is beyond the “sleazy” that ever day of their administration and action or chosed inaction needs to be looked at as corrupted by them putting their plot into motion from day one and then for everyday since of keeping it running of their scheme of Bill’s promise to Hillary to put a Presidency for her firstly ahead, it still seems, of every decision even of their Presidency of William Jefferson Clinton.

It seems improbable and impossible, again, that the Clintons’ Global Initiatives as CGI can be accounted for as lawful and legal at least if the IRS standards per the Tea Party and others targeted is the threshold of President Obama’s Prudence.

Actually it is more cute and romantic that Bill Clinton is still trying to keep his promise to his wife that if she let him be President first he would be committed to keeping his promise and commitment somehow to making sure she would then get her own Presidency.  This has led to his “sleazy” politics likely but in itself is quite cute and romantic albeit highly compromising and maybe itself to near or of a legal jeopardy even internationally now.

This is not meant to be personal - but I do have a tired and telling personal history with the Clintons.

I write today as Thucydides is said to have written about political philosophy as by presenting it objectively without attempt to bias it, and but for my use of the word “history” and even words “political philosophy” about SLEAZEBALL.  I have since election day been considering a political pickle that Mayor elect of New York City is partisanly in and due to such did pull out my Strauss & Cropsey HISTORY OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY published by the University of Chicago Press in a third edition.  Seems to be the mayor of the candidate de Blasio promise he needs to get out from being a partisan stooge and tool of his party’s leader President Obama;  It seems Mayor elect Bill de Blasio should consider asking all his voters to move with him to a re-affiliation as a different party or as independents.

But this is about the troubles we are all still in much because of the Clintons and their “politics.”

As Thucydides is so said to have written so I leave this as written for you to reach your own conclusions and not expect that I have concluded anything with this historical espousal.  Right!  I have personally known the Clintons since I was near a first grader in New Haven and of having been out after school hours a play in the school yard of my Hooker School as it was then conveniently just across my street, and as it was they were then still in New Haven as Yale Law Students who broached a political queriousness directly to me.  Right!  My first impression of Bill Clinton was that he was a sleazeball.  Right! He and Hillary have only these many years confirmed that of my first impression of Clinton.

To broach yourself into a more real realm of the “politics” of the Clinton vessel now as more it seems a WOMAN HILLARY PAC by CGI conscripts scheming please trim your own imaginary lines effectively so to see them in a historical light as having been oddly perfectly “politically” positioned when the first 9/11 happened and oddly ready and prepared and yet as the winds still blow hard that it seems they are in jeopardy for never having really planned enough for a Bush to have risen in 2000 instead of just Gore, and, that you too may wonder and wonder if tacked yet to a helmsmanship cautionary of consideration that the Clintons are now trapped in a passed broach too much of their “politics” for never at having prepared for or considered that a “Barack Obama” could possibly upset their long fig’d and set plot.

There is meat on the Clintons’ bones to be served up more publicly now and forever forward much showing for political and judicious consumption that there are tell tales as ginger bread crumbs about their “legacy” that have them very exposed at times certain when they had to alter their plans of their though maybe cute and romantic commitments to right their ship of WOMAN HILLARY after winds like Obama blew, at least, as they never did plan for.  It is that there are in jeopardy, it seems, because their trails can be seen in retrospection and historical consideration of them of, it seems, having gone too far to “correcting” course when they found out that they had scenarios that they had never planned for and yet couldn’t quite well enough compensate about in their “political” reality.

Again, as Thucydides attempted this is attempted - please this is written to ask you to fig and conclude by yourselves and not be conclusive itself while honestly of a presentation attempt in historical and political honesty and truth.

Comments Off
11/12/13
CRAZY WHITE WOMAN
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, 22ND AMENDMENT, OBAMACARE, AFGHANISTAN, #SUSPECT, WAR ON WOMEN, #BLAME, #NEW_YORK, #AUSTERITY, RIVAL LEGACIES, SANS SCRIPTS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:25 am

What are journalists now to do - what are journalists now to do with President Barack H. Obama so exposed and earnedly politically down?  It wouldn’t be prudent or sporting to just kick him and kick him or beat him however while so down - right?  To now be to covering President Obama “tough” could be too much as if of a bigotry or hate crime in kin to either men hitting women or men hitting other men while down and still with geeky glasses on.

What are journalists now to do?  To be earnest in their work (craft?) these days are fraught with tough partisan regulars also called out to like “honestly” cover the Democrats - to cover the Party under the leadership of their Party Leader President Barack H. Obama.  The truth is that President Obama doesn’t have enough “history” - enough “resume” - enough “phat” for trying times like these - for these long days of lingering economic uncertainty.  He may have out matched the Clintons in 2008 contests but still he doesn’t have a track record to suggest he must be right now because he has been right before.

What are journalists now to do?  To be partisan of a liberal persuasion may be a general calling - but how now for Democrats of such professional bias at least without a “before” and “after” President Barack H. Obama strategic consideration?  Can one - can any now create a sympathetic for “Barack” - for President Barack H. Obama?  Even if it possible to forget the “where is Bill?” party dynamic it wouldn’t be prudent to try to ignore the “Hillary Factor” - the “Hillary in the room” - a: Where is Hillary?  The Obama team had First Lady Michelle stylistically “back in the fields” as (back?) in the/a garden and seemingly as much to help sell NEW DEAL AUSTERITY at home.  Right!  We all know Hillary Clinton isn’t in a garden or in the kitchen (politically speaking).

A Hillary Clinton expectant line:  “Though maybe pretty in pink times toll she more true blue of and in blood red.”

Is Hillary Clinton the alternative now to Barack Obama for bi-partisans everywhere trying to get a scoop to press out for party or Presidential politics - political drama?  Can the OBAMA SLIDE be halted and reversed now by covering Hillary Clinton - by exposing and picking apart a fat resume hers of much real personal history of the most political engagements legally possible for any woman in/of The United States of America?  Can President Obama now be saved by his partisan scribes if only they shift to honestly covering Hillary Rodham Clinton - Mrs. Clinton now currently of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives?

A Hillary Clinton political ad starter:  You see a mountain top and clearly it with a shear cliff / Enter Hillary Clinton with white gloves on / camera perspective shifts to as if from the eyes of Hillary Clinton as taking in the path to the cliff and the cliff edge itself / now panning obviously from a “Hillary” perspective but of a self aware out of body alternate dimension you see the bust of President Barack Hussein Obama come into view and noticeably lower than Hillary seemed / Oddly President Obama seen as happy of like an oblivion political much like of his recent remarks seemingly of a future near when Obamacare will be so “working” and “great” that he as still the President will then be as he suggested to using such as a model to change so much else likewise across the Federal Government / White gloved hands more female than male are now seen on the bars of a wheel chair and a wheel chair that now explains how President Obama was appearing much lower than Mrs. Clinton / soundtrack engages with a mix of doom and political opportunity / A hope of an Obamacare fix seems motivating Mrs. Clinton as she is now caught with palpitations of HOPE pushing quickly a wheel chair with President Obama in it towards the cliff …

The political truth even now most inconveniently for a coven of journalists of partisan liberal persuasion can be alternatively covered intra-party by illuminations of any potential in Mrs. Clinton to be other than a white Barack Obama - to be in any way, however, yet better than or just as bad as her Party’s current leader.  It seems impossible to believe that Mrs. Clinton even with her fat records and long engaged phat political resume has a potential to be different or better than President Barack H. Obama.  Can covering Mrs. Clinton as she teases at least a dashing towards 2016 now be a panacea or just a timely and needed political fix for President Obama?

The REAL Mrs. Clinton - how say you?  Isn’t there only a HOPE for Mrs. Clinton of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives now per Obamacare if she can offer a fix in an administrative - if she can say she is an un-Obama - if she can present herself somehow as a needed replacement for President Obama?  Doesn’t she have to run as if she can get President Obama and his administration somehow out of the way - politically speaking?   Doesn’t Mrs. Clinton need to metaphorically suggest that she can push at least Obamacare over the cliff and fix healthcare either with Romneycare or Hillarycare?

There is much bar talk to be commenced just anew about Mrs. Clinton.  It should be an easy row for Obama loyalist partisans however of a wizardry in spin or a coven for liberal persuasion to now hoe in a defense at least comparative between First Lady Michelle Obama and the trying legacy so phat personally of former First Lady Hillary Clinton.  It should be an easy row to hoe if one takes to the Obama “garden” in lieu of say the “broken promises” of the Clintons to now cover just Mrs. Clinton towards protecting and maybe saving the President.  There is Mrs. Clinton’s “depth charges” bar videos and as well that Kenneth Starr nearly did move to also disbarring of the First Lady when then of success otherwise just to using the evidence against William Jefferson Clinton for conduct unbecoming a barred lawyer.

Right!  That President Barack H. Obama has basically no “resume” can help save him.  President Obama doesn’t have the personally condemning public and private records such that must haunt Mrs. Clinton daily.  Mrs. Clinton was a dangerous choice for Secretary of State for it was near impossible for her to be “Diplomatic” in such charge while needing so much time to politically protect and/or maintain a political cover for the Clintons’ years of global meddling.  Mrs. Clinton unlike President Obama but for his lies of suggesting “it” could be non of the Clintons’ fault and somehow yet “all Bush’s fault” has a personal “resume” quite fat of compromising “phat”; President Obama unlike Mrs. Clinton didn’t have twice as much “work” to do per “Diplomacy” just of a personal need to write a new positive history for the Clintons while trying to make a good and just history and legacy for President Barack Hussein Obama.

What is she thinking?  Really you all:  What can she be thinking even now just teasing towards being of a right or good phat now and towards 2016 and beyond?

Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is more true blue in blood red than now pretty however covered in any other lighter color.

It is not now yet too late to save President Barack Hussein Obama — there is yet time to even save the President from Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton. 

Even the President still now has time to attempt at least to explain to the known world that in reality time has passed enough for the phat of the issues to show themselves as more of the fat of Mrs. Clinton and her personal storied resume than yet the to be fore skinny on President George W. Bush.  Mrs. Clinton has a story of a “FEMIFEST DESTINY” like spousal scheming gone a rye;  Mrs. Clinton has a story to at least be hinted at in a clever disposition or kindly rendition journalistic probative post “phat” review that really should suggest she must be insane if she thinks she should even enter “officially” any 2016 Presidential contest.  It has been proven that “it” couldn’t have been at all as tagged in a too partisan as if a history could be real in the hashed “it is all Bush’s fault.”  It remains now that since it couldn’t have been all Bush’s fault that Mrs. Clinton is even more a first person to suspect before suspecting as well the so impeached and disbarred Mr. William Jefferson Clinton.  It may help to move coverage to President Obama from any talk that he too should be at least disbarred as a still barred lawyer President by way of rehashing that Mrs. Clinton was once also considered for disbarring and now newly may be quite sowed for all ears to hear a reaping in a harvesting of Clinton lies.

There may be time for President Barack H. Obama to be saved - even saved from their Obamacare debacle.

President Barack Hussein Obama would not be necessarily seen to be crazy and to be too committed if he were to change course and offer up a diagnosis more in keeping with the full history of his problems;  President Obama could now and likely should defend himself from both Mrs. & Mr. Clinton, and as of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives, and straight forwardly with a pronouncement like: “It has finally come to my attention since Mrs. Clinton was no longer my Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton that “it” as I had been led to believe actually is more an “it” and so of official records and enduring intelligence as more “all the fault of the Clintons.”

What are journalists now to do?  It actually now seems relevant that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton oddly historically has endured as the American politician whom actually most benefited politically from the attacks of 9/11.  It may be that the second 9/11 attacks would have more benefited her politically if Candidate Mitt Romney hadn’t stepped onto international stage about so and offered a more realistic telling of possible or likely facts.  Has the “Ground Zero Senator” “HILLARY” was spun large and remade in ways that allowed herself and her spouse to escape the normal “junior senator” seniority struggles of the Congress - of the Senate of The United States of America.  Senator Mrs. Clinton got a grand and sympathetic international extreme make-over almost uniquely because of her timely carpetbagging to New York local politics.  President Obama can help himself by helping President Bush sympathetically and restoratively after all these years of Democrats, whomever, of being party to false accusations and in a seeming known baring of false witness however naively in a collusion to protect the Clintons.

What are journalists now to do?  Can they just sit back and let the Mrs. or Mr. Clinton effectively just push President Barack Hussein Obama out of the way - even off a cliff with Obamacare?

What are journalists now to do?  Won’t it necessarily, otherwise, just be racist to suggest that the way to fix the Democrats now long lingering problems of the Presidency of Obama is to bring up white Mrs. Clinton as their savior? 

What are journalists now to do?  What will Katie Couric at least do now if she is supposed to ask Mrs. Clinton what she reads?  I mean like she admitted she didn’t even read the intelligence reports on Iraq before voting to commit troops - right?

It works journalists however partisan and like of a coven in liberal persuasion if one now looks historically at Mrs. & Mr. Clinton to explain the to be explained that it has been proven that it was not an “it” nearly or at all as said an “it” of “it” as “all Bush’s fault.”  She is white and yet hardly explainable ever if to just teasing that she can be a white Obama fix;  She might be crazy for not already having been to a disappearing of a promise of a full retirement and of both that of the persistent global meddling in matters too “executive” to long of Mr. Clinton however a last or first international playboy of heralding as if the known worlds’ first President of the World.  It seems more clearly that Mrs. Clinton and President Obama are politically more of opposite ends of just intra-party politics.  It is crazy - it was/is “CRAZY” - Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was crazy about far more about Benghazi than just her “JACK” hearing outburst of her hardly able to handle the truths.  It is just crazy that a Secretary of State hasn’t been thrown under the bus by her President after such a sad performance. 

It was President Obama’s Secretary of State that maybe for a lack of reading “intelligently” again was ridiculously to “official” comments after the the second 9/11 from the State Department declaring that she personally and professionally wasn’t able to believe that like such an attack could happen in a country that she had liberated.  Really, how could she have missed the lessons of Iraq - the lessons of insurgents from Operation Iraqi Freedom?  Really, how could she have missed such for any country of the Middle East political environs unless she was firstly too busy defending the “story” of the Clintons, and of avoiding reading new and intelligent fact based reports?

It seems we all need to now help Mrs. Clinton find the still too missing years of history hers and of The United States of America such as they were of those 1993 to 2001. 

It seems certain there is now more to blame even just Mrs. Clinton professionally and personally for than there ever was inappropriately blamed upon President George W. Bush. 

Really, this is crazy.  Really it is crazy that any “journalists” are still entertaining any “HILLARY” tease for 2016.

Comments Off
11/03/13
IN DEFENSE OF HILLARY
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, #WHITEPRIDE, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:43 am

How pleasant an American political consideration is it that any HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT caressing is firstly and primarily trenchant of her in the corner of hedge fund managers and trial lawyers?

There must be only one Hillary Clinton - what pray worked to moderate a true jeopardy of the Clintons when spotlighted of MONICA BEACH isn’t “campaign” stock.  Hillary Clinton can not be in defense of/for herself Presidentially as if “is Mrs. Clinton” and “isn’t Mrs. Clinton.”

The charm of Hillary Clinton is much in a well worn highly maintained suggestion of innocence - a presumption maintained somehow much of only an innocence.

An essential Clinton campaign fashioning must need be in a flattering defensive offensive.  Any “REAL” Mrs. Clinton exposing likely of a rawness - a heaviness.  An essential politically fitting caricature of Hillary Clinton seems justified if of showing herself of a struggle at/for any dashing — she rightly has a ball and chain braced to each of her ankles to a public eye - a critical minds eye respecting just admitted as yet culpabilities.

A charm and polish of Mrs. Clinton is too frayed and tarnished for her not now to have one ball and chain rightly fashioned for her personal absence of timely styling for prudent guidance and duty of her Odysseus pride — her pride has been set asunder in the public eye, however she may yet be of a personal and political denial.  She is fixated upon the public conscience of her Odysseus dawning pride of more than character assassination in Libya.  She is fit for a Benghazi 10 pounds of cold steel of an anklet with matching chain attachments in pillorying Hillary Clinton by at least an apparition of justice rendered with a ball and chain.  She is admitted of a culpability for such cold steel fashioning.

A charm and polish of Mrs. Clinton is too frayed and tarnished fro her as well of her first ball and chain - her Bill Clinton - her Clyde to her Bonnie - her intimate partner President William Jefferson Clinton.  She is so intimate in the matters of the Presidency theirs that it seems inappropriate to allow her a degrading of all other First Ladies of a suggestion that she too hasn’t already broken the greatest said “glass ceiling” of the Clintons’ BOGO plotting.  Their intimacy begiles so much of how it should be considerate much for such as their old and compromised “two-fer”, as it  be, and so established/proven, that she - Mrs. Clinton - may be justified to a public modeling more transparently truthful as with this ball so of marriage soul due a re-fitting with a rendering so heavy of a ball and chain and anklet respective of their political culpabilities.

How politically dashing can Hillary Clinton, however - however historically - now manage to be?

Whom cannot now bare witness to a real difficulty to hedge and/or defend Mrs. Clinton if she/they soon by free will  are to toeing in a start for such as a long and most public trial of all things Clintons now as a re-opening of all things Clintons especially since 1993?  And, if the Clinton BOGO “two-fer” doesn’t shelve 2016 itself?

She is well fashioned forward in a difficulty to any dashing as she herself is due at least transparent apparitions of her with two balls so chained such that firstly and primarily she as if pilloried for travels in a need to like pick up two 5-10 pound steel balls and carry likely near her bosom if to manage any more modern justified styling of/as “dashing”!

It isn’t really pleasant at all how we are all due an un-hedged ghosting about her Odysseus like Benghazi dawning originality.

To what or whom may yet be of Barack Obama coat tails it seems Mrs. Clinton is stuck as to being whipped up for trial lawyers more than they may yet be prudent/affording if of an exposure of a toeing the lines in defense of her.

Any due critique of a soon maybe justified opening and re-opening of all things Clintons and too of all things of the Clintons’ Administration will likely leave too little for the public imagination and consumption for hedgers or pal’d trial lawyers to yet much defend, and/or hide.

The Clintons have put themselves in jeopardy quite of the foreign and domestic.  Any official entrance as if self selecting to 2016 again as a like clean slate start need be now to a new transparency fitting for such a public trial.  Any official step past just teasing with a toeing of the 2016 Presidential campaign lines may yet render them safer from sedition charges but possibly though yet net otherwise albeit without trimming or thinning down what seems a real jeopardy - even maybe a clear, present and too certain global jeopardy.

Can you proffer a defense for Mrs. Clinton now to a charge due if so afoot officially past a Presidential teasing for 2016 and as if for an effective whitewashing about any “Justice” for Mrs. Clinton just for starters to hide further tarring culpability from a re-heating of all things Clintons specifically in a forensics for a believable pathology that now can yet explain what “all Bush’s fault” has proven to fail at explaining?

Can you now proffer or just posit any defense for the Clintons to a due charge that they for all the years of the Clintons’ 90s administering and such of the new millennium the Clintons in a selfish spousal political styling did arguably put their plans for a HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT and to a fig’n for a political A.S.A.P. ahead of their sworn duties in the charges of their Presidency?

If a defense of Hillary Clinton is even possible it now though must be vacant of assertions that the Clintons are pre-cleared for 2016.  The Clintons have put themselves in a to be determined original jeopardy by way of one and now both of their Clinton Global Initiatives.  The Clintons otherwise are of the People of a jurisdiction to an new “all things Clinton” just now as Justice still calling as a ravenous upon Mrs. Clinton and her Benghazi open door just now trimmed as yet with a primary culpability.

Comments Off
10/27/13
OCTOBER SURPRISE
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, TWO HISTORIES, #MORALS, #AUSTERITY, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 3:11 pm

A cardinal rule , for an Arab Spring political era,  may be in the MTA taxing tune of the Kingston Trio.

Who yet can even afford, under President Barack Obama’s SCORCHED EARTH GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM and his New Deal Austerity, even a nickle in fare increase.  At two rides a day in old Boston times that could be a nickle times five hundred or a dimed calculus by an average annum of 250 rides if only of a ride to a job a day and a return fare.  In today’s money that even may have proven to be an obstacle and unfair a fare.

The Clintons may have put themselves legally in the reach and mission of the International Criminal Courts - its jurisdiction.  They now either with their Clintons’ Global Initiatives have to be of their “progressiveness” to being within the reach of the international long arms of a more global Law or be firmly of just the House of a jurisdiction to at least annually fully audit all monies and emoluments however flowing of or through the Clintons and their foundations.

How much DANGER! - ECONOMIC DANGER! - is afoot in local and state Democrats running on raising taxes on the “rich”?  What is a moral “work” and how are Democrats politically self immolating publicly this October by igniting propaganda that tags Republicans, and to being stuck now as if only in amoral “work”?

It is not a SURPRISE that Democrats did cause the housing collapse and have been long instrumental in a suppression by Government of heavy hands.  It shouldn’t be a political or economic surprise if economies contract or just slow again if local and state Democrat Party candidates run on higher taxes, win, and then effect higher taxation.

The ECONOMIC SURPRISE  is that local and state Republican candidates should be running on higher taxes on the “rich”, and, Republicans could win and be to raising taxes without an amoral “work” economic suppression paradigm affected.   It is a conundrum similar to the contra-indicative histories of the Clintons.  Former Senator George J. Mitchell proved a man and statesman of his times with his Northern Ireland tuned empathy and Diplomacy.  President William J. Clinton however showed such a lack of understanding about conflicts, it seems, like in Northern Ireland between religious sects of Christianity, in his general political practice — President Clinton’s Iraq and Middle East histories demonstrate no core to discern as of a prudent common core or common standard as a universal operating methodology for even similar conflicts.

We cannot now this late in October of the Year of the Founder’s Lord two thousand Ten and three be to ignoring a relevance for GUILT in politics and economics, and we shouldn’t forget to account for risks if and to a persistence in falsity and improper historical tagging.

We may need to broach a political psycho-babble to excuse the Clintons for their histories so contradicting and lacking in a standard.  The Clintons’ Iraq policies show them naturally more of a politics to spark sectarian unrest - not to mitigate & ease peoples from such.

President William J. Clinton is no Senatory George J. Mitchell — Time that has passed has seemed to etch this forever to still a ponderous querious for those about and considerate for all ages to come.  It may now be that many are being asked to consider that Mrs. William J. Clinton isn’t now even quite a measurable talent as Governor Jerry Brown.  Politics is supposed to always mostly be local — The Clintons seem to long have found this inconvenient and to be avoided.  But this is less about the Clintons per say than about TAXES by whomever, and how different they can and might be if so eitherwise.

There is in the down economies a Clinton PATHOLOGY of FORENSIC NEGLIGENCE that will rear and ghost if Democrats  now raise taxes under a banner in a HISTORY of the Clintons, otherwise.  Again this is supposed to be more now of clear and maybe certain dangers lurking in any local or state based hiking of taxes.

President Barack H. Obama has proceeded much as if the Clintons would have if Mrs. William J. Clinton had won and been allowed to take the oath of office of the President of The United States of America.  A win whence or ever for the Clintons has to be contested and ruled upon by the Supreme Court for the 22nd Amendment is still yet undecided but relevant Law.  And with that said back to the more taxing side of this as more about President Obama and local and state Democrats though as economically related to a psycho-babble of the Clintons, forever.  President Obama has basically proceeded enough just as the Clintons would have and quite with the very same people as supposed “experts” as they would have, and but with himself without it all personally necessary in a defensive politics.

President Obama has made it economically as DANGEROUS as just a nickle fare increase was sung  as for Boston.  The economy may not be able to return.

A cardinal rule is much that what should be is what is — that the still propagandized GREATNESS for Clintons and for a presumption of innocence, is, by far, amassed with too many irreversible LIES.

Whether Republican or Democrat it may now only be economically SAFE for Republicans to campaign for and then to effect due higher local and state taxes on the RICH. 

Republicans can be of an oddly CAPITALISTIC MORALITY with new and higher TAXES as necessary to fix the too SOCIALISTIC mess caused by President Obama quite exactly as the Clintons too eitherwise.  If Democrats promise to locally now raise taxes on the rich they will do great DAMAGE to any economic growth potential.  President Obama made what had been BOOMS from RICH at God’s “work” of an industriousness in believing themselves morally engaged otherwise to Republicans if working then only at amoral “work.”  Seems!

The only way to raise taxes now at local and state levels seems to be if only such is justified in a correctional for all the DAMAGE done by the Clintons and Democrats generally GLOBALLY and LOCALLY.  And as of an HOWEVER rather to a not so - NOT IF BY THE REPUBLICANS.  In such is also the simple economics and psycho-babble of these down times more of RICH as having done what Democrats told them to do as of the Obama Administration and generally too the too NATIONALISTIC Democrats with their SCORCHED EARTH GLOBAL WARMING ALARMIST POLITICS.  It is that these economic times have been of the Republican much of having done the NEW MORAL with all the Democrats calls and dictates to personal sacrifice inherent in President Barack H. Obama’s NEW DEAL AUSTERITY era.

New taxes are likely now necessary and justified if local and state bases on wealth and/or property assessment - not though if now so further on the industriousness and nationally exposed income and profits of the People of the Constituted by the Constitution of The United States of America.

Republicans can be MORAL and CAPITALISTIC now with such for an increase in local and state revenues for such may be correctional to the troubles from CLINTONOMICS and OBAMANOMICS and the long to be debated and criticized bailing out of the BIG BANKS without at least an issuance of cash stipends directly to the too many stuck on fixed incomes as the Democrats marched and marched to their ill reasoned and too little considered new much higher GREEN ENERGY gas prices and so as of them to a new era of a too POLITICAL ECONOMICS.  The People were trampled and tread upon unjustly and now it seems only the Republicans are capable of unifying enough to a workable solve to move all forward to growth again.  New higher taxes on the RICH can be MORAL and CAPITALISTIC now if by Republicans in a CORRECTIONAL for as all the 2012 GOP Presidential field declared:  The Government cause this economic slide.  It seems it only now time for the Democrats to be guarded from tax increasing and Republican necessarily to such if at local and state levels to correct for the TARP and such as too HEAVY for the BANKS while the People were due at least cost of living increases in the form of cash stipends to be able to afford while on their known fixed incomes all the new and higher costs of the Democrats politicized GREEN economics.

Republicans can be MORAL and CAPITALISTIC now with such and while they should be sufficiently able to explain clearly in common lay and more legal terminologies how it is that the Democrats caused this MESS and its SHRINKAGE in the “MIDDLE CLASS” and, and some too with their being as so NOT BEING REALISTIC.  The Democrats seemed to not have calculated that the RICH would do as the President said.  The Democrats seemed to not have calculated that the Republicans would do as the President dictated and not be as otherwise still of an immoral and in a persistence expected at being so IMMORAL. It seems the Democrats expected the Republicans to keep doing all that he said was bad and to not be to doing as he said and be of such as if it were actually a NEW MORAL.

I really don’t know if all this can be a “CARDINAL RULE” as an “OCTOBER SURPRISE” even for “BOSTON” and the lessons of the taxing tune of THE KINGSTON TRIO as to what could be too much an obstruction as per any fare.

President Obama and his band of merry too nationalistic Democrats have proven their tunes to be of them synchronized, however, as dividers more than uniters.  The Democrats should avoid raising new taxes, at least alone, as they are viscerally too much to Republicans as of a pathology as DIVIDERS - NOT UNITERS.  Local and state Democrats if so of taxing will it seems only increase the DIVIDE - not UNIFY.

This OCTOBER is should not be any surprise that the Clintons are HEAVY and quite politically at risk, and even now for possibly having put themselves and their “global” “initiatives” in the reach of the “progressive” long arms even of the International criminal courts.  The Clintons have put themselves in JEOPARDY globally and locally - long live their “progressiveness” as per JUSTICE?

Comments Off
10/23/13
BUT! BUT! BUT!
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, #CGI, #KERRY, #BLAME, #MORALS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:34 am

If you are to see Hillary Clinton, however, as if a Devilish this Halloween it is safer to step back and focus that such is of a real legacy not as a costume but more fashionable as her in an absence of costume.  She has long been proud of her work as a “Devil’s advocate” - she has long either played a Devil’s advocate to Bill Clinton’s political briefery or she has been to depending on him for being one for hers.  Their truths are more dangerous than their fictions - and even their posited purposefulness to be a “two-fer” of regularity of fictions to keep their seduced media all grease up and phat.

It is essential Clinton that the actual history of Bill and Hillary, since their Yale Law School Days, has been that one or the other was near always being the Devil’s advocate.  It seemed certainly Devilish and a seditious act in denial of insubordination when Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as a barely Christened new “Diplomat” was to her personal remarks near:  I WILL TAKE MY INSPIRATION FROM THE SAME PLACE DANTE FOUND HIS.  This it seemed and seems still as if she was saying she wasn’t yet ready or ever planning to take “guidance” from he that was just recently the Clintons’ too successful opponent.

It did seem President Obama was a sympathetic figure when in his early stepping out with the Clintons on the Global stage of State was somehow behind his Secretary of “TOP DIPLOMACY” when she of her pronouncements near:  WE WILL NOT BE MAKING HUMAN RIGHTS A PRIORITY.

Have you found #DemsAgainstHillary hash tag on the Twitter yet?  And too have you found #NoJuiceObama and/or #RedFlagClintons?

I do not know how Hillary Clinton, however, can be thought of as a good lawyer now if she “officially” enters the 2016 Presidential race.  It is impossible if her so beyond mere trespass on such politics to be considerable as a good lawyer for it will be that such introduces into evidence their past that until know they have kept mostly camouflaged or costumed.  On official entry can only be bad lawyering that maybe for which she most will have her Devil’s advocate to blame.  Congress now already has sufficient right and Power to probe deeply what has been politely brushed over for too many years of the real Clintons to match the failed Clintons.  These days going forward are days to discern and deduce the how and why of the now more admitted negligence of both of the Clintons as now too inseparable in their confessed culpability.

Too we have that (but for recent developments per Saudi Arabia) President Barack Hussein Obama has benefited from a noticeable improvement in Foreign Affairs and “Diplomacy” since Catholic Democrat Former Senator John Kerry surpassed the previous “diplomacy” however of - as of - the embattled and entangled Clintons.  It may be that the improvements in Obama’s Diplomacy since the Clintons were of his cleaning house have something to do with Vice President Joe Biden being freer to be of his Catholic morals globally and that he finally had another of such who wouldn’t be able to avoid casting “Catholic Guilt” upon the Clintons, some, despite their secularity - specific sects of Christianity walked of/by Bill and Hillary.

It is only a hypothesis I am not trained at proving that the said “New John Fitzgerald Kennedy” Barack Hussein Obama is as if he has become a better President at least around the Globe as more Catholics amassed around him and his “Diplomacy.”

What any Devil’s advocate knows about success and its discipline is that said as:  THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS.

BUT?   BUT?   BUT?  

It truly would be PANDORA’S box about any new attempt at a HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT now that Mrs. Clinton has been a TOP DIPLOMAT beyond the treasured and traditions of protections and honors for a First Lady.  The rules to what is admissible as evidence against her of her own making and confessions of culpability are no long that of the soft handed - gloved hands the legacy of propriety about our institution as it is of the Presidency.

Neither President William Jefferson Clinton nor Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton can going forward quite be thought of as good lawyers or even smart Devil’s advocates if they trespass beyond their protections now as it would be if to a new HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT as protections then become improper in any American politics if yet permitted still to be covered as if costumed in the protectorate nature of the traditions of honors for former First Couples, and especially those long for former First Ladies.

Congress though has the Devil in their details rightly of a just purview as to jurisdiction and venue.  Any subpoena that is likely or not still to be served is only a detail in process for a public case that will be heavily contested now probably even if the Clintons are not officially again to attempts to re-secure the Plantation of the White House as their’s again.  The Clintons are publicly inseparable as entangled in global meddling of and by their Clintons’ Global Iniatives and as it is with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of her “JACK” Congressional outburst akin to her “culpability” shouldering. 

It seems more the work as if of governance by man in lieu of laws that such a Clinton culpability can be of such personal entaglements where President Obama’s first TOP “Diplomat” seems wisely, however, lawyered up even as to explaining how it seems she cannot honestly answer Benghazi queries without at least incriminating the Clinton Presidency, and the more Devilish as if of autocratic global “governance” of man as in the international meddling and monies distributing by that of the CGI.

BUT!    BUT!    BUT?

Benghazi is a terrible tragedy that can hardly be explained by the Obama Administration.  Libya was Mrs. Clinton’s ODYSSEY DAWY Arab Spring baby - Libya was “Hillary Clinton’s” chance to do as right for decapitating a sovereign state as a good credit taking as though still about her President Boss of saying such was wrong in practice for the Republican sandwiched between their Powers holding.

Benghazi can best be detailed as if “Hillary Clinton” was of having ignored her baby.  And, as it was on a 9/11 Anniversary so booted it is that her past flip flopping as Senator Clinton as well as her crusading and inciting imperial First Lady agenda are all to be deeply probed and considered (finally).  And, as it was on a 9/11 Anniversary it was Devilish and Dante-esque that her inferno was of a pathology as if it was her baby Libya and that she had been forgetting her baby’s birthday.

BUT YES!  THIS IS ALL NOW ALREADY MOSTLY ADMISSIBLE AS EVIDENCE AGAINST THE CLINTONS.

Comments Off
10/19/13
COVERT CYPHER
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AFGHANISTAN, COVER UPS, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:35 am

Rendered now a stallin’ - rendering of higher education set asunder - low - base - heated - too heated.

The stoked considerate of the Marxist parlance so heated accrues its dividends of Hades shored.  The Styx so cross’d - OH! It may take “Tiny Tim” to bring us lately to a frank Christmas.

Lew BOND too RED - red Voodoo ember’d.  PRESSURE!  Noel Joel’d noted to conjoined afloat by ferry - - - MO’ DEVILISH than Harper’s or Jubal Early?  They’ll all descend together WILL’D & HILL’D pilloried but LOUIS CYPHER’D?

Yes Virginia, however your ANGEL HEART, there is a Clinton penitence due.  From Norfolk to Arlington ghosts a stirring fo’ Justice haunting and yet fo’ all some lately to Justice rendering.  The TERRIBLE haunting of the Clintons’ 90s - no TRICK nor TREAT — the banding skirting of the Clintons served and dished an economic diabetes.

The bones, economic, of the skeletons’ marrow of the Clintons’ closet of them of seizing the days by not seizing the MOMENTS for Posterity & Tranquility.  I ghost these out with TREATS of past Virginian TRICKS of ollies and curb hops from about a few VA ASYLUMS — The old and gone likely still spiriting ASYLUM - WAKE, SKATE, SNOW board shops I did original contracting performance there abouts and specifically within.  I can tell the devilish tales about the Clintons to the crash as from their machinations that set asunder a better economic and to a nation beset with phat of a too fattened economic as if diabetes.

The e.g. like i.e. for Virginia to specific diagnosis and forensics of the Clintons’ economic culpability are of my hands whence about the metropolitan DC area are secured in the economics of Potomac steel, at least.  I bore witness in the Virginia economics of old especially how the GREEN ENERGY campaigning by Democrats did spike the price of gas and decimate housing economics whence such commenced and persisted.  The price of gas did trigger the diabetic crash of the housing crisis;  I witnessed the politicized too subjective market influence on the price of gas as with and by GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM while still in and around The Commonwealth of Virginia.

I was of much welding for the original Virginia ASYLUM - for the first store design & build out I bought a basic ark welder & taught the carpenter builder me myself to its accomplished original fabrications.  For the second store and further design developments for display apparatus I was to upgrading to a basic mig welder.  Potomac Steel is where I bought all it seems of the raw material for the skate board stores I did design and build out or just accessorize later as I myself was too busy to be the contractor for additional stores for the old ASYLUM chain.

I have done my penance for having towards 1992 been to making the Clintons more electable than I meant to even though to top Democrats I had said I would be to making them electable if they were to learning how to sound like me.  I had to fix much of what they got wrong while of much you all liked as right that wasn’t of their fattening of the general Welfare synthesized politics of my integrated marketing conceptualized;  I did help President Bush fix for years so much of the bad inheritance he had fall about his Presidency as from the devilishness of the Clintons’ selfish spousal politics.

The first trigger to the housing collapse can be said to be so near to the launch of HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT that it may be most fair and just to tag HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT as the GROUND ZERO of the housing collapse.  It is though more political though that it may firstly have been the INCONVENIENT TRUTH alarmism of the Clintons’ Vice President.  It is though more speciously apropos that alone the alarmism of Al Gore couldn’t have triggered the housing collapse by triggering a too subjective market pricing for supplies of fuel and gas;  It is more seriously considerate that HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT could have triggered such diabetic seizure alone without any INCONVENIENT TRUTH, and, that Al Gore didn’t light the Clintons’ candle - - - It is essential of CLINTONOMICS that it was of a political economics as at burning the candle from both ends at once.

From the witnessed onset of the Clintons Housing Bubble Crash forward the mathy econometrics start with the price of gas.  As I was of Virginia commerce and communing from DC Capitol Hill basis I as a welder of steel purchasing saw quickly how drastically a change in the price of gas could change the price of material and supplies.  I saw quickly that my material costs were to exceed the market price for work to be affordable in the retailing ASYLUM skateboarding commerce.  I could easily lean on my Villanova University BA in Economics learnedness & years of associated extra-curricular and discern a concern for those pimped by the Clintons into such as their diabetic hyper-consumerism not limited to the risky loan housing bubble.  It was simple math then, and still, how the Clintons set up and triggered the devastation of the housing collapse.  As a contractor self employed and about such material use of the raw products as retailed by Potomac Steel in Virginia I saw quickly that the price of gas could near over-night double the price of material.

The Clintons are no longer like the ANGEL HEART Louis Cypher and hidden from even the ghosts of their originally covert setting asunder of ADAM SMITH more conservative and working economics.

This is not a 2013 limited edition TRICK OR TREAT retrospective.  It is that I advised President Bush to not try to fix the economy and housing mortgage market whence he felt progress in Iraq via OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM afforded him time to focus on attempting to then safely repair economics of his day.  It was that I warned him that then about 2006 he should limit himself to postponing a collapse as it seemed the economy was set to crash if he attempted to fix it.  The politics some were that as well if he attempted to fix the economy and not just postpone a collapse as long as he could he would be politically attacked by the Clintons’ political machinery and to serious blows to progress in Iraq.  It was so, YES, that I saw the collapse coming and with no way for President Bush to fix it as long as at least Speaker Pelosi so obstinately at defending the spending cuts of that unnecessary extra trillion cut of their popularity chase.

It is nonsense to speak of the Bush TAX CUTS as causal to the housing collapse.  As you are now being told by Democrats, indirectly, such debt isn’t such a bad thing - at least if it is theirs.  The Clintons’ SURPLUSES of that extra trillion cut did, though not justified or wise, sufficiently and politically justify the Bush TAX CUTS.  It wasn’t until the Clinton inheritance became more clear on 9/11 that it began to seem that the Bush TAX CUTS were irresponsible.  Until the reaping was about of the sowing of underfunding to unpreparedness set deep with the PEACE DIVIDENDS and more cutting of necessary and prudent budgeted programs it was that really the CLINTONS’ SURPLUSES fully justified the BUSH TAX CUTS.

The devilish camouflage that rendered the Clintons spousal selfish politics as covert have been at least partly shed and decoded.  It is now quite overtly upon them like feathers justified for them as tar and feather whence would have been standard and effected justly.

The Devil is in the details.  The price of gas spiked because of the politics of the Democrats campaigns including Al Gore as Mr. Weather with global alarmism.  As a purchaser of steel in Virginia I did quickly see that the price of fuel and gas first increased the production costs about the acquisition of the ores then increased its valuations through the energy costs of the smelting and rolling or pressing before yet spiking its eventual wholesale and retail values by ways of transportation costs maximization as for accounting for fuel use by mileage related to shipping weight.  Hillary Clinton promised to seize all the profits of all the oil companies - that was too much devilishness - the details are forensic and archived that the blood of the oil as the suffering of the displaced is her’s even more than her spouse’s.

The diabetes the Clintons worked into an otherwise stable and growing sound economics was of phat pimpin’ in a hyper-consumerism not limited to the risky loaning for a housing bubble.  President William Jefferson Clinton is guilty of selling PEACE for a People phat-ness that too rendered a fattening of the individual people;  It has been reported that The United States of America experience such an increase in average body weight under the leadership of the First Couple Clinton that the nation could be to spending a trillion dollars less in healthcare costs if the People could get back down to their pre-Clinton averaged from individual body weights.  Economically Bill Clinton was loved for being less of Hillary Clinton cooking and more as if of two super-sized BIG MAC meals a day or seating.

The Devil in the details of the Clintons’ Presidency is that nearly no PEACE DIVIDENDS should have been justified - - - that PEACE was being challenged by obviously long simmering caldrons about the Middle East and post Cold War politics.

When the phat of the Clintons economics met with the seizure dangers of Hillary Clinton rising it was firstly most evident likely in the steel markets as such so carbon and carbon fuel dependent/heavy.  But the Clintons had addicted too many to a lazy devilish sloth and envy while discipline and religious education needed for the not peace boiling up.  The CLINTONOMICS was of hyper-consumerism much for people of Democrat Party blind faith and long of life and American DREAMING but while mortgaged and fueled on fixed incomes.  When the price of gas started to climb there was a time uncertain of believing it wouldn’t stay around because OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM had finally brought sufficient stability back to international oil markets.  It was reasonable to discern a political understanding that there was while of President Bush not real expectation that Republicans would let gas prices keep climbing towards the 2008 elections, if they could help it.  The last thing any Republican wanted or care to abide was high gas prices at the time of the 2008 political deciding.  The Democrats on the other hand had means, motive and opportunity to and for higher gas prices to effect such days of deciding — the shorting though is still to covered/covert about how even so the Democrats’ high gas prices were feared then to not be to enough economic CRISIS to assure a 2008 Republican beat down.

The Democrats did reign too much as if Hades were their lot - - - the River Styx should have been more clearly accounted.

For those of CLINTONOMICS loyalty it is all TRICK AND NO TREAT.  For those on fixed incomes of the buy-ins about Clintons’ hyper-consumerism it wasn’t long after the price of gas climbed that it was too late for them after having budgeted firstly as if it could be now so high and yet to stay and climb higher.  The econometrics is still mostly unfigured and unaccounted per the culpability of the Clintons and at least the ghosting repercussions of their gross under-funding.  Whence the price of gas stayed so high and heated by campaign rhetoric in such a too great a subjective it became primarily that homes budgeted on fixed incomes had to choose between paying for gas to get to work or their mortgage before it metastasized more as if a economic cancer though however started as an economic diabetes from the reckless stewardship of the Clintons with their phattening. 

The ghosts of the Clintons’ TREATS AND TRICKING are much ghosting Virginia from Norfolk to Arlington.  It is a decoded once covert shenanigans no longer disguised by any cypher.  They are quite for Posterity as if two together each as an officer of Louis Cypher transgressions.  The Clintons have largely been guilty of bringing President Obama low as by cover-ups — that they have together been apparently covered merrily is now as if a clear skeleton of the bones of the collapse pulled from their closets.  It is that the Clintons have a public record that undermines the Obama covers for them as tricked out to suggest it was all Bush’s fault — the very mass and size about their cover-up shenanigans suggest that they feared themselves belonging in Hell, or jail, as politically it remains ridiculous that such a politics to cover-up should have been dramatized if there wasn’t a whole lot of personal culpability to disguise.

Eventually, though, yes, and as now is kinda late, the curtain of the calamity of what once was theirs more covert and coded in disguise has become plain and exposed.  The Clintons have no where to hide - they have no where to hide now. 

In Virginia it did become quickly calculable that a crash was coming; I am still proud of my advise to President Bush to warn him to just postponing it and to avoid any attempts at a fix.  Eventually the price of transportation for all retail items climbed to a due matching higher retail that then made saving mortgages impossible for so many that bought into the Clintons’ reckless hyper-consumerism. 

Rendered now a stallin’ - rendering of higher education set asunder - low - base - heated - too heated?  Really?

                                                      *  *  *

Comments Off
08/26/13
MLK & THE APOSTATE
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, #KERRY, SYRIA, #MORALS, #ISLAM SQUIBS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 5:28 pm

It may be commendable that a former President is to be helping commemorate the 50th anniversary of the March On Washington this Wednesday.  President William Jefferson Clinton is scheduled to have his “Got MLK!” soapbox moment.

There were earlier times in the history of the United States of America where a draft was thought a useful tool for what ailed urban areas.  President Barack Hussein Obama, so a born son of Islam, if now to the visceral drum beat of his new Secretary of State likely should and will be to a new draft and one naturally of his “governance” as with a real college exemption.

Many things complicate the United States of America to any involvement now in Syria. 

It may be all over again a “do your homework or you’ll end up in…” Democratic Party politics.  Seems eerily familiar.

We have that Secretary John Kerry, though a Catholic Diplomat head and shoulders above Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, is breathing the same petrified heinous Democratic leadership exhaustings as that which riled the guts of normal Americans in earlier days.  These times do have a beat now of and by a drummer President Obama that are dangerous for he as of his personal story as an apostate.  These times though by the wrenching words of his new Secretary of State do rattle the bones - do rattle the old bones of the transgressions on the souls whence by then new President Clinton.

President Barack Hussein Obama hasn’t though as a self professed “Messiah” political figure yet been to explaining how his personal choice of Christianity over Islam has been formational to at least his governance views on theocracies or Islamic Dictatorships.  Such seems more a cup half empty of the work of Martin Luther King even than how President Clinton when a new President wrenched the souls and troubled the guts of Americans and especially Iraqi people of the majority was to deciding he didn’t want to have to deal with Saddam Hussein’s heinous past, and not be even to an in absentia new Nuremberg like war crimes prosecution. 

Secretary John Kerry has worked out the words and sentiment such as was once in the air in 1993 and so of a partisan political preference by the Clintons’ administration thence as America was told in a contrariness that they shouldn’t need to be bothered with such however heinous or gut wrenching.  It was PEACE Bill Clinton wanted to sell and a dovish Presidency he most wanted to proceed with — I was to PEACE DIVIDENDS - full steam ahead but for the inconvenient crisis left the world about Bosnia and Herzegovina.

It is an inconvenient lesson plan now for any college now to be current and of an intellectual honesty about Syria without being to spilling so much milk about the still too propped up legacy of the Clintons.  It is to President Obama though to now necessarily be to a believable proffering as to how and why his choice to abandon his faith from birth for Christianity now guides his senses as to a right and wrong at least per Syria.

I do not doubt Obama’s Catholic Secretary of State for his gut reaction and tagging of Syria for chemical weapons use as a truly heinous act.  For me and I imagine many others it is like a deja vu all over again as it feels like that very irregularity that was Saddam Hussein when President William Jefferson Clinton came to town and like chose to prefer intelligence of a PEACE for his dovish wants of PEACE DIVIDENDS full glasses.  The outrage of these “heinous” and “gut wrenching” events as per Syria are due but if a US politician is asked to be or expected to be of a consistency in “governance.”

President Barack Hussein Obama made a horrible choice in Secretary of State.  When he set off on his “First Black” march with the unexpected drum of the Presidency the Clintons should have been relegated to the back rows for their actual history of global abandonment about moral causes - their history of unconscionable inaction and avoidance.  It may have been better yet if President Obama hadn’t even let them in the building - or on his bus.

President Obama’s Catholic Secretary of State John Kerry has spoken well as to the unconscionable “governance” by Syria’s Assad.  The problem quite though is — scratch that — The problems are quite that his words may move the US to a draft as well as how an election of Mrs. Clinton too would - and yet it is that these erudite expressions otherwise are contrary even to the older words of that “anti-war” Senator John Kerry when of his railing against Republicans for action - not inaction.

I don’t know if you have yet any idea how much all of this is essentially of milk spilled by Hillary Rodham Clinton - a Methodist, if I recall — one not an apostate as her former black boss is of his storied march to Christianity. 

What does the religiousity of the Obama administrations have to do with current and past events?  How is it Obama’s Catholic Secretary of State has braved a stand with strong moral language in ways former Methodist Secretary of State didn’t or couldn’t?  How is it though the language seems appropriate to these events it oddly is contrary to past “views” on morality of John Kerry while Senator or Candidate for the Presidency?

It seems President Barack Hussein Obama is positioning himself as towards as great a new need for a Armed Forces draft as long feared that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was while beating her way, however Methodist, to a power grab like no other - to a power grab quite extra-Constitutional as if a seat for two BOGO “Two-fer” not a two but a united in marriage religiousness as a union of one.

I would mention that President William Jefferson Clinton may be a Southern Baptist but with the clamor or moral outrage now in the air it seems we first should look at him as a husband and lawyer who just didn’t want to do the moral work now said anew to be expected of our leaders in government.  We know he loves to be loved as a politician who sold good and happy FAT (PHAT) times even though such was trumped by hard knocks learning - of real actual history — We know as a lawyer he was disbarred easily and yet forget to consider enough that Mrs. Clinton quite nearly as well was brought up so publicly too for at least a matching dishonesty while a lawyer.

The good news about Syria for citizens of the United States of America is that Hillary Clinton is no longer the Secretary of State.  The goods news now be that if a draft is necessary it will have Obama’s name all over it likely, and as well Secretary Kerry’s, of having an incentive to “do your homework” — a draft now in the second term of President Obama just seems to have to exist if and only it can exist if it is to have a full blown college exemption.

These may be trying days to think learning about capitalism is “getting an education” but it must be harder now for everyone with such “heinous” and “gut wrenching” news being a calling for President Barack Hussein Obama to explain verse for verse even how his choice to be an apostate to Islam was and is right - and acceptable if he is to intervene at all in the sovereign matters of Syria.

It is like “IT IS ALL THE CLINTONS’ FAULT” clear as day with the new beat the drum beat their’s of old.  The Clinton, for your education or refreshment, did choose to play Saddam Hussein as if for all their eight years his past of such war crimes was able to be overlooked.  When President Bush came to town it seemed the Clintons left now war drums anywhere with an alternative for Saddam Hussein and to a prosecution or “justice” as history has long suggested that the Clintons’ did leave office without any entrance or exit plans for Iraq to be dusted off by President George W. Bush.

Comments Off
08/06/13
PHOENIX DANGER - 2016
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, #BLACKS, WAR ON WOMEN, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:22 am

It is all about the repackaging!  It is all about the recovering - a new cover-up ing!

The stunt women for beating the canned “Hillary” now set for scene - now ready in fire proof pant suit in first color option - now ready to be captured/digitized forever as a “Hillary” as a ‘Phoenix Danger’ rising from the ashes of Benghazi Consulate hell fires of controversy.  Scenes to be shot in each color option as ‘Phoenix Danger’ makeover of “Hillary” still necessarily busy with extreme work to find a color that newly can work for a new “Hillary”.

We should take her at her word that she left office so such that she would be needing much time to find a way to humanize herself of have some find a way to re-humanize her.  It seems we are still months from a NEW Hillary, however a ‘Phoenix Danger’, being ready as for new covering and in a coloring that might have a chance to work/stick.

It may be hardest yet for Diane Lane as to a “Phoenix Danger” to handle the years 2007-2008.  These are the years where a former First Lady Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton wasn’t able to defeat in just a party primary a relatively unknown with no substantial experience but a 2004 Convention speech that wasn’t in his own style.  She never made it to a national contesting as a representative Democrat against the best the Republicans had still standing for such for them - for their side.  Hillary Clinton however to new packaging as covering must be to much near or certainly as cover-up-ing — 2016 is not going to be another 2008 where near all the other Democrats on the line but the near unknown black wonder couldn’t defeat the Clintons’ machinations and party machine without so defeating themselves by self incrimination.

We have gotten to this point and to “Hillary” a tweeting in every color option as if of a danger as too much to a political child propaganda as all the Teletubbies and as well as if all the Dancing Bears - in so many colors at once that is not a believable “Hillary” even if Diane Lane can become a needed ‘Phoenix Danger’ caricature as like a stunt woman able to go and do what “Hillary” has yet been able to yet.

To understand the great vast girth of the challenge Diane Lane has been asked to assume one may have to picture Dante’s Hell.  This is quite fitting for the former Secretary of State of President Barack Hussein Obama’s cabinet of rivals as she was from near day one of such quite devilish in a selfish Clinton politics of insubordination of the new President - of her new BOSS.  From day one, nearly, of Secretary Clinton, of the defeated but placed “Hillary”,  she was quite devilish with her proclamation that she would take her guidance from the same place like that Dante had - that in short she wasn’t planning to take her guidance from such an inexperienced Obama despite that he was now the winner to her the loser.

To understand the great vast girth of the challenge Diane Lane has been asked to assume one may have to picture Dante’s Hell.  And, to properly picture #Lane as #Clinton you may at least have to focus on her set knee deep in ashes or somehow and some where deep and low in Hell and its infernos.  And, with the grey of Hillary as this ‘Phoenix Danger’ much set around the too southern too Confederate Grey that she and “Bill” forever set their eternal image in with their “gun”/”"Weiner” shaped “Presidential” library in The Natural State of Arkansas.  Grey is mostly fittingly as newer news as the color of ashes that should be so about the blood stained hands of #Hillary and #Diane however yet to ‘Phoenix Danger.’

We are now early to days of consideration for a President Obama successor for 2016 as these days seem made for the movies and scandal sheets of stories of how if he were actually all white and so then he most likely already would have been impeached.

We are now early to days of consideration for a President Obama successor for 2016 as these days seem made for a long over due most critical and public litigation of all of the Clintons’ years from 1993-2001.  We are of days where we should see President Obama’s too generous attempt at covering up for the Clintons had him asking citizens of the United States not to “relitigate” what really had yet to be actually firstly litigated so of all the years and much quite negligent to grossly negligent of their personal entanglements of their decisions and decision points.

It is remarkable - quite remarkable - that a near unknown that was basically of one big speech, and that not even in his, until then published style, was able to devastatingly defeat the lore’d GROUND ZERO SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON.  It almost explains itself how only a Democrat that was able to offer a “Hillary” alternative and to stand without a corruption so that had him self incriminate while standing against the Clintons’ machine as it did the other Democrats.  It should be more remarkable how the new “style” of the Obama of the 2004 Convention Speech inappropriately had Barack Obama in a performance of my decade old political style and yet without it so as how corrupted by the Clintons since it was newer or new of 1992 era.  Personally I still smart at the unwelcomed visceral experience of the 2004 Convention as it was of me privy to an effort to have Barack Obama sound like my original writings enough to like take ownership of it and by a success in the desired effecting to affect it as of one as by one of a black face.

It is remarkable - quite remarkable - that a near unknown that was basically of one big speech, and that not even in his, until then published style, was able to devastatingly defeat the lore’d GROUND ZERO SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON.  Diane Lane, if not already to abandoning the cause of the Clintons’ political machinations, really now has her greatest acting challenge ahead of her to date — these are the years that preface firstly how the Clintons were negligent to both 9/11 I & 9/11 II and to the ashes and gray that still too much surrounds both.  These are the years and days where Daine as ‘Phoenix’ Clinton ‘Danger’ will have to portray the Clintons and their effecting and justifications of the walls of separation they dogged the Federal Bureau of Investigation in gray matter towards, and, as it was that their efforts to create obstacles to justice with walls at their FBI between enforcement and intelligence were causal to a guilt in a negligence at least to the otherwise maybe preventable affectings in “Holy War” by the 19 of 9/11 I.

The Clintons if in their party showdown for Democrat Party President wanna bees for 2016 critical review and parsing are quite to be on display, however, for a late litigation, in maybe only three shades of grey - in maybe the color of the ashes of 9/11 I & 9/11 II and the eternal telling grey of their BIG GUN shaped Clinton Presidential Library.

Of the Clintons and their folk - even their folk as the too many of Republican elephantine shadows of those late nineties co-corruptions hoofed along with them on their merry donkey trails - it will haunt most hellishly the grey of the Clintons of the ashes of their culpability of just 9/11 I.  For the folks of the Clintons like Janet Reno and Philip Bobbitt I have fond memories of at least #Reno of levity found in how I successfully did about the 2008 races use the words and positions of key Clinton officials to effect defeating deconstruction about their floated re-making spin.

I have now idea how humorous either Janet Reno nor Philip Bobbitt, nor Doug Sosnik, may now find the colors about the Obama administration as too also just “grey” of the Clintons’ “grey.”  It is Philip Bobbitt in his TERROR AND CONSENT dense read that specifies a problem of the Clintons’ style of political fabrication as of his tombed expression of concern that a White House that works too closely with the “Hollywood” begets terrorism.

Of the Clintons and their folk to any or all, however late, litigation for all the mostly like politically missing years of 1993-2001 we have it that Diane Lane is now to assume an near impossible role necessarily needing dramatic trickery as to a “Hillary” newly as if a “Phoenix Danger” of colors just of hope and potential and no rendering of accountability by her Dante and his Hell - his levels of Hell.

There is so much to this challenge for Hollywood and NBC for a new make-over again as extreme as that which led to Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton former First Lady to being the GROUND ZERO SENATOR as such internationally sympathetic NEW “Hillary”.  The ashes are still towards 2016 judiciously to cling to the Clintons and all the years 1993-2001 as if feathers to tar that NBC may be most honest and awardingly dramatic if such extreme makeover is produced in black and white so that all these three shades of Clintons’ grey show most accurately.

Again:  It is remarkable too that President Barack Hussein Obama as of the 2008 contests was a near nobody even more junior peer to the GROUND ZERO SENATOR FORMER FIRST LADY now as well tag’d forward as MADAM SECRETARY OF STATE MRS. WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, and yet able to defeat the Clintons and their vast grey political Clintons’ Political Machine as no other in the field was able to.

Of this promised assumption by Lane as to a NEW Clinton in all her shades of grey NBC is set to have their intelligence challenged and their viewer loyalty threatened.  Such is only as if to a “PHOENIX DANGER” rising that will draw out more clearly how the grey(s) of the Clintons and all their years establish clear as a contrast between whites and blacks a traceable forensics to at least a negligence to gross negligence of even just the Clintons of the oddly limited Lane review and execution set forth now as if a good - as if possibly of the Clintons of a capability to offer Hope - any hope.

Of the rising from the ashes now promised as if of an innocence greater than a guilt we are still of the consideration that if President Barack Hussein Obama were still of 2008 challenge but all white he could still have defeated the Clintons then as the pimp’d NEW JFK.  2008 is a year of great concern both for these shades of Clintons in their grey and for history should demonstrate loudly with official future record how it was an election year that benefited the Democrats mostly for work theirs about having made and kept the electorate most ignorant of the depth and hellish breadth of the issues of such days.  In the election of 2008 more voters were voting more ignorant of the real truths of the real issues than maybe ever before in the history of the United States of America.

Of the rising from the ashes now promised as if of an innocence greater than a guilt we are still of the consideration that if President Barack Hussein Obama were still of 2008 challenge but all white he could still have defeated the Clintons then as the pimp’d NEW JFK.  Today we have much to fear in a “Hillary” and/or Diane Lane as “Hillary” as a “Phoenix Danger - 2016″!  Today we have much to remember and fret to a new harmonic less devilish yet!  Today we have much to remember and yet still fret as the base lines of the Clintons are all gray and still of the corruptions stories of the Democrat Party struggles of the 2008 primary field where all but the near unknown Senator Obama couldn’t defeat the Clintons’ and their years without also being to a rising in a dangerous self incrimination.

President Barack Hussein Obama could have defeated the “Hillary Clinton” of 2008 and all those constructs and spun yarns about her too if he were all white - so it figures.  And, yes if President Barack Hussein Obama so otherwise as all white had been so elected it does figure now that 2016 would be a Democrat Party in whole about needing to rise and rise from lows pressed finally more about accepted “greys” of guilt of so many scandals of the old and new infernos of the Clintons.  And, yes if President Barack Hussein Obama had been all while it figures he still could have and would have defeated the Clintons and the rest of that field which couldn’t incriminate the Clintons without incriminating themselves, and, that now if he were so an otherwise all white President he likely already would have been impeached.

How say you?  How say you all?  R U 4 “PHOENIX DANGER” in 2016?  Would you rather be away finally from the ash grey of the Clintons however of the South and William Jefferson (Davis) Clinton and their oddly telling permanent coloring of their Arkansas library so in Confederate Grey?  How do you fig the architecture of the Clintons’ body politics evermore now but for them of their Posterity set so finally in The Natural State as a “gun” shape so scandalous as the Clinton protege Weiner in his briefed grey exposure?  There is no mistaking the Clinton Library as other than meant as a gun shaped phallic symbol in a too proud horizontal and even though it was forced back from being of its tip so postured over the “eternal feminine” metaphorically when forced back from being too proud out over the flowing (feminine) waters of such river fem.
 
How say you?  How say you all?  R U 4 “PHOENIX DANGER” in 2016?

Comments Off
08/01/13
DISCOUNT(ED) AT 1600
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, 22ND AMENDMENT, OBAMACARE, TREASON, WAR ON WOMEN, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 6:37 pm

For some this may be put aside as political reading as of the Congress of August 2013, and, for reading during their five week summer break

For all though it is puzzling this supposed Hillary the Superwoman myth in the air that suggests that the Democrat Party is already all together as the lorded class of an agreement that the future representative of the “demos” ( the People) has already been picked and arranged for the 2016 change of crown - like.  It is quite puzzling that the party that is supposedly defined as “Democratic” as defined by “democratic” is as if so set with a new leader already hand picked and pre-selected by a elite set of Lord-ish Party leaders.

On the race angle though it is a problem as after the defeat of the vast “Clintons’ Political Machine” by an inexperience novice political junior peer of the Senate of First Lady Senator Clinton as well quite puzzling as if wondering if chum in the waters can attract sharks.  Whom that is black and an established politician actually of executive experience won’t or shouldn’t be in 2016 Presidential race at least if it seems it only Hillary Clinton that needs to be defeated again?

On reparations there is problematic politics too as per the suggestion that Hillary Clinton is an inevitable next President already picked by a few to be the new People’s leader not to actually need picking by the People - the “demos” of “democratic” and “Democratic.”  It seems suggested that Hillary Clinton deserves the office and should be an inevitable next President this time actually but so as if as a white woman deserving of reparations for time served as just the enslaved spouse of an earlier male President. 

On reparations too there is other race problems more black on black for it seems that President Obama did account to himself so much that as an executive he otherwise could have spread out to others more of slave descent than he — It is considerable how far to reparations for passed African American enslavement the vast millions President Obama didn’t have to have spent on himself as “perks” could have otherwise blessed others more of an American Slave legend. 

The Presidency if for a Democrat Party candidate again is towards 2016 now like cotton for the picking if just to prove a black again can out pick Hillary Clinton if she again enters such laboring - said laboring - refreshments of the “demos” Americana.

On reparations with myself as some of Irish descent I have to oppose reparations angle for the former First Lady Clinton and stick to summation above that Obama’s personal “perks” could have been sufficient for a blessing on most as a justified reparations for the Irish like labor abuses — I have to stick to summation so as if reparations by a refund of the last purchase price of a former slave relation was/is the only passable level of rendering late of old injustices.

Hillary Clinton has done much to demean former First Ladies and women in general with her of this similar false sense of personal entitlement.  It is diabolical to suggest she deserves to be President because as a woman while First Lady she was entitled to more that a spousal co-holding unabridged embrace of real power though of a third of every day with her husband privately much left alone to her mercy or lack of it.

Hillary Clinton set a ridiculous example that still diminishes all First Ladies of The United State of America - even our current FLOTUS Michelle Obama.  It was ridiculous that Hillary Clinton saw the office of First Lady - the Spousal Preserve of shared Power otherwise than all others have.  It was ridiculous that she insisted in a bureaucratic personal submission within the West Wing flow chart of obedience to her husband that undermined the historic traditions of real Power through intimacy.  She asked to be removed from the full protections and celebration of spousal rights as joined and united souls of our legacies and legends made by the women First Ladies.

More successful, than Hillary Clinton, even on healthcare for all is the black Democratic Party winner Governor Deval Patrick.  With President Obama’s ACA - Obamacare a general train wreck it just seems that the United States of America have a successful black executive to lean on towards 2016; it just seems that with Obamacare said of being so doomed 2016 has to be like a religious political calling for Governor Patrick of Massachusetts towards carrying the Democrat Party torch as no other could - towards carrying the torch of a promise that he could, if elected, help states learn how to make a Romneycare work for them.

This can only be some as a set up for Diane Lane and much because others more than Snipes have become snipy about the IRS and taxation.  This is about Joes more than - well this really could and should be more about Joes now than it is. Vice President of the United States is a First Stater and likely of cross party loyalties maintained across the isles of the Congress - across especially the isles of his old and familiar Senate haunts.  This is more about discounts at 1600 - and as “murder at 1600″ still a consideration of Congress as to a likely possible permanent tag on at least Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton for gross negligence per Benghazi or even something near a “negligent homicide” rap.

Where is the buck to stop - the bucks to stop about all this that is supposed to not be at all of a “phony” until it has been established that something didn’t stop at rival Clinton’s State desk that was supposed to have gotten to the President’s desk yet didn’t.

There are interesting alternative political plot lines that could have been and still could be soon — there are interesting plot lines to at least entertain now as August break dramatic distractions/escapes.  We have that President Obama likely has shown that his Irishness is not dominant - not to obvious stereotypical dominant traits as his.

If President Barack Hussein Obama were more Irish in his salt and pepper - ebony and ivory - gene strings he likely would have as a visibly black Irish President have worked out a resolution for reparations at least to the last price paid for slaves of African descent of blood relations now settled as citizens of The United States of America.

How has Joe - How has Joe Biden, Vice President, not discounted black President Obama already enough so that he could himself be President now by some simple loyal reviews by his loyal peers in Congress?  How are we not now already with President Obama impeached or removed as by Political duty entrusted in our Vice Presidency?  How has Joe not moved on competence at least as it was possible (but for Obama being a “First Black…”) to have move Congress and Country to a change on cause with a hope then in maybe two Joes? 

How are we not now already (but for Obama being a “First Black…”) to a change from within and to a President Joe Biden and maybe so set anew with a Vice President Joe Lieberman?  Why hasn’t experience and seniority reset and saved our body politics from all this division that has been arising from novice and amateur “leadership”?

These are trying days with a President that still seems to be in office quite over his head at least per economics.  Vice President Joe Biden (but for Obama being a “First Black…”) could even have moved Congress in the first term of such upside down and divisive political condition and as a champion for reparations to cure a stinging lack of whipping by First Black President - by President Obama.  We could now have President Joe Biden and with he of success in an earlier removal of a rival politician of little or no real experience and as otherwise an actual and real champion for reparations if only as to a summation tilled justly around the last price paid for each slave of African descent identifiable as of the history of U.S.A. slavery Big Business.

I don’t know how President Obama didn’t make reparations a priority for his first term as the First Black President; it now seems too late for him, and so any or all others.  It seems reasonable that had he been more typically Irish while a politician he would have been, however also white, to having braved the reparations politics when prescient of his first term.

Hillary Clinton did not live up to the Diplomatic challenge it seems that President Obama had hoped to gain from with her as a politically picked rival for his cabinet.  It seems much either stopped at her desk that could have or should have been resolved/attended to there or that stuff got too discounted by her there and so that she was to political selfish reasoning of a practice of keeping it from getting to the President’s desk (in time).  Besides all the improvements that could have or should have been made to the President’s foreign policy speeches and how such should have been caught by the dutiful supporting teamwork expected of a State Department cabinet appointee - there is still Benghazi as of his political rival not having been able to do the lesser job well enough - without apparent tragic negligence.

Whom hasn’t been too discounted at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.E. in Washington, D.C. since the First Black President firstly became so sworn in for his first term?  How has he not already been discounted enough from within so that we had an reset via Vice President Joe Biden and his loyal old Congressional peers, however of their seniority, and so that we otherwise could now be cruising back to American ways with two Joes - with President Joe & Vice President Joe?

It is historic that a first term of The First Black President passed with slaves of African descent seeming discounted more and as if he thought it was righteous for he to expend upon himself such vast sums as Presidential “perks” that symbolically at least could better have gone for reparations.

It may be too early to call him THE GREAT DIVIDER as it is still political that it looks like that we if Hillary Clinton had been elected would have been to having tagged her so THE GREAT DIVIDER more so.  He may be for history THE GREAT DIVIDER of the short history of legacies of past Presidents and irreversibly as The First Black President who avoided some great race based political issues at least during his first term, but, it is so that it was that Hillary Clinton made almost all the same Political partisan campaign promises and so that she as his rival may be a problem within that discounts his rap as a “divider” though without removing the sting from all their lack of whipping on issues that should have been of their first term.

It does seem with Obamacare such a said trainwreck that black Governor Deval Patrick is a nature and evolutionary next Democrat Party nominee for the office of the President.  He actually has political and executive experience and on a workable healthcare for all governance.  Deval Patrick could ask Mayor Cory Booker, if the Newark leader is actually to be old enough to be President by 2017 inauguration day, to join him for a 2016 ticket to take the Democrats away from the DANGER like warned of by a Doug Sosnik recent public comment to how his party is set to have big problems when President Obama is no longer its leader.

For now I can just hope that The First Black President has already read THE EMPEROR OF OCEAN PARK, and most at least of the SAMPLER set out of order at http://jphogan.org.  I have known of Barack Obama since the late 70s when I was in the seventh grade at East Rock Community School in New Haven, Connecticut and was readying for my oratory competition with President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s DAY OF INFAMY declaration of war against Japan speech.  I though didn’t know until the 2008 races that he and I share the same August day as our birth date each year - with he old so by four years to the date.

It seems too discounted so that it has been so discounted as to not even much considered that really the politics of these years of The United States of America with its First Black President likely could have been more interesting if President Obama were white or just more white - white enough such that Vice President Joe Biden could have moved Congress to removal of the President for “competency” or “lying under oath” if not worse and so that he could have proven to be a really smart and ambitious rival.

What have we now missed these few years that could have been otherwise if Obama had been white to us of an impeachment or removal, however, so that now we didn’t have Joe so discounted - so that now we had two “Joes” - so that now we of the United States of America had a President Joe Biden and a new Vice President Joe Lieberman?

This is the Barack Obama, President, that said before his 1st Inaugural that the United States could use a new and different Declaration of Independence as if he meant as from the start and so before there was Delaware as a First State.  This is of he that spoke campaign rhetoric in his 1st inaugural as if his win had rewritten history and made his spin the new FACTS of the nation - of he that lied in his 1st inaugural.  This is of he that in his 2nd inaugural breathed a whipping of progressive anti-Constitutionalisms with he so then of his expressiveness smarted but with a legal ignorance while he too of a discounting of the relevance of the founding writs with he then of his like;  THOUGH I JUST SWORE THE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I WILL NOT NOW FEEL BEHOLDEN TO SUCH OATH - TO MY SWEARING JUST MOMENTS AGO AS AN OATH OF THE OFFICE.

Comments Off
07/30/13
THE BUSTED VESSEL(S)
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, POPE, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:52 am

To wake in Gracie Mansion with the City on your shoulders - perchance as not judged “lesbian” by the Pope as dawn breaks after dawns - Christie Quinn may have a yoga mat for that - a set of rosary beads - actual candles to light each morn pro-procreation.

The Big Apple has big hopes and wakes each day strongly of a pro-procreation metrosexual - at least.

You likely at this moment are more afraid with where I might be going with this new column so titled than where I am as set of considerations about how much political capital I still have banked and unspent as a feminist.

There is good news quite in that a Mayor Quinn can be no Hillary Clinton, nor a reborn Governor Clinton, or General Clinton.

Poor Diane Lane - oh the thumping she will have to take just to get into character.  Oh, My!  It is almost as bad as A. Weiner leaving nothing left to one’s imagination.  The Clintons’ apples haven’t fallen far from their tree.

A four part miniseries of the “vessel” Clinton that is Hillary must embrace farce to be realistic.  Hillary has long willingly been subservient to Bill Clinton’s ambitions and as I have known since I was of, to her, in the early 70s of an answer:  “If you want to be President be careful who goes first.”  I have known since the Clintons were law students that Hillary Rodham Clinton wanted to be President and am among a few I figure that told her to run first if she wanted to ever actually realized such.

Yes, I am banking on having most if not all of the political capital from my decade(s) as a feminist now to work with especially now as per THE BUSTED VESSEL here.  It is a long story as to how I can and should have so much feminist political capital such that even NBC is quite on a list of debtors fittingly, if of an artists’ code, to me due eventually much credit as a most successful and entertaining muse/wizard.  A miniseries of Hillary Clinton should tell of me at least as per my extensive strategizing that can be reprinted/rebroadcast to show how effectively I was strategic in the 2008 defeat of the Clintons.

I expect that a Mayor Quinn can great each dawn as well as any straight mayor with a lighting of candles of a grand energy in celebration of a pro-procreation civility.  She can say she has a yoga mat for it without having a personal natural penchance of it, and yes guys (& A. Weiner) she can light actual candles, as well.  I do not know how a Mayor Quinn has designs on dusk and dawn Gracie celebratory ops - I do wonder how she would too great each day so pro-living and pro-life in a survival of the species natural pro-procreation (lobby) posture - and if by rosaries or candles or even if by community calisthenics or yoga.

As to the thumping Diane Lane now is teased to professionally having to be to:  As the Weiner couple are apples fallen from the Clintons’ tree we have to consider that Hillary Clinton is already outed as a busted political vessel.  It is farcical how she has been a Bill’s is not an is herself and such that it is her legacy that she has been submissive as his Mrs. quite of a husbandry, however, of a readiness to be whomever her husband wanted or needed her to be.

There are foreign and domestic problems with Hillary and Diane as vessels of Bill Clinton - as either Ambassador to the World Bill Clinton or President of the World Bill Clinton.  It seems Hillary already has been a vessel as to be beyond domestic and to being an international “boat” partner to President Clinton as a globalist firstly.  It seems that Mrs. Clinton and Diane Lane can only use farce now to sell the Clintons as a suspended historical - a suspended reality - is necessary for an acceptable Posterity.

Little known of the Clintons humiliating defeat in 2008 whence thence commenced so publicly with Mrs. Clinton as “inevitable” is how I was able with my bankable political capital to prevent them from sounding like themselves as they were thought to be of their eight years as first couple.  I was able to protect what was originally mine and while motivated then (and still) to avoid at all costs any knowing effort that would be to me helping them succeed in stealing from me.  2008 was a year of a defeat of the Clintons that I predicted many times while otherwise mostly of having been to explaining why they shouldn’t win.  I am not sure I explained it better to any one person than when that day in 2007, if I recall, that the Serbian Ambassador to the United States sat down next to me at an American Enterprise Institute public event.  When Ivan Vujacic and I got talking over the lunch break we got talking about Hillary and the 2008 race.  I did take issue with his remark that top Republicans were telling him he should expect that Hillary Clinton would be the next President and did work through my opinions with adaptations so to fit his State interests as per Serbia.

With the Clintons - I am to wondering how many times must I so defeat them.  I have succeeded many times since having worked to make them the promised “electable” for 1992 I teased to Democrats like Representative Gephardt, Representative Rosa DeLauro, and some too when then as well of a meeting with Doug Sosnik in Senator Dodd’s office in months prior to the Clintons very late entry into the 1992 race.  Right!  George Stephanopoulus was then with a Koch as peers running Representative Gephardt’s office - Representative Rosa DeLauro was a long time neighbor and my rep - Doug Sosnik was Senator Christopher Dodd’s AA and my sister Joan’s boss.  (Yes, my political capital as a past feminist is still largely unspent - and there is much that relates to my sister and her professional story)  The Greenberg - DeLauro family is that of such as my old neighbors with their wards/children my peers and friends.

But back to THE BUSTED VESSEL as a problem for Diane Lane and the world:  Hillary Clinton has now too long been borderless with Bill Clinton’s post presidency global internationalism such that she has been his boat sailed too long tackless and much adrift as to Constitutional propriety of important lines and visceral dimensions between foreign and domestic.  The Clintons have together busted out beyond “American” as per Hillary as a political “vessel.”  It seems evident already that Hillary can no longer discern the difference between American and Global as per politics - that she is a “boat” too long sailed with the international thumping of Bill Clinton either as Ambassador to the World or President of the World.

Diane Lane may be able to sell that Hillary Clinton need only too have a candle to light or a yoga mat specially designated - but Hillary to be real is herself quite already sailed past a point of safe return.  Her Benghazi and her A. Weiner scandals show that the Clintons quite are already too much a vessel hard on the rocks.

As per Hollywood and a miniseries somehow created to try to pimp Hillary Clinton as fresh and usable - I have beaten her before - I have beaten her badly - she broke bad so long ago it was easy to break them publicly down enough for Senator Obama to have had such and unexpected opportunity.  It was that I was able to defeat them with Hollywood without spending my political capital that should be bankable as long as there is an artists’ code - In essence I needed the legal authority of the Bush Administration to protect my rights to my original works and such as my intellectual property - I did need for Bush to be pro Law and Order in order for me to keep the Clintons from hiding their bad again by taking credit for so much that was originally of me and as my good.

As per Hollywood I still mean to work to historical documentaries of a more honest portrayal of the Clintons’ 90s as years fit a title that should surprise yet inform as:  THE TERRIBLE NINETIES.

As per Hollywood and my said defeat of the Clintons it is that before they so publicly lost half their Hollywood friends and such have of their expected silver screen booty I had put out to such artist realm a personal dictate than none of the many who benefited from my years of entertaining musing were authorized to interpret any of it then or forward anyhow as in a support of the Clintons.  I heard the cries that thousands would lose their jobs there - I was insistent quite and because I have no intention of ever knowingly being to helping the Clintons succeed in stealing from me.

Yes, Diane Lane and others - I know GAME CHANGE movie is a big lie about and for Hillary and Bill Clinton, and, I hope there is still a working artists’ code.  I did before Hollywood turned half against the Clintons so instruct that those especially to millionaire celebrity status via NBC sitcom successes be respectful of my personal dictate that nothing that had come from me was to be interpreted anyhow or used to help the Clintons.

When I was to telling many that they shouldn’t expect Hillary Clinton to win in 2008, and as it was at times while such seemed a politically insane posturing I was of special and unique knowledge of how much I should be able to keep the Clintons from sounding like the Clintons of old - I was confident I would be able to keep them from sounding again like me.

Yes, I was amazed after the Clintons did succeed as I had said a Democrat could in 1992 when then as well of speaking against what seemed the pollable obviousness — I was though really amazed that they proceeded to govern then too much on what had come from me without approaching me to acquire any or all rights to such.  But really I was more amazed and scared that they then would proceed to pervert such that had worked as promised as from me without consulting with its originator as to whether it had pitfalls or dangers set to unfold if it were used otherwise or used past “campaign” worked posturing.

The Clintons have been of Hillary a loyal spouse a vessel too long thumped, however, however political, however international, such that a Hillary For President 2016 is a busted vessel too dangerous to actually float.

Comments Off
07/18/13
TREASURE’D HEDGES
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, AFGHANISTAN, #CGI, #BLAME
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:50 am

The problem at least with the People of the United States of America is still that they didn’t in mass bust out their hash #WTF when the Clintons as a former First Couple suggested that a mandatory annual meeting of world leaders around Clintons’ global initiatives wasn’t a WINNING THE FUTURE development.  Red flags should have been thrown at the feet of anything the Clintons’ then with all the hash that could be mustered all #WTF confrontational.  I mean who ever heard of it as Constitutional for a former and term limited President to grandstand over the United Nations as if as or more important so?

Former President William Jefferson Clinton did prostrate himself for years as a penitent (hedger) missionary with his trollops about Africa as a lesson to the dangers of careless extra marital sexual relations as a spokesman for condoms and sexually transmitted (political) dangers.  It seems it was politically necessary as of a show of penitence after he so damaged Hillary Clinton’s hopes to become President too with his public infidelity beyond that of the dangers of his infidelity to the Constitution much of our inherited problems across the Middle East.

A fitting book (by me) for a fair coverage of the Clintons’ two terms could be summed up by a titling so as AS THE WOMEN CRIED - THE WOMEN ABANDONED.  This might need a subtitling to catch those interested in the affairs and problems of the Middle East and specifically Iraq and Afghanistan - it should likely have a subtitle to locate the covering blame on the Clintons as to be detailed about their eight years of inaction and avoidance - of abandonment of Iraqi and Afghani peoples.

The Clintons are terrible hedgers.  The Clintons may think themselves great (political) hedgers because most have yet seen them as just hedgers and cast them out as the most responsible and for their hedging for so much now that President Bush and President Obama did inherit as of diminished or destroyed global value.  The Clintons while still not yet adequately #WTF for not having been much helping the future or “winning the future” with their grandstanding as if as important or more important, with their CGI, than the United Nations and our Presidents (and/or Congress) must be thinking they were good at their global political hedging since otherwise they would have been caught for having had actually bad opinions and practices.

It is late to be red flagging both of the Clintons - each of them of Clintons’ hedging!  But it isn’t too late to now red flag them to keep them from making such damage permanent or worse.  A former President even if not term limited has no business setting up a global mandatory meeting for world leaders to rival the gathering of the United Nations.  There is no known Constitutional basis for such for any individual citizen of the United States of America.  The Clintons didn’t want to have to give up executive power and did want to be considered as fit for extra-Constitutional Power by their pronouncements that we needed to think of US as past its Constitution and now needing leaders specifically like them to be staying around and in power for longer.

Even the appearance of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives is remarkable politically speaking and in keeping with the near permanently disgraced President Clinton of having been like a penitent condom missionary across Africa speaking so to the dangers of extra-marital sexual relations — it seems that anyone trying to appear to be doing so much “good” as he with CGI can either only be motivated from great guilt or from a overwhelming hunger for power, however.

Yes, simply speaking to historicals of the Clintons it is wise to start with a most illuminating perspective analysis of them as always first (spousaly) (politically) as “hedgers.” 

Comments Off
07/10/13
PHILOSOPHICAL FLOAT
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, BENGHAZI, #MUSIC, #BLAME, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 1:17 pm

Imagine sitting knees over with orchestra seats - peace is possible for the moment - it is cast and set.

It is like what could have been - it is like happier times could already be here - and good intelligence and logic - political.  We have Richard Haas and federalism to talk about with the antagonist of Hillary Clinton first acts so contrary with JOBS DIPLOMACY.

I may be to sliding too near to Neil Simon farce - but these are slippery notes too embedded with false iconic hollow Clinton notes — it is that it is safer to believe the stories depend on an understanding that what has been missing from economies of the past growth resonance and harmonics is what was and remains mostly a Republican base strumming.  It is for the sake of the integrity of these philosophicals on the badness of JOBS DIPLOMACY best to anchor the keying on it as of the legend of economic growth how it was more of Republican music.

So as you at least imagine being seated and knees over — Who really killed the music?

Can we get this to a simple refrain of how the chorus of our problems tis now too spare as an empty new solar factory and yet have the message be heard?  There is a lot of upstairs and downstairs is as not is is to parse logically and intelligently.

Oil and water go better together than electrical fires and water - than Hillary Clinton’s Power obsessions to usurp global legacy powers of rival branches of The Treasury Department and The Commerce Department.  It may be more Stephen King - our Hillary Clinton, Madam Secretary, for it has been a nightmare for too many while she as if too of a Constitution not a Constitution — It was though President Barack Obama who said crackingly from the rails of Philadelphia byways on that fateful day he became first sworn in that the US needed a new Declaration of Independence.

That his Secretary of State may have been too preoccupied with attempts to usurp the rival powers @ Treasury & @ Commerce is more on her lap and to be noted as possibly a misdirected time management that had her then without enough time to do her “original” job as per the care and keep of her consulates and their personnel, where ever.

For Richard Haas, and his sympathetic federalism, I have long spoke to as necessary, otherwise, to have saved and rebooted the old notated Republican music of basic fundamental free economics it is maybe best trespassed first while the antagonistic of Hillary haunts to speak to a 100 piece National Traveling Orchestra of only 51 moving parts.

There is beauty in the musical political and economic philosophicals so even as you just get seated expecting a 100 moving piece National Orchestra from your home concert hall and it’s orchestra seats.  It is as if the Republican music is back already - at least the federalist promise of loud and free notations seems already maybe back.

Have you found your seat yet?  Do you recognize any of the 49 missing pieces in a 100 piece National Traveling Orchestra that travels only with 51 moving pieces?   Are you wondering if those of your special and conjoined local 49 will have and make your state proud for days to come?  Are you afraid that the 51 moving pieces of the National 100 piece Traveling Orchestra of 51 moving pieces will, for the record, make better music in your more rivalrous neighboring state’s concert all with their 49 special and conjoined whence?

Hillary Clinton, Madam Secretary, and her JOBS DIPLOMACY were together of hatched socialist State anti-free market economic plotting.  It was and is wrong to blur the lines between the philosophies and necessities of “diplomacy” and “economics.”  It was as if she want central planning for State run economics globally as if “imperialism” wasn’t in retreat.

By now you should be at least imagining being seated with knees over and to understanding the “antagonist” Hillary Clinton if not the already gathered storm of her Socialism and as diabolical enough to fit the storms.

Essentially you are to ask yourselves if she wasn’t to Power hungry and Socialist to an Un-American trespass on our Constituted ways and fear that at least your more rival neighbor state may, for the record, produce better tracks with the 51 moving pieces of the 100 piece National Traveling Orchestra.  The job of the diplomats is Diplomacy — the job of Diplomacy is largely to be able to have distance and deniability from the provinces of The Treasury Department and The Commerce Department - at least.

The State Department as it has historically been seems mostly to have kept it peace and place until the antagonistic of Hillary Clinton had her wanting more Power as Secretary as to it being Power more like as if she had been elected President.  For our State Department of the United States of America to attempt to set itself apart from the priorities of consulates and their personnel firstly as of “diplomatic” missions is to step into the haunted dangers of imperialistic notables too socialistic.

So as you at least imagine being seated and knees over — Who really killed the music?  How is it that what is missing now from the economies of the world and with the growth and potential is the contrary to heralded - is the Republican music missing and not the falsely set blame on others not the Democrats?

You cannot have Diplomacy so mixed and cast - set with Economies without one or both no longer quite by definition still being what it is supposed to be - Constituted with separations and checks and balances long from being.

There is much to still be set and witnessed of the story of the Fall of Hillary —- it can be said to be Shakespearean how she wasn’t happy with the limited power she did get and that her blood thirst for power did distract her from the normal and proper thorough execution of her sworn duties - at least as per THE BENGHAZI FOUR.   Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is to be haunted for having maybe so spent actually too much time in attempts to power grab by usurpation the global legacy powers of two rival cabinet seats, and, as well that fate dictates we look for omens and understanding as to how as well she may have stayed more loyal to her husband and his global initiatives (as if his personal travel office - again) more so than her also socialistic comrade (Boss) President.

Can you hear the music?  Can you believe the story of hope can return and the local in artistries and orchestrations federalistic too?  Can you gather that too long all - even globally so - have tolerated the floated by Clintons of is not is and as per too a Constitutional not necessarily still and important Constitutional?

Hillary Clinton for this episode is the primary antagonist and she of the most haunting concerns.  It is that our Executive Branch and Constitution is philosophically and logically set up with separations and checks and balances much just to protect us from the type of politicians that the Clintons’ and their “two-fer” have long been embodiments unwashable as.

If it is as set and cast and best to be told less farcical as that it is actually Republican compassionate free market economic notation and instrumentation that is missing will you insist on leaving still believing the too long floated contrary that it is Republicans to blame?

And really isn’t it a wonderful thought matching the new bookishness of Richard Haas that a National Traveling 100 piece Orchestra could be of only 51 moving pieces and that the rest would be competitively, however, up to more federalism “local” with tracks never quite the same and of at least 50 different Orchestral conjoinings?

With JOBS DIPLOMACY there can be no “diplomacy” - no PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY!

Comments Off
06/25/13
WHITES OF THEIR LIES
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, TWO HISTORIES, WAR ON WOMEN, SYRIA, #MAGIC, #NEW_YORK, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:26 am

Forensic historians have a disarmed mine field of political content to safely now work in to unearth new more realistic understandings of Bill and Hillary Clinton - without needing to be whistle blowers.

From Bunker Hill and our Constitution - USS “OLD IRONSIDES” - to Manassas the bull that has run - run long of the Clintons - can now be more civilly chocked.

As Massachusetts goes so the nation may not go - today.  In the eyes of the voters a justice for a Beer Federalism is brewing — If the President can have a nationalist brew - can’t and shouldn’t Governor Patrick at least have a hard cider state federalism spirit on tap?  The Clintons may both have gone all egg whites only after having had to check their ambitions to four co-presidencies of the old sold saw too British with its twine so tuned too totalitarian by plots strung to be of a reign too autocratic by political arrangement to bypass a more American standard general electoral refreshment/refreshing.

From the Pilgrims to the shores of Syria the Constitution as written stands of its ordaining and establishment in religion of the founders as so unanimously subscribed by all under God so then as “in the Year of our Lord…” clearly.

It is best to try to imagine a new board game of the Clintons if to success in seeing through them of a Bunker mentality and a bunker mentality clever coyness quite selfishly political.  It can be begun to be imagined but since recent Benghazi and IRS scandals have blown up on paper and tablets most can find from the first blush - first sighting - their board(s) are like TILTED as it seems impossible that all their operations and foundations and numerous “legal” or “tax” status can be LEGAL as besides being too Political their marching beats seems too irregular as if all of WILD CARD rules not rules.

It may not help to try to paint a picture of the Clintons up close as a portrait clearly showing the whites of their eyes - perspective may be better if from a distance to see all the trees (pieces) as of the forest (plots/strategies) theirs.

From up close the former enabler FLOTUS, of at least a fat food fad political fashion for POTUS, she, Hillary, served up rations as if it wouldn’t kill you to live as of her kitchen not a kitchen with a husband said of a preference for like two Big Mac Super-sized Value Meals per day cooking of others.  Surely there is more to look at than the eyes of the Clintons that should be considered and safely civilly revealed as it seems we have to still pound at Benghazi as of a cover-up some or much necessary to maintain old lies of at least the Administration of the Clintons.

It is haunting, maybe just for all the body bags that piled up as tributable to Madam Secretary of State Mrs William Jefferson Clinton, how she of the intimate bunkering as FLOTUS, with POTUS, whence of those midnight hours and such as so thence with a third of each day theirs together for spousal husbandry plotting, how she as Obama’s chief Diplomat left a legacy as if more a Secretary of War than a Stately Diplomat.

However you begin to bridge more safely the historical marching beats of the Clintons, and forensically, back to what they inherited as fundamentally already set to much peace while still less peace than they hoofed, her cooking may have been worse for Bill and us, and a mine field still best avoided at least per bad cholesterol.

It is that Massachusetts itself has a new contest about like a new Bunker Hill but for too little ammunition to guard against Clintons and their ilk now again.  Their pens should be mighty enough, and more set to scholarly unearthing safely of what is quite a once more dangerous mine field of the Clintons and their careful spousal selfish political plotting — Truths are marching on like whence of the first Tea Party to the revelations that the new Clintons are as bad as the old Clintons and as much against John Adams as that early New York Governor Clinton, must have been.

A lay of the embedded fielding of bull did depend on like flying buttresses of media support to their propositions (of the Clintons’ seduction of the main stream media) that they were of an opinion of race and affirmative action per all voting rights that Americans should be sold that a white women deserved to be President at least before a black man.

The Clintons did boldly seem to go about a mine field in our politics too much as if knowing of its bulwarks specific grid lay and even hardly civilly as if with at least New York City Democrat Party deep pockets as of a retailing of the BOGO Clinton “two-fer” as the best way to arrange a postponement in America of Black rule in Washington.  Just seems too hauntingly real that such bull of the Clintons did fly in the early 90s as if of a collusion and conspiracy to somehow arrange an un-American reign for them as if American NEW Camelot royalty able to be prescribed to contiguous supremacy in lieu of Constitutional standards more Jeffersonian for regular resets by refreshing democratically by Republican People.

As of Hillary hardly disciplined as if from the halls of or near Montezuma to the shore lines Google-able remotely of Tripoli yet we got images of Marines too - yet hardly enough as to whence Benghazi.  And, all the while non Marine rapid response teams hers to conjure timely duty forthwith in times of crisis of imminent need.

It was in the primary in Massachusetts in the year of the great defeat of THE INEVITABLE HILLARY 2008 that those Boston Brahmin to Berkshire’d Pillow’d and Tangled’ did but divide themselves state wide as the more socialist of the Commonwealth to that spread where as many divided on white women vs. black man as that was near the total number of US brave deployed to liberate but not occupy Iraq.  There is a wonder in the details that a forensics too can civilly record for Posterity about how magic a number 150,000 can be or might not be — it was only about 150,000 of the more socialist of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts that haunt John Adams (still) since 2008 that divided the lot for “Hillary” and that for “Barack” and while it to was just that number tasked to stand with all Iraqi people in an overdue liberation so successful.  It is quite odd though that such a number then was what President Obama and Secretary Clinton thought wasn’t excessive to chase about 50 Al Qaeda though to be otherwise quietly camping in Afghanistan.

Amateur forensic historians hopefully won’t now beat the Boston forces too long bent to a cover-up bunker mentality for the not too long past administering of the Clinton “two-fer” - won’t be now to going more civilly into the past of the Clintons and their embedded seduced media fields of camouflaged intent and able to be to embarrassment for said more learned of said of a supremacy of and from a more elite degree benefactor cadre. 

Right?  We are to hope that those said to be our smartest are our smartest and most learned and that they won’t be late to the coverage now more safely and civilly possible and necessary (and proper) for such a still campaigning conundrum of “Bill and Hillary”?

{NOTE:  Seems I need, while having so much fun - too much fun - civilly writing this broadside, to take a break and revisit the Bunker and bunker histories fit for close and thorough historical forensic grid metric analysis at a later time today.}

Comments Off
06/06/13
#BLAMEANDGO
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, #BLAME, #MORALS, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 6:16 am

The tyranny of the Clintons is finally over!  And, now, quite most to blame!

We have historically that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton may go down in history as the greatest known liar to have been nominated for the pay scale of the Secretary level job of Diplomacy at State.  We don’t know if it was politics and Clinton arm twisting of a then Democrat Primary Victor Obama that lined up “Hillary” to a cabinet level job as a paid liar.  These are days where the “stories” of her time served are at or near to fallen apart.

It seems naive to now believe we are safer now than we were before Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton became our chief Diplomat, and with her personal and political history as a known liar like her husband.

We are not now safer than we were before President Barack H. Obama became President!

It is that we have a time scheduled now of hearings as if a live dissection of President Obama & Secretary of State Clinton, and as well by the fog of association and to date global meddling - President Clinton.  It cannot have been all Bush’s fault!

As the Democrats have now made a practice of carrying administrative duty with a continuance at political campaigning these times are of a duty to be more free in speech and tagging of Democrats in Power, now.  They themselves have left themselves to the wolves as both in “politics” and “governance” simultaneously by being of never ending “campaigns” while however of time spent “administering.”

It is hard not to see that any biography of Secretary Clinton shouldn’t be transparent on its cover with a historical resonance of a tag hashable as like: HILLARY - “PAID LIAR”!

Of that we are not now safer than before President Obama took office, there is that we are of times fit of hearings for scandals that have to peel back, however, as if a live dissection, layers, and layers of political speech, too long of a fog of “transparency” and #truth as of “official” speech and “campaign” rhetoric - oddly as if compatible.

It still logically and historically is impossible that “it is all Bush’s fault” was beyond “campaign” rhetoric and to “official” speak as a know and perpetuated lie.  This has been a lie that maybe “Hillary” needed most to have any standing for “Diplomacy” - it was a “campaign” rhetoric that had no place becoming an “official” speech as Senator Obama became President Obama.  For such President has since his First Inaugural Speech been himself specifically of “official” lying.  It is taggable and hashable that such is scandalous as a COVER-UP for the Clintons (and Democrat Party Leadership).

We have that we were cheated by many of the current ranking members of “Democrat Party Leadership” both with it either an “impossible truth” or a “lie” so either when “campaign” rhetoric or inappropriate “official” speech as they cheaply proceeded with there political shortcuts with “#BlameAndGo” divisive and polarizing partisan politics.

“IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT” is and was a ridiculous impossibility.  It had to have been some or much of a fault of the Clintons and their administration from 1993-2001.  The Clintons were known as liars before President Obama defeated their “two-fer” as with them publicly tagged as liars and so severely that there was an impeachment and disbarring associated with them as over paid liars.  Yes, FLOTUS Clinton was nearly as well of the Ken Starr prosecution of POTUS Clinton and for a complicity and collusion that likely would have her at least disbarred as well had he reach slightly yet to have also officiated a rap on her as “Liar” - however.

But it is we are of times now where it is safer to believe that we are not now safer than we were before Senator Obama became officially sworn in as President Obama and to him as of his First Inaugural of LIES when of using “campaign” rhetoric as “official” speech as if his election had changed the history and facts truly associated about such.

It seems it is safe to say that our politics have now moved us however “safely” past a long tyranny of the Clintons - as it was at least about a Democrat Party Leadership domination.  We have not been safer since President Obama wrongly tagged our realms of Diplomacy and Foreign Relations with a lie that it was or could be “All Bush’s fault.”

It has been cheap political theater since whence we commenced together with a new administration strapped down by its inclusion of the Clintons when already known to be liars such that any pay for either to establishing them then as “Paid Liar”!

President Obama, whether as a necessary attempt to cover-up for the Clintons, was from hour one of day one to lying officially as if “campaign” rhetoric could become “official” and “historical” “truths” just because it had worked as political lying during the electoral contests.  His politics have been cheap political theater of a #BlameAndGo in lieu of reasoned and thorough Constitutional process;  he and Clintons together moved political and partisan agendas forward on a platform not of reason and consent but by saying the other side was lying and at fault with lies theirs to effect political support falsely.

But for now we have that with promotions about the realms of national security and Diplomacy in the second term of President Obama it is time to consider that a live dissection of “lies” however sold or carried as “official” speech while of lower standards of “campaign” rhetoric with these days of freer political speech for Dems so much of never ending campaigning is quite officially and necessarily prudent in our political reviews - however scandalous.

We have suffered too long with too many lies and with them unsubstantiated but repeated and repeated.  It is that President Obama by his obvious record of these years since his missteps in his first hour of his first day is exposed and due a public live dissection to peel back lies and to properly associate a guilt rap upon any and all of his “officials” low or high.  His “truths” if not “lies” have to be cut into by Congress, now.  His “truths” must be of many times now set otherwise as “lies” as they have stood only this long politically as propped up while ridiculous as “impossible”!

They have cut corners about Constitutional PROCESS and claimed at times that these times were Post-Constitutional so that they could by mere regulation or legislating effect Extra-Constitutional Powers without troubling themselves with proper legal writs to establish and ordain by sufficient majority an actual necessary Amending.

Beyond the simple tag as them of cheap politics of #BlameAndGo - they are guilty and liars so here we go as the more innocent necessarily as “right” because the others are tagged as “wrong” — It was a lie from hour one of day one when President Obama after taking the oath of office for the Presidency did then speak “officially” with unsubstantiated “campaign” rhetoric as if his election had rewritten truths and history.

But the real DANGER of #BlameAndGo cheap politics however of “official” and “campaign” lying is about that which seems flushed out with these broken scandals now more transparently — President Obama and his former Secretary of State have shown with the first term to have not had problems with President Bush’s general methods.  The real DANGER is in that President Obama has revealed himself too much too near to scandalous and diabolical cover-ups about a playing politics in official realms he should not have been.  President Obama has in just these few years shown that it wasn’t that Bush “lied” that he had political trouble with but that he was naive himself to thinking it was that President Bush said too little and tried to lie to simply - that he Barack Obama would have known how to and would have actually effected better lies and without realizing he already has said more than he should have about too many things, and too prematurely at times.

It seems he, President Barack Hussein Obama, may be fit for the Clinton’s purported tag as an “amateur” and now so while we maybe safer just because a live dissection of Democrat Party Leadership “truths” has commenced, and, so now while promotions in Obama’s White House have it politically reasonable to declare that a tyranny of the Clintons is over.

Our new Plymouth Rock may be how it now settles here anew that a morality is discernible even in North America.  It was and remains a cheap politics too near to Oliver Cromwell and as well however oddly the separatist philosophicals of Rene Descartes of his treatments written from near about where the original Pilgrims did depart. 

At least some are “Paid Liars” now still in the administration of President Barack Hussein Obama.  But where do we go from here with them so long of #BlameAndGo lies told contrary to our standards in a governance meant to be for and of an innocence until of a proven not accused guilt?

Comments Off
05/27/13
BEYOND THE PALE
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, OBAMACARE, #SUSPECT, #WHITEPRIDE, #MORALS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:57 am

Happy Memorial Day 2013.

Today seems a very good day to press out some not too simple reasoned thoughts about the state of the United States of America and/or it Politics - political history.

I don’t want this piece to be about race or specifically about failures of the first actually “black” President of the United States.  It may be beyond a pale to discuss his darkness as of his darkness, however black enough or maybe not black enough.

It isn’t on a proud readiness of the citizens of the United States of America to which this presser broadside is primarily to be worked through as about the “pride” citizens should have that the USA was ready to elect a black president.

It is inescapable that Barack Hussein Obama is black and also now too much that he is justly being compared to a white tagged as “Criminal” Richard Milhous Nixon.  Impeachment may be looming - looming large and realistically for Harvard Law Grad and former Constitutional Law Professor B. Obama.

So let’s just look at the whites of the team of rivals of the USA’s first black President. 

All that now is actionable, however just this far, and just as for an administration a “the most corrupt ever” as beyond a pale of political decency may be most of a culpability of the paler whiter of his careful selection and management.  It may be hard to step so far so fast as to a “it is all Hillary Clinton’s fault” but yet that may be a more just broadcast presser.  It could be too much affirmative action for a hoped for 1st female to assert first an affirmative action for a US executive to be slammed firstly though as due at least an equally affirming action as a 1st black as a 1st female might get, however wrong or right.

It wasn’t the first black President whom after 9/11 II showed a deep ignorance still about 9/11 I and intelligence per the Middle East since.  No!  That was his paler white female Secretary of State Madam Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton - Former First Lady.  It is worse than all the “PLAYING POLITICS” both are now seriously suspect of while officially expected to be above such a pale - embarrassment;  President Obama’s Secretary of State though with some outburst @ Congress did admit to a culpability for the senseless loss of the Benghazi Four. 

It was Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, Former First Lady Hillary, who embarrassed herself and the United States of America or at least its State Department with her first official remarks after the dreadful tragic loss of the American Consulate in Libya and the Benghazi Four.  It is unthinkable how she could have had such a naive perspective in her official remarks posited from the dais of the seventh floor at State. 

It was Obama’s “Hillary” who wasn’t ready for a 9/11 II whether on day one or at 3 am - as it turns out.  It was naive and embarrassing that she officially spoke about the attacks of September 11, 2012 with a too personal addendum integral to her speechifying like:  I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS COULD HAPPEN IN A  COUNTRY I LIBERATED.

For now it seems that black President Obama is above the fray and beyond the pale - whites - more central to the too criminal sloppy management across different departments within his team of rivals officialdom.  It may not be quite believable that he as his long shown self of a desire to have a “personality based” Presidency and to need BEER SUMMITS for speaking out too early as if a ready judge, jury and executioner can not get pulled down at least by white Hillary Clinton for her also sloppy “customer service” (management).  His “Hillary” showed her intelligence and foundation was flawed with her too personal official and naive remark after the tragic loss of Americans in Benghazi.  Hillary Rodham Clinton as Secretary of State in President Barack Hussein Obama’s TEAM OF RIVALS admitted to having a ridiculous and impossible view of the Middle East and for her Diplomatic Mission when of orating that she couldn’t believe such an attack could happen.

This has to go above the seventh floor of the State Department and all the way up to however raised a dais of the President is.

He has to himself really be wondering sure like:  WHAT DID SHE KNOW AND WHEN DID SHE KNOW IT.

But he has to be able to have the buck stop at his however raised dais of the Presidency as well with a consideration that he is not beyond the pale & beyond a due process for official embarrassment at least for his “Hillary” for having had on blinders - so it seems.

He has to himself be now more concerned of a:  WHAT DIDN’T SHE KNOW?  HOW LONG HASN’T SHE KNOWN?  HOW COULD SHE NOT HAVE KNOWN?  HOW LONG COULD HE HAVE NOT SEEN THAT SHE DIDN’T KNOW?

President Barack Hussein Obama, however black, and due an American celebration by its people for themselves of having shown the world that citizens of the United States of America are modern and compassionate already enough to be beyond accepting black leadership. 

But “Hillary” isn’t alone in being a more pale embarrassment while of the Black President’s TEAM OF RIVALS. 

But with that said we can this Memorial Day remember that Governor Mitt Romney cost himself the last election and maybe for driving to much as if black Obama - on healthcare. 

It is difficult to believe that after Governor Mitt Romney suggested that if white he were elected and black President Obama defeated he would repeal and replace OBAMACARE with ROMNEYCARE he had a chance with common sense citizens.

Governor Mitt Romney only offered basically that citizens of the United States should elect him to solve healthcare because he was white, maybe.  It could be a fairness thing that since he was white when he got ROMNEYCARE passed in a liberal Massachusetts he thought that as long as President Barack H. Obama was saying OBAMACARE IS ROMNEYCARE then he should be voted to a defeat of black President Obama because it wasn’t honorable for his ROMENYCARE to be stolen from him and taken as if that the work of another.

But beyond that Governor Mitt Romney may have had a moral case, after President Obama himself asserted that OBAMACARE is ROMNEYCARE, such that since so it should be returned to its rightful owner and he that admitted/confessed a stealing should at least be defeated it rests that as long as OBAMACARE WAS ROMNEYCARE and Governor Mitt Romney yet was saying that if he was elected he would repeal and replace OBAMACARE with ROMNEYCARE it actually seemed simply political that it would have been racist to have elected Mitt Romney unless of a moral standing that OBAMACARE was a theft of ROMNEYCARE.

So simply the field is set and there seems an impossibility in our modern politics that Democrats can offer a road of any sort back to a bi-partisan politics in Washington DC.

It is impossible to believe that Obama’s Secretary of State couldn’t have known about Iraq and years of attacks on State Department facilities or people.  It is irrational to believe that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as former First Lady or Secretary of State had any reasonable basis to believe an attack like that of 9/11 II couldn’t happen in a country she liberated.

It is beyond a pale for US politics and Diplomacy that “Hillary” however now culpable also for PLAYING POLITICS at least with the deaths of the BENGHAZI FOUR isn’t of having been at President Obama’s side for so long, however in a TEAM OF RIVALS, is an embarrassment due a subpoena by Congress and with her Middle East expert too, as the wife of Bill Clintons’ protege Anthony Weiner, if “Hillary” wasn’t just PLAYING POLITICS, must, it seems, have been the Secretary’s go to person to be best able to explain the events of our second 9/11.

It may have been all the white people whom have seemingly taken black President Barack H. Obama beyond the pale to such official and embarrassing days as these with a potpourri of scandals, and, all worst when each looked at as to consider if the President of the United States wasn’t just PLAYING POLITICS.

And, yes!  Yes Governor Mitt Romney lost the last election less because he was white and the President was black but that he himself blurred the lines and issues while maybe too prideful with his campaigning on his desires to basically repeal and replace OBAMACARE with ROMNEYCARE and while the country was believing that OBAMACARE was ROMNEYCARE.

Comments Off
05/23/13
“PEACE” NIXS
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, OBAMACARE, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, #NEW_YORK, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:24 am

As a political writer I am sitting here with Memorial Day Weekend near wondering how to cover Democrat Leaders fresh and stale as of their Obamacare of Darwinian concerns.

Are we of days of lesser weevils like rotten apples about a Bernoulli greater evils of like rotten apples in your bushels?

Oh my!  Are these days of lifts or down drafts - more days of political dark clouds nearer than the horizon?  Can I even remember how or why a old college Economics Professor did once call the Bernoulli Principle a “bad apple theorem”?  May be easier now to just wonder how a new municipal politics is afoot for a Big Apple - and due some damming.  Whom may crowe about lesser or greater weevils may be ravenous too much of old evils said of an Axis of Evil.

How Manhattan may all memorialize a loose Union anew in 2013 seems now for the picking as about East Egg & West Egg escapism of old fashioned Leonardoesque capping.  What is the weevil in the barrels truly of the Clintons’ evil of old avoidance and inaction than cannot long support still their old “PEACE” for “PEACE DIVIDENDS”?

Has it been seventeen years already since when Bill and Hillary Clinton should have measure Saddam Hussein as a serpent in their garden and but how Biblical moved so judiciously and civilly prudently for a prosecution in full of all sanctions and crimes held up against Iraq’s tyrannical leader?

Do New Yorkers have among them already a perfect Super Bowl Mayor candidate for 2013 political harvesting?

Among the ebb and flow and thermodynamics of our current political pickings there may be a need to dam some old currents to stem a re-streaming of conditions from the conscious politics of the Clintons still to causing turbulence of/from unstable “hot-air.”

It may this weekend be more difficult to pick through the Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama for “good fruit” even if of like Mr. Binks of Rudyard Kipling’s MUNICIPAL sewers keeping.  Yes Ja Ja Binks seems to be still quite a Gunga Din.  Yes, President Barack H. Obama did receive a Nobel Peace Prize.  Yes, the President of the United States, currently, when of his acceptance speech for his Peace Prize was early to a damming of old lingering dangerous fruits of Clintons’ evils in their avoidance and inaction, globally.

Do you - all New Yorkers - take Bill and Hillary to be yours - yours as embraced New Yorkers?  Do you take carpetbagger Hillary Clinton of a bought nepotic Senate acquisition by Executive arrangements of and by her spouse while then a seated President of the United States of America?  How whether you take them as your own is it that it was fair that she Hillary was allowed to campaign for Senate and the Presidency legally at least while of the full protection and its pomp and circumstancing luxury of the details for a term limited President?  What is “not fair” - what is “NOT FAIR!!!”?

Do you yet get the import of the apple of the eyes of the Eightieth Congress as entrenched for now still by the existent 22nd Amendment of a careful “holding” poetic legalese to keep our term limits Amendment supposedly from being just a loop hole say for FDR to have just run again after two terms on his wife’s name Eleanor Roosevelt?  Our Constitutional Amendment for term limits upon our President was a reaction to Franklin and Eleanor.  Our Constitutional Amendment so written by the Eightieth Congress and ratified by the nation does respect that marriage laws and “holding” of united souls in marriage unions can not be set asunder for an interpretation of their limiting writ as if an election of one spouse to a holding isn’t actually also an indivisible by election working to a “some” or maybe “much” “holding” of such office by the other spouse.

There is a serpent of knowledge awaiting our Constitution as our 22nd Amendment is still on the books yet as undecided law.

By it being now undecided law so much can be said as if its original or derived intent to tag current politicians with labeling as if Criminal - Un-Constitutional - Treasonous.  But for now it is a knowledge of a united two in marriage union that can not be set asunder by its legal “holding” so that the “holding” of the 22nd Amendment can reasonably be to allowing legally for Hillary Clinton to run for President as an election of her would then effect a by election “holding” some or much of office again by her spouse.  Bill Clinton is not allowed to be returned to any holding of the office of the President by election and as he is indivisible from his marriage holding and union Hillary Clinton is not a legal eligible candidate for an election of her would return Bill Clinton by election to at least some “holding” Constitutionally barred.

But New Yorkers this is more about the Big Apple and so much long fought for since THE FEDERALIST PAPERS were written as if by Publius to defend the hopes of a more perfect Union of the Founding Fathers, and, as written to defend such from an earlier Clinton of New York politics who had more empirical and/or imperialistic designs too like these still in our faces newer Clintons.  We have that these days are much like the days of the Founding Fathers of the United States and yet now with it just a new Clintons about a similar resistance but now as per more global opportunities to less than Constitutional designs.

Enter again our concerns about President Barack H. Obama even as he seemed smarter (smart enough) earlier at least when to tagging the Clintons with a global guilt from their years of administering with so much international inaction and avoidance.  Enter again the current President who early did so speak seemingly erudite about DANGERS!!! from politics like that of the real legacy of Bill and Hillary and their Presidency.

It may be necessary to go all Darwinian “survival of the species” political in 2013 at least while discussing how important it may be to over-turn Obamacare.  It may be about what has to be dammed that is of old unstable turbulence from “hot-air” of the Clintons’ administering - Quite!  It may now be seriously that we have to dam both the Clintons and their protege(s) and as well Obamacare - REALLY!  We have that we aren’t getting economic lift maybe because the Apple of the Clintons is spoiling the whole lots of bushels.

There was no real “PEACE” in their days as “two-fer” intimates engaged however properly or devilishly in a holding of the office of the President of the United States of America.  Their “PEACE DIVIDENDS” were more conjured as of evil spirits then and of a poisonous fruit of “PEACE” then as a BIG LIE.  The already recorded “legacy” of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is coincidentally also able to be of a tag on Clintons as of too much hedging and too little fruit baring economics.  New Yorkers may better than most recall that in 1993 when sworn in the “two-fer” Clintons were to inheriting a almost already recovered from recession economy.  What happened after 1993 was that they worked an evil devilish selfish politics of a fattening of a recovered economy so that they could have headlines to make people around the world believe that they had made the economy better. 

By now it may be that New Yorkers are the ones behind the bad air and drafts of the Clintons and some how of political blinders to an ignorance that the Clintons did actually cause most of the economic conditions that made the collapse possible.

They while wanting to be loved as like PEACENIKS are actually of such as of theirs as of “PEACE” then actually of the rot with the collapse much of from their pickings to PEACE DIVIDEND popularity from now more obviously questionable (lies) about “peace.”

Afghanistan and Iraq are the two greatest failures about such BIG LIES by the administration of the Clinton “two-fer” and specifically what our current President was admonishing when with his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech was to careful tagging of DANGERS from “inaction” and “avoidance.”  Yes these are the same Clintons that after eight years didn’t even leave a succeeding President a single option on the table as per even just Saddam Hussein and a full prosecution or enforcement of him by rights established with United Nations agreements.

The politics of both the Clintons and Obama as per ACA - Obamacare is such that a devolution may now result from an over coddling new nationalism with their centralized near BIG BROTHER/BIG SISTER “caring” governance.  The more they get citizens (subjects) to let the Government do for them the less capable such as a species of Americans should then develop and evolve in years with as still of a natural selection “survivor” trait(s).  The old “AMERICAN” may be a dying bread - Quite!

The Clintons’ “PEACE” for their desired devilish wants for a rare popularity for/from “PEACE DIVIDENDS” can be said to be a bigger and proven more dangerous lie than that of President Bush when after the Presidency of the Clintons seemed to be with Americans down to near only one way left to proceed with a due prosecution of Saddam Hussein, and to tagging as “Bush lied - soldiers died.”

As the Clintons’ “PEACE” was maybe the biggest and most dangerous lie by an American leader in the past twenty years, and seemingly because “Bill” just wanted to be lovable as like a Dove, it is still dangerous that the Clintons seem too institutionalized in their marriage and of a plot to allow “Bill” to be the “Dove” and then to shock and awe with “Hillary” later allowed to be the “Hawk.”

But will the over-coddling socialism reaching centralizing attempts by the lot of Democrat leaders lead to a devolution of the American species?  With the Government trying to have power to do more for Americans of that which Americans were long strong and proud for being of a self sufficiency won’t it be more of a survival of the species Darwinism to Americans to devolving not evolving as a class or species?

This Memorial Day Weekend it would behoove New Yorkers of Mayoral Race of 2013 much also to consider that the world has not become a better place with the new Clintons trying to effect globally quite what an earlier New York politician Clinton did once unsuccessfully after being confronted by Publius and his THE FEDERALIST PAPERS.

The bad apples now possibly about the Big Apple municipal political reset are of turbulence that needs to be dammed or damned still of an inferno of Hillary and her crusading while FLOTUS.  She was having trouble being right recently on foreign affairs and the Middle East not just because of limits of her “experts” - she is quite able to be tagged as blinded as well by the hot-air streaming nonsense of the “PEACE” they pimp’d that never actually existed.

New Yorkers if you do still take the Clintons as yours will you if and when the Congress deems it wise to subpoena maybe both Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and dig deep into as well all matters and monies movements via the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVES?  Benghazi is a scandal that for its cover-up opens up a concern that the cover-up was politically needed because they had been wrong about intelligence and history and at risk each or all as possibly of being to naively funding like a by material support the very terrorism they were supposedly fighting.

Please do consider either whether right to choose the less of the two weevils and how to now choice something better than a consideration just politically as a “lesser of the two evils.”

[note:  I am still of the strategic opinion I figured since before the Clintons did enter 1992 race and so of from before I helped make them electable in part because of such concerns in my philosophical strategizing about my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that the Clintons or a re-elected President Bush was best to move to prosecute Saddam Hussein within that new term.  What was needed after the Persian Gulf War to be done before it was likely safe to move finally against Saddam Hussein was that at least New York City and its Time Square and Las Vegas had to first have started a real revival and urban renewal with Community Policing.  It still seems plausible that Saddam Hussein had a way to defeat the new sole superpower USA in a global PR war if we didn’t show the world that Americans could fix their own cities before asserting that they could run Baghdad better than he.  It still hasn’t made sense to me for USA to have not moved for a full enforcement of the United Nations sanction on Saddam Hussein and his Iraq within what was the first term of the Clintons’ “two-fer.”]

Comments Off
05/14/13
THE RECOVERY
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, #CGI, #MUSIC
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:36 am

The worse news possible for President Obama and the Clintons’ machine is that a Republican RECOVERY is already stoked and ready.  It may be unseen by most and yet quite entrenched and ready - already.  These are bad days for the Democrats.

Much of the economy when allowed to work free of Government suppression is based on teams and competition.  Obama & Democrats have been to a politically controllable “THE GOVERNMENT MADE IT” and as of Obama’s airey spiriting to spread “you didn’t build it” over-lording.  It may be as simple now to recover our economy of citizens from his as if of “subjects” most quickly by showing that he and they are just obstacles blocking the way back to a vibrant economy.

There is your faith now - your trust now too - much to be concerned with if such can be so simply true.  It may help to start by asking yourself if President Bill Clinton isn’t now working so hard to appear to be being of a doing of good primarily because of a great need from a guilt to be to assuaging his own culpability - a vast social guilt his.

The down economy can come back quickly, and, Republicans have teams of teams ready at our state level if you are just ready to trust that you are best actually now to look at the state level not the national level to have a renaissance in vibrancy of free market economic growth.  The Democrats do want you to think you have to look for a national solution and yet for the economies to come back we need less need of national taxation because we need more teams of teams more locally and community and state based to be at economic competitions amongst others so sized around the entire known world.

With the popularity down for Congress we have that it may best come back too by standing for a renaissance in state’s rights firstly.  Our best national security and economic posture seems still to be to have a renaissance in state’s rights.  Our Constitution can be celebrated so while about such as a charge in new Federalism.  Yes I still have this as thinking of my collection titled THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that was written before the Presidency of the Clintons and now long tested of these administerings since.  Republican Governors are poised at least of thirty of our fifty states to be to local bellowing for a full and enlighting new sustainable era of economic growth.

We may now need people in Washington DC whom most do not want power in Washington DC seats.  It is a music for growth that is ready to be set free even if now the hard way by prosecutions of Democrats generally and the administration specifically for too many efforts much of effrontery to our Constitution.

President Barack Hussein Obama and his loyal subjects however “Czar’d” or more common subjects has been an obstacle to an enlightened economic stoking for a re-birth in economic growth - for a RECOVERY.  We do have to arrest the Democrats’ efforts at random higher taxation of their newest boldness these past four years that had them go from having been the TAX AND SPEND lots to their reckless SPEND, SPEND, SPEND TO JUSTIFY “NECESSARY” NEW VAST TAXATION - SPEND & TAX tag.  The problem much specifically with their new nationalism is that it asks for a national centralized controllable assimilated masses then smothered from natural freer economic growth of the old American standard of by competition and local community and faith based solidarity.

The specific team of whom you and I may best be to having as national Republican leaders is still not figured yet.  Whom we are to have next is critical and as while it is mostly our Governors of the thirty states with Republican Governors that have us stoked and ready for a strong and vast RECOVERY.  Obama’s over-lording to a national loyalty of a forced assimilation is an obstacle smothering home fires across the world - and especially in the United States of America.  But whom can be right for a new national leadership of Republican credits going forward as it is a renaissance in state’s rights best for our national security and economies? 

Whom are those who can come together as an executive team of the Executive Branch soon as trusted and effective experts?  It is for our economy and communities our national debate has to trend now to Washington based pols as gifted to ask people to look away from Washington to more local community and faith based common sense governance.  For our economy to again glow an enlightenment of a vibrant and workable E Pluribus Unum solidarity in looser pursuits of individuals about selfish personal economic interests it is best to look at our Governors for a moderated bellowing to stoke an over-due renaissance in state’s rights.

These are bad days for Democrats.  It is that President William Jefferson Clinton with his CGI is much motivated to be appearing to be at doing good just from a great guilt and as to assuage himself for much of an earlier GROSS NEGLIGENCE, at least.  His pimping of “PEACE” for his “PEACE DIVIDENDS” is nearer the worst Government LIE of the past twenty years even than Democrat successor President Obama with his Benghazi talking points suggesting it could have been just about a video.  But economically more concerning is that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of an unnecessary extra trillion cut now is quite the greatest economic blunder of the past century.  He cut too much too quickly and while tagging necessary spending for economic growth and jobs stability as un-necessary spending so that he could cut so so so much of it.

President Clinton did do much of what it was of our Government that was responsible for as per our banks - Big Banks - and how they became too corrupted to have kept the economy from recovering nearer 2008.  Republicans then likely could have turned the economy around in a couple of years if while about such with an election of McCain/Palin and President McCain to his promises to revitalize state’s independence there had been also a very public call for bank reforms and with such of a prosecution of Democrats of banking executive decisions starting with President Clinton.

We are poised to have a vibrant recovery now most in thanks to maybe all of the thirty Republican Governors.  The Democrats are now as grand new nationalists quite still too much of a centralized suppression of economic growth by community and faith based competition.  The Democrats are in the way blocking with their trenchant partisan politics.  And, yes there is no sense of whom now would be a team of a national Republican leadership fitting for a enlightened renaissance more of the kindling and stoking of state’s homefires.

As these troubles gather about the Democrats long too nationalistic as if a hellishly hot inferno it may be that even Democrats can benefit from looking away from Washington for solutions and warm hearths of less centralized assimilation in states and communities across the United States of America.  And, too it may be that we have Republicans in Washington fit to be feeders of timbers more set for a ready bellowing of our Governors and their more locally stoked and kept teams of teams still endearing as of competition economics.

Comments Off
05/09/13
OHIO STATE - TYRANTS?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, AFGHANISTAN, #WHITEPRIDE, WAR ON WOMEN, CRUSADES, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:52 am

HONEST JOHN, of the Beaver Wars pride, stands tall of the felted beaver pelted topping of Abraham Lincoln as a bundle of flesh and bones quite more an embodiment of personality as to the HEDGER TYRANNICAL HILLARY now being processed as too institutionalized.

The hide of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is being metaphorically, at least, justly processed/peeled back not as if a quite dry autopsy of the Republican Party but as if of long due deep cutting for a not too political live dissection of so much of/from the Clintons inhibiting much as if a cancer on our politics and economy.

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?

Is Hillary Clinton more of a hedge fruitless global Diplomacy such that it has hardly been “Diplomacy” baring?

Is President Bill Clinton nearer to admitting it was more all his fault?  What of their foggy bottoms of Clinton two-fer?

{Enter President Barack Hussein Obama - as if newly present at Ohio State as if erudite about tyranny:   Puffed up.}

It is like a new kind of Beaver War that young Ohioans have been pulled into with their President of no tyranny claims while a tyranny of the Clintons reigns within his own Democrat Party for Party control and for rants of keeping whom they mean to as lower Democrats barred from higher Party status or institutional acclamation and rank.  It seems it is quite tyrannical how the Clinton have been trying to hold onto inappropriate executive power since leaving office in 2001.  It seems President Obama has a tyranny of his “team of rivals” and that this is some revealed in the live dissection of the Democrat’s cover-up pertaining to Benghazi.

If Americans are to find justice from the commenced live dissection of some rants of Mrs. Clinton and her keeps - of others less politically favored or protected while also her keeps - and a Shakespearean JUSTICE of a pound of flesh from around her heart it must now be set before that her blood may spill however while accruing the just full pound of flesh and no more — that her blood may now spill too if and when it a pound of flesh, a half pound or pounds of flesh judged fair.

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

This is not just a literary technique.  House Speaker John Boehner is both of these new Beaver Wars and of Ohio and the old Beaver Wars pride and tall honor much of Abraham Lincoln standing long so tall as a Republican in beaver felted pelted topping.  I do not know if Ohio can claim to have been the home of Lincoln’s own beavered tall standing.

Are the Benghazi hearing now as a live dissection of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton also about how the Clinton two-fer is now long as a tyrannical political power of a reigning about just Democrats as the keepers of the party gates for passage of young to Party places and classier ranks?  In Ohio President Barack Hussein Obama spoke as if there was no tryanny to worry about and not even that long now of the proximity of his “team of rivals” Clintons.

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

This is not just a literary technique.  There is a tyranny over at least the minds of Democrat Party women now just of and by the concerned “Diplomacy” of Hillary Clinton as fruitless in hedging it has been.  There is a more political and partisan tyranny as well over at least Democrat Party women of and by the reigning of the Clinton two-fer however concerning as of President Barack Hussein Obama’s “team of rivals.”

With Benghazi the first real surgical cutting of the now much late live dissection of the political and “Diplomacy” of just Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton we have peeled back the ribbing and spine of a Party tyranny, much - already.

I dug out this of 9/18/2012 called TREASON SELLS while looking for a specific different piece more about #Benghazi > http://bit.ly/10jc6kk
.  I still recommend stretching your mental muscles against tyrannies over minds of men, and women too, with a visit to http://CitRB.com and a reading of all that queues after a local site search by BENGHAZI.

“Of #Hillary #Benghazi “WHAT DIFF …” IF THIS OR THAT clever defense - Really if that or that not big diff - BUT!!!, if TERROR or WAR BIG DIFF.“*

#Hillary LIKE REALLY? BEST YOU HAD FOR #CONGRESS #BENGHAZI WAS LIKE “or maybe just some guy walking down the street” possibility?”*

#Benghazi is about same Clintons that had their Prez Library designed in a gun shape & skinned in Confederate Gray & who planted on Whitehaven?”*

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

This in not just a literary technique!  There is a diabolical dichotomy nearer a trichotomy of the Clintons and their triangulations.

Re: #Benghazi much that GAME CHANGE book a vast lie about Hillary as she & Bill consummated their marriage towards both becoming President.”*

Re: #Benghazi “it’s for the video” - but isn’t it more insulting to Muslims to say brutality of video motives so more than insult video actually was?”*

[note: an “*” here denotes a quoting reposting of a recent #Benghazi related tweet of me with my twid (Twitter ID) @jphoganorg and as readable in bulleted of http://citizenrosebud.mobi]

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has been a hedger and arguably of a Diplomacy that hasn’t been baring fruits - at least as promised or as her rants and tying of rants bosoms yet of cold suggestions too institutionalized.

It is not fair to even just the young of Ohio State to let Hillary Clinton be as if of a new pride in a new Beaver Wars - it is safer and politically more prudent to still talk more of her as tyrannical in an imperialistic socialism as a Crusader with a history as FLOTUS as having been globally to much too inciting and too polarizing.

“THAT ONLY 2 SENATORS VOTED TO NOT THROW SEN CLINTON OUT OF SENATE DOESN’T ACTUALLY LEGALLY MEAN IT WAS CONSTITUTIONAL FOR HER TO BE SOS.“*

Seems an important day to remember Operation Iraqi Freedom as figured originally to be a new bold step for global relations with the liberation not to be an occupation and it to be of compensation after the fact by a freed Iraqi People with their profits from their oil output.  Odd how Dems say Iraq wasn’t paid for while it was Pelosi Congress that mostly killed how it was to be paid for by those liberated.  Even odder that we were supposed to believe that Hillary’s bold State move on Libya of her Odyssey Dawn was then set up and sold as if it were a brand new idea and a Democrat idea to have a liberation of a sovereign people and to have it set up supposedly to be as if a liberation compensated for by oil outputs of such country and its people. Hmmm?  Something not quite politically right about this as it seems at least Hillary can not hide she was playing politics with Libya & Benghazi.”*

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!

[Note: a “*” could as well be for a posted sharing longer than 140 characters and yet also a tweeted by me as with twid @jphoganorg as originally a Facebook status update that re-posted to Twitter.]

House Speaker John Boehner is an honorable man and maybe due a tag too as of “honest” like say HONEST JOHN.  We have that the known history and legacy of the Clintons’ two-fer is now of the commenced late live dissection inseparable from their personal reputations as known liars and “Big Liars.”

#SecClinton per #Benghazi may have been too busy trying to usurp legacy global powers of Treasury & Commerce to do Diplomatic Mission well!”*

Oh #SecClinton per #Benghazi I guess it just used to be AMERICAN to think that our SoS would take daily threat ass. in countries they invaded?”*

I think that like Economic Statecraft idea of Hillary’s Diplomatic nonsense & dangerous as necessarily a restructuring of Exec Branch.”*

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?

Is President Bill Clinton now nearer to admitting it is much really all his fault?  Would that be fair or accurate analysis of the diabolical dichotomy of the Clintons’ two-fer triangulating trichotomies?

President Barack Hussein Obama as now still as if of Ohio seems to have missed the very dangers of his own “team of rivals” as of an actual and affecting modern tyranny of and by the Clintons at least still within his own Democrat Party.

“It was a cover-up method of & tall tales > but so they could avoid an appropriate necessary measured RESPONSE?”*

“The hardest hitting tweets - tweets with background to stand on links - on now threaded at - “*

“Of lies that if TERROR or ACT OF WAR then they might have had to bomb Meca or all the Afghan opium stores/crops.”*

“1/2 million may have already read my THE BIG TENT here linked > REALLY speaks to & Clintons as haphazards > “*

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?

& foggy bottoms of two-fer intel > so wrong about it still hard for him to be right bout anything in region”*

“Per & best we’d prosecuted Saddam in Clintons’ 1st term with a bring of Community Policing then & not just when SURGED”*

“Of “WHAT DIFF” If THIS or THAT clever defense - Really if THAT or THAT not big diff - BUT!!!, if TERROR or WAR -BIG DIFF”*

And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts:  Really it seems a tyranny over minds and bodies of Democrat women at least that we are of a President Obama embraced by a tyrannical rivalry he may not even recognized as such.  Really it seems a tyranny over at least minds and bodies of Democrat women how the rants of Clintons’ two-fer are of their attempts to keep a party keep by rants tying and lashing down to hopes of so many they institutionally need to keep as a keep beneath them

And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts:  Of Benghazi we see cracks in the cover-up of the Clintons by President Obama as well as an actual “played politics” tyranny of a political election count-down fields of conflicts and competition.

And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts:  Of the modern sit rep of just Democrat Party politics, however of a tyranny while our President says to not worry yourselves about tyranny, it is ridiculous that with #Benghazi streaming, however now commenced as a late but due “pound of flesh” live dissection, of at least an arguable fruitless hedged “diplomacy” by Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, that you are not alone in a time of tyrannies.

And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts:  Really!!!  And how can it not be so while Hillary Clinton is so INSTITUTIONALIZED!?  How now as maybe we have that President William Jefferson Clinton may be nearer to admitting it was much all his own fault?  And, how, now as we have a state of Democrat Party Politics such that a tyranny likely explains best how it seems there are no other women than Hillary Clinton now allowed to be see as capable of becoming President.  And, how, as it is prudent and important to ask if there is even another women that hasn’t slept with Bill Clinton whom can be said now to be at least as capable as Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?

Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED!  She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?

{IF YOU ARE NEW NOW TO FINDING THE POLITICAL PUNDITRY OF POET PUNDIT JP HOGAN I DO NOW STRONGLY SUGGEST YOU VISIT AT LEAST ALSO http://CitizenRosebud.org AND FIND YOUR WAY TO ALSO ENJOYING THE SAMPLER THERE.}

Comments Off
04/18/13
THE BIG TEASE?
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, #CGI, #KERRY, #SUSPECT, WAR ON WOMEN
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 1:35 pm

A time it is and what a times it is to round up now the usual subjects and predicates.  Oddly it seems no one knows enough about the scope and range of leading news even today.  I may be much of such a class - such a subject much ado about President Obama as a politician from Chicago.

I had hardly given it much though on Patriots Day, as I set out for a long ten plus mile walk about in one of my pairs of hardly used FootJoy golf shoes, that such day was as well the annual day of the Boston Marathon.  My dad did run in it once back in the 80s and I have been at or near the finish line because — I haven’t been in Boston since before the Big Dig got started but once maybe near its ground breaking.  It was Tax Day of April 15th and the day after a remarkable Masters finale — my dad just had his first ever knee replacement surgery recently - I wasn’t thinking of him running or not running.

These times seem times of old but how, and too political in some ways, however, maybe more fitting for Dirty Harry in a hunt for bombers in Clinton masks - maybe firstly Hillary Clinton masks and then secondly a paired Bill and Hillary covering.  Too little seems known of the suspects as per this subject and a class of “criminal” yet quite properly predicated, however.  As it was I must have been finishing my long walk about the time of the ________________ that happened on the Boston Marathon route.

“It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.” 

Right!  Interesting start.  Such a start fits with existing and potential “political” plot twists at least as too few or none know enough about such a tragic event, and, as so soon after she as Boston’s John Kerry’s predecessor was grilled about Benghazi culpability hers and to such pressured “Jack” moment as if of a Dirty Harry A COUPLE BAD WOMEN sequel to A FEW GOOD MEN with her of her outburst like “WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE - NOW???”, and, to proffering a weakness on terror - a softness on crime investigating.

Are Bill and Hillary Clinton the (political) type to not go down alone?  And Hillary Rodham Clinton, like President Obama can be said to be from Chicago too - she was born there and maybe now still more naturally a “Chicago pol” of a greater likelihood to end up in prison.  I don’t know how shameful these subjects - this class of subjects of Mrs. Clinton and President Obama should now be as per gun control with them both “from” Chicago and not of having made Chicago as a gun-land danger zone not a 100 Days Priority.  It is twisted that President Obama as from Chicago more directly and as a recent “Chicago pol” tried to stand up a political show about gun control any time after his first 100 Days without having spent such time dedicated fully to such, and, then long still before he too was to proffering free healthcare coverage.

It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.  It is not believable that a Republican in Boston even on Patriots Day could have not been suspicious in a Mitt Romney even about the Boston Marathon.  It seems it might have had to have been a domestic about such cookery and caldrons of security and as if so in a Clinton mask, however, jolly as if off to a party.  I do not know myself if there were only two “potlucks” served up in-suspiciously or if more of of the subject for better predication now - or if there were actually two more cooked up that didn’t get served properly.

It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.  She reportedly doesn’t like to cook and doesn’t like exercise and is suffering politically at least some from her successor from Boston John Kerry’s Secretarial acumen being a beating on and of her as likely not much more than mediocre while of the charge previously.  It seems the Clintons are more like Will Farrell in THE CAMPAIGN than most in our recent history and not to lightly let a hit go un-responded to - it seems if the Clintons are now going down (finally) they are still of posturing to make sure that they won’t go down alone, right?  If the Clintons won’t go down alone by natural instinct how will they try to scare off truth seekers from exposing them too much on however many subjects with whichever class of predicates that could be peacefully employed?

It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.  It is not that she is a witch or ever practiced witchcraft at least in Salem.  It isn’t even much about Bill for having been judiciously sewn a SCARLET A upon their presidency.  It may be more like another Tripoli as if another convenient crisis like a WAG THE DOG and yet generously of a sisterhood of HILLARY WOMEN as with her first strike ODYSSEY DAWN it timed to have been as if a tail wagging a dog anew but as if for Anthony Weiner’s predilections as a devotee of his mentor Bill Clinton.  I don’t know how this tragedy of a “just something I cooked up” crockery that got past the caldron of Boston’s finest could have transpired but as if of a non-state sponsor at least like the Clintons’ CGI in range and scope — it seems they couldn’t have been set by conservatives on Patriots Day in Boston on any April the 15th Tax Day without being suspect from the outer rims/perimeters - it seems logical that the perp(s) must have like been covered as if in masks of either a jolly Bill Clinton or Hillary Rodham Clinton.

It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.  I can with such limited knowledge of such even only surmise that a Democrat or non-Republican could have pulled off walking through such crowds and security as if with a “POT-LUCK” mantra however carried as if of a “JUST SOMETHING I COOKED UP”.  I don’t get this incident as for it being so late in the marathon unless somehow the “cooks” were not able to get through earlier with such a mantra seeming innocent enough.  It still seems days later that this tragedy could be nonsense of thrill seekers and/or an exercising of too radicalized Democrat expression towards justifying higher taxation.  If it has Mrs. Clinton’s finger prints all over it, or just a generous and defensive husband in Clintons’, I haven’t reasoned that out past such as these starts towards consideration of subjects and predicates.

I do fear the Clintons have to try to drive the news too much if they are to have any chance in surviving intra-party comparisons during the second term of President Obama and the seeming trumping Diplomacy of Bostonian Secretary John Kerry.  They can now only be considered non-state actors about such despite how much Bill may still be on our payroll as a past President. 

I did mean to use this title to start towards summer full of fun and light to amorous golf witticisms for sporting consumption.  I didn’t figure a pressure cooker as the news broke as but a heavy crock pot slow cooker, even though I have seen such oddly somehow in use on interesting cooking channel shows.  I was not aware that a “BOMB” could be tagged as if a POT-LUCK and carried into crowds anywhere, however, as if a jolly contribution as innocently “JUST SOMETHING I COOKED UP.”

It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.  She is the one that whined to Congress as if pleading that they tolerate her being light and/or soft on terror.  Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton must have been despite her dislike of staying at home and cooking preeminently aware that bad actors as even HILLARY’S WOMEN could be carrying off “BOMBING” as if of sympathetic and timely political cooking.

I do wish my quiet April 15th activities of a long walk near a half marathon hadn’t become so disturbed by more tragic news seemingly somehow (yet explained) of inheritances from Hillary diplomacy and politics.  It seems it could have been thrill seekers who just couldn’t resist trying to walk around with a “BOMB” as if a “POT-LUCK” - and that any conservative or Republican even if not in a Mitt Romney mask would have been naturally too suspect in such pressure caldron of Boston’s finest.

I too have not yet heard of a justification about these subjects and predications for a USUAL SUSPECTS that could explain how it is more likely of foreign elements or motives.  It was both Tax Day and Patriots Day and seemingly only of outcomes to justify more taxes as per Democrats agendas - and even so if to keep taxes justified to a new high so that funding will still be there to like go after terrorists that Boston’s John Kerry’s Diplomacy now won’t be as soft as Chicago’s Hillary Rodham Clinton had been.

“It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.”   And how really we shouldn’t treat this as just a teased perspective on another maybe “terror” related event that still has to be as well some of a “too political” consideration and judging - like RIGHT?

It is undeniable that Hillary Rodham Clinton was born to be a Chicago politician, such that she has become, however, and so that she among her peers, however less prone, is of a higher likelihood to be eventually imprisoned.  It was documented that she was both raised as a young girl to hit her peers and to hit first - I will have to look up whom documented that she was raised to hit boys and to hit them first.  It is now too much of a new record for the United States of America that she lacked in “diplomacy” while of such charge and to State based too “political” renderings as if a Secretary of War to a new way for the USA in a time of first strikes.

How have Obama’s days been of times more of a Hillary Doctrine to strike first and ask any questions later if someone disliked is still too alive to be conveniently handled?  Is it only President Obama’s fault that he ushered the USA to a first strike standing with far less due process or is this what he dealt away before first being sworn in as a political solution to keep the Clintons from sabotaging his administration from like day one?

Comments Off
04/07/13
MASTER-LESS
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, WAR ON WOMEN
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:22 am

To tee up stories for this weeks coming challenges we have that grammatically there is a place for sport and for sports.  It may be that Tiger Woods and Hillary Clinton are most in the weeds or stuck deep in the woods for having hazarded the most so far.

It isn’t sporting now to beat up Hillary Clinton too much after she couldn’t keep a straight face while puffing up for Women in World audiences.  She couldn’t keep a straight face as she put her best leg forward knowing it doesn’t historically show well and as if a sad political war profiteerette seizing a chance to reinvent herself while apparently knowing she doesn’t deserve such.  That she while of her new puffing up leg work was to failing to keep a straight face is quite politically suggestive that she is not a viable candidate for higher office.

It is not quite sport though to speak of Condoleezza Rice as per the Masters though it can be sporting now more than ever before.  She is now professionally again sworn to defending her employer and its professional standards where ever she is as a Stanford University Professor.  I don’t think she can be loyal based on race this weekend without being concerned for her school colors officially — I can hazard a consideration that Tiger Woods in entering this Masters plantation having hazarded his standing however by winning.

It is sport in sports to consider how Tiger Woods may or may not be able to take the heat - all the heat this week whether weaker at Amen Corner or of great temptresses around the Magnolias and laurels and all the legends of hazards bounded by and about Hogan’s Bridge.

But with Hillary Clinton, as a successor to Condoleezza Rice, and to much dishonesty, with lies about new foundations being needed, and all the while she as she managed to stand and proceed, mostly on grounds actually gained by progressive efforts about a freedom agenda, of the Bush administration, it is interesting how it may be another Hogan bridging about a Freedom Agenda that is still to be established as a freedom agenda as of a manifesto like of a Hogan’s THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM a oddly foundational for both the Clintons’ and Bush Administration. {The Clintons present themselves as inseparable as a “two-fer” so “Clintons’” usage is appropriate and sporting for a political honesty in marketing their branding in a possessive plural sharing.}

The talk of the Masters may all be how though Michelle Obama may not herself be a golf enthusiast she could trump masters better than Hillary with 2016 Presidential race if it isn’t inconvenient to have a Michelle vs. Hillary Constitutional Crisis as per our 22nd Amendment constructs and its less than wordy establishments.  It is sporting now to suggest that the members of the Bush administration have not been setting themselves all free from the railroading still of and by the Clintons with learned erudity orally proffered in part for being themselves the more honorable of the administrations.  And, how this may be some for their Freedom Agenda by the timeline suggested recently by Elliot Abrams as so following a teed off sharing of a poetic manifesto like so whence thence committedly with THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM.

But to stand up as a Stanford University Professional golfer and one of two of the first women ever to be admitted as members of Augusta National seems now for Condoleezza Rice a sporting concern as per Tiger Woods.  I am not talking so here of a concern that another win by him so soon could caused him to need to return to therapy — I am talking here coincidentally about Hillary and Tiger of having contradictions to much in their branding as spring breaks anew in the Year of our founding fathers’ Lord two thousand Ten and three.  For Tiger it was of a retailing of him at Torrey Pines as if he was reconciling with his wife and starting the season off with a putting of fathering first in his fields.  For Hillary, well she couldn’t keep a straight face while trespassing upon good souls again with an attempt to an new unearned reinvention of herself.

I do find it sporting that I did once install new closet doors for Condoleezza Rice while President Bush’s NSA master, and, that as it may be her last thoughts on 9/11 morning before her aid walked in with news of a single plane crash into one of the World Trade Towers were of a professional referral airing for me as I then at that moment was coincidentally driving up 17th Street in Washington DC and right by the Old Executive Office Building of the White House plantation.  I didn’t though myself know of the timing of such or of the plane crashes until maybe an hour later and after I had arrived at a new clients home and already had been to unrepairable full removal of the old front door.

When I wrote to Representative Gephardt’s offices then that August in days and weeks before the collapse of the Soviet Union George Stephanopoulus and a Koch son were peers and equals there.  When I wrote then I shared the first starts of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM thinking and as a way forward towards better freedom for more with such a started sporting attempt to give local American words and meaning in a rhyme and reason to Bush’s term NEW WORLD ORDER.  It is still sport and sporting that so much of what Clintons then braved learning to say and sound like was teed off primarily, at least, with the due focus on New Haven, Connecticut - as I had so based it poetically and as a global coding.

But for Tiger he hasn’t quite failed to keep a straight face with a new extreme makeover type improper leg work so as recently such a sad sight by Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton now too much of disordered personalities and contrary historicals.  But though branded for Torrey Pines as if to being this Year of our founders’ Lord two thousand Ten and three it seems by the Arnold Palmer Invitational that he was all about being iced tea and lemonade otherwise but likewise.  I don’t know how it won’t be sporting for even Condoleezza Rice if not called upon too officially about such to hazard a “beware of the hazards” to Tiger Woods as well of her Stanford University branding.

What can be par for the course this week for Tiger Woods at least near Hogan’s Bridge or Amen Corner?  Will the foliage be metaphorically at least too in bloom and as a HAZARD?  How won’t servants and service people be now most on black Tiger “Ice Tea” Woods mix about Augusta National for all of the Masters of this week in the Year of the founders’ of the United States of America Lord so such as it now is two thousand Ten and three? 

My sister did bring me back some paraphernalia from recent gathers of Masters - at least as a hostess executive for Time Warner Cable partying of the 75th Anniversary branding.  I do not know at the time of this pressing if she will be hosting as a corporate executive again there at some time this week - her last name is not now Hogan - she is a Democrat whom I believe still keeps a personally autographed mug of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on or near her desk.

A Michelle vs. Hillary is a Constitutional Crisis waiting to be fluffed and folded for all the world to see.  Michelle has as much right to let her husband run for re-election on her name now as Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has to run as if not a criminal enterprise, again.  If it is not fair for President Obama to trump our 22nd Amendment protections and seeming established intent by running now on his Princeton and Harvard degreed lady’s name than it likely is so criminal for there to have been one HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT such that we should now find our Masters in Treason and learn of their learnedness at least as to whether there are any statutory limits that run with treasonous activities if not merely somehow established as criminal.

{note:  At this moment on Sunday I am breaking from this pressing of a new column - not knowing if it is done or due furtherences however farther or further may be grammatically the appropriate metric for such meters and footings.}

Comments Off
04/04/13
HELL ON EARTH
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, 22ND AMENDMENT, #KERRY, #FEMINISM, #NEW_YORK
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:24 am

Poor Obama for he seems to have been played by the Clinton “two-fer” - really played. 

It seems considerable that the Clintons did together what GOPers sought to.  The Clintons in their own way seem to have effectively made Obama a one term executive and a second term Clinton stooge as some a “lame duck” executive.

Nothing POPS a “whose your daddy?” now better than a new DPRK CRISIS.  It seems that President Obama is now stuck having once needed the superior political skills of President William Jefferson Clinton to bring USA back from a nuclear brink again.  This is the President Obama who had to visit President Clinton in his Harlem office and as I recall bow before him and with a recording of him calling President Clinton “The President” who then needed the Clintons’ superior political skill to save his administration from the crisis brought on after Clintons’ VP Al Gore as a private citizen had his babe private spies caught in North Korea with inadequate training.

In the coming days it will be as if a trial has started and the Clintons are burying President Obama as if a weaker lawyer - if not already.

Where is Bill?  Where is nearly self proclaimed “PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD” Bill Clinton?  Where is Bill and how is he now coping without his spouse his overseer at State there more effectively as if just running another Clinton Travel Office?  We now have Secretary John Kerry charged with overseeing the foreign policy meddling of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE - Where is Bill?

He called them rivals.  How much is that turning out to have been an understatement?  I called the Obama save of the first DPRK CRISIS of this administration the BAY OF BABES for it seemed meant to be sold as if as dramatic and as a sequel so to our old BAY OF PIGS.  And, yet young and inexperienced President Barack Hussein Obama needed to call in President Clinton to save the day and bring us then back from the brink of WAR - yet just by being a grand escort service to collect and babysit Al Gore’s private spies who got caught maybe for having had the wrong training, or not enough training.

These days stories just don’t write themselves naturally about the Clintons to present them in a good light.  I mean unless you like the idea that the may have until now succeeded in high-jacking USA executive power since they were thought to have been officially term limited from such, from such anymore for evermore.  I don’t have time now to discuss the “HOW” about that they may have successfully high-jacked USA foreign policy at least since 2001 - that does now though some want to write itself unlike stories that would be readable as of a “good light” for the Clintons.

But what about Mrs. Clinton’s private Hell these days?  If you are on the road or a run with her (political run not “exercised”) can you figure out who or what she is?  It writes itself that she isn’t a good example for an independent feminism as she has put being under her husband as her primary ceiling her whole life since Yale Law School.  She is the enabler of Bill Clinton most obviously — her primary character is that of having made herself and her career submissive to the ambitions and career of her husband and only stepped out as if maybe otherwise when our 22nd Amendment got in the way of his being able to “officially” stay her visibly dominant main man.

But what about President Obama’s public Hell these days?  Did he miss that Mrs. Clinton was firstly loyal to her husband with her earliest of public decrees as his Secretary of State and top “rival”?  I mean he had to humble himself before President Clinton in the Harlem office of the Clintons’ continuing global political activities and for public consumption with a record of a bowing some then with a calling of a former President as “The President” - such that I recall.  I mean when former First Lady Clinton started as promised “rival” in his new Cabinet she set up a Hellish but clever insubordination on her new boss by using Dante.  One of his first mile markers on this road to Hell with the Clintons must still be of record of her saying that as Obama’s Secretary of State she would be taking her direction from that whom Dante did and much more so than as if listening to her new most inexperienced upstart of a politician boss.

Is President Barack Hussein Obama now stuck again in a political dependence that again will have him have to call in President William Jefferson Clinton to restore world peace at least as per the DPRK new but familiar CRISIS?  If it will make her man happy Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton now more as just a public private person as now a First Lady of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INIITIATIVES, as it seems, is likely to be fully submissive again in her man getting all the credit and pomp and circumstance.

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a dangerous and quite faux feminist figure.  It is not a fair lesson or example to sell her other than as her story wants to write itself respective of all the conflicting details.  It is not even fair that to be for Hillary For President you have to explain to young girls everywhere that to be like her is to put your husband first and for as long as your government will allow and then be to needing the full pomp and ceremony at least of a full Presidential Secret Service division in order to win any office registered for with your name more than his.

There is that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s story doesn’t write itself well but as a blob of FRIENDS OF BILL still somehow holding on and moving forward as a political mass. 

We have maybe that we should hear of still political Clintons that they will at least take a lead from President Barack Hussein Obama and to a doubling down rivaling with a promise to give back 10% of the Federal Funds being spent annually at least for New York rents for former President Clinton.  I do not know how we tolerate so much foreign policy meddling from a former President and especially for those years that his spouse was running the real State Department - but for us to be however to paying the rents for operations of such and with such allowed an grandstanding of an annual meeting schedule to rival the United Nations as also a politically mandatory meeting is quite ridiculous in an American traditional consideration.

What seems to write itself now is that the Clintons have been the bigger rivals to President Obama than the GOPers and that now we have it on our plates too that Mrs. Clinton’s culpability for Benghazi as Secretary of State should be forever joined with a tag for the DPRK CRISIS as necessarily some or much of other failures in her while charge with being Obama’s Top Diplomat.

What has happened to President Barack Hussein Obama - how has he come to looking so much as if just a stooge of the Clintons’ “two-fer” and under Dante still as she decreed she’ld be, however inflaming.

Comments Off
04/03/13
RUN FOR COVER
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, #CGI, #KERRY, #MUSIC, #BLAME
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:27 pm

No really we have to now sweat detail about Mrs. Hillary Clinton - private citizen.  Good stories about her or for her just don’t write themselves well or naturally - you can say - you could say - anymore.

This whole North Korea sit rep so soon after her Congressional “JACK” outburst is most concerning.  As you may recall she was like “you can’t handle the truth” but as more a ‘I can’t handle the truth’ in her “what’s the difference now?”  And, quite so especially if she really is all the rival she and President Clinton rode an independent world wide popularity for. 

What to make of Hillary Clinton now as private citizen with DPRK maybe an “official” reaction to her time as Secretary of State and with too imperialistic a Diplomacy?  Surely we now as stories aren’t writing themselves (well) about her have to look at real details about her reign as President Obama’s Secretary of State.  It is too much a “rival” story that wants to be written now as if she of a pride that she and Bill were able to keep or make peace with North Korea and yet her “rivals” of President Obama, Vice President Biden and Secretary of State Kerry seem otherwise less capable.

On the heels of her “culpability” and questions quite to wondering if she saw an Ambassador as a martyr for her cause and expendable by her own thinking, about herself of a self importance greater, it seems the DPRK raises more issues that go to competence about her service while of duties as President Obama’s Secretary.

It is very confusing thinking about how we now should be covering Hillary Clinton as a private citizen still as a public figure and out as if of her USA should go gay decree too much as if speaking as a First Lady of the CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE while it still of offering of political cover as if President Clinton is an unelected President of the World.

It seems a good story now for Hillary Clinton just doen’t want to write itself.  It is confusing how many ways it seems details matter that are being willingly overlooked.  It is confusing especially now as well with DPRK nuclear posturing that we have to wonder rightly if it can be in part due to Secretary Clinton time of a too imperialistic Diplomacy now then moderated globally with her of her decree like that the USA should go gay.  Aren’t we at wondering if she either was dictating a strong suggestion at least to all foreign nationals she had relations with that they now were to presume she was also talking to them and about them?  And about DPRK people too?

What we have for starters as “details” about Hillary is that she seems not to have a single hobby other than a once mentioned and infrequent use of a said home kept elliptical stationary “exercise” machine.  She isn’t a concert pianist or musician of any said capability or interest and nor is she a real golfer or even a bad golfer.  She by her New Hampshire tears was revealing of real electoral pressures then put to her to answer for some details - I remember such as stirred by queries as to whether she was at all well rounded and with a hobby or two or any extracurricular personal interests.  It seemed she had to cry for political cover as now she has to run for new political cover.  It seems she really isn’t well rounded or even nearly as personally engaged in non work activities as we long have expected from male “candidates” at least.

As per her being out as public figure still and with a globally stirring decree that at least the USA should go gay we have as well that it seems as if she is lobbying for CGI and as if now a First Lady again to President Clinton as he rides high still too much as if an unelected and unchecked President of the World.

We have to remember that President Clinton got the high drama like of a new BAY OF PIGS stand off as it was awhile ago with an earlier DPRK CRISIS that seemed fit to be called a BAY OF BABES for Bill Clinton as called into a public relevance to be of a grand escort service to collect and babysit Al Gore’s private spies after they had been caught without enough training illegally in the DPRK.  We have now that President Obama may have no choice but to call in Bill Clinton as a private citizen to negotiate a peace and as if it is needed for details that tell of more than Benghazi failures for Mrs. Clinton.

It seems Hillary Clinton was supposed to be an inevitable first female President much of a thought that stories would just write themselves well.  It seems now that she has to run just to have cover and that it is hard to find a way around so many concerning “details” to cover competently.

It seems we have to consider that her recent decree as though acceptable as a rival while in a no woman’s land as a public private citizen still seems out of order so soon as of a meddling in foreign policy while a new successor still so new.  As Hillary Clinton however now a lobbyist at all or too soon by our standards with efforts of or the mission of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE we have her as Hillary of any domestic comment as a decree as well meant to be a foreign dictate or STRONG SUGGESTION.

I don’t know how yet to write about the tough spots she has her former boss now in.  I don’t yet know how to cover President Obama so soon after losing Mrs. Clinton as of whatever allegiance she as a rival so whence.  I don’t yet know how to cover much of this but to try to think about all the details of Hillary’s story so far and as of her as if a typical wife of a cheating spouse who coped by busying herself with work - only with work.  It seems we have to explain away that she doesn’t seem to have a single hobby of record and is yet celebrated as being a workaholic.

Right, at least we know, it seems, that she doesn’t hit the players or throw balls at them with a foul mouth.  Right we know, it seems, that she isn’t a concert pianist or musician of any note and nor an athlete even in golf sport.

What we seem to have as a concerning detail is that she may need to run as if running for cover.  And, that now like after 9/11 we may have our Democrats saying they just did what the people asked them to do, and, even while it seemed that they had asked to be elected as if smarter and smart enough to know not to do just what the people were asking them to do.  After 9/11 the Democrats did meddle in foreign affairs while such the matters of State of a new administration of a different party - they even did shed any claims of blame upon them by casting it carelessly on Americans quite innocent in comparison.

I am confused - I don’t know how we as Americans have gotten so to a time like now with it so complicated as per a now public private citizen such specifically as Hillary Rodham Clinton.  It seems she is running much just to run for cover and yet that seems the story that writes itself and yet oddly the story that isn’t being told.

Comments Off
03/24/13
HER DOUGHBOYS
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, 22ND AMENDMENT, OBAMACARE, TREASON
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:39 am

A nation that forgets to consider Treason as a possible crime still and one that any of their “leaders” may be capable of is likely a nation already in decline.

To separate this from Benghazi fog of “war” as it was in an “election cycle” it may help to consider and remember that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton seemed too disturbed while suggesting that she is more important and of a more important job as Secretary of State because her people are in danger and like Ambassador Christopher Stevens willing to be a martyr for her “Diplomacy.”

We have that had our SCOTUS decided otherwise than that Legislative Branch avenues were still open for more democratic assaults on faults of ACA - Obamacare and to “IT’S A TAX” as if of a War Power allowance for a war on health undeniable short term power it as of our Supreme courting might have had to rule that Democrat Party members had in mass acted to undermine our Constitution and effectively to a near Treasonous Un-Constitutionality.

As per the cases our SCOTUS will hear this week and how our former FLOTUS has lightly weighed in it is that conveniently we have the Clintons’ marriage to instructively deconstruct and reconstruct and deconstruct and reconstruct much as to if an when an is of marriage is a is of marriage or conveniently not an is of marriage or Constitutionally.  I don’t know how with the Clintons still insisting on being public figures of weights enough to “weigh in” substantially our Supreme Justice is not to be best served by a careful dissection of what is or is not a Marriage as by example around the Clintons.

President Barack Hussein Obama may now be trying to grandstand in the Middle East as if the Clintons are not the heir apparents and Bill Clinton a strong man soon to return to flex and whine however still too much in a partisan and globally polarizing Political.  If it is to be Hillary for President then as per the long perspective traditional to the Middle East President Obama is now a lame duck and Bill Clinton not Hillary Clinton by marriage most to be seen as the real heir apparent on any if any possible peaceful future.

What can be Hillary and Bill Clintons’ Lusitania - has it already sunken in and are we now already on a path to a new draft and warring for the “honor” of/for Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?

These are just such as of any and all complexity due any and all SCOTUS marriage discussions and discourse this week as per marriage rights as established and not federally established, and, while democratic and legislative avenues are still for such wide open for less Judicial rending.  Like Obamacare in many ways the issues billed as for this week for our Supreme courtly are also of other avenues still democratically available and while it seems it has become reestablished that our Constitution was an establishment ordained and subscribed as of the New Testament establishments.

At the time of this judicial sharing I still am unaware if there is a statute of limitations for any or all prosecutions relating to “treasonous” acts by citizens (or subjects?) of the United States of America.  What I can offer is we should be wise enough to consider that as per this raising it won’t be to a Hillary is now trying to act with a treachery or treasonous or would be if elected but that she is only her for this consideration possibly from and by a willful and premeditated conspiracy to undermine our Constitution and to betray it, maybe clearly to.  We have established practices for due process of checks and balances and some exceptions about an Executive Powers infidelity by tradition - not Constitution establishment.  We should be wise enough to consider and reflect that the Clintons may think they have already gotten away with a treasonous needed to be here now with possibilities to actually effect a return to our Executive Powers.

{Stay tuned — more to come as the weekend moves to imports more of the coming week.}

Comments Off
03/14/13
FEMIFEST DESTINY
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, OBAMACARE, WAR ON WOMEN, POPE, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:35 am

Her footprints are huge…

It seems a great naivete to believe Secretary Clinton was just a tool of President Obama.

It seems dangerous to risk an escapism for the rule of Clintons now as if not of the rule of Obama, however confusing and confounding her first steps about such are dramatized.

I do not want to tire my readers here by ruining a great title as if Hillary Clinton deserves it all to herself.  Others may be deserving of any higher orderings about any new Manifest Destiny as set as a “FEMIFEST DESTINY” as a discussion of whom women have a right to conquer as if to “liberate” them.  Hillary Clinton has a history to suggest she is a fem like the three me most of Evan Thomas’ THE WAR LOVERS - as a “war lover” herself.

Many body bags have been piled, however, up full from failures and sacrifices about a crusading of and by Hillary Clinton though more as if by remote control coddled distant safety.  In her huge footprints are many lost souls - and as these some of her still as if walking in Bill Clinton’s shoes, spousally.

She seems not to have even “ducked and ran for cover” let alone had a charge up a San Juan Hill all her own.

Yesterday on the Thirteenth day of the Third month of the Year of our Lord two thousand Ten and three our Constitution stood ratified and witness to a first Jesuit become Pope.  America of the North of The United States of America did become subscribed unanimously as preambled to be ‘ordained’ and ‘established’ as of “…the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord on thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven.”  The U.S.A. was so Constituted by its ratification so as a Union under one Lord as a Christian Lord of a Christian calender.  These American states, though, were not Constituted to be allowed to be by laws of Congress established along sectarian lines even to being a Catholic State by establishments of religion.

The Church so now of Peter of Francis has its pastoral charities loopholes for acceptance of a contrariness.  The United States of America though may actually be written such that our First Amendment is meant to follow the stoicism of George Washington’s First Inaugural orations and such that ACA - Obamacare - is not allowed as by our Bill of Rights for it imbues an “establishment of religion” barred even for Christian Charity from acts of The Congress.  Obamacare can be Un-Constitutional if it exists to be an establishment by Law that there, like, is no God and so a secular socialist Government program is needed.  The Congress by our First Amendment seems to be not allowed to pass any Law as if an establishment that there is no God.

Again, it is naive to believe Hillary Clinton.  Again, it is dangerous to accept blindly on a faith in the speak of President Obama that Hillary was just his tool about His foreign policies.  His as her’s of his is exceptional as a conundrum confounding of these times - and maybe as of a comparative ranking for all times.  Her of his (thought His of Obama’s) is a she of fem past of like a missing 8 years - a missing 1993 - 2001.  Her years of those year more of the big footprints, literally, comparatively, of Bill Clinton of His about such foreign realms do exist actually as in a real contrariness to a proposition that President Obama’s claims can be truthful.

The House of Obama has the House of the Clintons to rival it and battle it now for “LEGACY” and more or their regular lots of transference and projection strategics.  Again, I do not want to ruin a good title by letting it be used here as if forever only about Hillary Clinton.

It is hard not to tag Hillary Clinton as a “lover of war” and one as if of a “lover of war bar none.”  We have that it gets complicated with Bill Clinton’s footprints so huge and causal to the vast numbers of filled and piled, however, body bags with Hillary Clinton’s name due on them, officially for Posterity of Records — it is complicated that Hillary’s love of war may too much be of the “school” of “politics” of the “Wag the Dog” “convenient” “crisis” “escapists” set.

As First Lady Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton FLOTUS Hillary did crusade as a fem imperialist - not as an anti-imperialist.

It is naive, again, to accept blindly or on the word of President Obama that Hillary Clinton was just his tool in a Foreign Policies all His (his as Obama, President).  By offering in his first hours and by his orations of his inaugural that “it” could be of a ‘none of the fault of the Clintons’ as with his then official Presidential speak as of “it is all Bush’s fault” he trapped himself and us all into a realm for foreign policies for whomever might be his Top Diplomat then limited by half a potential hope or possible range of diplomatic flexibility/nuance.

Hillary Clinton cannot have been just a tool of a superior President and his orderings by his figurings, logically, for it follows that he was a prisoner to the Clintons since his inauguration so of such a ridiculous posturing as if “it” could be of a “none of the fault of the Clintons.”  Hillary cannot have been a bit player and just a tool as President Obama was trapped and so as if a tool of the Clintons for having proceeded from day one with a cover-up for the Clintons as a Governance PRIORITY.

Again, I do not want to ruin a good title by making it all about Hillary, just yet, just now before the whole story can be told.

Comments Off
03/03/13
THE ALTERNATIVE(S)?
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, #CGI, #WHITEPRIDE, #NEW_YORK, #AUSTERITY, #STUPID SQUIBS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, RIVAL LEGACIES, SANS SCRIPTS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 4:41 pm

The high drama of the SEQUESTER has its roots in the first round - the FOOL ME ONCE round - of the politics of the Clintons in the second term of the co-Administration of the Clintons.  This is the shame on us round now - the round two - of at least the Republicans no longer able to say “shame on you” as round one tolerates - or expects.

Hillary Clinton was not an alternative to this.  A President Clinton, as irregular and ill advised as it was, would have been of these same polarizing partisan politics but more clearly as a round two now longer a shame upon the foolery of the Clintons on the Clintons.  She wasn’t born to this polarizing harkening to Soviet styled socialism as President Barack H. Obama was as born so salt and peppered beautifully as a Soviet Studies LOVE child.  Hillary Clinton made nearly all the same impossible spending promises that “socialist” @BarackObama did - Hillary Clinton started off maybe more “socialist” than he has actually has been with her first parlay her promise to seize all oil company profits if she is elected.

Yes this is an era of political high drama.  And, yes, this time around for the Republicans to play “bi-partisanly” well with these Dems they would now be the party of the shame of round twos as of “FOOL ME ONCE - SHAME ON YOU — FOOL ME TWICE - SHAME ON ME!”

I really don’t know how much of this I have to explain to new or old and loyal readers of my blogging, now.  The era of an administration of the Clintons as “bi-partisan” would have been over as soon as if it were actually she that got elected.  There are serious concerns as too how much the spousal husbandry of the Clintons’ political strategizing to have successfully lined both of them up each for their own Presidency did get in the way of regular and prudent governance and did undermine our general stability - economically, at least.

Some perspective to how similar, not dissimilar this all might have been, if yet otherwise and successfully of the spousal “two-fer” power grabbing political machinations, so also of global plotting, of/by the Clintons, is achievable with a consideration of 2008 all over again.  Simply the Democrats and especially the Clintons wanted and needed gas prices to be high - much higher heading into November elections.  Simply President Bush, and the Republicans, if “stupid” and “unelectable” as “liars” for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM cannot be thought to have been so dumb that they are considered have wanted higher gas prices in 2008 or that they would have worked to effect such without knowing they were effectively making Republicans unelectable in November.

It is hard to decide which aspect of the roots of this high drama about the sequester to now broach next.  There could not have been a repeat of the Clintons’ “bi-partisanship” of their second term had she been elected and promised to as much irresponsible nationalizing of so much “governance” as well without a workable philosophy.  She campaigned to polarized Washington along the very same idealistic “spending” lines as President Barack H. Obama. 

The Clintons are remembered for seeming to think at least by their second term that they now had the technology to fool all of the people all of the time and had the advantage of incumbency and newness of such to the order of thinking that the Republicans had to get on board or get left behind forever.  There are enough public statements by the Clintons and especially from the years afterwards that are yet before much of this mess, but about it all, and of those days they said stuff more defensively as their plans for reigning seemed most to be falling apart.  What is less considered is how much fell apart because it was considered and affected of a plot by spouses to line one up to be intentionally different than the other publicly while of the Powers of incumbency.

But how to be brief now about so much that isn’t now an alternative to this gridlock of prideful and defensive NEW DEAL AUSTERITY - how to talk about any “alternative” while realizing the Clintons are not and were not actually an “alternative.”  It is some that he was born “Barry” Obama as a Soviet Studies LOVE child who then had to twist and turn thorough at least his developmental years about what went wrong between his ‘ebony’ and ‘ivory’ parental Soviet specialiality melodies.

There is the objective lesson of LOCATION & LOCATION of the Clntons and yet hardly with enough curiousity even as to how Senator Clinton become such as if by political nepotism and patronage as a carpetbagger to New York.  Of the “LOCATION” con, shall we say, we have that one can discourse on how Harlem did save at least Bill Clinton from himself.  He did not choose to locate in Harlem - I seem to recall he was dragged up there crying or whining - and after having gone to his banking friends he made so rich with his derivatives “guidance” as a back up plan to such bastion of Power basis he sought originally high above the Russian Tea Room in the then new Carnegie Hall Towers near Time Square. 

I don’t know why or how Arkansas couldn’t have still been good enough for Bill or Hillary.  But oddly there is LOCATION and ‘architecture’ now more to be discussed as the PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY of President George W. Bush readies to finally open.  It seems by his first choice and his remembered (reported) fights with our government for massive annual sums for his post-office holding convenience in excess originally of the sum of all past President’s ‘allowances’ combined for first year expenses that there must be a lot he wanted from the sought most regal location still available in CHT and that it to him may have been one of the last bastions of white male power holding that was domestically available to him.  It seems too coincidental that by his words and designs he has raised a due queriousness as to his own true “evolution” and reputation.

Again, President Clinton did not want to end up in Harlem.  Harlem was the nearest we would afford him when after our Government accountants realized we couldn’t or shouldn’t afford him that million dollar a year rent for life depression was setting in after he sought and then fought publicly and privately to be high above Time Square and able to dominate our Forth Estate however it then may have been still a last great bastion of white male power.

I do hope you will soon participate in a due intellectual and patriotic exercise about comparing and contrasting the LOCATION and ARCHITECTURES of the libraries of the Clintons’ Administration and the soon to be open library of the Presidency of George W. Bush.  I do not, again, understand how even his Mrs. would have signed off on the Clintons’ legacy so for it phalicly like a gun, at least, and seemingly forever clad/skinned in colors of Confederate Grey.

With the banking and housing crisis what it has been and now this sticking NEW DEAL AUSTERITY we all can consider how lucky both Clintons have been that Bill Clinton did basically get dragged kicking and screaming/crying up to Harlem.  Had he been situated as hoped and long fought to be in CHT the story really should maybe be now that the BIG Bank FOB (Friends of Bill) are paying his rent for life at near a million per year in thanks for all the money he made them with his original guidance to and of derivatives cons. 

I see that President Obama is not a Hillary Clinton and that she as of ODYSSEY DAWN broaching of America’s legacy to be not the “offensive” “first striker” may have been more just a tool of a died in the wool Clinton Democrat, however otherwise.  It is the Obama administration not the Bush administration that set out to a new frontier of global “politics” of “first strike” “offense” as to be to a willful hunting of “monsters” without regard for regular American due process.

The Republicans and George W. Bush cannot be as stupid/dumb or corrupt as Dems have suggested.  A point to such case is that it is ridiculous it seems to think that they would not have lowered gas prices in 2007 & 2008 if they could have to so save or prevent the economic slide from subjective & political market affectings of a “GREEN” and “PARTISAN” idealism.

The fastest or only way to have stopped the housing crisis as it broke was to get the global price of gas back to normal and more objective rational basis and as the successes of the Bush FREEDOM AGENDA was then of having made possible and reasonable.  It was from the higher prices, and how they kept climbing, that those who had bought into CLINTONOMICS, and their (political) hedging, and its a “patriotism” of spending far more than every penny they had, and while on fixed incomes, that the domino effect started to the full blown housing crisis and then the related CRISIS OF VALUATION. 

These are days where the Republicans can still say “Shame on the Clintons!” and/or “Shame on the Clinton Democrats!” for round one as it of those days too much of them thinking they now had the tools and technology, so it seemed/seems to fool all of the people all of the time. 

There is no alternative now in the Clintons - this is much an economic mess of CLINTONOMICS II as not at all likely to have been less “polarizing” and “socialistic” in a unnecessary “New Nationalism” than OBAMANOMICS.  The Clintons have enough water under the still too condemned bridges of America for most now to not see that CLINTONOMICS II if Hillary had been elected would have too been devoid of “partisan” balancing of CLINTONOMICS I.

Yes, we are kinda of stuck now with too few ‘alternatives’ and some not because the Bush administration could have lowered the gas prices from the spiking of the market supply and demand subjectivity from GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM in time to have prevented the housing crisis above scratched at that then did cause too great a loss of consumer confidence in banks and Washington based Politics. 

We are still of the CRISIS OF VALUATION and in ways that our Republicans cannot step back from with having let themselves all be played out as fools.  Please remember it would have been dumb for Republicans to support higher gas prices even privately with investments then for Hillary was the “inevitable” next President of very strongly of promises to seize any or all oil company profits - especially those then conveniently of unnecessarily inflated market pricing.

And, Please remember to consider how you would now be thinking of the Clintons if his back up plan to have had those BIG BANKS “friends” cover his million dollar a year lease had worked.  It is remarkable that in a consideration of his “architecture” of his own library he sets us up now to a discussion of his life of having until Harlem been able to stay “white” and “chauvinistic” as a master above most of it personally while able to stay a white southern male above such movements. 

Yes there are different ways to look at the obvious and historical trails of Bill Clinton.  By marrying Hillary and with her legacy as a feminist and her willingness to subjugate herself with a putting of his career first he never really had to become a feminist in practice himself.  As well it is quite remarkable still that such can be said of “race” politics too as now later in his career he has left enough record to bring questions out at least as per his library “design” and their choice of Washington residence on Whitehaven Rd that he talked so much as he did about race (until in Harlem) as a southern white male who in his day had stayed ahead of being less than an accepted “master” - right?

How much is in William Jefferson Clinton’s public displays and those reports about him like as if he had been dragged kicking and screaming/crying all the way to Harlem, and, now how that has actually saved his and his wife’s political street cred at least until this #sequester started? 

#Obama #FORWARD has to be out the door - thrown from the train - whipped to death!  We/he now are engaged in a new conflict much of old days now to be reconsidered and finally judged in a due litigation or a re-litigation.

For the record here it seems still that so much of new President Obama’s early pleading to be of us not “re-litigating” the past was actually politically and judicially of injustices that had hardly yet even been litigated once.

If this were Nixon’s era and that Congress we likely already would have impeached Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton and be still about or done as well with one for President Barack H. Obama.  So it seems.

Comments Off
02/22/13
THE TERRORIST(S)?
Filed under: POLITICS, AUTO-BIO'D, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, AL QAEDA, #KERRY, #SUSPECT, WAR ON WOMEN, #MORALS, #NEW_YORK, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:15 am

The Governors are my mascot.  I was publicly educated through the twelfth grade to my graduation from New Haven’s Wilbur Cross High School.  We were/are THE GOVERNORS.

What is a WEATHER TERRORIST?

What is too low a standard morally or ethically speaking for a former US Executive to be at without it “charming” while lower than we should expect?  When is a former Executive of our United States exposed to personal suits for having been of conduct unbecoming a former officer of our Executive Branch?

What is a TERRORIST?

Whom are our referees for all this that is of an air of our protections secured for JUSTICE more than a willy nilly of our POLITICS?  Where are the flags from our referees however where ever they are for LIES unbecoming a former officer of our Executive Branch?

Before I graduated as a GOVERNOR from New Haven’s Wilbur Cross Public High School I already knew of “B.O.” of Hawaii of interests in presidential oratory and as well already knew there was a Sarah Heath of a Bush, Conn & Heath title IX basketball passion in Alaska.  I have cousins related to Connecticut’s second Governor after the Great Independence & Revolution & original Constituting.  While a high schooler if I was to asking someone to pick up my down winter coat I had to ask them to like grab the “Jerry Brown” coat - for it is I had/have a Gerry brown down winter coat.

By 1971 I had picked a good career path for myself that was much in my mind in 1983 while near to HS graduation.  My grandfather Arthur M. Menadier was to mandatory retirement as a top “Mad Man” of his day (show’s era) as the primary account chieftain for the consolidated work for Johnson & Johnson then at Young & Rubicam.  In 1971 I asked him to take me under his wing and teach me to become like him - with an agreement of “but without your vice of smoking.”

I am John Peter Hogan as named “John” of the oldest son of my paternal grandfather John W. Hogan Sr. and oldest son of his oldest son - my dad named more for his father as John W. Hogan Jr. Esq.  I wanted by 1983 to grow up to be like both of my grandfathers as a merger of their uniquenesses as responsible contributing honorable citizens.

Today is also my dad’s 74th birthday.  The “B.O.” of Hawaii I have known since the late seventies of when I was to the middle school school wide East Rock Community School New Haven Public School’s Oratory Contest with President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s DAY OF INFAMY Declaration of War Speech did become known only more recently for having my same birthday of August 4 though I have all along known him to be four years ahead of me.

I did grow up wanting or needing to be ambitious at least because of my family and our neighborhood and its neighbors and legacy.  While growing up Richard Hegel was of hosting of Holiday Parties we were invited to and while he was New Haven’s official Historian.  It was my old classmate Steve who started dating another old friend who lived across the street from another of BO a “Bo” — Steve Brennen is still a professional artist and now as well a Hamden Fireman, last I knew.  Steve Brennen is the old seventh grade pal whom is responsible for he of “Are you ready for the Oratory Contest? and Are you ready as well to compete in any school wide competition with it also in Hawaii?” queriousness with a like Operator for Hawaii broadcast to all whom might want to compete in presidential oratory against me.

I get it is funny that I have known so many characters for so long and while of interests to a career like both of my grandfathers somehow to a touch as an international marketer of the highest ordering.  I am not sure though it is funny that if you change two “e”s to two “a”s you get “Hagel” from “Hegel” and “Brennan” from “Brennen.”

It is still relevant that I have know Bill and Hillary since 1971 or 1972 and for them of days as students not yet engaged to each other and both to walking my neighborhood with wondering and querying about whether they both might be able to become President someday.  They asked me about such and effectively, to make a long story short and while this is more about Governors today, I like said “NO - if you marry each other be careful who goes first in attempt as the 22nd Amendment should keep you if married to each other from both becoming elected.”  I still don’t know how as a near 1st Grader I was to such a comment - but do get that I was wised up enough to realize I should never let myself forget two people who would ask such a question of anyone.

Is Al Gore a WEATHER TERRORIST?  Was Hillary Clinton with HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT, from near day one, also effectively acting as if a WEATHER TERRORIST?

As our Diplomacy standing rule is like - THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PERMANENT ENEMIES OR PERMANENT FRIENDS - JUST PERMANENT INTERESTS - Secretary Kerry with “we have now permanent enemies” is maybe more of the “rule” than a practicable reality.

The Clintons were wrong not to proceed against Saddam Hussein in their first term to a full compliance with all United Nations sanctions.  We have that President Bush was wise not to proceed immediately into Baghdad with THE PERSIAN GULF WAR as until the United States of America started saving its own cities like New York City and its Time Square and as well Las Vegas Saddam Hussein had a way to win.  Saddam Hussein had enough cards up his sleeve to turn the world to his side if we had proceeded immediately at him and Baghdad and with sympathetic marketing to ask peoples of his region and the broader world about whether he wasn’t able to better manage Baghdad than Americans were able to manage their own big cities.

Within the first term of the Clintons we were ready to stand up our cities as at least as well run as his and able to defeat his PR advantage and then move at him for a WWII like post world war RECONSTRUCTION with trials like Nuremberg’s but then for him.  In hindsight we can see many troublesome “official” acts by the Clintons different from this and contributive to so many problems that we have had since that were otherwise able to have been checked and addressed better sooner.

John Kerry, Secretary of State, was smart to remark about how well Japan and Germany are after we defeated their earlier constitutednesses and then worked post world war RECONSTRUCTIONS about.  It is remarkable though that his location was a slap at the Clintons of them more like William Blygh or Bov. George Clinton as well as his mention of RECONSTRUCTION good will of at least the Japanese and Germans as proven to not be “permanent enemies.”  Such begets the late query as to how or why the Clintons didn’t prosecute Saddam Hussein for war crimes in a timely manor nor proceed ASAP to a POST WWWIII RECONSTRUCTION for Iraq once we had started our COMMUNITY POLICING & LIVEABLE CITIES INITIATIVES. 

We have our Governors may now want and get their own drones.  We have that President Obama’s foreign policies with Secretary Clinton are suspect and with Mrs. Clinton of acceptance of a “culpability” for her intelligence and leadership failures as per the BENGHAZI FOUR and our 9/11 II. 

If they cannot explain whom is a terrorist as per BENGHAZI acts of war on like a Holy Day for Al Qaeda how can they or we be sure they know a “terrorist” when tasking a “kill” off their “Kill List” by drone(s)?

If we cannot be clear yet about what a “TERRORIST” is or isn’t still - is it because a defiinition of such will tag both Al  Gore and former candidate for President Hillary Clinton of then HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT while Senator Clinton as well as ‘TERRORIST” - but more as WEATHER TERRORISTS?

What is a TERRORIST?

What is a WEATHER TERRORIST?

What is “MATERIAL SUPPORT OF TERRORISTS” and how isn’t Bill Clinton’s CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE while so modeled for “support” like Al Qaeda’s purported “banking system” maybe incidentally or accidentally to casual or real “material support of terrorists”?

Who are our referees?  Where are our referees?  Where are the flags for conduct unbecoming a former Executive Branch Officer of The United States of America?  Where are the penalty flags for all the LIES?

Did I tell you already that today is also my dad’s birthday?

Brennen is a friend - he married the Geller friend once a co-tri Governors swim-team captain with myself and another swimmer David.  This female Geller and other swimmer David were the basis for my musing FRIENDS show into existence as bulwark for friends and a guards against foes.  Bo was and is likely still big into pick-up urban B-ball games though a Professor of Marketing now - as I recall. 

Yes we needed to start fixing New York City, Time Square and some Las Vegas before we proceeded to a prosecution of Saddam Hussein and an attempt to run his Baghdad.  Yes we could have and should have moved to a full enforcement of all United Nations sanctions on Iraq within the Administration of the Clintons’ first term and to a RECONSTRUCTION like that for Japan and Germany after the earlier last world war. 

Secretary Kerry as opened up a can of political worms now with such as in his inaugural speech and with it from the University of Virginia.

What is “material support of terrorists”? 

What is a WEATHER TERRORIST?

What is a TERRORIST?

How much has it cost us since the Clintons acted official with an infidelity to our own Justice standards abroad for their eight years as regards Iraq and Saddam Hussein?  How can it be right to have these years be to helping Afghani women and girls and not right for President Bush to have tried to help Iraqi women and girls?  How wrong was it for the Clintons’s official “State” speak to have been religiously bases with a bias against Shia peoples and especially the Shia majority of Iraq oppressed and suppressed by Saddam Hussein and as official speech of “Iraqi Shia are not capable of governing themselves”?

Are we ready for a book BILL AND HILLARY - TERRORISTS OR PEACEMAKERS?

Their foreign policy now also in hindsight is horrendous for a religious basis with sectarian bias contrary to our own established Justice and rights.  It is scary that we let them sell PEACE and PEACE DIVIDENDS while such morally questionable with Middle East region realities quite different. 

It seems we have that Bill Clinton was at least an AMERICAN INFIDEL to our own Justice standards - and that too many are at risk of a guilt by association now as he thinks we and others have permanently forgotten.

Comments Off
02/18/13
MASHABLE POWER(S)
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, 22ND AMENDMENT, OBAMACARE, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, CLIMATE CHANGE, AL QAEDA, IRAN, TWO HISTORIES, #MORALS, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 10:53 am

It is inescapable that Bill Clinton is at heart the very politician that gave the filibuster like Democratic Party Convention Speech for the nomination of Governor Michael Dukakis.  1988 was a different time for Americans of the United States of America still in the longest of warring such as our Cold War.  Governor Clinton of Arkansas in 1988 in Atlanta, Georgia, droned on and on, and on, by many reports.

By 1991 we were in a new global state of affairs heralded as a NEW WORLD ORDER.  Many may have been dreading seeing Governor Clinton return to any national dais for another oration.  There is a long story to tell that now fits with a Democrat Party in need of branding help.  Today’s order as per intra-party Democrat worlds has a is segmented to a split about three identities;  Today there are different biases about the brand as of a trichotomy between Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - Barack Hussein Obama Dems.

Some are grateful much more than others that Vice President George H. W. Bush was elected in 1988 and that Governor Michael Dukakis was not.  As many may be grateful some about a retrospective that Governor Clinton may have cost Governor Dukakis the election with his convention speech still reported as of an air of a “Will it ever end?”

Students of the politics of the United States of America can hardly be to erudite posits and papers today in these times without having an understanding of the years 1988-1993.  To some it was just the years that the U.S.A. became the sole superpower in the world, and, to others it was the years of a concern that a third world war would break out and be the foretold end - the end of the world as by fire.

Of at least an intra-party Democrat world set about with a dichotomy just between Bill Clinton Dems & Hillary Clinton Dems we have that the First Couple Clintons did leave after their eight years without having left, so it seems, any alternative plan for “bite” as per Saddam Hussein.  We still have a vacuum about our political logic quite dangerously of roll outs of new policies and defense spending concerns endemic to the Administration of the Clintons and how they left President George W. Bush no entrance and/or exit strategy for Iraq and the considerable dust ups about a prosecution due for Saddam Hussein.

There is much hubris about so much over too many of these many years since Governor Clinton showed his true self with the nominating speech for Governor Dukakis that is of reports of some fearing it might never end, like.  From this we have that students of American history of the politics of the United States of America have a dichotomy to consider and scrutinize too much just within that which is just singularly of the known history of Bill Clinton.

Iraq and Iran, logically speaking, now would likely be engaged in a mini cold war of their own with non U.S. global support of quite a different “new world order” than President George H. W. Bush managed us towards.  Without the PERSIAN GULF WAR of President George H. W. Bush and OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM of President George W. Bush it is logical and supportable by known global sympathies that Saddam if still in power would now be in a cold war nuclear power and nuclear weapon race with Iran.  It helps to understand the years between 1988 & 1993 and how so then about a major adjustment for the world to a NEW WORLD ORDER with the U.S.A. emerged from such long dust up with the U.S.S.R. as a sole global super power.

About so much of this is still that Hillary Clinton Dems of the above concerning trichotomy and or dichotomy is that which did the most flip flopping.  She is also the Clinton, and Democrat, most culpable and mashable around a hashable #Iraq for she voted for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, logically, as one that as Mrs. Clinton the former FLOTUS of the most recent prior administration was of intimate enough “intelligence” to have known if “WMD” was or was not a lie.  She is remembered for being of reports that she was so confident with “WMD” intelligence as former FLOTUS, it seems, that she didn’t even take it upon herself to read the provided “NEW” intelligence estimates.

In light of the recent vast democratic reset that happened when the U.S.A became the victor of the longest of wars - of the COLD WAR - and became in the years 1988 -1993 effectively the only super power it is quite relevant and concerning that logic can help us be to better understandings of our here and now if we dig into the old dust ups of a couple decades ago.  Afghanistan can be said to have been the GETTYSBURG of the COLD WAR - the “turning point.”

In the mashable of our current problema challenging any now “Democrat” as of an “Intelligentsia” we have that we should consider that “WMD” may have been a genius stroke however a “LIE” for still we have that any entrance or exit about Iraq for a prosecution of Saddam Hussein and/or “bite” for United Nations’ sanctions was best to be booted as somehow definitively not of the U.S.A. or Coalition as to a HOLY WAR footing.

Hillary Clinton Dems are now quite past a reasonable deadline for proffering posits positively purposeful politically per prudent possible and probable prosecution of her past sworn officialdoms.  It is logical that Hillary Clinton has been making the same mistakes over and over since she first flip flopped about OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM.  When one accepts “Bush lied” it logically becomes both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton whom appear to look worse - worser even that President George W. Bush.

There is a dichotomy taggable as of a Bill Clinton’s Dems and Hillary Clinton’s Dems even from their Administration as the first stirrings of a dust up in Afghanistan had one more a dove and the other more hawkish.  Together they abandoned Afghanistan for their eight years and such that once was manageable as of a too early exit by the United States of American became years of insult added to injury, like, such that now we may be there and for so long because they wanted to sell PEACE before its time and be coyly of an inaction and avoidance in Afghanistan and Iraq so that they could justify, somehow, PEACE DIVIDENDS during known unsettled times.

Yes there is a dichotomy at least just in Bill Clinton that is now still very relevant for it is not logical that he was himself truly while of his 1988 Democrat Party Convention speechifying and that he had been naturally as himself while of much of the exposure since their late entry into the 1992 Presidential race.

OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM would better to have been of ACTION by the Clintons in the first term of the Administration of the Clintons’ “two-fer” and then as well somehow clearly and definitively as of a “war” like posture not footed or booted as confusable as a HOLY WAR. 

Saddam Hussein was like a father or godfather figure about Al Qaeda.  How much this was strategic and purposefully politicked by Saddam Hussein to a consideration that he would be able to keep Kuwait despite the U.S.A. of treaties because Americans wouldn’t risk stirring up radicals known to be of geopolitical sensitivity and pride - like Al Qaeda.  We have that we are still deciding politics with still too little consideration about how our 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT is flawed for having looked back only ten years at Al Qaeda all the while it was nearer 12 years old and formed specifically to be a response/reaction to politics and warring by Saddam Hussein.  Saddam Hussein may have well like rocked the cradles of Al Qaeda against the United States of America towards gains like of his efforts in seizing Kuwait.

And today there is at least about Iraq and OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM an intra-party trichotomy among Democrats as of either Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - President Barack Hussein Obama Dems.  These three still have different histories related to so much of what is now too effecting to our politics and these years of gridlock.

Logically there wouldn’t have been a 9/11 I or 9/11 II if Saddam Hussein hadn’t invaded Kuwait.  Logically it seems 9/11 may have been kept like as a HOLY DAY for Jihadists of Al Qaeda 2001 sense of justice and so if as well an attack by them to being only then interpretable of an “intelligence” of a motive nearly identical to 9/11 I.  There is more in just the broached “dichotomy” concern about Bill Clinton that relates to some of his earliest moral short comings of his first steps in the Middle East of his first year of his first term;  it is actually mashable and logical that Al Qaeda attacked us on both 9/11 days as acts of war in a HOLY WAR or Jihad for a sense of justice related still to Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait.

And today there is still a concern about “LIES” of “WMD” and yet hardly enough discussion as to the religious and geopolitics variables that were better worked around to assure that any due prosecution of Saddam Hussein wouldn’t and couldn’t be seen as of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA of a wagging of HOLY WAR.

Again, there is a dichotomy just about Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton for their years of the Administration of the Clintons as per Afghanistan and Iraq.  Again, most reports still are of us as having had power shift from the Clintons to President George W. Bush without there having been a plan of the Clintons’ eight years left for entering and exiting Iraq. 

It seems that “BITE” for United Nations’ sanctions on Saddam Hussein, as an issue, as our history, does divide the house of Clintons still.

And, still we had the clock running.   We were some to a new way of “liberation” for the United States of America, as of a new world order, and expectation to “police’” as a sole super power, as it became an expected way for Americans that had risks of the U.S.A. becoming punk’d by other nations to such while to such.  We the People of the United States of America were uniquely fortified to a new way to “liberation” of other peoples where we had been compromised/engaged before much some just because we had (still had) an all volunteer force.

And now though with two acts of war by Al Qaeda on 9/11s are we to measure and consider the current intra-party trichotomy existant about a logical and historical divide between the politics of Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - President Barack Hussein Obama Dems?

And, again:  It is remarkable that as the discussion goes from “Bush lied” to an acceptance that “Bush lied” it is the Clintons however similar and intimate and different are two that each are to politically looking worse that President George W. Bush!

So:  Did we get attacked on both 9/11 because Bill Clinton failed to sufficiently prosecute Saddam Hussein per the sense of justice reasoning of Al Qaeda?  Was the second act of war on such that may have been kept as a terrorist HOLY DAY then for Bill Clinton returned and not penitent so when again in a Democrat Party Convention - when at Charlotte as the charlatan yet of a history of having been of an Administration of the Clintons now proven to have been too much of an avoidance and inaction as per Afghanistan and Iraq? 

We can accept that it is logical that Saddam Hussein fathered Al Qaeda by his violation of Kuwait - Right?

Comments Off
01/27/13
JUST SAY NO
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, 22ND AMENDMENT, IRAN, #KERRY, #SUSPECT, #NEW_YORK, COVER UPS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 12:25 pm

The days are numbered for writer critics of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton to pound #Hillary about Hillary Clinton as a clearly “PUBLIC FIGURE”.

The presumptive Democrat Party 2016 nominee for the office seeking of the United States of America Executive Branch Presidential see is not the still now Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.  We have that she has been of a “TEAM OF RIVALS” of the first of the Obama’s “we…” consideration as likely of two of his “we…” Secretary’s to be considered towards 2016.

The presumptive Democrat Party 2016 nominee for their leadership to capture the American Presidency must be considered firstly to be Senator John Kerry if confirmed nominee to duty as another Obama rival as a Cabinet Officer bound of State Diplomatic duties.  He should have the mantle of “Obama’s rival” at least as much as aspirant Mrs. Clinton of State husbandry, however, has or is presumed to be to a having towards 2016.

But for now it will be that “Hillary” is for a while no longer a public figure to kick around with fair criticisms and much due doubt — it is soon more that she will have been put out to pasture to idyllic retreating.  Of course if she is really a “rival” we should expect official statements contrary and critical of now re-seated President Barack H. Obama. 

Secretary of State John Kerry for President in 2016, though as “white” as a “Hillary” again for President, is what should be presumed firstly with bias based on sex, race, or age.  He has the money - he’s run before - he likely has to be at least as much a rival to President Obama as still charged and sworn Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton and as well the re-sworn Vice President Joseph Biden.

Citizens United as been quite rendered a good and necessary ruling in light of the ease with which President Barack Hussein Obama raised and spent that sum in excess of a billion campaign dollars. 

More concerning is any or all “foreign” “influence” now in our politics - and all global activities of both of Obama rivals - both “Bill” and “Hillary.”  Secretary of State John Kerry as his Democrat Party Nominee in 2016 makes more democratic sense even though he can likely fund a billion dollar campaign with his own wealth.

Are the days now numbered as if “Hillary” soon no longer a “public political figure” to criticize as not due a privacy as if a lamb quietly set out to pasture in idyllic retreat?  Are these the last days to fairly speak of due criticisms of Obama’s first Secretary of State?

“Kerry For President 2016″ is at least a halo Senator John Kerry deserves if also to be seen as an independent thinking Cabinet Officer also a wanted “rival” sworn to obedience to President Barack Hussein Obama, but how fronted as a challenger.

A due long continuous battle to unearth the cover-up air about the Obama’s State avoidance and inaction of Benghazi failures of his first “we…” now butter’d up for departure but not legal escape is afoot such that she is to remain suspect as a person of interest yet still much in the public domain and eyes. 

Writers for politics and justice though, unless she steps out like now soon with a how and a why for consumption of “rivals” with specifics hers much to how and why she would have been a better President these past four years, are to consider civility and decorum and political politeness as if she is due an idyllic retreat as if placidly out to pasture as just a lamb.

It would behoove her to quietly retreat as much as possible now.  Obama’s new “rival” Diplomat is hardly more “white” than she, and, of a more lore’d and well beaten step by step path and resume building towards a Presidency for himself.

It should much behoove both President Clinton and soon X-Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton to both quietly now try to just fade away from foreign and domestic entanglements at least now for high profile and long about pressures to justice and understanding of at least the first four years of “Foreign Policy” of the Administration of Barack H. Obama.

These days are numbered for writers to write as strongly as a “public figure” deserves about our former First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton unless besides a continued push by our honorable Congress as per a lingering haze of “cover-up” of fogs about Benghazi we soon see “Hillary” of official steps to directly set her self apart as having been an independent thinking “rival” these four years and of the aforementioned “how” at least speaking to what she would have done differently and better these past four years.

I will be freer without her as Secretary of State or otherwise a sworn officer of the United States of America to reach to much deeper and globally broader markets with my already written thousands of pages long of years yet maybe not of having been critical enough of Presidential aspirant Hillary Rodham Clinton.  I will though myself until further developments be to considering her less now for new pieces as of “new” material.

I do look forward to finding my real audience for my book idea to publish past columns and commentary about “Hillary” and our 22nd Amendment towards a Guinness Book record for “most number of pieces written as to why Hillary Rodham Clinton should not become President.”  And, I look forward to being more entertaining of comity and comedy as a political pundit and as well as a poet and political poet.

It seems reasonable to consider that most of my columns are as long here as a New York Times Op-Ed Columnist’s there - but yet three times wider and so nearly 3x the word count there.  I have not yet compared word counts between my average length column and such as an industry standard.  I am glad many of my pieces did not have to be reduced to such standards as theirs.

“Secretary of State John Kerry for President” has a ring of Boston Brahmin lore’d good will and wealth for much musing to considerations that he with his Yale pedigree could be a revolutionary American elder in four years of promises to a long necessary cleaning up of his own party.  He will have to likely have to also run as a “rival” of President Barack H. Obama’s to assert that he as well at least as “Hillary” and “Joe” was not just a bureaucratic tool incapable of independent thinking.

The Clintons have been public figures long enough such that an idyllic retreat as if out to pasture not a lot fair or due either President William Jefferson Clinton nor soon X-Secretary of State Mrs. Hillary Clinton. 

We have to write about and publicly long consider that Republicans couldn’t run clean enough campaigns in 2008 & 2012 because too many still of our Congress were about that had been too weak to avoid the corruptive collusion to political corruption worked politically by the machinations most political and new-tech of and by the Administration of the Clintons whence.

The Clintons with their Clintons’ global initiatives are due a near “monopoly” consideration to a new era of Congressional “trust busting” - can’t you say, yourself?  We have that we have no idea how vast the left wing global conspiracy is now already towards further undermining of our Constitution and at least our Constitutional protections set to limit and check all foreign “contributions” or “gifts” like by foreigner or agents of foreign countries.

As Walt Whitman sung of us as of body electricities while electricity hardly but a novelty otherwise we have that the Clintons have already too long been to involved and meddling as term limited by our 22 Amendment by at least the prudent example set by “George” and “Martha” - however pre-Lincoln re-uniting.

As per Clintons vs. Kerry towards 2016 with “whiteness” so muted it seems we must be to measuring the “foreign” influence in at least President Clintons affecting as of a electricity (bought and built) of foreign gifts towards political electoral homeland effectings as bankable swingable “CHARISMA.”

And, yes the Republicans still have troubles for having been compromised and corruptive by the Administration of the Clintons at least while during the Clintons’ second term.  We have yet to have a young enough Republican challenge to Democrat Party national ticket since President George W. Bush whom can stand up with enough inside the beltway Republicans without the Clinton having them not able to be free enough to speak against them without incriminating themselves.

The Clintons have to be the most long shot most “underdog” ticket to now measure towards 2016 hopes - right?

Comments Off
01/23/13
SLAUGHTERHOUSE STATE
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, AFGHANISTAN, #KERRY, TWO HISTORIES, #NEW_YORK, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 3:18 pm

I personally am not versed enough in particularities in scholarly discussions of “FREE WILL” as per a polarizing of global relations between different people of varied histories and levels of living under tyranny.  Appearances by Secretary Clinton do stir wonderment as to what meats may go into her sausage making - and to how kosher or FDA certifiable as if a policy approval of and by the people for that which is less read about such as her of global work to divide the world along polarized partisan political lines firstly much to assimilations to “Clintonites.”  This is a mess we are witnessing.

I do not know enough about Senator John Kerry to know of his views to an importance of “FREE WILL” and nor how he may be different and maybe better at State leadership than Hillary Rodham Clinton specifically because of his religiousness as Roman Catholic.  As Secretary of State if his kited appointment sails through he will inherit a duty global of much seized opportunities by the Clintons together to establish loyalties to Clintons and the Clintons Global Initiative and intimately also shared political operations of just their Foundation.  I am not even sure, in light of the recent Congressional hearings on Clinton failures, that he as a new Secretary of State will have half the global “FREE WILL” our office of State Diplomacy harbored prior to the over-reaching post office international political meddling of just President Bill Clinton.

Seldom is discussed, so that I am yet aware, how we are of these years of conflicts and a new “Longest War” much as a related due discourse to consider that our Bush Administration and its standardized FREEDOM AGENDA was at least of a visible method of building with foreign peoples from the ground up.  The years of Clintons’ “diplomacy” strike more as a call to hold on high and herald politicians as lawyers as ready compromisers - not steady and considered builders.  We could use more public discussion as oddly as it may sound to a chit chat where ever about how the chase of “POPULARITY” as the end all for a Clinton be all of the Obama 1st term was actually a “WRONG” way to proceed “DIPLOMATICALLY” after the hard work and years of the Bush Administration nurturing of freedom with bottom up “standing with” boots on the ground developmental compassionate progressive conservativism.

The Compassionate Conservative George W. Bush as President was quite progressive internationally.  But now as per the rap on Hillary Clinton of a SLAUGHTERHOUSE STATE it is time we peel back some truths and look at lies for what they were.  Against the better judgement of Secretary Clinton however prejudiced still from her days “international” as FLOTUS Clinton we have to contrast how we are now of permanent truths contrary enough to ask about said “lying into war” by President George W. Bush.  Like:  So if President Bush lied us into OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM and now it looks like such was a necessary but late due prosecution of Saddam Hussein - why did he think it necessary to “lie” us into a proven to have been necessary execution of American sense of fairness?  What were the politics he had to fight and/or the ignorance in our Washington or general Peopleness that he for some reason needed to proceed with lies duly because of in order to be so progressive and to doing what has it seems been proven to have been necessary?

Besides that it can be put upon Senator John Kerry much for his/a disloyalty to our President whence then after our President had committed us all albeit with lying us into OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM for having started his very disruptive ANTI-WAR REVIVAL with questions of voracity marched at President Bush only after the USA and coalition states had become actually committed into OIF with boots on the ground — we have that so from such it may be ANTI-WAR ACTIVIST KERRY that so undermined confidence at home and abroad that he on his shoulders most should carry our weight of OIF taking so much longer and costing so much more.  He seems to have it as his culpability that he so spread fear across Iraq that liberated people we expected ready cooperation from with their liberation tucked away rightly with stirred fears by Kerry’s ANTI-WAR proffering that they best lay low as long as it looked like he, Senator John Kerry, would succeed at  a quick CUTTING AND RUNNING again by the seeming there to see it through of a global coalition.

A most strategically puzzling of today’s partisan softball cordial queriousness is that line of support taken nobly by Senator form Illinois Dick Durbin when of a sparring softly supportively with his own Pandora’s Box mine field of Operation Iraqi Freedom being of lies about still unfound WMDs (Weapons of Mass Destruction).  Since Senator Hillary Clinton didn’t offer a diplomatic honesty intellectually in defense of truths of the circumstances of her having voted for Operation Iraqi Freedom:  It is most puzzling today amidst all this that WMD issue can be raised at all to help free Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton from her Senate vote as Senator Clinton of New York while such vote then was proffered by her with so much confidence in her own understanding of the issue that she cast a vote for a war by such reasoning and without thinking she needed to read the intelligence reports for such voting whence.  WMD as per Iraq should be a weight to sink her in any “intelligence” queriousness now at all about worsening sit reps for the Middle East, at least. Right?  Hillary voted for Operation Iraqi Freedom confident in her own political understanding and without feeling beholden to question herself by reading a fresh post Administration of the Clintons new intelligence report - Right?

In Hillary’s tears more the guilt of the Clintons’ avoidance & inaction of the 90s as causal following on from her speaking of dangers from avoidance and inaction - that still follow on from President Obama’s Nobel Acceptance Speech as a slap at the Clintons for their avoidance and inaction on Afghanistan and Iraq while of his charge earlier in our 90s.  President Barack Hussein Obama with his Nobel Acceptance Speech spoke pointedly but coyly of “dangers of inaction and avoidance” much as Hillary today did while prefacing her tears for those affected by loses from her negligence years after such path towards such became trodden by the dangers that grew from the Administration of the Clintons inaction and avoidance as just per Afghanistan and Iraq.  Her use of word “husbandry” is quite a clever way to like hide that the Clintons for four years may have been overtly getting away with serious and dangerous like official conflicts of interests - at least.  She did bristle when her tears fell flat and she had to go on the defensive - quite so!  As one who remembers her New Hampshire tears as those triggered by her sliding in pols and with then a hit about if she was at all well rounded with even at least one hobby so stressing her so whence - as I recall from having been one of pressuring her before her New Hampshire tears for not at least having a hobby - but not to expecting she could shed tears for not having time for her stationary walker machine to avoid her inaction and lack of well roundedness - a less well roundedness than such campaigns long had insisted for its male entrants.

Those of the Administration of George W. Bush demonstrated a very different social norm globally and expandingly with their FREEDOM AGENDA respective of ‘FREE WILL’ as if at least the majority of Iraqi should and could be endowed by their creator as Americans free by theirs - a very different and even more progressive but yet not “socialist” than the heavy hands of change of Obama/Clinton FP with fear and pressure kept more distantly centralized, and, quite of the same governance sense that Government (by them) knows best.  Surprisingly these hearings may help peoples all around the world better see now that American Republicans are better protectors of individuals and their God given “FREE WILL” than at least President Barack Hussein Obama while of such rivalrous Clintons pulling him down.

I do not know if with Secretary of State as seems now inevitable of a turnover to the charge and such duty boundedness for John Kerry we can see HOPE return to the Administration of President Barack H. Obama.  I do not know if the assault on due process and developmental threats to “FREE WILL” as perpetrated by the Clintons’ “two-fer” are now bound to keep em shackled even so.

[I think that wraps up SLAUGHTERHOUSE STATE composition. {Well I’ve gotten this new column started.  Please check back throughout rest of day and evening and tomorrow as I work out the necessary bulwarks to ideas so broached already.}]

Comments Off
01/22/13
HANG HER HIGH?
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, AL QAEDA, TWO HISTORIES, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:11 pm

These are momentous days of truths rolling on beyond the control and wishful messaging of President Barack Hussein Obama The Re-Elected.  Firstly we should primarily concern ourselves much already to 2016 to the preservation of U.S. of at least two parties.  Secondly we should firstly also be to a present queriousness as to whether these past four years have been of the United States of America of a governance and politics actually more polarizing politically than was thought beyond “expected” to of an “inevitable” new partisan dividing quite on the way and yet of a President Hillary Rodham Clinton.

There are greater truths rolling on above this now ancillary historical still concerning problem more pressing now judicially as Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is set to be paraded for problems inescapably hers and some much more than of others about her as failures at least in “leadership” messaging and tone hers.

Whether President Clinton would have been more polarizing if the resultant victor of the 2008 challenges - more polarizing than he that has now been sworn in again for having hung himself higher successfully than she in our public eyes/galleries is somewhat a something that both our House and our Senate by tomorrow should also consider at least as per “motive” and “means” while working to see if she can or will incriminate her boss without delay.

If it is to a real concern that a capital punishment is deserved at least for Madam Secretary Clinton it shouldn’t be a high hanging of a well worked rendition in oil on canvas for her but harkenings chorused on high as if the United States of America had French guillotines.  These are moments like past lore’d histories where at least a threat of “off to the guillotine” or water-boarding would be in the pressing and generally in the civil airs.

Whom to hang higher tomorrow?  To at least consider hanging higher tomorrow and now on the eve with political palpitations in flux anticipatory to a high drama possible if “rival” Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton may or may not be prone to an outburst or worked plotting to effectively throw her boss under a bus — Whom to hang higher or lower soon?

The state of our nation is at stake and our last vestiges of HOPE maybe in our institution of Congress.  His team of “rivals” has truths their own rolling on contrary and maybe superior to a better and higher legacy than he may yet be able to lift or peg as his own.  There has been much change but now with scholarly called hopefully to an intellectual honesty professionally rended towards future editions reared to consider his successes may actually already now be more her “successes” and not much at all anything he actually built.

How much is at stake?  Is the entire reputation of our state of a nation at stake and threatened by what should be heard and discoursed fully through with his “Hillary” to hot seats with a “the buck stops here” out of passing the buck up to her boss to help set her up, however, towards 2016?

How threatened is the state of our nation vis a vis our view of our representatives and our institutions of Congress as our House and Senate now with a “Hillary” disposition maximus or again too minimus due news of this week?  Can she be hung high now despite whether or not politically an “how high” or if “higher than” her boss without our Congress being again too complicit in a vast lowering of standards of our State?

This is more for echoes of our Statuary Hall and galleries, where ever, though in centuries earlier more dramatic events would likely have already unfolded for at least our Madam Secretary of State for having doned pompous capping in preposterous hats as figuratively as if too much a modern day Marie Antoinette - nearer to “off to the guillotine with her” or for her boss.

No, we can wait to see if President Barack Hussein Obama can stand the never ending campaign of the Clintons in battles for legacies greater for themselves than they have earned, and now with he too set to have a institutionalized never ending campaign for himself.  For our Statuary Halls and galleries, where ever, it may be that the Clintons will succeed in still out foxing President Obama and maybe by some clever transference or projection again in coming days of State disposing hearings into renditions of Hillary’s questionable understanding of history.

Today on the eve of a scheduled challenge to seated power such as times before celebrated eons and eons prior like with a sharpening of guillotines or a building of a hanging stand we behold a great institutional threat to our House and our Senate and so our Tranquility and Posterity. 

Must our Congress find that Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has to be effectively somehow and very publicly set out tomorrow and in coming days for perpetuity as if always now to be hung lower than President Barack Hussein Obama?  Can his “Hillary” effect a coup as a still too celebrated “rival” and yet not be so to a corrupting of our institution of Congress of the People quite sworn? 

Can they go light - can they as our Congress’s sworn go as light on her as she and our now re-sworn President have in mind as of a “fairness”?

Our we at a weakness for firsts primarily now too much like of a too high affirmative action for those held out as of our highest or presumed finest?  Are we of these as “her” and “she” of “Hillary” as our to be most scrutinized highest yet for all the State failures at least in Presidential messaging and “leadership” “tone” such to as of a “he” and “his” of “Obama” as our still unreached maybe too to be faulted as per our not to be forgotten BENGHAZI FOUR and so that they are hoping that our institution of Congress can only be to a review of them as nearly our First Female President and he as historied already as a First Black Man so by reasoning as of a low standard for each of them firstly to be primarily no higher than the worst of the white men that have preceded either of them?

Our Congress has before it the ability to destroy itself if it proceeds towards a hanging of a prettier portrait of our Secretary of State than she has earned or merited.  There is that maybe she can make a deal to throw her boss under the bus to get herself hung higher for perpetuity but still with that we have the risk that our Congress could be to being of acts too low and basic to be only to devastating affectings upon themselves.

Can our Congress now proceed at all “lightly” against our currently seated Secretary of State without incriminating themselves to publicly of a set and cast to standards now too low for our people of our We the People…?

It may be too dramatic a judicial pondering to be believing that either our Secretary of State Clinton as an almost First Female President Clinton or our re-elected and re-sworn President Obama are self-possessed to an escapist rendition of justice such that they and their failures as per our not to be forgotten BENGHAZI FOUR and the related contrary suggestive that their Al Qaeda intelligence must all or nearly all be fundamentally flawed intelligence at our highest of political review levels are now or ever can be judged by our institution of Congress now only by comparison to the worst white men that have preceded them in their current offices.

Some truths are rolling on now greater in an honesty and breadth of permanent details now such that President Obama seems to think it necessary to now also be of running a permanent campaign at least to defend himself defensively from machinations by the most political and proven polarizing Clintons and their never ending campaigning.

And, some truths are now more self evident and still rolling on that stand up Republicans as more correct and of having been of a more honest telling than yet broadly known specifically as pertains to renditions of Dems histories as preached or posited by “Hillary’s” boss.

We have that just though for all the State failures in crisis prioritizing and “leadership” tone it looks like we are set now to just see our institution of Congress seize these moments to RESET their “standards” be to effecting that Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has now done too much too poorly to ever be hung as high as now re-elected and re-sworn President Barack Hussein Obama.

Comments Off
01/05/13
HER FAIR SHARE?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, 22ND AMENDMENT, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, #CGI, #QUEEN, #BLAME
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 5:19 am

We have heard a lot about “fair share” these past weeks, and, we gladly haven’t heard too much about coal.

We have hardly heard from Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, and nor have we yet had the fair discussion of how much “coal” this “lady” deserved/deserves.

What is right?  What is wrong?  What was and is “Playing Politics”?  What needs to be done?

We have a leading woman character too written of a presumption of innocence not fitting the amount of baggage she carries around, and, we have that she meddled in similar affairs earlier that are of records stored somewhere.

It is wrong to forget THE BENGHAZI FOUR, and, it is wrong to ignore that “Hillary” used to be FLOTUS Clinton.

President Barack Hussein Obama may be avoiding jousting at Libya as if just a windmill, and, VP Biden may be loyal and subservient with such hoofing and pedestrian tripping.

It is wrong to let go or ignore that Senator Clinton did reportedly vote for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, and, that she voted for a war like “operation” without having read the related intelligence reports.

Records of the Administration of the Clintons that are related just for her travels and foreign meddling are much of protections of political privacy wanting of that which remains of their maybe thirty years of “secrecy.”

President Obama and his trusty borrow also mounted sidekick VP Biden are right not to joust at Libya and Benghazi as just “windmills” — they are wrong - so wrong as Secretary of State Clinton - much now more so for having “Played Politics” with “terrorism” while such considerable as actually an “act of war” expecting a serious response.

Simply the foreign policies for the vast and varied regions from Tripoli to the Afghanistan and Pakistan border are considerably different between this administration and its predecessor administration and the co-administration of the Clintons then before such. 

We do not have a common thread that needs us to think this administration has to be treated with kid gloves to avoid incriminating the previous administration of the other party.

Sorry to say our Congress has a hard lot served as their trails to ride and walk about this to an “honorable” and “respectable” or “chivalrous” soldiering.  Hillary Clinton, as failed and failing still Secretary of State, is a can of worms politically speaking. 

We have that these matters do relate as per the injustice and unprofessional lack of foresight and preparedness by “leadership” of Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton to a presumption of innocence for her despite her past flip flopping as per Operation Iraqi Freedom and such as stumbling after she had been to “voting” without having reportedly read the related “intelligence reports.”

With anticipation building for a great Political Congressional “SMACK DOWN” of a seemingly grossly negligent female Cabinet Officer of the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama:

We have that these matters do relate at least in a sense of “what did she know - when did she know it” queriousness to her inciting and crusading days as FLOTUS Clinton and so to official records of the Administration of the Clintons. 

We have that she being this wrong now suggests she has been quite wrong officially for a while and so much so that we may think it our civic duty to suggest or insist that Congress unseal most of the foreign policy records of the Administration of the Clintons otherwise tucked away for that remaining of secured “privacy” allowances nearly thirty years set.

She is a can of worms that seems already to much OPEN to now not see if President Obama’s “jousting” or not has he and his trust side kick VP Biden has also of having stepped all in it, all that among it on the sordid trails from the hoofing of the crusading Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.

Benghazi represents more than a lurking threat of a windmill possessed.  As an “ACT OF WAR” of an ongoing known war it is that President Obama is taggable as of “Playing Politics” and muckraking with his Madam Secretary as if it could be “terrorism.”

{We can leave it to conspiracy theorists to discuss alternative machinations these events could have wrought if Governor Mitt Romney hadn’t quickly stepped in and stemmed a flood of misinformation that probably or just possibly was building.} 

{We can leave it for others to wonder if Bill Clinton with Al Qaeda like “funding” methods now his with his CGI isn’t himself incidentally or accidentally of a “material support of terrorism” if Benghazi rates as “terrorism.”}

The Administration of Barack Hussein Obama seems to have let now - and still seems to be letting still - an “act of war” go unanswered, and, the administration with Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton seems beset with a now long over due queriousness as per “what did she know - and how long did she know it?”

Earlier during the co-Administration of the Clintons we did let acts of war, like, on embassies go largely un-responded to as of a category of a fog of conflicts of a “terrorism” gray, and, earlier the Clintons could call it “terrorism” for they were avoiding acknowledging their “PEACE” time as actually “WAR” time.

It is wrong for President Obama now to call the events that show now a of a gross negligence by a female Cabinet Officer to accept her attempts to let it go as “terrorism” and further political cover for failures of the co-Administration of the Clintons.

The attacks that killed four under the care and keep charge upon Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton and while of such as one of her “babies” of BOLD “mothering” are best to be called “ACTS OF WAR IN A KNOWN AND ONGOING WAR.”

What did she know?

When did she know it?

Is she just being loyal to spousal plotting and of the “secured” papers of the co-Administration of the Clintons now and of “political” judgements in keeping with a “behavior” of avoiding “intelligence reports” or new counsel of “intelligence”?

Is Hillary Clinton the most POLITICAL Secretary of State our nation has ever had?  How is it that the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t “Playing Politics” with events of such as the negligence about Hillary’s BENGHAZI?

The co-administration of the Clintons essentially seemed to leave President George W. Bush two started games of JENGA, and, the Clintons seemed in unison of like a coy “best wishes” while it seems that they did leave him each a tower of their own “playing” where he had but only one move left to “play” before two towers would just fall down.

{We can leave it to conspiracy theorists to discuss how annoyed and even paranoid once new President Clinton was when then of a simple self awareness that he had oddly become President without having earned such mantle, and, we can leave it to them that he did express annoyance that his predecessor had “left him a war.”  It is better for such to look at how President Clinton may have been petty again and to thinking he (they?) should leave their successor at least one war.}

We have that by the time our Congress may get to giving Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton a due “third degree” or a “whole nine yards” of review for her of a perp walk or cat walk “political” the events of 9/11 II have passed too long as considerable as an unanswered ACT OF WAR.

What is a fair share of blame now for President Barack Hussein Obama?

What is the fair share of blame for Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton, and, how long its years of incrimination?

What is or is not just a “windmill” to Vice President Joseph Biden?

This is not about Christmas “coal” for a born yesterday “Hillary”!

With the elections now passed we can look back and consider that these of the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama did seemingly get all busy with “Playing Politics” over events in Libya, and, with these elections once so critically set to turn against them if such was allowed out honestly as not “terrorism” - as but acts of war in a warring known and ongoing - but/yet there to fore of having been being politically sold as “GOING WELL” and them of “WINNING.”

Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has her fair share of documents of their co-Administration of the Clintons earlier “official” days, and, Madam Sec now gives cause to have such reviewed much at least as they that are just of her fair share of secured papers and such. 

She did crusade and incite as FLOTUS “Hillary” - and stomp and rant much as if an imperialistic queen irrespective of whose “turf” she was upending.  She has now been of such a BOLD intelligence failure that she seems institutionalized about such failure as of a consistent and/or persistent other realmness.

These may be just “windmills” to President Barack Hussein Obama and his otherly orderly side kick Vice President Joseph Biden, and, these may be days where they are due a political separation and differentiation from “Hillary.”

Comments Off
01/01/13
NEW WORLD TABLETS
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, #CGI, #KERRY, #SUSPECT, #BLAME, #MORALS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:21 am

A longer title could or should be NEW WORLD ORDER TABLETS.  Our world has changed and we have by one party more than another been encouraged to change with them in ways contrary to our long established systems of checks and balances.

Happy New Year 2013 — it may actually be “leaders” long of your own party that have the most guilt about avoiding to bring us all into these new times as teased and informed as they could have or should have.

A retrospective on President Obama should now at least dig up how his famed “SPEECH TO THE MUSLIM WORLD” CAIRO SPEECH oddly proffered like:  American slaves got out of their bondage peacefully and without violence.

The complexity of this recently re-elected President who wanted to have a “personality” based Presidency has another grand oratory moment of international concern for any world order.   Some how Senator Barack H. Obama spoke to a large crowd in Berlin, Germany and with linguistic oratorical looseness such that he closed out his rendition of history as if his father as a army cook was critical to the success of the Berlin Air Lift and so that he the son now can stand and inherit from his father and all listening a personal empowerment of having saved the World - or just Berlin, himself.

We are of days of wonderful new communication tools that don’t just have to be wired by Government as tools for mass partisan assimilations.  As tablets are of our past carried morality now new tablets are there yet to be used for a better modern morality.

President Obama now has a problema much like that visceral for his predecessor while himself no long re-electable — The Clintons as like “family” - adopted and embraced step children/brethren - by the Bush clan did turn out knives as if back stabbing political opportunists even though Bush was no longer “electable.”   President Obama now himself no longer re-electable has the Clintons as his greatest threat and as an internecine Democrat divided house — as the Clintons were willing to back stab the Bush as “family” as “rivals” of Administration of President Obama what won’t they be willing to try to do, politically just within their own party?

President Obama may have the greatest friend as of the adage “an enemy of my enemy is my friend” with Senator John Kerry if approved to be Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton’s successor.  He should after Benghazi failures now of problems and unpreparedness within some of her own “pet” issues be called to a cleaning of her houses of State.  A Secretary of State John Kerry is a perfect political ally for President Obama against an expected internecine power struggle (for legacies - over legacies).

Most concerning, despite how dangerously framed, in these complicated times, by the real international and geo-regional politics more real than some of the above oratorical confounding profferings, and as if we are working on a tower of policies on shifting sands and without an adequate foundation, remains, though little pressed, to be how we have been of Mrs. Clintons our “oversight” head for Mr. Clinton while of all his CGI and Library and/or Foundations’ global machinations.

I don’t know that our system with checks and balances and its three equal branches of Government ever failed to consider that a wife is not supposed to be our “policing” agent for a “hen house” of global egg laying of her husband.  I do think that is like having put an known egg thief in charge of securing our eggs.

We can recall how I and others did give the orator of at least the above mentioned past Obama speeches very low grades or failiing grades for one or the other - and how others gave him glowing like A++ s even though he spoke as if orating a denial that our Civil War had actually been at all about slavery. 

We can though still look at how our Executive Department has historically worked with more checks and balances and too more transparency over our history — We can look at how almost all of President Obama’s weak or faulted international moments and especially of his speaking with prepared remarks has his top Diplomat as Secretary of State as a Cabinet level “officer” at least primarily a suspect for each as each fault had her of a job to see it and say something about each before each and even maybe to have been an “expert” with “edits” proffered.

Politically speaking just about the very concerning above problema intertwined in much of what isn’t working now while of “national” or “federal” hands we have that a Secretary of State John Kerry can come in and blame his predecessor for most if not all of his new boss’s past international foibles - and domestic messaging as per them all.

I was disappointed recently when I quickly Googled “modern moralists” and didn’t see any “modern” moralists then in the first page of results.  Again, it may be “leaders” of your party that are using new “tablets” to attempt to work a mass hysteria to an acceptance of methodologies contrary to our system and still writ regulatory ways. 

But about President Obama — has he been an imperialistic neo-colonialist?  Was he trapped by internecine Democrat Party machinations hung-over from the Clintons’ spousal plotting to a having of his “governance” hands greatly tied up by the Clintons?  Is President Obama though of a desire to be of a “personality” based Presidency and despite how a “cabinet of rivals” rivaled such as a contradicting paradigm/conundrum but now of a legacy near exactly as that which we would have had if of an extention of the Administration of the Clintons as attempted?

With former President William Jefferson Clinton, here to fore protected by his spouse, while she the cabinet level officer charged with oversight of organizations like his creatively established CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE, still of his CGI as if a privately operated “State Department” can Senator Kerry start at State as the successor of such charge now without calling rightly for a full and complete audit of all the overseas activities of our former President William Jefferson Clinton?

Even though like President Bush in years past we have that President Obama is no longer also re-electable can that the Clintons are of his own party keep them from behaving just as disloyal or even more of a lack of loyalty?

Though our new tablets are now of us still of a lasting legacy of foundations in earlier tablets we have problems now in part for international “relations” are so borderless that we are of a new world more of “international politics” than as before of and for “global diplomacy” for relationships between peoples.

Again we have had administration by Democrats where they have worked less than possible and/or prudent towards an national awareness raising to better “informed” “citizens” as all of a “towards such” reality.  These Democrats new and or compromised so, as of a before when a “before” wasn’t too early, have been contrary to our basic methodologies secured by our Constitution by policies and practices more towards a shift at home and abroad to as many as possible more to as if just “subjects.”

These are days of us of new world order with tablets old and new — and of people in a world more already of an “international politics” than the “Diplomacy” so far of the Obama administration’s State Department has pressed, itself. 

We have that we are of dangers just from a lack of sharable understanding of the attacks to the loss of THE BENGHAZI FOUR as such is going down rightly, it seems, as an “ACT OF WAR” in a known ongoing war and not as a random act by unknown unaffiliated “terrorists” as spewed in amateur fashions by those we accepted (wrongly) as experts.

The new order possible for President Obama in his second term with Senator John Kerry if confirmed to be our next Secretary of State remains of opportunities for the both of them to blame Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton for most of the past “shortcomings” or “failures” - yet to allow President Obama an escape for near un-American “management” methods of his having let Mrs. Clinton be the policing “officer” of his cabinet for all “foreign” activities of her husband has to rest on his shoulders as of his naivete and bad managerial and legal judgement.

We are so of new tablets and a new world order our Democrat Party leaders are trying to subdue but when to mass assimilations to dictatorial obedience as if of more “subjects” than “citizens” below them, and while of an opportunity to govern more as if a media corporation of “pop” artistry in lieu of due process by governance still of and by laws, not man or woman.

It is if, some at least, that President Obama thought he of a “personality” based Presidency wouldn’t have to make consideration for “management” or “cost consciousness” that actually recognized “temptations” as a human problema necessitating a governance by laws not by will or tyranny of a man or woman - or an elite troika.

Again:  Happy New Year 2013 — it may actually be “leaders” long of your own party that have the most guilt about avoiding to bring us all into these new times as teased and informed as they could have or should have.

Comments Off
12/30/12
THE BIG TENT
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, SYRIA, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:54 am

Barack Hussein Obama has been an “Our Pot Has Held A Melting” person for his first term.  We are now of a time he inherited more than made but to now the circus of his elementary politics all so gone carney.  These times are ours as the new year two thousand ten and three fast approaches.

Many people of color before him have done more for America and fellow Americans that he has (yet) and with less.  That he is our first black President of record has us now of such as a “fact” for comparing and contrasting more than now celebrating.  Earlier times had yeomen of Republican Party being nearly the most critical of legislators for early passage of civil rights laws.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he can hardly claim to have built it himself.

As a RING MASTER he has been big on ceremony and big promises of miraculous what evers and as if he had more rings in his circus “tent” than were actually there.  He has built a carney atmosphere about our once more prudent Republic and its governance from Washington.  He has even spirited hoopla about his rings of influence as if we could read our Second Amendment with import as if our First Amendment didn’t come first.

As Condoleezza Rice, a trailblazer in/of merit based race equality, has often pined, we have that America is now already a country where your zip code is too much predetermining your individual possibilities to advance with hard work and education.  Republicans have a different perspective to solutions while long of sharing a common humanity concerning equality problems.

Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Cheney in far earlier years and more specifically of charges each of and about our Congress did marshall the necessary yeomen legislative muscle to stir our governance of our 60s - to whip their Congressional peers - to the passage of some of our most basic and fundamental civil rights laws.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he has been more a divider than a uniter himself.

We have that President Barack Hussein Obama has created a circus of governance these past four years with it he that took us all to such so “gone carney.”  Donald Rumsfeld nor Richard Cheney are half breed black Americans yet they together did much and for a long time less “carney” and quite effecting to a “bigger” “tent” for Americans and even others around the world.

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

President Obama has been of such a circus of governance these past four years that often two things in one of his sentences do not and cannot work together yet orated as if they can.  Condoleezza Rice was a pioneer for THE FREEDOM AGENDA and a trend setter for even Barack Hussein Obama but for a prudence and practicality in foreign affairs.

Little, as the year 2012 wraps up, can or should be said well of Hillary Clinton as Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.  It doesn’t matter as per Libya if Congress had the purse strings for “security” as this was one of her “babies” of “accomplishment” and “boldness” that should have had Ambassador Chris Stevens and all about his charge SECURED by 9/10 with at least a bed check by herself.  Libya has led to us seeing “Hillary” as willing to sacrifice Ambassador Susan Rice in a playing of politics CYA for her own hams;  “Hillary” was the lead as per ODYSSEY DAWN but how the French needed to provide the leadership she lacked;  Libya consulate security should have been at least in her top 5 checked every day and not at the mercy of “Congressional purse strings.”

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

Much of President Obama’s problem of our governance turned into a circus act by his deciding does rest historically upon the Clintons and thought “GOOD” decisions made by them during the 90s that were actually the “BAD” decision(s).

Our Fiscal Cliff is only here now because we haven’t dealt with how the CLINTONS’ SURPLUSES were the greatest economic blunder of the past century.  We had no need for surpluses those years and we had already arguably cut too much too quickly when the Republicans found a way to offer a thought impossible balanced budget.  We have been of war costs and social costs especially school and infrastructure items because of that extra trillion cut by the Clintons for convenient political popularity;  we have been of greater costs and economic struggles because we have needed after the surpluses to be at far greater costs to a putting back so much of what they cut, and as necessary spending.

To appreciate the comments of racial trailblazer Condoleezza Rice as per deep problems in America’s education paradigm and how we are at a point where one’s zip code is too determinative it may help to refresh some management  methodologies even if they stir a like “federalism” debate about such.  When you have problems like such is the worst place to attempt a fix a distant centralized see of sorts?  Is this a problem that needs to see an uncentralized “one size does not fit all” approach were distant cells more local and of “community” are stirred in freedoms to compete in lieu of a national assimilation?

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

We may be clearly of a showing that the “rings” of the “tent” of President Barack Hussein Obama’s “governance” show that Democrats do not have the management sense or skill needed to even just be as successful as Republicans had years before when of a practical broadening of our BIG TENT. 

Obama’s engagement in Afghanistan has been “war of choice” of Democrat specificities.  Afghanistan mission still troubled for it in a country that has its primary national industry that of supplying near 80% of the world’s opium.  Afghanistan may be a convenient place to play war and with a “war of choice” from a earlier measured enterprise to trespass to find Al Qaeda 50 or so “campers” - but the nation has nearly 75% of its populace as illiterate in any language even a “local tribal dialect”.

As we look to judge President Obama by his Secretary of State we still have it a circus of contrariness where two things just never seem to belong together in a single promise or proffering.

President George W. Bush, with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Richard Cheney, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, was in Afghanistan not in a “war of choice” but as of a “WAR ON TERROR” and specific deals and permissions to be trespassers on such nation’s sovereignty per a policing search for wanted and known members of Al Qaeda.  President Bush’s administration was trading road and school construction as part of a limited engagement about Afghanistan of a necessary WAR AGAINST TERROR.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he can hardly claim to have built it himself.

A suggestion by President Obama or even just his mere political appointee Madam Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton that Afghanistan can be won is best balanced and checked with a simple comparison to our Southwest border — I should be logically at least fifty percent easier to solve the problems of our Southwest border and it as well of a drug trade of huge scale than it should be to be able to “win” in Afghanistan while interrupting whole foreign cultures about opiates.

The explanation for Al Qaeda’s attacks of 9/11 that make now still the most simple and logical understanding possible is much of the hypothesis that we were attacked after the Administration of the Clintons because America during the such years had failed to bring sufficient justice to/upon Saddam Hussein.  Our 9/11 Commission Report still rings as flawed with echoes still fresh of its charged American leaders’ personal statements that they had decided to “only look back ten years”!  We have that with such our chosen “detectives” for such purposes as they were charged as a “commission” was of a naivete like that more recently by Madam Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton with regards to Benghazi — at the time they “chose” to only look back ten years Al Qaeda was maybe already past its 12th anniversary of its conception/consecration as a group organized to bring needed justice to/upon Saddam Hussein.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he has been more a divider than a uniter himself.

Personally, my public commentary about Afghanistan near as soon as the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama started was early and regularly of:  “BRING OUR TROOPS HOME - BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW!!!” postings as of my best advice per such “conflict.”

It is more logical to believe that we could fix our immigration and our Southwest border with the level of commitment and engaged troop levels for Afghanistan than that such could be close to reasonable for whichever limited “goals”/”mission” that could be writ as if then a reachable goal to a “win.”

As per education - much has been made to be such a governance circus with this administration leading the rings to too much all carney.  We have that “federalism” discourse must continue as such is where the answers lie for workable management methodologies for solutions that stay of our keep with freedoms first and protections second so Constituted.

As per the ARAB SPRING - you should be better of lessons that there wouldn’t and couldn’t be an up side if Operation Iraqi Freedom hadn’t affected the then oh so late prosecution of Saddam Hussein.

As per the COLD WAR - Afghanistan, until the eight years of avoidance and inaction that cooked a great “abandonment” attitude as those eight were of the “leadership” of the Administration of the Clintons, was an Afghanistan to the Cold War as Gettysburg was to our Civil War.

As per THE BENGHAZI FOUR - you still should be considering it is late for any “Diplomat” to be speaking of “terrorists” without specifities as to how such was not of STATE ACTING - A RELIGIOUS ACTING - A CRIMINAL ACTING.  We have that we are still of a underwhelming “explanation” by this Administration of Obama that allows a tagging as “demostration” or “terror” while it may make more sense that it is an expansion of the “theater” of conflict in our now LONGEST WAR in Afghanistan so however commenced to a forced marriage between the TALIBAN & AL QAEDA.  We have not begun to hear sufficient explanations for “Hillary’s” serious failures in Libya.

As per THE TALIBAN - their leadership has been on TV with interviews and speaking of how in Afghanistan now of the Obama years and policies, at least, the Taliban & Al Qaeda are now basically one.  It is still possible that BENGHAZI ambush of “Hillary’s” people was of an ACT OF WAR in an ongoing war with the Taliban and as an act thought justly of and to a broader theater of conflict.

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

It was straight up a clear demonstration of “Hillary’s” persistent naivete as per the conflicts of the Middle East post the Saddam invasion of Kuwait when she with near first comments about her failures as per the lost BENGHAZI FOUR, at least, spoke with:  “I do not know how this could have happened in a country we liberated.”

As of the ARAB SPRING, again, there likely would be no upside for the United States of America now if such were happening before we had “prosecuted” Saddam Hussein.  I am still of the opinion that the best time and place for the full enforcement of the United Nations sanctions against Saddam Hussein was during the first term of the Administration of the Clintons.  It is little considered, and dangerously, still, that those were the best years to have proceeded judiciously in keeping with our standards and examples with Germany and Japan after earlier world warring.  We have now an ARAB SPRING contrary to the governance posits and proffering of this administration and even more so to that of the Administration of the Clintons — these days the “SPRING” is some a competition with justly freed Iraqi people and to attempts to better them in their workings at bettering for themselves a better Constitution that that which is America’s.

President Obama inherited a BIG TENT America - he can hardly claim to have built it himself.

And we cannot now avoid the 16 trillion made by the Administration of Obama with the careful hands of those seemingly in line to have been the chosen Clinton experts if “Hillary” had managed to have been actually “inevitably” aligned by political machinations concerning enough without foreign concerns.

And we must consider how simple a truth it is for “budgets” now that it will be irresponsible for the Administration of Obama with whomever left-overs of the Administration of the Clintons to be suggesting job and economic growth promises without first seriously offering a solid fix to immigration.  It is ridiculous that with immigration and illegals so long such a problem and a problem also much ignored by the Administration of the Clintons (while of a trillion not needed to go to surpluse to spend) that Healthcare Reform was put ahead of Jobs Plans and that both were put ahead of Immigration Reform like of “carrots” towards temptations to over-ride any possible planned new workings for Immigration Reform.

And, so we have that President Obama is of a BIG TENT America hardly of his own “building” - and with us to a new year two thousand ten and three with it seeming he has now “accountability” for so so so many proposals and plans that are of the circus of governance now set in our DC.  He built this mess upon good deeds built by others, not nearly as guilty as he - as he is making others out to be while covering up for clearer fault and guilt of both Mr. and Mrs. Clinton.

And again, as per Iraq and the Administration of George W. Bush - Today’s ARAB SPRING though under the Administration of Barack Hussein Obama would not have an up side for the United States of America if we hadn’t already worked that very late and very costly due prosecution of Saddam Hussein. 

As the Clintons had been leaving it - if so still as they had been leaving it - today we could hardly globally appear to be much better than Syria’s Assad - Don’t you think?

President Abraham Lincoln lives - He was a uniter not a divider by the end of the Civil War.

Comments Off
12/23/12
GOD IN THE CLASSROOMS
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, 22ND AMENDMENT, AFGHANISTAN, AL QAEDA, WAR ON WOMEN, #FEMINISM, #MORALS, COVER UPS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 1:26 pm

*

These are days, again, it seems, difficult to be kind to Hillary Clinton.  These are not days of a happy “swan song” of Mrs. Clinton nor her reign as Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.  Much is afoot and now exposed though long presented as if a good gift of gentile art.

These are not days (again) for hailing her a good “chief” or “teacher.”   She “Hillary”  - daughter of “Rodhams” - the daughter of a “Hugh” and a “Dorothy” and raised a first striker - raised to strike first.  It is an odd immunity she as “Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton” is being afforded with so much costs and so much blood upon her hands as if more long a “Secretary of War” than of “Diplomacy.”

A dichotomy of our “Hillary” that has legs so long that these days her stride steps all of “All Bush’s Fault” false titling and clearly back to walks and talks of her crusading 90s’s as “FLOTUS.”

With Ambassadors like her “children” she is now suffering us all too much as freshly wounded of her as a bad “mother.”  Where wasn’t she?  How long wasn’t she there?  How did she miss all the cries of her Ambassadors as she had as First Lady “Mother” Clinton once those eight years deaf to or avoiding the cries of the women of Afghanistan and Iraq, at least?

Does the RACE TO THE TOP of her Boss and his other department(s) we seem at least safe from also having been hers, as once feared as sold and as “inevitable” yet however taint her too as of a removal of GOD from classrooms?

Does the RACE TO THE TOP replace GOD and morality with a like “catch of day” Politics with fidelity to our President as never written or intended? 

Does the RACE TO THE TOP as of its dictates these four years have a dangerous dichotomy quite diabolical too — Does it  oddly preach a greed and competitiveness for a TOP while though also oddly dictating that any where above the “middle” is evil?

Does the RACE TO THE TOP replace GOD and morality more though with peer pressure “corporate ladder” like daily status boxing based just on video game aggressive cultures?

It seems that Hillary has been exposed at least for lying for over four years and as a bearing of false witness knowingly and politically in a partisan and very polarizing methodology.  We should consider that since she was once packaged as “inevitable” as a new first “Mother” of our federal provinces now are the days to ask if we weren’t saved from her much - if she wouldn’t have been a worse President than Barack Hussein Obama.

Valerie Plame had her husband as an outer quite like Madam Secretary Mrs. Clinton had her “husband” trap her by boldly stepping into Charlotte as the charlatan with economic voo doo and/or snake oil as he did.  And, Hillary Clinton has been so bold to as well have been being as if a Joe(sephine) Wilson of national warring of a personal agenda.

Our “Hillary” - however - is a reigning Constitutional conundrum of management and/or accounting best practices.  She is as not taught to be for safeguards even for petty cash in corporate endeavors.  She reigns as if a CEO were allowed to have a private residence off his Corporate Offices and with their spouse free to come and go with shared power and an expectancy to succeed just because they were able to mix business and pleasure with a office based home.

It seems to confusing to try to explain Mrs. Clinton as other than a faux feminist - for with her husband she put the glass ceiling over herself for most of her adult life, and, while her husband by marrying her was able to avoid becoming an actual feminist.

We are gathered about these issues now as a year end and term ending consideration and much of a Madam Secretary of State that could have been worse and worse with much more of our “governance.”   She was not born “Adam” son of “Peter” and a blessed “Nancy” and then to schools where the story of your self is declared regularly, by a Government, to be nonsense.

“Hillary” was only promised a Rose Garden by her husband and yet conditional upon her being diminutive as if of a self elected “glass ceiling” of a necessary faux feminism for her until such time as he were to Constitutionally not being able to have it as his firstly.  That she tolerated a reigning of her “Bill” with his CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE and while it made her look smaller as if just a bureaucrat of a travel office secretarial “job” is a puzzle not too dangerous as if a TROJAN HORSE before the first TROJAN HORSE.

We have that as per THE BENGHAZI FOUR, whom we also should never forget, we also have that we have a 22nd Amendment and the legacy of prudence of “George” and “Martha” of a togetherness where eight years set to be enough.  We have that by trying to have more than eight years between them “Bill” and “Hillary” may have quite seriously, and to great costs to us all, have hidden for a long time how much was “all their fault”. 

For “Adam” - son of “Peter” and a blessed “Nancy” - it may be that when God was taken from our classrooms his life went to Hell.  For “Hillary” - Secretary of State - she now only has to answer for THE BENGHAZI FOUR and how that she by so wrong about such now is of an exposing of her years of having beared false witness at our expense. 

The whole Truth of our “Hillary” now seems that THE BENGHAZI FOUR exposes her and her “Bill” (and President Obama) as having been very wrong about Al Qaeda since back to the first term of the Administration of the Clintons.

Our classrooms now with or without God have to consider a revisionist “history” of the Administration of the Clintons and our entire era of “the 90s” - it seems.  Poor “Adam” son of a “Peter” and a blessed “Nancy” and all joined to his Hellishness.  May he not have been long of a tag of the slang for “Nancy” as well as rapped upon by Government busy at taking “Adam” out of classrooms.  Our classrooms are fraught with troubles to last a while for the ill considered race of RACE TO THE TOP.

And, though where can our “Hillary” now sit in our classrooms with our without God? 

She has long beared false witness against many of the Administrations of the Bushes and while her husband kept up a like “ceiling” above her of a reign extra-Constitutional in many ways much as if he alone had been “promoted” out of our Office of the President and to where he is globally as if an unchecked and unelected President of the World.

At least if RACE TO THE TOP has any redeeming qualities all our schools should now be mandated to ask and discuss how if “Hillary” as per THE BENGHAZI FOUR could be so wrong now then mustn’t she also have been so wrong about Al Qaeda while First Lady “Mother” Hillary Clinton too?  And, to a scholarly crediting if as well of asking if she mustn’t have been so causally wrong as a crusading FLOTUS to have been more wrong then than presently?

Think?

President Bill Clinton should not have participated in the Dem Convention in Charlotte both because of his conflict of interest with his wife sworn to “not be in politics” while Secretary and he of his Clintons’ Global Initiative of a promised mission to not be partisan nor political with such.  His presence and proffering much worse for of new fuzzy math and economic constructs quite farcical as bold brassy lies. 

Bill Clinton did maybe lie President Obama to a victory. And, he as well to assuring a new and more polarized grid lock as their cover-up of themselves as if just a beautiful and innocent wooden horse of a “none of the Clintons’ fault” now becomes exposed as now a danger and for long having been a danger we should have seen from the start.

With or without God in our classrooms may we at least now to having the lies of the Clintons in there as “lies.”

And, again:  Bill Clinton should not have even without his being a Charlotte charlatan have spoken at the Democrat Convention for to speak was inappropriate while his spouse was/is our sworn Secretary of State, and, because he stood up and told more economic lies. 

That it was proffered as “All Bush’s fault” stands logically as such a preposterous impossibility that on its face it has been confessional by Dems - and yet supposed to work as a “cover-up.” 

Oddly when you accept that Bush did it seems take the easy way to Operation Iraqi Freedom with “lies” offered to a willing Congress and enough to get the desired vote we have that it is the Clintons that both end up looking worse that President Bush.

It is teachable that President Bush chose the easy path of lying for a vote from Congress for a necessary and quite complicated “operation” for a very late prosecution of Saddam Hussein, and, that such was while he could have sold it more honestly and necessary if he needed to. 

But by “lying” President Bush didn’t otherwise have to mess with the politics of calling out the Clintons for their failures as earlier “Father” and “Mother” of our Country - nor for them of a TROJAN HORSE dimensional as like a bearing of false witness.

                                                *       *

*[This prefaced piece while a public work in progress Sunday before Christmas.]
{WHAT FOLLOWS WILL FOR A WHILE BE A WORK IN PROGRESS SHARED PUBLICLY AS I WORK OUT A CONSIDERATE COMPOSITION FOR SO MUCH.  AS IT STARTS AND STANDS TEMPORARILY MAY NOT BE HOW IT IS FULLY MEANT TO BE UNDERSTOOD OR NUANCED WHEN FULL THOUGHTS WORKED THROUGH.}

Comments Off
11/05/12
A MONROE DOCTRINE?
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM, AFGHANISTAN, WAR ON WOMEN, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 6:56 pm

We should accept that President Obama would have liked to have used his middle name and maybe for a HUSSEIN COMPACT.

To be brief this could have been just another Obamaism if he actually used “compact” while himself too often prone to too much droning.  The issues of the Monroe Presidency do relate, and, so that it may be best to think instead of a new Monroe Doctrine.

Is President Obama in a tight race and desperate with attempts to be seen of using FEMA to recolonize some of the original American colonial plats?  Is the author Obama, who has long tagged himself as of concerns for a neo-colonialism, and a penchant too great to centralize too much, now over-reaching at home as if citizens are actually subjects?

A HUSSEIN COMPACT is beyond a comprehension for the current President - President Barack Hussein Obama hasn’t compacted or cleared up any of the great issues of our day much past a seventh grade level opaque use of a global “we” and a confused centralized “our” with a spillage so over most breastworks and waters’ edges with inappropriated and deeds uncertain usages of “they” as a similar “they” and then not if a different “they” can be redistributed as a confirming posit tangential to his starting premises.

Ok, I am a blogger and thought I might find an earlier column to re-post for you all for Election Day 2012 — Ok, I realized I have likely over 1,500 past blogged compositions to have chosen from and that it should now be easier and better to try to produce an entirely fresh new work.

There seems to be no uniting thread or worked through “compact” of a workable set of interactive principles of this administration now facing a JUDGEMENT DAY this Election Day 2012.

There seems to be a vacuum here among all this a JUDGEMENT DAY of the Obama Presidency as we know it.  And, there seems to be much we don’t actually know about it or him that we have long thought we should be, and already.

We seem for 2012 to be of a President without FIRST CONTACT principles so a HUSSEIN COMPACT must default more to our timely MONROE DOCTRINE.  He did expand the GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR deeper into Afghanistan and as well Pakistan but as like an accident of unplanned mission creep.  His war of choice that is our long Vietnam like Afghanistan War was not a war Bush was in “on a credit card” - the current long battling in Afghanistan is of Obama’s making as a war of choice against the Taliban.

It is still clear enough that 9/11 to the Administration of President Bush was an inconvenience to his prudent purposefulness to see that Saddam Hussein put up or shut up as regards all the United Nations sanctions and his past.  It is still clear that from day one the Democrats seems mostly to want to use 9/11 as an excuse to go to war against the Taliban and so as if an imperialistic war on literacy and women’s rights. 

I still do not understand the Democrats of the Hillary Clinton set for having a heart some for a war against the Taliban as a war on literacy and women’s rights while so about such as if all of Iraqi women should be left to suffer further after a similar abandonment by America.

A CRISIS like Sandy has unearthed much and torn asunder and decimated much.  But still this is the very type of CRISIS that this administration has cherished as a political opportunity not to be wasted on their march to secure a socialistic power to a Democrat Party elite few.  I don’t know how President Clinton hasn’t been pushed out by now - almost seems he must have some card files of dirt on his rivals and even his chief rival President Barack Hussein Obama.

Now President Bush is another issue.  He actually had a globally based standard operating procedure that was of his FREEDOM AGENDA and progressive in how compassionate it was while considerable to spreading equal rights more equally.

Now President Bush is particularly of interest about this with a JUDGEMENT DAY about for the Administration of President Obama.  He actually had a harder time making a case for helping those abandoned in Iraq by the Clintons for all of their eight years, and especially all the oppressed Iraqi women because of 9/11/2001.

The Clintons are now more easily drawn out about all this and with it like a:  WE JUST FOUND THE MISSING YEARS 1993-2001! 

Though Newt Gingrich seemed to want to take some to the dark side of the moon in 2012 we know that John F. Kennedy was secretly taping long before Richard M. Nixon.

And well again:  Don’t ask Vice President Joe Biden if Afghanistan is a new Vietnam — He might answer:  Afghanistan is a trillion dollars the Democrats wanted to spend to have a new Vietnam.

And so we have that President Bush had essentially a FREEDOM AGENDA that was standardized and progressive in how compassionate it was, and, that so he nearly had a BUSH DOCTRINE to rival President Monroe’s MONROE DOCTRINE.

And still it seems that neither President Obama nor his Secretary of State have a working first contact plan.  And yet we are just supposed to believe and hope that one of them can have enough personality to make something up that may or may not work - whenever.  I think this may be some of Clint Eastwood’s problem also with Presidents as also lawyers.

And with a JUDGEMENT DAY here for our first AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PRESIDENT and so with the alternative other AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CANDIDATE now his Secretary of State it seems time to grade his editorial recently published with one by Governor Willard Mitt Romney in the Wall Street Journal.  I have to conclude that it lacked any sense of a limiting principle, a waters’ edge or any of our many jurisdictions and so that it didn’t even rate as considerable as a work of a first year law student.  That said it seemed for all the different “we” and “ours” and “yours” or “theys” to be so confused a composition that it could have been the work of a virgin seventh grader unknowing about politics and global affairs.

And election of the America’s Comeback Team now could start a post Obama economic recovery really within a day or two.  But as per Monroes and the Republicans we have that he can rock out a post “Deep Throat” new way with it socialized properly that it has not been that Nixon was guilty but really that the Democrats are at least as guilty.

Willard Mitt Romney may be no Bush - Can he be a Monroe - Need he be?  Need Mitt try?

It seems Clinton’s Blue Dress is the new “Deep Throat” and that the Dems now live as the party that embraced irregularities more.  I have written already with OBAMA’S BLUE DRESS that he didn’t inherit it but that he chose to embrace it.

Tomorrow is a JUDGEMENT DAY for our first AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PRESIDENT — was it too much affirmative action that left him in over his head - if that is how it falls?  Was he innately prepared, actually, but too inclined to be a new like Marie Antoinette?

One after tomorrow will be more on their knees as the loser.  In 2012 only one is likely to be a defeated loser while the other may suffer a loss but not be defeated or moved from their shared goals.

Is home where the heart is?  Or is it as you have been nearly evangelized socialistically these past four years where ever your President can reach you all e like - and in your face NEW NATIONALISTIC like?

Saddam Hussein did reportedly pervert the founding ideology of the original Ba’athist conceptions to be to a ideal United Arab Socialistic State and to grab and hold power for himself and his purposes and with a homage to socialist ideals of the birth of Ba’athism if such was the readiest weapon in his political arsenal.

I don’t know how President Barack Hussein Obama could have embraced either of the Clintons after they were of 8 years of abandonment of Iraqi Shia majority, at least, and many of the lands of Afghanistan.  I do get he has been too clever by half at times with socialistic global “we” or “they” or “our” propaganda.

And with this JUDGEMENT DAY now for him I ask you to help me transition however you all have decided to be more towards a time to reflect and compose about the 90s as THE TERRIBLE 90s and while so about such to be redoubling concerns and efforts to see our Forth Estate is renewed and rebuilt. 

Though I may have suggested much of the strategy to a real challenge to President Obama these many years - I am less of having a horse in this race but my fight to have actual history be taught and preached. 

I get that such is a judgement against President Obama - I though am waiting to discern how you all have spoken and to wondering then to a what next.

And yes I think it is about:  $16,000,000,000,000.00 ++++++ & for the unborn a WELCOME with and UOUS near already a $40,000 per new born as a personal debt theirs.

It seems even if there had been a HUSSEIN COMPACT there still hasn’t been found a way to pay for its costs.

Well maybe I do think it would be insane if President Barack Hussein Obama were to be re-elected.  But that is more for you all to decide and me to consider after the fact as objectively as I might to the highest standards our Forth Estate may yet hold - hold forward.

Comments Off
09/03/12
HUN THE ENABLER
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, 22ND AMENDMENT, TREASON, AFGHANISTAN, #BLACKS, #WHITEPRIDE, #FEMINISM, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 11:24 am

The question of the week may now be:  Can Bill and Hillary defect from the USA to even Russia and not be a threat to Americans or our national security? 

I posit here that the answer has to be “YES”!

It may be too soon to offer that if they defected to Russia it might actually help secure Americans and make us all safer.

That said a cut and run by the Clintons might reinforce a perspective upon them as of a white supremacy.

It is not too soon to profess that their choices for Secreataries of State for the Presidency of the Clintons couldn’t possibly have been more white.   In many ways though it is too late because of such as a realistic historical “perspective.”

It is that William Jefferson Clinton born William Blythe III and to a “never knew my father” but if he shared dreams did go to Oxford and was of a Fulbright.   How did he though choose to be so to more full white and the United Kingdom’s rearing as a white man of the south still of civil rights days of struggles for less fortunate?  Did he want to learn how to be a loyal Southern “gentile” within a royal blessing?  Did he have to go to England to learn how to be more totalitarian and/or autocratic?

Most troubling of the Clintons most white Secretarial postings to State of the Presidency of the Clintons may be how they let official state language be in violation of our 1st Amendment protections at least abroad.  It was official bigotry and bias religious as if an Un-Constitutional establishment respecting religion that best marks their politics and policies as regard Saddam Hussein and Iraq — They governed bigoted and biased so that the USA was of officially preferring Iraqi Sunni or Ba’athists over Iraqi Shia.

The most white they likely could have found as selections for Secretarial leadership to carry the Clintons’ State were poetically poorly chosen unless to be LOUD as of a white supremacy, Christian.   We have that they presented first with a “Warring” like Warren like warring as a “Christ O for” Christopher.   We have then that they proceed maybe even more arrogantly still while officially standing America up as bigots biased against the Shia as inferior people to the Sunni, at least.  We have that after being as white as possible with Warren Christopher in such times of strife and unsettled sanctions they followed up with one more for all madams to be all white like bright - a white like call to their “brightness” as if all bright about all madams and all mad lines.

Regardless of how the white supremacy may have hidden itself as long as Bill Clinton’s classic male chauvinism may have more to do with their earlier days together both studying to be lawyers to get above their times and stay above their times with as much supremacy while white that they could consecrate.

Officially we have we may be safer if the Clintons do defect and even if they defect to Russia.  We are still living with their mistakes and bias and bigotry that violated our 1st Amendment standards - we are still living with a mess from them presenting us all as bigoted and biased against at least the Iraqi Shia as inferior people - as inferior an “incapable of governing themselves”.

It may be a stretch to call the Clintons both “racists” but we cannot now escape the mess they caused being in violation of our 1st Amendment principles as per the Iraqi Shia, at least.  To call the “white supremacists” is not to call them “racists.”  To call them “white supremacists” is to suggest that they wanted to always be supremely over others not them, at least.  I don’t know how or why they could have been to buying a house in DC on a Whitehaven Road or to together having cherished a permanent Library to memorialize them while publicly choosing to let it be phallic and in Confederate Gray.  That it is phallic as a gun or half bridge may be their most honest statement ever for being suggestive that they never meant to consecrate any full bridge about issues of their times.

The only thing that can honestly be said of “it is all Bush’s fault” is limited to an all that of Bush being a road block to attempts to pervert socialist or totalitarian ideals by Dems to get and hold power by a few elite.   I is maybe all Bush’s fault that a spread of SOCIALISM to Americans at home and abroad has been failing.

Yes, it was official language of the Presidency of the Clintons that had the Shia people of a majority in Iraq officially declared so inferior a people based upon “religious” establishments by the Clintons that the most white possible Secretarial selections of the Clintons were regularly of proclamations or declarations like:  THE IRAQI SHIA ARE INCAPABLE OF GOVERNING THEMSELVES.

Yes, we all might be safer without the Clintons - please defect Clintons.  Even, please defect to Russia if they will have you now.

We can see by your very public histories that when your “supremacy” weakened or became challenged or ready for permanent public memorializing you chose or inadvertently showed yourselves to have wanted to be your white selves supremely as long as possible or at least as long as you could legally manage.  

And, it seems that “Bill” to manage to hide his natural dominant desire to remain above feminism as long a his “Hillary” could help him stay her “Russian Bear” in whiteness and with his American chauvinistic charm to here fully enabled and secured.

Comments Off
07/18/12
DAVID OR GOLIATH
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, NEW NATIONALISM
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 6:52 am

President Barack Hussein Obama may be happiest when successful at getting you to think of him as a “David” and not a “Goliath.”

I don’t know how he has managed to still have so many not see him as a “Goliath” and while of these global days much of a new world ordering.  Even our states of our United States are some “Goliaths” more than “Davids.”

Before, long before, Thomas Friedman wrote for his THE WORLD IS FLAT works mine in strategized thinking were wrought towards a sharing and effecting such that an international “more level” playing field could be striped, marked & refereed.  America then was already a “Goliath” yet not so much now as President Obama affects.

We can keep this or at least try to make this an IT’S ALL ABOUT THE ECONOMY - SMARTIES.  We can try to discuss David and Goliath in our time less politically for now.   We should be able to discuss economically enough issues that can be measured and balanced as per global markets now without getting into how our being either now a “David” or “Goliath” is effecting our domestic politics, at least.

If we are now to foreign markets an oppressive “Goliath” just for the size and independent influence of some of our states then how can the collective whole not also now be also an oppressive “Goliath”?

President Barack Hussein Obama still doesn’t seem to get how much was worked to help make the world as we know it as “global” and “international” was long worked to even out the fields of play - the playing fields for fairer economics.

Yes that was meant as an alarming “economic” comment - not as a strictly or mostly “political” comment.

If you are a “David” - where are you? - how are you there?  Is the ground wooded and uneven with an advantage for a giant that Sun Tzu would have seen as sufficient cause to retreat or to battle another day?

It seems it would necessarily be political to discuss President B. H. Obama as a globally “apologetic David” or otherwise as a “apologetic Goliath” - we likely can avoid that for now and focus more specifically on sensitivities of markets - international markets not exclusively, though.

If we are to others of the world now as an Obama Goliath then what might such be begeting?  The Clintons National Security Council official Philip Bobbitt in his TERROR AND CONSENT did document a view that if a governance from Washington be too much of and with Hollywood it has so been known to beget terrorism. 

If we are to others of the world less free, however, now as an Obama Goliath then will they address us, however, as “Davids” in level markets in a global economic or might they think that if Americans persist in presenting itself as an Obama Goliath then it should be met squarely by reorganizations to “Goliaths” of their own, however?

Yes, it seems a fair assessment of our current predicament much still of President Washington’s first words “AMONG the vicissitudes incident to life…” that some of our states are now quite and internationally quite so as “Goliaths” in their own mass and attitude.

If a former Clinton NSC expert can document a concern that a Clinton Administration may have begot terror by governing to close and intimately with Hollywood then therefore now we must be more a “GOLIATH” than the “David” President B. H. Obama would rather be over estimated as.

The trick now for our current problema - our current politics - might be to move to an open and full discussion of a rightness or wrongness about OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM as of “economic” not “political” import.  We have as well the jurisprudence about finally having offered a prosecution of Saddam Hussein and a trial of and by his peers - yet that can be put aside now for a while if to an “economic” give and take more civil now than a “political” bounding might.

As per RACE TO THE TOP messaging of this administration of Barack Hussein Obama - it may be too early and still developmental to separate how such is and has been about the worst political and economic education platform imaginable for these economic and political times.  It may be better to avoid just how bad it is now, and especially now that we are as well of diatribes from on high that one’s success isn’t to be seen as their success.  It may be relevant to our economic problema now and not just theoretically but it may be far too large as a political issue to battle just now.  The two are contrary - quite.

There is more than the workings of the FREEDOM AGENDA to dig up and sift through theoretically to see how mountains were moved in just the past couple decades strategically towards better future with more level playing fields less of “Davids” and “Goliaths” (a Goliath).  We as Americans had our lots suddenly reworked by our times without much premeditation or chance to plan - we as Americans became citizens of a sole super-power more by defense and our times than by a grand plan.

I don’t know if I am being too political or not sufficiently objective economically speaking now with:  President Obama didn’t need to say or be to affectations for a NEW FOUNDATION for global economics. 

I do remember that great efforts had been afoot long and much by “Davids” more of our Republican traditions and affiliations and that maybe they were hard to see or posit - and maybe so for Obama Democrats were off to set themselves off as “friendly giants” yet still as “Goliaths” not “Davids.”

2012 is much about a politics of two very different choices for governance methods and methodologies - 2012 though now is at least as much about choices economic that may be best made however and whenever with a consideration to avoid a tagging or stirring as of a U.S. as a “Goliath” organized to stir others to be “Goliaths” themselves, however, and while they all mostly and much for strictly individual and economic reasons are rather to more peaceful “Davids”.

If there isn’t a sense of justice and a chance for property rights protections and then as well an environment for peace treaties and alliances for security then there hardly be an economic level playing field.  Without the very late prosecution of Saddam Hussein such as it was OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM there wouldn’t have been a chance for our old foundations of justice and economics and especially not for President B. H. Obama’s “NEW FOUNDATION” affectations.

Saddam Hussein was, economically and politically speaking a “Goliath” more than a “David.” 

The USA, with coalition states so involved, towards the long overdue prosecution of Saddam Hussein, at least for his global effrontery to standards of jurisprudence in international commerce among civilized nations, such as his invasion of Kuwait was, is now still more to an economic mash up as a “David” than a “Goliath” as per Saddam Hussein and his effrontery to civilized progress at least for his pillaging of Kuwait in such time specific.

President Barack Hussein Obama while now so contrary betwixt his education message of RACE TO THE TOP and now his most revealing positing that your success isn’t now nor will it ever be actually “your success” is more dangerous for such also contrary to so much leveling progress that economically speaking towards better international free markets that is now still dependent on our specific standing with the Iraqi people - Saddam’s peers - for the still quite late prosecution of Saddam Hussein.

It does seem that though some of our states now internationally can rate as “Goliaths” we have a greater concern about our national politics much effecting our economics now as of their America a “GOLIATH” still though they hope, and hope, their over-reaching at home and abroad can be sold as them though a bully as yes a “friendly giant” - not a “David.”

This could all be moot if we hadn’t finally been to that extremely late judicial prosecution of Saddam Hussein that was and remains some OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM.  We may fight and fight as “Davids” more than a “Goliath” when like with such we are fighting for a more level economics for all where and when an establishment of property rights or a reestablishment is calling.

Comments Off
07/02/12
A DOUBTING PAINE?
Filed under: POLITICS, BENGHAZI, OBAMACARE, #SUSPECT, #MORALS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:32 pm

I could go on here about how as Washington became our first President and with only one of his own teeth left and as an argument against Obamacare.  I am now as July 4, 2012 approaches making my way through our early days while reading Ron Chernow’s WASHINGTON.

I do wonder about all the “Doubting Thomases” about today and whence.  I expect that Doubting Thomases predate Thomas Paine and help so explain his perspective and common sense groundings.

We have ourselves all consecrated as well by President George Washington’s First Inaugural with its “AMONG the vicissitudes incident to life…” and so with that such spoken with such import the suggestion that healthcare was not to be an American Constitutional right.  I have learned from Chernow that George Washington seems to have inherited books about sex from his parents in law.  I learned from reading the First Inaugural of our United States how grounded our first President was to a new land so with a new government and all the ups and downs of its citizens - all the “vicissitudes incident to life…”. 

The best piece I may have yet heard orated (for its irony from the whom orating) about the wisdom of limited terms for Power holding is still possibly one performance by Senator Clinton years ago where though projecting other meanings she did very well celebrate George and Martha’s foundational wisdom.

Oh, and were now to start about the political and common sense governance problems with ACA - Obamacare? — where now to start a full and deep discussion still of vicissitudes incident to life but to the “wisdoms” about shortcomings of Obamacare?

To jump ahead to Abe Lincoln and his COOPER UNION SPEECH?  To try to be of the common sense of George and Martha and how our First President commenced our Union with special oratory to proclaim Martha all the “pecuniary” or “personal emoluments” he needed from his new Country? - to how he pledged fidelity to Martha and in lieu of becoming a tyrant or conqueror taking for himself all he might be able to?

That Bill and Hillary have tried after decades of plotting and scheming to try to work around the wisdom of George and Martha to a taking of more terms for their “two-fer” nearly ‘however’ we may be here more in a down economy because they also took liberties with the wisdoms of Thomas Paine and especially with a looseness for pecuniary responsibility in budgeting as their two trillion cut with that extra trillion to SURPLUS pops up now AMONG the “most likely” and “simplest” explanations and as a most tagable and mashable conceivable to a first couple to a fiduciary “GROSS NEGLIGENCE”!

It was ironic when Senator Hillary Clinton spoke of President Washington to a wisdom in limiting power whence.  It still is, quite.

We have that the economy is suffering from too much “progressivism” and as a new revolution too soon upon an earlier revolution - and by ten years at least so.  We have that much that happened in the early 1990s was revolutionary and necessary as a “NEW WORLD ORDER” was quite a vicissitude itself.  We have that the Clintons inherited a boom time and then with their works developed a instability for our future economics.  We have that the very Clinton economic “experts” more then free riders on a boom economic inheritance for their inability to effect a repeat boom economic are now too suspect - we have that we should be doubting the “experts” of the Obama economy especially for being the “exerts” of the Clintons and now specifically for a failure to repeat a performance that as “experts” should have been a home run guaranteed.

We have as I above mentioned that we can look at our down economy as the fault mostly of the Clintons or at least their “experts” and much for an excess of progressive or liberal policies pushed and pimped out unsynchronized in a haphazard over reaching careless much for it of attempts to do too much at once.

We have President George Washington’s lead still to follow.  We have the attempts by the Clintons’ “two-fer” to work and exceeding proposition against the charm and democratic distinction of George and Martha now still much as a real concern.

We have that the speech I remember by Senator Hillary Clinton may be the first piece I would look for to show others an argument orated best to guard and protect our Constitutional wisdoms embodied for us by George and Martha as a check and balance ding ding ding alarmism to forewarn but maybe too late of a subversion and extra Constitutional wanting of and by the Clintons.

As we look now to understand the ARAB SPRING we have that the Bush FREEDOM AGENDA better explains how America didn’t get caught on the wrong side of it with much still to be shamed and guilted about related to an abandonment of Afghani and Iraqi peoples (during the Clintons’ years).

That said America would be better to recognize that the Obama administration has been with Clintons described by their Brookings experts at least as having been surprised and not prepared for the economy nor for the ARAB SPRING.  We have that we have an administration now that seems to have sought office expecting one thing and maybe offering ideology for a new governance potentially then acceptable that but for the surprises they have been documented now as unprepared for now a sore subject since it seems what they planned for stopped long ago being appropriate or at least considered enough.

We have us as a nation that until the Obama administration could still be said to have quite nearly only waged defensive wars.  With this administration and it so to offensive warring we have that a national healthcare morality financially in a governance wisdom and prudence therefore seems best left to our states and not moved to our State.  We have that if to offensive warring so we should avoid a national healthcare morality commitment so as not to then become beholden to all the peoples of any foreign state we may be in with enough force to effect and occupation - enough say as proven to be about 150,000 troops.

Our states and the National Guard units are most considerable in these times for never maybe has each state had so many ready and salted with sands of time experience to a state power from an armed and ready citizen guard all COMBAT READY.

It seems with our current vicissitudes incident to our times we have that besides neighbors still being best to care for neighbors and with neighbors that are doctors or healthcare professionals of a community known for the others of their neighborhoods and streets it is a moral danger to suggest or consecrate that if America is in control then all controlled by the United States therefore are due the same healthcare provisions and to a matching level of care, especially as we are in odd new times with a young administration quite a first for offensive foreign operations more of choice than necessity.

Whose pain is your pain?  Is our Paine your “common sense” too - or also did it just used to be?

Would a good Samaritan under a kept Obamacare become a traitor to his State if again to good Samaritan deeds?

Comments Off