How pleasant an American political consideration is it that any HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT caressing is firstly and primarily trenchant of her in the corner of hedge fund managers and trial lawyers?
There must be only one Hillary Clinton - what pray worked to moderate a true jeopardy of the Clintons when spotlighted of MONICA BEACH isn’t “campaign” stock. Hillary Clinton can not be in defense of/for herself Presidentially as if “is Mrs. Clinton” and “isn’t Mrs. Clinton.”
The charm of Hillary Clinton is much in a well worn highly maintained suggestion of innocence - a presumption maintained somehow much of only an innocence.
An essential Clinton campaign fashioning must need be in a flattering defensive offensive. Any “REAL” Mrs. Clinton exposing likely of a rawness - a heaviness. An essential politically fitting caricature of Hillary Clinton seems justified if of showing herself of a struggle at/for any dashing — she rightly has a ball and chain braced to each of her ankles to a public eye - a critical minds eye respecting just admitted as yet culpabilities.
A charm and polish of Mrs. Clinton is too frayed and tarnished for her not now to have one ball and chain rightly fashioned for her personal absence of timely styling for prudent guidance and duty of her Odysseus pride — her pride has been set asunder in the public eye, however she may yet be of a personal and political denial. She is fixated upon the public conscience of her Odysseus dawning pride of more than character assassination in Libya. She is fit for a Benghazi 10 pounds of cold steel of an anklet with matching chain attachments in pillorying Hillary Clinton by at least an apparition of justice rendered with a ball and chain. She is admitted of a culpability for such cold steel fashioning.
A charm and polish of Mrs. Clinton is too frayed and tarnished fro her as well of her first ball and chain - her Bill Clinton - her Clyde to her Bonnie - her intimate partner President William Jefferson Clinton. She is so intimate in the matters of the Presidency theirs that it seems inappropriate to allow her a degrading of all other First Ladies of a suggestion that she too hasn’t already broken the greatest said “glass ceiling” of the Clintons’ BOGO plotting. Their intimacy begiles so much of how it should be considerate much for such as their old and compromised “two-fer”, as it be, and so established/proven, that she - Mrs. Clinton - may be justified to a public modeling more transparently truthful as with this ball so of marriage soul due a re-fitting with a rendering so heavy of a ball and chain and anklet respective of their political culpabilities.
How politically dashing can Hillary Clinton, however - however historically - now manage to be?
Whom cannot now bare witness to a real difficulty to hedge and/or defend Mrs. Clinton if she/they soon by free will are to toeing in a start for such as a long and most public trial of all things Clintons now as a re-opening of all things Clintons especially since 1993? And, if the Clinton BOGO “two-fer” doesn’t shelve 2016 itself?
She is well fashioned forward in a difficulty to any dashing as she herself is due at least transparent apparitions of her with two balls so chained such that firstly and primarily she as if pilloried for travels in a need to like pick up two 5-10 pound steel balls and carry likely near her bosom if to manage any more modern justified styling of/as “dashing”!
It isn’t really pleasant at all how we are all due an un-hedged ghosting about her Odysseus like Benghazi dawning originality.
To what or whom may yet be of Barack Obama coat tails it seems Mrs. Clinton is stuck as to being whipped up for trial lawyers more than they may yet be prudent/affording if of an exposure of a toeing the lines in defense of her.
Any due critique of a soon maybe justified opening and re-opening of all things Clintons and too of all things of the Clintons’ Administration will likely leave too little for the public imagination and consumption for hedgers or pal’d trial lawyers to yet much defend, and/or hide.
The Clintons have put themselves in jeopardy quite of the foreign and domestic. Any official entrance as if self selecting to 2016 again as a like clean slate start need be now to a new transparency fitting for such a public trial. Any official step past just teasing with a toeing of the 2016 Presidential campaign lines may yet render them safer from sedition charges but possibly though yet net otherwise albeit without trimming or thinning down what seems a real jeopardy - even maybe a clear, present and too certain global jeopardy.
Can you proffer a defense for Mrs. Clinton now to a charge due if so afoot officially past a Presidential teasing for 2016 and as if for an effective whitewashing about any “Justice” for Mrs. Clinton just for starters to hide further tarring culpability from a re-heating of all things Clintons specifically in a forensics for a believable pathology that now can yet explain what “all Bush’s fault” has proven to fail at explaining?
Can you now proffer or just posit any defense for the Clintons to a due charge that they for all the years of the Clintons’ 90s administering and such of the new millennium the Clintons in a selfish spousal political styling did arguably put their plans for a HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT and to a fig’n for a political A.S.A.P. ahead of their sworn duties in the charges of their Presidency?
If a defense of Hillary Clinton is even possible it now though must be vacant of assertions that the Clintons are pre-cleared for 2016. The Clintons have put themselves in a to be determined original jeopardy by way of one and now both of their Clinton Global Initiatives. The Clintons otherwise are of the People of a jurisdiction to an new “all things Clinton” just now as Justice still calling as a ravenous upon Mrs. Clinton and her Benghazi open door just now trimmed as yet with a primary culpability.