hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
June 2018
S M T W T F S
« May    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
04/01/12
WHO SHILLED THE MOCKINGBIRD
Filed under: POLITICS, IRAQ, 22ND AMENDMENT, IRAN, #KERRY, #BLAME, COVER UPS, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 7:29 am

As we wait with baited breaths for the decision of the century screen doors may already be slamming open and shut - almost shut.

Can it all turn us back to a reasoned Constitutionalism just for some one being too “leftie”?

The Clintons make simple piece work for trial lawyers - pity the fools?

How are we all now here?

We are of a complicated time of contrariness and not even much whispered rebelliousness.

President Obama once was a Constitutional Law professor.

President Obama studied law and our Constitution at Harvard Law School.

Both of the Clinton “two-fer” studied at Yale Law School.

Both the Clintons and Barack Obama have been rebelling from our Constitutional.

How are we all here now?

Can our “main stream media” learn to cover a new federalism?

Can our MSM learn to treat our Governors and state legs with equal rights - their full rights?

Can the Clintons and Barack Obama manage if MSM now work to cover states’ greater rights?

So gauche were and are Bill Clinton and Barack Obama - yet so too George H. W. Bush, it seems.

I don’t know the critical handing of Hillary Clinton - I do know she may have guilt.

On the one hand we have “Bill” & “Hillary” of fame for not spending.

On the other hand we have “Bill” & “Hillary” & “Barack” of excessive spending.

It does seem gauche that Clintons can be popular for crash and unnecessary cutting of near a trillion.

It does seem gauche that Clintons now can be offensive with spend, spend, spend & not defensive.

Our Supreme Court Justices are at risk of a “Political” ruling if to an upholding vote for ACA.

ACA use of “affordable” near as bad yet maybe worse than “Hillary’s” use of “universal”.

President Barack Hussein Obama is still wrong about spending for Iraq.  And so too the Clintons.

The Clintons as per Iraq had been their 8 to official biased and bigoted religion based foreign policy.

The Clintons have guilt - they as well shouldn’t be of offensive spending without also being defensive.

We didn’t need the Clintons’ SUPRLUS of trillion of rash defunding - how can they say spend now?

Because we haven’t heard the Clintons did it - they may be the only ones left not yet found innocent.

Before the Presidency of the Clintons Iraq and Iran had been of a Cold War geopolitics.

During the Presidency of the Clintons our foreign policy as per Iraq and Iran became “religious” and bigoted.

We have that President Barack Hussein Obama has been a shill for the Clintons - to quite a cover-up defense.

We have that President Barack Hussein Obama has been a shill for Clintons more than they shills for him.

After the Persian Gulf War Clintons should have avoided foreign policy bias bigoted against Shia.

The Clintons’ Presidency wasn’t well reasoned or Constitutionally balanced. 

The Obama Presidency isn’t defensive enough for its offensive spending and offensive defense of Clintons.

Where is Senator John Kerry when a real anti-war movement seems now deserved and calling?

It is offensive that the Clintons can be innocent with spend, spend, spend now while of rash defunding to Trillion surplus!

If we have “Bill” shill for “Hill” and “Hill” shill for PBO & PBO shill for “Bill” and “Hill” while “Hill” a shill for “Bill” - OH MY!

How are we all here now?

How are we to an entire party to such now a case of Un-Constitutional governance?

If President Barack Hussein Obama just to sworn “best of my ability…” is it Harvard’s Law School at fault?

As per the Clintons I have known “Bill” as a liar since he was a Yale Law student - Not sure Yale at fault.

As per Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton I remember she is whom’s face “Bill” lie to.

I am not sure Yale Law School can be blamed for the greasy watermelons that are these Clintons.

How are we all here now?

I know law student “Bill” lied to “Hillary” while walking & talking & polling law students - they polled me.

I know for he lied to her about what my honest answer so requested was amended to when they added without consideration to their polled question the complication that they were then of asking if they could both become president someday actually otherwise than first asked as if of two equal Yale Law Students with independent futures.  I know for when they changed the question of their polling about whether they could both become president some day my answer did change to amend answer to their conclusion as per their poll response as if it had been to a different question — I know for when they changed nature of question with “Hillary” then of response to my first answer with “then I will marry you” my answer changed for they hadn’t asked me if they could both become President if they married each other and became a united “one”.  I know this and know specifically that Yale Law School not as responsible for “Bill” as a liar and of that day for moving to lie to “Hillary” with his first words after her “then I will marry you” to a lying about my amended answer she hadn’t heard and then had been to asking him “what did he say” to such from “Bill” a lie about what I said.  If you think it odd I took to an appreciation of our 22nd Amendment you should realize most of this happened because of the Clintons then polling me as like a “charming boy at play in the school yard” and then years remembering me as like a talisman to their over-reaching plotting and ambitions - still as like “that charming young boy” once playing after hours alone in the school yard in a neighborhood known to be a New Haven professionals neighborhood much populated by lawyers and law professors and many professors from other departments at Yale.

How did we get here now?

And really it ridiculous that the Clintons of their trillion in defunding can present as right with spend, spend, spend now!

Nine?  Can we get ruling of nine justices against ACA - for otherwise justices are as political activism shilling for Dems?

Are we all at least agreed that they took an oath of office to treat the Constitution as our rules of their gaminess?

Comments are closed.