Are you willing to risk going to prison for a support of the selfish political ambition of the Clinton “two-fer”?
This is not as simple as a Senate race say in Massachusetts in the Year of our Lord two thousand ten & Three as it is that the Clinton “two-fer” is setting up a running operatic touring too globally and too much of a trichotomy of two.
It seems we have that the United States Tax authority of the IRS has a 501(c)(4) tax exempt status that many if not all can well use to educate against such a soapy operatic Clintonesque (sedition) without it technically being “political” to organize against the politics of the Clinton “two-fer.”
Though it seems it may be a Moulin Rouge tease the Clinton “two-fer” is working to paste on and billboard out they may be obviously trite yet too operatic and Chicago!
Massachusetts may now be especially set to be wary long before it chimes a time of being able to see the whites of the Clinton “two-fer” eyes. I am not sure little #Mass has the ammo yet to stand a long (seditious) assault from an already too globally (seditious) modern political Bonnie and Clyde - the Clinton “two-fer.”
There are some simple Constitutional lessons to be whispered, chatted up and generally broadcast for a social welfare timely pamphleting new era of civic engagement likely all the way until 2016 even if the Clinton “two-fer” doesn’t survive public scrutiny past 2013.
To speak to a too soap opera shallowness of just one of the Clinton “two-fer” trichotomy of two it helps to compare Democrat past Presidents; It is helpful and instructive (even for Massachusetts) to now compare and contrast President Carter and President Clinton. I am not suggesting there is any comparison to make between these two as to variants in and of a sedition by each; Jimmy Carter, Former President, spoke eloquently recently at the opening of the Presidential Library for President George W. Bush.
Democrats and Republicans of at least Massachusetts can all be patriots in a fair and simple political consideration of President Carter’s special remarks orated honorably at the dedication of the Bush Library.
It is remarkable for its historical significance and its political illumination how President Carter stood up proudly as a Democrat and with dignity told the world how he was able in just the first days of the administration of President George W. Bush to get the new President to do more for Africa than the Clinton “two-fer” had been willing to do in all of their eight years.
There are trying character traits established in the entrenched personality of “Bill Clinton” quite now again at least arguably as near of a sedition as when the Clinton “two-fer” in the early months of the administration of “43″ seemed to have been of effectings too much of efforts arguably as if they were trying to hold onto executive Power though no longer the First Couple and regardless of their status as “term limited.”
Yes we have a special right in America as per our Constitution and especially specifically per our 22nd Amendment to warn people that there is a chance still that they may be at risk of prosecution for sedition at least for any past or future support of the Clintons. It may be legally mostly limited to any support of any past organizing for a “Hillary for President” “movement” but then it may be beyond “sedition” and to a Constitutional allowance that such may be “criminal” or “Un-Constitutional” if not “treasonous.”
The technicalities that now allow for a 501(c)(4) Tax Status to be 90% to 100% engaged in Social Welfare mass messaging to confront the plots of the Clinton “two-fer” with education and public discourse it of such as a Constitutional right to say all of the above specifically of the Clinton “two-fer” as long at least as the 22nd Amendment remains undecided law.
As long as the 22nd Amendment sits in our Constitution as yet undecided law as written and ratified by efforts of the Eightieth Congress so fresh with concerns and lesson of the Power sharing of Franklin and Eleanor every citizen of the United States of America has a Constitutional right and maybe duty to proffer an oration or quiet discoursing that all are free still to tag the Clinton “two-fer” of the already existent record of “Hillary for President” and now for any continuation or refreshing so as it as chargeable as “criminal” for “Un-Constitutional” and maybe actually of a treasonous politics quite now too soapy and operatic in a seditiousness.
What few in the United States of America and fewer even in Boston or Cambridge have yet discussed is how it was maybe a worked and effecting sedition by the Clinton “two-fer” as of premature vocalizations and postures to a planned “Hillary for President” that had new President Bush “43″ in his first year of a government seeming unresponsive as if oddly responsive to extra-Constitutional influencing of and by Clinton “two-fer” while no longer legally of executive Powers then yet were meddling globally like with.
If they succeed in selling their (seditious) selfish political ambitions now as they seem to be proceeding as if a clever soap opera chimed to be like a Moulin Rouge looseness more may be technically legally at risk and prostrate to our allowances for Supreme rending of justice as a now late establishment of meaning of our 22nd Amendment can permit.
It is something the Supreme Court can now preface while about the Same Sex Marriage and DOMA cases as it is those are asking the SCOTUS honorable to render and broad and general understanding that marriage should be inseparable legally and not divisible from any set per their sexual preferences. This might be a precedence to allow polygamy by such logic but it as per the Clinton “two-fer” and the 22nd Amendment would be inconvenient as it would be to rendering their “separability” toward four co-Presidencies as Un-Consitutional while establishing a respect for equality and indivisibility of a soul of a marriage union as paramount and equal for all regardless, again, as per a couples’ sexual preferences.
Now there are problems with the current cases so before the Supreme Court as there are assertions that a class of people arguably a social set while some a natural set can have rights for all established as if all of such set were of it as a set as a legal and established natural set.
The Clintons do want their marriage union to be divisible and their law degrees and “professional” status (however now or again of disbarment) to allow the laws of union of souls to one in marriage to have like a Descartean separability to conveniently allow a legal trichotomy of two towards four co-Presidencies of the Clinton “two-fer.”
Be forewarned! You may already be at risk of a Constitutional prosecution for past naive following and associating with the Clinton “two-fer” at least as per “Hillary For President” as already of our many carefully kept and secured records. You may be in further jeopardy if you now step out with them and their (seditious) plotting even maybe if you add a follow to either @BillClinton or @HillaryClinton; the laws yet concerning any jeopardy are quite now still TBD.
Massachusetts I am concerned for you all and your general welfare now at risk again with a Senate seat contest and especially since you last elected a bankruptcy law professor who (as loyal to the Clinton “two-fer”) was amiss in judgement and practice for not herself educating you all (in a Social Welfare) to the histories of how the Democrats did set up and then trigger the economic collapse long so spun as like a new convenient Great Depression. I don’t know that I have time now to help you with Social Welfare messaging specifically as per your current predicaments; I proffer it may be wise to remember that President Carter so as he spoke in dedication of the Bush Library was to admonishing the Clinton “two-fer” with his rendering of history as to how President George W. Bush was willing to do more for Africa in his first days than the Clintons had been for their eight years.
Hard to say; It is that as long as our 22nd Amendment is undecided law and seems clearly of a time and an import of original intent to have barred President Franklin Delano Roosevelt from keeping any iron grip on executive power even if by a loophole logic practiced as if coyly and soapily by an appearance of running to return again but as by a “two-fer” electing by that of the spouses proper name. It actually seems ridiculous to consider that we have an Amendment than can be judged to be a non-law Amending if it allows a return of a spouse to some or much “holding” of “office” by the election of a spouse that marriage laws allow a full holding of to a holding that then again would be another “co-holding.”
A 501(c)(4) status may be right now for everyone whom feels a Constitutional defense is necessary and as that as long as our 22nd Amendment is undecided law every citizen is at least allowed to charge the Clinton “two-fer” at least for any or all “Hillary For President” organizing as if “criminal” in an “Un-Constitutional” treasonousness maybe as well of years of inappropriate to extra-Constitutional global (seditious) meddling.
I can not legally speak to what jeopardy any may now actually be considerate of already for any prosecution as per these rights and seeming prima facia violations.