*So how can we discuss “bite” in sanctions on Iran if we aren’t discussing and emphasizing that United Nations sanctions on Saddam’s Iraq should have only have been given 3-4 years for full compliance? How can we now so but without very publicly discussing how we should now to at least be claiming we should have been to so prosecuting Saddam Hussein within the Clintons’ first term?
*Well as per Trayvon comments by Pres O about “if I had a son he would look like him” it seems that he spoke inaccurately — I do believe he might have had a son or daughter that would maybe have looked white or at least Hispanic. I am commenting here on this in part because Bill Clinton hasn’t seemed to want to shake or give up the mantle of “First Black President” even for President Obama.
*To cover 2012 Romney vs. Obama race as if against Obama but Clintons would have been better is to play to racism and sexism - There seems no basis or rationale to suggest that Hillary though white and a woman would have been any better than first black President Obama. We have that most of what we find disagreeable about our first black President isn’t his high popularity for good personality but everything else more accurately about Washington Democrats and first white woman Speaker Pelosi governance and spinning.
*We have learned since Odyssey Dawn that Dems are now supportive of such idea that help from American and coalition countries can be with a compensation from people being “liberated” not “occupied” - right?
*It may have been better to be foggy on WMD with Saddam Hussein per cause and selling of war just for it helped assure that our efforts couldn’t be and wouldn’t be seen otherwise as if of “Holy War” bias following on Clintons’ years of becoming of un-American establishment of religion foreign politics and policies with religion and sect based bias new where old Cold War geo-politics had been otherwise long economic or Cold War-ish. The Clintons’ were wrong to be biased and bigoted much of their 8 years with pro-Sunni anti Shia “official” speak and policies. It was the Clintons who governed with this an American establishment to their avoidance and inaction: Iraqi Shia are incapable of governing themselves.
*If Madam Sec of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton shows strategizing to being next Dem Pres we are likely to have 2012 of the year we discuss how bad the Clintons actually were and how it is surprising they are both not guests of Gitmo already? We cannot see race against Obama with it also about Clintons even if only of the Clintons having been “A Couple of No - actually” and saboteurs of Obama admin since they most have been withholding advice and efforts to be separable and different from our first black President?
*You do get that if Saddam Hussein hadn’t gone into Kuwait they may never have been an Al Qaeda so organized to be reactive to Saddam Hussein and then America?
*I do believe WMD prefacing was important to giving Saddam Hussein a way out and to prepare America and Coalition states and their forces for what could be a soon upon us worse case scenario if Saddam Hussein failed to fully comply cooperatively. I do acknowledge we shouldn’t have given Saddam Hussein more than 3-4 years to comply and so that we should have had this discussion within the first term of the Clintons’ admin.
*Remember it was the spending side of Clintons’ Surplus that got us into much of this mess - and how Speaker Pelosi held such inviolate when President Bush was looking for ways to fix growing mess in time. There is little or nothing moral in the Clintons’ Surplus that took their cutting to near two trillion and at a time two trillion was available and otherwise budgeted. If you see a run down school or old school books - thank the Clintons - If you see a bad road or bridge - thank the Clintons.
*Because of the CLINTONS’ TRILLION cutting of two trillion - the BUSH TAX CUTS would have been just fine if 9/11 hadn’t been an actual inheritance left the President after the Clintons “two-fer” foreign and domestic administered meddling - well except how that it likely could have been the Al Gore Tax Cuts - since Clintons’ Surplus did justify them.
*The biggest problem with THE BUSH TAX CUTS is that they were justified by the Clintons’ SURPLUS - the moral was put into them by the two trillion the Clintons cut out of government spending all the while schools went needing and even bridges on or near condemned list were left otherwise unfunded “morally” and to attempts to “repair” too late what needed to be replaced.
*I know Pres Clinton set this mess up - do you? I know political trillion surplus unnecessary and shouldn’t have coexisted with his desire to have a housing boom economy with hyper consumerism. I know he willfully burned the economic candle from both ends at once to chase rare political popularity. I also get that without AL GORE GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM the spike in gas prices might not have been as bad and sudden and so this mess that Pres Clinton set up might have been more manageable while about an attempt to fix it. I did advise Pres Bush not to try to fix it and to just work to postpone what seemed a coming crash, and as long as he could so as not to also lose Iraq and other critical battles by trying to fix an impossible economic set-up. Bush never would have been allowed to fix it anyway since to fix it he would have had to demonstrate just how wrong and bad Clintonomics had been and by finding a way to counter Speaker Pelosi pride in Clintons’ surpluses and all its spending cuts - its spending side.
*We can say that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s “DIPLOMACY” has been so questionable that she could be called a Secretary of War - we can say that and now worry about her attempts to global over-reaching with something cleverly called “JOBS DIPLOMACY”.
*WHO’S TO BLAME FOR THIS “RECOVERY” — HILLARY WHOM IF ELECTED WOULD HAVE USED NEAR EXACTLY THE SAME “ECONOMIC TEAM” OF HAS BEENS FROM HER HUSBAND’S TIME AS NAMED HOLDER OF OFFICE WHILE SHE A HOLDER OF OFFICE TOO THERE AS WELL BY ELECTION AS “A HOLDER” OF NAMED HOLDER? OR PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA WHO DIDN’T KNOW BETTER THAN TO USE THE SAME TEAM OF CLINTON HAS BEENS AS THE CLINTONS WOULD HAVE USED THEMSELVES? HMMM?