hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
October 2018
S M T W T F S
« Sep    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
10/27/13
OCTOBER SURPRISE
Filed under: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, IRAQ, BENGHAZI, TWO HISTORIES, #MORALS, #AUSTERITY, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 3:11 pm

A cardinal rule , for an Arab Spring political era,  may be in the MTA taxing tune of the Kingston Trio.

Who yet can even afford, under President Barack Obama’s SCORCHED EARTH GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM and his New Deal Austerity, even a nickle in fare increase.  At two rides a day in old Boston times that could be a nickle times five hundred or a dimed calculus by an average annum of 250 rides if only of a ride to a job a day and a return fare.  In today’s money that even may have proven to be an obstacle and unfair a fare.

The Clintons may have put themselves legally in the reach and mission of the International Criminal Courts - its jurisdiction.  They now either with their Clintons’ Global Initiatives have to be of their “progressiveness” to being within the reach of the international long arms of a more global Law or be firmly of just the House of a jurisdiction to at least annually fully audit all monies and emoluments however flowing of or through the Clintons and their foundations.

How much DANGER! - ECONOMIC DANGER! - is afoot in local and state Democrats running on raising taxes on the “rich”?  What is a moral “work” and how are Democrats politically self immolating publicly this October by igniting propaganda that tags Republicans, and to being stuck now as if only in amoral “work”?

It is not a SURPRISE that Democrats did cause the housing collapse and have been long instrumental in a suppression by Government of heavy hands.  It shouldn’t be a political or economic surprise if economies contract or just slow again if local and state Democrat Party candidates run on higher taxes, win, and then effect higher taxation.

The ECONOMIC SURPRISE  is that local and state Republican candidates should be running on higher taxes on the “rich”, and, Republicans could win and be to raising taxes without an amoral “work” economic suppression paradigm affected.   It is a conundrum similar to the contra-indicative histories of the Clintons.  Former Senator George J. Mitchell proved a man and statesman of his times with his Northern Ireland tuned empathy and Diplomacy.  President William J. Clinton however showed such a lack of understanding about conflicts, it seems, like in Northern Ireland between religious sects of Christianity, in his general political practice — President Clinton’s Iraq and Middle East histories demonstrate no core to discern as of a prudent common core or common standard as a universal operating methodology for even similar conflicts.

We cannot now this late in October of the Year of the Founder’s Lord two thousand Ten and three be to ignoring a relevance for GUILT in politics and economics, and we shouldn’t forget to account for risks if and to a persistence in falsity and improper historical tagging.

We may need to broach a political psycho-babble to excuse the Clintons for their histories so contradicting and lacking in a standard.  The Clintons’ Iraq policies show them naturally more of a politics to spark sectarian unrest - not to mitigate & ease peoples from such.

President William J. Clinton is no Senatory George J. Mitchell — Time that has passed has seemed to etch this forever to still a ponderous querious for those about and considerate for all ages to come.  It may now be that many are being asked to consider that Mrs. William J. Clinton isn’t now even quite a measurable talent as Governor Jerry Brown.  Politics is supposed to always mostly be local — The Clintons seem to long have found this inconvenient and to be avoided.  But this is less about the Clintons per say than about TAXES by whomever, and how different they can and might be if so eitherwise.

There is in the down economies a Clinton PATHOLOGY of FORENSIC NEGLIGENCE that will rear and ghost if Democrats  now raise taxes under a banner in a HISTORY of the Clintons, otherwise.  Again this is supposed to be more now of clear and maybe certain dangers lurking in any local or state based hiking of taxes.

President Barack H. Obama has proceeded much as if the Clintons would have if Mrs. William J. Clinton had won and been allowed to take the oath of office of the President of The United States of America.  A win whence or ever for the Clintons has to be contested and ruled upon by the Supreme Court for the 22nd Amendment is still yet undecided but relevant Law.  And with that said back to the more taxing side of this as more about President Obama and local and state Democrats though as economically related to a psycho-babble of the Clintons, forever.  President Obama has basically proceeded enough just as the Clintons would have and quite with the very same people as supposed “experts” as they would have, and but with himself without it all personally necessary in a defensive politics.

President Obama has made it economically as DANGEROUS as just a nickle fare increase was sung  as for Boston.  The economy may not be able to return.

A cardinal rule is much that what should be is what is — that the still propagandized GREATNESS for Clintons and for a presumption of innocence, is, by far, amassed with too many irreversible LIES.

Whether Republican or Democrat it may now only be economically SAFE for Republicans to campaign for and then to effect due higher local and state taxes on the RICH. 

Republicans can be of an oddly CAPITALISTIC MORALITY with new and higher TAXES as necessary to fix the too SOCIALISTIC mess caused by President Obama quite exactly as the Clintons too eitherwise.  If Democrats promise to locally now raise taxes on the rich they will do great DAMAGE to any economic growth potential.  President Obama made what had been BOOMS from RICH at God’s “work” of an industriousness in believing themselves morally engaged otherwise to Republicans if working then only at amoral “work.”  Seems!

The only way to raise taxes now at local and state levels seems to be if only such is justified in a correctional for all the DAMAGE done by the Clintons and Democrats generally GLOBALLY and LOCALLY.  And as of an HOWEVER rather to a not so - NOT IF BY THE REPUBLICANS.  In such is also the simple economics and psycho-babble of these down times more of RICH as having done what Democrats told them to do as of the Obama Administration and generally too the too NATIONALISTIC Democrats with their SCORCHED EARTH GLOBAL WARMING ALARMIST POLITICS.  It is that these economic times have been of the Republican much of having done the NEW MORAL with all the Democrats calls and dictates to personal sacrifice inherent in President Barack H. Obama’s NEW DEAL AUSTERITY era.

New taxes are likely now necessary and justified if local and state bases on wealth and/or property assessment - not though if now so further on the industriousness and nationally exposed income and profits of the People of the Constituted by the Constitution of The United States of America.

Republicans can be MORAL and CAPITALISTIC now with such for an increase in local and state revenues for such may be correctional to the troubles from CLINTONOMICS and OBAMANOMICS and the long to be debated and criticized bailing out of the BIG BANKS without at least an issuance of cash stipends directly to the too many stuck on fixed incomes as the Democrats marched and marched to their ill reasoned and too little considered new much higher GREEN ENERGY gas prices and so as of them to a new era of a too POLITICAL ECONOMICS.  The People were trampled and tread upon unjustly and now it seems only the Republicans are capable of unifying enough to a workable solve to move all forward to growth again.  New higher taxes on the RICH can be MORAL and CAPITALISTIC now if by Republicans in a CORRECTIONAL for as all the 2012 GOP Presidential field declared:  The Government cause this economic slide.  It seems it only now time for the Democrats to be guarded from tax increasing and Republican necessarily to such if at local and state levels to correct for the TARP and such as too HEAVY for the BANKS while the People were due at least cost of living increases in the form of cash stipends to be able to afford while on their known fixed incomes all the new and higher costs of the Democrats politicized GREEN economics.

Republicans can be MORAL and CAPITALISTIC now with such and while they should be sufficiently able to explain clearly in common lay and more legal terminologies how it is that the Democrats caused this MESS and its SHRINKAGE in the “MIDDLE CLASS” and, and some too with their being as so NOT BEING REALISTIC.  The Democrats seemed to not have calculated that the RICH would do as the President said.  The Democrats seemed to not have calculated that the Republicans would do as the President dictated and not be as otherwise still of an immoral and in a persistence expected at being so IMMORAL. It seems the Democrats expected the Republicans to keep doing all that he said was bad and to not be to doing as he said and be of such as if it were actually a NEW MORAL.

I really don’t know if all this can be a “CARDINAL RULE” as an “OCTOBER SURPRISE” even for “BOSTON” and the lessons of the taxing tune of THE KINGSTON TRIO as to what could be too much an obstruction as per any fare.

President Obama and his band of merry too nationalistic Democrats have proven their tunes to be of them synchronized, however, as dividers more than uniters.  The Democrats should avoid raising new taxes, at least alone, as they are viscerally too much to Republicans as of a pathology as DIVIDERS - NOT UNITERS.  Local and state Democrats if so of taxing will it seems only increase the DIVIDE - not UNIFY.

This OCTOBER is should not be any surprise that the Clintons are HEAVY and quite politically at risk, and even now for possibly having put themselves and their “global” “initiatives” in the reach of the “progressive” long arms even of the International criminal courts.  The Clintons have put themselves in JEOPARDY globally and locally - long live their “progressiveness” as per JUSTICE?

Comments are closed.