hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
June 2018
S M T W T F S
« May    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
11/06/13
OPPOSITE ENDS
Filed under: POLITICS, #NEW_YORK, #AUSTERITY, COVER UPS, SANS SCRIPTS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 2:59 pm

Sometimes politics can and does offer up an indefensible.

Is it of adage “LOCATION - LOCATION - LOCATION”  that now past election day 2013 has us wise to consider if term “progressive” is a dirty word locally and globally - just nationally - or otherwise if just poignant in a locally or globally?

In modern day America the political set up seems with all education of “RACE TO THE TOP” at the presidency of the “TOP” and say a mayorship, even of New York City, as more a “rock bottom.”  There yet is the most odd outlier of the Clintons for they seem more nationless and of posturing as if the first First Couple in a “GLOBAL” as if there is a Presidency of the World.

Besides it  seeming that the Clintons are of a nowhere land in the established and writ governings - they are less than an old “RED SCARE.”  They may be now indefensible and yet not even of a modern “RED SCARE.”  So much has been leaked about the secrets of the USA, at least since they were in offices, however, that they likely now could defect to the Russian Federation and by so doing actually leave us and render US technically safer.  The Clintons’ departures as they were of such controversies should have been matched with a closing of ranks and whatever open programs they could have had any privileged knowledge, however of a working intelligence - yet of still.  If the Government of The United States of America has been working then the Clintons should now not be eitherwise in “Bill” or “Hillary” of any special Government Powers.

Mayor elect Bill de Blasio of the five boroughs of New York City is a most intriguing break out modern politician.  He may now be set so in a political location more “rock bottom” and opposite the President Obama’s “TOP.”  The promise, it seems,  of a new urban “progressive” politics for NYC also theoretically  seems in conflict with “TOP” of President Obama while set so of and in his new nationalism.  It seems that when Mayor officially sworn Bill de Blasio must be to at least opposing opposite ends with the President.

Politics is tricky business near everywhere - it is considerable that either or both of Clintons could also defect to the Russian Federation and have us not any more yet at a greater risk.  A case in point specific to them of any lasting relevance is that of the story of Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York State.   Governor Cuomo was a top expert of the Clintons’ administration and yet when he ran for governor and had to find a way to govern he had to change.  The case of New York State is much that Governor Cuomo had to unlearn/throw out near all his “Clintons’” expertise, basically, to find a new way forward while of duties at fixing much that became problematic by ways of the Clintons’ governance.

I do hope that when sworn in that the new Mayor of New York City Bill de Blasio will put out a recommended reading list of 3-7 books.  I do hope for at least 3 book recommendations to be said of an informative to/for his “progressive” and how it is or is not in rivalry to the top heavy new nationalism New Deal austerity of the now Clintons free Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama.

The Clintons now may be quite politically indefensible where ever they may be actually located.  Not even the best trial lawyers should be able to fix the failed and still failing generous cover-up attempts for them by President Obama, and how since so of affectings as early as he was first sworn and to words so engaged in his first inaugural. For 3-4 lawyers between them it is remarkable these present and coming debacles set and triggered so it seems by an abstinence from long common legal adages.

Most lawyers are just supposed to be trained away from making generalizations, and from asking any question for which they have not already fig’d, somehow, the answers.  Essentially and as simply as possible these 3-4 lawyers were trained in law to not state any generalization at all like their “IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT!”  This is an impossible truth and so ridiculous that it acts on its face as if a confession of great guilt instead of yet being a true tag on President George W. Bush of/for an actual assessment of guilt.

Mayor elect Bill de Blasio is a mostly unknown yet quite intriguing break out political figure;  I don’t know how he can be of a local “progressive” promise without therefore being set up as insurgent and of rivalry to President Obama, and, be set up much at odds and theoretically opposite ended, at least at start.

The Clintons have simply it seems moved themselves into the politically checkmated position by the shared moves with Governor elect Terry McAuliffe;  For Governor McAuliffe  to be sworn and true now to his promise for a bi-partisan governing he must answer to the Clintons presented conundrums.  It has been proven that it couldn’t have been that as generalized as “IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT”  It has been proven that it couldn’t have been just all the fault of President Bush.  Governor McAuliffe cant’ be to any real bi-partisanship without explaining how as it is left now true that he will have to be explaining what truth is left - he will have to be thence under oath and stuck to having to explain that reality is it must have a BIG “IT” of more ends and means of numerous its and as more of “IT” it as honestly left simply as of more of it pared down to a “IT IS ALL MUCH THE FAULT OF THE CLINTONS.”

Sometimes politics can and does offer up indefensibles.

A sworn Governor McAuliffe, if to his bi-partisanship promised, will be stuck at sticking it too to President Barack H. Obama for at least his “ALL BUSH’S FAULT” now proven a lie, at least, and as a generalization no trained lawyer should have ever uttered - uttered unless at a last straw and such inconveniently was the only nonsense available for a dire and much needed cover-up.

And, yet since the Presidency of Richard Milhous Nixon and Hillary Rodham Clinton days with the Watergate Congress matters it has been common and standard - it has too been an adage that lawyers and especially Mrs. Clinton herself was to know better of it best to never forget it is as warned that it is like the cover-up that’ll get you.

Sometimes politics can and does offer up an indefensible couple too.

It seems with so many opposite and opposing ends now set even if to promises made for a new bi-partisanship that the Clinton BOGO “two-fer” is off the political selves, and stuck forevermore in an evermore of a checkmating move there own yet too much as well of their location in a governance neverland.

                                                 *   *   *

Good luck to the lot of you all the newest whatevers “elect”.  “Progressive” to some has to be a dirty word and yet for some of the newest less so — it may be that for the next forty years it will be as if of Jeffersonians of holds by ways as democratic republicans — it may be that Obama has been more an Adams too to Federalist at least and now…

Comments are closed.