This is not personal.
It is no longer about Mrs. Clinton showing a little leg for 2016 - it is as real as a fallen angel. We all have to look at her though either as “the next Clooney girl” or “not a Clooney girl now or ever.” We have to look at her through the prism of the Presidency of the Clintons and quite of all the colors and grays of the “politics” of William Jefferson Clinton. We all have to now finally come to terms with it that it hasn’t proven to have been fair to President Barack H. Obama that the 1990s, not the Clintons actually, made it appear too easy to actually be a President.
This is not personal — The Presidency of the Clintons was a bad administration - President William Jefferson Clinton really was a bad President. Mr. and Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton were corrupt in their Presidency since day one — this piece can and should be a fair but too brief treatment to such effect - to such as too late breaking news. SLEAZEBALL tag fits not because of a personal infidelity a light flaw to be overlooked forever but because the known personal infidelity is better looked at through the lens of it a symptom of a sleazy “politics.”
President Barack Hussein Obama should never had had his HOPE hands so forced into a Secretarial job for Mrs. Clinton of the Clintons’ Global Initiatives. He never should have been trapped as by Benghazi attacks with such an inferior “diplomat” at the helm of his stewardship abroad — Whenever she stepped out of her Stately office after the tragedy and debacle of the Benghazi, Libya attacks and volunteered as she did to the Press nearly this diabolical “I couldn’t believe this could happen in a country I liberated” was the tolling of the hour near for President Barack Obama to ring her bell and fire her, and easily for she had just publicly admitted gross incompetence. It is the “sleaze” and “sleazy” of the Clintons’ “politics” only that have her still so highly maintained otherwise than honestly.
Right, in keeping this from being personal and still as it is intended to be an expose primarily on the “business” and “politics” of the public William Jefferson Clinton and his “legacy” I should get back now to speaking more of the inherent and explanatory of the “sleaze” of Clinton that explains these troubled days much as of still and from still the “politics” of President Clinton and of the truth that he is better to be thought of for having actually having been a bad President. Right, I write here objectively and bolster such truth now by offering that later I will go into another treatment that may explain that despite the “sleaze” we had it may have been the lesser of the dangers of the limited choice the American people had in 1992. I just have to save for later the explanatory to how that if Republicans had won in 1992 things actually could have ended up much worse than what I will essentially brush out now objectively and historically of it due and overdue that we all open our minds and get real with an acceptance that these bad times are explained by the proof to the hypothesis that Bill Clinton was in fact a bad President and for being generally of sleazy “politics.”
Readers the history is that it may be doubly condemning and doubly sleazy that the “politics” of Clintons followed on from the late entry and still to be rightly explained 1992 victory as the times were that President George Bush was near at 87% popularity but of a political conundrum in that the new world order seemed to be inhabited with Republicans whom if he was re-elected were idealistically too greatly of a “politics” just for his own party that he had he been the 1992 victor was likely then to be no longer capable of moderating a/the Prudence he was known for even in his own ranks.
To also trip the “doubly” bad you need to get with the breaking objectivity that Governor Bill Clinton knew he won in 1992 as a sleazeball of known infidelity at least in his personal political habits and that he won only with a minority vote. It is doubly bad that he as a knowing sleazeball won of sorts classically as if the lesser of the two (three) evils toed in and then governed and “politiked” still then as if since sleaze won as the lesser of evils long live sleaze - his flaws however and where ever they may have been born.
It is no where more concerning that the Clintons’ Global Initiative persists now with Mrs. Clinton now back primarily as it seems as Bill Clinton’s first mate than of the global politics of it very sleazy that the CGI overlaps its meeting as a vessel Clinton of the “woman” “Hillary” with the otherwise more LADY LIBERTY meeting of the thought independent United Nations.
It is impossible, it seems, that the politics of the CGI of the Clintons can actually be legally copacetic globally or locally - it seems impossible to account for it and its practices as other than a PAC for the “WOMAN HILLARY” as a sleazy Clinton vessel first and last. I can only imagine how furious President Barack Hussein Obama must be in the Republicans for their arresting of his abuse of the IRS taxing authority to look into political rivals — President Obama must be quite beside himself that he can now hardly use the IRS covertly to peel back the truths and plots of the Clintons and their intimacy in CGI global meddling and monies moving.
Right! How now to arrest the truths inherent in the Clintons “politics” and as them of essentially a jeopardy of a running, not a one time on then off, con? The Clintons’ administration became corrupt on day one because the Clintons had been of corrupt thoughts ever since their law school days — on day one they had to initiate their plots so schemed over and about since the 70s, at least, or give up their “dream.” It is beyond the “sleazy” that ever day of their administration and action or chosed inaction needs to be looked at as corrupted by them putting their plot into motion from day one and then for everyday since of keeping it running of their scheme of Bill’s promise to Hillary to put a Presidency for her firstly ahead, it still seems, of every decision even of their Presidency of William Jefferson Clinton.
It seems improbable and impossible, again, that the Clintons’ Global Initiatives as CGI can be accounted for as lawful and legal at least if the IRS standards per the Tea Party and others targeted is the threshold of President Obama’s Prudence.
Actually it is more cute and romantic that Bill Clinton is still trying to keep his promise to his wife that if she let him be President first he would be committed to keeping his promise and commitment somehow to making sure she would then get her own Presidency. This has led to his “sleazy” politics likely but in itself is quite cute and romantic albeit highly compromising and maybe itself to near or of a legal jeopardy even internationally now.
This is not meant to be personal - but I do have a tired and telling personal history with the Clintons.
I write today as Thucydides is said to have written about political philosophy as by presenting it objectively without attempt to bias it, and but for my use of the word “history” and even words “political philosophy” about SLEAZEBALL. I have since election day been considering a political pickle that Mayor elect of New York City is partisanly in and due to such did pull out my Strauss & Cropsey HISTORY OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY published by the University of Chicago Press in a third edition. Seems to be the mayor of the candidate de Blasio promise he needs to get out from being a partisan stooge and tool of his party’s leader President Obama; It seems Mayor elect Bill de Blasio should consider asking all his voters to move with him to a re-affiliation as a different party or as independents.
But this is about the troubles we are all still in much because of the Clintons and their “politics.”
As Thucydides is so said to have written so I leave this as written for you to reach your own conclusions and not expect that I have concluded anything with this historical espousal. Right! I have personally known the Clintons since I was near a first grader in New Haven and of having been out after school hours a play in the school yard of my Hooker School as it was then conveniently just across my street, and as it was they were then still in New Haven as Yale Law Students who broached a political queriousness directly to me. Right! My first impression of Bill Clinton was that he was a sleazeball. Right! He and Hillary have only these many years confirmed that of my first impression of Clinton.
To broach yourself into a more real realm of the “politics” of the Clinton vessel now as more it seems a WOMAN HILLARY PAC by CGI conscripts scheming please trim your own imaginary lines effectively so to see them in a historical light as having been oddly perfectly “politically” positioned when the first 9/11 happened and oddly ready and prepared and yet as the winds still blow hard that it seems they are in jeopardy for never having really planned enough for a Bush to have risen in 2000 instead of just Gore, and, that you too may wonder and wonder if tacked yet to a helmsmanship cautionary of consideration that the Clintons are now trapped in a passed broach too much of their “politics” for never at having prepared for or considered that a “Barack Obama” could possibly upset their long fig’d and set plot.
There is meat on the Clintons’ bones to be served up more publicly now and forever forward much showing for political and judicious consumption that there are tell tales as ginger bread crumbs about their “legacy” that have them very exposed at times certain when they had to alter their plans of their though maybe cute and romantic commitments to right their ship of WOMAN HILLARY after winds like Obama blew, at least, as they never did plan for. It is that there are in jeopardy, it seems, because their trails can be seen in retrospection and historical consideration of them of, it seems, having gone too far to “correcting” course when they found out that they had scenarios that they had never planned for and yet couldn’t quite well enough compensate about in their “political” reality.
Again, as Thucydides attempted this is attempted - please this is written to ask you to fig and conclude by yourselves and not be conclusive itself while honestly of a presentation attempt in historical and political honesty and truth.