hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
October 2018
S M T W T F S
« Sep    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
03/26/14
8 BOTTLES OF POPOV ON A G7
Filed under: POLITICS, NEW NATIONALISM, OBAMACARE, #SUSPECT, #ISLAM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 8:39 am

1.  “#SCOTUS per #Economics Dems are lost souls not knowing #HobbyLobbby “work” as “not for profits” more as for disciples as a type of insurance by community pre-organizing that cannot be rightly as a rainy day and daily synchronicity be to the time and attention to assimilation to political uniformity as set importantly in the fog of poetry and Christian forgiveness, where so.  As “not for profits” as more of the work of later disciples of past prophets it is that “for profits” are about those thinking ahead as of a belief they are of a prophets beneficience to hope and change that only might prove necessarily devilish in a devils’ advocation sort of way or rightly heavenly on an earthly shared electricity of humanity.  “For profits” are more for working an existence for a believed possible shared energy in humanity than the metric of taxation as that of the rewards that may flow to those brightly about hope and change, however incorporated in shared missions with vague or specific mission statements - publicly or privately.”

2.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vodkas

3.  WHITE COLLARED POSSE http://bit.ly/1gVcy0g - treatment in SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS.

4.  “#CspanChat on #HobbyLobby & #Conestoga need economics of “for profit” refreshed as of the entrepreneurial of risk at thinking if to doing what a profit may suggest could be possibly fruitful if enough forethought and organized work efforts conjoined about it.  It isn’t meant in traditional capitalism to be that a business even as a corporation of people is singularly organized to “make money” but as to prove a forethought like of a prophet is proven to have been of beneficience and of rewards from having been prepared correctly.  And, as it is confused as by “not for profits” yet of work of past prophets’ realms it is explainable that “not for profits” have tax exempt status more because of an establishment for everyday realities and possibilities than are like of insuring from risks and not of a luxury in aforethought hope for change in a uncertain belief.  “Not for profits” are yet said maybe for a prophets work but as after the fact not like for profits as of the shared hope a priori apropos.

5.  “#CommonSense #HobbyLobby if #Obama can claim signing subjects up for #ACA is “God’s work” then at least medical corps exempt!

6.  “#SCOTUS as “Order” a founders’ noun “respecting” as USC only yet establishment of USG informs 1st Amnd must by “no Law respecting an establishment of religion” mean that the Constitution as yet the only Order of the Union establishment be an Order as of an establishment of religion so as the 1st Amendment informs as with “respecting” any thing so new imports that by use of “re…” one as an establishment must already exist in the Ordering of the Union so by the Order as the People’s writ Constitution.  It is clever both how the First Amendment appears to placate Thomas Jefferson’s objections and yet by its words and grammar seem set to actually reaffirm the very un-Jeffersonian Constitutional constructs so subscribed to humbly unanimously by the founding signers.  It too is extremely clever how it seems the most important aspect of the protections of the 2nd Amendment are essentially secured in the specific implications by grammar in the 1st Amendment and so that it seems the most important relevance to the 2nd Amendment interpretive seems that the 1st Amendment is 1st. ???

7.  “#HobbyLobby #SCOTUS @ #Obama #CONTRACEPTION illegal of that #USA #USC should never have seen a #RFRA in #Congress — The First Amendment is of one essential truth that Congress by it is barred from making any Law as a declaration that there is no GOD and that GOD has been necessarily been replaced with nationalization in centralized social programs and too as “entitlements” though by Article 1 no “TITLING” is to be allowed however minor such “titling” may yet be proffered as and if just a granting as by title to a right to even say a poverty level or now a green minimalism new PC.”

8.  “#HobbyLobby #BecketFund @CardinalDolan #Religion #SCOTUS #Corporations


“Still liking this FB/JPeterHogan UPDATE: 
#HobbyLobby #BecketFund @CardinalDolan #Religion #SCOTUS J Peter Hogan ditto posting of comment @TheBecketFundforReligiousLiberty”

“As #HobbyLobby like a #LittleSistersOfThePoor Constitutional poetic of original ordained concepts writ “done” in that Year of the founders’ Lord this week is ripe for cross training citizen Peoples in First Amendment revelations.  A genesis of a Constitutional problema is in how there seems now philosophy of governance about the Obama administering during these years of the ill fated marching of leftist Democrat Party political dogmatic wants.  A prolegomenon to Constitutionality originality rebirth is of the old book a still new book as with the USA USC there is writ an accompaniment.  The more biting words to a proper defense of religious freedom as pertains to contraception breach seems pertinent of RFRA of McKeon & Gallo as a bringing elected Clinton back to a rationality in the folds of prudence, necessarily.  The more biting assault for a restoration of such renaissance in foundational establishment yet this week is maybe best served up as also much to the Constitutional legality that any Law a “Tax” as ACA ruled merely as “it’s a tax” is strictly speaking not subscribed as of a permanence as a right — As it is a tax, and now with the First Amendment prescient and apropos, the justices of the Supreme Court should be asked to rule upon how a tax isn’t yet to be considered established law of the land as if to be prejudged in a permanency as if a law writ to be suspect as a permanent Law.  It seems fleeting as it however “established Law of land” that as a tax the People have the Power to expect it not to be enduring as it not yet a Constitutional right but so as in an impermanence as a law a law merely as a temporary specific taxation.  It seems to properly be to a resurrection of prudence of the religious protections of the First Amendment respecting of the spectacle of the body of its articles as subscribed as established and ordained to a People’s Order done in constituting a more perfect Union (than the United Kingdom’s) (than the Articles of Confederation) as of God’s bite as a writ in accompaniment to the New Testament as set so unanimously and “done” in the Christian Calendar.  It seems however George Washington inaugurated poetically with vicissitudes and a seeming humor common for the People’s times as of “washing” ton o’ humor in a heralding prudence at a prophylactic conscience (and said concern of “impregnable fortitude) to be of thinking at least to rinsing and reuse of condoms as ’skins’ of the modernity.  It does seem to behoove all about SCOTUS to illegalities of POTUS now to reconsider the fate of a permanence for entitlements contrary to Constitutional stoicisms in sectarian preserves by ways of pimp’n the issue that any Law a tax like The Affordable Care Act is by its nature not of a legal permanence by design - that any permanence too would be of the same realm of First Amendment religiousness violates as such as being defended by Hobby Lobby.  http://JPHogan.org/



* #Hashtags #tag ISLAM, #Islam, MUHAMMAD, #Muhammad

Comments are closed.