1. “#SCOTUS per #Economics Dems are lost souls not knowing #HobbyLobbby “work” as “not for profits” more as for disciples as a type of insurance by community pre-organizing that cannot be rightly as a rainy day and daily synchronicity be to the time and attention to assimilation to political uniformity as set importantly in the fog of poetry and Christian forgiveness, where so. As “not for profits” as more of the work of later disciples of past prophets it is that “for profits” are about those thinking ahead as of a belief they are of a prophets beneficience to hope and change that only might prove necessarily devilish in a devils’ advocation sort of way or rightly heavenly on an earthly shared electricity of humanity. “For profits” are more for working an existence for a believed possible shared energy in humanity than the metric of taxation as that of the rewards that may flow to those brightly about hope and change, however incorporated in shared missions with vague or specific mission statements - publicly or privately.”
3. WHITE COLLARED POSSE http://bit.ly/1gVcy0g - treatment in SUPPOSITORY & DEPOSITORY ECONOMICS.
4. “#CspanChat on #HobbyLobby & #Conestoga need economics of “for profit” refreshed as of the entrepreneurial of risk at thinking if to doing what a profit may suggest could be possibly fruitful if enough forethought and organized work efforts conjoined about it. It isn’t meant in traditional capitalism to be that a business even as a corporation of people is singularly organized to “make money” but as to prove a forethought like of a prophet is proven to have been of beneficience and of rewards from having been prepared correctly. And, as it is confused as by “not for profits” yet of work of past prophets’ realms it is explainable that “not for profits” have tax exempt status more because of an establishment for everyday realities and possibilities than are like of insuring from risks and not of a luxury in aforethought hope for change in a uncertain belief. “Not for profits” are yet said maybe for a prophets work but as after the fact not like for profits as of the shared hope a priori apropos.“
6. “#SCOTUS as “Order” a founders’ noun “respecting” as USC only yet establishment of USG informs 1st Amnd must by “no Law respecting an establishment of religion” mean that the Constitution as yet the only Order of the Union establishment be an Order as of an establishment of religion so as the 1st Amendment informs as with “respecting” any thing so new imports that by use of “re…” one as an establishment must already exist in the Ordering of the Union so by the Order as the People’s writ Constitution. It is clever both how the First Amendment appears to placate Thomas Jefferson’s objections and yet by its words and grammar seem set to actually reaffirm the very un-Jeffersonian Constitutional constructs so subscribed to humbly unanimously by the founding signers. It too is extremely clever how it seems the most important aspect of the protections of the 2nd Amendment are essentially secured in the specific implications by grammar in the 1st Amendment and so that it seems the most important relevance to the 2nd Amendment interpretive seems that the 1st Amendment is 1st. ???“
7. “#HobbyLobby #SCOTUS @ #Obama #CONTRACEPTION illegal of that #USA #USC should never have seen a #RFRA in #Congress — The First Amendment is of one essential truth that Congress by it is barred from making any Law as a declaration that there is no GOD and that GOD has been necessarily been replaced with nationalization in centralized social programs and too as “entitlements” though by Article 1 no “TITLING” is to be allowed however minor such “titling” may yet be proffered as and if just a granting as by title to a right to even say a poverty level or now a green minimalism new PC.”