Let me be clear: It seems a convenient truth, for a return of evolution to the known world, that Democrat woman Representative Nancy Pelosi, and also Democrat woman Mrs. Clinton, however, while busy as opposites, have yet both been critical of Republicans as against evolution, and while themselves effectively, to a measurable devolution, each differently causal of devolutions for their species; It seems there need be something akin to a war on women - a warring at least on two women both “Democrat women” but so clearly differentiable.
It cannot now be all on President Barack H. Obama that a measurable onset of devolution can be registered as having occurred due to Democrat leadership - we must also war on women of his party, at least where there are clear and present differences that contrast or conflate reason. It seems beyond just a matter of National security that we have to look at risks and dangers specifically of the political domains, however eminent, to be politically of specific ownership as of “Pelosi” or “Clinton” dirty hands.
I write not here to celebrate a coding for humanity in a shared body electric force fields in polarities assessing civil common humanity by rites and rituals around a poetry of creationism and morality. It would be a luxury now to talk here only of humanity held together for peace Posterity by strung theories kept general and poetic as a programmed civil code yet maintainable. We have clear and present dangers to cut away the fog towards if we are to reverse what is now advanced under Democrat women quite to a measurable, it seems, devolution at least of the Politics of Democrat President Barack H. Obama.
It is timely with the referendum for independence of the Scottish people, however, merely near of 4 million souls, that America alone isn’t now asked to consider even the prudence of John Jay as PUBLIUS in Federalist Papers 2-5, and as it pertains to Scotland independence whence as if concurrent and fresh now. It may be we have a war on women due to carefully separate those of a domains of “Pelosi” from any of “Clinton” and for each has history of too much whimsy in their deciding.
Since this is really more of a concern for Justice and Truth let me defer from here to fore established as firstly a concern for being of Democrat women too much to devolutionary politics. Let me get down to brass tacks specifics to a culpability for each so that it won’t be of “blind approbation” or “blind reprobation” that any joins as if ordered to a certain offered opine.
But where to start? Is it that Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as a first female Speaker of The House of Representatives has caused greater devolution and economic collapses? Or: Is it Mrs. Hillary Clinton, however, since First Lady and towards being an inevitable first female President yet is even more a Democrat woman a most culpable human yet responsible for a devolution that has coincided, however, with economic collapses due to her specific “politics”?
Do you perchance doubt either has been devolutionary as first women so Political? Have you yet considered how ridiculous it is strategically that Democrat Senators did offer up a Politics that the Senate should move forward an attempt to amend the Constitution by altering the Bill of Rights so to seemingly address inequality in campaign finance allowances? But for the Democrat President may have needed such Senate activity against the Constitution to appear to have yet “Constitutional” legs for his White House declarations against ISIS there is that the Democrats, at least for their circa 2008 “campaign” “politics” have invited a general inquiry that should be more to arresting their own improprieties than just being like shooting themselves in their own feet.
Fight the onset of devolution now epidemic of the Congress! Write the Republicans to ask them to entertain for a while the Democrat Senators suggestion that a Constitutional Amendment be thoroughly debated as regards at least a problematic “influencing” discernible over at least the past couple decades. Write either Republicans and Democrats and actually ask that a thorough debate be commenced for it is essential that any Justice to such must first entail a resolute probing of the economic factors preceding the 2008 election and especially now all things money of the Clintons, and especially since their CGI seems to be being operated globally as if a PAC for the Clintons and facilitated not for “charity” but for “patronage”.
If we are not generally now witnessing a devolution of Americans we at least have clear examples of Democrat leadership seeming devolved for they are asking Republicans to open investigations into them even while President William J. Clinton has been with Maria Bartiromo on economics of explaining he knew, essentially, and knows, specifically, that his surpluses were wrong when effected. Essentially we have been asked, as a People’d people to actually war on women - to war no at least separately and differently against Democrat woman Nancy Pelosi, and Democrat woman Mrs. Clinton. It seems essentially devolved too much already - our National Politics - for essentially Democrats generally, not just President William J. Clinton, are of years of public statements that combine to be confessions for the very faults they yet persist of a “politics” as if properly of the work of their opponents - of Republicans to be specific. (Right, “specifics”! Yes Mrs. Clinton recently in Iowa parsed on Obamacare as a late Romneycare quite a confounding “our opponents are against …” for such didn’t declare that Republicans were so against any Romneycare for each state but just that any against it was then an “opponent” of “theirs” specifically.)
Brace yourselves “Americans”! Beyond where it may be all “Bill Clinton’s” fault, and he now maybe of domestic abuse, of dragging his Mrs. across the country to try to return him to TOP DOG, or TOP GUN, National status, we may be quickly approaching a general understanding that two Democrat women are each near most responsible for so much that has gone wrong, and, we may soon have to agree to agree, to return to evolving, about which yet is actually more culpable even if by negligence.
Right essentially they or another Democrat now has enough public statements in the record books essentially confessing to being those most culpable for general collapses, however specifically also causal to a devolutionary. I seems it behoove the civilized yet prescient enough to actually write to Republicans to ask them in the Senate to thoroughly entertain the Democrats wishes for a consideration even to amending the Bill of Rights as if for “campaign finance” purports.
Let me be clear, again: We need to work to agree to agree now after careful investigation and forensics based debate as to whom is most responsible, and now firstly to if it Democrat woman Nancy Pelosi or Democrat woman Mrs. Clinton. To get to such we much open two boxes, however if like Pandora’s, and yet around discerning how much Democrat male Bill Clinton is himself yet dominantly culpable.
As we should agree to proceed to finding agreement thus let me close for now with some details to how Speaker Nancy Pelosi was personally more responsible for the economic collapses that started befalling the Nation during the second term of the administration of President George W. Bush. Yes, essentially President Clinton, has publicly left a record confessing to knowing his “economics” of “surpluses” at least were known to be risky and wrong when yet commenced, but for matters of real guilt of dirty “political” hands instrumental to such we have to look at one Democrat woman specifically - we firstly must rightly look primarily at the “leadership” of Speaker Nancy Pelosi - at the first female Speaker of The House of Representatives.
Some facts remembered are that Democrat Speaker Pelosi, regardless of her sex, was a greatest defender of the Clintons’ surpluses from the 2 Trillion cut so rashly during the 1990s. How she specifically affected “Politics” so that President George W. Bush had to run wars on credit cards, like, as she prohibited him from declaring there was culpability for the Clintons for 9/11 and however their surpluses needed to be reversed to start rebuilding the economy.
Hmmm! It’s complicated! Right, essentially President Bush could only get votes for Operation Iraqi Freedom if he didn’t assuage any fault upon the Clintons’ Administration. Right! It seems the only way to have proceeded to the late and due prosecution of Saddam Hussein was to lie for to tell truths to such it would have been publicly necessary to discuss an at least “negligence” for the Clintons.
Hmmm! It’s complicated! Right, essentially President Bush had set up Operation Iraqi Freedom to be yet paid for otherwise than by condemming the Clintons’ surpluses, reversing them, and moving forward with Congress of the purse strings more appropriately - - - Right, Operation Iraqi Freedom, to be brief to a need now for such a war on women, was to be paid for otherwise than by specifically assessing guilty upon the Clintons by yet having a liberated Iraqi People compensate the coalition nations with their recovered and then available quite profitable National oil revenues.
Hmmm! It’s complicated! Right, it is recalled that Democrat first female Speaker of The House of Representatives is most repsonsible for stopping how Operation Iraqi Freedom was to be paid for from compensation with National oil revenues of a liberated more free Iraqi consenting. Right!!! Oh MY! Secretary of State Democrat woman Mrs. Clinton did try to have Libya, by her ODYSSEY DAWN, be of such a gall that it was she proceeded as if also at monsters, rightly, as if of her own “Bush’s Iraq” but then done right by a woman a Democrat and yet then rightly done with it OK! that such “liberation” was to be supposedly paid for with Libyan National oil revenues.
Hmmm! It’s complicated! Right, please write all the Senators and ask for them to proceed to a thorough debate however if seeming to amend the Bill of Rights for “campaign finance” purposes. Democrat male President William J. Clinton is actually of sufficient public record at confessing to being wrong to what Democrat woman Nancy Pelosi prides herself yet in being still defensive of as if ever and always right - right of Clintonomics and Clintons’ foreign policies at least as per Iraq.
Hmmm! It’s complicated! Right, but necessary now, and particularly after hearing Democrat woman Pelosi speak to New York Law School gathering as if more innocent than actually quite a she most the guilty. For now as we wait for the Senators to take the initiative to digging deep at a greater guilt, however in negligence to gross negligence, for two women clearly of different specific culpabilities let me just remind you all of the conditions in the 2008 election reviewable as to “Democrat” “money” & “influence” smartly:
THERE IS THAT THE DEMOCRAT CAMPAIGN SPEECH, HOWEVER ALSO GLOBAL, WAS SO ALARMING AROUND GLOBAL WARMING OF A DIRE AND IMMINENT CLIMATE CHANGE END OF THE KNOWN WORLD SERIOUSNESS THAT THEY DID CAUSE THE SPIKE IN THE GAS PRICES THAT ALSO CONVENIENTLY WAS MEANT TO CAUSE AN ECONOMY THE REPUBLICANS COULD BE BLAMED FOR AND INCONVENIENTLY TO POSSIBLE NOVEMBER SUCCESSES.
THERE IS THAT THE DEMOCRAT GENERAL HOPES FOR CHANGE IN 2008 WERE FIRST PLANNED TO RETURN THE CLINTONS BY SUCH PRE-PLANED PARTISAN ACTIVITIES AND MUCH INHERITED YET BY SENATOR BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. IT IS LESS SPOKEN OR READ OF HOW WHEN THE REPUBLICANS SEEMED TO YET BE RISING ABOVE THE DEMOCRATS TANKING OF THE ECONOMICS BY SPIKED GAS PRICES THOUGHT “LIBERAL” INSTITUTIONS BEGAN SHORTING THEIR ENDOWMENTS, IT STILL SEEMS, TOWARDS FURTHER MOVING “DEMOCRAT’ MONEY FOR CAMPAIGN INFLUENCE SO TO IT SEEMING TOO BAD AN ECONOMY FOR REPUBLICANS YET TO BE RIGHT TO ELECT OR RE-ELECT.
PLEASE, WRITE YOUR SENATORS AND ASK THEM TO SO COMMENCE FORTHWITH UPON CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM BY FULL DEBATE OF TWO DECADES TOWARDS AND IF NECESSARY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDING OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS - IF SO YET FOR REPUBLICANS OF UNFAIR INFLUENCE WITH PARTISAN RICHES AVAILABLE.
YES, DEAR AMERICANS, IT SEEMS THERE HAS BEEN SOME DEVOLVING DUE TO SOME OF THE ABOVE AND SO THAT WE SHOULD CONCUR THAT WE NOW MUST WORK TO AN AGREEING TO AGREE AS TO WHOM IS MOST RESPONSIBLE AND NOW AS IT SEEMS DEMOCRATS HAVE INSISTED WE WAR ON TWO DEMOCRAT WOMEN SO OBVIOUSLY DIFFERENT IN AT LEAST THAT DEMOCRAT WOMAN SPEAKER PELOSI WAS AGAINST OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, AND WHILE DEMOCRAT WOMAN MRS. CLINTON WAS YET FOR IT AND SO FOR IT FIRSTLY THAT SHE, HOWEVER WHILE WITH “BILL CLINTON” AS AN INTELLIGENT “ASSET”, SHE YET WAS WILLING TO VOTE FOR IT WITHOUT HAVING READ THE INTELLIGENCE REPORTS CONCERNING ITS AVAILABLE SPECIFICS.
Hmmm! It’s complicated! Right, please yet us now just agree that it is necessary to now finally start this discussion!