So it really happened! So across the nation states, not Connecticut, amassed a new balanced political to these days forward differently. Why is/was Connecticut different - why didn’t the Nutmeg State the Constitution State also seemingly adjust to a “more mature”? What explains my Connecticut - what explains a state that should be now much aligned with the Republican Congress for the economics of the state?
This is not personal nor judgemental of senior Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal nor junior Senator Christopher Murphy; This is hardly even to be specifically associated with Governor Daniel Malloy governance; what follows in the brevity here is more to how embarrassing, for starters, that Connecticut hasn’t/didn’t have a ROMNEYCARE as long as Massachusetts, and too for Hartford the “INSURANCE CAPITAL OF THE WORLD” wasn’t as the capitol of the state also yet the leader more than Massachusetts and Governor Mitt Romney in seeing all its citizen residents covered somehow.
The problems concurrent of Connecticut are bigger and more historical than those its top politicians currently.
My state should expect these though to be to voting less to defend or support any #VANITY of President Obama.
My state should expect these though to be considerate that it is also embarrassing for #LABOR that President Obama’s JOB CZAR whom found “shovel ready” not as easy as expected is that CEO Jeffrey R. Immelt an executive of a Connecticut headquartered corporation.
My state should expect these though to consider, even if unavoidable, that had they been up for re-election they likely would have lost to Republicans and some for more Independents and Republicans likely would have voted so that the state could be better positioned for copacetic votes to support its defense contractors, insurance industry, and yet still somehow its institutions of liberal education.
But for now: IT IS REALLY EMBARRASSING THAT MY STATE DIDN’T HAVE A ROMNEYCARE BEFORE MASSACHUSETTS! IT IS TROUBLESOME HOW A SINCE SUCH WE HAVE HAD A FEDERAL NATIONAL MANDATE AS IF NECESSARY BECAUSE OUR STATES’ LOCAL AND STATE “LEADERS” ARE ALL FAILURES AND THAT THE FEDS HAD TO STEP INTO “LOCAL” MATTERS TO BE “CORRECTIVE” OF “LOCALS” SHORTCOMINGS/FAILURES.
It too must be of people watching in my state that any seeing some likely of OBAMACARE are to feeling guilty and to pondering politics for the querious should be shamed to asking: WHY DID THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVE TO INTRUDE SO THAT MY NEIGHBOR COULD GET HELP FROM THEIR NEIGHBORS IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD/COMMUNITY?
For now I do hope my Senators are the first to reboot bipartisanship in Washington in the Republican Congress and without being asked by representatives of competing states firstly to do what is best or just right for their own constituents.
I do not know how this state, I did help much in the early 1990s, and coincidentally by also helping Democrats be protected from themselves, by pulling or pushing them to get Governor Clinton to enter 1992 races, as a talking head political to express a popular logic for victory, as I had pressed, for a anchoring of the NEW WORLD ORDER, as set with sufficient rode, in the “local” of NEW HAVEN, fell so far from mark. This is what my fellow Connecticut peeps little know of as of the Clintons so of me as of New Haven and as yet so some only learned to the imports useful of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM postures. Yeh, run-on wordy! I must feel some betrayed by my state in how 2014 races could be of CLINTON showboating and yet without the state generally learning more of one of its own, me - of learning of me from those its “leaders”.
The real problem with WASHINGTON and OBAMACARE is that it is affected as if it is/was necessary because all the local and state “leaders” across the nation were and are incompetents and failures - that communities are incapable of community organizing like of old parish basis of tithing the “insurance” for such catastrophes. Connecticut based General Electric Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey R. Immelt hasn’t provided a civil leadership to much of the imports of economics essays at http://CitizenRosebud.net, and to it that corporations likely are better if back to promoting only those whom somehow are still of giving back near 10% voluntarily to their communities, however in religious freedoms for diversity in pluralism rights.
It is embarrassing that it was a Connecticut CEO who so failed as a JOBS CZAR and too as reported while such Connecticut headquartered company supposedly nearly paid zero taxes. I don’t know the story to how GE paid so few taxes - - - I get General Electric showed a lack of imagination while its CEO was JOB CZAR and as it is I have explained how it was a company that should have been lobbying for growth industries with its expertise in “cooling” & “energy” product lines to these years of the Obama Administration as better if to other directions for CLIMATE CHANGE solutions.
Right - Immelt should have been able to find like a ton of GREEN & SHOVEL READY jobs just for AMERICANS with his own company’s selfish corporate interests. But how did CONNECTICUT let it get to OBAMACARE while it of its capitol as THE INSURANCE CAPITAL OF THE WORLD? More to these embarrassments try trusting bitly links http://bit.ly/PeoplesClimate & http://bit.ly/CapToPeace of assorted available on and off of http://JPHogan.org!
Right - Clinton caught a wave for 1992 after entering the races late, after first testing of my messaging firstly with Pennsylvania race of Harris Wofford as with James Carville and Paul Begala. George Stephanopoulus was too party to such #HOGAN strategizing for New Haven to anchor a urban agenda in NEW WORLD ORDER balanced politics as set up in my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM figuring of local & global - while seemingly more/only “local”. Stephanopoulus was in Representative Richard Gephardt’s office with Charles Koch’s son as a peer equal when I first wrote to such to prode Democrats to get someone to enter races that Democrats otherwise were like of Senator Al Gore from running away from.
So I am embarrassed for my state and for three reasons as broached in brevity - OBAMACARE - JOBS CZAR IMMELT - THAT STATE LEADERS HAVEN’T INFORMED VOTERS OF CITIZEN ROSEBUD AND THE HOGAN WRITTEN BASIS OF SO MUCH PROVEN MORE RIGHT THAN THE CLINTONS OF “THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM” THAT BEST EXPLAINS TOO HOW THEY WON IN 1992 AND TOO WHY THEY ENTERED YEARS AHEAD OF THEIR PLANS TO BEGIN NATIONAL SEDUCTIONS TO ALLOW SOMEHOW A PRESIDENCY IN NAME OF MR. CLINTON AND THEN IN NAME OF MRS. CLINTON.
SO YES! IT SEEMS I CAN EXPLAIN THE STATE AS TOO DEVOLVED TO OBAMACARE AS SOME RELATED TO IT MY STATE AGAIN AND YET WITHOUT MY STATE OF BEING TOLD OF MORE ABOUT ME AS OF THINKING THAT HELPED IT AND CAN HELP IT MORE, LIKE AS WHEN JACK WELCH WAS SYMPATICO WITH THIS HOGAN & WITH GE OF NBC, AND WHILE I AM WITH LESS MOTIVATION TO TRY TO EXPLAIN HOW OR WHY OTHERS AREN’T YET VOLUNTARILY EXPLAINING HOW I GOT MORE RIGHT THAN THE CLINTONS AND WHILE THEY WORKED TO USE LESS THAN THE POTENTIAL OF SUCH - AND TO IT NOW PROVEN SUCH WAS AS DANGEROUS AS EXPECTED AND DETRIMENTAL TO THE NATION.
THE CLINTONS ARE MORE AT FAULT THAN THE ADMINISTRATION OF GEORGE W. BUSH AND WHILE IT IS THAT CONNECTICUT HOGAN, ME, CAN BETTER EXPLAIN HOW THE CLINTONS WON AGAINST PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH THAN THE CLINTONS YET HAVE OR ACTUALLY CAN.
Right - I do expect the Connecticut Senators Blumenthal and Murphy must be figuring for Pratt & Whitney, GE, Sikorsky, Groton Electric Boat, … Hartford Insurance companies … that they should be like the first to be crossing the lines to a new bipartisanship in the Republican Congress.
Seems it is in Connecticut best interests to vote less for the #VANITY of President Obama and too to be joined forward to a prosecution of the Clintons as seeming of a fraud long in not being able to repeat past successes long sold to the nation as if of their genius and made by them.
If Connecticut had Senators also up for election in 2014 wouldn’t this state have been again to expressive politics of a better balance of interests in its home economics and to also having found a clear vote for Republicans - one to at least caucus with Republicans even if newly another a Connecticut Independent?