hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
August 2018
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
10/14/15
U 2 R NOT 2 OLD!
Filed under: POLITICS, OBAMACARE, #FEMINISM, #MORALS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 12:58 pm

Bill Clinton has lost control of the Democrat Party to a staying power, homely, of First Lady Michelle Obama.

Perhaps that should be as a question! e.g.:  Has Bill Clinton lost control of the Democrat Party? To a black woman?

There are many ways to interpret Tuesday night Democrats Debate in Las Vegas hosted by CNN!

Were there two giants missing from such ‘politics’ - two Power personalities of sway & import? - VP Biden, & First Lady Michelle Obama? Wasn’t that attitude of Mrs. Clinton that President Barack Obama could be over looked? - that the promising of a “I am BACK” Bill Clinton doth trump any President Obama present?

To step easily into such a quagmire let us rock the constitution some:  “Hillary” the candidate has problems with the “Federalist Papers” - for now we will limit it just as to real trouble with “Federalist” numbers 1-5. Mrs. Clinton has trouble with Article 1 Section 9 Paragraph 8, and much with the First Amendment.  Mrs. Clinton can not abide the preamble to be read as written with “Order” in it as a noun, - as a noun a synonym for “constitution”!  Mrs. Clinton must read the Constitution preamble contrary to have her “interpretation” friendly to her assaults for a “post-Constitution” win; - Mrs. Clinton, right confusing, is while so contrary to reading the preamble as “/in order to/form/a/more perfect/Union/” while the grammar and pathology historical is for it as “/in/Order/to form/a/more perfect/”!

Let us also broach the Article V relativity in Mrs. Clinton’s problem with the preamble established & ordained. Two thirds, as needed, is not antiquated/passe! Two thirds is the Clintons’ Achilles heels.

Personally, first, let me add the Senator Joe Biden has been a me, Hogan, thought of since my sister in her ’80s, & some ’90s, was of the ranks of Senator Chris Dodd’s offices.  Also, yet of “Michelle” FLOTUS, let me date to such years to the winter of 1987-88 how it is that I have known M.O. since before she and the President ever knew each other, and, again, that it is that I have known of President Obama since the late ’70’s due an awareness of his interest in Presidential oratory.

“Hillary” the candidate grasped at Senator Bernie Sanders as if her vessel sunken & he was generously offering her a life preserver ring from a USS Sanders. It is hard to judge a “WIN” for debate for Mrs. Clinton for how desperate her grasping at the Senator was as if desperate.

Mrs. Clinton in poise for “Hillary” the campaigner of #Hillary2016 machinations was devoid a natural or becoming sagaciousness. The debate is to be archived for eons and eons to how Mrs. Clinton, beyond “desperate”, was yet set asunder as if of a sunken vessel by posturing for politics in an ignorance of the relativity of the “reset” Constitutionals.

Mrs. Clinton in poised debate stands did collapse the logic of a workable “politics” as if the Constitution was irrelevant!  Mrs. Clinton has no general election poise is how postured as if it were inconsequential that her “GOP” “haters” have her, by the plain language of the Constitution, and some restored original intent, as contrary to constituted Order by a simple majority and on many of her postured stands most definitely by the Article V protections in a 2/3rds majority necessary.

“Hillary” the candidate grasp at Senator Bernie Sanders is beggard to: Bill Clinton has lost his power, his mojo, his standing?

Perhaps that should be exclamatory! - - - Perhaps that should have an exclamation for punctuation!

Where First Lady Michelle Obama has been sagacious and warm Mrs. Clinton has reigned in too institutionalized machinations!

I do not know the full history of how the Iran Nuclear Agreement, thanks to Senator Bob Corker (?), became less important to only a majority needed for an agreement of such gravitas that unity was called for Constitutionally to yet the 2/3rds bar. The Clintons can not go forward, much successfully, against the deep field of Republicans for President, as so set against the plain language of the Constitution, and especially much the reset to restored original intent prudence behind the 2010 & 2012 big wins.  Young and middle aged, and aged, however employed or retired are not the UNIFORMED VOTERS OF PAST CLINTON MAJORITIES.

So, beyond candidate “Hillary” as debate poised until her desperate grasp at Senator Bernie Sanders, as if Mrs. Clinton knowing she of a sunken vessel, it seems however aged the voters have split from Bill Clinton & Mrs. Clinton as independents and centrist Republicans in unrecoverable ways due the “post-Constitution” reach of the Clintons’ machinations has not begotten them their desired more autocratic powers in a said needed “extra-Constitutional” interpretation. “Bill & Hillary” (whom I have known too, but since the early 1970s, but due they polled me querious to if I as that “charming boy in the school yard” thought they both could become President of the United States of America, each, some day.) (REALLY!!!)…!  Right! “Bill & Hillary” need the Constitution to not be the Order “done” as “subscribed” in under God as by in “Year of our Lord”!

America, of these united states, so Ordered, as Constituted, are in an establishment of a freedom of religion by an establishment of separation verticle to as under the Christian Calendar but so that the Federal Government could not be theocratic. The “American” most in the way of the Clintons perverted interpretations is to that before any is under their Government they are as Bible Paul wrote to firstly under God their Creator. The “Conservatives” are not as scary as it seems David Brooks has opined; The Conservatives are maybe more set back to mere state’s power by such reset in original intent, than the Clintons.

America, of these united states, so Ordered, as Constituted, are in an establishment for religious liberty where the citizens are expected to be moral under God before ever governed under their Governments. The “American” is that, as much as it may set Conservatives as much back from a Christian Nationalism, or as much as it does set the Clintons back from further National Socialism, akin to Obamacare as like a revised improved Hillarycare!

This “American” - ours - if for state’s rights of some supremity in religious liberties of it the core Constitutional Ordered that each should have a voluntary extra-nation established morality practiced enough for “community” - and for “community” in such to be based still as fundable by a tithe to such “community” voluntarily adhered to for the Freedom in Posterity for Tranquility & general Welfare is beggard to each for the Constituted “Federal” to abide Union of a basic citizenry need to be of a voluntary morality before under Federalism, - so to not give Powers to a few to justify Power over many because they stopped living for “community”!

Bill Clinton is antiquated! Bill Clinton wasn’t in the room - the hall of the Vegas debate for fear of seem too Mrs. Clinton’s puppeteer!

Bill Clinton idea of what is Constitutional for the hard to define business model of Clintons’ Global Initiatives is specifically contrary to Federalist 1 by Alexander Hamilton, but much more so due Article 1 Section 9 Paragraph 8 and with John Jay as Publius in his important writs against tyrannical power in Federalist 2-5.

First Lady Michelle Obama has to much natural power to abide the Clintons politics much more, forward!

Mrs. Clinton can hardly hold herself up as having been a better First Lady, and to Bill Clinton’s ambitions disappointment to as if having been a better Secretary of State than John Kerry, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, and at least also Madeleine Albright.

Most damming to the Bill Clinton for President “Hillary” fidelity as he to firstly to keeping his long ago heard promise that she would get her own Presidency after he got his, if she cooperated to he getting his first, is that the Constitution is an Order that the Republicans forward will not compromise by acquiescing to a simple majority where a 2/3rds votage the prudent bar?

Comments are closed.