hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
September 2017
S M T W T F S
« Jul    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
02/04/16
ANSWER WITH A QUESTION!
Filed under: POLITICS, CLIMATE CHANGE, #KERRY, #BLAME, #STUPID SQUIBS, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, RIVAL LEGACIES
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 9:30 am

Two Corinthians walk into a South Carolina Democrats Town Hall set for the Bernie Sanders vs Hillary Clinton battle, - one man wins!  Who is _______________?

Too Galatians is most set relevant for there to be Christian sanctuaries of/from gaiety, - where there is “homosexual perversion” as in the Bible there then is the derivative logic of grammar there then must also be “homosexual” and “holy homosexual”!  Why is alarmist Al Gore alarmism bad for Global Warming politics?

To Paul, there is credit due for letters, - words to word play to allow for liberal democracies, there is credit due Paulists for keeping the metaphors of place as metaphors of faith!  Why shouldn’t you go/trip to Galatia for what Corinth is governed for in their “local”?

Why did so much go so wrong?  How did the hope of the 1992 solutions to President George H. W. Bush get past said “NEW WORLD ORDER” as yet without a “new” “order” parsed/defined?  How does the real story of the Clintons’ Presidency now still not truthfully or accurately explain that the answer cannot be good for their Posterity, - a their legacy?  How is it the spun woven tales of the “THE CLINTON” is only Holy like Swiss Cheese wholly?

Are Bill and Hillary Clinton like two on the road to Corinthians, but yet politically after having laid low, - laid siege upon it, it the lay of land the lay of souls of Galatians, after two wrecked a practical deconstruction to devastation of how Christians’ liberalism is for how governed under God?

In the book of Bill Clinton there is that he cannot have wrecked all this havoc all alone, - the Clintons alone could not have set so much asunder by their lonesome “two-fer” as their united souls to one shared soul is historically of a cohorting of collaborations!  This is far more dire than now just asking:  Who is Al _____?

Generally the Clintons, necessarily with their sidekick, - their Sancho Panza, - their accomplice in their Quixotic, are contrary to democratic liberalism as Paulist for their work has been too secular as if purely for Power grabbing by undermining the constitutions of those of these united states of the Americas by spin to numb to even wreck a devolutionary for a convenient “Too Stupid”!  Who is Massachusetts Institute of Technology Gruber?  Why is “GruberGate” so not a political matter for laughs?

The general “THE CLINTON” is forward to be known for bad strategies, and even maybe soon enough a tag mashable on their Quixotic of former President William J. Clinton and former Vice President Albert A. Gore as worldly pressed of a fit’n rap of charges akin to CONDUCT UNBECOMING FORMER EXECUTIVES OF THE UNITED STATES. 

Generally, they did, & do, hoof it with dramatic covers, much ado about windmills, while such cloaks how much they ride to set asunder the constitutions of the union of Americans as Constituted under God as Paulists as not allowed to be to secular socialism by that the Order that formed the “more perfect Union” did secure to the citizens that they are always to be under their Creator before ever under a Government of man, - they are to be of government by laws that are ordained as inviolate to God’s Law, - by though a structural and pledged to allegiance to and for due process for religious liberty to be workable of civility.  Why is “Order” only readable as a word a noun in the preamble?

Specifically we must yet work to evolve the law, - we must work to be evolutionary, even progressive, to amending our laws forward to keep up with progress, and especially a innovative for the contrary to criminal!  As this bad “Quixotic” has done more bad than harm by a tyranny in alarmist parlance to lingua divisive to comity and civility we must consider the “international” to the “global” now and to that both President Clinton, and Vice President Gore have exposed themselves to the International Criminal Courts jurisdictionally speaking and too while their activities raise if their post-office politics have to put them in real jeopardy!  Can you even claim Al Gore didn’t commit fraud globally by a Climate Change solutions tyranny, - a politics unbecoming to former holders of U.S. high office?

Forward as any steps out, -emerges for a walk, - steps ahead for a daily constitutional, there is we all must look back to see how “THE CLINTON” set out to set asunder the Constitution, - our Constitutionals!  With “Order” a noun and subscribed founding fathers as under God, so “done” in the “Year of our Lord”, and then President Washington’s letter to Newport, Rhode Island Jews, it is critical to antidote-ish that we shoulder the methodology (yes of the Clintons less “progressive” than revolutionary for monarchical powers to a new American way by a Autocracy of Clintons) and walk the talk of the word “establishment” in our first rights in our Bill Of Rights! Who is William Blythe III to such willful storied insurrections?

Why is “establishment” to mean “tenets of religion” & not “Establishment” as if of an organized in interpreted?

Why does “establishment” as for “tenets of religion” set asunder the “THE CLINTON” attempts to set asunder to a “post-Constitution” “extra-Constitution” new way of new Powers for an autocratic of them? 

How by “establishment” as for “tenets of religion” are the Clintons beaten by it written that Congress shall make no Law respecting the tenets of religion for that is juri-loco prudently left for regionalism not a centralized Socialist Nationalism?

And, how is it the “THE CLINTON” and alarmist Al Gore, were of conduct unbecoming prosecutable, maybe as of fraud, by the I.C.C. by how they structured their “business” - technically speaking to the legal ifs?

And lastly: HOW?:  Whom are the the worst of the lot of Democrats akin to such efforts to set asunder the Constitutional for extra-Constitution new Powers for a ruling class as set up by a jousting to “we are in a post-Constitutional world”?

And lastly newly:  WHY?  Whom to blame that you can’t get past the Constitution Article 1 without finding Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 8, as seemingly written to yet have worked prophylactically to have protected an impregnable fortitude from perversions to our Constituted by giving to Congress a DUTY to treat any “work” like of the Clintons’ global initiatives as so the work of the People’s Legislature that the Government is set upon to basically do any such if such extant a second time thoroughly just to then perform its due diligence to “whatever” high standard of by auditing and maybe approving essentially any “global initiatives” of even a former executive?

Has Bernie Sanders, and coincidentally the leading of a #NewGOP been to casting rightly the first stones at Clintons, and Gore?  Are enough past Gruber’s reveal of slight on Democrat voters as if specifically “Hillary Clinton voters are too stupid to be consulted with per…”?

Can we get yet past how Hillary Clinton is only present in these races today by machinations like from the Socialist playbook, as like of it written to have Machiavellian Power a little princess too must first get hold of healthcare, and too much set asunder religion, - a faith in shared humanity Unity?

Can you at least trip up Hillary Clinton by asking her to explain the First Amendment as of “establishment” as for “tenets of religion” so, and so that then Congress is prohibited from making laws to take over an oldest establishment of religion, that which is the healthcare of the people and their souls? 

Can Hillary Clinton ever, due her resume and known espoused condemnations for extra-Constitutional Power, yet ever herself dare to explain how the First Amendment is intended to sync to the body of the Constitution as of an Establishment under God’s Law by it “done” “subscribed” humbly under God so in the “Year of our Lord”?

Can candidate Clinton explain her part is these dramatizations “Quixotic”?  If you dare explain “establishment” as for the “tenets of religion” she will self incriminate, and incriminate likely both President Clinton, and too Vice President Al Gore!!!

Whom can cast (a stone?) a second?  Whom can believe the Clinton methodologies so machinations can abide the for sagacious of that the states are left the law making as pertains to at least the matters of the Ten Commandments?

I.e.: HOW DID SO MUCH GO SO WRONG?  E.g.:  WHO IS BILL CLINTON? AND: WHO IS ______________?

                                         *       *       *

Political Constitutional conundrum:

MUST BERNIE SANDERS PROGRESS/EVOLVE TO BECOME STATIST AS IT BY THE PEOPLES ORDER THAT HEALTHCARE IS FOR JURI-LOCO AS BY ESTABLISHED THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS ARE THE COMMUNITY BUSINESS KEPT FROM THE NATIONAL CONGRESS?

Comments are closed.