This Earth Day 2016 as synchronized to the Paris Agreement & the United Nations gathered together for signings is an important day to still ask if the ends can justify the means. Can there yet be a “Climate Redirect” to morals in “Climate Change” discussions or will the politics continue to out weigh morality?
This squib will speak to whom have been the bad actors now still too spotlighted as knights in shinning armor. In appreciation for the First Lady of The United States of America, Michelle Obama, - for her #4College campaign with Chance The Rapper, and due we must for civilizations to endure be to a #EvolveTheLaw duty, - and vigilance, let us e-gather, however, today and celebrate that critical thinking must be taught as college educations encouraged and to that all aspirants for higher knowledge learn to look at both sides of issues, - at the right & wrong, at the good & bad, and in a considerate to an of the pros & cons.
The Paris Agreement cannot be about selling “STUPID”! That would be most impractical and improper! On this Earth Day let us remember to look for the bad actors and to prosecute, civilly, at least, their bad acts, - their effected of as if ends justify their means when time is tolling that their means should not be yet consider justified or ever prudent, - ever becoming of leaders.
This is an American perspective and will primarily stick to those whom have been American bad actors!
Though I am close to starting with Secretary of State John Kerry or Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and also former Vice President Al Gore, let us come together so e-gathered for the common good as I now commence on President Bill Clinton as a primary bad actor.
There cannot yet become morals in climate change, especially an effecting by a Paris Agreement, if we do not settle some American politics issues of that the Republicans were never as bad as Democrat Party “leaders” postured them to be, and that really, for the history books, Bill Clinton can be said to be worse than many of the old GOP & especially the New GOP.
Thomas Friedman’s “THE WORLD IS FLAT” is a perfect case to assuaging a vast guilt, political, upon Bill Clinton. There is it is quite contrary to cherish or celebrate a Clinton for being a good steward of the environment and also praise him for Clintonomics and the heaps of praise by Friedman by published storied of a world flat thanks to Clinton. Yes, if Clinton is to be praised for his “economics” then he is more to most to be blamed for ruining the atmosphere by politics for carbon excess.
Clinton may have that he toyed with Kyoto but it is undeniable and inescapable that Clinton “economics” affected dangers greatly across our shared Mother Earth. It is more realistic due Clinton “economics” to pare it that Clinton at best just toyed with Kyoto Accords. (To George W. Bush, President, business sense, crediting there is that one of his biographers did note to it now later that he was right, - to that a movement to exercise the radical programs like of Kyoto were likely to cause an economic crash, quite as the campaigns of “HILLARY 2008″ & Al Gore at “INCONVENIENT TRUTH” do attest.)
For now this isn’t to be about President Bush or about the economic damage done by rash and rushed unbalanced climate campaigning by Democrats, Americans, of Clinton - or Clintons loyalty. This for brevity is to mostly be about assuaging a need for #EvolveTheLaw to keep civilizations enduring and to how Bill Clinton, and at least Al Gore, are exposed and fit’n being sued on how they effected change, and as with the global Justice of jurisdictions for the International Criminal Courts, - the #ICC.
As Thomas Friedman penned/pressed out “THE WORLD IS FLAT” (though an incomplete story as other people not storied for leading to a “more level playing field” 1992 politics platform) to wrongly too much credit Clinton for vast industrialization and a new materialism (also of his politics for hyper-consumerism recklessness) let us just work with how the good sold by Friedman as good deeds done by Clinton are yet, very much, and vastly, the actual hands on personal of the mistakes worked into the expanding global free market system. What Friedman sold as a “GOOD CLINTON” is necessarily now very importantly and critically much that the world, to evolve on climate change, and to effect a “Climate Redirect” to morals in environmental politics (of American politicians), is vitally essentially now what we should be gathered together for progress around as taggable and mashable more as a the “BAD CLINTON” affected.
To be brief: to leave to later: to let time settle some of this obvious more to some than others: How Clinton was complicit in how the vast industrialization ‘flattened the world’ is prosecutable at least in for a morality - a worked at historical understanding (of the bad actors) - for how Clinton “economics” and “leadership” help let it all get started really is morally reprehensible as it is that so much so bad is due how Clinton let it all get started.
THE POLITICS OF EARTH DAY 2016 IS AT WE ARE AT THESE TIMES OF IT TIME TO CONSIDER THAT CLINTON & GORE AFFECTED GLOBALLY, AND WHILE INDIVIDUALLY EXPOSED TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS BY THEIR INITIATIVES, - HOW STRUCTURED - AND TO THAT AMERICANS ALONE SHOULDN’T BE ONLY ASKING IF SUCH WASN’T MORALLY OF AN IMMORALITY OF LIKE OF “CONDUCT UNBECOMING A FORMER PRESIDENT, &, VICE PRESIDENT”!
* * * * *
NOTE: ALSO CRITICALLY TO THAT THERE CAN BECOME A MORAL FROM THE CLIMATE IMMORALITY HERE TO FORE TOO PRESENT AND REGULAR TO THE ONE SIDED PARTISAN POLITICS OF AMERICAN DEMOCRATS AT “LEADERSHIP” IS THAT THERE MUST BE A LIABILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE DUE THEIR WORKS AT A TYRANNY OF SOLUTIONS AND TO HOW WHAT HAS BEEN MOSTLY PROVEN SO FAR IS THAT THERE HAS BEEN OBVIOUS MAN MADE DAMAGE FROM THE GREEN AGENDA CUTS BY THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OF THAT AT LEAST NEAR 10% CUT AS OF REDUCTION (BY ECONOMIC SUPPRESSION) SINCE 2006. ALL THAT HAS BEEN MUCH PROVEN IS THAT BEYOND HOW CLINTON LET IT ALL GET OFF TO A HORRIBLE START OF HIS “FLATTENING” THERE IS NOW THAT THE PROVEN MAN MADE RISKS ARE FROM HAVING SO FLIPPED THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT FROM ONE SIDE OF THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE TO THE OTHER SIDE - TO ASIAN AREAS OF CHINA & INDIA. WE HAVE NEW STORMS AND BIGGER STORMS, AND POLAR VORTEX EFFECTS, AT LEAST DO THAT THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT WAS REDUCED OVER THE ATLANTIC AND INCREASED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE EARTH TO SUCH THAT NEW THERMAL PATTERNS WOULD CREATED NEW ALTITUDINAL THERMAL CONDITIONS LIKE TO THAT WARM AIR WOULD NOW RISE FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TOWARDS THE POLAR ICE CAP REGION AND TO DISPLACING THE COLD AIR AS IT THEN OBEYED LAWS OF PHYSICS OR THERMAL DYNAMICS OF “HEAT RISES” TO THAT POLAR VORTEX CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN NEWLY MAN MADE BY CARBON REDUCTIONS SIMPLY BECAUSE THE COLD AIR OF THAT WHICH CREATES OR SAVES POLAR ICE CAP IS TENDING TO DIVE SOUTH INSTEAD AS BY SUCH LAWS AS TO DIVING UNDER THE WARMER AIR SO NATURALLY WORKING TO RISE, AND RISE.