Lifetime employment? Lifetime corporate association and the First Amendment? Lifetime dedication to a common cause, rituals, and appropriate attire?
What is one’s “Sunday Best” either from Queens and Presbyterian or from Ebenezer or Dexter Avenue Baptists of Martin Luthers akin to a Protestant Revolution? What is a minimum “dressed up” for a necessary conscientious to be so lay dedicated for a walking the talk of the daily battles between good and evil, or just some right and wrong?
Can Donald Trump not be tru’d out for economics if peoples of these united states of the Americas won’t dress the part?
Whom are the suits? Where is there honor in how picking their peacocks fantail accessorizing demonstrative lines and colors?
How does one dress to abide clothed to honor the disciplines of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. - forward? Mustn’t one’s very appearance be considerate for a choosing of good over evil, of right over wrong, of Godliness over slothfulness? Mustn’t each be outta their homesteads, humble, and kept clean, and sharp, keen and bright?
Spiritual advisors to Donald Trump of Queens long of his Presbyterian roots have reared such a suit in stories of Power of togetherness comity structures secured of a post Protestant Reformation - so we are to presume. He wears his suits like to be for the gold standard of faithful builders - like a dedicate to the traditions and rituals long of the preserve of the Masons and how their faiths were plumbed to on the level all squared up - squared away. He wears his suit as a suit and yet it seems as befitting the methodical practices honoring of at least masons.
Election 2016 - once past the “Primadonna Of Platitudes” variety show of “spice” supposedly in pastel pantsuits - is setting up like a people watching on a day kept for worship. As Bernie Sanders dresses the part of labor for recognition of the plights and conditions of workers - of workers employability - of workers livable standards - there is yet the contrary of the covers of the Clintons consorts of measured and hemmed for hedging - for banking on gambling with others labors - for gains without progress from building much, or anything.
I must only posture, as it would be improper to presume, or assume, that today if graced still of a Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as walking among the living of the world we might be hearing about “EVIL HEDGERS” and at least to struggles from gadget addictions maybe focused by offering in this Catholic “Year Of Mercy” a “word of the year” as “ECUMENICAL”!
What is dressing the part? Where can there be a corporate responsibility for lifetime employment if no dress code is associated of shared faithfulness of practiced rituals practiced to a sufficed to nonsense? There is a need for 24/7 accommodations of the apropos to comity of community from Queens to Dexter Avenue. There is that corporations must have the same right of assembly and rights of religious freedom and liberty in free speech (to at least divine a settling of truth - truths).
Republican nominee Donald Trump dresses the part of a suit a builder dedicated to keeping a morals yet about a copacetic with a gold standard. Still deserving to be Democratic nominee Bernie Sanders also dresses the part, also as a suit, but to that 2016 is like morally unfolding like a live HAMILTON MUSICAL in real time and of the modern/present concurrence, and to that TRUMP is dashing as garbed as “MANAGEMENT” and SANDERS is smartly attired representative not of a casual or lazy but “smartly” as “air dried” compliant, measured, collared as a white collared for the blue collared of the building, of an everyday worship day best that represents well, of a uniformed for morality, also.
Embattled of scandals and a rich compromised history with family’s banking associations for the standard a HEDGING AMORALITY Mrs. Hillary Clinton dresses, when not like years so of a “Mao Chic” yet much as suited but suitable for playing both sides as her creed - like suited for hedging and greed - like suited for greed’s amorality.
Instead of a regular “Sunday Best” Mrs. Clinton entourage is begot of so much baggage and to that her “style” is like she is a political chameleon of like a different “color” for every occasion, - a variable wardrobe where a fixed values compliance more apropos for morality’s work.
Lifetime employment may be now gone and forever an aspect of the past, but forward there is likely only too much instability from irregularity where corporations are not allowed to be of their First Amendment rights for free assembly, and expression, and a unity for comity in a religiousness, a religiosity, a religious freedom, a religious liberty.
Lifetime employment has maybe only endured when people gathered for work and community of a standard for attire of that there were wardrobes of appropriate attire for rituals and practice suffice to maintain a copacetic by nonsense - by like of “practiced Christianity in suffice to nonsense” where Bible “nonsense” equals “liberalism” - like e-stirred for Easter’s of eggs and bunnies.
Neither the wardrobe of Donald Trump, builder, nor Bernie Sanders, labor leader, are for a bad styled to be for greed by gambling like “work” as absent “bridge building” as amoral as to fortunes by “hedging” or just “derivatives” coy “playing” to a “rigged economy” - to a banking system anti-HAMILTON as firstly for to maintain a “ruling class”!
There may be a potential for a return of something more akin to “LIFETIME EMPLOYMENT” but not in a politics dedicated firstly for amoral hedging and fortunes made just in markets by gambling.
There can only be a suffice for a practicable “LIFETIME EMPLOYMENT” when there are adherents adhering of to a “nonsense” for a ritualized for comity in community.
These days are upon us to be involved en masse so that a presuming “ruling class” gets checked from and balanced from furthering the Clintons’ schemes for global autocratic (to Oligarchical) domination. There is much more to “dressing the part” that we still need to prosecute of the storied and actually historical of the “THE CLINTON”!
Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton was so regularly, in years before candidate for the Democrat Party nomination, (self?) styled in a “Mao Chic” - albeit when on President William Jefferson Clinton arm at the opening of the President George Walker Bush Library she was yet covered more submissive and quite, it seems, more “Geisha” than “Maoist”!
Even suits as “minds” actually gathered together while hip as the DAVOS #WEF (World Economic Forum) “top minds” have in past years proffered these times are like rich for a new “PROTESTANT REFORMATION”!
For Bernie Sanders to walk the dressed up of HAMILTON concurrent to 2016 politics he must not be alone in how suitable and accessorized to the import of FEDERALIST PAPERS first article FEDERALIST #1 and how Alexander Hamilton, as Publius, spelled out, from a mere (and humble) measured hemming, to cap off the establishment for the Constitution, as arguing against the then opposing opinion of then Governor of New York Clinton, his masses must be a collective to a solidarity with the intelligence of Hamilton more than Clinton - and to being able to most walk the conundrum to a workable discipline of that the Constitution is said to be ordained for “INDUCEMENTS TO PHILANTHROPY” and “PRESERVATION… OF PROPERTY”!
#SANDERS #TAGS MUST BE HIP TO #RAP #CLINTON WAS WRONG THEN, AND #CLINTONS ARE WRONG NOW, QUITE LIKEWISE, AND AS IF INTENTIONALLY ANTI-CONSTITUTION!
#TRUMP MUST SELL A #HIPHOP TO A SUFFICED FOR NONSENSE AND STILL SELL HIS SUITS AS OF A BUILDER, - EVEN A “BRIDGE BUILDER” AS SELLING WALLS/BARRIERS!
Your First Amendment rights are applicable to your styling - to your suitable styling - to your if dressed for good or evil, - to if clad for right or wrong! Whether of #TRUMP or #SANDERS this #YearOfMercy of #Election2016 how can you be appropriately attired to be suitable for if Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. were to “ECUMENICAL” as prudent and the “WORD OF THE YEAR”?
How now dress concurrent to ‘E-GATHERED MORALS” and prudently TRADITIONALLY - of FLOCKS OF NOT TOO GULLIBLES?