hogan
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
November 2017
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
09/09/12
A JOE(SEPHINE) WILSON?
Filed under: POLITICS, AFGHANISTAN, WAR ON WOMEN, CRUSADES, #SOCIALISM SQUIBS, COLD WAR SCROLL
Posted by: J. P. Hogan @ 5:54 am

Maybe this is all something we should be talking with Elizabeth Warren about.  You are hardly to see any one more “corporate” than Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton.  “Hillary” knows “limited liability” - “Hillary” is a lawyer.

She may want to play with a “WHOPPER” (spelled WOPR) but she may want to play “JOSHUA” more and not with a game of Tic Tac Toe.

But what about “Bill”?  If she cannot handle “Bill” can she even handle “JOSHUA” in a game of Tic Tac Toe?

Is Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton so so so “corporate” that it is better to describe her coldness and aloofness in “limited liability” structured protection as more a more modern day “Joe Wilson”?

And, what about “Bill”?  If he so wants to be a real “Al Haig” in control when not Constitutionally writ for control how can she be doing an “Al Haig” at the same time upon President Obama’s plausible deniability or naivete in trusting either “Bill” or “Hillary”?

Is this all really, too really, just “Bill” and “Hillary” being diabolical trying to have more years to play “political” Bridge?

Whether “Hillary” is a modern day ‘Josephine’ or ‘Joe’ it is simply plausible that she is being a second coming of Joe Wilson.

Poor President Obama?  Poor President Obama? - you ask.  How did he miss her tells - his tells?

We could hardly have had a more inciting First Lady than Hillary Clinton ‘THE CRUSADER’.  She went to some of the most radicalized areas with the least “Hillary” like philosophy for treatment of (their) women and trash talked and trash talk until most or all were without a doubt riled - didn’t she?

Where was “Bill”?  Why weren’t are Armed Forces all put on alert and readied with his wife “Hillary” so institutionalized to be “corporate” to Elizabeth Warren with a coldness from a structure for “plausible deniability” and “limited liability” for those otherwise thought about as “people.”

And, today if yesterday long before would “Hillary” have been of the Pharisees or the Sadducees?  And “Obama”?  And “Bill”?

And, today if today of “FORWARD” might she too be a Pharoah Ramses (Ramesses II?) or an all powerful Nefertari?

But for “Bill” of his moment at the convention at President Barack Hussein Obama’s backward looking “FORWARD” podium wrought however to resemble a chariot of Ramses would he have been more stripped down and simple as a Nubian, however?

There is a “tell” in the air still that harkens to the days thought expectant for a President Al Gore — What was then did seem in the air oddly again though less whence hence of a “plausible deniability” if checked.  Whence thence “FORWARD” to backwards, however garbed and/or adorned, we have that the Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama did step forward more like a “WHOPPER” (spelled WOPR) stuck in a corporate game not a corporate game.

Are the Clintons, as if now, but really not as now as if of a simile or so rather a false taggable as just as of a metaphor, engaged in an unauthorized intimate play of “political” Bridge?

Bill Clinton did seem to revel in his own “BRASS” maybe more that that tactic as of “BRASS” could have been meant to praise any other.  When it comes to “BRASS” for trying to project and transfer your badness upon another even this performance by Clinton had him most maybe of greatest attempt at going after another for what you were actually doing and bad for.  And if it were now Hillary as President how wouldn’t too much of Bill already have been too Al Haig and even just when she maybe whined about a headache and went shopping instead or off to a spa or nap — AND HE TO:  DON’T WORRY, I AM IN CHARGE!?

But really - WHAT ABOUT THE REASONING OF AND FOR THE 22 AMENDMENT?  Is a spouse of a President, regardless of their sex, as a ‘partner’ however, the one Americans are wise to be to considering most as wise to be term limiting?

And really - I don’t know how for all the psycho babble of and from the Clintons they haven’t yet waxed on or off about such - while seemingly so confident as “politicians” like “corporate” “people” to the maxed “plausible deniability” and liability limiting for themselves however a modern day Bonnie and Clyde or Joe Wilson.

Did you sense or actually see a tell of the hold outs Clintons or Gore?  Did you see new President Obama seemingly with his cards set and his hands forced about Afghanistan?   Afghanistan was the Gettysburg of the Cold War, however - it was the turning point for a global spread of at least Soviet Socialism. 

That said:  

The new frontier for American Socialist Society however now may have to be smaller venues than our Federal stage,

Now there may be a necessity to regroup almost like Federalists and move towards our state house instead.  I don’t imagine they will get the need for re-socialization right and the most appropriate “class size” — it just seems they will miss that the best and fastest way to heal our “communities” and our economy while of a new need to have towns and cities publicly covered as in competition with each other - spirited competition - it just seems they will miss that regardless of how much like faith based re-socializing it may be it can be said that we just need communities to come together more at least one non-work day a week and sing and re-socialize together around a common message and which due new community message due to cover developing concerns over weakness or breaches in “the force.”

It seems we may need to see something like “socialism” at its maybe best proven level - a parish level or neighborhood level - it seems a re-socialization every week where many can fill a hall and sing as a united sect can help, can help restore a healthy free market capitalist spirit and what “socialism” might be workable.

That said:

Are “Bill” and “Hillary” now inappropriately engaged in an intimate play beyond our “CHECKS AND BALANCE” of ‘WAR BRIDGE’?

That said:

Was it a “tell” however as whomever when new President Obama seemed to have his hands limited and his cards fixed as per Afghanistan as if it was always supposed to have been a grand necessary war against all Taliban?

That said:

What about Al Gore - what about 9/11? Seems it is reasonable to believe that a President Al Gore would have moved to commit maybe as many as 300,000 troops in response and all to Afghanistan and also that he likely would have re-instituted a draft.  Right?  Close enough?

That said: 

Strategically speaking:  If one was to wanting to spread Soviet Socialism finally to the USA and all Americans at home or abroad wouldn’t it first be critical to securing it as a winning ideology for governance by a few elite that Afghanistan be re-invaded for such purposes to show that “socialism” could be spread to even the Taliban?

Despite all this however it can be ignored or over-looked:  It seems Elizabeth Warren should have a BIG PROBLEM - a BIG PROBLEM with Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton the former First Lady Hillary Clinton as really like a too “protected” corporate person.

It just seems the ‘PLAUSIBLE DENIABILTY’ and her ‘limited liability’ now should be checked and severely LIMITED!

That said:

“Hillary” as a new “Joe Wilson” has legs if you can call such that — Ever has there been yet whence or hence to now a more globally inciting and crusading radical than Mrs. President Clinton?  And, well about “Joe(sephine)” and “Bill” — however did he decide it was wise to under fund and unfund our intelligence and defense departments while “Hillary” was off all wild on her own personal CRUSADES?

That said:

Hmmm?  By the way:  WHERE IS AL GORE?

Comments are closed.