Jeez Louise Mrs. Hillary Clinton! you have a Presidential Library designed (supposedly) for OFFICIAL RECORDS proper keep!
A great General is retiring today as the American flag is to be hoisted above Cuba! now General Ray Odierno deserves the defense in how Iraq engagement by Operation Iraqi Freedom was right and proper, albeit late, very late, - albeit as compromised by political activism of Senator John Kerry (for an anti-war revival #POP) from near as soon as President George W. Bush, with Congress support, had so many boots and equipment on the ground committed.
A great General is retiring today and so today is a great day to talk about how bad a Presidency the Clintons’ Administration was! now is a most appropriate moment to discuss the errs by “political” leadership as more long at fault than that at all of our Military decidings! today is a day to assess more than a prima facia due Clintons’ records hanky panky as per Cuba for today is like a fresh day we can all be cleaner with if to washing our thoughts and to ringing them out as of an if Camp Gitmo is where the Clintons deserve to be assigned! today is a day to wonder if there mustn’t be a #FOB52 - a full deck of 52 known accomplices - a “Friends Of Bill” too associated with that relates capitally to issues that go between “patriots” and if to “military tribunals” most apropos.
To how a great General is retiring, on the day that Secretary of State John Kerry is embattled for the #BadIranDeal, and to hoisting for the American Embassy in Cuba, - ceremonially, is good karma for freedom, due the juxtaposition(s).
Today is a good day to be here! today is a good day to use the #HOGAN #Cats (categories) for historical background (and to better reporting, and historicals)! today is a good day to start with bitly shortcut http://bit.ly/KerryByHogan ~ really! REALLY!
Our Generals, - Military Command Leaders - are admirable beyond an appreciated concurrent to these days of President Barack Obama compromised by Secretary Clinton, and Secretary Kerry! generally it is lesser known, to unknown, how important the story of http://bit.ly/TwoHistories* broaches, by the time you are washed over by enough of its particulars, of it of and related to Senator John Kerry undermining OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, that the tag line for Democrats #TRUTHS is quite simply they have been working to defeat the #USA defeat of #SOCIALISM since the end of the Cold War.
*[Yes, some #HOGAN links do open to sorted sets yet from a column newest, like now, as its opener/first, in scrollable.]
Generally it is so not admirable of a set of Democrats, at least Clinton Democrats, at least some to much a #FOB52 associated, by a conventional measure, as by of citizen review, how yet we can/must now clean ourselves up by cleaning out a that of the Clintons! these days are due an awakening superior to Hans Solo as encased justly, if, in carbonite, for his bad debt(s)! these days are capitol for a distinction between the political and military leadership, to the culpabilities at least rating “NEGLIGENCE” upon the decidings, political, by the Clintos’ Administration.
Rest in peace Robert Conquest! LONG LIVE Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice! long live! ~ LONG LIVE THE FREEDOM AGENDA, and however it still relates to #HOGAN #TCONF - “THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM”!
Today is an especially apropos day, this August day, 14th solar, moon adjusted, in the Year of our Lord 2015, to be to and read through of the important of auto-bio’d as sorted of #CitRB by “Serbian” organized by bitly shortcut http://bit.ly/MadamSecretary* — I can tell of having explained the FREEDOM AGENDA to Ambassador Ivan Vujacic, after I incidentally** ended up at the American Enterprise Institute for a lecture by Robert Conquest, and for the Serbian Ambassador sat down next to me — to that we sat through lunch talking for a half hour, - I do tell, — speak as a lay contributor of having shared so much originally his own strategery such that OFFICIAL RECORDS prudence has no gag order Power over my own historicals, - my so told, and still telling to deep background for so much.
**[I say so “incidentally” for my attending AEI even with Conquest was yet of me a day late for event I thought I was @!]
So President William Jefferson Clinton completely messed up the Middle East by too personal decisions in 1993 that then set up the rest of his term(s) as too compromised from a reasonable justice for all in a tradition akin our Constitution and Bill of Rights! today Secretary of State John Kerry is so to his hoisting as our hoisting above Cuba much yet as compromised for his personal politics to an anti-war revival that is rotten in his setting asunder OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, when in the Senate as Massachusetts’ Senator, in a treasonous for commenced really only after the brave of America and coalition countries had become boots on the ground committed! it is really important we at least now become behooved to beneficial truths now less a political mine field, of Clintons political machine defensives, to how smartly the warming with Irani, and Cuban, can be real - REAL!!!***
*** BUT ONLY IN SO MUCH AS OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, AS OF THE S.O.P. OF THE “THE FREEDOM AGENDA” {AS INTERPRETED BY ME, IN MY UNSOLICITED INTEGRATED STRATEGERY THINK}IS TOO CELEBRATED MORE THAN ANY DEMOCRATS’ PARTY SANCTIONS AFFECTED!
IT FIGURES THAT THESE DAYS OF WELCOME WARMING WITH OLD ENEMIES ARE ONLY POSSIBLE DUE THE MILITARY SUCCESS, NOT THE POLITICAL BRAGGADOCIO OF DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS!
IT FIGURES TODAY IS A MOST IMPORTANT DAY TO CONSIDER THE GUILT OF BILL & HILLARY, AT LEAST TO “NEGLIGENCE” AS TO THEM MORE GUILTY THAT “W” - “43″ -, AND MORE CULPABLE THAN PRESIDENT OBAMA OR YET HIS ALSO SOME COMPROMISED SECRETARY KERRY!
IT FIGURES, TODAY, AMERICANS ARE BEST BEHOOVED TO BEHOLDEN REFRESHED TO TRUTHS TO HOW ANY #IRANDEAL OR #FREECUBA IS NOW WORKABLE PROGRESS #NEWS MORE THANKS TO OUR MILITARY LEADERSHIP, AS A CONUNDRUM, THAN OUR DEMOCRATIC LEADERS!
IT FIGURES, AND TO ERRS OF THE CLINTONS’ ADMINISTRATION IN 1993, THAT SANCTIONS ENFORCEMENT, HOWEVER TO A NUCLEAR BREAKTHROUGH, AS IF A WORKED BLOCKADE FOR FROM A CRISIS, CAN ONLY AFFIRM A COMPLIANT, — NOT A “WARMING”!
IT FIGURES THAT TREASON IS IN THE AIR AS TO A CULPABILITY FOR PRESIDENT CLINTON FOR AT LEAST BY HE POSSESSION OF “HIS” SERVER TO HE THEN UNLAWFUL AS WRONGLY IN THE POSSESSION OF “TOP SECRET” AND LOWER IMPROPRIETIES, TO HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS FIT’N OUR HEADLINES, ESPECIALLY TODAY, - ESPECIALLY ON SUCH A RELATED MOMENTOUS/HUGE/TREMENDOUS DAY!
For today, I, John Peter Hogan, always just a private citizen, do offer too the shortcut bitly http://bit.ly/PettyTreason and as it behoove us all to consider TREASON of HIGH CRIMES, AND MISDEMEANORS, beggard to capital punishment debates! today, now, is an apropos day of politics fit’n the fig’n forthwith of a #DEATHPENALTY good off the tables at least as long as CAMP GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention facilities - and freezing in carbonite are alternatives.
For today, I, John Peter Hogan, of @jphoganorg, of http://facebook.com/jpeterhogan, do offer that it may only seem extreme to serve the Clintons and Kerry before President Obama, and yet that such is more better #BlackLivesMatter, and #feminism, - of for #equality!
For today, I, John Peter Hogan, globally know blogger of http://JPHogan.org, as my primary domain/homepage, suggest that we too as per #Iran, & #Cuba, must/can be considerate, newly, as regards any #DEATHPENALTY, that it may be just/justice for some to be condemned to death for their sins while yet improper, where alternatives extant, to ask any other to by premeditation do such as a killing.
For today, and forward, I, #PoetJPHogan, do stand by all my press’d words, albeit their may be typos, to it that we should consider an actual guilt of vast criminality, and long so by the Clintons machinations, and to it that it would be better to see them “Bill & Hillary” publicly shamed (for eternity?) by public display of them as by a sentenced:
“CARBONITE B&H” #JUSTICE!
Candidate Senator Barack Hussein Obama by choosing to embrace the primarily defeated Clinton “two-fer” forward and too as after they reportedly lost half their Hollywood friends for a rap as BIG LIARS did essentially choose to be the Captain of the Titanic but after it had already struck the iceberg
Concurrently: As posted as a share on Facebook as update this morning: #Politics of 2014 much in thought: CLINTONS BROUGHT DOWN OBAMA! #Democrats should consider Obama with Clintons to Obama w/o Republicans - w/o bipartisanship. Obama with ALL BUSH FAULT too with Clintons as if NONE CLINTONS FAULT. Obama chose not to clean up his own party of excessive lies, at least, and so isolated himself in a divided DC. Obama so with Clintons then to being too w/o #CitRB #CitizenRosebud and yet while #Hogan a singular one historical of knowing Barack & Michelle each since before each knew each other, and first of any so - seems. PBO since late 70s; #FLOTUS since 1987-1988 winter.
Republicans will have a problem if they do not now, and especially loudly before elections, stand up exclamations to the above as #TRUTH #TRUTHS important to any informed deciding as to whom can now be trusted and maybe should be trusted with any voted affirmation. I do not know if it helps to ask: CLINTONS? TERRORISTS OR PEACEMAKERS?
As also a poet perhaps I should restrain myself from such arresting commentary of the Clintons as of a TITANIC for too “romantic”! As a poet perchance I should alight upon a diabolical “THE CLINTONS” more to it that as if of BATTLESHIP and President elect Obama yellow to green in intra-party keeled for it more that he chose to board with the Clintons like after I had sunk their BATTLESHIP - sunk it more than he himself had while also contesting their contemptible primarily.
There is my history as a muse and my emails to Hollywood with instructions per my vast centrist mused manied successes begot there with as for being prior to the exodus from the Clintons of what seems reported of a thought half of their total number of thought “friends” in entertainment. It may be that for such I did more to defeat the Clintons than Senator Obama with all his vast campaign dollars and e-tech organizationals. See before the thought “inevitable” of Mrs. Clinton split in half with such artful exodus it is that I was to emailing with instructions that only but a few of the shows and characters I had seeded with my musing and anchoring forward as with a basis in my reality could be ever to be permitted any presumption not of denial of any usage by the Clintons.
It is that Senator Obama had an easy/easier road to 2008 after I put out cease and desist to Hollywood generally of notice that none should consider anything that had come from me to be assumed or presumed to be for any affirming or supporting of the Clintons. {For a taste of relevance try putting in “Serbia” or “Serbian Ambassador” or “Vujacic” into local site search pane for a sorting otherwise informed of such knowing. Or click on http://bit.ly/MadamSecretary}
RIGHT! TO CLINTONS AS A BATTLESHIP - IT IS QUITE THAT MY NOTICE TO HOLLYWOOD SUNK ‘EM!
And to otherwise see a tragic in WHITE HOUSE DOWN flag twirling metaphorically:
SHOCKING!!! SHOCKING!!! BOTH THE STANDARD OF THE CLINTONS’ CGI AND THE OBAMA GLOBAL WAVES OF “O” ARE GRAPHICALLY AS IMPERIAL - MAYBE MORE IMPERIAL - THAN LIKEWISE THE NAZI THIRD REICH SWASTIKA AS ALSO IMPERIAL OF A GLOBED CIRCLE. TO SEE THE CLINTONS AT LEAST HIERARCHICALLY WITH THERE FLAG THEIR STANDARD TWIRLED PICTURE THIS: BOTH THE CLINTONS AND OBAMA SEEMS TO SEE THEM OF THEIR REALM OF A “GLOBAL WE” WHERE THEIR “STANDARD” IS SUPERIOR TO OLD GLORY AS THE PEOPLE’D PEOPLES’ WOVEN; BOTH THE CLINTONS AND OBAMA SEEM TO TALK A WALK OF YET IMPERIAL GRAPHIC BANNERS TO HEADLINE AS IF SUCH ARE TO BE SEEN AS FLYING ABOVE THE RED, WHITE, BLUE STARS AND STRIPES “OLD GLORY.”
Pretty much it is SHOCKING!!! that even just the Clintons are so graphically IMPERIAL and politically perilously for their as seen to be kept superior also imparts an affirmation of an “up yours” to the European Union otherwise celestial and humble full circle of stars.
There is the question of “permanence”! There is the Constitutional prepositions for and against permanence!
Some stories just come out as if they were meant to be of a magic of a tingle down Chris Matthew’s leg(s) - some times a story just is about how the story writes itself in a prophylactic preparatory.
When I moved to Washington DC in 1998 there was no Department of Homeland Security across the street from American University. When I moved out of “The Beltway” as 2008 elections were of their 2007 stirrings it did exist and I had been incidentally to explaining to Ivan Vujacic, the then Ambassador to the United States of America from Serbia , during an accidental meeting at an American Enterprise Institute event how Senator Hillary Clinton should not and would not win the 2008 elections. What was most odd to the Ambassador at first was that my opinion ran counter to what he said he was hearing from “top Republicans” that he should like “prepare for Hillary Clinton to be the next President.”
2008 was of election cycles where the Republicans seemed defeated and just campaign puppets for the Democrats to play with from the start. For me though it was as it was that I was able to explain a defeat logically to the Serbian Ambassador; for me it was that I knew that the Clintons did not have the integrated marketing concept or rights to that of the nineties that was still making them appear to be better - far better - than they ever really were.
2006 was of a politics of Iraq and a surge debate that had me behind the MIRROR cover for TIME Person of Year cover as a recommendation in lieu of a YES to TIME for query to a picture of me as “uc” for such cover. I was very publicly blogging with commentary in 2006 for the IRAQ surge and then in defense of it and as it was many times directly it seems in a contrary and superior logic to that of Chris Matthews. 2006 was my first year of internet “blogging” and was mostly exclusively on the media watchdog site http://newsbusters.org — by 2007 I was better known and as J.P. Hogan for blogged commentary mostly across the treads of http://politico.com. I have been my “more a Citizen Rosebud than a Citizen Kane since 1983 - at least.
For decades I have fought a Holy Cross group think that may only partly explain Chris Matthews - I exist beyond a metaphysics with many of The Crusaders as kin. I’ve been of years of helping Democrats and Republicans by fixing and/or moderating what I saw as flaws in what was identifiable as of a group think of Holy Cross College and maybe prepared so myself beyond my self learning gains as by my Augustinian, not Jesuit, Villanova University BA. I have a BA in Economics and the credits for a minor in philosophy that is of my “undeclared minor” in Philosophy for I took them to such but without informing the Philosophy Department of my intent or motives for minoring in Philosophy.
But this is supposed to be a prophylactic satire on a scheduled lap dance at American University - at least metaphorically speaking.
Right the Clintons successes where they were and if they actually lasted may much be of my shared story of them of using my guidance of the 1992 primary problematic years. They were not of authorization to use such so as they much did from me after their unexpected election in 1992 — I say such much because had they asked for permission for a proper use I would have said no and in an expressed spirit of that I wouldn’t even use them to govern as they had been workable yet for campaigning. The Clintons are known by me for making a mess of a whole lot and some to much to me knowing such just because they proceeded to use without permission that they should have asked permission for and so in the ways that I as an architect about them never meant or was for guidance in further use there of.
So it seems that it must be more akin to a LAP DANCE scheduled between “HARDBALL” host Chris Matthews as the stage is being set politically with teasing as if a grand SLOW PITCH SOFT BALL SOFTBALL “HARDBALL” the “journalism” to be pressed.
American co-eds when I graduated from Villanova University in 1987 after having grown up in a prime Yale University & New Haven Professionals neighborhood with Yale Professors in Economics my neighbors and ‘rents of my peers I did not yet figure that one would later become a first client and then become a twenty year reigned President of Yale. I did while at Villanova know Pat McPherson the President of Bryn Mawr as a family friend through her father. But I regress to share as it seems timely to refresh that I do post and update at times with some that were college papers I wrote whence that have been relevant now during much of these trying times, and as I did also graduate with 12 credits in Modern Standard Arabic and a politic science elective that taught me “there is no such thing as permanent enemies or friends - just permanent interests” & another that was full of content related to course title as about the United Nations and International Organizations. Yes, my BA so amassed at Villanova though with hardly a chapel or church visit or physical participation too with me of one course in computer programing in Pascal.
The sad truth is that I while using other more self taught disciplines in my years of self employment did as a successful and engaged hobby maintain an ambition of my Villanova Economics BA towards at least and existential or metaphysical better earthly realm for a philosophical in an integrated marketing mine to widely/broadly facilitate hopes and thought to and for economic recovery and record low unemployment. From my knowing of the Clintons personally since early 1970s when they were still in the neighborhood as Yale Law students I have been keenly aware of how they have gotten credit for much that since they haven’t been able to repeat while of yet being again of using as much “governance” energy as they thought the past good times had taken to be.
But this is about the concern and dangers of what may be conceived tomorrow between Chris Matthews and President Barack Hussein Obama at the venue of American University. This is about bad seeds maybe but as timely now of it more of dangers of bad and flawed logic much too of the flaws in reasoning and marketing of the THE KRUGMAN FALLACY @ http://bit.ly/1dmjKqL. The shared “politics” of HARDBALL’s Chris Matthews and President Barack Obama are of the economic mess, and of it as that their NEW NATIONALISM is so also of the new deal austerity mashed GREEN to a green minimalism mantra; they share in how it was of a predictable to the said near depression recession. The economy actually was poised to recover and take off in 2008 & 2009 otherwise if “nationalism” was not encourage and if Congress would have moved to restore consumer confidence by seriously affecting bank reforms.
All are welcome at my still free to read e-sampler of JPHogan.org > http://jphogan.org! There there are many pieces that explain the politics and economic history that can be a prophylactic to what is being teased as “journalism” worthy tomorrow between expectantly seated HARDBALL Chris Matthews and rightfully embattled President Barack Hussein Obama at American University. There there are also some poems some original rap and some odic renditions as of a lyrical tradition as poetry or song as meant to be sung or at least read aloud with attitude and pace.
The THE RICE SISTERS is one at JPHogan.org that is meant to be sung.
As to the complexity of my integration of my (hobby) of marketings what the Clintons and most others cannot be is me whom synthesized local New Haven new world order pro-active writing for “jounalism” and the politics of city and state with a global post Persian Gulf balance while as well moderating original concerns related to Stanley Tools for new handsaw evolution revolution; Snowboard and half-pipe pathology of origins from a high school brainstorming with a sledding pal; LIFE IS GOOD take off after VU classmate Bert Jacobs & I met at our fifth reunion and he told me he and his brother after three years were ready to give up; and even much the major changes that fit with even just these few as was of the IBM saving. I could list shows that can be said to have been conceived and anchored in the spirit of all this as of my mused from a far maybe golden touch - I’ve already filled in/out too much for today - for here.
The “permanence” tease is of the Constitutional abuse of power purview due about President Obama and Obamacare. A First Amendment challenge can be yet about a legality and Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act as it was passed only as a Law and not yet as even an Amendment or a Right of the Constitution but as a tax while taxing is basically specifically only expected to be non-permanent and not Constitutionally, it seems, to be a allowable basis for such a permanence in new social welfare centralized socialistic entitlements as an establishment for eternity.
To read the First Amendment and get to the use of “establishment” and “respecting” as just specified as a bar to Congress per Religion should have any student of America at least to firstly wondering like: Ok, why did they use “establishment” - why does “establishment” sound so familiar - Oh my! Why is “establish” in the preamble with “ordain” and so that the founders writ it permanent as greater than a Law of Congress so by their unanimity in subscriptions under God by signage so eternal as might endure so of it keyed for legend in “the Year of our Lord” and with “our” not also or otherwise capitalized?
To read the First Amendment and its quite unusual grammar and capitalizing there is also that the word “respecting” is odd unless there is firstly the body of the Constitution as set as an establishment in the New Testament by way of subscriptions in unanimity under God by rooting in the Christian calendar. It seems it is playful and instructive and to how Obamacare aka ACA has a First Amendment violation that is coming to a head - politically. I do not know prematurely what will be beyond teased at American University this Thursday in December 2013 but I do wonder why “respecting” is used if not to affirm the above of the body of the Constitution as writ larger than a mere Law by Congress as a Constitution of the People and to demonstrate the spectacle of the body by an amendment barring Congress supposedly from the very type of governance being more than tease by a too “post-Constitutional” advocate as President, President Barack Hussein Obama.
It seems to reason out and be pre-figured and secured that if just as “It’s a Tax” then Obamacare as the Affordable Care Act is not to be considered by The Supreme Court of The United States of America as of an established right to permanence. If you also have not refreshed your American history even by Jon Meacham’s THOMAS JEFFERSON - ART OF POWER than you may still be missing the folds of history as of he that penned the Declaration of Independence was of duties to new nation with stationing in France at the time of the Founding Fathers’ penning of the body of the Constitution for a greater than mere Law of Congress eternity if it could endure.
The First Amendment is a wonder to be sorted some to much by the spring calendars of our governance; It seems to have been requested by a returned Thomas Jefferson as part of a Bill of Rights and yet it seems to have been cleverly written to yet affirm much of what Thomas Jefferson so more of his deism and “Age of Reason” preponderance found offensive.
To wake in Gracie Mansion with the City on your shoulders - perchance as not judged “lesbian” by the Pope as dawn breaks after dawns - Christie Quinn may have a yoga mat for that - a set of rosary beads - actual candles to light each morn pro-procreation.
The Big Apple has big hopes and wakes each day strongly of a pro-procreation metrosexual - at least.
You likely at this moment are more afraid with where I might be going with this new column so titled than where I am as set of considerations about how much political capital I still have banked and unspent as a feminist.
There is good news quite in that a Mayor Quinn can be no Hillary Clinton, nor a reborn Governor Clinton, or General Clinton.
Poor Diane Lane - oh the thumping she will have to take just to get into character. Oh, My! It is almost as bad as A. Weiner leaving nothing left to one’s imagination. The Clintons’ apples haven’t fallen far from their tree.
A four part miniseries of the “vessel” Clinton that is Hillary must embrace farce to be realistic. Hillary has long willingly been subservient to Bill Clinton’s ambitions and as I have known since I was of, to her, in the early 70s of an answer: “If you want to be President be careful who goes first.” I have known since the Clintons were law students that Hillary Rodham Clinton wanted to be President and am among a few I figure that told her to run first if she wanted to ever actually realized such.
Yes, I am banking on having most if not all of the political capital from my decade(s) as a feminist now to work with especially now as per THE BUSTED VESSEL here. It is a long story as to how I can and should have so much feminist political capital such that even NBC is quite on a list of debtors fittingly, if of an artists’ code, to me due eventually much credit as a most successful and entertaining muse/wizard. A miniseries of Hillary Clinton should tell of me at least as per my extensive strategizing that can be reprinted/rebroadcast to show how effectively I was strategic in the 2008 defeat of the Clintons.
I expect that a Mayor Quinn can great each dawn as well as any straight mayor with a lighting of candles of a grand energy in celebration of a pro-procreation civility. She can say she has a yoga mat for it without having a personal natural penchance of it, and yes guys (& A. Weiner) she can light actual candles, as well. I do not know how a Mayor Quinn has designs on dusk and dawn Gracie celebratory ops - I do wonder how she would too great each day so pro-living and pro-life in a survival of the species natural pro-procreation (lobby) posture - and if by rosaries or candles or even if by community calisthenics or yoga.
As to the thumping Diane Lane now is teased to professionally having to be to: As the Weiner couple are apples fallen from the Clintons’ tree we have to consider that Hillary Clinton is already outed as a busted political vessel. It is farcical how she has been a Bill’s is not an is herself and such that it is her legacy that she has been submissive as his Mrs. quite of a husbandry, however, of a readiness to be whomever her husband wanted or needed her to be.
There are foreign and domestic problems with Hillary and Diane as vessels of Bill Clinton - as either Ambassador to the World Bill Clinton or President of the World Bill Clinton. It seems Hillary already has been a vessel as to be beyond domestic and to being an international “boat” partner to President Clinton as a globalist firstly. It seems that Mrs. Clinton and Diane Lane can only use farce now to sell the Clintons as a suspended historical - a suspended reality - is necessary for an acceptable Posterity.
Little known of the Clintons humiliating defeat in 2008 whence thence commenced so publicly with Mrs. Clinton as “inevitable” is how I was able with my bankable political capital to prevent them from sounding like themselves as they were thought to be of their eight years as first couple. I was able to protect what was originally mine and while motivated then (and still) to avoid at all costs any knowing effort that would be to me helping them succeed in stealing from me. 2008 was a year of a defeat of the Clintons that I predicted many times while otherwise mostly of having been to explaining why they shouldn’t win. I am not sure I explained it better to any one person than when that day in 2007, if I recall, that the Serbian Ambassador to the United States sat down next to me at an American Enterprise Institute public event. When Ivan Vujacic and I got talking over the lunch break we got talking about Hillary and the 2008 race. I did take issue with his remark that top Republicans were telling him he should expect that Hillary Clinton would be the next President and did work through my opinions with adaptations so to fit his State interests as per Serbia.
With the Clintons - I am to wondering how many times must I so defeat them. I have succeeded many times since having worked to make them the promised “electable” for 1992 I teased to Democrats like Representative Gephardt, Representative Rosa DeLauro, and some too when then as well of a meeting with Doug Sosnik in Senator Dodd’s office in months prior to the Clintons very late entry into the 1992 race. Right! George Stephanopoulus was then with a Koch as peers running Representative Gephardt’s office - Representative Rosa DeLauro was a long time neighbor and my rep - Doug Sosnik was Senator Christopher Dodd’s AA and my sister Joan’s boss. (Yes, my political capital as a past feminist is still largely unspent - and there is much that relates to my sister and her professional story) The Greenberg - DeLauro family is that of such as my old neighbors with their wards/children my peers and friends.
But back to THE BUSTED VESSEL as a problem for Diane Lane and the world: Hillary Clinton has now too long been borderless with Bill Clinton’s post presidency global internationalism such that she has been his boat sailed too long tackless and much adrift as to Constitutional propriety of important lines and visceral dimensions between foreign and domestic. The Clintons have together busted out beyond “American” as per Hillary as a political “vessel.” It seems evident already that Hillary can no longer discern the difference between American and Global as per politics - that she is a “boat” too long sailed with the international thumping of Bill Clinton either as Ambassador to the World or President of the World.
Diane Lane may be able to sell that Hillary Clinton need only too have a candle to light or a yoga mat specially designated - but Hillary to be real is herself quite already sailed past a point of safe return. Her Benghazi and her A. Weiner scandals show that the Clintons quite are already too much a vessel hard on the rocks.
As per Hollywood and a miniseries somehow created to try to pimp Hillary Clinton as fresh and usable - I have beaten her before - I have beaten her badly - she broke bad so long ago it was easy to break them publicly down enough for Senator Obama to have had such and unexpected opportunity. It was that I was able to defeat them with Hollywood without spending my political capital that should be bankable as long as there is an artists’ code - In essence I needed the legal authority of the Bush Administration to protect my rights to my original works and such as my intellectual property - I did need for Bush to be pro Law and Order in order for me to keep the Clintons from hiding their bad again by taking credit for so much that was originally of me and as my good.
As per Hollywood I still mean to work to historical documentaries of a more honest portrayal of the Clintons’ 90s as years fit a title that should surprise yet inform as: THE TERRIBLE NINETIES.
As per Hollywood and my said defeat of the Clintons it is that before they so publicly lost half their Hollywood friends and such have of their expected silver screen booty I had put out to such artist realm a personal dictate than none of the many who benefited from my years of entertaining musing were authorized to interpret any of it then or forward anyhow as in a support of the Clintons. I heard the cries that thousands would lose their jobs there - I was insistent quite and because I have no intention of ever knowingly being to helping the Clintons succeed in stealing from me.
Yes, Diane Lane and others - I know GAME CHANGE movie is a big lie about and for Hillary and Bill Clinton, and, I hope there is still a working artists’ code. I did before Hollywood turned half against the Clintons so instruct that those especially to millionaire celebrity status via NBC sitcom successes be respectful of my personal dictate that nothing that had come from me was to be interpreted anyhow or used to help the Clintons.
When I was to telling many that they shouldn’t expect Hillary Clinton to win in 2008, and as it was at times while such seemed a politically insane posturing I was of special and unique knowledge of how much I should be able to keep the Clintons from sounding like the Clintons of old - I was confident I would be able to keep them from sounding again like me.
Yes, I was amazed after the Clintons did succeed as I had said a Democrat could in 1992 when then as well of speaking against what seemed the pollable obviousness — I was though really amazed that they proceeded to govern then too much on what had come from me without approaching me to acquire any or all rights to such. But really I was more amazed and scared that they then would proceed to pervert such that had worked as promised as from me without consulting with its originator as to whether it had pitfalls or dangers set to unfold if it were used otherwise or used past “campaign” worked posturing.
The Clintons have been of Hillary a loyal spouse a vessel too long thumped, however, however political, however international, such that a Hillary For President 2016 is a busted vessel too dangerous to actually float.
What is it said about “plans” and “war” - about “a plan” as soon as an actual war starts?
President Obama as Candidate Barack Hussein Obama - BHO - planned to be a new JFK, right?
And now how while BHO is seeming more pasty and unprepared for prime time You Tube video streams?
Looking at 2012 complexity:
> Are we to define “working class” as those of class as per governance that have work that pays taxes - and so “working class” is those busy as the reported less than fifty percent that pay taxes into a …? When President Obama says - “get back to work” is he speaking to the “rich” as his “working class” as it is they he needs working to afford his own “work”?
> So bike and pedestrian projects are “local” - pedestrian bridges and bike paths are best kept or made “local” projects and as near to “public/private” partnerships as economically reasonable as alternative and “better” commuting routes to businesses - businesses especially local fitness centers and eating establishments?
> More on the survival of our Constitution: #SCOTUS today with Arizona case set up ACA ruling seriously well >> from today’s decision and especially siding by Chief Justice Roberts we have established practically that if you can’t use race or “legal” status in Arizona then it cannot then be used by doctors under any Obamacare even for “family” or “genetic” factors and that Obama wants our borders open so that any can have American care since well after today they don’t have to carry proof of legal presence.
> Query: Re: Arizona dec - Conservative Justices could so support such for by supporting such they reinforce deciding against Obamacare - ACA - for having no limiting principles like with Arizona an example since of no power to establish whom therefore is “legal” and limited to Obamacare???
> Anyone have the numbers for this yet?: Is Obama running for re-election hoping for votes from recently unemployed or is he running for votes for millions grateful for a near three year paid vacation? Are women for Obama grateful and willing to vote for him for having thinned down the jobs market so much they have him as an excuse to stay at home with more “me time” - or are they considering re-electing him thinking he knows what work they are better to be doing and believable with promises of finding non “me time” work for women?
> If I were moderating a Presidential Debate tonight I would have or hope for a question about immigration and self deportation of these economic times as it seems since immigration wasn’t worked out and fixed before ACA - Obamacare hysterics our economy may not start growing the new jobs in a new growth economy than some that haven’t self deported are maybe still waiting for, and so that we are to ask and get an answer about whether it is possible that until immigration is fixed the jobs won’t come back and that if a new immigration or re-immigrate legally system can be worked out it may be smarter and more self serving to self deport just so so much that Dems did backwards can be fixed and to unleash a new attractive growth economy.
Hmmm? Anyone - anyone with the last name Romney or Obama?
> Related to “SOVEREIGN STATE” powers and rights we have actually inseparable and relative philosophically at least - as least socially speaking comparatively - that therefore when a state is sovereign whom is “legal” is a particular particular - say for if Obamacare isn’t overturned if the United States of America is to have enough armed forces in another country another “sovereign state” and enough force to “OCCUPY” such state regardless of the stated state of such forces as if not combat though combat ready - hmmm? It follows whom is “legal” or a “subject” critical for by the very lack of a complete philosophy of governance with sufficient checks and balances of limiting principles then therefore it stands that if the United States or another state is to have enough armed forces in another sovereign state but so that then morally all the people of that sovereign state have a right to expect for the duration of effective “OCCUPATION” the same full rights to medical coverage and American medical care. So it seems #SCOTUS - how can it not be so based on the inadequate limits herefore so far writ?
> The easiest way I have of remembering the troop size considered by some to have been an Iraq OCCUPATION force of United States of American stand up citizens is to remember than during the primary race between junior Senator Clinton and junior Senator Obama in just Massachusetts’ primary the gap between them that primary election day was about 150,000 - about the same number of US troops at highest level of deployed whence.
> With efforts to ACA - Obamacare was much about a federal IMAC clearinghouse of all legal citizens and their personal medical files and medical histories and maybe as well to required annual or semi-annual check-ups #SCOTUS to the Thursday a wonder where we may be to hearing as well how IMAC so conceived as a Big Brother centralized computer database system to cost efficiencies isn’t to our Government to illegal search and seizure of incriminating personal information like urine - stool - and blood tests for all the substances legal and illegal then most a political and/or health concern. I mean didn’t Obamacare get set up to allow the new Big Brother Centralized Main Frame IMAC concept to be to comparing and contrasting details of individual citizen’s current and past medical facts without warrants otherwise to such and so to cost analysis maybe not just down to zip code but maybe per street to an objectivity not based on name that would at least be allowed to legally publish sharable analytics with “detail” down to at least a side of a particular street within a particular zip code or subset per zip-code?
> So as per #SCOTUS is it Thursday we may be reading lines about how in America and these United States you cannot claim “Under God” that an individual citizen’s soul or sexuality is free and locally set asunder in rights and yet have their body and its “jurisdiction” as per “their” body be to “their” body being of a soulless national body physically of national jurisdiction and Supreme Powers and even to a control of its arms via dictates adapted may as well to limit control of arms as per our thought preserved Second Amendment rights? #commonsense It is Thursday we may have to wonder how our nation can separate our body from our freedoms and our soul?
> Wow - aren’t we to the Clintons are suspect as towards all this and much of their 8 now vacuous of waste - time lost on a wrong path - to a post Constitutional era that isn’t?
> There is a big diff between how CGI was set up and how it is being run - Mr C claimed he would not use it to partisan or political powers - and yet really he is and is regularly - most regularly to an irregular especially when of his annual mandatory meeting of world leaders then able to be in town also for the meeting of the over-shadowed so United
Nations???
> With this (Major Lawsuit Claims Dodd-Frank Is Unconstitutional) as long as some of ACA - Obamacare Unconstitutional - we have that Clinton Global Initiative as operating can also be challenge and separation of powers concerns and especially since it is operating while Mrs C is Madam Sec Mrs. C. — they thought they had the Constitution beat as no longer relevant and tried to do how much??? And Mrs. C our top officer responsible for saying whether Mr. C is operating completely within the intent of our protections and for saying whether anyone should be even looking at Mr. C so?
> And so yes - Operation Iraqi Freedom was needed and with us in the right to be about it so. Yes Bush admin though of a good feeling that it was right was not all that great at selling us on it as right - that said, the time to sell it rightly and timely was the first term of the Clintons’ admin thought maybe easiest if actually the second term of President George H. W. Bush. Don’t know if I have written this all out fully yet but I have addressed it much now many places for a long while and in some of columns of just past few years.
Hmmm? Yes it was right but not sold well - and I had confidence that Bush 43 had a feeling that it was right though he maybe could have sold it better even though the best time to sell it and only easy time was likely during what was the Clintons’ first term.
> And so still yes - Operation Iraqi Freedom was right and necessary and yet not to cause a peoples movement across the Middle East but so that we didn’t get trapped morally and hypocritically on the wrong side of it - and maybe as Saddam Hussein had considered or hoped he could trap us and as of a thinking that he had a way to keep Kuwait after invading it. Hmmm? Yeh a re-election of the Clintons would have been maybe America’s biggest ever mistake too - a return of the Clintons with suggestions that they were wise of a Grand Strategy needing continuity even though there was an actual ‘GRAND’ strategy - and nor a left entrance or exit plan for dealing with Iraq to leave to their successor whom ever - and so no real alternative by the Clintons and only a weak supposition of “bite” by Clintons for sanctions even just for human rights violations.
> Well, that was an interesting line in Foreign Affairs by Brooking xprts to find today about how Arab Spring was an unexpected curve ball to Pres O and therefore necessarily also former FLOTUS Madam Sec Mrs. C. I thought they had been trying to take credit for it and not have their favorite institute of xprts say it was a ‘CURVE BALL’ unexpected. See this is where it gets very interesting - if you have been to un-hid {maybe again “hidden”}commentary/blog page at jphogan.org as enticed you likely saw a composition mentioning a 2007ish conversation I had with Serbian Ambassador Ivan Vujacic about Hillary and Operation Iraqi Freedom - about why even though if AEI had “top Republicans” seeming already defeated that they were so early saying he should expect Hillary to be the next US President - - about Operation Iraqi Freedom while I told him Hillary shouldn’t or couldn’t win while then adapting for the only time anyone asked me to explain and defend Operation Iraqi Freedom and Bush admin as per Serbia and me to telling him my personal thoughts and how such was with needing that Clintons were not elected and to that way a way that Serbia would be able to be best positioned for the type of peoples movement I had a hunch had to be allowed for - sort of like the Arab Spring. Seems my advice is admitable now as right then for how we did the necessary thing with Operation Iraqi Freedom even if it wasn’t sold as well as it could have been.
Hmmm? I guess Obama’s favorite xprts aren’t also going with: Neither Obama nor Clinton were prepared for such.
Hmmm? Did you hear the one about Obama policies expert Vladimir Putin and how he suggested that if President Obama didn’t beat his addiction to Soviet socialism he could cause the United States to fall apart into six separate regional realms? @jphoganorg of http://jphogan.org/ & …
Recently I asked: How did we get from the Six Million Dollar Man to the 16 Trillion Dollar Women?
To read Maureen Dowd today one seems to be asked to forget President Obama Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance speech and its admonition of the “avoidance” and “inaction” of the Clintons’ Presidency as it seemed about women’s rights and their talking it but not walking it at least as per Afghanistan.
We have now just to see Ground Zero and even with all the beautiful restoration about it and the splendor planned to be to an instinctive reaction to a pronouncement thought at least that our 90s must have been a mess - that the Clintons’ 90 were really a mess.
President Obama now persists with his attempt to cover-up for the Clintons inaction and avoidance yet when he actually did seem to so admonish them so. We have historically that Obama’s Iraq position though oddly unchanged as history more revealed begets a contrariness as per Madam Sec Mrs. Clinton and feminism. As per Clintons’ 90s and feminism we have that now by President Obama’s own edicts that we should have helped women of Afghanistan but ignored the women of Iraq.
We have that the Clintons’ “globalism” now is to spreading the big “D” not the small “d” and with their big “D” for Democrats and all the while President Bush’s Operation Iraqi Freedom was about spreading small “d” democracy, and as well his trading of school and road construction for permission in Afghanistan to trespass their sovereignty in our chase of about 50 Al Qaeda members thought to be camping in their country.
We have, looking to Tampa Convening, that even Candidate Mitt Romney is running to be a better democrat than the Obama administration has been and the Clintons’ administration actually was.
There was not majority representation in Iraq until after President Bush stayed the course, and, stayed the course some more. President Obama still today held to his cobbled “foundation” on his own otherwise shifting sands that is his dedication to an elementary premise his, about Saddam Hussein and the regional geo-politics involving Iraq.
As per Thomas Friedman and his waxing about capitalism and communism it is still plausible that we are now engaged in the last battles of the “Capitalism v. Communism” entanglements as those at “home” have been teased/drawn out as Obamacrats too socialistic. We seem amidst the battle between the “Communists” sympathies thought about our sixties and seventies at “home” and the survival of the “capitalist” free market traditions now still kickin’ it quite well.
The Clintons’ 90s must have actually have been a mess! By Tampa their “X” factor likely to be on parade as much as the for being of an entirely separate school of thinking as Obamanomics is from economic direction Republicans are of a new promise.
We have a simple allegorical to suggest Obama has problems with Saddam Hussein still: If Saddam Hussein were a Chicago crack lord as much a tyrant to his turf he too then under Obama likely would be as deserving to escape justice.
We are now to a Democrat suggestion that the Clintons were right to avoid Iraq and Afghanistan even though their intelligence estimates likely defied their public messaging suggestive that we of America were to a moral right to have PEACE DIVIDENDS. We have by the suggestion that Iraq was a war of choice that Obama’s choice to war on Afghanistan more than just in Afghanistan belies the Clintons’ avoidance and inaction and raises queries as to how or why we should be fighting for the women under the Taliban and not have for the women under Saddam Hussein?
And we have the “feminism” example of “rouge” Sarah H. Palin too as Tampa X Factors rear near. We don’t have an all or nothing hit the roads with “Hillary” or just hit the road - we have striking comparisons just between “Sarah” and “Hillary” as per feminism and action, family values and politics, Title IX & Title X, and, two parties with different foreign policies and economic options separable as two remarkably different schools of thinking.
It may help that so many men are still contesting for the Republican nomination since it seems the Tampa 2012 Convention could be much or mostly about women. And, why President Obama was willing to try to cover-up for the Clintons with his elementary white paper speak suggestive that Saddam Hussein was to be allowed to fully escape justice from his subjects.
As I recall, this now may be part of “rogue” Sarah H. Palin’s Southern Strategy. And WOW I really still cannot believe that we have Madam Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton our first or last line of defense and over-sight over Mr. Clinton, former President, and his global initiatives and mass money moving efforts that to some at least somewhere are likely considered “material support of terrorism” and all the while it seems the Bush administration pushed small “d” democracy and the Clintons both more to pushing a global partisan spread even with US tax dollars of big “D” Democrat machinations to global partisan political support and development of Clinton power.
Separating Saddam Hussein from crimes against his people and war crimes is like separating either Clinton from PARTISAN politics. I still hold to my complex thinking about Operation Iraqi Freedom and that where it was a Bush Freedom Agenda that such was to spreading equal rights more equally and without it being “religious” or “partisan” as per American Republicans or Democrats.
I was though back in 2007 maybe that I did explain it best and as that Operation Iraqi Freedom was necessary like because the Middle East could be having a democratic awakening that if we were not to first having attempted to remedy our past entanglements with Saddam Hussein could have US forever on the wrong side of Middle East peoples wanting as much freedom as we claimed for ourselves. But this memory is of my conversation with Ivan Vujacic, Serbian Ambassador to the US after he sat down next to me at an American Enterprise Institute lecture and we got talking over lunch and with me to offering this as applicable for Serbian interests too.
Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton (born William Blythe III) was to official first days as President Obama’s Cabinet ranked official for diplomacy to saying near: “We won’t be making human rights a priority.”
I don’t know where this “Hillary” has come from - and I have been wondering if she were dressing herself.