It is elementary dear Budget San. You may be away from your wheel house for a while, actually quite a while.
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
There may be something equally historical to the lost decade for Japanese economy and the T BIRDS.
As an avian Bill flew yet as an avian Hill seems to have her wings clipped.
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
Her T BIRD is fried - it hits the pan and burns. Avian fluish less her condition than Evian spelled backwards.
We could all start with: THERE IS NO MONEY FOR BOATS.
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
MacAurthur, General, had boats but the Navy had ships and vessels - you could say.
Anjin San had a ship, had another, even had another, I think.
In the early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate Americana to JAPANESE MANAGEMENT CULTURE.
IBM may have been ready - yet a story as trying as Anjin Sans there may be to floating IBM from such whence.
Her T BIRD is fried - it hits the pan and burns. Avian fluish less her condition than Evian spelled backwards.
It is elementary dear Budget San. You may be away from your wheel house for a while, actually quite a while.
There may be something equally historical to the lost decade for Japanese economy and the T BIRDS.
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet? Have you even heard of the bird flu so avian and Asian whence?
IBM may have been ready - yet a story as trying as Anjin Sans there may be to floating IBM from such whence.
America didn’t have to follow its leaders it didn’t also be to such “almost” JAPANESE MANAGEMENT assimilation.
GE may have been on board at first and as well rallied to sail and tack back to more American waters.
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
For the Japanese of early 90s nothing suddenly surprising wasn’t quite a gung - ho as they had planned.
For the United States of America today we should deal with an elementary of a Budget San as well as naivete of a Hill.
There may be something equally historical to the lost decade for Japanese economy and the T BIRDS.
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
Dear Budget San, how elementary is it that CLINTONS’ SURPLUS & OBAMA’S IN RED STATE are irreconcilable?
These truths we hold self evident — we should.
It is elementary that OBAMA’S RED STATE SPENDING upside down to CLINTONS’ TOO BLACK SURPLUS.
We could all start with: THERE IS NO MONEY FOR BOATS.
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
In the Year of our Lord two thousand ten and two years either Clintons are right or Obama is right.
It should be elementary and self evident that these two can not both be right.
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
For the Japanese of early 90s nothing suddenly surprising wasn’t quite a gung - ho as they had planned.
Are we all clearly now of a tale of SHOBUDGE with trials of a Budget San?
Oh, Captain our Captains - Clintons can not also be right if Obama right about spending. One dishonorable?
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
Call me SHOBUDGE?
Call me Budget San?
Call me ghost of 90s past when once more to a T BIRD stand for domestic over expected foreign flop?
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
MacAurthur, General, had boats but the Navy had ships and vessels - you could say.
Were we just court marshalling MacArthur - a past Robert Moses of Japan - of Japanese?
Was the JAPANESE MANAGEMENT CULTURE we suddenly turned from assimilating to too MacArthur so?
As an avian Bill flew yet as an avian Hill seems to have her wings clipped.
This time a budget - a Budget San wheel house or not our USA still sworn to Constitutionals?
This time a budget - a Budget San with less float needed?
We could all start for CLINTONS’ SURPLUS “bad” if RED STATE SPENDING “good”?
We could all start for RED STATE SPENDING “bad” if CLINTONS’ SURPLUS “good”?
Yet it seems elementary, finally, and consecrated enough that C’s SURPLUS has cost too much to rebuild.
We have that Hill of Bill doth cut near two trillion with cutting “good” and spending to the red “bad”!
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
Her T BIRD is fried - it hits the pan and burns. Avian fluish less her condition than Evian spelled backwards.
Anjin San had a ship, had another, even had another, I think.
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
MacAurthur, General, had boats but the Navy had ships and vessels - you could say.
You could ask Akers or Welch, maybe even Punch or Pinch.
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
Call me SHOBUDGE?
Call me Budget San?
Call me ghost of 90s past when once more to a T BIRD stand for domestic over expected foreign flop?
Before one can set sail anew it may be more about how you budget than why you budget.
We have that Hill of Bill doth cut near two trillion with cutting “good” and spending to the red “bad”!
Her T BIRD is fried - it hits the pan and burns. Avian fluish less her condition than Evian spelled backwards.
We could all start with: THERE IS NO MONEY FOR BOATS.
We could all start with: Cars, threats foreign and domestic - in early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate.
MacAurthur, General, had boats but the Navy had ships and vessels - you could say.
Anjin San had a ship, had another, even had another, I think.
In the early 90s we didn’t need to assimilate Americana to JAPANESE MANAGEMENT CULTURE.
Have you found the missing years 1993 - 2001 yet?
It seems self evident there still is a shipped naivete that C’s SURPLUS can be a “good”.
We have little figured yet just how much more it has cost USA to put back so much spending cut by Clintons.
As an avian Bill flew yet as an avian Hill seems to have her wings clipped.
As Bill set sail fronting as a “two-fer” Hill now sinks, and hardly fathoms her problema maxis.
For the Japanese of early 90s nothing suddenly surprising wasn’t quite a gung - ho as they had planned.
For the people of the world - Republicans and patriots all - things aren’t going as Clintons planned or budgeted.
{note: Yes this is partly autobiographical and as well of those years mine still in my early twenties so to standing against businesses of Business Roundtable and IBM at least when the dared seem to take first step to issuances of a guidance suggestive of an American need to assimilate all to JAPANESE MANAGEMENT CULTURE.}
In the legend of Johnny Cash there really is a prison - a Folsom Prison. And yet when you hear how poorly she wares MEMBERS ONLY? comes to mind - is the thought that should be landing in measured time.
It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.
First Lady Michelle Obama had a call Herculean and daunting just for the trillions the Clintons’ dietariness was costing.
First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton has been more to dressing to Marie Antoinette than to the black of Johnny Cash.
Oh, have you yet considered our times of old - say September 12 , 2001 - and how a then President Barack Hussein Obama would have stepped out?
Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes? The all black of Johnny Cash, NOT - but maybe the hats of M. Antoinette?
First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton did more to encourage a two Big Macs a day habit than the austerity of First Lady Michelle Obama. First Lady Hillary did seem to favor KING OF QUEENS mad dashing to a marketed acceptability of her bubba’s pre-existing condition. First Lady Michelle as otherwise embrace labor and austerity and “twigs” for her hubbie.
Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes? Can you imagine both in stripes?
It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.
Prison fare may suit them and even set a better example for all - even better than “twigs” for Lady Obama’s hubbie.
Word is it is costing us a trillion more than it would have - word is the Clintons dietary “leadership” raised weights and related healthcare costs for the past two decades such that a reverse of their guidance could save us a trillion dollars in healthcare costs.
But diabolical more is still the alternate realm and possibility of this President Obama as President Obama circa 9-12-01.
We have that he is a man merely of “twigs” and “arugula” but when his burger is with cheddar, arugula and Dijon mustard. We have that he, President Obama, another of a Hyde Park with wants to New Deal Austerity for all has stayed in character theirs so.
It is tough still growing up on Clintons - it has been especially tough for so many to their diets.
As you wake up to this thought as if waking now on September 12, 2001 with President Obama in charge of which ever nationalism or new nationalism he might already have worked out with labors, his - would it be stripes for the Clintons, and not the flattering types?
As you wake up to this thought asked in keeping with Obamas now decades still in character consistency so - would it be a call to austerity and apologies and as well a chiding of a suggestion to “please go shopping”?
Can you imagine a Clinton in stripes? The all black of Johnny Cash, NOT - but maybe the hats of M. Antoinette?
Seems we can suggest that the Obamas do only know austerity for others and not in a Johnny Cash black suitedness kindly way.
But as you wake to these thoughts - and stir anew in as much curiosity to intellectual honesty as your habit or hope — President Barack Hussein Obama on a morning of September 12, 2001, left as it was actually whence, but unable to be himself and declare like or exactly: “I INHERITED THIS MESS!!!”
NO! You own this mess???
NO! “I INHERITED THIS MESS!!!”
OK! - SO LET US LOOK BACK AT LEAST THROUGHOUT THE PAST TEN YEARS - BUT LET US BE SMARTER THAN THE 9/11 COMMISSION AND NOT ONLY LOOK BACK TEN YEARS - LET US AT LEAST FINALLY LITIGATE THIS FOR YOU AND LOOK BACK AT LEAST TWELVE YEARS OR BETTER YET TWO DECADES. IT SEEMS YOU DID INHERIT A MESS FROM THE CLINTONS’ 8 OF DANGEROUS ABANDONMENT OF AFGHANS AND IRAQI PEOPLE, IN PRACTICE, AND SUCH AS IT IS OF DANGERS YOU SPOKE TO WITH YOUR NOBEL PRIZE ACCEPTANCE SPEECH WHEN YOU CHIDED YOUR PREDECESSORS SO ABOUT DANGERS OF INACTION AND AVOIDANCE IN FOREIGN POLICIES. YES IT SEEMS A MESS WAS INHERITED FROM THE CLINTONS BUT REALLY IF WE LOOK BACK MORE THAN THE TEN YEARS THAT OUR 9/11 COMMISSION LIMITED ITSELF TO WE CAN BEGIN TO SEE IT ALL MIGHT NOT HAVE HAPPENED BUT FOR SCHEMING OF SADDAM HUSSEIN AND ESPECIALLY THAT RELATED TO HIS INVASION AND HOPES TO KEEP AN ALLY - KUWAIT.
A OK!
“A OK!”???