With an American in Poland old freshness now soured rises anew of the “among the vicissitudes incident to life” parity of President George Washington firstly speaking so in New York City - and so metaphorically for a new born nation. We are forced to a consideration of Herman Melville if only of any “Moby Dick” as a “Great White…” - seems.
Let us get to some technicalities in a measurement of any said a “Longest War”! Now:
When did this “Longest War” not a “longest war” start but under the “Diplomacy” (failed) of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton? She seemed to start with a forced (political) surge as if “diplomatic” and postured and postured as if of a violate actually a declared (necessary) war. She seemed to have left her office in a worsened “Diplomatic” state than she found it; Hillary Rodham Clinton, however, must have failed at any and all “diplomatic solutions” for such as (”Hillary’s War) to be a “war” and a “longest war” however hardly actually a “longest” or “declared” war.
This “Longest War” didn’t start under/during the Presidential administering of President George W. Bush. President Bush traded for trespass rights with the sovereign of Afghanistan to be “in country” investigatively and purposely looking for about 50 foreigners as “campers” and some to much “trespassers” themselves. A fact of Afghanistan is how tribal it is so that it seems Al Qaeda “campers” didn’t need or have any cooperation or real authorization in shared purposes with a majority.
To get to the metric and an honesty of chronological measurement to a/the failure in “Diplomatic” by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton however not a “Longest War” it behoove any to frame and key their probatives around a postulating that it could only have been so if she was of failing and failing and failing and failing and failing years at finding (as like now) a “diplomatic” end/solution. For purposes of ratio - it seems as now with “war” announced as like “over” that she herself just needed all those long years to herself just offer to declare “war is over” to have “reset” the Clinton PEACE.
We can hardly presume Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton of a accepted “innocence” or “authority” in “rightness” for it is her State Department of the OBAMA RETREAT from Iraq - so injudiciously and prematurely. What for the sake of measuring the body of Mrs. Clinton’s “Diplomacy” have been the costs of such a brutal abandonment of Iraq and so after so much was spent to build a new - a brand new and like most expensive newest and largest newest - Embassy in Iraq? Her numbers of any metric so far seem far from actually flattering.
Perchance a parsing to it best to brine to thin the fats of any meat on the thighs of the leg work “diplomatic” of Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton before any roasting or exposing of her as if already too fried? Right!!! It seems there are no “wings of Hillary”! It seems she can be judged to for it having to be her and her alone and such to that now it “evidence based” deciding to discern there is not a flock at the ready as lifted to by her drafts as of a keep of a flock as a metaphor as of any if “under another’s wings”! It seems the Clintons have buried any Democrat woman who could be a threat to Mrs. Clinton; It seems there are bodies of women Democratic in Party to yet look for as subdued and like “buried” by the Clintons.
She walks in shadows of valleys of death of so many of suffrage and suffering from a darkness in the eclipse of President William Jefferson Clinton still at blocking so many from a clear “light”! It is yet publicly clear how it is that it seems there are no Democrat Party women to “challenge” Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as if she is only the queen bee of Democrat female bees and of a power only possible if there are not any that haven’t like also compromised themselves from a bedding with he whom as also presumed to be a first President of the World.
So until recently Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was supposed to see President Barack Hussein Obama as her “BOSS” and however like either “Ahab” or a “Great White Whale” himself. It was odd and awkward from the start of her submissiveness that she both as Mr. & Mrs. Clinton were of political & party pressure to have her boss tag her “two-fer” as “rivals” and how while so was of incredible insubordination to President Obama as her “Moby Dick” that she declared she was to be so of her declaration to be of “leadership” from taking her “inspiration” (seems) from the same place Dante found his (for his Inferno?).
Again her measurements for her body in “diplomatic” treading are not flattering. Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton, however, however now more “first lady” in all corporated appearances to Mr. William Jefferson Clinton, did neither have “Hard Choices” of a “war” nor “necessary war” nor of an operating actually a “longest war.” Before there was a Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton however the “great woman” behind and success of her “BOSS” President Obama there was mostly just “operations” in Afghanistan of trespass rights from trading building roads and schools endeavors.
As it seems too measurable that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as a Cabinet Officer and “executive” is of so many short comings “evidently” when an “evidence based” review is past even an initial probative it therefore is transparent that she (and more than President Barack Hussein Obama) is of having #FAILED!
But in the failures and failing of Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, however, aren’t we behooved to be to a:
1. WHAT WAS HER MANAGEMENT STYLE?
2. WAS SHE A BROWN NOSER?
3. WAS SHE A SUCK-UP?
4. WAS SHE TOO EASY?
5. WAS IS THAT SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE CLEARLY
SEEN IN A LIGHT OF “FAILURE” FAR EARLIER IF HER
HUSBAND VIA APPEARANCES OF #CGI WASN’T A
SUGAR DADDY OF “BROWN BAG” GLOBAL POLITICS
TO GREASE THE FOREIGN INFLUENCES (TO PERSONAL
EMOLUMENTS THEY THOUGH THEY COULD CALL
6. IF SHE DID “IMPROVE” (LEGALLY) “FOREIGN RELATIONS”
ANYWHERE - HOW DID SHE?
7. DID SHE PUT HER HUSBAND FIRST OVER HER “BOSS”
Is it now the country is in a pickle for a divided Democrat “house” of a “party divided” and some for she having lived up to the “Hillary is too polarizing” tag so that her rap is judicious and a queriousness risen to how now Democrat female under her of “wings” as if all Democrat women have been corrupted by the Clintons and unable to rise without tagging themselves in a self-incrimination if at attempting to boldly step out to incriminate Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, however?
Where are all the Democrat female leaders buried - where is Mrs. Clinton’s female “competition”? Is it that only the Republicans have now grown new party boughs free of the tree of Clintons’ corruption where whence it was the GOP had near none whom could rise to incriminate the “The Clinton” without also self-incrimination?
O Democrats, O Democrats — Where for art thee a one you can smartly call a “Captain”?