HILLARY IS INSTITUTIONALIZED*
And, so we find the Forth Estate still “urban” and now a better social referee.
And, today you have to pick the club or the honey do - the honey do or the hubby do.
And, all the while the institutionalization of “Hillary” stays juxtaposed here in America most against a regularness where a hook to the left too much, quite too much - as community members should still be allowed to walk down their streets and wonder on why their community cannot fix itself.
To have witnessed just the DESPERATE “SHOW” WIVES OF OBAMA STATE DEPARTMENT this week was one thing - to have seen/witnessed some of the rest was too much - too much even for just one of our institutions — It will help that you have already read “HE GOT HIS!” column from this point on.
So we have again this week to have to deal with some or much “Hitler” in our play — even his institutions no matter what they were called. It may be a good day to find some more trophies for interior decorations of ego walls or trophy rooms for Forth Estate, but vigilance about such and referee duties may not allow - allow at least a co-ed and personal effort about such today — On the teas and in the sands today is still that Peter Orzag tried to chip in, for Obama and Hillary, an institutionalization for both of them, for Obamacare and/or Hilllarycare III, of a massive and invasive IMAC — and, oh, the Congressional roars, now still, about such mac ill roiling— oh, and yes on the tees too.
As “HE GOT HIS!” drove straight to the ‘greenness’ of “Hillary” and her ‘game’ and “experience” and her necessary institutionalization now this reporting of HILLARY IS INSTITUTIONALIZED notes more concerns and abuse by “Hillary” much contrary to many of our institutions and even fair play in golf sport and political competitions. Charlie Rose reported recently with his series of interviews with past and present Secretaries of State - actually showed more than “reported” more institutional delusions by “Hillary” our current Secretary of State.
The “UN-OBAMA” & “UN-HILLARY” new problema is an old problema much to do with “Hitler” and others of lesser “selling of their souls.” You should have seen Henry Kissinger’s expression when “Hillary” went of to “institutional” with her abrupt and inappropriate blurting to Charlie Rose with an irrational and unreasonable proposition that like “there has been a ’smooth’ transtition between all Secretary of States throughout the history of such institution.” (paraphrased, most certainly.)
As the new problema establishes, for global citizens, and, for their referees, and such that is their Forth Estate, the “UN-OBAMA” & “UN-HILLARY” new diet for all as towards limiting need for further institutionalization for Americans - and better criteria for admittance around operations and dictates.
Rumors of “Hillary” as of a “medical bag” to rival JFK’s storied “medical bag” also from White House “maintenance” doctoring are still sparse and hard to confirm - is it bigger, was it term - limited, has one magic pill been enough? And, so Hillary may not be also of such a “magical” medical bag as JFK was known to be of as ‘necessary’.
Whether you tee-off teed-off set off still about old and new Tea Party rights - today is much a Congressional and leadership day about Hitler and his institutions. “HE GOT HIS!” broached part of abuses around “Hillary” of “institutionalized” - but hardly the ridiculous preposterous answer she asserted to Charlie Rose and the world so with her defensiveness with her offensive posturing as the former First Lady that left the next Secretary of State the not so “smooth” transition from Clintons’ 8 we refer most often to as just “9-11? – and so as to have gotten Henry Kissinger “britches in a sudden bunch” as a “johnny on the spot” called to defend her ridiculous proposition that power has supposedly always transfered “smoothly” from one Secretary of the State to the next. See how “Hillary” deludes more with her “instutional” defense about our institution and traditions about Secretary of State now as well as how she has been deluding many with her “don’t touch me” institutional preposterousness around our lored Institution of the First Lady?
Whose rights still at our “Congressional” - our play about our institutions? How will Speaker Boehner or President Obama stike also at institutionalization of “Hillary”? It is also about golf, and still “Bill” - where is Bill, by the way? What was his scoring of these past two weeks of his officiated Weiner and to it a DESPERATE SHOW WIVES OF STATE inconvenient exposure?
With the new problema to an new walking and talking - a more honest and accepting walk of personal freedoms and individual responsibility - the “institutional” of “Hillary” is now much a grand or greater concern than that yet from President Obama, even with his IMAC of Orzag over-reaching, now much in play. Everywhere people should be reading - reading to address and guard - to stand tall but honestly and without the offensive institutionalization that is “Hillary.” Everywhere we are all to first a walking and talking to a new urbanism with a honest teeing to a Tea Party or even New (Democrat) Independence Party - to a walking first and foremost with a “why can’t we fix our own community - without it becoming a greater borough burden - or city burden - or county burden - or state burden - or regional burden - or most shouldn’t be necessary “failed all the way to the top” nationalembarrassment?
It is preposterous! “Hillary” survives only with her “preposterous” postulates that put the entire “institutions” of State and our even more lored and celebrated Institution of our First Lady at her defense, and to create a fog about her of “do not touch!”
I am getting to the “Hitler” in all this. First we have to absorb how “not a smooth transition” was the transition from the Clinton years to the Bush years for our foreign policy - it may get confusing to see such due to the characters involved but the preposterousness is certainly there. First you may be best to consider how much the years of crusading by First Lady Hillary Clinton was to inciting the very disruptions that the Bush administrators inherited — her popular imperialism much of her traveling dictates for her brand of feminism.
You really should try to find a viewable snipet of Charlie Rose show that was first in series with Secretaries of State - that then due to Charlie’s acceptance of “Hillary’s” preposterousness, that which got the most unusual expression from Henry Kissinger, when he was demanded to defend “Hillary’s” ridiculous postulation, by “Hillary’s” asserting, was then to me deciding to avoid the rest of such series and even most of the rest of such “first episode.”
The only joke in all this may be Irish humor of sorting type - as Rory McIlroy at Congressional is maybe in Gaelic quite the “lion in the woods” - “a tiger in a hedgerow” and now as Speaker Boehner and President Obama play through the “selling of souls” and the “Hilter ghost” in Obamacare/Hillarycare III and their IMAC over-reaching — the only joke may be that Rory McIroy may essentially translate as “tiger woods” in Gaelic. Better though to stay focused on our institutions and our new problema about our developing new “urbanism.” It is to Speaker Boehner and President Obama that institutional concerns about “Hillary” are really all about “Hitler” and government over-reaching.
And, so the Forth Estate stands still free and able to referee and celebrate.
And, so the propositions that are Obamacare revival of Hillarycare to such new institutionals necessities, are of a suggestion that “We the People” accept “government care” as a God given right and though all the while in ways counter to decades of people selling their souls in some ways to get some of it for themselves with personal liberty and individual responsibility.
And, so Speaker Boehner and President Obama, time to tee this off: That it is immoral for America, these United States of America, to suggest healthcare for all, and as so institutionally yet devised, and at all to a God given right, since still we have issues, we have Hitler issues — we have all the medical advances in our medical industries and institutions (only) made possible by Hitler and his institutions persistent and well documented years of medical experimentation on some/many/very many humans?
And, so it may still be more “moral” to let our free markets stir the individual responsibility and personal liberties and market value discussions with a new urbanism also about how much selling of your soul may actually be worth.
HILLARY IS INSTITUTIONALIZED!: That Hillary is “institutionalized” is both so of her “fog of Hillary” positing such that her “experience and judgement” cannot be questioned and shouldn’t be without her threatening to smear all past First Ladies as like a identical class due such action, and, as well for her “preposterousness” with daily asserting and visible posturing as well with her public blurting asserting to former Secretary of State on Charlie Rose show, as a bubble defense as well, that there has always been a “smooth transition” from Secretary to Secretary throughout our history as a country.
The new “urbanism” of the new problema that is as well our current “UN-OBAMA” & “UN-HILLARY” is much to a walking and talking and tea times of persons, together, wondering locally why they cannot fix their own communities.
Rory, hopefully you have sufficient institutional support - most notable about you so far is you look like my high school girl friend - whose X-Step-father once was a police chief. Good luck to all the golfers - maybe a momentus day for freedom for President Obama and all things “Congressional”!
Again, where is “Bill”? Oh, yeh, and where is “Hillary”?
* [Filed under: MYBLOG - JUNE 18, 2011]
ORIGINAL TO 09/01/11
LABOR ON THIS
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 7:05 am
Ollie and Bill have too much in common? We cannot now have TEA PARTY as civil as foreign beneficiaries of CGI muckraking?
The oft heralded Clintons’ Global Initiatives, so run more like a shadow government that any of “governance” that old “Ronnie” and “Ollie” may have actually accomplished, & now even still the apple in labor’s eye - the eye of Trumka, has got to go.
How much a SHADOW GOVERNMENT can CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE be? Is a good place to start as long as you ask as well: How much an extra-Constitutional body involved in “governance” is it actually now? That it rated a mention by Mr. Trumka yesterday is concerning, and confusing. It got a mention seemingly after Mr. Trumka at AFL-CIO was of professing a new way forward for “labor” via such organization and to a less partisan outreach and one mixed with an announcement that he would be leading a late compliance with President Obama’s “green” governance at his building so just a couple blocks away. Hmmm?
It is all so coy and even clandestine how CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE that had Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton compromising our foreign relations and state affairs back a while to hype the (MANDATORY?) annual meeting soon approaching of CGI so scheduled to maximize compliance, and attendance, and, usurp attention from such other “governance” organization, THE UNITED NATIONS, a better chartered and checked international meddler.
So far beyond old “Ronnie” and “Ollie” yet so similar in so many concerning ways.
It would be Unconstitutional if…?
It would be clearly Unconstitutional if…?
It would necessarily be Unconstitutional if its coy “commitments” funding scheme was of actuall deposits and dispersements of same exact funds or variations even smaller - so it seems.
More concerning though is that if such is muckraking abroad to stir up local and global politics, even without known known of President Clinton using such efforts as a global soap box for partisan politics, the he has and is definitely out “SHADOW GOVERNING” old ”Ronnie” and ”Ollie.”
See, it is really Constitutionally confused - See, we have to look now to our top Diplomat, his wife, to see if our Government is protecting us from his global ambitions and personal initiatives. We have to rely solely on his wife to tell us those he is personally directing material support too are not in the least “terrorists” and yet while the “bar” for “terrorists” now so low in our politics that our TEA PARTY is considered “terrorists” by acting agents or officers also very near President Obama.
If our TEA PARTY is “terrorist” than our Madam Secretary of State is negligent in her duties to protect us from all Americans giving foreign “terrorists” material support. It seems one of her greatest charges to keep.
So what if besides dropping such labors essential to our constitution and CONSTITUTIONALS - It is still very concerning how she compromised her office and our checks and balances to help “Bill” and CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE build hype and interest for last (mandatory?) annual meeting of their coy global shadow governance organization with her about Middle East near “LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE!” exclamation! EXCLAMATION!!! just days before. I say last ”(mandatory?) meeting” for such organized cabal of world leaders but don’t actually know if there hasn’t been some secret meetings more recently called.
I caught so little of remarks from AFL-CIO yesterday to understand if there was an offered explanation for such mention of CGI while speaking of reaching out in new ways not (as) partisan, and, I also learned little as to how it is now three years into President Obama’s ”green” priorities and Mr. Trumka is only now promising his HQ will comply and with a retrofit, finally.
Surely if they are going to support “rebels” in Libya and call those of TEA PARTY at home “terrorists” we really have to consider that President Clinton and his coy financing with “commitments” must be some to much well into a fog of “material support to terrorists” abroad. If he actually collected “commitments” as deposits/contributions and then dispersed them himself he would clearly be acting Unconstitutionally?
Irregardless of our 22 Amendment and thought existence as a check and “limit” on Presidential Power - President Clinton is out “Ollieing” “Ollie” with operations too near SHADOW GOVERNANCE. By making it appear “high visibility” how much is he actually better able to hide? But about our term limits for our Presidents — what must it be most supposed to protect us from but further global meddling with even less once imagined continuation of executive influence and “governance”?
Funny thing about Governor Rick Perry — This blogger that is me seems to have said at least “treason” before him and also maybe that Obamacare pushback suggestion of “secession” for TEXANS. But that said isn’t “Bill” really out “OLLIEING” both “Ronnie” and “Ollie”?
This is the same Clintons that tried to secure a rent for life for thought former President William Jefferson Clinton in the CARNEGIE HALL TOWERS top floors at a rent in just the first year that would have been more than the past rents of all past Presidents yet - combined. It was such an amount attempted that it also warrants notice for having been located with location next to THE RUSSIAN TEA ROOM and as well a location next to TIFFANY’S. But really that they tried to secure government “allowance” to such an amount suggests and insistance that “Bill” must still be an active “officer” and/or “agent” of our government at least as much as they chose to have such Power interpreted for their “governance” purposes.
So maybe it is now Madam Secretary of State taking care of the guns - and at least in a compromised way for past moments of using her office to build media importance and interest in CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVES then approaching annual (mandatory?) meeting of world leaders, so scheduled to challenge and rival the “importance” of the work of the United Nations, too.
But when it comes to metrics and comparisons of concerns about SHADOW GOVERNANCE between “Bill” and “Ollie” does it help to consider that attempt to place “Bill” so high in CARNEGIE HALL TOWERS, and with government paid rent for life, a rent per year that likely as well would have been mentionable regularly as maybe still the highest per year in future years, on and on, than all future Presidents, unless it actually had sufficient rent control to prevent an appreciation of value and increased rent in future years to keep it of a nationally fair market value?
If we have our TEA PARTY as “terrorists” by rule of this “governance” than “Bill” and “Hillary” must be hip deep in it, illegally, abroad. Can you believe that all that NYC rent for life scandal took place while one of them was actually running for Senate as a carpetbagger in such state? Amazing! Amazing! Amazing!
They have themselves argued umimpeachably so that “Bill” must still be an “agent” of “officer” of our United States of America just by asking for such a rent and reward as he so wanted that he was even willing to go begging to his “banking friends” to get them to pick up much of his excess as like in return for him having gotten them all into his housing bubble derivatives gambling scheme. But YIKES!!! They really asked for rent for life that in just the first year would have been more than all past Presidents combined and that in future years likely would have stayed more per year than most future Presidents could find space to equal - unless a President “Hillary” maybe got elected and then as well got hardly “put out to pasture” as well maybe in few floors left above.
How can this not now be a case of actual SHADOW GOVERNMENT and extra-Constitutional ways quite reasonable to UNCONSTITUTIONAL (treacherous or treasonous definitions?) in a time when our economics would suggest a better and more American strengthening of localism and local powers more around our State Houses and Governors?
Is CGI also terrible for our economy and too BIG BROTHER for the world? Is it wrong for any time for America and not just diabolical and counterproductive for AMERICANA today?
“JOB” FOR EVERY BLACK MAN?
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 1:13 pm
Alive still at eight three Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is likely rolling over in his grave - tossing and turning with news of today maybe his second or third worst nightmare scenario.
We can imagine that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would have been an early and proud supporter of this our still “present” and voting “Congress of NO!” as tagged. There is a moral clarity offered by such. We have those not of the “party of NO!” more to a “fog of war” and reach for eternal grayness.
Welcome to this new century - ALL! As Martin Luther wasn’t born Michael nor as a “King” he did rise above his lot himself and to a construct of civility about forgiveness, and even such to a bought moral new clarity, it seems. Martin Luther King Jr. and Martin Luther must be now if of today, physically and metaphysically, of wondering about Jobs and jobs - JOBS AND JOBS.
The half breed President now with a job too Jobian for some more than others may be one of the worst overdramatizations Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. might have ever imagined. A black American, yes, but still too black but not enough a “black Irish” specifically — A son of a father and his dreams yet raised by the hard toil and work of a single mother, white.
The “Party of NO!” stands still with a real moral clarity quite inconvenient for President Obama and his JOB. President Barack Hussein Obama can now only run towards 2012 elections to ask for a repeat - for a “new and improved” just not reasonable - just not “re-elect” “mandate” quality. This Party of spend, spend, spend — spend, spend, spend again that is our modern Democrat Party has President BO stinking up faith and community and most race religions with its divisiveness and grayness.
We have a morality more fitting to even just Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Cheney for the championing and passage of much of the core of our current civil rights legislation. (You have all read their memoirs, yes?) We have the storification of years of civil rights struggles with many Republicans of a Lincolnesque and of long Jobian struggles excessive to their jobs just for the obstructive behavior and politics of many Democrats of those days. We have that President BO to stink up 2012 elections with his grayness up against contrast of “Party of NO!” moral clarity so that we are at a rare time where truth is to be flushed out for all and more of an equality with a “re-election” only to offering an option to “repeat” not to “new and improved.”
It is simple that half breed President Barack Hussein Obama could be today the worst possible truth for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and his life’s work - his ministry. We have him Jobian, yes, and a hallmark figure for a Jobian life for all black men - but was massive unemployment and so more Jobianism as promise of “JOB” really what Dr. King was preaching?
President Obama with his ECONOMIC SUPPRESSION (not “recession” nor “depression” but design over-government “suppression” of economies.) has been an equal opportunity unemployer. He has not been bigoted while to his Jobian for all. He is hardly separable from the “mother figure” “Hillary” he keeps close - he keeps so close that it demeans his Lady Michelle, and looks like necessary compensation/compensating.
Critical to Democrat Party “grand” strategy was that there be some “bipartisan” history in any first term about so much top down torrent or trickles to so much forced “Jobian” for so many. To be “re-electable” to a better future and not just a threat of a dangerous “repeat” they needed a corruption and complicity that a “Party of NO!” moral clarity does prevent. It is a “dandy” - he has been quite a “Political Dandy.”
To be a man “Jobian” is to have a “job” even though you may not know it - right? President Barack Hussein Obama with his “green” energy incivility and sans bipartisan has done more than Dr. King may have imagined to give every black man a “JOB.”
We have a half breed black man with a job - a holding of office of our President but with a keeping of a white mother figure a former master of such house close - too close - REALLY.
Really, you should have read KNOWN AND UNKNOWN, &, IN MY TIME by now - and not need a remedial educating now about how Rumsfeld and Cheney did as Republicans historically champion so much of our new civility.
Richard Milhous Nixon would have made a better Secretary of State than “Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton ever might, even in her own dreams - her dreaming of getting away with being “Nixonian” without any calling her out on such presentations inadequately dramatic or timely considered.
We could make the case that “Hillary” is more “Jobian” as of a job and struggle she doesn’t understand - a real job challenge - too challenging.
Maybe Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would today be having his first laugh, and a real belly laugh — at all these now “Jobian”.
It can be said that President Barack Hussein Obama is “BLACK IRISH” and his Irishness his secret - but I don’t think he is at all Spanish - so the Irish may be safe. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. today would either being crying or laughing - really hard to nail up today, you could say.
And so we have Democrat Party and their long worked ECONOMIC SUPPRESSION they prefer to dress up as a new GREAT DEPRESSION though really much worked less of a “Jobian” unawareness than a purposeful and dedicated socialism, as spoken indirectly and at time directly to. We have that the SUPPRESSION got its first real political legs with “Hillary for President” announcement and that which soon followed as a partisan and very political polarizing declaration against capitalism and market principles as it was near: “I will seize all oil company profits.”
It is hard to say how aware President Obama is about his existence in a world “Jobian” much the specific handiwork and plotting of the Clinton “two-fer.” He may be too “Jobian” in his job - due to an unawareness of his politics.
I myself may be of a “Jobian” with wishful thinking that it isn’t actually all the Irish black half of President Obama.
We have that the old lower fuel economies was a job hog - a massive somewhat hidden private - public socialism. We have that the Democrat Party acted without balance or bias condemning what had been one of Industrial Era greatest job saver and creator. We have that President Obama was quite “Spanish” in his “greenness” with all his marches to whiter energy (cleaner?) done with prior and full knowledge that such by Spanish did kill two jobs, about, for every new politically correct job it created. We have that President Obama whether “Jobian” in such as his petty handiwork did overcome “Spanish” with such a rare dedication to partisan and polarizing politics was to, it seems, a march that killed three jobs for each of his ideological existentialism.
STRIKE JOB? - INSERT “BIBLE” WHERE “JOB” IS EVERYWHERE - LIKE: A BIBLE FOR EVERY BLACK MAN, EVERY MAN SO THAT THEY ARE NOT MERE SAVAGES OR SLAVES ONLY TO OTHER MEN?
I am being “Jobian” writing about JOB - I am not the person best to discuss with scholarship Dr. King’s “JOB” or “JOB”. I have no idea how he meant thought: A JOB FOR EVERY BLACK MAN. I don’t know if it was as “white” a condition consideration where a finding of a Holy purpose above savagery and isolation his specific ideological existentialism, and or metaphysical consideration.
It seems irrefutable that Clinton “two-fer” enough in the know to have known they would kill two jobs with every one of these new partisan and polarizing politically correct agendas otherwise effected — it may actually be “Jobian” for first black President, the more black “First Black President” than President Clintons “two-fer” was in their “8? and that we may still yet have a “First Black President” with exclamations more American and historically fulfilling with one not a half-breed but directly up and out of savagery they way they once were more democratically considered.
And as now on review for consideration to a “repeat” President Obama knowingly or not, or not yet, approaches the steps anew to such free markets, such less free markets, historically. President Obama is now up for sale with his labors what they be for our consideration of “p’s & q’s”. He is set up now to be of lashings better meant or deserved by “Hillary” and yet may consider it his “JOB” to just suffer the fool.
Because Democrat Party “grand” strategy needed a corrupted and cooperative bi-partisanship to effect a new think to cover-up their own decades of malfeasance and misconduct and inadequate laboring - our Republicans are set now to run not “against” President Obama but FOR OUR GOVERNORS & WE THE PEOPLE. President Obama is so left the scraps of his partisan politics to run against the Republicans running for what he has been long against.
I don’t know whether Dr. King would be laughing finally or crying today. President Obama can be said to be one of the worst imaginable evolutions of his ministry, though black.
The grayness of the partisan polarizing political agenda of this sect of Democrat Party leadership has the “Party of NO!” set to 2012 elections with a clearer moral clarity. They can stand for clean energy and proudly as we all bare witness now to miracles of science to new higher mileage economies that can only have been from their decades of careful job saving politics kept long supported as well in research and development so that when JOB’s less significant “new and improved” could be ushered in carefully and scientifically without it being a rash partisan knee jerk political a devastation upon a rather socialized private and public jobs construct in our free markets with lower mileage standards long a JOB saver and creator.
We have it obvious that President Bush must have been a “green” equal opportunity employer and leader as otherwise we couldn’t possibly be now witness to so many fast mileage improvements so quickly - we could be here today after Democrat Party rash political market meddling unless Republicans had long purposefully supported all the research and development that was ready so before it was prudent or necessary - unless purpose was to JOB killing.
Yes President Obama’s suffering may date primarily to “Hillary for President” announcement and effecting that had her of embodiment of a “socialism” with her declaration near exactly of “I WILL SEIZE ALL OIL COMPANY PROFITS.”
ORIGINAL TO 12/07/11
CLOSER TO HOME
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 10:42 pm
Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day. What will long live in infamy now may be a commission report that …
A first strike if to a new world war likely would be with multiple and seeming unrelated EMP incidents and…
If a small yield nuclear device hidden on drones detonates if/when opened the wrong way are we to blame if…
And, how was it that our 9/11 Commission decided it was responsible - responsible with a decision to look back only ten years?
It does seem that President Clinton preceded this - this new unexpected tack by President Obama - “Teddy” Obama - when recently with his envy on parade and with his book his tool and trade while “political” again, much, with near: “I should be allowed to have a third term.” I don’t know what or whom was served with our 9/11 Commission self limiting history to a ten year window of relevance.
What do you say when a President wants a third term?
What do you say when a President wants a third term if not even likely to get a second term?
What do you say when PBC seemed to be channeling TR a week or more before PBO?
It does seem odd that President Clinton didn’t insist that the 9/11 Commission at least look far enough back to include Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi invasion of neighbor Kuwait - of neighbor Kuwait with many “friend” by treaties of declared united ends. It does seem odd that even Senator Clinton of “Ground Zero Senator” instant extreme personal and political makeover didn’t as well insist on behalf of New York that Congress and 9/11 Commission at least look back farther than 10 year self imposed historical window limit and back far enough to consider at least the early days that were of the conception and original unifying for Al Qaeda.
I guess we have to assume that another world war is possible.
I guess we have to allow that we should have back ups for most of our “connectedness” and new media.
I guess we have to articulate that we could be surprised with lasers in the sky and EMP suitcase stored.
It does still seem odd that both Clintons didn’t raise cain early and often after 9/11. Where were their calls to probe publicly and transparently questions at least about why Saddam Hussein must have thought he would be able to keep Kuwait? Where are now their explanations that there could be no “real bite” in any international sanctions if we only had their eight years of “enforcement” about them? I mean it has been a while since I remembered being in seventh grade and being entered in schools oratory contest to present President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s DAY OF INFAMY speech - I mean it has been a while since I could remember with certainty that Al Qaeda original formation did date back longer than ten years from surprise attacks of 9/11/2001.
Sometimes you learn about warring surprises festering in time.
Sometimes you learn from a book not until 70 years after the fact.
Sometimes you can not learn for thirty years or some plus a new thirty of protection as if anew to President Clinton.
You don’t always have to read an entire book - sometimes a “cover to cover” of just book jacket enough to be surprise. Take inside front cover of Edmund Morris’ COLONEL ROOSEVELT and its first paragraph as:
“Of all our great Presidents, Theodore Roosevelt is the only one whose greatness increased out of office. When he toured Europe in 1910 as plain ‘Colonel Roosevelt’ he was hailed as the most famous man in the world. Crowned heads vied to put him up in their palaces. ‘If I see another king,’ he joked, ‘I think I shall bit him.’”
“Had TR won his historic “Bull Moose” campaign in 1912 (when he outpolled the sitting president, William Howard Taft), he might have averted World War I, so great was his international influence.”
Due to unforeseen erudition around Colonel Roosevelt I may not get past the second chapter that seems to have already warned “Teddy” or plainly as “Colonel Roosevelt” already past two terms in office and his huge British East Africa predatory mass killings while on largest safari ever set about by man, and from minds about Europe that America of 1910 era was likely on a path to war with Japan. Or was it Japan was seemingly already then on a path towards eventual war against the United States of America.
And, again, I don’t know how our 9/11 Commission set out historically with a ten year window presumption agreed. And, I really don’t know how either former President Clinton or Senator Clinton let such slide, and still.
Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day - that day is not alone in infamy, now.
Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day - I did take second place with “INFAMY” in the seventies - I didn’t want 1st for “WAR!”.
Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day - and I don’t recall classmate next to me who wondered if a Hawaiian could compete, so.
But now we have President Barack “Teddy” Obama who better could have taken such Rooseveltianism to the HQ of the National Rifle Association as such commemorates “plain ‘Colonel Roosevelt’” it seems, so far, for being predatory most of 1909, and so to a “Bull Moose” “New Nationalism” a spin around America for hunters and gun totters to celebrate his hunts and haunts locally in chase - in chase of American moose. Was it accidental or did he get punked by President Clinton? How did a sitting Democrat President come out so exactingly for furs and hunting? How can “Bull Moose” not been a progressive argument for gun ownership and hunting of moose, of American moose, of local moose, of hopefully that US trophy bull moose?
A first strike if too a new world war likely would be with multiple and seeming unrelated EMP incidents and…
Not every day is a Pearl Harbor day - I think a Hawaiian did think they could compete.
If a small yield nuclear device hidden on a drone detonates if/when opened the wrong way are we to blame if…
PEACE is possible if…
ORIGINAL TO 10/08/11
BABES OF WALL STREET
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 1:18 pm
Keynes for one a player out of his league and times for these days.
When a silent treatment of a “mob” may be better than “a mob”
How to gallop - how to cant - how to decant these spirits a party divided?
E - rich now a foot when not a sleep - E - poor though maybe “e - rich” too?
How now old Keynesian - Keynesians anew?
“TRUTH WILL OUT” a conundrum - a beat of yours.
“TRUTH WILL OUT” a beat of yours - discordant and rude.
We have a party divided - we have no choice.
We have a party divided - we must reboot.
We have a party divided - labor will be dead if we don’t
We have a party divided - Washington is falling - our mobs on the rise.
Oh my Democrats who are you now?
Oh my Democrats what have you undone?
Oh my Democrats where haven’t you seen your divisions?
Oh my Democrats when can we the new labor movement have the reigns from you?
Oh my Democrats how soon - we need to be saving you from you?
Some are milking camels
Some are milking sunshine
Some are milking firsts and “CRISIS”
Some are milking monopolies on good.
Oh my Democrats is Clintons’ Global Iniative a MONOPOLY?
Oh my Democrats why does Bill get all our glory
Oh my Democrats remembering Steve Jobs
Oh my Democrats why doe Bill get all the altruistic Ipodishness for good?
Oh my Democrats why did NewYorker put Keynes tense on the balls of his feet?
Once upon a time in America
Once upon a time in America
Once upon a time in America
Perchance to dream the impossible dreams again - anew.
Oh poor Keynes and all his modern misguided Keynsians
I cannot condone being a Hogaian - too bad “Heros” of “Hogan’s Heros” taken.
Truth will out against mobs now more for “something for nothing” if so.
Truth will out against mobs now more “race to the top” and unprepared.
Truth will out against mobs not more against “too much” and “excessiveness”.
Truth will out against mobs against the same mob and its messaging.
Truth will out remembrances of liberal institutions shorting their endowments.
Truth will out remembrances not more of protest anew of nothing for something.
Oh my Democrats of Washington why is a NEW LABOR DEMOCRAT MOB about so?
Oh my Democrats oh too Keynesian - this is your dance - you caused it.
E Cantor if you must - they are acting against themselves
E Cantor if you must - They are putting Dem Americans against Dem Americans.
E Cantor if you must - Others might just anew go silent.
E Cantor if you must - Do they have any where else to go?
E Cantor if you must - Keynsians are up against “TRUTH WILL OUT”
E Cantor if you must - Mobs are working for themselves and for you - too - much.
TRUTH WILL OUT even as mobs stir and sleep.
TRUTH WILL OUT even as Obama reaches anew for yet another “new foundation.”
TRUTH WILL OUT even now especially as it has no place else to go.
TRUTH WILL OUT but who what and which party first?
TRUTH WILL OUT - Oh my Democrats why are you so now a Party divided and dividing?
J. P. Hogan - little acknowledged political poet known to the New York Press in early nineties especially the then op-ed staff of The New York Times - still writing about economics some but with little reason if any to help the Democrats again, really. Oh, and yes blogging while doing laundry.
ORIGINAL TO 11/01/11
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 9:52 am
Well, it now seems obvious that Democrats of today would have been able to keep “Ronnie” from a Hollywood style to actual real roles in politics, whence. Having “character” or “getting into character” would have been admissible and confusable.
These are the early days of a week of opening up WOOP (SEE: DONKEYS) with some kick back and color.
Women everywhere are at risk, and in the “hot seat” especially this week, these early days of November’s first week, 2011. There can be no real claim to equality - the barriers are dimensional - Women everywhere have a corporateness unequaled and yet unrivaled by them - by women enough. “Rosie the Riveter” may have hammered out a song - and long and proud and tough song, but today women have a can of worms their own to open before them for all to see.
There hasn’t been enough feminism yet for them to claim equality - they haven’t gone the distance nearly yet. Where Herman Cain may be lucky not to have been a bad actor of Hollywood set or another Reagan stamped out with cookie cutter now women have the runways. Can they claim equality and call for more corporate ratings for themselves without calling all women to at least a decade of hard times to prove they can socially handle chase? Can women ever be “equal” to societies historical expectations for men as hunter gatherer providers of the long slog willing to come home week after week even when so of such social burdens during depressing times even just recessionary?
When will women be able to call themselves equal - can it only be after a decade allowed to be sole proprietor of a family unit in tough times and willing to week after week come home to husbands that spent a day shoe shopping again - say for climbing shoes one day and new golf shoes another and well new flip-flops or water socks another?
What are our current social and societal expectations - is the recession a once in a century opportunity for women and more specifically feminists to step forward and test their mettle, as equally?
There is much color about all this now in early November 2011 - Condoleezza Rice with her memoir NO HIGHER HONOR is out with her version and edition of “black power” either of shelving “WOOP” upon Colin Powell or of holding back or showing “compassion” and/or “empathy.” This week we could actually say you can have your news any color you want as long as you want it black.
Mr. Herman Cain is in battle of his life yet not so much reported as sparring against feather weight (?) President Barack Hussein Obama. (note to self: Find out if Herman Cain has a middle name and if news worthy or column/punditry fodder.)
Without a decade just to themselves women may never be able to prove themselves as a full set or class as equals at least in the world of games and contests once called “men’s work” that just started for societal and home pressures for men to find something to do to get them out of the house so not to bother or contest their women from their things (work?).
As of now it doesn’t look like this will get to be too graphic with daily bar charts or fun raising graphs to side by side compare life of Bill with life of Herman, even just year by year. It as of now isn’t even looking like a story of black power in Washington of keeping an illegitimate white bastard child hidden away off on some family plantation. It is a week with many expected cans to be opened of worms or “WOOP.”
The nineties was an easy time for women into men’s work world - a bubble economy was about that created entry opportunities the belied more historical and competitive modeling for showing a leg through the doors of man’s world - into corporateness to equal opportunities in what had been the man’s side of surviving home life.
Sure Colin Powell was part of the BUSH FREEDOM AGENDA but he was also much of the CLINTONS’ laxity about global equality more of words and rants than walk or steps. Will NO HIGHER HONOR now offer up enough color and “WOOP” - Do female black scholars make better secretaries than retired generals? Did she?
We are now to the competitive corporate equality that Clintons’ bubbles of teased and unscientific economic policies basically ignore - we are too a bubble that let women more into man’s word of work and to breaching old societal expectations for men to find something to do to get out of wife’s way and so out of the home. (R.I.P. Mrs. Rodham, mother of Hillary Clinton - I just now heard the news.) I tend to be a workaholic and have many hobbies and much professionalism, much of this cannot apply to me - I can “work” most anywhere - I have been meaning to find time to learn rules of golf better and develop my first scoring “handicap” - still have to find and arrange a home course eligible when time allows, though.
I know, this just isn’t seeming fair. I am really wondering though on size of “WOOP” (again see: DONKEYS) scholar Condoleezza Rice may have writ upon Secretary Powell. That said, Herman Cain is a rare racial window now into corporateness of at least the past twenty years - not sure whom has gotten a leg through his doors or for what or why, or how, where, or as whom or for whom. Why didn’t a woman, at least a white women get his jobs when he got them or had them - are some jobs just better for men than for women and other corporated ranks better in places for women than men?
Yes, it seems Ronald Reagan could never have been elected today - bad actors in character now would have played out his “getting into character” likely as the real thing - as the Godfather to his “pie” - the Cain to his Abel.
ORIGINAL TO 12/27/11
A PARCHED MEANT OF MILK?
Filed under: POLITICS
Posted by: JP HOGAN @ 1:39 pm
These days that start anew short like all the rest in this Year of our Lord 2011 we try to go back to sleep each morning un-alarmed and yet with concerns due for a lost generation redux.
We wake as challenged Americans and anew, as it lies, some many as Christians and even Catholics, we wake worried about Mother Mary and milk for young Jesus, we try to rise later especially when naturally of days so short.
To be alarmed unnecessarily - or not to be, not to be too early stirred — he must crawl before he can walk, luckily.
Bells do tell, then and now, they tolled for some more than others, to some more in keeping for pace and grace, and dining/meals.
From whence I sat and from where, now, some Knights are regular and near their original intents - their founding halls, and many papers. For from where I am now near is near a Columbus enclave of Knights and their original founding parish. I don’t know what should be said of me now or later, and wonder though on the “already” but it seems my Grampa Hogan was indeed a Knight, a Knight of Knights of Columbus - I can remember his passing and his wake and the presence of compadres or brethren.
From where I write now so four years “global” yet “local” and four years so since henceforth from whence the where of near then years so hence as whence near the realm of Capitol Hill and its original parchments — I can bike, bus, or even walk just ten miles to be near the Saint Mary’s Church of Hillhouse with memories of such the officialdom for my sisters marriages. I am but so few miles even if afoot to be near the base and bulwarks, as they may be of the “court” of my Grampa Hogan’s Knightness in Columbus of Saint Mary’s Church. Yale School of Management is now just up the street and a Yale Museum for musical instruments and the Henry Luce Institute. I did crawl first a little nearer yet far enough so to be of a more local parish originally.
Are we now fearful and cautious - are we guarded enough now to fears reasonable that we may be of a new generation born already and to a political concern, at least, as a new “lost” generation? We must crawl before we walk - we carry still a standard of/for Columbus however a story told - Americans have parchments long of history and Christian crawling.
Where has Joe gone - is Mary now too forsaken - has Jesus GOT MILK? I am of a story of parish first of Saint Joseph’s and then a family anchoring more of Saint Mary’s - Has Jesus GOT MILK? Oh, for due to matters of timing and grace - grace kept for a story telling foundational more in wizardry and witchcraft arts and such as related to America’s “Watergate” personalities - I did but visit Saint Peter’s Parish Church on Capitol Hill while there so localized near ten years. This internet stuff is confusing enough when trying to live and write for multiple parchments follow on entertainments, a single parish participation when a muse for magic curriculumizing of seven years thought possible in five that then took nearer 12 - I was doing an American time warp, and not a Knight myself.
Does Jesus have shoes - are these of Christian crawl storification standard then to just swaddled feet? Will yours be over swaddled and over coddled now?
Was Jesus swaddled and coddled enough as born in a manger and then to days …
His Metachlorian count must have been sky high - but do we now have to worry of a lost generation anew - a new batch to crawl Christian and American before they walk? Mother Mary must have done something right - at least to quench the thirst - to negotiate the manger and then …
A Global we now reset around our shortest days - a “Christian Crawl” now at least rolled out - a grand thirst soon afoot?
These are not the ways of a “FORCE” to RACE TO THE TOP — this is at least a crawl for Christians, yet for many parched out as American as well — We have differing original intents - we have original crawls from abroad more once of mere swaddling of coddling. We have a prescribed “details matter” spouting anew - we have happenstance retro to a redux - we have an American “RESET” now much afoot.
Our states can do “an” or “the” CHRISTIAN CRAWL and yet our Congress cannot itself “establishment”!
Our states can adjust its “FORCES” to a better and slower more massive hike!
Our states can be beholden less to a slim and light RACE TO THE TOP parsed meant of ECONOMIC “SUPPRESSION.”
His Metachlorian count must have been sky high!
My Grampa Hogan became a Knight - I know not of which order, but know the Order of Knights of Columbus existent so as his order but not his “rank” or “standing” - his own “ordered” order in such order. I bore witness at his wake - he had brethren - he had Knights also witness in their regalia.
I have less cause now myself to be of a time warp, the musing near twice as long as considered or expected where whence then nearer some I did - I did muse a challenge for seven books of seven years of magic and wizardry curriculum. An entertainment endeavor now scientific and to developmental and for me and J.K. to a life of its own, as yet before impossible.
This is a new world to me, and for many just now born hopefully swaddled enough and not over coddled and not to now a new “LOST GENERATION.”