As a political writer I am sitting here with Memorial Day Weekend near wondering how to cover Democrat Leaders fresh and stale as of their Obamacare of Darwinian concerns.
Are we of days of lesser weevils like rotten apples about a Bernoulli greater evils of like rotten apples in your bushels?
Oh my! Are these days of lifts or down drafts - more days of political dark clouds nearer than the horizon? Can I even remember how or why a old college Economics Professor did once call the Bernoulli Principle a “bad apple theorem:? May be easier now to just wonder how a new municipal politics is afoot for a Big Apple - and due some damming. Whom may crowe about lesser or greater weevils may be ravenous too much of old evils said of an Axis of Evil.
How Manhattan may all memorialize a loose Union anew in 2013 seems now for the picking as about East Egg & West Egg escapism of old fashioned Leonardoesque capping. What is the weevil in the barrels truly of the Clintons’ evil of old avoidance and inaction than cannot long support still their old “PEACE” for “PEACE DIVIDENDS”?
Has it been seventeen years already since when Bill and Hillary Clinton should have measure Saddam Hussein as a serpent in their garden and but how Biblical moved so judiciously and civilly prudently for a prosecution in full of all sanctions and crimes held up against Iraq’s tyrannical leader?
Do New Yorkers have among them already a perfect Super Bowl Mayor candidate for 2013 political harvesting?
Among the ebb and flow and thermodynamics of our current political pickings there may be a need to dam some old currents to stem a re-streaming of conditions from the conscious politics of the Clintons still to causing turbulence of/from unstable “hot-air.”
It may this weekend be more difficult to pick through the Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama for “good fruit” even if of like Mr. Binks of Rudyard Kipling’s MUNICIPAL sewers keeping. Yes Ja Ja Binks seems to be still quite a Gunga Din. Yes, President Barack H. Obama did receive a Nobel Peace Prize. Yes, the President of the United States, currently, when of his acceptance speech for his Peace Prize was early to a damming of old lingering dangerous fruits of Clintons’ evils in their avoidance and inaction, globally.
Do you - all New Yorkers - take Bill and Hillary to be yours - yours as embraced New Yorkers? Do you take carpetbagger Hillary Clinton of a bought nepotic Senate acquisition by Executive arrangements of and by her spouse while then a seated President of the United States of America? How whether you take them as your own is it that it was fair that she Hillary was allowed to campaign for Senate and the Presidency legally at least while of the full protection and its pomp and circumstancing luxury of the details for a term limited President? What is “not fair” - what is “NOT FAIR!!!”?
Do you yet get the import of the apple of the eyes of the Eightieth Congress as entrenched for now still by the existent 22nd Amendment of a careful “holding” poetic legalese to keep our term limits Amendment supposedly from being just a loop hole say for FDR to have just run again after two terms on his wife’s name Eleanor Roosevelt? Our Constitutional Amendment for term limits upon our President was a reaction to Franklin and Eleanor. Our Constitutional Amendment so written by the Eightieth Congress and ratified by the nation does respect that marriage laws and “holding” of united souls in marriage unions can not be set asunder for an interpretation of their limiting writ as if an election of one spouse to a holding isn’t actually also an indivisible by election working to a “some” or maybe “much” “holding” of such office by the other spouse.
There is a serpent of knowledge awaiting our Constitution as our 22nd Amendment is still on the books yet as undecided law.
By it being now undecided law so much can be said as if its original or derived intent to tag current politicians with labeling as if Criminal - Un-Constitutional - Treasonous. But for now it is a knowledge of a united two in marriage union that can not be set asunder by its legal “holding” so that the “holding” of the 22nd Amendment can reasonably be to allowing legally for Hillary Clinton to run for President as an election of her would then effect a by election “holding” some or much of office again by her spouse. Bill Clinton is not allowed to be returned to any holding of the office of the President by election and as he is indivisible from his marriage holding and union Hillary Clinton is not a legal eligible candidate for an election of her would return Bill Clinton by election to at least some “holding” Constitutionally barred.
But New Yorkers this is more about the Big Apple and so much long fought for since THE FEDERALIST PAPERS were written as if by Publius to defend the hopes of a more perfect Union of the Founding Fathers, and, as written to defend such from an earlier Clinton of New York politics who had more empirical and/or imperialistic designs too like these still in our faces newer Clintons. We have that these days are much like the days of the Founding Fathers of the United States and yet now with it just a new Clintons about a similar resistance but now as per more global opportunities to less than Constitutional designs.
Enter again our concerns about President Barack H. Obama even as he seemed smarter (smart enough) earlier at least when to tagging the Clintons with a global guilt from their years of administering with so much international inaction and avoidance. Enter again the current President who early did so speak seemingly erudite about DANGERS!!! from politics like that of the real legacy of Bill and Hillary and their Presidency.
It may be necessary to go all Darwinian “survival of the species” political in 2013 at least while discussing how important it may be to over-turn Obamacare. It may be about what has to be dammed that is of old unstable turbulence from “hot-air” of the Clintons’ administering - Quite! It may now be seriously that we have to dam both the Clintons and their protege(s) and as well Obamacare - REALLY! We have that we aren’t getting economic lift maybe because the Apple of the Clintons is spoiling the whole lots of bushels.
There was no real “PEACE” in their days as “two-fer” intimates engaged however properly or devilishly in a holding of the office of the President of the United States of America. Their “PEACE DIVIDENDS” were more conjured as of evil spirits then and of a poisonous fruit of “PEACE” then as a BIG LIE. The already recorded “legacy” of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is coincidentally also able to be of a tag on Clintons as of too much hedging and too little fruit baring economics. New Yorkers may better than most recall that in 1993 when sworn in the “two-fer” Clintons were to inheriting a almost already recovered from recession economy. What happened after 1993 was that they worked an evil devilish selfish politics of a fattening of a recovered economy so that they could have headlines to make people around the world believe that they had made the economy better.
By now it may be that New Yorkers are the ones behind the bad air and drafts of the Clintons and some how of political blinders to an ignorance that the Clintons did actually cause most of the economic conditions that made the collapse possible.
They while wanting to be loved as like PEACENIKS are actually of such as of theirs as of “PEACE” then actually of the rot with the collapse much of from their pickings to PEACE DIVIDEND popularity from now more obviously questionable (lies) about “peace.”
Afghanistan and Iraq are the two greatest failures about such BIG LIES by the administration of the Clinton “two-fer” and specifically what our current President was admonishing when with his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech was to careful tagging of DANGERS from “inaction” and “avoidance.” Yes these are the same Clintons that after eight years didn’t even leave a succeeding President a single option on the table as per even just Saddam Hussein and a full prosecution or enforcement of him by rights established with United Nations agreements.
The politics of both the Clintons and Obama as per ACA - Obamacare is such that a devolution may now result from an over coddling new nationalism with their centralized near BIG BROTHER/BIG SISTER “caring” governance. The more they get citizens (subjects) to let the Government do for them the less capable such as a species of Americans should then develop and evolve in years with as still of a natural selection “survivor” trait(s). The old “AMERICAN” may be a dying bread - Quite!
The Clintons’ “PEACE” for their desired devilish wants for a rare popularity for/from “PEACE DIVIDENDS” can be said to be a bigger and proven more dangerous lie than that of President Bush when after the Presidency of the Clintons seemed to be with Americans down to near only one way left to proceed with a due prosecution of Saddam Hussein, and to tagging as “Bush lied - soldiers died.”
As the Clintons’ “PEACE” was maybe the biggest and most dangerous lie by an American leader in the past twenty years, and seemingly because “Bill” just wanted to be lovable as like a Dove, it is still dangerous that the Clintons seem too institutionalized in their marriage and of a plot to allow “Bill” to be the “Dove” and then to shock and awe with “Hillary” later allowed to be the “Hawk.”
But will the over-coddling socialism reaching centralizing attempts by the lot of Democrat leaders lead to a devolution of the American species? With the Government trying to have power to do more for Americans of that which Americans were long strong and proud for being of a self sufficiency won’t it be more of a survival of the species Darwinism to Americans to devolving not evolving as a class or species?
This Memorial Day Weekend it would behoove New Yorkers of Mayoral Race of 2013 much also to consider that the world has not become a better place with the new Clintons trying to effect globally quite what an earlier New York politician Clinton did once unsuccessfully after being confronted by Publius and his THE FEDERALIST PAPERS.
The bad apples now possibly about the Big Apple municipal political reset are of turbulence that needs to be dammed or damned still of an inferno of Hillary and her crusading while FLOTUS. She was having trouble being right recently on foreign affairs and the Middle East not just because of limits of her “experts” - she is quite able to be tagged as blinded as well by the hot-air streaming nonsense of the “PEACE” they pimp’d that never actually existed.
New Yorkers if you do still take the Clintons as yours will you if and when the Congress deems it wise to subpoena maybe both Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and dig deep into as well all matters and monies movements via the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVES? Benghazi is a scandal that for its cover-up opens up a concern that the cover-up was politically needed because they had been wrong about intelligence and history and at risk each or all as possibly of being to naively funding like a by material support the very terrorism they were supposedly fighting.
Please do consider either whether right to choose the less of the two weevils and how to now choice something better than a consideration just politically as a “lesser of the two evils.”
[note: I am still of the strategic opinion I figured since before the Clintons did enter 1992 race and so of from before I helped make them electable in part because of such concerns in my philosophical strategizing about my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that the Clintons or a re-elected President Bush was best to move to prosecute Saddam Hussein within that new term. What was needed after the Persian Gulf War to be done before it was likely safe to move finally against Saddam Hussein was that at least New York City and its Time Square and Las Vegas had to first have started a real revival and urban renewal with Community Policing. It still seems plausible that Saddam Hussein had a way to defeat the new sole superpower USA in a global PR war if we didn’t show the world that Americans could fix their own cities before asserting that they could run Baghdad better than he. It still hasn’t made sense to me for USA to have not moved for a full enforcement of the United Nations sanction on Saddam Hussein and his Iraq within what was the first term of the Clintons’ “two-fer.”]
The worse news possible for President Obama and the Clintons’ machine is that a Republican RECOVERY is already stoked and ready. It may be unseen by most and yet quite entrenched and ready - already. These are bad days for the Democrats.
Much of the economy when allowed to work free of Government suppression is based on teams and competition. Obama & Democrats have been to a politically controllable “THE GOVERNMENT MADE IT” and as of Obama’s airey spiriting to spread “you didn’t build it” over-lording. It may be as simple now to recover our economy of citizens from his as if of “subjects” most quickly by showing that he and they are just obstacles blocking the way back to a vibrant economy.
There is your faith now - your trust now too - much to be concerned with if such can be so simply true. It may help to start by asking yourself if President Bill Clinton isn’t now working so hard to appear to be being of a doing of good primarily because of a great need from a guilt to be to assuaging his own culpability - a vast social guilt his.
The down economy can come back quickly, and, Republicans have teams of teams ready at our state level if you are just ready to trust that you are best actually now to look at the state level not the national level to have a renaissance in vibrancy of free market economic growth. The Democrats do want you to think you have to look for a national solution and yet for the economies to come back we need less need of national taxation because we need more teams of teams more locally and community and state based to be at economic competitions amongst others so sized around the entire known world.
With the popularity down for Congress we have that it may best come back too by standing for a renaissance in state’s rights firstly. Our best national security and economic posture seems still to be to have a renaissance in state’s rights. Our Constitution can be celebrated so while about such as a charge in new Federalism. Yes I still have this as thinking of my collection titled THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM that was written before the Presidency of the Clintons and now long tested of these administerings since. Republican Governors are poised at least of thirty of our fifty states to be to local bellowing for a full and enlighting new sustainable era of economic growth.
We may now need people in Washington DC whom most do not want power in Washington DC seats. It is a music for growth that is ready to be set free even if now the hard way by prosecutions of Democrats generally and the administration specifically for too many efforts much of effrontery to our Constitution.
President Barack Hussein Obama and his loyal subjects however “Czar’d” or more common subjects has been an obstacle to an enlightened economic stoking for a re-birth in economic growth - for a RECOVERY. We do have to arrest the Democrats’ efforts at random higher taxation of their newest boldness these past four years that had them go from having been the TAX AND SPEND lots to their reckless SPEND, SPEND, SPEND TO JUSTIFY “NECESSARY” NEW VAST TAXATION - SPEND & TAX tag. The problem much specifically with their new nationalism is that it asks for a national centralized controllable assimilated masses then smothered from natural freer economic growth of the old American standard of by competition and local community and faith based solidarity.
The specific team of whom you and I may best be to having as national Republican leaders is still not figured yet. Whom we are to have next is critical and as while it is mostly our Governors of the thirty states with Republican Governors that have us stoked and ready for a strong and vast RECOVERY. Obama’s over-lording to a national loyalty of a forced assimilation is an obstacle smothering home fires across the world - and especially in the United States of America. But whom can be right for a new national leadership of Republican credits going forward as it is a renaissance in state’s rights best for our national security and economies?
Whom are those who can come together as an executive team of the Executive Branch soon as trusted and effective experts? It is for our economy and communities our national debate has to trend now to Washington based pols as gifted to ask people to look away from Washington to more local community and faith based common sense governance. For our economy to again glow an enlightenment of a vibrant and workable E Pluribus Unum solidarity in looser pursuits of individuals about selfish personal economic interests it is best to look at our Governors for a moderated bellowing to stoke an over-due renaissance in state’s rights.
These are bad days for Democrats. It is that President William Jefferson Clinton with his CGI is much motivated to be appearing to be at doing good just from a great guilt and as to assuage himself for much of an earlier GROSS NEGLIGENCE, at least. His pimping of “PEACE” for his “PEACE DIVIDENDS” is nearer the worst Government LIE of the past twenty years even than Democrat successor President Obama with his Benghazi talking points suggesting it could have been just about a video. But economically more concerning is that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of an unnecessary extra trillion cut now is quite the greatest economic blunder of the past century. He cut too much too quickly and while tagging necessary spending for economic growth and jobs stability as un-necessary spending so that he could cut so so so much of it.
President Clinton did do much of what it was of our Government that was responsible for as per our banks - Big Banks - and how they became too corrupted to have kept the economy from recovering nearer 2008. Republicans then likely could have turned the economy around in a couple of years if while about such with an election of McCain/Palin and President McCain to his promises to revitalize state’s independence there had been also a very public call for bank reforms and with such of a prosecution of Democrats of banking executive decisions starting with President Clinton.
We are poised to have a vibrant recovery now most in thanks to maybe all of the thirty Republican Governors. The Democrats are now as grand new nationalists quite still too much of a centralized suppression of economic growth by community and faith based competition. The Democrats are in the way blocking with their trenchant partisan politics. And, yes there is no sense of whom now would be a team of a national Republican leadership fitting for a enlightened renaissance more of the kindling and stoking of state’s homefires.
As these troubles gather about the Democrats long too nationalistic as if a hellishly hot inferno it may be that even Democrats can benefit from looking away from Washington for solutions and warm hearths of less centralized assimilation in states and communities across the United States of America. And, too it may be that we have Republicans in Washington fit to be feeders of timbers more set for a ready bellowing of our Governors and their more locally stoked and kept teams of teams still endearing as of competition economics.
HONEST JOHN, of the Beaver Wars pride, stands tall of the felted beaver pelted topping of Abraham Lincoln as a bundle of flesh and bones quite more an embodiment of personality as to the HEDGER TYRANNICAL HILLARY now being processed as too institutionalized.
The hide of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton is being metaphorically, at least, justly processed/peeled back not as if a quite dry autopsy of the Republican Party but as if of long due deep cutting for a not too political live dissection of so much of/from the Clintons inhibiting much as if a cancer on our politics and economy.
Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED! She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?
Is Hillary Clinton more of a hedge fruitless global Diplomacy such that it has hardly been “Diplomacy” baring?
Is President Bill Clinton nearer to admitting it was more all his fault? What of their foggy bottoms of Clinton two-fer?
{Enter President Barack Hussein Obama - as if newly present at Ohio State as if erudite about tyranny: Puffed up.}
It is like a new kind of Beaver War that young Ohioans have been pulled into with their President of no tyranny claims while a tyranny of the Clintons reigns within his own Democrat Party for Party control and for rants of keeping whom they mean to as lower Democrats barred from higher Party status or institutional acclamation and rank. It seems it is quite tyrannical how the Clinton have been trying to hold onto inappropriate executive power since leaving office in 2001. It seems President Obama has a tyranny of his “team of rivals” and that this is some revealed in the live dissection of the Democrat’s cover-up pertaining to Benghazi.
If Americans are to find justice from the commenced live dissection of some rants of Mrs. Clinton and her keeps - of others less politically favored or protected while also her keeps - and a Shakespearean JUSTICE of a pound of flesh from around her heart it must now be set before that her blood may spill however while accruing the just full pound of flesh and no more — that her blood may now spill too if and when it a pound of flesh, a half pound or pounds of flesh judged fair.
Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED! President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!
This is not just a literary technique. House Speaker John Boehner is both of these new Beaver Wars and of Ohio and the old Beaver Wars pride and tall honor much of Abraham Lincoln standing long so tall as a Republican in beaver felted pelted topping. I do not know if Ohio can claim to have been the home of Lincoln’s own beavered tall standing.
Are the Benghazi hearing now as a live dissection of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton also about how the Clinton two-fer is now long as a tyrannical political power of a reigning about just Democrats as the keepers of the party gates for passage of young to Party places and classier ranks? In Ohio President Barack Hussein Obama spoke as if there was no tryanny to worry about and not even that long now of the proximity of his “team of rivals” Clintons.
Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED! President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!
This is not just a literary technique. There is a tyranny over at least the minds of Democrat Party women now just of and by the concerned “Diplomacy” of Hillary Clinton as fruitless in hedging it has been. There is a more political and partisan tyranny as well over at least Democrat Party women of and by the reigning of the Clinton two-fer however concerning as of President Barack Hussein Obama’s “team of rivals.”
With Benghazi the first real surgical cutting of the now much late live dissection of the political and “Diplomacy” of just Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton we have peeled back the ribbing and spine of a Party tyranny, much - already.
I dug out this of 9/18/2012 called TREASON SELLS while looking for a specific different piece more about #Benghazi > http://bit.ly/10jc6kk. I still recommend stretching your mental muscles against tyrannies over minds of men, and women too, with a visit to http://CitRB.com and a reading of all that queues after a local site search by BENGHAZI.
“Of #Hillary #Benghazi “WHAT DIFF …” IF THIS OR THAT clever defense - Really if that or that not big diff - BUT!!!, if TERROR or WAR BIG DIFF.“*
“#Hillary LIKE REALLY? BEST YOU HAD FOR #CONGRESS #BENGHAZI WAS LIKE “or maybe just some guy walking down the street” possibility?”*
“#Benghazi is about same Clintons that had their Prez Library designed in a gun shape & skinned in Confederate Gray & who planted on Whitehaven?”*
Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED! President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!
This in not just a literary technique! There is a diabolical dichotomy nearer a trichotomy of the Clintons and their triangulations.
“Re: #Benghazi much that GAME CHANGE book a vast lie about Hillary as she & Bill consummated their marriage towards both becoming President.”*
“Re: #Benghazi “it’s for the video” - but isn’t it more insulting to Muslims to say brutality of video motives so more than insult video actually was?”*
[note: an “*” here denotes a quoting reposting of a recent #Benghazi related tweet of me with my twid (Twitter ID) @jphoganorg and as readable in bulleted of http://citizenrosebud.mobi]
Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED! President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!
Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has been a hedger and arguably of a Diplomacy that hasn’t been baring fruits - at least as promised or as her rants and tying of rants bosoms yet of cold suggestions too institutionalized.
It is not fair to even just the young of Ohio State to let Hillary Clinton be as if of a new pride in a new Beaver Wars - it is safer and politically more prudent to still talk more of her as tyrannical in an imperialistic socialism as a Crusader with a history as FLOTUS as having been globally to much too inciting and too polarizing.
“THAT ONLY 2 SENATORS VOTED TO NOT THROW SEN CLINTON OUT OF SENATE DOESN’T ACTUALLY LEGALLY MEAN IT WAS CONSTITUTIONAL FOR HER TO BE SOS.“*
“Seems an important day to remember Operation Iraqi Freedom as figured
originally to be a new bold step for global relations with the
liberation not to be an occupation and it to be of compensation after
the fact by a freed Iraqi People with their profits from their oil
output. Odd how Dems say Iraq wasn’t paid for while it was Pelosi
Congress that mostly killed how it was to be paid for by those liberated.
Even odder that we were supposed to believe that Hillary’s bold State
move on Libya of her Odyssey Dawn was then set up and sold as if it were
a brand new idea and a Democrat idea to have a liberation of a
sovereign people and to have it set up supposedly to be as if a
liberation compensated for by oil outputs of such country and its
people. Hmmm? Something not quite politically right about this as it
seems at least Hillary can not hide she was playing politics with Libya
& Benghazi.”*
Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED! President Bill Clinton is nearer to admitting it was much all his fault!
[Note: a “*” could as well be for a posted sharing longer than 140 characters and yet also a tweeted by me as with twid @jphoganorg as originally a Facebook status update that re-posted to Twitter.]
House Speaker John Boehner is an honorable man and maybe due a tag too as of “honest” like say HONEST JOHN. We have that the known history and legacy of the Clintons’ two-fer is now of the commenced late live dissection inseparable from their personal reputations as known liars and “Big Liars.”
“#SecClinton per #Benghazi may have been too busy trying to usurp legacy global powers of Treasury & Commerce to do Diplomatic Mission well!”*
“Oh #SecClinton per #Benghazi I guess it just used to be AMERICAN to think that our SoS would take daily threat ass. in countries they invaded?”*
“I think that like Economic Statecraft idea of Hillary’s Diplomatic nonsense & dangerous as necessarily a restructuring of Exec Branch.”*
Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED! She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?
Is President Bill Clinton now nearer to admitting it is much really all his fault? Would that be fair or accurate analysis of the diabolical dichotomy of the Clintons’ two-fer triangulating trichotomies?
President Barack Hussein Obama as now still as if of Ohio seems to have missed the very dangers of his own “team of rivals” as of an actual and affecting modern tyranny of and by the Clintons at least still within his own Democrat Party.
“It was a cover-up method of #Obama & #Clinton #Benghazi tall tales > but so they could avoid an appropriate necessary measured RESPONSE?”*
“The hardest hitting tweets - tweets with background to stand on links - on #Benghazi now threaded at http://citizenrosebud.mobi - #TRUTHS #USA“*
“Of #Obama #Clinton #Benghazi lies that if TERROR or ACT OF WAR then they might have had to bomb Meca or all the Afghan opium stores/crops.”*
“1/2 million may have already read my THE BIG TENT here linked > REALLY speaks to #Benghazi & Clintons as haphazards > http://bit.ly/15dtEpU“*
Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED! She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?
“#Benghazi & foggy bottoms of #Clintons two-fer intel > #Obama so wrong about #Iraq it still hard for him to be right bout anything in region”*
“Per #Benghazi & #Iraq best we’d prosecuted Saddam in Clintons’ 1st term with a bring of Community Policing then & not just when SURGED”*
“Of #Hillary #Benghazi “WHAT DIFF” If THIS or THAT clever defense - Really if THAT or THAT not big diff - BUT!!!, if TERROR or WAR -BIG DIFF”*
And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts: Really it seems a tyranny over minds and bodies of Democrat women at least that we are of a President Obama embraced by a tyrannical rivalry he may not even recognized as such. Really it seems a tyranny over at least minds and bodies of Democrat women how the rants of Clintons’ two-fer are of their attempts to keep a party keep by rants tying and lashing down to hopes of so many they institutionally need to keep as a keep beneath them
And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts: Of Benghazi we see cracks in the cover-up of the Clintons by President Obama as well as an actual “played politics” tyranny of a political election count-down fields of conflicts and competition.
And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts: Of the modern sit rep of just Democrat Party politics, however of a tyranny while our President says to not worry yourselves about tyranny, it is ridiculous that with #Benghazi streaming, however now commenced as a late but due “pound of flesh” live dissection, of at least an arguable fruitless hedged “diplomacy” by Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, that you are not alone in a time of tyrannies.
And, well, at least yee Ohio women maybe of Democrat Party thought - thoughts: Really!!! And how can it not be so while Hillary Clinton is so INSTITUTIONALIZED!? How now as maybe we have that President William Jefferson Clinton may be nearer to admitting it was much all his own fault? And, how, now as we have a state of Democrat Party Politics such that a tyranny likely explains best how it seems there are no other women than Hillary Clinton now allowed to be see as capable of becoming President. And, how, as it is prudent and important to ask if there is even another women that hasn’t slept with Bill Clinton whom can be said now to be at least as capable as Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?
Hillary Clinton is INSTITUTIONALIZED! She has rants - She has her famous Benghazi rant - yet is she a tyrant?
{IF YOU ARE NEW NOW TO FINDING THE POLITICAL PUNDITRY OF POET PUNDIT JP HOGAN I DO NOW STRONGLY SUGGEST YOU VISIT AT LEAST ALSO http://CitizenRosebud.org AND FIND YOUR WAY TO ALSO ENJOYING THE SAMPLER THERE.}
For the sake of controversy and selling of truths it is that we are now here to read and discuss white chocolate politically, maybe.
As Mother’s Day is fast approaching and a big hat day of the year too we have that for Mrs. Clinton to run again she will have to hoof it all as either her racing against her own mothering or against First Lady Michelle Obama’s mothering. It is not appropriate to be to stereotypically shoeing Mrs. Clinton as a “white chocolate” and our current wife of an also “the first black President” so as First Lady Michelle is as if she a “dark chocolate.” It may be insensitive too, and while still it may be too confusing to compare them as equally of a milk chocolate.
Mrs. Clinton and First Lady Michelle Obama do seem as different as night and day - as different as black and white - as per playing the woman cards in our politics. With our current FLOTUS we have culinary greatness of grown at home healthiness and wholesomeness to consummate while Mrs. Clinton is still so served as our Fast Food Queen to super-sized McDonald’s Big Mac meals for her like “Mac Daddy” spouse.
It has been reported that if only we like could get back as a nation to before the influences of dietary corruption of once First Lady Mrs. Clinton our nation could be to saving a trillion dollars in healthcare costs by having been without the vast increase in obesity of the incredible national increase in personal body weight average of her mothering.
We will somehow have to discuss President Clinton as having been the “First Black President” and comparatively and contrastingly while it seems on its face that honestly President Obama has been the United States of America’s first black President, still going forward.
But really while it may be a confounding conundrum of politics to broach how Mrs. Clinton will have to either race against her own reputation or race against First Lady Michelle Obama’s example and mothering we have that there are economic consideration that are of President Obama’s governance and governing these years fundamentally so as absent a philosophy of governance. It may be the fault of “Hillary” or “Michelle” somehow - somehow as we have to consider that Mrs. Clinton did make as many impossible campaign promises as “Obama” and was set to have had nearly the same Clintons’ alumni as her own economic advisers.
As you should decide whose mothering you think is better and how, however, you may prefer one personally more than the other there is a problem with the economics now that likely would have arrived by either the mothering of “Hillary” or as it has with the “fathering” of “Obama.” We may now be necessarily to a second wave of economic shrinkage.
It is remarkable that a suggestion is about a candidacy for “Hillary” that there are no other Democrat women capable of such challenge - that there are none able to competently stand up to Mrs. Clinton. I don’t know how yet to write sufficiently politically about the Democrat Party of such a paradigm where it seems that President Clinton with his recent politics is standing too much with powers he was supposed to have been limited from as of executive domains generally and so that it seems he is flexing muscle that it must be “Hillary” for she can be thought to have slept with him the most.
There is an intra-party war for political legacy between the Clintons and Obamas already commenced and with it now that President Obama is maybe trapped with the Clintons seeming possibly re-ascendant and so that he and his family will be then forward politically back under Democrat Party Leadership dominance of at least President Bill Clinton.
But speaking to the economy and the resultant down economy that started much with the announcement of HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT and she then with a promise to violate capitalism with a seizing of all oil company profits >> President Obama still seems to have until the end of a second term as at the helm of our economy as so that a President is such juiced. And, oddly he has set up a new economic situation where if the Republicans do not decide to keep offering a rivaling economic method in capitalism personally then Obama’s socialism will bankrupt the United States of America.
See this isn’t about “Hillary” as white chocolate or “Michelle” as dark chocolate.
This is black and white along the lines of economics and common sense. President Obama (or President Clinton) now needs the Republicans and Independents to not do as he says but to do stupidly as they would if capitalism rules were still our economic rules. For the Democrats socialism to work they need even just the Republicans to blindly still live their profitable capitalism American Dreams.
A candidacy for Mrs. Clinton cannot offer us a respite from this new economic way from the united Democrat Party game changing. Simply from now until 2016 it makes more sense for at least Republicans to do as the President has said and to not do as he needs them to as of a idiotic staying the course in profitable capitalism. To also help save the planet and gird us all for these years of climate change there is a moral and patriotic duty now much for at least the Republicans too to do as the President has said, however so with alarmism.
You may want to use this time of the NEW DEAL AUSTERITY of these in governance with the current Democrat Party unity to yourself figure how much less you need others to do for you and how much less raw resources you really will quite need as these times of Democrat Eco Alarmism stay politically justified. It may though be maddening to try to understand how Mrs. Clinton really will either have to race against her own reputation or specifically race against the mothering of/by First Lady Michelle Obama. (I still assert all have the right as long as our 22nd Amendment is undecided law to protest that any campaign by Clintons whenever to returning to a co-holding of the Presidency can and should be called criminal, un-Constitutional, and/or treasonous.)
Our Federal Government’s revenue streams come mostly from income and profits - not wealth or property taxation.
The worst economic reality for President Obama as he attempts to prove he can afford such “idealism” is that the Republicans, at least, will do as he says to a new flatter economy with a new greenness in conservationism their way too. We as a nation cannot and likely will not be able to afford these new entitlements of the recent rush to a NEW NATIONALISM of socialism if at least Republican don’t idiotically keep to blindly being capitalists.
We have to consider that First Lady Michelle Obama is a dominant women in the Obama marriage and maybe as responsible as her husband for this confounding new economics - as responsible as Mrs. Clinton for her mothering as if two super-sized Big Mac meals a day was good politics - even before it seems to have increased national medical costs with an increase in obesity to us of now having been able to save a trillion dollars if she hadn’t been such a ham for President Clinton’s dietary excesses.
I have to believe, whomever your political “Mother” preference is, and however you have been weened and reared by a real mother, you are ready to politically consider at least that Mrs. Clinton likely has to run against First Lady Michelle Obama’s legacy as it would be quite ridiculous for her to run against herself as if she is politically not defensible.
It may now be that Democrats have done more to bring “family values” back at least to realm of family and home economics. It is that at least Republicans have been also asked to assimilate patriotically in a new austerity and conservationism and that now are times when they have less need to stand in defense of capitalism themselves. It figures though quite confoundingly that President Obama and Democrats forward are stuck unable to see our nation afford their idealism if at least Republicans don’t blindly still pursue profits and income from capitalism. It is that Republicans seem the more important class of economic taggables to be firstly and mostly to a full Obama conservationism, however it may also now be seen as socialism.
Mother’s Day is near - Please don’t ask me to decide for you whom you should respect more - whether your mother or First Lady Michelle Obama or even possibly Mrs. Clinton.
I am with you Gen (Whatever) - the new YOUTH OF AMERICA.
The trenchant President Barack Hussein Obama, as long as his ACA Obamacare is surviving, has you all now protected until age 26, I believe, as still subjects/wards of your parents - justly. The wise pursuit for each of you now isn’t to try to find a job as your greatest returns may now be of the economic game changing by Prez as “wards” with time to now start lobbying your Federal Government so that by the time you turn 27 you will still be able to be a just ward of your parents and country.
It has been said that our current President has no philosophy of governance. It is that he did early on suggest we needed to become more French - more like the French. These days of depressed and trying times has most of the old stigma of unemployment “governed” away. It is that France didn’t become “French” by turning the worlds greatest economy into what they now have. It is as if Prez has been trying be more French as if all the stylings and economies of just Manhattan could all fit in one beret.
What has been happening as a next predictable to some devolution of the United States of America is that now Prez while so trenchant has been while of a posit of RACE TO THE TOP quite to a coddling to remove social stigmata about any wards/subjects not educated quite so. There are many ways that Prez has been depressing recessionary economics by government suppression of once more naturally moral philosophical renditions. His treatments on your human condition are not well thought through or considerate as of an a priori possible.
There is a probability that Prez while so trenchant and yet without a philosophy of governance while of so much acting is now to a new wave of economy shrinkage due to his “morality.” With what has been offered though mostly as of an Obama hypothesis as if a working theorem there is that such begets that now there is a game change to a duty of all employers and those industrious to ask and answer: HOW SMALL SHOULD THE ECONOMY BE?
Peeps of Gen (Whatever) you best use of time may now be to a self motivated home schooling in philosophy - philosophy of governance and governments. As it seems with our Prez so trenchant you all will be best to learn how to publicly protest (party?) at the national level as unemployed yet fully covered YOUTH OF AMERICA as a united Lobby and firstly best likely as towards amendments to Obamacare so that by the time you turn 27 you will then all so be able to be coddled still as wards of your parents and Government.
It did become clear since before such of how trenchant Prez is that his RACE TO THE TOP was of a usage of “TOP” uncertain and unexplained. Confusing was much about this so confounding too that while he said “RACE TO THE TOP” he soon regularly turned tail and spoke dictatingly to how per his thinking it is bad to be above the middle, like.
How to be an Obama-TRON is your current and greatest new predicament. Prez BO has undermined if not fully disassembled our once greatest economy in the world - SEEMS. He has now effected such a game change that it seems possible or probable that those of the economy of the United States of America have only witnessed a first wave of economic shrinkage.
Unlike George Washington Prez has been against there being vicissitudes incident to life as free radicals in his economics. He wants an economy, as he has long said, quite basically flat and free from unpredictable UPS and DOWNS - highs & lows.
Of what can stay together in his thinking that seems well short of being a workable philosophy of governance, and while it so seems as if he ignored that France didn’t become so admirably French by setting asunder at home the worlds greatest economy, we can say is that he has shown a desire and dug-in-ness to suggest that he must want to control all of it if he has tried to control this much of it.
Obama-TRONS of this new flat economy of Prez BO it is time to figure that it is pointless to resist - to be of a resistance any longer. He will assimilate you - or stay so trenchant while trying. It figures you are now liberated by his efforts at assimilation as he has rendered so many old of stigmata as stigma no longer as per meek to inherit health and strength freely and so that it is now PC to be on the Government dole - and of a race to be TOP in statistics as if of a MOST FREQUENT FLYER.
Yes Obama-TRONS it is confusing that ACA Obamacare is set up so that you and your gen can bankrupt the entire nation by seeking to be loyal and patriotic in a full and compliant assimilation. Yes Obamacare is like Social Security.
Right Obama-TRONS as the new YOUTH OF AMERICA you have been freed from needing to get work to stay healthy. Yes it is so of Prez thinking that you’ld should believe he has a pill for it, like. Right Obamacare is like Social Security - and OH MY - yet how different now as you have to consider your grandparents and their life style & carbon footprints.
It is essential to all this of Prez so trenchant to a half baked game change, and how it seems he thinks all the stylings and economies of just Manhattan can fit in one beret of Obama, that now thinkers and educators too would be amiss if not to asking and proffering diatribes morally figured about how small our economy now should be. Prez BO is still trying to be a costumed super hero that saves the entire planet from an end of the world as we know it doom of GLOBAL WARMING, however scientific or not. ie: It may be wrong to permit new construction as per a NEW NATIONALISM and his green federal agents as building and building activities may net more carbon use by enough so that it would be immoral to want to like “move up” or “move out.”
I am with you Gen (Whatever) - the new YOUTH OF AMERICA. Right Obamacare is like Social Security - BUT!!!
Right you are now of an age and a changed economy where your grandparents like have two of the jobs that might have been already yours. Right these days are of a liberation from old social stigmata and you now freer to be a Washington based Lobby unto yourselves however of a Party. It figures to be patriotic you are best to be now to a personal race to the TOP of Prez and his example that it is an ability to get free from Government whatever you need or want as his TOP so exercised so far.
I am with you Gen (Whatever) - the new YOUTH OF AMERICA. Right Obamacare is like Social Security - BUTT!!!
It is fruitless to fight the assimilation now! You know the math! You know maybe that we have now only seen the first wave of economic shrinkage related to Prez being so trenchant to fit the once greatest economy of the world into a French beret, like. Right! You get that it is pointless to resist while so much is being offered for free for so many if they just assimilate. You get that as your grandparents now likely have two of the jobs that might have been yours they otherwise would be more so to taking most of your earnings if you actually had a real job.
Right Obamacare is like Social Security! But unlike Social Security it is set up so that people of the United States of America can quickly bankrupt their own nation while assimilated in a NEW NATIONALISM so. Unlike Social Security, yet while argued as being nationally just as moral, it is that Obamacare is a social program to allow people to have some net safety but on oddly set up to allow people instead of waiting decades for its dollars to near instantly be seeking compliant ways to get hundred folds what they contribute out of it immediately and regularly.
Right Obamacare is like Social Security but that you don’t have to wait and are not supposed to wait - you can and should be getting as much from it up front as you can even if hundreds or thousands times what you did or ever will be of putting in.
And see why you may want to become home schooled, at least, now in a study of philosophy - philosophy of governance? As long as your grandparents have at least one of the jobs that should have been yours and otherwise to an unemployment with their excessive carbon footprints to just a high subsistance level grossly now more greatly off your nets - what is there really to do but take all the free and less stigmatized time to start lobbying as a NEW NATIONALIST now for the age to be soon enough to age 27 - at least?
Frankly it is diabolical how much we have now to cut through as a fog/smoke of the histories of the past twenty plus years.
To preface a late treatment of such dangers here are a few of my recent Facebook status posts:
“#Obama let me be clear (of) #BushLibrary > US Constitution has God in it & is a Christian establishment > Founders did ordain & establish it all in the Year of their Lord with that “Year of our Lord” for Posterity and Tranquility of “We the People…” with it People not people and “Year of our Lord…” not “Year of Our Lord…” Don’t know how to interpret now that it seems re-established that the USA is of a Christian Constitution of a 1st Amendment barring of Congress such that it is barred from making any laws to set itself above the equal right of the people though in “interpretation” of God and God’s will.”
“What is written of/for Islam as to facing East 5 times a day in shared prayer as at least as important as a sextant to a sailor of at least two dedicated uses per day and with one always early enough in each morning so of/for Islam about observations so as to keep faithful from losing their ways with God as a dedicated sextant use is necessary to a sailor to avoid becoming lost at sea?”
“Was #SecClinton #Hillary too busy trying to usurp legacy global powers of Treas & Commerce Dptmnts to do Diplomatic Mission right?“
“Is it of Islam that the paths to God disappear most days though still there while for most Christians their paths just become more worn and beaten and especially if just temporarily covered/hidden by some fresh snow? And that for Irish there of Ireland maybe their drinking paths are also same paths to Church? Where for Islam and the sands of times theirs there as paths to God’s places do most days seem to have disappeared?“
I figure it may be far safer to be a stoner in the regions dominantly and historically of Islam and desserts than to be of such regions with heat stroke risks and regular dangers from disorientation particular to wide open desserts and sand storms. I figure it may be safer to be stoner and even one lightly stoned than to be there and inebriated as of intoxication with alcohol.
President George W. Bush’s recently rebroadcast remarks as to how suicide bombers must have been “hopeless” speak to an alarmism due about the actual already passed years of Clintons’ administering - as still quite haunting.
President Barack Hussein Obama recently with his incriminating #BUZZFEED two am #WHCD stoking did give rise to the questioning now as to whether his illegal drug use that had him with early morning munchies was of usage criminal to break GOOD or break BAD haunting establishments or if it was just recreational mind numbing chemical doping of no points or counterpoints specificities.
President William Jefferson Clinton has left Jihadists and the established moral leaders of their religion less hope than they likely ever imagined possible as from one of the highest office of the United States of America.
It is as per Jihad it seems to rest that hope must have been dashed for a path to civil and peaceful Justice for their to be a Holy War causal. Even as per 9/11 I & II if “Jihad” mustn’t there have been, however, no civil or peaceful path for Justice left available as per the issues of an associated guilt?
I don’t know if President Obama would have to get half baked or fully cooked to be of a mental capacity to fathom the full diabolical of the Clintons’ legacy that left radicals of Islam of no hope for Justice but as by Jihad.
Attorney General Eric Holder has his hands full if he is to rend Justice back into Democrat Party executive execution exactly as per reducing a sense of Justice by Jihad only for those of Islam where ever. He may have to offer those remaining “Middle East Leaders” once of an 1993 era Clinton political con a specific amnesty and exactly as associated with moral justifications left to realm of suicide bombers at least as concerns 9/11 I.
If the 9/11 highjacker “terrorists” are so “Jihadists” and so of having seen no hope for Justice but as then through a Holy Warring sacrificial Jihad then such is of the moral realm of the faith and faithful of Islam and of a knowing about the right and wrong in the charges of the supreme leaders of the establishments moral of such faith. For us to be to finally litigating a guilt of the Clintons at least to a GROSS NEGLIGENCE for their eight years as our highest office holders our Attorney General Eric Holder may have to offer said of “Middle East Leaders” circa 1993 corruption of President Clinton amnesty from prosecution so that we can morally discuss how the Clintons had left Justice as not possible by any other means more civil or peaceful.
It was half baked that President Barack Hussein Obama did pressure all to not “re-litigate” a past that hardly had been yet litigated specifically once at least to a necessary moral understanding. The Clintons have not yet been effectively litigated for so much that can have been causal to faithful of Islam thinking there was no civil or peaceful path for a Justice as per the issues that are discussed as the motivation of the 9/11 I suicide bombers.
There is a political trap still effectively set for said “Middle East Leaders” however associated honorably with a corruption of the Clintons dated back as far as 1993. Without an offer of specific and full amnesty for such high class of people where ever they may be now as survivors of the Arab Spring they cannot share their perspective on the Clintons however “corrupting” it might be honorably. It is as if the Clintons are still surviving politically as if Redford in the STING and them of the conning globally.
We are stuck all sort of in a half baked no-mans land that now will beget more terrorism as of a Jihad just because said “Middle East Leaders” cannot speak morally and free about the cons and crash politics of the Clintons without damning themselves in a too on its face to people of the United States self incriminating telling.
It remains that President Barack Hussein Obama may be more dangerous as one of our highest office as not still a faithful of Islam. It is that to some of such faith he may be an apostate and to us of greater dangers as he governs as an adult who shed his religion of birth as if by choosing Christianity as a better religion. We have that for such to be resolved we may need a more serious BOOK OF BARACK than my column @ jphogan.org to detail how he lives not as if Christianity is a better religion than Islam is but just that it is a better religion for him.
It is the Congress of the United States that is barred by the First Amendment from making any law respecting an establishment of religion and religious tenets as if it has a superior right in moral interpretation than the people of the People. Our President is allowed like our Courts to be though of wearing their morality and faithfulness on their sleeves and in their talk and walk.
Our Clintons are not loveable for how diabolical their conning was and still is. They do seem to be fooling too many still too long as if of a STING set up for personal and political profits for their spousal husbandry however of private and public domains. It does figure that the supreme moral leaders of Islam and likely leaders of sovereign Muslim countries had to have an awareness of some “knowing” as predictive to 9/11 I & II. It figures that this may be a matter of our Clintons of having left no sense that a civil and peaceful path for a Justice on such issues was possible, and, that said “Middle East Leaders” could bare witness against the Clintons still if only maybe our Attorney General Eric Holder could secure them a just amnesty from prosecution.
It is that I oddly remember new President William Jefferson Clinton as to haunting me while about such in its earliest days in the White House. I was haunted then by such as inappropriate and corrupt and then for those years long until 9/11/01 - as it happened to have turned out.
Can we get the Clintons’ recipe for Jihad disasters revealed yet and as if of a first litigation?
Is President Barack Hussein Obama more dangerous as an apostate to his religion of birth than if he actually were a faithful of Islam?
Is this really not about religion but of a GROSS NEGLIGENCE at least of the Clintons’ 8 as at least politically half baked?
It seems it can only have been the administration of the Clintons’ “two-fer” that left no hope for Justice by any means more civil and peaceful than that of the said Jihad of “terrorism” of 9/11 I. It seems we are all at least have cooked still as long as the Clintons’ con is allowed to keep running. It seems we should find a way to peacefully invite said supposed “Middle East Leaders” long ago of the Clinton request hauntingly and oddly remembered of he of asking them to “just blame Republicans” and as well like “to not attack the USA until after he was no longer President.”
TILT!!! ???
Have the Clintons rigged the global politics such as if they are successfully like a Robert Redford with a STING for personal political gain? How can we free the honorable faithful however of a predictive knowing that preceded events to a thought Justice on 9/11/01 - how can we loosen the tongues honorably of those as “Middle East Leaders” that the Clintons did seemingly trap and keep since 1993 “blaming” ploys?
We are now still unjustly suffering because so much of the politics of the Clintons was half baked.
Ours and those faithful of Islam may only have a better hope for peace and Justice now if we can clear whomever were knowing faithful as leaders whence to feel safe to bare witness against the Clintons - or just Bill Clinton.
As long as it seems at home or abroad that Bill Clinton is rising again to such highness however so corrupted and diabolical we all will be such that Jihad will have justifications still as per issues at least dated back as far as the Clintons’ first term. As long as Bill Clinton continues to think he can get away with this there will be no hope possible for an effective Justice as per what might have been until his first term actually much just the fault of Republicans.
Please Attorney General Eric Holder do offer any appropriate said as “Middle East Leaders” a proper amnesty from prosecution so that we can get those that actually know this to come forward to pave a better way to Justice anew away from a sense that no Justice is possible by more civil and peaceful means than Jihad.
It actually figures that unless we embrace those of “Middle East Leaders” and in a sharing of how the USA may have asked for it we cannot restore our Constitution and Government to working and respectable order free from what is diabolical as of a con half baked of and by the Clintons - such as I can tell.
There were some sheer moments of Obama in a no-nonsense comedic self incrimination. These may be the times of better leg work by Secretary Kerry as Obama’s Secretary Clinton replacement than of the leg work of Obama while politically stuck to the hemming and fraying of the Clintons’ exploits.
You have been un-styled too long. If you haven’t fashioned a comity about politics of the American confederate republic of the years since Governor and Mrs. Clinton walked your way in a rudely late 1992 strutting it may be because the Clintons can not be styled for comity. We do now have Mrs. Clinton now infamous for “ready from day one” and “ready at 3am” runs contrary to how she warranted or guaranteed her “Hillary for President” vanity.
Maybe if Mrs. Clinton were now having to out model our Barack Obama for high office she might have that his “BUZZ FEED” 2am moments might be worse than her infamy for her as unable and unprepared when fateful 3am challenges dressed her down.
What of our Barack Obama’s walk of his second term as of his new Secretary of State struggling to helm the heeling of so much keeled over that he has inherited from Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?
It may have been political fashion faux pas for President Obama to ask either of the Clinton “two-fer” to walk more straight and with more honesty. He may have tuned out when he needed most to have tuned in back when stumbling or fumbling however to ‘BUZZ FEED” satisfaction celebration/consummation. But still it is that the Clinton “two-fer” is strung out now quite noticeably as they have to strut deniability and work it daily to avoid having to carry the weight and mass of their personal baggage just of their eight years as our highest in our confederate republic.
These are the days that must be trying Secretary John Kerry’s personal delights in kiting times as he is leeward bowed by an unjust innocent cloaking of two Clintons. He may have stories to tell of these inherited times tacked hard and back with less than stellar lines of Hillary Clinton’s heeled helming of State. He may be stirred by ghosts of an albatros fairly due about the neck of at least then FLOTUS Clinton. It is hard to say that Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton while First Lady was more humane than the lore’d ancient mariner.
It is a stone cold sober reality that President George W. Bush and his father were no Reagans. And, it is still sobering that so much of the spending by President George W. Bush was simply necessary because the Clinton “two-fer” had created a disaster waiting to bust out by having cut two trillion too quickly and so with it of nearly one trillion too much cut. President Bush 43 was stuck with an economy the Clintons had treated as a candle that they could burn from both ends at once. Though the Bush Tax Cuts were justified and justifiable by the Clinton “two-fer” trillion in surpluses the CLINTONS’ SURPLUSES were not well figured nor judiciously fit for those days.
It seems it is a moral paradigm some how there seems to be a calculation that Bush was wrong and for lying and yet so such that the Clinton “two-fer” were necessary to that which too many have simply let walk as lies talked and strutted. It is sheer madness that there is much nonsense of our Barack Obama as of posturing that is suggestive that Hillary was/is not worth looking at. The years 1993-2001 were not years that justified the Clintons’ ploys of/to PEACE DIVIDENDS.
It may help the confederate republic still stand true if we boost Secretary John Kerry so that he feels freer to walk an erudite rendition of the Clintons as per their eight years and so that we can picture Mrs. Clinton with all her personal baggage as her’s to carry herself and towards a truer new fashioning that she may have been near our worst Secretary of State in the history of the United States of America.
Though we know have been refreshed that our Barack Obama by two in the mornings had likely tuned out in days he would have been better to have tuned in it is still that so much of the Clintons is revealable as more half baked. It is arguable that President Bush left a set-up for some due times for global tough love to allow the USA to better position itself going forward for parity and equality/fairness. As #SecClinton such set-up was squandered and now with it arguable that we didn’t need to improve relationships so as “Hillary’s” legwork as strutted as if well styled and necessary. It seems that “Hillary” just gave too much away and was too easy as she gave and gave.
It is still nonsense that President Obama didn’t herald the prudence of either of the Bush Presidents however they were yet short of Reagan while pimping the Clintons as if of a innocence that can be stoked but not quite reasoned. The slop of the tides and currents that are keeping Secretary John Kerry from an ecstasy in swift board kiting is also much of how the Clintons did corrupt our banks so to keenly politicize an unjust popularity to burn our economy as if a candle lit from both ends so that they could pass the bucks by stoking irregular branding. It isn’t just that FLOTUS Clinton was an incendiary imperialistic First Lady of global trotting and posting as if it were safe then to come home and unharness our defenses and intelligence realm with vast budget cuts for them to get a new fix from PEACE DIVIDENDS in times when old wars were being rewalked.
We may not have the luxury of avoiding looking closely at Hillary Clinton and the Clintons’ fashionings since 1993. It is ridiculous that “Hillary” did crusade as a inciting imperialistic First Lady and that she would then come home and support her husband fully as they they proceeded with sheer nonsense now all to haunting of having cut our defenses and intelligence realms after having traveled the world picking fights.
Really it may be a good first step towards 2014 & 2016 to look grossly at the leg work of the Clinton “two-fer” as much of utter nonsense, however it now may net out.
This is a time for a new REASON, MORALITY AND POWER discussion. And, now it seems President Carter as sold it that President Bush was from day one due more honors for fairness than either of the Clinton “two-fer” after their eight years.
It is reasonable to join a dressing down of at least Mrs. Hillary Rodham Clinton as a Secretary of State that can go down as near our worst ever in the history of the confederate republic of the United States of America. It may have been that our Barack Obama by two in the mornings was fumbling in a faux ecstasy with munchies his “BUZZ FEED” yet it is the infamy of our Hillary Clinton that is a stoking to be forewarned about.
Better it would have been if our Barack Obama served up that the Clintons can go down as “HALF BAKED” and that we should have prudently flushed them for such long long ago; it is concerning that for some reason she of the Clinton “two-fer” cooked up a squandering of days of righteous indignation opportunism that she inherited as a rare styling for a new prudence from global international tough love diplomacy.
You do not know the Clintons nor President Obama the way that I do. I have known the Clintons since the early 70s and known of such B.O. from Hawaii four years ahead of me since the late seventies.
There is much to my regularly refreshed ‘he is so wrong on Iraq he can hardly be right about anything’ thought that needed be specifically about tragedies of this week and my history with Barack Obama.
There is much I can not ever ignore of and from the Clintons of from their plotting years between the early 70s and as predating their assumption of the White House as of them of sharing with me that they had thoughts and plotting to undermining our Constitution as if of plotting to break it but as if appearing to be bending it greatly. I know the Clintons for having shared that they wanted to disregard our Constitution in order to attempt their ambitions like now long visible towards being the most powerful two people in the world. I can not ignore that I bore witness in spirit to their plotting and sharing nor that I was surprised that after their assumption of the White House they turned out to be so bold to actually think it wise or practicable to attempt to effect such of their decades of spousal scheming.
But today of this tragic week it is more to how sad it was for me after having helped the Clintons become more electable than I had meant to towards 1992 that further down the road my original assistance was being misappropriated by them and others in the Democrat Party though original to me and my ambitions and figurings to be a caboose to the Reagan Revolution.
My story of having helped the Clintons in 1992 is too long a story now some told to go into greatly here now, but as it of me of thinking Democrats were desperate as a party and dangerous in a desperation and of a need to be much saved from themselves.
But I cannot abide President Barack Hussein Obama much for having embraced the Clintons after my efforts to have defeated their 2008 attempts much to his unintended benefit. I was of a generous thought for him that I should give him a year to show a willingness to clean up his own party before trusting my distrust primarily in a fuller stand against any Democrat too affiliated with the Clintons. I can be remembered for having encouraged the Republicans to try to position themselves as a party of noes from the earliest moments of such a general GOP response, and, I can be remembered for having asked CNBC to ask one of theirs to broadcast my thought that America could use a new Tea Party.
But for now and for this tragic week it is as much for the problems I have historically much with once just state Senator Barack Obama for his break-out Democrat Party Convention speech. Many since have read his DREAMS FROM MY FATHER and to a possible realization that stylistically the two are quite different. For me who didn’t intent to watch that convention at that moment and yet turned it on it was a woeful and most annoying moment of thoughts visceral of “he is stealing my lines” and with it of echoes of powers that be of guidance to him to “try to own it - make it your own” and with “put a black face on it”.
If only you knew how such lines were originally meant and intended to work for a greater good as new more civil language much needed when first figured back before the Clintons had yet braved their unexpected late entrance into the 1992 race.
Yes I know that State Senator Barack Obama’s break-out convention speech had him more of my style than his of his DREAMS FROM MY FATHER and that the echoes about his oration of lines too much mine were quite viscerally quite annoying as if a theft of intellectual property. I was years into annoyance along these lines for the Clintons were not authorized after the election for their misappropriate and incomplete usage of such that I had figured to be both to be a caboose to the Reagan Revolution and then some retweeked in a generosity to be to some saving of the Democrats from themselves.
The Clintons made me witness their spirited considerations to how they could benefit from a weaker interpretation of our Constitution that could come from them bending it so much on its face that it could only maybe be seen as a breaking and intent to undermine such. Again, I couldn’t believe they were thinking those things when they those years shared such thoughts and I could even less quite believe that after their assumption to the White House however then quite unearned and lucky that they then were so bold or stupid to actually try to move along with such effectings as they had long dreamed up.
I know that it was most annoying years into so much of this misappropriating and incorrect usage of what was my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM figurings to be as if a caboose to the Reagan Revolution when Howard Dean needed to be told as well to stop stealing my lines and especially while of his misuse of such in speeches to inner city youths supposedly as a message to not steal.
At the time of State Senator Obama’s break-out convention speech I had yet to connect that he from Chicago was that B.O. from Hawaii I had been aware of since I was in the seventh grade and reading to compete in school wide oratory contest with President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Declaration of War Day of Infamy speech.
He is so wrong about Iraq that he really can hardly be right about so much more. I did feel it was generous to give him a year to show he was willing to clean up his own party to naught. I do feel it was ridiculous that he so boldly offered a cover-up of the Clintons with “all Bush’s fault” impossible nonsense as such on its face was so preposterous an impossibility that the size of it as a cover-up suggested the size of a guilt really due considered as mostly the Clintons.
It was ridiculous that I had to tell Howard Dean to stop stealing my original lines and as it was that I had to when he was stealing them to give speeches against stealing. As per the unexpected defeat of the Clintons in the 2008 race you may have the Bush administration and its honoring of my request to officially keep the Clintons from misappropriating anew more inappropriate use of my original works and figurings originally most figured to be for a strong economic recovery then as a caboose to the Reagan Revolution. I was able with the honor and officialdom of the Bush administration keep the Clintons from sounding like their earlier more popular selves as when mostly of having learned to have sounded like me and my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM.
The Clintons are not running to be a new hope for America if they unwisely risk an entrance into the 2016 races. The Clintons are running to continue with their extra-Constitutional plotting to undermine our Constitution to have more essentially global autocratic powers as still the most powerful two people in the world since like 1993. They are at running to be the most powerful people in the world regardless of our Constitution as if not an inconvenient relic of outdated unpopular useless Law.
I have said most of this in different ways in various pieces on and off of my blog sites for years - this week bring new concerns as we have it seeming commenced that the Clintons are already at least started down the roads of the intra-party warfare towards destabilizing the Obama legacy even while he is still trying to write one to supplant the Clintons’ legacy whatever and however it is yet.
I know more than most or any other how much both sides of such started intra-party warfare has roots but otherwise than would have been if not for me and my old figurings of decades of individual thought to my then afterwards titled so as my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM.
I really would like to know whom it was who boldly was of the echoes of the State Senator Barack Hussein Obama break-out convention speech that annoyed me as theft of intellectual property and to such misuse so that now is more publicly notable as of #Obama as then of a different style remarkably from his DREAMS FROM MY FATHER and yet quite of the rhyme and reasoning of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM.
And, yes it is of a woe to me that one who could have been to such a visceral annoyance so so was then later to be so wrong about Iraq as to be so wrong about everything else while oddly of some of an unauthorized use of words mine of a peace that historically better explains how and why both Clintons and this Obama have been quite wrong.
And this week of its tragedies we still have to wonder about the Time Square bomber as one of such family abroad that was of reports of being of dollars from the USA to fight terrorism at home and he supposedly so of reports of having set out to bomb in Time Square to restore his loss of honor to his family by bombing to offer further justification for more USA dollars to keep flowing to his country and his family to prevent terrorism.
A time it is and what a times it is to round up now the usual subjects and predicates. Oddly it seems no one knows enough about the scope and range of leading news even today. I may be much of such a class - such a subject much ado about President Obama as a politician from Chicago.
I had hardly given it much though on Patriots Day, as I set out for a long ten plus mile walk about in one of my pairs of hardly used FootJoy golf shoes, that such day was as well the annual day of the Boston Marathon. My dad did run in it once back in the 80s and I have been at or near the finish line because — I haven’t been in Boston since before the Big Dig got started but once maybe near its ground breaking. It was Tax Day of April 15th and the day after a remarkable Masters finale — my dad just had his first ever knee replacement surgery recently - I wasn’t thinking of him running or not running.
These times seem times of old but how, and too political in some ways, however, maybe more fitting for Dirty Harry in a hunt for bombers in Clinton masks - maybe firstly Hillary Clinton masks and then secondly a paired Bill and Hillary covering. Too little seems known of the suspects as per this subject and a class of “criminal” yet quite properly predicated, however. As it was I must have been finishing my long walk about the time of the ________________ that happened on the Boston Marathon route.
“It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.”
Right! Interesting start. Such a start fits with existing and potential “political” plot twists at least as too few or none know enough about such a tragic event, and, as so soon after she as Boston’s John Kerry’s predecessor was grilled about Benghazi culpability hers and to such pressured “Jack” moment as if of a Dirty Harry A COUPLE BAD WOMEN sequel to A FEW GOOD MEN with her of her outburst like “WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE - NOW???”, and, to proffering a weakness on terror - a softness on crime investigating.
Are Bill and Hillary Clinton the (political) type to not go down alone? And Hillary Rodham Clinton, like President Obama can be said to be from Chicago too - she was born there and maybe now still more naturally a “Chicago pol” of a greater likelihood to end up in prison. I don’t know how shameful these subjects - this class of subjects of Mrs. Clinton and President Obama should now be as per gun control with them both “from” Chicago and not of having made Chicago as a gun-land danger zone not a 100 Days Priority. It is twisted that President Obama as from Chicago more directly and as a recent “Chicago pol” tried to stand up a political show about gun control any time after his first 100 Days without having spent such time dedicated fully to such, and, then long still before he too was to proffering free healthcare coverage.
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. It is not believable that a Republican in Boston even on Patriots Day could have not been suspicious in a Mitt Romney even about the Boston Marathon. It seems it might have had to have been a domestic about such cookery and caldrons of security and as if so in a Clinton mask, however, jolly as if off to a party. I do not know myself if there were only two “potlucks” served up in-suspiciously or if more of of the subject for better predication now - or if there were actually two more cooked up that didn’t get served properly.
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. She reportedly doesn’t like to cook and doesn’t like exercise and is suffering politically at least some from her successor from Boston John Kerry’s Secretarial acumen being a beating on and of her as likely not much more than mediocre while of the charge previously. It seems the Clintons are more like Will Farrell in THE CAMPAIGN than most in our recent history and not to lightly let a hit go un-responded to - it seems if the Clintons are now going down (finally) they are still of posturing to make sure that they won’t go down alone, right? If the Clintons won’t go down alone by natural instinct how will they try to scare off truth seekers from exposing them too much on however many subjects with whichever class of predicates that could be peacefully employed?
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. It is not that she is a witch or ever practiced witchcraft at least in Salem. It isn’t even much about Bill for having been judiciously sewn a SCARLET A upon their presidency. It may be more like another Tripoli as if another convenient crisis like a WAG THE DOG and yet generously of a sisterhood of HILLARY WOMEN as with her first strike ODYSSEY DAWN it timed to have been as if a tail wagging a dog anew but as if for Anthony Weiner’s predilections as a devotee of his mentor Bill Clinton. I don’t know how this tragedy of a “just something I cooked up” crockery that got past the caldron of Boston’s finest could have transpired but as if of a non-state sponsor at least like the Clintons’ CGI in range and scope — it seems they couldn’t have been set by conservatives on Patriots Day in Boston on any April the 15th Tax Day without being suspect from the outer rims/perimeters - it seems logical that the perp(s) must have like been covered as if in masks of either a jolly Bill Clinton or Hillary Rodham Clinton.
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. I can with such limited knowledge of such even only surmise that a Democrat or non-Republican could have pulled off walking through such crowds and security as if with a “POT-LUCK” mantra however carried as if of a “JUST SOMETHING I COOKED UP”. I don’t get this incident as for it being so late in the marathon unless somehow the “cooks” were not able to get through earlier with such a mantra seeming innocent enough. It still seems days later that this tragedy could be nonsense of thrill seekers and/or an exercising of too radicalized Democrat expression towards justifying higher taxation. If it has Mrs. Clinton’s finger prints all over it, or just a generous and defensive husband in Clintons’, I haven’t reasoned that out past such as these starts towards consideration of subjects and predicates.
I do fear the Clintons have to try to drive the news too much if they are to have any chance in surviving intra-party comparisons during the second term of President Obama and the seeming trumping Diplomacy of Bostonian Secretary John Kerry. They can now only be considered non-state actors about such despite how much Bill may still be on our payroll as a past President.
I did mean to use this title to start towards summer full of fun and light to amorous golf witticisms for sporting consumption. I didn’t figure a pressure cooker as the news broke as but a heavy crock pot slow cooker, even though I have seen such oddly somehow in use on interesting cooking channel shows. I was not aware that a “BOMB” could be tagged as if a POT-LUCK and carried into crowds anywhere, however, as if a jolly contribution as innocently “JUST SOMETHING I COOKED UP.”
It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it. She is the one that whined to Congress as if pleading that they tolerate her being light and/or soft on terror. Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton must have been despite her dislike of staying at home and cooking preeminently aware that bad actors as even HILLARY’S WOMEN could be carrying off “BOMBING” as if of sympathetic and timely political cooking.
I do wish my quiet April 15th activities of a long walk near a half marathon hadn’t become so disturbed by more tragic news seemingly somehow (yet explained) of inheritances from Hillary diplomacy and politics. It seems it could have been thrill seekers who just couldn’t resist trying to walk around with a “BOMB” as if a “POT-LUCK” - and that any conservative or Republican even if not in a Mitt Romney mask would have been naturally too suspect in such pressure caldron of Boston’s finest.
I too have not yet heard of a justification about these subjects and predications for a USUAL SUSPECTS that could explain how it is more likely of foreign elements or motives. It was both Tax Day and Patriots Day and seemingly only of outcomes to justify more taxes as per Democrats agendas - and even so if to keep taxes justified to a new high so that funding will still be there to like go after terrorists that Boston’s John Kerry’s Diplomacy now won’t be as soft as Chicago’s Hillary Rodham Clinton had been.
“It seems this has Hillary Clinton’s finger prints all over it.” And how really we shouldn’t treat this as just a teased perspective on another maybe “terror” related event that still has to be as well some of a “too political” consideration and judging - like RIGHT?
It is undeniable that Hillary Rodham Clinton was born to be a Chicago politician, such that she has become, however, and so that she among her peers, however less prone, is of a higher likelihood to be eventually imprisoned. It was documented that she was both raised as a young girl to hit her peers and to hit first - I will have to look up whom documented that she was raised to hit boys and to hit them first. It is now too much of a new record for the United States of America that she lacked in “diplomacy” while of such charge and to State based too “political” renderings as if a Secretary of War to a new way for the USA in a time of first strikes.
How have Obama’s days been of times more of a Hillary Doctrine to strike first and ask any questions later if someone disliked is still too alive to be conveniently handled? Is it only President Obama’s fault that he ushered the USA to a first strike standing with far less due process or is this what he dealt away before first being sworn in as a political solution to keep the Clintons from sabotaging his administration from like day one?
To tee up stories for this weeks coming challenges we have that grammatically there is a place for sport and for sports. It may be that Tiger Woods and Hillary Clinton are most in the weeds or stuck deep in the woods for having hazarded the most so far.
It isn’t sporting now to beat up Hillary Clinton too much after she couldn’t keep a straight face while puffing up for Women in World audiences. She couldn’t keep a straight face as she put her best leg forward knowing it doesn’t historically show well and as if a sad political war profiteerette seizing a chance to reinvent herself while apparently knowing she doesn’t deserve such. That she while of her new puffing up leg work was to failing to keep a straight face is quite politically suggestive that she is not a viable candidate for higher office.
It is not quite sport though to speak of Condoleezza Rice as per the Masters though it can be sporting now more than ever before. She is now professionally again sworn to defending her employer and its professional standards where ever she is as a Stanford University Professor. I don’t think she can be loyal based on race this weekend without being concerned for her school colors officially — I can hazard a consideration that Tiger Woods in entering this Masters plantation having hazarded his standing however by winning.
It is sport in sports to consider how Tiger Woods may or may not be able to take the heat - all the heat this week whether weaker at Amen Corner or of great temptresses around the Magnolias and laurels and all the legends of hazards bounded by and about Hogan’s Bridge.
But with Hillary Clinton, as a successor to Condoleezza Rice, and to much dishonesty, with lies about new foundations being needed, and all the while she as she managed to stand and proceed, mostly on grounds actually gained by progressive efforts about a freedom agenda, of the Bush administration, it is interesting how it may be another Hogan bridging about a Freedom Agenda that is still to be established as a freedom agenda as of a manifesto like of a Hogan’s THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM a oddly foundational for both the Clintons’ and Bush Administration. {The Clintons present themselves as inseparable as a “two-fer” so “Clintons’” usage is appropriate and sporting for a political honesty in marketing their branding in a possessive plural sharing.}
The talk of the Masters may all be how though Michelle Obama may not herself be a golf enthusiast she could trump masters better than Hillary with 2016 Presidential race if it isn’t inconvenient to have a Michelle vs. Hillary Constitutional Crisis as per our 22nd Amendment constructs and its less than wordy establishments. It is sporting now to suggest that the members of the Bush administration have not been setting themselves all free from the railroading still of and by the Clintons with learned erudity orally proffered in part for being themselves the more honorable of the administrations. And, how this may be some for their Freedom Agenda by the timeline suggested recently by Elliot Abrams as so following a teed off sharing of a poetic manifesto like so whence thence committedly with THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM.
But to stand up as a Stanford University Professional golfer and one of two of the first women ever to be admitted as members of Augusta National seems now for Condoleezza Rice a sporting concern as per Tiger Woods. I am not talking so here of a concern that another win by him so soon could caused him to need to return to therapy — I am talking here coincidentally about Hillary and Tiger of having contradictions to much in their branding as spring breaks anew in the Year of our founding fathers’ Lord two thousand Ten and three. For Tiger it was of a retailing of him at Torrey Pines as if he was reconciling with his wife and starting the season off with a putting of fathering first in his fields. For Hillary, well she couldn’t keep a straight face while trespassing upon good souls again with an attempt to an new unearned reinvention of herself.
I do find it sporting that I did once install new closet doors for Condoleezza Rice while President Bush’s NSA master, and, that as it may be her last thoughts on 9/11 morning before her aid walked in with news of a single plane crash into one of the World Trade Towers were of a professional referral airing for me as I then at that moment was coincidentally driving up 17th Street in Washington DC and right by the Old Executive Office Building of the White House plantation. I didn’t though myself know of the timing of such or of the plane crashes until maybe an hour later and after I had arrived at a new clients home and already had been to unrepairable full removal of the old front door.
When I wrote to Representative Gephardt’s offices then that August in days and weeks before the collapse of the Soviet Union George Stephanopoulus and a Koch son were peers and equals there. When I wrote then I shared the first starts of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM thinking and as a way forward towards better freedom for more with such a started sporting attempt to give local American words and meaning in a rhyme and reason to Bush’s term NEW WORLD ORDER. It is still sport and sporting that so much of what Clintons then braved learning to say and sound like was teed off primarily, at least, with the due focus on New Haven, Connecticut - as I had so based it poetically and as a global coding.
But for Tiger he hasn’t quite failed to keep a straight face with a new extreme makeover type improper leg work so as recently such a sad sight by Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton now too much of disordered personalities and contrary historicals. But though branded for Torrey Pines as if to being this Year of our founders’ Lord two thousand Ten and three it seems by the Arnold Palmer Invitational that he was all about being iced tea and lemonade otherwise but likewise. I don’t know how it won’t be sporting for even Condoleezza Rice if not called upon too officially about such to hazard a “beware of the hazards” to Tiger Woods as well of her Stanford University branding.
What can be par for the course this week for Tiger Woods at least near Hogan’s Bridge or Amen Corner? Will the foliage be metaphorically at least too in bloom and as a HAZARD? How won’t servants and service people be now most on black Tiger “Ice Tea” Woods mix about Augusta National for all of the Masters of this week in the Year of the founders’ of the United States of America Lord so such as it now is two thousand Ten and three?
My sister did bring me back some paraphernalia from recent gathers of Masters - at least as a hostess executive for Time Warner Cable partying of the 75th Anniversary branding. I do not know at the time of this pressing if she will be hosting as a corporate executive again there at some time this week - her last name is not now Hogan - she is a Democrat whom I believe still keeps a personally autographed mug of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on or near her desk.
A Michelle vs. Hillary is a Constitutional Crisis waiting to be fluffed and folded for all the world to see. Michelle has as much right to let her husband run for re-election on her name now as Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton has to run as if not a criminal enterprise, again. If it is not fair for President Obama to trump our 22nd Amendment protections and seeming established intent by running now on his Princeton and Harvard degreed lady’s name than it likely is so criminal for there to have been one HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT such that we should now find our Masters in Treason and learn of their learnedness at least as to whether there are any statutory limits that run with treasonous activities if not merely somehow established as criminal.
{note: At this moment on Sunday I am breaking from this pressing of a new column - not knowing if it is done or due furtherences however farther or further may be grammatically the appropriate metric for such meters and footings.}
Poor Obama for he seems to have been played by the Clinton “two-fer” - really played.
It seems considerable that the Clintons did together what GOPers sought to. The Clintons in their own way seem to have effectively made Obama a one term executive and a second term Clinton stooge as some a “lame duck” executive.
Nothing POPS a “whose your daddy?” now better than a new DPRK CRISIS. It seems that President Obama is now stuck having once needed the superior political skills of President William Jefferson Clinton to bring USA back from a nuclear brink again. This is the President Obama who had to visit President Clinton in his Harlem office and as I recall bow before him and with a recording of him calling President Clinton “The President” who then needed the Clintons’ superior political skill to save his administration from the crisis brought on after Clintons’ VP Al Gore as a private citizen had his babe private spies caught in North Korea with inadequate training.
In the coming days it will be as if a trial has started and the Clintons are burying President Obama as if a weaker lawyer - if not already.
Where is Bill? Where is nearly self proclaimed “PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD” Bill Clinton? Where is Bill and how is he now coping without his spouse his overseer at State there more effectively as if just running another Clinton Travel Office? We now have Secretary John Kerry charged with overseeing the foreign policy meddling of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE - Where is Bill?
He called them rivals. How much is that turning out to have been an understatement? I called the Obama save of the first DPRK CRISIS of this administration the BAY OF BABES for it seemed meant to be sold as if as dramatic and as a sequel so to our old BAY OF PIGS. And, yet young and inexperienced President Barack Hussein Obama needed to call in President Clinton to save the day and bring us then back from the brink of WAR - yet just by being a grand escort service to collect and babysit Al Gore’s private spies who got caught maybe for having had the wrong training, or not enough training.
These days stories just don’t write themselves naturally about the Clintons to present them in a good light. I mean unless you like the idea that the may have until now succeeded in high-jacking USA executive power since they were thought to have been officially term limited from such, from such anymore for evermore. I don’t have time now to discuss the “HOW” about that they may have successfully high-jacked USA foreign policy at least since 2001 - that does now though some want to write itself unlike stories that would be readable as of a “good light” for the Clintons.
But what about Mrs. Clinton’s private Hell these days? If you are on the road or a run with her (political run not “exercised”) can you figure out who or what she is? It writes itself that she isn’t a good example for an independent feminism as she has put being under her husband as her primary ceiling her whole life since Yale Law School. She is the enabler of Bill Clinton most obviously — her primary character is that of having made herself and her career submissive to the ambitions and career of her husband and only stepped out as if maybe otherwise when our 22nd Amendment got in the way of his being able to “officially” stay her visibly dominant main man.
But what about President Obama’s public Hell these days? Did he miss that Mrs. Clinton was firstly loyal to her husband with her earliest of public decrees as his Secretary of State and top “rival”? I mean he had to humble himself before President Clinton in the Harlem office of the Clintons’ continuing global political activities and for public consumption with a record of a bowing some then with a calling of a former President as “The President” - such that I recall. I mean when former First Lady Clinton started as promised “rival” in his new Cabinet she set up a Hellish but clever insubordination on her new boss by using Dante. One of his first mile markers on this road to Hell with the Clintons must still be of record of her saying that as Obama’s Secretary of State she would be taking her direction from that whom Dante did and much more so than as if listening to her new most inexperienced upstart of a politician boss.
Is President Barack Hussein Obama now stuck again in a political dependence that again will have him have to call in President William Jefferson Clinton to restore world peace at least as per the DPRK new but familiar CRISIS? If it will make her man happy Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton now more as just a public private person as now a First Lady of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INIITIATIVES, as it seems, is likely to be fully submissive again in her man getting all the credit and pomp and circumstance.
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a dangerous and quite faux feminist figure. It is not a fair lesson or example to sell her other than as her story wants to write itself respective of all the conflicting details. It is not even fair that to be for Hillary For President you have to explain to young girls everywhere that to be like her is to put your husband first and for as long as your government will allow and then be to needing the full pomp and ceremony at least of a full Presidential Secret Service division in order to win any office registered for with your name more than his.
There is that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s story doesn’t write itself well but as a blob of FRIENDS OF BILL still somehow holding on and moving forward as a political mass.
We have maybe that we should hear of still political Clintons that they will at least take a lead from President Barack Hussein Obama and to a doubling down rivaling with a promise to give back 10% of the Federal Funds being spent annually at least for New York rents for former President Clinton. I do not know how we tolerate so much foreign policy meddling from a former President and especially for those years that his spouse was running the real State Department - but for us to be however to paying the rents for operations of such and with such allowed an grandstanding of an annual meeting schedule to rival the United Nations as also a politically mandatory meeting is quite ridiculous in an American traditional consideration.
What seems to write itself now is that the Clintons have been the bigger rivals to President Obama than the GOPers and that now we have it on our plates too that Mrs. Clinton’s culpability for Benghazi as Secretary of State should be forever joined with a tag for the DPRK CRISIS as necessarily some or much of other failures in her while charge with being Obama’s Top Diplomat.
What has happened to President Barack Hussein Obama - how has he come to looking so much as if just a stooge of the Clintons’ “two-fer” and under Dante still as she decreed she’ld be, however inflaming.
No really we have to now sweat detail about Mrs. Hillary Clinton - private citizen. Good stories about her or for her just don’t write themselves well or naturally - you can say - you could say - anymore.
This whole North Korea sit rep so soon after her Congressional “JACK” outburst is most concerning. As you may recall she was like “you can’t handle the truth” but as more a ‘I can’t handle the truth’ in her “what’s the difference now?” And, quite so especially if she really is all the rival she and President Clinton rode and independent world wide popularity for.
What to make of Hillary Clinton now as private citizen with DPRK maybe an “official” reaction to her time as Secretary of State and with too imperialistic a Diplomacy? Surely we now as stories aren’t writing themselves (well) about her have to look at real details about her reign as President Obama’s Secretary of State. It is too much a “rival” story that wants to be written now as if she of a pride that she and Bill were able to keep or make peace with North Korea and yet her “rivals” of President Obama, Vice President Biden and Secretary of State Kerry seem otherwise less capable.
On the heels of her “culpability” and questions quite to wondering if she saw an Ambassador as a martyr for her cause and expendable by her own thinking, about herself of a self importance greater, it seems the DPRK raises more issues that go to competence about her service while of duties as President Obama’s Secretary.
It is very confusing thinking about how we now should be covering Hillary Clinton as a private citizen still as a public figure and out as if of her USA should go gay decree too much as if speaking as a First Lady of the CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE while it still of offering of political cover as if President Clinton is an unelected President of the World.
It seems a good story now for Hillary Clinton just doen’t want to write itself. It is confusing how many ways it seems details matter that are being willingly overlooked. It is confusing especially now as well with DPRK nuclear posturing that we have to wonder rightly if it can be in part due to Secretary Clinton time of a too imperialistic Diplomacy now then moderated globally with her of her decree like that the USA should go gay. Aren’t we at wondering if she either was dictating a strong suggestion at least to all foreign nationals she had relations with that they now were to presume she was also talking to them and about them? And about DPRK people too?
What we have for starters as “details” about Hillary is that she seems not to have a single hobby other than a once mentioned and infrequent use of a said home kept elliptical stationary “exercise” machine. She isn’t a concert pianist or musician of any said capability or interest and nor is she a real golfer or even a bad golfer. She by her New Hampshire tears was revealing of real electoral pressures then put to her to answer for some details - I remember such as stirred by queries as to whether she was at all well rounded and with a hobby or two or any extracurricular personal interests. It seemed she had to cry for political cover as now she has to run for new political cover. It seems she really isn’t well rounded or even nearly as personally engaged in non work activities as we long have expected from male “candidates” at least.
As per her being out as public figure still and with a globally stirring decree that at least the USA should go gay we have as well that it seems as if she is lobbying for CGI and as if now a First Lady again to President Clinton as he rides high still too much as if an unelected and unchecked President of the World.
We have to remember that President Clinton got the high drama like of a new BAY OF PIGS stand off as it was awhile ago with an earlier DPRK CRISIS that seemed fit to be called a BAY OF BABES for Bill Clinton as called into a public relevance to be of a grand escort service to collect and babysit Al Gore’s private spies after they had been caught without enough training illegally in the DPRK. We have now that President Obama may have no choice but to call in Bill Clinton as a private citizen to negotiate a peace and as if it is needed for details that tell of more than Benghazi failures for Mrs. Clinton.
It seems Hillary Clinton was supposed to be an inevitable first female President much of a thought that stories would just write themselves well. It seems now that she has to run just to have cover and that it is hard to find a way around so many concerning “details” to cover competently.
It seems we have to consider that her recent decree as though acceptable as a rival while in a no woman’s land as a public private citizen still seems out of order so soon as of a meddling in foreign policy while a new successor still so new. As Hillary Clinton however now a lobbyist at all or too soon by our standards with efforts of or the mission of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE we have her as Hillary of any domestic comment as a decree as well meant to be a foreign dictate or STRONG SUGGESTION.
I don’t know how yet to write about the tough spots she has her former boss now in. I don’t yet know how to cover President Obama so soon after losing Mrs. Clinton as of whatever allegiance she as a rival so whence. I don’t yet know how to cover much of this but to try to think about all the details of Hillary’s story so far and as of her as if a typical wife of a cheating spouse who coped by busying herself with work - only with work. It seems we have to explain away that she doesn’t seem to have a single hobby of record and is yet celebrated as being a workaholic.
Right, at least we know, it seems, that she doesn’t hit the players or throw balls at them with a foul mouth. Right we know, it seems, that she isn’t a concert pianist or musician of any note and nor an athlete even in golf sport.
What we seem to have as a concerning detail is that she may need to run as if running for cover. And, that now like after 9/11 we may have our Democrats saying they just did what the people asked them to do, and, even while it seemed that they had asked to be elected as if smarter and smart enough to know not to do just what the people were asking them to do. After 9/11 the Democrats did meddle in foreign affairs while such the matters of State of a new administration of a different party - they even did shed any claims of blame upon them by casting it carelessly on Americans quite innocent in comparison.
I am confused - I don’t know how we as Americans have gotten so to a time like now with it so complicated as per a now public private citizen such specifically as Hillary Rodham Clinton. It seems she is running much just to run for cover and yet that seems the story that writes itself and yet oddly the story that isn’t being told.
This has to be about President Barack H. Obama and his RACE TO THE TOP. There is a general confusion as to what is good and what is bad and where such is an allowed bad or weakened good — he says as if by decree to try to get on top - to race to the top - and yet whines and whines about how it is bad to be above a new middle.
Our SCOTUS and the effrontery before it with briefs out so publicly and orally this week is as Law or not Law - of an/the effrontery at least against President Barack H. Obama of a walk and talk of Constitutional by example and un-Constitutional by orated nearly - too nearly - of dictate decreeing propositions. Our President is a walking and talking contradiction about so much that is of the Easter and Passover challenges this week as such under-prepared buffet at the Supreme Court of the United States of America.
There were many holes aired publicly in the questions by our Justices and the holding up of briefs to hold Law as for and against. These Law claims are in a realm long kept by Holy Scripture as more of a deviance from a “created equal” and not of a “natural class” limited by creation. The skidding on the briefs showed mostly among those long labeled more of deviant than natural and for being so publicly out as if all of a “natural” class and not honestly of such as of some of just in such as a “social” class. It is Supremely of our Constitutional concerns that “social” classes be set separate and different from “natural” classes and that as of yet the LGBT banding has been of cross labeling that will give predatory deviant rights as if “natural” to a “social” set not well enough established as “different” within them as a “class” presented as a indivisible “same” in “natural” law seating.
President Barack Hussein Obama with his Jewish bling acceptance and his White House seder celebration did bind and or tie up the Supreme Courts equality with he of serving up a reset contrary to his support of lower courts decision against the United States standing as per DOMA. A seder so Holy and/or regal by a President trying still to be a Caesar a “Messiah” in Christ and a Christian Christ denier in Judaism can only be a public demonstration for a Constitutional of and by Law as by Moses’ historical establishment. Our Constitution is an establishment by our founders under God and so in that Year of their Lord as it was so that so as set by the key and legend of the preamble was to that ordaining and establishment and subscribing under God of that Year of such Lord of the New Testament. Our President has arrested the Supreme Courts hands with his seder as a reset to the original establishment by our Constitution in the Law of the Bible - they cannot now be as free as they might have to legislate from the bench a popular new meaning or understanding for words in our Laws so long there about concerns about socially deviant behavior.
I don’t know if it was a contempt for our Courts that President Obama orated with his Second Inaugural Speech and how he was specifically to rending that though he did just swear the Oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America he did so with a BUT!!! - a like: BUT!!! I won’t consider myself now beholden to such Oath.
As well it is a professional wonderment that a Lawyer for the LGBT rendition was to stepping out so after their arguing with a hope and belief that the day would be won for them because like it seemed our Justices were willing to just find a new meaning and understanding for our Laws contrary to how such Law has long been our establishment. I don’t know what this says about a current legal standing for Stanford Law School reputation by so of an association with one theirs professorally. I don’t know how if one was to believing that they had Justices willing to legislate new Congressional intent from their bench it could behoove any of such wants and desires to be so publicly out speaking to such a random justice to be newly rendered so.
But now can our Supreme Court Justices but do what has been long done and as inoculations against Blue Flu, at least, and recognize our Constitution as of the respect due of Law as from stories of Moses and Passover and Easter? Can our Supreme Court Justices honorably ignore President Obama’s attempt at a Constitution and Holy seder observation and that it contradicts his DOMA standing? Our First Amendment is instructive as it of the very first wording to preventing Congress from making any law that would undo the establishment by the Articles of the Constitution of such as the establishment of religion of the founders under God in that Year of their Lord and so of the New Testament? Justice Sotomayor has her answer to concerns that a new legal category is being willy nilly established about “homosexuals” in a negation of her assumptions for the first sentence of our First Amendment establishes that our Constitution is bases in establishment of religion and establishment of what “marriage” is.
But can our Solicitor General be tolerated for a proposition so publicly oral as if LGBT briefs not full of holes for being of attempt to give “natural” class protections to a “social” class some and so that it won’t be “equal rights” won but a winning of greater rights and a new establishment less an inoculation or prophylactic from Blue Flu, at least? On its face it seems the President’s courtly standing was undermined by such holes in his briefs and orally waxed by the U.S. Solicitor General with presumptions unestablished for such parties that there is a wholeness claim for the entire band as if of “natural” class rights in comparison while still cross wired with those long of a concern as just a social class of predatory deviants.
And how must the Clintons now be a broken political lot — how can the challenges of Passover and Easter so this week be not of them again of flip flopping such that they have flopped one time too many?
And, again how is it that President Barack H. Obama’s Second Inaugural Speech with his holy “BUT!!!” wasn’t showing contempt for our Constitution and as well our Supreme Court?
And how now can our honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States of America not now take into consideration so much about such as from the mouth of a seated Executive as per the Second Inaugural so unlike President George Washington’s First Inaugural and its “Among the vicissitudes incident to life…” as if it was of a suggestion that he knew that cases like these of the Passover and Easter challenges were fundamentally Un-Constitutional and that he would push them out too publicly and prematurely anyways?
To start today for a peace as with a with a piece respecting civil trust and civil obedience I am left to Job and what is maybe Jobian still as a God given struggle of and against (devilish) temptations.
With Job of a Jobian in Holy Scriptures can same sex marriage not be of a discussion in such by such? I don’t know. I don’t want to imagine it either.
To be more civilly American of the North American United States we can look back to Walt Whitman and Lincoln’s Civil War as of a time so much pre-electric but of a singing of bodies electric.
Can one man or one woman know the actually Holy struggles of another person as of their full humanity, and, as of their full struggles in humanity against (devilish) temptations maybe more for failures of others or as from an inheriting, however, of sins of their parents? Can one man or woman now if but better to think along lines of humanity for stray cubs however of an abandonment by other earthly humans?
God is established as an establishment in the Constitution of the United States of America and as of the second coming in Jesus of the New Testament. As God is so the establishment so by the humble subscibing to the ordaining and establishing of such without an interpretation of such under God so then in that Year of the Lord of the founding signers so then is a creed about second chances, it seems.
Is there a civil problem with the language and diction of our establishments that must be kept inviolate?
Is there a problem of closing off avenues of Christian second chances if such as “same sex marriage” proffered - embraced before its time?
Is there a problem that gay and straight may all be of Holy struggles against (devilish) temptations and some so near to such that is of an either or about a working creationism body electric polarity for themselves?
Is there a problem as if of a no way out or no way back if that of a God made is so near a struggle about homosexuality to be of a necessary struggle for humanity to bolster and regird a general Welfare for Posterity and Tranquility for all trying to resist (devilish) temptations? Is it that some may be born of God or of man to a homosexuality not of their own control and as a destiny that cannot be struggled through otherwise - and some as if a stray cub in a general humanity.
There is a problem in being civil about much of this of the general existence in a Holy potential for all as some may be of Jobian struggles near to being homosexual but with enough polarity and grounding and personal will to find a more creative way.
As there are stories of a JOURNEY OF MAN and as if we do all come from an Adam as an African firstly we do not yet know what we should maybe as to the analysis of “Messiah” Barack Obama’s personal DNA and his true bloodedness to Adam so. We seem also not to now know while knowing that DNA shows our first Father in Man to have come from Africa if our First Eve did come from an extra ribbing somehow - or of what or which species in God’s kingdom whence thence first to successful body electric creationism.
We do as Americans celebrate that it may be better to be of later versions of the original “Adam” and as more a mutted mixed bread than a thoroughbred human. Some though may have been created under God set in ways like a stray cub in a world beyond its control with others more responsible for their struggles, however Jobian, than themselves.
But to evolve and/or stay true there are those that can be confused and while of a Jobian struggle that general Humanity needs and needed again to be a trial and turmoil against whatever (devilish) temptations then too much about in a contrariness to natural polarity and grounding in God’s creations of singing songs of bodies electric.
We have that God’s creation as of the human brain is still beyond human’s earthly full understanding. And, we have that as per human’s civilly singing with their bodies electric they are so with various different blood types and some compatible with other some or more so and/or not at all. As it is we have human blood types flowing through God’s creation in the human cranium of blood types of “universal receiver” and “universal donor” as part of all this of our’s and other’s human Jobian existence.
Of my own say Jobian struggle I did consider paths much seeming of going upstream against the odds to be a writer or marketer of a capacity now to maybe be pressing these points at least this well. I knew I liked girls and didn’t want to be celibate but I also knew I wanted to achieve and to reaching brighter heights of a more global understanding. I had times of my mid or early 80s where I thought not that God hadn’t made a right possible wife for me for what I thought my Jobian struggle may be - hmmm? - I mean the opposite of that - I mean I did think I had to figure out why I liked girls so much but wasn’t seeing one in my time of my age that was right for the goals I seems to think I was best towards as me.
Of my own struggle I have known since Watergate how and why Mark Felt was to being “Deep Throat” and that with such of my Jobian struggle I had a duty to preserve the truth and the electric fields (devilish) temptations would be sparking about while aware or unaware of greater and more historical truthful origins as to how Mark Felt as “Deep Throat” was to with Woodward and Bernstein to operating a non-government victims protection network.
If as the Constitution is an establishment in the Lord of the Founders so of their humble subscribing to ordain and establish such without offering specific scriptural interpretations so then on that date in that signing of “subscribing” in that Year of their Lord so now still we have the consideration that Christianity is much of second chances for all.
It is as if of stray cubs however of an abandonment of their time or of from before their times more of others successes or failures in Jobian struggles about a general Welfare in a Godly condition about bodies electric that we are now today still of trying to move forward with a fairness for all. It is that though a same sex marriage issue has particularly ticklish to civil discernments of just establishings it is as well that for now we are using “same” both for “same” and for “different” on the face of the fields of polarity in civil discoursing.
A “different” is “different” it is not “same” while of a “different” by two of a “same” but how so “same” while to claims as if “same” as for those that are “different” in the Constitutional and established.
To speak or write of my say “singing of the body electric” is to trip physically on a grounding that seems too impossible yet not of a shorting or a cross polarization. I know that some of what may be of a Jobian for me has to also be reasoned as from a me knowingly of asking for it while others about were like of suggesting God wouldn’t be thinking such was being asked of me.
But then really I do not know the human brain in the fullestness of God’s creation to holiest potential. Elders must have been about in my life and its moments for me to have thought that what was seemingly greatly against the odds actually had enough possibility for success to be taken to as a seeming chosen path of a self awareness though dauntingly maybe too Jobian in an a priori consciousness, however yet partial.
A passage of all that is being asked for today as per #samesexmarriage has complications to being to an establishment to fewer changes at second chances and as well as of civil considerations that for such now as proposed in its propositioning as to being effectively not to giving “equal” rights by such but to incidentally to, if so maybe, to an unplanned granting of greater rights.
Yes, I know it was Mark Felt and I know it started as from a Federal jurisdiction to look into a matter of bullying by a minor or early or first wondering as to how much bullying he might be able to get away with by flexing at least his uncle’s political powers rooted in the Democratic Party Headquarters. I know this and my personal existence in the civil electric fields of propriety about (devilish) temptations and politics of “Deep Throat” because as a young youth I was quite naive when pushed to come up with a nick-name for a Federal file and did so by offering “Deep Throat” as though from a political threat about a possible bullying about “not deep” flexing with political power in a blood line then wired directly to Dem HQ politics.
I have known of Barack Obama since the late seventies for an interest in Presidential oratory contests. I have known of Sarah Heath Palin since about 1982 as of a consideration of another Sarah Heath as if there were another I should also know if I were to proceed professionally to use photography skills learned from one to a journalism career. I have known Bill and Hillary since the early 70s and from before they were engaged but as single coeds committed to their nearby studies at Yale Law School - I have remembered them as one would be wise to even if Jobian so for if as a first grader two people ask you if they both can become President some day it would be foolish not to keep tabs on them.
And, as per my own maybe too Jobian struggles from ambitions I think I chose for myself at least largely it is that I did figure maybe God could take a like “back order” for right wife for me before I even graduated High School and so that I could then focus better for at least 17 years confident that after being maybe too celibate I would be done of such pre-marriage too Jobian personal responsibility for a maintenance of civil body electric fields around a very little known political truth.
And, quite unexpectedly it has turned out that I didn’t find the person of my request for a creation of a future wife as a fit partner for my burdens - she seems to have found me and years after I had thought such original best planning had gone a rye by corruptions of and by Bill and Hillary that affirmed to me my correctness in keeping them known and of a bad first impression gut concern responsibility. I remember her as of a body electric about such early 80s spiriting for a “back order” wife of her mother near of my high school prom days of pulsing an “it worked — she is now about a three month old fetus.”
I have been on the Jobian path as one dedicated to being more a Citizen Rosebud than a Citizen Kane for the most part ever since, and, it has not been without many struggles and temptations.
A nation that forgets to consider Treason as a possible crime still and one that any of their “leaders” may be capable of is likely a nation already in decline.
To separate this from Benghazi fog of “war” as it was in an “election cycle” it may help to consider and remember that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton seemed too disturbed while suggesting that she is more important and of a more important job as Secretary of State because her people are in danger and like Ambassador Christopher Stevens willing to be a martyr for her “Diplomacy.”
We have that had our SCOTUS decided otherwise than that Legislative Branch avenues were still open for more democratic assaults on faults of ACA - Obamacare and to “IT’S A TAX” as if of a War Power allowance for a war on health undeniable short term power it as of our Supreme courting might have had to rule that Democrat Party members had in mass acted to undermine our Constitution and effectively to a near Treasonous Un-Constitutionality.
As per the cases our SCOTUS will hear this week and how our former FLOTUS has lightly weighed in it is that conveniently we have the Clintons’ marriage to instructively deconstruct and reconstruct and deconstruct and reconstruct much as to if an when an is of marriage is a is of marriage or conveniently not an is of marriage or Constitutionally. I don’t know how with the Clintons still insisting on being public figures of weights enough to “weigh in” substantially our Supreme Justice is not to be best served by a careful dissection of what is or is not a Marriage as by example around the Clintons.
President Barack Hussein Obama may now be trying to grandstand in the Middle East as if the Clintons are not the heir apparents and Bill Clinton a strong man soon to return to flex and whine however still too much in a partisan and globally polarizing Political. If it is to be Hillary for President then as per the long perspective traditional to the Middle East President Obama is now a lame duck and Bill Clinton not Hillary Clinton by marriage most to be seen as the real heir apparent on any if any possible peaceful future.
What can be Hillary and Bill Clintons’ Lusitania - has it already sunken in and are we now already on a path to a new draft and warring for the “honor” of/for Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?
These are just such as of any and all complexity due any and all SCOTUS marriage discussions and discourse this week as per marriage rights as established and not federally established, and, while democratic and legislative avenues are still for such wide open for less Judicial rending. Like Obamacare in many ways the issues billed as for this week for our Supreme courtly are also of other avenues still democratically available and while it seems it has become reestablished that our Constitution was an establishment ordained and subscribed as of the New Testament establishments.
At the time of this judicial sharing I still am unaware if there is a statute of limitations for any or all prosecutions relating to “treasonous” acts by citizens (or subjects?) of the United States of America. What I can offer is we should be wise enough to consider that as per this raising it won’t be to a Hillary is now trying to act with a treachery or treasonous or would be if elected but that she is only her for this consideration possibly from and by a willful and premeditated conspiracy to undermine our Constitution and to betray it, maybe clearly to. We have established practices for due process of checks and balances and some exceptions about an Executive Powers infidelity by tradition - not Constitution establishment. We should be wise enough to consider and reflect that the Clintons may think they have already gotten away with a treasonous needed to be here now with possibilities to actually effect a return to our Executive Powers.
{Stay tuned — more to come as the weekend moves to imports more of the coming week.}
Speaking first in a secular analytical erudition there is that without the vast bureaucracy of the Church President Ronald Reagan wouldn’t have been free to be so successful as himself as he was in winning the Cold War, at least.
With that said: We have secondly a problem with Secretary John Kerry and as a Catholic of a good and a bad as per Operation Iraqi Freedom. It can be said that he singularly with his single note Johnny come late to an opposition did with his anti-war revival efforts do more than any individual in the world to undermine the success that was thought to be possible from near day one. It is that Senator John Kerry, was, near day one, of us with President Bush, and those of the new coalition more then of Countries with volunteer defenses than of larger earlier world wide aligned defensively for the Persian Gulf War, to an dumbed down one beat new anti-war movement nearly from the moment we all became committed in OIF as “boots down”!
President William Jefferson Clinton may have gone to Georgetown for some Catholic education, or not. He did study abroad where a tradition for totalitarianism may have been more the standard and legacy. His trillion dollar surplus may have greatly undermined our intelligence and defenses as well as possible enforcement when also of his “walls of separation” efforts to separate FBI Intelligence branch from the FBI Enforcement branch. Without his trillion dollar surplus 9/11 terrorist likely would have had maybe a fifty percent lesser chance of success. There is the “morality” to have someone learned to discuss about President Clinton for having worked a trillion dollar surplus too soon and knowingly after a nearly too quick cutting by Republicans of a trillion to that thought impossible feat of balancing of our Federal Budget whence.
Senator John Kerry wasn’t alone as a Catholic - he had Representative from Pennsylvania John Murtha with him radicalizing Americans to a disloyalty to our Operation Iraqi Freedom as well nearly from day one - as from like the first day that we all were committed in Iraq with coalition boots on the ground. It isn’t that the Pope was fallible for his dictates to American Catholics to the ordering so religiously familial that as so blessed and together they did not have a responsibility to support Operation Iraqi Freedom. The Pope seem to speak only to American Catholics as of the worldly family of Catholicism as not of a moral calling to go to a Muslim country to help some Muslims get justice from other Muslims. As I recall the Pope didn’t address that Senator John Kerry and Representative John Murtha may have been of immoral American efforts while close minded to that American Catholics otherwise organized as Americans with historical precedence were so called by reconstruction and judicial precedence to as Americans to a prosecution for Saddam Hussein, assistance, at least.
I don’t know if it can be said to have been like Franciscan to have committed so many brave souls of foreign and domestic honors and colors to Operation Iraqi Freedom as of a “standing with” of “boots on the ground” war morality. It at least seems less of a new Cold War bunker mentality of however too much a distant comfort for less that fully just remote droning.
We may now be in all this economic mess for many reasons — many different reasons - for reasons of too many reasons existing at the same time for the same thing and while not yet understood as if so for just such. We have that it has likely cost us besides the costs from us not having been prepared for the 9/11 I & II by Democrat budgeting much by multiples of what it would have if we hadn’t let the Clintons chase rare SURPLUS political popularity so then as they mostly did for personal political gains. I have to doubt that President Clinton’s Georgetown domestic education taught him that such could be “moral” or that as well his foreign rearing more of a legacy of autocracy and totalitarianism would have strategically advised such even on secular political lines.
It is hard to consider the spin that Operation Iraqi Freedom has been to costing between 4-6 Trillion US dollars unless you add yourself all that should be subtracted and/or credited to costs of war from Clintons’ spending cuts and as well those from how Catholics Kerry and Murtha destabilized OIF from the first day we all were past the point of no return about such.
As a Catholic though Senator John Kerry and Representative John Murtha did have a maybe just calling that a learned few can explain to have taken up a protestation against “Bush’s War” as of having been too much started on lies. If we can find a few learned moralists we can move to a very late but public scrutiny and litigation of the seeming missing years 1993 - 2001, and, how but for it of a Johnny one beat dumbing down the Kerry ANTI-WAR REVIVAL had a Catholic morality thence because President Bush had taken the easy way to such liberation and late prosecution of Saddam Hussein. President Bush let some glee slip, it seems, as of a happiness that lying to get the agreeable votes had worked before Senator Kerry’s maybe Catholic morality (guilt?) had him rightly, but for it so much of a dumbing down, to standing up against OIF as a war commenced by lies by a President.
What we have now is a general populace aware that the Clintons’ “PEACE” for “PEACE DIVIDENDS” was a lark and a fraud. We have that Senator Kerry and Representative Murtha did Americans a service and great disservice with their most Catholic but to parochial interpretations of right and wrong as per Operation Iraqi Freedom, so it seems. They seem to have forgotten to remember Nuremberg and war reconstructions of Germany and Japan, and, Thomas Jefferson, at least.
There seems, if we can find some learned moralists, a morality near Franciscan in Bush’s boots on the ground “standing with”!
There seems, for all the lay and learned a simple and un-American like immorality to the maybe too random remote droning and kill lists of President Obama of his BEER SUMMIT history as one necessarily to earlier retractions and apologies for too publicly having shown himself to be of wants to be judge, jury and executioner of judgements.
It seems establish history that President Bush did take the agreeable to Congress shortcut to Operation Iraqi Freedom of such by convenient lies also arguably a bolstering pre-war to a readiness for what could be the worst case scenario all should be guarding themselves for. And yet we have that when you accept that Bush lied us into such war it is the Clintons that start to look worse. And yet though Bush “lied” the Clintons had to be less moral in an American way for they needed to lie with him for such shortcut to such late prosecution to be effectual. And yet there is the politics of this that if President Bush didn’t take the path of such a dramatic causal means basis preparatory for a possible worst case scenario the only other means to such end would have required many learned moralists to work the public establishment about the Clintons and their now too missing still years 1993 - 2001 as of executive gross negligence, at least.
With the plentiful “analysis” now about Operation Iraqi Freedom ten years later we still are missing the brassy mathematics to explain how if it does go down as of a 4-6 Trillion Dollar War much of that has to be figured as Bush of mulitiples of costs for “defense” and “intelligence” than if Clintons had not willy nilly cut an extra trillion for a popularity chasing surplus politics.
Of any and all costs of “Bush’s War” is that he had to refund so much cut by the Clintons as said “unnecessary” defense and intelligence spending as it was found too late to have been too much “necessary” security spending costs. It seems it fair to say of any cost analysis for OIF that some parts did cost 3-4 x as much because such had to be put back into our budgets after having been cut and after such cutting had left America after the Clintons too much like with its pants down.
And again, there is that Secretary John Kerry may more than any other in the world have caused such a loud Johnny one beat ruckus with his Anti-War Revival (however justified in a Catholic morality once Bush let glee slip that he was happy his lying had worked) so that in Iraq a real and palpable fear set in unexpectedly from like day one that the USA was going to just Cut&Run again and again abandon justice and freedom seeking Iraqi majorities like again to eight years of avoidance and inaction like of the Clintons’ eight years. It seems all costs about OIF now have to have a Kerry factor for all the variables effected by his stoking of a dumbed up or down new Cut&Run lobby with his Anti-War Revival, however justified in a Catholic morality.
Have you heard the one about how we now as per our much better and fuller understanding of how President Clinton though educated by Catholics of Georgetown was of more lies with “PEACE DIVIDENDS” while chasing popularity with lies so easy for such so of falsities that “war” wasn’t necessary while it actually was, at least as a liberation for proesecutions in our Nuremberg tradition and reconstruction precedence?
Have you heard the one about how, now with so many refreshed to our Constitution, and, with a more generally learned understanding of the real situation of the still too missing years 1993 - 2001 complexity, that citizens of the United States of America can push back from efforts about to all to work most as if more just State subjects, and rightly now as while of a best national security posture as of a renaissance in states’ rights and maybe as well a Holy Americas Doctrine some with an Axis of Catholics (reset)?
I may prefer to preserve these words for a new poetic attempt at CitRB.us. That said: what actually is of a forbidden “law respecting an establishment of religion”? In this day while unamended from original intent our Constitution is writ large as an Establishment to a more perfect Union as of a certain Lord and in that “Year of our Lord” whence of our founders.
What is is? What is a “convention” of such “convention” for a constitution for all in a Constitution so ordained and established as an Establishment set in a to be determined freedom for “nuance” of the New Testament?
It seems that Creationism is a barred “establishment” so set out of the reach of petty Congressional politics of “laws” so that any weakening of its import is preserved to an “Amending” by the People wholly enough.
It seems that the Ten Commandments have to be seen as a truly foundational “establishment” of religion as per the specific subscribing in that Year of our founders’ Lord, specifically. We seemed endowed by our Constitution’s clerical Lordly basis to be sectarian in Christ and freely. It seems certainly set so with such a Constitutional writ that Congress can pass no “law” to alter such for our constitutions in Our Constitution by our founders’ “our” Lord and that we are foundationally set in a preservation of the Ten Commandments as a fixed establishment of religion for citizens of the United States and its subscriptions to a more perfect union (Union?).
As long as there are the Ten Commandments and the learned dangers of seven deadly sins - it is for God of such Lord & not mere Congress people and their weaker laws that the health of the citizens is constituted by their Constitution so that no law respecting “fate” or “destiny” as established as of a Lord Christ with reasonable “interpretation” of scriptures of the New Testament can be passed by Congress as per “healthcare” unless fully worked with the People as an effective affecting amending with the fullest ratification so required.
It seems our Founders and their “our Lord” differentiated the writs of their Constitution and its ordaining and establishments as for the “We the People…” but as of also under their Lord Jesus Christ and the New Testament since we have our Establishment of Religion by our Constitution of US of “We the People… in the Year of our Lord…” not otherwise more foggy as “We the People… in the Year of Our Lord…”.
Yes today our Constitution is the best prophylactic against the Democrats weak substitutes to due and subscribed processes towards 2014 & 2016. We have that we have to discuss PROCESS and how and when now of a “breaking of our rules and procedures” as much or more than we have to discuss a morality about such supposedly not pop to be a justification of the means for their ends.
It seems that the realm of Religion and our Establishment to a more perfect Union in the “Year of our Lord” so large and specifically has us now to consider that Congress would be and is Un-Constitutional for any passing of a law as per the relationship between man and woman that is short of an convened Amending for a new constitutional in at least a newly amended Constitutional.
Again: What is an “establishment of religion” so when following firstly after the body of Our Constitution as itself a Big Establishment of Religion about a freedom preserved though in Christianity with freedoms consummated in a preserved protection from Congress to having a superior right to interpret scriptures than any citizen also has?
{Stay tuned - this is a work in progress still as of 9:22 am March 19 in the Year of Our Lord two thousand Ten and three}
There are lessons in architecture - there are whole schools of how good architecture is related to human form and function.
Soon we all should be stirred to palpitations and warm pulsations as the new Bush library opens and so most sternly. It will be hard to avoid a judgmental attitude and strong bias about Bush’s contrasting of Clintons’ library architecture in Arkansas.
I don’t know how much you know of Kentucky’s and Ohio’s standards of a keying and securing past the Beaver Wars. We have that top hats like President Lincoln’s were of beaver pelt constructions.
These are days when our architecture has to be considered anew as per jurisprudence and jurisdictions (even of prudence if/when droning) as of International Law and the reach of International Courts. How Sam Powers (Samantha Powers) was an “architect” of President Obama’s attempt for a rushed RESET to copacetic collusion with Russian powers is as well much of this consideration. We cannot un-consecrate the old Georgian structures/borders post the rushed juxtaposing of bordering sovereignties and how so said of a South Assetia (Ossetia?). There is a Bardish Shakespearean casting about such so dramatically and geographically set as with a President Medvedev and a President V. Putin.
Our set and cast about Obama’s war of choice in Afghanistan as of their mission creep from Bush’s War on Terrorism to be a warring on feminism and illiteracy in Afghanistan and Pakistan has Bardish constructs too, and as well so a “New Vietnam” plot, it seems. Geographically Afghanistan news of war has been as “architectural” or “Freudian” as of Helmand Province and as it like the discarded Soviet State of Georgia for looking in shape like a prophylactic.
You should ask Mrs. Hillary Clinton, our recent Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, how to interpret the physical architecture of their library in Arkansas (The Natural State) now publicly due a critical review and contrasting as the new Bush library readies in all its sterness to open. It seems more prudent to ask her how “Bill’s” library got to looking phallic and Freudian and too suggestive in a skin of Confederate Gray - right?
President Karzai’s Helmand Province of Afghanistan seems to have a sovereign and proud history as if of a meant structural difference as between South Carolina and North Carolina. The province to the South East of Helmand Province seems more like our West Virginia and of a destiny or fate to be more of a protectorate about shrinkage.
I do not know how the Clintons’ library got its shape, nor do I know how Helmand Province or South Carolina got theirs. I do get that President Medvedev and President V. Putin did nearly return discarded Georgian State to the drawing board to be more otherwise a checked South Assetia (Ossetia?) reshaped from being more like Helmand and at least Trojan brands to being more like a new seat of a new ham shire and as of pipe line concerns, at least. It seems Georgian styling got made nearly more symetrical by Presidents Medvedev and Putin as if so publicly made a butt of an separatist joke (governance?).
I don’t know how to Constitute specifically for each of these regions the differences about sam powers and Samantha Powers of Obama’s casting and setting even with it of a legacy reach to be more Soviet like with a friendly apologetic RESET.
Church steeples are also considerable architecture and how other places of worship and sanctuary are structurally welcoming as if a great big bosom of offerings of compassion. It is clear that our Ground Zero Memorial sits as if our World Trade Center has had a double sex change.
I did nearly submit a design concept for the Ground Zero site myself to having two towers rebuilt in there original footings and as tall but taller by some and as pentagonal obelisk twin towers with memorial glass topping where more a obelisk’d pyramid high above and open to heaven’s lights. I didn’t. I did think about the concept some and share thoughts with at least one friend then an architect with Cesar Pelli as I considered that if I did offer a submission I might have wanted to pair up with George Knight of Cesar Pelli firm.
I had many friends from the mid 90s associated professionally with the design and construction management of the Petronas Towers - and such is part of the story of the birth of Quid Ditch, Voldemort and Patronus Spells. (How cool > I hadn’t seen Patron US in Patronus Spell before now.)
I would have had to answer George Knight’s first (only) profession design query about my idea for rebuilding two towers at least as tall and as twin pentagonal obelisks. I would have had to (with him?) figure out how to skin the new towers for such a shape to either be all in glass or somehow much as if skinned like the original twin towers.
If Hillary Clinton had become President after having been that carpet bagger Senator it is probable and too possible that she would have insisted that the nearly winning idea of a LADY LIBERTY glass and steel tower replacement be named forever as the HILLARY CLINTON LADY LIBERTY TOWER. Yes the 9/11 Memorial now is architecturally as if our World Trade Center site (our’s as of all global citizens) has had a double sex change from phallic in the male twinness to feminine in twin wet ports as “memorials.”
Yes there was too much too graphically and Bardish dramatized for TV teasing about the mission creep to Obama’s warring of choice in Afghanistan on feminism and literacy. There were days were it was there was either a story of shrinkage and reservation of one province or a strong or too strong (too proud) story as from Helmand Province. What does Kandahar sound like when said once? What does Kandahar sound like when said ten times quickly?
If the Clintons were behind 9/11 by willful plotting and clever inciting of radicals and then with their new walls of separation between FBI intelligence and FBI enforcement branches there is some incredible and dangerous or diabolical genius about such. For them to have been behind it knowingly it may have been as a team of taunting inciting provocation to have pushed a known enemy enough to have forced them into a corner for a predicable acting out and not by a buying of “terror” or “terrorism” or a specific machination for a specific outburst. For if the Clintons were behind it they figured a way to get US attacked by an enemy so that such enemy would be justifying the very type of convenient crisis that they of a “justice” seeking Jihad would not have wanted; If the Clintons were behind 9/11 it might only have been by inciting a set of radicals to a predicable outburst to then justify the war on feminism and literacy that was needed for “Hillary’s” fem imperialist crusade needed for her to be more than just full of hot air talk.
I don’t know how President Obama will orate or proffer an attempt at erudite architectural review at least of the Clintons’ library in The Natural State down south. I don’t know if he will care to join the due comparing and contrasting and judging of the two newest of our Presidential Libraries when the new most stern Bush library does soon open to the public.
Presidents Medvedev and V. Putin did hold court for a while internationally about whether Georgia needed to be reshaped from being like a separated and discarded used prophylactic to a visibly exposed butt of a new regional inclusiveness. Again, it was somehow also about pipe lines and some acting up too much without enough respect for a sanctuary in morality whether secular or religious.
President Obama may be more willing to broach his war of choice in Afghanistan as a new Vietnam than to be orally committing to discussing the architecture of the library for the legacy of the Clintons, and it so skinned in Confederate Gray. He did wax a strapping erudite philosophical oration with his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech while whipping up a frenzy of youths the world over with his slights directed at the Clintons’ and their eight years of “avoidance” and “inaction.”
President Obama was a wise man while of his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech to speak so barbed and pointedly about “dangers of inaction and avoidance.”
Yes Petronas and Patronus belong together like Dorothy and Ultimate Frisbee and my parents fireplace broom whence. Those were the early days long before JK Rowling had her struggles finding a publisher — those were the days so early she was of asking for more as of “you didn’t give me enough for five books” and as well so early she was of asking “should we have flying brooms?” and me to a pondering and then answer of “yes, but go big make it a team sport.” George Knight was one of my many architect Ultimate Frisbee Leagues friends when I put an attitude of frisbee flying disk sport to an echo for creativity for JK in Scotland.
Dumbledore like Gryffindor come from the earlier days than these and as from “double door” a couple doors away and from Griffin doors as of a balance to so many of Yale Hospitals and Yale about such with a working about Derby’s Griffin Hospital Emergency Room Doors. JK Rowling is about 5-6 days older than me. Her late father Peter Rowling was a critical part of she being the one to answer a like Googling pre-Google for an unknown writer willing to write about a character “Peter Rowe-ling” and about magic learning with seven books for seven separate years of curriculum.
You may want to visit the Borough of Jeffersonville as of Ohio and the Beaver Wars. There is a short initial series still to be developed when I have the time and professional inclination in the archives of my blogs that covers November of 2010. As since November 2012 elections I changed styles and moved to a poetry working with Citizenrosebud.us link I had in 2010 as well post the election results changed my writing to be long prose as if a new LITTLE HOUSE ON THE PRAIRIE some with my BEATRICE BOXER AND THE GREAT BEAVER WARS series so archived off of jphogan.org.
I did protest but without working to distroy public state or religious property when it seemed that the “LADY LIBERTY” towers replacement design had been picked. I do appreciate and celebrate the whole hearted and compassionate architecture of the new towers and the 9/11 Memorial about Ground Zero - yet will have to wonder on how the sight seems to have had a sex change.
It is hard to believe that the Clintons are smart enough to have been actually behind 9/11 so that they incited the known radicals to an outburst that they could use to overwhelm and then defeat them and with a response an actual ushering in of an imperialism in a new global feminism as per FLOTUS Clinton’s heated and stirring walking and talking, whence.
To be frank…
To be frank, a Texan may be on to something quite uniquely American - North American - specifically of the The United States of America. This is not particularly about how gun control debate now could be to labeling “assault” weapons of common usage as more “American” as defensive anti-assault weapons. And, nor is it really to be about the poetry of our Bill of Rights in a heavy handed way to profess that our Second Amendment may be ratified from its times of a prudence for free people created by a common Lord to be as well armed as private citizens as that of any “militia” that might be organized by their “State” against them.
I do not know if the great baby boom of the loosely affiliated populaces of the united states of the Constitution of the USA was exclusively of creationism exuding by citizens only or mostly North American and of the boundaries of our Constituted in our Confederate Republic. We have though an economic consideration about the Baby Boom now still as our economy may be down for those born of its well tempered creationism surging maybe tone deaf economically about marketability. We have that the USA maybe now in need of leaders who are not at least wholly born and raised as of our Baby Boom Era.
This may be more a regional economic consideration that might exclude a negativity from those not raised in the North East but maybe in the wilds of Kentucky or Texas. I can write of this as one born four years after President Barack H. Obama and yet on the same August date — I can write of this as one who experienced those of a grade or two ahead of me as of the Baby Boom tail end while as well of associations with the next gen not technically of the Baby Boom Era of the grades coming up behind me.
For sake of jurisprudence with war criminal suspect permitted as it seems the protections of our citizens and as if merely of criminality for a peer review in New York City Federal Courts: It may not be that such shouldn’t be allowed to proceed in our civilian court system more not because of what one may use our Fifth Amendment rights to avoid saying but for the soap box one can stand on to say almost anything and as of a self defense - self representation. A war criminal suspect so allowed a seemingly evolutionary civility by our Baby Boom gen leaders is much not of an inclination to stand to stay within our rules and regulations at least as it may seem to us for a “defense” could be of a soap box filibuster like self representation that could go on and on with orations of a very different and interestingly sounding different record of a “history.”
For those of our Baby Boom such stepping seems less than judicially prudent and not nearly as evolutionary as their idealism may have imagined it. For a balance to such as that which we can hear of somehow from such a fateful executive decision it may help to consider our First Amendment more in the legend and key of our preamble to it and the prefacing to the unanimous subscribing that settled its primary documents ratification. For a balance to a possible “new history” defense with a civilian venue for a war criminal suspect we seem at a critical reflection for citizens of the USA, at least, to consider that we of the Americas may now be most prudently to a global axis of Catholics - an Axis of Catholics with a Holy Americas Doctrine.
What may occur as a war criminal suspect is allowed the rights and protections of citizens of the United States of America is a prideful call by a self professed enemy of such so united American states by one maybe more learned in our own faith of our founders of the Lord or the ordaining and establishing of our Constitution - of the Christian calender all subscribed the ordaining and establishing so then when of that “Year of of our Lord” special and judicial usage.
I don’t know if we can blame all of what is going wrong economically and in governance practice on the unique and discernible sociological variations about a generation of people of our Baby Boom Era. Our 1990s have some more interesting ways to be historically analyzed and recorded for Posterity — our 90s may have been of a time still when parents of those born of our Baby Boom Era still had ways to compensate for the rebelliousness of its era’s youth that were necessarily of stealthy methodologies for such era liked too much to tune out when it should have maybe tuned in more. We have that this gen now of our top leadership posts may have been compensated for and that good times rolled in spite of them not because of them, at least economically during our 1990s.
Religiousity is an new frontier now that our sworn (terrorist) enemies may understand better. Our sworn enemies may now know better how we think as Anglo Saxons inheritors of governance once more of a Manifest Destiny era. We may as a nation need to become more learned about religions and the United States of America Constitution as a Christian Constituting just to be better able to defend ourselves as a nation. The Catholics of our adjoined Americas are naturally by their shared creator already much of an Axis of Catholics also on the defensive from “terrorism” of sworn enemies of the USA. A “HOLY AMERICAS DOCTRINE” would be a celebration of our First Amendment by some interpretive security logics and not as much a violation of it.
I do not know how any or most could be tripping over the on its face simplicity of out Constitution and its ten of the Bill of Rights with the legend and keying of the preamble set with “do ordain and establish” so then closed for its ratification as with the unanimous subscribing in the “Year of our Lord” so thence. I do not know how we can be of so many of our Baby Boom Era wanting to trip past (over or under - around?) our First Amendment of a particular basis around “establishment” with it prefaced with “do ordain and establish” of the legend and keying of the primary body of Constitution.
As we have these days of debate about our Second Amendment we have that it may be that Liberals violated Adam Lanza’s First Amendment rights too severely by their long work to a national secularism contrary to the writs of our founders and the Constitution. As we have these days to worry about the guns of Adam of Peter and Nancy we have the apple of the discussion too much it seems as well that Liberals too much took Adam’s Adam and his creationism out of not just his classrooms.
There is that as long as we were of Bush’s FREEDOM AGENDA it was patriotic for citizens of the United States of America to hold and cherish weapons like their brave were brandishing as volunteers in service to the securing and sharing of our Constituted freedoms. If not weapons of defensive or liberating “wars” such at home in our loosely affiliated states of our Confederate Republic were of a common use more of a patriotism to hold and preserve them as American anti-assault arms.
We have that at least I witnessed the chasm of generational differences between those a year to three ahead of me in my youth and those then a year or few behind me also like me hardly as born of the Baby Boom Gen. In my family my oldest sister seems much too much like a Baby Boomer like President Obama while a year younger and yet my other older sister is less so and my younger brother definitely not at all. While of the years of success of the philosophy of governance and language change about my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM with its first round back from before the Clintons even entered the 1992 race I was of a clever attempt to preempt the Baby Boom weaknesses at least around economic thought with a prophylactic pre-marketing of their era in our general entertainments. With such as part of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM those now in power of the tail end of the Baby Boom Era may be stumbling over themselves as if just a sad and out of tune has been beat too of a lack of awareness that we already marketed them before their time and too much to the max.
We may have been saved by these of a certain Baby Boom Era having tried to sell themselves without a new originality and because it seems to all have fallen flat, and some because it fell flat for they themselves didn’t realize how we grew so much in the 90s by having prophylactically marketed around them and these now most too apparent short comings in a philosophy of governance and economics.
It seems just nutty and absurd that any though of any generation should think that war criminal suspects belong in our civilian courts. It seems dangerous that such offering such as wise haven’t themselves warned us and educated us on the risks from a self defense and/or self representation that could be filibuster like and of a new telling of a believable yet different “history.”
Our First Amendment uses “establishment” quite cleverly and specifically following on with a complementary import to the use of “do ordain and establish” of the legend and keying of the preamble.
To be frank: Today I have more questions for you than answers.
Her footprints are huge…
It seems a great naivete to believe Secretary Clinton was just a tool of President Obama.
It seems dangerous to risk an escapism for the rule of Clintons now as if not of the rule of Obama, however confusing and confounding her first steps about such are dramatized.
I do not want to tire my readers here by ruining a great title as if Hillary Clinton deserves it all to herself. Others may be deserving of any higher orderings about any new Manifest Destiny as set as a “FEMIFEST DESTINY” as a discussion of whom women have a right to conquer as if to “liberate” them. Hillary Clinton has a history to suggest she is a fem like the three me most of Evan Thomas’ THE WAR LOVERS - as a “war lover” herself.
Many body bags have been piled, however, up full from failures and sacrifices about a crusading of and by Hillary Clinton though more as if by remote control coddled distant safety. In her huge footprints are many lost souls - and as these some of her still as if walking in Bill Clinton’s shoes, spousally.
She seems not to have even “ducked and ran for cover” let alone had a charge up a San Juan Hill all her own.
Yesterday on the Thirteenth day of the Third month of the Year of our Lord two thousand Ten and three our Constitution stood ratified and witness to a first Jesuit become Pope. America of the North of The United States of America did become subscribed unanimously as preambled to be ‘ordained’ and ‘established’ as of “…the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord on thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven.” The U.S.A. was so Constituted by its ratification so as a Union under one Lord as a Christian Lord of a Christian calender. These American states, though, were not Constituted to be allowed to be by laws of Congress established along sectarian lines even to being a Catholic State by establishments of religion.
The Church so now of Peter of Francis has its pastoral charities loopholes for acceptance of a contrariness. The United States of America though may actually be written such that our First Amendment is meant to follow the stoicism of George Washington’s First Inaugural orations and such that ACA - Obamacare - is not allowed as by our Bill of Rights for it imbues an “establishment of religion” barred even for Christian Charity from acts of The Congress. Obamacare can be Un-Constitutional if it exists to be an establishment by Law that there, like, is no God and so a secular socialist Government program is needed. The Congress by our First Amendment seems to be not allowed to pass any Law as if an establishment that there is no God.
Again, it is naive to believe Hillary Clinton. Again, it is dangerous to accept blindly on a faith in the speak of President Obama that Hillary was just his tool about His foreign policies. His as her’s of his is exceptional as a conundrum confounding of these times - and maybe as of a comparative ranking for all times. Her of his (thought His of Obama’s) is a she of fem past of like a missing 8 years - a missing 1993 - 2001. Her years of those year more of the big footprints, literally, comparatively, of Bill Clinton of His about such foreign realms do exist actually as in a real contrariness to a proposition that President Obama’s claims can be truthful.
The House of Obama has the House of the Clintons to rival it and battle it now for “LEGACY” and more or their regular lots of transference and projection strategics. Again, I do not want to ruin a good title by letting it be used here as if forever only about Hillary Clinton.
It is hard not to tag Hillary Clinton as a “lover of war” and one as if of a “lover of war bar none.” We have that it gets complicated with Bill Clinton’s footprints so huge and causal to the vast numbers of filled and piled, however, body bags with Hillary Clinton’s name due on them, officially for Posterity of Records — it is complicated that Hillary’s love of war may too much be of the “school” of “politics” of the “Wag the Dog” “convenient” “crisis” “escapists” set.
As First Lady Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton FLOTUS Hillary did crusade as a fem imperialist - not as an anti-imperialist.
It is naive, again, to accept blindly or on the word of President Obama that Hillary Clinton was just his tool in a Foreign Policies all His (his as Obama, President). By offering in his first hours and by his orations of his inaugural that “it” could be of a ‘none of the fault of the Clintons’ as with his then official Presidential speak as of “it is all Bush’s fault” he trapped himself and us all into a realm for foreign policies for whomever might be his Top Diplomat then limited by half a potential hope or possible range of diplomatic flexibility/nuance.
Hillary Clinton cannot have been just a tool of a superior President and his orderings by his figurings, logically, for it follows that he was a prisoner to the Clintons since his inauguration so of such a ridiculous posturing as if “it” could be of a “none of the fault of the Clintons.” Hillary cannot have been a bit player and just a tool as President Obama was trapped and so as if a tool of the Clintons for having proceeded from day one with a cover-up for the Clintons as a Governance PRIORITY.
Again, I do not want to ruin a good title by making it all about Hillary, just yet, just now before the whole story can be told.
In the Potterville of President Obama’s Sequestration how might we consider many different jurisdiction issues?
In the bailiwick of banking and our housing crisis how can we now be better bankers ourselves. This administration sided with the Big Banks and not those more of the Savings and Loan of Bailey’s. There were better stewards of our public trusts available to step out otherwise and to help home owners and main streets more if we hadn’t been so stuck upon TOO BIG TO FAIL full embrace by the then new administration of President Obama.
As Rand Paul and others his peers stand up to educate and involve many about threats real to their freedoms we have that our Sequester is more of a Jimmie Stewart of IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE than as Mr. Smith in MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON. I did read all of Ayn Rand’s books by the mid 1980s, and, I do not know if or by how much Rand Paul may be older than I am old/young.
So about Obama and his “Potterville” administering of TOO BIG TO FAIL and alarmism about a politically convenient new Great Depression: There were other ways to fix our economy, and, there were other ways also to have attempted to address “solutions” for any pressing climate change or global warming.
How now to be better teachers and educators with an involving of our too huddled in recessionary times masses?
This is for a BAILEY WICKING about bailiwicks of our sequestration, while of the time and duties of the institution of this seeming real new day of a “Mr. Smith.”
How now should we consider that President Obama could otherwise have from his official first days have been to governing more like Mr. Bailey of IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE?
Was/is President Obama trapped by his own party from having been anything but Big Potters of Bedford Falls? Was the alternative of being more of Mr. Bailey out because they would have had to incriminate themselves as causally responsible for the housing collapse near wholly as a party? Was/is TOO BIG TO FAIL the only defense the Democrat Party had other than stirring up too much curiosity by a public pleading of the Fifth, like?
Was/is it simply better to have written checks to most Americans as cost of living stipends directly to them while of trouble paying their mortgages due to the new higher energy politics of the Democrat Party GREEN ENERGY policies?
All the Republican candidates for President in the 2012 Republican primaries stood up to the person and declared that our Government caused the housing crisis, and without incriminating themselves more than they were incriminating Democrats.
It would still have been a capitalism for our Government to have issued many handouts to those with tight finances and troubled mortgages, oddly - yet truly. It would not have been “socialism” specifically or necessary hypothetically or theoretically since it would have been of stipends for cost of living increases due specifically to the Democrat Party leadership meddling with energy “scarcity” and “demand” and as well with weather politics. Had such been done as Mr. Bailey might have as soon as President Obama had otherwise taken to being more just a Big Potter of Bedford Falls we might have had our Government have to spend less than it did by bailing out all the banks.
It would have been self incriminating though for the Democrats rivaling President Obama and he himself to have argued that we should copy China’s economics and just write some checks to the people — President Obama couldn’t be as free as the Chinese to be capitalistic for he would have had to incriminate himself and his party in order to properly justify that it would have cost less and have been more efficient to have issued cost of living stipends to the people directly.
It was all supposed to be sold as of a polarizing partisan political #rap against at least President Bush - with the message and dictates all to TOO BIG TO FAIL let us be Potters of Bedford Falls based on the impossible of “IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT.”
Though the housing crisis started during the administration of President Bush it was of new faulty foundations of the plotting of Democrat President Clinton. The housing crisis did get triggered under President Bush mostly by the campaigning to an energy revolution by Democrats of Al Gore, Senator Clinton & Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The housing crisis was triggered by the higher gas prices triggered by the new and too subjective supply and demand possibilities about the Democrat Party’s energy idealism and revolutionary methods.
If the Democrats could have just martyred themselves and instead have written checks to Americans caught on fixed incomes and then overextended in credits not only might the bank bailout have not been necessary but our economy might have been able to bounce back within a couple years like it likely would have if McCain/Palin had been elected.
To have justified otherwise proceeding to stop the economic slide to a convenient era for NEW DEAL politics and a NEW DEAL AUSTERITY we either had to get the price of gas lower than it was before HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT commenced or before Al Gore started with his AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH crusading. We either had to get the price of gas as low as it was then as then possible because the Bush administration had actually gotten to stabilizing global markets for oil or we had to send checks out as capitalistic cost of living stipends to cover the additional costs of and from the GREEN ENERGY REVOLUTION politics of the Democrats — We had to do one or the other to have stopped the housing crisis in time and to have avoided needing to bail out all the banks.
It seems Senator Rand Paul as Mr. Smith is still going - Stand with Rand - your freedoms are being threatened domestically.
Like we have it a historical consideration that President Bush could maybe have only argued his case for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM more clearly and with more honesty and transparency if he had been otherwise from lying for such to the harder and most political truer route of needing to argue for such necessarily with a parallel discourse about the Clintons’ Administration of a GROSS NEGLIGENCE.
The Democrats would have had to martyr themselves for their energy idealism for us to have avoided bailiwicks for so many about bailing out so many that would have been better served by a President Obama as a Mr. Bailey of Bedford Falls than a Mr. Potter.
That said: It would have been “capitalistic” to have cut checks to the American People as cost of living stipends to supplement their finances so like of fixed incomes already maxed out and it likely would have saved most banks better and faster than the TARP and TOO BIG TO FAIL politics did. The Republican candidates during their primary did all stand up and speak to how it was the Government not the people that caused the housing crisis. The same Republicans though might have had a hard time seeing a way to writing checks even though the Chinese Government was then being that capitalistic and prudent even if actually just “cost of living stipends.”
We had many stories of these early trouble days of convenient crisi for new NEW DEALERS of how in Spain a similar energy idealism had cost at least two existing jobs (regular jobs) for every one new green job that their politics managed to create.
The Democrats have a history with me of my having been party to old concerns that we needed as a nation to get our energy prices higher to change the nation to a better frame of mind about efficiencies and environmental concerns. When they once asked me “Could it work?” they only wanted to hear the start of my answer that started like: It could work — But it likely won’t work or wouldn’t work! I remember them being dismissive (naively) and with “we just want to know if it could work!”
Again, the Democrats would have had to martyr themselves politically to have prevented the housing crisis and stopped the very global economic slide to such now their much (it seems) unexpected not easily reversed convenient “recession” like a “depression” down time from their mathy suppression. I was of a shared mind that we needed to find a way to educate and involve the American people to real concerns that a higher price of gas could be a variable about — I didn’t think “could work” would work because of the economies and politics of the time and that Democrats mostly were seeming to be being counterproductive by trying to do too much too quickly.
We have seen since this all really got rolling that other things were already quite happening to have fixed the problem without needing higher gas prices and general energy costs. We have that our natural gas finds and other innovative developments may have been doing more for climate change concerns these past few years and yet while hardly if at all of the Democrat Party plotting as too much all more Mr. Potters of Bedford Falls.
To be brief as this is all now of real bailiwicks of so many new and former members of our Congress: A Mr. Bailey solution would have been better and especially capitalistic though oddly for too many if so of our Federal Government otherwise to have written checks out (like the Chinese economics) as “COST OF LIVING STIPENDS.” President Obama has taken to being much more a Mr. Potter and hardly a fan of Mr. Smiths; he would have had to martyr himself contrary to his own Fifth Amendment rights though to have been so more “capitalistic” and yet as well like the Chinese.
Note: Had McCain/Palin been elected we likely would have seen the economy recover in just a couple years. There is that he was set to let a renaissance in state’s rights happen fluidly and naturally and not have been of like a New Nationalist heavy hand too like a Mr. Potter. And, they would have needed to stand up a bailiwick PRIORITY for regulators to necessary and speedy bank reformation. By my own considerations it was as far back as 2006 that I had become concerned that the Big Banks had become too corrupt on their collections side and to try out of necessity and desperation to try to cover the corrupted lending side so much a bastard banking child of Clintonomics.
It is all our bailiwicks that Democrats should have admitted that they wanted or thought they needed higher energy prices, and that we would have been better off if they had told us and sold us and decided to educate and involve more like a Mr. Bailey.
To not be ad hominem, too specifically tet a tet from a distance, with Paul Krugman, as he licks his wounds, of his not too rosy Charlie Rose match fight, with Joe Scarborough, maybe I should start with it that Democrats generally are missing that what is a void in our economy is the Republican market music we all used to enjoy in an Adam Smith invisible hand kind of way.
We are of and American pie of music that has died with the Democrat Party assault on the Republican arts of good will by pursuit of self interests and how they had been making the world better for others, albeit too much as a rhythm from invisible hands.
Now that the Dems have much killed Adam Smith’s proven theorems, practically, these past four years, with their ideological over-reaching, there are matters so confused, and confounding, to air, discuss, and resolve many about, visibly of a drum beat not musical of or for economic growth.
I guess it is probably best to start with how the Democrats did work specifically to create a polarized and partisan new economic that had them hopefully to appear as if the only good guys in DC, and, that the Clintons are too little considered for which ever of their spousal efforts as foreign or domestic as they were. If one doesn’t get the confounding of that Bill Clinton while embraced and treated as if another Bush kin would lie and go all “brassy” politically in a polarizing partisan construction standing on a character reference from the Bush friendship and to using such to get away with more than a few misstatements to aid those aligned against the Bush clan. He essentially would as well call a Bush a liar and get away with using the Bush name as a “good” character reference to get away with “brassy” new lying and bolstering of his old falsities.
There are structural problems now in our body politick not exclusively of the domains of the Clintons. On about the only light note here we can parlay that President Obama has since a youth felt a need to turn the world to Soviet “socialism” as if to fix his own family - as if to reunite his parents in the here or their hereafter - as if to go backwards to when his parents made him as a Soviet Studies LOVE Child. Oh, but Paul Krugman went to never never land or no man’s land economically with his less than rosy notables tonight on PBS.
I can be reasoned that though Adam Smith’s economic theorems did get proven to be correct at least at times and quite workable for years we may now be of a time where they were assaulted so much that we cannot use that around the prudence of his premises that markets should let people individually act in their own self interest as if such would benefit all as if a grand economic music for growth by invisible musical composition and renderings. We cannot now use “invisible hand” theory to get us back to where “invisible hand” economics had been grandly established to a global Republican artful co-habitated earthly era of potential in growth enabling notations.
What there is of a workable sense in spinning by Paul Krugman today, as he asked to only be questioned about today and not the inconsistencies of his body of work and history of past analysis relates to a heard comment about spending cuts not being needed for the next ten years, like.
Before it can be politically feasible to move forward on such “analysis” it would be prudent to consider that we may have record revenues now only because President Obama didn’t get the vast additional amount of “stimulus” spending he wanted and that markets believe that Republican music will be visibly be allowed to get reconstructed so that our growth economy can return sooner rather than later. We have to consider that additional stimulus spending now would be dangerous as so much of his earlier supported vast sums were because the marketing arm of Demonomics has stronger messaging to a new conservationism based on the sold GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM of an end of the world as we know it import preciously based on politicking on the emotions and undeveloped intelligence and reasoning of America’s youths.
I am not saying: You can only lie to our children so many times in a term, or two! But, I am suggesting the marketing wing of Demonimics (Obamanomics) has been pushing such a note too long and too hard dangerously in a false advertising no man’s non musical conduction construct not synthesized to “artful.”
Again, it seems now certain that Democrats do not yet have an understanding of the economy of the 90s, and, that the political credit they have long claimed for its successes cannot be due them, actually. These many mistakes do suggest that they at best lip synced there way along until now and that now it is time to like pay the piper - the actual pipers - however - however invisible.
What the Clintons brought to the economics of the 90s was too much growth and fattening about a good economy they had inherited as improved and taking off that didn’t need what they were selling to be able to sell them to a getting the credit for what they had actually just inherited from many more like of Republican music of growth in Adam Smith’s notation and beats. Essentially the Clintons instead of selling regular sized McDonalds portions did sell instead the thought habit and addiction of “Bill” as if it were patriotic to also SUPERSIZE two Big Mac meals at least once a day.
Their Clintonomics was of fattening an inherited economy that would have been better and more stable if the Clintons had not been elected to inherit it. Someone some years ago presented himself as a doctor friend of the Clintons while about the Clinton vs Obama primary with a statistic that the USA could save a trillion dollars in healthcare costs if we could just reverse the onset of obesity during the Clintons’ guidance as First Parents - this person did “report” that the USA would like be able to save a trillion dollars in healthcare costs if it could be back to the average personal body weight from just before his friends took office.
Essentially it may be easier to take apart Krugman and the Clintons and especially the attempt tonight to offer that in 1997 we like should have thought to consider paying down our debts if we see it as a “fattening” and then so much as the clogging of arteries and such like that which might have killed President Clinton while of actually living like that badly himself.
To address though the proffered posit that economically we now do not need to address spending cuts for like ten years: It is a loaded postulate proffered coyly - It is offered by Paul Krugman with the condition necessary to complement it of us actually getting back to having a growth economy. By such we have the intelligence quotient consideration that though we may not need to address spending for ten years if we can get our economy growing again we may need to address it and effect such just to get our economy actually growing again.
This is in many ways someone or someones problem now as it wasn’t specifically before - eg Jack Lew. Or is it “ie Jack Lew”? Some parts of this that is of the Dems having polarized our economics in an real partisan visible new tao - for sure.
Odd, yes to think we have to explain to Democrats that they killed the music - a globally embracing not too government of man Republican music that was whence thence synthesized in Adam Smith notations of invisible uncredited hands. And yet Adam Smith seemed so misunderstood recently with some commentary that had me stirred for speaking of Dem economics without fair enough regard for “costs” of general industry wide numbers for now being figured as the “costs” that are there providing jobs from competition and to the competition that then works to keep prices lower in such industry. It is confusing to talk healthcare numbers and healthcare numbers if one in talking seizing gross industry revenue figures without figuring which part of such are industry costs that provide the jobs that are to the invisible benefits from a competitive intra-actions that are not redistributable to a government replacement without such removing the cost saving benefit from the competition that such jobs and competition keeps in the industry.
Odd, quite that Paul Krugman can offer that it was wrong not to have back in 1997 instead focused on debt reduction when instead President Clinton took off dimly to burning our economic candle from both ends at once with his (”fattening”) chase of rare short-term political popularity possible if he did the thought impossible of running a surplus that grandly and also a new massive unfunded federal social program such as his risky loaning pimping was much set about also dimly as. Unlike Paul Krugman tonight - I don’t mind if you ask me about any of my opinions about this back to the early 90s and to before the Clintons entered the 1992 race; I do not mind you asking me since I still am much of the same confidence then as now and with little if any changes in my opposition to this mentioned economic “fattening” by Clintonomics even from those days as it happened.
I will have to explain though when it gets confusing like around Paul Krugman’s recent comments about spending cuts like not needed for the next ten years since I have been warning some away from too much cutting too quickly thinking if it is done thinking that the 90s cutting wasn’t of having cut too much too quickly. These days to cut too much too quickly is actually likely safer that that which was cut so that Clintons could have that rarest of short term political popularity from having cut an extra trillion after the Republicans had found that thought impossible first trillion of cuts to that magical balancing whence. See, now cutting too much too quickly has already caused the worst of the dangers it could have and a discussion now for these economic times necessarily is fundamentally different than that which is about discussing how the Clintons with Clintonomics did cut too much too quickly and oddly so as a way to sell a lack of discipline good for getting more to fatten up even if also like on two SUPERSIZED Big Mac meals a day.
Detroit types may remember knowing there fears were real after Clintons became our new First Parents without enough economic sense to know to try to listen to them asking for some “marketing” guidance as of a theme or direction for them to work invisibly and magically around. That President Obama has wanted everything to be visible and visibly from and of him is a different problem than this I remember - than this I remember for having been the one that knew to listen to Detroit types and to offer to them that they should try to anchor around a new styling of 50s & 60s car styles but as compacts to help sell fuel efficiency indirectly with pop culture mashing and subliminal curb appeal.
Right - It was the type of advice to Detroit one shouldn’t expect could or would have come from Bill Clinton as so then of SUPERSIZING life style of scandals as if of too many big car back seats recreationally used even if officially a State vehicle.
Right - Bill Clinton as President was not at all naturally inclined to suggest that he could be involved in selling smaller back seats.
Right - I may know what I am talking about when talking about the Democrats not knowing how the economy of the 90s actually worked but where it was being “fattened” by public visible efforts of the Clintons to provide a way for them also to be able to stand up and take credit for all of it - even that which they still seem not to understand that was inherited by them as a fix and ready to take off economy of real Republican invisible rhythmic notes and good beats.
Before it would be prudent economically to say that we don’t need to worry about spending cuts for the next ten years we have the category more to sociology to worry about as a real concern around us needing spending cuts just to restore market confidence enough to get the markets moving again - but only if we can either proclaim that President Obama has already successfully and heroicly saved the entire planet from GLOBAL WARMING or that we didn’t need to worry about that so much for tens year, as well.
Right - I have already shared in earlier recent columns some how the Clintons didn’t enter the 1992 race until after stuff I was already saying semi-publicly was tested with the Carville and Begala campaign management for Harris Wofford in Pennsylvania. I had sent letters to Representative from Missouri offices of Richard Gephardt with concerns and a confidence that Dems could win in 1992 if they took to sounding like my shared notes and reasoning.
Yes those were the days that George Stephanopoulus and Charles Koch’s son worked together side by side as equals in Gephardt’s office, and, that I was of a local connection long in New Haven wise to that my neighbor Stanley Greenberg was a political pollster while married to Rosa DeLauro. At this time though she was no longer Senator Christopher Dodd’s AA and she that gave my sister an entry level opening as a receptionist when fresh out of college a couple years ahead of me. By such time my friends’ step mom was our Congressional Representative.
Even Jack Lew should consider flushing all or most of what Paul Krugman is saying now - and try to ignore that Bill Gates even quoted him recently. We seem stuck both by the Dems for having tried to polarize our foreign and domestic economics in a partisan new Government Handing, and, for that Dems seemed to have confirmed that they cannot yet know how or why the economy worked in the 90s but that by the “fattening” artery clogging “math” so “brassy” of Bill and Hillary guidance as our First Parents, how so our First Couple, indivisible in their “two-fer” co-holding of our office of the President.
Did I make my point in not too too ad hominem a way so suggesting just that so much now should just get flushed, and, that though we if we can get our economy growing again may not need spending cuts for ten years do definitely need them not towards getting a music of growth just playing softly again? And, yes we are at a different kind of risk of cutting too much too quickly now than of my comments of the 90s economy of a historical remark that the Clintons did cut too much too quickly then and so by at least maybe an entire trillion.
If you are trying to sing now about Lew you may yourself be catching yourself wishful for days passed and missing what was much an invisible chorus of Adam Smith “invisible hand” (Republican) art magically working inspite of Clintonomics - knowingly.
And on heathcare ACA - Obamacare: Yes it seems it would be wise to unfund it at least until the economy can start growing again and have time to get to where it is even possibly affordable. Yes, it is reasonable to consider that our states all can find a way to compete locally with Romneycare in the mean time while Obamacare unfunded for National Security reasons. Obamacare is an alternative system to an existing system that provides care more expensively - it is not a necessary system like much of our defense and intelligence securing budgets. We should defund Obamacare as long as our economy is stuck and unable to afford it, and, because as well our states may actually be able to come up with a better way to resolved their local healthcare coverage neighborly and community inefficiencies if just given the time that a necessary defunding of ACA might afford.
This is just some of what President Obama has seemed to stick Lew with. Does Congress yet have the Power to flush clean enough of this, and in time?
The high drama of the SEQUESTER has its roots in the first round - the FOOL ME ONCE round - of the politics of the Clintons in the second term of the co-Administration of the Clintons. This is the shame on us round now - the round two - of at least the Republicans no longer able to say “shame on you” as round one tolerates - or expects.
Hillary Clinton was not an alternative to this. A President Clinton, as irregular and ill advised as it was, would have been of these same polarizing partisan politics but more clearly as a round two now longer a shame upon the foolery of the Clintons on the Clintons. She wasn’t born to this polarizing harkening to Soviet styled socialism as President Barack H. Obama was as born so salt and peppered beautifully as a Soviet Studies LOVE child. Hillary Clinton made nearly all the same impossible spending promises that “socialist” @BarackObama did - Hillary Clinton started off maybe more “socialist” than he has actually has been with her first parlay her promise to seize all oil company profits if she is elected.
Yes this is an era of political high drama. And, yes, this time around for the Republicans to play “bi-partisanly” well with these Dems they would now be the party of the shame of round twos as of “FOOL ME ONCE - SHAME ON YOU — FOOL ME TWICE - SHAME ON ME!”
I really don’t know how much of this I have to explain to new or old and loyal readers of my blogging, now. The era of an administration of the Clintons as “bi-partisan” would have been over as soon as if it were actually she that got elected. There are serious concerns as too how much the spousal husbandry of the Clintons’ political strategizing to have successfully lined both of them up each for their own Presidency did get in the way of regular and prudent governance and did undermine our general stability - economically, at least.
Some perspective to how similar, not dissimilar this all might have been, if yet otherwise and successfully of the spousal “two-fer” power grabbing political machinations, so also of global plotting, of/by the Clintons, is achievable with a consideration of 2008 all over again. Simply the Democrats and especially the Clintons wanted and needed gas prices to be high - much higher heading into November elections. Simply President Bush, and the Republicans, if “stupid” and “unelectable” as “liars” for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM cannot be thought to have been so dumb that they are considered to have wanted higher gas prices in 2008 or that they would have worked to effect such without knowing they were effectively making Republicans unelectable in November.
It is hard to decide which aspect of the roots of this high drama about the sequester to now broach next. There could not have been a repeat of the Clintons’ “bi-partisanship” of their second term had she been elected and promised to as much irresponsible nationalizing of so much “governance” as well without a workable philosophy. She campaigned to polarized Washington along the very same idealistic “spending” lines as President Barack H. Obama.
The Clintons are remembered for seeming to think at least by their second term that they now had the technology to fool all of the people all of the time and had the advantage of incumbency and newness of such to the order of thinking that the Republicans had to get on board or get left behind forever. There are enough public statements by the Clintons and especially from the years afterwards that are yet before much of this mess, but about it all, and of those days they said stuff more defensively as their plans for reigning seemed most to be falling apart. What is less considered is how much fell apart because it was considered and affected of a plot by spouses to line one up to be intentionally different than the other publicly while of the Powers of incumbency.
But how to be brief now about so much that isn’t now an alternative to this gridlock of prideful and defensive NEW DEAL AUSTERITY - how to talk about any “alternative” while realizing the Clintons are not and were not actually an “alternative.” It is some that he was born “Barry” Obama as a Soviet Studies LOVE child who then had to twist and turn thorough at least his developmental years about what went wrong between his ‘ebony’ and ‘ivory’ parental Soviet specialiality melodies.
There is the objective lesson of LOCATION & LOCATION of the Clntons and yet hardly with enough curiousity even as to how Senator Clinton become such as if by political nepotism and patronage as a carpetbagger to New York. Of the “LOCATION” con, shall we say, we have that one can discourse on how Harlem did save at least Bill Clinton from himself. He did not choose to locate in Harlem - I seem to recall he was dragged up their crying or whining - and after having gone to his banking friends he made so rich with his derivatives “guidance” as a back up plan to such bastion of Power basis he sought originally high above the Russian Tea Room in the then new Carnegie Hall Towers near Time Square.
I don’t know why or how Arkansas couldn’t have still been good enough for Bill or Hillary. But oddly there is LOCATION and ‘architecture’ now more to be discussed as the PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY of President George W. Bush readies to finally open. It seems by his first choice and his remembered (reported) fights with our government for massive annual sums for his post-office holding convenience in excess originally of the sum of all past President’s ‘allowances’ combined for first year expenses that there must be a lot he wanted from the sought most regal location still available in CHT and that it to him may have been one of the last bastions of white male power holding that was domestically available to him. It seems too coincidental that by his words and designs he has raised a due queriousness as to his own true “evolution” and reputation.
Again, President Clinton did not want to end up in Harlem. Harlem was the nearest we would afford him when after our Government accountants realized we couldn’t or shouldn’t afford him that million dollar a year rent for life depression was setting in after he sought and then fought publicly and privately to be high above Time Square and able to dominate our Forth Estate however it then may have been still a last great bastion of white male power.
I do hope you will soon participate in a due intellectual and patriotic exercise about comparing and contrasting the LOCATION and ARCHITECTURES of the libraries of the Clintons’ Administration and the soon to be open library of the Presidency of George W. Bush. I do not, again, understand how even his Mrs. would have signed off on the Clintons’ legacy so for it phalicly like a gun, at least, and seemingly forever clad/skinned in colors of Confederate Grey.
With the banking and housing crisis what it has been and now this sticking NEW DEAL AUSTERITY we all can consider how lucky both Clintons have been that Bill Clinton did basically get dragged kicking and screaming/crying up to Harlem. Had he been situated as hoped and long fought to be in CHT the story really should maybe be now that the BIG Bank FOB (Friends of Bill) are paying his rent for life at near a million per year in thanks for all the money he made them with his original guidance to and of derivatives cons.
I see that President Obama is not a Hillary Clinton and that she as of ODYSSEY DAWN broaching of America’s legacy to be not the “offensive” “first striker” may have been more just a tool of a died in the wool Clinton Democrat, however otherwise. It is the Obama administration not the Bush administration that set out to a new frontier of global “politics” of “first strike” “offense” as to be to a willful hunting of “monsters” without regard for regular American due process.
The Republicans and George W. Bush cannot be as stupid/dumb or corrupt as Dems have suggested. A point to such case is that it is ridiculous it seems to think that they would not have lowered gas prices in 2007 & 2008 if they could have to so save or prevent the economic slide from subjective & political market affectings of a “GREEN” and “PARTISAN” idealism.
The fastest or only way to have stopped the housing crisis as it broke was to get the global price of gas back to normal and more objective rational basis and as the successes of the Bush FREEDOM AGENDA was then of having made possible and reasonable. It was from the higher prices, and how they kept climbing, that those who had bought into CLINTONOMICS, and their (political) hedging, and its a “patriotism” of spending far more than every penny they had, and while on fixed incomes, that the domino effect started to the full blown housing crisis and then the related CRISIS OF VALUATION.
These are days where the Republicans can still say “Shame on the Clintons!” and/or “Shame on the Clinton Democrats!” for round one as it of those days too much of them thinking they now had the tools and technology, so it seemed/seems to fool all of the people all of the time.
There is no alternative now in the Clintons - this is much aN economic mess of CLINTONOMICS II as not at all likely to have been less “polarizing” and “socialistic” in a unnecessary “New Nationalism” than OBAMANOMICS. The Clintons have enough water under the still too condemned bridges of America for most now to not see that CLINTONOMICS II if Hillary had been elected would have too been devoid of “partisan” balancing of CLINTONOMICS I.
Yes, we are kinda of stuck now with too few ‘alternatives’ and some not because the Bush administration could have lowered the gas prices from the spiking of the market supply and demand subjectivity from GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM in time to have prevented the housing crisis above scratched at that then did cause too great a loss of consumer confidence in banks and Washington based Politics.
We are still of the CRISIS OF VALUATION and in ways that our Republicans cannot step back from with having let themselves all be played out as fools. Please remember it would have been dumb for Republicans to support higher gas prices even privately with investments then for Hillary was the “inevitable” next President of very strongly of promises to seize any or all oil company profits - especially those then conveniently of unnecessarily inflated market pricing.
And, Please remember to consider how you would now be thinking of the Clintons if his back up plan to have had those BIG BANKS “friends” cover his million dollar a year lease had worked. It is remarkable that in a consideration of his “architecture” of his own library he sets us up now to a discussion of his life of having until Harlem been able to stay “white” and “chauvinistic” as a master above most of it personally while able to stay a white southern male above such movements.
Yes there are different ways to look at the obvious and historical trails of Bill Clinton. By marrying Hillary and with her legacy as a feminist and her willingness to subjugate herself with a putting of his career first he never really had to become a feminist in practice himself. As well it is quite remarkable still that such can be said of “race” politics too as now later in his career he has left enough record to bring questions out at least as per his library “design” and their choice of Washington residence on Whitehaven Rd that he talked so much as he did about race (until in Harlem) as a southern white male who in his day had stayed ahead of being less than an accepted “master” - right?
How much is in William Jefferson Clinton’s public displays and those reports about him like as if he had been dragged kicking and screaming/crying all the way to Harlem, and, now how that has actually saved his and his wife’s political street cred at least until this #sequester started?
#Obama #FORWARD has to be out the door - thrown from the train - whipped to death! We/he now are engaged in a new conflict much of old days now to be reconsidered and finally judged in a due litigation or a re-litigation.
For the record here it seems still that so much of new President Obama’s early pleading to be of us not “re-litigating” the past was actually politically and judicially of injustices that had hardly yet even been litigated once.
If this were Nixon’s era and that Congress we likely already would have impeached Secretary of State Mrs. Clinton and be still about or done as well with one for President Barack H. Obama. So it seems.
Bob Woodward’s complaints of censorship suggestion of the Obama Administration seems petty while I remember feeling the wrath of Bill Clinton from during my days of defeating HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT with my public blogging. I know what it is like to be grateful for having enough friends in law enforcement from moments like two I can not yet forget of the visceral blasts quite destabilizing of hearing President Clinton say like “I want him dead with every bone in my body.”
“An enemy of my enemy, is my friend” comes to mind now as President Barack H. Obama seems now the one person who most benefited from those days of my defeating the Clintons during the primary between Senator Obama and Senator Clinton. For the record I was able to keep the Clintons from sounding much like they were remembered for sounding well and together about their unexpected rise in the early 90s by having the officers of the Bush Administration appropriate to the protection of intellectual property keep the Clintons from further inappropriate and unauthorized use of my own intellectual property.
But this isn’t about the wrath of Bill Clinton and how it was of the unexpected rise to such heights of Hillary’s novice challenger Senator Obama. This is more as if President Barack H. Obama should be wearing a Superhero costume like from THE METEOR MAN. I cannot forget the first time I felt such wrath of Bill Clinton and how I decided I better get up from my seat on Capitol Hill in my apartment near Eastern Market and walk as best I can with the visceral fearful blast and out over to the eatery with take out oriental buffet a few blocks away on Pennsylvania Ave.
This is about whether President Obama has earned any street creds as a member of an “Intelligentsia” or if he is still stumbling and recovering while moving forward without a workable plan. There are problems now about this SEQUESTER that suggest there is no philosophy of governance but just a lot of stubbornness proving to be counterproductive.
I will try to be objective about so much so contradictory in the “governance” of the Administration of Barack Obama. He did embrace the Clinton “two-fer” after I had stoicly stood up to them to keep them from misappropriate further use of my intellectual property of my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM rhyme and reasoning that was leading when penned in days before the Clintons entered 1992 race and then critically again after 9/11 I as I offered it as having been refreshed for another go around to President George W. Bush and his administration.
I have problems with ACA - Obamacare though I accept that our Supreme Court saw a way to pass it as bad Constitutional law as still of a realm of war powers and taxation about general Health concerns. We have that our Governors are all capable of finding alternatives to Obamacare at local or county wide levels and that ACA is an alternative not a necessary system change. As long as we let Obamacare stand we have that we should be wondering how bad our own towns and counties must be such that our Federal Government had to step in and help our neighbors.
As I recall it seems that Senator Obama had some of his greatest break out primary moments against the vast Clinton political machine about the same times I was standing strongest to keep them from using again and misusing again that which was originally mine - originally my most marketable “change” to a new “PC” as of a better balanced political language with unique rhyme and reasoning.
President Barack H. Obama of Columbia and Harvard degrees is maybe in need of a SUPERHERO costume/armor and an actual philosophy of governance that isn’t contrary to our Constitution. His RACE TO THE TOP education messaging is troublesome for he hasn’t yet established a base line like of a “GREEN MINIMALISM” from which a philosophy can be grounded for practicable political effecting. “GREEN MINIMALISM” with a “RACE TO THE TOP” would be the new “PC” to replace “POVERTY” & “POOR” at least — he has suggested that his “TOP” has to be our Presidency, it seems. A green costume could work for President Obama as well, maybe.
President Barack H. Obama seems to have missed a necessary consideration for any fiscal responsibility about his ACA - Obamacare for a philosophy of governance to be workable since it figures simply with mathematical logic that he should not have pushed for such vast left wing healthcare alternative system while a working local caring still available and without first having pushed through the massive immigration reforms and border securing needed. It is figurable that President Obama should not have pushed through ACA until first having succeeded with immigration reforms and as well with jobs & economy reforms to reboot a reformed growth period.
I have intellectual problems with his seeming lack of a workable philosophy of governance, and, how his machinations seem too much to be revolutionary in too contrary to our Constitution ways. But it is as well that as an admitted illegal drug user that he even dare offer his RACE TO THE TOP as a guidance for all children within the United States of America while his days of admitted criminal usage was of tuning out instead of in during his academic years.
I have many many problems with his RACE TO THE TOP messaging as if it is fitting for education motivation while so much of his “governance” machinations have been so much about it being bad to be above any middle. His admitted criminal use of such illegal drugs as he used is most troublesome as of those years of his school days. And, today we have that such as his troubles with “governance” may have roots in his having tuned out when he should have tuned in - tuned in more.
It was HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT troublesome early messaging about using BIG Government Powers to seize all the profits of all the oil companies if and when elected. This would have been to the Clintons being even more polarizing than they stumbled as partly being when of their first term in the early 90s. Clintonomics would have been dead with bi-partisanship by the hands of the Clintons as well or more definitively than they have been otherwise by the governance of President Obama.
To be brief: President Obama needs a philosophy of governance with an established and defined bottom and a top for there to be his #sequester Intelligentsia movement and for there to be an effective RACE TO THE TOP. He is arguing that redistribution is necessary and a new GOOD and that our Federal Government is better to be running all education, it seems. President Obama is now at risk of angering his Intelligentsia base by disarming them with powers too like those a President Clintons was promising to flex if returned for a third term. President Obama now should explain how it could be right to seize profits of all oil companies and yet not seize all the private endowments of his Intelligentsia base and their private institutions of higher education.
To be brief: For the #SEQUESTER to be fair it seems necessary to explain how it wouldn’t be fair to amass all education dollars even if it means seizing those private endowments of the Obama Intelligentsia Base and to the fair and equalizing redistribution of “education” dollars by his national Department of Education.
To be brief and before we decide if it is wise or safe to root for President Obama now: President Obama should need to have a fully thought through and worked out philosophy of governance with established base lines and “top(s)” as if a SUPERHERO garb earned not just adorned for hoots.
President Obama cannot be an island of idealism now with this #SEQUESTER - Right?
President Obama must have details ready for us all and even about a fairness for his base and their private education endowments while he stands up there supposedly truthfully of honesty in advertising as if the general thinking is workable and smart/wise.
To be brief: There really is too much to talk about here about all this just already broached. It is President Obama that is asking us to believe his is #REALINTELLIGENTSIA? Mr. President how can you be right and your base not wrong for so many years before you? Mr. President how can it be fair not to equalize our education institutions if you are to not closing down our national Department of Education, as it could actually be now done as part of a cost savings and stream lining necessary due to your sequester?
Mr. President it does seem you have opened a can of worms that might better have been addressed by closing down at least our/your Department of Education - and at least since you of such a contradictory “above the middle is bad” general guidance and other philosophical and sociological problems with your RACE TO THE TOP spin and messaging.
Mr. President are you at risk while trying to sound as if a #REALINTELLIGENTSIA really quite at risk now of alienating your base?
As we rise with the end of BLACK HISTORY MONTH upon us we have to consider now that it is not racist to be about casual banter about how and why Americans were, however, to have been having had better sex during the Bush/GOP administering.
We have to today deal with real currents of events and ebbs and flows of societal proprieties and maybe not too economically.
There seems to be no little blue pill for President Barack H. Obama in his second term to straighten out his government over-reaching and subjectivized “economic” rendings. A serving of vitual comity not now so comedic with President Obama’s renderings so contrary and rended/set asunder per our p’s and q’s. A time warp to election day 2000 and the air of an old battling between two southern white men can be moderated with a literal consumption of an economic factoid that DC bartenders prefer Republican reigns in our Washington for Republicans are better tippers than Democrats.
But this is more about our here and now and less about the election day of 2000 and how then it was a choice between two southern white men. It is from as reliable a bartender source as one can probably find anywhere that I learned then on such momentous yet “undecided” day of Republicans historically as better tippers. I believe Restauranter James Carville’s chief bartender’s name was Norm - James and Mary co-operated WEST 23RD establishment whence - Norm is he whom is recalled for this “tipping” factoid.
Bill Clinton is also a southern white male. If he wanted you to remember him as otherwise he likely would not have had his Arkansas based Presidential Library design too Freudian as if a BIG GUN as so most half bridges naturally appear and covered it in architectural “skin” in Confederate Gray tones. For the sake of a discussion now about how Americans had better sex during the Bush administration than for the past four years under President Obama it is best to remember the 8 years of the Clintons, and, to remember that you can have it both ways since then it was that rare era of bi-partisanship.
We do need to look at all of President Clinton’s political and economic postures though since you may have picked up bad ways from him while so many were distracted by the unnatural highs of a careless bi-partisanship.
President Clinton is like a third wheel these days and as an ineligible player that just won’t leave the “bedrooms” of politics, and, especially won’t leave the politics of our economy. There is a concern about “Bill” being allowed to hang around and in a patronizing air of improper historicals; Bill Clinton still likes to think he was promoted out of the Office of the President and so that he doesn’t have to think he was at all “defeated.” This is troublesome for Hillary as his Mrs., however, - however engaged improperly in an administration of another man; Hillary Clinton is still by “Bill” as if not as honorable as he as it was he that was forever promoted above her when they were forced to leave the White House by our 22nd Amendment.
The mentioned era of “unnatural highs of a careless bi-partisanship” of at least the second term of the Administration of the Clintons is a troublesome political black hole for economics and social justice streaming now, historically. For the sake of this airing of a topical perusal comparative between the GOP and the Obama Dems it is better we keep the Clintons out of today’s bedroom banter — too many are likely to just lose sleep if we bring the Clintons back, now - ever.
Bill Clinton is not now, however, our Patronizer in Chief — Nor is his Mrs. our former Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton so consecrated and of a consummated holding such that she while married seems never to be out from under “Bill” her “Mr.” at least as long as he continues to interject himself as if he reigns above after having been permanently promoted out of and above America’s office of the President “holding.” It is arguable that President Obama had an illegal Secretary of State and that “Hillary for President” was an Un-Constitutional endeavor undermining to the logic of the 80th Congress and its carrying of our 22 Amendment through to its ratification.
(Nixon was a member of the Eightieth Congress - women and wives by those “standards” were even more subjects of a “set asunder” “holding” trigger writ to render spouses of either sex as an indivisible “two-fer” with our term limit amending to be not just a loophole as with a spousal exception.)
To keep Bill and Hillary now out of our bedrooms of such currents of discourse to proprieties proper and civilly considerated is wise and necessary, much. She as a spouse of a term limited First Couple rightly is arguably of having been barred by the undecided law of our 22nd amendment and even from any posting however an intimate engagement in another man’s administration if such so bedded down into our constituted line of succession.
The eightieth Congress waxed sexual and without being of Posterity for perpetuity in a sex descrimination; the eightieth Congress scribed so such writ and carried it through its ratification to be an enduring bar and not a weak regulatory arbitrary maleable bit piece of lower law; the eightieth Congress construction of our 22nd Amendment as a Term Limit Constitutional bar is remarkably poetic though of undecided license yet as intimately varied to be sensitive to engagements of unions indivisible and vow not to be set asunder in marriage - of marriage vows standard writs. To be otherwise is to have our marriage laws set asunder by other laws and specifically primarily superiorly by the Constituted 22nd Amendment.
Bill Clinton was not promoted out of our office of the President — Mrs. Hillary Clinton is not now nor will she ever be First Lady of the World to an unelected superior, and yet by self-decreeing, President of the World Bill Clinton. There are prudent reflections to peruse about the inseparability of the Clintons and all First Couples, regardless of their sex. Today we are set about to consider at least that most Americans did have better sex before even the first inaugural of President Barack H. Obama — along Partisan lines - not personal particulars.
Bill Clinton is trying to be in the room again and as superior still to his Mrs. Bill Clinton with the arguable economic failures of President Obama, though all the while of his own former “experts” and with his wife quite too complicit, is yet still trying to climb to a workable high ground of an air of superiority that can only mostly now be “patronizing” at least much to President Obama, and, even on this last day of BLACK HISTORY MONTH.
If you have not yet even considered the improper design of the PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY of WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON can you even be prudently considerate enough to broach naval matters more now of a union divided along partisan lines and with it not too patronizing if Republicans were to buy full pages and see published a simple progression that explains how the Democrats while oddly united were to the cause and effects that have brought us so about a new Depression like era of a worked Government biased economic suppression long of this most long recession.
It is a misplaced patronizing by the wants seemingly of President William Jefferson Clinton to ask you to bed now still with a ridiculous belief in him (and Hillary - his Mrs.) that all you/we need now is just to have “Bill” back. As we slide to sequestration it is with President Barack H. Obama conflicted and compromised by both spouses of the Clintons’ “two-fer” - it is that he has been stuck and uninspiring for having dragged out the Clintons as if innocent and free to partronize, however, though these economics as well attest that “IT” can not have been none of the Clintons’ fault.
Is it patronizing at least to President Obama that with a “not sexy” sequestration set upon our otherwise privately workable economics that President Clinton still wants you to believe that you/we just need him back? Is it at least sexist that such seems in the air now and even patronizing to Mrs. Clinton whom is not now nor ever to be an unelected First Lady of the World to self proclaimed President of the World Bill Clinton - that you/we need “Bill” back so much we should see an entire Constitutional Amendment as just a loophole to use “Hillary” (his Mrs.) now to get him back?
And, yes it seems that from that day in 2000 when two southern white men were battling our electoral rhetoricals and historicals LIVE in the present that at least by James’ and Mary’s Norm as chief bartender it became establish factoid that Republicans are preferred in DC by restaurant staffs as better for their personal economics as said thence as “better tippers.”
While handling your new serving of Bob Woodward of “if a President says it is legal” Constitutional echoes it does complement the Confederate Grey “personalized” “architecture of the William Jefferson Clinton southern phalic “BIG GUN” allegoricals historical for not just the Clintons such that his Arkansas based Presidential Library is, quite, that the Clintons are host and hostesses about DC as residers former in Chief at their personally selected private residence for nesting and Posterity on Whitehaven Road.
It does seem that regardless of how effective Bill Clinton may still think his patronizing is we are of a new day dawning tomorrow all #sequestration irregular. It does seem that tomorrow dawns a day for a simple global strategy by Republicans and Bob Woodward types even so if kept to historically basic media of full page buys to publish globally a time line of the cause and effect who, what, where, when, why and how that can explain elementarily that the Democrats did cause these long years of an economic new Depression like long recession by Goverment over-reaching effectively of economic suppression.
Cheers! Happy #sequestration so much as you have a right to manage - have earned a right to have.
The Governors are my mascot. I was publicly educated through the twelfth grade to my graduation from New Haven’s Wilbur Cross High School. We were/are THE GOVERNORS.
What is a WEATHER TERRORIST?
What is too low a standard morally or ethically speaking for a former US Executive to be at without it “charming” while lower than we should expect? When is a former Executive of our United States exposed to personal suits for having been of conduct unbecoming a former officer of our Executive Branch?
What is a TERRORIST?
Whom are our referees for all this that is of an air of our protections secured for JUSTICE more than a willy nilly of our POLITICS? Where are the flags from our referees however where ever they are for LIES unbecoming a former officer of our Executive Branch?
Before I graduated as a GOVERNOR from New Haven’s Wilbur Cross Public High School I already knew of “B.O.” of Hawaii of interests in presidential oratory and as well already knew there was a Sarah Heath of a Bush, Conn & Heath title IX basketball passion in Alaska. I have cousins related to Connecticut’s second Governor after the Great Independence & Revolution & original Constituting. While a high schooler if I was to asking someone to pick up my down winter coat I had to ask them to like grab the “Jerry Brown” coat - for it is I had/have a Gerry brown down winter coat.
By 1971 I had picked a good career path for myself that was much in my mind in 1983 while near to HS graduation. My grandfather Arthur M. Menadier was to mandatory retirement as a top “Mad Man” of his day (show’s era) as the primary account chieftain for the consolidated work for Johnson & Johnson then at Young & Rubicam. In 1971 I asked him to take me under his wing and teach me to become like him - with an agreement of “but without your vice of smoking.”
I am John Peter Hogan as named “John” of the oldest son of my paternal grandfather John W. Hogan Sr. and oldest son of his oldest son - my dad named more for his father as John W. Hogan Jr. Esq. I wanted by 1983 to grow up to be like both of my grandfathers as a merger of their uniquenesses as responsible contributing honorable citizens.
Today is also my dad’s 74th birthday. The “B.O.” of Hawaii I have known since the late seventies of when I was to the middle school school wide East Rock Community School New Haven Public School’s Oratory Contest with President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s DAY OF INFAMY Declaration of War Speech did become known only more recently for having my same birthday of August 4 though I have all along known him to be four years ahead of me.
I did grow up wanting or needing to be ambitious at least because of my family and our neighborhood and its neighbors and legacy. While growing up Richard Hegel was of hosting of Holiday Parties we were invited to and while he was New Haven’s official Historian. It was my old classmate Steve who started dating another old friend who lived across the street from another of BO a “Bo” — Steve Brennen is still a professional artist and now as well a Hamden Fireman, last I knew. Steve Brennen is the old seventh grade pal whom is responsible for he of “Are you ready for the Oratory Contest? and Are you ready as well to compete in any school wide competition with it also in Hawaii?” queriousness with a like Operator for Hawaii broadcast to all whom might want to compete in presidential oratory against me.
I get it is funny that I have known so many characters for so long and while of interests to a career like both of my grandfathers somehow to a touch as an international marketer of the highest ordering. I am not sure though it is funny that if you change two “e”s to two “a”s you get “Hagel” from “Hegel” and “Brennan” from “Brennen.”
It is still relevant that I have know Bill and Hillary since 1971 or 1972 and for them of days as students not yet engaged to each other and both to walking my neighborhood with wondering and querying about whether they both might be able to become President someday. They asked me about such and effectively, to make a long story short and while this is more about Governors today, I like said “NO - if you marry each other be careful who goes first in attempt as the 22nd Amendment should keep you if married to each other from both becoming elected.” I still don’t know how as a near 1st Grader I was to such a comment - but do get that I was wised up enough to realize I should never let myself forget two people who would ask such a question of anyone.
Is Al Gore a WEATHER TERRORIST? Was Hillary Clinton with HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT, from near day one, also effectively acting as if a WEATHER TERRORIST?
As our Diplomacy standing rule is like - THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PERMANENT ENEMIES OR PERMANENT FRIENDS - JUST PERMANENT INTERESTS - Secretary Kerry with “we have now permanent enemies” is maybe more of the “rule” than a practicable reality.
The Clintons were wrong not to proceed against Saddam Hussein in their first term to a full compliance with all United Nations sanctions. We have that President Bush was wise not to proceed immediately into Baghdad with THE PERSIAN GULF WAR as until the United States of America started saving its own cities like New York City and its Time Square and as well Las Vegas Saddam Hussein had a way to win. Saddam Hussein had enough cards up his sleeve to turn the world to his side if we had proceeded immediately at him and Baghdad and with sympathetic marketing to ask peoples of his region and the broader world about whether he wasn’t able to better manage Baghdad than Americans were able to manage their own big cities.
Within the first term of the Clintons we were ready to stand up our cities as at least as well run as his and able to defeat his PR advantage and then move at him for a WWII like post world war RECONSTRUCTION with trials like Nuremberg’s but then for him. In hindsight we can see many troublesome “official” acts by the Clintons different from this and contributive to so many problems that we have had since that were otherwise able to have been checked and addressed better sooner.
John Kerry, Secretary of State, was smart to remark about how well Japan and Germany are after we defeated their earlier constitutednesses and then worked post world war RECONSTRUCTIONS about. It is remarkable though that his location was a slap at the Clintons of them more like William Blygh or Bov. George Clinton as well as his mention of RECONSTRUCTION good will of at least the Japanese and Germans as proven to not be “permanent enemies.” Such begets the late query as to how or why the Clintons didn’t prosecute Saddam Hussein for war crimes in a timely manor nor proceed ASAP to a POST WWWIII RECONSTRUCTION for Iraq once we had started our COMMUNITY POLICING & LIVEABLE CITIES INITIATIVES.
We have our Governors may now want and get their own drones. We have that President Obama’s foreign policies with Secretary Clinton are suspect and with Mrs. Clinton of acceptance of a “culpability” for her intelligence and leadership failures as per the BENGHAZI FOUR and our 9/11 II.
If they cannot explain whom is a terrorist as per BENGHAZI acts of war on like a Holy Day for Al Qaeda how can they or we be sure they know a “terrorist” when tasking a “kill” off their “Kill List” by drone(s)?
If we cannot be clear yet about what a “TERRORIST” is or isn’t still - is it because a defiinition of such will tag both Al Gore and former candidate for President Hillary Clinton of then HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT while Senator Clinton as well as ‘TERRORIST” - but more as WEATHER TERRORISTS?
What is a TERRORIST?
What is a WEATHER TERRORIST?
What is “MATERIAL SUPPORT OF TERRORISTS” and how isn’t Bill Clinton’s CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE while so modeled for “support” like Al Qaeda’s purported “banking system” maybe incidentally or accidentally to casual or real “material support of terrorists”?
Who are our referees? Where are our referees? Where are the flags for conduct unbecoming a former Executive Branch Officer of The United States of America? Where are the penalty flags for all the LIES?
Did I tell you already that today is also my dad’s birthday?
Brennen is a friend - he married the Geller friend once a co-tri Governors swim-team captain with myself and another swimmer David. This female Geller and other swimmer David were the basis for my musing FRIENDS show into existence as bulwark for friends and a guards against foes. Bo was and is likely still big into pick-up urban B-ball games though a Professor of Marketing now - as I recall.
Yes we needed to start fixing New York City, Time Square and some Las Vegas before we proceeded to a prosecution of Saddam Hussein and an attempt to run his Baghdad. Yes we could have and should have moved to a full enforcement of all United Nations sanctions on Iraq within the Administration of the Clintons’ first term and to a RECONSTRUCTION like that for Japan and Germany after the earlier last world war.
Secretary Kerry as opened up a can of political worms now with such as in his inaugural speech and with it from the University of Virginia.
What is “material support of terrorists”?
What is a WEATHER TERRORIST?
What is a TERRORIST?
How much has it cost us since the Clintons acted official with an infidelity to our own Justice standards abroad for their eight years as regards Iraq and Saddam Hussein? How can it be right to have these years be to helping Afghani women and girls and not right for President Bush to have tried to help Iraqi women and girls? How wrong was it for the Clintons’s official “State” speak to have been religiously bases with a bias against Shia peoples and especially the Shia majority of Iraq oppressed and suppressed by Saddam Hussein and as official speech of “Iraqi Shia are not capable of governing themselves”?
Are we ready for a book BILL AND HILLARY - TERRORISTS OR PEACEMAKERS?
Their foreign policy now also in hindsight is horrendous for a religious basis with sectarian bias contrary to our own established Justice and rights. It is scary that we let them sell PEACE and PEACE DIVIDENDS while such morally questionable with Middle East region realities quite different.
It seems we have that Bill Clinton was at least an AMERICAN INFIDEL to our own Justice standards - and that too many are at risk of a guilt by association now as he thinks we and others have permanently forgotten.
Call me J.P. Hogan!
I did not just give my first inaugural address as a new Secretary of State today. I do not think that I am an Imperialist.
We can all be empirical forwards and backwards now comparatively on some whales of issues paddled by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton versus those now postured for a new rowing by John Kerry - Secretary of State.
We have an obligation as Americans and/or global citizens to figure out what are the important questions that need to be asked if we are to try to get the answers that are not just random talking points.
If you are not yet away of how a new journey has already started today and how from the inland historical helm of considerations of and by Thomas Jefferson - you can accept as a known fact that John Kerry gave his first speech as President Barack H. Obama’s new Secretary of State from the University of Virginia today.
He as an inheritor of the questionable years of his predecessor’s over-reaching is now of an inaugural addressing of a Jeffersonian quality not measured just by a sextant’s metrics — President Obama’s new Secretary of State (#SecKerry) broached issues quite modern and old and foggy still while Obama’s.
I do not take him to be a maddening Captain William Blygh of a Bounty helmsmanship nor a mad whale hunter for a great white ways. Sec Clinton could have been as by William Jefferson Clinton otherwise still much the same but how as Mrs. Hillary Rodham Blythe III - as William Blythe III is President Clinton’s original Christian name. The HMS Bounty however fated to a mutiny as it was did set sail historically so before the embers of our Tea Party styled independence started struggle burned out to an effected Independence of once mere colonies.
I like Thomas Jefferson for many reasons - I as J.P. Hogan one not an imperialist to the best of his knowledge. He was inventive besides being an erudite and practical scribe of writs that could endure in a Posterity. He did as I recall invent a coat hanger and as well a way for French double doors to simultaneously open with a push on just one of them for his Monticello manse. Thomas Jefferson as well that I remember is credited for the architectural credit about having brought sky lights to America.
But did Secretary of State John Kerry with his inaugural address bury Caesar or praise him with “Hillary” a “Caesar” put to fade away? What are the whales of the issues in his inheritance from her that will most unsettle his own crews, and, while however once hers?
I am on board some with #SecKerry as I couldn’t be with President Obama’s 1st Secretary of State for she arguably too imperialist at least while of her crusading days as FLOTUS Clinton of her global dictates and trespassing on women’s rights. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as she could have been Senator Hillary Rodham Blythe III otherwise, maybe, did bring too much baggage with her to our ship of State.
Call me maybe “the narrator”?
There is a whale of an elephant still about the china shop of Diplomacy of State as long as the Clintons’ Global Initiative is still operational as if a shadow government or at least a shadow Department of State. I am not sure if Mrs. Clinton is yet allowed to start lobbying for their CGI for at least a year or if she will immediately put on airs as if the First Lady of the Clintons’ Global Initiative.
I may not be ready to narrate on all of this empirically enough yet - call be a “blogger” for now, maybe?
Did you hear about #SecClintons “JOBS DIPLOMACY” yet? Mustn’t #SecKerry disband this merry mutinous over-reaching immediately if his helmsmanship didn’t first commence effectively already so?
John Kerry, Secretary of State, the newly “foggy” as of Tea Party common sense sympathies old and now new, has inherited a bunch of new blubber energy snags and turbulence. I as a “narrator” or just a “blogger” appreciate his freshness as believable, unlike his predecessor, with his ordering and posits of his State of he as no longer “political.” Legends will be made on all the ways that the Clintons fogged up our State and Diplomacy spousally in ways that “not in politics” effectively sounded no more believable that “it depends what the definition of is is.”
I cannot myself abide that there was not a running conflict of interest with Mrs. Clinton as Secretary of State while her Husband as if “President of the World” and reigning still “executively” with their CGI.
Today’s inaugural address from the University of Virginia by John Kerry, Secretary of State wafts over those already exposed as a breath of fresh air yet not explainable as part of a continuous philosophy of governance by President Barack H. Obama. There is a whale of an elephant in the china shop of our State — Has President Obama been liberated by John Kerry and from a tyranny of and by the Clintons and such that now he is free to be his better self?
Did the Clintons have President Barack H. Obama essentially chained to them and their global plots set too much in motion too imperialistically too long ago?
How can President Obama’s NEW #State Top Diplomat now seem so different and already so much more intelligent?
It is now that you can nearly call President Obama’s new Top Diplomat a Tea Partier or a great Jeffersonian sympathizer, and, while the Clintons together seems set adrift to fade away as too autocratic and of too great over-reaching extra-Constitutional plotting and scheming as if they were HMS keeled and “majesties” in their own minds. So much of the era of William Blygh and his HMS Bounty with sympathies more akin to George Clinton then about as in opposition to the ideas of America as the Governor of New York.
But of the whale of the elephant as if in a china shop about our foreign services left over of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clintons bureaucratic and imperialistic over-reaching such as her JOBS DIPLOMACY empirically heels:
Was #SecClinton mutinous for all of her four years as President Barack H. Obama’s Top Diplomat? Was her JOBS DIPLOMACY bad economics and not of the spirit of our Constitution - at least as figured by Thomas Jefferson?
You can call me stirred and shaken by her and her JOBS DIPLOMACY and yet consider me less informed than I do desire as we all seem too much of random talking points while back room plots were being hatched and maybe after a special spousal setting keeled by and of the “two-fer” of Clintons as whence thence our reigning First Couple.
I do answer to “J. P. Hogan” and am most easily Googleable so. But now what of the over-reaching of “Hillary’s” JOBS DIPLOMACY of it empirically it seems of an attempt to usurp legacy global powers of two other cabinet level departments?
Secretary Kerry can you assure me that you will not continue the imperialistic scheming to bring Commerce and Treasury legacy global yet separated Powers under the “Diplomatic” seat of duty and obedience as however you now find it with as the inheritor of dangerous over-reaching ambitions long of the Clintons’ politics to a new dawn of Powers for them if they could just effect a “Post-Constitutional Era” acceptance as a “new necessary” way?
I will have to bed down tonight believing that John Kerry has liberated President Obama from the shackles of the Clintons politics and decades of plotting as a “two-fer” never not “Political.” I know not what else there is to believe tonight after Secretary John Kerry spoke intelligently and eruditely as if of Tea Party sympathies old and new.
As a blogger I gander empirically a sense about much of this as if a sea change about President Obama.
I am more an observer seeing them prepare anew to cast off to foreign ports of call Diplomatically, however. But as per “Hillary’s” JOBS DIPLOMACY danger lurks deep beneath our keel of State — while it of a too imperialistic heeling and not yet already or soon righted or arrested.
We know “Hillary” wanted the BIG job in the BIG house — and that it figures it would be as logical to close down our Department of Education as to let a Secretary of State be about usurping however enumerated Powers of Commerce and Treasury while of wants hungover to the REAL power of the BIG house.
He is now at the helm of State - he is now the captain of our Diplomacy - he is John Kerry, Secretary of State.
A new day has dawned! - but? - and, yet: Does President Barack H. Obama have a philosophy of governance?
We have that “capitalism” and “socialism” were top keywords for 2012, and, now with 2013 due a grand diligence about “cost consciousness” at least.
We can conclude later that President Obama has corned himself politically with a gridlock of and from his own absolutes.
To be brief, and yet poignant, while a hashable audience is e-assembled, for social media networking, and physically organized gathered as a #smw ecosystem:
We have that these days of President Obama as re-elected with a mandate for austerity and gridlock have us stuck much because of some of these works of the Administration of the Clintons:
If he were to trying to actually sell and effect a new growth economy wouldn’t he necessarily be about a different politics?
It figures that President Obama now owns the down economy and that enough may now be realizing that the Democrats actually did far more to cause the economic downturn than even President Bush’s tax cuts.
Many can easily fathom how to twain a marking of blame upon the Clintons for their eight years after they get over the first condemned bridge about the Clintons’ SURPLUSES as of a trillion in cuts that neither our Government nor our economy needed.
It is hard to avoid speaking of dangers from political ABSOLUTES now for there is so much that relates almost solely economically and politically just to the workings of the Administration of the Clintons. Obama has cornered himself with his ABSOLUTE “It is all Bush’s fault!” Or, the Clintons trapped newly elected President Obama with an insistance that he should go again with “WE’RE RIGHT - THEY’RE WRONG” absolutism.
President William Jefferson Clinton knew enough to be aware that he shouldn’t have proceeded with a SURPLUS while he pursued his risky loan housing bubble economic plans as an unfunded Federal social program. Those two political items should not ever be able to work together or well co-exist.
The Clintons messed up our economics by rigging succession schemes for Hillary to be set up to be asap elected to return them to our Executive seat of “holding of office” of our Office of the President. There are historical moments to consider as our economy is stuck with a jobless recovery much still that precisely rest about the workings of the Administration of the Clintons.
The Clintons’ SURPLUSES could go down as the greatest economic and/or political blunder of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA of at least the past century. We had no economic or governmental need for that cutting of an additional trillion in cuts past the trillion the GOP found to cut (too quickly) to balance our Federal budget.
The SURPLUSES linger in these down economic times of us much still in the “ditch” yet hardly as critically as they should. To understand the SURPLUSES it helps to consider the scheming to successionary Power by the Clintons to as much as possible set Hillary up to asap return them to such seat of Powers for the both of them again. It is critical that you do not accept or believe the innocent portrayal of Hillary Clinton as in the book or movie GAME CHANGE for she and Bill were of dating compatibility while at Yale Law School because they both wanted to be elected President. She did not only after becoming “Senator Hillary Clinton” get to thinking she might want to be President herself and as from people having suggested the idea firstly to her.
The Clintons’s SURPLUSES now sit in a lacking safety about a media and politics too hesitant to consider them as contrary and conflicting to the very New Deal spending ideology of President Obama. It seems as if there are two absolutes that do not and cannot fit together now still to propped up and marketed as if somehow they are actually compatible. The Clintons stood up an unnecessary cutting of an additional trillion while there was no economic need for a surplus, &, President Obama stands up suggesting so much they said we didn’t need to spend even a trillion on is now actually necessary spending.
There are many condemned levies and roads and bridges and even schools that the Clintons took away available Federal dollars from. In the case of Katrina and the failure of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MR GO) their surpluses fit with the courts finding of “gross negligence” upon our Federal Government to a date back to 1983 most negligently morally speaking on the legacy of the Administration of the Clintons for them of cutting money by a trillion for a political popularity from a SURPLUS thought most impossible and while it was not necessary economically nor for governance purposes.
We have it nearly as a truth self evident after past the first condemned bridge left to collapse by the Clintons’ SURPLUSES that it cannot have been as ABSOLUTE as President Obama decried with “IT IS ALL BUSH’S FAULT!”
The greatest economic threat if not just the most dangerous moral threat is that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES were only “necessary” politically to save a queen like plotted and schemed succession workings towards a President Hillary Clinton. The Clintons needed to politically save themselves and their vast plotting too near to a reach at global autocratic power after the GOP proved that they could find a trillion in cuts to safely balance our Federal budget. The Clintons would not have been able to sell anyone on more years for either of them then for their second term if they couldn’t prove that they too could find a thought impossible trillion to also cut.
Hillary Clinton much deserves the rapped tag as the “TRILLION DOLLA’ SURPLUS’D QUEEN” in poem FUZZY MATH available at http://jphogan.org and where originally streamed and published via http://citizenrosebud.us.
President Clinton and Senate Banking chieftain Dodd are oddly remembered for having asked a small gaggle of banking heads to find a way to “gamble away” the known and/or expected risks inherent in Bill Clinton’s desire to be most popular by coyly burning our economic candle from both ends at once. You can call it “a ditch” or that “it burned out” as expected - seemingly.
It is absolutely not now funny that President Obama’s Obamacare ACA was fronted as not meant to cover illegal immigrants while now of he of an immigration proposal that would have them all by their conservative estimate of 12 million to be fully covered it seems as citizens by about the time his Obamacare however costs otherwise is to then be in effect on the promises and predictions about it as affordable without these 12 million covered as well.
Only the Clintons needed the Clintons’ SURPLUSES of them also to a finding of a thought impossible trillion in cuts. Without matching the GOP efforts of the balancing of our budget their scheming and effecting to line Hillary up would have been bust.
The Clintons’ SURPLUSES did take away the pipeline of Federal Government spending that needed the 4-7 year headstart to have kept enough employment in our economy for the risky lending housing bubble as run yet as their unfunded Federal social program. The timing of such is nearly enough self evident now though hardly the political absolute it should rank with while incidentally chronological to a set up for economic collapse about 2006 or 2007. It is that to have seen the housing not collapse the “shovel ready” jobs had to not have been cut by the Clintons’s SURPLUSES during their second term so that they would have been already processed and in the works with all necessary permitting for the “economics” then needed after the Clintonomics of stirring a hyper-consumerism ran the length of its short wick.
It is that President Obama is the President now maybe most trapped by ABSOLUTES of his own orations. But that said it is absolutely a real concern that the Clintons were offered political protection like of a “WE’RE RIGHT - THEY’RE WRONG” polarizing political partisanship then quite only able to lead to gridlock. But with these shared it is important to really consider how absolutely correct I am in sharing that the Clintons were the only ones that needed the SURPLUSES and politically to save a succession scheming to line Hillary up for an inevitable anointing more as if a “queen.”
We have all long been paying too high a price for the SUPLUSES of the Clintons. And it is absolutely contradictory that the Clintons can be economically right for so much cutting, and that President Obama can be so right for wanting to spend so much once cut as unnecessary as if it is still necessary.
The Clintons’ SURPLUSES do deserve to go down in history as one of our greatest national economic blunders of the past century. President Clinton did know enough to know he shouldn’t have pursued surpluses and his risky lending programs with his Clintonomics of a pimped out hyper-consumerism — but resisting temptations (political) is historically of record a characteristic not as of a “strong suit.”
A while ago while being a partisan political operator against his promises to operate his CGI as non-partisan and non-political he in an interview with Maria Bartiromo proffered an “expertise” about economies needing time to recover science that by his own words and phraseology if actually an “expert” and if such affirms he was an expert while President did condemn himself as knowingly have been of doing what he knew he economically shouldn’t have done while President.
Beyond this we are of a 2013 as much needing a pop trending for key word relevance about “capitalism” and “socialism” still. We though need to find a way to break down the ABSOLUTES of and by President Obama to get to the realistic realm of “cost consciousness” needed as we also need to really discuss tax reforms.
It is inescapable that Bill Clinton is at heart the very politician that gave the filibuster like Democratic Party Convention Speech for the nomination of Governor Michael Dukakis. 1988 was a different time for Americans of the United States of America still in the longest of warring such as our Cold War. Governor Clinton of Arkansas in 1988 in Atlanta, Georgia, droned on and on, and on, by many reports.
By 1991 we were in a new global state of affairs heralded as a NEW WORLD ORDER. Many may have been dreading seeing Governor Clinton return to any national dais for another oration. There is a long story to tell that now fits with a Democrat Party in need of branding help. Today’s order as per intra-party Democrat worlds has a is segmented to a split about three identities; Today there are different biases about the brand as of a trichotomy between Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - Barack Hussein Obama Dems.
Some are grateful much more than others that Vice President George H. W. Bush was elected in 1988 and that Governor Michael Dukakis was not. As many may be grateful some about a retrospective that Governor Clinton may have cost Governor Dukakis the election with his convention speech still reported as of an air of a “Will it ever end?”
Students of the politics of the United States of America can hardly be to erudite posits and papers today in these times without having an understanding of the years 1988-1993. To some it was just the years that the U.S.A. became the sole superpower in the world, and, to others it was the years of a concern that a third world war would break out and be the foretold end - the end of the world as by fire.
Of at least an intra-party Democrat world set about with a dichotomy just between Bill Clinton Dems & Hillary Clinton Dems we have that the First Couple Clintons did leave after their eight years without having left, so it seems, any alternative plan for “bite” as per Saddam Hussein. We still have a vacuum about our political logic quite dangerously of roll outs of new policies and defense spending concerns endemic to the Administration of the Clintons and how they left President George W. Bush no entrance and/or exit strategy for Iraq and the considerable dust ups about a prosecution due for Saddam Hussein.
There is much hubris about so much over too many of these many years since Governor Clinton showed his true self with the nominating speech for Governor Dukakis that is of reports of some fearing it might never end, like. From this we have that students of American history of the politics of the United States of America have a dichotomy to consider and scrutinize too much just within that which is just singularly of the known history of Bill Clinton.
Iraq and Iran, logically speaking, now would likely be engaged in a mini cold war of their own with non U.S. global support of quite a different “new world order” than President George H. W. Bush managed us towards. Without the PERSIAN GULF WAR of President George H. W. Bush and OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM of President George W. Bush it is logical and supportable by known global sympathies that Saddam if still in power would now be in a cold war nuclear power and nuclear weapon race with Iran. It helps to understand the years between 1988 & 1993 and how so then about a major adjustment for the world to a NEW WORLD ORDER with the U.S.A. emerged from such long dust up with the U.S.S.R. as a sole global super power.
About so much of this is still that Hillary Clinton Dems of the above concerning trichotomy and or dichotomy is that which did the most flip flopping. She is also the Clinton, and Democrat, most culpable and mashable around a hashable #Iraq for she voted for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM, logically, as one that as Mrs. Clinton the former FLOTUS of the most recent prior administration was of intimate enough “intelligence” to have known if “WMD” was or was not a lie. She is remembered for being of reports that she was so confident with “WMD” intelligence as former FLOTUS, it seems, that she didn’t even take it upon herself to read the provided “NEW” intelligence estimates.
In light of the recent vast democratic reset that happened when the U.S.A became the victor of the longest of wars - of the COLD WAR - and became in the years 1988 -1993 effectively the only super power it is quite relevant and concerning that logic can help us be to better understandings of our here and now if we dig into the old dust ups of a couple decades ago. Afghanistan can be said to have been the GETTYSBURG of the COLD WAR - the “turning point.”
In the mashable of our current problema challenging any now “Democrat” as of an “Intelligentsia” we have that we should consider that “WMD” may have been a genius stroke however a “LIE” for still we have that any entrance or exit about Iraq for a prosecution of Saddam Hussein and/or “bite” for United Nations’ sanctions was best to be booted as somehow definitively not of the U.S.A. or Coalition as to a HOLY WAR footing.
Hillary Clinton Dems are now quite past a reasonable deadline for proffering posits positively purposeful politically per prudent possible and probable prosecution of her past sworn officialdoms. It is logical that Hillary Clinton has been making the same mistakes over and over since she first flip flopped about OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM. When one accepts “Bush lied” it logically becomes both Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton whom appear to look worse - worser even that President George W. Bush.
There is a dichotomy taggable as of a Bill Clinton’s Dems and Hillary Clinton’s Dems even from their Administration as the first stirrings of a dust up in Afghanistan had one more a dove and the other more hawkish. Together they abandoned Afghanistan for their eight years and such that once was manageable as of a too early exit by the United States of American became years of insult added to injury, like, such that now we may be there and for so long because they wanted to sell PEACE before its time and be coyly of an inaction and avoidance in Afghanistan and Iraq so that they could justify, somehow, PEACE DIVIDENDS during known unsettled times.
Yes there is a dichotomy at least just in Bill Clinton that is now still very relevant for it is not logical that he was himself truly while of his 1988 Democrat Party Convention speechifying and that he had been naturally as himself while of much of the exposure since their late entry into the 1992 Presidential race.
OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM would better to have been of ACTION by the Clintons in the first term of the Administration of the Clintons’ “two-fer” and then as well somehow clearly and definitively as of a “war” like posture not footed or booted as confusable as a HOLY WAR.
Saddam Hussein was like a father or godfather figure about Al Qaeda. How much this was strategic and purposefully politicked by Saddam Hussein to a consideration that he would be able to keep Kuwait despite the U.S.A. of treaties because Americans wouldn’t risk stirring up radicals known to be of geopolitical sensitivity and pride - like Al Qaeda. We have that we are still deciding politics with still too little consideration about how our 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT is flawed for having looked back only ten years at Al Qaeda all the while it was nearer 12 years old and formed specifically to be a response/reaction to politics and warring by Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein may have well like rocked the cradles of Al Qaeda against the United States of America towards gains like of his efforts in seizing Kuwait.
And today there is at least about Iraq and OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM an intra-party trichotomy among Democrats as of either Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - President Barack Hussein Obama Dems. These three still have different histories related to so much of what is now too effecting to our politics and these years of gridlock.
Logically there wouldn’t have been a 9/11 I or 9/11 II if Saddam Hussein hadn’t invaded Kuwait. Logically it seems 9/11 may have been kept like as a HOLY DAY for Jihadists of Al Qaeda 2001 sense of justice and so if as well an attack by them to being only then interpretable of an “intelligence” of a motive nearly identical to 9/11 I. There is more in just the broached “dichotomy” concern about Bill Clinton that relates to some of his earliest moral short comings of his first steps in the Middle East of his first year of his first term; it is actually mashable and logical that Al Qaeda attacked us on both 9/11 days as acts of war in a HOLY WAR or Jihad for a sense of justice related still to Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait.
And today there is still a concern about “LIES” of “WMD” and yet hardly enough discussion as to the religious and geopolitics variables that were better worked around to assure that any due prosecution of Saddam Hussein wouldn’t and couldn’t be seen as of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA of a wagging of HOLY WAR.
Again, there is a dichotomy just about Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton for their years of the Administration of the Clintons as per Afghanistan and Iraq. Again, most reports still are of us as having had power shift from the Clintons to President George W. Bush without there having been a plan of the Clintons’ eight years left for entering and exiting Iraq.
It seems that “BITE” for United Nations’ sanctions on Saddam Hussein, as an issue, as our history, does divide the house of Clintons still.
And, still we had the clock running. We were some to a new way of “liberation” for the United States of America, as of a new world order, and expectation to “police’” as a sole super power, as it became an expected way for Americans that had risks of the U.S.A. becoming punk’d by other nations to such while to such. We the People of the United States of America were uniquely fortified to a new way to “liberation” of other peoples where we had been compromised/engaged before much some just because we had (still had) an all volunteer force.
And now though with two acts of war by Al Qaeda on 9/11s are we to measure and consider the current intra-party trichotomy existant about a logical and historical divide between the politics of Bill Clinton Dems - Hillary Clinton Dems - President Barack Hussein Obama Dems?
And, again: It is remarkable that as the discussion goes from “Bush lied” to an acceptance that “Bush lied” it is the Clintons however similar and intimate and different are two that each are to politically looking worse that President George W. Bush!
So: Did we get attacked on both 9/11 because Bill Clinton failed to sufficiently prosecute Saddam Hussein per the sense of justice reasoning of Al Qaeda? Was the second act of war on such that may have been kept as a terrorist HOLY DAY then for Bill Clinton returned and not penitent so when again in a Democrat Party Convention - when at Charlotte as the charlatan yet of a history of having been of an Administration of the Clintons now proven to have been too much of an avoidance and inaction as per Afghanistan and Iraq?
We can accept that it is logical that Saddam Hussein fathered Al Qaeda by his violation of Kuwait - Right?
Can we be better off a year from now than we are presently after 2013 rap up of 2012 playing under President Barack H. Obama? How is it more likely that the JETS will carry NEW YORK and all the JETS fans all the way to SUPER BOWL XLVIII?
The JETS have as much to tackle as an organization as President Obama claims he should but at a national level. The JETS while of, as a team, most of the same issues in Obama’s colors will have to find local and real solutions. They cannot expect to have a cloud nine political top down national solution disrespective of sport competition and fairness that could last a whole game let alone an entire season.
For the JETS to be America’s TEAM in 2014 as victors of a season of putting it all on the field as an organization capped with a SUPER BOWL XLVIII top rings they will have to be the GREENEST of GREEN MACHINES and yet as of a way of a new federalism of practicable community based workabilities.
I think it is not too early to write off the GIANTS as possible 2014 SUPER BOWL XLVIII participants or victors. A home team advantage for them seems written as if as poorly figured as the nationalization of so much about even just MET LIFE by President Obama. If their is to be a GIANT rush and standing with for contests of 2013 it seems that towards 2014 the JETS have the mantle in GREEN MACHINE to be jolly and nutritious GREEN GIANTS OF MET LIFE.
It seems President Obama is fixated against the likes of the GIANTS as too much evil “giants” of “healthcare” evil corporate non-people monoliths in a rude and callous capitalism. The President, if not impeached by late 2013, should find the JETS as irresistible even though as a team and organization in sport they have to find local solutions in lieu of national solutions and be of doing the compassionate and hard work - personally to a person - as corporate and involved organizational persons.
It seems the JETS have an opportunity to win with and without the President as a fan. The JETS have to walk and play almost all of his key issues - especially immigration as long as quarter’d as of Sanchez back’d. The JETS cannot escape playing to the sympathies around healthcare insurance and healthcare costs reform by its home field advantage and its team ownership with “Woody” Johnson. And, again they already have the sport mantle to walk and play as THE GREEN MACHINE.
This doesn’t bode well for President Barack H. Obama even one day after his 2013 State of the Union speech. New Yorkers are going to want at least one of their teams in the SUPER BOWL they will be hosting. President Obama will be on the edge of sport and local spirit of our competition model about community organizing and community togetherness at least. It is arguable that President Obama’s “new nationalism” centralizing attempts are not sporting and/or fair.
These are the days that before he strutted to a class warfare he at least should have strapped in about a tackling of the new paradigms of wealth and income fairness of these days. These days are different from so many of the days he matured and developed in non US territories informatively to “Barack”. These days before there should be a class warfare we have the black on black to compare just to the old white on white unfairness.
Footballers are a good place to start. New York Footballers are hardly different in these aspects than any others that have been as successful personally across our National Football League. Many of each of every team are now of a conundrum about the class warfare of President Obama “The Nationalizer” in a black on black “distribution” or “redistribution” social justice “fairness” conundrum; before our President move to outright “class warfare” inequality politics he should have first established the differences now between even just old white on whites disparities and the current black rich athletes and entertainers chasm of social injustice related to just blacks of low classes.
With JETS of a SANCHEZ as QB they have to play sensitive to immigration issues where ever and however. I am not sure this can help the JETS - at least during this new administrating by President Obama. We know that former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as long harbored interests and ambitions to being the Commissioner of the sport. Today she is out on the field of United States contests as per immigration as of news of joining a new team ready to be towards tackling the tough issues involved.
GREEN MACHINES are here to stay. THE GREEN MACHINE at least as a New York team should by the 2013 start of season for the National Football League should have a community about it of its tri-state area as “green” as any other - and maybe quite to a “best in green” GREENEST. Much of this will depend on how the peoples of all the classes President Barack H. Obama as set off to being in a national class warfare see a way to find local and state based solutions that allow them to keep and hold a “community” spirit and fandom specially specifically.
There are old days of inequality in New York City like those of the days of Boss Tweed and Tammany Hall politics. But for the GIANTS and the GREEN GIANTS of the JETS - THE GREEN MACHINE - New Yorkers seem inoculated about such as it seems such is now the new nationalistic ways of the Administration of President Barack H. Obama.
But are there to be by the start of the 2013 season of the National Football League any “individual” recognition that isn’t but for a “RACE TO THE TOP” jack booted marching to a NEW NATIONALISTS assimilation? By the start of the next season will community organizing be out at least as per the “competition” and “sport” lessons long fundamental to the development of new soldiers in peace, anywhere?
How will all the teams be trying to balance this towards such? How will all the trading to GREEN - to GREENEST - possibly now proceed? Will every team now want a SANCHEZ of their own? Will every team organization now try to find a way to sell itself as however of backing by evil corporate non-people monoliths Insurance Corps as a “good” - “GREATNESS” - contrary to slights and trash talk of the Administration of President Barack H. Obama?
It has just been like a political amateur hour seeing these plays attempted to a CLASS WARFARE before all Americans were at least asked to consider these still new days of there being enough/so many very rich black Americans the if and how the problems just of lower class blacks is now because their kind having now “made it” aren’t themselves giving back - giving back enough at least by the President’s fairness fuzzy math.
And to help the JETS maybe more than President Obama, again, it seems that our upper class smart people who did their homework whether to stadium specialized trade labor skill and traditions or to the more that of paper pushing as needed for architects, will all be able at least around the JETS and its TRI-STATE area be celebrants in a GOOD of the JETS as a GREAT GREEN MACHINE by fall as now even jets are iconic in a new greenness to carry all to a greater more eco future.
It doesn’t reside only among our most learned that President George W. Bush while with “Commissioner” aspirant Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (still some a CLEVELAND BROWNS fan) had to have been a practicably “GREEN” President. It is like “street” for all that Dems couldn’t have “changed” so much in just a year or two unless the administration before it had been strong and steady funders and supporters to such themselves.
But what about SANCHEZ? Will every team with a national bi-partisan move to reset our immigration policies be now necessarily looking for their own “SANCHEZ”?
We have to accept that POTUS to SOTU as specifically #SOTU2013 is limited to fashioned stylings for now or this fall again pointedly so quite as if whether he will or will not wear a flag lapel pin this Tuesday to #Congress in appropriate dress.
I do not want to have to read THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO to be able to understand how foreign or domestically born the expectant vacuum of political anticipation filling, with as if “intelligent” and “considerate” oration, POTUS’ SOTU will covertly or overtly wax on spectacularly, however.
I do not remember how much of THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO I did read when decades ago I read just that much.
America and Americans are now in grave danger from having listened at least to Paul Krugman too much.
There are presumptions postured as if of a Posterity posit in a possible while presently pressed and presided by POTUS practicably proven politically polarizing as too partisan for of limited or minimal pragmatism.
America and Americans are still in a grave economic political POTUS’D rendered Government New Nationalism too much of the experienced excessive centralizing less “economic” than “social planning.”
We may be better to hope that Russia has a twelve step program to beat addictions to old Soviet styled communism and that we can get our POTUS treated - and that we still have time to see that our POTUS gets the treatment our economy really seems to need. It seems we are wiser now to listen to Russia’s V. Putin than to President Barack H. Obama’s Karl Marx. The Russians may have been right at least in that six separate regional smaller unions is something modern America could fall apart into.
We have that it would have been simply better if President Barack H. Obama came into his first term more like the Chinese economists thinking for China as of a move to capitalism from socialism and not as he POTUS did with attempts to paddle up stream all tweedy professorial as a political dandy to socialism from capitalism.
The easiest way to explain how and why the Democrats of Obama’s and Clintons’ iron grip have been unable to restore us to a vibrant new growth economy may be to start with how they brought back a centralized political policing bunker mentality even though it was a more convenient for our People era of decentralizing that is the milk or honey of what remains of popularity for or of the Clintons for our 1990s.
We have that their droning as it undermines our foundations nationally of a system of laws above governance by man is illustrative of an endemic problem with them about a “management” skill for growth economics. We have that we can talk comparatively of a Chicago grandmother figure of say one of such cities worst neighborhoods that just won’t move because it has been her home since before it was so troubled. We have that by the “kill list” politics of Obama’s like new manifest destiny foreign policy by remote hands off joy-sticking is so questionable and worrisome that it is as if “collateral damage” for “hot zones” would even have such a Chicago “Grandmother” figure GUILT BY ASSOCIATION by a proximity in location and as if such doesn’t need to be a consideration of humanity or souls at risk.
It seems it is reasonable to suggest that we all economically and socially even could now be better off in 2013 if President Barack H. Obama had listened to and or emulated or imitated the Chinese and Russian leaders of his day more than as he did, as it seems, just the dead Karl Marx.
With anticipation building to #SOTU2013 and how such tweedy professorial Presidential dandy may yet fill an expectant vacuous political new hour we are all maybe best to being to constructs of mental and emotional breastworks of an immunity to and from a new oration of impracticable idealism.
The first step may be best to remember and better realize that the supposedly “bad” Bush Tax Cuts were actually then fair and just as justified by the Clintons and their unnecessary SURPLUSES. As long as Bush wasn’t allowed to put back in the necessary spending the Clintons cut while signing off on the prudent trillion of cuts to balanced proffered by the Republicans or that of the extra trillion Dems found rashly there was nothing then that was needing higher taxing than that of the Bush Tax Cuts.
Right before there should be a second step each should realize that the crass Clintons’ SUPRLUSES justified the Bush Tax Cuts. There is an atmosphere about too much of this still excessively vacuous.
Again: Re: our Budget now: Our best NATIONAL SECURITY posture now is like best for us of America and the United States of America to be to a real renaissance in state’s rights. A renaissance in state’s rights is our best hope for regrowing our economy and maybe even jump starting a frozen global economy. A renaissance in state’s rights now would reset us to the decentralizing that was central to what worked and sold during the Clintons’ 8 of our now too little discussed seemingly missing years 1993-2001. A renaissance in state’s rights would be our best foreign policy posture as if also of a dominant global trend and yes as a reset to what had been the trending before the Obama call for a “New Nationalism” centralizing too much also of a poorly considered evangelizing about a supposed need for a “new foundation.”
President Barack Hussein Obama is due a historical tag as a professorial tweedy dandy. He is also still it seems too stuck on old and dead (former) socialists than freed or liberated/cured by successors mostly from such now of new ways such as of modern leadership in Russia and China.
For our POTUS to SOTU now again for #SOTU2013 new media social media speedy media interactiveness we have that he should feed our demands with a supply less vacuous than the “vacuous” now expectant from him.
Can President Barack Hussein Obama - the RE-ELECTED - proffer on Tuesday night a professorial intelligentsia new attitude sufficiently erudite and in a “modern moralism” if only for his now more “subjects” than “citizens” of these no longer loose enough states? He managed to remain after 2012 contests a American Bolshevik - though seemingly only with a mandate for austerity.
How will he step out as “FRESH & NEW” this week - what talk will he walk as styled right for these times and even for this Fall? Can he offer us anything new? Can he offer a promise of new jobs and a jump started economy if he doesn’t learn to wax on carefully layer oratorical polish for a return to decentralizing from a bunker mentality?
After your first steps about this - if even to be supportive to President Barack Hussein Obama with he braving first steps - to get to breaking an addiction to old Marxist styled socialism or old Soviet Communism one or all should consider that more taxes at the national level is not arguably the most idealistic taxation change of the still too purported idealism suffered now too long these past four years.
For our tweedy dandy professorial President even now especially as many fear a vacuous new political hour for Tuesday night we have that ideally he wants to punish wealth variances not mostly earnings as with which our federal revenue streams flow. A renaissance in state’s rights now would be our best way to reset our economies and to be to finding the much needed real cost savings for healthcare. A renaissance in state’s rights would be more marketable as for with such though contrary to 1st term of #Obama it would be as if Americans were also for a “spring” for Arabs - as if Americans also wanted a “spring” at home.
Well, we are nearing the release and steppin’ of/for the 2nd Term - of/for the NEW President Obama if not a old and tired return and rehashing just of a too old idealism of a “THE OLD OBAMA.”
How will he dress? Will he wear a “power tie”? Will he wear a flag lapel pin of our Stars and Stripes standard of our not as loose as they could best be United States of America? Will he wear a flag lapel pin dutifully and/or proudly with faith in our Constitution kept?
And of such professorial tweedy dandy of a modern American “politics” is he to offer a new attitude for a developed intelligentsia with specifics to a “GREEN MINIMALISM” as a new political correctness to supplant all discussion as to “poverty” and or “poverty levels” to a workable new base line for any “ideological” new utopian “governance”? Can he or will he step out and wax on not too vacuous a rendition in erudite and modern oration with a practicable and pragmatic philosophically discerned that can fit with us now best to be to a renaissance in state’s rights or the “falling apart into six separate regions” proffered by a living modern Russian leader?
And of such too: What about the Chinese? What about how as President #Obama started his first term he moved to march as if a drum major too many to socialism from a still workable methodology nearer Capitalism, and, how so while the Chinese Government seemed to be effecting more democratic bottom up changes to Capitalism from Socialism?
Mr. President there is an intelligence vacuum about your politics and social engineering. Would you please explain how now still it would be better if we reset to the decentralizing workable economics but now as if also to a renaissance in states rights like a “spring” for Americans? Would you and will you at least explain the philosophical “intelligence” that your “fairness” concerns actually are best if addressable as of a venue civilly more appropriate as of state not State jurisdictions? — Will you explain that economies are frozen because you were wrong to try to revolutionize with a social engineering in ways that needed wealth based taxation not income and earnings basis like that our our Federal Revenue streams?
It would be dandy if you could wear tweed and be professorial with practicable and pragmatic posits proffering even for #SOTU2013 and to be informative and instructive as to how a renaissance in state’s rights for our fifty states would allow your own idealism and attempts at “modern moralism” to be workable and more just and fair for our states do have the taxation powers for community redistribution moral concerns with their Power to tax wealth and property.
After twelve modern steps a “tweedy dandy” could be a good thing more than a bad - than still a bad - tag. We have that it would be more moral to have attempted so much of the revolutionary ways of President Obama at now higher or greater a political level/jurisdiction/community size than that already Constituted with wealth and property taxation Posterity Powers - than that like our fifty states - right?
Do you concur?
President Barack H. Obama exited Iraq prematurely and for partisan political gain. The President left not for military or economic greater good as he moved of a cutting and running retreat such as he did.
For starters this is what we should be talking about and thoroughly considering and debating.
It seems we now are talking sequester and defense cuts because he as our top Administrative Executive has been of a great and vast economic failure. It seems we are talking about defense cuts now in part because he as our President has not been able to restart a growth economy. It follows as well that such is of a problem now if we are to defense cuts because of ACA and as for it as Obamacare as not actually affordable.
With our Congress of the Power of the purse it may be that there has to be a reserved and implied right to effect an injunction upon Obamacare as UNAFFORDABLE during these unrecovered economic times. Our Congress must if of the Power of the purse must be of a sworn duty to protect defense spending and defer other budget items more idealistic than practical or necessary if and when it comes down to looking at reducing our security by defense cuts as now broached. Our Congress must, it seems, be of sufficient Power someway already to “postpone” as by “injunction” with budget powers spending for Obamacare if it is threatening our defense - and yet only as long as an economy is such that both are not simultaneously affordable. Our Congress must, it seems, have the implied responsibility not to overturn ACA but to suspend its spending until something so idealistic is actually economically practicable.
Are we though now only at this point because President Barack H. Obama exited Iraq too early?
Are we now here because we cut and ran of a retreat about Operation Iraqi Freedom just before it could have started economically working better for all Iraqi peoples and all of the involved Coalition?
It is real that we are of a time where it seems our nation is of a continuously depressed economic time and such as from a failure in Government economic leadership. It seems we cannot afford to stay secured enough and prepared enough and yet be of a way to afford a fancy new way to Nationalize otherwise still carried community duties and costs such as with Obamacare.
You must now be among those remembering that Operation Iraqi Freedom was originally supposed to cost the USA much less and as well any or all member states of the Coalition of OIF. It should be fresh now in most peoples’ minds as for the scheme became refreshed but pushed coyly as if new when we heard first of ODYSSEY DAWN as if it would be paid for by compensation from Libyan people’s oil profits.
There is that Operation Iraqi Freedom was planned to have been paid for not by the “credit card” scheme President Bush is tagged with now long since Democrats in Washington successfully politicked to work USA out of the “benefits” and “compensation” that costs of “liberation” were thought justly to an earning.
Many of the same Democrats that took away USA plans to be compensated for the “liberation” of Iraq with Operation Iraqi Freedom though didn’t mind a similar process for “funding” a “liberation” under their watch as with what started as their ODYSSEY DAWN.
We have that this is more about how we cannot seem to afford so much that President Obama was of promising as well with his then opponent Senator Clinton while also just a candidate to this our highest executive office. We have that OIF was started with a plan for compensation from freed/liberated Iraqi people that seems to have been able to have worked - it seems Democrats wouldn’t have tried to use the concept as new and their own in Libya if not so.
You are likely among those that are already realizing that we left Iraq too early for even economics of liberated Iraq. By leaving when we did it seems President Obama is culpable for the Iraqi oil capacity having been left more stagnant and nearly half possibly what it could have become if we hadn’t cut and run so prematurely. It seems that with what the price of gas became with the ill advice GREEN ENERGY agenda of this President that Iraqi oil profits had become of mulitiples many fold than expected to have been of an affording of “liberation” “compensation” as first conceived.
The math of the Democrats premature partisan political “war” meddling such as the too early retreat from fuller operations in Iraq is such that if we had stayed even one more year the Iraqi people likely could have doubled their oil output and exports and at a new higher price such that it would have cost them may a third what was originally considered to compensate friendly nations that participated with them about their liberation and prosecution from/of Saddam Hussein.
You too must now see how elementary and near even “stupid” President Obama’s abandonment of Operation Iraqi Freedom has turned out to be and that now it by itself is much what is threatening his own idealized Nationalization by ACA in Obamacare as unaffordable.
We have it as a puzzle without a solution yet for public consumption how what Republicans were thwarted from implementing as their planned and affordable way to see that Operation Iraqi Freedom was a justly funded “liberation” engagement is what then became like a NEW & BOLD Democrat Party concept for funding a LIBERATION from Qadhaffi of Libya. I do not know at these moments of writing this if USA has been successful in collecting the promised compensation from Libyan people and their oil profits.
But what of the Power of the purse of Congress and that Defense should be well above as a necessary and higher budget priority than a over-reaching substitute method of caring such as centralization plans of Obamacare?
And, Mr. President what of that if you hadn’t retreated from our commitment to securing new freedoms of the liberation we stood for and with in Iraq with your premature cutting and running it seems that a year or two more there would have had the Iraqi people of 2X to 3X the oil export capacity they then did and then with the spike in gas prices much caused by your GREEN ENERGY AGENDA so that President Bush’s Operation Iraqi Freedom would have been able to have stayed “paid for” as planned and yet quite economically conveniently as a year or two more of OIF would have likely had Iraq able to cover all “costs” at at most one third the involved labors or “work”?
Mr. President mustn’t Congress now have to consider an injunction from funding or implementing your ACA of a substitute centralized Nationalized healthcare “reform” largely because you left Iraq at least just one year too early?
I mean it figures that if we had stayed and developed more standing with “securing” the Iraqi economy could have been at least of 3-4 times the ability to pay compensatory “liberation” costs of all of the involved coalition states.
And, that such logic now also implies a guilt upon you Mr. President for your abandonment by premature retreat of your USA cutting and running did then stifle economic development in Iraq and such that quality of life and healthcare for Iraqi people then was left to be depressed so by a similar multiple but inconveniently in what has been what has been missed by them that didn’t have to be missed - right?
I have a BA in Economics from Villanova University — I am not an economist. That said: Though I suggest a multiples of 3-4 times to an Iraqi economy ability to easily have paid “liberation” costs an economist can probably confirm that Iraq with just a year more of USA “standing with” of OIF would have been at the Obama economics oil prices to a factor nearer 10X - 20X as their economy did have because of Obama’s retreat. And yet so a real economist may figure it even much higher even than 20X.
What pray tell is one’s patriotic or civic duty in the year two thousand ten and three? What is a “reasonable expectation” to have and to hold as a bar for a “leader”? Where, if you are a community type - even a community organizer - are your Ps & Qs best registered, and how?
A sober reflection now may be best not to be encouraged. To look back may for too many now still be too traumatic.
It is not just Americans of the United States of America whom experienced very personal and devastating devaluations somehow about the standardized record established nearly to a mean of 40%. Untold numbers lost their American Dream holdings and even with company with those more of humble/basic subsistence quartering of by ownership not by leasing.
May the HOPE for CHANGE of the new team of the refreshed administrating by re-elected President Barack H. Obama be of a rekindled Americana not about a too treading upon those upended by the crisis of valuation now at risk of being a new too permanent victim class. It was the Republicans that stepped up as the 2012 lot of Presidential Candidate most as of a promise as “guardians” for those effected by what they all stated clearly was a economic crisis of which their Government was most responsible.
It is only fair now to want to hope in the newly re-elected most challenged President Barack H. Obama. It is quite fair to be hesitant in offering him and even his new team much trust. It is possible and of hope that his new team is likely to be (much) better than his old team.
There will have to be a work around his first stepped hopes to be able to just run our vast Governance on the strength and limited range of his own personality. There will have to be more honesty moving forward in this second term as it seems he doesn’t have a personality fit for a growth economy. The Clintons were blessed by a growth economy beyond their own similarly (lawyered) limited personalities in ways candidate Barack Obama should not reasonably have expected to be yet again available and so available to him if he were to be elected.
And, what about Jack?
Are we in need of a self conscious new memoir from our newly re-elected most Executive of our leaders to offer a bankable reflection on how he did or did not turn out to be a new Jack Kennedy (JFK)?
And, what about Jack?
Would he have also pulled back from shovel ready road and bridge work? Would it have also been inconvenient and too of an idealism to a new GREEN ECONOMY if he by fixing roads and bridges with shovel ready Government made jobs then too of a counter productive political policy for BIG CHANGE? He also couldn’t have used vast stimulus to create infrastructure jobs to fix and better roads while of energy policies to get people to dislike their “old” cars and ready for “new” “GREENER” cars without such “shovel ready” options having made “old” cars even with their inflated energy costs newly more tolerable with new Government roads and bridges to be on or soon look forward to - right?
When you decide to try to play at being a reincarnated Franklin Delano Roosevelt and as also as a man from a Hyde Park are you not being to much possibly and unstable Jekyll already?
It may have taken a Ronald Reagan or yet a Richard Milhous Nixon to clarify a “politicians” personality as if defined as: Politician = one that is able to create shovel ready jobs. It had long been part of our American dreaming to consider that if one is a politician then such one must be almost predetermined to be inevitably able to like divinely create shovel ready jobs always. It likely is Reaganesque now to have to consider speaking publicly of politicians unable to create shovel ready jobs - to speak of any politician as re-elected that couldn’t do the “politicians” most basic task of creating shovel ready jobs.
Of our President’s Predator predilection about drone use - he as either a stable man of Hyde Park too, or as a quarky mutant Jekyllized reincarnation, is lucky his Predator drones are not President Reagan’s Patriot missiles that were best if not even attempted of a single shoulder firing use.
What about “THE NEW JFK”?
As one also of Hyde - another of a Hyde Park - and yet a NEW DEALER WANNA BE - is it reasonable to call oneself a politician if in fact time as proven that you are not seemingly capable of “shovel ready” job creation?
As one of a cocky pride walked of talk of being able to run the most established modern global Power on the “strenght” of their personality and it as he just of a hodgepodge of happenstance of times spent beyond U.S. territories “on in America” personality development how can he not now be queried at about his “decision” not to capture and question Osama Bin Laden?
He is accepted as a representative of Harvard Law School sense of jurisprudence while yet of his claims that his “personality” should be sufficient. Can he now be seen as a SEEKER of justice? Is he just for his kill orders more just a seeker of vengeance? Can we let him go as a Hyde not a Jekyll just as per the kill not capture and question orders as per Osama Bin Laden?
What about Justice and Posterity? What about due process and Americans of a call to walk what they talk and breath?
Can he be a “SEEKER OF JUSTICE” or must his first term be our new lower norm? With justice out the door as once we kept it more at home and abroad but when clearly of a known war time, however, aren’t we wise as of a civic and patriotic duty to at least asking: What pray tell might the Democrats have wanted to hide by not seeking Justice better with a capture and question standing priority even as per the supposedly most informed of our current most modern enemy?
Can we say for certain that a Republican administration of John McCain and his steady but unsteady hands would also have ordered a kill on sight order even for Osama Bin Laden? Is it fair and of our civic duty now to deeply probe if our Democrats were afraid more than our Republicans about what Osama Bin Laden might say if he were just captured alive?
And, again: What about Jack?
And, again: We can HOPE that these CHANGES to a new team have us able and ready to presume and believe: THE NEW TEAM OUGHT REALLY TO BE BETTER THAN THE OLD TEAM - right?
Perhaps you have heard of the long day ride of the nominee of President Obama Chuck Hagel! Two lanterns may be needed, or just one, for that guardian charge many are being asked to allow as a trusted duty his.
How many candles can he light - need he of Nebraska light at least metaphorically - how wicked or enlightened be he in old lights for Posterity as a candle otherwise maybe lit as our beacon of defense? William Golding of Brasenose College - a perhaps idyllic or iconic in life and death for Chuck Hagel and his comraderies?
We were nearly all the boobs of the threat considerations of the 2006 SURGE dates — Senator Chuck Hagel, whence pressed, and probed, those moments lingering on, still as “complicated” relationships hung over much, with fogs of ignorance and naivete horned yet not seen, was figuratively a Paul Revere of Nebraska biased to measures scaled to relations foremost considerate of natural law erudity flames or sparks.
“Among the vicissitudes incident to life”* start stands as a prophylactic of earlier days governance commencements quite so whence Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska was charged of considerations of personal emoluments of official duties and which ever pecuniary costs for skins or pounds of flesh, however Solomesque, the peace of the dates or the spark of threats had embedded particularly.
It is considerate to not relate or report yesterday’s pounding of President Barack H. Obama’s first choice to succeed Sec Def Panetta as Republican on Republican hate. He may have been a silversmith to only a second place though for himself, now.
When Senator, he, Chuck Hagel, may have wanted to see a Clinton PEACE as not a “PEACE!” before its time and been too much to a bosomed embrace of our Houses as united while still divided by actual wars and their political costs and histories.
There were ways to buffet such dates of so much warring thought not to have been to becoming our fate or destiny but not to run from the light of the actual candles/beacons of truths of the ages in which all was bedded.
The pounding and pressing of President Barack H. Obama’s first choice even if it leaves nominee Hagel now of a silver of his own wraught - is good for the President and for us since it was an airing of shared SURGE naivete still long over-coddled by the Administration of Obama. What was lit yesterday for all to be forewarned from is that his shared pinings and sympatheties on review as also those long fronted by our current President are now no longer “historical” or defensible - that they are not now “reasoned” nor “reasonable” as most now shed their innocence and naivete of the “it’s complicated” old dated relationships as per threats not as simple as such that a warm embrace could fix or settle.
Among the vicissitudes incident to the SURGE Senator John McCain and myself and maybe all that I wrote publicly in 2006 as “uc” has been much confirmed and affirmed as our actual histories for and about the SURGE for Posterity now as a candle/beacon of and for fact based governance (and defense budgeting).
Strategically speaking so much of such past dates were really always political then of “it’s complicated” near to a maximus, and, still of a more reasoned understanding for motivations as justifications by the seats of Al Qaeda to 9/11 I quite that more should be considerate that our Senators at least had their judgement compromised by our 9/11 Commission Report as it was/is a flawed bedded and binded mess for having only looked back ten years all the while Al Qaeda was known to have been born nearer twelve years thence earlier.
Of nominee for Secretary of Defense beaconship we can be considerate that Senator Chuck Hagel when given the right histories or facts is likely of a capacity and accomplishment in governance to make a good or right decision. It is arguable that his hot seat flaming is lit by embers of ignorance and naivete official bound by our 9/11 Commission findings.
The incident vicissitudes particular to the erring by nominee Hagel now so historical as lacking in “historical” correctness are of days and threats against America that had long passed Nebraska thresholds as of a bosom and soothing or settling by coddling, it seems.
We have too long been blinded by the worked ignorance upon the minds of just Americans by politicking with our histories such as two Clintons have too long done. It is considerate not to report yesterday’s ups and downs so incident as Republican on Republican HATE. The bound bedding now long pertinent to the bad dates so rehashed with discussions of earlier Republican possible partisan betrayal is buttress’d covertly too much in a false narrative not a rap enough of the false yet convenient rap of two of the Clintons.
As per such as the important and incident actual histories of the relative past twenty plus years of ups and downs foreign and domestic it behoove all to remember the Clintons’ are by their “friends” still fresh of taggings as “BIG LIARS”!
By the lies of the Clintons - the known and the unknown lies of the Clintons many leaders have fallen or slipped as BOOBS!
William Golding was of erudition by way of Brasenose College and Senator Chuck Hagel to politics of vicissitudes of incidents domestic and foreign by way of Nebraska.
His hesitancy whence to be of Republican Party loyalty as to the proven sound reasoning of and for a SURGE is not quite as bad a faux pas as that which have made Clinton loyalists and the Clintons themselves now nearer to a record as of a actual historical global naivete - of an embrace to much of “PEACE” before its time.
But of his Congressional Senatorial review - it is good news that the President’s seemingly intimately shared naivete about histories now better understood than whence thence to political hesitancy and dangerous inaction and avoidance posturing have been aired by his first choice for Secretary of Defense charge. We now may all be able to GET SMART and start moving forward with intellectual honesty and a reset to US Governance along fact based actual histories.
We may all be at risk if we don’t check nominee Chuck Hagel’s rendition of SURGE political bedding/binding. Whether by across the seas or by lands American of the United States all are now still too at risk of also becoming BOOBS of the Clintons at least if failing to consider that Saddam Hussein gave birth incidentally to Al Qaeda by his invasion of our Ally Kuwait, and, that Al Qaeda likely attacked us on both 9/11 as a political or thought just act of “Jihad” against first the failures of President Clinton to sufficiently have prosecuted Saddam Hussein, by their radically so sense of justice, and, then with the second 9/11 maybe so for the same reasoning then of an abhorance visceral to their ideological theocratic group think as President Clinton of Charlotte charlatan posturing like a pouring of salts into their wounds, the wounds by their conception kept open and sore and misunderstood at least by those that trust our 9/11 Commission findings.
It may be that Nebraskan nominee Chuck Hagel came across as a BOOB of Obama’s preference from a trust in the history as bound by his old Congress’ consdiration of Al Qaeda by way of their 9/11 Commission and its ______________ for having only looked back ten years when the group know to have actually attacked of their own wills and sense of justice was yet then nearer twelve years old.
A better embrace of history is now available for many - for many more than whence thence now of old wounds reopened:
Al Qaeda was formed to be a Muslim answer to Saddam Hussein’s invasion of neighbor Nation State of Kuwait and was so chided and long abraded by the USA and coalition states having been otherwise chosen to be the just warriors. It can be said that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11 but likely only by way of having incidentally having been the father of Al Qaeda by way of his inappropriate violation of Kuwait.
There is real and historical “cause and effect” now more publicly consumable such that fewer need be BOOBS still about our own trying times that followed on so much of the Clintons’ “PEACE DIVIDENDS” of ups and downs like of lies of a “PEACE” “officially” before its times.
Nominee Chuck Hagel might be a candle of naivete too much - I hope our Senators figure out such in time. As more than a time of natural law biased “PEACE” where coddling too long thought a way to bedding for Posterity Nominee Hagel is still at risk of not being embraced if he rests with President Obama like of a innocence from ignorance and naivete disrespective of incidental histories that relate to Saddam Hussein legacy and motivations seemingly of a confidence that he thought he had a way to defeat the United States of America - globally, and, specifically with traps set about an assault figurable against Americans of the United States by way of cyber or global public relations warring spin.
These hearings now are for Posterity with us now to trust that our charged Congress will be to greater good discourse to be a prophylactic for endemic naivete imprudence.
* {SEE: FIRST INAUGURAL SPEECH OF THE FIRST PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES}